2019-07-29_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jour
City of Saint John
Common Council Meeting
Monday, July 29, 2019
Committee of the Whole
1. Call to Order
Si vous avez besoin des services en français pour une réunion de Conseil communal, veuillez
contacter le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862.
Each of the following items, either in whole or in part, is able to be discussed in private pursuant
to the provisions of subsection 68(1) of the Local Governance Act and Council / Committee will
make a decision(s) in that respect in Open Session:
th
4:00 p.m., 8 Floor Boardroom, City Hall
1.1 Approval of Minutes 68(1)
1.2 Financial Matter 68(1)(c)
1.3 Financial Matter 68(1)(c)
1.4 Negotiation Matter 68(1)(c)
1.5 Financial Matter 68(1)(c)
1.6 Financial Matter 68(1)(c)
1.7 Land Matter 68(1)(d)
Ville de Saint John
Séance du conseil communal
Lundi 29 juillet 2019
18 h
e
Salle du conseil communal (salle Ludlow), au 8
Comité plénier
1. Ouverture de la séance
Si vous souhaitez obtenir des services en français pour une séance du conseil communal,
veuillez communiquer avec le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862.
privé en vertu des dispositions prévues au paragraphe 68(1) de la Loi sur la gouvernance
locale. Le conseil/comité prendra une ou des décisions à cet égard au cours de la séance
publique :
e
16 h, Salle de conférence, 8 étage, hôtel de ville
1.1 Approbation du procès-verbal paragraphe 68(1)
1.2 Question financière alinéa 68(1)c)
1.3 Question relative aux négociations alinéa 68(1)c)
1.4 Question financière alinéa 68(1)c)
1.5 Question financière alinéa 68(1)c)
1.6 Question financière alinéa 68(1)c)
1.7 Question relative aux biens-fonds alinéa 68(1)d)
Séance ordinaire
1. Ouverture de la séance
2. Approbation du procès-verbal
2.1 Procès-verbal du 8 juillet 2019
2.2 Procès-verbal du 11 juillet 2019
5.1 Service de police de Saint John : demande relative à un événement sur la
voie publique Third Shift (recommandation
5.1.1 Third Space : demande de fermeture de rue pour le festival
artistique Third Shift / demande de présentation (recommandation : refuser
la demande de pr
5.2 Service de police de Saint John : demande relative à un événement sur la
voie publique E2L Jam (recommandation
lieu public)
5.3 Avis de motion (recommandation
figurant au rapport)
5.4 Contrat 2019-17
(recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.5 Commission sur le stationnement de Saint John : nomination de Nicholas
5.6
de réserve -190, rue Winslow
(recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.7 Contrat 2019-05 : Phase 3 de la réhabilitation structurale des conduites
Divers emplacements (recommandation figurant au
rapport)
5.8 M.E. Carpenter : priorités en matière de transport (recommandation :
accepter à titre informatif)
5.9 319, rue Lancaster (recommandation
figurant au rapport)
5.10 Demande de fonds de réserve de croissance Programme des normes
communautaires (recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.11
figurant au rapport)
5.12 Changement de nom de rue (recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.13 Contrat de services d
(QSA) (recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.14 Conseil des commissaires de la police de Saint John : Budget de
fonctionnement 2019
Saint John (recommandation : accepter à titre informatif)
5.15 E. Cusack Stationnement pour les élèves des écoles secondaires du
centre-ville (recommandation : consulter la Commission sur le
stationnement)
5.16 Saint John Water 2018 (recommandation :
accepter à titre informatif)
o
5.17 Soumission n 2019-081204T Station de pompage intégrée Travaux de
génie civil (recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.18 Bail conclu avec le Saint John Arts Centre Place Peel (recommandation
figurant au rapport)
5.19 Area 506
(recommandation
province)
6. Commentaires présentés par les membres
7. Proclamation
e
7.1 25 anniversaire du Marathon près de la mer 10 et 11 août 2019
7.2 15 août 2019
8. Délégations et présentations
8.1 Develop Saint John prioritaires
9. Audiences publiques 18 h 30
9.1 81, promenade Bayside,
rezonage
ree
9.1.1 81, promenade Bayside (1 et 2 lectures)
9.2 Modification proposée au règlement de zonage 149, rue Broad, avec
présentation du personnel
ree
9.2.1 149, rue Broad (1 et 2 lectures)
9.3 Modification proposée en ce qui concerne 59 49, avenue Noel,
modification
10. Étude des arrêtés municipaux
10.1
e
59 646-648, chemin Westmorland (3 lecture)
10.2
e
59 0, voie Heather (3 lecture)
11. Interventions des membres du conseil
11.1 Interdiction des plastiques à usage unique (conseiller Hickey)
11.2 Lettres / documents adressés au Conseil (mairesse suppléante McAlary)
11.3 Arbres destinés à la Côte Chipman (mairesse suppléante McAlary)
11.4 Restructuration financière (maire Darling)
11.5 maire Darling)
11.6 Barrière du pont des Reversing Falls (conseiller Sullivan)
11.7 Rapport sur le développement durable (conseiller MacKenzie)
12. Affaires municipales évoquées par les fonctionnaires municipaux
12.1 Mise à jour sur le développement durable (verbalement)
12.2 Démolition de bâtiments vacants, délabrés et dangereux au 174, rue Pitt
(NID 00006403)
12.3 Démolition de bâtiments vacants, délabrés et dangereux aux 261-263, rue
Wentworth et 214, rue Britain (NID 00001149)
12.4 Demande de Mise à jour de
(phase 1)
13. Rapports déposés par les comités
13.1 Comité des finances
ation 2020 et 2021
13.2 Comité des finances
15. Correspondance générale
15.1 : Soutenir Saint John Un plan en trois
parties
15.1.1 Commentaires du personnel : Clarification des recettes à court
terme générées par « Soutenir Saint John Un plan en trois parties »
15.2 Demande de commandite
Late Night with the
Foundation »
15.3 Demande de commandite : WE Believe Saint John
15.4 : Rocmaura Nursing Home Foundation
15.5 Demande de commandite : Collège communautaire du Nouveau-
Brunswick
15.6 Saint John Citizens Coalition Marque GrowSJ
16. Ordre du jour supplémentaire
17. Comité plénier
17.1 Sculpture Saint John 2020
18. Levée de la séance
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
JULY 8, 2019 AT 6:00 PM
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
Present: Mayor Don Darling
Deputy Mayor Shirley McAlary
Councillor-at-Large Gary Sullivan
Councillor Ward 1 Blake Armstrong
Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton
Councillor Ward 2 Sean Casey
Councillor Ward 2 John MacKenzie
Councillor Ward 3 Donna Reardon
Councillor Ward 3 David Hickey
Councillor Ward 4 David Merrithew
Councillor Ward 4 Ray Strowbridge
Also Present: City Manager J. Collin
Deputy City Manager N. Jacobsen
City Solicitor J. Nugent
Fire Chief K. Clifford
Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer K. Fudge
Deputy Commissioner Growth and Community Development P. Ouellette
Deputy Commissioner of Transportation and Environment J.Hussey
Commissioner of Saint John Water B. McGovern
Common Clerk J. Taylor
Deputy Common Clerk P. Anglin
1
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
2.1 Minutes of June 17, 2019
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Merrithew:
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of Common Council held on June 17, 2019,
be approved.
MOTION CARRIED.
3. Approval of Agenda
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the agenda of this meeting be approved with the addition of items:
12.3 M&C 2019-168 South Bay Wellfield Performance staff report added
17.1 Sustainability Report Update
17.2 Appointments to Committees
17.3 South Bay Wellfield Update
17.4 Pension Plan Analysis Project
MOTION CARRIED.
Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the item 17.3 South Bay Wellfield Update be moved ahead on the
agenda.
MOTION CARRIED.
4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
City Solicitor J. Nugent, Deputy City Manager N. Jacobsen and Councillor G. Norton
declared a conflict with the items 12.3 South Bay Wellfield Performance and 17.3 South
Bay Wellfield Update.
5. Consent Agenda
5.1 Refer to Discussion 14.1
5.2 That the Saint John Board of Police Commissioners - 2018 Operating Budget -
December Year End (Unaudited) Financial Results be received for information.
2
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
5.3 That the M.E. Carpenter Letter: Safe Pedestrian Access be received for
information.
5.4 That the M.E. Carpenter Letter: Saint John Transit Evaluation be received for
information.
5.5 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-
163: Proposal for Cured-in-Place Point Repair Liners, the standing offer agreement for
the supply and installation of Cured-in-Place Point Repair Liners and associated work be
awarded to Industrial Hydro-Vac NB Limited for 2019 with an option to extend for years
two through five.
5.6 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-
169: Online Payment Solution, Common Council receive the report for information.
5.7 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-
173: Succeed and Stay Project - Research, the City enter into an agreement with the
University of New Brunswick for the Succeed and Stay Project.
5.8 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-
164: Licence Agreement for Moonlight Bazaar on City Property,
1. That the City enter into a Licence agreement with Five & Dime Inc. hereby called the
access to and use the City owned property, identified as PID No. 8979 for the
Moonlight Bazaar event, including the painting of a mural on the City retaining
wall, and further removal of same, subject to the following terms and conditions:
a. the Licence shall commence on July 15, 2019 and conclude at 11:59 pm (local
time) on July 21, 2019;
b. that Five & Dime Inc. shall, at no expense to the Licensor, obtain and maintain in
full force and effect during the entire term of this Licence, a Commercial General
Liability Insurance policy with policy limits of not less than five million dollars
($5,000,000.00) inclusive per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage;
which policy shall name the City as an additional insured and shall contain a
cross-liability clause and host liquor liability coverage;
c. proof of insurance stated in (b) above is due on or before close of business July
12, 2019;
d. all damages, cost, claims, demands, actions, suits or other proceedings by
whomsoever claimed, made, brought or prosecuted in any manner and whether
in respect of property owned by others or in the Licensee does hereby indemnify
and save harmless the Licensor from respect of damage sustained by others
based upon or arising out of or in connection with the use of the Licensed Area;
e. the Organizer is responsible for security of the area and their property;
3
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
f. that the organizing committee has made satisfactory arrangements with the
Saint John Parking Commission for the temporary relocation of the necessary
parking spaces for the users of the parking lot for the length of time as noted
above in (a);
g. the provision of washroom facilities will be the responsibility of the Organizer;
h. the site is to be thoroughly cleaned to the satisfaction of the City of Saint John
representatives when the event has concluded;
i. that Five & Dime Inc. or its representatives be authorized to make application for
any permit that is required in conjunction with the Moonlight Bazaar event; and
j. that the proponent provide $1,000.00 to the City to be used for future
maintenance of the art work, as the City deems appropriate, and
2. That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the Licence
Agreement.
5.9 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2018-
160: Sale of Portion of Land at Mispec Beach to the Province, Common Council enter
into the Corporate Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Her Majesty The Queen in
Right of the Province of New Brunswick, as represented herein by the Minister of
Transportation and Infrastructure, attached hereto M & C # 2019-160, and further
directs the Mayor and Common Clerk to execute any document necessary to effect the
transfer.
5.10 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-
174: Naval Memorial Harbour Passage Licence Agreement with United Services
, Common Council approve the proposed Licence
Agreement between the City and Royal United Services Institute of New Brunswick Inc.
() as attached to M&C 2019-174 and authorize its execution by the Mayor and
Common Clerk once confirmation has been received that RUSI has been duly
incorporated.:
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in each consent agenda item respectively,
with the exception of item 5.1 which has been referred as item 14.1 for discussion, be
adopted.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. Members Comments
Council members commented on various community events.
7. Proclamations
7.1 Hepatitis Awareness Day July 28, 2019
4
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
The Mayor declared July 28, 2019 as Hepatitis Awareness Day in the City of Saint John.
8. Delegations/Presentations
9. Public Hearings 6:30 PM
9.1 Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment 0 Heather Way with Planning Advisory
Committee report recommending Rezoning / Staff Presentation
stnd
9.1.1 Zoning Bylaw Amendment (1 and 2 Reading)
Ken Melanson presented the recommendations contained in the staff report.
The Common Clerk advised that the necessary advertising was completed with regard to
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning a parcel of
land having an area of approximately 55,603 square metres, located at 0 Heather Way,
also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential (R2) to Mid-Rise
Residential (RM) with no written objections received.
Consideration was also given to a report from the Planning Advisory Committee
June 18, 2019 meeting at
which the committee recommended the rezoning of a parcel of land located at 0
Heather Way as described above with Section 59 Conditions.
The Mayor called for members of the public to speak against the re-zoning with no one
presenting.
The Mayor called for members of the public to speak in favour of the re-zoning with
Andrew Toole representing the developer presenting.
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Merrithew:
RESOLVED that the by-
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning
a parcel of land having an area of approximately 55,603 square metres, located at 0
Heather Way, also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential (R2)
to Mid-Rise Residential (RM), be read a first time.
MOTION CARRIED.
-Law of The
City of Saint J
-
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
5
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
RESOLVED that the by-Bylaw of The City of
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning
a parcel of land having an area of approximately 55,603 square metres, located at 0
Heather Way, also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential (R2)
to Mid-Rise Residential (RM), be read a second time.
MOTION CARRIED.
Read a second time by title, th-Law of
9.2 Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment 646-648 Westmorland Road with Planning
Advisory Committee report recommending Rezoning / Staff Presentation
stnd
9.2.1 Zoning Bylaw Amendment (1 and 2 Reading)
The Common Clerk advised that the necessary advertising was completed with regard to
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning a parcel of
land having an area of approximately 1,000 square metres, located at 648 Westmorland
Road, also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential (R2) to
Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) with no written objections received.
Consideration was also given to a report from the Planning Advisory Committee
June 18, 2019 meeting at
which the committee recommended the rezoning of a parcel of land located at 646-648
Westmorland Road as described above with Section 59 Conditions.
The Mayor called for members of the public to speak against the re-zoning with no one
presenting.
The Mayor called for members of the public to speak in favour of the re-zoning with Mr.
Harold McInnis East Side Food Bank and Rev. Greg McMullen St Mary and St
Bartholomew Church presenting.
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the by-
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning
a parcel of land having an area of approximately 1,000 square metres, located at 648
Westmorland Road, also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential
(R2) to Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN), be read a first time.
MOTION CARRIED.
6
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the by-he City of
amending Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning
a parcel of land having an area of approximately 1,000 square metres, located at 648
Westmorland Road, also identified as PID Number 55208300 from Two-Unit Residential
(R2) to Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN), be read a second time.
MOTION CARRIED.
10. Consideration of By-laws
10.1 ByLaw respecting Code of Conduct for Elected Members of The City of Saint John
rd
(3 Reading)
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the by-l-Law Number LG-5, A By-Law respecting the
Code of Conduct for Elected Members of The City of S.
MOTION CARRIED.
In accordance with the Local Governance Act sub-section 15(3) the by-
ByLaw respecting Code of Conduct for Elected Members of The City of Saint John
instead of being read in its entirety was read in summary as follows:
The Local Governance Ac t authorizes and requires local governments to establish a
Code of Conduct Bylaw. The submitted Code of Conduct Bylaw includes the following
mandatory provisions:
Values of Members of Council
Behavior of Members of Council
Use of Local Government Property, Resources and Services by Members of Council
Use of Communication Tools and Social Media.
The Code of Conduct Bylaw also addresses:
Conflicts of Interest
Roles and Responsibilities
Gifts and Benefits
Conduct at Meetings
7
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
Handling of Confidential Information including a provision to not disclose
confidential information following service on Council, and
Remedial Action if Contravention occurs
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Merrithew:
RESOLVED that the by-l By-Law Number LG-5, A By-Law respecting the Code
of Conduct for Elected Members of The City of Saint John
and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto.
MOTION CARRIED.
Read a third time by title, the by--Law Number LG-5, A By-Law
respecting the Code of Conduct for Elected Members of The City of S
10.2 Public Presentation Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment re: Policies related
to Green Energy Development
Deputy Commissioner Ouellette read into the record a public presentation to amend the
Municipal Plan policies including amending Sections 2.4 The Rural Areas, 2.5 Lands
Common to the Primary Development Area and The Rural Areas, 7.8 Energy Efficiency
and subsections 3.6.1 Rural Resource and 3.7.1 Parks and Natural Areas in addition to
other relevant subsections and policies in order to facilitate Green Energy
Developments and facilitate the ability to construct green energy projects involving
wind and solar in limited designations in the Municipal Plan.
As advertised, written objections to the proposed amendment may be made to Council
by August 7, 2019. Enquiries may be made to the Common Clerk or the Growth and
Community Services.
11. Submissions by Council Members
12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers
12.1 General Fund Debt Management Policy FAS-006
Councillor Merrithew, Chair of Finance commented on the importance of the General
Fund Debt Management Policy. The Commissioner of Finance outlined the report
details.
Moved by Councillor Merrithew, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report entitled
M&C 2019-167: General Fund Debt Management Policy FAS-006, Common Council
approve the General Fund Debt Management Policy FAS-006
8
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
MOTION CARRIED.
12.2 2019-2020 Arena Rental Fees and Ice Allocation Policy
Referring to the submitted report entitled 2019-2020 Arena Rental Fees and Ice
Allocation Policy Deputy Commissioner T. illustrated the proposed 2019-2020
rates and the rate comparison throughout the region and Atlantic Canada.
The City Manager commented that the cost recovery model referred to in the report is
set for one season only. The rates are estimated operating cost-recovery shared by the
Saint John Taxpayers and Arena Users. Capital Costs are not addressed. Going forward
all aspect of City finances involving the arena rental fees will be reviewed.
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Hickey:
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report entitled
M&C 2019-166: 2019-2020 Arena Rental Fees and Ice Allocation Policy, Common
Council:
1) Endorse the changes proposed in M&C 2019 - 166 to how the City charges fees for
rental of ice at the four City-operated arenas,
2) Endorse a continued investment of additional City taxpayer contribution to reduce
-operated arenas,
3) Approve the arena hourly rental rates at the four City-operated arenas for one year
starting October 11, 2019 as proposed in M&C 2019- 166, and
4) Approve the updated City of Saint John Ice Allocation Policy as attached to M&C
2019 - 166.
MOTION CARRIED.
City Solicitor J. Nugent, Deputy City Manager N. Jacobsen and Councillor G. Norton
withdrew from the meeting.
12.3 M&C 2019-168 South Bay Wellfield Performance
Referring to the submitted report entitled M&C 2019-168 South Bay Wellfield
Performance the Commissioner of Water advised of the proactive steps required to
reduce demand on the wells and protect the South Bay Wellfield from the risk of
saltwater intrusion. The West Side Water Servicing Adjustments will transition sections
of West Side to water from the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment Facility. Other
areas will remain on the South Bay wells.
The City is pursuing legal remediation from the consulting firm, BGC Engineering Inc. the
SCDWP Groundwater Advisor that recommended the South Bay Wellfield as a
sustainable source for the City.
9
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
The Commissioner stated that Saint John Water continues to serve customers across the
City with safe, clean, drinking water quality that exceeds the New Brunswick and the
Canadian guidelines for drinking water quality. Regular testing of the water supplies
from both the South Bay Wellfield and the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment
Facility (LLDWTF) confirms that Saint John has two excellent sources of high-quality
drinking water. Water quality results are
questions about the Loch Lomond switchover. Communications resources are also being
made available to the public. An interactive map for residents is available on the
webpage to assist residents determine if they will be receiving well water or water from
the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment facility.
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report entitled
M&C 2019-168 South Bay Wellfield Performance Common Council adopt the following:
Whereas, in preparation for carrying out the Safe, Clean Drinking Water Project
(SCDWP), the City of Saint John explored potential sources of safe, clean drinking water;
and
Whereas, in 2012, the South Bay Aquifer was identified as a potential source of
groundwater; and
Whereas the City engaged engineering consultants to carry out due diligence, to verify
the quality and quantity of water in the South Bay Aquifer; and
supply a sufficient quantity of safe, clean drinking water to service West Saint John; and
Whereas, in reliance upon that advice, the City arranged, as part of the SCDWP, to
supply drinking water to West Saint John from three wells that draw water from the
South Bay Aquifer; and
Whereas, in 2018, following the implementation of that decision, the City was advised
by the same engineering consultants that, contrary to prior advice, the South Bay
Aquifer cannot supply an adequate quantity of water for West Saint John without well
water levels falling below sea level, and below the minimum prescribed level set out in
the Approval to Operate granted by the New Brunswick Department of the Environment
and Local Government for the West Wells; and
10
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
Whereas, in order to address the long-term risk of saltwater intrusion into the South Bay
Aquifer, and in order to ensure compliance with the Approval to Operate, it is necessary
to reduce the quantity of water drawn by the City from the South Bay Aquifer; and
Whereas the City has identified an interim solution, that involves supplying areas of
West Saint John with safe, clean drinking water from the Loch Lomond Drinking Water
Treatment Facility;
Now therefore be it resolved that the City implement the interim solution described in
M&C No. 2019-168 of supplying water from the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment
Facility to Lower West, Milford, Randolph, Fundy Heights, Duck Cove and Sand Cove
neighbourhoods, as shown in a yellow colour on the plan titled West Side Water
Servicing Adjustments in Appendix 1 while it develops a long-term solution to ensure a
long-term sustainable supply of safe, clean drinking water for West Saint John.
MOTION CARRIED.
City Solicitor J. Nugent, Deputy City Manager N. Jacobsen and Councillor G. Norton re-
entered the meeting.
13. Committee Reports
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
14.1 (5.1) That the Fundy Regional Service Commission - Audited Financial Statements
for the Year Ended 31 December 2018.
Moved Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Reardon:
RESOLVED that the Fundy Regional Service Commission be requested to present to
council on their mandate, achievements to date and plans for the future.
MOTION CARRIED.
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the Fundy Regional Service Commission Audited Financial Statements
for the Year Ended 31 December 2018 be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED.
15. General Correspondence
15.1 Ticket Purchase Request New Brunswick Afrofest
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Hickey:
11
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
RESOLVED that the Ticket Purchase Request New Brunswick Afrofest be approved and
the Office of the Common Clerk be directed to purchase tickets for those Council
members wishing to attend the event.
MOTION CARRIED.
16. Supplemental Agenda
17. Committee of the Whole
17.1 Sustainability Report Update
The City Manager commented that the City received a Cabinet Confidence document;
and recommends that Council request the Government of New Brunswick to release the
Cabinet Confidence document publicly; thereafter Council will debate the report.
Responding to question, the City Solicitor advised that the document provided to the
City by the province has impressed on the top of the page that the report is
Cabinet and Common Council: Confidential The
provincial legislation Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (RTIPPA)
expressly provides that a public body must not disclose advice given to Cabinet.
Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie:
RESOLVED that Common Council formally request to the Government of New Brunswick
the public release of the Saint John Sustainability Report; after which Common Council
will determine its position on the aforementioned report.
MOTION CARRIED with the Deputy Mayor McAlary and Councillors Norton and Casey
voting nay.
y and all
City Manager responded that all the information
will be included.
Moved by Councillor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that Common Council formally request that all parties publicly release all
analysis, information and products associated with the work and deliberations of the
Joint Sustainability Working Group.
MOTION CARRIED with Councillor Casey voting nay.
17.2 Appointments to Committees
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
12
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
th
RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on July 8,
2019 Common Council approve the following appointments:
Community Grants Evaluation to appoint Amit Tamarak for a three year term from July
8, 2019 to July 8, 2022.
Fort LaTour Development Authority to appoint Jane Fullerton for a three year term
from August 23, 2019 to August 23, 2022.
Growth Committee to appoint Councillor David Hickey from July 8, 2019 to the end of
his current term on Council.
PRO Kids to re-appoint Devin Burnham for a three year term from August 23, 2019 to
August 23, 2022.
Saint John Community Arts Board to appoint Lisa Hrabluk, Joanna Killen, Suping Shi,
and Trina Thorpe each for a three year term from July 8, 2019 to July 8, 2022.
Saint John Energy to re-appoint Bill Edwards for a three year term from July 8, 2019 to
July 8, 2022; and to re-appoint Stephen MacMackin for a three year term from
September 4, 2019 to September 4, 2022.
Saint John Free Public Library to appoint Mohamed Bagha for a three year term from
August 23, 2019 to August 23, 2022.
Saint John Substandard Properties Appeal Committee to appoint Don Cullinan for a
three year term from July 8, 2019 to July 8, 2022.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councillor Hickey expressed interest to fill a vacant position on the Arts Board.
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie:
be referred back to the Nominating Committee.
MOTION CARRIED.
17.3 South Bay Wellfield Update Hydrogeological Assessment
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Councillor Armstrong:
RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on June
th
24, 2019 concerning the South Bay Wellfield Sustainable Yield and Potential Claim
Against BGC Engineering Inc., Common Council approve the following:
13
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 8, 2019 / le 8 juillet 2019
1. That, pursuant to its contractual obligations, The City of Saint John provide 30
to the Hydrogeological Assessment of the South Bay Wellfield; and further
2. That The City of Saint John initiate the Dispute Resolution Process leading to
arbitration under the contract between the City and BGC Engineering Inc. relating to the
Hydrogeological Assessment of the South Bay Wellfield; and further
3. That the City of Saint John retain Torys LLP for legal services required in relation to
the South Bay Wellfield for an amount not to exceed $275,000.00 plus HST and
disbursements.
MOTION CARRIED.
17.4 Pension Plan Affordability
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Councillor Hickey:
RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on July 8,
2019 Common Council approve a maximum of $70,000 be allocated from the
Restructuring Reserve Fund to support the Pension Plan Affordability Analysis Project.
MOTION CARRIED with Deputy Mayor McAlary and Councillor Armstrong voting nay.
18. Adjournment
Moved by Councillor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Armstrong:
RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on July 8, 2019, be adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED.
The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
14
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le 11 juillet 2019
MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
JULY 11, 2019 AT 6:00 PM
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
Present: Mayor Don Darling
Deputy Mayor Shirley McAlary
Councillor-at-Large Gary Sullivan
Councillor Ward 1 Blake Armstrong
Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton
Councillor Ward 2 Sean Casey
Councillor Ward 2 John MacKenzie
Councillor Ward 3 Donna Reardon
Councillor Ward 3 David Hickey
Councillor Ward 4 David Merrithew
Councillor Ward 4 Ray Strowbridge
Also Present: City Manager J. Collin
Deputy City Manager N. Jacobsen
City Solicitor J. Nugent
Police Chief B. Connell
Fire Chief K. Clifford
Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer K. Fudge
Deputy Commissioner Growth and Community Development P. Ouellette
Deputy Commissioner of Transportation and Environment J. Hussey
Commissioner of Saint John Water B. McGovern
Common Clerk J. Taylor
Deputy Common Clerk P. Anglin
1
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le11 juillet 2019
1. Call to Order
1.1 Addition to Agenda
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
RESOLVED that the following item be added to the agenda:
Denial of Pension under the Heart and Lung Act.
MOTION CARRIED.
1.2 Approval of Agenda
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Merrithew:
th
RESOLVED that the agenda for the July 11, 2019 meeting be approved.
MOTION CARRIED.
1.3 Denial of Pension under the Heart and Lung Act
Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan:
th
RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on July 8,
2019 Common Council approve the following:
WHEREAS an application was made by Employee No. xxxx for a pension pursuant to the
terms of ;
AND WHEREAS the aforementioned application for a pension was evaluated in
accordance with established/applicable criteria and the City has received satisfactory
medical advice confirming that Employee No. xxxx does not meet the eligibility criteria
as identified in section 1 of
Heart and Lung Act clarified by an Order of the Co
Bench of New Brunswick, dated April 5, 2018, because he is indeed able to
carry on in the Saint John Fire ;
BE IT RESOLVED that the employee identified by Employee No. xxxx be denied a pension
pursuant to the terms of the Heart and Lung Act, as interpreted having regard to the
interpretative clarification provided in the Order of the Court of
Brunswick, dated April 5th, 2018.
MOTION CARRIED.
2
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le 11 juillet 2019
1.4 Sustainability Saint John: A Three-Part Plan
Referring to the submitted staff PowerPoint Common Council -
Sustaining Saint John A Three Part Plan, the City Manager described the aim of the
presentation: to present to Common Council a summary of the joint (Province/City)
sustainability efforts of the past 15 months and the resulting report; with a view to
setting the conditions for motions, questions, discussion and decision.
The presentation outlined the following:
Financial Background Review
Importance of Property tax revenues and growth
Property Tax Revenues and Growth
The City of Saint John reliance on property taxes is very high; nearly 80% of our
revenues come from property taxes. Property tax reform is vital; the City must diversify
revenue streams.
Reliance on Short Term Provincial Assistance
The City is relying on Provincial Funding to operate, the short-term financial assistance
ends in 2020.
The Challenge
Saint John has significant structural deficits. be solved. The
% per year and costs are 3% per year. Just cutting does not
solve the challenge; the problem will return until costs balance revenue. Binding
arbitration changes and wage escalation policy are vital. The City has reduced the
workforce by 82 positions since 2008. How many more can be removed?
Highest Tax Rate in New Brunswick
City residents pay the highest tax rate in New Brunswick and 44% more than the Town
of Rothesay.
City residents pay an unequitable tax burden based on income.
City Debt
City debt exceeds $230M Debt Management Policy is vital.
Infrastructure Debt
Infrastructure Deficit
City has a sizable infrastructure deficit $434M We must invest more in Capital.
2018 Funding Agreement
3
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le11 juillet 2019
Common Council approved the 2018 budget with $4.7 in proposed cuts; $2.5M public
safety cut and $1.7M transportation service cut. On or about December 11, 2017 the
City received a letter from the New Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant that resulted in
short-term financial assistance with the following terms: $22.8M over a three year
period ($3.5M in 2018, $8.9M in 2019 and $10.4M in 2020). The Funding Agreement
terms included no cuts to front facing services and Working Committee Solutions report
to be delivered in early 2019.
Sustaining Saint John A Three-Part Plan - Review of Three Part Plan
Part 1 Developed by the Working Group Implement 20 Action Items
1. Collective Agreements City of Saint John to address non-sustainable clauses.
2. Special Pension Payments City of Saint John to explore options to decrease
annual payments but not diminish overall contributions.
3. City Boundaries Province/City of Saint John will explore if reducing territorial
boundaries would yield cost savings.
4. Binding Arbitration The Government of New Brunswick will invite local
government and union representatives to develop a proposal for binding
arbitration reform.
5. Tax exemption Municipal Transit Facilities.
6. Municipal Property Tax Reform Province will lead a comprehensive review of
current property tax policy and any tax-related tools that would benefit
municipalities.
7. Population Growth Province with ACOA
Population Growth Framework by accelerating pilot to attract 500 new residents.
8. Saint John Energy City of Saint John will conduct independent evaluation of
Saint John Energy growth agenda.
9. Regional Facilities Capital Costs Province introduce legislation to add capital
10. Accommodation Levy Province has introduced legislation for mandatory levy.
11. Regional Services Commission - Province will review the RSC model to find
improvements in regional service delivery.
12. City of Saint John Budget City will commit to further reduce expenses and/or
increase revenues.
13. Fundamental review of organizational structure of City employees.
14. Develop Continuous Improvement Framework.
15. Third Party Operational Audit.
16. Fundamental review of Economic Development Framework.
17. Facilitate growth through enhanced collaboration with industry.
18. Develop and execute long-term financial plan.
19. Develop and execute Debt Management Plan and Wage Escalation Policy.
20. Complete next Phase of Asset Management Plan.
4
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le 11 juillet 2019
Part 2 Developed by GNB/Provincial Cabinet Establish a Regional Management Task
Force to achieve equitable cost-sharing by March 31, 2020
From the Terms of Reference the objectives of the Regional Management Task for are:
To Achieve comprehensive and equitable service cost-sharing through the engagement
of regional governance partners; and
To establish a collaborative regional planning and priority-setting framework on service-
sharing and other areas of common interest through this forum.
As a deliverable, a signed agreement, delivered to the Province March 31, 2020.
Part 3 Developed by GNB/Provincial Government Commit to a re-assessment by the
what, if any, further response is required.
In May of 2020, once Government officials have reviewed the status to date on the 20
Actions, and the outcomes from the Regional Management Task Force, the Government
has committed to re-
In making this commitment, the Government does not want to discourage the diligent
efforts of regional leaders and the City of Saint John from making every gain possible to
benefit the City and the region as a whole. At this time, no additional provincial funding
has been identified. Instead, Government will re-assess the situation and determine
whether any further action is required, including any further policy, operational, or
financial measures.
-making in May 2020, will allow for pre-budget
planning by the City in advance of the new municipal fiscal year of January 1, 2021.
Staff Analysis
20 Action Items - Over half are City initiatives that are in progress or planned. Some are
minor (i.e.: Removing provincial property tax from transit facility). Some have
tremendous (albeit uncertain) potential; Property Tax Reform, Binding Arbitration, Saint
John Energy revenue, Regional Management Task Force (Part 2 of Plan). Most have been
committed to in other forums, but this is the first time for a Cabinet-endorsed written
document.
Action items will not yield major results before 2023. Quoting from the report
expected to yield modest revenue or savings for the city beginning in 2020, with more
.
All action items require implementation plans with due dates and milestones,
objectives (Specific, Measureable, Assignable, Relevant, Time Based) and performance
measurement throughout.
