2023-10-03_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jour
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 AT 6:00 PM
MEETING CONDUCTED VIRTUALLY
An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may view
the meeting on the Website (www.saintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV͵
Present: Mayor Donna Noade Reardon
Deputy Mayor John MacKenzie
Councillor-at-Large Gary Sullivan
Councillor-at-Large Brent Harris
Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton
Councillor Ward 1 Joanna Killen
Councillor Ward 2 Barry Ogden
Councillor Ward 3 Gerry Lowe
Councillor Ward 3 David Hickey
Councillor Ward 4 Greg Stewart
Councillor Ward 4 Paula Radwan
Also Present:
Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) B. McGovern
Chief Financial Officer K. Fudge
General Counsel M. Tompkins
Commissioner Human Resources S. Hossack
Fire Chief K. Clifford
Commissioner Utilities & Infrastructure Services I. Fogan
Acting Commissioner Growth and Community Services A. Poffenroth
Director Communications L. Caissie
Commissioner Public Works and Transportation Services M. Hugenholtz
Director Legislative Services / City Clerk J. Taylor
Deputy Clerk Patricia Anglin
Administrative Assistant A. MacLean
1
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
1. Call to Order
The Mayor called the virtual meeting to order.
1.1 Land Acknowledgement
Deputy Mayor MacKenzie read aloud the Land Acknowledgement and called for a moment
of reflection.
the
Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet.The Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet along with their Indigenous Neighbours,
the and
Friendship Treaties with the British Crown in the 1700s that protected their rights to lands
1.2 Statement from Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, Mayor of Saint John
The Mayor read a statement advising that the City of Saint John stands with residents in
their concern and outrage over the environmental, safety and public health crisis caused
th
by the toxic fire at American Iron and Metal (AIM) which occurred on September 14.
The Premier has promised to move with speed in conducting the investigation, including
clear deadlines for AIM to uphold and for the Department of Environment and Local
Government to enforce. Craig Bell Estabrooks President and CEO of Port of Saint John
also issued a release. We also look forward to hearing from the Federal Government
who owns the land on which AIM operates. The residents and businesses of Saint John
must be respected and protected going forward. Anything less is unacceptable.
2. Approval of Minutes
2.1 Minutes of September 5, 2023
Moved by Councillor Radwan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that the minutes of September 5th, 2023 be approved.
MOTION CARRIED.
3. Approval of Agenda
Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that the agenda for September 18, 2023 be approved with the addition of the
following items:
16.1 Motion American Iron and Metals Company Inc. (AIM) (Councillor Norton)
16.2 Proclamation Freedom of the City HMCS Brunswicker
16.3 Update AIM Public Safety Committee Chair Councillor Hickey
16.4 BIA Uptown Saint John letter
17.1 Building Safer Community Fund
17.2 Discharge of Restrictive Covenant
MOTION CARRIED.
2
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
4.Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
5. Consent Agenda
5.1 Moved for discussion to item 14.1.
5.2 As recommended in M&C 2023-216 Fire Marque Agency Agreement Renewal,
Common Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached
renewal agreement with Fire Marque Inc. for the purpose of appointing Fire Marque
Inc. as agent for the Corporation of the City of Saint John to submit claims and
insured perils resulting from Saint John Fire Department response to incidents.
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in item 5.2 be adopted.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. Members Comments
Members commented on various local events.
7. Proclamation
7.1 Rail Safety Week September 18-24, 2023
Mayor Donna Noade Reardon proclaimed the week of September 18 to 24, 2023, Rail
in The City of Saint John.
7.2 Wrongful Conviction Day October 2, 2023
Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John declared October 2, 2023, as Wrongful
Conviction Day in The City of Saint John.
7.3 National Forest Week September 17-23, 2023
Mayor Donna Noade Reardon proclaimed the week of September 17 to September 23,
2023, City of Saint John.
8. Delegations / Presentations
8.1 Launching a New Era with Burchill Wind Saint John Energy
Commissioner I. Fogan introduced the presenters, Jim Shaw Board Chair and Ryan
Mitchell President and CEO of SJ Energy.
Referring to the submitted presentation Launching a New Era with Burchill Wind Saint
John Energy, CEO Mitchell discussed
leader in the transition to net zero.
Moved by Councillor Hickey, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
3
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
RESOLVED that the presentation Launching a New Era with Burchill Wind Saint John
Energy be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED.
9. Public Hearings 6:30 p.m.
10. Consideration of By-Laws
rd
10.1 Proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment 50 MacAuley Avenue (3 Reading)
Acting Commissioner A. Poffenroth advised that all legislative requirements have been
met and Council may proceed with the application for third reading.
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the by-By-Law Number C.P. 111-158 A Law to Amend the
Zoning By-Law of The City of Saint Johwhich rezones a parcel of land having an area
of approximately 841 square metres, located at 50 MacAuley Avenue, also identified as
PID Number 55176341, from One-Unit Residential (R1) to Two-Unit Residential (R2),
be read.
MOTION CARRIED.
The by--Law Number C.P. 111-158 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law
of The
Moved by Deputy Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Councillor Hickey:
RESOLVED that the by-By-Law Number C.P. 111-158 A Law to Amend
the Zoning By-which rezones a parcel of land having an
area of approximately 841 square metres, located at 50 MacAuley Avenue, also
identified as PID Number 55176341, from One-Unit Residential (R1) to Two-Unit
Residential (R2),
be read a third time, enacted, and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto.
MOTION CARRIED.
Read a third time by title, the by--Law Number C.P. 111-158 A Law to
Amend the Zoning By-
rd
10.2 Proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment 351 Latimore Lake Road (3 Reading
with s.59 conditions)
Acting Commissioner A. Poffenroth advised that all legislative requirements have been met and
Council may proceed with the application for third reading.
Moved by Councillor Harris, seconded by Councillor Lowe:
RESOLVED that the by--Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning
By- a
John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 0.17 hectares, located at 351
Latimore Lake Road also identified as PID Number 00334631 from Rural Residential (RR) to
Integrated Development (ID); and also a
4
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
Saint John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 8.4 hectares, located
adjacent to 351 Latimore Lake Road also identified as PID Number 00421727, from Rural (RU)
to Integrated Development (ID) pursuant to a resolution adopted by Common Council under
Section 59 of the Community Planning Act be read.
MOTION CARRIED.
The by--Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law of the
Moved by Councillor Killen, seconded by Councillor Lowe:
RESOLVED that Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community
Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of
approximately 8.6 hectares, located at and adjacent to 351 Latimore Lake Road, also identified
a. That the development of the site be limited to the following uses in addition to the
Artist or Craftsperson Studio;
Bakery;
Bed and Breakfast;
Business Office, subject to paragraph 11.11(3)(a);
Community Centre;
Community Policing Office;
Contractor Service, Household;
Day Care, Home, subject to paragraph 9.5(a);
Day Care, Neighbourhood, subject to paragraph 9.5(b);
Day Care Centre;
Dwelling, One-Unit;
Dwelling, Two-Unit;
Garden Suite, subject to section 9.8;
Home Occupation, subject to section 9.9;
Medical Clinic;
Mobile or Mini-Home, subject to paragraph 10.11(2)(j);
Personal Service;
Pet Grooming;
Place of Worship;
Retail General;
Secondary Suite, subject to section 9.13;
Service and Repair, Household;
Supportive Facility minor;
Supportive Housing, subject to section 9.14;
Veterinary Clinic;
5
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
b. Setbacks and other zone-specific standards shall be as set out in Section 11.11
of the Zoning By-Law (Rural General Commercial Zone).
c. Parking and access standards for the site shall be as subject to the standards
set out in Part 4 of the Zoning By-Law with the site considered as a commercial
zone for the purposes of regulating parking and access.
d. Landscaping standards for the site shall be as subject to the standards set out
in Part 6 of the Zoning By-Law with the site considered as a residential zone for
the purposes of regulating landscaping.
e. Signage on the subject site shall be subject to the provisions contained in Part 7
of the Zoning By-Law with the subject site considered to be a residential zone
for the purposes of regulating signage.
f. Accessory buildings and structures shall be subject to the provisions contained
in Part 5 of the Zoning By-Law with the site considered a commercial zone for
the purposes of regulating accessory buildings and structures.
g. Outdoor storage is permitted in conjunction with the commercial use on the site
and site shall be subject to the following standards:
(i) The storage area shall be completely enclosed by a wooden fence or a
chain-link fence entirely covered by filler strips woven into the mesh or a
walled structure or a berm, or any combination thereof, which may also
include a gate;
(ii) The enclosure required by paragraph (i), including any gate, shall have a
maximum height of 2.5 metres;
(iii) The enclosure shall not occupy any required yard or any area required for
amenity or parking; and
(iv) Notwithstanding the above, an outdoor storage area may instead be
enclosed with landscaping in accordance with paragraph 6.1(k) of the
Zoning By-Law or by any combination of permitted structures, berms, and
landscaping.
h. That the development be subject to a site plan, submitted by the
proponent with the Development/Building Permit application and
approved by the Development Officer, showing the location of site
features including all buildings, the fenced storage compound, and
regulated wetland boundaries, and parking and access areas.
MOTION CARRIED.
Moved by Councillor Killen, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
6
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
RESOLVED that the by--Law Number C.P. 111--159 A Law to Amend the
Zoning By- a
City of Saint John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 0.17
hectares, located at 351 Latimore Lake Road also identified as PID Number 00334631
from Rural Residential (RR) to Integrated Development (ID); and also amending Schedule
of approximately 8.4 hectares, located adjacent to 351 Latimore Lake Road also identified
as PID Number 00421727, from Rural (RU) to Integrated Development (ID) pursuant to a
resolution adopted by Common Council under Section 59 of the Community Planning Act
be read a third time, enacted and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto.
MOTION CARRIED.
Read a third time by title, the by--Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to
Amend the Zoning By-
10.3 Proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment - 90 Wilton Street (3rd Reading)
Acting Commissioner A. Poffenroth advised that all legislative requirements have been
met and Council may proceed with the application for third reading.
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Radwan:
RESOLVED that the by--Law Number C.P. 111--157 A Law to Amend
the Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John amending Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of
The City of Saint John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 965
square metres, located at 90 Wilton Street, also identified as PID Number 55218192,
from Two-Unit Residential (R2) to Mid-Rise Residential (RM) be read.
MOTION CARRIED.
The by--Law Number C.P. 111-157 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law
Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Deputy Mayor Mackenzie:
RESOLVED that the by--Law Number C.P. 111--157 A Law to Amend
the Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John amending Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of
The City of Saint John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 965
square metres, located at 90 Wilton Street, also identified as PID Number 55218192,
from Two-Unit Residential (R2) to Mid-Rise Residential (RM) be read a third time,
enacted and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto.
MOTION CARRIED.
Read a third time by title, the by-By-Law Number C.P. 111-157 A Law to
Amend the Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John.
11. Submissions by Council Members
12. Business Matters Municipal Officers
12.1 Labour Disruption Update (verbal)
7
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
CAO B. McGovern provided an update on the CUPE Local 486 labour disruption.
Chief Financial Officer K. Fudge provided a presentation re the Wage Escalation Policy
and City Reserve Funds.
Moved by Councillor Radwan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that the Labour Disruption Verbal Update be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED.
12.2 New Provincial Highway Partner Program Application
Moved by Councillor Harris, seconded by Councillor Radwan:
RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2023-217 Provincial
Highway Partner Program Common Council approve the attached application for
funding under the Provincial-Municipal Highway Partnership Program for 2025-26 and
direct staff to submit the application to the Department of Transportation and
Infrastructure (DTI).
MOTION CARRIED.
13. Committee Reports
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
14.1 P.R.O. Kids Policy Updates (Moved from item 5.1)
Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Stewart:
RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2023-205 P.R.O. Kids Policy Updates and
supporting documents including the P.R.O. Kids Advisory Code of Conduct be referred to
the CAO to revise the content to reflect it is the authority of Council and not staff to provide
governance and determine disciplinary matters of Board Members.
MOTION CARRIED.
15. General Correspondence
15.1 Letter from Andrew Green Chair City of Saint John Shared Risk Plan -Annual
General Meeting Pension Board of Trustees
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Norton:
RESOLVED that Councillor Gary Sullivan attend the AGM (virtual meeting) on Wednesday
September 2023 at 1:00 p.m. on behalf of Common Council.
MOTION CARRIED.
15.2 Letters from various groups on Homelessness
8
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Radwan:
RESOLVED that the Mayor be directed to draft a cover letter to accompany the
correspondence on homelessness and forward the packet to appropriate departments at
the Provincial Government.
MOTION CARRIED.
16. Supplemental Agenda
16.1 American Iron and Metal Company Inc (AIM) (Councillor Norton)
Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Lowe:
RESOLVED that the Procedural By-Law provision s. 16.28 Motion by Member Deferral
to subsequent meeting - be suspended to allow Councillor Norton to present his motion
re the AIM
MOTION CARRIED unanimously.
Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Lowe:
RESOLVED WHEREAS American Iron and Metal Company Inc. (AIM) continues to
prove time and time again it is not a good neighbour to the residents of Saint John; and
WHEREAS the Province of New Brunswick has the power not only to suspend the
operations of AIM temporarily but forever, by force of legislation and, if necessary,
relying on section 33 of the Charter, the notwithstanding clause;
RESOLVED Council direct the Chief Administrative Officer to request in writing and
through ongoing efforts, as determined by the Chief Administrative Officer, that the
Premier and the Province of New Brunswick invoke their power to shut down AIM for
good and never allow an organization like this to operate on our waterfront or in our city
again.
Councillor Harris proposed an amendment to the main motion resolution.
Moved by Councillor Harris, seconded by Councillor Killen:
RESOLVED Council direct the Chief Administrative Officer to request in writing and
through ongoing efforts, as determined by the Chief Administrative Officer, that the
Premier and the Province of New Brunswick and the City of Saint John invoke their
power to shut down AIM for good and never allow an organization like this to operate on
our waterfront or in our city again.
MOTION DEFEATED with Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, and Councillors Stewart, Lowe,
Ogden, Hickey, Sulivan, and Norton voting nay.
The question on the main motion was called.
MOTION CARRIED with Councillors Killen, Radwan, and Harris voting nay.
16.2 Proclamation - HMCS Brunswicker Freedom of the City September 23, 2023
9
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
Mayor Donna Noade Reardon proclaimed Freedom of the City for the HMCS Brunswicker
on Saturday September 23, 2023. The Freedom Parade will commence at 10:00 a.m.
16.3 Update Public Safety Chair (Councillor Hickey)
Chair of the Public Safety Committee, Councillor Hickey advised the Public Safety
Committee will perform an after-action review of the AIM fire, renew calls to action, safety
assessment, emergency response and communication.
Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that the Public Safety Committee update be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED.
16.4 Letter from Uptown Saint John -AIM Fire
Councillor Hickey read into the public record the letter from Uptown Saint John regarding
the AIM fire.
Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Hickey
RESOLVED that the Letter from Uptown Saint John re AIM Fire be received for
information.
MOTION CARRIED.
16. Committee of the Whole
17.1 Building a Safer Communities Fund Amended Contribution Agreement with
Public Safety Canada
Moved Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Ogden:
RESOLVED that the City enter into Contribution Agreement Amendment #1 with the
Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, generally in the form as
presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held September 18, 2023, for the
receipt of $972,992.38 from the Building Safer Community Fund and that the Mayor and
Clerk be authorized to execute the said Contribution Agreement Amendment #1 and any
other documents ancillary thereto.
MOTION CARRIED.
17.2 Discharge of Restrictive Covenant
Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Councillor Stewart:
RESOLVED that the City release the encumbrance recorded on the Certificate of
Registered Ownership for PID
Clerk be authorized the execute the Discharge of Restrictive Covenant generally in the
form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held September 18, 2023,
and any other documents necessary to effect the release.
MOTION CARRIED.
10
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
September 18, 2023 / le 18 septembre 2023
18 Adjournment
Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on September 18, 2023, be
adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED.
The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
11
COMMON COUNCILREPORT
M&C No.2023-220
Report DateSeptember 28, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaGrowth and Community Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna Noade ReardonandMembers of Common Council
SUBJECT: Proposed Public Hearing Date: 1250 Fairville Boulevard, 91 Red Head
Road and 1429 Loch Lomond Road
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner / Dept Chief Administrative Officer
Head
Jennifer KirchnerAmy Poffenroth / David J. Brent McGovern
Dobbelsteyn
RECOMMENDATION
RESOLVED That Common Councilschedule the public hearing for the Zoning By-
law Section 59 amendmentapplication submitted by 627036 NB Ltd.for 1250
Fairville Boulevard (PID: 00424523),the Zoning By-law rezoning application
submitted by Joe Robertsfor 91 Red Head Road (PID: 00344457) and the Zoning
By-law Section 59 amendment application submitted by Michael Goldenbergfor
1429 Loch Lomond Road (PID: 00312900)for Monday, December 11, 2023 at 6:30
nd
p.m. at the Council Chamber, City Hall 2floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, NB.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to advise Common Council of theZoning By-law
Rezoningapplicationsreceived and to recommendan appropriate public hearing
datefor theseapplications. The next available public hearing dateisMonday,
December 11, 2023.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
At its meeting of August 3, 2004, Common Council resolved that:
1. the Commissioner of Planning and Development receive all
applications for amendments to the Zoning By-law and Section 39
\[now referred as section 59\] resolutions/agreements and proceed
to prepare the required advertisements; and
2.when applications are received a report will be prepared
recommending the appropriate resolution setting the time and
place for public hearings and be referred to the Planning Advisory
Committee as required by theCommunity Planning Act.
- 2 -
REPORT
In response to the motion above, this report indicates the applications received
and recommends an appropriate public hearing date. Details of the applications
are documentation
at the public hearing.
Name of Location Existing Reason for Section 59
Applicant Zone Amendment
627036 NB 1250 Fairville Corridor To facilitate the development of a
Ltd. Boulevard (PID: Commercial Self-Storage Facility.
00424523) (CC)
Michael 1429 Loch Low-Rise To incorporate a revised
Goldenberg Lomond Road Residential (RL) development concept for a
(PID: and Mid-Rise residential development.
00344457) Residential
(RM)
Name of Location Existing Proposed Reason
Applicant Zone Zone
Joe Roberts 91 Red Head Two-Unit General To facilitate the
Road (PID: Residential (R2) Commercial development of
00344457) (CG) a parking lot for
an existing
commercial
business.
While the holding of public hearings for proposed Zoning By-law amendments and
rezonings are a legislative requirement of the Community Planning Act, it is also a
key component of a clear and consistent land development processes envisioned
in the One Stop Development Shop Program. These processes provide
transparency and predictability for the development community and City
residents.
On a broader note, the development approval process works towards fulfilling key
Council priorities including:
Facilitate a mix of affordable housing in all our neighbourhoods;
rm;
Achieve 3% annual property tax base growth and ongoing work to increase
the target.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The scheduling of the public hearing and referral to the Planning Advisory
Committee satisfies the legislative and service requirements as mandated by the
Community Planning Act.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
- 3 -
ATTACHMENTS
None
/haahb /h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No.2023-221
Report DateSeptember 21, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaGrowth and Community
Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna NoadeReardonandMembers of Common Council
SUBJECT: t͵w͵h͵Yźķƭ tƚƌźĭǤ ƦķğƷĻƭ
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadChief Administrative Officer
Jen Reed / Kay Amy PoffenrothJ. Brent McGovern
Kanyandula
RECOMMENDATION
Your Chief Administrative Officerrecommends Common Council:
1.Approveamended Termsof Reference for the P.R.O.KidsAdvisory
Committee; and
2.Approveamended P.R.O.Kids Special Purpose Fund.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Saint John believes that all children regardless of economic ability
should have access to some form of recreation or positive leisure pursuit. To
achieve this goal Common Council has createdthe Positive Recreation
OpportunitiesKids program(P.R.O Kids). P.R.O. Kids provides financial assistance
to children and youth in need so that all children and youth will have the
opportunity to participate in the arts, cultural, recreation, and sport activity of
their choice. Individual participation in such activities has been shown to
increase self-esteem, knowledge,and personal development.
