The URL can be used to link to this page

2024-05-13_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jour�B City of Saint John Common Council Meeting AGENDA Monday, May 13, 2024 6:00 pm 2nd Floor Common Council Chamber, City Hall An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City's Website (wwwsaintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Pages 1. Call to Order 1.1 Land Acknowledgement 1.2 National Anthem 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of April 29, 2024 5 - 13 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 Proposed Public Hearing Dates for 1670 Hickey Rd, 1750 Sandy Point Rd, 910 14 - 16 Fairville Blvd. and 72 and 122 Clint Drive (Recommendation in Report) 5.2 License for Loyalist Day Military Gun Salute at Fort Howe (Recommendation in 17 - 22 Report) 5.3 Millidge Ave Boat Ramp Maintenance Agreement: City of Saint John — Royal 23 - 33 Kennebecasis Yacht Club (Recommendation in Report) 5.4 Saint John Fire Department Annual Report 2023 (Recommendation: Receive 34 - 54 for Information) 5.5 Fleet Replacement Procurement — May 2024 (Recommendation in Report) 55 - 60 5.6 Contract No. 2023-28: Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street) — Street 61 - 63 Reconstruction (Recommendation in Report) 5.7 Council Community Fund Application (Councillor Norton) (Recommendation: 64 - 72 Approve the application) 6. Members Comments 7. Proclamation 7.1 Retired Teacher's Day - May 14, 2024 73 - 73 7.2 Moose Hide Campaign Day - May 16, 2024 74 - 74 7.3 National Public Works Week - May 19 to May 25, 2024 75 - 75 8. Delegations / Presentations 9. Public Hearings - 6:30 p.m. 9.1 Municipal Plan and Rezoning By -Law Amendments with Staff Presentation and 76 - 248 Planning Advisory Committee report- 241-281 Douglas Avenue (1st and 2nd Reading) 9.2 Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law Amendment (1st and 2nd Reading) 249 - 303 10. Consideration of By-laws 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers 12.1 Chief Administrative Officer Update on Select Catalytic Projects and Advocacy (Verbal) 12.2 Repair of Unsightly Conditions at 80 Main Street 304 - 328 13. Committee Reports 13.1 Growth Committee: North End Neighbourhood Plan - Advisory Committee 329 - 335 Terms of Reference 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15. General Correspondence K 15.1 E. Gittens: 1671 Sandy Point Road (Recommendation: Refer to Growth 336 - 336 Committee) 16. Supplemental Agenda 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 FCM Green Municipal Fund Grant Agreement - North End Sustainable 337 - 337 Neighbourhood Action Plan (DFC-22-0070) 17.2 Recommended Appointments to Committees 338 - 339 18. Adjournment K City of Saint John Common Council Meeting Monday, May 13, 2024 Committee of the Whole 1. Call to Order Si vous avez besoin des services en frangais pour une reunion de Conseil communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862. Each of the following items, either in whole or in part, is able to be discussed in private pursuant to the provisions of subsection 68(1) of the Local Governance Act and Council / Committee will make a decision(s) in that respect in Open Session: 4:45 p.m., 2nd Floor Boardroom, City Hall 1.1 Approval of Minutes 68(1) 1.2 Financial Matter 68(1)(c) 1.3 Financial Matter 68(1)(c) 1.4 Nominating Committee 68(1)(b) 1.5 Financial Matter 68(1)(c) Ville de Saint John Seance du conseil communal Lundi le 13 mai 2024 18h30 2e etage de la Salle du conseil communal, 1-16tel de Ville Nous utiliserons un moyen de communication electronique lors de cette reunion. Le public peut assister a la seance en personne clans la Salle du Conseil ou la regarder sur le site Internet de la ville (www.saintiohn.ca) ou sur TV Rogers Comite plenier 1. Ouverture de la seance Si vous souhaitez obtenir des services en frangais pour une seance du conseil communal, veuillez communiquer avec le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862. Chacun des points suivants, en totalite ou en partie, peut faire I'objet d'une discussion en prive en vertu des dispositions prevues au paragraphe 68(1) de la Loi sur la gouvernance locale. Le conseil/comite prendra une ou des decisions a cet egard au cours de la seance publique : 16 h 45 — C16ture du comite plenier — Salle de conference du 2e etage 1.1 Approbation du proces-verbal 68(1) 1.2 Question financiere 68(1)(c) 1.3 Question financiere 68(1)(c) 1.4 Comite de nomination 68(1)(b) 1.5 Question financiere 68(1)(c) Seance ordinaire 1. Ouverture de la seance 1.1 Reconnaissance des terres 1.2 Hymne national 2. Approbation du proces-verbal 2.1 Proces-verbal du 29 avril 2024 K 3. Adoption de I'ordre du jour 4. Divulgations de conflits d'interets 5. Questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil 5.1 Dates proposees pour les audiences publiques concernant le 1670 Hickey Road, le 1750 Sandy Point Road, le 910 Fairville Boulevard et le 72 et 122 Clint Drive (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.2 Permis pour la salve d'honneur militaire de la Journee des Loyalistes a Fort Howe (recommendation clans le rapport) 5.3 Avenue Millidge Accord d'entretien de la rampe de mise a I'eau : City of Saint John — Royal Kennebecasis Yacht Club (Recommendation clans le rapport) 5.4 Rapport annuel du Service d'incendie de Saint John 2023 (recommandation : recevoir a titre d'information) 5.5 Remplacement du parc — mai 2024 (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.6 Contrat N° 2023-28 : Rue Charlotte (de King Sq. S. a Princess Street) — Reconstruction de la rue (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.7 Demande de fonds communautaire du Conseil (Greg Norton) (recommandation : Approuver la demande) 6. Commentaires presentes par les membres 7. Proclamation 7.1 Journee des enseignants retraites —14 mai 2024 7.2 Journee de la campagne Moose Hide — 16 mai 2024 7.3 Semaine nationale des travaux publics — du 19 au 25 mai 2024 8. Delegations et presentations 9. Audiences publiques 9.1 Modifications du plan municipal et de I'arrete de rezonage avec presentation du personnel et rapport du Comite consultatif d'urbanisme — 241-281 Douglas Avenue (111 et 2e lecture) 9.2 Modification de I'arrete sur les secteurs de conservation du patrimoine (111 et 2e lectures) K3 10. Etude des arretes municipaux 11. Interventions des membres du conseil 12. Affaires municipales evoquees par les fonctionnaires municipaux 12.1 Mise a jour de I'administrateur en chef sur certains projets catalyseurs et la defense des interets (verbal) 12.2 Reparation des conditions inesthetiques au 80 Main Street 13. Rapports deposes par les comites 13.1 Comite des finances : Plan de quartier de North End — Mandat du comite consultatif 14. Etude des sujets ecartes des questions soumises a I'approbation du Bureau 15. Correspondance generale 15.1 E. Gittens : 1671 Sandy Point Road (Recommendation : Renvoi au Comite de la croissance) 16.Ordre du jour supplementaire 17. Comite plenier 17.1 Entente de subvention du Fonds municipal vert de la FCM — Plan d'action pour un quartier durable du nord (DFC-22-0070) 17.2 Nominations recommandees aux comites 18. levee de la seance CI COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 The City of Saint job n MINUTES — REGULAR MEETING COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN APRIL 29, 2024 AT 6:30 PM 2ND FLOOR COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City's Website (www.saintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Present: Mayor Donna Noade Reardon Deputy Mayor John MacKenzie Councillor -at -Large Gary Sullivan Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton Councillor Ward 2 Barry Ogden Councillor Ward 3 Gerry Lowe Councillor Ward 3 David Hickey Councillor Ward 4 Greg Stewart Councillor Ward 4 Paula Radwan Absent: Councillor -at -Large Brent Harris Councillor Ward 1 Joanna Killen Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) B. McGovern General Counsel M. Tompkins Chief Financial Officer K. Fudge Commissioner Utilities & Infrastructure Services I. Fogan Fire Chief R. Nichol Commissioner Human Resources S. Hossack Commissioner Growth & Community Services A. Poffenroth Director Public Works & Transportation T. O'Reilly City Clerk J. Taylor Deputy City Clerk P. Anglin Call to Order 61 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 1.1 Land Acknowledgement Councillor Norton read aloud the Land Acknowledgement and called for a moment of reflection. "The City of Saint John/Menaquesk is situated is the traditional territory of the Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet.The Wolastoqiyik/Maliseet along with their Indigenous Neighbours, the Mi'Kmaq/Mi'kmaw and Passamaquoddy/Peskotomuhkati signed Peace and Friendship Treaties with the British Crown in the 1700s that protected their rights to lands and resources." 1.2 National Anthem The Saint John Symphony Youth Orchestra performed O Canada by video. 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of April 15. 2024 Moved by Councillor Hickey, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the minutes of April 15, 2024, be approved. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Approval of Agenda Moved by Councillor Hickey, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that the agenda for April 29, 2024, be approved with the removal of item 12.1 Corporate Asset Management System Award and the addition of 16.1 Recycling Materials Update; 17.1 Amended and Restated Membership Agreement with Envision; 17.2 Tentative Sale of Portion of Future Street off Clint Drive; 17.3 Tentative Sale of LPP at 17 Montgomery Crescent; 17.4 Delegation of Temporary Use authority to the Development Officer; 17.5 Corporate Asset Management System Award; 17.6 Civic Recognition Awards; and 17.7 Code of Conduct Matter. MOTION CARRIED. 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest Councillors Radwan, Stewart and Lowe declared a conflict of interest with item 17.7 Code of Conduct. 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-121: Staff Appointment Under the Saint John Building By -Law, Common Council adopt the following: WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted a by-law pursuant to the authority of the Building Code Administration Act, S.N.B. 2020, c. 8, and amendments thereto, (the "Building Code Administration Act'), namely the Building Bylaw, C.1 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 By-law Number BC-1 and amendments thereto (the "Building By -lave'), and it is necessary to appoint building inspectors, acting building inspectors, deputy building inspectors and city inspectors for the administration and enforcement of this By-law; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Pamela Bentley, is hereby appointed as a deputy building inspector, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until she ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 5.2 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-122: 2024 LPP Trust Fund Grant Applications, Common Council: 1. Authorize a total of $35,000 from the Land for Public Purpose Trust Fund be awarded to Saint John Cycling for Phase 1 of the construction of the Green Trail; 2. Authorize a total of $15,000 for Phase 2 of the Saint Rose Accessible Playground Project, upon the condition of the full completion of Phase 1; and 3. Authorize Parks and Community Services staff to award ACAP up to $5,000 from remaining LPP funds to support an approved stormwater mitigation or other environmental stewardship initiative following a staff review and approval of identified land and materials. 5.3 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-123: Provincial Grant for Community Public Art, Common Council enter into an agreement with the Province of New Brunswick for funding to facilitate the Community Public Art project as outlined in the terms and conditions attached to this M&C report and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement; and further, that staff be directed to facilitate the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 5.4 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-125: Proposed Public Hearing Date for a Text Amendment, Common Council schedule the public hearing for the Zoning Bylaw Text Amendments facilitated by Community Planning Staff for Monday, June 10, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. at the Council Chamber, City Hall 2nd floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, NB. 5.5 RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2024-128: 2024 Roadway Construction Projects, be received for information. 5.6 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-116: Tender 2024-681002T — Phosphate for Corrosion Control, the tender for the establishment of a supply agreement for Phosphate for Corrosion Control for the Loch Lomond Drinking Water Treatment Facility and the Spruce Lake Water Treatment Facility be awarded to the lowest compliant bidder, Brenntag Canada Inc., for a one-year term. 5.7 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-126: Street Naming — Sea/edge Court, Common Council amend the list of Official Street Names and approve the following change: 1. Add the name "cour Sealedge Court". Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in each consent agenda item respectively be adopted. r� COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. Members Comments Members commented on various local events. 7. Proclamation 7.1 The Mayor proclaimed the month of May 2024 as Lyme Awareness Month in The City of Saint John. 7.2 The Mayor proclaimed the month of May 2024 as Melanoma and Skin Cancer Awareness Month in The City of Saint John. 7.3 The Mayor proclaimed the month of May 2024 as YMCA Month in The City of Saint John. 7.4 The Mayor proclaimed May 3, 2024, as World Press Freedom Day in The City of Saint John. 7.5 The Mayor proclaimed the week of May 12 to May 18, 2024, as National Police Week in The City of Saint John. 7.6 The Mayor proclaimed April 28, 2024, as the Day of Mourning in The City of Saint John. 8. Delegations / Presentations 9. Public Hearings — 6:30 p.m. 10. Consideration of By -Laws 10.1 A Law to Amend a By -Law respecting Water and Sewerage (31d Reading) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Stewart: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled "By -Law No. M-16 A Law to Amend a By -Law respecting Water and Sewerage" amending Section 1 and Section 30 regarding "Exceptional Use", be read. MOTION CARRIED. The by-law entitled "By -Law No. M-16 A Law to Amend a By -Law respecting Water and Sewerage" was read in its entirety. Moved by Councillor Hickey, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled "By -Law No. M-16 A Law to Amend a By -Law respecting Water and Sewerage" amending Section 1 and Section 30 regarding "Exceptional Use", be read a third time, enacted, and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto. 4 E:3 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 MOTION CARRIED. Read a third time by title, the by-law entitled "By -Law No. M-16 A Law to Amend a By -Law respecting Water and Sewerage." 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters — Municipal Officers 13. Committee Reports 13.1 Growth Committee: Affordable Housing Soft Costs Grant Program Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Ogden: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Growth Committee in the submitted report M&C 2024-120: Affordable Housing Soft Costs Grant Program, Common Council adopt the Affordable Housing Grant Soft Cost Program Policy generally as presented on April 29th 2024, which includes authorization of a Grant Committee appointed by the Commissioner of Growth and Community Services to review applications and issue letters of approval to eligible applicants in accordance with the Policy criteria. MOTION CARRIED. 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15. General Correspondence 15.1 Save Your Skin Foundation — Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Public Safetv Committee) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the Save Your Skin Foundation Request to Present be referred to the Public Safety Committee. MOTION CARRIED. 15.2 Letters from the Public re: 1671 Sandy Point Road (Recommendation: Refer to Growth Committee) Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that the letters from the public regarding 1671 Sandy Point Road be referred to the Growth Committee. MOTION CARRIED. 15.3 Saint John Slo-pitch League: Advertising to offset Operating Costs (Recommendation: Receive for Information as part of rates review underway) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie: COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 RESOLVED that the correspondence from the Saint John Slo-pitch League regarding advertising to offset operating costs be received for information, as part of the rates review that is underway. MOTION CARRIED. 15.4 David Caird: Flyer Distribution By -Law (Recommendation: Refer to CAO for follow - Moved by Councillor Ogden, seconded by Councillor Hickey: RESOLVED that the correspondence from David Caird regarding the Flyer Distribution By -Law be referred to the Chief Administrative Officer for follow-up. MOTION CARRIED. 16. Supplemental Agenda 16.1 Recycling Materials (verbal update) Councillor Sullivan commented on the change from the city collecting recycling Materials, to the Provincial initiative operated by Circular Materials. Director Tim O'Reilly commented on change commencing on Wednesday May 1st. The new pick-up will change from night- time to day -time pick-up. For information refer to the website: circularmaterials.ca for collection dates or call: 1-833-644-1163. 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 Amended and Restated Membership Agreement with Envision Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, the City enter into the Amended and Restated Members' Agreement with Envision Saint John: The Regional Growth Agency generally in the form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held April 29, 2024, for the purpose of updating the contractual relationships following legislative reform and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Amended and Restated Member's Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. MOTION CARRIED. 17.2 Tentative Sale of Portion of Future Street off Clint Drive Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, Common Council adopt the following: 1. That the City enter into the Agreement of Purchase and Sale generally in the form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held April 29, 2024, with Ronald Karl Cropley for the sale of a portion of PID 55200000, identified on the submitted Amending Subdivision Plan as Part "A", containing an area of 1,250 square meters; ito] COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 2. That the City retain a Local Government Services Easement for its infrastructure within the subject lands; and 3. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute any documents necessary to effect this transaction. MOTION CARRIED. 17.3 Tentative Sale of LPP at 17 Montgomery Crescent Moved by Councillor Radwan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, Common Council adopt the following: 1. That Common Council seek the concurrence of the Planning Advisory Committee to remove the "Land for Public Purpose" designation for the property identified as PID 55173991, and in the event the Planning Advisory agrees, that the City deem the said property surplus to its needs. 2. Subject to the Planning Advisory Committee concurring, that the City enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale generally in the form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held April 29, 2024, with Mike Cavanagh Homes Inc. for the sale of the parcel of land at 17 Montgomery Crescent (PID 55173991); and 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute any documents necessary to effect this transaction. MOTION CARRIED. 17.4 Delegation of Temporary Use authority to the Development Officer Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Ogden: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, the Mayor issue a letter to the Planning Advisory Committee on behalf of Common Council requesting that the Planning Advisory Committee delegate the authority for authorizing temporary use to the Development Officer. MOTION CARRIED. 17.5 Corporate Asset Management System Award Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Hickey: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, Common Council adopt the following: 1. That the City enter into the Software License and Maintenance Agreement with Azteca Systems, LLC, and Esri Canada Limited, in the form attached to this M&C 2024-115, for the purpose of acquiring the software necessary to support the City's new asset management solution, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to 11 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 execute the said Software License and Maintenance Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. 2. That the City enter the Professional Services Agreement with Esri Canada Limited, in the form attached to this M&C 2024-115, for the purpose of securing services to assist in the implementation of the City's new asset management solution, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Software License and Maintenance Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. 3. That the City enter into the Cityworks Online Managed Services Agreement with Esri Canada Limited, in the form attached to this M&C 2024-115, for the purpose of having Esri Canada Limited Hosting and provision of the Managed Services Environment and Maintenance, and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Cityworks Online Managed Services Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. MOTION CARRIED. 17.6 Civic Recognition Awards Moved by Deputy Mayor, seconded by Councillor Hickey: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, Common Council approve the list of award recipients for Citizen of the Year and Council Commendation. MOTION CARRIED. 17.7 Code of Conduct Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Norton: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on April 29, 2024, Council accepts the findings of the investigator in her reports dated March 22, 2024, that Councillor Radwan breached sections of the Code of Conduct By -Law, and accepts remedial actions recommended by Committee of the Whole, including that the details of the sanction imposed remain private. MOTION CARRIED. 18. Adjournment Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on April 29, 2024, be adjourned. MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m. 12 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL April 29, 2024 / le 29 avril 2024 13 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-133 Report Date May 09, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Proposed Public Hearing Dates for 1670 Hickey Road, 1750 Sandy Point Road, 910 Fairville Boulevard and 72 and 122 Clint Drive AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner / Dept. Chief Administrative Officer Head Jennifer Kirchner Amy Poffenroth / J. Brent McGovern Pankaj Nalavde RECOMMENDATION RESOLVED That Common Council schedule the public hearings for the Zoning By- law Rezoning and Section 59 Amendment Application submitted by Joyce E. Barrett for 1670 Hickey Road (PID: 55221790 and part of PID 55198410), the Rezoning Application submitted by 667117 NB Inc. for 1750 Sandy Point Road (PID: 00050849), the Rezoning application submitted by Shabahat Shakeel for 910 Fairville Boulevard (PID: 00402446) and the Section 59 Amendment Application submitted by Brad Kierstead (Don -More Surveys) for 72 and 122 Clint Drive (PIDs: 55242671 and 55243166) for Monday, July 8, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. at the Council Chamber, City Hall 2nd floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, NB. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise Common Council of the Zoning By-law Rezoning applications received and to recommend an appropriate public hearing date for this application. The next available public hearing date is Monday, July 8, 2024. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION At its meeting of August 3, 2004, Common Council resolved that: 1. the Commissioner of Planning and Development receive all applications for amendments to the Zoning By-law and Section 39 [now referred as section 59] resolutions/agreements and proceed to prepare the required advertisements, and 2. when applications are received a report will be prepared recommending the appropriate resolution setting the time and place for public hearings and be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee as required by the Community Planning Act. 14 -2- REPORT In response to the motion above, this report indicates the applications received and recommends appropriate public hearing dates. Details of the applications are available in the City Clerk's office and will form part of the documentation at the public hearing. Name of Applicant Location Existing Zone Proposed Zone Reason Joyce E. 1670 Hickey Two -Unit Neighbourhood To facilitate the Barrett Road (PID: Residential Community development of a 00049916) (R2) Facility (CFN) second special and part of care residence. PID: 55198410 667117 NB 1750 Sandy Two -Unit Mid -Rise To facilitate the Inc. Point Road Residential Residential construction of (PID: (R2) (RM) two, 60-unit 00050849) apartment buildings. Shabahat 910 Fairville Regional CR-R (Regional To facilitate the Shakeel Boulevard Commercial Commercial construction of an (PID: (CR) Residential) approximately a 00402446) 60-unit multi -unit residential building. Name of Location Zone Reason Applicant Brad 72 and 122 Two -Unit A Section 59 amendment to allow Kierstead Clint Drive Residential the construction of semi-detached (Don -More (PIDs: (R2) dwellings Surveys) 55242671 and 55243166) While the holding of public hearings for proposed Zoning By-law amendments and rezonings are a legislative requirement of the Community Planning Act, it is also a key component of a clear and consistent land development processes envisioned in the One Stop Development Shop Program. These processes provide transparency and predictability for the development community and City residents. On a broader note, the development approval process works towards fulfilling key Council priorities including: • Facilitate a mix of affordable housing in all our neighbourhoods; • Grow our population at a rate of 2% annually by the end of Council's term; • Achieve 3% annual property tax base growth and ongoing work to increase the target. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES 15 -3- The scheduling of the public hearing and referral to the Planning Advisory Committee satisfies the legislative and service requirements as mandated by the Community Planning Act. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS N/A ATTACHMENTS None COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-130 Report Date May 07, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area General Counsel Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. License for Loyalist Day Military Gun Salute at Fort Howe AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Curtis Langille Melanie C. Tompkins, K.C. J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION That The City of Saint John enter into the License Agreement with His Majesty The King In Right Of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, in the form as attached to M&C 2024-130, for the purpose of conducting a Loyalist Day 21 Gun Salute on a portion of PID 414276 being Fort Howe, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said License Agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of ongoing training, His Majesty The King In Right Of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, is planning to conduct 21-Gun salute in honor of Loyalist Day held on May 18 this year. There would be a 105mm LG1 Howitzer gun on - site along with support vehicles for the purpose of the intended salute. The proponent has provided the attached license agreement, including a map illustrating the area in which the License is desired for consideration by The City of Saint John (the "City'), to seek the approval that would allow for this activity to proceed. The purpose of this report is to seek Council's authorization to enter the attached license. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A REPORT As a part of ongoing training, His Majesty The King In Right Of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, has requested a license from the City to allow for a 21-Gun Salute to honor Loyalist Day, which will be celebrated on May 18, 2024, on city property. The activity would involve the use of a 105mm LG1 howitzer gun with blank ammunition. This activity would be conducted on City owned property located at Fort Howe in a parking lot, as illustrated on an attached map, and is for a total of 4 hours. No fee is warranted given the short duration of the license. If Council is agreeable to the use, the attached License Agreement will facilitate this military salute to proceed. Licenses have previouslybeenissued for this purpose at Fort Howe and other city -owned sites for Loyalist Days in 2022 and Remembrance Day in 2021. -2- The General Counsel Office has reviewed the attached License Agreement and are supportive of the Terms and Conditions that are detailed therein, ensuring the responsibilities of all parties involved while also ensuring the City is protected from any liability. The City's Communications department and Special Events coordinator have been contacted and made aware of this activity. They would be instructed to provide appropriate notice to the public in advance of this salute to minimize any concerns there may be for this planned activity. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT N/A SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES There is no material financial consideration for this license, being a license granted to enable this activity to be conducted on City land. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS City Works and Transportation (Parking, Parks and Recreational Facilities) along with Growth and Community Development have reviewed the request and are supportive of the event being conducted at Fort Howe. The attached License Agreement has been reviewed by GCO who are satisfied with the Terms and Conditions to protect the City's interests in this matter. ATTACHMENTS 1. License Agreement, and 2. Schedule "A". iF:3 LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN: The City of Saint John, (the "LICENSOR") Corporate Office Address: 15 Market Square Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L1 0 HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF CANADA, as represented by the Minister of National Defence (the "LICENSEE") 101 Colonel by Drive Ottowa, ON K1A OK2 WHEREAS the LICENSOR is the owner of the property identified as PID 414276, Saint John in the Province of New Brunswick (the "Premises") AND WHEREAS the LICENSEE has requested permission from the LICENSOR to use the Premises for the purpose of conducting a Loyalist Day 21 Gun Salute; THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of, and subject to, the terms and conditions set out herein, the LICENSOR hereby grants permission to the LICENSEE to use the Premises for the purpose stated herein, and for no other purpose, under the following terms and conditions: 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The LICENSOR agrees that the LICENSEE may enter and use the PID 414276, Saint John the (the Premises) for the purpose of preforming a 21 Gun Salute in celebration of Loyalist Day. 2. TERM The term of this agreement shall be from 10:00 - 14:00 May 18 2024. 3. LICENSE FEE Total consideration for the use of the Premises is $ _1.00 , and the LICENSOR hereby acknowledges the receipt and sufficiency of this consideration. 4. INSURANCE The LICENSOR acknowledges that the LICENSEE is self -insured. 5. INDEMNIFICATION Subject to the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, the LICENSEE indemnifies and saves harmless the LICENSOR, its servants, agents, and employees and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, from and against all injury, damage, actions, causes of actions, suits, claims and demands of whatsoever nature which may result or may be brought or made by reason of any act or default of the LICENSEE, his servants, agents, or employees, or on account of any damage to the property of the LICENSOR or in connection with any loss, damage 1/3 1&61 or injury in any manner based upon, arising out of or incidental to the exercise or purported exercise by the LICENSEE of the license granted herein. 6. LICENSOR'S PROPERTY The LICENSEE agrees to assume full responsibility for the care of the Premises during his occupation, and to assume all risk of loss, damage, or injury to hisself, his servants, agents, employees or licensees. 7. DAMAGES The LICENSEE shall not be responsible for any damage or loss to the Premises arising from circumstances, acts or conditions beyond his control, or due to "force majeure", which is defined as an act of God, war, invasion, revolution, insurrection or other act of a similar nature. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE The LICENSEE is liable for any environmental damage to the Premises caused during his occupation, except for: a) any environmental damage to the Premises caused by the previous occupation of the premises by other persons, organizations, or the LICENSOR; b) any environmental damage to the Premises arising during the period covered by this agreement, where such environmental damage is a consequence of pre-existing environmental damage from previous occupation, or was caused by the activities of the Licensor during the period of this agreement; and c) any environmental damage to the Premises caused by any other persons, organizations, or by the LICENSOR. (Remainder of the page is intentionally left blank) 2/3 K91 9. GOVERNING LAW This agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws in effect in the Province of New Brunswick, including the laws of Canada. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this agreement has been executed by The City of Saint John, represented by Mayor Donna Reardon, and His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, this day of 2024. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of Witness SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER R OF NATIONAL DEFENCE ---a Per: . •-'} - pel , Y -_ Nwfie: LL of K.P. Currie Title: CO 3' Field Regiment Per: Witness Name Donna Reardon Title: Mayor 3/3 21 COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-134 Report Date May 03, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Council SUBJECT: Millidge Ave Boat Ramp Maintenance Agreement: City of Saint John — Royal Kennebecasis Yacht Club AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Mikel Lester Mike Hugenholtz/Marc Dionne J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City enter into an agreement with the Royal Kennebecasis Yacht Club (RKYC) to maintain the Millidge Avenue boat ramp in the form and upon the terms and conditions as attached to M&C No. 2024-134; and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval to enter into an Agreement with the RKYC to maintain the Millidge Avenue boat ramp following the completion of Contract 2023-23 the Millidge Avenue Boat Ramp Rehabilitation project. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS October 17, 2022: M&C 2022-317 — 2023 and 2024 General and Utility Fund Capital Budget, approved. January 9, 2023: M&C 2023-005 - Community Investment Fund Agreement: City of Saint John — Improvements (Design Services) — Millidgeville Boat Ramp Renewal, approved. October 30, 2023: M&C 2023-238; Revised 2024 General and Utility Fund Capital Programs, approved January 8, 2024: M&C 2024-007 — Community Investment Fund Agreement: City of Saint John — Millidgeville Boat Ramp Rehabilitation (Phase 2), approved. W -2- February 20, 2024: M&C 2024-030 — Community Development Fund Agreement: City of Saint John — Millidgeville Boat Ramp Rehabilitation (Construction), approved. April 15, 2024: M&C 2024-030- Contract 2023-23: Millidge Avenue Boat Ramp Rehabilitation Project, approved REPORT The proposed maintenance agreement is to maintain the boat ramp that is being constructed in the 2024 construction season. The new boat ramp will be concrete and fitted with a floating dock and aluminum pedestrian gangway. The new boat ramp will improve safety, accessibility, and ease of operation for boaters. The City currently does not have the capacity, or the expertise required to effectively maintain the to -be -constructed boat ramp. This proposed agreement leverages a relationship with a local not -for -profit organization with plenty of resources and expertise to effectively maintain the new boat ramp. RKYC's responsibilities as part of this agreement are the following: 1. Disassemble and haul out the two floating dock sections, and the Aluminum Pedestrian gangway at the end of the boating season. 2. Storage of the floating docks and aluminum gangway in the winter season. 3. Re -assembling the two floating dock sections and aluminum gangway to the floating docks. 4. Annual inspection of all parts. 5. Pressure washing the concrete boat ramp throughout the boating season. It is anticipated that the construction of the ramp is expected to be completed in late summer — early fall. Once completed, the RKYC, under this agreement, will be responsible for the seasonal maintenance of the boat ramp, floating docks, and aluminum gangway. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT The project aligns with Council's priority to BELONG and PERFORM as it will improve recreation programming while improving the quality of life by providing improved accessibility to our lakes/rivers. In addition, through exploring funding opportunities such as RDC funding, the City leverages viable opportunities to improve its infrastructure. -3- SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The City of Saint John will pay the RKYC a one-time fee of $1,124.70 for winter storage, and then commencing on May 315t, 2025, the City shall pay to the RKYC an annual maintenance fee of $3,068.00 for the seasonal maintenance of the boat ramp. This is to be paid for through Public Works operating budgets. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Council Report has been reviewed by the General Counsel's office, and Public Works and Transportation. ATTACHMENT 1) City RKYC DRAFT Maintenance Agreement: The DRAFT agreement between the City and the RKYC. i►R THIS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT made this BETWEEN: ,A& day of April, 2024 (the "AGREEMENT") THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, a body corporate by Royal Charter, confirmed and amended by Acts of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of New Brunswick, having its City Hall at 15 Market Square, Saint John, New Brunswick (the "City") OF THE FIRST PART - and - ROYAL KENNEBECASIS YACHT CLUB, a non- profit corporation under the laws of the Province of New Brunswick, having its registered office at 1042 Millidge Avenue, Saint John, New Brunswick ("RKYC) OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the City is the owner of an aluminum gangway and dock system which will be available for public use in the summer of 2025; AND WHEREAS the aluminum gangway and dock system will be installed for the use and enjoyment of the public; AND WHEREAS The Parties wish to enter into this Agreement to set out their respective obligations for the maintenance, cleaning, storage and inspection of the aluminum gangway and dock system; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the financial contribution provided by the City to RKYC for on -going maintenance of the aluminum gangway and dock system and in accordance with the terms and conditions in this Maintenance Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows: 41.1 ARTICLE I SCOPE OF MAINTENANCE 1.0 Annual Maintenance RKYC shall provide the following maintenance services: Action Timeframe Disassemble and haul out of the 2 dock October/November, as appropriate sections 7.315m x 2.426m. including the 7.620m x 1.2m Aluminum Gangway and inspection of all parts Storage of dock sections and aluminum Storage will be from October/November to the gangway end of April. Re -assembling the 2 dock sections to the pipe Early May (or prior to the commencement of piles and reconnecting the aluminum gangway the boating season, depending on flood levels) to the floating docks, and Inspection of all parts Pressure wash the ramp, dock and gangway Monthly during the boating season 1.1 Additional Maintenance RKYC shall promptly notify the City if additional maintenance is required or any defects are observed. The City shall bear no responsibility for additional maintenance or repair undertaken without the express approval of the City. 1.2 Notice of Additional Maintenance In the event RKYC is of the opinion that additional maintenance is required which is outside the scope of this agreement, they shall notify the Director of Parking, Parks and Recreational Facilities (Marc Dionne, marc.dionne@saintjohn.ca) and the Superintendent of Parks and Recreational Facilities (Steve Bishop, steve.bishop@saintjohn.ca). ARTICLE II MAINTENANCE FEES 2.0 Maintenance Fees a) Following the completion of construction of the gangway and ramp, the City shall pay to RKYC a one-time fee for storage of $1,124.70 (one thousand, one hundred twenty-four dollars and seventy cents). RKYC shall provide an invoice for the storage fee within thirty (30) days of the ramp and gangway being delivered for storage. WA b) Commencing on May 31, 2025, the City shall pay to RKYC, an annual maintenance fee of $3,068.00 (three thousand sixty-eight dollars) for the above -described maintenance of the city - owned docks, subject to the within terms and conditions. 2.1 Payments RKYC shall provide an invoice for the maintenance fee by April 1 st annually to the City. Payments by the City to RKYC for the maintenance fee shall be paid annually, on or before May 31 st of each year. 2.2 Taxes The storage and maintenance fees to be paid by the City hereunder shall be inclusive of all applicable taxes. ARTICLE III INSURANCE 3.0 Insurance Requirements of the City The City shall maintain the following insurance: a. A Commercial General Liability Policy covering the operational liability of the dock. 3.1 Insurance Requirements of RKYC Throughout the term of this Agreement and any renewal thereof, RKYC shall maintain the following Insurance coverages: a. Commercial General Liability insurance with a minimum limit of not less than Two Million ($2,000,000) inclusive per occurrence. Coverage shall include but not be limited to the following: i. the City shall be added as an additional insured; ii. Cross Liability; iii. Contractual Liability; iv. Non -owned automobile Liability; V. Sudden and Accident Pollution (120 Hour Reporting); vi. Products and Completed Operations; and vii. 30-day Notice of Cancellation. b. Marine Liability insurance with a minimum limit of not less than Two Million ($2,000,000) inclusive per occurrence. Coverage shall include but not be limited to the following: K-11 i. the City shall be added as an additional insured; ii. Cross Liability; iii. Contractual Liability; iv. Products and Completed Operations; and V. 30-day Notice of Cancellation. c. Broad Form (all risk) Property insurance covering all RKYC equipment used for the performance of the work including costs to cleanup and restore property damaged by sudden and accidental escape of pollutants and shall not allow subrogation claims by the Insurer against the City. d. Automobile Insurance Policy subject to a limit of not less than Two Million ($2,000,000) for all licensed motor vehicles owned, leased or operated by RKYC. Coverage must also apply in the event the operations of the insured resulted in a pollution condition including remediation costs. Where applicable, coverage shall not include any endorsements that remove coverage for Attached Machinery. 