If we assume major benefits in 2023 and beyond, the City of Saint John should plan to
address the entirety of deficit for the years 2021 and 2022; this will require drastic,
5
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le11 juillet 2019
impactful and difficult decisions that will affect everyone. A phased approach would be
required so planning has already begun and must accelerate.
cor
implemented.
Motion brought forward from Closed Session of the Committee of the Whole
th
June 26, 2019
RESOLVED that the City not accept the John
report as it does not meet the majority of the objectives of the City of Saint John; and
further, that a letter be sent to the Province thanking them for their efforts thus far.
Questions and Discussion
Following the presentation the City Manager responded to questions. Responding to
What is the risk in the report, what is bankable revenue in the report versus future
commitment? The City Manager :
Exemption to provincial property tax on the Transit facility $300,000
Changes to Regional Facilities legislation impacts on operating and capital costs
$600,000
These are two tangible bankable revenues within the action items.
Responding to further question in terms of money on the table from the report, the City
Manager quantified in addition:
External audit Operational Review $200,000 minimum
Change from the voluntary hotel levy to a mandatory levy will add $300,000-
$700,000 annually.
Responding to question financial risk of the action items in the report the
Commissioner of Finance stated there are significant commitments and significant major
themes in the report that would not only impact the City of Saint John but municipalities
across New Brunswick. Many of the major reforms that are needed and committed to in
the plan are for 2022 and beyond and the details for each of those major reforms are
yet to be determined.
From a financial perspective relying solely on the recommendations of the report given
that the timing of actions are uncertain, and considering the time required for action
items that the City is responsible to address, such as collective agreements, and things
of that nature, the uncertain timing of the conclusions in the report carries risk, and risk
for future finances for the City of Saint John.
The Commissioner advised that the City of Saint John, based on its current costs of
services, can no longer afford those services based on the revenues that with certainty
we can predict we are going to receive in the foreseeable future and that we are going
to have to make some cost adjustments going forward.
6
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le 11 juillet 2019
The Mayor asked the City Manager the following question: en Council was briefed
previously on the Working Group action items and we discussed that as a Council, did
Council place any condition on its approval in principle, on those action items?
hen Council discussed the draft city actions and
draft provincial actions that there was an element to that in terms of tax reform that
was an ask from the Province. T
would call that
Managed elaborated we worked through the 18-20 action items, once we came to
the realization that the large, potential significant change would be 2023 or beyond and
that the City of Saint John would have a very significant challenge for the fiscal years of
2021 and 2022 we then started to discuss within the Sustainability Working Group
options to deal with that short term challenge. We did initially focus on offering
potential bridging strategies to our counterparts at the Provincial level to get us through
those years. One of the bridging strategies morphed into the first step toward property
tax reform, holistic comprehensive property tax reform. It was so suggested within the
Working Group and mentioned to various elected officials, as I understand, at both
levels of government. The proposal put forward is in recognition of the City of Saint
Johnheavy industrial base and the stress it puts City services and infrastructure,
although they (heavy industry) pay a large portion of property tax, a proportion of that
goes to the province. Our suggestion was in order to recognize and compensate for the
additional pressures that are put onto our services, police, fire response, for example
and the pressure that is put on our infrastructure, for example one heavy truck puts the
same wear and tear as approximately 10,000-18,000 cars; our suggestion was as the
first step of comprehensive tax reform to transfer the industrial tax portion of Provincial
Responding to a taff recommendations on the report? the
City Manager responded that 4 recommendations were presented by staff:
1. Endorse plan with reservations - action items will not yield results before 2023.
2. Detailed implementation plans are required for the action items with due dates,
Assignable, Relevant,
Time Based) and with performance measurement throughout.
3. Assuming benefits in 2023 develop plans for deficit years 2021, 2022.
4. Direct City Manager to develop a communication plan to release the report.
A point of order was raised by Councillor Sullivan for not following the Procedural Bylaw
speaking times. The Mayor stated the topic is important and he is tracking speaking
times.
Responding to a hat are examples of the $10-12 Million in budget cuts
requiredthe City Manager provided illustrative examples:
Reduce transit subsidy
Reduce protective services
7
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le11 juillet 2019
Eliminate community grants
Cease recreation subsidies
Increase user fees for resident services, such as garbage
Increase non-resident fees
Workforce reductions, pay reductions
There will be more potholes and more ice on roads.
The City Manager also stated that staff is pursuing revenue streams to offset budget
cuts.
Responding to a question What will happen if the report is not endorsed? The City
Manager responded he does not know, he can only speculate and did offer his
speculation as comments in Closed Session on June 26, 2019.
Motions and Decision
Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Norton:
RESOLVED that Common Council adopt the submitted report entitled Sustaining Saint
John: A Three-Part Plan.
Councillor Reardon asked if a tabling motion could be entertained.
The Clerk advised that a tabling motion would require a timeline and a reason for the
tabling motion.
A 30 day timeline was suggested.
Councillor Reardon stated her reason for considering the tabling motion would be to
facilitate further review of the report, which was just released yesterday and to have the
p meeting consider the concerns and remarks
made by council and to take the concerns to the Province to determine if more could be
offered to assist the City.
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Deputy Mayor McAlary:
RESOLVED that the matter Sustaining Saint John A Three Part Plan be tabled for 30
days to facilitate further negotiation with the Province.
MOTION TIED, with Deputy Mayor McAlary and Councillors Reardon, Hickey, Sullivan,
and Norton voting yea and Councillors MacKenzie, Merrithew, Armstrong,
Strowbridge and Casey voting nay.
The Mayor cast the deciding vote in favour.
MOTION CARRIED.
8
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
July 11, 2019 / le 11 juillet 2019
Adjournment
Moved by Councillor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Armstrong:
RESOLVED that the special meeting of Common Council held on July 11, 2019, be
adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED.
The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
9
July 24, 2019
Christiana Myers, Third Space Programming Coordinator
COUNCIL REPORT
M&C No. 2019-178
Report Date July 11, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Finance and
Administrative Services
His Worship Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Fall Debenture Issue Notice of Motion
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Craig Lavigne Kevin Fudge/Cathy Graham John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor make the following motion:
expiration of thirty days from this day, move or cause to be moved, the following
resolution:
RESOLVED that occasion having arisen in the public interest for the following
Public Civic Works and needed Civic Improvements that the City of Saint John
th
proposes issue of the following debentures to be dated on or after August 28,
2019:
GENERAL FUND
Protective Services $ 3,100,000
Transportation Services $ 3,500,000
Economic Development $ 600,000
Parks and Recreation $ 200,000 $7,400,000
REFINANCE DEBENTURES
Debenture No. BB 13- 2009 $ 2,830,000
(General Fund 5 years)
Debenture No. BB 14 -2009 $ 2,500,000
(Water & Sewerage 10 years)
Debenture No. BB 15 -2009 $ 1,670,000 $7,000,000
(Transit 5 years)
TOTAL $ 14,400,000
- 2 -
THEREFORE RESOLVED that debentures be issued under provisions of the Acts of
Assembly 52, Victoria, Chapter 27, Section 29 and amendments thereto, to the
amount of $ 14,400,000.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Notice of Motion has been prepared as a first step in the financing of certain
capital projects approved by Council in previous Capital Budgets and refinancing
of debentures issued in November 2009.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
REPORT
The Notice of Motion has been prepared as a first step in the financing of certain
capital projects and the refinancing of debentures issued in November 2009.
The purpose of the issue is summarized in the resolution.
The Notice of Motion places the City in a position to take action after the expiry
of 30 days at such time as bond market and opportunities permit.
At this stage, it is not necessary to set limits with respect to the coupon rate or
the terms for which bonds are to be issued. These will be established at a later
date and will be related to the market conditions at that time.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
N/A
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-186
Report Date July 22, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Saint John Water
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Contract 2019-17: Meadowbank Avenue Sewer Separation
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Susan Steven-Power Brent McGovern/ John Collin
Brian Keenan
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Contract No. 2019-17: Meadowbank Avenue Sewer
Separation be awarded to the low Tenderer, Fairville Construction Ltd., at the
tendered price of $135,286.00 (including HST) as calculated based upon
estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be
authorized to execute the necessary contract documents.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council award Contract 2019-
17: Meadowbank Avenue Sewer Separation to the low Tenderer.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
July 30, 2018; 2019 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program approved
REPORT
BACKGROUND
The approved 2019 Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program included
funding for inflow and infiltration reduction in the Millidgeville area to regain
capacity in the Millidgeville Sewershed. It was determined that, as a result of
sewer system analysis in the Millidgeville area, there is work that could be done
- 2 -
to separate storm flows from sanitary sewers and, subsequently, redirect storm
flow away from the Beach Crescent Lift Station. This would result in more
capacity in the sanitary system for future development in this area. The work
involves the installation of sewer main and new manholes as well as
reinstatement of concrete curb, concrete sidewalk, asphalt and topsoil/sod.
TENDER RESULTS
Tenders closed on July 9, 2019 with the following results, including HST:
1. Fairville Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 135,286.00
2. MIDI Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 142,166.45
3. TerraEx Inc., Saint John, NB $ 147,418.50
4. Galbraith Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 159,744.20
5. Maguire Excavating Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 159,867.83
89,204.35, including HST.
ANALYSIS
Following analysis of the tenders
for the project was low. The pipe in this area is significantly deeper than typical
sewer mains and this would add extra cost and complexity to the construction of
this project.
The tenders were reviewed by staff and all were found to be formal in all
respects. Staff is of the opinion that the low tenderer has the necessary
resources and ability to perform the work, and recommend acceptance of their
tender.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2019 Water and
Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program. Assuming award of the Contract to the
low tenderer, an analysis has been completed which includes the estimated
amount of work that will be performed by the Contractor and Others.
The analysis is as follows:
Budget $ 150,000.00
Project net cost $ 145,796.53
Variance (Surplus) $ 4,203.47
- 3 -
POLICY TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
The recommendation in this report is made in accordance with the provisions of
Specifications and the specific project specifications.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Completion of this project will allow for additional capacity in the sanitary sewer
system for development and growth in the Millidgeville area Sewershed.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
Date: July 12, 2019
To: Planning Advisory Committee
From: Growth & Community Planning
Growth & Community Development Services
For: Meeting of Tuesday, July 16, 2019
SUBJECT
Applicant: Hughes Surveys and Consultants Inc.
Owner: 1163046 B.C. Limited
Location: 188-190 Winslow Street
PID: 00362764
Plan Designation: Medium to High Density Residential
Existing Zoning: Mid-Rise Residential (RM)
Application Type: Subdivision
Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory
Committee to advise Common Council concerning the vesting of
land for public purposes in conjunction with the subdivision of
land.
SUMMARY
The landowner is proposing to subdivide the site, which contains two existing buildings, into two
separate lots, one for each building. The proposal requires the assent of Common Council for
money in lieu of Land for Public Purposes, which is recommended by Staff.
Page 1 of 3
Hughes Surveys and Consultants 188-190 Winslow Street July 12, 2019
RECOMMENDATION
That Common Council authorize the acceptance of money-in-lieu of the required Land for Public
Purposes for the proposed subdivision at 188-190 Winslow Street (PID 00362764).
DECISION HISTORY
Our files indicate that there have been no previous decisions relating to the subject property.
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The landowner has proposed subdivision of the site into separate lots for each of the two
buildings. The proposal requires the assent of Land for Public Purposes or money-in-lieu of
Lands for Public Purposes.
Site and Neighbourhood
The property is located on the Lower West Side of Saint John at the southwest corner of
Winslow Street and Watson Street. The 459 square metre property contains 2-2 unit dwellings.
A common driveway located between the two buildings provides access from Winslow Street.
The site, and adjacent lands along Winslow Street are zoned Mid-Rise Residential (RM)and
contain a mix of single unit, two unit and multiple unit dwellings. The broader area to the north
and west of the site is also zoned Mid-Rise Residential (RM) with the areas to the south and
east largely zoned Two-Unit Residential (R2).
Municipal Plan
The site and surrounding area southwest of Watson Street are designated Stable Residential in
the Municipal Plan. These areas are built out and not anticipated to receive major change over
the horizon of the current Municipal Plan. As the proposal only involves subdivision, which does
not involve redevelopment or a change in the net density of the site, the proposal conforms to
the intent of the Stable Residential designation.
Zoning and Variances
The proposed lots generally meet the requirement of the Mid-Rise Residential (RM) zone, but
will require variances to permit increased lot coverage and reduced lot area, lot depth and lot
frontage. These variances will be processed by the Development Officer following the granting
of the required assent by Common Council.
Subdivision
The proposed subdivision satisfies the standards of the Subdivision By-law. The Community
Planning Act states that the creation of a new lot must include a dedication of Land for Public
Page 2of 3
Hughes Surveys and Consultants 188-190 Winslow Street July 12, 2019
Purposes, or money-in-lieu of land, which requires the Committee and Council to consider
recommends that Council
receive money-in-lieu of Land for Public Purposes. This approach is supported by the Citys
Parks and Public Spaces service area.
Conclusion
The proposed subdivision meets the intent of the Municipal Plan. Consistent with the direction
established in the Subdivision By-law, Staff recommends that Council accept money-in-lieu of
Land for Public Purposes.
ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
There are no alternate considerations for this application.
ENGAGEMENT
Public
In accordof Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to
landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on July 3, 2019.
SIGNATURES AND CONTACT
Prepared: Reviewed / Approved:
Mark Reade , P.Eng., MCIP, RPP Kenneth Melanson BA, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner Community Planning Manager
Contact: Mark Reade
Phone: (506)721-0736
E-mail: mark.reade@saintjohn.ca
Project: 19-110
APPENDIX
Map 1: Site Location
Map 2: Municipal Plan
Map 3: Zoning
Map 4: Aerial Photography
Map 5: Site Photography
Submission 1: Tentative Plan of Subdivision
Page 3 of 3
The City of Saint John
Map 1 - Site Location
Date: June 19, 2019
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
Low to
Medium Density
Residential
Stable
Residential
The City of Saint John
Map 2 - Future Land Use
Date: June 19, 2019
050m
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
R2
RM
CG
CG
R2
RM
R2
CL
RM
P
R2
CL
RM
R1
RM
RM
CG
RM
RM
CG
RM
R2
R2
CFN
CL
RM
RM
R2
RL
RM
R2
RM
R2
RM
R2
R2
R2
(CFN) Neighbourhood Community Facility(R2) Two-Unit Residential
(CG) General Commercial(RL) Low-Rise Residential
(CL) Local Commercial(RM) Mid-Rise Residential
(P) Park
(R1) One-Unit Residential
Section 59 Conditions
^
The City of Saint John
Map 3 - Zoning
Date: June 19, 2019
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
163
213
204
215
165
164
168
177
152
166
219
170
168 1/2
172
168
181 1/2
180
235181
170
228
182179
237
184
181
239
241
234
236
243
205
194205
245
238
207
247
196
220
211
224
248
188
200
226
190189
197
252
256
206
209
258
214
208
215
211
213
215
212
219
217
229
214
227
216
229
The City of Saint John
Map 4A - Aerial Photography
Date: June 19, 2019
025m
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
205
194
207
188
190189
197
206
The City of Saint John
Map 4B - Aerial Photography
Date: June 19, 2019
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
View from Watson Street frontage
View of site from Watson Street/Winslow Street intersection
View of 190 Winslow StreetView of 188 Winslow Street
The City of Saint John
Map 5 - Site Photography
Date: July-05-19
Hughes Surveys and Consultants - 188-190 Winslow Street
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-188
Report Date July 22, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Saint John Water
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Contract 2019-05: Sanitary Sewer Structural Lining Phase III Various
Locations
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Joel Landers Brent McGovern / Brian John Collin
Keenan
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Contract 2019-05: Sanitary Sewer Structural Lining Phase
III Various Locations, be awarded to the tenderer, Eastern Trenchless Ltd., at
the revised tendered price of $159,285.12 (including HST) as calculated based
upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be
authorized to execute the necessary contract documents.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to recommend that Contract 2019-05: Sanitary
Sewer Structural Lining Phase III Various Locations, be awarded to the
tenderer.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
October 2, 2017; 2018 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Program approved.
REPORT
BACKGROUND
The approved 2018 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program includes
funding for the Cured in place structural lining of sanitary sewers in various
locations. The location of the lining work recommended for award is on Union
Street from Sydney Street to Prince Edward Street.
- 2 -
TENDER RESULTS
Tenders closed on July 9, 2019 with the following results, including HST:
1. Eastern Trenchless Ltd., Fredericton, NB $ 344,904.80
220,000.00, including HST.
ANALYSIS
The tender was reviewed by staff and was found to be formal in all respects.
Staff is of the opinion that the tenderer has the necessary resources and
expertise to perform the work, and recommend acceptance of their tender
(revised tendered price of $159,285.12 including HST).
The difference between the original tendered amount and the available budget is
$154,904.80 ($344,904.80-$190,000.00). Staff wanted to ensure that the City
was receiving good value for the funds being allocated to this project. With this
in mind, Staff contacted the tenderer to discuss the difference in the tendered
explore ways to negotiate a better
overall project price. The tenderer and Staff were successful in negotiating the
quantities of lining work that would result in an overall project cost within the
available budget. The negotiated tender price is now $159,285.12 (including
HST).
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2018 Water and
Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program. Assuming award of the Contract to the
tenderer, an analysis has been completed which includes the estimated amount
of work that will be performed by the Contractor and Others.
The analysis is as follows:
Budget $ 190,000.00
Project net cost $ 154,946.52
Variance (Surplus) $ 35,053.48
POLICY TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
The recommendation in this report is made in accordance with the provisions of
Specifications and the specific project specifications.
- 3 -
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The sanitary sewer on this section of Union Street is in poor condition and
requires rehabilitation. The rehabilitation of the infrastructure will reduce the
likelihood of future service disruptions to the local residents and businesses due
to infrastructure failures.
This project will be completed within the original approved financial budget.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-182
Report Date July 19, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Proposed Public Hearing Date 319 Lancaster Street
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Kenneth Melanson Jacqueline Hamilton John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
That Common Council schedule the public hearing for the rezoning application of
Jamie Reschny (319 Lancaster Street) for Monday September 9, 2019 at 6:30
p.m. in the Ludlow Room, and refer the applications to the Planning Advisory
Committee for a report and recommendation.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to advise Common Council of the
rezoning/condition update applications received and to recommend an
appropriate public hearing date. The next available public hearing date is
September 9, 2019.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
At its meeting of August 3, 2004, Common Council resolved that:
1. the Commissioner of Planning and Development receive all applications for
amendments to the Zoning By-law and Section 39 \[now referred as section
59\] resolutions/ agreements and proceed to prepare the required
advertisements; and
2. when applications are received a report will be prepared recommending the
appropriate resolution setting the time and place for public hearings and be
referred to the Planning Advisory Committee as required by the Community
Planning Act.
- 2 -
REPORT
In response to the motion above, this report indicates the applications received and
recommends an appropriate public hearing date. Details of the applications are
the public hearings. The following application was received:
Name of Applicant Location Existing Proposed Reason
Zone Zone
Jamie Reschny 319 Lancaster Neighbourhood Two-Unit To convert a
Street Community Residential former place of
Facility (CFN) (R2) worship to become
two dwelling units.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
While the holding of public hearings is a legislative requirement of the
Community Planning Act, it is also a key component of a clear and consistent
land development process, which provides transparency and predictability to the
development community and City residents.
The development approvals process helps fulfill Council priorities of:
ensuring Saint John has a competitive business environment for
investment,
supporting business retention and attraction; and
driving development in accordance with PlanSJ which creates the density
required for efficient infrastructure, services and economic growth.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The scheduling of the public hearing and referral to the Planning Advisory
Committee satisfies the legislative and service requirements as mandated by the
Community Planning Act.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
None
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-183
Report Date July 18, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Growth Reserve Fund Request Community Standards Program
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Growth Committee
RECOMMENDATION
Growth Committee recommends
consideration:
Common Council authorizes the transfer of $30,000 from the Growth
Reserve Fund to support the enhanced Community Standards Program
for the remainder of 2019.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Enhanced Community Standards Program was established as a pilot in 2017
to address non-life safety compliance issues. The Program focuses on issues that
directly impact the aesthetics, enjoyment and pride of neighborhoods, including
unsightly premises, garbage issues, zoning infractions and general upkeep of
properties which negatively impact property value and quality of life of citizens.
Tfocus on community standards has gained important momentum
in an area that the City of Saint John has historically struggled to achieve
compliance. With an additional resource and a focused approach on community
standards issues, the program has helped deliver źĬƩğƓƷ
ğƓķ {ğŅĻ City. The Enhanced Community Standards Program is a strong enabler
of growth and is a key driver of a liveable City, which is central to attracting and
retaining people and investment to our City.
To continue the success of the Program, Growth Committee recommends a
$30,000 draw from the Growth Reserve Fund to extend funding for the
Community Standards Officer Position for the remainder of 2019. The following
- 2 -
report will provide a Program update and will provide 2019 year-end projections
should Common Council adopt the funding allocation.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Enforcement of the {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ƓƭźŭŷƷƌǤ tƩĻƒźƭĻƭ ğƓķ 5ğƓŭĻƩƚǒƭ .ǒźƌķźƓŭƭ ğƓķ
{ƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻƭ .ǤΏƌğǞ
REPORT
9ƓŷğƓĭĻķ /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ {ƷğƓķğƩķƭ tƩƚŭƩğƒ wĻƭǒƌƷƭ
The Enhanced Community Standards Program was established as a pilot in 2017
to address non-life safety compliance issues. The pilot program introduced a
Community Standards Officer over an entire year (i.e. enhanced service
delivery). The Program is a strong enabler of growth and is a key driver of a
liveable City, which is central to attracting and retaining people and investment
to our City.
Aggressive, strategic targets, a focused, streamlined approach and a talented
and dedicated resource with a background in community policing have been key
components to the success of the Enhanced Community Standards Program.
Since 2017, the results of the Program have exceeded all expectations in
resolving community standards issues, which in turn, has generated enthusiasm
and positive feedback from the public. Resolved issues as a result of the
Program include: unsightly premises, garbage issues, zoning infractions and
general upkeep of properties.
ЋЉЊАͲ ЋЉЊБ ğƓķ ЋЉЊВ /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ {ƷğƓķğƩķƭ tƩƚŭƩğƒ wĻƭǒƌƷƭ
2017 2018 2019 (YTD)
Notices to Comply Issued 20 9 14
Property Cleanups 2 6 1
Undertaken By Staff
Total Resolved Unsightly 82 75 95
Premises Cases
Prior to the establishment of the Program, gaining compliance on non-life safety
cases such as the clean-up of unsightly properties was a significant challenge. In
2017, a total of 82 unsightly premises cases were resolved with 20 Notices to
Comply issued. In 2018, a total of 75 unsightly premises cases were resolved
with 9 Notices to Comply issued. To date in 2019, the Community Standards
Program has been able to resolve a record number of 95 unsightly premises
- 3 -
cases and 16 Zoning By-law enforcement cases with 14 Notices to Comply issued.
While the Program has already supported impressive compliance and resolution,
staff observes that there remains continued demand within the community.
It is anticipated that an extension funded by the Growth Reserve for the
remainder of 2019 will allow an additional 40 properties to be cleaned, with
approximately 6 unsightly property clean-ups being undertaken through a staff
initiated clean-up. In other words, additional funding would support a total of
135 resolved unsightly premises cases in 2019.
The Community Standards Officer Position has been funded for the first 6
months of this year through the general operating budget, but the ability to offer
enhanced support for the remainder of the year is being requested through
The
Growth Committee is recommending that $30,000 be allocated from the Growth
Reserve fund to extend funding for the Community Standards Program to deliver
the enhanced service for the remainder of 2019.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
N/A
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-185
Report Date July 17, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Designation of By-Law Enforcement Officer
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Christopher McKiel Amy Poffenroth/ John Collin
Jacqueline Hamilton
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Common Council adopt the attached resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to designate Jordan McKinley, Assistant Building
Inspector, as a by-law enforcement officer for the various by-laws which are
enforced by Growth and Community Development Services.
In doing so, Mr. McKinley will be authorized to:
Issue Orders to Comply and Notices to Comply with respect to
enforcement of by-laws that fall within the scope of the Community
Planning Act and the Local Governance Act;
Lay informations in Provincial Court with respect to enforcement of by-
laws that fall within the scope of the Community Planning Act and the
Local Governance Act; and
Conduct inspections pertaining to enforcement of by-laws that fall within
the scope of the Community Planning Act and the Local Governance Act.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
- 2 -
N/A
REPORT
It is necessary at this time to designate Jordan McKinley as a by-law enforcement
officer by adopting the attached resolution so that he may carry out his duties
pertaining to enforcement of the Saint John Building By-law, the Zoning By-law,
the Flood Risk Areas By-law, the Saint John Dog Control By-law, the Mobile Home
Parks By-law, the Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law, Saint John Unsightly
Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law and the Saint John
Minimum Property Standards By-law.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
N/A
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The reviewed the attached resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
RESOLVED, that as recommended by the City Manager, the following resolution be adopted:
1. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the
Local Governance Act, including the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, By-law
Number M-Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law
and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of
the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By-
law;
AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms
of office;
AND WHEREAS subsection 25(1) of the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law
provides that a by-law enforcement officer appointed by council may notify the owner or
occupier of premises, dwelling, dwelling unit or structure by issuing an Order where the
condition of the premises, dwelling, dwelling unit or structure does not comply with said By-
law;
AND WHEREAS section 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for
breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the local government or
such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby appointed as by-
law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Minimum
Property Standards By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue
until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of
The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby appointed and
authorized to notify owners and occupiers where the condition of the premises, dwellings,
dwelling units or structures does not comply with the Minimum Property Standards By-
law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until he
ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City
of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby designated and
authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick
for breach of the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, effective immediately,
and this designation and authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee
of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is
rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
2. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the
Local Governance Act, including the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By- law, By-law
Number M-14 and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make
inspections for the administration of the By-law;
AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms
of office;
AND WHEREAS subsection 144(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
authorize by-law enforcement officers to enter the land, building or other structure at any
reasonable time, and carry out the inspection after giving reasonable notice to the owner or
occupant of the land, building or other structure to be entered;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley, by-law enforcement
officer, is hereby appointed as inspection officer and authorized to enter at all reasonable
times upon any property within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint John for the
purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration of the Saint
John Minimum Property Standards By- law which received first and second reading by
Common Council on September 10, 2018 and third reading on September 24, 2018,
being enacted upon approval by the Minister of Local Government, and/or the Local
Governance Act effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until he
ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Development Services
department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever
comes first.
3. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the
Local Governance Act, including the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings
and Structures By-law, By-law Number M-Saint John
Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law
time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New
Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By-law;
AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms
of office;
AND WHEREAS subsection 132(1) and 132(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that
an officer appointed by council may notify the owner or occupier of premises, a building or
structure by notice in the form prescribed by regulation when a condition exists pursuant to
subsections 131(1), 131(2) or 131(3) of the said Act;
AND WHEREAS section 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for
breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the local government or
such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby appointed as by-
law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly
Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and
this appointment shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and
Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by
Common Council, whichever comes first;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby appointed and
authorized to notify owners and occupiers with respect to premises, buildings or
structures that are unsightly; buildings or structures that are a hazard to the safety of the
public by reason of being vacant or unoccupied; buildings or structures that are a hazard
to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or unsoundness of structural strength,
as set out in the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures
By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until
he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The
City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby designated and
authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick
for breach of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures
By-law, effective immediately, and this designation and authorization shall continue until
he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The
City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
4. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the
Local Governance Act, including the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings
and Structures By- law, By-law Number M-30 and amendments thereto, and it may from time to
time be necessary to make inspections for the administration of the By-law;
AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms
of office;
AND WHEREAS subsection 144(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
authorize officers enter the land, building or other structure at any reasonable time, and carry
out the inspection after giving reasonable notice to the owner or occupant of the land,
building or other structure to be entered;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley, by-law enforcement
officer, is hereby appointed as an inspection officer and authorized to enter at all
reasonable times upon any property within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint
John for the purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration of
the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By- law
which received first and second reading by Common Council on May 22, 2018 and third
reading on June 4, 2018, being enacted upon approval by the Minister of Local
Government, and/or the Local Governance Act effective immediately, and this
authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and
Community Development Services department of The City of Saint John or until
rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
5. WHEREAS subsection 135(4) of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments
thereto, provides that within thirty days after the terms of a notice have been complied with or a
debt due to a local government or due to the Minister of Finance, as the case may be, is
discharged, the local government shall provide a certificate in the form prescribed by regulation
which requires that the corporate seal of the local government be affixed;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jonathan A. Taylor, Common Clerk, is
hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal of The City of Saint John to a Certificate of
Discharge that is issued by Jordan McKinley under the Saint John Unsightly Premises
and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, and such authorization shall continue
until Jonathan A. Taylor ceases to be the Common Clerk of The City of Saint John or until
it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
6. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and amendments thereto (the
Community Planning Act, including the Saint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 102
and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make inspections for the
administration of the By-law;
AND WHEREAS subsection 133(1) of the Community Planning Act provides that a council
may authorize persons at all reasonable times, and with the consent of the owner or
occupant, enter any land, building or premises for the purposes of inspection if the Director,
the development officer or the person authorized by the Minister or the council has
reasonable grounds to believe that a development or form of development on or in the land,
building or premises violates a provision of this Act or the regulations or a bylaw or an order
made under this Act;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley, who is a by-law
enforcement officer, is hereby authorized at all reasonable times, and with the consent of
the owner or occupant, enter any land, building or premises within the territorial
boundaries of the City of Saint John for the purpose of making any inspection that is
necessary for the administration of the Saint John Building By-law, effective immediately,
and this authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and
Community Development Services department of The City of Saint John or until
rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
7. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and amendments thereto (the
Community Planning Act, including the Saint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 102,
and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make orders for the
administration of the By-law;
AND WHEREAS subsection 134(1) of the Community Planning Act provides that a council
may authorize persons to, when a development is undertaken in violation of the Community
Planning Act, a by-law or regulation under the Community Planning Act, a by-law or terms
and conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development,
alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything
required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the
undertaking of such development;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley who is a by-law
enforcement officer, is hereby authorized to, when a development is undertaken in
violation of the Community Planning Act, the Saint John Building By-law or the terms and
conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development,
alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything
required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the
undertaking of such development, effective immediately, and this authorization shall
continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Development
Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council,
whichever comes first.
8. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and amendments thereto (the
Community Planning Act, including the Saint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 102,
and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings
in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to
comply with the said By-law;
AND WHEREAS paragraph 137(a) of the Community Planning Act provides that no person
shall violate or fail to comply with a provision of a by-law made under this Act;
AND WHEREAS section 139 of the Community Planning Act provides that proceedings for
an offence under this Act shall be commenced in the name of the Minister or the clerk of the
local government or any other person who is designated for that purpose by the council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby designated and
authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick
for breach of the Saint John Building By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment
and authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and
Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by
Common Council, whichever comes first.
9. WHEREAS, the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, including the Saint John Dog
Control By-law, By-law Number M-13, and the Mobile Home Parks By-law, By-law Number M-20,
including all amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence
proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has
contravened or failed to comply with these By-laws;
AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may
appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms
of office;
AND WHEREAS section 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for
breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the local government or
such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby appointed as by-
law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Dog Control
By-law and the Mobile Home Parks By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment
shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community
Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common
Council, whichever comes first;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby designated and
authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick
for breach of the Saint John Dog Control By-law and the Mobile Home Parks By-law,
effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until he
ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City
of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
10. WHEREAS, the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant
to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and amendments thereto, (the
Community Planning Act, including the City of Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law, By-law
Number C.P. 11, and The Zoning By-law, By-law Number C.P. 110, including all amendments
thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial
Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has contravened or failed to comply with
these By-laws;
AND WHEREAS paragraph 137(a) of the Community Planning Act provides that no person
shall violate or fail to comply with a provision of a by-law made under this Act;
AND WHEREAS section 139 of the Community Planning Act provides that proceedings for
an offence under this Act shall be commenced in the name of the Minister or the clerk of the
local government or any other person who is designated for that purpose by the council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jordan McKinley is hereby designated and
authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick
for breach of the City of Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law and The Zoning By-law,
effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until he
ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City
of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first.
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-179
Report Date July 18, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Corporate Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
ǝĻƭ \[ĽŭĻƩ Neil Jacobsen John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Common Council amend the list of Official Street Names
and approve the following changes:
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A request was received from NB9-1-1 to clear up some confusion with civic
addresses on Mill Street and Mill Road. Because no residences or businesses are
using a civic address on Mill Road, and Mill Road and Mill Street are essentially
the same street, it Mill Road should be renamed to become
part of Mill Street in order to reduce confusion for emergency service
responders.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
None.
REPORT
A request was received from NB9-1-1 to clear up some confusion with civic
addresses on Mill Street and Mill Road. Because no residences or businesses are
using a civic address on Mill Road, and Mill Road and Mill Street are essentially
the same street, it Mill Road (in red on the map below)
should be renamed to become part of Mill Street in order to reduce confusion
for emergency service responders.
-2-
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Ensuring street names meet NB 9-1-1- guidelines
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The costs to the City of Saint John for this change are approximately $75
associated in replacing the street name sign at the intersection with Bridge Road.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Transportation and Environmental Services were consulted and will cover the
costs from their operating budget.
ATTACHMENTS
None.