In January 2002, P.R.O. Kids began to operate as a charitable service administered
by Community Services Staff. P.R.O. Kids grew to serve residents of Greater Saint
John when the towns of Rothesay, Quispamsis and Grand Bay-Westfield became
annual contributors to administrative costs.
The Special Purpose Fund is established for the purpose of receiving, holding and
dispersing monies to be used to provide financial assistance to children and
youth in needto allow them to participate in community sport, recreation, art,
and cultural activities.
- 2 -
The P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee adopted their Terms of Reference
September 2001, with the last revision in November 2014. The Terms of
Reference are in place to provide structure, guidelines, and clear direction to
advisory committee members.
The last paragraph of Appendix A of the Code of Conduct has been modified to
reflect feedback received from Common Council as its meeting of September 18,
2023.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
th
December 8, 2003- RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager the
PRO Kids 2002 Annual Report be received and filed; the terms of reference for
the Special Purpose Fund be amended to reflect the proposed changes as
P.R.O.
Kids Committee be amended to reflect the proposed changes as outlined in the
proposed changes to the committee outlined in
.
rd
August 3, 2004- RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager:
1. The 2003 Annual Report for the P.R.O. Kids Program be received for
information.
2. The proposed amendment to the P.R.O. Kids Committee Terms of
Reference,
3. The proposed changes to the Committee, as outlined in the submitted
November 24, 2014- RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in
the submitted report M&C 2014-200: P.R.O Kids Committee- Terms of Reference
-Amendment. Common Council approves the amended . Kids Committee-
Term
September 18, 2023 RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2023-205
P.R.O. Kids Policy Updates and supporting documents including the P.R.O. Kids
Advisory Code of Conduct be referred to the CAO to revise the content to reflect
it is the authority of Council and not staff to provide governance and determine
disciplinary matters of Board Members.
REPORT
ƦķğƷĻƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ t͵w͵h͵ Yźķƭ {ƦĻĭźğƌ tǒƩƦƚƭĻ CǒƓķ
The Special Purpose Fund (Attachment A) is established for the purpose of
receiving, holding and dispersing monies to be used to provide financial
assistance to children and youth in need to allow them to participate in
community sport, recreation, art, and cultural activities.
- 3 -
Those monies withdrawn from the fund shall be used for the purpose of
supporting the participation of children and youth in community sport,
recreation, art, and cultural activities.
Staff is recommending the implementation of an alternative delivery model
which would see the P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee through a motion approve
disbursement of amounts up to but not exceeding $5,000 to short term
alternative program delivery models that uphold the mandate of P.R.O. Kids and
remain within the parameters of the eligibility and selection criteria. An objective
for this model of funding is to aid/remove barriers in the startup costs associated
with the new programs to allow for immediate participation. (i.e., the payment
of an instructor for a new activity at a community center- in turn the youth
participating in the event would participate free of charge). The following
parameters would be in place for qualification.
Those interested in the funding must complete the Program
Funding Application Form.
Before payment is issued- names and contact information of
participants must be submitted to P.R.O. Kids staff for application
records and reconciling.
Request for payment must be made within 4 weeks of the start
date of program. Failure to do so may result in nonpayment.
The program must identify a gap in service delivery and explain
how the assistance of the funding alleviates barriers to
participants.
Funding for these programs will not exceed two years.
The program must be facilitated by a not-for-profit organization
or be affiliated.
Consideration will be given to new and emerging programs that
support diversity and inclusion, (i.e., increased participation of
girls, newcomers, and people with disabilities.)
If the advisory committee by motion, requests to fund a program
exceeding the $5,000, the decision will be at the discretion of the
Senior Manager of Community Support Services.
- 4 -
ƦķğƷĻƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ t͵w͵h͵ Yźķƭ ĻƩƒƭ ƚŅ wĻŅĻƩĻƓĭĻ
The updates to the P.R.O Kids Terms of Reference provide clearer guidance and
structure for advisory committee members. Sections 2.0- Roles of P.R.O. Kids
Advisory Committee and Section 3.0 Responsibilities have been amended. Along
with section 6.7 which provides guidance for non-committee members to
volunteer for the program on subcommittees. Additions are the Code of Conduct
for Advisory Committee members and the Volunteer Code of Conduct for those
who wish to serve on the subcommittee.
The last paragraph of Appendix A of the Code of Conduct has been modified to
reflect feedback received from Common Council as its meeting of September 18,
2023.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
by enhancing the quality of
life and social well-being by offering recreation, arts, and cultural opportunities
to align with PlaySJ.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
N/A
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee endorsed both the attached documents and
the updates made to them (Appendix C) at the April 2023 Advisory Committee
meeting.
The City of Saint John City C office has reviewed the attached documents.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A- P.R.O. Kids Special Purpose Fund
Attachment B- P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee Terms of Reference
Attachment C- P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee Endorsement letter
Schedule "B"
Special Purpose Fund - P.R.O. Kids Program
Purpose
The Special Purpose Fund - P.R.O. Kids Program is established for the purpose of receiving,
holding and dispersing monies to be used to provide financial assistance to children and youth in
need to allow them to participate in community sport, recreation, art and cultural activities.
Common Council of City of Saint John directs that the Special Purpose Fund - P.R.O. Kids
Program shall be administered to:
1. Accept corporate, foundation, and individual donations in support of the P.R.O. Kids
program. That all the donations received shall be deposited in the fund.
2. Those monies withdrawn from the fund shall be used for the purpose of supporting the
participation of children and youth in community sport, recreation, art and cultural activities.
3. That authority for the expenditure of monies from the fund will be vested with the Senior
Manager of Community Support Services in accordance with the terms and conditions
designated by Common Council.
4. Disbursements from the Special Purpose Fund - P.R.O. Kids Program
All disbursements from the fund shall be such that the identity of individual recipients shall
be given the greatest degree of confidentiality and shall fully comply with the eligibility and
selection criteria.
(a) Community Services Coordinator designated by the Manager of Community Services
considering advice provided by one of the members P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee
members, shall have authority to approve expenditures per individual per calendar year of
amounts up to $500.00.
(b) The Manager of Community Services may approve up to an additional $500.00 per
individual per calendar year in special cases, upon the written recommendation of the
Community Services Coordinator and the P.R.O. Kids committee member.
The Pro Kids Committee through a motion may approve disbursement of amounts up to but not
exceeding $5000.00 to short term alternative program delivery models that uphold the mandate
of Pro Kids and remain with the parameters of the eligibility and selection criteria. An objective
for this model of funding is to aid/remove barriers in the startup costs associated with the new
programs to allow for immediate participation. (i.e., the payment of an instructor for a new
activity at a community centre- in turn the youth participating in the event would participate free
of charge).
Those interested in the funding must complete the Program Funding Application
Form.
Before payment is issued- names and contact information of participants must be
submitted to Pro Kids staff for application records and reconciling.
Request for payment must be made within 4 weeks of the start date of program.
Failure to do so may result in nonpayment.
The program must identify a gap in service delivery and explain how the
assistance of the funding alleviates barriers to participants.
Funding for these programs will not exceed two years.
The program must be facilitated by a not-for-profit organization or be affiliated.
Consideration will be given to new and emerging programs that support diversity
and inclusion, (i.e., increased participation of girls, newcomers, and people with
disabilities.)
If the committee by motion, requests to fund a program exceeding the $5000, the
decision will be at the digression of the Senior Manager of Community Support
Services.
(c) An annual report shall be prepared and presented to Common Council on the previous
year's activities within the fund detailing the activities of the funds (without naming
individual recipients).
Eligibility and Selection Criteria
Youth can be referred to the program through family agencies, coaches, community leaders,
neighbours, and community police. Parents and Guardians and youth may apply directly.
The Community Services Coordinator shall have the authority to establish application deadlines
and shall endeavor to advertise and promote the program widely throughout the community.
Eligibility Requirements:
Participants must be residents of the City of Saint John, the Town of Grand Bay-Westfield,
the Town of Rothesay or the Town of Quispamsis.
Children/youth must under 19 years of age at the start of the program applied for.
Children/youth shall not be participating concurrently in other paid programs.
The parent or guardian must certify that financial support is required.
An adult reference, not the parent or guardian, who knows the child, must certify that to the
best of their knowledge financial support is required. The reference may be a teacher, coach,
family friend, clergy, social worker, co-worker or group leader.
Selection Criteria:
Efforts will be made to try to accommodate all applicants. However, in the event that there are
insufficient resources to meet all requests for support, applicants will be placed on a first come,
first serve basis.
hǒƩ aźƭƭźƚƓʹ ƚ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ğƭƭźƭƷğƓĭĻ Ʒƚ ğƭ ƒğƓǤ ĭŷźƌķƩĻƓ ğƓķ ǤƚǒƷŷ ğƭ ƦƚƭƭźĬƌĻ Ǟŷƚ ğƩĻ ǒƓğĬƌĻ Ʒƚ
ƦğƩƷźĭźƦğƷĻ źƓ ƭƦƚƩƷͲ ğƩƷͲ ƩĻĭƩĻğƷźƚƓ ƚƩ ĭǒƌƷǒƩğƌ ğĭƷźǝźƷźĻƭ ķǒĻ Ʒƚ ŅźƓğƓĭźğƌ ƌźƒźƷğƷźƚƓƭ͵
Program Funding Application
A.CONTACT INFORMATION
Name of Organization:
Contact Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Email:
Not for Profit Affiliate:
B.APPLICATION
Name of Program:
Amount requested:
Provide a general description of the new program you plan to deliver. Include tentative dates,
number of days the program will be offered, location, number of children/youths expected to
participate, community partnerships.
How does the program align with P.R.O. Kids mission? How is financial need determined and
accessibility to the program determined? Identify the specific outcomes your program aims to
achieve with this funding (examples: how does this program address identified gaps in service
delivery, what special population are involved, etc.)
C. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Complete the forecasted budget below. Include all potential revenues from other
grants, fees or in-kind services. Eligible expenses may include instructor fees, venue
rental space, equipment and supplies, and transportation. Financial need will be a
consideration, factors include existing funding and sponsorships.
BUDGET FORECAST
REVENUES EXPENSES
Source Amount Source Amount
Total Revenues Total Expenses
*
D. SUSTAINABILTIY
If approved, how will this program become sustainability after the 2 years of funding
from Pro Kids?
E. SAFETY
What safety measurement will be in place for participants (Ie. Criminal backgrounds
check, appropriate insurance coverage etc.,)
F. CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and that I have verified its contents.
I agree to provide PRO Kids with participant information for reporting and
Special Purpose Fund - P.R.O. Kids Program
6
_____________
COMMITTEE AND STAFF EVUALTION MATRIX
Aligns with Pro Kids mission. Yes or No
(Please circle)
(Must align to move forward to ranking scale)
Evaluation Score: 1 to 3 scale (1 = no/ 2=somewhat/ 3= Yes)
Applicant must have a score of 11 or higher to receive funding.
Addresses gap in service delivery
(Emerging activity), geographic, gender
awareness)
Safety
Sustainability
Special Population considerations
Financial Need
Total
Adopted: Common Council, City of Saint John, (September 5, 2001)
Amended: Common Council, City of Saint John, (December 8, 2003)
Adopted: Common Council, City of Saint John, September 5, 2001)
Amended: Common Council, City of Saint John, (December 8, 2003)
Amended: Common Council, City of Saint John. (August 3, 2004)
Amended: Common Council. City of Saint John. (November 24, 2014)
Youth Parent
Recreation, sport, culture, arts Fundraising
Financial supporters Community leaders
Marketing Common Council
Social/Health services Citizen with lived experience
5.1 The P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee shall have authority to appoint its own officers.
5.2 Officers that form an Executive are: (i) the Chair, (ii) the Vice-Chair, the (iii) the Past
Chair, and the (iv) Secretary.
5.3 Officers may serve in a position for a 1-year term. The Secretary may serve for up to
three years in that position. The Chair automatically becomes the Past Chair for a 1-year
term once a new Chair is elected. The Vice-Chair does not automatically become the
Chair after the office of Chair is vacant, but only does so if elected by committee
resolution.
5.4 The Chair will officiate at meetings, and the Vice-Chair will officiate if the Chair is absent.
5.5 The executive members (officers) of the P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee have the
authority to sign letters, applications, and reports on behalf of, and at the request of the
Committee.
6.1 Committee members shall be appointed for three years.
6.2 Members may serve a maximum of two consecutive terms. Members may be
re-appointed after a one-year absence.
6.3 The Council, by way of the City of Saint John Nominating Committee, shall stagger
appointments so that no more than 50% of members' terms end at the same time.
6.4 A Committee member who fails to attend three (3) meetings shall be dismissed and
cease to be a member unless absences are excused by Growth and Community Services
staff.
6.5 A person shall cease to be a member of the Committee if that individual is found to be
in breach of the Committee Code of Conduct (Appendix A).
6.6 The Committee may by resolution appoint such sub-committees as it may require for
the purpose of carrying out or reporting on specific projects.
6.7 A person who is not a member of the Advisory Committee and wishes to serve on an ad
hoc sub-committee shall be appointed by the Advisory Committee and staff as an ex-
officio sub-committee member and must adhere to the Volunteer Code of Conduct
(Appendix B)
6.8 Committee members shall serve without remuneration.
st
6.9 All Committee members' terms will normally begin on January 1 and end on December
st
31 in the third year of their appointment. If a member is appointed mid-term, their
st
term will end on December 31 in the third year of their appointment. If a Committee
member is an elected official, their term ends on the date of the next municipal election
of the municipality they represent.
6.10 Committee members who are appointed agree to serve their entire term but may for a
just reason resign from the committee provided they provide proper notification to the
Committee who will then notify the Office of the Common Clerk.
7.1 Quorum is met by attendance of at least 51% of Committee members.
7.2 Growth and Community Services staff shall provide staff and resources for meeting
requirements.
7.4 The Committee shall make motions and recommendations pursuant to their role as
advisors and ambassadors of the Service for staff consideration.
7.5 In-camera deliberations may occur within a regular meeting by motion of the
Committee in which minutes are not recorded. No members shall be excluded.
7.6 Committee members must not deliberate about Committee work outside of committee
and subcommittee meetings.
7.7 The committee shall meet a minimum of six times per year.
8.1 Annually a report shall be provided to the Common Council of each municipal partner.
Appendix A
P.R.O.Kids Advisory Committee Code of Conduct
PO Box 1971
Saint John, NB
E2L 4L1
August 29, 2023
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Your Worship and Councillors,
Fraser Wells, Chair
At a regular monthly meeting of the PRO Kids Advisory Committee held on April 26, 2023,
Jordan Tracey, Vice Chair
the following motions were approved:
Greg Stewart, Councillor
City of Saint John
MOTION to Approve Special Purpose Fund and present to Council
John Balemans, Councillor
Town of Grand Bay-Westfield
-Dave Brown; Seconded Gary Crossman
Dave Brown, Councillor
CARRIED
Town of Rothesay
MOTION to approve Terms of reference with amendment to 6.4
Holly Knight, Member
Town of Quispamsis
-Marcy Barnes; Seconded Tamara Steele
Jason Court, Member
CARRIED
Leah Secord, Member
As our chair was absent for this particular meeting, I am signing on behalf of the
Tamara Steele, Member
committee as the chair of the meeting.
Alison Olsen, Member
Thank you again for your continued support of PRO Kids.
Marcy Barnes, Member
Hebetalla Mohamed, Member
Gary Crossman, Member
Jordan Tracey
Vice Chair
PROKids Advisory Committee
COUNCILREPORT
M&C No.2023-213
Report DateSeptember 12, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaUtilities and
Infrastructure Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna Noade ReardonandMembers of Common Council
SUBJECT: Community Development Fund Agreement: Regional Facilities
Upgrades(Carnegie/Arts Centre, TD-Station, Trade and Convention
Center, Canada Games Aquatic Center)
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadChief Administrative
Officer
Samir YammineIan FoganJ. Brent McGovern
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended That the City enter into Funding Agreements as attached to
M&C No. 2023-213with RDC for the purpose of obtaining funding through the
Community Development Fund and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to
execute the said Funding Agreements and any other documents ancillary thereto.,
for the following Projects Number:
1-ProjectNo 16566:The City of Saint John-Carnegie Building Upgrades.
2-Project No 16576: The City of Saint John-TD-Station &TCCUpgrades.
3-Project No 16534: The City of Saint John-Canada Games Aquatic Center
Upgrades.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
an Agreement
with the Regional Development Corporation for funding under the Province of
New Brunswick Community Development Fund forthe following Projects Number:
Project No 16566: The City of Saint John-Carnegie Building Upgrades
Project No 16576: The City of Saint John-TD-Station &TCC Upgrades
Project No 16534: The City of Saint John-Canada Games Aquatic Center
Upgrades
PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS
July 26, 2021: M&C 2021-221 Utility and General Fund 2021 Capital Programs
Revision III approved.
- 2 -
November 15, 2021: M&C 2021-303 2022 General Fund and Utility Fund Capital
Budgets, approved.
November 29, 2021: M&C 2021-334 Revised 2019-2023 Canada Community -
Building Fund (Formally the Gas Tax Fund) Capital Investment Plan & General Fund
Capital Program Revision I, approved.
REPORT
The City of Saint John has been approved for a financial contribution in the amount
of 40% of the eligible expenditures for the following Project No:
Project No 16566- Carnegie Building/Arts Centre Upgrades
The proposed capital projects including the financial contribution for the Carnegie
Building Upgrades are as follows.
Exterior Upgrades
Track Lighting Replacement
One Level Ventilator Equipment Upgrades
Total Grant $178,000
Project No 16576- TD-Station & TCC Upgrades
The proposed capital projects including the financial contribution for the TD-
Station & TCC Upgrades are as follows.
Design Services to renew 25-ton Main HVAC units.
Replace Brine Heater Shell and Tube Exchanger.
Replace Domestic Hot Water Boiler.
Replace Glycol Circulation.
Replace Shell and Tube Exchanger.
Replacement of Rubberized Rollup Overhead Door and operators.
Replacement of curtain wall glazing in suspended pedway.
TCC Card System
Total Grant $282,000
Project No 16534- Canada Games Aquatic Center Upgrades
The proposed capital projects including the financial contribution for the Canada
Games Aquatic Center Upgrades are as follows.
Leisure pool bridge replacement with metal bridge.
Replacement of Air Handling Units at Canada Games Aquatic Center.
Replacement of glazing units and curtain wall cladding.
Replacement of platform diving boards for competition pool.
- 3 -
Replacement of water slide in leisure pool.
Total Grant $488,800
In summary, the total amount of grant funding from the Regional Development
Corporation toward the regional facilities upgrades is $948,800.
The proposed upgrades to the regional facilities will result in the following
benefits:
Improved the level of services to the public,
Reduced operating costs,
Reduced infrastructure deficit. Several of the proposed projects have been
identified as high priority based on the asset management criteria: risk,
level of service, life cycle cost,
Extend the useful service life of the various assets within the buildings, and
Reduce the City capital budget by $698,000,
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The report
Share funding is fiscally responsible as it leverages available City funding to renew
infrastructure.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The City of Saint John will receive a total financial contribution in the amount of
40% of the eligible expenditures or $948,800 toward the regional facilities
upgrades. The total cost for these upgrades for the four regional facilities is
approximately $2,372,000. This funding will help offset budget pressures from
tenders that are coming in higher than budgeted. At this time, there is no expected
surplus and the projects are being managed within the approved budgets with
funding from others.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The proposed three agreements have
office.
- 4 -
ATTACHMENT
1. Project No.: 16566 - Agreement with the Regional Development
Corporation for funding under the Province of New Brunswick Community
Development Fund for the Carnegie Building Upgrades.
2. Project No.: 16576 - Agreement with the Regional Development
Corporation for funding under the Province of New Brunswick Community
Development Fund for the TD-Station &TCC Upgrades.
3. Project No.: 16534 - Agreement with the Regional Development
Corporation for funding under the Province of New Brunswick Community
Development Fund for the Canada Games Aquatic Center Upgrades.