3.2 Proof of Insurance Prior to commencement of the work and upon the placement, renewal, amendment, or extension of all or any part of the insurance, RKYC shall promptly provide the City with confirmation of coverage in the form of a certificate of insurance and, if required, a certified true copy(s) of the policy(s) certified by an authorized representative of the insurer together with copies of any amending endorsements applicable to the work. ARTICLE IV TERM 4.0 Term The term of this Agreement is five (5) years from the date of execution. At the end of the initial term, this Agreement shall automatically renew for subsequent terms of 5 years each, unless earlier terminated by RKYC by providing the City with not less than ninety (90) days prior notice. 4.1 Termination 1. The City may immediately terminate this Agreement upon giving notice to RKYC where: a. RKYC, or any successor operator, permanently ceases operation of the yacht club; or Wee b. RKYC breaches any of the terms or conditions of the within Agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty calendar days (30) following receipt of written notice from the City detailing such breach. The above rights of termination are in addition to all other rights of termination available at law, or events of termination by operation of law. 1 5.0 Referral to Senior Management ARTICLE V DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1. All Disputes arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement, or in respect of any legal relationship associated with or derived from this Agreement shall, within ten (10) Business Days, be referred for resolution to the City's Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), or its designate, and the General Manager, or its designate, of RKYC. 2. If the CAO and RKYC Representative are not able to resolve the Dispute referred to them under this section within ten (10) Business Days following such referral, the matter shall be referred for resolution by way of mediation upon the willingness of the Parties. ARTICLE VI NOTICES 6.0 Address for Notice Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, transmitted by electronic communication or sent by registered mail, charges prepaid, addressed as follows: (a) if to the City: The City of Saint John General Counsel Office City Hall 15 Market Square Saint John, NB E21- 4L1 email: generalcounsel@saintjohn.ca with a copy to: Director of Parking, Parks and Recreation Facilities 091 email: marc.dionne@saintjohn.ca (b) if to RKYC: 1042 Millidge Avenue Saint John, NB E2K 2P6 Attention: General Manager email: office@rkyc.ca Any such notice or other communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day on which it was delivered or transmitted (or, if such day is not a Business Day, on the next following Business Day) or, if mailed, on the third Business Day following the date of mailing; provided, however, that if at the time of mailing or within three Business Days thereafter there is or occurs a labour dispute or other event that might reasonably be expected to disrupt the delivery of documents by mail, any notice or other communication hereunder shall be delivered or transmitted by means of electronic communication as aforesaid. 6.1 Change of Address Any Party may at any time change its address for service from time to time by giving notice to the other Party in accordance with Section 6.0. ARTICLE VII GENERAL TERMS 7.0 Indemnification RKYC does hereby indemnify and save harmless the City from all damages, causes, claims, expenses, demands, actions, suits or other proceedings by whomsoever claimed, made, brought or prosecuted in any manner and whether in respect of property owned by others in respect of damage sustained by others based upon or arising out of or in connection with RYKC's negligence, except for damages cause by the City's negligence. 7.1 Applicable Law and Jurisdiction This Agreement will in all respects be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of New Brunswick and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein, excluding any choice of law provisions and without effect to principles of conflicts of law, regardless of the place of making or performance. New Brunswick courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all matters arising in relation to this Agreement, and each Party accepts the jurisdiction of New Brunswick courts. 31 7.2 Force Majeure In the event that any cause reasonably beyond the control of a Party, and provided the cause is without the fault or negligence of such Party, including but not limited to war, terrorism, flood, fire, tempest or other unusually severe weather, earthquake, strike, riot, pandemic or epidemic, act of God or a public enemy, act of the state or the government in its sovereign or contractual capacity, delays or prevents a party from performing any of its obligations under this Agreement, such Party shall not be liable to the other Party or its agents, servants, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or suppliers for any damages caused by such delay or non-performance for so long as such cause exists. In the event such cause renders, or is likely to render, the fulfillment and completion of the purpose of this Agreement impossible or commercially impracticable, the impacted Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective the date that written notice is given to the other Party. After ninety (90) consecutive or cumulative days of the suspension of Party's obligations due to force majeure, the other Party may terminate the Agreement. 7.3 Assignment, Third Parties Neither Party may sell, assign, or transfer this Agreement, without the other Party's written consent, but no consent is required if the assignment: (a) results from the assignor's merger, consolidation, spin-off, split -off or acquisition or sale, provided the assignment is limited to the assignor's survivor, subsidiary or successor; or (b) is to an affiliate or other related party capable of performing the assignor's duties and obligations under this Agreement. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement will enure to the benefit of and will be binding upon the Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement is not intended to be for the benefit of any person other than the City and RKYC. No other person or party will be considered a third -party beneficiary of or otherwise entitled to any rights or benefits arising in connection with this Agreement. 7.4 Amendment and Waiver No amendment of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of each of the City and RKYC. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement is effective unless made in writing, and any such waiver has effect only in respect of the particular provision or circumstance stated in the waiver. A Party's failure at any time to enforce any of the provisions of, or any right or remedy available to it under, this Agreement or at law or in equity, or to exercise any option provided, will not constitute a waiver of that provision, right, remedy or option or in any way affect the validity of this Agreement. A Party's waiver of any default by either Party will not be deemed a continuing waiver but will apply solely to the instance to which that waiver is directed. 7.5 Counterparts and Execution This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, in which case (a) the counterparts together shall constitute one Agreement, and (b) communication of execution by fax or electronic transmission shall constitute good delivery. This Agreement shall not be enforced or bind the Parties, until executed by all the Parties that are party to such Agreement. MA IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Maintenance Agreement on the day and year first written above. THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Per: Per: Donna Noade Reardon Mayor Jonathan Taylor City Clerk Common Council Resolution: , 2024 ROYAL KENNEBECASIS YACHT CLUB Per: Per: 091 D '� r r I l jl COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-136 Report Date May 06, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Fire and Emergency Management Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Saint John Fire Department Annual Report 2023 AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Leah Robichaud Danielle Mackin Chief Rob Nichol J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council receive the Saint John Fire Department Annual Report 2023 and file for information. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Saint John Fire Department 2023 Annual Report. A summary of emergency response statistics, training and development, community engagement, recognition of our employees, and Saint John EMO activities is included. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A REPORT The Saint John Fire Department has prepared an annual report to summarize the efforts, achievements, and challenges faced by the Fire Department over the past year, highlighting the commitment to ensuring the safety of our community. Key Highlights: 1. Emergency Response Statistics: The report provides a summary of emergency response by the Fire Department in 2023, responding to over 4,800 calls including fire incidents, medical emergencies, hazardous material responses, rescues, and general calls for service. We have also included a more detailed overview of some key incidents during the year. 2. Training and Development: Summary of the training initiatives undertaken by our firefighters to enhance skills and preparedness to a variety of situations. -2- Community Engagement: The Fire Department participated in numerous educational programs, fire prevention campaigns, and outreach events. This proactive engagement is done in partnership with our active IAFF Association Local 771. 4. Recognition: The annual report is an opportunity to recognize the service and awards received by our employees. Many have reached career milestones during 2023 including promotions, new hires and retirements. We thank them for their service and dedication to the community. 5. Collaboration and Partnerships: The report emphasizes collaborative efforts with other emergency response agencies, industry, and community organizations. It showcases joint training exercises and initiatives to enhance interagency coordination during emergencies. 6. Saint John Emergency Measures Organization: Under the leadership of the Fire Chief and Director of SJEMO and through collaboration among all city departments, the Municipal Emergency Response Plan underwent a full review and update in 2023. Through integrated planning, training and exercises, the organization ensures a cohesive and efficient response to emergency situations. The Annual Report demonstrates our commitment to excellence in fire and emergency services in the City of Saint John. We encourage Common Council and members of the community to review the report and engage in constructive dialogue to ensure SJFD is meeting the evolving public safety needs of our community. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT The Annual Report supports the Council Priorities of Belong and Perform. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES N/A INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS N/A ATTACHMENTS Saint John Fire Department Annual Report 2023 W f tp t 1J Ail 0 10 11 I'Ail MOMMU01 MOL A WORD FROM THE CHIEF It is a honour to present the 2023 Annual Report for the Saint John Fire Department Like many of the things that a fire chief is responsible for, the heavy lifting in putting this celebration of service together was completed by "a very talented and dedicated team" whom I have been most fortunate to work with. 2023 was a period of significant transformation for the SJFD. The third -party fire service review concluded with a series of recommendations from which to help move forward on Common Council's direction to create a fifteen -year strategic plan for SJFD. A renewed focus on fire prevention, data analysis, and service levels were prevalent activities of the Saint John Fire Service in the 2023 calendar year as the department begins work on its 15-year strategic plan. Our Fire Prevention personnel worked with our operational fire crews and provided school and at home safety messages to over two thousand members of our community at nearly 40 public education sessions. Fire prevention personnel also worked closely with fire administration on providing property gravestone information into our First Due records management system (RMS), thereby providing critical property specific response and inspection information to inspectors and operational crews. In addition to property information, fire administration, training and prevention personnel have been inputting various types of data into our new RMS systems with the goal of creating a data rich RMS that supports all activity and assessment needs to best serve our desire to be an evidence -based action orientated public safety service. Further to service levels the Saint John Fire Department, through our larger municipal organization, had a critical role in advancing Saint John High School's proposal on the federally sponsored Building Safer Communities Fund. In addition, and as leading participants to the Municipal Public Safety Committee and the Saint John Emergency Management Organization, fire managers Rob Nichol and Leah Robichaud received the Public Safety Committee and Common Council's unanimous endorsement of a proposed upgrade of our municipal emergency response plan. Further to public safety, SJFD was also a major contributor to the Province's Regional Public Safety Committee, helping to identify priorities and objectives for best utilizing public safety resources to the greatest benefit of the regional community. While back home in Saint John our fire service members worked to create relationships with those members of our community who are living hard, visiting tent sites, introducing ourselves and creating trust for those instances where we are called to help. Also, in 2023 SJFD continued to advance discussions on being a more inclusive, and diverse workforce, initiating action on a number of fronts. SJFD in collaboration with other first responders introduced Camp Courage (see special feature inside this report), invested in facility improvements, and took a broader look at the criteria for the candidate pool for potential HRFF candidates, setting the path for a new recruit class - All steps to be more welcoming, inclusive and diverse. The fire service review in its assertion to shift to be more of a prevention and data focus organization noted the need to sustain a capable emergency response service. 2023 reminded us of the emergency response challenges inherent to this community's hazard risk profile. Saint John Fire operations responded to numerous emergencies that involved medium to high hazard occupancies and most importantly demonstrated a high level of competence in minimizing the impact to property owners and citizens. The September 14 and 15 industrial fire at the AIM facility highlighted the investment that this department has put into performance competence and stakeholder collaboration. My announcement late in 2023 of my retirement early in 2024 was quickly followed by the appointment of Deputy Chief Rob Nichol to Fire Chief and Director of SJEMO beginning January 28th 2024. 1 wish Chief Nichol well and I am certain that he will have much success as he leads a period of transformation change that ensures that this service will be better tomorrow than today. On this my final message I must restate the admiration, gratitude, and respect that I have for the members of the SJFD; it was an honour to work along -side you for the past 44 years. We all should have a purpose in our lives and our fire service career has helped identify what ours is. I wish all personnel a safe and rewarding journey through this career of service. KEVIN CLIFFORD SAINT JOHN FIRE CHIEF SAINT JOHN FIRE Kul PAGE 02 LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Saint John Fire Department acknowledges that it is situated on the traditional territory of the Wolastogiyik/Maliseet. The Wolastogiyik/Maliseet along with their Indigenous neighbours, the Mi'Kmaq/Mi'kmaw and Passamaquoddy/Peskotomuhkati signed Peace and Friendship Treaties with the British Crown in the 1700s that protected their rights to lands and resources. ABOUT SAINT JOHN FIRE The Saint John Fire Department has been operating since 1786. Today, the department is responsible for servicing 316 square kilometers. The department's focus is on reducing loss of life, personal injury, property damage or impact on the environment through five primary services: • Fire Rescue and Suppression • Technical Rescue • Fire Prevention and Investigation • Medical First Response • Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Emergency Response SAINT JOHN FIRE 38 PAGE 04 MISSION, VISION & VALUES The Mission of the SJFD is to minimize the loss of life and injury, as well as damage to the environment, through effective and efficient traditional and non- traditional fire rescue services. We the members of the SJFD shall base our conduct on the highest ethical standards responding to the needs of our citizens. We shall serve with professionalism, courtesy, and respect, recognizing the diverse nature of our community. We shall hold devotion to duty above personal risk. SAINT JOHN FIRE 39 PAGE 05 • DCIATIC r - :,i %,-Ipft IWi lt7pll IV —,TW FOP: at 'a Fire FkphSers 'LyC01 �r x 11n1F et4STa�■ wCd:" 7. C-- WAvS The following are some highlights of the wonderful charity work the members of Local 771 are doing in our community • Canadian Blood Services donor drives • Ways and Means- $15,000 raised to support 40 families • West Side Days BBQ • Camp Courage • Remembrance Day Poppy Campaign throughout the City • Remembrance Day ceremony at TD Station • Santa Float for local Christmas parades • Salvation Army Christmas Kettles- 100 off duty members volunteer at various kettle locations throughout the City • Chuck -a -Puck at Saint John Seadogs Games in support of MD • United Way Donor • MD walk • Bobby's Hospice BBQ fundraiser • Run/Walk for the cure - Rockwood Park • Island View School fun day • Seniors BBQ at Exhibition Park • Island View School book fair • Lunch program for St. John the Baptist School • Fun day at the Firefghters Museum • Make a Wish Foundation • Compassionate grief Centre annual "Jason Zelward physical challenge" SERVING SAINT JOHN SAINT JOHN FIRE HAS 6 FIRE STATIONS LOCATED STRATEGICALLY AROUND THE CITY WE EMPLOY 124 PERMANENT FIREFIGHTERS 20 CASUAL STAFF WE CALL "HOLIDAY RELIEF" FIREFIGHTERS WHO FILL IN FOR ABSENCES. 10 MANAGEMENT STAFF & 2 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF SAINT JOHN'S UNIQUE MAKEUP OF RESIDENTIAL, OLD BALLOON FRAME HOUSING STOCK, COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES & HEAVY INDUSTRY PRESENTS FIREFIGHTERS WITH EXCEPTIONAL RESPONSE CHALLENGES 2023 Fire Incidents s% f v D.e .. .. SAINT JOHN FIRE 41 PAGE 07 FIRE PREVENTION & INVESTIGATION 2023 STATS • 13 SCHOOL VISITS (634 STUDENTS & STAFF) • 10 COMMUNITY EVENTS (1189 VISITORS) • 30 FIRE INVESTIGATIONS • 10 COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONS • 11 OFM ORDERS • 339 INSPECTIONS • 196 RE -INSPECTIONS TRAINING DIVISION • Watch what you heat. Always keep a close eye on what you are cooking and set a timer to remind you that you have something on the stove • Turn pot handles toward the back of the stove and always keep a lid nearby when cooking. If a small grease fire starts, slide the lid over the pan and turn off the burner • Have a child and pet free zone of at least three feet around the stove or barbeque and anywhere else hot food or drink is prepared or carried 2023 TRAINING • FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING • EMERGENCY WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER TRAINING • ICE RESCUE TRAINING • HAZMAT TRAINING • TECHNICAL ROPE RESCUE TRAINING • DRIVER OPERATOR TRAINING • BOAT RESCUE TRAINING • ANNUAL POINT LEPREAU TRAINING SAINT JOHN FIRE 42 PAGE 08 OUR EMPLOYEES We are committed to our employees and the service, dedication and expertise they bring to the Saint John Fire Department and Community PROMOTIONS CAPTAIN MARC CAREY PETER ALEXANDER QUALIFIED CAPTAIN PETER LAVIGNE TERRY CROPLEY CHRIS CLINTON STEPHEN JOHNSTON PAT CURRIE SONNY URQUHART LIEUTENANT PETER CHRISTIAN SCOTT GOGUEN TREVOR PRICE RETIREMENTS JD MURRAY SEAN JOHNSON GEORGE MORROW MARK MCCORMICK QUALIFIED LIEUTENANT ANDREW ROONEY BILLY SHEPPARD C H R I S WORTHMAN CRAIG HUSSEY CRAIG M E L V I N DAVID MACCREADY D E R E K DOUCETTE JEREMY HARLEY JUSTIN HORTON L A U R I E R 0 B I C H A U D MARK ARRAND MIKE MEW PATRICK THEBEAU RYAN FERRIS PERMANENT HIRES JOSHUA CROPLEY CRAIG PRICE ADAM MCILLWRAITH SAINT JOHN FIRE 43 PAGE 09 LONG SERVICE AWARDS 15 YEAR PROVINCIAL PINS 25 YEAR PROVINCIAL MEDALS Derek Doucette Terry Cropley Mark Arrand Peter Tait Ryan Ferris Ed Moyer Patrick Thebeau Colin Lucas Justin MacDougall Todd Walsh Adam Ketchum Joseph Shelley Melissa Martin Paul Hallett Natalie Harvey Sonny Urquhart Ryan Brown Alison Campbell Scott Nason Daniel Coates Tyler Embree Rob Nichol David Flewelling Peter Christian Scott Goguen Trevor Price 20 YEAR FEDERAL MEDALS Billy Sheppard Craig Hussey 30 YEAR FEDERAL 35 YEAR PROVINCIAL MEDALS BARS Craig Melvin Justin Horton Geoff Ferguson Joseph Furrow Andrew Rooney Thomas Foley Stephen Hamm Chris Worthman Peter Lavigne Gordon Chase David MacCready Trevor Tompkins Peter King Laurie Robichaud Mark Higgins George Morrow Mike Mew Jeff Kearney Mark McCormick Jeremy Harley Roy Nolan SAINT JOHN FIRE 44 PAGE 10 2023 STATS 600 500 400 800 ma loo a San Feb Mar Apr May lun lul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ 1021 140 133 204 211 182 206 234 226 210 201 233 215 ■ 2022 105 226 258 250 348 288 348 345 321 342 340 352 ■ 2023 321 396 312 4113 408 393 401 421 507 4" 366 442 2500 4126% 2000 1500 2caO 500 2023 Incidents Total MVA fi0 50 20 30 0 Jan Feb Me, As, May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Technical Rescue : V V 00 Sly 45`. 40`. 351 3U. 25! 2Q! 15,. 10`. 5% fl� SAINT JOHN FIRE 45 PAGE 11 2023 BUDGET DATA 2023 Operations Budget $25,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $15,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 -$5,000,000.00 Wages & Benefits Budget $22,499,522.00 Actual $21,708,506.49 Variance $791,015.51 $700£000.00 $600,000.DQ $500,OD0.()0 $400,000M $30a,000.40 $2C)Q,aao,l}Q $100,000.00 a Budget ■ Actual ■ Variance ■ Budget '-Variance Emergency Measure Organization Wages & Benefits $620,288.00 $411,389.12 $208,898.8s Goods & Services $50,072.00 $17,113.16 $32,958.84 Goods & Services $2,525,305.00 $2,915,111.43 $389,80&43 Every community needs a well-equipped fire department. Have you ever wondered how much all the necessary equipment costs? • One set of bunker gear is over $3,000 • One helmet is $650 • A pair of gloves is over $200 This gear, according to NFPA requirements, must be replaced every 10 years SAINT JOHN FIRE 46 PAGE 12 The first ever, NB Camp Courage was held in August 2023. The annual camp was established in 2006 and up until 2023 had only been hosted in Halifax and Calgary. It was created to introduce careers as First Responders - such as Paramedic, Police Officer, and Firefighter - to young women and gender -diverse youth aged 15-19. The camp provided information, inspiration, education, and empowerment, leaving youth with the confidence to achieve any goal, career, or dream they desire. Camp participants took part in hands-on exercises and training, coaching on preparing for fitness requirements for these fields and heard from other females who have chosen a profession in emergency services. SAINT JOHN FIRE emu Gu Up u��NCECE AMBULANCE Camp Courage was a new partnership between Saint John Fire, Saint John Police and Ambulance NB, bringing an interactive camp to the City, offering young females and gender -diverse teens an opportunity to explore a career in First Response. PAGE 13 SAINT JOHN EMO Exercises JUNE 6-8 CBRNE PROVINCIAL A EXERCISE NOVEMBER 8 SJ AIRPORT: TABLETOP MAY 16 EAST SJ TERMINAL FULL SCALE MERP Update Updated List of Potential Hazards • Flooding • Extreme Weather • Complex Structure Fire • Forest/Wildfire • Extreme Temperatures • Power Outage • Landslide/Erosion • Public Health/Pandemic • Cyber Attack • Active/Violent Threat • Communication Failure • Air Quality • Aviation Incident • Port/Marine Related Incident • Potable Water • Civil Disorder/Mass Gathering • Critical Infrastructure Failure • CBRNE ►., SAINT JOHN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DRGANIIATION DRGANISME DE GESTIDN DES SERVICES VU RUNEE SEPTEMBER 13 HAZMAT RAIL EXERCISE MONCTON SEPTEMBER 19 Irl DP WORLD EXERCISE i i SEPTEMBER 20 000 ANNUAL PLNGS 000 EXERCISE In 2023 Saint John EMO made significant updates to our Municipal Emergency Response Plan (MERP). An MERP is any plan, program or procedure prepared by a municipality that is intended to mitigate the effects of an emergency or disaster and to provide for the safety, health or welfare of the civil population and the protection of property and the environment in event of such occurrence. SAINT JOHN FIRE 48 PAGE 14 2023 SIGNIFICANT INCIDENTS On Saturday, August 12th a call was received for a male in Cardiac Arrest on Harbour Passage, and Engine 1 responded. The nearby Platoon Chief arrived first, and initiated CPR. When the crew of Engine 1 arrived, they took over CPR and administered 3 shocks from their AED. After this series of field actions, the citizen regained consciousness, and the ambulance arrived. Ambulance New Brunswick staff, along with our fire service staff continued to treat the patient while he was transferred to the hospital. Our post incident information is that AED and CPR restarted the heart, and the citizen had survived the cardiac arrest incident. On November 24th crews were called to 49 Adelaide Street for a large 3 division structure fire. The arriving crew reported heavy smoke coming from the building. The interior crew reported fire on all levels with the heaviest fire being on the second and third floor. Additional units were called to come to the fire and help with fire attack. After conducting interior operations for over an hour and with the exposure building, which wasjust 3 feet away being threatened by flames, crews hit the fire hard with elevated master streams. The expert positioning of Ladder Tower 1 was critical. (See photo) After about 15 minutes utilizing elevated master streams to attack the exposed fire, crews were able return to interior operations and cycled through the highly physical task of tearing ceilings and walls apart to expose the remaining fire. Eight people were displaced after a structure fire near the corner of Charlotte Street and Harding Street in Saint John's Uptown area, on October 1st. Crews found heavy smoke coming from the building upon arrival, and made repeated interior attacks. After several attempts, crews moved to a defensive strategy. It took more than three dozen Saint John firefighters about two hours to knock down the fire. No serious injuries were reported; however, a woman was treated at the Saint John Regional Hospital for smoke inhalation. Due to heavy smoke in the area, the Saint John Fire Department sent an emergency alert through the provincial Alert Ready notification system to notify citizens of the shelter in place recommendation. SAINT JOHN FIRE 49 PAGE 15 In the early morning hours of June 23rd, crews were dispatched to an alarm activation at a multi -unit building on Bayside Drive. Upon arrival Rescue 4 did not see smoke, however upon further investigation, smoke was discovered in the basement of one of the businesses. The call was upgraded to a structure fire and additional crews were dispatched. Further smoke was discovered in an office area of an adjacent business. The crews did a through investigation using thermal imaging cameras, and located the origin of the fire, which had been extinguished by the Rescue 4 crew, first on scene. a It took just 11 mins to have the fire knocked down which prevented further businesses being affected. CO Incident May 2-4 Two homes in the Millidgeville area were evacuated on May 2nd, 2023, over elevated levels of carbon monoxide. One owner called 911 after her carbon monoxide detector had activated. Once firefighters arrived on scene, they used their own gas monitoring equipment and confirmed the elevated levels ranged from 75 parts per million to 300 parts per million. To note, individuals would feel symptoms in the range of 50-100 parts per million, people may experience headaches, shortness of breath, tiredness or find their motor functions impaired. Ladder 5 took many readings in the first home, opening windows, etc. They also checked levels in adjacent homes, and discovered higher levels of carbon monoxide at the house next door to the original complainant. The homeowner was transported by ambulance to the Regional Hospital to be checked out, due to prolonged exposure. Liberty Gas was contacted and homeowners were evacuated until the source was identified, and levels dropped. The following day, Ladder 5 was back on scene investigating both homes, in full PPE. It was determined that blasting in the area, the day before may have been the source. Liberty Gas took soil readings and found that on the blasting side of the road, readings scored around 100 ppm near the first home, and 0 ppm was found next to the other home. The Department of Environment and the Saint John Water Department were called to aid in the investigation. It was determined that high levels of CO are a natural occurrence after blasting. With the concussion wave and the pressures involved, a pocket of CO can migrate through cracks in rock and soil and find natural infrastructure in the ground to follow, such as water mains, sewer and LNG lines into basements causing high CO levels. This pocket in the ground can last for 3 -7 days before it dissipates. The scene was turned over to David Peterson of the Environment who also called Worksafe and Public Health to get them involved to ensure that in 3 - 5 days it would be safe for the owners to return home. The homeowners were advised to contact a plumber to come in and properly seal off the Kitec pipes to avoid any further issue. Carbon Monoxide - The Silent Killer svmntoms of carbon monoxide poisoning feet a tot like the flu ver .-:Ague vomiting �headache Knovv the symptoms. Protect yourself from GO poisoning, SAINT JOHN FIRE 50 PAGE 16 AIM FIRE On September 14, 2023 Saint John Fire responded to a reported fire at the American Iron and Metal (AIM) facility, located in the Port of Saint John. It is estimated that this was the highest volume of water used for fire suppression in the city's history. Saint John EMO issued a voluntary shelter -in - place order for residents in the City's South end and Millidgeville areas. Residents were asked to remain in their homes, due to air quality concerns. It was recommended windows remain shut, and to turn off HVAC systems, as the plume and smoke were filled with chemicals and contaminants, making it hazardous. Port Saint John also activated their emergency operations. According to the province's air quality data, the amount of fine particulate matter in the air on Thursday was the highest it's been since December 2021. It's the second highest ever reported on the province's charts. The fire burned in a heap of scrap metal for 40 hours, with 83 Saint John Fire personnel involved in fighting the fire. The magnitude of the fire required significant interagency support from industry and municipal partners. Two Atlantic Towing vessels, Spitfire III and Atlantic Osprey, provided water from Saint John Harbour to support extinguishing the fire. The Atlantic Osprey propelled 16,800 gallons of water a minute onto the fire over an 18-hour period, discharging almost 15 million gallons of water, in total. The Spitfire III provided water for aerial trucks from the Saint John Fire Department and Irving Oil, on the scene. Irving Oil responded with its 100-foot aerial truck along with additional resources to assist. Irving Oil's aerial truck was equipped with elevated thermal imaging technology, which was used to outline areas on scene that were still smoldering. The Kennebecasis Valley Fire Department's Tanker 1 was part of a water shuttle operation which assisted in transporting water from hydrants nearby. SAINT JOHN FIRE 51 PAGE 17 CHALLENGES WE ARE FACING... 300 250 200 ISO 100 so 0 Encampment fires occur because people often use fire for cooking or warmth. Inside the homeless encampments, residents may use or store propane, butane, car batteries, or other hazards. Saint John Firefighters have visited encampments to familiarize themselves with the areas and contents. During visits, they have encouraged people living there to use safe warming practices. G— Fires ■20ai ■2o2s ■2023 Grass fires are a significant concern for the department. 2023 was a record breaking year for wildfires across the country, including here in the Maritimes. Grass fires can quickly spread and result in significant damage. Administered N'arcan Doses ■ 2023 1 2D22 SAINT JOHN FIRE 52 PAGE 18 JOIN US Firefighting is more than just putting out fires. Working in a team, firefighters are community minded individuals who provide an essential service. Firefighting provides an opportunity to give back to your community in a variety of ways. From public education with various community groups and schools to fundraising and helping citizens when in need. No two days are ever the same. If you enjoy a challenge, troubleshooting, a dynamic work environment, varied training opportunities, and are looking for a rewarding career - Firefighting might be for you. Saint John Fire has a dedicated team of professionals committed to delivering a high standard of service to our community 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. i SAINT JOHN FIRE 53 Qualified individuals interested in a rewarding and challenging career with the Saint John Fire Department are invited to apply for Holiday Relief Fire Fighter (HRFF) positions. SJFD typically recruits every two years depending on vacancies. We are an Equal Opportunity Employer. We are committed to building a workforce that reflects the diversity of the communities in which we live and which we serve. We encourage and support applications from Indigenous, and members of visible minority groups. For more information about the process and required qualifications please visit our website at the address below. https:Hsaintjohn.ca/en/public-safety/saint-john- fire-department/firefighter-recruitment PAGE 19 CONNECT WITH US 45 LEINSTER STREET SAINT JOHN, NB E21- 1H9 FIRE@SAINTJOHN.CA (506) 658-2910 WWW.SAINTJOHN.CA/PUBLIC-SAFETY ALL PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY FEATURED BY KATE TADIC PHOTOGRAPHY SAINT JOHN FIRE 54 PAGE 20 r � C IT J r _ COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-140 Report Date May 05, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Fleet Replacement Procurement — May 2024 OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author(s) Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Kevin Loughery/ Chris Roberts Michael Hugenholtz/ Ian MacKinnon J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council award the purchase of ten (10) full size half -ton four-wheel drive crew cab pick-up trucks, four (4) full size three -quarter - ton four-wheel drive crew cab pick-up trucks with a fleet side short box and nine (9) one -and -a -half -ton dual rear wheel four-wheel drive crew cab and chassis trucks at a total cost of $2,315,385.00 plus HST to Downey Ford Sales Ltd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Saint John manages a fleet rolling stock of approximately 290 units. Each year, the City's Fleet Management Division works with various City departments to identify and replace units which have reached the end of their useful service lives. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations to award the latest proposed units which require Common Council approval. The City currently has over 75 units past their optimal replacement point (ORP, a calculation based on the age of a unit, the odometer reading, overall condition and maintenance cost) and this year, 36 units (some of which are the least reliable and most expensive to maintain) will be replaced through the City's procurement processes. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION Not applicable. 6191 -2- REPORT Of the 290 rolling stock units, Fleet Management manages approximately 89 pickup trucks utilized by various City of Saint John departments and commissions. These people units, equipment units and toolbox units perform a wide variety of tasks; crew movers, supervisor, service, mini -packers, mini -dump, rescue, line painting, sign installation, crane, boom and bucket, locates, fleet pool, etc. Below is a breakdown of Service Area allocations, as well as the payload capacity of the units. Fire and Emergency Management Services Utilities And Infrastructure Services Saint John Police Force Public Works And Transportation Services 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 "',5 40 45 Payload Capacity 150 / 250 / 350 / 450 / 5501 Grand 1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 Total Fire and Emergency Management Services 3 3 3 9 Public Works and Transportation Services 19 1 4 15 1 40 Saint John Police Force 1 1 Utilities and Infrastructure Services 18 15 1 5 39 Grand Total 40 19 5 20 5 89 The ten (10) half -ton trucks in this recommendation are to replace ten (10), like for like, units; 583, 935, 431, 439, 307, 584, 562, 306, 414, and 425. 67� -3- Half Ton - Maintenance Costs / ORP $60,000.00 $50,000.00 ' $40,000.00 — ■ $30,000.00 — $20,000.00 — $10, 000.00 — $- 583 935 431 439 307 584 562 306 414 425 � Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Vehicle Number Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # 583 $42,217.40 $23,429.02 26 935 $18,122.58 $ 5,041.21 25 431 $20,247.36 $20,247.36 10 439 $53,192.39 $26,217.46 22 307 $35,206.82 $17,193.27 21 584 $26,163.97 $12,311.67 21 562 $26,573.40 $15,969.81 21 306 $38,078.67 $26,928.91 20 414 $30,745.68 $13,998.61 20 425 1111mL $42,533.05 $15,016.68 19 The four (4) three -quarter -ton trucks in this recommendation are to replace four (4), like for like, units; 232, 242, 244, and 436. Three Quarter Ton - Maintenance Costs / ORP $ 300, 000.00 40 $200,000.00 20 $100, 000.00 $- 0 232 242 244 436 � Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # Vehicle Number -Tv Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # 232 $207,744.19 $62,581.80 36 242 $ 63,085.42 $35,545.63 28 244 $ 65,919.15 $29,179.12 27 436 $ 35,181.99 $ 7,029.56 18 61YA -4- And the nine (9) one -and -a -half -ton trucks in this recommendation are to replace nine (9), like for like, units; 574, 563, 575, 580, 596, 530, 595, 589, and 577. One and a Half Ton - Maintenance Costs / ORP $200,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $50,000.00 11 574 563 575 580 596 530 595 589 577 Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 Vehicle Number Lifetime Last 3 Years ORP # 574 $ 93,367.37 $ 8,196.63 27 563 $147,903.35 $ 69,809.42 25 575 $143,695.52 $ 59,448.64 25 580 $165,382.83 $ 94,748.07 24 596 $157,055.21 $ 92,041.17 23 530 $130,314.28 $ 66,192.13 23 595 $139,811.78 $ 72,602.53 23 589 $135,242.70 $ 78,405.91 23 577 $188,628.89 $ 58,625.84 26 Of the twenty-three (23) units being replaced, all will be reviewed upon acceptance of their replacement to be sent directly to auction or cycled / removed from active use and held to offset 2025 summer rental period. Once the 2025 summer rental period is over, all the remaining units will be sent to auction. The unit specifications used in this RFP process have been previously utilized for past recent purchases and should allow for a closer standardization of the fleet, should reallocation be required. The tentative delivery date on the new twenty- three (23) units is twenty-one (21) to thirty-eight (38) weeks. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION Not applicable. i•'1:3 -5- STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's Priority for Valued Service Delivery, specifically as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES This purchase is a planned replacement of existing fleet units, approved in the 2024 capital budget. The funds specifically are provided for in the General Fleet Reserve and the Water Fleet Reserve, funded from the respected operating budgets. The specifications allow for vendors to submit proposals of new and/or used equipment to be evaluated using common criteria. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS — SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Supply Chain Management facilitated three (3) public tender calls for: 1. Truck - Full Size Half -Ton Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab Pick -Up Truck 2. One -and -a -Half -Ton Dual Rear Wheel Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab and Chassis Truck 3. Full Size Three -Quarter -Ton Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab Truck With Fleet Side Short Box This procurement followed our usual process. With the assistance of Supply Chain Management, the three RFP's were posted on the City of Saint John site and The New Brunswick Opportunities Network (NBON). In addition, via Supply Chain Management, the RFP documents were sent directly to three local dealerships in a hope of bids: Downey Ford Saint John, Dobson Chrysler Saint John and Steele Chevrolet Saint John. As such the three (3) tenders closed on April 23, 2024 with the following results (exclusive of HST): Tender No. 2024-232001T - Full Size Half -Ton Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab Pick - Up Truck: COMPANY NAME TENDER PRICE Downey Ford Sales Ltd. $61,868.00 Tender No. 2024-232002T - One -and -a -Half -Ton Dual Rear Wheel Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab and Chassis Truck: COMPANY NAME TENDER PRICE Downey Ford Sales Ltd. 1 $145,393.00 611%] -6- Tender No. 2024-232003T - Three -Quarter -Ton Four Wheel Drive Crew Cab Truck With Fleet Side Short Box: COMPANY NAME TENDER PRICE Downey Ford Sales Ltd. $97,042.00 Staff of Supply Chain Management have reviewed the tenders and have found them to be complete and formal in every regard. Staff believes that the sole tenderer is able to supply the equipment as required and recommend acceptance of their tenders. The above process is in accordance with the City's Strategic Procurement Policy and Supply Chain Management supports the recommendation being put forth. ATTACHMENTS None COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-137 Report Date May 08, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Utilities and Infrastructure Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Council SUBJECT. Contract No. 2023-28: Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street) — Street Reconstruction AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer John Campbell Ian Fogan/ Michael Baker J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that: (A) Council approve reallocating $44,000 of funding from the Engineering Investigations and Design project to the Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street) — Street Reconstruction project to offset the projected budget variance as outlined in this report and; (B) Contract No. 2023-28: Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street) - Street Reconstruction be awarded to the lowest tenderer, Galbraith Construction Ltd., at their tendered price of $602,565.50 (including HST) as calculated based on estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council award Contract No. 2023-28: Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street) - Street Reconstruction project to the low tenderer. PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS May 30t", 2022: M&C 2022-191 — Utility Fund (Revision 1) and General Fund (Revision II) - 2022 Capital Programs, approved. October 30t", 2023: M&C 2023-238 —Revised 2024 General Fund Capital Program, approved. AI -2- REPORT The approved 2022 and 2024 General Fund Capital Programs include funding for the reconstruction of Charlotte Street (King Sq. S. to Princess Street). The work includes the relocation of the overhead electrical and communications utilities to underground ducts, new concrete curb and sidewalk, brick median, tree pits and decorative light poles as well as a street reconstruction. TENDER RESULTS Tenders closed on April 23, 2024, with the following results, including HST: 1. Steele Trucking Ltd. $ 857,897.64 2. Fairville Construction Ltd. $ 749,472.25 3. Galbraith Construction Ltd. $ 602,565.50 4. TerraEx Inc. $ 834,497.50 The Engineer's estimate for the work was $465,920.00. I_W FANTMI•1 The tenders were reviewed by staff and all were found to be formal in all respects. Staff are of the opinion that the low tenderer has the necessary resources and ability to perform the work and recommend acceptance of their tender. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2022 and 2024 General Fund Capital Programs. Assuming the award of the Contract to the low tenderer, an analysis has been completed, which includes the estimated amount of work to be performed by the Contractor and Others. Estimates have been included in the Project Net Cost for materials and services for Saint John Energy, Bell Aliant and Rogers Communications to remove their above -ground infrastructure and install new wiring in the new underground duct banks. The analysis is as follows: Budget $ 760,000 Project Net Cost $ 803,335 Variance (Shortfall) $ - 43,335 I' -3- POLICY - TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS This recommendation aligns with the Council's policy for the tendering of construction contracts, adhering to the City's General Specifications and specific project specifications. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's Priorities for GROW as the project involves reconstructing sections of a city street currently in poor condition. The street reconstruction design incorporates elements to promote a more livable environment. A few of the noteworthy improvements are: • Sidewalks - Replacement of aging asphalt sidewalks with new concrete curbs and sidewalk will improve pedestrian infrastructure, while enhancing the quality of life for members of the community. • Brick Median and Trees - The addition of a brick median provides space between the road and the property line or sidewalk thereby enhancing the public space along this portion of Charlotte Street. • Newly planted trees. The median and trees align with the vision established in the Council's priorities. • The design provides continuity with the proposed reconstruction of Charlotte Street, between Union Street and King Square S. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The surface infrastructure along Charlotte Street is currently in poor condition and requires replacement. This infrastructure renewal effort will improve the appearance and function of the streetscape for pedestrians and cyclists as well as provide continuity of design with the upgrades done as part of the Irving Oil Home Office project. The estimated variance for the General Fund is ($43,334.55). This projected shortfall is proposed to be covered within the Engineering Investigations and Design project (24TC42), included in the 2024 General Fund Capital Program. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS This report was reviewed with Public Works and Transportation. The tendering process for this project was completed in accordance with the City's Procurement policy and Supply Chain Management supports the recommendation being put forth. ATTACHMENTS N/A W Council Community Fund Application Form A — EXTERNAL FORM 2024 Council Community Fund Application FORM A The Information you provide on this form will be used to assess eligibility and consideration for the award of funds at a Common Council meeting. Program Description Through the Council Community Fund Policy (the Fund) Council Members may apply for funding for projects or events that enhance the vibrancy and wellbeing of the residents of the City or minor capital expenditures to improve infrastructure. The Fund supplements Council's existing Community Grants program, allowing a timely and flexible approach to requests for smaller initiatives that align with Council priorities that would not otherwise coincide with the timing of the Community Grants Program. Successful projects will advance one of Council's five priority areas Grow, Green, Belong, Move and Perform. lee). is C7 Application and Eligibility for Community -Based Organizations Applications must comply with the City of Saint Jahn Council Community Fund Policy. For a complete description of application and eligibility criteria please review the Council Community Fund Policy. <hyperlink> Applications are always open for submissions during the calendar year. Community -Based Organizations (CBOs) must be a registered non-profit or registered charitable organization holding its principal activities within the City of Saint John. Application must also demonstrate that your proposal: is based in the City of Saint John o will spend the funding within the financial year in which it is awarded. Appfications have a funding limit of $1500 per Council Member. FORM A. Name of the Council Member submitting this application: Greg Norton Council Community Fund Application Form A— EXTERNAL FORM Name of Community -Based Organization: The Saint Rose School Playground Fund Non-profit status: (registered non-profit number, registered charitable organization number) The HST number is #11107863888 In short, schools are tax exempt. ASl3-S will act as the fiscal agent for the funding. Which means all purchases and revenue will be recorded in the books of the province and all policies and procedures will be followed. Name and Title of CBC individual responsible for the management of the Funds Tanya McGrath. Principal and/or Dave MacGowan, CPA, CA Rhone Number: 606-658-5364 and/or 506-633-7813 Email Address: tan a.mc rath nbed.nb.ca and/or dmacgowan _ kpmg-ca Address: 700 Manawagonish Rd., Saint John, NB E21VI 3W5 and/or 15 Market Square, Suite 501, PO Box 2388 Stn. Main, Sainnt John, NB E2L 3V6 Tell us a bit about your group (what does your group do?) The Saint Rose Playground is fortunately situated adjacent to Saint John Ball fields and Rink. The playground is used year-round by students, daycares, the community, and sports families. The Saint Rose School Playground Fund is focused on a much -needed playground update for Saint Rose School and Saint John Community use. The focus is engaging children of all ages, skill, and developmental levels. Structures and panels have been included to meet physical, visual, hearing, and neurodivergent learners. ICU Council Community fund Application form A —EXTERNAL FORM Tell us about what you want to do (describe the project 1 event 1 and any small capital asset request to support the projectlevent) The updated playground planned in three phases for Saint Rose School will each be accessible play spaces where children of all abilities can play and learn together in a fun and welcoming environment. This means an inclusive playground designed to challenge their physical abilities as well as their social and emotional needs. s our Our Vision r An Investme It In our coirnrn ity A Place to Play, x<. Grow • • LearnAMA y4C ikT'MC ow - 1 ... kl1r, AU* .j"aJJ�� S::J� 1�1A f�Y.•1 45!F YOU! Where is the location of your project i event? Saint Rose School Playground 700 Manawagonish Rd., Saint John, NB E21VI 3W5 What do you think the benefits will be to people living in the city? The updated playground planned in three phases for Saint. Rose School will each be accessible play spaces where children of all abilities can play and learn together in a fun and welcoming environment. This means an inclusive playground designed to challenge their physical abilities as well as their social and emotional needs. How does your project 1 event contribute to addressing the priorities of Common Council? We value a welcoming community. We enhance the quality of life and social well-being in a safe place to live, offering recreation, arks and cultural opportunities that align. PIanSJ, PlaySJ and other related plans. C�� Council Community Fund Application Form A— EXTERNAL FORM • Strengthening neighborhood groups that offer programming to the community, improve quality of life and targeted long-term neighborhood planning. • Improve quality of life with targeted long-term neighborhood planning. • Cultivate community pride and unity. • Foster diversity and inclusion. • Maintain Regional and District parks and enhance them. • Improve recreation programming facilities and infrastructure. How much will your proposal cost? What do you need to carry out your project or event what is the estimated cost? Breakdown of costs Amount Project being complete in 3 phases. Current) $1500 towards phase 2 of in Phase 2. Total estimated cost for 3 phases is project $500,000 TOTAL: [ Please confirm the amount of funds Lou are requesting: $1500.00 1 Estimated completion date: Will you be able to complete the project / event Yes / No and obtain any small capital assets within the financial year in which it is requested? Estimated completion date: I �A'l r "_&__ To Be Acknowledged by the individual responsible for managing the Funds for the Community -Based Organization named above. Accountability: I acknowledge that if funds are provided by the City of Saint John, I will accept Ix responsibility that the funds will be used for the stated purpose and within the timeline stated above. I acknowledge that I will be responsible for keeping all receipts and/or invoices relating to Xthe project or event above and completing an Outcome Report within 45 days of the project or event completion date. Cal Council Community Fund Application Form A - EXTERNAL FORM Liability Waiver for Community Based Organization Fund Recipient By submitting this application, l hereby acknowledge and agree that neither the City, its council, nor any of its members, agencies, officers, employees, or agents shall be held liable or responsible for any injury, including death to any person or for any claims, damages, liabilities, losses, costs, or expenses, including legal fees, arising out of or in connection with the use, allocation, distribution, or expenditure of the Council Members Discretionary Community Fund. I, as an authorized signatory or representative who has legal authority to bind the Community - Based Organization, agree to indemnify and hold harmless the aforementioned entities from all claims, damages, liabilities and losses incurred in relation to or resulting from the use of the allocated funds. Greg Norton Printed name of authorized signatory Signature of authorized signatory yam, ate Your privacy. We will use the information you provide on this form for the award of funds. The award of funds is reported publicly. All information held by us is liable to disclosure under the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act unless it is exempt. City Clerk acknowledgement: (To be completed by City Clerk or their designate) I acknowledge that the proposal described above meets the eligibility requirements of x the Council Community Fund Policy (CCFP) and may proceed to the next public meeting of Common Council. C�:3 8 Were our ANDIOU CAN HELP.1 Fundraising is now underway for a much -needed playground update for Saint Rose School and Saint John Community use. You can help: 7, OUR GOAU $350t000 • DONATE on behalf of a person, alumni or business • VOLUNTEER for ongoing fundraising projects • SPREAD THE WORD to friends and family! FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK! Please join us on Facebook for continued fundraising and construction progress. {J�• •fry+ AML qJFaggbook.com/SaintRosePlayground Our Vision The updated playground planned in three phases for Saint Rose School will each be an accessible play space where children of all abilities can play and learn together in a fun and welcoming environment. This means an inclusive playground designed to challenge their physical abilities as well as their social and emotional needs. SECTION 6 -PHASE 2 An inclusive addition to our existing climbing and gliding structure will offer lower -level shaded areas for play. This area features activity, sensory and communication panels for learning and engagement fun. The children's favorite climbing and gliding section will expand with a maypole to develop upper body strength while allowing the most active children plenty of challenge. w SECTION A PHASE I The addition of swings to the playground is an important part of our goal to accommodate and satisfy sensory needs of students while also encouraging safe risk taking. Swinging stimulates different parts of the brain and helps develop skills such as spatial awareness, balance, rhythm and muscle control. A quiet moment on a swing can help a child regulate their sensory system. Our ZoomTwist Duplex accommodates up to 14 children at once and has an opening to encourage inclusive and cooperative play. Spinning increases learning potential, spatial awareness and rhythm while giving children the vestibular input that many sensory seekers enjoy. SECTION C -PHASE 3 Our largest section of expansion is focused on being physically accessible by including a slide, musical instruments gagement structure s to climb, Our Guiding Principi The playground will focus on engaging children of all ages, skill, and developmental levels. Structures and panels have been included to meet physical, visual, hearing and neurodivergent learners. ACCESSIBILITY & SENSORY • Wheelchair access • Sensory panels • Brail panel • Sign language and communication panels PHYSICAL HEALTH • Multi level structures • Various gross motor activities • Movement engagement SOCIAL PLAY • Cooperative Panels • Parallel structures to encourage interaction • Cooperative structures LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT • Multi level skill • Imaginary Play areas • Engaging various interests A Pla Grog 1e1 Inclusive Swing DAccess Ramp DAccess Ramp r ,, t;nameieon a suae Barrel Ride Silo Climber eps Dome Climber Nu Edge Rock Wall • . Look out Tower puantum II Slide Side by Side Climber Side -by -Side Slide Access Ramp G- s i n Investment in ur communi The Saint Rose Playground is fortunately situated adjacent to Saint John Ball Fields and Rink. The Playground is used year round by students, daycares, the community and sports families. The Giving Tree Located in our Gym, this permanent painted tree will display our donors for all to see. DONATION LEVELS: Gold Leaf $100 Orange Leaf $1,000 Green Leaf $250 Apple $5,000 Red Leaf $500 Red Cardinal $10,000+ How to Donate Contact Saint Rose School online �r THANK you! r� 'The city of saint John PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: Teachers are the backbone of our education system, dedicating their lives to shaping the minds of our future generations; and WHEREAS: Retired teachers have served with distinction and dedication throughout their careers, imparting knowledge, wisdom, and guidance to countless students; and WHEREAS: Retired teachers continue to contribute to our communities through mentorship, volunteering, and advocacy for education; and WHEREAS: The experience, expertise, and passion of retired teachers are invaluable assets to our society; WHEREAS: It is fitting and proper to recognize and honor the contributions of retired teachers to the betterment of schools, our communities, and our nation; WHEREAS. Without the work, and volunteerism, of Retired Teachers within our community and province, many organizations and programs could not function. NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John, in recognition of their continued contributions, after years of serving the public as educators and volunteers in the school system and society, do hereby declare Tuesday, May 10, 2024 as Retired Teacher's Day in The City of Saint John. In witness whereof I have set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Mayor of the City of Saint John. 73 r� 'The city of saint John PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The Moose Hide Campaign is an Indigenous -led, grassroots movement of men, boys and all Canadians standing up to end violence against women, children and all those along the gender continuum and; WHEREAS: The Moose Hide Campaign was founded along the 'Highway of Tears' in British Columbia in response to the injustices and violence faced by many women and children in Canada, particularly those who are Indigenous; WHEREAS: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is at epidemic proportions across Canada with more than 4 in 10 women having experienced it in their lifetime, and this reality is worse for Indigenous women who are twice as likely to experience violence from their current or former partners; WHEREAS: The Moose Hide Campaign has distributed over five million moose hide pins that each spark five conversations about issues of violence against women, children and all those along the gender continuum; WHEREAS: Wearing the moose hide pin demonstrates a commitment to honour, respect and protect the women and children in your life, end gender -based violence and take meaningful action towards reconciliation with Indigenous peoples; WHEREAS. Participation in the Moose Hide Campaign is a concrete action for all citizens to address the legacies of colonization, residential schools and the reality of more than 1,200 missing or murdered women in Canada; WHEREAS. Engagement with the Moose Hide Campaign aligns with the United Nations Declaration on the Right of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action, and the Calls for Justice of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG2S+). NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John, do hereby declare Thursday, May 16°i, 2024 as Moose Hide Campaign Day in The City of Saint John. In witness whereof I have set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Mayor of the City of Saint John. 74 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: public works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public health, high quality of life, and well-being of the people of Saint John; and, WHEREAS: these infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees at all levels of government and the private sector, who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our nation's transportation, water supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; and, WHEREAS: it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders, and children in Saint John to gain knowledge of and maintain an ongoing interest and understanding of the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities_ NOW THEREFORE: I, Mayor Donna Noade Reardon, of Saint John do hereby proclaim the week of May 19-25, 2024 as National Public Works Week in The City of Saint John. In witness whereof I have set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Mayor of the City of Saint John. 75 Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution Property: 241-281 Douglas Avenue Public Hearing, 1" and 2nd Readings: May 13, 2024 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Yes That Common Council give 15t and 2nd reading to an Amendment Amendment to the Municipal Plan to: 1. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 3. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 5. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 6. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an WQ approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and NO Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; and 13. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility. Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd reading to an Amendment Amendment to the Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM)) to Major Community Facility (CFM). Recission of No Previous s. 39/s. 59 Conditions Section 59 No Conditions Section 59 No Agreement Section 131 No Agreement Other No 3' Reading: Scheduled for May 27, 2024 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to an Amendment to Amendment the Municipal Plan to: 1. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; rE:3 2. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; Amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 8. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Faci 0611 9. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; and Amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility. Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to an Amendment to Amendment the Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM)) to Major Community Facility (CFM). E:ii] Recission of No Previous s. 39/s. 59 Conditions Section 59 Yes That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section Conditions 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an approximate area of 2466 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in general accordance with the detailed building elevations and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, driveway accesses, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading areas, landscaping, signs, and exterior lighting as illustrated on the site plan submitted with the application. (b) That the New Brunswick Museum, upon the opening of the Museum expansion, provide offsite parking and shuttle service for all staff at an offsite location, such as their nearby Lancaster Avenue facility, and that this commitment remain in place as long as the onsite parking lot averages more than 80% capacity via regular visitation. Section 59 No Agreement Section 131 Yes That Common Council authorize an Agreement between the Agreement City and the Developer pursuant to section 131 of the Community Planning Act for the following public benefits associated with the development: (a) That upon completion of the New Brunswick Museum expansion project, the developer shall apply to designate the original museum exterior (including the King George Hall) as a heritage designated property as per the City of Saint John's Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law. E:1iI (b) That the developer enters into a cost sharing agreement to upgrade the existing crosswalks, located at Bentley Street and Douglas Avenue, into lighted crosswalks, to the satisfaction of the Chief City Engineer. (c) That the developer incorporates and install two covered transit stops located south of 277 Douglas Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Chief City Engineer. (d) That the developer extend the Harbour Passage trail system with the specialized trail extending from the new Museum entrance to the southern property boundary (bordering Riverview Park), at the developers sole cost. (e) That the developer establish the New Brunswick Museum parking lot as a Snow Ban Lot, for use by local residents during on -street parking bans. The details of the lot operations shall generally align with the existing Snow Ban Lot operations as well as the maintenance requirements of the Museum. Other No PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 24, 2024 Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council Your Worship and Councillors: SUBJECT: Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning for 241-281 Douglas Avenue On March 18, 2024, Common Council referred the above matter to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation. The Committee considered the attached report at its April 16, 2024 meeting. 'V1 The City of Saint John Jennifer Kirchner, Manager of Community Planning with Growth and Community Services, appeared before the Committee and provided an overview of the proposed amendments which will facilitate an expansion to the New Brunswick Museum. Tracy Clinch, the Chair of the New Brunswick Museum, indicated that they are align with the staff recommendation and indicated the Board's excitement about the proposed project. Don Schmidt, representing the applicant, provided an overview of the project and discussed the impact of the natural area (escarpment and river) and the Douglas Avenue streetscape on the proposed building design. His presentation included information about material selection and the engagement process that occurred in 8 communities throughout New Brunswick. Stephen Gray, owner of 281 Douglas Avenue, spoke before the Committee. He indicated he was unhappy with the land procurement undertaken by the Province, the Heritage Development Board recommendation to remove 281 Douglas Avenue from the Heritage Conservation Area and raised concerns about the removal of the pump station and its impact on his neighbour. The Committee asks questions to the applicant about the following: • Project Timeline; Page 1 of 4 83 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 24, 2024 • Number of Staff; • Existing speeding on Douglas Avenue; and • Traffic Circles Following consideration of the staff presentation, the Committee unanimously adopted the Staff Recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 3. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 5. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 6. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 8. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Page 2 of 4 84 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 24, 2024 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 9. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; and 13. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility. 14. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM)) to Major Community Facility (CFM). 15. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an approximate area of 2466 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in general accordance with the detailed building elevations and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, driveway accesses, vehicle and bicycle parking, Page 3 of 4 85 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 24, 2024 loading areas, landscaping, signs, and exterior lighting as illustrated on the site plan submitted with the application. (b) That the New Brunswick Museum, upon the opening of the Museum expansion, provide offsite parking and shuttle service for all staff at an offsite location, such as their nearby Lancaster Avenue facility, and that this commitment remain in place as long as the onsite parking lot averages more than 80% capacity via regular visitation. 16. That Common Council authorize an Agreement between the City and the Developer pursuant to section 131 of the Community Planning Act for the following public benefits associated with the development: (a) That upon completion of the New Brunswick Museum expansion project, the developer shall apply to designate the original museum exterior (including the King George Hall) as a heritage designated property as per the City of Saint John's Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law. (b) That the developer enters into a cost sharing agreement to upgrade the existing crosswalks, located at Bentley Street and Douglas Avenue, into lighted crosswalks, to the satisfaction of the Chief City Engineer. (c) That the developer incorporates and install two covered transit stops located south of 277 Douglas Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Chief City Engineer. (d) That the developer extend the Harbour Passage trail system with the specialized trail extending from the new Museum entrance to the southern property boundary (bordering Riverview Park), at the developers sole cost. (e) That the developer establish the New Brunswick Museum parking lot as a Snow Ban Lot, for use by local residents during on -street parking bans. The details of the lot operations shall generally align with the existing Snow Ban Lot operations as well as the maintenance requirements of the Museum. Respectfully submitted, Brad Mitchell Chair Attachments Page 4 of 4 86 The City of Saint John Date: April 11, 2024 To: Planning Advisory Committee From: Growth & Community Services Meeting: April 16, 2024 SUBJECT Applicant: Diamond Schmidt Landowner: Province of New Brunswick Department of Transportation and Infrastructure; City of Saint John; and Steven and Mary Smith Location: 241 to 281 Douglas Avenue PID: 55222129 (portion); 00377937; 00358481; 00377945; 55222012; 00379255;55172860;00379230 Plan Designation: Proposed Designation: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning Application Type: Stable Residential; Park and Natural Area Major Community Facility Park (P); Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Major Community Facility (CFM) Municipal Plan Amendment and Rezoning Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Municipal Plan and the Zoning By - Law. Common Council will consider the Committee's recommendation at a public hearing on Monday, May 13, 2024. Page 1 of 12 89 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting amendments to the Municipal Plan's City Structure Map and Future Land Use Map and the Zoning By-law's Zoning Map to facilitate the expansion of the New Brunswick Museum onto adjacent lands. The subject site is currently designated Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area in the Municipal Plan. A Municipal Plan Amendment is required to re -designate the subject site to Major Community Facility. The subject site is currently zoned Park (P) and Mid -Rise Residential (RM). A rezoning to Major Community Facility (CFM) is required to facilitate the building and site expansion. As part of the rezoning, Section 59 Conditions and Public Benefits form part of the recommendation. Variances from the zone standards are required and will be considered by the Development Officer. RECOMMENDATION 1. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 3. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PI D 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 5. That Common Council amend Schedule A of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 6. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 8. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, Page 2 of 12 ffi Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 9. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; and 13. That Common Council amend Schedule B of the Municipal Plan by changing the designation for the parcel of land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility. 14. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM)) to Major Community Facility (CFM). 15. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an approximate area of 2466 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in general accordance with the detailed building elevations and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, driveway accesses, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading areas, landscaping, signs, and exterior lighting as illustrated on the site plan submitted with the application. (b) That the New Brunswick Museum, upon the opening of the Museum expansion, provide offsite parking and shuttle service for all staff at their nearby Lancaster Page 3 of 12 a9 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 Avenue facility, and that this commitment remain in place as long as the onsite parking lot averages more than 80% capacity via regular visitation. 16. That Common Council authorize an Agreement between the City and the Developer pursuant to section 131 of the Community Planning Act for the following public benefits associated with the development: (a) That upon completion of the New Brunswick Museum expansion project, the developer apply to designate the original museum exterior (including the King George Hall) as a heritage designated property as per the City of Saint John's Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law. (b) That the developer enter into a cost sharing agreement to upgrade the existing crosswalks, located at Bentley Street and Douglas Avenue, into lighted crosswalks, to the satisfaction of the Chief City Engineer. (c) That the developer incorporate and install two covered transit stops located south of 277 Douglas Avenue. (d) That the developer extend the Harbour Passage trail system with the specialized trail extending from the new Museum entrance to the southern property boundary (bordering Riverview Park). (e) That the developer establish the New Brunswick Museum parking lot as a Snow Ban Lot, for use by local residents during on -street parking bans. The details of the lot operations shall generally align with the existing Snow Ban Lot operations as well as the maintenance requirements of the Museum. DECISION AND PROPERTY HISTORY In 1929, an act incorporating "The Provincial Museum" was passed in the New Brunswick Legislature which began the formal process of developing the existing museum located at 277 Douglas Avenue.' Upon incorporation, the Executive Committee undertook a site selection process and selected the existing Douglas Avenue property. The property was selected for a variety of reasons including the site overlooking both the harbour and the river and being directly adjacent to a public park.2 Construction occurred during the early years of the Great Depression, with the cornerstone laid on June 27, 1930 and the majority of construction completed by 1932.3 It should be acknowledged that the southern portion of the building was constructed on 281 Douglas Avenue (Riverview Park) and remains as a longstanding encroachment onto City property. The official opening of the Museum occurred on August 16, 1934, with then Prime Minister and New Brunswicker, the Rt. Hon. R. B. Bennett, unlocking the doors of the Museum and declaring it ' Squires, W. Austin. "The History and Development of The New Brunswick Museum (1842-1945)". 1945. Page 16. z Squires, W. Austin. Page 18. 3 Squires, W. Austin. Page 19. Page 4 of 12 90 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 open to the public.4 In the ensuing years, a number of renovations and additions were undertaken, expanding the building's footprint and capacity. ANALYSIS Proposal The applicant is proposing to expand the historic New Brunswick Museum building, located at 277 Douglas Avenue, to incorporate 263 to 241 Douglas Avenue. The proposed project would see the maintenance of the original museum structure, the removal of many of the additions undertaken over the years, and the construction of an expansion to the north of the existing structure. The project requires the demolition of four residential buildings and the decommissioning and demolition of the Douglas Avenue Lift Station. A simultaneous process is being undertaken to amend the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law in order to remove 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, in order to facilitate the demolition and redevelopment of that portion of land. The request to remove 241 from the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law received support at the April V meeting of the Heritage Development Board. Site and Neighbourhood The subject site is located on Douglas Avenue, in a historic neighbourhood within the City. The buildings at 241, 247, 261 and 263 Douglas Avenue are residential structures built from 1906 to 1920; and 255 Douglas Avenue is the location of a City owned lift station. The subject site is noted for its location along the Saint John River, which is a known historic Portage Site for a number of indigenous communities. As such, the area is rich in archeological sites and is important to the history and culture of the area. The neighbourhood is a mixture of uses ranging from institutional and park space to residential and commercial uses, with Harbour View High School and Riverview Park serving as area landmarks. Properties within the area represent a variety of zones including residential (R2 — Two -Unit Residential; RL — Low -Rise Residential; and RM — Mid -Rise Residential); institutional (CFM — Major Community Facility; CFN — Neighbourhood Community Facility; and P — Park); and commercial (CG — General Commercial). Public and Active Transportation The Museum property and proposed expansion area is well served by a variety of transportation options that provide flexibility to visitors visiting the Museum. Douglas Avenue contains an established sidewalk network on both sides of the street, that connects to the North End and to the West Side (via Chesley Drive). In addition, Harbour Passage currently extends to the intersection of Douglas Avenue and Bentley Street, which is located adjacent to the existing main entrance to the New Brunswick Museum. It should also be indicated that Douglas Avenue also contains a separated bike lane that provides additional connectivity to the broader active transportation network. 4 Squires, W. Austin. Page 22. Page 5 of 12 S1 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 The Museum is located on Transit Route 1, which is a main Transit Route serving the City. This route connects the Museum to a variety of locations within the City including the Uptown, McAllister Place, Lancaster Mall and the University of New Brunswick. Bus stops are situated near the existing Museum entrance, at the intersection of Douglas Avenue and Bentley Street. Due to the location of these bus stops and the access to a major transit route, the New Brunswick Museum is well situated to encourage visitors to utilize the transit system when planning their visits. Statements of Public Interest The Province of New Brunswick adopted Statements of Public Interest which are general standards that direct and shape growth and development within the province. Staff undertook a review of the proposal in regard to its alignment with these Statements, which can be found in the attached review document. The proposed development aligns with the intent of these policy statements. Municipal Plan Amendment The existing Museum property is located within the Major Community Facility Designation. The proponent is proposing that the Municipal Plan be amended to change the designation of the included properties to the Major Community Facility Designation. This is broken down as follows: • A portion of 281 Douglas Avenue, representing the portion of the building encroaching onto Riverview Park, from the Park and Natural Area Designation; • 255, 261 and 263 Douglas Avenue from the Stable Residential Designation; • 241, 247, and 249 Douglas Avenue from the Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area Designation; and • PID 00377937 from the Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area Designation. The area is comprised of a mixture of designations that have formalized diversity in the area. The lands incorporating the Riverview Park and river adjacent lands are identified as Park and Natural Area. The lands directly adjacent to Douglas Avenue are largely identified as Stable Residential, with the exception of a small portion of land across the street from the Museum, which as identified as Stable Commercial. In addition, Harbourview High School, located south of the Museum property, is also identified with the Major Community Facility Designation. The Major Community Facility is a Land Use Designation in PlanSJ that encompasses major institutions and significant facilities that serve the broader community. These include major learning institutions, including post -secondary institutions, major health service facilities, recreation complexes and cultural establishments. The New Brunswick Museum was identified as one of these institutions that not only serves the broader community but would also serve visitors to Saint John. The proposed Municipal Plan amendment seeks to extend the Major Community Facility designation to adjacent lands to expand the existing Museum. Amendments to PlanSJ to support the expansion of established uses have historically been supported, as it represents a Page 6 of 12 92 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 continuation and expansion of a recognized use that has been formally established and permitted through various Municipal Planning documents. PlanSJ explicitly acknowledges the important contributions the New Brunswick Museum has made to the local community and in raising awareness of the vast history of New Brunswick. As such, the Municipal Plan heartedly supports the continued operation of this institution within the City, and as such, the expansion of this facility aligns with the overall goals of PlanSJ. Zoning The existing Museum site is zoned Major Community Facility (CFM). The portion of the building that encroaches onto the adjacent park, is located on land zoned Park (P). The other properties to be included in the expansion are zoned Mid -Rise Residential (RM) and Park (P). The proposal is to rezone the impacted properties, including a portion of the site impacted by the historic encroachment, to the CFM zone. This will incorporate the entire Museum property as a CFM property and will enable the development to be undertaken with a singular set of zone standards. The CFM zone is utilized for facilities and structures that provide a range of large-scale community uses that provide services to a vast population on a regional or provincial scale. These uses are typically found in the Primary Development Area of the City and incorporate uses such as High Schools, Universities or Colleges, Hospitals, and Community Centres and Arenas. These uses often provide cultural, healthcare, education, and recreational services that are necessary to build a healthy, livable and sustainable community. The New Brunswick Museum would be considered a Cultural Establishment that provides cultural, educational and recreational opportunities for residents of New Brunswick. As such, the proposed use is permitted within the CFM zone. The CFM zone establishes a variety of standards that guide development. The zone standards include provisions associated with building setbacks, maximum building height and general guidance for building design. As part of the application, staff have undertaken a review of the proposal to determine its alignment with the zone standards. Based on the proposed site plan and elevation drawings, the proposed Museum expansion largely aligns with the CFM standards. A discussion of the proposed variances is included later in the report. It should be noted, however, that the existing encroachment of the historic museum structure on the adjacent park does not meet the standards of the zone but is considered to be a historic encroachment not impacted by this proposal. Infrastructure and Traffic The City's Infrastructure Development and Fire and Emergency Management Service Areas also reviewed the general proposal and no major concerns were raised in regards to the proposed expansion. Decommissioning and Removal of the Douglas Avenue Lift Station Page 7 of 12 93 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 The property at 255 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222012) is owned by the City of Saint John and contains a sanitary lift station which was established to serve the structures located at 241, 247, 261 and 263 Douglas Avenue. As part of the overall development project, the lift station will be decommissioned and removed, and the land transferred to Provincial ownership. Due to this, the above -mentioned residential structures will no longer be connected to the City's sanitary sewer, and therefore, cannot be occupied. Traffic Impact Statement and Parking Study As part of the application process, the applicant has prepared and submitted a Traffic Impact Statement and a Parking Study to determine any potential impacts the proposed Museum expansion might have on the existing road infrastructure including on -street parking. It should be noted that this project is somewhat unique, as the Museum formally operated fully out of this location, and the proposed development will see the site reactivated and expanded. Traffic Impact Statement A Traffic Impact Study was undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on Douglas Avenue and the surrounding road network. The study included an assessment of traffic volumes, projected impact of the museum on existing roadway operations including Harbour View High School and possible impacts on the three Douglas Avenue intersections (Douglas Avenue/Main Street; Douglas Avenue/Bentley Street; and Douglas Avenue/Chesley Drive). This assessment was based on the specific New Brunswick Museum hours with openings after the AM traffic peak (7am to 9am) and closings, except for Thursdays, prior to the PM traffic peak (4pm to 6pm). Based on the proposed visitor projections, including estimated trips, it was determined that the additional traffic volume produced by the Museum expansion would have a negligible impact on the existing road network including the above -mentioned intersections and operations of the Harbour View High School. Parking Supply Study A Parking Supply Study was undertaken to assess the parking needs for the Museum project. Due to archeological sensitives and site restrictions, the site has capacity for 75 parking spaces and a bus drop-off lane to be situated on Douglas Avenue. The Museum has also provided a written commitment for off -site employee parking, which is reflected in the proposed Section 59 conditions. The Study undertook an analysis of the parking needs of the Museum with comparisons to the Zoning By -Law standards, parking provisions at similar cultural facilities, visitor