COUNCIL REPORT
M&C No. 2019-184
Report Date July 24, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Corporate Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) Consulting Services Contract
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Sarah Ranson Stephanie Rackley-Roach John Collin
Kevin Fudge
RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that:
1) Mayor and Council enter into an agreement with Grant Thornton for
Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) consulting services for a term of two years
with possible extension of two additional years (for a total of four years).
2) The Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
contract documents.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Information Technology and Finance service areas require Qualified Security
Assessor (QSA) consulting services to assist in achieving Payment Card Industry
Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) compliance. The City is contractually required
to meet this standard as a merchant that accepts credit cards for payment.
Additional benefits of PCI DSS compliance are reduced risk of a data breach and
avoidance of the potentially significant cost of non-compliance.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
REPORT
The Payment Card Industry (PCI) Security Standards Council is a global forum for
the ongoing development, enhancement, storage, dissemination and
implementation of security standards for account data protection and continuity
of operations. The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) forms
part of the operating regulations that are the rules under which merchants are
allowed to operate merchant accounts. Security threats are non-stop and evolve
every day, which is why PCI DSS compliance efforts must be a continuous
process of assessment and remediation to ensure safety of cardholder data.
Given the City accepts credit and debit card payments, the City is contractually
obligated to be PCI DSS compliant as a condition of the agreement with Chase
Paymentech. The City is working on becoming PCI DSS compliant to ensure the
public service.
City staff has taken the initial steps towards compliance. This work included
network scans and implementing a PCI DSS compliant third party service
provider for online parking ticket payments. Although outsourcing online
payment processing simplifies security requirements and can
risk exposure, using a third party payment processor does not provide automatic
compliance or exclude the City from PCI DSS compliance.
In order to meet PCI DSS compliance, the Finance and Information Technology
service teams have completed a procurement process for a Qualified Security
Assessor (QSA) to advise and guide the City as we work toward achieving and
maintaining a compliant status. This requires understanding and implementing
twelve requirements for PCI DSS compliance noted below. Failure to achieve
even one of the requirements results in failure to be compliant.
PCI DSS Requirements
1. Install and maintain a firewall configuration to protect cardholder data
2. Do not use vendor-supplied defaults for system passwords and other
security parameters
3. Protect stored cardholder data
4. Encrypt transmission of cardholder data across open, public networks
5. Use and regularly update anti-virus software or programs
6. Develop and maintain secure systems and applications
7. Restrict access to cardholder data by business need-to-know
8. Assign a unique ID to each person with computer access
9. Restrict physical access to cardholder data
10. Track and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data
11. Regularly test security systems and processes
The PCI DSS compliance project will include a review of our current processes,
assessment of our security standards, completion of a gap analysis, and
implementation of the necessary controls or remediation. The project team will
- 3 -
also determine how to integrate PCI DSS compliance into organizational work
planning and budgeting processes. The implementation project ends when our
Attestation of Compliance (AOC) is accepted by our acquirer, Chase
Paymentech, the company that processes our credit and debit card payments
with the banks. At this point, PCI DSS compliance becomes part of our business
operations. Maintaining PCI DSS compliance is an ongoing process of
assessment, remediation and reporting.
The benefit of using a QSA is to have subject-matter expertise for understanding
the twelve requirements, completing on-site security assessments required by
PCI DSS, and for guidance when implementing compensating controls.
Compensating controls may be considered if the City cannot meet a PCI DSS
requirement explicitly as stated due to legitimate technical or documented
business constraints.
lead to a successful AOC submission.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
As outlined in Council Priorities, the City supports valued customer service
delivery. PCI DSS compliance contributes to this priority by ensuring
personal and cardholder data is handled properly. There is also a fiscal benefit
as the City reduces the risk of data breaches.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The agreement is for two years, with the possibility of extending for two
additional one year periods. The contract is valued at $41,200.00 each year,
although there is no guarantee of volume of work. Funds for this work is
allocated in the Information Technology and Finance service area operating
budgets. The business risks and ultimate costs of non-compliance, such as fines
and legal fees, could exceed the cost of implementing PCI DSS standards.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Materials Management facilitated the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to
solicit proposals for Qualified Security Assessor Services. As such, the RFP closed
on June 6, 2019 with the following proponents responding by submitting
proposals:
Grant Thornton LLP Halifax, NS
Digital Boundary Group London, ON
Bell Aliant Saint John, NB
MNP LLP Mississauga, ON
Online Business Systems Winnipeg, MB
A review committee, consisting of staff from Materials Management, Finance
and our IT Department reviewed the submissions for completeness and
- 4 -
compliance with the RFP requirements and selection criteria consisting of the
following:
1. Quality and Completeness
2. Demonstrated Understanding of the Project and Deliverables
3. Proposed Approach
4. Specific Experience, Qualifications and Expertise of Key Personnel
5. Cost
evaluated and ranked eac
Following this, the financial proposals were opened and evaluated and
corresponding scores were added to the technical scores.
proposal was ranked the highest based on an overall rating
of the evaluation criteria as well as offering the lowest cost.
Materials Management support the recommendations being put forth.
ATTACHMENTS
The agreement template is attached as information. Pending approval and
formal resolution from Council, the Materials Management service will send the
agreement package to Grant Thornton and the Common Clerk for signatures.
AGREEMENT
2019-080602P
Qualified Security Assessor Services
Saint John, NB
AGREEMENT
This Agreement made in duplicate copies this ____ day of ___________, 2019.
BETWEEN: THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, having its City
Hall at 15 Market Square, Saint John, New
Brunswick, a body corporate by Royal Charter,
confirmed and amended by Acts of the Legislative
Assembly of the Province of New Brunswick,
OF THE FIRST PART
And
\[Name of Organization\] a \[Type of organization\],
having offices located at \[address\], in the City of
\[City\] and the Province of \[Province\], hereinafter
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the City issued Request for Proposal \[2019-080602P\] for \[Qualified Security
Assessor Services\]
AND WHEREAS the Consultant submitted a technical proposal and a financial proposal, both
dated \[Date\] in response to the Request for Proposal (collectively,
AND WHEREAS the Request for Proposal and the Proposal are attached hereto as Schedules
AND WHEREAS the Financial Proposal forms part of the Proposal, is attached hereto as
and
AND WHEREAS the Common Council at its meeting held on \[Date\] resolved that:
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements herein and subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Request
for Proposal and the Proposal, the parties for themselves, their successors and permitted assigns
respectively, mutually agree as follows:
1. The Consultant shall perform the services and carry out the terms and conditions set out in
the Request for Proposal and the Proposal.
2. The City shall pay the Consultant, in return for the services performed, fees as outlined in the
financial proposal part of the Proposal, plus HST.
Term
3. The terms of this Agreement is for a period of
mutual agreement may choose to extend this contract for two (2) additional one (1) year
periods.\].
Termination
4. The City may immediately terminate this Agreement upon giving notice to the Consultant
where:
a. The Consultant makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, is declared
bankrupt or commits an act of bankruptcy, becomes insolvent, makes a proposal
or otherwise takes advantage of provisions for relief under the Bankruptcy and
Insolvency Act (Canada)or similar legislation in any jurisdiction, or any other type
of insolvency proceedings being commenced by or against the Consultant under
the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) or similar legislation;
b. The Consultant breaches any of the terms or conditions of the within Agreement;
c. Consultant, prior to or after executing this
Agreement, makes a material misrepresentation or omission or provides
materially inaccurate information to the City;
d. The Consultant undergoes a change of control which, in the reasonable opinion of
the City, adversely affects the Consultant
obligation under the within Agreement;
e. The Consultant subcontracts for the provision of part or all of the services without
first obtaining the written approval of the City.
The above rights of termination are in addition to all other rights of termination available at law,
or events of termination by operation of law.
Performance
5. Both parties agree to do everything necessary to ensure that the terms of this Agreement
take effect.
Non-Performance
6. The failure on the part of either party to exercise or enforce any right conferred upon it
under this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any such right or operate to
bar the exercise or enforcement thereof at any time or times thereafter.
Indemnification
7. The Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties
from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses (including legal,
expert and consultant fees), causes of action, actions, claims, demands, lawsuits or other
prosecuted, for third party bodily injury (including death), personal injury and damage to
real or tangible personal property, in any way based upon, occasioned by or attributable
to anything done or omitted to be done by the Consultant, its subcontractors or their
respective directors, officers, agents, employees or independent contractors in the course
of performance of the Consultant
this Agreement. The obligations contained in this paragraph shall survive the termination
or expiry of this Agreement.
Remedies
8. Upon default by either party under any terms of this Agreement, and at any time after the
default, either party shall have all rights and remedies provided by law and by this
Agreement.
9. No delay or omission by either party in exercising any right or remedy shall operate as a
waiver of them or of any other right or remedy, and no single or partial exercise of a right
or remedy shall preclude any other or further exercise of them or the exercise of any other
right or remedy. Furthermore, either party may remedy any default by the other party in
any reasonable manner without waiving the default remedied and without waiving any
other prior or subsequent default by the defaulting party. All rights and remedies of each
party granted or recognized in this Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised at
any time and from time to time independently or in combination.
Mediation
10. All disputes arising out or in connection with this Agreement, or in respect of any legal
relationship associated with or derived from this Agreement, shall be mediated pursuant
to the National Mediation Rules of the ADR Institute of Canada, Inc. Despite this
Agreement to mediate, a party may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction or other
competent authority for interim measures of protection at any time. The place of
mediation shall be the City of Saint John and Province of New Brunswick.
Force Majeure
11. It is agreed between the parties that neither party shall be held responsible for damages
caused by delay or failure to perform his undertakings under the terms of the Agreement
when the delay or failure is due to fires, strikes, floods, acts of God, lawful acts of public
authorities, or delays or defaults caused by common carriers, which cannot be reasonably
foreseen or provided against.
No Assignment
12. This Agreement is not assignable. Any attempt to assign any of the rights, duties or
obligations of this Agreement is void.
Time
13. This Agreement shall not be enforced, or bind any of the parties, until executed by all the
parties named in it.
Notices
14. Any notice under this Agreement shall be sufficiently given by personal delivery or by
registered letter, postage prepaid, mailed in a Canadian post office and prepaid courier,
addressed, in the case of notice to the City of Saint John, to the Common Clerk, 15
Market Square, P. O. Box 1971, Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L1 and in the case of
notice to the Consultant to \[Address\], or to any other address as may be designated in
writing by the parties, and the date of receipt of any notice by mailing shall be deemed
conclusively to be 5 days after the mailing.
Amendments
15. No change or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless it is in writing and
signed by each party.
Acknowledgment of Terms and of Entirety
16. It is agreed that this written instrument embodies the entire agreement of the parties with
regard to the matters dealt within it, and that no understandings or agreements, verbal or
otherwise, exist between the parties except as expressly set out in this instrument.
Further Documents
17. The parties agree that each of them shall, upon reasonable request of the other, do or
cause to be done all further lawful acts, deeds and assurances whatever for the better
performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Validity and Interpretation
18. Descriptive headings are inserted solely for convenience of reference, do not form part of
this Agreement, and are not to be used as an aid in the interpretation of this Agreement.
19. It is intended that all provisions of this Agreement shall be fully binding and effective
between the parties, but in the event that any particular provision or provisions or part of
one is found to be void, voidable or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, then the
particular provision or provisions or part of the provision shall be deemed severed from
the remainder of this Agreement and all other provisions shall remain in full force.
Governing Law
20. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
Province of New Brunswick.
Successors, Assigns
21. This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding on the respective successors
and permitted assigns of each of the parties.
Independent Legal Advice
22. The parties each acknowledge having obtained their own independent legal advice with
respect to the terms of this Agreement prior to its execution.
Acknowledgment of Receipt of Copy
23. Each party acknowledges receipt of a true copy of this Agreement.
$¤¥¨¤£ 4¤±¬²
24. When used in this Agreement, the following word or expression has the following
meaning:
)£¤¬¨¥¨¤£ 0 ±³¨¤²
independent contractors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have affixed their respective corporate seals,
attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf on the day
aforementioned.
)
SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
In the presence of: ) per
)
)
) Mayor
)
)
) Assistant Common Clerk
)
) Common Council Resolution:
) _____________________________________
)
)
\[Organization\]
) Per:
)
) \[Title\]
REQUEST TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL FORM
ABOUT PERSON/GROUP PRESENTING
First Name: Erin Last Name: Cusack
Name of Organization/Group (where applicable): Click here to enter text.
Mailing Address: Click here to enter text.
City or Town: Saint John Province: New Brunswick Postal Code: Click here to enter text.
Day Time Phone Number: Click here to enter text. Email: Click here to enter text.
If you do NOT wish to have your personal information (address, phone number,
email) become part of the public record, please check this box.
ABOUT YOUR REQUEST
Topic of Presentation: Parking for Uptown High School Students
Purpose for Presentation (what is the ask of Council): The purpose of this
presentation is to propose a change to the parking regulations to create a limited
student parking pass for uptown high school students with special needs.
Background Information:My idea is to create a better system for the uptown
student parking that every licensed high school student struggles with. Many
students are required to drive to school and struggle to arrive on time and to attend
employment and/or extra-curricular activities after school. My idea is designed to
help solve this problem and remove the danger created by students running out of
classes to attend to parking restrictions and struggling to avoid regular $30 tickets.
Students who attend Uptown High Schools, currently must move their cars
every two hours, which causes unnecessary stress, frustrated teachers and it
impacts everyone's learning environments. The current parking regulations are
adding unnecessary burden onto students whose focus should be on learning.
I have two proposals that I would like council to consider: the first one
would be to create a limited student parking pass. This pass would be valid from 8-
4, allowing students with special needs to stay in class all day and leave
immediately after school. The second solution would be to extend the parking limit
from two hours to four hours for students with a special needs pass. Either solution
REQUEST TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL FORM
would be only available for students who could prove that they needed the longer
hours.
YOUR SIGNATURE
Signature: Click here to enter text. Date: 2019-07-09
FOR USE BY THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ONLY
Date Received: Click here to enter a date. Council Meeting Date: Click here to enter a
date.
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-187
Report Date July 24, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Saint John Water
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Saint John Water 2018 Annual Water Report
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Kendall Mason Brent McGovern John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Common Council receive and file this report
summarizing the Saint John Water 2018 Annual Water Report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Municipalities in New Brunswick operate public drinking water systems under
conditions set out in certificates of Approval to Operate drinking water treatment
and distribution facilities. Developed by the Department of the Environment and
Local Government (DELG), in collaboration with the Department of Health, these
formal approvals set out standards for water treatment facilities, distribution
systems and operators that strive to assure safe drinking water.
The City of Saint John (as the Approval Holder) provides drinking water services
to the public under authority of Approval to Operate W-1510: Drinking Water
Treatment and Distribution Facilities. This Approval to Operate was issued by the
New Brunswick Minister of the Environment effective September 07, 2017, and
expires September 06, 2022.
The certificate of Approval to Operate is a regulatory tool designed around the
multi-barrier philosophy. All municipal water systems in New Brunswick are
required to abide by the various conditions set out in Approvals to Operate drinking
water treatment and distribution facilities. The standards set through the various
conditions strive to ensure safe and reliable drinking water for all users. Saint John
Water fully endorses the philosophy behind the need for strict regulation of systems
supplying such a vital public service.
- 2 -
ANNUAL REPORT
Condition 25 (Approval W-1510) of the certificate requires submission of an
Annual Report to the Department of the Environment and Local Government. The
report provides pertinent technical and operating information to the Regulator on
Monitoring results (daily/weekly/monthly data such as free chlorine
residual, turbidity, pH, temperature, iron, manganese, etc.)
Monthly water production
Operational highlights (significant incidents and system improvements,
changes, or additions);
Alarm log - major alarms
Summary of backflow prevention and cross-connection activities;
Summary of flushing activities;
Operator information (training, certifications, and staffing changes);
Public relations (notifications & public education)
List of major new extensions and/or renewals complete with analytical
results (microbiological, organic & inorganic)
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
October 2, 2017; 2018 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Budget.
(M&C No. 2017-247)
th
October 30, 2017; 2018 Water & Sewerage Utility Operating Budget.
(M&C No. 2017-273)
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Thiriority for Sustainable City Services and
Municipal Infrastructure.
- 3 -
BACKGROUND
Protective Barriers
People must have water to live; good health depends on consuming adequate
quantities of safe, clean drinking water. That water must be delivered, at the best
cost possible, to Saint John homes, institutions and businesses in a state that is clear,
colourless, odourless and free of disease-causing micro-organisms (pathogens) or
harmful chemicals.
The Drinking Water Service is a public service that provides drinking water to the
community and is vital to the economic vitality of the region. This service includes
the supply of water, treatment, testing, transmission and distribution, administration
of the service, and billing and collections.
Saint John Water manages its drinking water service based on the Multi-Barrier
Approach from the water source to
assured through a series of protective barriers, for instance:
Source (watershed and wellfield) Protection;
Drinking Water Treatment;
Operations and Maintenance (including staff training, development and
staff levels);
Monitoring and Alarms (Sampling Plan, SCADA system, and record
keeping);
Distribution System (residual chlorine maintenance, total coliform
sampling, E. coli sampling, water quality flushing, storage reservoirs,
backflow prevention and cross connection control); and
Emergency Response
ANALYSIS
The Saint John Water 2018 Annual Water Report, with all its attachments,
consists of hundreds of pages of facts and data. Rather than table the full
voluminous document with Common Council, a summarized version with selected
sections is provided. A full copy of the report with all appendices is on file with
the Common Clerk and available on the City of Saint John webpage Tuesday July
30, 2019.
Saint John Water is responsible for the delivery of water and wastewater services
on behalf of the City of Saint John. In accordance with Condition 25 of the Approval
to Operate, the annual water report is intended to provide the (DELG) with
pertinent information relating to operation of the municipal water system.
- 4 -
Analytical Results
The City of Saint John obtains its drinking water from primarily one watershed,
and two wellfields, Loch Lomond (east), the South Bay Wellfield (west) and the
Harbourview Wellfield. The quality of water in the lakes that make up the
watershed is important to the final quality of treated potable water. To that end,
Saint John Water analyzed raw water sources in the eastern water system from ten
locations and in the western water system from four locations. Saint John Water
also analyzes the raw water at each of the five production wells (3 West and 2
Harbourview). With the new West Well system, there are also monitoring wells
surrounding the wellfield which form part of the overall monitoring of the raw
water. This raw water sampling is in addition to the water quality Sampling Plan
approved by the DELG.
The approved Water Sampling Plan from the DELG required that samples be
collected weekly at thirty five locations across the three water distribution systems
and microbiologically analyzed. Twenty of the sites are required to be analyzed
semi-annually for inorganic parameters and quarterly for organic parameters.
In addition to the testing noted above, numerous other water parameters are tested
routinely to monitor system safety and drinking water quality.
Annual water production (raw from Spruce Lake and potable from the South Bay
Wellfield) during 2018 for the Spruce Lake / South Bay Wellfield system was
approximately 41.9 billion litres, an increase of 4.2 billion litres over 2017 annual
Spruce Lake water production, which was 37.7 billion litres. A comparison of
water production for previous four years can be seen in Table 1 below.
Table 1: 2018 Annual Water Production (raw and treated)
Spruce Lake & South Bay Wellfield
Production Increase/Decrease from Previous
Year (billion Liters) Year
(billions of Liters)
41.9 +4.2
2018
37.7 -4.6
2017
42.3 8.1
2016
34.2 -3.5
2015
37.7 -1.9
2014
- 5 -
In 2018, Loch Lomond water flowed from the East water system crossing
Reversing Falls Bridge to the West system via a 900 mm transmission main from
January to October. When East water is flowing across the bridge, it only supplies
Industrial Customers (Irving Pulp and Paper and Irving Tissue). The water
distribution system configuration physically prevents East treated water from
mixing with west potable water due to a physical air gap which was installed
between the 2 systems as part of the Safe Clean Drinking Water Project (SCDWP).
Water flow across the bridge stopped on October 2, 2018 when the requirement for
having the 900mm pipe in service to accommodate the SCDWP work ceased.
During the period, the 900 mm transmission main was in service, Industrial
Customers on the West side were supplied with water for process based on the
operating split of approximately one-sixth of their water from East and five-sixths
from the West raw water system. It is important to note that the West system
supplies only raw untreated water to these Industrial Customers. Irving Pulp and
Paper will be supplied raw water from the West Industrial System going forward.
In 2018, peak monthly production was 4.65 billion litres occurring in the month of
July. This is 0.90 billion litres higher than the peak in 2017 as can be seen in the
Table 2 below. Table 2
month in which it occurred.
Table 2 : Peak Monthly Production (raw and treated)
Spruce Lake/South Bay Wellfield
Year Peak Monthly Increase/Decrease from Peak
Production (billion Previous Year (billions of Month
Liters) Liters)
4.65 +0.90 Jul
2018
3.75 -0.52 Aug
2017
4.27 -0.03 Sep
2016
4.30 -0.42 Jul
2015
4.72 +0.84 Aug
2014
2018 South Bay Wellfield Treated Water Production
Annual ground water withdrawn from the South Bay aquifer in 2018 was about 4.2
billion litres. 2018 was the first full year water was pumped from the aquifer and
delivered to Customers after chlorination and orthophosphate addition at the Spruce
Lake Treatment Facility. Table 3 below breaks down the annual ground water
withdrawn from the South Bay Aquifer by month including the peak volumes per
month.
- 6 -
Table 3 : South Bay Wellfield 2018 Water Production
Peak Daily Average Daily Monthly
Month Production (Mega Production Production (Mega
Litres) (Mega Litres) Litres)
16.5 13.0 402.2
January
15.5 12.6 351.7
February
14.5 12.3 381.8
March
15.1 12.3 368.9
April
15.2 12.2 377.2
May
14.5 11.6 347.9
June
14.0 11.8 366.0
July
15.0 11.3 349.4
August
13.1 11.0 329.2
September
14.3 10.2 317.3
October
11.6 9.3 279.2
November
11.3 9.5 294.0
December
TOTAL 4,164.9
AVERAGE 11.4
Condition 2 in Approval to Operate W-1510 states a maximum annual average
pumping rate for the combined three production wells of 12.5 ML/day. It further
states that the 12.5 ML/day operational pumping rate for the South Bay Wellfield
is to be averaged over a running annual basis (i.e. a maximum of 4562.5ML pumped
over 365 days).
As can be seen in Table 3, a maximum of 4164.9 ML was pumped from the aquifer
in 2018. This represents 91.3% of the maximum allowable water pumped from the
aquifer or 397.6 ML lower than the maximum allowable as per the Approval to
Operate. Furthermore, the daily average pumping rate over the entire year is 11.4
ML/day which is lower than the 12.5 ML/day permitted within the Approval to
Operate; therefore Saint John Water is compliant with condition 2 of the Approval
to Operate. The Figure 1, below illustrates the daily pumping rates for the three
production wells along with the total of all three pumps (purple line).
-7-
{ƚǒƷŷ .ğǤ ĻƌƌŅźĻƌķ 5ğźƌǤ tǒƒƦźƓŭ wğƷĻ
18.0
17.0
16.0
15.0
14.0
13.0
12.0
11.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Southbay Wellfield Pump 1 Consumption (ML/day)Southbay Wellfield Pump 2 Consumption (ML/day)
Southbay Wellfield Pump 3 Consumption (ML/day)Total Water Consumption (ML/day)
Figure 1: 2018 South Bay Wellfield Daily Pumping Rates
As can be seen in Figure 1, the water demands on the west side were highest in
January 2018 decreasing constantly over the entire year ending with the lowest
water demands at the end of 2018. This pattern of water usage or water demands
by Customer has not been experienced in previous years by Saint John Water.
Water demands can be expected to peak in summer months during higher water
usage periods.
Approval to Operate W-1510 also requires the monitoring and recording of water
levels in each of the three production wells (Condition 27). Condition 27 further
states that each well is not to fall below +1m above mean sea level (amsl) more
than 100 days/year with a maximum of 20 consecutive days. Table 4, below shows
the water elevation for each production well on a quarterly basis since the
production wells were commissioned in September 2017.
- 8 -
Table 4: South Bay Wellfield
1
2017/2018 Quarterly Production Well Water Elevation
Water Level Water Level
Approximate Change in
Elevation at Elevation at
Water Level Elevation
Well Start of the End of the
Monitoring Period
(m)
ID Monitoring Monitoring
Period Period
(m asl) (m asl)
2,3
Quarterly Total
Q1 (Oct Dec 2017) 4.6 2 2.6 2.6
Q2 (Jan Mar 2018) 2 0.6 1.4 4
Well
Q3 (Apr Jun 2018) 0.6 0.2 0.4 4.4
#1
Q4 (Jul Sep 2018) 0.2 -0.8 1 5.4
Q5 (Oct Dec 2018) -0.8 -1.2 0.4 5.8
Q1 (Oct Dec 2017) 4.7 2 2.7 2.7
Q2 (Jan Mar 2018) 2 0.5 1.5 4.2
Well
Q3 (Apr Jun 2018) 0.5 0.1 0.4 4.6
#2
Q4 (Jul Sep 2018) 0.1 -0.7 0.8 5.4
Q5 (Oct Dec 2018) -0.7 -1.1 0.4 5.8
Q1 (Oct Dec 2017) 4.7 2 2.7 2.7
Q2 (Jan Mar 2018) 2 0.6 1.4 4.1
Well
Q3 (Apr Jun 2018) 0.6 0.2 0.4 4.5
#3
Q4 (Jul Sep 2018) 0.2 -0.7 0.9 5.4
Q5 (Oct Dec 2018) -0.7 -0.8 0.1 5.5
Notes:
1.
2. Total change in water elevation to the water level elevation observed at each location (August 21, 2017 before
the start of the wellfield operation (September 14, 2017).
3. Total change at the end or Q4 is the annual change.
As shown in Table 4, the water level in each of the three production wells begins
to stabilize below the +1m amsl towards the end of 2018. As a result, Saint John
Water is out of compliance with respect to Condition 27 of the Approval to Operate
the Drinking Water System. Saint John Water has been diligently working with
industry experts along with the Department of Environment and Local Government
and Department of Health to find a solution to this issue and restore the water levels
in the aquifer above the +1 amsl.
Musquash Water System Supplemental Supply to Spruce Lake Watershed
When the water level in Spruce Lake drops to approximately 60 metres, Saint John
Water turns on the Musquash Pump Station and transfers water from the East
Musquash watershed to Menzies Lake. This inter-basin transfer is necessary to
provide for the industrial demand and to assure adequate lake levels in Spruce Lake
in times of low precipitation. A total volume of 16.007 billion litres was transferred
during a total of 111 days of pumping in 2018. For comparison purposes, the
-basin transfers are shown in Table 5 below.
- 9 -
Table 5: Musquash Menzies Lake Interbasin Transfer
Volume Transferred # of Operating Days
Year
(billions of Litres)
16.007 111
2018
16.615 111
2017
23.726 182
2016
10.548 87
2015
7.197 57
2014
Water Production: Loch Lomond System
During 2018, annual water production for the Loch Lomond system (raw and
treated) was 27.5 billion litres, a decrease of 5.8 billion litres over 2017 Loch
Lomond water production, which was 33.3 billion litres. This decrease can be
contributed to the decrease flow across the Reversing Falls Bridge via the 900mm
transmission main compared to 2017 along with the rehabilitation of various water
transmission and distribution pipes associated with the Safe, Clean drinking Water
project. For comparison purposes the Table 6, shows the total annual water
production (raw and treated) for the previous four years.
Table 6: 2018 Annual Water Production (raw and treated)
Loch Lomond System
Production Increase/Decrease from Previous
Year (billion Litres) Year
(billions of Litres)
27.5 -5.8
2018
33.3 +1.6
2017
31.7 -4.7
2016
36.4 +4.4
2015
32.0 +0.2
2014
2018 Loch Lomond System Monthly Water Production
Annual treated water production for 2018 for the Loch Lomond system was
approximately 24.5 billion litres, a decrease of 5.4 billion litres from 2017 water
production, which was 29.9 billion litres. In 2018, peak daily production was 137.5
ML an increase from 2017 which was 135.1 ML. Table 7 presents the Peak Daily
Production and the Monthly treated water production.
- 10 -
Table 7: Loch Lomond System 2018 Treated Water Production
Peak Daily Production Monthly Production
Month
(Mega Litres) (Mega Litres)
100.6 2,404.5
January
97.5 2,192.5
February
102.4 2,320.8
March
136.0 2,263.9
April
97.6 2,261.5
May
119.2 2,559.7
June
137.5 3,112.4
July
126.1 2,450.8
August
54.9 1,401.0
September
43.5 1,143.1
October
46.0 1,134.7
November
44.1 1,243.7
December
TOTAL 24,488.5
CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION
During 2018, a total of 99.6 tonnes of gaseous chlorine were purchased for the Loch
Lomond System. This is a dramatic drop in consumption from previous years due
to the commissioning and start-up of the new Loch Lomond Drinking Water
Treatment Facility (LLDWTF). As part of the Safe, Clean drinking Water project,
the start-up of the new treatment plant occurred on August 30, 2018. As a result of
this start-up Saint John Water stopped the addition of Chlorine gas at Latimer Lake
on September 21, 2018 after a planned transition to the new plant.
A total of 52.9 tonnes of sodium hypochlorite was purchased for the South Bay
Wellfield. The drop in chlorine usage for the West system compared to previous
years is mainly due to the conversion from surface water to ground water in
September 2017, which has a much lower organic content than the surface water
supply and thus has much less chlorine demand.
Table 8: Chemical Consumptions by Year
Loch Lomond Spruce Lake System -
Year System - gaseous Sodium Hypochlorite
Chlorine (tonnes) (tonnes)
99.6 52.9
2018
129.4 133.9
2017
119.8 167.6
2016
171.5 175.2
2015
144.2 186.7
2014
158.3 210.6
2013
- 11 -
/0%2!4)/.!, ()'(,)'(43
Saint John Water manages its drinking water service based on the Multi-Barrier
Approach from the water source to ater quality must be
assured through a series of protective barriers. Source water (watershed and
wellfield) protection is the first barrier. To aid in this, both Spruce Lake and Loch
Lomond watersheds are protected under the P
Watershed Protection Area Designation Order. This order places various
restrictions on the types of activities allowed on either the watercourse or
surrounding land. In general, it is much less expensive to prevent negative impacts
to watersheds than site remediation after an incident has occurred.
Many of the lands in the watersheds are forested, and this brings risks such as forest
fire, disease, and insect infestation. When forests are not managed properly or are
not maintained in a state of good health, it puts the drinking water supply at risk.
In 2018, like previous years, we received various public concerns from home
owners around the Loch Lomond watershed related to misuse and illegal dumping
on city owned property. Operational staff increased surveillance in these areas and
in some cases erected signs and barriers in the affected areas in an attempt to curtail
these activities. Staff also removed several truckloads of garbage from these sites.
Operational Highlight Water Treatment
2018 marked a significant achievement for Saint John Water, the City of Saint John
and the citizens it serves. For many decades, the City operated a Water Treatment
Facility at Latimer Lake which consisted of coarse screening followed by
chlorination. This rudimentary process provided drinking water to Customers east
of the Reversing Falls for many years. With the completion of the new Loch
Lomond Drinking Water Treatment Facility in late August 2018, the City is now
delivering high quality drinking water to its customers using a modern day state-
of-the-art Water Treatment Facility. This treatment facility, along with several
kilometres of transmission/distribution pipe, was part of the Safe Clean Drinking
Water Project.
Operational Highlight Water Distribution
In 2018, Saint John Water Staff responded to 44 water main breaks, 4 more than
2017. The mains ranged in size from 50mm to 400 mm in diameter.
Also in 2018, Saint John Water did not experience any large transmission main
failures. This was a direct result of the new installations as well as the rehabilitated
portions of the transmission main system that was completed on the Safe Clean
Drinking Water Project.
-12-
Operational Highlight Orthophosphate Introduction
In 2018, Saint John Water began introducing an orthophosphate
solution to both the East and West water systems. Orthophosphates are
commonly used in the water treatment industry to combat pipe
corrosion by stabilizing the internal pipe scale. The orthophosphate
solution is a NSF 61 certified product which means it has been
approved to be used in potable water systems. It should be noted that
the introduction of orthophosphate was approved by both the
Department of Health (DOH) and the Department of Environment and
Local Government (NBDELG) prior to implementation.
A temporary orthophosphate dosing system was added to the West
system to potentially assist in stabilizing existing scale formation on
Figure : Temporary
private copper plumbing. The dosing system was commissioned in
Orthophosphate Dosing
March 2018.
System - Spruce Lake WTP
Orthophosphate addition in the East system started in June 2018 as a
means to slowly transition the water quality in the east system to water that will
eventually be produced from the new Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment
Facility. The temporary dosing of orthophosphate solution at Latimer Lake Water
Treatment Facility ceased in early September shortly after the LLDWTF came on-
line. The addition of orthophosphate at the new LLDWTF was always
contemplated under the Safe, Clean Drinking Water Project.
For comparison purposes, Table 9 below illustrates orthophosphate consumption
for the past year for both the East and West systems. Also included in the table is
the mass of dry Orthophosphate product the City purchased for the new LLDWTF.
