Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2026-02-09_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jour
City of Saint John Common Council Meeting AGENDA Monday, February 9, 2026 6:00 pm 2nd Floor Common Council Chamber, City Hall An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City’s Website (www.saintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Pages 1.Call to Order 1.1 Land Acknowledgement 1.2 National Anthem 2.Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of January 26, 2026 5 - 12 3.Approval of Agenda 4.Disclosures of Conflict of Interest 5.Consent Agenda 5.1 Contract 2024-18: Water Street Storm Sewer Extension (Recommendation in Report) 13 - 16 5.2 Public Information Session: Harbour Passage Extension (Carmarthen Street to Rockwood Park) - Conceptual Design (Recommendation: Receive for Information) 17 - 19 5.3 Public Information Session: The Cove - Harbour Passage Extension (Recommendation: Receive for Information) 20 - 22 5.4 Scheduling of Public Hearing Dates for Four Planning Applications (Recommendation in Report) 23 - 25 5.5 2029 Canada Games - Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovations Consultant Services Award - Phase C Detailed Design (Recommendation in Report) 26 - 29 5.6 Stopping Train Whistles at Ashburn Lake Road Rail Crossing (Recommendation in Report) 30 - 35 5.7 Infographic: Housing For All Strategy - Progress Update (Recommendation: Receive for Information) 36 - 36 5.8 Correspondence: T. Dempster - Residential Parking Permit Policy (Recommendation: Refer to CAO for review) 37 - 38 5.9 Correspondence: Hemmings Films Ltd. - Stompin' Tom Connors Statue - Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to schedule the presentation) 39 - 42 5.10 Correspondence: T. Boulos - Equitable Sidewalk Plowing and Reprioritization in the South Central Peninsula (Recommendation: Refer to CAO for review) 43 - 44 6.Members Comments 7.Proclamation 7.1 Heritage Week - February 15th to February 21st, 2026 45 - 45 8.Delegations / Presentations 9.Public Hearings - 6:30 p.m. 9.1 Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning with Planning Advisory Committee Report and Staff Presentation - 0 Rex Hurley Blvd. (portions of 00302778 and 00420802) (1st and 2nd Reading) 46 - 88 9.2 Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision with Planning Advisory Committee Report and Staff Presentation - 0 Summit Dr./0 Clint Dr. (Portion of PID 00311126) (1st and 2nd Reading) 89 - 192 10.Consideration of By-laws 10.1 A By-law Respecting Nuisance in The City of Saint John (3rd Reading)193 - 199 10.2 Use of Sidewalks By-law Amendment (3rd Reading)200 - 200 11.Submissions by Council Members 12.Business Matters - Municipal Officers 12.1 Heritage Awards 2026 201 - 214 2 13.Committee Reports 14.Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15.General Correspondence 16.Supplemental Agenda 17.Committee of the Whole 17.1 City of Saint John Employee Political Activity Policy 215 - 215 17.2 Initiate Stop-up and Closure for Portion of Old Lake Trail - Civic #81 Old Lake Trail 216 - 222 17.3 Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) / Government of Canada Contribution Agreement - Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovations Project Phase C Detailed Design 223 - 223 18.Adjournment 3 City of Saint John Common Council Meeting Monday, February 9, 2026 Committee of the Whole 1. Call to Order Si vous avez besoin des services en français pour une réunion de Conseil communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862. Each of the following items, either in whole or in part, is able to be discussed in private pursuant to the provisions of subsection 68(1) of the Local Governance Act and Council / Committee will make a decision(s) in that respect in Open Session: 5:15 p.m., 2nd Floor Boardroom, City Hall 1.1 Approval of Minutes 68(1) 1.2 Land Matter 68(1)(d) 1.3 Financial Matter 68(1)(c,e) 1.4 Labour Matter 68(1)(j) 1.5 Personal Information 68(1)(b) 1 Ville de Saint John Séance du conseil municipal Lundi 9 février 2026 18 h Salle du Conseil municipal, 2e étage, hôtel de ville Un moyen de communication électronique est utilisé lors de cette réunion. Le public peut assister à la séance en personne à la salle du Conseil ou la regarder sur le site Web de la Ville (www.saintjohn.ca) ou sur Rogers TV. Comité plénier 1. Ouverture de la séance Si vous souhaitez obtenir des services en français pour une séance du conseil municipal, veuillez communiquer avec le bureau du greffier municipal au 506-658-2862. Chacun des points suivants, en totalité ou en partie, peut faire l’objet d’une discussion en privé en vertu des dispositions prévues au paragraphe 68(1) de la Loi sur la gouvernance locale. Le conseil/comité prendra une ou des décisions à cet égard au cours de la séance publique : 17 h 15 — Clôture du comité plénier — salle de conseil au 2e étage 1.1 Approbation du procès-verbal 68(1) 1.2 Question foncière 68(1)d) 1.3 Question financière 68(1)(c,e) 1.4 Question de travail 68(1)(j) 1.5 Renseignements personnels 68(1)(b) Séance ordinaire 1. Ouverture de la séance 1.1 Reconnaissance territoriale 1.2 Hymne national 2. Approbation du procès–verbal 2.1 Procès-verbal du 26 janvier 2026 2 3. Adoption de l’ordre du jour 4. Divulgations de conflits d’intérêts 5. Questions soumises à l’approbation du conseil 5.1 Contrat 2024-18 : Prolongement du projet de l’égout pluvial de la rue Water (recommandation du rapport) 5.2 Séance d’information publique : Extension du passage du port (de la rue Carmarthen jusqu’au parc Rockwood) — stade de conception (Recommandation : recevoir à titre d’information) 5.3 Séance d’information publique : Le Cove — Le Cove — Prolongement du passage du port (recommandation : recevoir à titre d’information) 5.4 Calendrier des dates d’audience publique pour quatre demandes de planification (recommandation du rapport) 5.5 Jeux du Canada 2029 — Adjudication du contrat de services d’experts pour les rénovations du Centre aquatique des Jeux du Canada — Phase C : conception détaillée (recommandation du rapport) 5.6 Arrêt des sifflets de train au passage à niveau du chemin Ashburn Lake (recommandation du rapport) 5.7 Infographie : Stratégie Logement pour tous — Mise à jour de l’état d’avancement (recommandation : recevoir à titre d’information) 5.8 Correspondance : T. Dempster — Politique en matière de permis de stationnement résidentiel (recommandation : (Soumettre à l’examen de l’administrateur en chef) 5.9 Correspondance : Hemmings Films Ltd. — Statue de Stompin' Tom Connors – Demande de présentation (recommandation : Communiquer avec le greffier pour planifier une présentation) 5.10 Correspondance : T. Boulos — Équité dans le déneigement des trottoirs et repriorisation dans la péninsule du Centre-Sud (recommandation : (Soumettre à l’examen de l’administrateur en chef) 6. Commentaires présentés par les membres 7. Proclamation 7.1 Semaine du patrimoine — du 15 au 21 février 2026 8. Délégations et présentations 9. Audiences publiques 3 9.1 Proposition de modification du plan municipal et du zonage avec rapport du Comité consultatif d’urbanisme et présentation du personnel — 0, boulevard Rex Hurley (lots 00302778 et 00420802) (1re et 2e lectures) 9.2 Proposition de modification du plan municipal, du zonage et du lotissement avec rapport du Comité consultatif d’urbanisme et présentation du personnel — 0, promenade Sommet/0, promenade Clint (lot du NID 00311126) (1re et 2e lectures) 10. Étude des arrêtés municipaux 10.1 Arrêté relatif aux nuisances dans la ville de Saint John (3e lecture) 10.2 Modification de l’arrêté concernant l’utilisation des trottoirs (3e lecture) 11. Interventions des membres du conseil 12. Affaires municipales évoquées par les fonctionnaires municipaux 12.1 Prix du patrimoine 2026 13. Rapports déposés par les comités 14. Étude des sujets écartés des questions soumises à l’approbation du Bureau 15. Correspondance Générale 16. Ordre du jour supplémentaire 17. Comité plénier 17.1 Politique de la Ville de Saint John en matière d’activités politiques des employés 17.2 Mise en place d’n arrêt et d’une fermeture pour une portion de sentier Old Lake – Voie civique n° 81, sentier Old Lake 17.3 Agence de promotion économique du Canada atlantique (ACOA) / Accord de contribution du gouvernement du Canada – Project de rénovation du Centre aquatique des Jeux du Canada – Phase C : Conception détaillée 18. Levée de la séance 4 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 1 MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN JANUARY 26, 2026, AT 6:00 PM MEETING CONDUCTED BY ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City’s Website (www.saintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Present: Deputy Mayor John MacKenzie Councillor-at-Large Gary Sullivan Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton Councillor Ward 1 Joanna Killen Councillor Ward 2 Barry Ogden Councillor Ward 3 Gerry Lowe Councillor Ward 3 Mariah Darling Councillor Ward 4 Paula Radwan Councillor Ward 4 Greg Stewart Absent: Mayor Donna Noade Reardon Councillor-at-Large Brent Harris Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer (Interim) K. Fudge General Counsel M. Tompkins Fire Chief R. Nichol Chief Financial Officer (Acting) J. Forgie Commissioner Utilities and Infrastructure Services I. Fogan Commissioner Public Works and Transportation M. Hugenholtz Commissioner Growth and Community Services A. Poffenroth Commissioner Human Resources S. Hossack Director External Relations L. Kennedy City Clerk J. Taylor Deputy City Clerk A. McLennan 1. Call to Order 5 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 2 1.1 Land Acknowledgement Councillor Darling read aloud the Land Acknowledgement and called for a moment of reflection. “The City of Saint John/Menaquesk is situated is the traditional territory of the Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet.The Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet along with their Indigenous Neighbours, the Mi’Kmaq/Mi’kmaw and Passamaquoddy/Peskotomuhkati signed Peace and Friendship Treaties with the British Crown in the 1700s that protected their rights to lands and resources.” 1.2 National Anthem 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of January 12, 2026 Moved by Councillor Darling, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the minutes of January 12, 2026, be approved. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Approval of Agenda Moved by Councillor Darling, seconded by Councillor Killen: RESOLVED that the agenda of January 26, 2026, with the addition of items 17.1 Delegation of Authority to Amend Agreement of Purchase and Sale for 608 Millidge Avenue; 17.2 Triparty Memorandum of Understanding with Service New Brunswick, Hotspot, and City of Saint John; 17.3 Housing for All - Contribution Agreement and Assignment of Green Zones; and 17.4 Multipurpose Recreational Facility - Status Update, be approved. MOTION CARRIED. 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2026-007: Community Development Fund Agreement: Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovation Project Phase A&B Concept Design, the City enter into an Amendment Agreement with the Regional Development Corporation (RDC) for funding under the Province of New Brunswick Community Development Fund for the following project: Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovation Project Phase A&B Concept Design, Project No. 18281, in the form and upon the terms and conditions as submitted; and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement. 5.2 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2026-009: Regional Development Corporation (RDC) Fund Agreement: Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovation Project Strategic Infrastructure Fund, the City enter into an Agreement with the Regional Development Corporation (RDC) for funding under the Province of New 6 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 3 Brunswick Community Development Fund for the following project: Canada Games Aquatic Centre Renovation Project Strategic Infrastructure Fund, Project No. 19684, in the form and upon the terms and conditions as submitted; and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement. 5.3 RESOLVED that the Canadian Amyloidosis Support Network - Proclamation Request - Amyloidosis Awareness Month be referred to the Clerk to schedule the proclamation. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Killen: RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in each consent agenda item respectively, be adopted. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. Members Comments Members commented on various local events. 7. Proclamation 8. Delegations / Presentations 8.1 Alzheimer Society of New Brunswick re: Dementia Friendly Communities Moved by Councillor Darling, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that the presentation from the Alzheimer Society of New Brunswick - Dementia Friendly Communities be referred to the Clerk to be rescheduled for a later date. MOTION CARRIED. 9. Public Hearings – 6:30 p.m. 10. Consideration of By-Laws 10.1 Nuisance By-law and Use of Sidewalks By-law Amendment (1st and 2nd Reading) Commissioner Poffenroth provided an overview. Consideration was given to the submitted report M&C 2026-010, entitled “Nuisance By- law and Use of Sidewalks By-law Amendment”. The by-law amendments are necessary to modernize municipal by-laws and align with best practices used by other municipalities. The by-laws establish clear, contemporary standards for addressing specific nuisance behaviours that impact the safety, accessibility, and enjoyment of public spaces. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-Law Number L.G. 25 A Law to Amend a By-Law Respecting the Use of Sidewalks W ithin The City of Saint John” deleting section 19, deleting subsection 20(2), and deleting and replacing subsection 21(2) with “A person who violates any provision of this By-law, may pay to the City within 45 calendar days from the date of such violation an administrative penalty of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00), 7 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 4 and upon such payment, the person who committed the violation is not liable to be prosecuted therefore”, be read a first time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a first time by title, the by-law entitled “By-Law Number L.G. 25 A Law to Amend a By-Law Respecting the Use of Sidewalks Within The City of Saint John.” Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-Law Number L.G. 25 A Law to Amend a By-Law Respecting the Use of Sidewalks W ithin The City of Saint John” deleting section 19, deleting subsection 20(2), and deleting and replacing subsection 21(2) with “A person who violates any provision of this By-law, may pay to the City within 45 calendar days from the date of such violation an administrative penalty of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00), and upon such payment, the person who committed the violation is not liable to be prosecuted therefore”, be read a second time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a second time by title, the by-law entitled “By-Law Number L.G. 25 A Law to Amend a By-Law Respecting the Use of Sidewalks W ithin The City of Saint John.” Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Darling: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-law Number LG-24 A By-law respecting Nuisance in the City of Saint John” repealing and replacing “By-law Number M-24 A By-law Prohibiting the Throwing or Depositing of Litter in the City of Saint John”, be read a first time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a first time by title, the by-law entitled "By-law Number LG-24 A By-law respecting Nuisance in the City of Saint John.” Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-law Number LG-24 A By-law respecting Nuisance in the City of Saint John” repealing and replacing “By-law Number M-24 A By-law Prohibiting the Throwing or Depositing of Litter in the City of Saint John”, be read a second time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a second time by title, the by-law entitled "By-law Number LG-24 A By-law respecting Nuisance in the City of Saint John.” Having been absent for 1st and 2nd reading on January 12, 2026, Councillor Stewart withdrew from the meeting for item 10.2 10.2 Zoning By-Law Amendment - 19 Anglin Drive (3rd Reading) Commissioner Poffenroth provided an overview. 8 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 5 Moved by Councillor Killen, seconded by Councillor Darling: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-Law Number C.P. 111-213 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John” rezoning on Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, a parcel of land having an area of approximately 12,021 square metres, located at 19 Anglin Drive, also identified as PID 55054779, from Low-Rise Residential (RL) to Mid-Rise Residential (RM), be read. MOTION CARRIED. The by-law entitled “By-Law Number C.P. 111-213 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John” was read in its entirety. Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled “By-Law Number C.P. 111-213 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John” rezoning on Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, a parcel of land having an area of approximately 12,021 square metres, located at 19 Anglin Drive, also identified as PID 55054779, from Low-Rise Residential (RL) to Mid-Rise Residential (RM), be read a third time, enacted, and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto. MOTION CARRIED. Read a third time by title, the by-law entitled “By-Law Number C.P. 111-213 A Law to Amend the Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John.” Councillor Stewart re-entered the meeting. 10.3 Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment - 30-Day Letter - North End Neighbourhood Plan Moved by Councillor Darling, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the proposed Municipal Plan Amendment regarding the North End Neighbourhood Plan be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and authorize the necessary advertising with a Public Hearing to be held on Monday, March 9, 2026, in the Council Chamber at 6:30 pm. MOTION CARRIED. 10.4 Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment - 30-Day Letter - 358 ½ Rothesay Avenue Moved by Councillor Darling, seconded by Councillor Ogden: RESOLVED that the proposed Municipal Plan Amendment regarding 358 ½ Rothesay Avenue be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and authorize the necessary advertising with a Public Hearing to be held on Monday, March 9, 2026, in the Council Chamber at 6:30 pm. MOTION CARRIED. 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters – Municipal Officers 9 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 6 12.1 Community Safety Services Team Update Commissioner Poffenroth provided an introduction. Manager Community Standards B. Purinton provided an update. Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Darling: RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2026-016: Community Safety Services Team Update, be received for information. MOTION CARRIED. 13. Committee Reports 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15. General Correspondence 16. Supplemental Agenda 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 Delegation of Authority to Amend Agreement of Purchase and Sale for 608 Millidge Avenue Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 26, 2026, Common Council approve the following: 1. The CAO be delegated the authority to approve non-material amendments to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale with Somerset Investments Ltd., dated October 22, 2025, related to dates and timelines, which do not have any material effect on the general intention of the parties or the consideration for the transaction, including, but not limited to, the authority to amend section 2.4 of the said Agreement to allow additional time for the investigations to be completed without the Agreement becoming null and void for the reasons explained to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held January 26, 2026; and 2. The Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute any amendments, approved in form and content by the General Counsel, necessary to effect any amendment approved by the CAO in accordance with paragraph 1. MOTION CARRIED. 17.2 Triparty Memorandum of Understanding with Service New Brunswick, Hotspot and City of Saint John Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 26, 2026, the City of Saint John enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with HotSpot 10 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 7 Parking Inc. and the Province of New Brunswick Motor Vehicle Branch, generally in the form submitted, to establish a framework for secure data exchange and processing responsibilities related to the prosecution of parking violations under the City‘s Traffic and Parking By-laws and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute said Memorandum and any other documents ancillary thereto. MOTION CARRIED. 17.3 Housing for All Contribution Agreement and Assignment of Green Zones Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Darling: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 26, 2026, Common Council approve the following: 1. That the City enter into an Amending Agreement with the Province of New Brunswick, generally in the form as attached to this M&C 2026-018, for the purpose of amending the City’s Discretionary Contribution Agreement with the Province of New Brunswick, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Amending Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. 2. That the City enter into a First Amending Agreement with 12Neighbours Community Inc., generally in the form as attached to this M&C 2026-018, for the purpose of amending the City’s Service Agreement with 12Neighbours Community Inc. to permit it to be assigned by the City, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to executed the said First Amending Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. 3. That the City enter into an Assignment Agreement with the Province of New Brunswick, generally in the form as attached to this M&C 2026-018, for the purpose of assigning the City’s Service Agreement with 12Neighbours Community Inc. to the Province effective April 1, 2026, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Assignment Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. MOTION CARRIED with Councillor Radwan voting nay. 17.4 Multipurpose Recreational Facility - Status Update Moved by Councillor Radwan, seconded by Councillor Ogden: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 26, 2026, Council approve the draw from General Capital Reserve Funds project costs for: 1. Fieldhouse Inc. surveying costs in the amount of $4,393.31 + HST 2. Capital Campaign expenditures of up to $150,000, 3. Murdock & Boyd costs to undertake a Request for Proposals for the Construction Management services for this project in the amount of $8,000 plus HST. MOTION CARRIED. 18. Adjournment 11 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 26, 2026 / le 26 janvier 2026 8 Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on January 26, 2026, be adjourned. MOTION CARRIED. The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. 12 COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2026-020 Report Date February 02, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Council SUBJECT: Contract 2024-18: Water Street Storm Sewer Extension AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Of Staff Gerry Mattsson Ian Fogan/Michael Baker Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that: Contract No. 2024-18: Water Street Storm Sewer Extension be awarded to the low tenderer, Steele Trucking Ltd., at their tendered price of $1,839,493.81 (including HST) as calculated based on estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council award Contract No. 2024-18: Water Street Storm Sewer Extension project to the low tenderer. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS October 30th, 2023: M&C 2023-238: Revised 2024 General and Utility Fund Capital Budgets, approved. REPORT The 2024 approved General Fund Capital Program includes other share funding for the installation of approximately 160m of new 1800mm storm sewer on Water Street from Princess Street to King Street. This work will redirect storm flow that flows in a storm sewer under The Gathering Space as well as supports future sewer separation of underground infrastructure upstream of this portion of Water Street. This project is fully funded within the (2019-2023) Canada Community Building Fund (CCBF) Program. 13 - 2 - TENDER RESULTS Tenders closed on January 20th, 2026, with the following results, including HST: 1. Steele Trucking Ltd. $1,839,493.81 2. TerraEx Inc. $2,075,261.25 3. L.C.L. Excavation (2006) Inc. $2,263,346.05 4. Galbraith Construction Ltd. $2,346,937.25 5. Fairville Construction Ltd. $2,682,824.65 6. L. Sanford and Sons Ltd. $3,230,124.27 The Engineer’s estimate for the work was $2,221,828.75. ANALYSIS The lowest tender was reviewed by staff and was found to be formal in all respects. Staff are of the opinion that the low tenderer has the necessary resources and ability to perform the work and recommend acceptance of their tender. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2024 General Fund Capital Program. The CCBF funding program includes a budget for this project of $2,000,000. Assuming the award of the Contract to the low tenderer, an analysis has been completed, which includes the estimated amount of work to be performed by the Contractor and Others (i.e. design & inspection services, Saint John Energy electrical costs, etc.). The analysis is as follows: Budget $2,000,000 Project Net Cost $2,015,438 Variance (Shortfall) -$ (15,438) As noted above, the projected project shortfall is $15,438. It is proposed that the shortfall be addressed within the overall 2019-2023 CCBF funding program. The City earns interest yearly on this funding therefore it is expected that this shortfall can be addressed within the overall 2019-2023 CCBF funding program. It should be noted that construction for this project has been permitted to occur outside the normal construction working hours (7am to 7pm), as required. This deviation in working hours is required as the contractor will need to work around tide cycles (i.e. complete work when the tide is low). The City is also attempting to expedite completion of this work before the busy uptown tourist season is fully underway. 