information/admission data, and an on -street parking analysis of Douglas Avenue and adjacent streets. The full document forms Submission 4 of this report. A basic summary of the Study indicates that the New Brunswick Museum has an admission average of 45,000. This Study utilized a 90,000 visitor count in order to provide a conservative assessment of the Museum's future parking needs. Based on this projected visitor count, they would anticipate a peak hour attendance of 87-104 visitors. Based on historical information, it is believed that only 55% of visitors arrive by car, as the remaining visitors comprise of school field trips and cruise ship passengers which arrive by bus. Each car arrival has an average Page 8 of 12 94 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 occupancy load of 2.1 visitors per vehicle, which would result in a parking requirement of 62-70 parking stalls based on the peak hour attendance estimated above. Public Benefits The revitalization of the New Brunswick Museum is a significant community benefit which will not only revitalize Douglas Avenue and reactivate the historic Museum building, but it also represents a significant investment into the preservation of the province's heritage and culture. As part of the project development, the New Brunswick Museum have committed to a variety of Public Benefits which will provide direct enhancements to the surrounding area. These items will form part of a Section 131 Agreement, which will formalize these project elements. These public benefits include: • The designation of the original museum exterior (including the King George Hall) as a heritage designated property. • A financial commitment to the upgrading of the existing crosswalks, located at Bentley Street and Douglas Avenue, into lighted crosswalks. • The design and installation of two covered transit stops located south of 277 Douglas Avenue. • The extension of the Harbour Passage trail system to incorporate the new Museum entrance. • Allowing the New Brunswick Museum parking lot to serve as a Snow Ban Lot, for use by local residents during on -street parking bans. The majority of the proposed public benefits will support the transportation network in the area, encouraging the use of our transit system and pedestrian network in order to access the Museum and making these options safer and more functional for all Saint Johners. Variances Staff undertook a detailed analysis of the proposed development to determine alignment with the standards set forth in the Zoning By -Law, including the Major Community Facility Zone (CFM). Due to the significant site limitations due to archeological sensitivities, a few variances are requested to support the development. A Development Officer variance will be required for the only variance to the CFM zone. This is a variance to permit the placement of the parking area in the required 7.5m side yard setback. The more significant variance required for this project is a variance to the parking standard. The proposed building is significant in scale and can be considered unique due to the multitude of uses and functions that form the operation of a Museum. These uses and functions overlap, which is significantly different than if a variety of independent uses were operating within a singular building (ie — a shopping centre). Staff reviewed the breakdown of the building's layout to determine how many parking spaces would be required based on the most comparable uses identified in the Zoning By -Law. As the Museum will be comprised of diverse functions that align with uses such as a business office, warehouse (comparable to archival space), library, retail general, restaurant and cultural establishment, the Zoning By -Law would require 316 parking Page 9 of 12 a6 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 stalls for the Museum. Due to site constraints, the proposed development is able to provide 75 parking stalls, which would necessitate a variance from the By -Law standards. Use Zoning By -Law Requirement Building Area Parking Requirement Business Office 1 parking stall per 50m2 493.98m2 9.88 Warehouse 1 parking stall per 200m2 (up to 2000m2) 1 parking stall per 500m2 (for area over 2000m2) 3,355.12m2 12.71 Library 1 parking stall per 35m2 101.01 m2 2.89 Retail General 1 parking stall per 30m2 142.11m2 4.74 Restaurant 1 parking stall per 10m2 251.79m2 Cultural Establishment 1 parking stall per 20m2 5,281.44m2 264.07 Total Requirement 316.46 parking stalls The applicant has undertaken a Parking Study to assess the functional parking needs of the New Brunswick Museum based on historical information from the Museum operations, visitor transportation patterns (eg. tour bus visitors and school groups), projected visitor counts, and peak parking needs. This assessment (as discussed earlier in the report and as included as Submission 4) was used to determine what the actual parking needs are for the Museum, which determined that 62-70 parking stalls would be utilized based on the peak hour attendance. In addition to the findings of the Parking Study, the applicant has also committed to a number of items that will help further reduce the onsite parking demand and to promote alternative modes of transportation. This includes: • Offsite parking (with transportation) for all Museum staff; • Financial support for the upgrading of the existing Douglas Avenue crosswalks to lighted crosswalks; • Extension of Harbour Passage infrastructure; • Installation of two covered transit stops. These commitments will help enhance the user experience for Saint John Transit and will provide a safer pedestrian experience, which will make these transportation options more viable for potential visitors, in addition to existing Saint John residents. Based on the information provided in the Parking Study, as well as the additional commitments made by the applicant in regards to offsite parking and enhancements to the transit and pedestrian routes, staff are comfortable with the proposed parking variance, which will be processed as a Development Officer variance. Section 59 Conditions Common practice in the City of Saint John has been to include a series of Section 59 conditions that tie a rezoning with a specific development proposal. This trend resulted in an increased Page 10 of 12 96 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 number of Section 59 amendment applications being submitted to allow for minor changes to the development proposal which otherwise could be reviewed and approved by Planning Staff. As such, staff are moving away from placing significant Section 59 conditions on rezoning applications, in order to provide the necessary flexibility to support design changes that occur during the detailed design phase of the project prior to submission of a building permit. Community Planning staff are recommending two Section 59 conditions for this project. The first condition is that the development be undertaken in general accordance with the detailed elevations and site plans that formed the application. This will provide general guidance for the ultimate site development, without limiting any necessary changes that may arise due to further site exploration, engineering design and finalizing of the architectural plans. The second Section 59 condition is associated with the use of the onsite parking. As part of the variance request, the applicant has indicated that Museum staff will be provided offsite parking at their Lancaster Avenue facility and that staff will be shuttled to the Museum for their work shifts. This commitment helps reduce the regular demand for parking onsite and helps to rationalize the reasonableness of their proposed parking variance. This condition will help ensure the parking functionality of the site but allows for changes in the future if onsite parking demand decreases. Conclusion The proposed expansion of the New Brunswick Museum onto the adjacent properties is supported by the Municipal Plan and represents an expansion of an established and historic land use on Douglas Avenue. The recommitment of the site as a public museum will serve as a benefit to the community and represents a substantial reinvestment into a significant public institution. The redesignating of the subject site to Major Community Facility will ensure that the Museum expansion will be formally incorporated with the historic museum property. Rezoning of the site to Major Community Facility (CFM) not only aligns with the zoning of the existing museum but is the zone that best aligns with the use of the site as a prominent community facility that serves not only Saint John residents, but those across the Province. Additional Public Benefits associated with pedestrian connectivity and enhancement to the transit system show a commitment to encouraging visitors to utilize alternative transportation methods. Appropriate Section 59 conditions are recommended related to site development, particularly associated with offsite parking arrangements. ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No alternatives were considered. ENGAGEMENT Proponent Page 11 of 12 91 Diamond Schmidt 241-281 Douglas Avenue April 11, 2024 The applicant undertook a robust public engagement process that included in -person engagement sessions in Saint John and in other locations across the province, as well as a virtual session. A public engagement website was also established to provide information about the project, a copy of the virtual engagement sessions and mechanisms to provide additional feedback. A copy of the Public Engagement Summary is included as Submission 5. Public In accordance with the Committee's Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on April 2, 2024. The public hearing notice will be posted on the City of Saint John website on or before April 18, 2024. APPROVALS AND CONTACT Author/Manager Acting Director Commissioner Jennifer Kirchner, MCIP, RPP I David Dobbelsteyn I Amy Poffenroth Contact: Jennifer Kirchner Telephone: (506) 639-7933 Email: Jennifer. Kirchner@saintjohn.ca Application: 23-187 APPENDIX Map 1: Aerial Photography Map 2: Future Land Use Map 3: Zoning Attachment 1: Site Photography Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy Review and Statements of Public Interest Review Submission 1: Site Plan Submission 2: Renderings Submission 3: Traffic Impact Study Submission 4: Parking Supply Study Submission 5: Public Consultation Summary Page 12 of 12 as J N L H E � Y O O 0 O O O M o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o `m m zz EE 0o o oo 0 o U co T E Q N Z O Z - m O E a � � co 0 — - T E o O o `o U) = ii LJ L!' E m` 3 z `o Q o _ — o .o N N > ' ¢ a M � p _ o z i V 0 N a L c) m N 01 0) .C: 0 N E � Y O O 0 O O O M o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o `m x m m � � m Q E E E a oL N ono E-W o E o� o d > J 1 O N U LL � U U d 1 1 E U m N z O O O U � a N N Q d CM � m a o _ r O a 4 am O N ® N O N ca 2 O UA O O UA 70 cB E O U) co rn 0 O O Q CO cB w Z3 O 0 N 70 co r- N O O O a ow—q c co a) n c O U s ao c 4' co 4' c (1) � ) C O s+0a' 'Oto (n .— 4 � c C i++ O s ° aU oc s M ° s -0p o ° o c a) c c '0 3 s '0 ° 4� c � -a s° 4� E f6 c a) s a4 4� ° c° — ° s o cC ac o s s m E xQ aa)) � Mc Y c W 4. -p :E " c a) aQo o v c o '7A o a 4� Q) o E 0 3 c s a) c U C .2 o f 6 c O U a) o c ° a� >" o s " c a' °o s" +' a) U s= +' Co ° O -a f6 }� U a) a) cco a c c s C Ln E o o c `-a) o sac) v Oo i 4-1 O CN O U Q o OCL o'V E + o UE a) O U � QJ > () 0 a) p 0 > C >, J N 0 O U 4� 0 s +' (6 4 J M +' +1 C 0 M -0 s 4-1 a s 4� s Ei C o a) a) O of s c o rn a) C a+ Q > E f6 U 0 ++ O O`) Cto V aca)) c o 0 x 3c a) 3 E E ) •Oi 41 6 U ° J c 4-1 E 4�o _ U ca m s a f6 >. W o m a) a a) +� aCo - m c -0 c a) � oCn 00 N 3 E° s c 3 a) c c s f6 p 0 CL c -a a) s_ c 'c O a) '.E ° o c O +� � z +1 c : co E c z Z; c ao 4, cs > a ca a �, E v, o2S RT s s a) v o o s a) c '- ° s s 4' 3 s o o f6 N H 4� -0 a) 2 v) Q 4� 4� H U U o c m�o Q aA a) c � i oC c O aica) s u : C X W +� E s � o° 4- 0 O c g E f—CL 6U ��c s�o � w a a) =�>, U o Qa0 V o 'wa ) c °E � s a) a) s a sc p O U u o - + _, o -aato) p +aU s � ° i a JaCcoo U E +, 4,C 4 1oa�) ca U L C W o 30 _ i• a) to co a) cn a) ° 3 '� O> a) Q U = a) E m 0 c E �, +' �, E E o s E o +� Q •� cv c - co Q 4� a) E ° 3 �_ U c c U U E C7 0 s i O i a) a) 7 i• �O � co 4�of f�6 s z s a) s c� > o� .� c E 4-13 N U E o 4, 4-1s +� E E o n +� to c m 'U ° co a) c j + L f0 o -0o VI E� p m E o O O U0 aC �) _a) Oa OE 3 o a)o+oa) 0� a) O U s E +OrE o a s a v o 3w� OW 7uv Q ''an aE MsUMoo"o MO O 2io a) m e O 3 + Eco a o m O_j0C E c m a+�- o M f 6 s� u s a)6 "J a �a o >, M _j� cn •CGVO L 4-1 a) (A c E �O-1�0 � a)'O C -O (Q6 v a 0 u 4. c E �-° " a W m 'C5 U > a) c ° E 0 a) M c EE_ M m oca)U O am 0 OJ U 0 6 nCO— a� s c ' 4� u -0 O au) o O E s a) s-a 7 +� m O +' dA O v� cv to v� dA u f6 o 7 a) +� > Q +� -CC 4' 000 o s s C O c0 4' 0 O 0n a) s4 3 (0 a) si ) c0 + 00� a UO� a) E Z a p O E U o U o Up to u SE N u' O m C a > Q s -Cm +' b Q E 'X c O cp s > ?=p tA n s cOo O O a) Z -C � 7 0 u s p s+ a) i � s u `n� C v p X U 4� f6 C Uu C a) p i_ 7 U E 4 s 'a O N a-•' •� .�°- a) ate, � > a) i 7 C 7 � U s a-•' p CO a) 0 u > ate, v� co > N " Q C O C > Q 4� 7 u O n a) = C " ,n ° to ° to c) +m a) 1O m= +� co O 3 a)>' a) C O s •`� a) Q dA m 'a XX- M 4� Q N p 0 0-0 s '3 ' s a� c co m c a) o •� � 4 s ° '� 3 o a E a� a� a� a o a' co s +' 4 s O a m > c aa) Q) o N N cco O > m > °' a) a) +� .v co dA ° 4� 'O 7 ao o o co E c Q a� v� Q o a� u —Ln O a L c s cio 0 Q s w +� U > a� 7 -p Q c c a) u Q U C f6 °c° s s - Q s -a _ + Q ao N a) C s m v 'a a) Q 3 'ss to CL -0a) O +,CQ pn �X m 4� a p a s 7 � C n v a 4E a) os 0 s0 Cs a) -a oX '> p .� a) Q co ao) s u s 76 O 4� U CL U Q 0i Q U u m 0_0 S 4- O -Ca) x s E (0 s a u C O c a) `) C a, c > O v� E u s n E c O C uCL +, (�6 Q C i O i O -O C > ia) i E dA v� CL — C C '� a-.' O a) U C 7 O u s i O C U C C O O u — � C m > a) i s a) 7 i n Q oa 'i + 'p O a) -p O Z u c`o m N s +t C O 4, 0 0 _ EL C dA O vi C C u co ° C -a C 0 c O a) u C:u s co o a) a c coo n +6 o a 0 s� u O o a` E o c u om +,sE > N Nc4� — c , Oo s O Q > 4� -a 0 Q0 w+0uu +� O m,, s a) Q m C m s U 4� C 0 0 c p � ao c x} � c Q 4, c o +� c s ao � a) s v� a) a) m Q +� c m a) s i m p +1 C a) 4� ,n E m O a) o'aO c c O aa� 4-1 M E s a �,— aa c oE o + +J a) 3 co c, c O Q Q O i E s ao 0 '7 U — > a) C a) C O� u a) � a) a) 'p Q c a) U s C C Z -a C1 -0 (J 4 to -0 Q — a) ' n s o s s C Q } U 4O O 4-1 (6 M +J V] M of Q U d d m �p (0 (0 a w o � s c o s .� _= f6 O = 0 3 a-o � ap a) -a o — a) s 3 s 0 o c o a) �o O E acQ C+U c p O cuUQ) OQ ab co ai s = Q — 4° c a) 'a }' a) •� Q i Q i O a) a) c o> c Q s a O a) a) s Q `-o a)s s Q o 4-1 O 1 4� +sO 4-1 " s4-1 ) °° o asU co —00°Q- 3>u >. c� o te'� O o O 7 a) ai Qs 1 o— s4-1 s E ° c u ao 0 U `ag°o s U aco ca 4� 4-1 U +' u co o °4-1 =s uU p aa)4-1 0 O +' '� n +� 4s Q O 4- a0 Q a) 0 U a) 1 w a) n C E ao a) •� � c O Q i � d +� OU s '0 � C C (a E C c 4-1 s -p +� U a) C c U C Q 4-1 .- 0 s 4-1 � � v�i p � � O '6 � 'p � � •� � s � i i � f0 Q a) • 0 C •x +, m >, N 7 •- a) U C +, f6 () v� O C +.' 7 co a) a) X w a) O C 'a 0-0 >-0 M C i C'A m w Q as- ) 3 s 4-1 O c6 �p U C + C a) s U 0 U +' � U 0 M 7 � i OCA C � +� _ _ 7 cv �' s �, m Q C a) Q a) co dA s +� U oCL N -O *' O O Oi O i O � .� 7 f0 4-1 N .X O N 7 7 U 7 v� n O Q a) Q s O Q co v� -0 a) p a) a) s s s m a) w u= u a) a) Q a) a) m o a) m }' a) a) o c o a) Q a) a) s s i C s i s s Q .� p s M a) s C i s Q. n s s i co i s E s } H to a) +1 to H 4� O > +1 -0 H Q H 0 > H 4- Q U Q H a) H .� ZZ, +1 4� -0 4� -a c co a O c \ m ao U C ao 5 c 41 m O c-0 C a) c U co coo a) u u a) Q 0 c O a) f 6 41 0-0 +� +1 -0> i a) .— -a E Q ai > co E n -„ ` ` c Z vn s 0 0 OO o a) s u aEi u a of 6) o o� u ° `1 c 1 c a) a) 7 �+� CL O 0 dO a ° C u O c s O " U s " -a ap c,, > O mp o c p c a `�' � a c o i f 6 o o> a) CL u `�° 0 3-0 o `° 0 0 o c a) aco co E s o c� 4-1 c .c a) Q c n s u C E O s a) a) a) E" s " o ao c a) co 'a s w � cUo � a) O c Q a) to M m a) C x }? cco +' s aci a) s E °) E a) ,c o c_ a) 4-1 o °�° as aco co - as 'p 5, s O a) -° C +� 4� �, co u .� axi '� c c a) o 4 c c c u ao > _ U �, o Q +� o 3 c Q Q Q c a a)co 0 U s a) s ao s 'co a) u � _ mc to a) 75i O a) 7 3 a) a) C -p a) -0 i O O U C Q S > p E co '6 _ c C 7 m c �O a) Q a) +' - a) +� p +, i a) v� c6 'p (6 a) a) a) s 'a N O m O O O C C M � u-QQ" C o � E aA p Oou 4� f6 p,a f0 .0 a) a) i dA +� i a) C i •� VI •N qp U m .� S 7 '� • ) S • n -a 'Z j � Q C .a) • n O +�+ O U+ O _� +� •gin N C E -a U O m Q m 'i f0 m Q M i m N f0 w C dA � dA ccr _ C r M '0 4�� p C 4� _ C 4- dA ao i CL 16 C a) m Q m dA p _ u VI Co- VI � O , ) -p -0 'VI E C a) VI +� Q U p O �_ U 7 a) a) a) O > a) 7\ C J 4. 0 > -0-0 > Q dA 0 U D -0 U Z W o s an 4� C c� M s ai +, ao a� ao E w o -o u w u +' s .a 7 '� co o U w co N N C `n C +' a� CL a� c s0-C, ai -Ca ° c c ++ � � o a ° O ai -C 0 an o o H a c �_ E o > C � 4� u° oaa+ u c U _ E allo 0 � +' 7 0 0 C _ _ C Q 4. — C N InZ f0 i Q a-+ 4- a)a-+ C U N > 1 4' 4- S a) O CLMc c: -C � _ u� 3 c 3 U °C° C o Y N �' two f6 co n ca 0 aCo u •3 -a -Co � i c c co � ono ° o +� C '� N s N 4�° O co Q +' 4' C co EU c axi o c s E o Q- > f 6 .� an s o c o ° a 0 i C +, Q co 7 4� i N co n n i C C c� vi a>igo La aC+ aQ � CL C: -C CIn o c6 OCA C OCA 4 J 00 +�+ 4' N — i N a)-0 -00 +J 0 4� M u C 7 Q 4� C bCA C 4� •� i N CL , C x aCL te, df1 4, =3 _C M N E C ° C (0 -0 i 0 N � +� dA 7A n 0 S U � � U C 0 o U X dA � S C N Ol N S S.- -C'p — 0 Q co E 0 N Q O i C s w -C C: 4s s C 7 C C O C dA i ,C (0 ,(0 +� C � 0 4. N M i N O N i N v> > � E s a) 4� s E Q 4s }�— Mvi N O� p > a > C: 4� to u -Cu N 7 N v� o C c:N Q 0 4� 3 4� dA M M C w +, u U Q >, 4-' M 0 (a to i 0 N C Q -C`� i Q L OC.O U c6 O 0 4 u +' U dA M C �O k N C ° O" S S C C (6 (6 N C C dA Q 4. i C dA dA C s o i +� C i +5 N a- 0 '� C Q O p C 4' N M C U +' M N a)-C'� Q pp N dA M _ (6 i C C -O i i O C U S +' +' O i 7 dA o (6 N >� dA +� C +� ° C (a C N -0 � Q ate'. N +� v� E C E N Q C -a u dA i of M M > M w C 7 N U •� � M c0 C O Q 4' O u ° 3 u-0 vi u cep M O In O i N > 4J-0 s N > s -O +' I Q M C C '� -p dA C .� � -0 N 4 � dA i 'v� v� u (a s (6 N pCp O dC0 C 000 0 N s M C Z Q O C i 4" (CO N 'a O ' X U f4�6 -0 C,C ' M C M C M N N C v�i C 0 a N to C to co co 0 O O co co C " N o +' C a-•' dA 7 � w Q O C aC� U C � U C C i dA +� to v� > cL d -0 M U Q D u Q-0 3 0 O 4� / / $ 7 4-1 ) ( 0 U m / k R 2 2 f 0 j( � / \ / / 4 0 / - k -E E ° + 4E % / § } / / ( � / 7 2 u \ \ \ ƒ I \ 7 .E o m � / / ® t R \ o C 0 e e 3 -0 co CO f § \ \ § % e » / e f [ a)» % -0 2 -0 / 2 \ \ c ƒ \ In k / $ e § / > e /e f f $ g -0J / # g / % / ) \ / \ \ ) 2 e u E § \ / f t E n U \ f 3 \ 0 \ § n 0CL 7 } t / \ E 2 •� ƒ f -0\ ( / / .§ G n n E G@ 7 % u o = a. u } g = m > k s vi C a) i Q 7 s i 'a C a) > U_ > 'a -a > O 3 s +� s f 6 3 a +� +� U 4' (o -� ao 1 a `° s 4�'i Q O sao `-�° O o° v�i � (co 0 > s 4� c a) 4� vi 3 a) 4�o m 4� '� 0 'x i VI ago •� VI o c°Ao l�/I U O- U O U C a) a) N +' 6 CO (a p i > a) d a) � 4' M 'a O 4� _ U O O O m (a C s c 4� s U s 4� +� ca 3 > c -0 O C '� i O s 3 vi -a n C O s > X (o _ Z �� 4Q C n3 0 •U O Q of s s C> s a 4 c 0 4� 4� (o 4� U 3 .Q o U Vf (co a (a C c: (o -a ai ai C C ai a) c-0 � c + ai o Q u a p N °= 2 a s — — Q c c — O p U aci > > (U cCL ao U a� 4� ;� O 0 N Z U_0� W o o _0 -a p o U4� c a) a) O (U a s co N COL 0- E u 0 a) a) O 4� O 0 f 4' d0 O Oaa > s CO c N7 c 4+ Q Q Q E V OQ Q U a �' X s s a f6 p s s r4 s a) H U B c to s a) = U rn> .� C7 X a) a) s H s s a H s 3 4, QJ E +, (o C O 4 J 4� > y QJ (0 aA (0 C (0 C O Q- c i Q c U 7 O E i 7 E i Q C >� i c N_ s E p vi u a) O v a Q 4, U 7 U a,, U C 4s > > s c c of O 4- 0 c Vi c O aA U i a) c a) ° 4' (o 4' of U U U (0 .- p U U p i O- O U O Q (6 O +�+ 0 a) (0 � Q —_ (0 70 U •0 C +�+ +� 7 s > 'n > ( C 'E ) � a)> (aU) a) Q .0E Q a) O 4' E _a _a c-s o Q�a U O E O u O> - (a O a) N c: p a) c a) a QsO + N � a) CO O C 4�0 -4 -0 O > O OCA O O i C Q s Q U Q O c m M 4' •0 4� w N d (io s dA Q 7 E O a) O ( 4. +U c:O (0 U vi C a) (o > a a) o s E Ov a) O U a) C c f6 iCl U a) Q i a) c +s a) s � a) f, Q (o +, p i +, O N (o +O E E Oaa) a � E+�a) iCO s p E o s c a) 'a E O C Eao 4� Q +�w daA p i >E: O vX�cCo O a 'x f6 FL a a c a s a c a a) -0 a o a) -a a Q) (n 4� (n a) V) a) 0 (A c E v) I.e C 4• 7 m -a — ate+ a) 7 N O +' 72 i O •� U a) ° O -Co � > O ° = -0ma) U _0 C 'a ^ '6 a) j O_ t6 Q s +' n u M c6 n t6 > C C O O E M N-o C n O j 0 u vi O v� s C 4 � +' '� dA a) +� c6 f0 -0 -a C m U C -a C (6 C S— a) U° O .— a) m i O � c6 s C c6 s a c6 U a) Q m m 0 cC6 +�+ '6 > O C (�6 U m : (�6 C (�6 U a) c6 a) +� O a) i 4� ,� 7 (6 C d j O c6 4- c6 in a) M 5 '.0 s c6 co +> u O Q ate+ *U ° " p E U a a) O Z C a) E U n '� ao C U m i u CO `n s i 'a f6 N cC6 r ac-61 >. ' 4-1Q 7 O (6 7 s i i O O 4s �sa) 0 o = 6 U ,7 E O VU O i O i4-1 +�+ m -CM a) i �O dA c6 +' 3 X of C N C O C C O +.+ C ai ai ai C a)° c6 O C a) a) c6 O -0 —Cu c6 C> a+' x a O c66 c66 c66 c6°4-1 Eo ° ao s a a a ° 4-1 c -0 C 4� >X UUO Q O> -1 -1u -0 " o ° o o 0 0 °> u E a) c > oa) ao s°a) a E o � N au a CC O Ln Q o ° " m E> > U U U Q- C .04-1�4� o v�N •� •O o+ o m CL a O a) O O O d °m U 4 4� C u x ai a a a C a a a) Oca > > o _° Q s c a) C 4-1 u o °� v _ 3 �' ' o a O O axi 6�0 .y d0 4 N a) E N a) a) L Q� V i_ O C i 0 0 4' a+ f6 C E U C E U s Q a) Q u U c U fl E O s > ° U C c6 O (6 Q a) a) -C 4' N c c6 O u U w C a) N 7 of f6 (1) i m � }' i U U '� U — O C f�6 u C a) (6 a) •i s a) i r vi 0 a) a) +, •U c6 4 � (6 c6 C VI 0 O c6 U'n O M 0 � E E o E C 3 Ca) �, s O a_ ° O U O co i O V (.0 i0 0 cO (A•a°Q so m° a) L O 3 Q2 E w m c c u C m a M a -0 v', oO O Om p a a > f6 a) C ago . U 4-1 N a= c) C U .� E O i dA c6 N +� dA i C a) 4-1C 4�U S i O U C C E C C a) o E 0 m vi C o a) f6 o 0 O0 a) c�6 4-1CCo C c s 4-1 U > E s s 4� a) a) s E 3 4 a) v a) 3 C U O Q U V ii a = u NaN a) a; o s m c O C O U � a) -0 i a) O E> O O —C 7 4• +' •— 4J O Ca) O OC >d� +af6 d 7— U Q U C 0� a U O ) 00 . Ol O i-I U m p N "s a a O s U E a)E •+ac6� cn N 4� Q m Q m U Q 7 U cr 4� U .— 4. u Is. \ \ \ \ § § § § u u u u 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ # # # # E E E E ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ 0 0 0 0 ƒ ƒ ƒ ƒ � � � � 0 0 0 0 t t t t E E E E 0 0 0 0 / / / / § 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 z z z z CL/ xCL/CL/CL/ k 0 0 u / .\ ■ o§ e t R Eƒ 5 / /}± \\ e 0 f Bƒ � y R // CL 0 $ 0 E / § 2 ' .g u / e # 0 M / n .§ f f G .� E E � # -C \ ) 4 ƒ 2 E E E§ E f = G E t E 2 f E n ® o® 2 o -C •— a) a)s .E 0 > > > e 0 ƒ ° ° � ° o t a)o t 3 2'§ § / § § 2 f 'S ° E ° ° ° t o g n g/• g e -0 & 2 u ƒ E o 0 \ M / >'/ / � / •§ / a) f / ± M 0 4$ \ 7%ƒ 7% E § 3 § { 3 § / @ m E f G & ƒ / ƒ § U- § ƒ I e� O N` O a o of o E 0 7117-1111 **-7Av*lNl A rxJ �' e i � �, i _ � ,$' r � @ ; �� 1 � t 4 o �� s� . x � � + - �''r j. ' �,JII A �a v3 A �� y 4 ..1F'� � �+ k Y ... ., �� ...�, �� - � �rV,� �u _� .- i _ _ f,' „t �- �r'�- � �a� � .�� -- , >�-_y ��e � � �i��,� �� s� a� L �__ _ _— _ F _ � '�� Is,-� �� 4' = } +- - s ��. ' I I' = ` � •�<� ��i f � ��. �ry _,�!, � r,B 1�'^ Wc�.! �/� - `� �` r - -yj� '„ r �. � n, y � u■ 6 R V i M, E E s � N dl` - o i t I I I I II I I I 3 1A ®aa Rio wzzae��q��s-vsa-Hoava�o�ezraa-w�asow ao��l,�,e NaN-aaezar�oa �acw�v MMMMSolutions today I Tomorrow®mind' CenterBeam Place, 14 King Street, Suite 420, PO Box 20040, Saint John, NB, E2L 1G2 1 506-633-6650 I CBCL.ca l info@CBCL.ca April 4, 2024 Justin Sears, PTech Project Manager New Brunswick Museum 277 Douglas Avenue SaintJohn, NB, E2K 1 E2 Email: Dear Mr. Sears: RE: New Brunswick Museum - Parking Supply Study 4 o BEST Z MANAGED COMPANIES Platinum member CBCL Limited (CBCL) was engaged to prepare a Parking Supply Study for the proposed NB Museum on Douglas Avenue in Saint John, NB. This letter summarizes our project understanding, methodology, and key study findings. 11-1roject unaerstdrium The existing New Brunswick Museum (Museum) building, located at 277 Douglas Avenue, is planned to be upgraded and expanded to increase the overall building size. The upgraded Museum site is expected to include common public spaces (e.g., cafe, boutique, library), exhibition spaces, storage facilities, administration and building services; the building area schedule and associated Gross Floor Areas (GFA) are summarized in Table 1. It is understood that the Museum is in the early phases of design and planning. A preliminary site concept, issued on November 29, 2023, by Diamond Schmitt, is illustrated in Figure 1. The site plan shows 75 parking spaces, including 4 designated as barrier -free. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Museum completed by exp in January 2024, stated that 306 parking stalls would be required for the site based on the parking rates published in the City of Saint John Zoning By -Law. While this adheres to the City's Zoning By -Law requirements, there is concern that this is a significant oversupply, exceeding the realistic parking demand for the site, and resulting in the parking being heavily under-utilized. Therefore, an in-depth review of the Museum's parking needs was completed to determine a number of parking spaces that would be more reflective of the anticipated parking demand. IiV-_11 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 Table 1: NB Museum - Proposed Building Schedule FloorGross .. Space Name Area (M) Area A Public Lobby Spaces Cafe 91 982 Boutique 158 1,701 Balance ofpublic lobby space 858 9,227 Library 105 1,133 Subtotal 1212 13,043 B Exhibition Spaces & Education Spaces Exhibition Spaces 3,316 35,676 Education Spaces 1,078 11,597 Subtotal 4,394 47,273 Storage Facilities C Natural History Collections 937 10,085 D Humanities Collections 1,429 15,375 E Archives Collection 541 5,817 F Conservation 206 2,213 G Gateways 283 3,044 H Design Fabrication 353 3,802 Subtotal 3,749 40,336 J Administration Administration 601 6,462 Subtotal 601 6,462 F Building Services Buildings services (e.g., Mechanical, Electrical, IT/Comms, Shafts) 2,353 25,315 Subtotal 2,353 25,315 Grand Total 12,309 132,429 Ii141-Al New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 DOUGLAS AVE Figure 1: Proposed Site Plan Methodology Five analyses were completed to assess the necessary parking supply through different perspectives and data sources. These reviews and analyses included: Zoning By -Law Review: Review the parking requirements published in the City's Zoning By -Law. Admission Data Review: Analysis of parking need based on historic admission data. Comparison to Similar Museum Facilities: Analysis of parking supply provided by comparable museum facilities. Published Parking Rates: Analysis of parking generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition. On -Street Parking Analysis: Review of the on -street parking demand and available supply along Douglas Avenue. Zoning By -Law Review The City of Saint John Zoning By -Law outlines the minimum parking space requirements based on the land use and GFA of the building. The TIS completed by exp determined the parking requirements using the Zoning By -Law parking rates based on a breakdown of the separate building uses and associated square footage; the sum of each of the Museum's components yielded a total of 306 parking stalls. This approach is focused on the potential parking supply of `I1 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 each component land use of the Museum, in isolation, as if they were standalone establishments, instead of ancillary activities related to the museum exhibition space. As such, it does not provide a reliable estimate of the mixed parking demand of this facility. Past studies have shown that detailed parking requirements, which specify varying minimums per unit (e.g., square meter), often do not accurately reflect actual parking needs and can often result in an oversupply of parking'. Municipal zoning by-laws are modernizing by adapting to the evolving change in mode choice, by providing greater emphasis on transit and active transportation modes rather than support vehicle -centric modes (i.e., moving away from minimum parking rates). A recent example of the shift away from parking minimums was portrayed by The City of Edmonton implementing an "Open Option Parking" policy city-wide.2 This eliminated the minimum on -site parking requirements, allowing developers and businesses to determine their parking space needs according to their particular operations or activities. Therefore, further investigation of the Museum's future parking demand was warranted. Admission Data review NB Museum staff provided historical admission data, aggregated annually between 2010 and 2020, which is shown graphically in Figure 2; data following 2020 was omitted due to the impact of travel restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. An annual average of 44,904 visitors were found to visit the previous Museum site between 2010 to 2020. While this annual average value provides a general sense of the magnitude of visitors that had previously visited the Museum, it does not provide detailed information on the month, day, or time when these admissions occurred. Since, this level of detail is not available, a representative daily profile of admissions cannot be determined. For the purposes of this study, this data shows average admissions around 45,000 persons per year. The Museum expansion would aspire for future admissions to be as high as 60,000 to 90,000 visitors per year, so the parking supply analysis conservatively selected the higher visitor load of 90,000 visitors; although, the higher value would be double what has historically been observed. Furthermore, it was noted that the previous NB Museum had two distinct visitor peaks: one during mid -morning that included a higher proportion of students arriving by bus, and the second during mid -afternoon with a higher proportion of general admissions. 1' Rachel Weinberger and Joshua Karlin -Resnick (2015), Parking In Mixed -Use U.S. Districts: Oversupplied No Matter How You Slice The Pie, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. z Nelsons Nygaard. (2019). Comprehensive Parking Study - Phase 1. City of Edmonton. New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 50000 Ln 0 40000 N E Q 30000 O 20000 n NB Museum - Annual Average Admissions 2010/1 1 2011 /12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 Year Figure 2: Historical Annual Admission Data The yearly admission target was used as a basis of estimating peak daily and hourly visits, as an indication of a reasonable parking supply. An analysis was undertaken with the following operational assumptions: - Operation 6 days a week, Monday -Saturday - Operation 8 hours per day - Peak month of the year corresponds to roughly 20% of yearly admissions3 - Peak day of the week accounts for roughly 20% of weekly admissions. This analysis yields an estimate of an average 87 visitors per hour during the peak attendance month, with a potential peak of 104 visitors per hour during the busiest day of the week, as summarized in Table 2. Visitor turnover is generally expected to occur over approximately 60 minutes, which would imply a peak month, peak hour attendance of 87-104 visitors. 3 Attendance at museum institutions, Statistique Quebec, https://statistique.quebec.ca/en/document/attendance-at-museum-institutions. Last accessed February 6, 2024. IjPri:- New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 Table 2: Peak Parking Demand Based on Peak Attendance 90,000 18,000 4,154 692 87 831 104 Historic admission data was not available, but NB Museum staff estimated that 55% of visitors would be expected to arrive by car, with the remaining 45% expected to use other modes of transportation. Furthermore, a considerable number of visitors would be expected to arrive by bus (e.g., school field trips, cruise ship passengers). For a more conservative estimate, however, further analysis assumes 100% auto mode share during the peak month peak hour (i.e., reduction for bus trips was not applied). To derive an appropriate parking space requirement, the peak visitor numbers were translated to vehicle count by applying a vehicle occupancy ratio based on visitor grouping, since museum - goers typically arrive in family or friendship groups. In lieu of historical admission grouping data, two sources were reviewed: Royal BC Museum Modernization - Parking Assessment Report: A comprehensive parking analysis was completed by WATT Consulting Group in 2021 to assess various parking elements associated with their modernization project. A travel survey was conducted to determine the visitor mode share to the museum; it was found that roughly 3 people on average travel in the same vehicle to the museum. Statistics Canada Data 2021 Census Community Profile: o Average Household Size in Saint John is of 2.14 people. o Average Size of Census Family in Saint John is 2.74 people. Based on this review, a visitor vehicle occupancy ratio of 2.1 visitors per vehicle was used. With the conservative assumption of 100% auto mode share during the peak month peak hour, the arrival of 87-104 visitors would translate to a parking supply of 42-50 spaces. Furthermore, if staff parking is permitted on -site, then an additional 20 parking stalls for the 20 employees would result in a total parking requirement of 62-70 stalls. This range would accommodate the higher projected admissions (i.e., 90,000 visitors) while also providing employees parking; however, it is understood 4 Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population. Saint John, City (C) New Brunswick. Last retrieved March 5, 2024. I jPQ1l New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 that employee parking could be provided off -site with staff transported by shuttle to the proposed Museum. Comparison to Similar Museum Facilities A review of comparable museums across Canada was completed to obtain an understanding of the parking supply and demand at similar facilities. An effort was made to identify museums that possessed similar characteristics as the proposed NB Museum, such as: - Type of Exhibits (i.e., natural history, earth sciences, etc.) - Land Use Setting (i.e., proximity to downtown, rural setting) - Museum Size (i.e., similar gross floor area) An initial screening exercise was performed to identify suitable museums for comparison based on the above characteristics. Once a short listed was generated, the comparable museums were contacted to solicit information on the museum's operation, annual admission numbers, available parking stalls, as well as insight as to whether the available parking is sufficient or if it is under/over utilized. The museum facilities found to be generally comparable were: Resurgo Place - Moncton, NB - Local history museum including a transportation discovery center, located in proximity to the downtown area. - 21 parking spaces total, including 2 designated as barrier free to accommodate visitors. 8 staff parking spaces are provided off -site. - Parking lot generally accommodates daily demand of museum; however, parking is often insufficient during special events (e.g., holidays). - Average annual admission is approximately 27, 000 visitors per year. - The GFA is 30,000 square feet. The Exploration Place - Prince George, BC - Science museum, located outside the downtown area in a large public park. - 53 parking spaces in total adjacent to the museum, including 4 barrier free spaces. Additional park parking is located adjacent to museum parking lot and can accommodate over flow days. - Parking accommodates daily demand other than on days with special park events (e.g., Canada Day). - Average annual admission is approximately 50,000 visitors per year. - The GFA is 33, 700 square feet. Three other museums were identified as being comparable, but responses were not received from museum staff: o Johnsons Geo Centre - St. John's, NL o Alexander Graham Bell National Historic Site - Baddeck, NS o Royal Saskatchewan Museum - Regina, SK `PV:3 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 Generalized comparisons were made from the comparable museums that provided data. Proportional parking rates were calculated for each of the three museums, based on (1) total number of parking stalls per 1,000 GFA and (2) per annual visitors. These rates were then translated to the context of the proposed NB Museum based on the total GFA and the projected annual admissions of 90,000; the parking rates developed from other museums and resulting parking stalls yields are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Summary of Existing Museum Parking Rates Parking Rate (Stalls / 1,000 GFA) 0.97 1.57 Parking Requirement based on GFA 129 209 Parking Rate (Stalls / 1,000 Annual Visitors) 1.07 1.06 Parking Requirement Based on Visitor 97 96 Attendance This comparative analysis suggests a parking supply of 129-209 parking stalls based on GFA, and 96-97 parking stalls based on annual visitors. The total parking from the three comparable museums were noted to accommodate typical parking demands with the exception of major events; however, parking utilization was not specifically available to understand if there is an excess of parking during typical operations. Therefore, due to the range of proportionally calculated parking stalls from the generally comparable sites, additional analysis was undertaken. Published Parking Rates Parking generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 6th Edition, were used to calculate the parking supply for the Museum. Rates published in this manual are widely accepted by the traffic engineering community, as they are based on empirical data. The estimated peak parking demands were estimated based on the GFA of the building. In the case of the NB Museum, the GFA used in the calculation was the sum of the areas that would generate parking; the portion of the building that is intended for storage (i.e., regular trips would not be expected) was excluded from the calculation. Therefore, the GFA used for analysis was 92,140 ft2. New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 The ITE Land Use code selected was 580 - Museum. This land use code includes displays, shows, exhibits, and/or demonstration of historical, science, nature, art, entertainment, or other cultural significance. The reported parking rates include both visitors and employees. This land use code was found to have a relatively small sample size with only four studies conducted during the weekday period, and three studies conducted on a Saturday. The associated parking generation for a weekday and weekend period are summarized in Table 4. Table 4: ITE Parking Generation for Land Use 580 (Museum) r 92.1 1000 ft2 Rate Peak Period Parking Demand Weekday (85th Percentile) 1.34 124' Weekday (Average) 0.90 83' Weekday (Fitted Curve) 61' 92.1 1000 ft2 Rate Peak Period Parking Demand Weekday (85th Percentile) 0.95 88 Weekday (Average) 0.92 85 Weekday (Fitted Curve) N/A 'Dataset includes outlier. Upon closer review of the data points for each time period, an outlier was found for the weekday period for a museum that had a GFA of 940,000 ft2 and 910 parked vehicles. Since this data point skewed the results for the weekday period, it was removed from the dataset. The average and 85th percentile values for the weekday period were then recalculated based on the three datapoints and are summarized in Table 5. Based on the weekday and weekend time periods analysed, the expanded Museum would be expected to exhibit a parking demand of 80 to 105 spaces, with the greatest amount of activity expected during a weekday. Table 5: ITE Parki Data Points 1 77 103 1.34 124 2 155 98 0.63 59 3 176 108 0.61 57 4 940 910 - - Weekday (Average) 80 Weekday (85th Percentile) 105 0 IiEti-11 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 On -Street Parking Analysis Due to the sensitivity surrounding on -street parking near the proposed Museum, an analysis was completed to quantify the existing parking demand compared to the available parking supply. A broader study area was initially examined, which included all of Douglas Avenue and Bentley Street; this was subsequently reduced, focusing on the street blocks immediately adjacent to the proposed Museum. The study area used for the analysis is shown in Figure 3. a. Clarendon St Douglas Ave � lexandra St Summertime Figure 3: On -Street Parking Study Area On -Street Parking Supply The on -street parking space inventory was estimated through measurement of each block length, and the following assumptions: ► On -street parking spaces are assumed to have a length of 7.0m; ► On -street parking is prohibited within 10m of fire hydrants; ► Driveway curb cuts were excluded; and, ► On -street parking is prohibited within 10m of an intersecting road. The resulting estimated on -street parking supply throughout the study area is summarized in Table 6. Five properties east of the existing Museum site have been acquired to accommodate the proposed expansion. While the removal of some residential buildings could represent a reduction in the future on -street parking demand, the analysis conservatively assumed no reduction in parking demand. Furthermore, a bus layby and two, two-way parking accesses are currently planned for the proposed Museum, which will reduce the available on -street parking supply by 8 spaces. No other developments were included in the analysis that would impact future on -street parking supply. New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 On -Street Parking Demand Afield survey was performed on March 281", 2024, to obtain a profile of the existing parking demand through the study area. On -street parking data was collected over 30-minute intervals that coincided with the morning peak hour of the Museum (i.e., 10:OOAM-12:OOPM), the afternoon peak hour (i.e., 2:OOPM-4:OOPM), as well as the evening peak hour when on -street parking was expected to be most utilized by residents (i.e., 6:OOAM-8:OOPM). Observed parking demand and utilization are summarized in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. This observed parking demand was assumed to be reflective of typical parking activity for the study area. Several observations were noted while data was being collected for the on -street parking analysis: During the afternoon (PM) peak hour, an increased parking demand was observed on Douglas Avenue between Bentley and Fallsview/Summertime; vehicles were also observed to park within the bike lane on the west side of this block. Since this period coincided with school dismissal at Harbourview High School, it appeared that this increased demand of 16-20 vehicles was associated with student pickup and would not represent demand associated with nearby residents. During all three time periods, vehicles were observed to consistently park on the west side of Douglas Avenue between Clarendon Street and Alexandra Street, where it is currently designated as "no parking except Sundays". While there is parking demand along this section, there was no allowance made in the analysis for parking supply at this location. During all three time periods, vehicles also parked on the south side of Bentley Street where on -street parking is currently permitted. However, the street cross-section is too narrow to accommodate on -street parking, two-way travel lanes, and a bike lane. Therefore, the parking utilization analysis excluded parking at this location and the demand was assumed to be displaced and fill in residual parking supply elsewhere in the study area. It is likely that parking restrictions could be implemented in response to higher vehicular traffic once the Museum expansion is complete. Ii�,0% o m m 0#/ o/ o e o m 7 « .,, o w w 0# o\ o m o m o J a _ �� WO OE o w w\#/ o\ o e o m\ / e 0 z .,, t o w m 7 m e o/ o e o m $% / Z o# m 0 w 0 m\ o m o# G / 7 o e w\ m \ o m o m od 0- 0 o # m/ m I o 7 0 m o m $ \ � .,, . o# w\ o c o\ o e o m $\ _ _ ., o w/ m» 0 7 o m o\ 0 0 .,, o / # » \ o # o w L \ \ ! .,� , o w /# I o\ o e o w %o\ 2 \ zW¥00:OL o w /# I o 7 o c o w 0- a o a/0 ■ o # o $ o o % ooM ƒ \ \ u _ may. s Jam > / / / / / / \ G 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5\/ u L ° o / a) 0 E § m 2 &/\ § ƒ / » \� '/ § (A j (v � ( t t t k o 0 2) 2 t 2 © E o.¥ = o ■ 0 w= c \ 7 \ I \ ƒ / / o \ ra ) E to r u\_ / a) \ 4 § _0 \/ [ � ± y/\ / \ ƒ § » \ k \ u t 2 x t 2 y t 2 7 E o.