Table 9: Orthophosphate Consumption
Loch Lomond South Bay System Loch Lomond
System - Liquid Liquid Drinking Water
Year
Orthophosphate Orthophosphate Treatment Facility
(Litres) (Litres) (kg)
8,000 7,000 14,515
2018
Operational Highlight Sodium Hydroxide Introduction
In 2018, Saint John Water began introducing a 50% sodium hydroxide solution to
the East water systems. Sodium Hydroxide is commonly used in the water
treatment industry to adjust the pH of finished water. It is a NSF 61 certified
product which means it has been approved to be used in potable water systems. It
should be noted that the introduction of sodium hydroxide was approved by both
the DOH and NBDELG prior to implementation.
- 13 -
pH adjustment in the East system started in April 2018 as a means to slowly
transition the water pH in the east system to water that will eventually be produced
from the new Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment Facility. The temporary
dosing of sodium hydroxide solution at Latimer Lake Water Treatment Facility
ceased in early September shortly after the LLDWTF came on-line. Table 10 below
shows the amount of Sodium Hydroxide consumed with the temporary dosing
system at Latimer Lake. pH adjustment at the new LLDWTF was always
contemplated under the Safe, Clean drinking Water Project.
Table 10: Sodium Hydroxide Consumption
Loch Lomond
Year System - Sodium
Hydroxide (kg)
106,877
2018
Operator Training & Certification
Saint John Water continues to make advances in the operation and maintenance of
our water and wastewater systems and the pivotal role they play in providing for
the protection of public health and the delivery of a vital service. The City of Saint
John continues to work with the New Brunswick Community College Saint John
in developing training programs for its water and wastewater operators. The
training has been attended by City of Saint John staff, numerous other
municipalities from New Brunswick and by private companies. A detailed training
and certification summary is included in the annual report.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Staff will be forwarding the Saint John Water 2018 Annual Water Report to the
DELG and the Department of Health on behalf of the City of Saint John (Approval
Holder). An electronic version of the full 2018 Annual Report is available on the
City of Saint John Web site.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
N/A
COUNCIL REPORT
M&C No. 2019-189
Report Date July 24, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Saint John Water
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Tender No. 2019-081204T - Packaged Pump Station Civil Works
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Dean Price Brent McGovern / Kendall John Collin
Mason
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that:
1) Common Council approve an adjustment to the 2019 Water & Sewerage
Utility Fund Capital Program to establish a new project entitled Fallsview
Drive Interim Booster Pump Station with a budget of $575,000
($525,000 net cost after HST rebate) with the overall 2019 Water &
Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program to remain at the original approved
envelope amount as the Fallsview Drive Interim Booster Pump Station
project will be offset from a $525,000 budget surplus from the Metcalf
Street project;
2) The tender submitted by Keel Construction Ltd. , for Tender No. 2019-
081204T: Packaged Pump Station Civil Works, in the amount of
$228,107.66 plus HST be accepted. Additionally, it is recommended that
the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary
contract documents.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Packaged
Pump Station Civil Works to the lowest compliant bidder.
- 2 -
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
On July 8, 2019, Common Council resolved that the City implement the interim
solution described in M&C No. 2019-168 of
supplying water from the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment Facility to
Lower West, Milford, Randolph, Fundy Heights, Duck Cove and Sand Cove
neighbourhoods, while it develops a long-term solution to ensure a long-term
sustainable supply of safe, clean drinking water for West Saint John.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Saint John invests in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
Council with the adoption of M&C 2019-168 on July 8, 2019 approved the design
and construction of an interim booster pump station at Fallsview Drive at a cost
of approximately $575,000 ($525,000 net cost after HST rebate) which will be
offset from surplus funds from the Metcalf Street project under the 2019 Water
& Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS MATERIALS
MANAGEMENT
Tender no. 2019-081204T for the civil work related to the Packaged Pump
Station was issued on July 10, 2019 and closed on July 23, 2019 with four (4)
companies submitting bids as follows (excluding HST):
COMPANY NAME TENDERED PRICE
Fairville Construction Ltd $246,293.00
TerraEx Inc $306,095.00
Galbraith Construction Ltd $297,898.30
Keel Construction Ltd $228,107.66
Staff of Materials Management, and Saint John Water have reviewed the tender
and have found it to be complete and formal in every regard. Staff believes that
the low tenderer has the necessary resources and expertise to perform the work,
and recommend acceptance of their tender.
Materials Management support the recommendation put forth.
ATTACHMENTS
N.A.
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-190
Report Date July 23, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Finance and
Administrative Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Lease Agreement with Saint John Arts Centre Peel Plaza
CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Acting City Manager
Curtis Langille Kevin Fudge/Ian Fogan John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Common Council adopt the following terms and conditions contained in
this recommendation to be incorporated into a Lease agreement with the Saint
John Arts Centre, which had previously expired on June 30, 2013 with all other
terms and conditions remaining the same:
a) the term of the lease shall be ten (10) years commencing on August 1, 2019
and ending July 31, 2029;
b) the annual rent payable to the City of Saint John shall be as follows:
i) on August 1, 2019 $10.00, plus HST (if applicable);
ii) as of August 1, 2020 an annual rent of $111,632.00 to be paid in
equal quarterly installments commencing on August 1st of each and
every year during the term, pursuant to the payment schedule of
the Greater Saint John Regional Facilities Commission with annual
increases of one percent with the last year of the Term commencing
on August 1, 2028 having an annual rent of $120,881.00, plus HST
((if applicable);
c) the City will provide the Lessee with an Option to renew this lease for one
additional term of ten years at the then prevailing market rate to be
mutually agreed upon by both parties and the exercise of which shall be in
writing delivered to the lessor not later than January 31, 2029;
d) in the event the lessee desires to encumber this Lease, assign or sublet all or
any part of the premises or grant any licence, concession or other right of
occupancy, the Lessee shall notify the Landlord in writing, attention Real
Estate Services, City of Saint John, the name of the proposed assignee, sub
lessee or other transferee and the terms and conditions of the proposed
assignment, sublease or transfer;
e) the Lessee shall be responsible to pay all public utilities, electricity (including
heating the premises), natural gas, water, sewerage, telephone and internet
- 2 -
services (both fixed-line and mobile) with payments to be quarterly as
detailed above in (1)(b)(ii); and
f) the lessee shall pay real property tax for the premises with payments to be
quarterly as detailed above in (1)(b)(ii).
2. that the City Solicitor be directed to prepare the lease reflective of the
foregoing and that the Mayor and Common Clerk sign any documentation
necessary to execute this agreement.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Lease agreement between the City and the Saint John Arts Centre (SJAC) for the use
and operation of the Carnegie building had expired on June 30, 2013; the SJAC has been
over-holding on a month to month arrangement since that date. This is a Regional
Facility with expected cost sharing between the City and the three surrounding
communities.
The Saint John Arts Centre Board has reviewed and supports approval of a new lease
agreement with the City as per the terms and conditions stated in the recommendation
contained in this report.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Staff aims to provide open, transparent and consistent internal process to facilitate
economic health priorities.
REPORT
The lease agreement with SJAC expired on June 30, 2013 and the arrangement between
the parties has been on a month to month basis since that date with the financial
arrangement remaining unchanged.
As per the Greater Saint John Regional Facilities Commission Act, the facility under the
control and management of the Saint John Arts Centre Inc., called the Saint John Arts
Centre, is a regional facility and should be managed accordingly with the financial
responsibility shared by all four municipalities. In order to achieve this in a fair and
equitable manner, a new lease between the SJAC and the City should incorporate into
its terms and conditions that the Lessee be responsible for ğƌƌ public utilities, including
heat and should also be responsible for property taxes and pay fair market rent.
The total floor area of the Arts Centre is 13,954 square feet. Staff considers a fair
market rent for this building type; considering its location, amenities, etc. to be $8.00
per square foot of leased space. This results in a fair market value rent of $111,632.00
annually. As the budget has already been set for the upcoming year, it is proposed to
commence fair market rents one year into this agreement with one percent added to
the annual rent for the duration of the lease. Staff is in agreement with the lessee that
the lessee be billed quarterly of each and every year during the term, pursuant to the
payment schedule of the Greater Saint John Regional Facilities Commission.
- 3 -
In addition to receiving fair market rent, the lessee is agreeable to pay property taxes
and all public utilities, including heat. These would also be billed quarterly.
The proposed lease would include one ten (10) year term with an option by the
proponent to renew for one additional 10 year term.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The Regional Facilities Commission provides for fair and equitable funding of operating
budgets for its five regional facilities listed in its Act; the Saint John Arts Centre being
one of them. These terms and conditions as recommended by staff are reflective of a
lease between a landlord and its tenant whereby the tenant is expected to pay fair
market rent and to be responsible to pay all operating costs associated with the space it
leases.
Based on the formula used by the Greater Saint John Regional Facilities Commission, the
City would budget for two-thirds of the operating costs with one-third being the
responsibility of the outlying municipalities. This lease would allow the City to recover
approximately $47,000.00 annually from the other municipalities, which amounts to
approximately $500,000.00 over the proposed ten (10) year term.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Facilities Management was solicited for their input in the preparation of this report.
ATTACHMENT
Location Map
Proposed Council Resolution respecting AREA 506 Application for Extended Hours of
Operation:
RESOLVED that Common Council endorses the request by AREA 506 for members of the
Fare) to extend their hours of operation on August 2 4, 2019 until 3:00 am (1 hour).
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN
Priority Infrastructure Projects July 29, 2019
infrastructure funding requests to Federal and Provincial
Governments with the exception of emergency response
related funding, include:
A new school in the central peninsula;
Development of the Fundy Quay site; and,
Foster Thurston/Ashburn Lake Road NB Route 1 Interchange
Project
2
Develop Saint John
Mission
We grow the tax base in Saint
John by relentlessly creating
and seizing strategic real
estate opportunities and
getting deals done.
Portfolio includes 56 projects
with a total potential tax base
increase of $560 million.
3
Develop Saint John
Three catalytic
projects
Greatest ability to leverage
private sector investment
and tax base growth
Strong business cases for
both City and Province
Support the Vision of PlanSJ
and the Neighbourhood Plan
4
Develop Saint John
Three catalytic projects
Route 1 Ashburn / Retail
Fundy Quay DevelopmentNew Central Peninsula School
Drive Interchange
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay Development
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay Development
A Priority of PlanSJ & the Central Peninsula Neighbourhood Plan
Catalyst for new Investment &
Development
Reputation
Contributes to the Growth of the Regional
Economy
Provides Cultural and Recreational
Amenities for all of Greater Saint John
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay Development
A Complex Infrastructure Project
A Complex Project
The Fundy Quay project will require a strong private sector development
partner, with the support of the City, the Province & Federal Government.
Funding Applications Submitted
DMAF Funding Application:
Seawall Repair & Raise Elevation
Bi-Lateral Funding Application:
Soil Remediation
Site Raising & Flood Protection
Loyalist Plaza Update, Harbour Passage, & Pedway
District Energy System
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay
Where We Are At
Stage 1 Call for Expressions of Interest for Private Sector Partner
completed
Working with Potential Private Sector Partner on Feasibility, Due
Diligence & Business Planning
Approval of Federal Funding for the Sea Wall (DMAF)
Bi-Lateral Funding Application Submitted
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay
The Next Steps
Continue Working with Private Sector Partner on Feasibility, Due
Diligence, Business Planning & Anchor Use Attraction
Working with the Province on Funding & Potential Anchor Use
Opportunities
Awaiting Results of Bi-Lateral Funding Application
Building a Strong Business Case for the City, Province & Federal
Government
Seawall work could begin in 2020
Develop Saint John
Fundy Quay Development
The Business Case (Under Development)
Anticipated Private Sector Investment: $150 -$200 Million
Estimated Direct Municipal Tax Revenues: $1.5 -$2.5 Million
Annually
Indirect Municipal Tax Revenues: Up to $550,000 Annually
A Strong Investment for the Province
Preliminary Economic
Analysis Completed by
Develop Saint John
Route 1 Ashburn / Retail Drive Interchange
Develop Saint John
Route 1 Interchange Required for Development
Develop Saint John
Route 1 Interchange Required for East Point Final Phase
Develop Saint John
Route 1 Interchange
Municipal Benefits
Addresses Traffic Issues on Rothesay Avenue
Improves Access to McAllister Regional Retail Centre
Improves North South Connections to Hospital / UNB Cluster
Allows for the Completion of East Point & the Construction of The
Crossing
Annual Tax Revenues of $2.1 Million at Full Build Out
Develop Saint John
Provincial Return on Investment
Return on Investment
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN16
Develop Saint John
Private Sector Direct Investment Leveraged
Direct Investment
$300,000,000
$250,000,000
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
$0
ProvincialPrivate Sector
$8 Private investment for every $1 Provincial investment
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN
Develop Saint John
Provincial Revenues (From Construction Activity)
Tax Revenue Generated From Construction Activity
$10,600,00
Personal Income Tax
Taxes on Products
$15,500,000
Sales Taxes
$9,900,000
Total
$36,000,000
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN
Develop Saint John
Provincial Revenues (From Operations: Ashburn & New East Point)
Annual Tax Revenues at Full Build Out
$3,000,000
Personal Income Tax
Taxes on Products
$6,400,000
Sales Tax
$4,100,000
Property Tax
$1,500,000
Total$15,000,000
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN
Develop Saint John
Provincial Revenues
Provincial Cash Flow (Cumulative 25 Years)
$350,000,000
$300,000,000
Break Even Point
Break Even Point
$250,000,000
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000
$50,000,000
$0
20202021202220232024202520262027202820292030203120322033203420352036203720382039204020412042204320442045
($50,000,000)
DEVELOP SAINT JOHN20
Develop Saint John
New Central Peninsula School
St. John the Baptist / King Edward School
Prince Charles School
Develop Saint John
New Central Peninsula School
A Central Peninsula Neighbourhood Plan Priority
Supports the transition to mixed income
neighbourhoods
Replaces some of the oldest schools in the
Province with the most innovative
Will catalyze growth and reinvestment
Retains young families in the urban core
Includes an innovative community
commons to enhance programming
Develop Saint John
School Program Overview
ProposedSchool Details
K-8 School, 113,000 sq. ft.
550 Student Capacity, with 30 Classrooms
Early French Immersion Program
Early Learning Centre for up to 80 licensed spaces
Innovative & Collaborative Community & Learning Commons
Approach
Develop Saint John
The Business Case
Municipal Benefits
Annual Property Tax Increase of $1.1 Million
Will support the transition to mixed income neighbourhoods
Will replace some of the oldest schools in the Province with the
most innovative
Will catalyze growth and reinvestment
Will retain young families in the urban core
Will provide an innovative community commons to enhance
programming
Develop Saint John
The Business Case
Social Savings
Community programs have significantly contributed to a reduction
in the number of drop-outs in Saint from 211 to 128.
The present value of Provincial Savings in this impact is
estimated to be between $13.2M $26.5M
Develop Saint John
The Business Case
Property Tax Base Benefits (Province of New Brunswick)
Annual Provincial Revenue Increase: $144k -$262k
Present Value of $3.3M 6.0M
Develop Saint John
The Business Case
Leveraged Resources & GNB Cost Savings
Approximately $2 Million in Potential Community
Contributions
Develop Saint John
GNB Return on Investment
Payback by Year 6
NPV over Lifecycle: $16M (95% prob) -$32M (50% prob)
Develop Saint John
GETTING DEALS DONE
Date: July 12, 2019
To: Planning Advisory Committee
From: Growth & Community Planning
Growth & Community Development Services
For:Meeting ofTuesday,July 16, 2019
SUBJECT
Applicant: City of Saint John
Owner:
Location: 81 Bayside Drive
PID: 00317636
Plan Designation: Stable Commercial
Existing Zoning: Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN)
Proposed Zoning: General Commercial (CG)
Application Type: Rezoning
Jurisdiction:The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory
Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning
proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law. Common Council
will consider the Committee recommendation at a public hearing
onMonday,July 29, 2019. Committee may impose conditions.
Page 1 of 4
City of Saint John 81 Bayside Drive July 12, 2019
SUMMARY
The City of Saint John is initiating this application on behalf of the landowner (Everett Erb) to
rezone 81 Bayside Drive from Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to General
Commercial (CG). This application will correct the improper zoning applied to the site during the
adoption of the City of Saint John Zoning Bylaw (ZoneSJ) exercise.
RECOMMENDATION
That Common Council rezones 930 square metres of land located at 81 Bayside Drive, also
identified as PID No. 00317636, from Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to General
Commercial (CG).
DECISION HISTORY
There are no relevant planning decisions made for 81 Bayside Drive.
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The City of Saint John is seeking approval of the rezoning of 81 Bayside Drive from
Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to General Commercial (CG) to rectify the improper
property owner made an inquiry to the One Stop Development Shop.
Staff has reviewed the Municipal Plan and in accordance with Policy I-3, has determined that
the rezoning of 81 Bayside Drive is consistent with the vision of the plan.
Site and Neighbourhood
The subject site is located in East Saint John, and is designated as Stable Commercial. The lot
abuts Bayside Drive, and has two small lanes separating it from other Neighbourhood
Community Facility lots. The neighbourhood consists of a diverse number of uses, ranging from
Two-Unit Residential to Light Industrial, while the site itself is adjacent to a large Neighbourhood
Community Facility (Bayside Middle School).
As the site is currently zoned Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN), the uses for the site
are limited, which is in stark contrast to similar sites on Bayside Drive, most of which are zoned
General Commercial (CG) or Corridor Commercial (CC). By rectifying the zoning of the site to
CG, the uses for the site can include restaurants, grocery stores, and service stations that are
similar uses to other developments along Bayside Drive.
Page 2 of 4
City of Saint John 81 Bayside Drive July 12, 2019
Conclusion
Approvalofthe re-zoning of 81 Bayside Drive from Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN)
to General Commercial (CGwill restore the correct zoning rights, allowing the property to be
developed moreappropriately withthe vision of the Municipal Plan.
ALTERNATIVESANDOTHERCONSIDERATIONS
No alternatives wereconsidered.
ENGAGEMENT
Public
In accordof Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to
landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on July , 2019. The public hearing for the
rezoning was advertised on July 12, 2019.
SIGNATURESANDCONTACT
Prepared:
Corey Cooper,MPlan
Planner
Reviewed:Approved:
Kenneth Melanson, BA, RPP, MCIPJacqueline Hamilton, MURP, MCIP, RPP
Manager,Community PlanningCommissioner
Contact: Cooper, Corey
Phone: (506)632-6846
E-mail:corey.cooper@saintjohn.ca
Project:19-0107
Page 3 of 4
City of Saint John 81 Bayside Drive July 12, 2019
APPENDIX
Map 1: Site Location
Map 2: Municipal Plan
Map 3: Zoning
Map 4: Aerial Photography
Map 5: Site Photography
Page 4of 4
The City of Saint John
Map 1 - Site Location
Date: June-10-19
City of Saint John - 81 Bayside Drive
Stable
Commercial
Residential
Corridor
Stable
Commercial
Light
Industrial
The City of Saint John
Map 2 - Future Land Use
Date: June-10-19
City of Saint John - 81 Bayside Drive
CG
CFN
R2
R2
IL
RL
CG
R2
R2
CG
CFN
P
CG
(CFN) Neighbourhood Community Facility(RL) Low-Rise Residential
(CG) General Commercial
(IL) Light Industrial
(P) Park
(R2) Two-Unit Residential
Section 59 Conditions
^
The City of Saint John
Map 3 - Zoning
Date: June-10-19
City of Saint John - 81 Bayside Drive
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,
IGN, and the GIS User Community
The City of Saint John
Map 4 - Aerial Photography
Date: June-10-19
025m
City of Saint John - 81 Bayside Drive
81 Bayside Drive
Presentation to Planning Advisory Committee
th
July 16, 2019
Growth & Community Planning Team
DƩƚǞƷŷ ε /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ {ĻƩǝźĭĻƭ
Proposal
Rezoning Application
The City of Saint John is seeking approval of the rezoning of 81
Bayside Drive from Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to
General Commercial (CG) to rectify the improper transition made
during the adoption of ZoneSJ. This issue came to the
attention when the property owner made an inquiry to the One
Stop Development Shop.
Ћ
Site Location
Ќ
Site Zoning
Ѝ
Site Aerial
Ў
Future Land Use
Џ
Site Photos
View from Site (Site)
А
Site Photos
View from Site (West of Site)
Б
Public Engagement
Notification of the proposal was sent to landowners
rd
within 100 metres of the subject property of July 3,
2019.
Our office received no letters from the public.
The public hearing for the rezoning was advertised on
th
the City of Saint website on July 8, 2019.
В
Staff Recommendation
Approval of the re-zoning of 81 Bayside Drive from
Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to General
Commercial (CG will restore the correct zoning rights,
allowing the property to be developed more
appropriately with the vision of the Municipal Plan).
ЊЉ
Public Engagement
rd
Letters to land owners July 3, 2019
No letters were received
th
Website ad (Public Hearing) July 8, 2019
th
PAC Meeting July 16, 2019
Applicant presentation
No members of public in attendance
ЊЊ
PAC Recommendation
PAC recommends:
That Common Council rezones 81 Bayside Drive from
Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to General
Commercial (CG).
ЊЋ
Date: July 12, 2019
To: Planning Advisory Committee
From: Growth & Community Planning
Growth & Community Development Services
For: Meeting of Tuesday, July 16, 2019
SUBJECT
Applicant: Tailored Developments
Owner: Lang Lee
Location: 149 Broad Street
PID: 00000604
Plan Designation: Medium to High Density Residential
Existing Zoning: Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN)
Proposed Zoning: Urban Centre Residential (RC)
Application Type: Rezoning
Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory
Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning
proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law. Common Council
will consider the Committee recommendation at a public hearing
on Monday, July 29, 2019. Committee may impose conditions.
Page 1 of 5
Tailored Developments 149 Broad Street July 12, 2019
SUMMARY
The proposal is to rezone a 1,483 square metre property from Neighbourhood Community
Facility (CFN) to Urban Centre Residential (RC) to enable the redevelopment of a vacant 3
storey brick building. The building, formerly known as the Courtenay House, operated as a
number of uses including a community facility from 1892 until its closure in 1976. Staff are
supportive of the proposal as it would allow for the adaptive reuse of a community facility
building into a multiple unit dwelling.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Common Council rezone an approximately 1,483 square metre parcel located at
149 Broad Street, also identified as PID No. 00000604, from Neighbourhood Community
Facility (CFN) to Urban Centre Residential (RC).
2. That, pursuant to Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, the development and use
of the parcel of land with an area of approximately 1,483 square metres, located at 149
Broad Street also identified as PID No. 00000604, be subject to the following condition:
a. That any development of the site be in accordance with a detailed site plan to be
prepare by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer,
indicating: the location of all buildings and structures, vehicular parking areas &
driveways, bicycle parking, loading areas, signage, exterior lighting, outdoor
storage areas, landscape and amenity areas, and other site features. The site
plan is to be attached to the application for the building permit for the proposed
development.
DECISION HISTORY
There are no Council or Planning Advisory Committee decisions associated with this property
subsequent to 1979.
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The proposal is to rezone a parcel located at 149 Broad Street from Neighbourhood Community
Facility (CFN) to Urban Centre Residential (RC) to enable conversion to a multiple unit dwelling.
Renovations tentatively consist of creating 10 apartment units (6 two bedroom and 4 one
bedroom). A site plan was included in the application, which shows the creation of on-site
parking in the side and rear yard to service the units. The final site plan, as required by condition
of the rezoning, will need to be submitted at the time of any building permit.
Page 2of 5
Tailored Developments 149 Broad Street July 12, 2019
Site and Neighbourhood
The property is located in the eastern portion of the
situated on the north side of Broad Street. Under the Municipal Plan, Broad Street is identified
as an arterial street, a road whose function is the movement of larger volumes of all types of
vehicle traffic at medium to high speeds. The existing 3 storey brick building occupies 35% of
the lot with an attached shed. The remainder of the lot is vacant, but notably, there are 4-5
mature trees located in the northwest corner of the property.
According to Archives NB, Courtenay House had a longstanding history of serving as a home
for women over the age of sixty. In 1976 residents were transferred to the Church of St. John
and St. Stephen Home Inc. Since that time, there have been a variety of uses which have
occupied the building. Under the current owner, the property has remained vacant since 2016. A
structural report was conducted by Tailored Developments and submitted prior to the rezoning
application, with the conclusion that overall the structure is in good condition to be rehabilitated
for a residential dwelling.
The property is surrounded by residential uses, with the neighbourhood block made up of
converted dwellings housing between 2 and 6 units. In addition to residences, the outlying
neighbourhood contains an office/warehouse, nursing home, and vacant lands of Imperial Oil.
The property is within close proximity to amenities such Queen Square and Rainbow Park and
Municipal Plan and Rezoning
The property is designated Medium to High Density Residential under the Municipal Plan and
lies within an Urban Neighbourhood Intensification Area. From this perspective, the proposal is
appropriate. Policy LU-
range of housing types with an emphasis on the provision of higher density housing forms such
Furthermore, Policy I-2 of the Plan sets out general criteria to be evaluated by the City in its
consideration of amendments to the Zoning By-law. This proposal is capable of meeting this
criteria based on the following:
a) The proposal is in conformity with the goals and policies of the Municipal Plan.
b) Owing to its location within an intensification area, the proposal is not premature or
inappropriate in terms of the delivery of services, proximity to community amenities,
access, or potential for negative impacts to designated heritage buildings.
c) The proposal consists of an existing building; however, appropriate controls will be
placed on any renovation through the requirement of a site plan that must demonstrate
conformity in terms of parking, outdoor storage, signs, and any other relevant matters.
d) The proposed site is suitable in terms of environmental considerations and susceptibility
of flooding.
e) Terms and conditions related to phasing of the development are not applicable.
Page 3of 5
Tailored Developments 149 Broad Street July 12, 2019
f) Public health and safety considerations at this time are not applicable; however, any
renovations will be required to be in conformity the Building By-law.
General Urban Design Policy UD-
design by promoting the conservation and adaptive re-use of existing buildings and designing
. A review of the preliminary site plan
indicated that a side yard setback variance would be required to permit the parking configuration
as shown. The final site plan will be dealt with by the Development Officer at the time of
submission of the building permit, including evaluation of any potential variances. The site plan
also indicates the removal of mature trees to the northwest of the property. The retention of
mature trees on the property is encouraged as much as possible.
Conclusion
In evaluating the rezoning proposal, it was found to be appropriate in terms of land use, density,
and adaptive reuse of an existing building. The addition of new housing stock in this area of the
City is much in conformity with the intent of the Municipal Plan and on this basis staff is
recommending approval of the rezoning.
ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
No alternatives were considered.
ENGAGEMENT
Public
In accordof Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to
landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on July 5, 2019. The public hearing for the
rezoning was advertised on the City website on July 8, 2019.
SIGNATURES AND CONTACT
Prepared:
Andrew Reid , MCIP, RPP
Planner
Page 4 of 5
Tailored Developments 149 Broad Street July 12, 2019
Reviewed: Approved:
Kenneth Melanson, BA, RPP, MCIP Jacqueline Hamilton, MURP, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Community Planning Commissioner
Contact: Andrew Reid
Phone: (506) 658-4447
E-mail: andy.reid@saintjohn.ca
Project: 19-98
APPENDIX
Map 1: Site Location
Map 2: Municipal Plan
Map 3: Zoning
Map 4: Aerial Photography
Map 5: Site Photography
Submission 1: Site Plan
Submission 2: Rendering
Page 5 of 5
The City of Saint John
Map 1 - Site Location
Date: June-07-19
050m
Tailored Developments on behalf of Mr. Lang Lee
Medium to
High Density
Residential
Federal
Transportation
Primary
Centre
The City of Saint John
Map 2 - Future Land Use
Date: June-07-19
050m
Tailored Developments on behalf of Mr. Lang Lee
RC
RC
CFN
RC
CM
RC
CM
RCCBP
RC
CFN
RC
CL
RH
RC
RC
CFN
RC
RC
CBP
RC
T
CM
RC
CFN
RC
CFM
CBP
(CBP) Business Park Commercial (RC) Urban Centre Residential
(CFM) Major Community Facility(RH) High-Rise Residential
(CFN) Neighbourhood Community Facility(T) Transportation
(CL) Local Commercial
(CM) Mixed Commercial
Section 59 Conditions
^
The City of Saint John
Map 3 - Zoning
Date: June-07-19
Tailored Developments on behalf of Mr. Lang Lee
151
149
137
The City of Saint John
Map 4 - Aerial Photography
Date: June-07-19
Tailored Developments on behalf of Mr. Lang Lee
The City of Saint John
Site Photography
Date: June-17-19
Tailored Developments on behalf of Mr. Lang Lee - 149 Broad Street
149 Broad Street
Presentation to Council
July 29, 2019
Growth & Community Planning Team
DƩƚǞƷŷ ε /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ {ĻƩǝźĭĻƭ
Proposal
Rezoning
ΏwĻǩƚƓĻ ğ ЊͲЍБЌ ƒЋ ƦƩƚƦĻƩƷǤ ŅƩƚƒ bĻźŭŷĬƚǒƩŷƚƚķ
/ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ CğĭźƌźƷǤ Λ/CbΜ Ʒƚ ƩĬğƓ /ĻƓƷƩĻ wĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ Λw/Μ
Ʒƚ ĻƓğĬƌĻ ƩĻķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ ƚŅ ğ ǝğĭğƓƷ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƷŷğƷ źƭ
ĭǒƩƩĻƓƷƌǤ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ğĭğƓƷ ğƓķ 5ğƓŭĻƩƚǒƭ .ǒźƌķźƓŭ ƌźƭƷ͵
Ћ
Site Location
Ќ
Zoning
Ѝ
Future Land Use
Ў
Site Plan
Џ
Site Aerial
А
Site Photos
Б
Site Photos
В
Public Engagement
Letter to area property owners on July 5, 2019
Advertisement posted on City website July 8, 2019
PAC Meeting held on July 16, 2019
No letters or phone calls received with respect to the proposal
One member of the public spoke at PAC in support of
proposal
ЊЉ
Staff Recommendation
That the Committee recommend Common Council
approve the rezoning subject to the following conditions:
-Detailed site plan
ЊЊ
PAC Recommendation
Adopt Staff Recommendation
That Common Council approve the rezoning subject to
the following conditions:
-Detailed site plan
ЊЋ
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 23, 2019
His Worship Mayor Don Darlingand
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT:Section 59 Amendment
49 Noel Avenue
OnApril 23, 2019Common Council referred the above matter to the Planning
Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation.The Committee
considered the attached report at itsMay 22, 2019meeting.
Mr.Stephen Brittain,the applicant, appeared before the Committee and was in
agreement with the Staff recommendation. No other persons appeared before
the Committee and no letters were received regarding the application.Upon
considering the Staff report andcomments made by the applicant,the Committee
adopted the Staff Recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.That Common Council amend the Section 39 conditions imposed on June
13, 2016 rezoning of the property situated at 49 Noel Avenue, also
identified as PID 55235717 (formerly 00370593, 00370601, 00370767,
and a portion of 00050575) by rescinding the existing conditions and
imposing the following:
a.That any development of the site be in accordance with a detailed site
plan to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of
the Development Officer, indicating the location of all buildings,
structures, parking areas driveways, loading areas, signs, exterior
lighting, outdoor storage areas, amenity areas, pedestrian circulation
elements and other site features. This site plan is to be attached to
the application for the building permit for the proposed development
Page 1of 3
Village View Suites49 NoelAvenueMay 23, 2019
and all site improvements illustrated on the plan must be completed
within one year of completion of the building;
b.That any development of the site shall be in accordance witha
detailed landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and
subject to the approval of the Development Officer. This landscaping
plan is to be attached to the application for the building permit for the
proposed development and all landscaping illustrated on the plan
must be completed within one year of completion of the building;
c.That the proposed building be constructed in accordance with detailed
elevation plans prepared by the developer and approved by the
Development Officer. These building elevation plans must be
attached to the application for the building permit for the proposed
development and all work illustrated on the plans must be completed
within one year of completion of the building;
d.An engineering water and sewer analysis must be completed by the
applicant’s engineering consultant and submitted to the City for review
and approval in order to determine the impact this development
(capacity requirements, peak flows, fire flows, etc.) will have on the
existing water and sewer infrastructure and also to ensure that this
proposal does not exceed the current capacity of the existing
systems. If any upgrades to existing infrastructure are necessary, this
will be the responsibility of the developer;
e.The applicant’s engineering consultant must submit a detailed storm
water drainage plan and design report indicating how storm water
collection and disposal will be handled to the City for review and
approval. If any infrastructure improvements are required to service
this proposal, it will be theapplicant’s responsibility and cost to
complete. No stormwater is to be directed to adjacent lands;
f.That servicing for electrical and telephone utilities be provided
underground from existing facilities;
g.That the proposed building be limited to 47 dwelling units; and
h.That notwithstanding Subparagraph 10.3(3)(i) of the City of Saint John
Zoning By-Law, the height of the building is permitted to be a
maximum of 16.6 metres.
Page 2of 3
Village View Suites49 NoelAvenueMay 23, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
Eric Falkjar
Chair
Attachments
Page 3of 3
Date:May 17, 2019
To:PlanningAdvisory Committee
From:Growth & Community Planning
Growth & Community Development Services
For:Meeting ofWednesday,May 22, 2019
SUBJECT
Applicant:Village View Suites
Owner:621946 NB Inc.