/haahb /h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No.2023-223
Report DateSeptember 27, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaStrategic Services
Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: wĻƓĻǞğƌ ƚŅ CƚƩƷźƓĻƷ 5ĻǝźĭĻ ağźƓƷĻƓğƓĭĻ ğƓķ \[źĭĻƓƭĻƭ
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadChief Administrative Officer
Hugh KwakStephanie Rackley-RoachJ. Brent McGovern
Kevin Fudge
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend that Common Council approve the purchase of FortiNet Device License and Maintenance
from BulletproofSolutions ULC (Bulletproof) at the standing offer price of $261,443.85 (plus HST).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Regular maintenance and licensing updates are vital to ensure the continued effectiveness and security
of information technology infrastructure. This report outlines the procurement ofFortiNet Device License
and Maintenance from Bulletproof, a reputable vendor. The total cost of this procurement is $261,443.85
(plus HST). Bulletproof has quotedtheirstanding offer pricebased on their agreementwith the City of
Fredericton, making it a competitive choice for ourorganization. Three (3) vendors were invited to provide
ne vendor failed to provide a comparable price, and
another vendor did not meet the specified due datefor the quotes.This report presents a compelling case
for selecting Bulletproof as the preferred vendor for this critical acquisitionbased onvendor evaluation,
the significant cost savings offered by Bulletproof, their reputable standing in the industry, and their
commitment to meeting the due datefor quotations.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS
N/A
REPORT
The Cityof Saint Johnrelies heavily on FortiNet devices to secure our information technology network
infrastructure and safeguard sensitive information. Regular maintenance and licensing updates are vital
to ensure the continued effectiveness and security of these devices. The existing FortiNet licenses are
approaching their expirationdate, necessitating prompt procurement of renewal licenses and
maintenance services.
2
The Information Technology (IT) team has reached out to three (3) vendors for quotes. Bulletproof
provided a quote based on their standard offer contract pricing with the City of Fredericton. Saint John
and Procurement Manager to confirm our use of
their standing offer with Bulletproof. It is recommended that Bulletproof is awarded the renewal since
Vendor A was unable to provide a comparable price and Vendor B did not meet the specified deadline of
submission for a quote.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
By increasing availability of systems and minimizing risk of cyber threats, IT will improve the performance
administrative, operational, and service functions. Business continuity is also more secure
and effective with faster response to incidents and efficient recovery.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
beneficial for the City of Saint John to get the
products required at lower prices. The total cost of the 3-year renewal of FortiNet license and
maintenance is $261,443.85 plus HST. These costs are allocated in the 2023 Information Technology
operational budget.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
General Counsel Office has reviewed the recommendation of this report.
Supply Chain Management supports the recommendation put forth.
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS: the City of Saint John has recognized climate change as an
urgent and immediate threat, and is committed to a better
future by fighting climate change through the Climate
Change Action Plans; and
WHEREAS: the sport sector has historically been recognized as a venue
for improving public health, accelerating the local economy,
and facilitating social change in Saint John, and has
tremendous potential to contribute to the city's climate goals;
and
WHEREAS: Green Sports Day is an opportunity to celebrate progress
toward achieving the low-emissions goals of the United
Nations Sports for Climate Action Framework, reaching
waste reduction targets, encouraging continued sustainability
efforts and increasing equitable opportunities for all Saint
John to play sport in clean and safe environments;
NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John do hereby
th
proclaim Friday, October 6, 2023 as Green Sports Day in The City of Saint John.
In witness whereof I have affixed the official seal of the Mayor of the City of
Saint John.
Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution
Property: 1260 Fairville Boulevard
Public Hearing: October 3, 2023
Item: Required: Recommendation
(Y/N)
Municipal Plan No
Amendment
Zoning By-Law No
Amendment
Recission of No
Previous s. 39/s.
59 Conditions
Section 59 Yes That Common Council rescind the conditions imposed on the
Conditions November 6, 1978 rezoning of the property located at 1260
Fairville Boulevard, also identified as PIDs 00402933,
00402925, 00402941, 00397299, and 55176879.
Section 59 No
Agreement
Section 131 No
Agreement
Other No
Date: September 14, 2023
To: PlanningAdvisory Committee
From:Growth & Community Services
Meeting: September 19, 2023
SUBJECT
Applicant: Joel Armstrong
Landowner: 048017 NB LTD
Location: 1260 Fairville Boulevard
PID: 00402933, 00402925, 00402941, 00397299, 55176879
PlanDesignation: Regional Retail Centre
Zoning: Corridor Commercial(CC)
Application Type: Section 59 Amendment
Jurisdiction:Common Council has requested the views of the Planning
Advisory Committee concerning proposed amendments to the
Section 59 conditions of the subject property. Council will consider
the Committee’srecommendation at a public hearing on Tuesday,
October3,2023.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant is seeking anamendmentto the existing Section 59 conditions imposed on the
property toallow for the developmentof a self storage facility. The former Section 59 conditions
limited the development to the exact proposal presented during the rezoning in 1978.
Staff recommendsrescinding the Section 59 conditions thatlimitthe useof thesite to allow for
the development of self-storage facilities.
Page 1 of 5
Joel Armstrong1260 Fairville BoulevardSeptember 14, 2023
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Common Council, rescind the conditions imposed on the November 6, 1978,
rezoning of the property located at 1260 Fairville Boulevard, also identified as PIDs
00402933, 00402925, 00402941, 00397299, and 55176879.
DECISION HISTORY
On November 6, 1978, Common Councilrezoned the site at 1260 Fairville Boulevard from “I-3”
Light Industrial Park to “I-4” Heavy Industrial Park to allow for the expansion of a transport
business including the storage of trailers. The rezoning was approved, with Section 59
conditions limiting it to the approved site plans submitted at the time of the application.
The conditions limiting it to the proposed site plan were to help enforce the placement of trailer
storage, landscaping, and access to the site. It has been common practice to create Section 59
Conditions that tie a specific development proposal and associated site plan to a successful
rezoning process.
During the enactment of the new Zoning By-Law in 2014, the previously zoned Industrial lands
along Fairville Boulevard were changed to Commercial zonings to align with the new Municipal
Plan and the intent to make that area a Regional Retail Centre.
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The applicant is proposing to construct a self-storage facility on the currently vacant site. The
buildings would be the common typology of associated with a self-storage facility, with units
accessed from the exterior of the buildings. The development would also include an associated
office building and a parking lot created in the eastern portion of the site.
Site and Neighbourhood
The subject property is located on the north side of Fairville Boulevard, just north of the exit from
Highway 1. It is the last commercial property accessed from Fairville Boulevard heading west.
The property has an area of 24,961 m², including existing vegetation located on the rear portion
of the property, which acts as a visual buffer between the residential properties to the north.
Lands along this portion of Fairville Boulevard are zoned Corridor Commercial (CC), and
features a variety of uses including equipment rental business, vehicle repair shops, and
hardware stores. These businesses are representative of typical CC zoned sites, which allows
for continued operation of more service-based industries while transitioning from more
traditional industrial uses. The development pattern in this portion of Fairville Boulevard is
largely comprised of single building sites, as opposed to the larger scale retail facilities and
multi-tenant commercial buildings located further east along Fairville Boulevard. Self-storage
facilities help benefit and support new residential development, including the arrival of new
residents into the City. With the creation of new multi-tenant commercial buildings being
developed further down Fairville Boulevard, this is a land use that would benefit the changing
neighbourhood.
Page 2 of 5
Joel Armstrong1260 Fairville BoulevardSeptember14, 2023
To the north of the property, along Manwagonish Road, is largely residential uses. Due to the
elevation difference between Fairville Boulevard and Manawagonish Road, it represents an
elevation change of 20 metres and features heavy vegetation between the commercial sites and
the adjacent residential lands. This creates a physical separation and a visual buffer.
The wider area contains varying residential densities and various commercial zonings, as well
as Park and Community Facility zonings.
Section 59 Amendment Application
In 1978, the property was rezoned to permit an existing business to expand and include
additional uses such as trailer storage. Section 59 conditions were imposed on the site to limit it
to the site plan that was proposed at the time of the rezoning.
The landowner is seeking approval to amend the existing Section 59 conditions to allow for the
development of the now vacant lot as a self-storage facility.
Municipal Plan and Zoning
The surrounding properties located along Fairville Boulevard are designated as Regional Retail
Centre. The Regional Retail Centre designation identifies two areas of the City for large-format
retail and service concentrations, which are designed to be accessed primarily through
automobiles. The Fairville Boulevard Regional Retail Centre is viewed as a secondary and more
community-based centre which is less intensive than the McAllister Centre located on the east
side of the City. These lands are expected to evolve to serve the needs of the community. An
analysis of the proposal with respect to the relevant policies of the Municipal Plan is provided in
Attachment 2.
Policy LU-60 allows for a range of commercial uses to exist with the intent being more
community-based to serve residents on the west of the St. John River. Self-storage facilities
would support existing residential uses as well as new residential buildings being developed
along Fairville Boulevard and the wider neighbourhood.
LU-61 which is concerned with ensuring that significant new development and redevelopment in
areas is permitted only when certain criteria are met. Relevant criteria include:
The proposed land uses are appropriate and strengthen the role of the City’s Primary
Centres.
The proposal strongly discourages new major professional offices.
The development includes quality urban design.
The proposal shows consideration of transit and pedestrian connectivity to the street and
between retail locations.
The proposed development meets all requirements of the Corridor Commercial zone, including
parking and landscaping. This would see the development of a currently vacant lot with an
appropriate land use that complements and supports surrounding residential and commercial
Page 3 of 5
Joel Armstrong1260 Fairville BoulevardSeptember 14, 2023
uses.The enhanced landscaping and development of the lot will contribute positively to the
neighbourhood and is compatible with other land uses in the area. A main transit route also
serves the area and the north side of Fairville Boulevard contains a sidewalk ensuring
connectivity for pedestrians.
Since the proposal aligns with the intent of the Municipal Plan and the Corridor Commercial
Zoning, staff are in support of the proposed Section 59 amendment to allow for the proposed
development of the site.
Section 59 Conditions
Since the rezoning of the subject area in 1978, Section 59 conditions have been imposed on the
use and development of this parcel. This application provides the opportunity to rescind these
conditions surrounding the restriction of site development. Staff do not recommend any
additional conditions be placed on this property, as the existing Corridor Commercial zone and
Zoning By-law standards provide sufficient direction related to the development of the site. The
applicant will be required to create an enhanced landscaping area along the frontage of the lot,
in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning By-Law, which will include a fence as shown
in the attached site plan. The Zoning By-Law standards require a specific amount of trees and
shrubs to be planted based on the front yard area.
No major issues were raised by the different service areas, and they are supportive of the
proposed removal of the Section 59 conditions.
Conclusion
The construction of a self-storage facility is an appropriate development proposal for the site.
The use is permitted within the Corridor Commercial zone and will be compatible with existing
land uses in the wider area. Staff are recommending the rescinding of all former section 59
conditions.
ALTERNATIVESAND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
No other alternatives were considered.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
In accordance with the Committee’s Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to
landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on August 31, 2023. The Public Notice for
the proposed Section 59 Amendment was posted on the City of Saint John website on
September 5, 2023.
APPROVALS AND CONTACT
ManagerActing Director Acting Commissioner
Jennifer Kirchner, RPP, MCIP David Dobbelsteyn Amy Poffenroth
Contact: Yeva Mattson
Telephone: (506) 721-8453
Email: yeva.mattson@saintjohn.ca
Page 4 of 5
Joel Armstrong1260 Fairville BoulevardSeptember 14, 2023
Application: 23-0132
APPENDIX
Map 1: Aerial Photography
Map 2: Future Land Use
Map 3: Zoning
Attachment 1: Site Photography
Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy Review
Submission 1: Site Plan, Elevations, and Renderings
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT 1: SITE PHOTOGRAPHY
Subject Site looking West
Subject site looking North – existing vegetation and elevation show the natural buffer with residential properties.
Fairville Blvd looking West from access onto subject site
Fairville Blvd looking East from access to subject site (Highway 1 exit ramp visible on right side of photo)
-
to
utilize
Law
-
this zone
permitted within
and the applicant
.
support to the broader supports
s
of the Zoning By
tandards
s
storage facilities is
-
overall goals of the Fairville Boulevard
aligns with the intent of the
make use of a vacant lot and
with the creation of new landscaping in
zone and provide
Infrastructure in regard to any future
network within the area.
facility
landscaping
(CC)
in the rear
aligns with the
storage
-
An office for the business is proposed but will
development of self
ection 59 amendment of the site, to remove restrictive
S
self
ommercial
is served by a main transit route and is in proximity to bus
C
and residential
The
the CC zone and
.
orridor
Assessment
proposed development would see the development of a vacant
The proposed former conditions, Regional Retail Centre as it continues to support commercial and servicebased uses.the Ccommercial
The Regional Retail Centres prioritize commercial uses established within the CC zone. The Fairville Boulevard area allow a range of uses that benefit residents of Saint John. The proposed
designated area. not contain any professional offices. The land. It would conform to all requirements including The property stops. The proposed development will existing landscapingthe
frontThe property is already serviced by City infrastructure has received comments from improvements.
b.
a.b.c.d.e.f.
Planning
a
to
the
-
of
by
based
to
lots,
-
and
role
Centres:
the
offices
parking
the Regional
necessary
possible, more
Retailin
connectivity
made
wheresurface
strengthen
Regional
and
financial responsibility of
professional
and
Analysis
established
the
pedestrian
in
major
Regional Retail Centre which will
design
minimizing
uses
and
Policy
byimprovements
parking, increasing landscaping and
new
land
urban
based
Plan
-
appropriate
transit
of
are
development
specific
quality
Policy
atmosphere
discourage
theinfrastructure
Municipal
2:
Plan
developer.
60
61
-
-
Fairville Boulevard Regional Retail Centre is a secondary, more communitycontain less intensive commercial retail and serviceuses intended to primarily serve residents west of the St.
John River.
LU Stronglylocate;Encourageintense land use and development;
Ensure development contributes to a more pedestrianorientedencouraging sharedimproving sidewalks and streetscaping; andEnsuredevelopment are generally the the
EnsureRetail Centrethe City's Primary Centres;Require development applicants to demonstrate considerationstreet and between retail locations;
considering
b.
MunicipalPolicy LUPolicy
When
Attachment
is
proposal
in the area and
s
uses. The
policy statements is
land use
commercial
boundary of the Regional Retail
standing
-
commercial uses and a physical and
western
more applicable long
development conforms with the existing CC zoning.
is located at the
al will see the development of a currently vacant lot
development aligns with
The propos
The property
The supported by existing infrastructure.Centre in an area that includes diverse is compatible with surrounding visual buffer exists between the adjacent residential properties due to
elevation differences.including enhanced landscaping.
The proposed
a.d. e. f.
This policy addresses a larger scale planning process for the area, but an assessment of the proposal to the included below.
Boulevard Regional Retail Centre, which shall
Fairville Boulevard Regional Retail Centre
:
63
-
Further encouraging the relocation of incompatible land uses from the area to the City’s Industrial Parks; Providing improved linkages and transitions between the Regional Centre and
adjacent neighbourhoods; andEstablishing priorities for community improvements.
the area;
Coordinating land uses and infrastructure improvements in
a.
Policy LU Require the preparation of a neighbourhood plan or structure plan for the Fairville contain statements of policy with respect to:
General Application Form
GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES
onestop@saintjohn.ca Phone: 658-2911 Fax: 632-6199 CITY OF SAINT JOHN
11513:52-!114:83::-!11513:44-!11513:36-!6628798:
LOCATIONCIVIC ADDRESS :PID # :
2371!Gbjswjmmf!Cpvmfwbse
HERITAGE AREA: Y / N INTENSIFICATION AREA: Y / N FLOOD RISK AREA: Y / N APPROVED GRADING PLAN: Y / N
APPLICATION #:DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY:
APPLICANTEMAILPHONE
KpfmBsntuspoh
MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE
365!Divsdimboe!Spbe!!!Tbjou!Kpio!OC!!!!F3O!2W5
CONTRACTOR EMAILPHONE
Fohjoffsjoh!Cz!Ipvhiupo!)dpotvmubou*!!!kbdpcAfczi/db!!!!!!!!!617.718.181:
MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE
2:53!Nbobxbhpojti!Spbe!!!!!Tbjou!Kpio!OC!!!!!!!F3N!6I6Kbdpc
OWNEREMAILPHONE
159128OCMue/
MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE
66!Tujotpo!Esjwf!!!!!!!!!!!Tbjou!Kpio!OC!!!!!!!!!!F3N!8F4
PRESENT USE:Dpnnfsdjbm PROPOSED USE:Dpnnfsdjbm!.!Tfmg!Tupsbhf!Gbdjmjuz
BUILDINGPLANNINGINFRASTRUCTUREHERITAGE
INTERIOR RENOVATIONNEW CONSTRUCTIONVARIANCESTREET EXCAVATIONHERITAGE DEVELOPMENT
5
EXTERIOR RENOVATIONACCESSORY BLDGPLANNING LETTERHERITAGE SIGN
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
ADDITIONPOOLPAC APPLICATIONHERITAGE INFILL
5
DRAINAGE
DECKDEMOLITIONCOUNCIL APPWATER & SEWERAGEHERITAGE DEMO
5
CHANGE OF USESIGNSUBDIVISIONOTHEROTHER
MINIMUM STANDARDSOTHEROTHER
Uif!bqqmjdbou!dvssfoumz!ibt!b!dpousbdu!gps!qvsdibtf!pg!uif!tvckfdu!qspqfsuz!boe!jt!bqqmzjoh!gps!bo
bnfoenfou!up!uif!fyjtujoh!Tfdujpo!6:!dpoejujpot!)sfnpwbm!pg!uif!dpoejujpot*!up!bmmpx!gps!uif
efwfmpqnfou!pg!b!tfmg!tupsbhf!gbdjmjuz!po!uif!qspqfsuz/
5
I consent to the City of Saint John sending to me commercial electronic messages, from time to time, regarding City initiatives and incentives.
General Collection Statement
I, the undersigned, hereby apply for the permit(s) or approval(s), indicated
above for the work described on plans, submissions and forms herewith
This information is being collected in order for the City of Saint John to deliver an existing
submitted. This application includes all relevant documentation necessary for
program / service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program /
the applied for permit(s) or approval(s). I agree to comply with the plans,
service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saint John will not share your personal
specifications and further agree to comply with all relevant City By-laws and
information with any third party without your express consent.
conditions imposed.
Kbdpc!Ljmqbusjdl
The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and
_______________________________________________________
the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions
Applicant Name
regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer:
_______________________________________________________
CityHallBuilding
Applicant Signature
15Market Square Saint
John, NB E2L 1E8
Nbz423134
_______________________________________________________
commonclerk@saintjohn.ca
Date
(506) 658-2862
Council Application
GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
CIVIC ADDRESSAPPLICATION #FEE PAID
Y N
2371GbjswjmmfCpvmfwbse
TYPE OF APPLICATION
Land for PublicPurposesNon-Conforming UseSatisfactory Servicing
Release
ServiceFee:$200ServiceFee:$200
Service Fee:$300
Section9AmendmentZoning By-law AmendmentZoning By-law Amendmentwith
5
aMunicipal Plan Amendment
Service Fee:$2,ServiceFee:$
ServiceFee:$3,
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION
Where applicable, indicate the changes to existing Section 39 conditions, zoning, or Municipal Plan designation being requested.
Attachsite plans, buildingelevations, floorplans,and other documentationto fully describe the application. The submission of a
preliminary proposaland a Pre-Application Meeting is encouraged prior to seeking approval. Please contact the One-Stop
Development Shop at (506) 658-2911 for further information.
Uifbqqmjdboudvssfoumzibtbdpousbdugpsqvsdibtfpguiftvckfduqspqfsuzboejtbqqmzjohgpsbobnfoenfouup
uiffyjtujohTfdujpo6:dpoejujpot)sfnpwbmpguifdpoejujpot*upbmmpxgpsuifefwfmpqnfoupgbtfmgtupsbhfgbdjmjuz
pouifqspqfsuz/QfsdpowfstbujpotxjuiDjuztubgg-uifdvssfouTfdujpo6:dpoejujpotpouiftvckfduqspqfsuzbsf
ijhimzsftusjdujwfjoufsntpguifgpsnpgefwfmpqnfoubmmpxfepouifqspqfsuzjodmvejohtvckfdujohuif
efwfmpqnfoupguifqspqfsuzuppomzbwfsztqfdjgjdtjufqmbombzpvu/Uifbqqmjdbou(teftjsfjtupsfnpwfbmm
fyjtujohTfdujpo6:dpoejujpotqsjpsupgjobmj{johuifqvsdibtfpguifqspqfsuzupfotvsfuifeftjsfeuzqfpg
efwfmpqnfou)tfmgtupsbhfgbdjmjuz*dbocfdpotusvdufepouifqspqfsuzjobmjhonfouxjuiDjuzpgTbjouKpiocz.mbxt
boetuboebset/
ENCUMBRANCES
Describe any easements, restrictive covenants, andother encumbrances affecting the land.