¥ o � \ g / \ / f 4,1 / 6 I 6 ƒ / / / 7' § m q @ @ � / t ° e / 0 $ ƒ / � ® -0/ < ® \ \ \ / I IR 0 •L Q ZWdO£:L 0 ZWdO£:9 Z INVOO:0 6 m z z Ln r v Q Q m Q Q Q Q o Z L Z ,m m oo Z t Z m Z Z Ul o � Ln Q Qo o Q m o m Q o Q Q Q oo o Z m Z m Z Z ru 0 z O ¢ m r- r ¢ "o ¢ o ¢ ¢ N Z O Z Ln ,o F Z oo Z Z Z N Ul Ul v 0 Q Q 0m oQoQQ o Z Z't o 00 Z"D Z Z Z Ln �o 2 Q O Q N O N Q "oQ � Q Q 00 Q Z o Z't o� Z ,n Z Z Z ° 3 0 0 Q 0 Q Lim 0 m Q O Q � Q Q � >, Z o Z t o" Z� Z Z Z ru Q o Q o 0 o Q o Q o Q Q o Z m Z m O Ln Z m Z Z Z w O Z N Z m Z Z Z Z CYl O i 0 7 Q o Q o \ o Q o Q o Q Q o w Z m Z m Z ,m Z Z Z o � � V Ul o N Q Q Q Q Q Q o O Z En Ln Z m o Z m Z N Z Z p O 0 Do c Q O Itt O 00 mO mO N O O M v ul r i F/i V � LL LL LL LL LL z l ul N Q O V C •}, Q o _0 O � N � N l Q N N r6 N N > to N GO N c a) i N X N C NUl O ram-+ N ram-+ N 4am1 L L O> i-r C A L U l/ I Q l/ I m u) L.L Ul) U D O Q 0 X 7- N O Ln 4.1 ra O C r6 � •� i � w Q l/ I O+ O +--+ N r 4J d C L r6 N > _ Q 0 N N N C N L N •> f6 Ln � Ln v U ii Q ii m ii L.L in U D O C°� o H o i Ln Ul rur6 Q) O Z, N 4.1 X Z) O C N N L O Q 0011 LL�of 2 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 On -Street Parking Summary The on -street parking analysis suggests that the study area may have a future inventory of 130 on - street parking spaces, and an estimated peak hour demand ranging between 62 and 86 spaces, depending on the analysis period. Further, human perception is such that an area's parking supply is perceived as being "full" when utilization exceeds 85%; therefore, we considered the 85" percentile on -street parking inventory as being more representative of the perceived parking supply. This results in a range of residual parking as summarized in Table 8. Table 8: Summary of On -Street Parking Supply - Entire Study Area AM Peak V�M ._ ak "I Hour Hour -. Parking Supply 130' Parking Demand 62 862 70 Residual Parking Supply 68 44 60 Residual 85t" Percentile Parking Supply 57 37 51 'Future parking supply includes the reduction of 8 on -street parking spaces. zlncreased parking demand associated with Harbour View High School afternoon dismissal. The results of the on -street parking analysis were further refined to understand the impact to on - street parking immediately adjacent to the proposed Museum, as this area would be more likely to accommodate any potential parking overflow. This refined area includes one block north and south of the proposed Museum site (i.e., Douglas Avenue between Fallsview/Summertime and Alexandra Street). The refined summary is provided in Table 9. Table 9: Summary of On -Street Parking Supply - Blocks Adjacent to Proposed Museum I AM Peak Evening Hour -. k Hou Parking Supply 59' Parking Demand 38 562 35 Residual Parking Supply 21 3 24 Residual 85t" Percentile Parking Supply 17 2 20 'Future parking supply includes the reduction of 8 on -street parking spaces. zlncreased parking demand associated with Harbour View High School afternoon dismissal. Impact to Neighborhood Parking Since the Museum is situated within a residential area, parking can be a sensitive issue as nearby residents are concerned that parking will be unavailable close to their home. Assessment of on - street parking indicates that the current on -street parking inventory in the study area is not fully utilized on any street block and is roughly 50% utilized. While there is potential for convenient IiEs1:7 New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 parking to be unavailable during the afternoon peak hour, it should be relatively short lived once afternoon dismissal at Harbourview High School ends. While this has potential to inconvenience residents during the afternoon peak hour, it should not dramatically impact parking supply as there is residual parking available within the study area. In addition to the above analysis, it was noted that periodic evening events are expected to be hosted at the proposed Museum that would require specialized parking plans to accommodate an increase in parking demand. While there are plans currently in development to provide off -site parking to accommodate this increased demand, the residual on -street parking supply adjacent to the proposed Museum appears to have capacity during the evening peak hour to accommodate roughly 20 vehicles. Summary of Parking Supply Review The analyses complete for the parking study revealed the following parking supply from each of the analyses: i. Zoning By -Law Review: 306 parking stalls 2. Admission Data Review: between 62 and 70 parking stalls based on the projected annual admissions doubling to 90,000. 3. Comparison to Similar Museum Facilities: between 129-209 parking stalls based on GFA, and 96-97 parking stalls based on annual visitors; 4. Published ITE Parking Rates: between 80 and 105 parking stalls. 5. On -Street Parking Analysis: the future parking supply for the study area was found to be 130 spaces. Parking demands of 62, 86, and 70 were found for the AM, PM and evening peak hours, respectively. Analysis of a refined area adjacent to the Museum, yielded an estimated parking supply of 59 spaces, and parking demands of 17, 2, and 20 for the AM, PM and evening peak hours, respectively. The parking supply from each of the analyses do not converge to a single value, but rather provide a range. The earlier parking calculations based on cumulative Zoning By -Law requirements appear to overestimate the required supply, whereas the comparison to existing museum facilities does not reflect a sufficiently similar land use to confidently apply an equivalent parking supply rate. Based on the proposed Museum's land use and gross floor area, as well as ITE's published parking rates, 105 parking stalls would provide a conservative upper estimate for the supply to accommodate visitors and staff for proposed Museum expansion. However, due to several known site constraints (e.g., topographic, archeological), it would be challenging from a technical, public, and financial perspective to provide this volume of parking on -site. Therefore, there are several site -specific considerations that may warrant a reduction in on -site parking: The NB Museum has issued a letter of commitment to the City of Saint John stating that off -site parking will be provided for all staff at their Lancaster Avenue facility from where they will be New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 shuttled to the proposed Museum on Douglas Avenue. This commitment would reduce the staff component of the parking demand by 15-20 stalls, assuming that approximately 5 parking stalls would be retained for a few employees to park on -site. Potential reduction of 15-20 stalls. The survey of on -street parking along Douglas Avenue found that on -street parking has a general utilization of roughly 50% during the Museum's AM, PM and evening peak operating times. Where the residual on -street parking supply was found to be 17, 2, and 20 spaces during the AM, PM and evening peak hours, respectively, it is expected that on -street parking capacity will be available. While the Museum will operate without reliance on neighbourhood parking, on -street parking could occasionally accommodate overflow parking. Potential reduction of 0-20 stalls. NB Museum staff noted that roughly 45% of visitors could be expected to arrive by bus, which could include school trips or passengers from cruise ships. Since data was not available to support the proportion of mode share for buses, no reductions were applied in the analyses; however, it would be reasonable to expect a proportion of visitors in this order of magnitude to arrive by bus. This would also have a reduced impact on the overall parking demand for the proposed Museum. Potential reduction of 10-30 stall. The study further considered the following: The Museum is located roughly 200m east of Harbour View High School (HVHS). It is understood that parking is limited for HVHS, so the Museum should consider a form of parking control to discourage overflow staff or student parking from the school. Conversely, due to the proximity of HVHS, its parking area could potentially be used to accommodate overflow parking from the Museum during special events that occur outside school hours. However, this option should only be considered through consultation with HVHS. IiKFA New Brunswick Museum April 4, 2024 Closing Thank you for the opportunity to complete this Parking Supply Study for the proposed NB Museum. We trust this information satisfies your current requirements, but if you have any comments or questions that arise from the review, please reach out to us at your earliest convenience. Yours very truly, CBCL Limited AM -No mamm Prepared by: Brendan McPhee, M.Sc.E., P.Eng. Transportation Engineer Direct: Direct: (506) 633-6650 E-Mail: bmcphee@cbcl.ca CC: Tim McCluskey, P.Eng. Report No: 242803.00 Reviewed by: Emanuel Nicolescu, MCIP, LPP Group Lead, Transportation Engg. and Planning This document was prepared forth party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflects CBCL Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third party use of this document. 17 153B O*4 P exp. Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Upgrade to NB Museum Diamond & Schmitt Architects Type of Document: Final Report — Revision 1 Project Number: FRE-23004019-AO Prepared By: Katie Hazzard, P.Eng. Barry Riordon, EIT Reviewed By: Don Good, P.Eng. EXP 1133 Regent St Suite 300 Fredericton, NB t: +1.506.452.9000 Date Submitted: 2024-01-10 W-51 TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 i FRE-23004019-AO Table of Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Approach.............................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Area...........................................................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Traffic Analyses Methodology.............................................................................................................................................3 2 Conditions without the Development........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Traffic Volumes...................................................................................................................................................................4 2.2 Horizon Period....................................................................................................................................................................4 2.3 Existing Traffic Operations..................................................................................................................................................5 2.3.1 Intersection No.1— Main St/Douglas Ave...........................................................................................................................6 2.3.2 Intersection No. 2 — Doulgas Ave/Bentley St......................................................................................................................7 2.3.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr.....................................................................................................................7 3 Future Conditions with Proposed Development......................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Trip Generation...................................................................................................................................................................8 3.2 Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment................................................................................................................................8 3.3 Future Traffic Volumes........................................................................................................................................................9 3.4 Future Traffic Operations with the Proposed Development............................................................................................10 3.4.1 Intersection No.1— Main St/Douglas Ave.........................................................................................................................11 3.4.2 Intersection No.2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St.....................................................................................................................11 3.4.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr...................................................................................................................11 3.4.4 Intersection No.4 — Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access (new intersection).......................................................................12 4 Other Considerations................................................................................................................................................13 4.1 Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities.......................................................................................................................................13 4.2 Parking..............................................................................................................................................................................13 4.3 Impacts on Harbour View High School..............................................................................................................................14 4.4 Access................................................................................................................................................................................14 5 Summary of Findings.................................................................................................................................................15 5.1 Existing Traffic Operations................................................................................................................................................15 5.1.1 Intersection No. 1— Main St/Douglas Ave........................................................................................................................15 5.1.2 Intersection No. 2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St....................................................................................................................15 5.1.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr...................................................................................................................15 5.2 Traffic Operations with the Development........................................................................................................................15 5.2.1 Intersection No. 1— Main St/Douglas Ave........................................................................................................................15 5.2.2 Intersection No. 2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St....................................................................................................................16 5.2.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr...................................................................................................................16 5.2.4 Intersection No. 4— Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access (new intersection)......................................................................16 5.3 Other Considerations........................................................................................................................................................16 5.3.1 Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities.......................................................................................................................................16 2024-01-10 ex p• 1� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO 5.3.2 Parking..............................................................................................................................................................................17 5.3.3 Impacts on Harbour View High School..............................................................................................................................17 5.3.4 Access................................................................................................................................................................................17 Appendix1— Proposed Site Plan.............................................................................................................................................. 1 Appendix 2 — Synchro Detailed Reports — Existing Conditions.................................................................................................. 2 Appendix 3—Synchro Detailed Reports — With Proposed Development.................................................................................. 3 List of Tables Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections............................................................................................................................3 Table 2: Traffic Operations without Development............................................................................................................................6 Table 3: Estimated Trips Development Trips.....................................................................................................................................8 Table 4: Traffic Operations with Development...............................................................................................................................10 Table 5: Building Breakdown for Parking Requirements.................................................................................................................13 List of Figures Figure 1: Proposed Development Site Plan......................................................................................................................................1 Figure 2: Study Area Intersections....................................................................................................................................................2 Figure 3: Existing 2023 Traffic Volumes (PM peak period)................................................................................................................4 Figure 4: Future Background 2031 Traffic Volumes (PM peak period).............................................................................................5 Figure 5: Trip Assignment for Phase 1 (PM Peak Period)..................................................................................................................9 Figure 6: Projected 2031 Traffic Volumes With Development (PM Peak Period)...........................................................................10 2024-01-10 ex p• 11b1 I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 1 FRE-23004019-AO 1 Introduction EXP was retained to complete a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the upgrade of the New Brunswick Museum. The Museum is located at 277 Douglas Ave in Saint John, NB. The proposed upgrade to the NB Museum includes a target building size of 132,500 sq ft (12,310 sq m) and a parking lot with 75 parking spaces (including 4 Barrier Free spaces). The new entry to the Museum is proposed to be on Douglas Ave approximately 80 m north of Bentley St. The new NB Museum is expected to open in 2026. Figure 1 shows the proposed site plan for the development. Appendix 1 also provides a larger copy of the site plan. VICTORIA SQUARE .. , PARK = _ -- - - -- - -m�— _-_- - - DOUGLAS AVE 1 Figure 1: Proposed Development Site Plan F777V1 I 1 1 r t-_---- i I � r r v In order to assess the traffic impacts that the proposed development will have on the roadway network, an analysis was conducted with the existing and future traffic volumes "without the development" (Section 2) and then compared with the traffic operations "with the development" (Section 3). The upgraded development is projected to be operational by 2026. This TIS evaluated the traffic impacts associated with the development at a 5-year horizon period (2031) from the year of final completion. The levels of service and vehicles delays at the various Study Area intersections and driveway, along with any deficiencies, were assessed as to whether these deficiencies are attributable to the existing background traffic or to the proposed development, or a combination of both. The NB Museum is assumed to have the same hours of operation as the former museum, which are as follows: • Tuesday/Wednesday: 10 am — 4 pm • Thursday: 10 am — 7:30 pm • Friday/Saturday/Sunday: 10 am — 4 pm • Monday: Closed 2024-01-10 1ex p � I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 2 FRE-23004019-AO Given that the peak hour of adjacent street traffic for the AM period occurs between the hours of 7 am and 9 am on a weekday, the AM peak period was not analyzed as part of this Study. The traffic associated with the development would have no impact on the adjacent street traffic during the AM peak period because the Museum would not be open. It is also notable that the peak hour of adjacent street traffic for the PM period occurs between the hours of 4 pm and 6 pm, therefore, traffic associated with the development would only affect the PM peak period of adjacent street traffic on Thursday's when it is open past 4 pm. 1.2 Study Area The Study Area included the following intersections: 1. Main St/Douglas Ave; 2. Douglas Ave/Bentley St; 3. Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr; and, 4. Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access (new intersection). The above intersections are shown in Figure 2 below. I Figure 2: Study Area Intersections 2024-01-10 ex p.. 1%3 I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 3 FRE-23004019-AO 1.3 Traffic Analyses Methodology Key measures used in the analysis of intersection operations generally include average vehicle delays, level of service (LOS), 95th percentile queues on the intersection approaches and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios. The standard LOS criteria for stop sign -controlled intersections are provided in Table 1 below. The methodology from the HCM 6th edition was used in the evaluation of the unsignalized Study Area intersections. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections A Very low delay; most vehicles do not stop (Excellent) B Higher delay; more vehicles stop (Very Good) Higher level of congestion; number of vehicles C stopping is significant, although many still pass through intersection without stopping (Good) Congestion becomes noticeable; vehicles must D sometimes wait through more than one red light; many vehicles stop (Satisfactory) Vehicles must often wait through more than E one red light; considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay (Acceptable) less than 10.0 between 10.0 and 15.0 between 15.0 and 25.0 between 25.0 and 35.0 between 35.0 and 50.0 Considered to be unacceptable to most drivers; occurs when arrival flow rates exceed F greater than 50.0 the capacity of the intersection (Unacceptable) 2024-01-10 ex p• 1� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO 2 Conditions without the Development 2.1 Traffic Volumes EXP staff collected turning count movements for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection on Thursday, June 15t 2023 for the AM (7-9 am), Noon (11:30 am-1:30 pm), and PM peak period (4-6 pm). The City of Saint John provided traffic counts for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection from March 3, 2022 and for the Main St/Chesley Dr intersection from May 2022. Counts were adjusted by an annual growth rate of 1%/year to estimate 2023 volumes. Based on discussions with the City Traffic Engineer, the counts from the Main St/Chesley Dr intersection were used along with the counts obtained on Douglas Ave to estimate the traffic volumes at the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection. This was done using the known eastbound and westbound volumes on Main St west of Chesley Dr, the known through volumes on Douglas Ave north of Bentley St, and using the existing traffic patterns on Main St. Existing estimated 2023 PM peak hour traffic volumes for the Study Area intersections are shown in Figure 3 (the AM peak period was not analyzed due to the hours of operation of the Museum). Figure 3: Existing 2023 Traffic Volumes (PM peak period) 2.2 Horizon Period The development is projected to be in full operation by 2026, therefore a 2031 horizon year was chosen for the analysis. Existing 2023 traffic volumes were expanded at a 19/o/year rate to project future 2031 traffic volumes without development. The future 2031 traffic volumes (without the development in place) for the PM peak hour volumes are provided in Figure 4. 2024-01-10 ex p. 1� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO Figure 4: Future Background 2031 Traffic Volumes (PM peak period) 2.3 Existing Traffic Operations The operational conditions were evaluated using Synchro 11 traffic analysis software. The results for each existing intersection turning movements, including results of future 2031 conditions without development, are summarized in Table 2. The detailed Synchro reports are provided in Appendix 2. 2024-01-10 ex p 1� I T1S for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museu>r - Finai Report - Revision 1 FRE 23004019-AO Table 2: Traffic Operations without Development Scenario Traffic Peak Overall Los Criteria y « Control Hour & Delay sec veh EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Main St Main St Dou las Ave v/C 0.3 1.23 28.6 Delay (s/veh) Free Shared 9.8 Free >200 Shared Existing 2023 PM D LOS Flow A Flow F Queue (m) 9.1 72.1 Future 2031 v/C 0.34 1.63 W/o PM 50.9 Delay (s/veh) Free Shared 10.3 Free >200 Shared F LOS Flow B Flow F Development Queue (m) 10.5 99.4 Bentley St Dou Ias Ave Dou Ias Ave v/C 0.15 0.17 0.6 12.2 Delay (s/veh) 9.0 Shared 8.6 Shared Shared 13.8 Existing 2023 �� PM B LOS A A B Queue (m) 3.5 4.2 28.7 Future 2031 v/C 0.16 0.19 0.66 w/o PM 13.4 Delay (s/veh) 9.2 Shared 8.9 Shared Shared 15.5 Development B LOS Queue (m) A 4.2 A 4.9 C 35 Chesley Dr Chesley Dr Dou Ias Ave v/C 0.17 0.56 Existing 2023 ' PM 4.4 Delay (s/veh) 9.4 Free Free Free 21.2 Shared A LOS A Flow Flow Flow C Queue (m) 4.2 23.1 Future 2031 v/C 0.19 0.64 W/o PM 5.2 Delay (s/veh) 9.7 Free Free Free 26.1 Shared Development \ / A LOS Queue(m) A Flow 4.9 Flow Flow D 30.8 2.3.1 Intersection No.1- Main St/Douglas Ave Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that the intersection is operating at an overall satisfactory LOS D for the existing PM peak period. The northbound left turn movement is operating at an unacceptable LOS F with a v/c ratio that exceeds 1.0, indicating that the demand exceeds capacity. The 95th percentile queue for this approach is 72 m. By the 2031 horizon year, the intersection is projected to be operating at an overall LOS F. The northbound left turn movement is projected to continue operating at LOS F with higher delays and above capacity. The 95th percentile queue for the northbound approach is 99.4 m. Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that there are existing and projected future without development operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach. It is notable that the northbound movements can take an alternate route by using Bentley St to access Main St via the signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr. A signal warrant analysis may be required to determine if a traffic signal is warranted to help improve existing and future conditions without development. However, this should be completed with peak AM, Noon, and PM traffic volumes collected at the Douglas Ave/Main St intersection (rather than the estimated volumes used in this Study) to ensure accuracy. It is unlikely that a traffic signal would be warranted at this location given the close proximity to the upstream signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr (approximately 80 m to the east of Douglas Ave). Right turning movements are being delayed the same time as the left turning movements due to the shared lane on the Douglas Ave approach. The City could consider implementing separate left and right turn lanes on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach to improve right turning delays. This scenario was run in the Synchro model 2024-01-10 ` •4ex. 1917 p TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO and results indicate LOS B for the right turning traffic with a separate right turning lane, while the left turning movement remains at LOS F. 2.3.2 Intersection No. 2 — Doulgas Ave/Bentley St Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that the intersection is currently operating at very good LOS B during the PM peak. All individual movements are currently operating at LOS B or better with v/c ratios well below the threshold of 1.0, indicating sufficient capacity. There is no significant queueing during the PM peak period. Results are similar for the 2031 horizon year without development. Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that there are no existing or projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing. 2.3.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that the intersection is currently operating at excellent LOS A during the PM peak. All individual movements are currently operating at a good LOS C or better with v/c ratios well below the threshold of 1.0, indicating sufficient capacity. There is no significant queueing during the PM peak period. Results are similar for the 2031 horizon year without development. Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that there are no existing or projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing. 2024-01-10 1ex p � I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO 3 Future Conditions with Proposed Development 3.1 Trip Generation To estimate the amount of traffic that will be generated by the new development, trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) were utilized. These rates are documented in the TripGen 11 web - based app and are based on the 111h edition of the Trip Generation Manual. For a museum, the rates are based on the Gross Floor Area (square footage) or number of staff. The upgraded NB Museum is anticipated to be 132,500 sq ft (12,310 sq m) with 20 staff members. The Gross Floor Area provides the more conservative (higher) estimate of generated trips and was therefore used for this Study. A breakdown of these trips, in terms of entering and exiting vehicles associated with the Study Area for the PM peak period, is presented in Table 3. fable 3: Estimated Trips Development Trips Lot Classification " Use,U Unit � Size I Land Use Description rive reaK Hour Code In Out Total NB Museum :0 Sq. Ft. GFA 1 132500 Museum 4 20 24 The NB Museum is planning on hosting occasional functions in their event space. The capacity of the event space includes in auditorium that allows for approximately 100 people. There is the possibility of the NB Museum hosting events that spill over into the lobby, which would allow for a total of approximately 150 people. Therefore, the NB Museum would have a maximum demand of 150 people plus 20 staff members. Any special events are likely to occur outside of the peak PM hour of the adjacent street (4:30 pm to 5:30 pm)and when the museum is outside of it's normal working hours. 3.2 Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment A review of existing vehicle traffic distribution patterns in the Study Area was conducted for the PM peak hour. It is anticipated that the PM peak hour vehicle trips for the proposed NB Museum would be distributed as shown in Figure 5. 2024-01-10 ex p 1� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO Figure 5: Trip Assignment for Phase 1 (PM Peak Period) 3.3 Future Traffic Volumes The proposed development trips (Figure 5) were added to the future roadway background traffic volumes for the 2031 horizon year (Figure 4). The total projected 2031 traffic volumes with the development in place are shown in Figure 6. 2024-01-10 ex p 1�D I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NEI Museum - Final Report - Revision 1 10 FRE-23004019-AO Figure 6: Projected 2031 Traffic Volumes With Development (PM Peak Period) 3.4 Future Traffic Operations With the Proposed Development Based on the projected traffic volumes with the proposed development, operational analyses were conducted for each Study Area intersection. The results for the 2031 horizon year with development are shown in Table 4. The detailed Synchro reports are provided in Appendix 3. Table 4: Traffic Operations with Development Scenario Traffic Peak �overa"Los &Delay Criteria control Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Main St Main St Dou IasAve Future 2031 v/C 0.34 1.71 W/ PM 56.9 Delay s/veh) Free Shared 10.3 Free >200 Shared F LOS Flow B Flow F Development Queue(m) 10.5 105.7 Bentley St Dou IasAve Dou IasAve Future 2031 v/C 0.16 0.19 0.68 W/ GO PM 14.1 Delay s/veh) 9.3 Shared 8.9 Shared Shared 16.4 B LOS A A C Development Queue (m) 4.2 4.9 38.5 Chesley Dr Chesley Dr Dou IasAve Future 2031 v/C 0.19 0.68 w/ PM 5.8 Delay (s/veh) 9.7 Free Free Free 28.4 Shared A LOS A Flow Flow Flow D Development //J Queue(m) 4.9 35 Museum Access Dou IasAve Dou IasAve Future 2031 v/C 0.05 0.002 0.4 Delay (s/veh) 12.9 Shared 8.5 Free Free Shared w/ PM A Los B A Flow Flow Development Queue(m) 0.7 0 $ Delay exceeds 300 seconds per vehicle 2024-01-10 ` •4ex. 10 p TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 11 FRE-23004019-AO 3.4.1 Intersection No.1— Main St/Douglas Ave Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that by the 2031 horizon year with the development in place, the intersection is projected to operate at an overall unacceptable LOS F for the PM peak period. The northbound left turn movement is operating at an unacceptable LOS F with high delays and a v/c ratio that exceeds 1.0, indicating that the demand exceeds capacity. The 951h percentile queue for this approach is 105.7 m (compared to 99.4 m without development, i.e. one additional vehicle). The City of Saint John was particularly interested in knowing the affect the development traffic would have on the westbound left turn (Main St) at this intersection. Based on the results, this movement is projected to operate similarly by the 2031 horizon year both with and without development, operating at LOS B with a v/c ratio of 0.34, indicating sufficient capacity, for both scenarios. Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that there are projected future operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach with development. Note that these results are similar without development. It is notable that the northbound movements can take an alternate route by using Bentley St to access Main St via the signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr. The proposed development is only projected to add an additional 7 vehicles to the northbound approach during the PM peak period. Based on the hours of operation for the NB Museum, this is only expected for Thursday's, as this is the only day that is open past 4 pm. Operational deficiencies at this intersection are not projected to be the result of traffic associated with the proposed development. As noted in Section 2.3.1, a signal warrant analysis may be required to determine if a traffic signal is warranted to help improve existing and future conditions without development, however, this should be completed with peak AM, Noon, and PM traffic volumes collected at the Douglas Ave/Main St intersection (rather than the estimated volumes used in this Study) to ensure accuracy. It is unlikely that a traffic signal would be warranted at this location given the close proximity to the upstream signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr (approximately 80 m to the east of Douglas Ave). Any improvements required at this intersection would be due to existing traffic. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 3.4.2 Intersection No.2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that by the 2031 horizon year with development the intersection is projected to operate at very good LOS B during the PM peak. All individual movements are projected to operate at LOS C or better with v/c ratios well below the threshold of 1.0, indicating sufficient capacity. There is no significant queueing projected during the PM peak period. Results are similar for the 2031 horizon year without development. Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 3.4.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that by the 2031 horizon year with development the intersection is projected to operate at excellent LOS A during the PM peak. All individual movements are projected to operate at a satisfactory LOS D or better with v/c ratios well below the threshold of 1.0, indicating sufficient capacity. There is no significant queueing projected during the PM peak period. Results are similar for the 2031 horizon year without development. 2024-01-10 ex p 1E� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 12 FRE-23004019-AO Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 3.4.4 Intersection No.4 — Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access (new intersection) The new intersection of Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access was analyzed as an unsignalized intersection with stop control on the eastbound (NB Museum Access) approach. All approaches were modelled as a single shared lane. The results of the traffic operations show that by the 2031 horizon year with development the intersection is projected to operate at an overall excellent LOS A for the PM peak period. All individual movements are projected to operate at LOS B or better with v/c ratios of 0.05 or less, indicating there is sufficient capacity. There is no significant queueing projected during the PM peak period with development. Results for the Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. The intersection is recommended to be constructed with single shared lanes on all approaches and with stop control conditions on the eastbound (NB Museum Access) approach. 2024-01-10 1ex p �33 I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum - Final Report - Revision 1 13 FRE-23004019-AO 4 Other Considerations 4.1 Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities Douglas Avenue currently has a sidewalk on both sides of the street within the Study Area. There are marked crosswalks on the south leg and the east leg of the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection. Bike lanes are present on Douglas Avenue on the west side beginning south of Bentley Street. The functional program for the proposed NB Museum states the following for "Site Amenities": "Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure (including bike racks) will connect the building to the local pedestrian walkway, public transit and bicycle routes, and streets". This will tie into the existing sidewalks on both sides of Douglas Ave. The current preliminary site plan shows entry to the building connecting to the existing sidewalks on the west side of Douglas Ave. In addition, Saint John Transit's Route 1W/1E provides transit service adjacent to the development with bus stops at Bentley St and Alexandra St. 4.2 Parking The Request for Proposal (RFP) that the Client responded to referenced the need to provide 80 parking spaces. The updated site plan indicates 75 parking spaces, including 4 Barrier Free spaces. Diamond & Schmitt Architects provided a breakdown between building uses for determining parking needs based on the City Zoning By-law. It should be noted that the City Zoning By-law does not specifically reference a museum land use. Based on the information provided, the preliminary breakdown of building use, corresponding areas, and the required parking for each based on the Zoning By-law is presented in Table 5. Table 5: Building Breakdown for Parking Requirements Area Gross Area Net #spaces Space Name sqm sqm By -Law Use Min. Parking Requirement (Grossarea) A. Public Lobby Spaces (744.2 sq.m. Net) Cafe 91.26 67.60 Restaurant 1/10square metres 9.13 Boutique 158.13 117.13 Retail General 1/30square metres 5.27 Balance ofpublic lobby space 857.61 635.27 Cultural Establishment 1/20square metres 42.88 Library 105.30 78.00 Library 1/35square metres 3.01 B. Exhibition Spaces & Education Spaces Exhibition Spaces 3,316.07 2,456.35 Cultural Establishment 1/20square metres 165.80 Education Spaces 1,077.98 798.50 Cultural Establishment 1/20 square metres 53.90 C-H Storage Facilities C. Natural History Collections 937.44 694.40 Warehouse D. Humanities Collections 1,429.11 1,058.60 Warehouse E. Archives Collection 540.68 400.50 Warehouse F. Conservation 205.69 152.36 Warehouse G. Gateways 282.96 209.60 Warehouse H. Design Fabrication 353.43 261.80 Warehouse Subtotal 3,749.30 2,777.26 1/200square metres forthe First 2, 000 sq. m. 2,000.00 2,000.00 first 2,000 square metres 10.00 1/500square metres more Beyond2,000sq.m. 1,749.30 777.26 than 2,000 square metres 3.50 Administration J. Administration 600.62 444.90 1/50square metres 12.01 Building Services Buildings Services (Mechanical, F. Electrical, IT/Comms., Shafts) 2353.05 1,743.00 0.00 2024-01-10 --,ex p 1� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 14 FRE-23004019-AO According to the information shown in Table 5, this breakdown would result in a total of 306 parking spaces to meet the City's Zoning By-law based on Gross Floor Area (as stated in the By-law). Further breakdown of building use may be warranted to better understand demand. The City Zoning By-law also requires a minimum number of barrier free parking spaces. For a minimum of 306 parking spaces, the By-law requires eight (8) barrier free parking spaces (i.e., 6 barrier free spaces for every 200 required parking spaces, plus an additional 1 barrier free space for every additional 100 spaces or portion thereof over 200). The current parking shown on the site plan (75 spaces, including 4 barrier free spaces) does not meet the City Zoning By-laws according to the information provided. The Board of the New Brunswick Museum has provided a more detailed analysis of parking requirements as part of their application and as documented in the Parking Recommendations Report for the New Brunswick Museum. This report utilizes various data relating to annual visitors, percent of visitors arriving by car, average car occupancy, average stay duration, and museum operating hours. Discussions should be held with the City with respect to the results to ensure adequate parking is provided. It should be noted that there is currently on -street parking on both sides of Douglas Ave in the general area of the project. The updated site plan indicates a proposed drop-off area for the Museum on Douglas Avenue adjacent to the building. In addition, Saint John Transit's Route 1W/1E provides transit service adjacent to the development with bus stops at Bentley St and Alexandra St. 4.3 Impacts on Harbour View High School The hours of operation for the NB Museum begin at 10 am on weekdays. This is outside of the hours of peak AM drop off times for Harbour View High School. Therefore, it is not anticipated that traffic associated with the Museum would impact the School's peak AM period. The PM peak for a high school typically occurs for a brief 15-minute period at dismissal time (3:30 pm), which is prior to the PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic. The proposed NB Museum access shown on the preliminary site plan is approximately 80 m north of the existing Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection. Minimum spacing between adjacent intersections is 60 m for collector roads according to the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Geometric Design Guide. The proposed NB Museum access location, therefore, meets the TAC guidelines for minimum intersection spacing. A preliminary review of the updated site plan suggests that intersection sight lines should be available, as long as there is curbing used to define the proposed drop-off area on Douglas Avenue, adjacent to the Museum. Intersection sight lines should be checked during detailed design of the parking lot and access. 2024-01-10 ex p 1E� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 15 FRE-23004019-AO Summary of Findings EXP was retained to complete a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the upgrade of the New Brunswick Museum. The Museum is located at 277 Douglas Ave in Saint John, NB. The development is expected to be operational by 2026. The following is a summary of the findings and recommendations. 5.1 Existing Traffic Operations To assess the traffic impacts that the proposed development could have on the roadway network, an analysis was first conducted with the existing and future 2031 traffic volumes "without the development". 