14 - 3 - As a result, this Contract includes an Enhanced Level of Service/Contractor Performance Penalty Structure as the timeline for completion of this project is time sensitive. An Enhanced Level of Service has been set at $2,000 per working day that the contractor precedes the substantial completion date up to a maximum of $50,000. Should the contractor not meet the project schedule as included in the tender documents, a Penalty of $2,000 per working day from the time of the scheduled substantial completion to the actual substantial completion will be applied. The intent is the enhanced level of service will be funded through the project contingency and/or the overall approved capital fund budget envelope. POLICY - TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS This recommendation aligns with the Council’s policy for the tendering of construction contracts, adhering to the City's General Specifications and specific project specifications. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's Priorities for GROW and PERFORM as the project involves installing a new storm sewer to support future development and sewer separation while leveraging Other Share funding. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The installation of this new extended storm sewer will support future development and future capital construction projects by allowing the City to separate storm and sanitary sewer systems upstream of the project site. It is expected during the majority of the construction period that Water Street (Princess Street to King Street) will be reduced to 1 lane of alternating traffic. There will be temporary full roadway closures and lane closures as required when the Contractor is crossing Water Street with the new storm sewer as well as working in the intersection of Water Street, St Patrick Street and King Street. City staff will be receiving a traffic control plan from the Con tractor once the Contract is signed that will be reviewed. Traffic advisories will be sent out to the public prior to the start of construction and when changes to the traffic controls are implemented. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Name of Service Area/Stakeholder Name of Staff Person Supply Chain Management Financial Services Chris Roberts Craig Lavigne 15 - 4 - The project design was reviewed by Utilities and Infrastructure Services as well as Public Works and Transportation Services. The tendering process for this project was completed in accordance with the City's Strategic Procurement Policy and Supply Chain Management supports the recommendation being put forth. On April 3rd, 2025, staff hosted a Public Information Session for this project. Staff have also been in contact with Uptown Saint John Inc. to keep them up to date on the status of the project. Once construction timelines are confirmed with the Contractor, staff plan to send out an up-to-date information letter to businesses/residents in the area of the construction. Staff will also send the letter to Uptown Saint John Inc. to ensure they are informed of the work and its expected timelines. ATTACHMENTS N/A 16 COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2026-027 Report Date February 03, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Council SUBJECT: Public Information Session: Harbour Passage Extension (Carmarthen Street to Rockwood Park) – Conceptual Design AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Admin. Officer Susan Steven Ian Fogan/Michael Baker Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this report be received and filed. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the Public Information Session that will be held in relation to the Harbour Passage Extension (Carmarthen Street to Rockwood Park) – Conceptual Design project. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS October 30, 2023: M&C 2023-238 – Revised 2024 General and Utility Fund Capital Programs, approved. REPORT The approved revised 2024 General Fund Capital Program included funds for the investigation and development of a conceptual design for the extension of Harbour Passage from the intersection of Broad Street and Carmarthen Street to Rockwood Park. The conceptual design was to include new roadway cross- sections for Broad Street, Crown Street and Mount Pleasant Avenue within these limits. A public Request for Proposals was issued and Englobe Corp. (Englobe) was awarded this project. After extensive discussions with City staff and various corridor iterations, Englobe has developed a proposed conceptual design for the Harbour Passage 17 - 2 - Extension. A Public Information Session has been set for the following date and time to allow residents and businesses an opportunity to view the conceptual design and renderings, ask questions and give their feedback. The following Public Information Session will be held in a drop-in format: Harbour Passage Extension (Carmarthen Street to Rockwood Park) Conceptual Design Thursday, February 12th, 2026 3:00pm to 7:00pm Trinity Anglican Church – 115 Charlotte Street This report is being provided for information to Council and to extend an invitation to any Councillor who may wish to attend the Public Information Session. The Public Information Session will be advertised on the City’s various social media platforms, including the website and Shape Your City. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This project aligns with Council’s Priorities for MOVE, GREEN, BELONG and GROW. By extending Harbour Passage, the City is expanding its offering of accessible travel options through various sustainable transportation choices (MOVE and GREEN). This multiuse trail will promote residents to consider using alternative modes of transportation. By incorporating resting places with scenic views along a purpose-built travel way, the City will be enhancing the quality of life for residents (BELONG). Focusing on key infrastructure investments such as this will encourage population growth and, subsequently, economic growth (GROW). SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Through the extension of Harbour Passage, neighbourhoods and parks will be connected by accessible transportation infrastructure, thereby encouraging alternative, sustainable transportation choices. The City’s heritage and beauty will be showcased along these trails, cultivating community pride. The final phase of this project will include the submission of recommended phasing of the various sub-projects required to complete this work, including associated cost estimates. This information will be used to incorporate these sub-projects in the City’s 5-year investment plan. It is expected that, since this is such a large scope of work, some of the sub-projects will be listed in the Extra Projects category of the 5-year investment plan. If funding opportunities 18 - 3 - become available in the future these subprojects could be moved up the City’s priority list. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The proposed conceptual design has been discussed with Public Works and Transportation (including Parks and Recreation) team members. City staff will also be meeting with the Saint John Ability Advisory Committee to review the proposed conceptual design. ATTACHMENTS N/A 19 COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2026-032 Report Date February 03, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Council SUBJECT: Public Information Session: The Cove - Harbour Passage Extension AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Admin. Officer Katy Harris Ian Fogan/Michael Baker Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this report be received and filed. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the Public Information Session that will be held in relation to the The Cove – Harbour Passage Extension project. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS October 30th, 2023: M&C 2023-238 - Revised 2024 General and Utility Fund Capital Programs, approved. January 16th, 2024: M&C 2024-020 – The Cove – Funding Agreement, approved. October 28th, 2024: M&C 2024-287- 2025 Draft General and Utility Fund Capital Budgets, approved. November 18th, 2025: M&C 2025-273 – 2026 General and Utility Fund Capital Budget, approved. REPORT The approved 2024, 2025 and 2026 General Fund Capital Programs include funding for the design and construction of the extension of Harbour Passage, from Riverview Drive to Riverview Avenue. Other Share funding for this project 20 - 2 - will come from the Active Transportation Funding (ATF) Agreement. A public Request for Proposals was issued, and Glenn Group Landscaping Architects & Park Planners (Glenn Group) was awarded the design services contract for this project. After careful consideration and extensive discussions with City staff regarding the location of the trail, Glenn Group has developed a preliminary design for the extension of Harbour Passage, from Riverview Drive to Riverview Avenue. A Public Information Session has been set for the following date and time to allow residents and businesses an opportunity to view the preliminary design and 3D renderings, ask questions and give their feedback. The following Public Information Session will be held in a drop-in format: Carleton-Kirk United Church Tuesday, February 10th, 2026 2:00 – 4:00 pm and 6:00 – 8:00 pm 1 Carleton-Kirk Place, Saint John, NB This report is being provided for information to Council and to extend an invitation to any Councilor who may wish to attend the Public Information Session. The Public Information Session will be advertised on the City’s website, and a notice will be delivered door to door in the project area. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This project aligns with Council’s Priorities for MOVE, GREEN, BELONG and GROW. By extending Harbour Passage, the City is expanding its offering of accessible travel options through various sustainable transportation choices (MOVE and GREEN). This multiuse trail will promote residents to consider using alternative modes of transportation. By incorporating resting places with scenic views along a purpose-built travel way, the City will be enhancing the quality of life for residents (BELONG). Focusing on key infrastructure investments such as this will encourage population growth and, subsequently, economic growth (GROW). SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Through the extension of Harbour Passage, neighbourhoods and parks will be connected by accessible transportation infrastructure, thereby encouraging alternative, sustainable transportation choices. The City’s scenic beauty will be showcased along these trails, cultivating community pride. 21 - 3 - INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The preliminary design has been discussed with Public Works and Transportation (including Parks and Recreation) team members. City staff will also be meeting with the Saint John Ability Advisory Committee to review the proposed design, prior to tendering the project. ATTACHMENTS N/A 22 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2026-030 Report Date February 05, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Growth and Community Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Scheduling of Public Hearing Dates for Four Planning Applications AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Jennifer Kirchner Amy Poffenroth/Pankaj Nalavde Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION RESOLVED That Common Council schedule public hearings on Monday, March 9, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. for: Rezoning Applicant Gerald Laskey For 1360 Old Black River Road PID 00340703 Section 59 Amendment Applicant Erin Schryer For 567 Millidge Avenue PIDs 00041574 and 55113682 Location: Council Chamber, City Hall 2nd floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, NB. RESOLVED That Common Council schedule public hearings on Monday, March 23, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. for: Text Amendment Applicant Staff Led Submission To Amendments to the Zoning By-Law related to Mobile and Mini-Homes. Rezoning Applicant MDC Holdings Ltd. For 0 and 36-46 Ocean Drive PIDs 55245930, 55245922, 55245914, 55245906, 55245898, 55245880, 00448589 Location: Council Chamber, City Hall 2nd floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, NB. 23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise Common Council of the need to schedule Public Hearings for four planning applications and to recommend appropriate public hearing dates. The proposed public hearing date s are Monday, March 9, 2026 and Monday, March 23, 2026. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION At its meeting of August 3, 2004, Common Council resolved that: 1. the Commissioner of Planning and Development receive all applications for amendments to the Zoning By-law and Section 39 [now referred as section 59] resolutions/agreements and proceed to prepare the required advertisements; and 2. when applications are received a report will be prepared recommending the appropriate resolution setting the time and place for public hearings and be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee as required by the Community Planning Act. REPORT This report addresses the scheduling of Public Hearings for four applications to amend the Zoning By-Law or Section 59 conditions. The Public Hearings are proposed for March 9, 2026 and March 23, 2026. Details of the applications are outlined below and will form part of the documentation at the public hearings. March 9, 2026 Name of Applicant Location Existing Zone Proposed Zone Reason Gerald Laskey 1360 Old Black River Road (PID: 00340703) Rural Residential (RR) Rural Mixed Residential (RMX) To place a manufactured home on the property. Name of Applicant Location Existing Zone Proposed Amendment Reason Erin Schryer 567 Millidge Avenue (PIDs: 00041574 and 55113682) Local Commercial (CL) Rescind the Section 59 Conditions that limit the use of the site to a day care. To allow the site to be used for any of the permitted uses established in the Local Commercial zone. March 23, 2026 Name of Applicant Proposed Amendment Reason 24 Staff Led Application Amendments to the Zoning By-Law associated with Mobile and Mini-Homes. To integrate requirements of the Mobile Home Parks By- Law into the Zoning By-Law. Name of Applicant Location Existing Zone Proposed Zone Reason MDC Holdings Ltd. 0 and 36-46 Ocean Drive (PIDs: 55245930, 55245922, 55245914, 55245906, 55245898, 55245880, 00448589) Local Commercial (CL) Low-Rise Residential (RL) To permit the development of the site into a multi-building development that includes a mixture of semi-detached and townhouse dwellings. While the holding of public hearings for Zoning By-law and Section 59 amendments is a legislative requirement of the Community Planning Act, it is also a key component of a clear and consistent land development processes envisioned in the One Stop Development Shop Program. These processes provide transparency and predictability for the development community and City residents. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Common Council established five priorities for their 2021 -2026 term. The holding of Public Hearings aligns with the Council Priority of “Perform”. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The scheduling of the public hearings will ensure that the proposed by-law amendments satisfy the legislative and service requirements as mandated by the Community Planning Act including the required Public Notification of the Public Hearings. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Name of Service Area/Stakeholder Name of Staff Person The proposed amendments are circulated to other City Service Areas and External Agencies and Governmental Departments for Feedback as part of the application review process. This information will form part of the Planning Advisory Committee Reports for the applications. ATTACHMENTS None 25 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2026-023 Report Date February 02, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: 2029 Canada Games – Canada Games Aquatic Center Renovations Consultant Services Award- Phase C Detailed Design AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Samir Yammine Ian Fogan Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION It is Recommended 1) That the revised cost submitted by ACRE Architects/MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects (MJMA) Ltd, for Professional Services for the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) Renovations Project for Phase C -Detailed Design be accepted and the award amount be amended from $509,783 to $854,000 plus HST. 2) Additionally, that the revised cost submitted by ACRE Architects/MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects (MJMA) Ltd, for Professional Services for the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) Renovations Project for Phase D and E- Contract and Construction Management be accepted from $539,352.50 to $811,300 plus HST to address the additional cost for Phase D and E, contingent on the approval of funding from the Regional Development Corporation (RDC) and Federal Government, and the FRSC’s capital budget approval process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Board of Directors of the Fundy Regional Service Commission (FRSC) has authorized the advancement of Phase C- Detailed Design in the amount of $854,000 Plus HST (See attached Resolution) conditional on the approval of ACOA’s funding of 80% of the total eligible cost of Phase C. 26 The City of Saint John has received formal approval from ACOA to cover 80% toward the total eligible cost of the Phase C Detailed Design. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval to amend the contract for Professional Services for the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) Renovations project to ACRE Architects/MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects (MJMA) Ltd to award the revised cost of Phase C. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION M&C 2025-177 -It is recommended 1) that the proposal submitted by MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects (MJMA) Ltd, for Professional Services for the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC)Renovations project, in the amount of $1,473,410.50 plus HST, be accepted, with the understanding that Phases C, D and E are conditional on 40% approved funding from the Regional Development Corporation (RDC) as well as the approval by the Fundy Regional Service Commission of the entirety of the capital plan for the CGAC renovation project.; and 2) that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. REPORT The total cost of the existing proposal submitted by MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects (MJMA) Ltd, for Professional Services for the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) Renovations Project is based on a lump sum for phase A and predetermined number of hours for Phase B,C,D,E. The reason for the predetermined number of hours of the remaining phases is the scope of the work was not known and not well defined at the time of the preparation and submission of the RFP. The completion of Phase A has provided the City/FRSC and the consultant team with more detailed and accurate information including cost estimates of the proposed CGAC Renovations project, to address the many unknown factors. Once Phase A is completed and the scope of work and budget known , and well defined , the consultant team ( as it is stipulated in the RFP) revised their cost and established a fixed cost for Phase C Detailed design. 27 The revised cost for Phase C has increased by $344,217 as well as cost for Phase D/E has increased by $271,947.50 due to the following: 1- During the evaluation of the Renovation Project there were number of factors, i.e. interior/exterior structure, additional scope of work, etc. that have contributed to the cost. 2- Complexity of the project to design and execute the renovation plan as well as prepare the tender documents. 3- The revised cost of the consultant fees represents 9.3% of the construction value, which is less than the national association [Royal Architectural Institute of Canada] recommends [11.53%]. Phase C consists of detailed design and preparation of the tender documents. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT The Canada Games Aquatic Center Renovations Project is clearly aligned with the Council’s Priorities to invest in sustainable City services, municipal infrastructure as well as by enhancing quality of life and improving recreation programming in a safe place t o live. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The total cost to perform the detailed design and tender documents of the Renovations of the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) as per Phase C scope of work is $854,000 plus HST. The Phase C breakdown cost is as follows: Total cost : $854,000 ACOA Funding (80%): $683,200 FRSC Contribution: $76,860 City of Saint Contribution: $93,940 The City contribution will be charged to the 2026 City General capital program and is already part of the approved 2026 Capital Budget. The approved 2026 Capital Budget contained a city contribution of $374,047 . INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Name of Service Area/Stakeholder Name of Staff Person Supply Chain Management Chris Roberts Strategic Services Jodie Forgie 28 Strategic Services Craig Lavigne Utilities and Infrastructure Services Jeff Rogers Utilities and Infrastructure Services Samir Yammine From the Fundy Regional Service Commission: Fundy Regional Service Commission Board Resolution (January 28, 2026) for Phase C That the Board approves the consultants’ presentation and report on Phase B of the CGAC Enhancement Project design and authorize the advancement to Phase C, inclusive of the City of Saint John securing Construction Management (CM) services, conditional on formal approval from ACOA of 80% funding support for the Phase C budget, and the balance drawn from the 2026 capital budget allocation Fundy Regional Service Commission Board Resolution (Special Meeting July 14, 2025), to approve Phase C,D,E That the FRSC Board of Directors commits to including the costs of Phase C through Phase E in the amount of $1,019,685.50 plus HST, conditional on the approval of 40% funding from RDC, in future FRSC budgets towards the contract for the Professional Services f or the Canada Games Aquatic Centre (CGAC) Enhancement Project. ATTACHMENTS None 29 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. MC 2026-26 Report Date February 03, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Stopping Train Whistles at Ashburn Lake Road Rail Crossing AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Interim Chief Administrative Officer Tim O’Reilly Michael Hugenholtz Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Mayor be authorized to send a letter to New Brunswick Southern Railway on behalf of the City requesting the stopping of train whistles at the rail crossing on Ashburn Lake Road, and 2. That Common Council indemnify the Province of New Brunswick and New Brunswick Southern Railway in the forms as attached to M&C 2026 - 26, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the document ancillary thereto. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The alignment of Retail Drive with Ashburn Lake Road at Rothesay Avenue presented multiple benefits. Among the project’s benefits were safety improvements at the nearby rail crossing on Ashburn Lake Road. Gates were installed to help warn road users when a train is approaching and the rail crossing now over- rides the adjacent traffic signals to clear any vehicles that may be on the tracks. Whistles on trains are a safety measure, also to warn road users of an approaching train. However, train whistles negatively impact quality of life for residents living near a rail crossing. This report commences a process to determine whether train whistles can be stopped at the Ashburn Lake Road rail crossing, for the benefit of nearby residents, given recent installation of additional safety improvements. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A 30 REPORT The Province of New Brunswick is the regulator of Shortline Railways. The vast majority of rail in Saint John is part of this the province’s Shortline rail system. The province has an established process to determine whether train whistles can be stopped at a particular Shortline rail crossing. The process is generally as follows: 1. The city must initiate the process by requesting the railway, in this case New Brunswick Southern Railway (NBSR), to stop the train whistles at particular rail crossings, 2. NBSR then requests the province to approve the stopping of the train whistles, 3. A detailed Rail Crossing Safety Assessment, to the satisfaction of the Provincial Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI), must be completed jointly by several stakeholders, including city staff, to confirm adequate safety mitigation is in place in lieu of use of train whistles, 4. The Minister of DTI approves stopping of train whistles with any conditions as required, 5. Any additional mitigating measures in lieu of the use of train whistles are implemented, and 6. The city must accept liability in the event that the lack of train whistling contributes to an accident. Safety improvements at the Ashburn Lake Road rail crossing were incorporated into the recent Capital project to align Retail Drive with this road at Rothesay Avenue. Improvements at the crossing included the installation of gates to warn motorists of an approaching train. In addition, a system was installed that allows the rail crossing to over-ride the traffic signals and clear any vehicles that may have stopped on the rail crossing; known as pre-emption, when a train approaches this crossing that activates the crossing lights and gates, a signal is sent to the traffic controller at the adjacent traffic lights that changes the lights facing Ashburn Lake Road to green, to allow any motorists stopped on the tracks to drive off of them before the train arrives. These improvements are expected to improve the likelihood that train whistles at this rail crossing can be stopped without compromising safety requirements. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report supports Common Council’s BELONG priority through improving quality of life while balancing its MOVE priority by ensuring travel options are safe. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Stopping train whistles at the Ashburn Lake Road rail crossing will improve quality of life for nearby residents. Risks associated with accepting liability for stopping train whistles are mitigated through the completion of a detailed Rail Crossing Safety Assessment. No additional Capital or Operating costs are expected at this time, aside from an expectation to install and maintain signs on the approach to the rail crossing advising that train whistles are not used. 31 INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Name of Service Area/Stakeholder Name of Staff Person General Counsel Maria Powell ATTACHMENTS Liability indemnifications for both the Province of New Brunswick and New Brunswick Southern Railway 32 RELEASE AND INDEMINITY To: HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK (the “Province”); AND TO: THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFASTRUCTURE OF NEW BRUNSWICK (the “Minister”); AND TO: ALL OTHERS WHOM IT MAY CONCERN WHEREAS the CITY OF SAINT JOHN (the “City”) desires that train whistling cease at the railway crossing located at Ashburn Lake Road in the City of Saint John, in the Province of New Brunswick (the “Crossing”); AND WHEREAS the City made a request to the Minister for train whistling to cease at the Crossing; AND WHEREAS the City recognizes that the Province and the Minister are not responsible for upkeep or maintenance of the Crossing; AND WHEREAS the Minster has determined that the Crossing meets the a pplicable criteria for the cessation of whistling; KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that, in consideration of the Minister having granted, pursuant to the New Brunswick Shortline Railways Act (the “Act”) an exemption to the train whistling requirements for the Crossing, the City, a body corporate by Royal Charter, confirmed and amended by Acts of the Legislature of the Province of New Brunswick, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to forever release, indemnify, defend and save harmless the Province, the Minister, and each of their respective officers, employees, servants, agents, representatives, contractors, subcontractors, successors, and assigns, and each of their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, of, from and against any and all losses, costs, expenses, claims, demands, proceedings, suits, causes of action, actions, damages, debts, liabilities, obligations, commitments, of every nature and kind, including without 33 limitation any and all injuries or damages, including indirect, consequential, and incidental damages, to persons (including death) or property, arising out of, from and as a result of, or which are or may be in any way related to, or connected or associated with, the Minister having granted , pursuant to the Act, an exemption to the train whistling requirement for the Crossing. The City will bear no responsibility for injury or damages, including indirect, consequential, and incidental damages, to persons (including death) or property that are or maybe in any way related to, or connected or associated with or arising from the negligence of the Province or the Minister. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City of Saint John has caused these presents to be executed by its duly authorized signing officers and affixed its corporate seal this ________ day of __________________, 2026. SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED ) In the Presence of ) ) ) THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ) ) ) ) ______________________________ ) Mayor ) ) ) ) ______________________________ ) City Clerk ) ) ___________________________ ) Council Resolution Date 34 INDEMNITY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, a body corporate by Royal Charter, confirmed and amended by Acts of the Legislature of the Province of New Brunswick, for itself and its successors and assigns hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the NEW BRUNSWICK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITED, its affiliates and subcontractors (including other railways operating on the applicable crossings), and their respective employees, officers, agents, successors and assigns (collectively, the “Railway”), from and against any and all losses, costs, claims, demands, expenses, proceedings and actions of every nature and kind (collectively, “Claims”), for injury or damages, including indirect, consequential and incidental damages, to persons (including death) or property which are or may be in any way related to, or connected or associated with the Province of New Brunswick having granted an exemption to the train whistling requirement for the railway crossing located at Ashburn Lake Road in the City of Saint John, in the Province of New Brunswick. The City of Saint John shall bear no responsibility for injury or damages, including indirect, consequential and incidental damages, to persons (including death) or property which are caused by the negligence of New Brunswick Southern Railway Company Limited. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City of Saint John has caused these presents to be executed by its duly authorized signing officers and affixed its corporate seal this ________ day of __________________, 2026. SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED ) In the Presence of ) ) ) THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ) ) ) ) ______________________________ ) Mayor ) ) ) ) ______________________________ ) City Clerk ) ) ___________________________ ) Council Resolution Date 35 Housing for All Strategy: Progress Update* Operational Support Transportation & Public Works: 2 staff dedicated to litter cleanup in Waterloo area (4 nights/week) Green Zones Number of Green Zones Number of Units Site 1 27 "We are super proud of our participants and the strides they have taken." - Site Manager Red Zones Housing for All Framework Implementation Plan City Land Private Land Provincial Land 22%44% 33% Location Breakdown 2 Site Updates 339 Outreach engaged with clients Framework Activation City staff, in collaboration with community partners, are advancing the Housing for All Strategy and Policy Framework to support the Red Zone Implementation Plan and guide ongoing operations. *Tracking period: September 23, 2025 - January 30, 2026 24 Operational Update Participants have been able to obtain employment and reconnect with family members. The new mobile health team announced by GNB will be visiting the Green Zone sites as well. 41 Encampment relocations 21 Encampment clean ups 20 Encampments vacated Units Occupied Number of Units Site 2 27 26Units Occupied 36 From: City of Saint John, New Brunswick <webform-noreply@saintjohn.ca> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 6:43 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Webform submission from: Submission to Council Form [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Submitted on Wed, 01/21/2026 - 18:42 Submitted by: Anonymous Submitted values are: About Person/Group Submitting First name Terry Last name Dempster Mailing Address Saint John. E2L3R9 Telephone If you do not wish to have your personal information (address, phone number, email) become part of the public record, please check this box. Yes About your Submission Topic of submission Residendial parking permits policy Purpose for submission (what is the ask of council): Amend the pokicy for residential parking paases Executive summary 37 Currently the policy states that if a car has any outstanding parking tickets you cannot purchase a parking permit however this policy violates rights of our citizens when yiu receive the ticket it states that you have the right to contest the ticket in court however if your parking pass expires you cannot get a new one unless the tixket is paid so that leaves you with a choice of taking the chance of getting more tickets and fight said ticket which is your right or pay the ticket to ve avle to get the pass. I would like the opertunity to speak on this to counsil as our parkibg commision picks and chooses whwn they will enforce the parking rules in my area and i gave been waiting since last december to have my day in court for a ticket so i wasnt able to get a new pass in april of last year 38 From: City of Saint John, New Brunswick <webform-noreply@saintjohn.ca> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:33 AM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Webform submission from: Request to Present to Council Form [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Submitted on Tue, 01/27/2026 - 06:32 Submitted by: Anonymous Submitted values are: About Person/Group Presenting First Name: Greg Last Name: Hemmings Name of Organization/Group (where applicable): Hemmings Films Ltd Address: 4 River Cove Lane Saint John, New Brunswick. E2K5C8 Canada Day Time Phone Number: 5066396577 Email greg@hemmingshouse.com If you do NOT wish to have your personal information (address, phone number, email) become part of the public record, please check this box. No 39 About your Request Topic of Presentation: Stompin' Tom Connors Statue Purpose for Presentation (what is the ask of Council): I am one member of a four-person group of passionate Saint Johnners who believe that Stompin' Tom's legacy could be more pronounced in this city, as he was born in and spent his early years here. 2026 marks Tom's 90th birthday, and the NB Country Music Hall of Fame is also going to honour him this year. We have been in close touch with Tom's widow and his management and have their blessings and support to honour his legacy in the form of a larger-than-life statue. Details of the material of this statue are to be determined (bronze, wood, other material). We see the statue being erected on our waterfront, where there is high tourism activity. We would like to have the full support of the common council for this initiative, as that would be the first step in our ability to fundraise to get this project off the ground. We also understand the City of Saint John Art Bank will be instrumental in making this project possible. We would like to have a chance to present to the council (yes, in an entertaining way) to pitch our vision as soon as possible, as we will need several months to fundraise, then put the sculpture ou t to RFP, have it built and then erected in October 2026. Background Information: Hemmings House is hoping to make a film about this community initiative to promote the city as the birthplace of Tom. Her eis the TV pitch we are developing for CBC. The ptch gives all background info. Title Saint Stompin’ Tom Logline In Stompin’ Tom Connors’ 90th birth year, a group of New Brunswickers attempt to reclaim his birthplace through a waterfront statue and tribute concert, while reflecting on the role his music once played, and could play again, in bringing Canadians together. Synopsis Stompin’ Tom Connors was born in Saint John, New Brunswick, on February 9, 1936. Though other communities, such as Skinner’s Pond on Prince Edward Island, proudly claim Tom as their own, Saint John, the city of his birth, has never meaningfully honoured the man whose songs helped define Canadian identity. This film follows three deeply committed New Brunswickers as they attempt something audacious. In less than a year, they aim to raise awareness, funding, and public support to erect a larger-than-life-size statue of Stompin’ Tom on Saint John’s waterfront, unveil it in the presence of his family, the community of Saint John, and stage a landmark tribute concert (picture The Last Waltz, but Stompin’ Tom style) that celebrates both his music and his values. Their target is October 2026, timed to coincide with posthumous 40 induction into the New Brunswick Country Music Hall of Fame and the broader celebration of Tom’s 90th year. Running parallel to this present-day effort, the film journeys back to Tom’s early years in Saint John. Through archival material and interviews with community members who remember him as a child, as well as participation from Tom’s widow, Lena Connors, the film reclaims a missing chapter of Canadian music history and reconnects Tom to the city where his story began. The third thread of the film looks forward. At a time when Canada is navigating cultural fragmentation and geopolitical uncertainty, the film asks what Tom’s legacy can teach us now. Known for writing hundreds of songs about real places, real people, and everyday Canadian life, Tom used music as a unifying force of pride and hope. Through contemporary musicians, young New Brunswick artists, and community voices, the film explores how Tom’s spirit might inspire a new generation to write proudly and honestly about Canada again. Like the filmmaker’s previous documentaries that sparked Sistema NB, Brilliant Labs, and a creative renaissance in Saint John’s comedy scene, this film is designed not just to observe change, but to help catalyze it. Act Breakdown The film opens in present-day Saint John, a working port city shaped by tides, industry, and resilience. We meet Scott Gogan, Mike Bravener, and Jason MacLean as they stand on the waterfront at Market Square, imagining a bronze or wood Stompin’ Tom statue where cruise ships now dock. Their idea feels both obvious and impossible. The clock is already ticking. October 2026 is closer than it sounds. As momentum builds, the film reveals why this matters. We move into the past, uncovering Tom’s early life in Saint John, his childhood shaped by poverty, displacement, and being raised by a single mother. Through the voices of elders, family recollections, and Lena Connors’ personal reflections, we see how these formative years planted the seeds for Tom’s fierce independence, empathy, and storytelling voice. Midway through the film, obstacles emerge. Funding gaps, bureaucratic hurdles, skepticism, and the reality of trying to rally institutions quickly all threaten the vision. At the same time, the film widens its lens. Musicians across generations reflect on what Tom represented and why his songs still matter. Young New Brunswick artists step forward with original songs about place, pride, and identity, not as competitors, but as inheritors of a tradition Tom helped build. The final act returns to the present-day push. Stakeholders are pitched. Government agencies are courted. Artists commit. A sculptor is commissioned. The concert takes shape. As October 2026 approaches, the film crescendos toward a collective moment of recognition, reflection, and celebration. Whether every goal is achieved or not, something irreversible happens. Saint John reclaims its connection to Stompin’ Tom, and in doing so, reasserts the power of local stories to shape national identity. 41 Treatment The visual language of the film is grounded, musical, and deeply Maritime. Saint John’s waterfront, weather, brick, and history are ever-present. We contrast the industrial textures of the city with intimate interiors, rehearsal spaces, kitchens, and community halls where ideas are born and debated. Archival footage of Tom is treated with reverence, never nostalgia for nostalgia’s sake, but as a living dialogue with the present. Music drives the film forward. Tom’s recordings are woven sparingly and purposefully alongside live performances, rehearsals, and contemporary interpretations. Scott, Jay and Mike’s embodied tribute performance, including moments where they physically channel Tom on stage, becomes both homage and inquiry into what it means to carry a legacy responsibly. The camera stays close to the protagonists as they wrestle with doubt and conviction. Meetings feel lived in, not staged. The process of building something meaningful in a short time becomes the drama. The statue itself is treated almost like a character in the film, beginning as an idea, taking shape in clay and bronze (or wood), and ultimately occupying public space. Throughout, the film resists cynicism. It embraces the idea that culture still matters, that place still matters, and that one song, one statue, or one community effort can ripple outward. By the end, the audience is left not only with a renewed appreciation fo r Stompin’ Tom Connors but with a larger invitation to ask how they might honour their own places, stories, and shared values. Are you making a request for funding? No 42 From: City of Saint John, New Brunswick <webform-noreply@saintjohn.ca> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 4:52 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Webform submission from: Submission to Council Form [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Submitted on Wed, 01/28/2026 - 16:49 Submitted by: Anonymous Submitted values are: About Person/Group Submitting First name Tania Last name Boulos Mailing Address Saint John. E2L 1S4 Telephone Email If you do not wish to have your personal information (address, phone number, email) become part of the public record, please check this box. No About your Submission Topic of submission Equitable Sidewalk Plowing and Reprioritization in the South Central Peninsula Document Uploads Dear Mayor Reardon and Members of City Council,.pdf (14.1 KB) 43 Dear Mayor Reardon and Members of City Council, I am writing to express my concern about the lack of consistent and timely sidewalk plowing during the winter months in our city, particularly in the South Central Peninsula. Unplowed or poorly maintained sidewalks create serious safety and accessibility barriers. These conditions disproportionately impact seniors, people with disabilities, individuals using mobility aids, parents with strollers, children walking to school, and residents who rely on walking and public transit as their primary mode of transportation. I have observed that less dense, lower-traffic areas of the city have had sidewalks cleared ahead of higher-traffic streets in the South Central Peninsula. This raises specific equity concerns, as denser neighbourhoods tend to have higher concentrations of renters, lower-income households, seniors, and residents without access to private vehicles. These residents are more likely to depend on sidewalks year-round and are less able to avoid unsafe conditions by driving. Currently, some streets in this area are classified as Priority 4 on the City’s winter plowing schedule. Given the volume of pedestrian traffic, proximity to transit routes, schools, and essential services, and the City’s stated goals around walkability and equitable access, I respectfully request that these streets be reviewed and reclassified to Priority 1 for sidewalk plowing. When winter maintenance prioritizes lower-use areas over dense, high-demand corridors, the result is an inequitable distribution of risk. Those with the fewest transportation alternatives are exposed to the greatest danger, while those with private vehicle access are least affected. Sidewalks are essential public infrastructure. If the City is committed to equity, accessibility, and reducing reliance on cars, winter sidewalk maintenance must reflect those commitments in practice. I urge Council to reassess the sidewalk plowing prioritization in the South Central Peninsula and ensure that winter maintenance decisions align with the City’s equity, safety, and transportation objectives. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to seeing concrete and equitable action taken. Sincerely, Tania Boulos 44 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The second week in February is provincially recognized as a time to celebrate our heritage; and WHEREAS: The third Monday in February is National Heritage Day in Canada; and WHEREAS: The complex histories which we have inherited from our ancestors play a vital role in providing a unique identity to our City; and WHEREAS: Our built heritage provides us with a legacy to maintain, to enrich, and to hand down to future generations; and WHEREAS: Our diverse cultural landscapes continue to play a vital role in developing the rich social fabric of our city; and WHEREAS: This year’s theme: Life Below Us encourages New Brunswickers to discover the heritage beneath the surface and reflect on how it shapes our identities, our communities, our environment, and our future. NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John do hereby proclaim the week of February 15th to February 21st, 2026 as Heritage Week in the City of Saint John and urge all citizens to support and participate in cultural activities occurring throughout the City. In witness whereof I have set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Mayor of the City of Saint John. 45 Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portions of 00302778 and 00420802) – Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning Public Hearing, 1st and 2nd Readings: February 9, 2026 Item Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 106-44 a Law to Amend The Municipal Plan By- Law of the City of Saint John. Zoning By-Law Amendment Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 111-216 a Law to Amend The Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John. Tentative 3rd Reading: February 23, 2026 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 106-44 a Law to Amend The Municipal Plan By-Law of the City of Saint John. Zoning By-Law Amendment Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 111-216 a Law to Amend The Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John. Recission of Previous s. 39/s. 59 Conditions No Section 59 Conditions No Section 59 Agreement No Section 131 Agreement No Subdivision No Other Yes It is recommended that Common Council amend the list of Official Street Names and approve the following changes: a. Add the name “chemin Crossing Creek Road”. 46 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 1 of 2 January 22, 2026 Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council Your Worship and Councillors: SUBJECT: Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning for 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portions of PID 00302778 and 00420802) At the regular meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee, on January 20, 2026, the Committee considered the attached report regarding the proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and rezoning of the subject site. Yeva Mattson, Planner with Growth and Community Services, appeared before the Committee and provided an overview of the application. Stephen Perry, the applicant, presented the proposed development and noted a growing demand for this type of affordable housing. He explained that the existing mobile home park is currently at capacity and that the street and servicing infrastructure are already in place to support the expansion. Committee members inquired about sidewalks, and Mr. Perry explained that the street is designed to be wide enough for shared use. He noted that sidewalks and curbs are not well suited to the nature of mobile home parks, as they can interfere with the placement and movement of new homes. In response to questions regarding rock removal, the applicant stated that this phase of development contains significantly less rock removal than previous phases. Mr. Perry also indicated that discussions with NB Power regarding the transmission lines, will take place at a later stage, and that the easement area will be used as green space. One letter was received in opposition. 47 Brunswick Engineering 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard January 20, 2026 Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 106-44, A Law to Amend the Municipal Plan By-Law of The City of Saint John”. 2. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 111-216, A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law of The City of Saint John. Respectfully submitted, Brad Mitchel Chair 48 Page 1 of 6 Report Date: January 15, 2026 To: Planning Advisory Committee From: Growth & Community Services Meeting Date: January 20, 2026 SUBJECT Applicant: Brunswick Engineering Landowners(s): Debly Forest Services Ltd., Province of New Brunswick – Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Location: Civic Address: PID: Lot Size: 0 Rex Hurley Blvd Portions of 00302778 and 00420802 5.5 hectares Plan Designation: Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area Proposed Plan Designation: Stable Residential Zoning Rural (RU) Proposed Zoning: Mini-Home Park (RP) Application Type: Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Municipal Plan and the Zoning By-law. Common Council will consider the Committee’s recommendation at a public hearing on Monday, February 9, 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A proposal has been submitted to expand the Glenview Mobile Home Park. The expansion to the north -east of the existing park, would involve a 5.5 hectare site and would include the extension of Rex Hurley Boulevard and Glen Road and the placement of approximately 55new manufactured or mini-homes. To facilitate the development, amendments to the City’s Municipal Plan and Zoning By-Law are required. The Municipal Plan amendments will: 49 Brunswick Engineering Portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 January 15, 2026 Page 2 of 6 • Redesignate the property from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area on the City Structure Map. • Redesignate the property from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential on the Future Land Use Map. • Expand the Primary Development Area (PDA). In addition, the subject site would be rezon ed from Rural (RU) to Mini-Home Park (RP). Staff recommend the approval of the Municipal Plan Amendments and the rezoning. RECOMMENDATION 1. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “entitled “By-law No. C.P. 106-44, A Law to Amend the Municipal Plan By-Law of The City of Saint John”. 2. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 111 -216 , A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law of The City of Saint John. DECISION HISTORY The Glen Falls Mobile Home Park was expanded in 2013 when it underwent a municipal plan amendment (CP 106-4) and rezoning. That application added 78 new mobile homes to the park, and created Rex Hurley Boulevard and Keith Castle Way, as private streets. ANALYSIS Proposal The proposed municipal plan amendment and rezoning would enable the expansion of the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park. The expansion, to the north-east of the existing Park, would be accessed from Rex Hurley Boulevard and would facilitate the placement of approximately 55 new manufactured or mini-homes. This would include an expansion of the Primary Development Area to have the new expansion area connect to municipal services. Site and Neighbourhood The subject site is located on the east side of the City, in an area known as Glen Falls. The development area is located to the northeast of the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park, at the end of Rex Hurley Boulevard, and consists of approximately 5.5 hectares of two unaddressed PIDs. Both properties are undeveloped and are largely forested. Marsh Creek and its associated wetlands are located to the west of the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park and extend through PID 00420802. The proposed development has been designed to avoid the Creek and wetlands. No concerns were raised regarding the proximity to the watercourse and wetlands as there is a significant elevation difference between these features and the proposed development. Any development inside the watercourse and wetland buffer will require a WAWA permit. 50 Brunswick Engineering Portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 January 15, 2026 Page 3 of 6 The surrounding area consists of the existing Glen Falls Mobile Home Park and the Glen Falls neighbourhood, which is a residential neighbourhoodbuilt in the 1950’s-1960’s. The surrounding residential development includes a variety of typologies that are implemented through the Low- Rise Residential, Mid-Rise Residential and the Mini-Home Park Residential zones. These neighbourhoods are served by commercial areas located on Rothesay Avenue and McAllister Drive, in addition to community facilities such as schools, places of worship, and the Irving Fieldhouse. A local park containing a playground sits on the corner of Glen Road and Simpson Drive Extension, near the entrance to the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park. The Glen Falls Mobile Home Park and the proposed expansion is a private development with that is developed with a private road network. Due to this, the existing Mobile Home Park does not include a sidewalk system or form part of the City’s transit network. The broader Glen Falls neighbourhood is served by Transit Route 33 and includes a pedestrian network that ends at the entrance to the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park. Plan and Policy Alignment Municipal Plan As part of the review process, staff undertook an assessment of the proposal’s alignment with the Municipal Plan. A copy of this assessment is included as an attachment to this report. The subject site is designated Rural Resource Area, with a portion of land surrounding Marsh Creek and the wetlands being designated Park and Natural Area. The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Municipal Plan to redesignate the lands to Stable Residential, which would align with the designation utilized for the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park and Glen Falls neighbourhood. Lands to the north, east, and west of the subject site would retain their existing designation. Stable Residential is a land use designation within Plan SJ that applies to several established neighbourhoods throughout the City. These areas are generally built-out but may accommodate additional development at a scale and density that is compatible with the surrounding context. The existing neighbourhood is low-rise in character, consisting primarily of single-family dwellings. The proposed amendments to Plan SJ would facilitate the expansion of an existing mobile and mini home park, allowing for the development of serviced developments that are comparable in scale to those within the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park. Portions of the site designated as Park and Natural Area, and are associated with the presence of Marsh Creek and wetlands along the western boundary, are also proposed to be redesignated to Stable Residential to support the overall development. The development concept is not intended to impact the existing watercourse or wetlands, and any development within or adjacent to these areas will be subject to a WAWApermit. In addition, the proposed Municipal Plan amendment will expand the Primary Development Area, allowing the site to be connected to City water and sanitary services. Development 51 Brunswick Engineering Portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 January 15, 2026 Page 4 of 6 located outside the PDA must be serviced by private well and septic systems, which require larger lot sizes. Based on the analysis of the proposed development under the Stable Residential designation, the proposal is consistent with the policies of the Municipal Plan, which support the expansion of existing neighbourhoods at a similar scale and density. Zoning The rezoning of the subject site to Mini-Home Park Residential (RP) is required to permit the expansion of the Glen Falls Mobile Home Park. The current zoning of Rural (RU) is intended for Rural land uses and does not support the development of a residential land uses at this scale. The RP zone is compatible with the existing Glen Falls Mobile Home Park and is an expansion of that development typology. The Mini-Home Park Residential (RP) Zone is designed to accommodate mini or mobile home developments, where multiple small-scale units are built along private streets. The overall site design of the entire Park, along with each building lot, is assessed through the Development Permit process which ensures that all aspects of the development align with the Zoning standards including landscaping, parking and communal amenity space components. A secondary exit is proposed which will connect the Park expansion area with Glen Road. The creation of the second exist is a requirement from the City’s Fire and Emergency Services and Infrastructure Departments to provide alternative access to the development area. Statements of Public Interest (SPIs) An assessment of the proposal’s alignment with the Provincial SPIs is included as an attachment to this report. The proposed development aligns with the Provincial SPIs, which support development that aligns with existing settlement patterns and utilizes existing infrastructure. In addition, the proposal aligns with SP. 3, which encourages the provision of a range of affordable housing options, which can be achieved through permitting the development or expansion of manufactured and mini-home parks. Service Area Review Internal Service Areas Feedback Infrastructure No concerns. A watercourse/drainage channel is indicated on the site plan, the detailed design must account for this existing condition. Building All requirements of the Zoning Bylaw must be met. The homes will need individual building permits for the placement of each building on site as well as plumbing permits for each. The existing expansion to the mobile home park (Glen Falls Mobile Home Park) should be 52 Brunswick Engineering Portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 January 15, 2026 Page 5 of 6 completed and closed. That means that all areas of concern need to be agreed that the conditions of the expansion permit have been met. There should be condition on the approval, that no rock or material can be removed from the site. This was an issue with the mobile home park expansion of 2017. Emergency Management Supportive of the application, subject to the understanding that Fire Department response times to this neighbourhood are beyond industry standards for structure fire responses. Parks Supportive of money in lieu of LPP Traffic No concerns Transit No comments Parking Commission No concerns Operations (Public Works) No comments. External Agencies Department of Local Government and Environment – WAWA No concerns. Wetlands are present in the area but any alteration in or within 30 metres of a watercourse or a wetland will require a Watercourse and Wetland Alteration Permit (WAWA) permit. NB Power The provided sketch does show the approximate location of the proposed overhead transmission line (currently under EIA review). In the coming months, we intend to acquire a 38.10m (125 feet) wide easement at that location. We would not approve of developments within the limits of the right of way of the transmission line. If they want to proceed with the rezoning as shown, they should create a gap in their development to allow for space for transmission line. Ultimately, once the easement is acquired, there would be no issues with private development near our transmission line, as long as they are outside the right of way. Section 59 Conditions No Section 59 Conditions are being recommended as the zoning and the permitting process shall address development elements. 53 Brunswick Engineering Portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 January 15, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Conclusion This proposal aligns will all relevant Municipal Plan polices and the Statements of Provincial Interest and meets the intent of the Zoning By-law. No concerns were raised from internal or external service areas regarding the proposal. Therefore, Staff are recommending approval of the Municipal Plan amendment, and rezoning. ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No alternatives were considered. ENGAGEMENT In accordance with the Committee’s Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on December 23 , 202 5. As of the date of this report, 0 letters were received in. The public hearing notice was posted on the City of Saint John website on January 15, 2026. The public hearing will be held on Monday, February 9, 2026 at 6:30PM. APPROVALS AND CONTACT Manager Director Commissioner Jennifer Kirchner RPP, MCIP Pankaj Nalavde RPP, MCIP Amy Poffenroth P.Eng., MBA Contact: Yeva Mattson Telephone: 506 -721 -8453 Email: yeva.mattson@saintohn.ca Application: 25-0196 APPENDIX Map 1: Aerial Photography Map 2: Future Land Use Map 3: Zoning Attachment 1: Site Photography Attachment 2: Policy Review Attachment 3: Bylaws Submission 1: Site Plans 54 RexHurleyBlvd.GlenRd.KeithCastleW ayAerial Context - 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard Subject Property 0 150 30075 m 55 Rex Hurley Blvd. G lenRd.KeithCastle WaySubject Property Future Land Use Rural Resource Park and Natural Area Stable Residential 0 160 32080 m Municipal Plan - 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard 56 RP RR RU Rex Hurley Blvd. G lenRd.KeithCastle WaySubject Property Zoning Mini-Home Park Residential (RP) Rural Residential (RR) Rural (RU)0 160 32080 m Zoning - 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard 57 ATTACHMENT 1: SITE PHOTOGRAPHY Subject Site frontage (from end of Rex Hurley Blvd) where the expansion would occur Existing portion of Glen Falls Mobile Home Park (from subject site) 58 Glend Road near where secondary access would connect to 59 Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy Review 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard Municipal Plan Policy 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard Assessment Policy LU-86 Within the Stable Residential designation, housing of almost every form and density may be found and both the existing neighbourhood context and compatibility with the Municipal Plan goals will determine suitability of new proposals. Other compatible uses that may be found in the Stable Residential designation include convenience stores, home occupations, parks, and community facilities which are permitted in the designation without amendment to the Municipal Plan. The subject site is located adjacent to an existing residential development that is located within the Stable Residential designation. The proposed Municipal Plan amendment would redesignate the subject site as Stable Residential and expand the Primary Development Area. The plan amendment and associated rezoning are required to expand the existing mini-home park and would be a continuation of the existing land use patterns. The proposed development will expand an existing residential neighbourhood, providing additional housing that is compatible with the surrounding area. While the site currently exists outside the PDA, it is directly adjacent to an existing community. The expansion of the PDA will enable the development to be serviced by City water and sanitary services, while utilizing existing accesses and private roads. Policy LU-87 Intend that the areas designated Stable Residential will evolve over time from a land use and built-form perspective but that new and redeveloped land uses are to reinforce the predominant community character and make a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. The proposed development would be an expansion of an existing residential neighbourhood, providing new housing of a similar typology and density that is compatible with the original development. Policy LU-88 Ensure that significant new development and redevelopment in areas designated Stable Residential shall generally be permitted only through a rezoning process where compliance is demonstrated with the following requirements: a. The proposed land use is desirable and contributes positively to the neighbourhood; b. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses; c. The development is in a location where all necessary water and wastewater services, parks and recreation services, schools, public transit and other community facilities and protective services can readily and adequately be provided; a. The proposed residential development is an expansion of an existing residential neighbourhood. The development will continue the existing density and settlement patterns onto adjacent land. b. The proposed rezoning aligns with the established Glen Park neighbourhood, and will support the continuation of the existing development and land use. c. The property is located adjacent to an existing residential community and would be serviced by City water and sanitary services on a private road network. d/e. Site design will be reviewed during permitting on a site-by-site basis. All 60 d. Site design features that address such matters as safe access, buffering and landscaping, site grading and stormwater management are incorporated; e. A high quality exterior building design is provided that is consistent with the Urban Design Principles in the Municipal Plan. proposed developments will need to meet all zoning and city infrastructure standards including stormwater management. Policy I-2 In considering amendments to the Zoning Bylaw or the imposition of terms and conditions, in addition to all other criteria set out in the various policies of the Municipal Plan, have regard for the following: a. The proposal is in conformity with the goals, policies and intent of the Municipal Plan and the requirements of all City bylaws; b. The proposal is not premature or inappropriate by reason of: i. Financial inability of the City to absorb costs related to development and ensure efficient delivery of services, as determined through Policy I-7 and I-8; ii. The adequacy of central wastewater or water services and storm drainage measures; iii. Adequacy or proximity of school, recreation, or other community facilities; iv. Adequacy of road networks leading to or adjacent to the development; and v. Potential for negative impacts to designated heritage buildings or areas. c. Appropriate controls are placed on any proposed development where necessary to reduce any conflict with adjacent land uses by reason of: i. Type of use; ii. Height, bulk or appearance and lot coverage of any proposed building; iii. Traffic generation, vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle or transit access to and from the site; iv. Parking; v. Open storage; vi. Signs; and vii. Any other relevant matter of urban planning. a. This proposal is an expansion of an existing residential development on municipal services. The planned neighbourhood expansion aligns with the residential land use policies as established in the City’s Municipal Plan and will be required to conform with all relevant City Bylaws. b. The proposal is located on an existing lot that is adjacent to an established neighbourhood. The development will connect to existing water and sanitary infrastructure and will be serviced be a private road network. The proposed development will not have a negative impact on service provision and will benefit from its proximity to established residential development. c. Site development will be subject to the standards established in the Zoning By-Law, including building height, setbacks, parking and landscaping buffers. The proposed development will be compatible with the adjacent land uses, including the existing Glen Falls neighbourhood. d. The proposed development has no concerning elevation changes. While the development area is adjacent to a wetland, the Province of New Brunswick has indicated they have no concerns with the proposed layout. Any work near the buffer of the wetland will require WAWA approval. 61 d. The proposed site is suitable in terms of steepness of grade, soil and geological conditions, locations of watercourses, wetlands, and susceptibility of flooding as well as any other relevant environmental consideration; Statements of Public Interest SPI Assessment Settlement Patterns SP.1 Promote efficient development and land use patterns that are in the best interests of the Province, local governments and residents of the Province in the long-term. The proposed development is directly adjacent to the City’s serviceable boundary (Primary Development Area (PDA) – as defined in the City’s Municipal Plan) and is located on a site served by existing infrastructure, community facilities, and private road network. By expanding the PDA to this site, the expansion of the existing Glen Falls neighbourhood will connect to adjacent infrastructure. The proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and associated development is an extension of an existing mini-home park. Given these considerations, the proposal conforms to this Statement. SP.2 Promote a range of housing options such as size, type, density and design throughout communities. This development is an expansion to an existing manufactured/mini-home park. This will provide additional housing options in an existing residential area of the City. SP.3 Support the provision of a range of affordable housing options throughout communities. The proposed development is an expansion of an existing manufactured/mini- home park, which provides serviced dwelling units on a private road. Housing of this type has been considered an affordable housing option that can be constructed in a shorter timeframe than traditional construction methods. This development would increase the supply of manufactured/mini-homes within an established residential community. SP.4 Avoid development and land use patterns that may cause environmental or health and safety issues. The proposed development is located outside any watercourses, and if work should occur close to their buffer area, WAWA permits will be required. The development will also utilize City water and sanitary services as opposed to private servicing options. SP.5 With respect to development that occurs in a community with existing or planned public infrastructure and services, promote development in locations where the public infrastructure and services are or are planned to be available. The proposed development is adjacent to an existing neighbourhood and would utilize existing infrastructure, existing private road network, and community facilities. 62 SP.6 With respect to development that occurs in a community with no existing or planned public infrastructure or services, promote development in locations with previously constructed and actively maintained roads. Not applicable. SP.7 Promote a range of transportation options, including public, regional and active transportation. The development site is connected to the City’s broader road network. City transit routes are located in the adjacent residential neighbourhood, approximately 1km from the subject site. SP.8 Promote the use of green infrastructure, including climate resilient lands. The proposed site is adjacent to wetlands but would be outside of the buffer zone and all permits would be approved by WAWA. SP.9 Promote development in downtown areas and urban cores through increased density, infill and brownfield development. This policy is not applicable. Agriculture AA.1 Identify prime agricultural areas and prioritize them for agricultural uses and other compatible uses. Not applicable. AA.2 Identify current and future areas for fishery use and aquaculture use and prioritize them for those uses and other compatible uses. Not applicable. AA.3 Consider set-backs, including reciprocal setbacks if appropriate, between areas with an agricultural use, fishery use or aquaculture use and areas used for incompatible purposes. Not applicable. Climate Change CC.1 Promote energy conservation and efficiency, improved air quality, climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation through development and land use patterns. The subject site is located adjacent to a developed neighbourhood with access to existing roads and connections to city infrastructure. CC.2 Consider how the siting and design of infrastructure can improve air quality and energy conservation and efficiency, minimize the health and public safety impacts of climate change and increase climate resiliency. Not applicable. Flood and Natural Hazard Areas FH.1 Identify flood and natural hazard areas using provincial flood hazard mapping, provincial erosion mapping and other resources. Not applicable. FH.2 Promote land use and development in areas other than flood and natural hazard areas. Not applicable. FH.3 Promote land use and development that are not expected to increase the impacts on safety and costs associated with flooding and natural hazards. Not applicable. FH.4 Promote land use and development that incorporate mitigation measures with respect to flooding and natural hazards or that are appropriate for areas subject to natural hazards. Not applicable. Natural Resources 63 NR.1 Identify natural resource development areas and environmentally sensitive areas. Not applicable. NR.2 Prioritize natural resource development areas for natural resource extraction and development. Not applicable. NR.3 Prioritize environmentally sensitive areas for conservation and protection. Not applicable. NR.4 Consider set-backs, including reciprocal setbacks if appropriate, between natural resource development areas or environmentally sensitive areas and areas used for incompatible purposes. Not applicable. 64 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-44 A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 106-44 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L'ARRÊTÉ RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit: L'arrêté concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John décrété le 30 janvier 2012 est modifié par:: 1. Redesignating on Schedule “A” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802, from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area, to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule “B” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential, and extending the boundaries of the Primary Development Area (PDA) to include th is land. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. À l’annexe « A » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 5.5 hectares identifié comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de secteur de ressources rurale et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur stable; 2. À l’annexe « B » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 5.5 hectares identifié comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de ressources rurales et parc ou aire naturelle à Secteur résidentiel stable, et repousser les limites de la zone d’aménagement primaire pour inclure ce terrain. - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 65 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-216 A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 111-216 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L’ARRÊTÉ DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit : L'Arrêté de zonage de The City of Saint John , décrété le 15 décembre 2014, est modifié par : 1. Rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 from Rural (RU) to Mini-Home Park (RP) on Schedule A, Zoning Map of The City of Siant John. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. La modification de l’annexe A , Carte de zonage de The City of Saint John, permettant de modifier la désignation pour une parcelle de terrain d’une superficie d’environ 5,5 hectares identifiée comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de Zone rurale (RU) à Zone résidentielle – Parcs de minimaisons (RP). - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes : _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 66 EWEWEWEWOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH40 Ashburn Lake Road, PO Box 1045, Saint John, NB E2L 4E3tel: 506.696.9155 fax: 506.696.9158N67 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||40 Ashburn Lake Road, PO Box 1045, Saint John, NB E2L 4E3tel: 506.696.9155 fax: 506.696.9158||||||||||||||||||||XREX HURLEY BLVDGLEN ROADNEW ACCESSMarsh CreekN GLEN ROAD EXTENSION68 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||40 Ashburn Lake Road, PO Box 1045, Saint John, NB E2L 4E3tel: 506.696.9155 fax: 506.696.9158||||||||||||||||||||XREX HURLEY BLVDGLEN ROADNEW ACCESSMarsh CreekN GLEN ROAD EXTENSION69 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-44 A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 106-44 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L'ARRÊTÉ RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit: L'arrêté concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John décrété le 30 janvier 2012 est modifié par:: 1. Redesignating on Schedule “A” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802, from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area, to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule “B” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential, and extending the boundaries of the Primary Development Area (PDA) to include this land. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. À l’annexe « A » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 5.5 hectares identifié comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de secteur de ressources rurale et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur stable; 2. À l’annexe « B » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 5.5 hectares identifié comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de ressources rurales et parc ou aire naturelle à Secteur résidentiel stable, et repousser les limites de la zone d’aménagement primaire pour inclure ce terrain. - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 70 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-216 A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 111-216 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L’ARRÊTÉ DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit : L'Arrêté de zonage de The City of Saint John, décrété le 15 décembre 2014, est modifié par : 1. Rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 5.5 hectares identified as a portion of PID 00302778 and 00420802 from Rural (RU) to Mini-Home Park (RP) on Schedule A, Zoning Map of The City of Siant John. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. La modification de l’annexe A , Carte de zonage de The City of Saint John, permettant de modifier la désignation pour une parcelle de terrain d’une superficie d’environ 5,5 hectares identifiée comme une partie des NID 00302778 et 00420802, de Zone rurale (RU) à Zone résidentielle – Parcs de minimaisons (RP). - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes : _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 71 Common Council –Public Hearing February 9, 2026 –18:30 By-Law Number: CP 106-44 By-Law Number: CP 111-216 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802 72 Current designation: Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area Proposed designation: Stable Residential Proposal 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) Municipal Plan Amendment Rezoning Current: Rural (RU) Proposed: Mini-Home Park Residential (RP)73 City Context 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 74 Aerial Context 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 75 Site Photo 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 76 Municipal Plan Designation Rural Resource Area Park and Natural Area 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 77 Municipal Plan Proposed Designation Stable Residential These lands are inside the PDA and include several existing neighbourhoods which are generally built- out and are not anticipated to receive major change over the planning period. They have the potential to accommodate additional development, at a scale and density consistent with the surrounding context. 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 78 Within the Stable Residential designation, housing of almost every form and density may be found and both the existing neighbourhood context and compatibility with the Municipal Plan goals will determine suitability of new proposals. Policy LU -86 Policy LU -87 Policy Alignment Intend that the areas designated Stable Residential will evolve over time from a land use and built-form perspective but that new and redeveloped land uses are to reinforce the predominant community character and make a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 79 Zoning PID # Portion of 00302778 and 00420802 Lot Size 5.5 Hectares Rural (RU) The zone accommodates resource-related activities, such as agriculture, fishery, and forestry operations, as well as certain other land uses appropriate in the rural area. Limited unserviced residential development is also permitted. 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 80 Zoning PID # Portion of 00302778 and 00420802 Lot Size 5.5 Hectares Proposed Zoning Mini-Home Park (RP) The Mini-Home Park Residential (RP) zone accommodates serviced residential development in the form of mobile or mini- home parks or communities with streets inside the primary Development Area. 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 81 Mailout: Public Engagement December 22, 2025 Letters Received: Ad Posted on Website: 1 January 15, 2026 PAC Date:January 20, 2026 Applicant Engagement: No 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 82 Staff Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Redesignate the site from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential Rezoning Rezone the site from Rural (RU) to Mini-Home Park (RP) PAC is in support of the Staff Recommendation. 0 Rex Hurley Boulevard (Portion of PIDs 00302778 and 00420802) 83 From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Cc:OneStop Subject:FW: Proposed development Rex Hurley dr - minihome park Date:January 15, 2026 8:17:00 AM FYI Candice Rideout, BSc Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram -----Original Message----- From: Laura Moore-Simpson Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 11:15 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca>; yeva.mattson@ssintjohn.ca Subject: Proposed development Rex Hurley dr - minihome park [You don't often get email from lauramsimpson@icloud.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** I am writing in response to the letter and comment form that was sent out to residents of the mini home park regarding the extension of Rex Hurley Drive. 1. Do you Support the proposed development? I do realize that with buying a new minihome people need a place to park them. I have several concerns and it would depend on the responses to my concern that would tell if I supported the proposed development or not. 2. What are the top 2 to 3 concerns regarding the proposed development? I have a few concerns - number one how will clearing the land for these mini homes and new development impact the wildlife and streams below. Has there been any environmental studies on the impact of extending Rex Hurley drive? Another concern of mine is the amount of traffic this new development will continue to generate ..there have been near 70 new mini homes placed in the new section of Rex Hurley Drive in the past year or so and the amount of traffic that goes in and out of the park has probably tripled. There are no sidewalks for walking by myself or walking my dog and we have almost got hit a few times. Last week I walked down to the bottom of Glenview Drive turned right and walked to the bottom of the next street over - Purdy I believe it’s called and 14 automobiles had drove by us within 4 minutes. It’s crazy. Adding more mini homes will only add to this problem. The roads are narrow. There are young children and dogs to watch for. People drive too fast. When the park was adding the new roads of Rex Hurley - the number of big trucks going to and from that area was tremendous- and they started early in the morning. With the influx of housing - Will it put our Property tax up ? 3. How does the proposed development impact you? As mentioned earlier- I am concerned about the impact on the wildlife and water systems - streams, brooks in the 84 area. The amount of traffic coming and going, Including big trucks. Possibility of increased property taxes. Lack of sidewalks and speed limit signage - making it unsafe to walk 4. What are your recommendations for the proposed development? -Minimal interference with wildlife and waterways (above below and at road level of Rex Hurley) - sidewalks, speed limit signs in the park and bottom rd to help keep pedestrians, children and pets safe. Street lights which we just got after being without for a long time. - a guarantee that there will not be an increase in Lot rent or property taxes within 5 years 5. Would I support the development with suggested changes? I would possibly support if each of my concerns would be addressed, discussed and solved Sincerely Laura Moore-Simpson 506-636-1087 Sent from my iPhone 85 86 87 88 Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive (Portion of PID 00311126) – Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision Public Hearing, 1st and 2nd Readings: February 9, 2026 Item Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 106-43 a Law to Amend The Municipal Plan By- Law of the City of Saint John. Zoning By-Law Amendment Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 111-215 a Law to Amend The Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John. Tentative 3rd Reading: February 23, 2026 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 106-43 a Law to Amend The Municipal Plan By-Law of the City of Saint John. Zoning By-Law Amendment Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to By-Law Number C.P. 111-215 a Law to Amend The Zoning By-Law of the City of Saint John. Recission of Previous s. 39/s. 59 Conditions No Section 59 Conditions No Section 59 Agreement No Section 131 Agreement No Subdivision Yes 1. That Common Council assent to the attached tentative plan of subdivision (Overall Development Area, Oakhill Homes, dated 2024-12-03) with respect to the proposed vesting of a portion of PID 00311126 as a Public Street as outlined in Phase 1. 2. That Common Council authorize the preparation and execution of one or more City/Developer Subdivision Agreements to ensure the provision of the required work 89 and facilities associated with the extension of Summit Drive. 3. That Common Council assent to any necessary Municipal Servicing Easements. 4. That Common Council assent to money-in-lieu of Land for Public Purpose. Other No 90 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 1 of 3 January 22, 2026 Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council Your Worship and Councillors: SUBJECT: Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision for 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive (PID 00311126) At the regular meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee, on January 20, 2026, the Committee considered the attached report regarding the proposed Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision of the subject site. Yeva Mattson, Planner with Growth and Community Services, appeared before the Committee and provided an overview of the proposal. Isaiah Reid, the applicant, presented the proposed development and outlined the changes made to the scale of the rezoning in response to infrastructure and traffic concerns. He explained a need for single-family housing and noted that the use of modular-style construction helps make these homes feasible to build. He clarified that the proposal consists of single-family homes built with modular construction, as opposed to traditional mobile homes, and that the design would be consistent with the existing character of the neighbourhood. Mr. Reid also addressed concerns raised in neighbourhood correspondence, including a commitment to work with the City to provide green space. He expanded on the Traffic Impact Statement, clarifying that traffic volumes were analyzed using January data and not solely based on August data, and noted that the site is located within close proximity to existing bus routes. Committee members asked questions regarding servicing and stormwater management. The applicant explained that flow sheets had been submitted and that no servicing issues were identified for Phase 1. Staff later clarified that there are no concerns regarding sanitary servicing for the full build-out and that Saint John Water can support Phase 1 but would prefer to reassess servicing at each phase. Staff also indicated that there were no concerns related to stormwater management, as this is reviewed during the permitting stage, and that the applicant has completed preliminary assessments. When asked about the ultimate unit count, the applicant stated that the end goal is approximately 219 units, although this number may change as green space 91 Don-More Surveys 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive January 22, 2026 Page 2 of 3 negotiations continue. In response to questions about building height, he confirmed that three-storey buildings are not being considered. Committee Member Lowe asked when the applicant agreed to rezone only 30 units rather than pursuing rezoning for the full build-out. Mr. Reid explained that, due to traffic concerns and Saint John Water’s request to reassess servicing at each stage, the application was amended based on staff’s recommendation to rezone Phase 1 only. Staff clarified that this change occurred after neighbourhood notification letters had been sent, but the applicant stated that he had been transparent with all individuals he had been in contact with, including those who submitted letters. Staff further clarified that public notification is based on the full application, as opposed to the staff recommendation, and that applicants can reduce the scale of their applications based on the staff recommendation. Committee members referenced letters indicating that the site has been used informally as parkland and raised concerns that the development could displace activities, such as ATV use, to other areas or create conflicts for the 30 proposed homes. In response, Mr. Reid stated that the applicant has always respected outdoor recreational activities and noted that there is an additional 18 hectares of accessible woodland in the area. The City’s Traffic Engineer provided some clarity regarding the use of ATVs within the City. The City’s Traffic Engineer then responded to questions regarding traffic impacts on Loch Lomond Road. He explained that Phase 1 would result in a modest increase in traffic and that some improvements are already underway at key intersections. He added that while full build-out would require close coordination with the developer, the City plans to assess traffic demand on Loch Lomond Road in the coming year, considering both local and regional traffic, to identify potential solutions. 27 letters were received in opposition; 1 letter was received in support. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 106-43, A Law to Amend the Municipal Plan By-Law of The City of Saint John”. 2. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 111-215, A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law of The City of Saint John. 3. That Common Council assent to the attached tentative plan of subdivision (Overall Development Area, Oakhill Homes, dated 2024- 92 Don-More Surveys 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive January 22, 2026 Page 3 of 3 12-03) with respect to the proposed vesting of a portion of PID 00311126 as a Public Street as outlined in Phase 1. 4. That Common Council authorize the preparation and execution of one or more City/Developer Subdivision Agreements to ensure the provision of the required work and facilities associated with the extension of Summit Drive. 5. That Common Council assent to any necessary Municipal Servicing Easements. 6. That Common Council assent to money-in-lieu of Land for Public Purpose. Respectfully submitted, Brad Mitchell Chair 93 Page 1 of 8 Report Date: January 15, 2026 To: Planning Advisory Committee From: Growth & Community Services Meeting Date: January 20, 2026 SUBJECT Applicant: Oakhill Homes Inc. Landowners(s): Oakhill Homes Inc. Location: Civic Address: PID: Lot Size: 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive Portion of 00311126 18 hectares Plan Designation: Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area Proposed Plan Designation: Stable Residential Zoning Rural (RU) Proposed Zoning: Low-Rise Residential (RL) Application Type: Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Municipal Plan and the Zoning By-law, and on proposed street vesting. Common Council will consider the Committee’s recommendation at a public hearing on Monday, February 9, 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A proposal has been submitted for the expansion of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood on an 18-hectare site located at the end of Summit Drive and Clint Drive. To enable serviced residential development, the applicant is seeking amendments to the City’s Municipal Plan to expand the Primary Development Area and designate the lands for Stable Residential use. The proposal also includes rezoning and subdivision components to support the development of new residential lots. 94 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 2 of 8 Staff recommend approval of the Municipal Plan Amendment and support a phased approach to rezoning and street vesting, beginning with Phase 1, supporting the development of approximately 30 lots. The applicant is in support of this phased approach. RECOMMENDATION 1. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “entitled “By-law No. C.P. 106-43, A Law to Amend the Municipal Plan By-Law of The City of Saint John”. 2. That Common Council adopt the attached by-law amendment entitled “By-law No. C.P. 111 -215 , A Law to Amend the Zoning By-Law of The City of Saint John. 3. That Common Council assent to the attached tentative plan of subdivision (Overall Development Area, Oakhill Homes, dated 2024-12 -03) with respect to the proposed vesting of a portion of PID 00311126 as a Public Street as outlined in Phase 1. 4. That Common Council authorize the preparation and execution of one or more City/Developer Subdivision Agreements to ensure the provision of the required work and facilities associated with the extension of Summit Drive. 5. That Common Council assent to any necessary Municipal Servicing Easements. 6. That Common Council assent to money-in-lieu of Land for Public Purpose. DECISION HISTORY There is no decision history associated with this site. ANALYSIS Proposal The proposal involves the expansion of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood through the development of approximately 219 low-rise residential lots. The development would be accessed from Summit Drive, with a future phase connecting to Clint Drive. To facilitate the development, the applicant has submitted an application to amend the City’s Municipal Plan. The amendments would: • Redesignate the property from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area on the City Structure Map. • Redesignate the property from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential on the Future Land Use Map. • Expand the Primary Development Area (PDA) to allow the site to connect to municipal services. In addition to the Municipal Plan amendments, the application includes: 95 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 3 of 8 • Rezoning the site from Rural (RU) to Low-Rise Residential (RL). • A subdivision application for approximately 219 lots. • The vesting of public streets and lands for public purpose. Staff recommend approval of the Municipal Plan Amendment and further recommend that rezoning and street vesting be limited to Phase 1 of the development, which would support the development of approximately 30 lots. The applicant was consulted on the recommendation and agrees with this phased approach. Site and Neighbourhood The subject site is located at the end of Summit Drive and Clint Drive, which forms part of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood, located on the east side of the City. Lakewood Heights was originally established in the 1950s, with the most recent phases of development occurring in the late 2000s. Access to Lakewood Heights is provided from Loch Lomond Road and includes several existing streets that terminate at the subject site. The subject site is undeveloped land consisting of approximately 18 hectares. The site is largely forested and contains wetlands along the western boundary. The delineation of these wetlands will be undertaken as part of future approvals through the Provincial WAWA process. Lakewood Heights is an existing neighbourhood that is zoned Low-Rise Residential (RL) and includes a variety of low-density residential building typologies. Additional residential development has been developed to the west of Lakewood Heights and is zoned RL and Mid- Rise Residential (RM). The lands to north and east of the subject site, are zoned Rural (RU) and Rural Residential (RR) and support unserviced development. Mystery Lake, which is located on City-owned land, is immediately adjacent to the western boundary of the subject site. The proposed extension of the street network would include the creation of sidewalks, which would connect with the existing pedestrian network within Lakewood Heights. Public transit service is available via Route 33, which provides multiple stops throughout the Lakewood Heights subdivision including Willie Avenue. The area is served by Lakewood Heights School and the Little River Reservoir, a City owned park that is located 1.5km from the subject site and provides a playground, walking trails, swimming area, and a dog park. Due to the large size of the proposed subdivision, the Parks department is recommending that th City accept Lands for Public Purpose for the development of future greenspace. Plan and Policy Alignment Municipal Plan As part of the review process, staff undertook an assessment of the proposal’s alignment with the Municipal Plan. A copy of this assessment is included as an attachment to this report. 96 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 4 of 8 The subject property is designated Rural Resource Area, with a portion of the site designated Park and Natural Area. The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Municipal Plan to redesignate the lands to Stable Residential. The Stable Residential designation is used for the existing Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. Lands to the north, east, and west of the subject site are designated Rural Resource. Stable Residential is a land use designation within Plan SJ that applies to several established neighbourhoods throughout the City. These areas are generally built-out but may accommodate additional development at a scale and density that is compatible with the surrounding context. The existing neighbourhood is low-rise in character, consisting primarily of single-family dwellings. The proposed amendments to Plan SJ would facilitate the expansion of the existing Lakewood Heights neighbourhood, allowing for the development of serviced lots that are comparable in scale to those within the existing Lakewood Heights neighbourhood . Portions of the site designated as Park and Natural Area are associated with the presence of wetlands along the western boundary. These wetlands will require delineation, and any development within or adjacent to these areas will be subject to approval from the Wetlands and Watercourses Alteration (WAWA) as part of the permitting process. In addition, the proposed Municipal Plan amendment will expand the Primary Development Area, allowing the development of lots serviced by municipal infrastructure. Development located outside the PDA must be serviced by private well and septic systems, which would require larger lot sizes. Based on the analysis of the proposed development under the Stable Residential designation, the proposal is consistent with the policies of the Municipal Plan, which support the expansion of existing neighbourhoods at a similar scale and density. Zoning The rezoning of the subject site to the Low-Rise Residential (RL) zone is required to support the proposed development of serviced residential lots. The current Rural (RU) zone is intended to support rural land uses and does not support the development of serviced, residential neighbourhoods as proposed. The RL zone is utilized for the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood and will enable compatible development within the expansion area. The RL zone is designed to accommodate low-rise development of buildings that are 3 storeys and under, including townhouse, semi-detached, and single-family dwellings. The overall site design of each lot is assessed through the Development Permit process which ensures that all aspects of the development align with the Zoning standards including landscaping, parking and infrastructure. Subdivision 97 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 5 of 8 The vesting of public streets requires the assent of Common Council, along with approval to enter into a City/Developer Agreement and Municipal Servicing Easements to facilitate the extension of the road and associated water and sanitary services. While the proposed subdivision plan identifies the full build out of the development, staff are recommending that Common Council assent to the street vesting associated with Phase 1, as identified in Submission 2: Overall Development Area Plan, which identifies a portion of PID 00311126 to be an extension of Summit Drive. The further expansion of Summit Drive, and other streets can be evaluated when the applicant applies for the rezoning of future phases. Upon vesting of the public street, the Development Officer will be able to grant tentative approval of the lots, as this will provide the necessary legal and physical access. The plan does not currently propose dedication of Land for Public Purpose, however, Parks staff have indicated a desire for 0.5 acres to be provided for park space in a future phase. Dedication of Land for Public Purposes will be addressed in Phase 2 or 3, depending on site placement within the overall development. Common Council approval for Money-in-lieu of LPP will be required for the first phase of this subdivision. Statements of Public Interest (SPIs) The proposed development aligns with the Provincial SPI’s, including the SPIs associated with development that aligns with existing settlement patterns and the utilization of existing public infrastructure and services. The proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and expansion of the Primary Development Area, represent an extension of an existing, serviced neighbourhood. Service Area Review Internal Service Areas Feedback Infrastructure The water and wastewater demands were modelled by Saint John Water, and it was determined that beyond the first phase of development (30 units) there would be concerns with water delivery capacity. The applicant must resubmit water demands before the next phase of development to confirm available capacity. At this time there are no upgrades being specifically contemplated as necessary to support the development. Building No concerns for the proposed development. Emergency Management Support the project, subject to the understanding that Fire Department response times are beyond industry standards for a structure fire response and secondary exiting is required from the full proposed development. Parks Would like Land for Public Purposes dedication to be in the vicinity of 0.5 acres, and to be dedicated during a future phase. 