Location:49 Noel Avenue
PID:55235717 (formerly 00370593, 00370601, 00370767, and a
portion of 00050575)
PlanDesignation:Stable Residential
Existing Zoning:Mid-Rise Residential (RM)
Proposed Zoning:Mid-Rise Residential (RM)
Application Type:Section 59 Amendment
Jurisdiction:The Community Planning Actauthorizes the Planning Advisory
Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning
proposed amendments to existing Section 39(now 59)conditions
of the subject property.Common Council will consider the
Committee recommendation at a public hearing on Monday,June
3, 2019.Committee can impose conditions.
Page 1of 7
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
SUMMARY
The applicant is proposing to amend existing Section 39 (now Section 59)conditions to allow for
anadditional dwelling unit. Servicing capacity limited the site to a maximum of 46 dwelling
units, when Common Council approved the rezoning on June 13, 2016. The applicant has been
working with engineering and it had determined that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate
anadditional dwelling unit(to allow 47 units).
RECOMMENDATION
1.That Common Council amend the Section 39 conditions imposed on June 13, 2016
rezoning of the property situated at 49 Noel Avenue, also identified as PID 55235717
(formerly 00370593, 00370601, 00370767, and a portion of 00050575) by rescinding the
existing conditions and imposing the following:
a.That any development of the site be in accordance with a detailed site plan to be
prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development
Officer, indicating the location of all buildings, structures, parking areas
driveways, loading areas, signs, exterior lighting, outdoor storage areas, amenity
areas, pedestrian circulation elements and other site features. This site plan is to
be attached to the application for the building permit for the proposed
development and all site improvements illustrated on the plan must be completed
within one year of completion of the building;
b.That any development of the site shall be in accordance with a detailed
landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of
the Development Officer.This landscaping plan is to be attached to the
application for the building permit for the proposed development and all
landscaping illustrated on the plan must be completed within one year of
completion of the building;
c.That the proposed building be constructed in accordance withdetailed elevation
plans prepared by the developer and approved by the Development Officer.
These building elevation plansmust be attached to the application for the
building permit for the proposed development and all work illustrated on the plans
mustbe completed within one year of completion of the building;
d.An engineering water and sewer analysis must be completed by the applicant’s
engineering consultant and submitted to the City for review and approval in order
to determine the impact this development (capacity requirements, peak flows, fire
flows, etc.) will have on the existing water and sewer infrastructure and also to
ensure that this proposal does not exceed the current capacity of the existing
Page 2of 7
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
systems. If any upgrades to existing infrastructure are necessary, this will be the
responsibility of the developer;
e.The applicant’s engineering consultant must submit a detailed storm water
drainage plan and design report indicating how storm water collection and
disposal will be handled to the City for review and approval. If any infrastructure
improvements are required to service this proposal, it will be the applicant’s
responsibility and cost to complete. No stormwater is to be directed to adjacent
lands;
f.That servicing for electrical and telephone utilities be provided underground from
existing facilities;
g.That the proposed building be limited to 47dwelling units; and
h.That notwithstanding Subparagraph 10.3(3)(i) of the City of Saint John Zoning
By-Law, the height of the building is permitted tobe a maximum of 16.6 metres.
DECISION HISTORY
On June 13, 2016 Common Council approved the rezoning of the site from to Mid-Rise
Residential (RM)and imposed a number of conditions. This rezoning included the release of a
parcel that was Lands for Public Purposes and the Stop up and Closure of a portion of Clovelly
Driveand a maximum number of dwelling units. The site then subdivided to create the current
PID for 49 Noel Avenue, however these conditions continue onto the subject lot (see
Attachment 1).
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The applicant proposes to amend the conditions on 49 Noel Avenue to permit the construction
of a 47unit building. Current conditions limit the number of units to a maximum of 46 due to
sanitary sewer capacity. The applicant has been working with the City and it has been
determined there is sufficient capacity to acceptanadditional dwellingunit necessitating this
application.
Site and Neighbourhood
The subject site is locatedat the end of Noel Drivewith the surrounding area characterized by
low-to medium-density residential development. Around the site is a number of multi-
residential developments, with low density residential development along Tudor Lane on the
west side of the site.
Municipal Plan
The subject site is designated Stable Residential in the Municipal Plan. Stable Residential areas
are existing neighbourhoods, whichhave the potential to accommodate additional development
Page 3of 7
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
at a scale and density consistent with the surrounding context. Policies LU-86 through LU-88
support intensification of Stable Residential areas with Policy LU-88 providing criteria to
considerwithproposed developments. These policies were reviewed at the time of the original
rezoning, but are being included with this report since there is a level of intensification occurring.
Policy LU-88–Ensure that significant new development and redevelopment in areas
designated Stable Residential shall generally be permitted only through a rezoning
process where compliance is demonstrated with the following requirements:
a)The proposed land use is desirable and contributes positively to the neighbourhood;
b)The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses;
c)The development is in a location where all necessary water and wastewater
services, parks and recreation services, schools, public transit and other community
facilities, and protective services can readily and adequately be provided;
d)Site design features that address such matters as safe access, buffering and
landscaping, site grading and storm watermanagement are incorporated;
e)A high quality exterior building design is provided that is consistentwith the Urban
Design Principles in the Municipal Plan; and
f)The proposal is on a property identified as a Corridor on the City Structure map
(Schedule A) or does not detract from the City’s intention to direct the majority of new
residential development to the Primary Centres, Local Centres, and Intensification
Areas.
Staff note that the proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses in the neighbourhood
given that the surrounding area contains a mix of residential densities with multiple unit
development located immediately around the site. The proposed request to increase the by one
unit doesnot represent a significant departure from the general development pattern of the area
and so Staff support this proposal.
Development in this area is serviced by existing municipal infrastructure and transit can be
accessed via University Avenue. The City’s Infrastructure Development Service Area noted
during the rezoning process that there waslimited capacity in the downstream sanitary sewer
system. Portions of this capacity have been allocated to other approved developments, and
there is capacity available to originally accommodate the 46 dwelling units. New analysis has
demonstrated that this cap on dwelling units can be increased to 47units without downstream
issues and is supported by Staff.
Conclusion
Staff support the proposed amendments to existing conditions to increase the maximum number
of dwelling units from 46 to 47. The surrounding context and development pattern supports
further multi-residential development and the proposed unit count is consistent with the adjacent
sites.
Page 4of 7
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
ALTERNATIVESAND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
No alternatives considered.
ENGAGEMENT
Public
In accordance with the Committee’s Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to
landowners within 100 metres of the subject propertyonMay 8, 2019.The publichearing for the
rezoning was advertised in the City’s websiteonMay 10, 2019.
SIGNATURES AND CONTACT
Prepared by:
Corey Cooper
Planner
Prepared and reviewedby:Approved:
Kenneth Melanson, BA, RPP, MCIPJacqueline Hamilton, MURP, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Community PlanningCommissioner
Contact:Kenneth Melanson
Phone:(506) 721-8694
E-mail:ken.melanson@saintjohn.ca
Project:19-0046
APPENDIX
Map1:Site Location
Map2:Municipal Plan
Map3:Zoning
Map 4:Aerial Photography
Map 5:Site Photography
Attachment 1: Conditions from 2016 Rezoning
Submission 1:Renderings
Page 5of 7
The City of Saint John
Map 1 - Site Location
Date: April 23, 2019
Village View Suites - 49 Noel Avenue
Park and
Natural Area
Stable
Residential
The City of Saint John
Map 2 - Future Land Use
Date: April 23, 2019
Village View Suites - 49 Noel Avenue
FD
R1
R1
RM
R2
R2
R2
RM
RL
R2
(FD) Future Development
(R1) One-Unit Residential
(R2) Two-Unit Residential
(RL) Low-Rise Residential
(RM) Mid-Rise Residential
Section 59 Conditions
^
The City of Saint John
Map 3 - Zoning
Date: April 23, 2019
Village View Suites - 49 Noel Avenue
90
86
84
82
51
The City of Saint John
Map 4 - Aerial Photography
Date: April 23, 2019
Village View Suites - 49 Noel Avenue
Site seen from Noel AvenueSite from Noel Avenue
Adjacent multi-residential developmentAdjacent multi-residential development
The City of Saint John
Map 5 - Site Photography
Date: May 15, 2019
Village View Suites - 49 Noel Avenue
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
Attachment 1 –2016 Rezoning Conditions
1.That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an area of approximately 2650
square metres, located at 45 Noel Avenue, also identified as PID Nos. 00370593,
00370601, 00370767 and a portion of PID No. 00050575 from Two-Unit Residential (R2)
and Future Development (FD) to Mid-Rise Residential (RM).
2.That pursuant to Section 39 of the Community Planning Act, the development and use of
the parcel of land with an area of approximately 2650 square metres, located at 45 Noel
Avenue, also identified as PID Nos. 00370593, 00370601, 00370767 and a portion of
PID No. 00050575 shall be subject to the following conditions:
a)That any development of the site be in accordance with a detailed site plan to be
prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development
Officer, indicating the location of all buildings, structures, parking areas
driveways, loading areas, signs, exterior lighting, outdoor storage areas, amenity
areas, pedestrian circulation elements and other site features.This site plan is to
be attached to the application for the building permit for the proposed
development and all site improvements illustrated on the plan must be completed
within one year of completion of the building;
b)That any development of the site shall be in accordance with a detailed
landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of
the Development Officer.This landscaping plan is to be attached to the
application for the building permit for the proposed development and all
landscaping illustrated on the plan must be completed within one year of
completion of the building;
c)That the proposed building be constructed in accordance with detailed elevation
plans prepared by the developer and approved by the Development Officer.
These building elevation plansmust be attached to the application for the
building permit for the proposed development and all work illustrated on the plans
must be completed within one year of completion of the building;
d)An engineering water and sewer analysis must be completed by the applicant’s
engineering consultant and submitted to the City for review and approval in order
to determine the impact this development (capacity requirements, peak flows, fire
flows, etc.) will have on the existing water and sewer infrastructure and also to
ensure that this proposal does not exceed the current capacity of the existing
systems. If any upgrades to existing infrastructure are necessary, this will be the
responsibility of the developer;
e)The applicant’s engineering consultant must submit a detailed storm water
drainage plan and design report indicating how stormwater collection and
Page 6of 7
Village View Suites49 Noel AvenueMay 17, 2019
disposal will be handled to the City for review and approval. If any infrastructure
improvements are required to service this proposal, it will be the applicant’s
responsibility and cost to complete. No stormwater is to be directed toadjacent
lands;
f)That servicing for electrical and telephone utilities be provided underground from
existing facilities;
g)That the proposed building be limited to 46 dwelling units.
h)That notwithstanding Subparagraph 10.3(3)(i) of the City of Saint John Zoning
By-Law, the height of the building is permitted to be a maximum of 16.6 metres.
Page 7of 7
1
FRONT ELEVATION
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A7
32
2
SIDE ELEVATION & PARKADE ENTRY
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A7
32
3
READ ELEVATION
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A7
32
--
Y
R
A
N
I
M
I
L
E
R
R
P
O
F
T
N
O
O
I
N
T
C
U
R
T
S
N
O
C
WINDOW TYPE 1WINDOW TYPE 2
NOTE
VILLAGE VIEW PHASE IV:
NOEL AVE.,
SAINT JOHN, NB
ELEVATIONS
SECTION DETAIL:
456 WINDOW HEAD & SILL, TYP.
SIDE ELEVATIONWINDOW SCHEDULE
AEP
31
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
SCALE:" = 1'-0"SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A7A7A7
4
32AS SHOWNJAN. 2019
218264
"
"
6
6
x
CEILING HT+7'-8"
x"
"
2
-
2
-
4
1
4
:
.
:
.
L
L
9
O
'
A5-
0
O
4
"
C
ABCD
O
"
C
P
6
E
N
B
x
L
I
M
N
"
V
42'-6"36'-0"36'-0"LG
:
-
2
3
3
-
-
:
L
PS
V
M 3
4
"
1
BL
6
8'-8"
9:1
"
'.4
x
-
7
x
3
"
2'-6""
L
1
4
6
1 G
1
"
"
O N
4
I
3
N
-
'
C
E
4
P
2
ELEVATOR
9
1
O
'
-
"
7
06'-9"
"
-
D'
9
3
PSPS
P
C
C
1
P
A
2B
2B2B
"
13'-0"
D
2
PWPW
AB
-
'
9
P
P5P5
W
3
15'-11"
4
3
2
6
DW
2
NOTE:GARBAGE RM.
"
'
-
0
HWH
MAIL BUNK
TAKES WHOLE SPACE
"
THIS FLOOR ONLY
5
PER
CEILINGCEILING HT.:+8'-3"
W/D
"
F
A1
HWH
.
D
W/D
2
.
1
HT.: +7'-8"
"
2
1
LOBBY
DW
HWH
6
DW
W/D
-
17'-4
'
U
S P
8
2B
T
A
LINE OF LOBBY CEILING
I
R
N
o
.
E
1B
BULKHEAD PER 6/A2
G
A
R
B
A
DN.G
C
E
R
P
O
O
M
2
STAIR
12'-0"
PC
PC
No.2
DN.
PC
"
5'-7"
4
UP
66'-4"
1
"
4
3
P
1
W
ELEC.3
HC DOOR
6'-2
1'-9"
4
4'-2
D
ACTIVATOR
3
W
HC
6
'
E
-
L
0
E
W/D
WR
HWH V
"
A
H
T
"
O
W
W/D
R
2 H
HWH
1
DW
CEILING
W
/
D
HT.: +8'-3"
17'-4
H
W
H
"
4
ENTERTAINMENT
FITNESS
PC
ENTRY VESTIBULE
1
PC
W 2B
DW
RM.SUITE
/
MAIL BUNK D
L
O
B
8'-2
B
F
Y
P 6
A
-ANNUNCIATOR
C
108a108b
-SECURITY PANEL
A1
-KNOX BOX
1B1B
H
W
H
FG
PWPWPW
D
W
W
/
D
13'-0"
P
W2W2
W
E
N
T
R
Y
V
E
S
3
T
4
I
B
BM: 3-1"x 16" LVL BEAM BY
U
4
4
"
L
E
2
D
6
W
'
-
-
76'-0"
'
TRUSS MANUFACTURER
6
C
D
"
4
F
12"
P
12"
C
F
D
C
H
9
LINE OF UNIT
W
1
'HC DOOR
-
5
H
2
"
TERRACE ABOVE
ACTIVATOR
W
3B
/
D
1B
HWH
4
C
1
6
I W
'
-/
D
0
LINE OF UNIT
"
P
W
A
1
TERRACE OVER
D
W
G
9
1
'1
-
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN
5
2
"
2
DETAIL PLAN: MAIN ENTRY VESTIBULE & LOBBY
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A1
32
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A1
16
2
W
D
A1
23
2B
WALL & PARTITION SCHEDULE:
E
P
C
5'-7"
3
F.S.F.S.
PC
3-LVL 16" x 1" BM.
4
LOADBEARING EXTERIORCORRIDOR PARTITION
"
W1
0
1
COMMON PARTITION:
S
-
'
WALL-HARDIPLANK:LOADBEARING/SHEARWALL:
P1
P 3
W 1
1
-" G.WB, FIN., BOTH SIDES
FS, 1Hr. F.R.R., STC 55, ULC W-302SIM.
2
-VINYL SIDING, COLOUR BY OWNER
P
5
-2" x 4" WOOD STUDS, 24"o/c
W
-TYVEK AIR BARRIER-2L-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN. (CORR. SIDE),
8
"
0
-ACOUSTIC BATT INSULATION
7
1"
5
CONT. TO u/s OF FRAMING OVER 1
-
2
6
'
-" OSB SHEATHING
2"x 6" JOISTS, JOIST HUNG, 16"o/c
8
'
5
-
4
1
0
-
'
NOTE:" CEMENT BOARD AT AREAS
1
D
"
2
0
N
NOTE: 12" o/c
-2" x 6" WOOD STUDS (-" RESILIENT CHANEL
53
2 3
.
2L-" TYPE 'X' G.WB ON "WD STRAPP'G
TO BE TILED IN BATHS
84
5
@GROUND FLOOR, 16" o/c 2nd/3rd/4rth
-" OSB SHEATHING, CONTINUOUS TO u/s
S
8
16"o/c
1B
T
U
A
"
FLOORS, & DOUBLE TOP PLATES @ ALL
P
N
1
I
4
R
OF FRAMING OVER
o
PLUMBING CHASE WALL:
55
J
W.
5
3
D
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB OVER " OSB SHEATHING
P2
'
88
LEVELS)
7
NOTE:DOUBLE-1"
12" o/c @GROUND
-2" x 6" WOOD STUD (
1
1
-" G.WB, FIN., BOTH SIDES
2
-R24 BATT INSULATION
FLOOR, 16" o/c 2nd/3rd/4rth FLOORS, & DOUBLE
RIM BOARD
-2" x 6" WOOD STUDS, 24"o/c
5
LOBBY CEILING: RESILIENT
" TYPE 'X' G.WB
& 6mil. POLY V.B.
8
TOP PLATES @ ALL LEVELS)
"
CONTINUOUS
7
2
-ACOUSTIC BATT INSULATION
-
5
'
5
CHANNEL, 16"o/c, & 2L- " TYPE
5
CORRIDOR CEILING: 2'-0"x 4'-0" SUSPENDED
8
-R19 BATT INSULATION
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.
8
@ WALLTOP
1
NOTE:" CEMENT BOARD AT AREAS
2
PC
'X' G.WB, SOUNDBATT INSULATION
5
ACOUSTIC CEILING @ +7'-8"A.F.F.
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN. (UNIT SIDE)
3
8
TO BE TILED IN BATHS
LOADBEARING EXTERIOR
W2
LOBBY
CORRIDOR
WALL-SYNTHETIC STONE CLADDING:
PARTY WALL PARTITION
PW COMMON 1Hr. F.R.R. PARTITION:
-SYNTHETIC STONE CLADDING TO LINE P3
"
LOADBEARING/ SHEARWALL:
0
5
-
'
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.
8 3
"
OF 2nd FLOOR ONLY
1
1
FS, 1Hr. F.R.R., STC 57, ULC W-302 SIM., W13b SIM.2
SECTION DETAIL: LOBBY CEILING @ CORRIDOR
3
5
4
-
-3" METAL STUDS, 16"o/c @
'
8
5
-ICE-&-WATER SHIELD, HORZ. APPLIED,
0
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, CONTINUOUS TO
3
3
8
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
PARKADE LEVEL, 2" x 4" WOOD
A1
4
NAIL TOP EDGE OF SELVAGE ONLY
u/s SUBFLOOR OVER
TUDS 16"o/c @ ALL OTHER
5
-"OSB SHEATHING
-2" x 4" WOOD STUD, 24"o/c
8
LEVELS
(NOTE: 12" o/c
-2" x 6" WOOD STUDS
(DOUBLE TOP PLATE)
5
UNIT
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.
@GROUND FLOOR, 16" o/c 2nd/3rd/4rth
8
1
FOR EXTENT OF OUTDOOR BELOW:
-3" MINERAL FIBRE INSULATION
4
NOTE: ACOUSTIC BATT INSULATION
FLOORS, & DOUBLE TOP PLATES @ ALL
W1
-1" AIR SPACEMIN. 2" SPRAY URETHANE INSULATION
--
4
@ LAUNDRY/STO. ROOMS
LEVELS)
5
@ BOT-OF SUBFLOOR
-" OSB SHEATHING
8
-R24 BATT INSULATION & 6mil. POLY V.B.
SECOND
(CONTINUOUS TO u/s SUBFLOOR OVER)
CONCRETE BLOCK WALL:
5
P4
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.FLOOR LEVEL
8
-2"x 4" WOOD STUD, 24" o/c
-PAINTED EXPOSED SIDE
34"
(DOUBLE TOP PLATE)
-6" CONCRETE BLOCK
FOUNDATION/PARKADE WALLS:
W3
1
Y
-3" MINERAL FIBRE INSULATION
4
-8" STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WALL R
A
5
N
I
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, CONTINUOUS TO
8
-BITUMOUS DAMPROOFING (BDP)@
VESTIBULE
PARKADE LEVEL PARTITIONS,M
3
I
P5
BM: 3-1" x 16"
L
4
u/s OF SUBFLOOR OVER
E
ALL BELOW-GRADE SURFACES
NONCOMBUSTIBLE:R
R
LVL BY TRUSS P
O
CEILING HT:
F
1
-1" RIGID EPS INSULATION
T
-" G.WB, FIN.
N
2
MANUFACTURER
LOADBEARING ELEVATOR SHAFT WALL:
O
+8'-3"
O
I
N
PS
5
-2" x 4" WOOD STUD, 24"o/c
T
-3" METAL STUDS, 16"o/c
C
FS, 1Hr. F.R.R., STC 56, ULC W-302 SIM.
8
SOFFIT :
U
R
1
-R14 BATT INSULATION
5
CEILING HT:T
-" G.WB, FIN.
2
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB INSIDE SHAFT,
-1"x4" STRAPP'G BOT OF
S
8
"
1 N
4
-" G.WB, FIN.1
O
+7'-8"
2
TAPED & FILLED
C
TRUSSES
42
5
-" SPRUCE PLY SHEATHING
-1/2" OSB SHEATHING
FURRINGS WHERE INDICATED:
8
P6
:
W4
3
-2"x 6" WD. STUD, 16"o/c
-TYVEK AVB
" METAL FURRING CHANNEL
4
-SYNTHETIC STONE CLADDING TO
W2
1
1
-PREFIN. METAL SIDING
-ROXUL MINERAL FIBRE BATT, 3"
2
S/A AIR/VAPOUR
" G.WB
2
LIMITS SHOWN
"
3
4
3 IDEAL 'CANADIANA'
-" RESILIENT CHANNEL
1
4
BARRIER ON" PLY,
9"
4
-1" x 4" P.TTD STRAPPING 16"o/c
GROUND FLOOR
9'-6"
5
72
LOADBEARING PARTITIONS
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB
METAL WRAPPED
8
P7
-ICE-&-WATER SHIELD, HORZ.
LEVEL
NOTE: AT SHAFT-WALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
WITHIN SUITES AS SHOWN:
FACE OF
APPLIED
BLOCKING, STUDS, & OTHER PROVISIONS AS
LOADBEARING, 1 Hr. F.R.R., NO STC
FOUNDATION
-8" CONC. WALL PER STRUCTURAL
5
REQUIRED BY ELEVATOR INSTALLATION.
-" TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.
8
9"MAIL BUNK: 2-CMC
BELOW
RE-ESTABLISH THE INTEGRITY OF G.WB, INSIDE
VILLAGE VIEW PHASE IV:
-2"x 6" WD. STUDS,
1
LOBBY ENTRY
1301 12H x 5W (42 "H
4
& OUT, AFTER ELEVATOR INSTALL.
12"o/c MAIN LVL, 16"o/c 2nd/3rd/4rth LVL
1
TERRACE: 15'-0" x 9'-6"
1
x 34" W x 17 " dp.)
2
8'-2"
4
(DOUBLE TOP & BOTT. PLATES)
30"
x 4"TH. CONC. SLAB ON
NOEL AVE.,
5
FINISHED
-"TYPE 'X' G.WB, FIN.
HSS 6"x 6" COL., REFER2" FOIL-FACED POLYISO INSULATION
GRADE OVER 2" RIGID
8
SAINT JOHN, NB
FLOOR LEVEL
TO STRUCTURAL DWG.sc/w SELF- ADHERING A.V.B.
INSULATION, TYP.
2mm ALUM. COLUMN COVER
PROPOSED
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
ELEVATION DETAIL: MAIL BUNK
PLAN DETAIL: COLUMN @
AEP
@ ENTRY VESTIBULE & LOBBY
65
ENTRY VESTIBULE & LOBBY
4
SECTION DETAIL: ENTRY VESTIBULE & LOBBY
AS SHOWNJAN. 2019
13
3
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A1A1
4
2
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A1
8
218264
1
A5
ABCD
42'-6"36'-0"36'-0"
9
'
-
7
2'-6""
9
1
'
-
7
"
D
2B2B2B
13'-0"
PWPW
DAB
P
W
3
6
DW
'
-
HWH 0
"
G
A
R
B
W/D
"A
F
HWH
G
.
D
W/D
2
.E
1
R
O
O
M
DW
HWH
DW
W/D
17'-4
U
S P
2B
T
A
I
R
N
o
.
E
1B
E
L
E
C
DN.
.
R
M
.
2
STAIR
PC
PC
No.2
DN.
PC
5'-7"
UP
66'-4"
3
P
W
HWH
W/D
D
3
W
6
'
E
-
L
0
E
V
"
A
H
T
"
O W
DW
W/D R
2
D H
/
HWH
W
1
W
/
D
HWH
W/D
17'-4
2B
DW
F
P
A
C
H
W
H
D
W
2B
2B
A
1B
W
L
PWPW
D
H
13'-0"
P
W
W
P
D
W
4
4
D
/
1B
W
2
'
-
76'-0"
6
H
"
H
P
W
H
C
P
W
3B
W
D
HWH
W
/
D
1 PROPOSED SECOND, THIRD, & FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
G
3
SCALE:" = 1'-0"
A2
32
2B
NOTES:
H
D
/
W
W
H
A
1.FOR DETAIL UNIT PLANS: REFER TO DRAWING A3/A4
H
W
W
D
H/D
2.FOURTH FLOOR ONLY:
W
a.PROVIDE 3-ATTIC HATCHES, 1-PER FIRE-STOP
ZONE, IN CORRIDOR. MIN. 30" x 36" & FIRE-RATED
b.PROVIDE STAIRWELL PRESSURIZATION FANS.
P
C
P
REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS
W
"
0
1
-
'
3
1
W
D
ABCD
"
0
7
1"
1
-
2
6
'
'
5
-4
0
-
'
1 D
"
0
N
.3
D
3B
2'-0" EAVE &
S
T
A U
DRIP OVERHANG
K
"
P
N
1
I
2
R
o
.
5
3
TYPICAL
-
'
7
1
R
O
B
O
E
"
F
L
7
O
2
-
ATTIC FIRESTOP,
'
W
5
TYP. PER ??
3
2
3
"
0
-
'
"
3
SHOWN
1
2
1
4
-
'
DASHED:
0
3
OUTLINE OF
F
BUILDING
BELOW
1
4
--
A5
4
ABCD
42'-6"36'-0"36'-0"
9
'
-
7
2'-6"
"
G
9
1
'
-
7
Y
"
D
R
A
2
ROOF PLAN
N
I
M
I
L
NOT TO SCALE
E
A2
1
R
R
P
O
F
T
N
O
O
I
N
T
C
U
R
T
S
N
O
C
2
3
4
VILLAGE VIEW PHASE IV:
1
A5
NOEL AVE.,
ABCD
42'-6"36'-0"36'-0"
SAINT JOHN, NB
9
'
-
7
"
PROPOSED
2nd, 3rd, & 4rth
FLOOR PLANs
AEP
AS SHOWNJAN. 2019
218264
49 Noel Avenue
Presentation to Common Council
July 29, 2019
Growth & Community Planning Team
DƩƚǞƷŷ ε /ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ {ĻƩǝźĭĻƭ
Proposal
Amend Section 59 conditions imposed on original site
which limited the maximum unit count to 46 and
increase to 47 units (addition of 1 unit).
Note: due to an advertising error, incorrect public
hearing date advertised. New ad and letters were sent
out for re-scheduled public hearing of July 29. PAC
report will still reference previous date.
Ћ
Site Location
Ќ
Elevations
Ѝ
Site Aerial
Ў
Site Photos
Џ
Site Photos
А
Site Photos
Б
Site Photos
В
Future Land Use
ЊЉ
Zoning
ЊЊ
Zoning
Change of Section 59 condition to add one additional
dwelling unit sewer capacity has been found
workable to add unit.
All remaining conditions from original rezoning to
remain in place.
ЊЋ
Staff Recommendation
That Common Council amend the Section 39 (now 59)
conditions by rescinding and imposing the new
conditions found on pages 2 and 3 of the staff report.
ЊЌ
Public Engagement
Website advertisement May 10, 2019.
Letters to landowners May 8, 2019.
No letters from the public received by PAC or Common
Council.
Applicant in agreement with Staff Recommendation.
New Website advertisement and letters to land owners
with corrected Public Hearing Date (due to advertising
error) July 5, 2019.
ЊЍ
PAC Recommendation
That Common Council amend the Section 39 (now 59)
conditions by rescinding and imposing the new
conditions found on pages 2 and 3 of the staff report.
ЊЎ
Received Date July 10, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Open or Closed Open Session
His Worship Don Darling and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ .ğƓ ƚƓ {źƓŭƌĻ ƭĻ tƌğƭƷźĭƭ
.ğĭƉŭƩƚǒƓķʹ
WHEREAS plastic pollution is a global challenge that requires immediate action.
WHEREAS the City of Saint John has passed a Climate Action Plan and has declared an emergency on climate
change.
WHEREAS plastic waste ends up in our landfills and incinerators, litters our parks and beaches, and pollutes
our rivers, lakes, and ocean.
WHEREAS many jurisdictions have already taken the initiative to ban single use plastics and the federal
government aims to have it done by 2021.
aƚƷźƚƓʹ
RESOLVED that council instruct the City Manager and staff to report to Common Council with a
recommendation and assessment on the ban on single use plastics in the City of Saint John.
Respectfully Submitted,
(Received via email)
David Hickey
Councillor, Ward 3
Saint John
wĻĭĻźǝĻķ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЊАͲ ЋЉЊВ
aĻĻƷźƓŭ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋВͲ ЋЉЊВ
hƦĻƓ ƚƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ hƦĻƓ {ĻƭƭźƚƓ
Mayor and Councillors:
Subject: Letters/Documents addressed to Council
Motion:
5źƭĭǒƭƭźƚƓ Ʒƚ ĬĻ ŷğķ ƚƓ ƌĻƷƷĻƩƭ ğƓķΉƚƩ ķƚĭǒƒĻƓƷƭ ğķķƩĻƭƭĻķ Ʒƚ aĻƒĬĻƩƭ ƚŅ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ķźƭĭǒƭƭĻķ ƚƩ
ƦƌğĭĻķ ƚƓ ƭƚĭźğƌ ƒĻķźğ ƚŅ ğƓǤ ƉźƓķ ĬĻŅƚƩĻ ƷŷĻ ķǒƌǤ ĻƌĻĭƷĻķ aĻƒĬĻƩƭ ƚŅ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ
WƚŷƓ ŷğǝĻ ŷğķ ƷŷĻ ƚƦƦƚƩƷǒƓźƷǤ Ʒƚ ķźƭĭǒƭƭ ğƷ ğ ķǒƌǤ ƭĭŷĻķǒƌĻķ ƒĻĻƷźƓŭ ƚŅ ĻźƷŷĻƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ ƚƩ hƦĻƓ /ƚƒƒƚƓ
/ƚǒƓĭźƌ͵
Respectfully Submitted,
Shirley McAlary
Deputy Mayor
City of Saint John
Received Date July 22, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Open or Closed Open Session
Mayor Don Darling and
Members of Common Council
Mayor and Councillors:
{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ ƩĻĻƭ ŅƚƩ /ŷźƦƒğƓ Iźƌƌ
.ğĭƉŭƩƚǒƓķʹ
Once construction is completed and before the paving of street and sidewalks on Chipman Hill that we
accept a donation to purchase up to twelve trees for each side of the street. Total of 24 trees. This will be a
huge improvement in efforts to beautify this street which is an important connection to so many of our
facilities; TD Canada Trust, City Hall, Aquatic Centre, Chipman Hill Suites, Delta Marriott Hotel, Saint John
Court House, Saint John Police Headquarters and Saint John Arts Centre to name a few.
Trees will be donated by a business owner of our city in return for a tax receipt. Staff of our Parks
Department will determine what type of trees are best suitable and advise Donor who will purchase trees at
local Garden Shop and the trees will be picked up and planted by our City Parks Staff.
aƚƷźƚƓʹ
Refer this motion to the City Manager for appropriate staff to look into as soon as possible and report back.
Respectfully Submitted,
(Received via email)
Shirley McAlary
Deputy Mayor
City of Saint John
wĻĭĻźǝĻķ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋЌͲ ЋЉЊВ
aĻĻƷźƓŭ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋВͲ ЋЉЊВ
hƦĻƓ ƚƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ hƦĻƓ {ĻƭƭźƚƓ
Deputy Mayor and
Members of Common Council
Deputy Mayor and Councillors:
Subject: Financial Restructuring
Background:
many steps to achieve this goal, for example the focus on growing the residential tax base, population, jobs and
equitable taxation. The pre election white paper on sustainability and making evidence based decions on
infrastructure with our asset management plan. The development of our long term financial plans and capital plans,
will help guide future councils and encourage continuity of focus.
During the deliberations of budget 2018, it became clear that council must act. Our structural deficit was growing and
options were limited. Council voted unaminously to pause our necessary restructuring (cuts), to see if a sustainable
alternative could be found. Over the last year our city management has been working with senior provincial
management, to deliver a working group report. This report has now been delivered, has not met its goal of financial
sustainability and will be further debated at a meeting mid August.
identified, It is our fudciary responsibility to prepare a
restructuring plan based on what we know and not embrace further delays, based on hope and future promises.
I believe that we have a cost problem and must implement a radical restructuring plan in 2019. That said, we must
continue to push for a full suite of reforms so that the citizens of this city, are not left with high taxes and diminished
services. Regardless, we must prepare for an alternative Plan B and act in advance of any new council.