5.1.1 Intersection No. 1— Main St/Douglas Ave Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that there are existing and projected future without development operational deficiencies in terms of LOS (F), delays, capacity, or queueing on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach. It is notable that the northbound movements can take an alternate route by using Bentley St to access Main St via the signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr. A signal warrant analysis may be required to determine if a traffic signal is warranted to help improve existing and future conditions without development. However, this should be completed with peak AM, Noon, and PM traffic volumes collected at the Douglas Ave/Main St intersection (rather than the estimated volumes used in this Study) to ensure accuracy. It is unlikely that a traffic signal would be warranted at this location given the close proximity to the upstream signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr (approximately 80 m to the east of Douglas Ave). Right turning movements are being delayed the same time as the left turning movements due to the shared lane on the Douglas Ave approach. The City could consider implementing separate left and right turn lanes on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach to improve right turning delays. This scenario was run in the Synchro model and results indicate LOS B for the right turning traffic with a separate right turning lane, while the left turning movement remains at LOS F. 5.1.2 Intersection No. 2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that there are no existing or projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing. 5.1.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that there are no existing or projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing. 5.2 Traffic Operations with the Development The vehicle trips for the proposed development were estimated using trip generation rates from ITE. These trips were added to the future 2031 roadway background traffic volumes and operational analyses were conducted for each of the Study Area intersections for the horizon year with the development in place. 5.2.1 Intersection No. 1— Main St/Douglas Ave Results for the Main St/Douglas Ave intersection show that there are projected future operational deficiencies in terms of LOS (F), delays, capacity, or queueing on the northbound (Douglas Ave) approach with development. Note that these results are similar without development. The City of Saint John was particularly interested in knowing the affect the development traffic would have on the westbound left turn (Main St) at this intersection. Based on the results, this movement is projected to operate 2024-01-10 ex p. 17�16 I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 16 FRE-23004019-AO similarly by the 2031 horizon year both with and without development, operating at LOS B with a v/c ratio of 0.34, indicating sufficient capacity, for both scenarios. It is notable that the northbound movements can take an alternate route by using Bentley St to access Main St via the signalized intersection of Main St/Chesley Dr. The proposed development is only projected to add an additional 7 vehicles to the northbound approach during the PM peak period. Based on the hours of operation for the NB Museum, this is only expected for Thursday's, as this is the only day that is open past 4 pm. Operational deficiencies at this intersection are not projected to be the result of traffic associated with the proposed development. Any improvements required at this intersection would be due to existing traffic. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 5.2.2 Intersection No. 2 — Douglas Ave/Bentley St Results for the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 5.2.3 Intersection No. 3 — Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr Results for the Douglas Ave/Chesley Dr intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. No improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed development. 5.2.4 Intersection No. 4 — Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access (new intersection) The new intersection of Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access was analyzed as an unsignalized intersection with stop control on the eastbound (NB Museum Access) approach. All approaches were modelled as a single shared lane. Results for the Douglas Ave/NB Museum Access intersection show that there are no projected future 2031 operational deficiencies in terms of LOS, delays, capacity, or queueing with the development in place. The intersection is recommended to be constructed with single shared lanes on all approaches and with stop control conditions on the eastbound (NB Museum Access) approach. 5.3 Other Considerations 5.3.1 Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities Douglas Avenue currently has a sidewalk on both sides of the street within the Study Area. There are marked crosswalks on the south leg and the east leg of the Douglas Ave/Bentley St intersection. Bike lanes are present on Douglas Avenue on the west side beginning south of Bentley Street. The functional program for the proposed NB Museum states the following for "Site Amenities": "Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure (including bike racks) will connect the building to the local pedestrian walkway, public transit and bicycle routes, and streets". This will tie into the existing sidewalks on both sides of Douglas Ave. The current preliminary site plan shows entry to the building connecting to the existing sidewalks on the west side of Douglas Ave. In addition, Saint John Transit's Route 1W/1E provides transit service adjacent to the development with bus stops at Bentley St and Alexandra St. 2024-01-10 ex p 1X� I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 17 FRE-23004019-AO 5.3.2 Parking According to the information shown in Table 5 in Section 4.2, a total of 306 parking spaces would be required to meet the City's Zoning By-law based on Gross Floor Area (as stated in the By-law). Further breakdown of building use may be warranted to better understand demand. The City Zoning By-law also requires a minimum number of barrier free parking spaces. For a minimum of 306 parking spaces, the By-law requires eight (8) barrier free parking spaces (i.e., 6 barrier free spaces for every 200 required parking spaces, plus an additional 1 barrier free space for every additional 100 spaces or portion thereof over 200). The current parking shown on the site plan (75 spaces, including 4 barrier free spaces) does not meet the City Zoning By-laws according to the information provided. The Board of the New Brunswick Museum has provided a more detailed analysis of parking requirements as part of their application and as documented in the Parking Recommendations Report for the New Brunswick Museum. This report utilizes various data relating to annual visitors, percent of visitors arriving by car, car occupancy, average stay duration, and museum operating hours. Discussions should be held with the City with respect to the results to ensure adequate parking is provided. It should be noted that there is currently on -street parking on both sides of Douglas Ave in the general area of the project. The updated site plan indicates a proposed drop-off area for the Museum on Douglas Avenue adjacent to the building. In addition, Saint John Transit's Route 1W/1E provides transit service adjacent to the development with bus stops at Bentley St and Alexandra St. 5.3.3 Impacts on Harbour View High School There are no impacts projected for Harbour View High School as a result of the proposed development, as the hours of operation fall outside of the peak drop-off and dismissal times for the School. 53.4 Access The proposed NB Museum access location meets the TAC guidelines for minimum intersection spacing. A preliminary review of the updated site plan suggests that intersection sight lines should be available, as long as there is curbing used to define the proposed drop-off area on Douglas Avenue, adjacent to the Museum. Intersection sight lines should be checked during detailed design of the parking lot and access. 2024-01-10 ex p 1XB I TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO Appendix 1— Proposed Site Plan 2024-01-10 --,ex O Na E 0 m v P r I - -- - - -- T w ��z x o �i 4, , I TR _ i I - TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO Appendix 2 — Synchro Detailed Reports — Existing Conditions 1. Existing 2023 Conditions Future Background 2031 Conditions 2024-01-10 �=.•eX . HCM 6th TWSC PM Existing 1: Douglas Ave & Main St 08/20/2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 19.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� + r Traffic Vol, veh/h 294 160 298 364 104 56 Future Vol, veh/h 294 160 298 364 104 56 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 320 174 324 396 113 61 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 494 0 1451 407 Stage 1 - - - - 407 - Stage 2 - 1044 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1070 144 644 Stage 1 - 672 - Stage 2 - 339 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1070 — 100 644 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - — 100 - Stage 1 672 Stage 2 236 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.4 139.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 100 644 1070 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.13 0.095 0.303 HCM Control Delay (s) 208.8 11.2 9.8 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.4 0.3 1.3 Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon PM Existing 1:46 pm 08/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC PM Existing 2: Douglas Ave & Bentley St 08/10/2023 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.2 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations y 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 54 106 17 16 442 Future Vol, veh/h 41 54 106 17 16 442 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 45 59 115 18 17 480 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 9 8.6 13.8 HCM LOS A A B Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 43% 3% Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 97% Vol Right, % 14% 57% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 123 95 458 LT Vol 0 41 16 Through Vol 106 0 442 RT Vol 17 54 0 Lane Flow Rate 134 103 498 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.172 0.145 0.602 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.639 5.072 4.355 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 771 705 831 Service Time 2.675 3.118 2.381 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 0.146 0.599 HCM Control Delay 8.6 9 13.8 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.5 4.1 PM Existing 1:46 pm 08/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Ij` -Aj HCM 6th TWSC PM Existing 3: Chesley Dr & Douglas Ave 08/20/2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.4 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + t r Traffic Vol, veh/h 150 561 549 15 2 247 Future Vol, veh/h 150 561 549 15 2 247 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Yield - None Storage Length 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 163 610 597 16 2 268 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 597 0 0 1533 597 Stage 1 - - - 597 - Stage 2 - 936 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 980 128 503 Stage 1 - 550 - Stage 2 - 382 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 980 107 503 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 107 - Stage 1 459 Stage 2 382 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0 21.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 980 488 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.166 0.555 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 21.2 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 3.3 PM Existing 1:46 pm 08/09/2023 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 `F,; :I HCM 6th TWSC PM Future 2031 without Development 1: Douglas Ave & Main St 08/21/2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 33.6 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� + r Traffic Vol, veh/h 318 173 323 394 113 61 Future Vol, veh/h 318 173 323 394 113 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 346 188 351 428 123 66 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 534 0 1570 440 Stage 1 - - - - 440 - Stage 2 - 1130 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1034 — 122 617 Stage 1 - 649 - Stage 2 - 308 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1034 — 81 617 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - — 81 - Stage 1 649 Stage 2 204 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.6 247.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 81 617 1034 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.516 0.107 0.34 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 375 11.5 10.3 HCM Lane LOS F B B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 9.9 0.4 1.5 Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon PM Future 2031 without Development 2:21 pm 08/09/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC PM Future 2031 without Development 2: Douglas Ave & Bentley St 08/10/2023 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.4 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 58 115 18 17 479 Future Vol, veh/h 44 58 115 18 17 479 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 63 125 20 18 521 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 9.2 8.9 15.5 HCM LOS A A C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 43% 3% Vol Thru, % 86% 0% 97% Vol Right, % 14% 57% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 133 102 496 LT Vol 0 44 17 Through Vol 115 0 479 RT Vol 18 58 0 Lane Flow Rate 145 111 539 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.189 0.16 0.658 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.716 5.19 4.395 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 759 688 819 Service Time 2.761 3.245 2.427 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.191 0.161 0.658 HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.2 15.5 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.6 5 PM Future 2031 without Development 2:21 pm 08/09/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 `F;1 HCM 6th TWSC PM Future 2031 without Development 3: Chesley Dr & Douglas Ave 08/21/2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.2 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + t r Traffic Vol, veh/h 163 607 595 16 2 268 Future Vol, veh/h 163 607 595 16 2 268 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Yield - None Storage Length 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 177 660 647 17 2 291 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 647 0 0 1661 647 Stage 1 - - - 647 - Stage 2 - 1014 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 939 107 471 Stage 1 - 521 - Stage 2 - 350 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 939 87 471 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 87 - Stage 1 423 Stage 2 350 Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0 26.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 939 456 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.189 0.644 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 26.1 HCM Lane LOS A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 4.4 PM Future 2031 without Development 2:21 pm 08/09/2023 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Iii FWFA TIS for the Proposed Upgraded NB Museum — Final Report — Revision 1 FRE-23004019-AO Appendix 3 — Synchro Detailed Reports —With Proposed Development 1. Future 2031 Conditions with Development 2024-01-10 ex p 1� I HCM 6th TWSC PM Future 2031 with Development 1: Douglas Ave & Main St 01/05/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 56.9 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� + Traffic Vol, veh/h 318 174 324 394 118 63 Future Vol, veh/h 318 174 324 394 118 63 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 346 189 352 428 128 68 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 535 0 1573 441 Stage 1 - - - - 441 - Stage 2 - 1132 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1033 — 121 616 Stage 1 - 648 - Stage 2 - 308 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1033 — 80 616 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - — 80 - Stage 1 648 Stage 2 203 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.6 $ 419.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 115 1033 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.711 0.341 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 419.1 10.3 HCM Lane LOS F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 15.1 1.5 Notes —: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon PM Future 2031 with Development 4:18 pm 08/09/2023 EXP BRiordon Synchro 11 Report ■L`4 1 HCM 6th AWSC PM Future 2031 with Development 2: Douglas Ave & Bentley St 01/05/2024 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.1 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations y 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 59 116 18 18 495 Future Vol, veh/h 44 59 116 18 18 495 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 48 64 126 20 20 538 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 9.3 8.9 16.4 HCM LOS A A C Lane N13Ln1 WBLn1 S13Ln1 Vol Left, % 0% 43% 4% Vol Thru, % 87% 0% 96% Vol Right, % 13% 57% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 134 103 513 LT Vol 0 44 18 Through Vol 116 0 495 RT Vol 18 59 0 Lane Flow Rate 146 112 558 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.192 0.163 0.682 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.741 5.23 4.401 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 754 682 820 Service Time 2.79 3.29 2.436 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.194 0.164 0.68 HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.3 16.4 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.6 5.5 PM Future 2031 with Development 4:18 pm 08/09/2023 EXP BRiordon Synchro 11 Report fiE:C�7 HCM 6th TWSC PM Future 2031 with Development 3: Chesley Dr & Douglas Ave 01/05/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.8 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + t r Traffic Vol, veh/h 164 607 595 16 3 279 Future Vol, veh/h 164 607 595 16 3 279 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Yield - None Storage Length 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 178 660 647 17 3 303 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 647 0 0 1663 647 Stage 1 - - - 647 - Stage 2 - 1016 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 939 107 471 Stage 1 - 521 - Stage 2 - 350 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 939 87 471 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 87 - Stage 1 422 Stage 2 350 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0 28.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 939 450 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.19 0.681 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 28.4 HCM Lane LOS A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 5 PM Future 2031 with Development 4:18 pm 08/09/2023 EXP BRiordon Synchro 11 Report fiE:tiil HCM 6th TWSC PM Future 2031 with Development 4: Douglas Ave & NB Museum Access 01/05/2024 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.4 EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 13 2 173 496 2 Future Vol, veh/h 7 13 2 173 496 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 14 2 188 539 2 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 732 540 541 0 0 Stage 1 540 - - - - Stage 2 192 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 388 542 1028 Stage 1 584 - - Stage 2 841 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 387 542 1028 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 387 - - Stage 1 583 Stage 2 841 Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.9 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1028 475 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.046 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 12.9 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 PM Future 2031 with Development 4:18 pm 08/09/2023 EXP BRiordon Synchro 11 Report fiE:11;4 REVITALIZE NBM PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM WHAT WE HEARD: SUMMARY REPORT MARCH 27, 2024 -L � PRODUCED BY DUKE CREATIVE COLLECTIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 3 .................................................................................................................................... Engagement results 4 .................................................................................................................................... Updates to museum design 12 .................................................................................................................................... Conclusion 13 .................................................................................................................................... Appendix A 14 .................................................................................................................................... • Methodology for public engagement .................................................................................................................................... • Communication and invitation efforts .................................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION With a commitment to fostering community involvement and gathering valuable insights, the Board of Directors of the New Brunswick Museum (NBM) undertook a series of public engagement sessions between September 9th and 28th, 2023. The following summary report provides information on engagement objectives, methods, results including emergent themes, and design changes that resulted from the public and stakeholder input. The goal was to provide an opportunity for citizens and stakeholders across New Brunswick to voice their opinions and contribute to the design of the new NBM. These engagement sessions served as a platform for dialogue and collaboration, shaping the foundation for the Revitalize NBM Project. OBJECTIVES The engagement strategy aligned with the following objectives: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Foster active participation and input from New Brunswickers from all walks of life, to help shape the design of the N BM. 2. VALUES -BASED INPUT: Gather insights reflecting the values and priorities of the community related to the design. 3. FOUNDATIONAL DESIGN INPUT FOR NBM REVITALIZATION: Provide a platform for citizens to contribute to the design of the Revitalize NBM Project. `E.t:7 ENGAGEMENT Sessions took place in locations across the province and on Zoom, ensuring accessibility for as many interested individuals as possible. It is important to note that given the unique rights and interests of First Nations related to the project, First Nations engagement is ongoing and being carried out by N BM staff in parallel to this public engagement process. Feedback from First Nations will be treated as distinct and a separate input to the N BM's decisionmaking, and therefore is not included in this report. Participants engaged in interactive discussions, shared their ideas, and heard from the NBM Board and project architects, Diamond Schmitt, about the project's overall mission and preliminary design concepts. Subject matter experts from the Diamond Schmitt team and the N BM, as well as Duke Creative Collective staff attended to present preliminary design concepts, inspire through examples of other cultural project designs, address questions and capture feedback. Open discussion was encouraged, and people were reminded of the ability to submit further questions or comments online at RevitalizeN BM.ca. Appendix A provides detailed information on the methods that were used to engage. In brief: • Invitation promotions reached more than 530,000 New Brunswickers: Social media engagement, website traffic, emails, paid and earned media strategy. • Ten events, over 960 participants, verbal input at meetings, 360+ written submissions: The engagement process successfully fostered active participation, with an emphasis on inclusivity and accessibility. • Locations: • Saint John • Fredericton • Edmundston • CampbeRton • Bathurst • Caraquet • Miramichi • Moncton • Province -wide Zoom meeting • New Brunswick Museum staff -only session KEY FINDINGS Overall response from the public engagement sessions was positive, and attendees were satisfied with the information presented and the open discussion format, indicating that they were comfortable asking questions and providing input. Valuable insights and suggestions from the community were provided regarding the design, appearance and functionality of the new museum facility. Participants expressed a strong connection to the existing iconic 1934 structure and emphasized the importance of sustainability, community engagement, and consideration for the natural environment. Their priorities were to have the project done properly and with a long-term perspective that considers both cost and environmental impacts. The events generated many questions and a clear desire for more information, particularly the opportunity to provide their ideas on the project and for continued dialogue/input opportunities. The sentiments offered by New Brunswickers regarding the Revitalize NBM Project share a consistent focus on four overarching topics. There was a resounding call for accessibility and inclusivity (30%), emphasizing the need for easy parking, smooth traffic flow, and designs that accommodate diverse abilities. 2. Sustainability and longevity (25%) took center stage, with a strong desire for eco-friendly features such as LEED Certification and birdfriendly architecture, as well as the use of sustainable materials. Participants expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of the new facility, emphasizing the use of contemporary design and engineering practices or longevity and reduced operational costs. 3. Community engagement and representation (25%) emerged as key priorities, with the hope that the new museum would be a true reflection of New Brunswick's rich history, natural environment and diverse cultures. 4. Finally, the importance of thoughtful building design and integration (2 underscored, including concerns about historic preservation, future exr and creating engaging, flexible spaces. ilirIM EMERGENT THEMES SUSTAINABILITYAND LONGEVITY Participants expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of the new facility, emphasizing the use of contemporary design and engineering practices for longevity and reduced operational costs. INTERACTIVE AND EVER -EVOLVING SPACES The community supports an architectural design that facilitates interactive exhibits, regularly rotated displays, and Instagram-worthy opportunities. Suggestions include a dynamic design that meshes with the existing building and the natural environment. ICONIC DESIGN AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE Participants encouraged an iconic design on the inside, with natural materials and minimal concrete. Suggestions also included possible naming sections after significant contributors and integrating sculptures or interactive outdoor features. FOOD SERVICE, CATERING AND EVENT FACILITIES Suggestions were made for a cafe with a view, a catering kitchen for special events, and a possible roof terrace. OTHER Some comments were also related to the following themes: representation, community and local impacts, First Nations inclusion and representation, preservation of historic elements, economic opportunities, cost, process, and transparency. SUMMARY OF MAJOR DISCUSSION COMMENTS BY SESSION TOPICjpdW COMMENTS SAINT JOH N -SEPT 9, 2023 Planning for future expansion -how will museum expand in the future. MUSEUM -GENERAL/ PLANNING/PROCESS Importance of engaging Indigenous groups. Potential to display digital version of exhibitions / collections from street. Building design should integrate and complement the Douglas Ave. streetscape. Request to reduce scale of North addition. BUILDING DESIGN -SCALE, SITING, & MATERIALITY Glass should be designed to protect birds. Questions around how the existing building will be renovated and restored. Importance of natural light - balanced with the protection of collections. Suggested more space for bus drop off is required, in addition to the parking lot. Concern about parking quantity. Interest in a path network on the western exterior. SITE LANDSCAPE & PARKING Access to landscape, building should have a strong interior and exterior connection. Interest in outdoor children's programs, a playground in the park. Suggestion for covered walkway or interior path from parking to building entry. ■ L67451 FREDERICTON - SEPT 10, 2023 Museum should reach all of NB - diverse cultural backgrounds of past and present. Exhibitions can tell stories of all N B cultures. Museum can serve as a community space - a "community MUSEUM -GENERAL/ PLANNING/CONCEPTS living room" and an indoor destination on rainy days. Importance of the portage routes and location along Saint John River. Importance of children's programming. NB forests & rivers as a concept that connect all of NB. Building shape can be influenced by the site. BUILDING - SCALE, Existing Douglas Ave. building should be complemented by a SITING, & MATERIALITY contemporary addition. Interest in maintaining the existing building entry stair. It is a recognizable symbol of the museum in NB. Opportunity for Indigenous communities to tell stories. Interest in trails or paths on West waterfront. SITE LANDSCAPE & PARKING Concern entrance is too far from parking, suggest a covered walkway. Roof terrace viewed very positively. Suggest trees or planting be incorporated on roof terrace. EDMUNDSTON - SEPT 11, 2023 Museum design should be exciting to attract younger generations. The lobby space is central to the experience. Museum could bridge the divide between different cultures and communities. Francophone cultural representation in the museum and exhibitions is important. CAMPBELLTON -SEPT]], 2023 Attendees expressed enthusiasm for the museum's revitalization project. Concerns about the accessibility of exhibits for visitors with reduced mobility. Suggestions were made for incorporating interactive elements to enhance visitor engagement. Integrating the museum building harmoniously into the existing site, preserving natural features where possible. BATHURST - SEPT 12, 2023 Tours would be of interestwhen the museum first opens. Suggest that NBM provide shared resources to community museums, such as workshop use for preparation of traveling exhibitions. Potential for an exhibition space in NBM designed to house travelling exhibitions from community museums. N B Museum should tell the stories of all the cultures of NB. Auditorium - suggest a stage for small performances. Interactive storytelling/ exhibition feature. Maintaining the facade of existing building will maintain familiarity. CA RAQU ET - S E PT 12, 2023 How to draw cruise ship visitors and uptown population to visit the museum. Offer a diversity of changing experiences to draw a range of returning visitors. Can the facade incorporate digital projections. Boutique accessibility from the street is important. Boutique items to reflect exhibits. Representation of all New Brunswick cultures, including new a rriva ls. How can the building represent its location on the coast. Involvement with community museums and supporting that network. MI RAMICHI - SEPT 13, 2023 MUSEUM -GENERAL/ PLANNING / CONCEPTS Glass should be designed to prevent bird strikes. How to control odors from local industrial sources and activities. Visitors want to see new exhibitions when visiting the museum - the ability to change displays and galleries is important. The collections should reflect the province, local stories. Interest in the ability to have interactive exhibitions. BUILDING DESIGN, SITE LANDSCAPE Treatment of the West facade should speak to the natural aspects of the site. Amount of glass used, protection of collections from light must be considered. Exterior facade ability for projections - display historic photographs or rotating views of exhibitions. All plant species used in landscaping should be native. Light pollution abatement. Outdoor lighting designed to protect birds during migration months and insect navigation. Interest in trails along west of site. Accessibility in all aspects of design. MONCTON - SEPT 13, 2023 Storytelling and landscape design should be incorporated at the design phase. Opportunities to connect galleries with landscape, through moments of pause. Concern about upkeep for museum financially. Importance of including staff in planning discussions. Instead of visible storage, suggest a space designated for display of new acquisitions. A donor wall should be incorporated in the design. Importance of community outreach while museum is closed. Importance of public art. Building should strive for a high LEED level certification, focus on carbon neutral. Interest in tours when new building is open, inviting the community in. N BM should promote Stonehammer Geopark. Building should reflect Paleontological history of the Province perhaps Trilobite on exterior facade. `F,;_:+� PROVINCE -WIDE ZOOM SESSION —SEPT 28, 2023 Potential for fire pit for outdoor storytelling. Interested in prioritizing the portage trail on the river. Importance of protection for collections. Interested to learn more about the research component of the museum. Wood from various tree species sourced from all areas of the province could create a mix of diversity & shared provincial view. The museum should highlight resource preservation efforts and concerns in NB. There should be a commitment to support New Brunswick businesses in the materials and labour for the project. Consideration for cafe space and catering space at the museum. Museum should be built for longevity, through selection of materials. There must be ample exterior lighting to deal with the famous fog. A building that generates electricity, has rest spaces with windows and natural vegetation either inside or outside, and the tidal tower's comeback. Building should highlight NB materials, in addition to the use of wood. The building should ensure bird strikes are reduced through design and lighting. Building should be unique to Saint John and reflect New Brunswick values. The findings from the public engagement sessions have provided valuable insights for the ongoing development of the New Brunswick Museum, emphasizing the importance of community input, sustainability, and a design that reflects the rich history, natural environment, and values of the region. `�*31 UPDATES TO THE MUSEUM DESIGN During the public consultations many valuable ideas and suggestions were shared by the public and stakeholders. Since the consultations have taken place, the design has continued to progress, and the project team has worked diligently to incorporate and address the suggestions and ideas shared by the community, where possible, during the design phase. While many comments shared during the sessions related to the museum programming and exhibitions design, these items will be carried forward and considered during subsequent phases of the project when these aspects are being developed. BUILDING SCALE AND PROPORTIONS The building has been reduced in height by one storey and the proportions of the gallery bays have been refined to further integrate with the existing building and streetscape context. The museum is considering long term use of a secondary collection and research facility which may allow the overall building size to be reduced with a focus on providing exhibitions and learning programming for the public at Douglas Avenue. BUILDING FORM The design for the new building has been developed further to reflect the meaningful connections with the site's dual topography of urbanity to the east and the steep, lush escarpment sloping down to the Saint John River to the west. The west -facing facade has been softly arced in response to the landscape and curve of the river's shoreline, while the east frontage reflects the more urban nature of Douglas Ave. and facade of the existing museum. ROOFTOP TERRACE The public's enthusiasm and positive input regarding the potential for a rooftop terrace with panoramic views prompted the design team to enhance and further develop this space. The rooftop terrace will provide visitors with a captivating experience, with views extending west to Marble Cove and the Saint John River, and east to Uptown Saint John, the Harbour and the Bay of Fundy. NATURAL LIGHT AND GLAZING The use of natural light, in controlled and well considered public spaces, has been further enhanced with the integration of skylights above the atrium space. The location of all glazing has been designed to consider the protection of collections and exhibitions internally, while also providing visitors opportunities to enjoy stunning views of the surrounding natural landscape. Night lighting and glazing will also provide measures for the protection of birds externally, including the use of bird friendly frit, a known treatment that prevents bird -strikes. COVERED WALKWAY To enhance visitor convenience and comfort, the design has incorporated a covered walkway between the parking lot and the main entry. This covered area runs along the east frontage of the building on Douglas Avenue and is created through the projection of gallery volumes at the second level. BUS AND VEHICLE DROP-OFF To facilitate easy drop-off for the public, particularly school buses and tour buses, a new drop-off lay- by lane has been included in the site plan. CONCLUSION The public engagement program forth e Revitalize NBM Project has successfully fulfilled its overarching goal — to actively involve New Brunswickers in shaping the new design and future of the NBM. With a commitment to fostering community involvement, the sessions provided a valuable platform for citizens to voice their opinions, ensuring that their perspectives play a pivotal role in the decision -making process. The insights gathered from these engagements will be instrumental in informing crucial project decisions. The themes and emergent priorities highlighted by participants, ranging from accessibility and sustainability to community engagement and thoughtful design, will serve as foundational pillars for the ongoing development of the NBM. This wealth of community input will be carefully considered by the project team, ensuring that the final design reflects the values and aspirations of the diverse communities it will serve. The success of these events is underscored not only by the robust attendance across various locations but also by the richness of feedback received. The engaged and participatory nature of the discussions, coupled with the diversity of ideas and perspectives, attest to the success of the public engagement strategy. New Brunswickers have demonstrated a vested interest in the revitalization of their provincial museum, showcasing a collective commitment to preserving the province's and region's history and values. This collaborative approach ensures the new museum will be a true reflection of the communities it serves, fostering a sense of ownership and pride among New Brunswickers. The success of these events goes beyond numbers; it lies in the genuine engagement and enthusiasm demonstrated by participants, marking significant milestone in thejourney toward a revitalized and community -centric New Brunswick Museum. ABOUT DUKE CREATIVE COLLECTIVE We are a creative consultancy and marketing agency based in Saint John, NB. Our award -winning team works with clients to build authentic brands, develop strategic campaigns, and create memorable experiences that effectively connect at scale with those that matter most. Learn more at thisisduke.com. APPENDIX A METHODOLOGY FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT INTRODUCTION Public engagement on the Revitalize NBM Project was carried out over a period of three weeks from September 9 — 28th, 2023. The design of the engagement process was a collaborative effort between the New Brunswick Museum Board and staff, Duke Creative Collective, and the Diamond Schmitt Architects team. Itwas determined that an overviewfrom the architects, including inspirational examples from previous projects, followed by Q&A and open dialogue would yield the most useful public input. NBM and Diamond Schmittwould then applythese findings to their design and project planning process. PROCESS AT A GLANCE SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Public Review and Revisions to Report engagement analysis design finalization sessions INVITATION DISTRIBUTION/PROMOTION C�t 0 8�� Im NBM-owned Paid media Via partners, Earned media channels (websites, (online) stakeholders and social media, email) employees OPPORTUNITIES • RevitalizeNBM.ca open feedback form • Revita[izeNBM.ca public engagement questions • Public engagement sessions in 9 locations • Dialogue with stakeholders and community leaders • NBM employee session • Province -wide public Zoom meeting Mr.] INVITE DISTRIBUTION/PROMOTION To garner widespread participation across the province, substantial efforts were dedicated to enhance the social reach and engagement associated with the invitations. This involved crafting a compelling engagement narrative, a persuasive call -to -action, and establishing a distinct visual brand specifically for the Revitalize N BM Project. This strategic approach aimed not only to generate earned media but also to create a buzz within the community by leveraging NBM's direct channels and stakeholder networks, making the project stand out and leave a lasting impact through cohesive and consistent project communications. Individual invites for each session were created and posted, and boosted into the respective geographic communities in advance of each session. OPPORTUNTIES TO ENGAGE The RevitalizeN BM.ca website made its debut as part of the official kick-off of the public engagement process. Serving as an informative hub, RevitalizeNBM.ca hosted a beautiful drone video providing captivating visuals of the current and future site of the New Brunswick Museum, including the stunning views of Marble Cove. The site played a pivotal role in sharing information surrounding the Revitalize NBM Project, laying the groundwork for NBM's engagement process providing an RSVP function, facilitating transparent and open communications with finable forms, and ensuring stakeholders stayed informed about engagement opportunities. Recognizing that the museum is for all New Brunswickers, it was important to make it easy to participate. A combination of both in -person and online tactics were employed and within those streams, multiple participation opportunities were made available to suit varying levels of knowledge and interest in the Revitalize N B M Project. The engagement process aimed to foster a sense of ownership and collaboration, ensuring that the diverse perspectives of New Brunswickers were integral to shaping the project's vision and objectives regarding design. COMMUNICATION & INVITATION EFFORTS The NBM and Duke Creative Collective sought to leverage all available channels to build awareness and understanding of the public consultation program and invite participation. Custom content resources were created to support this effort. Owned channels and networks leveraged: • NBM subject matter experts • RevitalizeNBM.ca / RevitalizeNBM.com • NBM-MNB.ca • Twitter: @NBM-MNB • Facebook: New Brunswick Museum - Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick • Instagram: nbm_mnb • NBM newsletter • NBM Board & NBM COO communications • Stakeholder email list Social media was a helpful means of building awareness and engagement, as illustrated by the Facebook/Instagram snapshot that follows. Full FACEBOOK/I N STAG RAM SNAPSHOT • Link clicks were up 9,800% on Facebook and 100% on Instagram • Total reach- 16O.7K • Interactions and conversations spiked during the public engagement period • The tone of social media conversations was generally neutral, focused on information sharing and engaging others Highest reach on a post Q r () Facebook post NOTICE: New Brunswick Museum prepares for move... a—� Oct 11, 2023, 12:54 PM This post's reach (18,395) is 1,902% higher than your median post reach (919) on Facebook. Highest reactions on a post Q O Facebook post The New Brunswick Museum invites all residents to join th. ' Sep 7, 2023, 8:55 AM This post received 1,615% more reactions (343 reactions) than your median post (20 reactions) on Facebook. REVITALIZE NBM SNAPSHOT Highest comments on a post 1Q O Facebook post The New Brunswick Museum invites all residents to join th... Sep 7, 2023, 8:55 AM This past received 6,000% more comments (61 comments) than your median post (1 comment) on Facebook. The Revitalize NBM Project website plays a pivotal role in keeping New Brunswickers informed and engaged throughout the public consultation process and the entirety of the project, serving as a centralized hub for project updates, announcements, public engagement events and interactive features. By fostering transparency and accessibility, the website ensures that New Brunswickers stay well-informed about the N BM initiative, allowing them to contribute their insights and stay connected with the transformative developments shaping their cultural landscape. The Revitalize N BM website serves as a digital bridge, connecting the project team with the community and reflecting a commitment to an inclusive and collaborative process. September 2023 • 4.4K pageviews • 364 form submissions • 4 min + time on page- demonstrating very high engagement from visitors* *One study shows that the average time that a site visitor spends on a webpage is 52 seconds across all industries. it-K EARNED MEDIA Earned media refers to audience impressions gained through news media and blogs. Traditional media coverage yielded significant audience reach, providing information about the Revitalize NBM Project and public engagement process. More than 10 related print, broadcast and online media stories were published province -wide during the engagement period. New Brunswick Museum seeks public input on —* axpsndon project New Bru,ssw ck Husoun, stopnq put in Saint John PAID MEDIA NEWS Architects offer insight into provincial museum plans ILI bxr bead d—WAh.