98 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 6 of 8 Traffic Transportation Engineering supports the proposed reduced approval of 30 lots (Phase 1) as it would add a relative modest level of traffic. It is important, however, that a full understanding of the impacts to the local neighbourhood and broader transportation network, as well as proposed solutions and investments, are needed before subsequent stages of this development proceed beyond this first phase. This subsequent work will need to be a shared responsibility between the developer, focused mainly on investments to constructed and connected neighbourhood streets, and the city, analysing reaching limitations of the connecting Loch Lomond Road corridor with solutions to overcome them that are developed and costed. Transit No Comments. Parking Commission No concerns. Lots would need to accommodate driveways to avoid on-street parking. During snowbans, there is no on-street parking permitted and currently no designated parking lots. Operations (Public Works) No comments. External Agencies Department of Local Government and Environment – WAWA The WAWA Branch is comfortable with the City approving Phase 1 to allow for the continued design and planning throughout the winter. Please note that a wetland presence/absence check and/or wetland delineation will be required prior to any development to determine the extent of potential wetland impacts and if a WAWA permit is required. School District The proposal could potentially increase the population at Lakewood Heights by 50 students if all homes were built at once. Of course this would not happen in that manner, a phased approach would provide planning opportunities to address any space pressures and there would be natural attrition from the existing population going to middle and high school leaving room for new students from new developments before gentrification happens. 99 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 7 of 8 The area is also supported by Forest Hills School for French Immersion École les Pionniers and Samuel de Champlain for francophone students. If required, boundary changes can be made to send students to neighboring schools where there would be capacity. Phasing of the Development Approvals Through feedback provided by different City Service Areas, capacity issues have been identified associated with the complete buildout of the proposal. Based on water and wastewater modelling undertaken, Saint John Water has provided their support for the rezoning and subdivision of Phase 1 of the project, which would support the development of 30 units. They have indicated that future Phases will need to be assessed independently to determine capacity at the time of development. The Traffic Service Area is in agreement with the proposed Phased development approach indicated by Saint John Water. By phasing the approvals, it will enable a reassessment of the existing traffic conditions to be undertaken, which may warrant a new Traffic Impact Statement which would address changes to traffic in the area. Based on this information, a phased approval approach was presented to the applicant, in which they would receive the full municipal plan amendments for their entire development site, but would only receive rezoning and subdivision for Phase 1, as identified in Submission 2: Overall Development Area Plan. Section 59 Conditions No Section 59 Conditions are being recommended. Conclusion As this proposal aligns with the overall intent of the Municipal Plan and Statements of Provincial Interest, the proposed Municipal Plan amendments are recommended for approval. Due to infrastructure and traffic capacity constraints at this time, it is recommended that the rezoning and subdivision approvals only be granted for Phase 1 of the project. Future phases would be assessed through new rezoning and subdivision applications, which will enable further assessment of infrastructure and traffic capacities. The applicant has been advised of the proposed recommendation and is in support of this approach. ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No alternatives were considered. ENGAGEMENT In accordance with the Committee’s Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on December 23 , 202 5. As of the date of 100 Oakhill Homes Inc. Portion of PID 00311126 January 15, 2026 Page 8 of 8 this report, 28 letters were received including 2 in support and 26 in opposition to the application. The public hearing notice was posted on the City of Saint John website on January 15, 2026. The public hearing will be held on Monday, February 9, 2026 at 6:30PM. APPROVALS AND CONTACT Manager Director Commissioner Jennifer Kirchner RPP, MCIP Pankaj Nalavde RPP, MCIP Amy Poffenroth P.Eng., MBA Contact: Yeva Mattson Telephone: 506 -721 -8453 Email: yeva.mattson@saintohn.ca Application: 25-0129 APPENDIX Map 1: Aerial Photography Map 2: Future Land Use Map 3: Zoning Attachment 1: Site Photography Attachment 2: Policy Review Attachment 3: Bylaws Submission 1: Overall Development Area Plan Submission 2: Site Plans 101 Dolly Dr. Clint Dr.Ril e y D r . Reba Rd.Hu x t a b l e S t . Willie Av. S umm i t D r . Aerial Context - 0 Summit Drive Subject Property 0 150 30075 m 102 Dolly Dr.Ril e y D r . Clint Dr.Hu x t a b l e S t . Reba Rd. Willie Av. S umm i t D r . Subject Property Future Land Use Rural Resource Park and Natural Area Stable Residential Urban Reserve 0 170 34085 m Municipal Plan - 0 Summit Drive 103 Dolly Dr.Ril e y D r . Clint Dr.Hu x t a b l e S t . Reba Rd. Willie Av. S umm i t D r . Proposed Zoning Zoning Low-Rise Residential (RL) Utility Service (US) Future Development (FD) Rural (RU)0 170 34085 m Zoning - 0 Summit Drive Low-Rise Residential (RL) 104 ATTACHMENT 1: SITE PHOTOGRAPHY Subject Site frontage (from Summit Drive) where Phase 1 and street extension would be Summit Drive from entrance to proposed project 105 Subject Site frontage (from Clint Drive) where future phase would connect 106 Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy Review 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive Municipal Plan Policy 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive Assessment Policy LU-86 Within the Stable Residential designation, housing of almost every form and density may be found and both the existing neighbourhood context and compatibility with the Municipal Plan goals will determine suitability of new proposals. Other compatible uses that may be found in the Stable Residential designation include convenience stores, home occupations, parks, and community facilities which are permitted in the designation without amendment to the Municipal Plan. The proposed municipal plan amendment and rezoning will facilitate the expansion of an existing low-rise neighbourhood. The proposed development will increase housing supply within a desirable neighbourhood. By utilizing the same residential zoning, it will ensure that the proposed development will reflect the existing density of the surrounding area. While the site currently exists outside the PDA, it is directly adjacent to an existing serviced community. Through the extension of the PDA, it will allow the proposed development to be developed utilizing City services, and to an urban design standard. Policy LU-87 Intend that the areas designated Stable Residential will evolve over time from a land use and built-form perspective but that new and redeveloped land uses are to reinforce the predominant community character and make a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. The proposed development would be an expansion of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. Through the use of the Low-Rise Residential zoning, it will support development of a similar typology and density to the existing neighbourhood. Policy LU-88 Ensure that significant new development and redevelopment in areas designated Stable Residential shall generally be permitted only through a rezoning process where compliance is demonstrated with the following requirements: a. The proposed land use is desirable and contributes positively to the neighbourhood; b. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses; c. The development is in a location where all necessary water and wastewater services, parks and recreation services, schools, public transit and other community facilities and protective services can readily and adequately be provided; a. The proposed low-rise residential development will reflect the density and building typology found in the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. The development is an extension of the existing neighbourhood. b. The proposed rezoning aligns with the land uses found within the Lakewood Heights community. c. The property is located adjacent to an existing neighbourhood and would connect to existing municipal services. The proposed expansion would benefit from proximity to transit routes and community facilities. A future phase of the development would include the dedication of Land for Public Purposes, which would facilitate additional park space within the neighbourhood. Staff are recommending that rezoning be limited to Phase 1 of the development, due to infrastructure capacity concerns identified by infrastructure and traffic. While infrastructure and traffic concerns limit the ability to rezone the entire development at this time, future upgrades and improvements could change infrastructure concerns and support further phases of the development in the future. 107 d. Site design features that address such matters as safe access, buffering and landscaping, site grading and stormwater management are incorporated; e. A high quality exterior building design is provided that is consistent with the Urban Design Principles in the Municipal Plan. Staff are recommending the completion of the full Municipal Plan amendment, as the project aligns with the general goals of PlanSJ. Future rezonings, undertaken on a phased basis, will control the pace of development to ensure alignment with infrastructure capacity. d/e. Site design will be reviewed during the permitting process, on a site-by- site basis. All proposed developments will need to meet all zoning and city infrastructure standards. Policy I-2 In considering amendments to the Zoning Bylaw or the imposition of terms and conditions, in addition to all other criteria set out in the various policies of the Municipal Plan, have regard for the following: a. The proposal is in conformity with the goals, policies and intent of the Municipal Plan and the requirements of all City bylaws; b. The proposal is not premature or inappropriate by reason of: i. Financial inability of the City to absorb costs related to development and ensure efficient delivery of services, as determined through Policy I-7 and I-8; ii. The adequacy of central wastewater or water services and storm drainage measures; iii. Adequacy or proximity of school, recreation, or other community facilities; iv. Adequacy of road networks leading to or adjacent to the development; and v. Potential for negative impacts to designated heritage buildings or areas. c. Appropriate controls are placed on any proposed development where necessary to reduce any conflict with adjacent land uses by reason of: i. Type of use; ii. Height, bulk or appearance and lot coverage of any proposed building; iii. Traffic generation, vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle or transit access to and from the site; iv. Parking; v. Open storage; a. This proposal aligns with residential land use policies as established in the City’s Municipal Plan and conforms to all relevant zoning standards. b. The subject site is a vacant property located adjacent to an established neighbourhood. The proposed development will connect to existing infrastructure and will include the continuation of existing streets. Due to concerns regarding infrastructure capacity, staff are proposing to limit the rezoning to phase 1 of the development. Each subsequent phase will be undertaken through a new rezoning application, to allow for further assessment of the infrastructure and traffic capacity. c. The zone standards will enforce building height, site setbacks, and parking and landscaping requirements. The zone standards also ensure minimum lot sizes which guides density for the development. d. The subject site does not contain any significant elevation changes. Through the subdivision and permitting process, development will be subject to the WAWA process. This will include the delineation of any wetlands or watercourses, and will establish the required separation buffers between the environmental features and development. 108 vi. Signs; and vii. Any other relevant matter of urban planning. d. The proposed site is suitable in terms of steepness of grade, soil and geological conditions, locations of watercourses, wetlands, and susceptibility of flooding as well as any other relevant environmental consideration; Statements of Public Interest SPI Assessment Settlement Patterns SP.1 Promote efficient development and land use patterns that are in the best interests of the Province, local governments and residents of the Province in the long-term. The proposed development is an extension of an existing, serviced residential development that is located within the City’s serviceable boundary (Primary Development Area (PDA) – as defined in the City’s Municipal Plan). Through the proposed Municipal Plan amendments and rezoning, the proposed development would connect to the existing road network and municipal services and would serve as an extension of the existing land use and development patterns of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. Given these considerations it conforms to the criteria as it is an expansion of an existing land use. SP.2 Promote a range of housing options such as size, type, density and design throughout communities. The proposed development is an extension of the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. The Low-Rise Residential zoning would facilitate the development of new housing options including single family, semi-detached, townhouses and other ground-oriented typologies. SP.3 Support the provision of a range of affordable housing options throughout communities. While the proposed development has not been identified as an affordable housing project, the introduction of additional housing units will provide new options to current and future residents of the City. SP.4 Avoid development and land use patterns that may cause environmental or health and safety issues. The proposed development will be subject to WAWA approvals, including the delineation of any wetland and watercourse, as well as the regulated buffers. In addition, the proposed development will utilize municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems, as opposed to private systems. SP.5 With respect to development that occurs in a community with existing or planned public infrastructure and services, promote development in locations where the public infrastructure and services are or are planned to be available. The proposed development is adjacent to an existing, serviced neighbourhood. Through the proposed Municipal Plan amendment, the proposed development will connect to and expand the existing road network, along with municipal water and sanitary services. The development will benefit from existing public 109 infrastructure and services including transit routes, community facilities and municipal services. SP.6 With respect to development that occurs in a community with no existing or planned public infrastructure or services, promote development in locations with previously constructed and actively maintained roads. The proposed development will involve the expansion of the existing road network and infrastructure, which currently terminates at the subject site. SP.7 Promote a range of transportation options, including public, regional and active transportation. The proposed development is an extension of an existing neighbourhood and will connect to the established pedestrian network. The development will also benefit from the existing City transit system, including Route 33 which connects the neighbourhood with key locations on the City’s East side. SP.8 Promote the use of green infrastructure, including climate resilient lands. The proposed development will expand existing municipal infrastructure, with site design respecting the wetland and watercourse delineation and its associated buffers. SP.9 Promote development in downtown areas and urban cores through increased density, infill and brownfield development. The proposed development is an expansion of an existing, serviced neighbourhood, within the City’s Primary Developable Area. Agriculture AA.1 Identify prime agricultural areas and prioritize them for agricultural uses and other compatible uses. Not applicable. AA.2 Identify current and future areas for fishery use and aquaculture use and prioritize them for those uses and other compatible uses. Not applicable. AA.3 Consider set-backs, including reciprocal setbacks if appropriate, between areas with an agricultural use, fishery use or aquaculture use and areas used for incompatible purposes. Not applicable. Climate Change CC.1 Promote energy conservation and efficiency, improved air quality, climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation through development and land use patterns. The subject site is located adjacent to a developed neighbourhood with access to existing roads and connections to city infrastructure. The proposed development will be an extension of the existing development and land use patterns established within the Lakewood Heights neighbourhood. CC.2 Consider how the siting and design of infrastructure can improve air quality and energy conservation and efficiency, minimize the health and public safety impacts of climate change and increase climate resiliency. Not applicable. Flood and Natural Hazard Areas FH.1 Identify flood and natural hazard areas using provincial flood hazard mapping, provincial erosion mapping and other resources. The development site will be subject to a wetland and watercourse delineation to identify environmentally sensitive areas and to formalize the separation buffers. FH.2 Promote land use and development in areas other than flood and natural hazard areas. The development site will be subject to a wetland and watercourse delineation to identify environmentally sensitive areas and to formalize the separation buffers. 110 FH.3 Promote land use and development that are not expected to increase the impacts on safety and costs associated with flooding and natural hazards. Not applicable. FH.4 Promote land use and development that incorporate mitigation measures with respect to flooding and natural hazards or that are appropriate for areas subject to natural hazards. Not applicable. Natural Resources NR.1 Identify natural resource development areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The development site will be subject to a wetland and watercourse delineation to identify environmentally sensitive areas and to formalize the separation buffers. NR.2 Prioritize natural resource development areas for natural resource extraction and development. Not applicable. NR.3 Prioritize environmentally sensitive areas for conservation and protection. The development site will be subject to a wetland and watercourse delineation to identify environmentally sensitive areas and to formalize the separation buffers. Site development will be subject to the WAWA permitting process. NR.4 Consider set-backs, including reciprocal setbacks if appropriate, between natural resource development areas or environmentally sensitive areas and areas used for incompatible purposes. Not applicable. 111 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-43 A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 106-43 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L'ARRÊTÉ RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit: L'arrêté concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John décrété le 30 janvier 2012 est modifié par:: 1. Redesignating on Schedule “A” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 18 hectares, identified as a portion of PID00311126, from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area, to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule “B” of the Municipal Development Plan, and having an approximate area of 18 hectares, identified as a portion of PID 00311126, from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. À l’annexe « A » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 18 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126 de de secteur de ressources rurale et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur stable; 2. À l’annexe « B » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 18 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126, de ressources rurales et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur résidentiel stable. - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 112 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-215 A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 111-215 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L’ARRÊTÉ DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit : L'arrêté sur le zonage de The City of Saint John, décrété le quinze (15) décembre 2014, est modifié par : 1. by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 2 hectares identified as a part of PID 00311126, from Rural (RU) to Low Rise Residential (RL) on Schedule “A”, the Zoning Map of the City of Saint John. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. La modification de l’annexe «A», Plan de zonage de la ville de Saint John, permettant de modifier la désignation pour une parcelle de terrain d’une superficie d’environ 2 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126, de Zone rurale (RU) à Zone résidentielle – Immeubles d’habitation bas (RL). - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-43 A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 106-43 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L'ARRÊTÉ RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit: L'arrêté concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John décrété le 30 janvier 2012 est modifié par:: 1. Redesignating on Schedule “A” of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 18 hectares, identified as a portion of PID00311126, from Rural Resource Area and Park and Natural Area, to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule “B” of the Municipal Development Plan, and having an approximate area of 18 hectares, identified as a portion of PID 00311126, from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential and extending the boundaries of the Primary Development Area (PDA) to include this land. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. À l’annexe « A » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 18 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126 de de secteur de ressources rurale et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur stable; 2. À l’annexe « B » du plan d’aménagement municipal, modifier la désignation d’un terrain d’une superficie de 18 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126, de ressources rurales et parc ou aire naturelle à secteur résidentiel stable, et repousser les limites de la zone d’aménagement primaire pour inclure ce terrain. - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 123 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-215 A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRÊTÉ NO C.P. 111-215 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L’ARRÊTÉ DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit : L'arrêté sur le zonage de The City of Saint John, décrété le quinze (15) décembre 2014, est modifié par : 1. by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 2 hectares identified as a part of PID 00311126, from Rural (RU) to Low Rise Residential (RL) on Schedule “A”, the Zoning Map of the City of Saint John. - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. La modification de l’annexe «A», Plan de zonage de la ville de Saint John, permettant de modifier la désignation pour une parcelle de terrain d’une superficie d’environ 2 hectares identifié comme partie de NID 00311126, de Zone rurale (RU) à Zone résidentielle – Immeubles d’habitation bas (RL). - toutes les modifications sont indiquées sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du présent arrêté. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - X Second Reading - X Third Reading - X Première lecture - X Deuxième lecture - X Troisième lecture - X 124 Common Council –Public Hearing February 9, 2026 –18:30 By-Law Number: CP 106-43 By-Law Number: CP 111-215 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive Portion of PID 00311126 125 Current designation: Rural Resource Proposed designation: Stable Residential Proposal 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) Municipal Plan Amendment Rezoning Current: Rural (RU) Proposed: Low-Rise Residential (RL) 126 City Context 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) 127 Aerial Context 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) 128 Site Photo 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) 129 Municipal Plan Designation Rural Resource Area Park and Natural Area 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) 130 Municipal Plan 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) Proposed Designation Stable Residential These lands are inside the PDA and include a number of existing neighbourhoods which are generally built- out and are not anticipated to receive major change over the planning period. They have the potential to accommodate additional development, at a scale and density consistent with the surrounding context. 131 Within the Stable Residential designation, housing of almost every form and density may be found and both the existing neighbourhood context and compatibility with the Municipal Plan goals will determine suitability of new proposals. Policy LU -86 Policy LU -87 Policy Alignment 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) Intend that the areas designated Stable Residential will evolve over time from a land use and built-form perspective but that new and redeveloped land uses are to reinforce the predominant community character and make a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. 132 Zoning 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) PID # Portion of 00311126 Lot Size 18 Hectares Current Zoning Rural (RU) The zone accommodates resource-related activities, such as agriculture, fishery, and forestry operations, as well as certain other land uses appropriate in the rural area. Limited unserviced residential development is also permitted. 