Motion:
Direct the finance committee to develop a restructing plan, which commences implementation in budget 2020
(January) at the latest and addresses the structural deficit
Furthermore, that this plan should be broad and address the 11 major barriers identified in the December budget
2019 documents. This plan shall be presented to a full meeting of council, as part of the budget 2020 deliberations by
the end of September 2020.
Respectfully Submitted,
Don Darling
Mayor
City of Saint John
wĻĭĻźǝĻķ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋЍͲ ЋЉЊВ
aĻĻƷźƓŭ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋВͲ ЋЉЊВ
hƦĻƓ ƚƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ hƦĻƓ {ĻƭƭźƚƓ
Deputy Mayor and
Members of Common Council
Deputy Mayor and Councillors:
Subject: Letter of support from neighboring communities
Background:
Earlier in July, my office received a letter (in consent tonight) from the mayors of Grand Bay Westfield, Quispamsis,
Rothesay and St. Martins. I would like to publically thank them for this letter and their support. This letter is
extremely supportive of the current discussion being had, with regards to a First Phase of tax Reform, where by the
City of Saint John would receive the provincial portion of Heavy industrial tax. Estimates from the presentation at the
th
July 18 Finance Committee indicate, that this would generate in the range of $9.0 million dollars per year in
revenue. A request felt justified within the report and would restore balance with our Heavy Industrial companies.
Within the letter, I will highlight some key statements and I quote:
regional partners, we want to make it clear that we support you in your call for tax reform
hopeful will be included are significant changes to the way Provincial property tax revenues
are shared between the province and municipalities.
As it stands, out-of-date and unfair. In fact taking our shared perspective one step further, we would assert that
ld
Motion:
That common council authorize the mayor to send a letter to all the communities listed above, including additionally
the community of Hampton, to seek further written support for an immediate first phase of tax reform, as presented
regarding Heavy Industry cost sharing. Furthermore that the following statement of support be proposed for the
Mayors and councils to consider.
The towns of Grand Bay-Westfield, Rothesay, Quispamsis, Hampton and the village of St Martins, formally requests
that the Province of New Brunswick implements the transfer of heavy industrial property tax revenue to host
municipalities as a first phase of municipal taxation reform. We believe in a growing and thriving region of greater
Saint John and need a strong Saint John, for this to be achieved.
Respectfully Submitted,
Don Darling
Mayor
City of Saint John
wĻĭĻźǝĻķ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋЍͲ ЋЉЊВ
aĻĻƷźƓŭ 5ğƷĻ WǒƌǤ ЋВͲ ЋЉЊВ
hƦĻƓ ƚƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ hƦĻƓ {ĻƭƭźƚƓ
{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ .ƩźķŭĻ .ğƩƩźĻƩ
5ĻğƩ ağǤƚƩ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ ğƓķ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ
LƓ ЋЉЊА ƷŷĻ ƦƩƚǝźƓĭźğƌ ŭƚǝĻƩƓƒĻƓƷ ŷğķ ƭĻƷ ƒƚƓĻǤ ğƭźķĻ Ʒƚ ĻƩĻĭƷ ğ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ĬğƩƩźĻƩ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ .ƩźķŭĻ͵
ŷźƭ ŷğƭ ƭźƓĭĻ ĬĻĻƓ ƦǒƷ ƚƓ ŷƚƌķ͵
ağǤƚƩ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ ğƷ ƷŷĻ ƷźƒĻ ƭğźķ ƷŷğƷ ǞĻ ǞĻƩĻ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓĻķ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ĻƭƷŷĻƷźĭƭ ƚŅ ŅĻƓĭźƓŭ ğƓķ ǞĻ ƩĻƦƚƩƷĻķƌǤ ƭĻƓƷ ğ
ƌĻƷƷĻƩ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ƦƩƚǝźƓĭĻ ğƭƉźƓŭ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ķĻƦğƩƷƒĻƓƷ Ʒƚ ƌƚƚƉ ğƷ ƷŷĻ ķĻƭźŭƓ͵
{źƓĭĻ ƷŷĻƓͲ ƷŷĻ źķĻğ Ǟğƭ ƭŷĻƌǝĻķ ğƓķ ĭźƷźǩĻƓƭ ƭƷźƌƌ ĭŷƚƚƭĻ Ʒƚ ĻƓķ ƷŷĻźƩ ƌźǝĻƭ ĬǤ ƆǒƒƦźƓŭ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ
.ƩźķŭĻ͵
/ğƓğķźğƓ wĻƭĻğƩĭŷ ŷğƭ ĬĻĻƓ ķƚƓĻ ƚƓ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ĬğƩƩźĻƩƭͲ ƦğƩƷźĭǒƌğƩƌǤ źƓ ƚƩƚƓƷƚ͵ ŷźƭ ƩĻƭĻğƩĭŷ ƭŷƚǞƭ ƷŷğƷ ƓƚƷ ƚƓƌǤ
ķźķ ƷŷĻ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ƩğƷĻ Ņğƌƌ ŅƩƚƒ В͵Љ ķĻğƷŷƭ ƦĻƩ ǤĻğƩ Ʒƚ Љ͵Њ ķĻğƷŷƭ ƦĻƩ ǤĻğƩ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ ƷŷĻ źƓƭƷğƌƌğƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ĬğƩƩźĻƩ͵
ŷĻ ƭƷǒķǤ ğƌƭƚ ƭŷƚǞĻķ ƷŷğƷ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ķĻğƷŷƭ ŅƩƚƒ ğƌƌ ĬƩźķŭĻƭ źƓ ƚƩƚƓƷƚ ķĻĭƌźƓĻķ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷƌǤ͵
L ĬĻƌźĻǝĻ ƚƓĻ ŅğĭƷ ƷŷğƷ ǞĻ ķźķ ƓƚƷ ķźƭĭǒƭƭ ğƷ ƷŷĻ ƷźƒĻͲ ğƓķ ƷŷğƷ ŷğƭ ĬƩƚǒŭŷƷ Ʒŷźƭ ĬğĭƉ Ʒƚ ŅƩƚƓƷ ƚŅ ƒźƓķ ŅƚƩ ƒĻͲ źƭ
ƷŷĻ ğŅŅĻĭƷ ƷŷğƷ ǞźƷƓĻƭƭźƓŭ ğƓ źƓĭźķĻƓƷ ƚŅ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ŷğƭ ƚƓ ĬǤƭƷğƓķĻƩƭ͵ ŷĻ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ .ƩźķŭĻ źƭ ğ ĬǒƭǤͲ ǝĻƩǤ
ƦǒĬƌźĭ ƭƦğĭĻ͵
CƚƩ ƷŷƚƭĻ ǞźƷŷ ƒĻƓƷğƌ ŷĻğƌƷŷ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓƭͲ ƷŷĻźƩ ŅğƒźƌźĻƭ ğƓķ ğƌƌ ƚŅ ƷŷƚƭĻ Ǟŷƚ ƒğǤ ĬĻ ğŅŅĻĭƷĻķ ĬǤ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ĬǤ ƆǒƒƦźƓŭ
ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ .ƩźķŭĻͲ L ƚŅŅĻƩ ƷŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ ƒƚƷźƚƓʹ
aƚƷźƚƓʹ L ƒƚǝĻ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ƭĻƓķ ğ ƌĻƷƷĻƩ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ aźƓźƭƷĻƩ ƚŅ ƩğƓƭƦƚƩƷğƷźƚƓ ƩĻƨǒĻƭƷźƓŭ ƷŷĻ
źƓƭƷğƌƌğƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ğ ƭǒźĭźķĻ ĬğƩƩźĻƩ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ wĻǝĻƩƭźƓŭ Cğƌƌƭ .ƩźķŭĻ͵
{źƓĭĻƩĻƌǤ
DğƩǤ {ǒƌƌźǝğƓ
/ƚǒƓĭźƌƌƚƩ ğƷ \[ğƩŭĻ
/źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ
Received Date July 25, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Open or Closed Open Session
His Worship Don Darling and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ {ǒƭƷğźƓğĬźƌźƷǤ wĻƦƚƩƷ
.ğĭƉŭƩƚǒƓķʹ
for us to be as open and transparent as possible regarding the deal being offered to the
City of Saint John and what it covers for the whole province verses what is only for Saint John. What we need
to get us from now until possible legislative changes can be made in 2022 -2023 in terms of a first phase of
tax reform of heavy industrial tax being retained by the municipalities. I would like all this information put on
the city of Saint John web page. In addition to this I would like to be fair and add the contact information for
all MLAs in the region so people can contact them and discuss their perspective on this. People need to have
to be successful.
aƚƷźƚƓʹ
That in the spirit of open transparent governance direct the City Manager to have staff provide background
information on the new deal, the immediate need in terms of a first phase of taxation reform on heavy
industry taxes, the GNB response and a template on the City of Saint John's website. These tools should be
completed and posted by August 1st, 2019.
Respectfully Submitted,
(Received via email)
John MacKenzie
Councillor
City of Saint John
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-192
Report Date July 17, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Demolition of vacant, dilapidated and dangerous building at 174 Pitt
Street (PID 00006403)
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Catherine Lowe J Hamilton /A Poffenroth John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
RESOLVED, that the building located at 174 Pitt Street, PID# 00006403, is to be
demolished as it has become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of
dilapidation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the building is to be demolished as it has become
a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of unsoundness of structural
strength; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that one or more by-law enforcement officers
appointed and designated under the Saint John Unsightly Premises and
Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law are hereby authorized to arrange for
the demolition, in accordance with the applicable City purchasing policies.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to advise Council that a Notice to Comply was
issued under Part 13 of the Local Governance Act for the building at 174 Pitt
Street. The hazardous conditions outlined in the Notice have not been remedied
by the owner within the required time frame and staff is looking for
authorization from Council to arrange the demolition of the building.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
- 2 -
REPORT
Inspections of the property at 174 Pitt Street, PID# 00006403, have revealed that
there is one building on the premise; a three-storey, three-unit apartment
buildingJanuary 2019 and
began standard enforcement procedures; however, the owner has indicated that
the building has been vacant for a number of years. The property is located in
South Peninsula in an urban centre residential zone on the corner of
Pitt Street and Mecklenburg Street. The Building is a hazard to the safety of the
public by reason of being vacant, by reason of dilapidation and by reason of
unsoundness of structural strength.
For the reasons described in the attached Inspection Report, a Notice to Comply
was issued on June 13, 2019 and was and served to the owner on June 19, 2019,
as per section 132(3) of the Local Governance Act that outlines acceptable
methods of service. The Certificate Regarding Title lists one individual as the
owner. The Notice provided the owner with 30 days to remedy the conditions at
the property. The owner did not file a formal appeal and did not take remedial
action to comply with the requirements of the Notice. A compliance inspection
was conducted on July 22, 2019 which revealed that the conditions which gave
rise to the Notice have not changed since the Notice was issued.
Attis the Notice to Comply that was issued and the
affidavit attesting to service on the owner via process server. Also included are
photographs of the building. The Local Governance Act indicates that where a
Notice to Comply has been issued arising from a condition where a building has
become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or
unsoundness of structural strength, the municipality may cause the building to
be demolished. As required in the Act a report from an engineer is attached,
forming part of the issued Notice to Comply, and provides the evidence to the
buildings vacancy, dilapidation, unsoundness of structural strength and resulting
hazard to the safety of the public. A copy of the letter advising of the Common
Council Hearing date and affidavit is attached; it was posted to the building on
July 17, 2019. It was also sent to the owner by registered mail on July 12, 2019.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and
Structures By-law
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
As is written in the Local Governance Act that a municipality must commence in
the proceedings of remedial action, approval of Common Council is required
prior to starting demolition activities at the property. Total cost of the
demolition work is approximated at $20,000 and will take about 3-5 weeks
- 3 -
before it is complete. Staff will seek competitive bidding in accordance with the
be billed to the property
owner. If the bill is left unpaid, it will be submitted to the Province with a
request for reimbursement.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
provided ownership verification by obtaining the
Certificate Regarding Title for the property
Office registered the Notice to Comply
Registry.
ATTACHMENTS
Notice to Comply
Affidavit of Service - Notice to Comply
Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Common Council Hearing Letter
Photos
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Њ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ћ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ќ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ѝ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ў
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Џ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ А
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Б
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ В
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
ЊАЍ tźƷƷ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ ЊЉ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЏЍЉЌ
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-191
Report Date July 17, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Demolition of vacant, dilapidated and dangerous building at 261-263
Wentworth Street and 214 Britain Street (PID 00001149)
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Catherine Lowe J Hamilton /A Poffenroth John Collin
RECOMMENDATION
RESOLVED, that the building located at 261-263 Wentworth Street and 214
Britain Street, PID# 00001149, is to be demolished as it has become a hazard to
the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the building is to be demolished as it has become
a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of unsoundness of structural
strength; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that one or more by-law enforcement officers
appointed and designated under the Saint John Unsightly Premises and
Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law are hereby authorized to arrange for
the demolition, in accordance with the applicable City purchasing policies.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to advise Council that a Notice to Comply was
issued under Part 13 of the Local Governance Act for the building at 261-263
Wentworth Street/214 Britain Street. The hazardous conditions outlined in the
Notice have not been remedied by the owner within the required time frame
and staff is looking for authorization from Council to arrange the demolition of
the building.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
- 2 -
REPORT
Inspections of the property at 261-263 Wentworth Street and 214 Britain Street,
PID# 00001149, have revealed that there is one building on the premise; a two-
storey, single unit dwelling
September 2015 and began standard enforcement procedures. The property is
South Peninsula in an urban centre residential zone. The
Building is a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of being vacant, by
reason of dilapidation and by reason of unsoundness of structural strength.
For the reasons described in the attached Inspection Report, a Notice to Comply
was issued on June 3, 2019 and was served to the owner on June 17, 2019, as
per section 132(3) of the Local Governance Act that outlines acceptable methods
of service. The Certificate of Registered Ownership lists one individual as the
owner. The Notice provided the owner with 30 days to remedy the conditions at
the property. The owner did not file a formal appeal and did not take remedial
action to comply with the requirements of the Notice. A compliance inspection
was conducted on July 22, 2019 which revealed that the conditions which gave
rise to the Notice have not changed since the Notice was issued.
Attis the Notice to Comply that was issued and the
affidavit attesting to service on the owner via process server. Also included are
photographs of the building. The Local Governance Act indicates that where a
Notice to Comply has been issued arising from a condition where a building has
become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or
unsoundness of structural strength, the municipality may cause the building to
be demolished. As required in the Act a report from an engineer is attached,
forming part of the issued Notice to Comply, and provides the evidence to the
buildings vacancy, dilapidation, unsoundness of structural strength and resulting
hazard to the safety of the public. A copy of the letter advising of the Common
Council Hearing date and affidavit is attached; it was posted to the building on
July 17, 2019. It was also sent to the owner by registered mail on July 12, 2019.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and
Structures By-law
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
As is written in the Local Governance Act that a municipality must commence in
the proceedings of remedial action, approval of Common Council is required
prior to starting demolition activities at the property. Total cost of the
demolition work is approximated at $20,000 and will take about 3-5 weeks
before it is complete. Staff will seek competitive bidding in accordance with the
- 3 -
be billed to the property
owner. If the bill is left unpaid, it will be submitted to the Province with a
request for reimbursement.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
provided ownership verification by obtaining the
Certificate of Registered Ownership for the property. Additionally, the City
ed the Notice to Comply
Land Registry.
ATTACHMENTS
Notice to Comply
Affidavit of Service - Notice to Comply
Affidavit of Posting - Notice of Common Council Hearing Letter
Photos
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Њ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ћ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ќ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ѝ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Ў
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Џ
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ А
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ Б
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
ЋЏЊΏЋЏЌ ĻƓƷǞƚƩƷŷ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ğƓķ ЋЊЍ .ƩźƷğźƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ
tŷƚƷƚ В
tL5ϔ ЉЉЉЉЊЊЍВ
/h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-195
Report Date July 24, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Growth and Community
Development Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Request to Set Public Hearing Date - Updated Heritage Conservation
Areas By-Law \[Phase One\]
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Emma Sampson Jacqueline Hamilton / John Collin
Amy Poffenroth
RECOMMENDATION
Your City Manager recommends that Common Council approve the necessary
advertising for the Public Hearing to be held on September 9, 2019 to consider
the proposed Phase One revisions to the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas
By-Law \[HC-1\].
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report will provide a high-level introduction to the first suite of proposed
revisions to the Heritage By-Law that will result in increased clarity, efficiency,
and flexibility for heritage property owners, as well as three external requests for
by-law amendments. A more detailed report on the revisions and the
amendments will be submitted for the proposed September 9 Public Hearing.
A second phase of amendments to the Heritage By-Law will be presented to
Council in coordination with the adoption of the Central Peninsula Plan. This
second phase addresses infill development and is facilitated by policy updates to
-Law. The Central
Peninsula Plan is expected to be adopted by the end of the year.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
- 2 -
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The proposed changes to the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-Law
-2020 priorities to support a Vibrant, Safe City
through the modernization of Heritage Conservation processes, as well as a
Valued Service Delivery through customer-focused services and a culture of
continuous improvement.
REPORT
Common Council has recognized the need for improvements to the Saint John
Heritage Conservation Areas By-Law (Heritage By-Law), and has formalized that
need by including the modernization of the Heritage By-Law in the 2016-2020
Common Council Priorities. In removing barriers to development through this
modernization, the City will move forward its goals of creating density and
growing the residential tax base, further solidifying its Heritage Conservation
Areas as desirable, attractive places to live, work and play.
With full adoption of the Phase one and two Heritage By-law revisions, Council
will have enacted a modernized regulatory framework which ensures strong
stewardship of heritage resources, while encouraging investment in this key
growth area of the City.
Updating the Heritage By-law began with formal stakeholder engagements
organized in the second half of 2017, in conjunction with the development of the
Central Peninsula Plan to identify areas of improvement for the By-Law. These
engagements were followed by a series of focus groups, workshops with the
Heritage Development Board, and a comprehensive review of the Heritage By-
Law by Taylor Hazell Architects. Collectively, these engagements highlighted the
need for ĭƌğƩźƷǤ, ĻŅŅźĭźĻƓĭǤ and most importantly, ŅƌĻǣźĬźƌźƷǤ in the Heritage By-
Law and its administration, while still protecting the valuable integrity of the
The positive trend leading to these proposed revisions started with amendments
to the Heritage By-Law in 2017 which gave authorization to the Heritage Officer
to approve a wide range of heritage permit applications, without going to the
Heritage Development Board. The continually increasing scope of Heritage
Officer permit approvals has resulted in faster turnaround times that have
demonstrated a marked increase in customer satisfaction with service delivery.
In 2019, over 55% of Heritage Permit applications have been processed by the
Heritage Officer, instead of being reviewed by the Heritage Development Board.
This sees permits issued typically within a week, rather than waiting for up to
one month for the next Board meeting.
PROPOSED REVISIONS
- 3 -
The Phase One revisions that are proposed to be brought forward for Public
th
Hearing on September 9, 2019 come in four main parts. The revisions that
have resulted from the by-law review form the largest part, with three external
amendment requests included in this suite for reasons of both timing and policy
review.
1. Heritage By-Law Phase One Revisions
2. External Amendment Requests
a. Request for Removal from Designation: King Street West
Heritage Conservation Area
b. Request for Designation: 152 Watson Street
c. Request for Site-Specific Amendment: The Telegraph
The Phase Two amendments will replace the current infill standards with new
infill guidelines. This will follow the adoption timeline of the Central Peninsula
Plan which is currently proposed to begin September 2019, and does not form
part of this report.
1. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROGRAM
Revisions to the Heritage By-Law are proposed in three main categories:
housekeeping, non-ǝźƭźĬƌĻ ŅğIJğķĻƭͲ ğƓķ ķĻƒƚƌźƷźƚƓ͵
Housekeeping
Definitions have been revised to align the Heritage By-Law with other related
municipal and provincial legislation, primarily the Local Governance Act and the
Heritage Conservation Act. There has also been the addition and removal of
definitions where required based on changes to other sections of the Heritage
By-Law itself.
Non-źƭźĬƌĻ CğIJğķĻƭ
To aid in achieving the goals of ĻŅŅźĭźĻƓĭǤ and ŅƌĻǣźĬźƌźƷǤ in the Heritage By-Law, a
key facet of the proposed revisions is an increase in the number of exemptions
from Heritage permitting. The most important exemptions are in non-visible
areas of buildings, being the rears of buildings and portions of sidewalls. In these
areas, the following items will no longer require a heritage permit:
Window and door replacements, with no change in the size of the
opening;
Decks, stairs, and fire escapes;
Fences;
Cladding, except masonry.
- 4 -
This group of exemptions was determined based on two reasons: they are some
of the most common applications made, and they are easily reversible, posing
minimal impact on the integrity of a heritage property. With these items
proposed to be outside of the scope of the Heritage By-Law, property owners
will be able to begin improvements on their own schedules and with their choice
of modern or traditional
public-facing heritage while enabling contemporary options in backyard and
private spaces should property owners so choose. Major alterations in these
areas, such as additions, partial demolitions or change in openings, will continue
to follow the current permitting process for the time being. It is worth noting
that the Heritage Board and staff have, over the last few years, been increasingly
flexible in enabling the use of more modern materials on public facing facades
and continue to explore further areas of improvement.
Demolition
Improving the ĭƌğƩźƷǤ of the Heritage By-Law, the process for obtaining a
demolition permit has been streamlined and strengthened with set expectations
for the two available application
property for sale.
The application path for ) has been
reworked with clearer standards for making that determination. The application
path requiring the listing of a property for sale has been made more
contemporary with current real estate practices and is designed to help increase
:
Easier determination of list price, in place of appraisers;
Requiring a 12-month listing period, and,
Establishing more visible advertisement for listed properties, both on the
building itself and on the City website.
It is also proposed that the Board be given the ability, in accordance with the
Heritage Conservation Act and in alignment with the Building By-Law, to require
if it deems necessary the detailed reconstruction of any designated building
demolished illegally. While the Heritage By-Law will still cede to any
deterrent to those who would consider not complying with process and
procedure.
2. EXTERNAL AMENDMENT REQUESTS
Three external requests for amendments to the Heritage By-Law have been
submitted. These requests have been worked into the proposed amendments
primarily due to timing and the link to by-law policy matters.
- 5 -
a. The first requested amendment is to remove the designation for all
properties in the King Street West Heritage Conservation Area. The area,
originally 11 properties designated in 2007 through resident initiative,
saw the removal of designation for two properties by Common Council in
Church itself in 2016. With these removals, and due to negligible
participation in both the Heritage Permit process and the Heritage Grant
Program since the establishment of the area in 2007, the prospect of
removing the heritage designation has been considered a strong
possibility. Further, a petition for the dissolution of the Area was
submitted by a property owner from the King Street West Heritage
Conservation Area in September 2018, and upon consultation with all
other property owners, only one expressed a desire to retain a
designation. In keeping with the staff recommendation, the Heritage
Development Board is recommending to Common Council to approve the
removal of the designation for those nine properties within the King
Street West Heritage Conservation Area.
b. The second requested amendment is for the designation of 152 Watson
Street, a single building two blocks south of King Street West. While Staff
has encouraged the applicant to pursue a Provincial designation, it has
been a planned change in policy as part of the Heritage By-Law revisions
to focus on collections of
significant properties instead of individual designations. The
overwhelming success of the Heritage Conservation program has been
exemplified in larger, denser areas such as the Trinity Royal Heritage
Conservation Area, with limited spot designation typically best suited to
public buildings of community importance. The revisions to the Heritage
By-Law have confirmed the intent to focus on designation of areas, not
single sites. In keeping with the staff recommendation, the Heritage
Development Board is recommending to Common Council to deny
designating 152 Watson Street as a Heritage Conservation Area.
c. The third requested amendment is a site-specific amendment for The
Telegraph, a proposed six-storey wood-framed development on the
current Saint John Parking Commission lot at the corner of Canterbury
Street and Grannan Street. Based on the current infill standards in the
Heritage By-Law, an amendment is being requested for the height
standard alone to allow for an additional few metres beyond the
maximum height that is prescribed through the By-Law. This item is
th
being reviewed by the Heritage Development Board at its August 7
meeting, with its recommendation to Common Council to follow for
th
consideration at the September 9 Public Hearing with the rest of the
Heritage By-Law revisions. All other standards will be reviewed by the
Heritage Development Board through regular permit applications.
- 6 -
CENTRAL PENINSULA PLAN
The Central Peninsula Plan (the Plan) will address the approach to height in the
Central Peninsula as well as provide further clarity around development and
design processes. Council and the public reviewed a preliminary draft of the
Plan in the spring of 2018. Substantial feedback was received suggesting needed
improvements around the readability and usability of the documents. Staff has
reformatted the Plan to be responsive to the community while maintaining its
action-oriented, growth-focused vision. These improvements capture the
growing momentum in the Central Peninsula and unlock the potential for
catalytic growth. The Plan is currently being prepared for the legislative
adoption process which is intended to begin in September in coordination with
the Public Hearing for the first phase of Heritage By-Law revisions.
CONCLUSION
The Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-Law has and will continue to
provide for appropriate development and the conservation of historic buildings
within the City. Making regular improvements to the Heritage By-Law,
particularly when these improvements aid in valued service delivery, will ensure
the long-term success of the Heritage Conservation program and, more
importantly, the Heritage Conservation Areas themselves. By coordinating this
modernization with the larger vision of the Central Peninsula Plan, the City will
be setting the stage for transformative change now and for years to come.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The proposed increase in exemptions from heritage permitting requirements will
remove barriers and improve timelines for heritage property owners by reducing
the number of permits required.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The Legal Department has provided legal support to the process and has
reviewed the proposed changes.
The Heritage Development Board supports the setting of a Public Hearing for the
proposed revisions and will be providing its formal recommendation following
th
the August 7, 2019 Heritage Development Board meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
None
Council:
Heritage Conservation Areas By-Law &
Central Peninsula Plan
July 29, 2019
THE CENTRAL PENINSULA PLAN PROJECT
Heritage Heritage
Conservation Conservation
Central
Areas By-Law Areas By-Law
Peninsula
Phase 1 Phase 2
Plan
Amendments
Amendments
Demolition Secondary Plan Infill Guidelines
Non-Visible Municipal Plan
CğIJğķĻƭ Amendments
House Keeping Zoning Bylaw
Amendments Amendments
Heritage By-Law:
Phase One:
All planned revisions except Infill (Phase 2)
Three externally requested amendments
- Request for Removal King Street West HCA
- Request for Designation 152 Watson Street
- Site-Specific Height Amendment The Telegraph
Heritage By-Law:
Phase One:
Housekeeping Exemptions Demolition
Revision of
Non-źƭźĬƌĻ CğIJğķĻƭ Clarity of Process
Definitions
Correction of Rears of Buildings,
Two Paths to Permit
Schedules Parts of Side Walls
Windows & Doors
No Public Benefit
(no change in size)
Stairs, Decks,
Listing for Sale
Fences, Siding
Public
Signage
Advertisement
Illegal Demolition
Exemptions
Heritage By-Law:
No Heritage Permits
Windows & Doors Stairs, Decks,
required for:
(no change in size) Fences, Siding
Demolition
Heritage By-Law:
Heritage By-Law:
External Amendment Requests:
Removal of Designation
King Street West Heritage Conservation Area
Request for Designation
152 Watson Street
Site-Specific Height Amendment
The Telegraph: Canterbury Street & Grannan Street
THE CENTRAL PENINSULA PLAN PROJECT
Vision
Growth Targets
Uptown, South End,
Neighbourhood
Waterloo Village
Plans
Corridor
Main, Union, Crown
Streets; City Road
Treatments
Building &
Clarity of process for
height and infill
Design
Thematic policy Community Action
Community
framework Strategy
Action Framework
5 year work plan, Capital Investment
Implementation
monitoring criteria Strategy
Strategy
End Notes:
Public Open House August
Phase 1: Heritage Amendments Public Hearing
September 9
Central Peninsula Plan Adoption Process Begins
in the Fall
COMMON COUNCIL REPORT
M&C No. 2019 - 180
Report Date July 19, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Finance and
Administrative Services
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Council Report 2020 and 2021 Proposed General Fund Capital
Budget.docx
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. City Manager Recommended by
Head
Craig Lavigne Kevin Fudge/Cathy John Collin Finance Committee
Graham Councillor Merrithew
Finance Chair
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that members of Common Council;
wĻŅƌĻĭƷ ǒƦƚƓ ƷŷĻ ğƷƷğĭŷĻķ ƦƩƚƦƚƭĻķ ЋЉЋЉ ğƓķ ЋЉЋЊ DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķ /ğƦźƷğƌ
.ǒķŭĻƷ ğƓķ ƒğƉĻ ğƌƌ źƓƨǒźƩźĻƭ ğƓķ ƩĻĭƚƒƒĻƓķğƷźƚƓƭ Ʒƚ ƭƷğŅŅͳ ğƓķ ƩĻĭĻźǝĻ
ğƓķ ŅźƌĻ Ʒŷźƭ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ͵
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed 2020 and 2021 General Fund Capital Budget was presented to the
thth. th
Finance Committee on May 29 and again on July 18 At the July 18 meeting,
the Finance Committee recommended sending the proposed General Fund Capital
th
Budget to Council for receive and file at the July 29 meeting. Staff will make any
roposed
General Fund Capital Budget on August 19, 2019 for approval.
This is the first time a multi-year capital budget has been presented to and
recommended by the Finance Committee for review. This multi-year
budget is laying the foundation for the 10 year Long Term Capital Budget Plan that
staff will bring to Finance Committee in Q4 of 2019.
The proposed Capital Budget continues to focus on multiple priorities; such as the
and safety and growth
- 2 -
opportunities. The proposed Capital Budget places emphasis on affordability and
reducing borrowing to $11 million in 2020 and $10.5 million in 2021. The recently
approved Debt Management policy will ensure debt continues to decrease as it
has in the last several years with a balance of $119.3 million end of 2014 and
estimated to be $102.4 million by the end of 2019.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
July 18, 2019 Finance Committee Meeting It is recommended that Finance
Committee approve the 2020 and 2021 Proposed Draft General Fund Capital
Budget and submit to Common Council with a recommendation to receive and
file.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The proposed 2020 and 2021 proposed draft General Fund Capital Budgets are
Debt Management Policy, Financial Principles,
Capital Budget Policy, Asset Management Plan, Central Peninsula Neighborhood
Plan, Play SJ, Move SJ, Plan SJ with a focus on growth.
REPORT
priorities to support investment in creating a Vibrant, Safe City, offering Valued
Service Delivery, Growth and Prosperity and being Fiscally Responsible. The
budgets align with the Capital Budget Policy, Debt Management Policy, Financial
Principles and the Asset Management Policy.
The 2020 and 2021 proposed draft General Fund Capital Budgets total
$50,621,551 over the 2 years with $29,131,401 to be funded from other funding
sources, pay as you go, operating and capital reserves and the remainder,
$21,490,150, to be funded by debt issue. The budget has funding from federal gas
tax fund, federal disaster mitigation adaptation fund, proposed bi-lateral (federal
and provincial) funding and other green funding.
Over half of the overall budget is coming from other sources. Bi-lateral funding
expressions of interest were received by the Province with a deadline for
submission of June 28, 2019. If the City is not successful in obtaining funding, staff
will come back to Finance Committee with a recommendation to reallocate City
funds.
2020 and 2021 PROPOSED CAPITAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS
The capital budget decision making was guided by the Capital Budget Policy,
Capital Budget Policy, Financial Principles, along with the Asset Management Plan.
These documents assist in addressing the infrastructure deficit, while factoring in
- 3 -
the needs of replacing existing assets with the need for new assets. The budget is
aligned with Council Priorities and various City of Saint John plans, with Plan SJ
being the overarching plan. Other factors in the decision making revolved around
environmental consideration such as mitigation and reduction of greenhouse gas
and focusing on growth areas.
Capital Budget Policy guided staff in prioritizing the capital budgets based on the
following criteria:
1. Mandatory
2. Risk
3. Priority of Council
4. Positive Financial Impact
5. Discretionary
The capital budget is investing heavily in asset renewal in order to address the
large infrastructure deficit identified in the State of the Infrastructure Report as
part of the Asset Management Plan.
State of the Infrastructure (SOTI) Report
The General Fund infrastructure deficit was $121.4 million with an estimated
replacement cost of $1.29 billion for those assets. The largest portion of the deficit
identified relates to Transportation and Environment. The majority of projects
being recommended as part of the capital budget have an letter grade, as
measured in the SOTI report, meaning the asset is at high risk of failure and near
or beyond its useful life.
Focus on Tax Base Growth
Fundy Quay The City was awarded a significant amount of funding from the
Federal government through the Disaster Mitigation Adaption Fund (DMAF). This
funding will split the almost $8.175 million dollar seawall refurbishment between
the City ($4.905 million) and Federal Government ($3.27 million) over two years.
This project is considered one the largest transformational projects the City is
and create significant tax base growth opportunities for the City.
The seawall project also involves raising the height of the wall. This will be key to
future development. It will ensure development can happen on the site and deal
with climate change events.
Other strategic investments involve a storm project in Millidgeville for $1.0 million
that will allow more storm water capacity which will enable more growth in that
area of the City. Another area of focus will be a number of major street
- 4 -
reconstruction and beautification projects along the St. James Street corridor.