Tfdujpo6:dpoejujpot/
Qpufoujbmnvojdjqbmtfswjdftfbtfnfougpsfyjtujohtbojubszboetupsntfxfs/
AUTHORIZATION
As of the date of this application, I, the undersigned, am the registered ownerof the landdescribed in this applicationor the
authorized agent thereof, and I have examined the contents of this application andhereby certify that the information submitted with
the application is correct insofar as I have knowledge of these facts, and I hereby authorize the applicant to representthis matter and
to provide any additionalinformation that will be necessaryfor this application.
EpvhTjnqtpo)tffbuubdifebvuipsj{bujpomfuufsgspndvssfoupxofs*
KbdpcLjmqbusjdl)pocfibmgpgKpfmBsntuspoh*
Registered Owner or Authorized AgentAdditional Registered Owner
Nbz42-3134Nbz42-3134
DateDate
The information contained in this application and any documentation, including plans, drawings, reports, and studies, provided in
support of this application will become part of the public record.
PROPOSED SECTION 59 AMENDMENT
RE: 1260 Fairville Boulevard
Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to
consider amending The City of Saint John Zoning By-Law at its regular meeting to be held in the
Council Chambers on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. by:
1. Amending the Section 59 conditions imposed on the Novmeber 6, 1978 rezoning of the
property located at 1260 Fairville Blvd, also identified as PID 00402933, 00402925, 00402941,
00397299, 55176879 to permit further development.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
To permit development of self-storage facilities.
For details on how to inspect the amendment, or to register to participate, please contact the
Office of the Common Clerk at commonclerk@saintjohn.ca. Written objections to the
amendment may be provided in writing and/or verbally at the Public Hearing to be held by
Office in advance at commonclerk@saintjohn.ca
If you require French services for a Common Council meeting, please contact the office of the
Common Clerk.
Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk
(506) 658-2862
PROJET DE MODIFICATION DEL'ARTICLE 59
Objet : 1260, boulevard Fairville
Par les présentes, un avis public est donné par lequel le conseil communal de la ville de Saint
John
réunion ordinaire qui se tiendra dans la salle du conseil le mardi 3 octobre 2023 à 18 h 30, en
apportant les modifications suivantes :
1. Modification des conditions de l'article 59 imposées relativement au rezonage du 6
novembre 1978 de la propriété située au 1260 boulevard, Fairville, , et portant le NID
00402933, 00402925, 00402941, 00397299, 55176879, pour permettre l'utilisation
accrue de la propriété pour développement.
INSERT PHOTO (this is just a note to make sure the photo goes here on the web
site, no need to actually insert it)
RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION:
Permettre le développement d'installations d'entreposage libre-service sur la propriété.
Souhaitez-vous plus de détails sur la façon d'inspecter la modification ou de vous inscrire pour
participer? Veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier commun à CommonClerk@saintjohn.ca. Les
objections écrites à la modification peuvent être fournies par écrit et/ou verbalement lors de
l'audience publique qui sera tenue par le conseil municipal. Pour vous inscrire à l'audience,
veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier municipal à l'avance à CommonClerk@saintjohn.ca
Si vous avez besoin des services en français pour une réunion de Conseil Communal, veuillez
contacter le bureau du greffier communal.
Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal
(506) 658-2862
Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution
Property: 1660 Manawagonish Road
Public Hearing: October 3, 2023
Item: Required: Recommendation
(Y/N)
Municipal Plan No
Amendment
Zoning By-Law No
Amendment
Recission of Yes That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section
Previous s. 39/s. 59 of the Community Planning Act, rescind the conditions
59 Conditions imposed on the March 11, 1991, rezoning, for the parcel of
land having an area of approximately 8,498 square metres,
located at 1660 Manawagonish Road, also identified as PID
Numbers 55076335 and 00402727.
Section 59 Yes That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section
Conditions 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following
conditions on the parcel of land having an area of
approximately 8,498 square metres, located at 1660
Manawagonish Road, also identified as portions of PID
Numbers 55076335 and 00402727:
a. The development and use of the parcel of land be in
accordance with detailed building elevation and site
plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the
approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the
design and location of buildings and structures,
garbage enclosures, outdoor storage, driveway
accesses, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading areas,
landscaping, amenity spaces, signs, exterior lighting,
and other such site features including front, side, and
back yard landscaping in conformance with the Zoning
By-Law.
b. That a detailed landscaping plan be prepared by the
developer and submitted with the Building Permit
application for the approval of the Development
Officer. This plan must detail the following:
i. Retention of existing trees on the property
along the boundaries of the site.
ii. Additional screening measures along the
northern (rear) and western property lines of
the site comprised of fencing or plantings or a
combination of both along these two
boundaries.
iii. Front yard landscaping conforming to the
commercial zone requirement of a tree or
shrub per 45 square metres of required front
yard provided 50% of the plantings are trees.
c. That the operation of a liquor licensed facility within the
proposed development:
i. be limited to the operating hours of the ball-
hockey facility; and
ii. that consumption of alcohol be restricted to
the interior of the building.
d. That an illumination plan be prepared by the
proponent and submitted for the approval of the
Development Officer, detailing the lighting for the
proposed development. The illumination plan must
demonstrate that there be no light spillover onto
adjacent properties from illumination of the outdoor
ball-hockey court.
e. That any lighting associated with the outdoor ball-
operation.
f. That sound mitigation measures, subject to the
approval of the Development Officer, be constructed
along the northeastern property boundary from the
northeastern building corner to the northeastern corner
of the property adjacent to PID 00397208.
g. That the proposed development incorporates
pedestrian connections between the building and the
parking lot, and between the building and the public
sidewalk located on Manawagonish Road.
h. That should the proposed ball hockey facility
incorporate two driveway accesses from Manawagonish
Road as shown on the site plan, that directional signage
be installed, to establish the traffic flow allowed at each
of the accesses, one being an entrance and the other
an exit. This condition only applies to the operation of
the site as a ball hockey facility.
i. Any modifications to the site accesses be constructed
by the proponent at their expense and that the
applicable City permits and approvals be obtained for
this work.
j. The attached elevation and site plans be attached to
the permit application for the development of the
parcel of land.
k. That the parcel of land be developed and maintained in
accordance with an engineering storm water drainage
plan and design report, prepared by a professional
engineer on behalf of the proponent and subject to the
approval of the Chief City Engineer, and that such
approved plan and report be attached to any
development and/or building permit for the proposed
development; and
l. Should any municipal infrastructure improvements be
required to service this proposal, it will be the full
responsibility and cost to complete of the proponent.
Prior to determining the requirement for any municipal
infrastructure improvements, detailed engineering
plans and a design brief must be submitted by the
nt to the City for
review and approval.
m. That vehicular access to the site from Clearview Row be
prohibited.
Section 59 No
Agreement
Section 131 No
Agreement
Other No
Date:
To:
From:
Meeting:
SUBJECT
Applicant:
Landowner:
Location:
PID:
Plan Designation:
Existing Zoning:
Application Type:
Jurisdiction:
Tuesday, October 3, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION
DECISION HISTORY
ANALYSIS
Proposal
Site and Neighbourhood
Municipal Plan
Zoning
Development Plans
Landscaping Plan
Liquor Licensing
Illumination
Sound Mitigation
Pedestrian Connectivity and Access
Access from Clearview Row
Recreation Strategic Plan (Play SJ)
InfrastructureDevelopment and Fire and Rescue Services
Conclusion
ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
ENGAGEMENT
Public
APPROVALS AND CONTACT
Mark Reade,Jennifer Kirchner,David Dobbelsteyn
Amy Poffenroth,
Contact:
Telephone:
Email:
Application:
APPENDIX
Aerial Photography
Future Land Use
Zoning
Site Photography
Municipal Plan Policy Review
Site Plan& Elevation Drawings
Development Details
,
the area
rs from the
an arterial
residential use within
-
separation from existing
facility as a permitted use
such a non
residential uses along Manawagonish
-
.
The westernmost playing surface located
density residential neighbourhood,
-
.
Planning Assessment
provides sound mitigation for the dwellings
along and orientation towards
lower
the dwellings on Coronation Avenue is interior to
places the use on the edge of the neighbourhood
facility is considered a community facility, albeit a
to mitigate the effects on the adjacent residential areas to
roviding a degree of compatibility and
The underlying zoning of the site, Neighbourhood CommunityFacility, does allow for a recreationand the site location on Manawagonish Road, an arterial street,is an appropriate location
for the broader residential neighbourhood.roadway puses the north and westadjacent tothe building which located west of the site
. The proposal represents the continued transition of the
a.b.
The proposed privately operated recreation facility.Although largely a contains commercial and nonRoadestablished neighbourhood to include recreational facilities and activities. The
location of the site on an arterial roadway provides an accessible location for the recreational facility to draw usebroader City.
existing
ourhood.
compatible
with the Municipal Plan
form perspective, but that new and
-
Municipal Plan Policy
density may be found and both the
permitted in the designation without amendment
B). Within the Stable Residential designation, housing of
88
86 87
-
--
the neighbourhood;wastewater services, parks and recreation services, schools, publictransit and other community facilities and protective services canreadily and adequately be provided;
Policy LU
Policy LU Create the Stable Residential designation on the Future Land Use map (Schedulealmost every form andneighbourhood context and compatibilitygoals will determine suitability of
new proposals. Otheruses that may be found in the Stable Residential designation includeconvenience stores, home occupations, parks, and community facilities which areto the Municipal
Plan.Policy LU Intend that the areas designated Stable Residential will evolve over time from a land use and builtredeveloped land uses are to reinforce the predominant community character
and make a positive contribution to the neighbEnsure that significant new development and redevelopment in areas designated Stable Residential shall generally be permitted only through
a rezoning process where compliance is demonstrated with the following requirements: a.The proposed land use is desirable and contributes positively tob.The proposal is compatible with
surrounding land uses;c.The development is in a location where all necessary water and
Law
of the parking
-
are a
.
dwellings along
brief
away from the four
to the
four of the five
.
requiring preparation of
aw.
L
-
design
Road seeks to provide
closest
condition
The area is served by transit routes
for the development
.
quality exterior building design
-
sound impacts in
cladding materials
high
has parking located
e
for the proposed development to
Manawagonish
to the north
mitigat
The playing surface
buffering in areas adjacent to existing residential
by vehicle to the broader community while
will be required in accordance with Zoning By
servicing capacity exists
The location along accessibility minimizing traffic impacts on the adjacent residentialneighbourhoodandThe site design largelyadjacent residential dwellings, although screeningarearequirements.
Coronation Avenue is located inside the proposed buildingwhich seeks to adjoining residential properties.Staff recommend a Section 59 a landscaping plan demonstrate properties and along
Manawagonish Road. A stormwater management plan and While the building is subject to detailed design, the massing ofthe proposed building in relation to Manawagonish Road isconsistent
with the former building located on the site.Renderings and elevation drawings provided with theapplication illustrate aincorporating multiple The site is located on an arterial roadway
and not anticipated todetract from demand being experienced in the IntensificationAreas established in the Municipal Plan.
c.d.e.f.
on Areas.
are incorporated;
buffering and landscaping, site grading and stormwatermanagementconsistent with the Urban Design Principles in the Municipal Plan;andintention to direct the majority of new residential
development tothe Primary Centres, Local Centres, and Intensificati
d.Site design features that address such matters as safe access,e.A high quality exterior building design is provided that isf.The proposal is on a property identified as a Corridor
on the City
,
which if retained
ay from
,
standing lot.
-
along the building facades.
was located on the site.
The building is not a high rise building.
-
ornamental buttresses
The setbacks and design of the proposed buildingconform to the requirements of the NeighbourhoodCommunity Facility (CFN) zone) with the proposed facilitycontained on an existing, longThe
building will have an entrance facing ManawagonishRoad.The subject site contains existing treesprovide for buffering from adjacent properties.No established view corridors exist in
the vicinity of thesite.Renderings and elevations provided with the applicationoutline different cladding materials and articulation toprovide variety in the façade design and to break
up thebuilding massing. The building is of a similar scale to theformer CNIB building that Little animation of the Public Realm is provided, Staffrecommend a Section 59 condition requiring
front yardplantings to provide a visual buffer and soften theappearance of the parking area along with an additionalcondition requiring a pedestrian walkwManawagonish Road.The building
is integrated with the external activity areathrough windows and entrances.The rendering provided with the application indicateswood cladding and brick veneer on the exterior facades.Articulation
of the buildings front wall is provided, andadditional articulation is provided via an entrance canopyand N/A Staff note the building orientation provides for somesolar gain given
south facing facades.The location of the main entrance and parking at the
a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h.i.j.k.l.
-
-
articulated
-
10;
-
rise buildings to appropriate areas and ensuring
-
9
-
(Schedule A), new development will be designed to respectand reinforce the physical character of the establishedneighbourhood, as set out in Policy UD
planned context in which it is located through appropriatesetbacks, landscaping, buildings entrances, building massing,architectural style and building materials. Specifically, the builtform
of new development shall be designed to achieve thefollowing objectives for specific areas of the City:i.In Stable Areas, as identified on the City Structure maptopography;function
to encourage high quality contemporary design that willform the next generation of heritage;oriented uses and a high level of transparency at grade toreinforce and help animate the
public realm;concepts with integrated functions;design and detail for all elements of the building;building façades, landscaping, local history, public art and/orculture into sites
and buildings;their design is sensitive to the neighbourhood and/or heritagecontext;
corridors to the water or landmark sites or buildings;
Policy UD Ensure all development proposals generally conform to the following General Urban Design Principles:a.That new development respect and reinforce the existing andb.Locating
building entrances facing the public street;c.Designing sites to incorporate existing natural features andd.Designing sites to protect, create and/or enhance important viewe.Incorporating
innovations in built form, aesthetics and buildingf.Where appropriate and desirable, encouraging active pedestriang.Designing sites, buildings and adjacent public spaces as completeh.Using
quality, durable building materials and a consistent level ofi.Designing for visual interest by incorporating wellj.Directing high
landscaping plan is a requirement proposed via a
A Section 59 condition.Although parking is provided between the building and the street, this location seeks to minimize the impacts of parking on adjacent residential uses. Additional
front yard landscaping is recommended via a Section 59 condition.Walkways from Clearview Row and Manawagonish Road are recommended via a Section 59 condition.Site design would be subject
to the appropriate provisions of the National Building Code and Provincial Barrier Free Regulation.Additional front yard landscaping is recommended to provide screening for the parking
area in front of the building.
m.n.o.p.q.
free,
-
use of existing
-
site stormwater
-
trip facilities, where
-
of
-
block connections where possible;
-
against, the natural environment by designing according to the topography, hydrology, ecology and natural drainage patterns of the site and taking advantage of passive solar gain and
natural light; and
management;
buildings and designing sites to retain mature trees;
where possible;energy;
i. Utilizing reused, recycled, renewable or local building materials ii. Using green building or neighbourhood standards;iii. Designing for energy efficiency and alternative sources
of iv. Designing for water conservation and on v. Promoting the conservation and adaptive re vi. Designing sites and buildings to work with, rather than vii. Using
native vegetation for landscaping where appropriate.through Environment Design (CPTED) principles to promote safety and security, in balance with other urban design goals; andgenerally
not visible from the street, particularly in Centres and Neighbourhood Intensification Areas;public street or sidewalk;and transit users by providing walkways from the public street,
transit stops, and parking areas to main building entrances and including bike parking and endappropriate, and midconvenient and have clear signage; and
k. Encouraging sustainability in design by:l. Designing sites and buildings according to the Crime Prevention m. Locating and screening parking and loading facilities so they are
n. Limit surface parking between the front of a building and the o. Design safe and direct access to buildings for pedestrians, cyclistsp. Design sites and building accesses that
are barrierq. Generally locating surface parking, outdoor storage, loading and
.
the
law,
-
like
-
storeys at
-
;
zone
family homes.
storeys which is
-
-
require any additional
hockey recreation facility
-
and along arterial and
an area that features diverse
or water services at this location.
is in
The development does not financial costs to the City. While it has the potentialto draw users from other facilities within the City,none of these facilities are near the subject site.The
construction of a ballwill not negatively affect the capacity of wastewater,stormwater,The subject site is 200 metres from the Island ViewSchool. The proposal would be the only recreationalfacility
within 2.5 kilometres from the subject site,providing access to nearby children and residents.
i.
The setbacks meet the requirements of the Zoning By
ii.
providing buffering setbacks from the street aswell as rear and side yards.
iii.
.
he development will utilize an existing lot.he proposal conforms with the goals and intent of the
TCommunity recreational facilities are often found inresidential neighbourhoods due to their proximity topotential attendees and schoolscollector roadways given their broader community
functionThe development residential and commercial buildings, all being twomost, with which the proposal aligns itself with.The building will be of similar massing to nearby nonresidential
uses and is limited to twomaximum height of the nearby singleTMunicipal Plan and meets the requirements detailed in theNeighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) -
& f
.
a.b.c.d.ea.b.
buildings;
8;
-
7 and I
-
measures;
The local pattern of lots, streets and blocks;The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses;Nearby building types;The height, scale and massing of nearby The setback of buildings
from the street;The pattern of rear and side yard setbacks;i.Financial inability of the City to absorb costs related todevelopment and ensure efficient delivery of services, asdetermined
through Policy Iii.The adequacy of central wastewater or water services andstorm drainage iii.Adequacy or proximity of school, recreation or othercommunity facilities;
2
-
a.b.c.d.e.f.
other service areas at the rear or side of the property and buffering or screening these functions from adjacent properties and the public realm.
Ensure that new development and redevelopment in Stable Areas is designed to respect and reinforce the physical character and uses of the surrounding neighbourhood, having regard for:Policy
I In considering amendments to the Zoning Bylaw or the imposition of terms and conditions, in addition to all other criteria set out in the various policies of the Municipal Plan, have
regard for the following:a.The proposal is in conformity with the goals, policies and intent ofthe Municipal Plan and the requirements of all City bylaws;b.The proposal is not premature
or inappropriate by reason of:
provide a buffer
but historically
to
.
law.
-
institutional use
the building that existed on the site
like
The property is located on the arterial ManawagonishRoad.N/AThe property is currently vacant, contained anThe building massing and location will be smaller ifnot previously.There is
adequate access via sidewalk, transit, andvehicular traffic. The proposal will keep the twoaccess design of the existing driveway, with oneaccess being an entrance and the other an
exit.Adequate parking will be provided;N/ASignage will be provided for under the regulations ofSection 7 of the Zoning ByExtensive landscaping, new and existing, and fencingwill be
required of the proposal between the existing residential and cemeteryabutting the property.
i.
v.ii.v.
iv.iii.iv.vi.
vii.
-The subject site is appropriate for the proposed buildingregarding environmental considerations.N/AConforming to the Building Code will ensure public healthand safety considerations.
c.d.e.f.
5 related
-
iv.Adequacy of road networks leading to or adjacent to thedevelopment; andv.Potential for negative impacts to designated heritagebuildings or areas.i.Type of use;ii.Height, bulk or appearance
and lot coverage of anyproposed building;iii.Traffic generation, vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle or transitaccess to and from the site;iv.Parking;v.Open storage;vi.Signs; andvii.Any
other relevant matter of urban planning.
c.Appropriate controls are placed on any proposed developmentwhere necessary to reduce any conflict with adjacent land uses byreason of:d.The proposed site is suitable in terms of steepness
of grade, soiland geological conditions, locations of watercourses, wetlands andsusceptibility of flooding as well as any other relevant environmentalconsideration;e.The proposal satisfies
the terms and conditions of Policy Ito timeframes and phasing of development; andf.The proposal meets all necessary public health and safetyconsiderations.