133 Zoning 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) PID # Portion of 00311126 Lot Size 18 Hectares Proposed Zoning Low-Rise Residential (RL) The Low-Rise Residential (RL) zone intended to accommodate a range of ground-oriented, lower- density residential development in a variety of housing forms including one- unit, semi-detached, duplexes, townhouses, stacked townhouses, and small-scale apartments. 134 Phasing 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) PID # Portion of 00311126 Lot Size 18 Hectares # of Proposed Lots: 219 135 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) Mailout: Public Engagement December 22, 2025 Letters Received: Ad Posted on Website: 28 January 19, 2026 PAC Date:January 20, 2026 Applicant Engagement: Yes 136 0 Summit/0 Clint Drive (portion of PID 00311126) Staff Recommendation Municipal Plan Amendment Redesignate the site from Rural Resource and Park and Natural Area to Stable Residential Rezoning Rezone Phase 1 from Rural (RU) to Low-Rise Residential (RL) Subdivision Vest the extension of Summit Drive in Phase 1 as a public street. PAC is in support of the Staff Recommendation.137 138 You don't often get email from jshellhanson@gmail.com. Learn why this is important From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Cc:OneStop Subject:FW: Municipal Plan Amendment, rezoning, and subdivision 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive Portion of PID 00311126 Date:December 30, 2025 1:32:20 PM Attachments:image002.png Letter for PA 25-0129 – 0 Summit Drive Candice Rideout, BSc Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram From: Shelly Hanson <> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2025 1:29 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: RE: Municipal Plan Amendment, rezoning, and subdivision 0 Summit Drive/0 Clint Drive Portion of PID 00311126 [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Good afternoon, I am writing in response to the letter received on December 22, 2025. This letter proposed a substantial development in the Lakewood Heights subdivision and it was looking for residents' concerns. I am a long time resident of the area, my husband and I purchased our home on Riley Drive in 2005. I grew up in East Saint John and I attended Lakewood Heights Elementary prior to that renovation. I have 2 children that also attended Lakewood Heights elementary as well. 139 The neighbourhood is one of the most sought after neighbourhoods in East Saint John and with that comes the opportunity to develop. It is an understandable progression, however I do not believe that all concerns have been addressed and fully discussed. The initial development off Summit Drive turned a quiet dead end street into a much busier area. There are currently stop signs at the corners of Summit and Willie that are often ignored. Speeding is a current problem in the neighbourhood as it is and with this large development I do not see it getting any better. 1.Do you support the proposed development? I do see all growth as progress, however, I do not see that this development will benefit the city or neighbourhood as it has been laid out. 2.What are your top two or three concerns about the proposed development? A)Increase in traffic is my main concern. The traffic not only in the neighbourhood, but on Loch Lomond Road as well. Morning traffic makes a 14 min commute take approximately 30 minutes due to heavy traffic. When there is an accident on the highway, many people in KV will hop on the airport arterial and travel into Saint John on Loch Lomond. B)Safety of residents. We already have an issue with some residents going through stop signs and speeding in the school zone. We have had speed bumps put on one street, which just pushed the traffic to another street. The Saint John Transit buses travel at reckless speeds and take extremely wide turns, often forcing cars to hug the sides of the streets. There are no sidewalks on much of the neighbourhood, which is a concern. My children have graduated high school, however, when they attended Lakewood Heights School (LHS) it was already too busy to allow kids to walk to and from school. If you add that many new homes, will sidewalks be placed on all streets? C)Environmental Impact. Our house on Riley Drive is quite a bit lower than the proposed development. Will the new development have an impact on the existing development? We have seen a large increase in animal activity in the neighbourhood, what will the additions do to this animal activity. For the first time ever there is an increase in rats all throughout the existing neighbourhood. 3.How does the proposed development directly impact you? My house on Riley Drive is a small dead end street. My house backs up to the houses on Riley 140 Drive. My family and I commute in and out of the neighbourhood daily during peak busy times. 4.What are your recommendations for improving the proposal? Connecting the neighbourhood in a way that allows access from another area. Connecting either to Golden Grove Rd or Hillcrest will allow a better traffic flow. This also comes with the negative of pushing traffic to "cut" through the neighbourhood, however it will allow residents to get to their home easier. 5.Would you support the development as proposed? Absolutely not. I purchased a home in a well established neighbourhood that has a small community school. This large of an increase will change the feel of the neighbourhood and cause substantial traffic concerns. 6.Would you support the development with some changes? At this time, no I would not. There have been other proposals in the area that have not worked out for one reason or another. There was a proposal to develop off Loch Lomond Road, onto Mosiac Drive and this is still not complete. There is still land that has not sold and been developed, as the people of the city could not afford to build. Many more discussions would be needed before this development would be a good idea, in my eyes. Please listen to the residents of the neighbourhood and take their concerns seriously. We purchased homes in a settled quiet area, not a construction zone that is going to greatly increase the traffic.....with no additional means of exit. Thank you, Jeff and Shelly Hanson 141 You don't often get email from shelleysue2@gmail.com. Learn why this is important From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Subject:FW: ie Extend existing Low Rise residential neighborhood on Summit and Clinton Drive Date:January 12, 2026 12:25:09 PM Colleen O’Connor, BA, BBA Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram My flexible workweek is Monday – Thursday. From: Shelley Hartley Sent: January 11, 2026 5:27 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Re: ie Extend existing Low Rise residential neighborhood on Summit and Clinton Drive [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Sorry, forgot to attach my name and address Shelley Hartley 47 Riley Drive On Sun, Jan 11, 2026, 5:26 p.m. Shelley Hartley wrote: 1.Do you support the development? No 142 2.What are your top two or three concerns? Traffic coming from Loch Lomond road. Speeding cars are already an issue, children from school crossing roads with all the extra traffic, plus trying to navigate getting into Loch Lomond is already crazy at the best of times. Water Main breaks are an ongoing issue in this area, how is the infrastructure going to handle 200 more houses? Snow removal is terrible is this area, how is the city going to be able to clear these extra streets and sidewalks when it can barely keep up with what is here currently. Lakewood heights school classrooms are already running at capacity. Where would extra kids go ? 3.How does the proposed development directly impact you? I am on the street below the proposed development. Traffic would definitely affect us while driving as well as walking the neighborhood. The noise and clearing of the development would also impact us. 4.What are your recommendations for improving the proposal? Possibly downsizing the amount of homes being proposed and make the entry point come from Golden Grove Road. 5.Would you support the development as is? No 6.Would you support the development with some changes? Would depend on the changes 143 From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Cc:OneStop Subject:FW: Opposition to Proposed Development at Summit/Clint Drive – PID 00311126 Date:December 31, 2025 9:03:58 AM Hi Yeva, Here is another citizen letter for Summit Drive. Thanks, Candice Rideout, BSc Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2025 8:08 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Opposition to Proposed Development at Summit/Clint Drive – PID 00311126 [You don't often get email from johnpaul.meunier@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** To whom it may concern, I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed development project on the Summit Drive / Clint Drive portion of PID 00311126. While I understand the need for responsible growth within our city, this particular project raises several serious concerns that would negatively affect our neighborhood, our school, and overall community safety. 1. Our local school cannot support the influx of new students The addition of 219 new lots would bring a significant number of new families into the area. Our neighborhood school is already operating near capacity, and there is simply no realistic way it could absorb the additional enrollment this development would generate. Overcrowding would compromise the quality of education and strain resources that are already stretched thin. 2. Traffic congestion will become unmanageable There is currently only one exit from this area onto Loch Lomond Road. Even now, morning traffic is extremely congested, with long delays and safety concerns for both drivers and pedestrians. Adding hundreds of new vehicles from 219 additional homes would turn an already difficult situation into a daily gridlock, increasing the risk of accidents and making commuting unsafe and inefficient. 3. The development would diminish the quality and character of the neighborhood Our community is valued for its quiet, family‑oriented environment. Introducing such a large number of new lots in a concentrated area would dramatically alter the character of the neighborhood. Increased noise, traffic, and density would erode the qualities that residents have worked hard to maintain. 144 For these reasons, I strongly urge the committee to reconsider or reject the proposed development. Growth must be balanced with infrastructure, safety, and community impact, and at this time, the area simply cannot support a project of this scale. Also, there were plans for adding a road through lensdale crescent as a way out of Lakewood heights. Would this be an option that could be considered? Thank you for taking the time to consider the concerns of residents who are directly affected by this proposal. I hope the committee will prioritize the long‑term wellbeing of our neighborhood and its families. Sincerely, Paul Meunier 57 Lensdale Crescent 145 You don't often get email from mary@optionsoutreach.com. Learn why this is important From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Cc:OneStop Subject:FW: Lakewood Hts Proposal for 219 Single Family Homes Date:January 8, 2026 8:25:06 AM Attachments:image002.png Importance:High Candice Rideout, BSc Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram From: Mary Stack Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 5:13 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Lakewood Hts Proposal for 219 Single Family Homes Importance: High [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Dear City Council Members, Planning Advisory Committee, and Oak Hill Home Representatives, I’m writing with respect to the proposed housing development at the end of Summit Drive onto Clint Drive (which could add approximately 219 homes) and to share my concerns. I have lived in Lakewood Heights for 50 years. I know many residents have already raised important issues about community resources, neighbourhood safety, and traffic — and I’d like to add my voice to that growing chorus. 146 Rather than removing a beautiful wooded area, I strongly encourage the City to consider permanently protecting it. Ironically, when my family moved here in the early 1970s, I remember parents and neighbours excitedly talking about City representatives promising park spaces that would co-exist with the woods. It sounded lovely then, and honestly, it still does. Additional sidewalks were also discussed back in the 70s and 80s — and while I admire the City’s commitment to long-term planning, five decades feels like a bit of a delay. Lakewood Heights School was small when I attended, and while it has grown, it is still not equipped to handle what could possibly be 200–300 additional students from 219 new homes. Has a study been done on this? I can only assume the solution might involve lining up trailers in the schoolyard and calling them classrooms. That’s not a great outcome for students or teachers — and certainly not a safe one. There has been a lot of discussion about how this development could create dangerous walking routes for students. I’d also like to point out that it creates unsafe conditions for neighbours like me who simply want to go for a walk without feeling like we’re playing a real-life game of Frogger. This neighbourhood has always been a wonderful place to grow up — and it should also remain a safe place to grow older. Without sidewalks and with the addition of potentially 300–400 more vehicles, walking in Lakewood Heights will become risky at best. If it isn’t safe, will anyone even be outside anymore? Traffic is already a significant issue in Lakewood Heights, with most routes funnelling onto Loch Lomond Road. Adding more housing will only increase congestion and driving risks, putting pedestrians — children, seniors, everyone — in danger. Has there been a recent, realistic traffic study to assess these impacts? I also noticed a comment on Facebook that summed things up quite well: “Taking away the marsh area also impacts the ducks, reduces green space, increases pollution, and results in more deer wandering through the neighbourhood.” Unfortunately, that’s both sad and true. Speaking of Facebook, that is actually how I learned about this proposal — which raises another concern. I would appreciate the City of Saint John providing clearer and more direct communication regarding developments like this. I’ve lived here for 50 years, and I believe that I — along with other long-term residents — deserve the respect of written notification. I heard that because I live just outside a certain distance (100 metres, perhaps?) I was excluded. Regardless, I find this disappointing and, frankly, disrespectful. Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns. I hope the City will take a step back and consider solutions that protect both the people and the natural spaces that make Lakewood 147 Heights such a special place. In short, I do not support the proposed development. Sincerely, Mary Stack 148 149 150 From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Subject:FW: PID 00311126 Questions Date:January 5, 2026 2:55:18 PM Colleen O’Connor, BA, BBA Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram -----Original Message----- From: Kyle Charlton Sent: January 5, 2026 2:19 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: PID 00311126 Questions [You don't often get email from kscharlton0617@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** 1.Do you support the proposed development? My wife and I absolutely do not support this development in any way. 2.What are your top two or three concerns about the proposed development? 1) Above all else, traffic. Our neighbourhood only has a few exits onto the main road (Loch Lomond) and is already a nightmare to get in and out of a several times in the work day. This is with our current capacity AND not a single tenant in either of the 4-story buildings they added just outside our neighbourhood. The last thing we need is 300 more (minimum) cars trying to enter and exit this neighbourhood during our already pathetic busy hour traffic. 2) Construction vehicles going in and out for years to build the development. Our roads are already poor quality, especially since the geniuses in planning decided to put the new speed bumps on Macnamara which has probably doubled traffic speeding through the school zone on Lakeview. Having these trucks and rigs put more wear on our roads is only going to make it worse. 3) Plowing. The snow removal in our neighbourhood is already substandard (being nice). Adding 200+ homes to be cleared will just leave my road to wait even longer for a plow, which can already take over 24 hours after the storm to arrive on a good day. 3.How does the proposed development directly impact you? See my answers above. I live on Riley Drive (dead end road parallel to Summit Drive). All these concerns will flood into my day-to-day if it goes through. 4.What are your recommendations for improving the proposal? Find a different area in the city to do it. Preferably, one that doesn’t attach to Loch Lomond as that road is already run over with traffic from all existing houses on it, as well as commuters from KV, St Martins, etc. Loch Lomond cannot expand to more lanes so you will further congest our already congested and ONLY road to connect us to all major points of the city. 151 5.Would you support the development as proposed? Absolutely, unequivocally no 6.Would you support the development with some changes? Absolutely not. I want no part of this in our neighbourhood. We are congested and populated in this area enough. - Kyle Charlton 152 If they offered to hook us up to city water and septic and put a sidewalk in out to Hillcrest, I may be swayed. Jennifer Belding 16 Cathline Drive. Saint John, NB E2N 2C1 Not unless we benefit in someway from it. Not at this time. I live on Cathline Drive and actually sold my house on Summit Driveto get away from the teenagers that are wreaking havoc on the neighbourhood. Theywere spray painting cars, egging houses, busting windows, etc. - The teenagers from Lakewood Heights as well as the disrespectful atv's/dirt bikes that come with them. - Increased traffic if they put an exit onto Golden Grove Rd.- Issues with our well water from the development.- Incrased wildlife as there are a lot of deer, coyotes, foxes, etc that live in those woods. We have a street that is very country in the city and I would like it to stay that way. Also noise polution from the development. Extend the option for city water and sewage through to Cathline Drive without excessive connection fees and add a side walk onto Golden Grove Rd. as far as Hillcrest. This should be done regardless as there are quite a few small children and young teens that walk this stretch as it is and it isn't safe. 153 I dont have problem with the proposed develpment. However, I have few concerns/questions as indicated below. Yes. 1. Drainage in the area. The terrain in this area is hilly and therefore, a proper stormwater drainage system will need to be installed otherwise properties on the downhill will be afftected.2. I pressume this new development may impact value of properties in the area.3. I see Reba Road is not being extended? Can the development include building a cul-de-sac at the end of Reba Road?4. Lots for the proposed development looks very small. Emial: OneStop@saintjohn.ca 22 Reba Road, Saint John NB E2J 0G5 1. Trees behind my property is nice but I guess all trees will now be cut down to allow construction of a proposed development. Can a row of trees be maintained along the proposed boundary line so that the existing provicy can be maintained?2. More people and traffic in the area. I assume extending Summit and Clint Dr. will allow through traffic and would increase traffic in the area. Will you be connecting Summit Dr. to Golden Crove Road in the future? I support the development plan with few changes/considarations I indicated above. Hassan Mteri / Arafa Lwavu 1.As part of the proposed development, we would love to have a paved cul-de-sac at the end of Reba Road. Currently there is a cul-de-sac at this location but it is not paved. This is where everyone is using to turn around, inluding garbage trucks and snow removal trucks.2. Increase the size of lots, therefore, reduce number of lots on the proposed development plan.. 154 You don't often get email from browngd19@gmail.com. Learn why this is important From:OneStop To:Mattson, Yeva Cc:OneStop Subject:FW: Comments for Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Subdivision for Summit/Clint Drive - PID 00311126 Date:January 14, 2026 8:14:01 AM Attachments:image002.png Candice Rideout, BSc Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l’aménagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4067 Website | Facebook | Shape Your City | Instagram From: Graeme Brown Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:32 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Comments for Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Subdivision for Summit/Clint Drive - PID 00311126 [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Hello, Appreciate the engagement and opportunity to comment on this potential development. 1. We would support the proposed development with some changes 2. Concerns about proposed development Traffic increase Park and school capacity limitations 155 3. We live near the top of Dolly Dr which is a relatively quiet street and are raising a young family here 4. Recommended Improvements (clarifications): Alternate entrance to neighbourhood to ease traffic concerns for Summit and Dolly Additional park/green space School considerations (is the current school size sufficient for this large influx of families?) Keep as many trees as possible! Our part of the neighbourhood was clear cut for the development, would be nice to avoid that again and leave some room for trees and green space 5. No - we do not support the development as proposed 6. We would support the proposed development if above recommendations were implemented Thanks for your consideration, Residents at 47 Dolly Dr. in Saint John NB. Graeme and Karlie 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 From:Common Clerk To:Mattson, Yeva Subject:FW: Lakewood Heights Development Date:November 20, 2025 8:40:17 AM Good Morning Yeva, Just passing along another citizen letter. Kelly Kelly Tibbits Administrative Assistant / assistant administrative City Clerk’s Office / Bureau de greffier municipal City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-2856 Note: My office hours are Mon – Thurs 8:15am to 5:30pm -----Original Message----- From: Peggy Cook <nannapeg2015@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 1:52 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Lakewood Heights Development [You don't often get email from nannapeg2015@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** I am writing today to expressed my concerns about the Lakewood Heights development. That would see at least 200 new homes built in our neighbourhood. I understand that we need solutions for the housing crisis. It would be wonderful to have these new homes for new families. My concern is that not enough information is available about water And sewage drainage. Will there be a new access road to this new development? Will there be accommodations made for our small school? It is not possible that the children from 200 new families will be able to fit into our little school. Are there plans for a green space or perhaps a playground or play area for these families? We already have a problem with cars speeding on the roads in the subdivision. That will only be magnified buy more cars. Many homes in this area have had problems with sewers backing up due to the inability of our current system to drain properly. Will this be addressed. I look forward to your response into a community meeting. It will ease my mind to have more information. 186 Sincerely, Peggy Cook 71 Lakewood Avenue Sent from my iPad 187 You don't often get email from cameronlindsay198@gmail.com. Learn why this is important From:Common Clerk To:Mattson, Yeva Subject:FW: New housing proposal for lakewood hights. Date:November 19, 2025 9:11:37 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Kelly Tibbits Administrative Assistant / assistant administrative City Clerk’s Office / Bureau de greffier municipal City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-2856 Note: My office hours are Mon – Thurs 8:15am to 5:30pm From: Cameron Lindsay <cameronlindsay198@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 6:14 AM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: New housing proposal for lakewood hights. [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Hello. As a new family that has moved to the neighborhood in the last couple of years I believe 188 adding 200 homes in the back of lakewood hights is not a good idea at this time. I believe this will create problems in the neighborhood with my main concern being traffic. We live at the start of summit drive and I think the traffic going by will be unbearable for us. Please think about the infrastructure before just throwing up 200 homes. Thanks for your time Sincerely. A concerned member of the community. 