-FprteM.N shtl . Tu6lI Of M lxp�rW.a hilw erulN 'ck MuS EuBdVVW COUP s A.eaib M S*d JnMo A �+9�mMrt casslona fw N.B. ktuFV.rm rriiN6satlon pmJ.ad ran.m�.�r�►��era nitbr —mdnd ahorat i, . iw Hodes C- '—' 1neFrbn ni P+.n��l�ud tN.]kun+wa•M F.ixrevm A targeted and strategic investment in paid media represents a crucial component of the Revitalize NBM initiative. Driving awareness and attendance with respect to public engagement, sessions contributed to a more comprehensive and inclusive range of insights from a diverse array of stakeholders. Through a targeted media buy on social platforms, the campaign goal was to amplify reach, ensuring that key messages and invitations to public engagement sessions in each community were effectively shared to a broader audience, reaching New Brunswickers who may not have otherwise been aware of the initiative. September 2023 Reach: 160K+ Impressions- 20K+ • 22% increase in Facebook profile visits INU14- INVITATION &AWARENESS Summary of invitation and awareness efforts and their reach. Social Media 400 K+ IMPRESSIONS Earned Media 130K IMPRESSIONS NBM Newsletter: 1400 SENT Q 70/ RevitalizeNBM website: 4.7 K PAGE VIEWS LE PROJET DE REVITALISATION DU MNB PROGRAMME DE MOBILISATION DU PUBLIC VOICI CE QUE NOUS AVONS ENTENDU: RAPPORT SOMMAIRE LE 27 MARS 2024 1 REDIGE PAR DUKE CREATIVE COLLECTIVE I'l ibi i TABLE DES MATIERES Sommaire 3 .................................................................................................................................... Resultats du programme 4 .................................................................................................................................... Mises a jour de la conception 12 .................................................................................................................................... Conclusion 13 .................................................................................................................................... Annexe A 14 .................................................................................................................................... • Methodologie du programme de mobilisation du public .................................................................................................................................... • Tentatives de communication et invitations .................................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION Soucieux de favoriser la participation communautaire et de recuei[[ir de precieuses perspectives, le conseil d'administration du Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick (MNB) a entrepris une serie de seances de mobilisation du public du 9 au 28 septembre 2023. Le rapport sommaire suivant presente de ['information sur [es objectifs, [es methodes et [es resu[tats de la mobilisation, notamment [es themes emergents et [es refontes de la conception resultant des contributions du public et des parties prenantes. L'objectif etait de donner ['occasion aux citoyens et aux intervenants du Nouveau -Brunswick d'exprimer [eurs opinions et de contribuer a la conception du nouveau MNB. Ces seances de mobilisation ont servi de plate -forme pour le dialogue et la collaboration qui ontjete [es bases du projetde Revitalisation du MNB. OBJECTIFS La strategie de mobilisation s'alignait avec [es objectify suivants 1. IMPLICATION COMMUNAUTAIRE: La participation active et la contribution des Neo-Brunswickois et Neo-Brunswickoises de tous [es horizons, afin qu'i[s puissent contribuer a fa�onner la conception du MNB. 2. APPORT FONDS SUR LES VALEURS: Le recuei[ des informations Bees a la conception ref[etant [es va[eurs et [es priorites de la communaute. 3. APPORT A LA CONCEPTION FONDAMENTALE DE LA REVITALISATION DU MNB: La creation d'une plate -forme permettant aux citoyens de contribuer a la conception du projet de Revitalisation du MNB. K:F! MOBILISATION Des seances ont ete tenues dans ['ensemble de la province et sur Zoom, afin d'assurer l'accessibilit6 au plus grand nombre possible de personnes int6ress6es. I[ est important de souligner qu'6tant donn6 [es droits et int6rets uniques des Premieres Nations lies au projet, [eur participation sera continue et men6e par le personnel du MNB, parall6lement au processus de mobilisation du public. La retroaction des Premieres Nations sera trait6e comme une contribution distincte au processus d6cisionnel du MNB et e[[e ne sera donc pas abord6e dans ce rapport. Les participants ont particip6 a des discussions interactives, its ont partag6 [eurs id6es et entendu le conseil d'administration du MNB et [es architectes du projet, Diamond Schmitt, qui ont presente la mission globate du projet et des concepts de conception preliminaires. Des experts en la matiere de ['equipe Diamond Schmitt et du MNB, ainsi que le personnel de Duke Creative Collective, etaient presents pour presenter [es concepts preliminaires de la conception, pour inspirer les participants en leur montrant des exemples d'autres conceptions de projets cu[ture[s, et pour r6pondre aux questions et recuei[[ir [es commentaires. Une discussion ouverte a ete encouragee et on a rappe[e aux gens la possibi[ite de soumettre d'autres questions ou commentaires en ligne a : fr.revita[izenbm.com. Des informations detait[ees sur [es m6thodes de mobilisation se trouvent dans ['Annexe A. En bref : • La pub[icisation des invitations a atteint plus de 530 000 gens du Nouveau -Brunswick : Mobilisation sur [es r6seaux sociaux, trafic sur le site Web, courriels, strat6gie media acquis et achet6s. • Dix seances, avec plus de 960 participants, [eurs commentaires [ors des reunions, et plus de 360 observations 6crites : Le processus de mobilisation a r6ussi a favoriser une participation active, en mettant ['accent sur ['inc[usivite et l'accessibi[ite. • S6ances: • Saint John • Fredericton • Edmundston • Campbe[lton • Bathurst • Caraquet • Miramichi • Moncton • Lors de reunions Zoom a ['echel[e provinciale • Et une s6ance r6serv6e au personnel du Mus6e du Nouveau -Brunswick. �. r':/ ram- --Wwmmm. l 1A� CONSTATATIONS CLES En general, la reponse aux seances de mobilisation du public a ete positive, et Les participants satisfaits de ['information presentee et du format de discussion ouverte, ce qui semb[e indiquer qu'i[s etaient a ['wise pour poser des questions et contribuer [eurs commentaires. De precieuses idees et recommendations ont ete fournies par [es membres du public concernant la conception, l'apparence et la fonctionnalite de la nouvette installation museate. Les participants ont exprime Leurs liens etroits avec la structure emblematique existante de 1934, et its ont souligne ['importance de la durabilite, de ['engagement communautaire et du respect de ['environnement nature[. Leurs priorites etaient de rea[iser le projet correctement et clans une perspective a long terme, tenant compte a la fois des couts et des impacts sur ['environnement. De nombreuses questions ont ete soulevees ainsi qu'un desir evident d'obtenir plus d'informations, en particulier la possibilite de faire part de Leurs idees sur le projet et d'autres occasions de dialogue et de contribution. Les sentiments exprimes par Les gens du Nouveau -Brunswick concernant le projet de Revitalisation du M N B etaient marques par une concentration constante sur quatre aspects primordiaux:Z 1. Un appe[ retentissant en faveur de l'accessibilite et de l'inclusivite (30%), soulignant la necessite de stationnement accessible, de la circulation fluide et de conceptions adaptees aux personnel ayant des capacites diverses. 2. La durabilite et la duree de vie (25 %) occu pent une place centrale, notamment un fort desir de fonctionnalites respectueuses de ['environnement telles que la certification LEED et une architecture respectueuse des oiseaux, ainsi que ['utilisation de materiaux durables. Les participants ont exprime Leurs inquietudes quant a la durabilite a long terme de la nouvelle installation, mettant ['accent sur l'utilisation de pratiques de conception et d'ingenierie contemporaines pour assurer sa [ongevite et reduire Les couts d'exp[oitation. 3. Uengagement et la representation communautaires (25 %) ont ete presentes comme des priorites cles, clans l'espoir que le nouveau musee reflete veritablement la riche histoire, ['environnement nature[ et Les diverses cultures du Nouveau -Brunswick. 4. Fina[ement, ['importance de la conception et de l'integration de la nouvelle installation (20 %) a ete soulignee, notamment Les preoccupations concernant la conservation historique, la possibilite d'un agrandissement future et la creation d'espaces attrayants et polyvalents. M-1:1 THEMES EMERGENTS DURABILITE ET LONGEVITE Les participants ont exprime [eurs inquietudes quant a la durabi[ite a long terme de la nouve[[e installation, mettant ['accent sur l'utilisation de pratiques de conception et d'ingenierie de pointe afin d'assurer la [ongevite et de reduire [es couts d'exploitation de ['installation. ESPACES INTERACTIFS ET EN CONSTANTE EVOLUTION La communaute a soutenu une conception architecturate qui facilitera [es expositions interactives, [es expositions en rotation reguliere et [es occasions que le public jugera dignes d'Instagram. Les suggestions comprenaient une conception dynamique qui s'harmonise au batiment existant et a l'environnement nature[. DESIGN EMBLEMATIQUE ET IMPORTANCE CULTURELLE Les participants favorisaient une conception emb[ematique a ['interieur de ['installation, exprimee par le biais de materiaux naturels et d'un minimum de beton. Les suggestions comprenaient egalement la possibi[ite de nommer certaines parties de ['installation en hommage a des contributeurs importants et d'integrer des sculptures ou des elements interactifs a l'exterieur. SERVICES DE RESTAURATION ET DE TRAITEUR ET INSTALLATIONS EVENEMENTIELLES Les participants ont suggere un cafe avec vue, une cuisine de traiteur pour les activites speciales et possiblement une terrasse sur le toit. AUTRE Certains commentaires portaient egalement sur [es themes suivants : la representation et [es impacts communautaires et [ocaux, ['inclusion et la representation des Premieres Nations, la preservation des elements historiques, [es possibi[ites economiques, [es couts, [es processus et la transparence. RESUME DES PRINCIPAUX COMMENTAIRES DE DISCUSSION POUR CHAQUE SEANCE S U J ETTiMMM" COMMENTAIRES SEANCE A SAINT JOHN, LE 29 SEPTEMBRE 2023 La planification en vue d'une expansion future : comment LE MUSEE FACTEURS agrandir le musee a L'avenir. L'importance de consulter Les populations autochtones. GENERAUX / PLANIFICATION / PROCESSUS La possibilite de presenter des expositions / collections virtuellement. La conception de ['installation doit integrer et s'harmoniser avec Le panorama de rue de ['avenue Douglas. Une demande de reduire la tai[Le de ['extension au nord de ['installation. CONCEPTION DU BATIM ENT: Les fenetres doivent etre con�ues afin de proteger TAILLE, SITE ET MATERIAUX Les oiseaux. P[usieurs questions relatives a la renovation et la remise en etat du batiment actuel. L'importance de la Lumiere du jour, compte tenu de la necessite de proteger Les collections. Con suggere que plus d'espace sera necessaire pour Les autobus, en plus du stationnement de voitures. Preoccupations concernant L'espace pour le stationnement. Un reseau de sentiers a L'ouest de ['installation suscite AMENAGEMENT DU SITE ET DU STATIONNEMENT de L'interet. L'acces au paysage; etablir un lien solide entre L'interieur et L'exterieur de ['installation. Des programmes a l'exterieur pour les enfants et une terrain de jeu dans le parc. Un passerelle couverte ou une voie d'acces interieure menant du stationnement a ['installation. SEANCE A FREDERICTON, LE 10 SEPTEMBRE 2023 Le musee doit rejoindre L'ensemble du Nouveau -Brunswick - Les origines culturelles diverses du passe et du present. Les expositions peuvent raconter L'histoire de toutes Les cultures du Nouveau -Brunswick. LE MUSEE : FACTEURS GENERAUX / PLANIFICATION / Le musee peut servir d'espace communautaire, de salon communautaire et d'abri pour Les evenements Lorsqu'il peeut. L'importance des routes de portage et de [eur emplacement PROCESSUS le long du fleuve Saint-Jean. L'importance de la programmation pour Les enfants. Les forets et cours d'eau du Nouveau -Brunswick comme facteurs unissant Les gens de toute la province. La forme du batiment peut s'inspirer du paysage qui L'entoure. Le batiment actue[ de ['avenue Douglas pourrait etre CONCEPTION DU BATIMENT: complete par une extension moderne. TAILLE, SITE ET MATERIAUX Uescalier d'entree du batiment existant devrait etre conserve car c'est un symbole emblematique du Musee au Nouveau -Brunswick. L'occasion pour Les Premieres Nations de raconter Leurs histoires. Le reseau de sentiers sur le versant ouest du site, donnant AMENAGEMENT DU SITE ET DU STATIONNEMENT sur le fleuve. L'entree seraittrop eloignee du stationnement, et une passerelle couverte est recommandee. L'idee d'une terrasse sur le toit est tres bien revue. Des arbres ou des plantations peuvent u etre incorpores. SEANCE A EDMUNDSTON, LEI] SEPTEMBRE 2023 La conception du Musee doit etre passionnante afin d'y attirer Les jeunes gens. Le grand hall d'entree doit etre au cceur de ['experience. Le Musee pourrait servir de lien aux diverses cultures et communautes. La representation cultureRe francophone au Musee et dans Les expositions est primordiale. SEANCE A CAMPBELLTON, LE 11 SEPTEMBRE 2023 Les participants ont exprime [eur enthousiasme pour le projet de Revitalisation du Musee. Des preoccupations concernant L'accessibilite des expositions pour Les visiteurs a mobi[ite reduite. IL a ete suggere que des elements interactifs pouvaient etre incorpores afin d'ameliorer ['experience des visiteurs. Integrer harmonieusement le batiment du Musee au site existant, en preservant clans la mesure du possible Les elements naturels. F>.�7 SEANCE A BATHURST, LE 12 SEPTEMBRE 2023 R serait interessant d'avoir des visites guidees [ors de l'ouverture du Musee. Que le MNB fournisse des ressources partagees aux musees communautaires, telles que des ateliers pour la preparation d'expositions itinerantes. La possibilite d'un espace d'exposition au MNB pour des expositions itinerantes des musees communautaires. Le Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick doit raconter [es histoires de toutes les cultures de la province. Un auditorium avec une petite scene pour des performances locales. Espace pour des contes / expositions interactifs. La conservation de la facade de ['ancien batiment maintient le lien avec le passe. SEANCE A CARAQUET, LE 12 SEPTEMBRE 2023 Comment attirer les visiteurs de navires de croisiere et la population du centre -vine au Musee. Offrir une gamme d'experiences changeantes afin d'attirer un public fidele. Projeter des presentations numeriques sur la facade. It est important que la boutique soit accessible a partir de la rue. Offrir des articles lies aux expositions. Representer toutes [es cultures du Nouveau -Brunswick, y compris [es nouveaux-arrivants. L'installation doit refleter son emplacement sur la cote. La participation des musees communautaires et le soutien de ce reseau. SEANCE P MIRAMICHI, LE 13 SEPTEMBRE 2023 Les fenetres doivent etre con�ues afin d'eviter la collision des oiseaux. Comment contro[er [es odeurs provenant des sources et LE MUSEE: FACTEURS activites industrie[[es locales. Les visiteurs veu[ent voir de nouvelles expositions lorsqu'ils GEN ERAUX / PLAN] FICATION / PROCESSUS visitent le Musee. R est important de varier [es expositions. Les collections doivent refleter la province et les histoires locales. La possibilite d'expositions interactives. 2CDO Le traitement de la facade ouest doit tenir compte des aspects naturels du site. L'on dolt prendre en compte la quantite de verre par rapport a la protection des collections contre la lumiere. La projection de films sur la facade exterieure ou l'affichage de photographies historiques ou d'expositions variees. Toutes les plantes utilisees pour l'amenagement paysager CONCEPTION DU BATIMENT. TAILLE, SITE ET MATERIAUX devraient etre indigenes. La reduction de la pollution lumineuse. Un eclairage exterieur con�u pour proteger les oiseaux pendant les mois de migration et la navigation des insectes. Un reseau de sentiers a l'ouest du site. L'accessibilite doit etre primordial clans tous les aspects de la conception. SEANCE A MONCTON, LE 13 SEPTEM BRE 2023 La narration des contes et l'amenagement paysager doivent etre integres des la phase de conception. La possibilite de relier tes galeries au paysage, en offrant des occasions de faire une pause. Preoccupations concernant l'entretien financier du Musee. L'importance d'inclure le personnel clans [es discussions de planification. A la place des collections visibles, proposer un espace destine aux nouvelles acquisitions. Incorporer un mur d'hommage aux donateurs. L'importance de la sensibilisation communautaire pendant que le Musee est ferme. L'importance des n?uvres d'art publics. Le batiment dolt viser la certification de haut niveau LEED et la carboneutratite. Les visites guidees tors de l'ouverture de la nouvelle installation afin d'inviter la communaute a entrer. Le MNB devrait promouvoir le Geoparc Stonehammer. L'installation devrait exprimer l'histoire paleontologique de la province. Un trilobite pourrait orner la facade exterieure. 2@9 SEANCE ZOOM A L'ECHELLE DE LA PROVINCE, LE 28 SEPTEMBRE 2023 La possibilite de creer un foyer pour conter des histoires pres du feu a ['exterieur. L'importance du sentier de portage pres du fleuve. L'importance de bien proteger [es collections. L'interet a en savoir plus sur le volet recherche du Musee. Le Bois provenant de diverses especes d'arbres de toutes [es regions de la province pourrait exprimer la diversite et une vision provinciale partagee. Le Musee devrait mettre en valeur [es efforts et [es preoccupations en matiere de preservation des ressources au Nouveau -Brunswick. Il devraity avoir un engagement a soutenir [es entreprises du Nouveau -Brunswick en ce qui concerne [es materiaux et la main-d'n?uvre necessaires au projet. Prise en compte d'un espace pour un cafe et service de traiteur au Musee. Le Musee doit etre construit en fonction de la durabilite, grace a la selection des materiaux. It faut prevoir un eclairage exterieur suffisant pour eclairer durant [es fameux brouillards. Un batiment qui produit de l'electricite, dispose d'espaces de repos avec des fenetres et des plantes a ['interieur ou a ['exterieur, et le retour de la tour des marees. Le batiment doit mettre en valeur [es materiaux du Nouveau -Brunswick, et ['utilisation du boil. Reduire [es collisions d'oiseaux grace a la conception et a ['eclairage. Le batiment doit refteter le caractere unique de Saint John et les valeurs du Nouveau -Brunswick. Les resultats des seances de mobilisation du public ont fourni de precieuses informations pour le developpement continu du Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick, soulignant ['importance de la contribution de la communaute, de la durabilite et d'une conception qui ref[ete la riche histoire, ['environnement nature[ et [es valeurs de la region. P1iT j MISES A JOUR DE LA CONCEPTION DU MUSES Au cours des consultations pub[iques, de nombreuses idees et suggestions precieuses ont ete exprimees par [es membres du public et [es parties prenantes. La conception a continue de progresser depuis [es consultations et ['equipe du projet a travai[[e avec diligence pour integrer et traiter Les recommendations et Les idees pronees par la communaute, clans la mesure du possible. Bien que de nombreux commentaires exprimes tors des seances portaient sur la programmation du Musee et la conception des expositions, ces elements seront reportes et pris en compte tors des phases ulterieures du projet, [orsque ces aspects seront adresses. TAILLE ET PROPORTIONS DU BATIMENT L'elevation du batiment a ete reduite d'un etage et Les proportions des travees de la galerie ont ete affinees afin de s'integrer davantage au contexte du batiment et du panorama de rue existant. Le Musee envisage une installation secondaire pour Les collections et la recherche a long terme, ce qui permettrait de reduire la taille globate du batiment en mettant L'accent sur L'offre d'expositions et de programmes d'apprentissage au public sur L'avenue Douglas. FORME DU BATIMENT La conception du nouveau batiment a ete developpee davantage pour refleter les liens importants avec la double topographie du site, le caractere urbain a Pest et L'escarpement abrupt et Luxuriant qui descend jusqu'au fleuve Saint-Jean a ['ouest. La facade orientee a ['ouest a ete [egerement arquee pour refleter to paysage et la courbe du rivage, tandis que la facade a L'est incarne la nature plus urbaine de L'avenue Douglas et de la facade du musee existant. TERRASSE SUR LE TOIT L'enthousiasme du public et Les commentaires positifs face a la possibilite d'une terrasse sur le toit avec vues imprenables ont incite ['equipe de conception a ame[iorer et a deve[opper cet espace davantage. La terrasse offrira une experience captivante aux visiteurs, avec des perspectives a ['ouest jusqu'a Marble Cove et le fleuve Saint-Jean, et a Pest du centre -vine de Saint John, du port et de la baie de Fundy. LUMIERE NATURELLE ET VITRAGE La lumiere naturelle, presente dans des espaces publics contrMs et soigneusement con�us, a ete ame[ioree davantage grace a ['integration de [ucarnes au-dessus de ['espace de ['atrium. L'emplacement de tous Les vitrages a ete con�u pour prendre en compte la protection des collections et des expositions en interne, tout en offrant la possibilite de profiter d'une vue imprenable sur le paysage nature[ environnant. L'eclairage nocturne et Les vitrages prevoiront ega[ement des mesures de protection contre [es collisions des oiseaux, notamment ['utilisation de verre contre [es collisions des oiseaux. PASSERELLE COUVERTE Pour la commodite et le confort des visiteurs, une passerelle couverte a ete incorporee a la conception une entre le stationnement et ['entree principale. Cet espace couvert s'etend le long de la facade est du batiment sur ['avenue Douglas sous la projection de la galerie au deuxieme niveau. AIRE DE DEBARQUEMENT DES AUTOBUS ET DES VEHICULES Afin de faciliter ['entree du public, et en particulier des autobus scolaires et touristiques, une nouvelle voie de debarquement a ete incluse clans le plan du site. i` 111G] CONCLUSION Le programme de mobilisation du public dans le contexte du projet de Revitalisation du MNB a atteint son objectif primordial : impliquer activement [es gens du Nouveau -Brunswick a ['elaboration de la nouvette conception et de ['avenir du MNB. Dans to but de favoriser la participation communautaire, [es seances ont fourni une plate -forme precieuse permettant aux residents d'exprimer leurs opinions, assurant ainsi que leurs points de vue jouent un role central dans le processus decisionnel. Les informations recuei[[ies tors de ces engagements contribueront a eclairer [es decisions essentie[[es du projet. Les themes et [es priorites emergentes sou[ignes par [es participants, a[lant de ['accessibi[ite et de la durabi[ite a ['engagement communautaire et a la conception ref[echie, serviront de pilfers fondamentaux pour le developpement continu du MNB. La richesse que representent [es contributions communautaires sera soigneusement examinee par l'equipe du projet, afin que la conception finale reflete [es valeurs et [es aspirations des diverses collectivites qu'elle desservira. Le succes des seances est sou[igne non seu[ement par la forte participation a divers endroits, mais egatement par ['abondance de la retroaction. La nature engagee et participative des discussions, de meme que la diversite des idees et des perspectives, temoignent du succes de la strategie de mobilisation du public. Les gens du Nouveau -Brunswick ont demontre leur interet pour la revitalisation de [eur musee provincial, faisant preuve ainsi de [eur engagement co[[ectif a preserver le patrimoine et [es valeurs de la province et de la region. Cette approche collaborative garantit que le nouveau Musee reflete veritab[ement [es collectivites qu'il dessert, inspirant un sentiment d'appartenance et de fierte parmi [es gens du Nouveau -Brunswick. Le succes des seances va au-dela des chiffres ; it reside dans ['engagement et l'enthousiasme veritables manifestos par [es participants, marquant une etape importante dans le cheminementvers un Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick revitalise et centre sur la communaute. A PROPOS DE DUKE CREATIVE COLLECTIVE Ce conseil creatif et agence de marketing est base a Saint John, Nouveau -Brunswick. Notre equipe primee collabore avec nos clients pour imaginer des marques authentiques, elaborer des campagnes strategiques et creer des experiences memorables qui communiquent au niveau des publics cibles. ARez a thisisduke.com pour de plus amples renseignements. ANNEXE A METHODOLOGIE DE MOBILISATION DU PUBLIC INTRODUCTION La mobilisation du public dans le contexte du projet de Revitalisation du MNB s'est deroulee sur une periode de trois semaines, du 9 au 28 septembre 2023. La conception du processus de mobilisation est le fruit d'un effort collaboratif du conseil d'administration et du personnel du Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick, de l'agence Duke Creative Collective et de l'equipe de Diamond Schmitt Architects. Il a ete determine qu'un aper�u presente par les architectes, comprenant des exemples inspirants de projets anterieurs, suivi de questions et de reponses et d'un dialogue ouvert, genererait la retroaction la plus utile de la part du public. Le MNB et Diamond Schmitt appliqueraient ensuite ces resultats a leur processus de conception et de planification de projet. APERCU DU PROCESSUS SEPTEMBRE OCTOBRE NOVEMBRE Seances de Examen et Revisions mobilisation analyse appportees a la publiques conception DISTRIBUTION / PROMOTION DES INVITATIONS C�t Ini Sur les reseaux du Publicite Par l'entremise de partenaires, MNB (sites Web, reseaux payee des parties prenantes et des sociaux, courriel) (en ligne) collaborateurs POSSIBILITES DE MOBILISATION • Formulaire de retroaction sur RevitalisonsMNB.ca • Questions des seances de mobilisation sur RevitalisonsM N B.ca • Seances de mobilisation publiques dans 9 endroits • Dialogue avec les parties prenantes et les chefs de file communautaires • Seance aupres des employes du MNB • Reunion publique Zoom a l'echelle de la province DECEMBRE Mise au point du rapport Medias acquis P111,41 DISTRIBUTION/PROMOTION DES INVITATIONS AUX SEANCES Afin d'inspirer une participation genera[isee dans toute la province, des efforts importants ont ete consacres a ame[iorer la portee sociale et ['engagement associes aux invitations. It fallait d'abord elaborer un recit d'engagement et un appe[ a ['action convaincant et etab[ir une marque visue[le distincte specifiquement pour le projet de Revitalisation du MNB. Cette approche strategique visait non seulement a generer des medias acquis, mail egalement a creer une effervescence au sein de la communaute en tirant parti des canaux directs et des reseaux de parties prenantes du MNB, permettant ainsi au projet de se demarquer et de creer un impact durable, grace a des communications coherentes et comprehensibles portant sur le projet. Des invitations individuelles ont ete creees et publiees pour chaque seance, puis diffusees dans les collectivites respectives avant chaque seance. POSSIBILITES DE MOBILISATION Le site Web RevitalisonsMNB.ca a fait ses debuts dans le cadre du lancement officie[ du processus de mobilisation du public. Servant de centre d'information, RevitalisonsMNB.ca hebergeait une magnifique video de drone offrant des vues captivantes du site actuel et futur du Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick, y compris des vues imprenables sur Marble Cove. Le site a joue un role central dans la diffusion d'informations sur le projet de Revitalisation du MNB, enjetant [es bases du processus de mobilisation en fournissant une fonction RSVP, en faci[itant [es communications transparentes et ouvertes grace a des formulaires a remp[ir, et en garantissant que [es parties prenantes restent informees des possibilites d'engagement. Sachant que le Musee s'adresse a tous les gens du Nouveau -Brunswick, it etait important de faci[iter la participation. Un melange de tactiques directes et en [igne a ete utilise et de multiples possibilites de participation ont ete offertes afin de repondre a differents niveaux de connaissances et d'interet par rapport au projet de Revitalisation du MNB. Le processus de mobilisation visait a favoriser un sentiment d'appartenance et de collaboration, en veillant a ce que [es diverses perspectives de toutes [es gens du Nouveau -Brunswick fassent partie integrante de ['elaboration de la vision et des objectifs en matiere de conception. TENTATIVES DE COMMUNICATION ET INVITATIONS Le MNB et Duke Creative Collective ont cherche a tirer parti de tous [es canaux disponib[es pour faire connaitre et comprendre le programme de consultation publique et inviter a la participation. Des ressources de contenu sur mesure ont ete creees pour soutenir cet effort. Canaux propres et reseaux exp[oites: • Experts en la matiere du M N B • RevitalisonsMNB.ca / RevitalisonsMNB.com • NBM-MNB.ca • Twitter: @NBM-MNB • Facebook : Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick - Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick • Instagram : nbm_mnb • L'info[ettre du MNB • Communications du consei[ d'administration du MNB et du chef de ['exploitation du MNB • Repertoire des parties prenantes Les medias sociaux se sont averes un moyen utile de renforcer la sensibilisation et la mobilisation, te[ qu'i[[ustre par ['aper�u suivant de Face boo k/Instagram. PIPIN APERCU DES RESULTATS SUR FACEBOOK/I N STAG RAM • Hausse des clics sur [es liens du MNB de 9 800 % sur Facebook et de 100 % sur Instagram • Portee totale - 160,7 K • Hausse des interactions et des conversations pendant la periode de mobilisation du public • Le ton des conversations sur [es reseaux sociaux etait generalement neutre, axe sur le partage d'informations et la mobilisation Highest reach on a post Q r () Facebook post NOTICE: New Brunswick Museum prepares for move... a—� Oct 11, 2023, 12:54 PM This post's reach (18,395) is 1,902% higher than your median post reach (919) on Facebook. Highest reactions on a post Q 0 Facebook post The New Brunswick Museum invites all residents to join th. ' Sep 7, 2023, 8:55 AM This post received 1,615% more reactions (343 reactions) than your median post (20 reactions) on Facebook. Highest comments on a post 1Q O Facebook post The New Brunswick Museum invites all residents to join th... Sep 7, 2023, 8:55 AM This past received 6,000% more comments (61 comments) than your median post (1 comment) on Facebook. APERCCU DU PROJET DE REVITALISATION DU MNB Le site Web du projet de Revitalisation du MNB a joue un r6le central en renseignant et en mobilisant [es Bens du Nouveau -Brunswick tout au long du processus de consultation publique et de l'integralite du projet, servant de plaque tournante centralisee pour les mises a jour du projet, [es annonces, [es evenements de mobilisation du public et [es fonctionnalites interactives. En favorisant la transparence et l'accessibilite, le site Web assure que les gens du Nouveau -Brunswick restent Bien informes sur l'initiative du MNB, leur permettant ainsi de partager leurs idees et de rester branches aux developpements transformateurs qui fa�onnent leur paysage culturel. Le site Web du projet de Revitalisation du MNB sert de pont numerique, reliant l'equipe du projet a la communaute et refletant leur engagement envers un processus inclusif et collaboratif. Septembre 2023 • 4,4K pages vues • 364 envois de formulaires • 4 min + passees sur la page - demontre un engagement tres eleve de la part des visiteurs* Selon une etude, le temps moyen clu'un visiteur passe sur une page Web est de 52 secondes en moyenne dans tous les secteurs. PTFITI:] MEDIAS ACQUIS Les medias acquis se rapportent aux impressions du public obtenues par le biais des medias et les blogues. La couverture mediatique traditionnelle a permis de toucher un public important, en fournissant des renseignements sur le projet de Revitalisation du M N B et le processus de mobilisation du public. Plus de 10 articles connexes dans les medias imprimes, audiovisuels et en ligne ont etc pub[ies dans toute la province au cours de la periode de mobilisation. New Btvnswiek Museum seeks puhlie input on major expansion pro}eet Dodos Now R—)Swrck HuSoum 5toyinq put m Buint John i' PUBLICITE PAYEE HEWS Architects offer insight into provincial museum plans m1 `u� kd— b-d d— Will.. FvrrWO sF— ■ MM pf.n erpeM.4 rae.. 6rt/13 kMu!! Euftng W DouVaS ArfR+f m S9b1JOM A €nq.r—m.... lnn. r., N B. Muswm reviiWixetion pmJecl x.,ea W.—A.aoy web. WIMom.—andift�pAaasat a hiind�e �ra,oeeaeeww.waxr. nrun.w.o-xvKum n '- Un investissement cib[e et strategique dans la pub[icite payee represente un element crucial de ['initiative de Revitalisation du MNB. En favorisant la sensibilisation et la participation dans le cadre de la mobilisation du public, les seances ont contribue a un eventai[ plus comp[et et inclusif d'idees provenant d'une vaste gamme de parties prenantes. Par le biais d'un achat media cib[e sur tes plateformes sociales, l'objectif de la campagne etait d'amp[ifier la portee, en vei[lant a ce que [es messages cles et les invitations aux seances de mobilisation du public dans chaque communaute soient efficacement diffusees a un public plus large, atteignant des personnes qui n'auraient autrement pas etc au courant de ['initiative. Septembre 2023 Portee -160 000 + Impressions - 20 000 + Hausse de 322 % des visites des profits Facebook PAIN INVITATION ET SENSIBILISATION Resume des efforts dinvitation et de sensibilisation et de leur portee. Medias sociaux: 400 K+ IMPRESSIONS Medias acquis 130K IMPRESSIONS L'infolettre du M N B 1400 ENVOIS TAU X Site Web RevitalisonsMNB: 4.7 K PAGES VUES 220 From: Taylor, Jonathan To: Reade. Mark; Kirchner. Jennifer; Nalayde. Pankai Subject: FW: For PAC members and staff related to museum meeting Date: April 16, 2024 1:58:05 PM Attachments: imaoe001.ono Please see the correspondence below respecting tonight's PAC meeting. Jon Jonathan Taylor Director of Legislative Services/City Clerk Directeur des services legislatifs/greffier municipal City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Cell / Cellulaire: 506 721-4983 Website I Facebook I X I Instagram Sr' TNT J HN Small City, Big He art_ Petite villa, grand coaur. From: Jeff Roach <jeff.roach@socialIogical.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 11:58 AM To: Taylor, Jonathan <jonathan.taylor@saintjohn.ca> Subject: For PAC members and staff related to museum meeting You don't often get email from ieff.roach CEDsocial logical.com. Learn why this is important [ External Email Alert] "Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to snamsamnle(a�aintjohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Mr. Taylor, Please ensure the letter below is circulated to all PAC members and staff related to today's meeting and including the topic of the NB Museum. Thank you so much. Jeff Roach 24 Alexandra Street, Saint John Subject: Vital Safety Investments for Douglas Avenue - Protect Residents and Enhance the New Museum Experience 211 To staff, Council and committee members, As a resident of the Douglas Avenue neighbourhood, I was thrilled to see the stunning design for the expanded New Brunswick Museum on earlier this month. Its vision to connect Saint John's rich history with the vibrant cityscape and natural beauty is truly inspiring. However, my enthusiasm is tempered by the pressing traffic safety concerns on Douglas Avenue. Our street, with its long, straight layout, has become an unofficial racetrack. This jeopardizes our residents, including children attending two schools, and will pose a significant danger to the increased foot traffic the museum will attract. While I appreciate the speed limit reduction to 40 km/h, it remains largely unenforced. Speeding continues unabated and I am curious to know what impact this speed limit reduction has had on the desired outcome. The "Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Upgrade to NB Museum" seems inadequate, as it doesn't even mention "speed," a fundamental risk in this context. To ensure the success of the museum and the safety of our community, I urge you to invest in concrete safety infrastructure before the museum's construction: • Traffic Circles: Install traffic circles at the five key intersections along Douglas Avenue to force vehicles to slow down while maintaining traffic flow. • Crosswalk Enhancements: Build concrete curb extensions at existing crosswalks, narrowing the road for drivers and reducing pedestrian crossing distances. A past suggestion to the city of purchasing ten thousand concrete curbs shows an understanding of the problem. Now is the time to deploy them for bold traffic -calming experiments on Douglas Avenue and beyond. This does not need to be expensive (see attached photos). Painted lines on roads will keep no one safe and currently convey a false sense of security to vulnerable pedestrians and cyclists. Paint -only solutions have been well documented to do more harm than good and are far from a best practice in 2024. The expanded New Brunswick Museum is a thrilling opportunity for our city. Let's act decisively to make Douglas Avenue a safe and welcoming gateway to this cultural landmark. By prioritizing safety, we create a vibrant environment where residents and visitors alike can thrive. Sincerely, PAN Jeff Roach Douglas Avenue Resident Jeff Roach I ieff(a)ieffroach.ca r Ar 40 '' "" Ap Al 4p 6; o I i M F] 0 i �o -In From: Cornel Ceapa <cceapa(@acadian-sturgeon.com> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 12:02 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerkl@saintjohn.ca> Cc: Cornel Ceapa <cceapa(@acadian-sturgeon.com> Subject: Registering for participating at the April 16 public hearing about the New Brunswick Museum You don't often get email from cceapa(a)acadian-sturgeon.com. Learn why this is important [ External Email Alert] "Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to sDamsamplenr in 101n.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** To Whom is May Concern, I would like to register to participate at the April 16 public hearing about the New Brunswick Museum. My main concern is the parking spaces (investing in building such a large and interesting facility needs Lots of parking both for visitors, staff, busses etc) and impact on traffic on Douglas Avenue both during construction and operation. Please let me know any details I need to know and prepare for. Thanks, Cornet Cornel Ceapa, PhD 248 Douglas Avenue Saint John, NB E2K1E6 506-642-1816 (office) 506-639-0605 (cell) PAIN O N O O a cu O in r N O r N O 4- ►� U C O C O E O U W. i O c O U) c cm CL x a� a� Cl) cm O co 4- 00 L. i--� CLO> C O N N ry C co C N E C N E Q C co 121 co U R R J E� ■0 low ) CD ! rM k � ma O O O mo Z co O C� R k : ■ § a I 6 O � o f�l Oa a O a o o p v a 4 ob r r Cli � ai d E E a i Q s fV CD w a rNo _- PV a O O U LO a O V rW v ca W m • am _0`� co co O N _U L co ++ > O L co L O Ca -0 CD- %+- p N cn N �= U C N �= U -0 E cn :3 � `e U U_ N cn N :3 C ® +r L ® . 5 -0 c CO E 0 a)16 cu -0 O U N 0) N c cn 0 cu O C � - cn m >> N Z C cu L L cn 0 �, r- 1 cu a) O O cu O c-)C®) O cn O m a) C a) CD O O O7 c6 O CD L O U Y N — U _0 +�' O cu E N -0 % cn cn C c cn } M O> >, L Q O d O � c N U O U O _0 N L > O U j6 :L M O `} O O CD 0 N CD m } cu cu 2 0) L c +� U m N c Q � cu cn U O L) O �� O - ca cn aj 0) co U cn c6 d L O L co 2 O c N x w N U cn cn m N N L O co cn w co U O A N U L O O J cu m O c cu cn cu O CD c L2 L cu Q U c cu CD c L cu Q N L cn O CD U N cn L LD N N N N N a 0 i NM W r L a w _:3 U U O O E CD CD .cn O O co U Q Q cc O O L n 0 L cc cc O .cc VJ E CD cc O7 O Lf� O .cn cn .E a) U L E E :3 VJ E 0) 0) W U L _N O o ` V ) O O L L CL CL O O u) CL CL L L C co c M N N U U N � C C •' N N � a LL N ., U 0 co coL CL C C O U a� L Q co LO N N LL N O O i-- : N C C (B (B E i--' (B E E O L &I U m Pp _ U O U) C O _U C C (B i--' _O O 0 E i.., C N • _0 0 O O LLO Q Q m 0 C N N O M N U N N L O cu Q N U Cn Cn N i-- O O 0 (B C C 0 O C C N N LL 0) 0 C C E -o _0 C:O 0 i--� E C C O Q cB 0 E E U m (� (B E N N N Q Q Q U cu O C N E O U N OC N s co U C O U a ee ip, rent Sho Council Application GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN CIVIC ADDRESS 241, 247, 249, 261 & 263 Douglas Avenue APPLICATION # FEE PAID Y N TYPE OF APPLICATION Land for Public Purposes Release Application Fee: $350 ❑Section 59 Amendment Application Fee: $2,650 ❑ Non -Conforming Use Application Fee: $250 ❑ Zoning By-law Amendment Application Fee: $2,650 ❑Satisfactory Servicing Application Fee: $350 Zoning By-law Amendment with Municipal Plan Amendment Application Fee: $3,700 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION Where applicable, indicate the changes to existing Section 59 conditions, zoning, or Municipal Plan designation being requested. Attach site plans, building elevations, floor plans, and other documentation to fully describe the application. The submission of a preliminary proposal and a Pre -Application Meeting is encouraged prior to seeking approval. Please contact the One Stop Development Shop at (5061658-2911 or CneStop@` saintjohn.ca for further information. Rezoning and municipal plan amendment as required for 5 residential properties undergoing strategic acquisition by the Province of NB (please see supporting materials for additional will - - --- NBM to it's historic home of 277 Douglas Avenue (also known as "The Provincial Museum" building) ENCUMBRANCES Describe any easements, restrictive covenants, and other encumbrances affecting the land. The civic address 255 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222012) between 249 and 261 Douglas Avenue is owned by the City of Sainto n and provides access to an existing municipal services easement adjoining trie rear of the prnperty A private sewer easement is also present on the property of 247 Douglas Avenue. AUTHORIZATION As of the date of this application, 1, the undersigned, am the registered owner of the land described in this application or the authorized agent thereof, and I have examined the contents of this application and hereby certify that the information submitted with the application is correct insofar as I have knowledge of these facts, and I hereby authorize the applicant to represent this matter and to provide any additional information, that will be necessary fort 's ap lication. See Supporting Materials ✓ �br i Registered Owner or Authorized Agent Additional Registered Owner Note: Consent has been received from each property owner. Signed consent letters are included within the documentation Sof this application. Date 7 Date The information contained in this application and any documentation, including plans, drawings, reports, and studies, provided in support of this application will become part of the public record. uouncu Appocaaon rorm zuzi uo ui 228 f 1961r, U-- 0- P'l-il'unt 8 16- j a,\\IN'G c? `t' DIN 1. `4 Kati rRl `l`t f.;Rl SAINT JOHN OneStop@saint;ohn.ca Phone:658-2911 Fax:632-6199 General 1-1 rmtl_ GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN LOCATION CIVIC ADDRESS : 241, 247, 249, 261 & 263 Douglas Avenue PI D # : Various (see supporting materials attached) N HERITAGE AREA: Y / N INTENSIFICATION AREA: Y / N FLOOD RISK AREA: Y / N APPROVED GRADING PLAN: Y / N LLLL APPLICATION #: DATE RECEIVED: H Vt RECEIVED BY: APPLICANT EMAI L PHONE 506-643-2351 Z O MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE a 277 Douglas Avenue E2K 1 E5 CONTRACTOR EMAIL PHONE � NA z i- MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE Z Q J OWNER EMAIL PHONE aVarious (see supporting materials attached) MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE PRESENT USE: Residential PROPOSED USE: Museum BUILDING PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE HERITAGE INTERIOR RENOVATION ❑NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑VARIANCE �ISTREETEXCAVATION II HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT Q ❑EITERIORRENOVATION ❑ACCESSORYBLDG []PLANNING LETTER []DRIVEWAY CULVERT ❑HERITAGE SIGN F- ❑ADDITION ❑POOL ❑✓ PACAPPLICAT10N ❑DRAINAGE ❑HERITAGE INFILL Q❑DECK ❑DEMOLITION ❑COUNCILAPP ❑WATER&SEWERAGE ❑HERITAGE DEMO uj ❑CHANGE OF USE ❑SIGN ❑SUBDIVISION ©OTHER ❑✓ OTHER u ❑MINIMUM STANDARDS ❑OTHER ❑OTHER LL Rezoning and municipal plan amendment as required for 5 residential properties undergoing strategic acquisition by the Province of (please see supporting material's foradditional z Yinformatiom). The Now Brunswiek 0Museum The properties will be eemselidated with that e)eetjp*ed by f- (NBM) and will facilitate construction of the proposed museum addition. The pro-'ect will W return the NBM to it's historic home of 277 Douglas Avenue (also known as "The Provincial Museum"ui ing). ❑I consent to the City of Saint John sending to me commercial electronic messages, from time to time, regarding City initiatives and incentives. General collection Statement This information is being collected in order for the City of Saint John to deliver an existing program / service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program / service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saint John will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy officer: City Hall Building 4. 