243(.7#57(.1#7(.1#
9(.4#3:(.1#9(.:#
E.B.
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
cbod!eft!kpvfvst
E.B.
7(.1#
E.B.
FVTTJFVTTJ
cbs
FVTTJ
21(.1#
E.H.
FVTTJ
41(.4#32(.:#
63(.1#
cbod!eft!kpvfvst
FVTTJ
E.B.
41(.4#32(.:#
63(.1#
23(.9#22(.5#3(.1#
35(.1#3(.1#
2(.1#
7(.9#22(.5#
35(.1#
ЊЏЏЉ ağƓğǞğŭƚƓźƭŷ wƚğķͲ .ğƌƌ ŷƚĭƉĻǤ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ
A building housing both an indoor and an outdoor ball hockey surface, along with a lounge, offers a
comprehensive combination of facilities to cater to the needs of ball hockey players and sports
enthusiasts. This configuration provides practical and social advantages, making it an excellent idea to
install such a facility at 1660 Manawagonish Road, NB. Here is a description of the usage of such a
building and the reasons why it would be beneficial at this location.
The indoor ball hockey surface is a specially designed space for playing the sport within the building. It
provides an ideal solution for year-round ball hockey, regardless of external weather conditions. Players
can engage in matches, training sessions, or simply have fun with friends in a safe and controlled
environment. The indoor surface is equipped with a suitable playing area, goals, lines, and all necessary
facilities for an optimal ball hockey experience.
The outdoor ball hockey surface is a valuable addition to the facility, offering players the opportunity to
enjoy the outdoors and play ball hockey under the sun. This surface is designed to replicate the
conditions of an outdoor rink, with a suitable playing area and appropriate equipment. Players can relish
the fresh air, the surrounding landscape, and a unique outdoor playing experience.
The lounge is a dedicated space for players and visitors to relax, socialize, and enjoy a friendly
atmosphere after games. This area can provide comfortable seating, refreshments, and entertainment
facilities. Players can gather in the lounge to discuss their performances, unwind with teammates, and
share moments of camaraderie after playing on both the indoor and outdoor ball hockey surfaces.
Installing such a building at 1660 Manawagonish Road, NB, offers numerous benefits. Firstly, it provides
a comprehensive solution for ball hockey players, who can take advantage of two distinct playing
surfaces to train, compete in matches, and enhance their skills regardless of weather conditions. This
configuration allows for consistent practice and contributes to player development.
Moreover, the location at 1660 Manawagonish Road offers geographical advantages. It is easily
accessible and situated close to residential areas, facilitating player and spectator participation. The
facility can become a central hub within the local community, fostering social cohesion and encouraging
active involvement from residents.
Lastly, the presence of the lounge creates a welcoming space for players and visitors. It promotes
exchanges, interactions, and social bonds, further strengthening the community of ball hockey
enthusiasts.
June 6, 2023
Good morning,
Mayor Reardon, Councillors, Greg Norton, Joanna Killen, Gary Sullivan, and Brent Harris,
seeking support and guidance on a community concern and am
therefore reaching out to my mayor,
Road
facility going up next door to me in the empty Road He also indicated that
this ,
proposed
and should remain so, the land sits
-
the proposed use for the land I cannot change in use
We are not in
support of a
as a commerciait impact our
community in many : from our quality of life, decreases in property values,
homes, increase noise , among other concerns
-game gatherings in the parking lot , loud
talking, drinking, very similar to tailgate es impact
The community standards program on the City of Saint John’s
Best regards,
506-609-0677
ΛƩĻĭĻźǝĻķ ǝźğ Ļƒğźƌ WǒƓĻ ЏͲ ЋЉЋЌΜ
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
From: Erin O'Brien <derintrainer@hotmail.com>
Sent: September 13, 2023 15:16
To: Lewallen, Thomas <Thomas.Lewallen@saintjohn.ca>
Subject: Section 39 Amendment, 1660 Manawagonish Road - Application No. 23-0129
\[ External Email Alert\]
Gspn;
Up;
Tvckfdu;
Ebuf;
From: Liam O'Brien <lpmobrien@gmail.com>
Sent: September 13, 2023 17:23
To: Lewallen, Thomas <Thomas.Lewallen@saintjohn.ca>; OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca>
Cc: Norton, Greg <greg.norton@saintjohn.ca>
Subject: Attn Planning Committee & Planners - Application No. 23-0129 - Section 39 Amendment,
1660 Manawagonish Road
\\!Fyufsobm!Fnbjm!Bmfsu^
Gspn;
Up;
Tvckfdu;
Ebuf;
Buubdinfout;
Jennifer Kirchner, RPP, MCIP
Manager, Community Planning / Gestionnaire, Service D’Urbanisme
Growth & Community Services / Services de la croissance et du développement communautaire
City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John
Cell / Cellulaire: (506) 639-7933
Website | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
From: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 5:04 PM
To: Planning Admin <planningadmin@saintjohn.ca>
Subject: FW: re Property Section 39 Amendment 1660 Manawagonish Road
Yeva Mattson
Planner, Community Planning / Urbaniste, Service D’Urbanisme
Growth and Community Services / Service de la croissance et de la communauté
City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John
Office / Bureau: (506) 721-8453
Website | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
From: M B <tc_ab@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:02 PM
To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca>
Cc: Lewallen, Thomas <Thomas.Lewallen@saintjohn.ca>
Subject: re Property Section 39 Amendment 1660 Manawagonish Road
\\!Fyufsobm!Fnbjm!Bmfsu^
Dear Planning Advisory Committee
Not long ago I signed a petition via Ms. Denise Johnston, Coronation Dr,
Island View Heights, regarding a plan to construct a sports arena (aka -
ball hockey recreation facility) on 1660 Manawagonish Road site. I work
full time with no coverage so was late in signing.
I have a home @ 400 Clearview Row, directly across from this lot and
am horrified the plan has changed from 'garden homes' as we were told
by the men who bought & cleared the site, to now a public sports
center.
I was thrilled when the derelict building, junk cars, old water slide and
mock 'jail'...etc...were removed! It was an eyesore and devalued
everyone's properties, especially mine with it in full view. A possible
buyer stated what an 'eyesore' you look at... so you can see I'm
concerned as to what is in my area and view yet again...
As you know, Isld Vw Heights is a 'bedroom' community with only a top-
notch elementary school at the back of Ridge Row with our homes. I
realize the lot in question may be more 'commercial' in nature, but if
garden homes are not built there (something 'baby boomers' need
now!), we all are affected by a sports arena.
It is a very quiet area with a great water view - hence "island VIEW" and
"clear VIEW" for our street names. The water view and quietness hold
huge 'value' for our properties for quality of life in a desired area. All
were thrilled to hear about the garden homes plan because they would
not impede the view, have like-minded home owners, and fill a housing
need that is imminent with retirees now.
Sound carries as I'm sure you are aware with the expensive, luxury
condos built on the water's edge near the Hilton uptown...sharing the
noise of the metal dump across the water! Sound will also carry with
cars coming and going, people's voices after a game, and I'm sure the
parking area will overflow to our streets bringing the noise closer.
I may not be able to attend pertinent meetings but I would ask you to
keep my email for the future response needed in the '10 day speak up
or shut up' pre-decision/approval for a sports arena on this site.
THANK YOU sincerely for 'hearing' what we are saying as I'm sure you
would feel the same if it was in 'your' neighbourhood.
Megan Brown, 400 Clearview Row, Island View Heights.
Reade, Mark
From:Planning Admin
Sent:September 19, 2023 9:30 AM
To:Reade, Mark
Subject:FW: PAC MEETING SEPT 19th and 1660 PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT TO 1660
MANAWAGONISH RD.
Attachments:20230918_162054.jpg; 20230918_162109.jpg; 20230918_162132.jpg; 20230918_115041.jpg;
petition.docx
Importance:High
JenniferKirchner,RPP,MCIP
Manager,CommunityPlanning/Gestionnaire,Service5 ƩĬğƓźƭƒĻ
Growth&CommunityServices/Servicesdelacroissanceetdudéveloppementcommunautaire
CityofSaintJohn/LaVilledeSaintJohn
Cell/Cellulaire:(506)6397933
Website|Facebook|Twitter|Instagram
From:OneStop<onestop@saintjohn.ca>
Sent:Monday,September18,20236:37PM
To:PlanningAdmin<planningadmin@saintjohn.ca>;Reade,Mark<mark.reade@saintjohn.ca>
Subject:FW:PACMEETINGSEPT19thand1660PROPOSEDZONINGAMENDMENTTO1660MANAWAGONISHRD.
Importance:High
FYI
Sincerely,
CarrieSmithBSc.,PTech
Manager,CustomerService&Operations/Gestionnaire,ServiceàlaClientèleetOpérations
GrowthandCommunityServices/ServicedelaCroissanceetdelaCommunauté
CityofSaintJohn/LaVilledeSaintJohn
Office/Bureau:(506)6584455
1
Cell/Cellulaire:(506)7211118
Website|Facebook|Twitter|Instagram
From:dcj13<dcj13@bell.net>
Sent:Monday,September18,20236:04PM
To:OneStop<onestop@saintjohn.ca>
Subject:PACMEETINGSEPT19thand1660PROPOSEDZONINGAMENDMENTTO1660MANAWAGONISHRD.
\[ExternalEmailAlert\]**Pleasenotethatthismessageisfromanexternalsender.Ifit
appearstobesentfromaSaintJohnemployee,pleaseforwardtheemailto
spamsample@saintjohn.caorcontactITServiceDeskat6496047.**
Totheattentionof:
MarkReade,SeniorPlanningOfficerandPACMembers
Kindlyacceptthispetition,comprisedofpagenarrativetogetherwith4pagesofsignaturesfromarearesidents.
**TimeSensitiveDocument**Mustbedeliveredbycloseofbusinesstoday,Sept18th.
Bestwishes,
DeniseJohnston
SentfrommyBellSamsungdeviceoverCanada'slargestnetwork.
2
Reade, Mark
From:M B <tc_ab@hotmail.com>
Sent:September 20, 2023 3:47 PM
To:City of Saint John Mayor's Office; MacKenzie, John; Harris, Brent; Sullivan, Gary; Killen, Joanna;
Norton, Greg; Ogden, Barry; Hickey, David; Lowe, Gerry; Radwan, Paula; Stewart, Greg
Cc:Lewallen, Thomas; Reade, Mark
Subject:follow up: Property Section 39 Amendment 1660 Manawagonish Rd
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
\[ExternalEmailAlert\]**Pleasenotethatthismessageisfromanexternalsender.Ifit
appearstobesentfromaSaintJohnemployee,pleaseforwardtheemailto
spamsample@saintjohn.caorcontactITServiceDeskat6496047.**
DearSaintJohnRepresentatives
WeneedyourwisdomandassistancetorepresentusaslocalSaintJohn
homeownersbecauseitseemsweareNOTbeingheardinmeetingsregarding
1660ManawagonishRd.
IfsomeonefromQuebeccanrandomlypickourhomestoplunkdownan
indoor/outdoorSportsBarcomplexinourbackyardsandtotallyignoreourhuge
concernsandquestions,thenwehaveNOhopebutourownlocalCityMayorand
Councillors(weelected)to'hear'ourplea.TheQuebecgentlemanevenadmitted
thathisplantodothesametootherhomeownersfamilyneighbourhoodswas
squashedseveraltimesforthesamereasonsbelow,sohehadtogotomore
industrial/commercialareastobuildSportsBararenas.Thisadmittanceshould
bringtheSAMEdecisionhere!
IaskyoutoprotectusfromthosewhowouldapprovethisplanwhodoNOTlive
affectedbytheirdecisiontoallowthis.Wewillandhave
besidenorwillbe
voicedwedonotwantitinourquietfamilyneighbourhood.Manyhavesigneda
petitionagainstthis.PLEASEchampionus!
THANKYOUSINCERELY,MeganBrown@400ClearviewRow,WestStJohn
1
From:MB
Sent:September19,20236:02AM
To:onestop<OneStop@saintjohn.ca>
Cc:thomas.lewallen@saintjohn.ca<thomas.lewallen@saintjohn.ca>
Subject:followup:PropertySection39Amendment1660ManawagonishRd
DearPlanningAdvisoryCommittee
Thankyoufortheinformationregardingtheproposalfor1660ManawagonishRdwhichnestlesamongour
homesinWestSaintJohn.Itisevenmoreconcerningtofindoutanopenarenawithexcitedparticipantsand
yellingfanswillalsofloodtheair,nottomentiona'rooftopBAR'inafamilyarea!
Nodoubtbrightfloodlights,likelyaPAsystemwithplaybyplay,announcementsandmusicwillpiercethe
silencebringingnoisetoourhomesineverydirection.Soundwillcarryasonecanhearadogbark,aleaf
blower,someone'smusic,andconversationsnow.I'msurewiththeBayview,thesportsbarwillwantan
openentertainmentareaaddingmorerevelryandliquourtothemixapredictablescenariowithalready
hypedparticipants.
Proposedparkingfor80carsandarequesttohavedirectaccesstoourhomeareaforoverflowparkingturns
ourquietneighbourhoodintoa'commercial'zone.Propertyvalueswillplummetandourwaterviewwillbe
goneformanyofus.
Iaskyoutopictureyourselflivingnexttoasportsbarfacilitybecauseifyouapproveandopenthiscanof
wormsnexttofamilyhomes,youwillnotbeabletoreseal,control,orcontaintheunpredictabilityyouhave
allowed...
MyproposalforaSportsBarComplexwouldbetobuilditonthe'GoldenMile'onFairvilleBlvd.where
structuresaremostlycommercialbuildingssurroundingtheentirestreet,notcrammednexttofamilyhomes.
THANKYOUforlisteningasI'msureyoucanunderstandourconcernsasahomeownerwhowouldwantto
keepyourquietneighbourhoodtoo.
Pleasesubmitforconsiderationatthemeeting.
Sincerely,MeganBrown,400ClearviewRow.
2
From:Renaud Barrière
To:Reade, Mark
Subject:Re: Additional Letters
Date:September 19, 2023 4:33:31 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image001.png
\[ External Email Alert\] **Please note that this message is from an external sender.
If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to
spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047.**
Well received.
On another hand, we made a petition for a Ball Hockey Center coming into SJ yesterday. It received more
than 500 James in 24 hours. We just wanted to see the support of the ball hockey community regarding our
project, here it is!
https://www.change.org/p/in-favor-of-a-ball-hockey-center-in-saint-john?
recruiter=1316755699&recruited_by_id=0b5768b0-5634-11ee-af42-
f5dd7cdfdbe2&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=share_for_starters_page&utm_medium=copylink
Le mar. 19 sept. 2023, 3 h 26 p.m., Reade, Mark <mark.reade@saintjohn.ca> a écrit :
Renaud, additional letters are attached regarding the application.
Mark Reade, P.Eng., MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner / Urbaniste Principal
Growth and Community Services / Service de la croissance et de la communauté
City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John
Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4455
Cell / Cellulaire: (506) 721-0736
Website | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
ЊЏЏЉ ağƓğǞğŭƚƓźƭŷ wƚğķͲ .ğƌƌ ŷƚĭƉĻǤ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ
A building housing both an indoor and an outdoor ball hockey surface, along with a lounge, offers a
comprehensive combination of facilities to cater to the needs of ball hockey players and sports
enthusiasts. This configuration provides practical and social advantages, making it an excellent idea to
install such a facility at 1660 Manawagonish Road, NB. Here is a description of the usage of such a
building and the reasons why it would be beneficial at this location.
The indoor ball hockey surface is a specially designed space for playing the sport within the building. It
provides an ideal solution for year-round ball hockey, regardless of external weather conditions. Players
can engage in matches, training sessions, or simply have fun with friends in a safe and controlled
environment. The indoor surface is equipped with a suitable playing area, goals, lines, and all necessary
facilities for an optimal ball hockey experience.
The outdoor ball hockey surface is a valuable addition to the facility, offering players the opportunity to
enjoy the outdoors and play ball hockey under the sun. This surface is designed to replicate the
conditions of an outdoor rink, with a suitable playing area and appropriate equipment. Players can relish
the fresh air, the surrounding landscape, and a unique outdoor playing experience.
The lounge is a dedicated space for players and visitors to relax, socialize, and enjoy a friendly
atmosphere after games. This area can provide comfortable seating, refreshments, and entertainment
facilities. Players can gather in the lounge to discuss their performances, unwind with teammates, and
share moments of camaraderie after playing on both the indoor and outdoor ball hockey surfaces.
Installing such a building at 1660 Manawagonish Road, NB, offers numerous benefits. Firstly, it provides
a comprehensive solution for ball hockey players, who can take advantage of two distinct playing
surfaces to train, compete in matches, and enhance their skills regardless of weather conditions. This
configuration allows for consistent practice and contributes to player development.
Moreover, the location at 1660 Manawagonish Road offers geographical advantages. It is easily
accessible and situated close to residential areas, facilitating player and spectator participation. The
facility can become a central hub within the local community, fostering social cohesion and encouraging
active involvement from residents.
Lastly, the presence of the lounge creates a welcoming space for players and visitors. It promotes
exchanges, interactions, and social bonds, further strengthening the community of ball hockey
enthusiasts.
#7.(342#1.(75#1.(7
#4.(9#1.(:3#:.(9
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
FVTTJ
tsvfvpktfedobc
#1.(7
FVTTJFVTTJ
sbc
FVTTJ
#1.(12
FVTTJ
#4.(14#:.(23
#1.(36
tsvfvpktfedobc
FVTTJ
#4.(14#:.(23
#1.(36
#9.(32#5.(22#1.(3
#1.(53#1.(3
#1.(2
#9.(7#5.(22
#1.(53
Proposed Section 39Amendment
RE: 1660 Manawagonish Road
Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to
consider amending Section 39 conditions at its regular meeting to be held in the Council
Chambers on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., by:
1. Amending the Section 39 conditions imposed on a parcel of land on the March 20, 1991,
rezoning of 1660 Manawagonish Road, also identified as PID numbers 00402727 and
55076335, to permit the development of a ball hockey recreation facility.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
To permit the development of a ball hockey recreation facility.
For details on how to inspect the amendment, or to register to participate, please contact the
Office of the Common Clerk at CommonClerk@saintjohn.ca. Written objections to the
amendment may be provided in writing and/or verbally at the Public Hearing to be held by
Common Council. To register for participation in the hearing, please
Office in advance at commonclerk@saintjohn.ca
If you require French services for a Common Council meeting, please contact the office of the
Common Clerk.
Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk
(506) 658-2862
39
Objet : 1660, chemin Manawagonish
Par les présentes, un avis public est donné par lequel le conseil communal de The City of Saint
John indique son intention de modifier des conditions de l'article 39, lors de la réunion ordinaire
qui se tiendra dans la salle du conseil le mardi, 3 octobre 2023 à 18 h 30, en apportant les
modifications suivantes :
1. Modification des conditions de l'article 39 imposées relativement au changement de
zonage du 20 mars 1991, de la propriété située au 1660, chemin Manawagonish,
également identifié comme les NID 00402727 et 55076335, pour permettre la
construction d'une installation récréative de hockey-balle.
RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION:
Permettre la construction d'une installation récréative de hockey-balle.
CommonClerk@saintjohn.ca
Si vous souhaitez obtenir des services en français, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier
communal.
Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal
(506) 658-2862
Manawagonish Road Public Hearing
Submitted on Tue, 09/26/2023 - 13:56
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Jane
Last name
Bell
the public
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
1660 Manawagonish Road
I would like Council to deny the Amendment. A ball hockey arena does not below in a primarily
Mayor and Common Councillors:
My name is Jane Bell. I live on Clear View Row in Island View Heights, very near the proposed ball hockey
arena. My family has lived in this home for 60+ years.
the increased noise an
a commercial or industrial area away from people’s homes.
that Mr. Barriere owns and runs in Quebec are from 12pm to 1 am. It should be noted that this rink is in
The proposed outdoor rink is to have a public address system, lights and bleachers for spectators.