189 You don't often get email from opearson@cantylutzgrant.com. Learn why this is important From:Common Clerk To:Mattson, Yeva Subject:FW: Proposed Development on Summit Drive Date:November 24, 2025 9:04:03 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Good Morning Yeva, Forwarding another for the 30-day period. Kelly Kelly Tibbits Administrative Assistant / assistant administrative City Clerk’s Office / Bureau de greffier municipal City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-2856 Note: My office hours are Mon – Thurs 8:15am to 5:30pm From: Olivia Pearson <opearson@cantylutzgrant.com> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2025 3:38 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Proposed Development on Summit Drive [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** 190 Hello, I am a resident of Summit Drive and am writing to you to express concerns regarding the proposed development on Summit Drive. I believe that before any major developments like this can occur, Saint John needs to upgrade the infrastructure. Commuting to work along Loch Lomond is already a nightmare between 7 and 8 am. It is difficult to get out of the subdivision during these times and then traffic is also often at a standstill along Loch Lomond. What is a 12-minute commute for me during good moving traffic can be as long as 25 minutes on heavy traffic mornings. Coming home in the evening is also challenging. The traffic issue is likely to get worse once the new apartment buildings are leased out along Loch Lomond. Something needs to be done with this traffic situation before we can consider adding so much more traffic to the subdivision and Loch Lomond. I have heard others' ideas about creating another exit of the subdivision out by Golden Grove. This may reduce some of the traffic in the subdivision and Loch Lomond. I also have concerns with how traffic travels along summit drive. We are at 17 Summit Drive, which is along the corner. Vehicles travel around this turn at a higher rate of speed than they should. It makes leaving my driveway dangerous at times. It is also hard to cross the road sometimes when taking my dog for a walk because cars suddenly appear around the turn. I think before we can expand summit drive, we need to extend the sidewalks the whole way. We also should have speed cushions installed along summit drive. It might also be helpful to have designated crosswalk areas. Doing this before expanding summit drive is crucial to ensuring residents' safety when the traffic along the road becomes heavier. I have also heard that the school within the subdivision would not have room to accommodate for the extra students/families that move to summit drive. We ought to make a 5–10-year plan to handle this. 191 In my view, before the proposal can conscionably be approved, we must take several measures to upgrade infrastructure and mitigate current issues. Sincerely, Olivia Pearson Get Outlook for iOS 192 CITY OF SAINT JOHN NEW BRUNSWICK A By-law respecting Nuisance in the City of Saint John Arrêté relatif aux nuisances de The City of Saint John By-law Number LG-24 Arrêté numéro LG-24 An uncertified copy of this by-law is available online Une copie non certifiée de l’arrêté est disponible en ligne 193 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIÈRES Section Description Page Article Désignation Page 1 Title 3 1 Titre 3 2 Definitions 3 2 Définitions 3 3 Interpretation 4 3 Interprétation 4 4 Appointment of By-Law Enforcement Officers 5 4 Nomination des agents chargés de l’exécution des arrêtés 5 5 Loitering/Soliciting 5 5 Flâner et solliciter 5 6 Vandalism 5 6 Vandalisme 5 7 Urination/Defecation 5 7 Uriner et déféquer 5 8 Littering 5 8 Jeter des déchets 5 9 Offences 6 9 Infractions 6 10 Administrative Penalties 6 10 Pénalités administratives 6 11 Repeal 6 11 Abrogation 6 194 - 3 - Title Titre 1 This By-law may be cited as the Saint John Nuisance By-Law (hereinafter the “By-law”). 1 Le présent arrêté peut être cité sous le titrel’arrêté de Saint John sur les nuisances (ci- après « l’arrêté). Definitions Définitions 2 The following definitions apply in this By- law. 2 Les définitions qui suivent s’appliquent au présent arrêté. “by-law enforcement officer” means a by-law enforcement officer designated by resolution of Common Council under this by-law (agent chargé de l’exécution des arrêtés); « agent chargé de l’exécution des arrêtés » désigne un agent chargé de l’exécution des arrêtés nommé conformément au présent arrêté, et désigné par résolution du conseil communal (by- law enforcement officer); “Cause an Obstruction” means to stand, sit or lie in a Public Place in a manner which obstructs or impedes the convenient passage of pedestrians (obstruer la voie publique); « obstruer la voie publique » signifie se tenir debout, s’asseoir ou se coucher sur une place publique de façon à obstruer ou à gêner le passage des piétons. “City” means The City of Saint John (municipalité); « municipalité » désigne The City of Saint John (City); “Common Council” means the elected municipal council of the City (conseil communal); « conseil communal » désigne les membres élus du conseil municipal de la municipalité (Common Council); “Litter” means waste or refuse of any kind that is discarded, deposited or left in an unauthorized location on public or private property (ordures) « ordures » désigne des déchets ou ordures de toute sorte qui sont jetés, déposés ou laissés dans des endroits non-autorisés sur des propriétés publique ou privées (Litter); “Loiter” means remaining in a Public Place without justifiable reason; « Flâner » signifie demeurer dans une place publique sans but précis (Loiter); “Public Place” means any street, sidewalk, highway, trail, park, beach, waterway, municipal building or any other real property owned by the City (place publique); « place publique » désigne toute rue, trottoir, autoroute, sentier, parc, plage, cours d’eau, bâtiment municipal ou tout autre bien réel qui appartient à la municipalité (Public Place); “Solicit” means to, without consideration, ask for money, donations, goods or other things of value « solliciter » Quêter, sans contrepartie, de l’argent, des dons, des biens ou autres objets de 195 - 4 - whether by spoken, written or printed word or bodily gesture, for oneself or for any person, and solicitation has a corresponding meaning, but does not include soliciting for a registered charity. valeur verbalement, par écrit ou par des gestes pour soi-même ou pour une autre personne et sollicitation a une signification correspondante, mais n’inclut pas le fait de solliciter pour un organisme de bienfaisance enregistré. Interpretation Interprétation 3 Rules for interpretation of the language used in this By-law are contained in the lettered paragraphs as follows: (a) The captions, article and section names and numbers appearing in this By- law are for convenience of reference only and have no effect on its interpretation. (b) This By-law is to be read with all changes of gender or number required by the context. (c) Each reference to legislation in this By-law is printed in Italic font. The reference is intended to include all applicable amendments to the legislation, including successor legislation. Where this By-law references other by-laws of the City, the term is intended to include all applicable amendments to those by- laws, including successor by-laws. (d) The requirements of this By-law are in addition to any requirements contained in any other applicable by-laws of the City or applicable provincial or federal statutes or regulations. (e) If any section, subsection, part or parts or provision of this By-law, is for any reason declared by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the ruling shall not affect the validity of the By-law as a whole, nor any other part of it. 3 Les règles d’interprétation suivantes s’appliquent au présent arrêté comme suit : a) Les titres, intertitres et numéros des dispositions ne servent qu’à faciliter la consultation de l’arrêté et ne doivent pas servir à son interprétation. b) Le genre ou le nombre grammaticaux doivent être adaptés au contexte. c) Les renvois législatifs paraissent en italique. Le renvoi à une loi vise également les modifications qui s’y appliquent, y compris toute législation de remplacement. Les renvois à d’autres arrêtés de la municipalité visent également les modifications qui s’y appliquent, y compris tout arrêté de remplacement. d) Les obligations qu’il crée s’ajoutent à celles découlant d’autres arrêtés applicables de la municipalité ou des lois et règlements applicables des gouvernements fédéral ou provinciaux. e) Si une disposition quelconque est déclarée invalide par un tribunal compétent pour quelque motif que ce soit, la décision n’entache en rien la validité de l’arrêté dans son ensemble ni de toute autre disposition. 196 - 5 - Appointment of By-Law Enforcement Officers Nomination des agents chargés de l’exécution des arrêtés 4 Common Council may, for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of this By-law, appoint by-law enforcement officers who may exercise such powers and perform such duties as may be set out in this By-law or the Local Governanance Act. 4 Le conseil communal peut, pour les fins de l’administration et de l’application du present arrêté, nommer des agents chargés de l’exécution des arrêtés chargés d’exercer les pouvoirs es remplir les fonctions prévus dans le présent arrêté ou le Loi sur la gouvernance locale. Prohibitions Interdictions Loitering/Soliciting 5 No person shall Loiter or Solicit in a Public Place in a manner that Causes An Obstruction, including but not limited to within 20 metres of: (a) a school, (b) a house of worship, (c) a transit stop, (d) a retail outlet, (e) a liquor store, (f) the City Market, (g) the entrance to a Bank, credit union or trust company; or (h) an ATM. Flâner et solliciter 5 Il est interdit de flâner ou solliciter dans une place publique de sorte à obstruer la voir publique, y compris mais sans s’y limiter, à moins de 20 mètres: a) d’une école, b) d’un lieu de culte, c) d’un arrêt d’autobus, d) d’un magasin de détail, e) d’une régie d’alcool, f) du marché municipal, g) de l’entrée d’une banque, d’une coopérative d’épargne ou d’une société de fiducie, ou h) d’un guichet automatique bancaire. Vandalism 6 No person shall deface, damage or vandalize any Public Place. Vandalisme 6 Il est interdit d’abîmer, d’endommager ou de vandaliser toute place publique. Urination/Defecation 7 No person shall, without reasonable excuse, urinate or defecate in any Public Place. Uriner et déféquer 7 Il est interdit d’uriner ou de déféquer dans toute place publique sans excuse raisonnable. Littering 8(1) No person shall deposit, throw, drop, discard or leave any litter in or upon: (a) any Public Place; (b) any private property not owned or lawfully occupied by that person; or Jeter des ordures 8(1) Il est interdit de déposer, de lancer, de laisser tomber, de jeter ou de laisser des ordures dans ou sur: a) toute place publique; b) toute propriété privée qui n’appartient 197 - 6 - (c) any body of water within the City. 8(2) No person shall sweep into or deposit, or cause to be swept or deposited into any Public Place, any litter or accumulation of litter. 8(3) The owner of any building, lot, private sidewalk or driveway shall not allow litter to accumulate thereon so that it is likely to be blown or scattered on any Public Place. pas à la personne qui a jeté des ordures, ou que cette personne n’occupe pas légalement; c) tout cours d’eau à l’intérieur des limites de la ville. 8(2) Il est interdit de balayer dans une place publique, de permettre que soit balayées dans une place publique, ou d’y déposer ou permettre qu’on y dépose des ordures ou une accumulation d’ordures. 8(3) Le propriétaire d’un bâtiment ou d’un terrain ou d’un trottoir ou d’une allée pour voiture privés ne peut laisser s’y accumuler des ordures de telle sorte que le vent risque de les faire voler ou de les disperser sur une rue. Offences 9 A person who violates a provision of this By- law commits an offence and is liable to a minimum fine of one hundred forty dollars ($140.00) and a maximum fine of two thousand one hundred dollars ($2,100.00) Infractions 9 Toute personne qui contrevient à une disposition du présent arrêté est coupable d’une infraction et est passible d’une amende d’au moins cent quarante dollars (140$) et d’au plus deux mille cent dollars (2 100$). Administrative Penalties 10(1) A person who violates any provision of this by-law may pay to the City within 45 calendar days from the date of such violation an administrative penalty of fifty dollars ($50.00), and upon such payment, the person who committed the violation is not liable to be prosecuted therefore. 10(2) Payment of an administrative penalty does not alleviate the responsibility for compliance with the by-law. Pénalités administratives 10(1) Toute perspmme qui contrevient à une disposition du présent arrêté peut payer à la municipalité dans un délai de 45 jours civils à compter de la date de ladite infraction, une pénalité administrative de cinquante dollars (50$), et une fois l’amende payée, la personne n’est plus susceptible de poursuites judiciaires. 10(2) Le paiement d’une pénalité administrative ne déroge pas à l’obligation de se conformer au présent arrêté. Repeal 11 A By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 21st day of November, 2005 entitled “By-law Number M-24, A By-law Prohibiting the Throwing or Depositing of Litter in the City of Saint John” is repealed on the coming into force Repeal 11 L’arrêté de The City of Saint John édicté le 21 novembre, 2005 intitulé « Arrêté interdisant de jeter ou de déposer des ordures dans The City of Saint John » est abrogé dès l’entrée en vigueur du présent 198 - 7 - of this by-law. arrêté. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this By-law the ______ day of ____________, A.D. 2026 and signed by: EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau municipal sur le présent arrêté le __________________ 2026, avec les signatures suivantes : _______________________________________ Mayor/Mairesse _______________________________________ City Clerk/Greffier de la municipalité First Reading - January 26, 2026 Second Reading - January 26, 2026 Third Reading - Première lecture - le 26 janvier 2026 Deuxième lecture - le 26 janvier 2026 Troisième lecture - 199 BY-LAW NUMBER L.G. 25 A LAW TO AMEND A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE USE OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRÊTÉ NO L.G. 25 ARRÊTÉ MODIFIANT L'ARRÊTÉ CONCERNANT L’UTILISATION DES TROTTOIRS DANS THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The By-law Respecting the Use of Sidewalks Within The City of Saint John enacted on the 3rd day of May, A.D. 2021 is amended by: Lors d'une réunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a décrété ce qui suit: L'arrêté concernant l’utilisation des trottoirs dans the City of Saint John décrété le 3 mai 2021 est modifié par:: 1. Deleting section 19. 2. Deleting subsection 20(2). 3. Deleting subsection 21(2) and replacing it with the following: A person who violates any provision of this By-law, may pay to the City within 45 calendar days from the date of such violation an administrative penalty of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150.00), and upon such payment, the person who committed the violation is not liable to be prosecuted therefore. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of XXXX, A.D. 2026 and signed by: 1. Par suppression de l’article 19. 2. Par suppression du paragraphe 20(2). 3. Par suppression du paragraphe 21(2) et son remplacement par ce qui suit : Toute personne qui contrevient à une disposition de présent arrêté, peut payer à la municipalité dans un délai de 45 jours civils à compter de la date de ladite infraction, une pénalité administrative de cent cinquante dollars (150 $), et une fois l’amende payée, la personne n’est plus susceptible de poursuites judiciaires. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le présent arrêté le X XXX 2026, avec les signatures suivantes: _______________________________________ Mayor / Mairesse ______________________________________ City Clerk / Greffier de la municipalité First Reading – January 26, 2026 Second Reading – January 26, 2026 Third Reading – Première lecture – le 26 janvier 2026 Deuxième lecture – le 26 janvier 2026 Troisième lecture – 200 Heritage Awards 2026 201 Heritage Development Board Melissa Wakefield -Chair Alex Weaver Crawford -1 st Vice Chair Lori Seymour -2 nd Vice Chair Councillor Paula Radwan Adam Pottle Greg Fekner Jesse Smith Julien Ouimet Jonathan Taylor 202 Heritage Awards 2026 15 Canterbury Street 38-42 Water Street 96 Germain Street Residential Façade Rehabilitation Award 118 Orange Street 216 Germain Street Heritage Signage Award22 King Street 87 Canterbury Street Heritage Stewardship Award 274 Sydney Street Committed to the Craft Award Hatch + Parley Commercial Façade Rehabilitation Award 203 Commercial Façade Rehabilitation Award 15 Canterbury Street Commercial Properties Limited 204 38-42 Water Street Brackish Design Studio inc. Commercial Façade Rehabilitation Award 205 96 Germain Street Saint John Masonic Temple/ Suwanna Commercial Façade Rehabilitation Award 206 Residential Façade Rehabilitation Award 118 Orange Street Andrew Kane & Spencer Farrow 207 Residential Façade Rehabilitation Award 216 Germain Street Lynn & John Mee 208 Heritage Signage Award 22 King Street Owjo Holdings Inc.and The Nest Yoga 209 Heritage Signage Award 87 Canterbury Street Clover Realty Limited and Glass Roots Canada 210 Heritage Stewardship Award 274 Sydney Street Commercial Properties Limited 211 Commitment to Craft Award Source: Hatch+Parley Source: Hatch+Parley 212 213 Congratulations to the Award Recipients! 214 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OPEN REPORT M&C No. 2026-014 Report Date January 19, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area General Counsel Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: City of Saint John Employee Political Activity Policy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL At its meeting held September 3, 2024, Council resolved “that the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) be directed to draft a policy for Council’s consideration that outlines the expectations and restrictions on political activities for city employees and elected officials to prevent conflicts of interest”. The purpose of this report is to present an employee political activity policy to Council for approval. COUNCIL RESOLUTION As recommended by the Committee of the Whole on January 26, 2026, Council resolves that: 1. The following Policy Statement is hereby adopted: The City is committed to effectively balancing the rights of employees to engage in Political Activity with the principle that the public service is, and should be perceived to be, politically impartial. 2. The CAO is hereby directed to finalize and implement a policy based on the Policy Statement. 215 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT M&C No. 2026-021 Report Date February 03, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area General Counsel Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Initiate Stop-up and Closure for Portion of Old Lake Trail – Civic #81 Old Lake Trail CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSION REASON This matter is to be discussed in closed session pursuant to the provisions of subsection 68(1)(d) of the Local Governance Act. OPEN SESSION RESOLUTION REQUIRED? Yes, resolution and full report to be added to open session AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Curtis Langille Melanie C. Tompkins, K.C Kevin Fudge RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council adopt the following resolution: 1. That a Public Hearing to consider the passing of an amendment to the Street Closing By-law to Close a portion of Old Lake Trail, having an area of 32 square metres, as shown on a Preliminary Plan of Survey titled, “Plan of Survey Showing portion of Old Lake Trail, City of Saint John, Saint John County, New Brunswick” (attached), be set for Monday, March 9, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber; 2. That Common Council authorize the publishing of a notice of its intention to consider the passing of such By-law, identified above; 3. In the event that Common Council gives Third Reading to the By-Law Amendment as stated above, and conditional upon the purchaser obtaining and registering a discharge of an existing public utility easement over the impacted lands, that the City sell the property to 708064 N.B. Ltd. for a purchase price of $1,000.00 plus H.S.T. if applicable, and that the purchaser be responsible for: a. any plan of survey required to initiate the process for the stop -up and closure for a portion of Old Lake Trail; 7216 b. all costs related to the conveyance of the property from the City to the purchaser; and c. all costs associated with the removal of any public utility infrastructure and the discharge of the related public utility easement. 4. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the documents necessary to effect the transaction. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In March of 2025, a building permit was issued for the construction of a two-storey dwelling on the subject property at civic #81 Old Lake Trail, located in East Saint John. During the later part of 2025, Building Inspection determined that the structure was not constructed on the lot as per the approved site plan. In fact, a portion of the dwelling and front porch and deck is situated over a public utility easement and onto the street right-of-way (see attached preliminary plan of survey). Interestingly, the public utilities are in fact not located within the registered easement area. Instead, they are located within the street right-of-way. Both utilities (Bell and Saint John Energy) are agreeable to relinquishing the easement and removing any existing infrastructure with all costs to be the responsibility of the property owner. City staff are supportive of the request to stop-up and close a 32 square metre portion of unused street right-of-way to address the building encroachment. If Council is in agreement, the recommendation contained in this report will facilitate the process for this street closure to be considered at a Public Hearing to be set for March 9, 2026. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS N/A REPORT On October 16, 2025 Growth and Community Services (Building Inspection) issued a “stop work order” as it had been identified by the building inspector that the dwelling under construction was situated over the front property boundary and onto the non-travelled portion of the street right-of-way. In addition, there is a public utility easement situated along the front portion of the subject property in favor of Bell and Saint John Energy over which the new building is also encroaching (see attached). An attached sketch illustrates the subject lot and where the “travelled“portion of the street is located in relation to the entire width of the right-of-way. This portion of Old Lake Trail has been constructed off-centre away from the lot in question. There is still significant space (approximately 7.75 metres) between the present front lot boundary and the edge of the curb for the street, providing sufficient spatial separation for aesthetic and practical purposes. 8217 In order to address the building encroachment, the proponent first had to contact the two public utilities to seek their support to remove the easement . In this instance, the utilities happen to not be located within the easement area. Instead, they are located within the street right-of-way. That said, there are two utility boxes that must be moved that are currently situated where the new proposed driveway is to be located. Both Bell and Saint John Energy are supportive to relinquish the easement and have the two utility boxes moved, as long as the cost of doing so is born by the property owner. The attached plan of survey shows the building encroaching slightly more than one metre into the right-way. The area to be considered for street closure is approximately one additional foot into the right-of-way to allow for legal access around the structure. Although the encroachment does not extend into the right- of-way for the entirety of the lot width, for continuity purposes, the proposed area to be considered for street closure runs the full width of the lot. City staff and public utilities are supportive of the proposed street closure of 32 square metres, as shown on the attached plan of survey. If Council is in agreement, the recommendation contained in this report will facilitate the Public Hearing for March 9, 2026 to consider an amendment to the By-law respecting the Closing of Roads, Streets or Highways in The City of Saint John. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with the City’s priority of PERFORM. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The proponent is responsible for all costs related to the process to consider a stop- up and closure for the portion of street right-of-way, and the ensuing land transaction. In addition, the proponent is also responsible for all costs associated with the removal of any public utility infrastructure and the related public utility easement. If the 32 square metre portion of land is stopped-up and closed, it is staff’s opinion there is minimal market value for this parcel. Therefore, it is recommended that it be sold to the proponent for a nominal fee of $1,000.00 plus HST. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Name of Service Area/Stakeholder Name of Staff Person Infrastructure Development Jeremy Clack Community Planning Jennifer Kirchner Building and Technical Services Pamela Bentley 9218 ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map; 2. Sketch showing spatial separation; and 3. Preliminary Plan of Survey. 10219 BonAccor dDr MacNaught onDr BonAccor dDr S tra th o rn e A v eMacNaughtonDr M c G re g o rP lBlackall LakeOldLake TrailOldLa keTr a il N o rm an D r81 Old Lake Trail Source: Esri, Vantor, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap Override 1 Official Civic Addresses Property Assessment Property Parcels 1/27/2026, 2:59:44 PM 0 0.06 0.110.03 mi 0 0.09 0.170.04 km 1:4,514 GIS Viewer (C) City of Saint John 11220 7.75 metres +- OldLakeTrail Old Lake Trail Old Lake Trail 81 Old Lake Trail Source: Esri, Vantor, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap Override 1 Override 1 Official Civic Addresses Property Assessment Property Parcels 1/27/2026, 3:05:16 PM 0 0.01 0.010 mi 0 0.01 0.020.01 km 1:564 GIS Viewer (C) City of Saint John 12221 Preliminary !Préliminaire !13222 M&C No. 2026-024 Report Date February 02, 2026 Meeting Date February 09, 2026 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services SUBJECT: Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) / Government of Canada Contribution Agreement - Canada Games Aquatic Center Renovations Project Phase C Detailed Design EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to seek Common Council’s approval to enter into a Grant Agreement with the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) / Government of Canada for the Canada Games Aquatic Center Renovation Project Phase C Detailed Design. COUNCIL RESOLUTION It is recommended that the City enter into a Contribution Agreement generally in the form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held February 9, 2025, with the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA) / Government of Canada for the Canada Games Aquatic Center Renovation Project Phase C Detailed Design, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Grant Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. 17223