This area is a key part of the Central Peninsula Neighborhood Plan to encourage
growth and these projects will invest $1.925 million in the St. James Street area.
Balancing Infrastructure Replacement with Climate Change
The proposed budget includes over $8.9 million in sewer separation projects.
complete street reconstruction. Sewer separation is a key component in dealing
with climate change and the extreme weather events that occur with climate
change.
The budget also includes $7.78 million for replacement of infrastructure that is
beyond its useful life with assets and will reduce our carbon footprint. The City
has applied for funding for the District Energy Project and Deep Municipal Energy
retrofit project and is confident that the City will be successful in receiving funding.
These assets being replaced involve various energy efficiency projects, new
exterior heat pump replacements at Harbour station, and HVAC upgrades at City
Market pedway. As well under the District Energy Project, Market Square, which
upgrades that will occur with or without funding.
Infrastructure Deficit
The multi-year budget focuses on some assets that are past their useful life, assets
at high risk of failure and assets that are considered extreme risk of failure. This
exterior and foundation work at Carleton Community Centre for $300K, replacing
the roof at St. Patrick Street Pedway for $30K and replacing part of the roof at City
Market for $700K.
The annual street rehabilitation program that includes curbs and sidewalks will
see a two year investment of $10.1 million dollars. This program has been a focus
of Council for several years. The SOTI report and excellent grade mark shows that
the reinvestment in roads has been a successful asset renewal program.
There are limited resources being put into arenas until a comprehensive arena
strategy is completed. However, there is a need to replace chillers at the Charles
Gorman and Peter Murray Arena for a total cost of $200K. As well, the LBR
requires replacement of its main electrical service for $100K and ice plant
compressor for $75K.
The Trade and Convention Centre require several pieces of equipment replaced
that are beyond its useful life and could have safety issues and impact business if
the assets fail. Over 2020 and 2021, $261K will be allocated to replace flooring,
- 5 -
banquet equipment, refrigeration, kitchen equipment, point of sale system and
LED lighting upgrades.
Harbour Station will be replacing a Zamboni for $115K to ensure two reliable
e Quebec Major Junior Hockey League.
equipment over two years as part of its annual equipment replacement program
and this money is all funded from internal reserves. The department will be
leading the project to replace its 20 year old enterprise reporting system for $3.0
million over two years. This will be a transformational project for all service areas
in the City and will require a significant amount of planning, testing and resource
requirements to make it successful. This will be a major first step to enable the
City to offer more technology based solutions for citizens.
Parking commission is continuing to move forward with replacing its aging parking
machines with more up to date pay by plate machines and will invest $226K over
the next two years. Saint John Transit is focused on replacing several bus shelters
that are deemed to be safety concerns for a total of $50K.
Fleet will budget $4.13 million over two years to replace vehicles and equipment
that are past useful lives and with high operating cost. These funds will come from
the vehicle reserve. Council will receive a detailed list of vehicles and equipment
to approve as the replacement list is compiled.
New Capital Investments/Service Enhancements
The proposed 2020 and 2021 has a total of $1.014 million for new capital. The last
payment towards the Exhibition Field House will be made for $564K in 2020. Also,
Harbour Station must upgrade its dasher board and glass system at a cost of $450K
to meet requirements of the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League.
CONCLUSION
Planned capital expenditures total $50,621,551 over the 2 years with $29,131,401
to be funded from other funding sources, pay as you go, operating and capital
reserves and the remainder $21,490,150 to be funded by debt issue. The annual
funding has
helped reduce projected borrowing costs while still investing in needed
infrastructure improvements.
This multi-year budget is the first step in the long term capital plan which will guide
decision making to ensure strategic reinvestments are being made, at the right
time, that infrastructure deficit in being addressed, fiscal responsibility is being
maintained, while ensuring the City continues to invest in assets to encourage
growth.
- 6 -
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
will be funded by borrowing. The projects chosen for the capital program
borrowing have a useful life of approximately 15 years or more.
.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Input has been received from all Service Areas, the ABCs, Senior Leadership
Team and members of the Finance Committee.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 2020 and 2021 Proposed General Fund Capital Budget
2020 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORYDEPARTMENT
SHARE SHARE
Transportation &
Parks & Public SpacesMarket Place Playground - Safety Surface Replacement $ 225,000
Environment Services
Millidgeville - Storm separation and elimination of
Transportation &
Storminflow and infiltration to reduce or eliminate sewer $ 1,000,000
Environment Services
overflows - Gas Tax Funding
Transportation &
StormShamrock Park Sewer Renewal - Gas Tax Funding $ 1,000,000
Environment Services
Waterloo Street - (W&S) - Haymarket Square to Castle
Transportation &
StormStreet - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 350,400 $ 129,600
Environment Services
Funding)
St. James Street - (W&S) - Prince William Street to
Transportation &
StormGermain Street - Sewer Separation (Subject to $ 69,350 $ 25,650
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Wentworth Street - (W&S) - Elliot Row to King Street
Transportation &
StormEast Intersection- Sewer Separation (Subject to $ 69,350 $ 25,650
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Princess Street - (W&S) - Wentworth Street to Crown
Transportation &
StormStreet - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 156,950 $ 58,050
Environment Services
Funding)
Germain Street- (W&S) - St. James Street to Lower
Transportation &
StormCove Loop - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 109,500 $ 40,500
Environment Services
Funding)
Transportation & Celebration Street- (W&S) - Stanley Street to end -
Storm $ 100,000
Environment ServicesSewer Separation - Gas Tax Funding
Broadview Ave. - (W&S) - Charlotte Street to
Transportation &
StormCarmarthen Street - Sewer Separation (Subject to $ 193,450 $ 71,550
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Page 1
2020 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORYDEPARTMENT
SHARE SHARE
Transportation & Asphalt Roadway Resurfacing, Curb & Sidewalk
Transportation $ 1,980,000
Environment ServicesRenewal Annual Program - Pay as you go
Transportation & Asphalt Roadway Resurfacing, Curb & Sidewalk
Transportation $ 1,500,000 $ 1,645,000
Environment ServicesRenewal Annual Program - Gas Tax Funding
Transportation &
TransportationEngineering Investigations and Design $ 300,000
Environment Services
Waterloo Street - (W&S) - Haymarket Square to Castle
Transportation &
TransportationStreet - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 591,300 $ 218,700
Environment Services
Funding)
St. James Street - (W&S) - Prince William Street to
Transportation &
TransportationGermain Street - Street Reconstruction (Subject to $ 153,300 $ 56,700
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Wentworth Street - (W&S) - Elliot Row to King Street
Transportation &
TransportationEast Intersection- Street Reconstruction (Subject to $ 131,400 $ 48,600
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Princess Street - (W&S) - Wentworth Street to Crown
Transportation &
TransportationStreet - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 346,750 $ 128,250
Environment Services
Funding)
Germain Street- (W&S) - St. James Street to Lower
Transportation &
TransportationCove Loop - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 124,100 $ 45,900
Environment Services
Funding)
Transportation & Celebration Street- (W&S) - Stanley Street to end -
Transportation $ 200,000
Environment ServicesStreet Reconstruction - Gas Tax Funding
Page 2
2020 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORYDEPARTMENT
SHARE SHARE
Broadview Ave. - (W&S) - Charlotte Street to
Transportation &
TransportationCarmarthen Street -Street Reconstruction (Subject to $ 346,750 $ 128,250
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Transportation &
TransportationCourtney Bay Causeway - Replace Guide Rails $ 300,000
Environment Services
Fundy QuayGrowth and DevelopmentFundy Quay - Seawall Refurbishment - Funding DMAF $ 1,090,000 $ 1,635,000
Asset and Energy
Saint John City MarketSaint John City Market Roof Upper and Lower $ 700,000
Management
Asset and Energy
Municipal BuildingsMarket Slip Sea Wall Protection Coating $ 150,000
Management
Asset and Energy *Deep Municipal Energy Retrofit (Subject to Federal
Municipal Buildings $ 606,667 $ 575,000
ManagementFunding)
Asset and Energy Air Handling Units - Phase 1 - Municipal Operations
Municipal Buildings $ 75,000
ManagementBuilding
Asset and Energy
Market Square*District Energy Phase 1 (Subject to Federal Funding) $ 976,000 $ 1,464,000
Management
Carleton Community Transportation &
Carleton Community Centre - Exterior Work $ 175,000
CentreEnvironment Services
Transportation &
Lord BeaverbrookIce Plant - Replace Compressor $ 75,000
Environment Services
Transportation &
Peter Murray ArenaChiller Replacement $ 100,000
Environment Services
Harbour StationRegional FacilitiesReplace Truck $ 25,000
Harbour StationRegional FacilitiesReplace Zamboni $ 115,000
Harbour StationRegional FacilitiesHeat Pump Replacement $ 60,000
Page 3
2020 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
DESCRIPTION
CATEGORYDEPARTMENT
SHARE SHARE
Canada Games Aquatic Fire Panel Replacement, Pump shut off valves
Regional Facilities $ 50,000
Centrereplacement, energy efficiency
Trade and Convention
Regional FacilitiesLED Lighting in Various Areas $ 25,000
Centre
Trade and Convention Replace Various Kitchen Equipment - Convection
Regional Facilities $ 76,000
CentreOvens, Hot Boxes
Trade and Convention
Regional FacilitiesUpdate POS systems - current system out of service $ 30,000
Centre
Trade and Convention
Regional FacilitiesSecurity Cameras $ 5,000
Centre
Finance and Administration
FleetFleet Replacement Program $ 2,065,000
Services
Transportation &
Saint John ParkingReplacement of 17 Parking Meters $ 113,000
Environment Services
Information TechnologyCorporate ServicesIT Infrastructure Replacement/Upgrades/ERP System $ 835,000 $ 1,500,000
Multiple Bus Shelters (Waterloo, Mystery Lake,
Transportation &
Saint John TransitMountainview, Duke St. West, Anglin Dr, Boars Head $ 40,000
Environment Services
Road)
$ 13,995,267 $ 10,435,400
2020 Capital Asset Replacement
Exhibition Field House Year 3 of 3 year $ 564,400
2020 New Capital Investment $ - $ 564,400
Total 2020 General Fund Capital Budget
$ 13,995,267 $ 10,999,800
Page 4
2021 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
CATEGORYDEPARTMENTDESCRIPTION
SHARE SHARE
Transportation & Shamrock Score Clock/Field Work & Memorial Score
Parks & Public Spaces $ 150,000
Environment ServicesClock Replacement
Transportation & Garden Street - (W&S) - Coburg Street to City Road -
Storm $ 175,200 $ 64,800
Environment ServicesSewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral Funding)
Charlotte Street - (W&S) - St. James Street to Lover
Transportation &
StormCove Loop - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 277,400 $ 102,600
Environment Services
Funding)
St. James Street - (W&S) - Germain Street to Sydney
Transportation &
StormStreet - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 109,500 $ 40,500
Environment Services
Funding)
Mecklenburg Street - (W&S) - Wentworth Street to
Transportation &
StormCrown Street - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 229,950 $ 85,050
Environment Services
Funding)
Peters Street - (W&S) - Waterloo Street to Coburg
Transportation &
StormStreet - Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral $ 131,400 $ 48,600
Environment Services
Funding)
Transportation & Rodney Street - (W&S) - Market Place to Watson Street
Storm $ 340,000
Environment Services- Sewer Separation
Transportation & Pitt Street - (W&S) - St. James Street to Broad Street -
Storm $ 94,900 $ 35,100
Environment ServicesSewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral Funding)
Transportation & Brittain Street - (W&S) - Pitt Street to Wentworth
Storm $ 91,250 $ 33,750
Environment ServicesStreet- Sewer Separation (Subject to Bilateral Funding)
Page 1
2021 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
CATEGORYDEPARTMENTDESCRIPTION
SHARE SHARE
Transportation & Asphalt Roadway Resurfacing, Curb & Sidewalk
Transportation $ 2,395,151
Environment ServicesRenewal Annual Program - Pay As You Go
Transportation & Asphalt Roadway Resurfacing, Curb & Sidewalk
Transportation $ 1,500,000 $ 1,100,000
Environment ServicesRenewal Annual Program - Gas Tax Funding
Transportation &
TransportationEngineering Investigations and Design $ 300,000
Environment Services
Transportation & Garden Street - (W&S) - Coburg Street to City Road -
Transportation $ 317,550 $ 117,450
Environment ServicesStreet Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral Funding)
Charlotte Street - (W&S) - St. James Street to Lover
Transportation &
TransportationCove Loop - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 204,400 $ 75,600
Environment Services
Funding)
St. James Street - (W&S) - Germain Street to Sydney
Transportation &
TransportationStreet - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 357,700 $ 132,300
Environment Services
Funding)
Mecklenburg Street - (W&S) - Wentworth Street to
Transportation &
TransportationCrown Street - Street Reconstruction (Subject to $ 335,800 $ 124,200
Environment Services
Bilateral Funding)
Peters Street - (W&S) - Waterloo Street to Coburg
Transportation &
TransportationStreet - Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 292,000 $ 108,000
Environment Services
Funding)
Transportation & Pitt Street - (W&S) - St. James Street to Broad Street -
Transportation $ 197,100 $ 72,900
Environment ServicesStreet Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral Funding)
Page 2
2021 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
CATEGORYDEPARTMENTDESCRIPTION
SHARE SHARE
Brittain Street - (W&S) - Pitt Street to Wentworth
Transportation &
TransportationStreet- Street Reconstruction (Subject to Bilateral $ 182,500 $ 67,500
Environment Services
Funding)
Transportation & Rodney Street - (W&S) - Market Place to Watson Street
Transportation $ 550,000
Environment Services- Sewer Separation
Charlotte Street - Trinity Church to Princess Street -
Transportation & Street Reconstruction. Saint John Energy to provide
Transportation $ 360,000
Environment Servicesadditional services for approximately $220,000 to
move overhead high voltage lines to underground
Asset and Energy
Fundy QuayFundy Quay - Seawall Refurbishment - Pay as you go $ 1,635,000
Management
Asset and Energy
Fundy QuayFundy Quay - Seawall Refurbishment - Funding DMAF $ 2,180,000 $ 1,635,000
Management
Asset and Energy *Deep Municipal Energy Retrofit (Subject to Federal
Municipal Buildings $ 553,333 $ 575,000
ManagementFunding)
Asset and Energy
Municipal BuildingsCity Market Pedway HVAC Upgrade $ 30,000
Management
Asset and Energy
Municipal BuildingsFirestations # 5,7,8 - Roof Replacement $ 200,000
Management
Asset and Energy
Municipal BuildingsSt. Patrick Street Pedway - Roof Replacement $ 30,000
Management
Asset and Energy Air Handling Units - Phase 2 - Municipal Operations
Municipal Buildings $ 75,000
ManagementBuilding
Asset and Energy
Market Square*District Energy Phase 1 (Subject to Federal Funding) $ 976,000 $ 1,464,000
Management
Page 3
2021 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
CATEGORYDEPARTMENTDESCRIPTION
SHARE SHARE
Carleton Community Transportation &
Foundation - Water proofing $ 125,000
CentreEnvironment Services
Transportation &
Charles Gorman ArenaChiller Replacement $ 100,000
Environment Services
Transportation &
Lord BeaverbrookMain Electrical Service Upgrade $ 100,000
Environment Services
Harbour StationRegional FacilitiesHeat Pump Replacement $ 50,000
Trade and Convention Replace Equipment (Banquet Equipment & Tables,
Regional Facilities $ 80,000
CentreWalkin Fridge)
Trade and Convention
Regional FacilitiesReplace Flooring and Staging Equipment $ 30,000
Centre
Trade and Convention
Regional FacilitiesSecurity Upgrades $ 15,000
Centre
Finance and Administration
FleetFleet Replacement $ 2,065,000
Services
Information TechnologyCorporate ServicesIT Infrastructure Replacement/Upgrades/ERP System $ 835,000 $ 1,500,000
Transportation &
Saint John ParkingReplacement of 17 Parking Meters $ 113,000
Environment Services
Transportation &
Saint John Transit Bus Shelter - Market Square $ 10,000
Environment Services
Total 2021 General Fund Capital Budget $ 15,136,134 $ 10,040,350
$ 450,000
Harbour StationRegional FacilitiesDasher Board and Glass System
2021 New Capital Investment $ - $ 450,000
Page 4
2021 - Proposed Draft General Fund Capital Budget
BUDGET - OTHER BUDGET - CITY
CATEGORYDEPARTMENTDESCRIPTION
SHARE SHARE
Total 2021 General Fund Capital Budget
$ 15,136,134 $ 10,490,350
Page 5
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷƭ
DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķΉ ƷźƌźƷǤ CǒƓķ
Common Council
July 29, 2019
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķ
2020-2021 Capital Budget Inputs
Asset Management Plan
State of Infrastructure Report
Plan SJ/Play SJ/Move SJ
Central Peninsula Neighborhood Plan
Capital Budget Policy
Climate Change
Council Priorities
Growth & Prosperity
Vibrant and Safe City
Valued Service Delivery
Fiscally Responsible
2
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķ
10 year Draft Long Term Capital Plan plan is
underway and to be completed end of Q3,
2019
Service areas have completed 2020-2029
submissions
2020 & 2021 Capital Budget based on draft
Long Term Capital Plan
Long Term Capital Plan Inputs
Asset Management Plan
Long Term Financial Plan
Debt Management Policy
Capital Budget Policy
Operating Budget Policy
3
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķ
20202021 Capital Budget includes
following financial principal adopted
by the Finance Committee;
Target 25% Reduction infrastructure
deficit over 10 years
Increase pay as you go annually
Reduce General Fund Debt by 25% per
year of next 10 years
Increase contribution to Capital by 10%
per year.
4
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ hǝĻƩǝźĻǞ
General Fund Debenture Balance in $Mil
125
119.13
120
117.93
117.09
115
110
112.06
106.55
105
102.41
100
95
90
201420152016201720182019
Projected
5
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ hǝĻƩǝźĻǞ
Proposed 2020-2021 Draft General Fund Capital Budget -$50,621,551
City Share - $21,490,150 (2 years) ΛυЊЉ͵ВВaΏЋЉЋЉͲ υЊЉ͵ЍВaΏЋЉЋЊ
Ņƚĭǒƭ ƚƓ ƩĻķǒĭĻķ ĬƚƩƩƚǞźƓŭΜ
Other Share - $29,131,401 (2 years)
Gas Tax Funding (Includes additional funding recently announced)
Disaster Mitigation Funding
Reserves Fleet, Information Technology, Capital
Bi-lateral funding (Federal and Provincial)
Pay as you go ($1,980,151 in 2020 & $3,230,151 in 2021)
Additional Federal green funding to be confirmed - $3,112,000 over 2 years
Deep Municipal Energy Retrofit
District Energy Phase 1 Market Square
6
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ hǝĻƩǝźĻǞ
City Market
Fleet - $4,130,000
$700,000
Transportation &
Fundy Quay
Environment
$8,175,000
Services
$22,571,151
District Energy &
Market Square
$4,880,000
Information
Technology
$4,670,000
Regional Facilities
Municipal
$1,011,000 Recreation
Buildings
7
$1,614,400
$2,870,000
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Focus on Tax Base Growth
Continued investment in Fundy Quay
Total investment to rebuild Seawall - $8.174 Million
Funding partnership with Federal Government ($3.27M) and City of Saint John
($4.904M)
Allows for City to mitigate climate change by raising seawall
Strategic reinvestments
Millidgeville Storm project - $1.0 M creating more capacity for
development
Major street reconstruction and beautification along St. James Street corridor
Charlotte Street St. James to Lower Cove Loop - $660K
St. James Street Prince William to Germain - $305K
St. James Street Germain to Sydney Street - $640K
Germain Street St. James to Lower Cove Loop - $320K
8
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Balancing Infrastructure Replacement
and Climate Change Mitigation
2020-2021 has a focus on high risk of failure
assets but also addresses climate change.
$8,915,000 investment in sewer separation,
resulting in complete street reconstruction.
$7,780,000 continued investment in low
carbon, energy efficiency measures and
reducing our carbon footprint.
9
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Infrastructure Deficit - Highlights
Buildings
Fire stations $200K - 3 facilities require new
roofs
City Market - $700K for roof replacement
Carleton Community Centre - $300K for
foundation and exterior work
Transit Bus shelters - $80K
Trade & Convention - $261K replacing outdated
equipment and technology
Harbour Station - $700K for Q League
requirements, heating upgrades, other assets
10
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Infrastructure Deficit - Highlights
Fleet Replacement - $4.13 million
Arena equipment - $475K (Chillers/Compressors)
Information Technology - $4.67 million
$1.67 million for annual equipment replacement
$3.0 million to replace 20 year old ERP system
New ERP system will a transformational project
Impacts all service areas in the City
Parking Meter $226K earmarked for continued
replacement of outdated parking meters.
Parks and Recreation - $225K for surface
replacement at Market Place playground (safety)
11
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
NEW INVESTMENTS
Exhibition Fieldhouse - $564K final grant of a three year
commitment (2020). (Note: this is not an asset of the City of
Saint John, however was approved before Capital Policy.)
12
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ CǒƓķ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ
CONCLUSION
Budget continues to focus and balancing projects between
Addressing infrastructure deficit (Assets at Risk Failure, Beyond useful life)
1.96%
Growth Opportunities
Climate Change
Infrastructure Deficit "F"
Leveraging funding opportunities
Disaster Mitigation Funding
Gas Tax Funding
New
Asset/Enchancement
Bi-lateral Funding
98.04%
Other Green Funding
21.93% of reinvestment
directly tied to growth
13
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ğƷĻƩ ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷƭ
14
{ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ğƷĻƩ /ğƦźƷğƌ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ Ώ ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ
Proposed -2020-2021 Capital budget
$26,215,000
Funding for Capital budget Capital from
Operating (pay as you go) - $10,283,450
over (2 years)
Heavy reliance on funding from other
sources - $15,931,500 (2 years)
Disaster Mitigation Funding
Gas Tax Funding
Bi-lateral funding opportunities support: infra.
renewal, Neighborhood Plan, dev. & sewer separation
No new borrowing for 2020-2021 Capital program
15
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ DĻƓĻƩğƌ /ğƦźƷğƌ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
16
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ ƷźƌźƷǤ .ǒķŭĻƷƭ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Latest State of Infrastructure Results
Infrastructure Deficit - $313,581,339
Addressing the deficit with 2020-2021 Budget
Budget includes, in coordination with
Transportation, over $7.8M of street
reconstruction projects.
Sewer separation falls under green infrastructure
Nearly all projects located in PDA
Improved infrastructure and streetscapes to focus on
growth opportunities
One Mile Sewer Lift Station - $5.0M
Current station is at end of life
Funding under Gas Tax Fund
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ ƷźƌźƷǤ .ǒķŭĻƷƭ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Addressing the deficit with 2020-2021 Budget
Other Infrastructure Renewal -Water
Hayes Avenue - $950K
Other Infrastructure Renewal -Sewer
Douglas Avenue - $325K
Lakewood Heights Sanitary System - $720K
Retail Drive Area (Oakland St.) - $500K
Fleet Renewal - $970K (funded from Reserve)
New Infrastructure
Wastewater Pumping Station - $520K
Prospect Street West
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ ƷźƌźƷǤ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ IźŭŷƌźŭŷƷƭ
Strategic Investments
Climate Change Adaptation
WWPS Lift Station C - $500K
Reconstruction and flood proof DMAF
Musquash Water Pump Station - $5.44M
Upgrade/Reconstruction/Flood Proof - DMAF
WWPS Lift Station Beach Crescent - $840K
Reconstruction and flood proof - DMAF
Watermain/Sewer Cleaning and Lining
$1.45M
Extend useful life of watermains/sewer lines
Improve water pressure and water quality
Improve fire flows
19
ЋЉЋЉΏЋЉЋЊ 5ƩğŅƷ ƷźƌźƷǤ .ǒķŭĻƷ Ώ /ƚƓĭƌǒƭźƚƓ
CONCLUSION
Budget continues to focus and balancing projects between
2.0%
Infrastructure deficit
Climate Change
Growth
Infrastructure Deficit "F"
No new debt
Funding Opportunities
New Asset/Enchancement
98.0%
12.08% of reinvestment directly tied to growth
20
wĻĭƚƒƒĻƓķğƷźƚƓ
Recommendation
It is recommended that members of Common Council;
Reflect upon the attached draft of the 2020 and 2021 General Fund
Capital Budget and Utility Fund Capital Budget and make any and all
inquiries and recommendations to staff; and receive and file this report.
21
/ƚƓĭƌǒƭźƚƓ
Questions?
22
/haahb /h b/L\[ w9thw
M&C No. 2019-181
Report Date July 19, 2019
Meeting Date July 29, 2019
Service Area Saint John Water
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: 2020 and 2021 Proposed Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital
Budget
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. City Manager Recommended by
Head
Craig Lavigne Brent McGovern John Collin Finance Committee
Councillor Merrithew
Finance Chair
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that members of Common Council;
Reflect upon the attached draft of the 2020 and 2021 Proposed Utility
Fund Capital Budget and make any and all inquiries and recommendations
to staff; and receive and file this report.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The draft 2020 and 2021 Proposed Utility Fund Capital Budget was presented to
thth
the Finance Committee on May 29 and July 18. It was recommended at the July
th
28 meeting by the Finance Committee to forward the draft 2020 and 2021
th
Proposed Utility Fund Capital Budget to Council for receive and file at the July 29
meeting. The draft budget will then be brought before Council again on August 19,
2019 for approval.
The Utility is proposing a very limited multi-year capital budget for 2020 - 2021
that focuses on leveraging monies from other levels of government for
investments being made by the Utility. Increased debt, limited growth, a large
infrastructure deficit and escalating rates are challenges facing the Utility for both
the medium and long term. A new rate structure is to be completed in 2019, along
- 2 -
with the Long Term Financial plan which will provide the road map for the Utility
to deal with these challenges.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
N/A
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The proposed 2020 -
priorities, Asset Management Plan, and Capital Budget policy.
REPORT
The proposed 2020 - 2021 Draft Utility Capital Budget is a total of $26,215,000.
Funding from other sources, (Gas tax, government funding, etc.) is $15,931,550
$10,283,450 over two years and
will be funded from pay as you go.
The completion of the Safe Clean Drinking Water project and Harbour Cleanup has
2017 (2018 - $101 million). The Utility will continue to focus on debt reduction and
in order to achieve this the Utility will not borrow any money for its 2020-2021
capital program.
This significant debt coupled with escalated rates, stagnant growth and pending
changes to rate structures will be challenging for the Utility as it tackles the
infrastructure deficit. The increased deficit as reported to Council as part of the
State of the Infrastructure report is approximately $308,276,480 which represents
frastructure deficit.
mitigation adaptation fund (DMAF). The Utility will spend approximately $10.2
million over the next 5-6 years raising and rebuilding critical infrastructure that
was prone to flooding. The cost will now be spilt approximately 40% Federal Share
and approximately 60% Utility Share.
The completion of the rate study in 2019, along with the Asset Management Plan
and Long Term Financial plan will guide the
replacement and how to fund the infrastructure deficit to ensure services are
reliably provided to rate payers while balancing the ability to fund more
investments in infrastructure renewal.
- 3 -
LƓŅƩğƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ wĻƓĻǞğƌ ğƷĻƩ ğƓķ {ğƓźƷğƩǤ
The proposed budget focuses on assets that are well past their useful life, subject
to risk of failure and in some cases extreme risk of failure with significant
consequences (ex. One Mile Lift Station).
There are several proposed street rebuild projects that are included in the budget
and most of these projects involve the general fund. These projects have assets
underground and are at a high risk of failure due to their age and material type.
Numerous streets within the draft program have terra cotta sanitary sewers, some
of which were installed in 1889 & 1895 and cast iron watermain installed in the
early 1900s.
The total capital for the Utility on street rebuilds is approximately $7.8 million over
two years and some of these street sections include; Wentworth Street, Germain
Street, Lower Cove Loop, Waterloo Street, Celebration Street, Princess, Peters
Street, Brittain Street, Pitt Street, Rodney Street and St. James Street. Many of
the street reconstructions are in the primary development areas and this work
supports the roll out of the Neighbourhood Plan.
St. James Street, Germain Street and Charlotte Street are prime examples of
growth. St. James Street for example was listed on the Central Peninsula
Neighborhood plan as key corridor and this transformational project will be
coordinated between; Transportation, Water, Growth and Development and
Develop SJ.
Another project that benefits both the Utility and helps to grow Saint John is the
asset renewal project Lakewood Heights Sanitary System. This project is geared
towards asset renewal and environmental protection, while creating capacity on
the system for growth initiatives without having to build new infrastructure a
best use of assets at the lowest possible cost.
The budget also includes phase seventeen and eighteen of watermain cleaning
and lining that will continue to extend the life of these assets while minimizing the
need for investment by lining as opposed to replacing. There is also structural line
of sewer line in both years and this will also extend the life of these assets.
There is a major investment being made at the One Mile Lift Station in 2020. The
existing lift station is at the end of its life and it requires investment to ensure
there is reliability around the collection of wastewater.
There are two other wastewater lift stations at Greenhead Road and Beach
Crescent that not only need to be rebuilt but they will also be raised to ensure
they can withstand future flood events and these projects have received funding
under the DMAF program.
- 4 -
The other major project under the DMAF program in this multi-year budget is the
complete upgrade and reconstruction of the Musquash Water Pump Station. This
asset will also be rebuilt to ensure flood proofing.
The budget also includes a fleet replacement program for vehicles and equipment
past their useful life or with extraordinary operating costs. In previous years the
Utility funded its fleet reserve directly to the General fund fleet reserve and all
vehicles and equipment were funded from that reserve. These reserves have now
been separated to ensure each entity is properly segregating its reserves.
The budget only includes one new asset which is a wastewater pumping station at
Prospect Street West and this is two ensure all residential wastewater is properly
being directed for treatment at the Lancaster Lagoon treatment plant.
/ƚƓĭƌǒƭźƚƓ
The 2020-2021 budgets is focused on leveraging as much additional funding the
Utility can secure along with its smaller capital from operating program. Projects
have been chosen are long past their useful life and have a high risk of failure.
There are several projects that are asset renewal that are being done to replace
or extend the life of the asset but also have a positive impact on growth.
The 2020 - 2021 Draft Utility Capital budget will continue to focus on ensuring
assets can provide reliable services to all customers, meet all environmental
regulations and mitigate against future climate change events.
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
The 2020 - 2021 Utility Fund Capital budget will be funded from the operations
(pay as you go) and from other sources of funding.
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Input and coordination was received from Engineering, Senior Leadership Team,
Growth and Community Development, Finance, Transportation and Environment
and Develop SJ.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 2020 and 2021 Proposed Utility Fund Capital Budget
Exhibit 2 Letter from Finance Committee Chairman Mr. David Merrithew
23-May-19
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
SAINT JOHN WATER
CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY
W & S UTILITY FUND
Proposed Program Summary For - 2020
No. ofOtherUtility
Category Total
ProjectsShareShare
Industrial Water Renewal - West1$1,020,000$1,700,000$2,720,000
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary13$6,938,450$1,546,550$8,485,000
Infrastructure Renewal - Water13$2,551,200$1,873,800$4,425,000
TOTALS:
27$10,509,650$5,120,350$15,630,000
Summary of Capital Costs (Utility Share)
Industrial Water Renewal
- West
33.2%
Infrastructure Renewal -
Water
36.6%
Infrastructure Renewal -
Sanitary
30.2%
Page1 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2020
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Industrial Water Renewal - West
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
Musquash Water Pump MusquashUpgrade/reconstruction - appropriate pump 1,020,0001,700,000
Stationsizing, electrical upgrades, flood proofing, etc.
Including design and construction management
services. Phase A. Project to be partially
funded under DMAF.
$1,020,000$1,700,000
TOTAL:
Page2 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2020
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
G&D*
Germain StreetSt. James Street to Lower Cove Renew 100 m of 375 mm T.C sanitary sewer 105,85039,150
Loop(with an in service year of 1884), including
design and construction management services.
Subject to successful funding under Bilateral
Funding.
G&D*
Lower Cove LoopCharlotte Street to Germain Install 150 m of 525 mm sanitary sewer, 248,20091,800
Streetincluding design and construction management
services. Subject to successful funding under
Bilateral Funding.
*
One Mile Lift StationRothesay Avenue at Russell New pumping station, new screening channel 5,000,0000
Streetstructure and associated building to replace the
existing pumping station that is at the end of
asset life to provide for relible collection of
wastewater, including design and construction
management services. Project to be funded
under the G.T.F.
Structural liningVarious LocationsStructurally line and point repairs to sanitary 0225,000
sewers, including design and construction
management services.
*
WWPS Lift Station C515 Green Head RoadReconstruct lift station above flood level to 200,000300,000
provide for reliable collection of wastewater,
including design and construction management
services Project to be partially funded under
DMAF.
*
Douglas AvenueCivic 399 to 425Install approx. 150m of 200mm and 27m of 300,00025,000
150mm sanitary sewer, including land, design,
and construction management services. Project
to be partially funded under G.T.F.
Wastewater PumpingProspect Street West at Walnut Pumping station, land acquisition, and required 0520,000
Streetpiping to direct flows to sewer on Main Street
West for treatment at the Lancaster Lagoon,
including construction management services.