Residents in my neighbourhood will have noise blaring from the PA system(including playing loud music
our quiet neighbourhood well into the
ev
in their yards enjoying the warm weather. The PA system at Memorial Field can be easily heard on
nearby streets in the Greendale area. Adding alcohol from the indoor lounge with an indoor lounge (as
with players “blowing of steam”, , as they currently do at the L
p
There will also be a problem with parking. When tournaments or special events are held, I fear that
Island View Heights will
Island View Heights has a sidewalk. If cars end up parked on both sides of the road, people will end up
walking in the middle of the street. Also, with cars parked on both sides of the streets, the passing of
emerg
pre-selected parking will work..
For these reasons, I am not in favour of at ball hockey arena being built at 1660 Manawagonish Road.
Jane Bell
Submitted on Mon, 09/25/2023 - 21:21
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Stephen
Last name
1660 Manawagonish Rd Proposal
If you do not wish to have your personal
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Proposal of 1660 Manawagonish Rd
Denial of proposal on 1660 Manawagonish Rd
Dear Mayor Reardon & Council,
I oppose the new proposed plan for a new ball hockey facility at 1660 Manawagonish Rd.
I live at 1680 Manawagonish Rd. Our neighborhood has a this goes
cay the council members that said community has voted in.
These unanswered phone calls and disregard for this community's concern will be remembered.
This community does not support this plan for several reasons. This would be 20-page document if I
were to list every single item, so I'm going to start with the most important.
-rink ball hockey facility on a property of this size there will certainly be parking
where will the extra vehicles go to? The neighborhood streets
that is where. Once these cars are parked on the side streets, it will make walking, jogging, and bicycle
riding a dangerous task. Forcing these cars to park on side streets puts the children and elderly forced
into the middle of the
The owner of the property of 1660 Manawagonish Rd has said the outdoor ball hockey hours will be
from 5:30 PM to 11:00 PM this means from 8:30 PM to 11:00 PM we will have to endure bright LED
lights shining into our homes. The lights will not be the only thing keeping this neighborhood up, hollow
Along with that there will be another reason this neighborhood will be sleepless, the cheering
intoxicated fan base.
the property being damaged by intoxicated fans. There is nothing stopping our neighborhood from being
vandalized by the intoxicated fanbase within 100 feet of our homes. The same residence that has had
unanswered.
If this facility gets approved in a community that
il members Morales and where they lie for the
community that voted them in. I hope you get to read this, and I hope it brings light to how serious this
Thank you.
Submitted on Mon, 09/25/2023 - 20:55
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Allison
Last name
Estabrooks
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Proposal 1660 Manawagonish Rd
Dear Mayor Reardon & Council,
nds you well. I am reaching out as I have many concerns regarding the proposed plan for
property beside 1660 Manawagonish Rd and add a granny suit for my mother in law (as she currently
owns the home) this proposal brings many concerns as someone who has been around the ball hockey
community for a few years to start the games currently take place at the LBR in which the parking lot is
always full as games tak park at the Holiday
Inn Express & Suites.The property at the LBR is far bigger than the one at 1660 Manawagonish Rd, that
alone shows that there is not enough parking as Mark Reid said at the end
spots may not be enough as I ens
between benches (to which I have videos of). This concerns me as being next door to an outdoor facility I
fear this is
hearing those things clear as day during the base ball games they have also spoke about things that have
he city will not do anything about it. Another
taken photos to prove this happens. I know they say having a liquor license will stop that but it doesn't.
I know when we met ng took place and they
to the public to use whenever so how can he assure that nobody from the public will go and use the
me he says it's closed, there is no way to assure us that it will not happen.
Submitted on Tue, 09/26/2023 - 14:53
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Liam
Last name
O'Brien
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Section 39 Amendment for 1660
Please do not approve Section 39 Amendment for 1660 Manawagonish Road. Or if you must, please
ensure proper and full mitigation of sound, security and privacy concerns of the immediate neighbours
of the site using a higher fully opaquer sound barrier wall.
Our back yard shares a property line with 1660 Manawagonish Road. We are one of the most directly
affected properties by the proposed development that requires the section 39 amendment.
Please accept this email as my formal objection and expression of concern and opposition to the
proposed changes for the 1660 Manawagonish site. To be clear, I am a strong supporter of welcoming a
ball hockey facility to Saint John. However, this location is not presently suited to this development, at
least not as presently proposed.
We purchased our property in 2021. We purchased it on the understanding that it was a relatively quiet
residential area and with an understanding that there was a fair degree of privacy for us in our back
new use will be very different in effect than any recent use in recent years. We are concerned for the
safety, tranquility and value of our property. More specifically:
Sound is a major concern. The proposal would lead to a facility with large quantities of not necessarily
local people moving in and out of that site at various hours. By its nature, like any public building, it will
also attract loiterers - this may be stemmed and controlled somewhat during hours of usage. However,
in the off-hour period, the problem is left for those who share a property line to experience and deal
with. Sound from this site will not be limited to activity on its "outside" playing surface (which is still not
that far from our property - a few dozen meters). The plan is for a liquor license that would see
beverage alcohol served at the facility until hours approaching midnight. That means a closing time and
people subsequently pouring out of this building at a very late hour. These will be significant sources for
sound and disturbance given that the property is directly on the other side of the back fence of us and
our neighbours on Coronation Avenue. Sound should be addressed honestly and with the full context of
what can and usually does happen in reality with all its context and not just what the proponents see as
the ideal or intended use and activity.
There is also the subject of construction noise. My wife and I work from home - our home is the site of
our home offices. We cannot do our work in the noise of a construction zone with unmitigated noise.
Security is another major concern. As already mentioned, these plans will lead to a lot more human
activity on lands immediate
erection of a sufficiently tall and secure fence to prevent any loiterers or others frequenting the site
from attempting to cross into our back yards. It's a concern for a reason. We each know of residents
elsewhere who face this kind of trespass when living beside such facilities and buildings. As it stands,
even during the Sept 19 PAC discussions, the estimates for parking even as -described by city staff sound
at best optimistic. Where does parking overflow go? Along Manawagonish? Or along Coronation and
on our properties as there are no sidewalks on Coronation. All of this leads to greater liklihood of
overflow visitors to the lot parking on our street, cutting across or along our property in order to access
the lot. We are already dissatisfied with police response to some property indcidents on our street and
in the general neigbbourhood.
Privacy is probably our largest concern. Presently and going forward the users of 1660 and anyone else
who happens onto that lot will be able to see into our back yards. This is not a problem or a situation we
anticipated when we purchased our property. At a minimum we would expect that a taller opaque
sound barrier would be constructed out of respect for ourselves and other residents of Coronation
hood.
At the end of the Sept 19 PAC Committee meeting, The committee supported a revised
recommendation with revisions related to the following conditions to help mitigate some of the
aforementioned concerns:
-Retention of bordering vegetation on all sides (acknowledged and understood and included eventually -
we support this)
-Removal of staff recommendation re pedestrian path to/from clearview (acknowledged and
understood and included eventually - we support this change too and oppose any such path)
-Requirement for the landscaping plan to include a plan for fencing on all sides that would be of a nature
City planning staff, after being asked several times by committee members to incorporate this third
aspect instead offered language that would allow for fences "or" plantings "or" "a combination of both."
Plantings are fine and may well be something to include as a separate and additional condition.
However, plantings and fences are not interchangeable in purpose - certainly not for purposes of full
privacy, security and addressing the overall dignity of the neighbourhood. Committee chair would not
permit any public participants to raise points of any kind about this very last minute dilution. So I
subsequently emailed the chair, councillor Lowe and the staff person who has supported the overall
process. I did receive a response, I do not feel it addressed the concern about what the committee was
seeking to include in the recommendation. I believe any public participants in that meeting will have
noticed the same, and the same would be confirmed by the recording.
One of the other recommendations of the PAC chair was that the proponents of the project reach out to
members of the neighbourhood after the Sept 19 meeting. (We had not received any communication
from the proponents up to that time). In fairness, the proponents of the project did contact and discuss
the property with us on two separate occasions in the intervening days. I also understand there was a
meeting of a group of residents at the site itself. In the course of discussions with the proponents we
once again expressed our concerns about sound, security and privacy and the need for mitigation along
the entire length of the property line we would share. All these problems should be considered in full
realistic context and not just ideal/intended use of the facility. The proponents asked us what we would
suggest for this mitigation. Initially, we were unsure of what options might exist beyond the general
suggestions raised at PAC.
a taller sound barrier fence like the options available here
https://www.groupe4s.ca/noise-barriers
in particular in the residential section under noise barriers. The "wood-style" or possibly another natural
colour option would fit the aesthetic of the proposed facility and the neighbourhood . This barrier or
something comparable from some other source erected the length of our shared property line would
significantly mitigate privacy, security and sound concerns. This suggestion was met with resistance and
skepticism about in particular our greater noise concerns. The proponent appears to believe that the
noise to be mitigate relates only to parking and internal/external play surfaces; we take a different view.
Sound will obviously include those sources but also general presence of people all over the lot to one
extent or the other, as well as factors like the presence of a bar that will sell alcohol to a late hour and
then have people departing after closing time out onto the property at a very late hour, as well as
inevitable loitering that comes with such a public space.
Given these factors, we believe the best mitigation would be taller fully opaque sound barriers the
length of our shared property.
Another option that was discussed was to apply "screening" to the existing chainlink fence that
separates our properties. The proponent did suggest that "screening" plus planting cedar hedge would
be sufficient mitigation. This raises some questions and concerns, namely:
- the current plain fence is insufficiently high to obscure viewplanes from our home, including large back
windows, steps deck, patio all above the level closest to the fenceline.
- Any cedar plantings would be best to run the entire property line, however, their success would
depend on maintenance and protection from wildlife who frequently tin cedars in all lots in the area. It
would also mean no solution in reality until they grow high enough unless sufficiently tall transplants
were possible to reduce the time until they gain effect. These are all commitments the proponent would
have to make - for the long term - ideally in some enforceable recorded way.
- the existing chain link fence in no way addresses PAC committee members' concerns and interest in
seeing a barrier that reflected/improved on the dignity of the neighbourhood.
Screening and planting would be a less effective mitigation, however its best shot at working would be
that fences and hedges would be as high as possible as soon as possible, that hedges and fences would
run the entire shared property line, and that all of this would be sufficiently maintained and allowed to
become a true sight/sound/security barrier at all practical viewplanes.
We appreciate the proponent reaching-out. We stand by our view of the problem and how to best
mitigate it.
We do take issue with some other points raised during PAC. There seemed to be some circular logic
applied that if section 39 conditions were not present this would be a simple approval. This seems to
presume great wisdom in some zoning that had to be applied after certain structures and realities of the
neighbourhood already existed. The fact is the site has not been a building of higher traffic, alcohol
serving, greater noise profile in any recent use. Hence our original point - you're making a large
fundamental change that will likely give future property buyers pause about wanting such a place on the
other side of their back fence.
Also, the subject of "mixed community" and "mixed planning" did come up at PAC. This argument
usually relates to mixtures of much more common usage facilities and residential areas. The proposal,
while interesting, is a boutique sport facility and not really part of typical general use recreation. The
added dimension of beverage alcohol service also further complicates the matter and weakens mixed
community arguments.
The residents of the neighbourhood have been fairly unform in their support to have the city welcome
such a facility into the city.There have also been some very significant concerns raised.
As the owner of one the properties most closely affected, I have been as clear as possible about our
concerns and how they can be best mitigated.
Thank-You to the council for allowing me to submit on this matter.
-Liam O'Brien
nd
2 letter from Liam O’Brien
My name is Liam O'Brien. I reside at 30 Coronation Avenue. Our back yard shares a property line
with 1660 Manawagonish Road. We are one of the properties most directly affected by the proposed
development that requires the section 39 amendment.
Please accept this email as my formal objection and expression of concern and opposition to the
proposed changes for the 1660 Manawagonish site. To be clear, I am a strong supporter of welcoming a
ball hockey facility to Saint John. However, this location is not presently suited to this development, at
least not as presently proposed.
We purchased our property in 2021. We purchased it on the understanding that it was a relatively quiet
residential area and with an understanding that there was a fair degree of privacy for us in our back
he neighborhood. The
new use will be very different in effect than any recent use in recent years. We are concerned for the
safety, tranquility and value of our property. More specifically:
Sound is a major concern. The proposal would lead to a facility with large quantities of not
necessarily local people moving in and out of that site at various hours. By its nature, like any
public building, it will also attract loiterers - this may be stemmed and controlled somewhat
during hours of usage. However, in the off-hour period, the problem is left for those who
share a property line to experience and deal with. Sound from this site will not be limited to
activity on its "outside" playing surface (which is still not that far from our property - a few
dozen meters). The plan is for a liquor license that would see beverage alcohol served at the
facility until hours approaching midnight. That means a closing time and people subsequently
pouring out of this building at a very late hour. These will be significant sources for sound and
disturbance given that the property is directly on the other side of the back fence of us and
our neighbours on Coronation Avenue. Sound should be addressed honestly and with the
what the proponents see as the ideal or intended use an
There is also the subject of construction noise. My wife and I work from home - our home is
the site of our home offices. We cannot do our work in the noise of a construction zone with
unmitigated noise.
Security is another major concern. As already mentioned, these plans will lead to a lot more
human activity on lands immediately adjacent to ours at varying ho
discussed for the erection of a sufficiently tall and secure fence to prevent any loiterers or
others frequenting the site from attempting to cross into our back yards. It's a concern for a
reason. We each know of residents elsewhere who face this kind of trespass when living
beside such facilities and buildings. As it stands, even during the Sept 19 PAC discussions, the
estimates for parking even as -described by city staff sound at best optimistic. Where does
parking overflow go? A
permitted, but but we already face chronic issues with illegal parking and trespass on our
properties as there are no sidewalks on Coronation. All of this leads to greater liklihood of
overflow visitors to the lot parking on our street, cutting across or along our property in order
to access the lot. We are already dissatisfied with police response to some property
indcidents on our street and in the general neigbbourhood.
Privacy is probably our largest concern. Presently and going forward the users of 1660 and
anyone else who happens onto that lot will be able to see into our back yards. This is not a
problem or a situation we anticipated when we purchased our property. At a minimum we
would expect that a taller opaque sound barrier would be constructed out of respect for
ourselves and other residents of Coronation a
At the end of the Sept 19 PAC Committee meeting, The committee supported a revised
recommendation with revisions related to the following conditions to help mitigate some of the
aforementioned concerns:
-Retention of bordering vegetation on all sides (acknowledged and understood and included eventually -
we support this)
-Removal of staff recommendation re pedestrian path to/from clearview (acknowledged and
understood and included eventually - we support this change too and oppose any such path)
-Requirement for the landscaping plan to include a plan for fencing on all sides that would be of a nature
to address not only security but privacy of adjacent residences (NOT correctly/sufficiently included)
City planning staff, after being asked several times by committee members to incorporate this third
aspect instead offered language that would allow for fences "or" plantings "or" "a combination of both."
Plantings are fine and may well be something to include as a separate and additional condition.
However, plantings and fences are not interchangeable in purpose - certainly not for purposes of full
privacy, security and addressing the overall dignity of the neighbourhood. Committee chair would not
permit any public participants to raise points of any kind about this very last minute dilution. So I
subsequently emailed the chair, councillor Lowe and the staff person who has supported the overall
process. I did receive a response, I do not feel it addressed the concern about what the committee was
seeking to include in the recommendation. I believe any public participants in that meeting will have
noticed the same, and the same would be confirmed by the recording.
One of the other recommendations of the PAC chair was that the proponents of the project reach out to
members of the neighbourhood after the Sept 19 meeting. (We had not received any communication
from the proponents up to that time). In fairness, the proponents of the project did contact and discuss
the property with us on two separate occasions in the intervening days. I also understand there was a
meeting of a group of residents at the site itself. In the course of discussions with the proponents we
once again expressed our concerns about rivacy and the need for mitigation
along the entire length of the property line we would share. All these problems should be considered
in full realistic context and not just ideal/intended use of the facility. The proponents asked us what we
would suggest for this mitigation. Initially, we were unsure of what options might exist beyond the
general suggestions raised at PAC.
mitigation. I suggested a taller sound barrier fence like the options available here:
https://www.groupe4s.ca/noise-barriers
in particular in the residential section under noise barriers. The "wood-style" or possibly another natural
colour option would fit the aesthetic of the proposed facility and the neighbourhood . This barrier or
something comparable from some other source erected the length of our shared property line would
significantly mitiga. This suggestion was met with resistance
and skepticism about in particular our greater noise concerns. The proponent appears to believe that
the noise to be mitigate relates only to parking and internal/external play surfaces; we take a different
view. Sound will obviously include those sources but also general presence of people all over the lot to
one extent or the other, as well as factors like the presence of a bar that will sell alcohol to a late hour
and then have people departing after closing time out onto the property at a very late hour, as well as
inevitable loitering that comes with such a public space.
Given these f
le
Another option that was discussed was to apply "screening" to the existing chainlink fence that
separates our properties. The proponent did suggest that "screening" plus planting cedar hedge would
be sufficient mitigation. This raises some questions and concerns, namely:
- the current plain fence is insufficiently high to obscure viewplanes from our home, including large back
windows, steps deck, patio all above the level closest to the fenceline.
- Any cedar plantings would be best to run the entire property line, however, their success would
depend on maintenance and protection from wildlife who frequently tin cedars in all lots in the area. It
would also mean no solution in reality until they grow high enough unless sufficiently tall transplants
were possible to reduce the time until they gain effect. These are all commitments the proponent would
have to make - for the long term - ideally in some enforceable recorded way.
- the existing chain link fence in no way addresses PAC committee members' concerns and interest in
seeing a barrier that reflected/improved on the dignity of the neighbourhood.
Screening and planting would be a less effective mitigation, however its best shot at working would be
that fences and hedges would be as high as possible as soon as possible, that hedges and fences would
run the entire shared property line, and that all of this would be sufficiently maintained and allowed to
become a true sight/sound/security barrier at all practical viewplanes.
We appreciate the proponent reaching-out. We stand by our view of the problem and how to best
mitigate it.
We do take issue with some other points raised during PAC. There seemed to be some circular logic
applied that if section 39 conditions were not present this would be a simple approval. This seems to
presume great wisdom in some zoning that had to be applied after certain structures and realities of the
neighbourhood already existed. The fact is the site has not been a building of higher traffic, alcohol
serving, greater noise profile in any recent use. Hence our original point - you're making a large
fundamental change that will likely give future property buyers pause about wanting such a place on the
other side of their back fence.
Also, the subject of "mixed community" and "mixed planning" did come up at PAC. This argument
usually relates to mixtures of much more common usage facilities and residential areas. The proposal,
while interesting, is a boutique sport facility and not really part of typical general use recreation. The
added dimension of beverage alcohol service also further complicates the matter and weakens mixed
community arguments.
The residents of the neighbourhood have been fairly uniform in their support to have the city welcome
such a facility into the city.They also raise very fair concerns about this site.
As the owner of one of the properties most closely affected, I have been as clear as possible about our
concerns and how they can be best mitigated.
Thank-You to the council for allowing me to submit on this matter.
-Liam O'Brien
Submitted on Sun, 09/24/2023 - 19:17
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Megan
Last name
Brown
Island View Heights Homeowners
pleas
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Regarding the proposal for 1660 Manawagonish Rd which nestles among our homes in West Saint John,
AR in a family area!
Plus the Quebec gentlemen hope to host WORLD championships here, and to expand!
the silence bringing noise to our homes in every don. Sound will carry as one can hear a dog bark, a
want an open entertainment area adding more revelry and liquour to the mix - a predictable scenario
with
-1 lead by Mark Reade who even
earview Row homes for added parking! The Quebec gentlemen said they did
next to their homes?! Property values will plummet and our water view will be gone for many of us.
While we all CELEBRATE a new sport for youth in St John, we propose a Sports Bar Complex would best
be built in a commercial zone like the 'Golden Mile' area on Fairville Blvd or elsewhere, even on vacant
ctures
street, not crammed next to family homes.
We need your wisdom and assistance to represent us as local Saint John homeowners because it seems
ng 1660 Manawagonish Rd. We trust our own
City Council will read 'between the lines' of this "deal" because I'm sure none of you would want a Sports
Many Island View homeowners met with the 2 Quebec proposed buyers, the 2nd sellers, someone
as to why we were lied to about building garden homes (we all approved) *threatened* if we "didn't
accept the Sport BAR complex with outdoor and indoor areas, we'd be looking at a 70 unit apartment
to other homeowner's family
decision here!