*
Wentworth StreetElliott Row through King Street Renew 90 m of 300 mm T.C. sanitary sewer 83,95031,050
East Intersection(Condition Grade of 4 with a year in service of
1867), including construction management
services. Subject to successful funding under
Bilateral Funding.
*
Waterloo StreetHaymarket Square to Castle Renew approx. 330m of 300mm and 375mm 299,300110,700
StreetT.C.sanitary sewer ( Condition Grade of 5 with
a in service year of 1869), including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral Funding.
Page3 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2020
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
St. James StreetPrince William Street to Renew 111 m of 250mm and 375 mm T.C. 94,90035,100
Germain Streetsanitary sewer (Condition Grade of 3.5 with an
in service year of 1876), including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral funding.
*
Celebration StreetStanley Street to endRenew 100 m of 375mm and 450mm T.C. 150,000
sanitary sewer, including design and
construction management services. Project to
be funded under the G.T.F.
*
Broadview AvenueCharlotte Street to Carmarthen Renew 275 m of 375 mm T.C. sanitary sewer 237,25087,750
Street(Condition Grade of 4 ), including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Princess StreetWentworth Street to Crown Renew approx. 250m of 225mm and 300mm 219,00081,000
StreetT.C. sanitary sewer (Condition Grade of 5 with
an in service year of 1893), with new 200mm
and 300mm sanitary sewer, including design
and construction management services. Subject
to successful funding under Bilateral Funding.
$6,938,450$1,546,550
TOTAL:
Page4 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2020
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Water
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
Fleet ReplacementVarious locationsFleet Replacement for Saint John Water. 485,0000
Project to be funded under Fleet Reserve.
G&D*
Germain StreetSt. James Street to Lower Cove Renew 100 m of 200 mm C.I. watermain 87,60032,400
Loop(1955), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
G&D*
Lower Cove LoopCharlotte Street to Germain Install 150 m of 200 mm watermain, including 131,40048,600
Streetdesign and construction management services.
Subject to successful funding under Bilateral
Funding.
Removal of cross- Ocean Westwest / Route 7 Removal of two cross- connections on Potable 0150,000
connections on Potable OverpassWater and Raw Water Transmission mains ,
Water and Raw Water including construction management services.
Transmission mains
Engineering Various locationsFunding for engineering investigations and 0250,000
Investigations and Designdesign for various projects under the Water and
Sanitary categories.
*
Wentworth StreetElliott Row through King Street Renew 90 m of 300 mm C.I. watermain (1931), 124,10045,900
East Intersectionincluding construction management services.
Subject to successful funding under Bilateral
Funding.
*
Waterloo StreetHaymarket Square to Castle Renew approx. 330m of 300mm C.I. watermain 434,350160,650
Street(1856), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
St. James StreetPrince William Street to Renew 110 m of 250 mm C.I. watermain 120,45044,550
Germain Street(1876), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral funding.
Hayes Avenue AreaCivic #289 Gault Road to Civic Install approx. 530m of 200mm watermain on 0950,000
#484 Gault RoadGault Road as well as a PRV to connect the
Hayes Avenue system, including construction
management services.
*
Celebration StreetStanley Street to endRenew 100 m of 300mm C.I. watermain, 150,000
including design and construction management
services. Project to be funded under the G.T.F.
*
Broadview AvenueCharlotte Street to Carmarthen Renew 275 m of 150 mm C.I. watermain 219,00081,000
Street(1917), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
Page5 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2020
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Water
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
Princess StreetWentworth Street to Crown Renew approx. 275m of 250mm C.I. (1924) 299,300110,700
Streetwatermain, including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Watermain Cleaning and Various locationsCleaning and lining of existing unlined C.I. 500,0000
Lining Phase 17watermains to improve pressure, water quality,
and fire flows. Project to be funded under
G.T.F.
$2,551,200$1,873,800
TOTAL:
Page6 of
23-May-19
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
SAINT JOHN WATER
CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY
W & S UTILITY FUND
Proposed Program Summary For - 2021
No. ofOtherUtility
Category Total
ProjectsShareShare
Industrial Water Renewal - West1$1,020,000$1,700,000$2,720,000
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary13$2,347,450$2,422,550$4,770,000
Infrastructure Renewal - Water11$2,054,450$1,040,550$3,095,000
TOTALS:
25$5,421,900$5,163,100$10,585,000
Summary of Capital Costs (Utility Share)
Infrastructure Renewal -
Water
Industrial Water Renewal
20.2%
- West
32.9%
Infrastructure Renewal -
Sanitary
46.9%
Page1 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2021
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Industrial Water Renewal - West
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
Musquash Water Pump MusquashUpgrade/reconstruction - appropriate pump 1,020,0001,700,000
Stationsizing, electrical upgrades, flood proofing, etc.
Including design and construction management
services. Phase B. Project to be partially
funded under DMAF.
$1,020,000$1,700,000
TOTAL:
Page2 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2021
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
G&D*
Charlotte StreetSt. James Street to Lower Cove Renew 155 m of 525 mm Concrete sanitary 171,55063,450
Loopsewer (With an in service year of 1965),
including design and construction management
services. Subject to successful funding under
Bilateral Funding.
*
Garden StreetCoburg Street to City RoadRenew approx. 101m of 300mm, and 86m of 156,95058,050
375mm T.C. sanitary sewers (Condition Grade
of 3), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
G&D
Lakewood Heights East of Hickey Road Pumping Line concrete sewers to eliminate 0720,000
Sanitary SystemStationInflow/Infiltration in the Sanitary sewer system,
including construction management services.
Rodney StreetMarket Place to Watson StreetRenewal of approx.290m of T.C., Brick, and 0410,000
Concrete saintary sewer (Condition Grade of
3), including design and construction
management services.
Structural liningVarious LocationsStructurally line and point repairs to sanitary 0225,000
sewers, including design and construction
management services.
*
WWPS Beach Crescent11 Beach CrescentReconstruct lift station above flood level to 340,000510,000
provide for reliable collection of wastewater,
including design and construction management
services, Phase A. Project to be partially
funded under DMAF.
*
Pitt StreetSt. James Street to Broad StreetRenew 155m of 370mm T.C. sanitary sewer 127,75047,250
(Condition Grade of 4), including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Mecklenburg StreetWentworth Street to Crown Renew approx. 265m of 600mm concrete with 248,20091,800
Streetnew 600mm sanitary sewer (Condition Grade
of 2.5), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Combined Sewer South / CentralA strategy prioritizing the separation of 365,000135,000
Separation Reduction combined sanitary and storm sewers for the
Strategy - South / CentralSouthend and giving an estimate for budget
purposes. One of the deliverables would be
maps showing all existing sewers (storm,
sanitary and combined) with proposed new
sewers for separation. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding
Page3 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2021
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Sanitary
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
*
St. James StreetGermain Street to Sydney StreetRenew 195 m of 300mm and 375 mm T.C. 164,25060,750
sanitary sewer (Condition Grade of 4 with an in
service year of 1878), including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral funding.
G&D*
Retail Drive AreaRockwood Avenue to Gull StreetRenew 275 m of 450mm sanitary sewer, 500,000
including design and construction management
services. Project to be funded under the G.T.F.
*
Britain StreetPitt Street to Wentworth StreetRenew 145 m of 300 mm T.C sanitary sewer 116,80043,200
(Condition Grade of 4 with a year in service of
1875), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Peters StreetWaterloo Street to Coburg StreetRenew approx. 190m of 300mm, and 375mm 156,95058,050
T.C. sanitary sewers (Condition Grade of 2.5
with an in service year of 1889), including
design and construction management services.
Subject to successful funding under Bilateral
Funding.
$2,347,450$2,422,550
TOTAL:
Page4 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2021
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Water
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
G&D*
Charlotte StreetSt. James Street to Lower Cove Renew 75 m of 200 mm C.I. watermain (1965), 69,35025,650
Loopincluding design and construction management
services. Subject to successful funding under
Bilateral Funding.
*
Fleet ReplacementVarious locationsFleet Replacement for Saint John Water. 485,0000
Project to be funded under Fleet Reserve.
*
Garden StreetCoburg Street to City RoadRenew approx. 258m of 200mm C.I. 208,05076,950
watermain, including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
Rodney StreetMarket Place to Watson StreetRenew approx. 295m of 300mm C.I. 0345,000
watermain, including design and construction
management services.
Engineering Various locationsFunding for engineering investigations and 0300,000
Investigations and Designdesign for various projects under the Water and
Sanitary categories.
*
Pitt StreetSt. James Street to Broad StreetRenew 155m of 200 mm C.I. watermain with 124,10045,900
200 mm watermain, including design and
construction management services. Subject to
successful funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Mecklenburg StreetWentworth Street to Crown Renew approx. 265m of 200mm C.I. 211,70078,300
Streetwatermain, including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
St. James StreetGermain Street to Sydney StreetRenew 230 m of 200 mm C.I. watermain 182,50067,500
(1878), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral funding.
*
Britain StreetPitt Street to Wentworth StreetRenew 145 m of 200 mm C.I. watermain 116,80043,200
(1934), including design and construction
management services. Subject to successful
funding under Bilateral Funding.
*
Peters StreetWaterloo Street to Coburg StreetRenew approx. 190m of 200mm watermain , 156,95058,050
including design and construction management
services. Subject to successful funding under
Bilateral Funding.
*
Watermain Cleaning and Various locationsCleaning and lining of existing unlined C.I. 500,0000
Lining Phase 18watermains to improve pressure, water quality,
and fire flows. Project to be funded under
G.T.F.
Page5 of
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
23-May-19
SAINT JOHN WATER
PROPOSED W & S FUND PROGRAM
2021
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
w&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
G&D: PROJECT IS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
*: PROJECTS DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Infrastructure Renewal - Water
OtherUtility
ProjectLocationDescription
ShareShare
$2,054,450$1,040,550
TOTAL:
Page6 of
COUNCIL REPORT
2019-194
M&C No.
July 23, 2019
Report Date
July 29, 2019
Meeting Date
Corporate Services
Service Area
His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council
SUBJECT: Clarification of Short-Term Revenue GSustaining Saint John A Three
Part Plan
OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION
This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council.
AUTHORIZATION
Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager
Neil Jacobsen John Collin John Collin
Kevin Fudge
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive for information.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On July 17, 2019 Members of Saint John Common Council received a letter from the Provincial
Minister of Environment & Local Government (Attachment A) that specifically referenced
Sustaining
Saint John A Three Part Plan. This Report provides the
identified short-term financial benefits to the City, as described
not provide comment on the remainder of the letter since the motion (and any corresponding
discussion or debate) regarding the Plan was tabled for 30 days on 11 July 2019.
PREVIOUS RESOLUTION
Common Council July 11, 2019
City of Saint John Sustainability Report
- 2 -
MAIN MOTION
Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Norton:
RESOLVED that Common Council adopt the submitted report entitled Sustaining Saint John: A
Three-Part Plan.
Councillor Reardon asked if a tabling motion could be entertained.
The Common Clerk advised that a tabling motion would require a timeline and a reason for the
tabling motion.
A 30 day timeline was suggested.
Councillor Reardon stated her reason for considering the tabling motion would be to facilitate
further review of the report, which was just released yesterday and to have the provincial
members present at the meeting consider the concerns and remarks made by Council and to
take the concerns to the Province to determine if more could be offered to assist the City.
TABLING MOTION
Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Deputy Mayor McAlary:
RESOLVED that the matter Sustaining Saint John A Three Part Plan be tabled for 30 days to
facilitate further negotiation with the Province.
MOTION TIED, with Deputy Mayor McAlary and Councillors Reardon, Hickey, Sullivan, and
The Mayor cast the deciding vote in favour.
MOTION CARRIED.
Click here to enter text.
SHORT-TERM FONANCIAL BENEFIT GENERATED BY A THREE PART
The Minister of Environment and Local Government identified specific short-term financial
benefit through adoption of the Plan.
The items that follow are on page 1 of the letter. For each, this report summarizes the action,
benefit
interpretation.
- 3 -
1. Tax Exemption Transit Facility, $306k Valid
2. Capital and Operating of Regional Facilities, $632k - Valid. However, please note that
approximately $400k would be capital contributions and approximately $200k would be
that the City will continue to invest in Capital in those facilities in accordance with our
historical trends.
3. Accommodation Levy, $400-500K Valid.
apThe
Accommodation levy is estimated to generate $1.4 million. The City will benefit will be
able to reduce its investment by $400-500K based on the additional levy revenue. It
should be noted however that the estimate is fully dependent on occupancy rate. Of
additional note is that the legislation has already been put in place by the Provincial
government. Our by-law will be in place by end year.
4. Accelerated Population Growth, $600k Uncertain. This estimate assumes the pilot
project is successful in attracting 500 people. It further assumes those people choose to
stay in Saint John and that those people end up causing the build of $34 million of new
tax base. The Province believes that past examples validate that the $34 million is an
appropriate estimate if the 500 people are attracted and stay.
5. Revenue from Saint John Energy, $1 million Uncertain. The early dividends of $500k in
each of 2019 and 2020 (totaling $1 million) are contingent on the enabling legislation
being in put in place by the Provincial Government.
6. Operating Budget Initiatives, $3 million. Staff is uncertain as to why this number is
included in the letter given this represents City cuts (with perhaps some limited new
local revenue through user fees) and therefore does not provide relief to our overall
situation.
Figures 1 and 2 below summarize the net gains to the City of Saint John.
Figure 1: Actions with High Probability
Property Tax Exemption for Transit Facility$306,000
Regional Facilities sharing of operating costs$200,000
Accomodation Levy$1,400,000
Less: Volunteer Levy-$948,000
Annual Operating Budget Impact$958,000
Annual Capital Budget Funding$400,000
Total Annual Value$1,358,000
- 4 -
Below is the same table with those elements that the Province believes are highly probable. It
is noteworthy that the Province feels that revenue from Saint John Energy is likely.
Figure 2: Provincial Estimate
Property Tax Exemption for Transit Facility$306,000
Regional Facilities sharing of operating costs$200,000
Accomodation Levy$1,400,000
Less: Volunteer Levy-$948,000
Population Growth$600,000
Saint John Energy Dividend$500,000
Annual Operating Budget Impact$2,058,000
Annual Capital Budget Funding$400,000
Total Annual Value$2,458,000
Saint John Energy One time Success Fee$500,000
Total Value$2,958,000
It is important to note that future dividends from Saint John Energy will be determined based
on their growth if enabling legislative changes are approved.
It is premature to assign a value to the remaining Action Items in the Sustaining Saint John A
Three Part Plan. Detailed implementation plans must first be developed by the Province and
City of Saint John; with the inherent ability to monitor the progress, associated timelines and
financial outcomes of each Action Item.
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
The motion on the question of support for the Plan remains tabled to at least 11 Aug 2019.
The staff recommendation remains unchanged and can be summarized as:
1. That Common Council endorse the Plan while expressing its reservations.
2. That Common Council insist on detailed implementation plans for each Action Item.
3. That Common Council direct the City Manager to continue with plans to address the
entirety of the deficit for 2021 and 2022.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The work of the Municipal Sustainability Working Group and related outcomes is aligned with
, as well as Service Principles of
SustainabilityPartnerships.
- 5 -
SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES
--
INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS
The work of the Municipal Sustainability Working Group has been led by the
Office, with on-going support from:
Finance and Administrative Services
Growth and Community Development Services
Strategy, Continuous Improvement, and Performance Reporting
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: July 17, 2019 Letter Received from the Provincial Minister of Environment
& Local Government
Dear Community Member
WE Believe Saint John is a youth lead grass roots community
initiative based in Saint John, New Brunswick that engages students
in volunteerism, leadership and social action through year round
activities. WE Believe is an international celebration to motivate
students across the Maritimes and the state of Maine to give back
both locally and globally to causes they are passionate about.
On May 14, 2020 at Harbor Station WE Believe Saint John will be
celebrated by almost 8000 live and by over 80,000 students via live
stream. In grade 5 through 12 from schools all across the Maritimes
and the state of Maine.
WE Believe is a part of th
coming together to create impact WE Day brings world renowned
speakers and A- list performers together with tens of thousands of
young people to celebrate their contributions and kick start another
year of inspiration. Beginning as a single event over 10 years ago, WE
Day has evolved into a series of 16 stadium sized events held a
crossed Canada, The United States and the United Kingdom. The past
year, 200,000 students attended WE Day and left inspired to create
c
At the WE Believe Saint John event the speakers and performers will
focus on various topics including but not limited to; mental and
physical health, volunteering, bullying and self-worth, and how each
of us can better the world.
Students and adults attending the event will have the opportunity to
speak with over 35 various organizations where they can become
volunteers in their community. In addition to this, various
organizations will offer information to students who wish to broaden
their volunteer experiences by going beyond the Maritimes and out
into the rest of the world.
On May 14, 2020 WE Believe Saint John event, in partnership with
the many businesses and organizations across the Maritimes and
Maine, will be the second time WE Believe will be held at Harbor
Station in Saint John, New Brunswick.
Students cannot purchase a ticket to WE Believe Saint John. They
must earn their way by doing something positive, both locally and
internationally. This is a movement to kick start our students to
change the world!
Check out the following link to watch WE Believe 2018 at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku9BQgBHL5w
We sincerely hope that the city of Saint John will consider becoming
a sponsor of WE Believe 2020. Therefore we are asking for the City of
Saint John to support WE Believe 2020 with a donation of $10,000, in
addition we will have the mayor speak at WE Believe, and will also
show a commercial highlighting Saint John to our 8000 live audience
and over 80,000 watching via live stream across North America.
Thank you for brining your passion and energy to the WE movement.
Sincerely,
Daniel Foote
WE Believe
daniel.foote@nbed.nb.ca
1 (506) 434 2254
Together WE can
change the world
WE Believe SJ works hand in hand with WE.org in their WE
Day, WE Schools, WE Villages, WE Company, WE Wellness,
and Me to WE trip initiatives. As a result of our first WE
Believe event, there are now over 60 schools using WE
Schools and committed to supporting both a local and global
project. Our 2020 event will highlight many of these projects
and will share even more stories to celebrate, inspire, and
support youth in New Brunswick and beyond.
Contact
WE Believe - Saint John
108 Penobsquis Loop Road
Penobsquis, NB E4G 2B8
Mr. Daniel Foote
1-506-434-2254
MAY 14, 2020
Cheques made payable to WE Believe
www.webelievesj.com<http://www.webelievesj.com
WE Believe Saint John is a high-energy,
motivational, non-profit event featuring local and
international speakers and performers. This WE Day-
inspired event celebrates, inspires, and supports the
youth of New Brunswick to be engaged in their local
communities and globally.
SPONSORSHIPTAX
DONATIONEXPOSUREPLUS at Event...
LEVELSRECEIPT
Business name on 2 Complementary tickets to
Sponsor page of WE Believe in the Business
SPONSORSHIP
websiteRoom (RSVP)
Mention on social media
FRIEND$500 +
The opportunity to meet
various presenters in the
DECK
Business Room throughout
the day
Business name on 4 Complementary tickets to
Sponsor page of WE Believe in the Business
websiteRoom (RSVP)
Mention on social media
SUPPORTER$1,000 +
The opportunity to meet
various presenters in the
Business Room throughout
WE Believe in our Youth!
the day
Business logo on Special mention
Sponsor page of
WE Believe Saint John engages the entire community to
website6 Complementary tickets to
WE Believe in the Business
support our youth. Youth are connected with local and global
Mention on social media
Room (RSVP)
TEAMMATE$2,500 +Logo on screen at event
charities and businesses to help them accomplish their goals,
The opportunity to meet
and develop leadership and socialpreneur/entrepreneur skills.
various presenters in the
Business Room throughout
the day
Medium Business logo Medium Business logo
Our speakers also share their personal challenges with mental
on Sponsor page of listed on Sponsors Page
health and overcoming obstacles to being all that they can be
websitedescription and Logo
Monthly mentions on
and to let youth know that they are not alone.
Special mention
social media up to June
2020
8 Complementary tickets to
PARTNER$5,000 +
Special mention at
WE Believe in the Business
Our Youth Walk provides information booths by local charities
event
Room (RSVP)
and support groups to further engage and connect with youth.
Logo on screen at event
The opportunity to meet
The Educators Room allows educational staff an opportunity
various presenters in the
Business Room throughout
to engage with speakers and new ideas to incorporate into
the day
their classrooms.
Special Mention,
Special mention and
description and logo.
description at event and
community events and
WE Believe is excited to grow our partnership with the
8 Complementary tickets to
coffeehouses
WE Believe in the Business
business community as we work together to engage, inspire,
Own slide on screen at
Room (RSVP)
event
and mentor our youth!
Tickets provided to your Shout out from the stage
on the day of the event
organization (RSVP)
WORLD
$10,000 +
Large Business logo on
CHANGER
The opportunity to meet
Sponsor page of
various presenters in the
website
Business Room throughout
the day
Opportunity to be
discussed about
speaking at WE Believe
Thanks for bringing your passion
and energy to the WE Movement!
Rocmaura Nursing Home Foundation
10 Parks Street
Saint John, NB E2K 4P1
Telephone: (506) 643-7090
Fax: (506) 643-7053
foundation@rocmaura.com
Making life better for Residents in their
Wednesday, July 10, 2019
Dear Friends;
Gala Honourary
I am
supporting our major annual fundraiser for the betterment of our Residents lives.
Chairs
You wo our 21st Annual Dinner, Auction and Dance at the
Wayne & Denise
SJTCC on Saturday September 28, 2019.
Long
us as we Tour the World! Wayne & Denise Long are our Honourary Gala Chairs,
along with our lovely Host Cindy Day who will be back! We will have tons of great
FOUNDATION
auction items up for bid, and a dance with 8- Pretty in Pink!
BOARD
OF
This year funds will be raised to enhance our Residents lives by providing some of
DIRECTORS
the extras to make life better in thei. There is a growing list
Emil Olsen -Chair of items we need. We have the Final Phase of our Wardrobe Project underway in
on Terrace Court. There are 48 units to build at a cost of over
Brian Fitzpatrick-
$170,000. These upgrades provide residents with comfort, pride, and joy. With a
Treasurer
$3500 donation you can build a wardrobe unit and have a plaque engraved in honour
of your company or someone special.
Rod Flood
June Creamer
well over twenty years. It is worn out and in
Cormier
need of replacement. We are in need of Resident room chairs, love seats for
families to visit, feeding stools and adjustable dining tables that can fit
Lisa Savidant
wheelchairs underneath. Our furniture must be durable, easy to clean, and meet the
Pat Miller
requirements of Residents who are at various levels of cognition and physical ability.
Patricia Murphy
You can help us furnish a sitting area!
Jocelyn Graham
Scott Waddell
All EXTRAS to improve our 150 Residents quality of life are funded through activities
by the Foundation, and we have a long Wish List from medical equipment to
Sr. Anita Naves
recreation therapy programs that have a direct impact.
Sr. Sandra Barrett
YOU can help make those wishes come true by purchasing a table of tickets,
Don Leblanc
making a monetary donation, being an event sponsor, and/or donating gift
Marie Murphy
certificates & auction items, new or gently used. (Jewellery, antiques, china, artwork
Rocmaura Auxiliary
may be appraised.) A table of ten tickets costs $1250 (you get a $600 charitable tax
receipt). We also have Dance Only Tickets for $35! The dance starts at 9pm.
Sheana Mohra
Executive Director
We hope that you will be able to be part of our Community of Caring People. Please
Rocmaura Inc.
contact Sally Cummings at the Foundation office at (506) 643-7090 or
foundation@rocmaura.com. Thank you for your interest!
Sally Cummings
Rocmaura Foundation Inc.
Director
Sally Cummings, Foundation Executive Director
Rocmaura Foundation Sept. 28, 2019 Sponsorship Form
NEW ! Everyone who purchases a Table of 10 for $1250 or level of Sponsorship below will
have their name printed on a thank you banner displayed in our home at Rocmaura.
MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO BE RECOGNIZED! I will participate!
Company Name________________________________ Contact ____________________
Address__________________________________________________________________
City_______________________________Post Code______________
Tel______________________________Email___________________________________
Platinum Sponsorship $10,000
Program mention (Largest size logo)
Company logo displayed on signage during the event
Table of 10 tickets are included
Rocmaura Foundation Website, Facebook, newsletter advertising
Announcement of sponsorship during the event
Announcement of sponsorship with the Media (Newspapers & PSAs)
Can be 8 tables of tickets, $ donation, or in kind contribution totaling $10,000
Gold Sponsorship $5000
Program mention (Large size logo)
Company logo displayed on signage during the event
4 tickets
Rocmaura Foundation Website Facebook, newsletter advertising
Announcement of sponsorship during the Dinner and Auction
Announcement of sponsorship with the Media (Newspapers & PSAs)
Can include 4 tables of tickets, $ donation, or in kind contribution totaling $5000
Silver Sponsorship - $3,500
Program mention (Medium size logo)
Company logo displayed on signage during the event
2 tickets
Announcement of sponsorship during the Dinner
Announcement of sponsorship with the Media (Newspapers & PSAs)
Can be $1250 table of tickets + $2250 donation or in kind gift totaling $3500
Bronze Sponsorship $1,500
Program mention (Small size logo)
Company logo displayed on signage during the event
Announcement of sponsorship during the event.
Announcement of sponsorship with the Media (Newspapers & PSAs)
Can be $1250 table of tickets + $250 donation or in kind totaling $1500
We have Auction Items to donate: _________________________________Value $______
TICKETS Please send _______tickets for dinner totaling $____________ ($125 each with $60
tax receipt)
Please send invoice Cheque Visa MC
#_____________________________ Exp Date MM YY ________ Signature_____________
S ally Cummings 10 Parks St. Saint John NB E2K 4P1 tel 506 643-7090 fax 643-7053 foundation@rocmaura.com
by August 1
Pack your bags! Join us for a - tastes of
the world dinner and so much more¼
CINDY DAY HOST
50/50 DRAW
WINE TOMBOLA
BLACK TIE BINGO
WINE FRIDGE DRAW
SILENT & LIVE AUCTION
DANCE WITH PRETTY IN PINK
DOORS OPEN AT 5:30PM
Honourary Gala Chairs Ã
Hon MP Wayne, Denise
& Konnor Long
We are paying tribute
to the memory of late
Malcolm Barry at this
yearÈs Gala.
To purchase tickets, donate an auction item, or for more information:
Contact 643-7090 | foundation@rocmaura.com
Rocmaura Foundation ~ Helping to make life better for Residents in their Åhome away from homeÆ
July 24, 2019
Common Council
City of Saint John
th
8 Floor City Hall
15 Market Square
Saint John, NB
E2L 1E8
Re: Grow SJ
The Saint John Citizens Coalition respectfully requests, the questions of accountability
contained within this letter,be included in ƷŷĻ /ƚǒƓĭźƌƭ !ŭĻƓķğPacket for July 29,2019.
We are requesting/ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ƩĻǝźĻǞ ƷŷĻ ağǤƚƩƭ ƦĻƩƭƚƓğƌ źƓźƷźğƷźǝĻ ƚƩ ĬƩğƓķͲ ƉƓƚǞƓ ğƭ
GrowSJ, to ensure that all activities related to the entity are legitimate and acceptable under
the Code of Conduct for Elected Representatives.
We have been informed by Mr. Patrick Beamish and others, that the GrowSJ Facebook group
and webpage, as well as events such as City Budgets and Beers ğƩĻ ͻƷŷĻ ƦĻƩƭƚƓğƌ ƦƩƚƦĻƩƷǤ ƚŅ
Mayor Don Darling and (are) not affiliated with the City of Saint JƚŷƓͼ͵
With this in mind, we believe the citizens of Saint John has the right to know the following:
1.Ļ ǒƓķĻƩƭƷğƓķ DƩƚǞ{W źƭ ƦŷǤƭźĭğƌƌǤ ƌƚĭğƷĻķ źƓ ƷŷĻ ağǤƚƩƭ /źƷǤ Iğƌƌ ƚŅŅźĭĻ͵ LŅ ƭƚͲ ǞŷǤ źƭ
Mr. Darling permitted to use premises that are designated for official business and
supported by tax dollars for a private initiative?
2.Is the Mayor using any city-owned/leased cellphone, computer etc. to write and/or
record tweets, posts, selfies, videos etc. concerning GrowSJ?
3.Is any city-owned/leased equipment i.e. computers, cellphones, furnishings etc. being
ǒƭĻķ ĬǤ ğƓǤƚƓĻ ǞƚƩƉźƓŭ ƚƓ aƩ͵ 5ğƩƌźƓŭƭ ƦĻƩƭƚƓğƌ ĬĻŷğƌŅͪ
4.Do any city employees currently work on any aspect of GrowSJ? Have any done so in the
past?
5.Who administers the GrowSJ Facebook page?
6.Who prepares and sends the GrowSJ newsletter to subscribers?
7.Who designs slides and other graphics used in GrowSJ sponsored presentations?
8.Who assists Mr. Darling in organizing City Budgets and Beers and other events that may
fall under the purview of his private brand?
9.What authority ķƚĻƭ aƩ͵ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ ŷğǝĻ Ʒƚ ǒƭĻ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓƭ ĭƚƩƦƚƩğƷĻ źƒğŭĻ ƚƓ
his Facebook page, website, invitations to Budgets and Beers and any other promotional
material? Who gave him this authority and why?
10.Lƭ ƷŷĻ ƒƚƓźƉĻƩ ͷDƩƚǞ{W ƓƚƷ źƷƭĻƌŅ ğ ƷƩğķĻƒğƩƉ ǝźolation that confuses the public, given
that the City of Saint John owns the rights to similar monikers such as PlanSJ, ZoneSJ and
MoveSJ?
11.Why is all information on ownership of www.growsj.liferedacted? Who registered the
website? Who owns the website?
12.Why is there no privacy policy on the website, given that it requests personal
information in order to subscribe to a GrowSJ newsletter?
13.What, if any, free space has been donated to the Mayor for Budgets and Beers or any
other GrowSJ sponsored event? Has the Mayor accepted any other donations related to
the activities of GrowSJ?
We understand that these questions are up to the Mayor himself to answer and could have
been sent directly to him. However, given that the Code of Conduct expressly states that
Members of Council (including the Mayor) are expected to perform their duties in a manner
that will bear close public scrutiny, we would hopethat Council will, on behalf of the citizens of
Saint John, put this to the test by seeking the answers to these and any other questions it may
ŷğǝĻ ğĬƚǒƷ ƷŷĻ ƦǒƩƦƚƭĻ ƚŅ DƩƚǞ{W ğƓķ ƷŷĻ ağǤƚƩƭ źƓǝƚƌǝĻƒĻƓƷ ǞźƷŷ źƷ͵
Yours sincerely;
Randall Goodwin
Saint John Citizens Coalition
sjccnb@outlook.com
WǒƌǤ ЋВͲ ЋЉЊВ
5ĻƦǒƷǤ ağǤƚƩ ğƓķ /ƚǒƓĭźƌƌƚƩƭ
{ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ {ĭǒƌƦƷǒƩĻ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ЋЉЋЉ
ŷĻ /ƚƒƒźƷƷĻĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ŷƚƌĻͲ ŷğǝźƓŭ ƒĻƷ ƚƓ WǒƌǤ ЋВƷŷͲ ЋЉЊВͲ ƒğķĻ ƷŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ
ƩĻĭƚƒƒĻƓķğƷźƚƓʹ
w9{h\[95 ƷŷğƷ ğƭ ƩĻĭƚƒƒĻƓķĻķ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ağƓğŭĻƩ źƓ ƷŷĻ ƭǒĬƒźƷƷĻķ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ aε/
ЋЉЊВΏЊВЎʹ {ĭǒƌƦƷǒƩĻ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ЋЉЋЉ ƷŷĻ /ƚƒƒźƷƷĻĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ŷƚƌĻ ƩĻĭƚƒƒĻƓķƭ ƷŷğƷ
/ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ķźƩĻĭƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ağƓğŭĻƩ Ʒƚ źƓŅƚƩƒ {ĭǒƌƦƷǒƩĻ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ
ƭǒĬƆĻ
ЋЉЋЉͳ ğƓķ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ źƭ ĭƚƒƒźƷƷĻķ Ʒƚ ǞƚƩƉźƓŭ Ʒƚ źķĻƓƷźŅǤ ğ ƭǒźƷğĬƌĻ ƌƚĭğƷźƚƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ
ЋЉЋЉ ĻǝĻƓƷ źƓ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ ĬǒƷ ǒƓŅƚƩƷǒƓğƷĻƌǤ CǒƓķǤ vǒğǤ Ǟźƌƌ ƓƚƷ ĬĻ ğ ŅĻğƭźĬƌĻ ƚƦƷźƚƓͳ
ğƓķ ŅǒƩƷŷĻƩ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷĻķ ĭƚƭƷƭ ğƭƭƚĭźğƷĻķ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ źƓƭƷğƌƌğƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ЋЉЋЉ
{ĭǒƌƦƷǒƩĻ ΛυЎЉЉЉΜ ĬĻ ƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ ŅƚƩ ЋЉЋЉ ƚƦĻƩğƷźƓŭ ĬǒķŭĻƷ ĭƚƓƭźķĻƩğƷźƚƓ͵
{źƓĭĻƩĻƌǤͲ
5ƚƓ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ
ağǤƚƩ