I ask you to pro
- and have voiced we do not want it in our quiet family
E champion us!
who then lied and didn't honour the agreement. The 2nd sellers don't seem to care what our concerns
are - - then drive away to their
homes.
A real issue is the cemetery next door where many come to pray/'talk' to loved ones, have special
when a death will happen. The plans include an outdoor arena on the cemetery side where lights, PA
system, music, revelry by players and fans will happen
grief. Adding alcohol to the mix was also a huge concern - buyers gave views on helping kids in sports so
away! This is not good for many
reasons, especially in a family area.
-4 acres of dry commercial land because they told us
they are open and willing to keep looking knowing we are so upset to have our home area
'commercialized'.
for listening as I'm sure you can understand our concerns as a homeowner who would want
to keep your quiet neighbourhood too. I ask you to picture yourself living next to a sports bar facility
approve and open this can of worms
next to family homes, you will not be able to reseal, control, or contain the unpredictability you have
allowed...
Please do not allow an outdoor and indoor Sports BAR complex with World Championship host
in Island View Heights and the Veterans cemetery next door. Thank you.
Submitted on Wed, 09/27/2023 - 09:33
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
George & Carol
Last name
Vair
the public r
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
George and Carol Vair live at 1815 Manawagonish
on the former property of the Blind Home. We see no sound reason why this proposal should not go
ahead and that it would be an asset for the Westside and the youth that live in the area.
Submitted on Wed, 09/27/2023 - 16:30
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Karen
Last name
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Road.
To hear our concerns and support us as members of the Saint John Community.
Mayor Reardon and Members of Common Council
adjacent to 1660 Manawagonish Road.
property at 1660 Manawagonish Road and the intent to build a Ball Hockey Facility. I am not opposed to
the sport of Ball Hockey but t
trust will consider the signatures of community members dir
impose this proposed use as a Ball Hockey Facility with one indoor and one outdoor arena and a Liquor
Lounge.
e
involved in bringing this large venture to our neighborhood, as relayed to one of our community
members, is that common council will vote in favor of this proposal and that this is a done deal.
Although it has felt this way I would like to believe in our
media, the belief that the decision has already been made.
Our council members must remember who elected them and drown out the voices from far and beyond.
without knowing this community and the impact this facility will have on our lives.
Our councillors must hear what WE are saying......we support ball hock
for this venture. We acknowledge and support growth but to pass this proposal contrary to what is best
for the neighborhood most impacted will be a travesty. Ball Hockey will grow in Saint John, however,
needs to be de
community.
My major concerns:
our homes, the noises that will disrupt our sleep and decrease the enjoyment of our homes especially
outside. Houses immediately border this property, and we will have to absorb the cost of privacy,
The Lord
number of cars that can park its lot would be 150 plus. They also have access to possibly another 150
rking.
parking lot during regular games. The property at 1660 Manawagonish Road does not have the physical
capacity nor space to house all of those cars.
designated Handicapped Parking Spaces, there by reducing the number of available spots down from 80
as there require more space.
This proposed facility at 1660 Manawagonish Road has parking for 80 vehicles, not enough for the
ons for our residents, they
spots at this facility. This is obviou
-6
months of the year and only 2-
members contend that they have no complaints fr
rink that mirror our complaints. The residents spoke of excessive noise from the cheering, the
loud
rse will we have with a
lots having a beer to stop drinking and leave.
Manawagonish Road, nor do they have Liquor Lounges nor bright lights meaning that the hours are not
late, and they are seasonal.
I need to say that in this community many residents are in bed by 9 pm., imposing this change to zoning
our way of life.
More growth will happen for the cit
commercial or industrial area. Instead of one property being developed, two will be developed and a
-
This is
immersed neighbor with families relying on the quiet backdrop they chose for their loved ones. They did
they visit gravesites.
associated with this business.
– 9:oo
There are a couple of motels that are family run and part of the community with not much business
There is an elementary school in Island View Heights with a
s use the highway below. This is not an auxiliary
Again, I live at 1680 Manawagonish Road immediately adjacent to this property.
our community must move itself to live in such adversity when the developer has plans f
use of the property at 1660 should this proposal not go through. This would be a win- win for everyone
involved, the community retains its way of life, the developer makes his money and Ball Hockey will
thrive on a larger parcel of land wher-night partying into the early
tec
impacted.
uality of life. These
concerns will not be felt or impact community members if Ball Hockey were to be located in a more
commercial or industrial site.
There exists may other parcels of land which will allow ball hockey to grow in Saint John and we have
sh
community and many are not even living in Saint John.
to house and contain will be an enormou
house and contain will stretch us to our limits.
Manawagonish Road runs through our community which starts to be busy when people leave for work,
school, the school busses do their run and again at the end of the day when buses make their last runs to
uiet again by 8:45am It is not an arterial to a
highway.
ity life in
general.
members from an owner who has not had success with this model in his own province, but our city will
allow him to move forward. To r
to lightly zoned industrial area.
Again, this type of facility should be in a more commercial or industrial area (as the Quebec owner has
We do not need nor welcome all that comes with housing a facility bringing a liquor lounge to our
nd privacy concerns.
ng loved ones’ graves to have
on a place
this is the case despite the fact that we will be the ones having to live with the consequence of decisions
being made based on money.
The comparison to Curling clubs with
(Even with denying the proposal of building the Ball Hockey Facility at 1660 Manawagonish Road)
much like Mr. Barriere did in Quebec. (Ball Hockey is big in Saint John, they want to be
here because of the players, the sport and because Gary Crossman is such an advocate, they will not
Growth will happen, -the developer, Mike Boyle has said he will build an apartment building should this
proposal not go through on this land.
Growth will happen-Mr. Renaud Barriere will develop the Facility in an area within Saint John that is
Growth will happen - - 1680 Manawagonish
Road
Growth will happen- my son will buy my house and grow this community and his family.
commercial or industrial area. Instead of one property being developed, two will be developed and a
-
industrial zones
East Saint John in the area of the Field House, knowing that
area.
I als
drive or have access to a drive and depend on bus service.
Submitted on Thu, 09/28/2023 - 04:08
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Denise
Last name
Johnston
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
City Municipal Plan to "Grow the
revenues for the Ci
ball hockey facility at 1660 Manawagonish Rd.
occ
To locate an untested sport facility next to a peaceful, stable, mature neighbourhood is an experiment
fraught with risk, over which residents will have no recourse and uncertain support from the City.
Residents of Island View Heights and environs fully support and applaud the applicant's desire to locate
on.
Sept. 27, 2003
Mayor Reardon and Esteemed Councillors:
Growth at any cost is not responsible growth. An untested facility immediately adjacent a mature
F
from the beginning.
This property was sold to current owners in good faith on the understanding that garden
l was the August 31st
-
ld be too expensive. Shortly
Cedar Hill Extension Cemeter
Island View (the applicant eagerly described how they hope to establish training camps and regular
ested student numbers.
ers on Dexter Drive, the street behind this sportplex
were canvassed. Yes, current residents occupy these homes with the knowledge a sports facility was
tes
to install black-out
occurrence and there are recurring nights when players deliberately hit rocks into the back walls of
homes causing damage and req
through for visual privacy deteriorates quickly and is useless if viewed on the diagonal. Deer eat cedars.
Personal enjoyment of one’s own backyard on game nights is impossible. Repeated calls to City Hall
Furthermore, residents eagerly sig
their own circumstances.
-Industrial zoned areas.
area. Why would Common Council knowingly
ignore this precedent?
is item has
been removed.
be useless as stated above), the PAC failed to react to correct this.
This neighbourhood area already includes a grocery store, take out restaurants, pharmacy, cemetery,
animal ho
d ball hockey facility complement this already unique and complete
neighbourhood community?
-Industrial zoned areas.
ea. Why would Common Council knowingly
ignore this precedent?
hieve
We are very much outnumbered by misinformed masses who are not listening when we say that we fully
support this sport facility …in a non-
e majority of Councillors, including in Ward 1, have been unavailable.
has been very limited.
It is also truly unfortunate to realize that standard prepara
ns should be imposed to protect and support
residents.
Best wishes,
Denise Johnston
Submitted on Thu, 09/28/2023 - 00:29
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Rania
Last name
Malik
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Impact of re-zoning of 1660 Manawagonish Road
The purpose of this submission is to summarize the feedback the west side community has on the
proposed redevelopment of the lot at 1660 Manawagonis
-
the west side community.
Letter for Common Council:
Many of our neighbours and I attended a Planning Advisory Meeting last week about the property at
1660 Manawagonish Road.
My family sold this property in Sept 2022. We trusted a close family friend (a Remax agent), who assisted
us in selling this property to Mike Boyle, the owner of Remax. We were assured that the developer had
the intent to build townhouses, garden homes, or condos. These were likely to be developed based on
zoning. If so, we were told that our parents would have the opportunity to buy a property at cost plus
5%. As our father was newly disabled, after a traumatic brain injury, it seemed it would be a good idea to
have him close to us. I reside within a few minutes of the property.
We did not expect this type of usage or rezoning of the property. In our decision to sell the property, we
had disclosed to our realtor that as we live in the area, we did not want a large commercial development
that would negatively impact the community.
There are many better suited areas to such a pursuit as ball hockey and many decommissioned rinks. The
neighbours have also come together and have helped to find other suitable locations and real estate for
Mr. Renaud Barriere through their own contacts and have been passing them on to him. If it is built at
1660 Manawagonish Road, this will cause a massive increase in noise, lighting pollution, traffic, as well as
destroying sight lines.
I think it is wonderful that they want to encourage young people to come and get involved in sports. But
their request for a liquor license feels contradictory. It lends the feeling that this is meant more for adult
patrons, than for young kids.
Renaud Barrière (the applicant) has stated that he will limit the operating hours from 5 to 11 pm, “except
for shoot outs and overtime”, but there will also be an outside rink with bleachers that will be open to
the public. His rinks in Quebec do not have these restricted operating hours. They open in the morning
and close at 12 a.m. or 1 a.m. I am doubtful that he would be able to keep these hours if he needed to
maintain a certain amount of revenue.
They are talking about bringing in national and international events to the community. If that is the case,
there is not enough parking or access. It will cause traffic on small residential side streets that don’t even
have sidewalks. This part of the city barely has city transit service (or snow clearing in the winter).
The property also borders a cemetery. I believe it would be troubling to visitors and for funerals and
processions. Outdoor games going on with cheering while the departed are being put to rest. The
Executive Director of Cedar Hill Cemetery also attended the PAC meeting and was firmly against it. There
is a growing community petition from neighbours that are protesting the arenas being built on
Manawagonish Road.
At the PAC meeting, the topic of the Peter Murray Arena and Memorial Field was raised. PAC Committee
members, Mark Reade and Matthew Daluz had stated that they were not aware of any complaints from
folks who live near these facilities. They stated that the houses around the ball field had not shared any
concerns or complaints on their quality of life.
I believe that this project was approved at the PAC meeting with inappropriate context. We have had
community members visiting Milford and Greendale, and are hearing about the disruptions and
damages encountered from the local baseball field (mentioned in more detail below). Karen Guenette
and Denise Johnstonwent to these houses and spoke to the people who live there.
One house had encountered damage to the siding of their house after players were using rocks as
baseballs, and hitting them against the side of their house. One house had been damaged from people
and it is very bright due to the lights. One family had to put up room darkening curtains so their
- and
people still park along the side streets. These folks have signed our petition and left their contact
information. They have also complained to the City of Saint John.
When people moved into those neighbourhoods in the Greendale area, they were aware of the ball
field, tennis courts and hockey rinks. The community was grown around those. This is the impact from
ear-round establishment with a liquor
license.
These residents shared our concerns and agreed that our neighbourhood was not the right place for this
type of establishment. And that such a facility would also likely cause much larger disruption, due to the
tight space and proximity to the neighbours’ property lines, the noise from the PA system and outdoor
rink, the lack of parking, and the bar they will have inside the facility.
It should be established in a light industrial zone- not a stable residential zone. Mr. Barriere’s other three
rinks are established on light industrial sites in Joliette, Quebec.
Our area does not have a large commercial development. There are small businesses, such as the
Pumpkin Patch, which is open half the year, the Anima
closes at 4. People move to Island View because of the beautiful views, the excellent elementary school,
and the peaceful community here. Speaking to an engineer, we found that to mitigate sound, we would
needa large solid fence, and that would also block the view for many of the neighbours.
I thank you for taking the time to consider the 80 individuals and counting residing in this area that have
signed a petition against the location choice for this development. This is within the very few days we
have had to prepare for these meetings.
Our argument is that this facility would better fit an area zoned for light industrial (as previous rinks in
Quebec are). There aresignificantsafety concerns due to the level of traffic it will bring to the
neighbourhood. I encourage you to please go visit this area in the evening, and please consider the
impact this will have.
Kind regards,
Rania Malik
Some of the issues we have mentioned in the PAC meeting have included:
Increased traffic and the overflow of parking onto residential side streets. Many of these side
streets do not have sidewalks. This will impede the ability of people to walk safely, especially
in the winter where snow clearing is not addressed.
The traffic in the area is limited to school hours and work hours. By the evening, the
neighborhood has quieted down significantly and most lights in the neighborhood are out by
9 pm.
A traffic impact study was not requested.
This development will bring a large increase in noise. There is a cemetery next door and many
young families and retirees (including a centenarian) in this neighbourhood. This will impact
quality of life, especially for young children going to school and folks trying to get rest for the
next day.
There are many better suited areas in Saint John. There are decommissioned rinks and light
industrial areas (similar to the areas where his previous rinks were established) that would
better serve this development.
have chosen will not serve this. The applicant has discussed bringing national and
international events to the area. The capacity will overwhelm the neighbourhood. There are
no hotels or restaurants nearby.
They have stated that this will encourage young people to get involved in community sport.
However, the location has also requested a liquor license. Why would they need a liquor
license at a spot meant to entice youth? This seemsmore to cater toadult patrons and
leagues.
The community is worried about increased drunk driving and disorderly behaviour. There is
currently no area for drinking anywhere near this neighborhood. We are concerned about
tailgate parties, folks bringing their own alcohol, and spending hours making use of the
outdoor ball hockey surface that they have planned. How wouldthis be prevented? The
applicant has several rinks (which he stated at the PAC meeting- are in light industrial areas in
Quebec).
Our questions about security and noise mitigation have not had satisfactory answers.
The current makeup of the neighborhood includes a small seasonal grocery store (the pumpkin
and close early.
At the PAC meeting, committee members took note of public recreational facilities that are
mentioned (in the Dever Road area, tennis courts and rinks) have any liquor licenses.
Members from our community spoke to individuals that live in this area- and there are in fact
complaints that have gone unaddressed.
Complaints include: parking taking up residential side streets (despite no parking’ signs
and sidewalks, which we do not have in Island View), noise from PA and loudspeaker
systems and music, and drinking at the ball field (even without a liquor license like this
proposed facility). One family has had to purchase room darkening curtains to help
their children fall asleep.
The definition of a recreational facility provided in the Zoning By-Law: “An establishment within a
building designed for athletic activities, including, but not limited to health and fitness, skating
or swimming, and may include within the same building secondary uses such as, but not
limited to, childcare, food service, medical office or personal service; or (b) an establishment
where land is used for non-motorized outdoor sports or athletic activities. Including, but not
limited to, a change room, shower, or washroom facility.” – These types of facilities do not
require a liquor license.
The number of required parking spaces and the lack of a traffic impact study are part of why this
application should be denied.
The applicant has claimed that the operating hours would be evening only, but his other rinks in
Quebec do not appear to follow this schedule. Also, three of his rinks are in light industrial
areas not residential.
Mr. Renaud Barriere is the general director of the Association du Hockey Mineure de
Joliette-Crabtree which has operating hours of 6 am to 3 am.
-Crabtree
He is the co-owner at HockeyQC Joliette which has operating hours of 12 pm to 1 am. He
has stated that the hours of operation for the new development would be from 5:30
pm to 11:30 pm, unless there are shootouts and overtime. How would this be
regulated? How would enough revenue be generated to keep the facility running with
half of the hours of his other facilities? Please see full hours posted at bottom of the
document.
The renderings submitted were done in Autocad, and do not show the closeness or size of the
facility in relation to neighboring homes. The homes that are nearby this new facility will have
their quality of life severely impacted by the noise and traffic. Please visit the area and take
note of this.
ThePAC Committee did not push for any specific sound and light mitigation.
There were very vague reassurances from Mr. Barriere on the mitigations for security, noise,
lighting, and disorderly conduct.He mentioned the use of cedar trees as foliage to dampen
sound. Will they be planting full-grown cedar trees? If not, this is a solution that will need
about 20 years.
Mr. Barriere stated he would not schedule games during burials or ceremonies. How would he
be able to do this? What conditions can be added to ensure that Mr. Barriere abides by this?
daily to visit family graves and pray, and this
will disrupt this peaceful area.
We submitted a petition with 56 signatures to the PAC Committee (still growing). They surveyed
folks within 100 meters of the development, all who are against the applicant’s proposal. It is
confusing that after our community has been surveyed, and has spoken up against this, the
PAC committee continues to push it forward. What other reason is there for consultation with
the surrounding homes? Shouldn’t they have consulted the neighborhood beforehand?
There was an engineer who attended the PAC Committee Meeting, whose daughter attends
Island View School. He had been part of a previous consultation for a different property and
raised the fact that the parking would not be suitable and would create traffic issues. Again- a
traffic impact study has not been requested.
Members of the neighborhood have offered to assist Mr. Barriere with finding a more suitable
welcome sports and activities, but this will be very detrimental to the Island View community.
We have neighbours that are actively looking for and sending them property listings, to
encourage them to come to Saint John.
Residents of other neighborhoods that have had developments that disrupted their
neighborhoods have gone to the city asking for help, and the city staff told them there was
nothing they could do. Matthew DaLuz and Mark Reade said during the PAC meeting that no
one has complained about other developments in the city which was incorrect. This
demonstrates a historyof nottaking neighbourhood concerns into account or finding
solutions for them.
At the PAC meeting, Alex Weaver Crawford stated that normally a public consultation would
have been done prior to submitting a proposal to the PAC, but that having one was better
than not having one at all. The PAC recommended a public consultation with our
neighbourhood in order to help the organization understand our needs as a community. Mr.
Barriere said that he would try to consult with the neighbours before the common council
meeting.
His “consultation” happened the next day with less than 24 hours’ notice. As far as we
know, only one neighbor was contacted 6 hours before the meeting and she then
ugh word
of mouth. Most of the area did not even know it was happening.
The community was not impressed by their comments that if a ball hockey facility did
not go up we would instead have a 70-unit apartment building to contend with, which
they seemed to be using as a threat (?).
Further to this, apartments are needed in a city with a housing crisis. Housing was the
original intent for the property. Better yet, make it affordable.
It seemed, in fact, like a bad faith consultation, in order to tell the planning advisory
committee, he had attempted to meet the neighbours, and to assuage the neighbours
without giving any definitive answers.
They also gave the community no solid information about how they would mitigate the
traffic, sound, and light issues, even six months after planning the proposal.
Mr. Barriere said that he had been looking at the location for 6 months. Gary Crossman
from the Ball Hockey Association surveyed some of the neighborhood for him three
months ago, and everyone we spoke to said that they told him they were against the
idea.
Gary Crossmancame looking for community
feedback in June and said that it was in the planning stages and would not go forward
if the community was against it.
It seems off that this proposal was never raised again until one week before the Planning Advisory
Council meeting, when we received letters in the mail about the proposal. It was as though they
anticipated the community being against it and wanted to limit our capacity to organize against it.
Despite this, you see an organized community that has legitimate safety concerns about location.
Letter from: Donna Gray (Submitted via email)
Cedar Hill Extension Cemetery, 1650 Manawagonish Road adjoins the property proposed for the Ball
Hockey rinks.
Cedar Hill Extension Cemetery is a large, well-respected cemetery. We can host up to 150 burials per
year. Covid-19 has implemented a major change in the way Grave Side Services are done.
-
funeral service but only the Grave Side Service which could last up to 1 hour.
Services around travel, etc. For this reason, the majority of burials are between
June and the end of August –
We are very concerned about the noise that will carry over to disrupt the Grave Side Services and family
We worry that in the middle of the service there will be
appreciate the impact this might have on grieving families.
Cedar Hill Extension Cemetery is open 12 months of th
one’s grave.
Parking is the other concern we have.
On Behalf of the Board ofDirectors of Cedar Hill-Greenwood Cemetery Company
COUNCILREPORT
M&C No.2023-219
Report DateSeptember 20, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaPublic Works and
Transportation Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon andMembers of Council
SUBJECT: Traffic By-law Amendments -Sydney Street (Broadview Avenue to
Vulcan Street) Third Reading
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadC hief Administrative Officer
Tim J. Brent McGovern
Michael Hugenholtz
RECOMMENDATION
ThatCouncil proceed with3rdReading of the Amendment to the Saint John Traffic
By-law, By-law Number MV-10.1,in the form attached toM&C 2023-219.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is torecommend to Council to proceedwith the third
reading to amend the Saint John Traffic By-law to remove the alternate sideon-
street parking on Sydney Street from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street and that
this section of Sydney Street bedesignated as no parking anytime. This
Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law willallow for the extension of the
Harbour Passage multi-use trail on Sydney Street from Broad Street to Tin Can
Beach.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
November 14, 2022
stnd
Your City Manager recommends Council authorize 1and 2Readings of the
Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law, By-law Number MV-10.1, in the
form attached to M&C 2022-343.
REPORT
stnd
At the November 14, 2022 meeting, Councilapproved 1and 2readingsof the
proposed amendments to the Saint John Traffic By-lawto remove the alternate
side on-street parking on Sydney Street from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street
and to designate this section of Sydney Street as no parking anytime. The
amendments were necessary to permit the required narrowing of Sydney Street
from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Streetto allow for the construction of an
- 2 -
extension of Harbour Passage on Sydney Street from Broad Street to Tin Can
Beach.
In M&C 2022-343 (attached to this report), staff indicated to Council the intention
to delay third reading of the proposed Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-
law until such time as the contract for the reconstruction work on Sydney Street
(Broad Street to Tin Can Beach) had been awarded and the contractor had
mobilized to the site. These two conditions have now been met and staff believes
it would be appropriate to proceed with the third reading to amend the Saint John
Traffic By-law at this time.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This action ies for GROW, MOVE, GREEN AND BELONG
as the project includes extending the existing Harbour Passage multi-use trail
along Sydney Street. This extension will connect the existing Harbour Passage
infrastructure to Tin Can Beach at the end of Sydney Street.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Adopting this Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law will allow for the
extension of the Harbour Passage multi-use trail on Sydney Street from Broad
Street to Tin Can Beach.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Public Works and Transportation Services provided input.
The General Counseldrafted the attached Amendment to the Saint John
Traffic By-law.
ATTACHMENTS
Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law, By-law Number MV-10.1
M&C 2022-343 Sydney Street (Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street) Removal of
Alternate Side On-Street Parking
A BY-LAW TO AMEND A BY-LAW
RESPECTING THE TRAFFIC ON STREETS RELATIF À LA CIRCULATION DANS LES
IN THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, BY-LAW RUES DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN,
NUMBER MV-10.1, AND AMENDMENTS ARRÊTÉ NUMÉRO MV-10.1, ET
THERETO MODIFICATIONS AFFÉRENTES
Be it enacted by the Common Council of
The City of Saint John as follows: The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit :
A By-law of The City of Saint John entitled
A By-law respecting the Traffic On Streets in The Saint John intitulé « Arrêté relatif à la circulation
City of Saint John, By-law Number MV- and dans les rues de The City of Saint John, Arrêté
th
amendments thereto, enacted on the 7 day of numéro MV-10.1 » et modifications afférentes,
e
October, A.D. 2019, is hereby amended as follows: décrété le 7 2019, est modifié
comme suit :
1. A-1 Parking for Specified 1. A-1 » Stationnement à des
Times 08:00 to 17:00 is amended by deleting the heures précisées 8 h à 17 h est modifié par la
following words under the following headings: suppression des mots suivants sous les titres
suivants :
Street Side Limits Time Rue Côté Limites Durée
Sydney St. Both Saint Andrews 2 hrs. rue Sydney des de la rue Saint 2 h
St. to Vulcan deux Andrews à la
St. côtés rue Vulcan
2. A-1 Parking for Specified 2. « A-1 » Stationnement à des
Times 08:00 to 17:00 is amended by adding the heures précisées 8 h à 17 h est modifié par
following words under the following headings: suivants sous les titres
suivants :
Street Side Limits Time Rue Côté Limites Durée
Sydney St. Both Saint Andrews 2 hrs. rue Sydney des de la rue Saint 2 h
St. to deux Andrews à
Broadview côtés
Ave. Broadview
3. B No Parking Anytime is 3. « B » Interdiction de stationner
amended by adding the following words under the en tout temps est modifié par
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney Street Both Broadview Avenue rue Sydney des de
to Vulcan Street deux Broadview à la rue
côtés Vulcan
4. G Alternate Side Parking is 4. « G » Stationnement en
amended by deleting the following words under the alternance est modifié par la suppression des mots
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Limits Rue Limites
Sydney Street Princess Street to end rue Sydney de la rue Princess à son
extrémité
5. Alternate Side Parking is 5. « G » Stationnement en
amended by adding the following words under the alternance est modifié par des mots
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Limits Rue Limites
Sydney Street Princess Street to Broadview rue Sydney
Avenue Broadview
Sydney Street Vulcan Street to end rue Sydney de la rue Vulcan à son
extrémité
6. N Streets for Residential Zone 6. N » Rues concernant les
Parking Permits is amended by deleting the permis de stationnement dans une zone
following words under the following headings: résidentielle est modifié par la suppression des
mots suivants sous les titres suivants :
Zone E Zone E
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney St. Both Duke St. to Vulcan rue Sydney des deux de la rue Duke à
St. côtés la rue Vulcan
7. N Streets for Residential Zone 7. N » Rues concernant les
Parking Permits is amended by adding the permis de stationnement dans une zone
following words under the following headings: résidentielle est modifié
suivants sous les titres suivants :
Zone E Zone E
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney St. Both Duke St. to rue Sydney des deux de la rue Duke à
Broadview Ave. côtés
Broadview
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait
has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said apposer son sceau municipal sur le présent arrêté le
City to be affixed to this by-law the ____ day of ______________ 2022, avec les signatures
_________, A.D., 2023 signed by: suivantes :
______________________________________
Mayor / maire
______________________________________
City Clerk / Greffier de la municipalité
First Reading - November 14, 2022 Première lecture - le 14 novembre 2022
Second Reading - November 14, 2022 Deuxième lecture - le 14 novembre 2022
Third Reading - Troisième lecture -
COUNCILREPORT
M&C No.2022-343
Report DateNovember 09, 2022
Meeting DateNovember 14, 2022
Service AreaPublic Works and
Transportation Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon andMembers of Council
SUBJECT: Sydney Street (Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street) Removal of
Alternate Side On-Street Parking
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadCity Manager
John Collin
Michael Hugenholtz
RECOMMENDATION
Your City Manager recommends Council authorize 1st and 2nd Readings of the
Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law, By-law Number MV-10.1,in the form
attached toM&C 2022-343.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is torecommend to Council that the Saint John Traffic
By-law be amended to remove the alternate sideon-street parking on Sydney
Street from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street and that this section of Sydney
Street be designated as no parking anytime. This Amendment to the Saint John
Traffic By-law willallow for the extension of the Harbour Passage multi-use trail
on Sydney Street from Broad Street to Tin Can Beach.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
REPORT
The approved 2022General Fund Capital Program includesfunding forthe
extension of the Harbour Passage multi-use trail along Sydney Street from Broad
Street to Tin Can Beach. The design of this extension is underway and it is planned
that this work will go out to tenderin early 2023.
- 2 -
During the design phase, the section of Sydney Street from Broadview Avenue to
Vulcan Street was identified as having several constraints that affect the design
and installation of Harbour Passage. These constraints include a narrow right-of-
way, an existing building that is located immediately adjacent to the property line
on the east side of the street and an existing steep slope and utility poles on the
west side of the street.
In order to allow for the installation of the Harbour Passage multi-use trail, staff
have determined that it will be necessary to reduce the asphalt travel lanes on this
section of Sydney Street from the current width of approximately 7.5m to a
reduced width of 7.0m. There is currently only curbing on the east side of Sydney
Street from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street. New concrete curbing would be
installed on both sides of the street as part of the planned work.
Sydney Street from Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street has two-way traffic and
alternate side on-street parking is currently permitted year-round. With the
reduction of the street width to 7.0m and the installation of concrete curbing on
both sides of the street, there is only room to provide two 3.5m wide travel lanes.
Based on current design standards, staff believes it is appropriate to remove the
alternate side on-street parking and designate this section of Sydney Street as no
parking anytime.
Staff have met with the owner of #30 Broadview Avenue as
representatives of #274 Sydney Street to review the proposed design as well as to
solicit feedback on the proposed removal of the alternate side on-street parking.
These properties would be most greatly affected by the proposed parking
restriction. No objections to the removal of alternate side on-street parking were
raised by either party.
As indicated above, should Council proceed with first and second reading of the
proposed Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law, staff would plan to proceed
to tender the project in early 2023. It is staff intention to come back to Council
for the third reading of the proposed Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law
once the contract to complete the work has been awarded by Council and the
successful contractor has mobilized to the site.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
ies for GROW, MOVE, GREEN AND BELONG
as the project includes extending the existing Harbour Passage multi-use trail
- 3 -
along Sydney Street. This extension will connect the existing Harbour Passage
infrastructure to Tin Can Beach at the end of Sydney Street.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Adopting this Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law will allow for the
extension of the Harbour Passage multi-use trail on Sydney Street from Broad
Street to Tin Can Beach.
The removal of the alternate side on-street parking on Sydney Street from
Broadview Avenue to Vulcan Street will result in the loss of 8 10 potential parking
spaces, depending on which alternating side of the street parking would be
permitted. The Parking Division of Public Works and Transportation Services was
consulted on this proposed Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law and no
objections or concerns were raised.
As communicated with development of MoveSJ, choices between use and
function of City streets need to be made from time to time given the limited width
available. In the case of this section of Sydney Street, the planned street upgrades
will result in further road narrowing, with associated traffic calming and asphalt
inventory reduction benefits, as well as additional space made available for
pedestrians. The trade-off is the loss of on-street parking spaces. Although
indications are the loss of on-street parking is not expected to be detrimental,
associated loss of this opportunity should be acknowledged and considered with
the associated positive trade-off outcomes.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Public Works and Transportation Services provided input.
Staff met with the adjacent property owners/representatives of #274 Sydney
Street and #30 Broadview Avenue and no objections to the proposed removal of
on-street parking were raised.
The General Counseldrafted the attached Amendment to the Saint John
Traffic By-law.
ATTACHMENTS
Amendment to the Saint John Traffic By-law, By-law Number MV-10.1
A BY-LAW TO AMEND A BY-LAW
RESPECTING THE TRAFFIC ON STREETS RELATIF À LA CIRCULATION DANS LES
IN THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, BY-LAW RUES DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN,
NUMBER MV-10.1, AND AMENDMENTS ARRÊTÉ NUMÉRO MV-10.1, ET
THERETO MODIFICATIONS AFFÉRENTES
Be it enacted by the Common Council of
The City of Saint John as follows: The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit :
A By-law of The City of Saint John entitled
A By-law respecting the Traffic On Streets in The Saint John intitulé « Arrêté relatif à la circulation
City of Saint John, By-law Number MV- and dans les rues de The City of Saint John, Arrêté
th
amendments thereto, enacted on the 7 day of numéro MV-10.1 » et modifications afférentes,
e
October, A.D. 2019, is hereby amended as follows: décrété le 7 2019, est modifié
comme suit :
1. A-1 Parking for Specified 1. A-1 » Stationnement à des
Times 08:00 to 17:00 is amended by deleting the heures précisées 8 h à 17 h est modifié par la
following words under the following headings: suppression des mots suivants sous les titres
suivants :
Street Side Limits Time Rue Côté Limites Durée
Sydney St. Both Saint Andrews 2 hrs. rue Sydney des de la rue Saint 2 h
St. to Vulcan deux Andrews à la
St. côtés rue Vulcan
2. A-1 Parking for Specified 2. « A-1 » Stationnement à des
Times 08:00 to 17:00 is amended by adding the heures précisées 8 h à 17 h est modifié par
following words under the following headings: suivants sous les titres
suivants :
Street Side Limits Time Rue Côté Limites Durée
Sydney St. Both Saint Andrews 2 hrs. rue Sydney des de la rue Saint 2 h
St. to deux Andrews à
Broadview côtés
Ave. Broadview
3. B No Parking Anytime is 3. « B » Interdiction de stationner
amended by adding the following words under the en tout temps est modifié par
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney Street Both Broadview Avenue rue Sydney des de
to Vulcan Street deux Broadview à la rue
côtés Vulcan
4. G Alternate Side Parking is 4. « G » Stationnement en
amended by deleting the following words under the alternance est modifié par la suppression des mots
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Limits Rue Limites
Sydney Street Princess Street to end rue Sydney de la rue Princess à son
extrémité
5. Alternate Side Parking is 5. « G » Stationnement en
amended by adding the following words under the alternance est modifié par des mots
following headings: suivants sous les titres suivants :
Street Limits Rue Limites
Sydney Street Princess Street to Broadview rue Sydney
Avenue Broadview
Sydney Street Vulcan Street to end rue Sydney de la rue Vulcan à son
extrémité
6. N Streets for Residential Zone 6. N » Rues concernant les
Parking Permits is amended by deleting the permis de stationnement dans une zone
following words under the following headings: résidentielle est modifié par la suppression des
mots suivants sous les titres suivants :
Zone E Zone E
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney St. Both Duke St. to Vulcan rue Sydney des deux de la rue Duke à
St. côtés la rue Vulcan
7. N Streets for Residential Zone 7. N » Rues concernant les
Parking Permits is amended by adding the permis de stationnement dans une zone
following words under the following headings: résidentielle est modifié
suivants sous les titres suivants :
Zone E Zone E
Street Side Limits Rue Côté Limites
Sydney St. Both Duke St. to rue Sydney des deux de la rue Duke à
Broadview Ave. côtés
Broadview
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait
has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said apposer son sceau municipal sur le présent arrêté le
City to be affixed to this by-law the ____ day of ______________ 2022, avec les signatures
_________, A.D., 2022 signed by: suivantes :
______________________________________
Mayor / maire
______________________________________
City Clerk / Greffier de la municipalité
First Reading - Première lecture -
Second Reading - Deuxième lecture -
Third Reading - Troisième lecture -
/haahb /h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No.2023-224
Report DateSeptember 27, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaStrategic Services
HerWorship Mayor Donna Noade ReardonandMembers of Common Council
SUBJECT: /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ LƓƦǒƷ źƓƷƚ ЋЉЋЍ DĻƓĻƩğƌ hƦĻƩğƷźƓŭ .ǒķŭĻƷ
AUTHORIZATION
Primary AuthorCommissioner/Dept. HeadChief Administrative Officer
Chair Gary SullivanKevin FudgeJ. Brent McGovern
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended Common Council receive and file this report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As part of the 2024 General Operating Budgetprocess, the Finance Committee is
seeking the feedback of Common Council prior to bringing backa budget
recommendationto Common Council in November.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
Not Applicable
REPORT
As part of the 2024 General Operating Budgetprocess, the Finance Committee
would like to seek the feedbackof Common Council on preferred areas of budget
focus priorto bringing back arecommendation in mid-November. An agenda item
th
will be added to the October 16, 2023,meeting of Common Council,where the
Chair of the Finance Committee will seek the input of each Councillor.
The Finance Chair willrequestthefeedback provided be in alignment with
10-yearLong Term
PlaySJ, and
the Central Peninsula Neighborhood Plan.
th
For convenience, staff will send an email to Council on October 4, 2023,with
links tovarious plans and documentsso Councilcan properly prepare.
- 2 -
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The .
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
th
The input received from Common Council on October 16 will be used by the
Finance Committee to make 2024 General Operating Budget recommendations.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Input from the Chief Administrative Officer and Finance Committee Chair was
received.
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
Submitted on Wed, 09/27/2023 - 10:28
Submitted by: Anonymous
Submitted values are:
About Person/Group Submitting
First name
Darlene
Last name
Sherwood
Name of organization/group (where applicable)
Darlene Sherwood
If you do not wish to have your personal information (address, phone number, email) become part of
the public record, please check this box.
Yes
About your Submission
Topic of submission
Homelessness help.
Purpose for submission (what is the ask of council):
Deer City Council I would like to open up St Vincent's School to house the homeless men and women it
would be a place where all needs of help in human society could be addressed, such as mental health
role models to help shape human behavior, a place to eat sleep and be cared about until we can find
appropriate living conditions for each individual while working with landlords as well. People don't seem
to care they're over 100 homeless people in St John it's very cold and a lot of people that are living
outside have backpacks on and have to literally keep moving walking to stay warm. People could partner
up with another person and get a bachelor apartment or save up enough to rent a warm room. Damage
deposits are a must these days and need to be paid for by Social Development for homeless people. I
have nursing experience and I was an alcohol and drug rehabilitation counselor I hope you take my
letter seriously and give the homeless human beings a chance in our lovely city of St John by opening up
St Vincent's School as a shelter. Yours truly, Darlene Sherwood
Executive summary
Please let me know if I need to come to city council to give our homeless people a chance to live and not
freeze to death. I noticed yesterday on Waterloo St. It was like tent central - 4 or so tents, Darlene
M&C No.M&C 2023-225
Report DateSeptember 29, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaGrowth and Community
Services
SUBJECT: CMHC Rapid Housing Initiative Contribution Agreement
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN
SESSION OF COUNCIL
At its meeting held July 24, 2023, Council resolved to enter into a contribution
agreement with Kaleidoscope Social Impact for a project located at 67 Broadview
Street. In light of recent circumstances, the waiving of 2 conditions precedents is
neededto ensure that the project remains viable. The purpose of this report is to
seek authority for the City to waive 2 conditions precedent
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
That the City waive conditions precedent 9.1(c) related to the cost overrun
mitigation plan and 9.1(i) in the Contribution Agreement between the City and
Kaleidoscope Social Impact Inc. dated September 13, 2023 and flow $900,000 in
funding to Kaleidoscope upon allother conditions precedent having been met,
as a partial payment of the first Milestone Payment defined in Schedule C to the
said Agreement; and that the remainder of the said first Milestone Payment be
paid when all the conditions precedent listed in section 9.1 have been met.
M&C No.2023-222
Report DateSeptember 28, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaCorporate Services
SUBJECT:CommercialTransaction- Legal Retainer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN
SESSIONOF COUNCIL
The City iscontemplatinga commercial transactionthat requires a high level of
expertise. Thepurposeof thisreport is toseek authorityfor the City toretain
Torys LLPfor expert services inthatcommercial transaction.
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Thatthe City retain Torys LLP for expert services ina commercial transaction in
accordance with thestatement of work and estimate presented toCommittee
of theWholeat its meeting held Oct., 2023 for the said transaction.
M&C No.N/A
DateOctober 03, 2023
Meeting DateOctober 03, 2023
Service AreaCorporate Services
SUBJECT: Council Code of Conduct Matter
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN
SESSION OF COUNCIL
The Committee of the Whole met on October 3, 2023 and passed the following
resolution:
RESOLVED thatpending the outcome of an investigation under the Code of
Conduct By-Law,the Committee of the Whole recommendsCouncillors Killen
and Harris be relieved of all theircouncilcommittee duties and their
appointments by Council to different bodies be rescinded effective
immediately.
COUNCIL RESOLUTION
RESOLVED that,on the recommendation of the Committee of the Wholeand
pending the outcome of an investigation under the Code of Conduct By-Law,
Councillors Killen and Harris berelieved of all theircouncil committee duties and
their appointments by Council to different bodies be rescinded effective
immediately.