15 Market Square Saint John, NB E2L IE8 CommonC lerknsaintj ohn. ca (506)658-2862 Tb, cnr 0(—i nnn I the undersigned, hereby apply for the permits) or approval;s), Iindicated above for the work described on plans, submissions and 6 forms herewith submitted. This application includes all relevant 5 documentation necessary for the applied for permit(s) or approval(s). I agree to comply with the plans, specifications and further agree to comply with all relevant City By-laws and conditions IT osed. L pplicant-tga. i1 v pp f iignoture 5 ---2,0;1- 1� Date 229 diamond schmitt 384 Adelaide Street West, Suite 100 Toronto, ON M5V 1R7 t: 416 862 8800 1050 West Pander Street, Suite 2010 Vancouver, BC V6E 3S7 t: 604 674 0866 1776 Broadway, Suite 2200 New York, NY 10019 t: 212 710 4329 www.dsai.ca info@dsai.ca Jennifer Kirchner Manager, Community Planning / Gestionnaire, Service D'Urbanisme City of Saint John I Ville de Saint John Cell / Cellulaire: (506) 639-7933 January 10, 2024 New Brunswick Museum - Re -zoning, Municipal Plan Amendment & Heritage De -designation Request Dear Jennifer, We have been working with the Board of the New Brunswick Museum on the preliminary planning and design for the exciting new museum project to be located at the original Douglas Ave. site. Please find below an outline of the purpose and rationale for this re -zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation application. The outline includes project summary, proposed zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation, site selection summary, design intent and community consultation strategy. Please find attached the following supporting documents and drawings: • List of properties forming application • Council Application • General Application • Consent letters from property owners • Request for heritage property de -designation • Parking Recommendations Report for the New Brunswick Museum • Traffic Impact Statement • Conceptual Sanitary & Water Demand • Site Plan • Site Plan — Demolished • Shadow Studies • Building Elevations* • Massing perspective* *Preliminary conceptual massing perspectives and elevations are included to indicate the general size, shape, and siting of the new museum. The design is being further developed and will integrate suggestions received during the Community Consultations sessions. Updated elevations and renderings will be provided as the design becomes more detailed. P1919!) diamo6 schmit Project Summary The purpose of this planning application is to secure required re -zoning and Municipal Plan amendments for six (6) contiguous residential properties along Douglas Ave. Four (4) of the properties in question have reached an agreement for the transfer of ownership as part of a strategic acquisition of lands that will facilitate revitalization of the "Provincial Museum" building for the New Brunswick Museum (NBM). The other two (2) properties included in this application were previously acquired by The Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI). In addition to the rezoning and Municipal Plan amendments, this application also requests the removal of 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The properties included in this application will be consolidated with that of the Museum building (owned by the Province of New Brunswick) to form a single property and facilitate construction of the proposed addition to the existing Museum building. The design intent of the proposed addition will be presented in the following sections of this application to demonstrate alignment with the City of Saint John's growth and development goals and the Municipal Plan amendment process. The Museum's history in Saint John can be traced to the 1840's and is Canada's longest continuing museum facility. However, in 2022, the Market Square exhibition space (home of the NBM since 1996) was closed and there is presently no exhibits in operation until construction of the new facility has been completed. In January of last year, the NBM released a request for proposals for the design of a new facility to securely preserve and showcase New Brunswick's natural and cultural history. In early April 2023, it was announced Diamond Schmitt Architects (DSA) was selected to design the new facility. Since that time, the consultant team (DSA and EXP) has been diligently working toward breaking ground on the project; currently expected to begin in Spring 2024. The Archives & Research Library, Humanities & Natural History collection storage which has continued to operate from the Douglas Avenue "Provincial Museum" building has begun the process of relocating to a new off -site facility as the NBM prepares the building for the proposed renovation and addition. This significant project will not only stabilize the existing c.1930 building but return the museum to their original home as well. In doing so, securing the New Brunswick Museum's legacy for the next 100 years. Proposed Zoning and Municipal Plan Amendment The properties affected by this application are as follows: • 241 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379230) • 247 Douglas Ave. (PID 55172860) • 249 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379255) • 261 Douglas Ave. (PID 00377945) • 263 Douglas Ave. (PID 00358481) • 255 Douglas Ave. (PID 55222012) 231 diamorr, schmitt Rezoning This application requests rezoning the six (6) properties (noted above) from Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to Major Community Facility (CFM). Rezoning will facilitate land consolidation required to build a state-of-the-art addition on the existing "Provincial Museum" building. Please refer to supporting materials for additional information on the proposed design. Comparison of the existing zoning to the proposed is demonstrated in the chart below. Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Major Community Facility (CFM) FRONT YARD 6m 5m REAR YARD 6m 7.5m SIDE YARD 1.5-2.5M 7.5M (DEPENDING ON RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY) FLANKAGE YARD 3.5m 7.5M MAXIMUM BUILDING 11 M 24M HEIGHT The development scale associated with the CFM zone is not unprecedented along Douglas Avenue. Similar land use and scale of building have existed previously along the corridor (ie. King George School and the Observatory, St. Peters Church). The neighbouring "Provincial Museum" museum property is already zoned CFM, as is Harbourview High School. Municipal Plan Amendment In addition to the proposed rezoning, this application also requires a Municipal Plan amendment; reassigning the residential lands (six properties previously identified) to Major Community Facility use. This request is supported by several policies under the Plan. Context Per the Municipal Plan (the Plan), Douglas Avenue is a "character corridor," identified as a place for ongoing investment in quality streetscaping and urban design, character corridors strengthen the quality of place in significant areas of the city. This investment along Douglas Avenue intends to maintain quality of the public realm (as it relates to the heritage context), as well as attract high quality development in the adjacent intensification areas. In addition to being along an important character corridor, the properties affected by this application are also part of a stable 09% diam , schmi residential area that adjoins a large natural area to the west and heavy industrial to the east. The residential land use along Douglas Avenue is punctuated by two (2) historic institutional uses (The NB Museum and Harbourview High School), also designated Major Community Facilities under the Municipal Plan. Supported Rationale As noted by the Plan, stable Areas are intended to grow and evolve through minor change. The proposed renovation and addition to the "Provincial Museum" building is simply expanding the existing land use along Douglas Avenue thus reinstating the New Brunswick Museum to its historic home. Per the requirements of the CFM land use, key development/urban design goals and policies of the Plan, the proposed design intends to: • Contribute positively to the neighbourhood through high quality development and design excellence. • Use landscape design strategies that will enhance the site/ public realm and buffer the proposed addition from neighbouring residences. • Provide a universally accessible facility with an enhanced pedestrian arrival experience as well as better connection to the broader public realm along Douglas Avenue a new street facing entrance. • Leverage the existing transit corridor along Douglas Avenue, as well as active recreation (bike lanes) and connection to the South - Central Peninsula via Harbour Passage offered by the choice of site. • Demonstrate respect for the existing "Provincial Museum" building via setbacks, street wall, architectural massing, and materiality. • Leveraging existing topography to minimize changes to the existing context (ie. natural drainage patterns, existing areas of conservation and natural areas). • Contribute to the NBM's commitment to the cultural heritage of New Brunswick by rehabilitating the existing "Provincial Museum" building. • Providing a dedicated bus/ delivery areas at the interior of the site to minimize visual and traffic impacts to the neighbourhood. Economic Prosperity Tourism is a vitally important driver of the local and regional economy. As a key cultural asset, the New Brunswick Museum is an attractive destination for visitors, and residents alike. Furthermore, not only do schools and children benefit from the educational programming available, but museum spaces are popular event spaces (for weddings, conferences, etc.). Investment in the new facility ensures the NBM is retained in Saint John while also enabling its continued growth and operational success. P4dc3 diam , schmi Major community facilities such as The New Brunswick Museum, contribute significantly to the quality of life, cultivating a strong sense of place and connection to history and our natural world. Moreover, a modern museum is more than space for a collection of objects, it provides a home for social engagement, education, culture, innovation, technology and more. Purpose built along Douglas Avenue almost 100 years ago, the residents of Saint John have never known the City without The New Brunswick Museum. The NBM site was strategically positioned at the top of Bentley Street, creating a view corridor between the site and Uptown. This project honors that 100 year old strategic decision, reinstalling the facility in its historic home. Request for De -designation — 241 Douglas Avenue Douglas Avenue is a broad tree lined street well known for the grand heritage homes that line it. They range in architectural style, however Italianate, Second Empire and Queen Anne are most prevalent. Constructed c.1881, the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is an example of the vernacular Italianate style. The house is two storeys' tall and features a prominent entry tower massing with a pavilion style hipped roof at the top. Ornamentation on the street facing fagade is generally consistent with the Italianate style, while other ornamentation— is of a simplified character consistent with a vernacular interpretation of the Italianate style. The Italianate style was hugely popular during the late 19th century in Canada. The style today is ubiquitous to the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area, as well as the City's other heritage areas . By comparison, the existing "Provincial Museum," is a late example of Beaux-Arts style designed by H. Claire Mott (son of preeminent Saint John -based architect H.H. Mott). The Museum building is unquestionably his most notable project. Defining heritage value of a building is not solely based upon architectural analysis. It is a holistic exercise informed by place (context), condition, evolution over time, and most importantly to this case - past and current importance to its community. The public importance of a purpose-built museum building (that is also of substantive architectural value) cannot be understated. 241 Douglas Avenue is a good candidate for de -designation from the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area when its heritage value is weighed against that of the Provincial Museum building, and the future public benefit having the NBM reinstated in its former home considered. Through a trade-off, the broader value (heritage and beyond) provided to the community by revitalizing the Provincial Museum building provides a sound argument for de -designation. 1�MI diam , schmi Site Selection Process A Site Selection process was completed in the summer of 2023 and resulted in the selection of the historic Douglas Avenue site. Over the past 180 years, the Museum has acted as a custodian of the natural and human history of New Brunswick and its surrounding regions. By revitalizing the existing building and preserving its unique character, the Museum stays true to its ethos while also enriching the new museum experience and preserving a piece of history for the Saint John and New Brunswick community. The selection of the new museum site on Douglas Ave was a result of a thorough analysis and consideration of fundamental criteria that were weighted to ensure the success of the museum. The criteria considered included urban design connectivity, community benefits, economic considerations, site servicing, municipal planning objectives, site capacity, archaeological sites etc. Ultimately, the Douglas Ave. site was chosen as its merits relating to funding, operational and architectural criteria superseded any other possible sites. The Douglas Ave. site allows for seamless integration of the site design with adjacent parks and urban reserves, offering a significant benefit to the community. Additionally, the site provides excellent connectivity to Uptown Saint John through existing transit, cycle, and pedestrian routes, including the Harbour Passage, aligning perfectly with the planning goals of the City of Saint John. One notable feature of the Douglas Ave site is the breathtaking views it offers. To the west, there are stunning views of the Saint John River, while to the east, views of uptown Saint John, the Saint John Harbour, and beyond to the Bay of Fundy. The selection of the Douglas Ave site ensures that these remarkable views will once again be accessible to the entire community. New Brunswick Museum Design Intent The new design of the New Brunswick Museum will not only serve as a home for the museum but also as a destination venue for all New Brunswickers. The Facility will be the home of the NBM for the next century and beyond. The new Museum will play a crucial role in providing a safe and secure location for provincial collections and museological functions while also providing vibrant new exhibitions and public spaces. The new museum will be a first -choice destination for both the community and visitors, it will not only benefit tourism but will also serve as an inspiration for all age groups, igniting their creativity and curiosity. Through the selection of the Douglas Ave location, the existing museum building will be revitalised, and its re -use will be prioritized to enhance its existing qualities. The original museum building built in 1934 will be restored and principally maintained, as well as the south fagade of the King George Hall. The presence of the existing front steps will be retained and enhanced as a public benefit, while the placement of a new entrance will reveal the P49191 diam , schmi inherent architectural qualities of the existing building. The design approach will embrace the heritage of the original museum building while providing a contemporary addition that will meet the current and future needs of the museum. The integration of the facility into the landscape will be done sensitively, ensuring a harmonious relationship between the exterior elements of the site and the interior public space. The design will also prioritize the creation of inviting and accessible places and streetscapes. Safety, comfort, and enjoyment of the public realm will be enhanced, allowing for year-round interaction and enjoyment. The views, both at grade and from the rooftop terrace will offer visitors an experience, showcasing the Saint John River and harbor views. The new museum will respect and reinforce the existing and planned context in which it is located. This will be achieved through appropriate setbacks, landscaping, building entrance, massing, architectural style, and building materials. By doing so, the design will seamlessly integrate into the surrounding neighborhood and enhance the physical character of the area. The new addition to the Douglas Ave building will be sited to avoid any identified archaeological sites and it will avoid any encroachment on the Victoria Square Park. The new frontage will be articulated and setback from the street with consideration for the existing streetscape proportions and rhythm. Site services, loading and large group arrivals will be done seamlessly and discreetly on the north side of the museum, screened to mitigate disruption to Douglas Avenue streetscape. The new museum building will seek to embrace its existing context while offering a contemporary perspective. Through an inviting design, commitment to sustainability, and integration with the public realm, the museum will be an inspiring landmark that enhances the public experience and fosters a sense of community and connection. Community Consultations The community consultation strategy aims to foster local and Province -wide interest and enthusiasm for the new facility. The first round of community consultation sessions took place between September 9th and 28th, 2023. The Board of Directors of the New Brunswick Museum and the project design team engaged in sessions that took place in locations across the province and on Zoom, ensuring accessibility for as many individuals as possible. The locations included Saint John, Fredericton, Edmundston, Campbellton, Bathurst, Caraquet, Miramichi, Moncton, Province -wide Zoom. The goal was to provide an opportunity for citizens across New Brunswick to voice their opinions and contribute to the future of the NBM. The consultation sessions provided an opportunity for individuals to share their perspectives and contribute to the decision -making process. During the sessions participants engaged in interactive discussions, shared their ideas, and learned more about the project's overall mission and preliminary design concepts for the revitalized museum. The discussions were centered 091.1 diam , schmi around crucial aspects such as the history and key characteristics of the site, urban design, community building elements, the relationship of museum interior spaces to the landscape and views, feature elements, materials, as well as public art. A community consultation summary report is being prepared and will be provided to the City, to accompany this planning application. P49YA Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and Zoning By -Law Amendement RE: 241-263 Douglas Avenue Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to consider amending The City of Saint John Municipal Development Plan and Zoning By -Law at its regular meeting to be held in the Council Chambers on Monday, May 13, 2024, at 6:30 p.m., by: 1. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 3. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 5. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 6. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 8. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also P4c1:3 identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 9. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; 13. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; and. 14. Rezoning a parcel of land having an approximate area 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM) to Major Community Facility (CFM), as illustrated below. f8191%7 REASON FOR CHANGE: To permit the expansion of a museum. For details on how to inspect the amendment, or to register to participate, please contact the Office of the Common Clerk at CommonClerka-saintiohn.ca. Written objections to the amendment may be provided in writing and/or verbally at the Public Hearing to be held by Common Council. To register for participation in the hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at commonclerk(a)saintiohn.ca Written objections to the amendment may be sent to the undersigned at City Hall. If you require French services for a Common Council meeting, please contact the office of the Common Clerk. Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk (506) 658-2862 PZ1IK Projet de modification du plan municipal et I'arrete de zonage Objet : 241-281, Avenue Douglas Par les presentes, un avis public est donne que le conseil municipal de la ville de Saint John a ('intention d'envisager de modifier le plan d'amenagement municipal et I'arrete de zonage de la ville de Saint John Tors de sa reunion ordinaire qui se tiendra dans la salle du conseil le lundi 13 mai 2024, a 18h30, par: A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379230, qui passers de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 2. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 3. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 4. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 00377937, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 5. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 55222129, qui passera de parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 6. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379230, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 7. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 8. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 9. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 115,88 metres carres, situee au 255 Avenue Douglas, IrzI egalement identifie comme NID 55222012, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 10. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 544,57 metres carres, situee au 261 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00377945, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 11. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 546,77 metres carres, situee au 263 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00358481, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 12. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 00377937, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable, parc ou aire naturelle et etablissements communautaires majeurs a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 13. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 55222129, qui passera de parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; et 14. Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ de 21 048 metres carres, situees au 241-281, avenue Douglas, egalement identifiees sous les NIDs 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481 et une partie du NID 55222129 du Zone de pares (P), Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM), et Zone de grandes installations communautaires (CFM) a Zone de grandes installations communautaires (CFM), tel qu'illustre ci- dessous. �Iry� �Sf fjF iqy S! RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION: Pour permettre I'agrandissement d'un musee. Pour plus de details sur la fagon d'inspecter la modification ou pour vous inscrire pour participer, veuillez contacter le Bureau du greffier commun a Common Clerk@saintjohn.ca. Les objections ecrites a la modification peuvent titre fournies par ecrit et/ou verbalement lors de I'audience publique qui sera tenue par le conseil municipal. Pour vous inscrire a I'audience, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier municipal a I'avance a commonclerk@saintjohn.ca Veuillez faire part de vos objections au projet de modification par ecrit a I'attention du soussigne a I'h6tel de ville. Si vous avez besoin des services en frangais pour une reunion de Conseil Communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal. Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal (506) 658-2862 P►z191 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-xx A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. Redesignating on Schedule A of the ARRETE MODIFIANT VARRETE RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL ARRETE No C.P. 106-xx Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a edicte cc qui suit: Uarrete concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John decrete le 30 janvier 2012 est modifie par: A 1'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379230, qui passera de secteur stable et pare on aire naturelle a secteur stable; Municipal Development Plan, land having 2. A 1'annexe A du plan d'amenagement an approximate area of 829.18 square municipal, modifier la designation metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 also identified as PID 55172860, from metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Stable Area and Park and Natural Area Douglas, egalement identifie comme to Stable Area; NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur stable et pare on aire naturelle a 3. Redesignating on Schedule A of the secteur stable; Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 960.21 square 3. A 1'annexe A du plan d'amenagement metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, municipal, modifier la designation also identified as PID 00379255, from d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 Stable Area and Park and Natural Area metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue to Stable Area; Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur 4. Redesignating on Schedule A of the stable et parc on aire naturelle a Municipal Development Plan, land having secteur stable; an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from 4. A 1'annexe A du plan d'amenagement Stable Area, and Park and Natural municipal, modifier la designation Area to Stable Area; d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 5. Redesignating on Schedule A of the 00377937, qui passera de secteur Municipal Development Plan, land having stable et pare on aire naturelle a an approximate area of 694 square metres, secteur stable; located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, 5. A 1'annexe A du plan d'amenagement from Park and Natural Area to Stable municipal, modifier la designation Area; d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue MzEll 5. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Douglas, egalement identifie comme Municipal Development Plan, land having une partie de NID 55222129, qui an approximate area of 584.42 square passera de parc on aire naturelle a metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, secteur stable; also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and 6. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement Natural Area to Major Community municipal, modifier la designation Facility; d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue 7. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Douglas, egalement identifie comme Municipal Development Plan, land having NID 00379230, qui passera de secteur an approximate area of 829.18 square residentiel stable et parc on aire metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, naturelle a etablissements also identified as PID 55172860, from communautaires majeurs; Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community 7. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement Facility; municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 S. Redesignating on Schedule B of the metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Municipal Development Plan, land having Douglas, egalement identifie comme an approximate area of 960.21 square NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, residentiel stable et parc on aire also identified as PID 00379255, from naturelle a etablissements Stable Residential and Park and Natural communautaires majeurs; Area to Major Community Facility; 8. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement �. Redesignating on Schedule B of the municipal, modifier la designation Municipal Development Plan, land having d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 an approximate area of 115.88 square metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, Douglas, egalement identifie comme also identified as PID 55222012, from NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur Stable Residential to Major residentiel stable et parc on aire Community Facility; naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 10. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having 9. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement an approximate area of 544.57 square municipal, modifier la designation metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, d'un terrain d'une superficie de 115,88 also identified as PID 00377945, from metres carres, situee au 255 Avenue Stable Residential to Major Douglas, egalement identifie comme Community Facility; NID 55222012, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements 11. Redesignating on Schedule B of the communautaires majeurs; Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 546.77 square 10. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, municipal, modifier la designation also identified as PID 00358481, from d'un terrain d'une superficie de 544,57 Stable Residential to Major metres carres, situee au 261 Avenue Community Facility; Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00377945, qui passera de secteur 12. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; 13. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility. all as shown on the plans attached hereto and forming part of this by-law IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the * day of *, A.D. 2024 and signed by: residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 11. A 1'annexe B du plan d'am6nagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 546,77 metres carres, situee au 263 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00358481, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 12. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 00377937, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable, parc on aire naturelle et etablissements communautaires majeurs a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 13. A 1'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 55222129, qui passera de parc on aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs touter les modifications sont indiquees sur les plans ci joints et font partie du present arrete. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arrete le 2024, avec les signatures suivantes : Mayor City Clerk/Greffier communal First Reading - Premiere lecture - Second Reading - Deuxieme lecture - Third Reading - Troisieme lecture - PzIFA BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-X A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Rezoning a parcel of land having an approximate area 21048 square meters, located at 241-281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID Numbers 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481, and a portion of PID number 55222129, from Park (P), Mid -Rise Residential (RM), and Major Community Facility (CFM) to Major Community Facility (CFM) - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of X, A.D. 2024 and signed by: Mayor/Maire ARRETE NO C.P. 111-X ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a decrete ce qui suit : L'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John, decrete le quinze (15) decembre 2014, est modifie par : Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ de 21 048 metres carres, situees au 241-281, avenue Douglas, egalement identifiees sous les NIDs 00379230, 55172860, 00379255, 00377937, 55222012, 00377945, 00358481 et une partie du NID 55222129 du Zone de pares (P), Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM), et Zone de grandes installations communautaires (CFM) a Zone de grandes installations communautaires (CFM) toutes les modifications sont indiquees sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du present arrete. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arrete le X 2024, avec les signatures suivantes : Common Clerk/Greffier communal First Reading - X Premiere lecture - X Second Reading - X Deuxieme lecture - X Third Reading - X Troisieme lecture - X 248 Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution Property: 241Douglas Avenue Public Hearing, 1" and 2nd Readings: May 13, 2024 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Saint John Yes That Common Council give 15t and 2nd Reading to the Heritage amendment to the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law Conservation which removes the property situated at 241 Douglas Avenue Areas By -Law from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area and to incorporate clarifying language associated with an encroachment into the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. 3' Reading: Scheduled for May 27, 2024 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Saint John Yes That Common Council give 3rd Reading to the amendment to Heritage the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law which removes the Conservation property situated at 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Areas By -Law Avenue Heritage Conservation Area and to incorporate clarifying language associated with an encroachment into the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. �V C O U J o o }' O Q U i N 4J a� 0 0 J O N rn r-A V E - E i O Q V 4.J Fi _ N .y W M W 2 —J co L aJ >+ E C m W O. C O � C U aI = O > O O O 2 O ® & L CO n. _� 'V L co}' S = O 0 O C V O O C O C c O Q a N Il LO N o �96 �-z , IV a � 0 0 0�� C n n O 0 0 n❑ y y h Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQ cLJ�W W W W W W W W GU' U' (7 C7 (7 (7 C7 C7 <7 C7 C9 C7 C7 f7 C7 f?(7 U' i7 C7 C7 U' C7 U' �'�u�'�zzQ�Q�dQ��dQ]]]ooa0000aooa0000a00000000000 �.,.�-,-,ww,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,00aonoan0000n000nonnaonn onn000 ,Q aQa}}QQyQp.. 01 m UUC? U f.1 V UC.1COO� hhq N �heM NM��}}m hN NOf M V h�}M{� y. O N7hN N N N N N N N H J N LO N v c � a a .. c -6 kn W U to U N a a- W a 4� a c N •� 0 0 N Q 4- i 4- a v Qj o C o -a +J w0 ao °�' o a .' o >- tao 0 ) O -0 co c N 0 c}n O w al p U tz) Q a qe CN Q M Ln N ,qt LO cli z 0 0 u u 0 P� u LO LO N im E Q O O cu C6 L r p ' � N 0 F. 0 � U 41 ■ �E _1 +� cd O m+ U t.0 i L � O �J r > 4 �m M� DC � 0 ►i L � O �J r > 4 �m M� DC � co U d �G>O cn In r— It N ca cu a� n O L n a� s a� a O N L U s J m CD ca L c O L a� co r_ O U U N L O L O L) O C c� m L a 0 cu L m co C O V N ca N N 7 C N a co 2 O N 0 L LD N BY-LAW NUMBER HC-1- A LAW TO AMEND THE SAINTJOHN HERITAGE CONSERVATION AREAS BY-LAW ARRETE No HC-1-_ ARRETE MODIFIANT UARRETE SUR LES ZONES DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DE SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, La Ville of Council convened, as follows: Saint John a decrete ce qui suit: The Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-law, enacted on the twenty-third day of September, A.D. 2019, is amended by: 1 Amending paragraph 2(1)(d) by adding immediately preceding "as illustrated and listed on Schedule 'D' which forms part of this By -Law, is hereby established as the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area.": It excluding the encroachment of the structure located at civic address 277 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222137) onto civic address 281 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222129)." 2 Amending Schedule "D", Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, by removing from the heritage conservation area a parcel of land having an area of approximately 584 square metres, including buildings and structures thereon, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID No. 00379230, and by adding to the written description immediately following "on this schedule": It excluding the encroachment of the structure located at civic address 277 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222137 onto civic address 281 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222129)" IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the * day of *, A.D. 2024 and signed by: L'arrete sur les zones de conservation du patrimoine de Saint John, decrete le vingt-trois septembre 2019, est modifie par: 1 Modifier I'alinea 2(1)(d) en ajoutant immediatement avant « comme illustre et enumere a I'annexe « D » qui fait partie du present reglement, est par la presente etabli comme zone de conservation du patrimoine de I'avenue Douglas. » : «, excluant 1'empietement du batiment situe a I'adresse municipale 277, avenue Douglas (NID 55222137) sur la parcelle de terrain a I'adresse municipale 281, avenue Douglas (NID 55222129).» 2 Modifier I'annexe « D », zone de conservation du patrimoine de ('avenue Douglas, en retirant de la zone de conservation du patrimoine une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 584 metres carres, y compris les batiments et les structures qui s'y trouvent, situe au 241, avenue Douglas, egalement identifiee comme NID 00379230 et en ajoutant a la description ecrite immediatement apres « sur cette annexe «, excluant 1'empietement du batiment situe a I'adresse municipale 277, avenue Douglas (NID 55222137) sur I'adresse civique 281, avenue Douglas (NID 55222129) » EN FOI DE QUOI, La Ville de Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arrete le 2024, avec les signatures suivantes : Mayor/Maire City Clerk/Greffier municipal K091 First Reading - Premiere lecture - Second Reading - Deuxieme lecture - Third Reading - Troisieme lecture - pk.q 2 rue Mom St. 0 w x Tus Main 5t- r� g � N 3 rue Clarendon St. r w n' N h �p N a y4 t d m ! Civic Addresses Adresses de voirie Civic Addresses Adresses de voirie a o'Bentley Street 7 rue Bentley 149 Douglas Avenue 149 avenue Douglas 73 Clarendon Street 73 rue Clarendon 187 Douglas Avenue 187 avenue Douglas u 83 Clarendon Street 83 rue Clarendon 191 Douglas Avenue 191 avenue Douglas 0 302 Douglas Avenue 302 avenue Douglas 203 Douglas Avenue 203 avenue Douglas a 260 Douglas Avenue 260 avenue Douglas 207 Douglas Avenue 207 avenue Douglas 254 Douglas Avenue 254 avenue Douglas 215 Douglas Avenue 215 avenue Douglas 222 Douglas Avenue 222 avenue Douglas 229 Douglas Avenue 229 avenue Douglas \\ 206 Douglas Avenue 206 avenue Douglas 233 Douglas Avenue 233 avenue Douglas 1n�@h 202 Douglas Avenue 202 avenue Douglas 297 Douglas Avenue 297 avenue Douglas 186 Douglas Avenue 186 avenue Douglas 81 Clarendon Street 81 rue Clarendon 152 Douglas Avenue 152 avenue Douglas 77 Clarendon Street 77 rue Clarendon 126 Douglas Avenue 126 avenue Douglas 75 Clarendon Street 75 rue Clarendon 108 Douglas Avenue 108 avenue Douglas 69 Clarendon Street 69 rue Clarendon 7 Alexandra Street 7 rue Alexandra 190 Douglas Avenue 190 avenue Douglas 25 Alexandra Street 25 rue Alexandra 204 Douglas Avenue 204 avenue Douglas 34 Alexandra Street 34 rue Alexandra 30 Bentley Street 30 rue Bentley ' 24 Alexandra Street 24 rue Alexandra 193 Douglas Avenue 193 avenue Douglas 3 Bentley Street 3 rue Bentley 31 Douglas Avenue 31 avenue Douglas 274 Douglas Avenue 274 avenue Douglas 79 Clarendon Street 79 rue Clarendon 272 Douglas Avenue 272 avenue Douglas 32 Alexandra Street 32 rue Alexandra 248 Douglas Avenue 248 avenue Douglas 303 Douglas Avenue 303 avenue Douglas 234 Douglas Avenue 234 avenue Douglas 91 Clarendon Street 91 rue Clarendon 28 Bentley Street 28 rue Bendey+ 93 Clarendon Street 93 rue Clarendon 56 Clarendon Street 56 rue Clarendon 95 Clarendon Street 95 rue Clarendon 25 Douglas Avenue 25 avenue Douglas 21 Douglas Avenue 21 avenue Douglas 29 Douglas Avenue 29 avenue Douglas 23 Douglas Avenue 23 avenue Douglas 127 Douglas Avenue 127 avenue Douglas 281 Douglas Avenue 281 avenue Douglas 147 Douglas Avenue 147 avenue Douglas pq 18j29 Schedule "D" Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area Includes the buildings, structures and lands as listed and illustrated on this schedule, excluding the encroachment of the structure located at civic address 277 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222137) onto civic address 281 Douglas Avenue (PID 552221296 22 9 a la® g4 � �!F !r + , f v c Y / / eegrysys ` ' ��f m� f. Civic Addresses Adresses de vairie Civic Addresses Adre es de vairie Bentley Street 7 rue Bentley 149 Douglas Avenue 149 avenue Douglas 73 Clarendon Street 73 rue Clarendon 187 Douglas Avenue 187 avenue Douglas 83 Clarendon Street 83 rue Clarendon 191 Douglas Avenue 191 avenue Douglas 302 Douglas Avenue 302 avenue Douglas 203 Douglas Avenue 203 avenue Douglas 250 Douglas Avenue 26C avenue Douglas 207 Douglas Avenue 207 avenue Douglas 254 Douglas Avenue 254 avenue Douglas 215 Douglas Avenue 215 avenue Douglas 222 Douglas Avenue 222 avenue Douglas 229 Douglas Avenue 229 avenue Douglas 206 Douglas Avenue 206 avenue Douglas 233 Douglas Avenue 233 avenue Douglas 292 Douglas Avenue 202 avenue Douglas 297 Douglas Avenue 297 avenue Douglas 186 Douglas Avenue 186 avenue Douglas 81 Clarendon Street 81 rue Clarendon 152 Douglas Avenue 152 avenue Douglas 77 Clarendon Street 77 rue Clarendon 126 Douglas Avenue 126 avenue Douglas 75 Clarendon Street 75 rue Clarendon 108 Douglas Avenue 108 avenue Douglas 69 Clarendon Street 69 rue Clarendon 7 Alexandra Street 7 rue Alexandra 190 Douglas Avenue 190 avenue Douglas 25 Alexandra Street 25 rue Alexandra 204 Douglas Avenue 204 avenue Douglas 34 Alexandra Street 34 rue Alexandra 30 Bentley Street 30 rue Bentley 24 Alexandra Street 24 rue Alexandra 193 Douglas Avenue 193 avenue Douglas 3 Bentley Street 3 rue Bentley 31 Douglas Avenue 31 avenue Douglas 274 Douglas Avenue 274 avenue Douglas 79 Clarendon Street 79 rue Clarendon 272 Douglas Avenue 272 avenue Douglas 32 Alexandra Street 32 rue Alexandra 248 Douglas Avenue 248 avenue Douglas 303 Douglas Avenue 303 avenue Douglas 234 Douglas Avenue 234 avenue Douglas 91 Clarendon Street 91 rue Clarendon 28 Bentley Street 28 rue Bentley 93 Clarendon Street 93 rue Clarendon 56 Clarendon Street 56 rue Clarendon 95 Clarendon Street 95 rue Clarendon 25 Douglas Avenue 25 avenue Douglas 21 Douglas Avenue 21 avenue Douglas 29 Douglas Avenue 29 avenue Douglas 23 Douglas Avenue 23 avenue Douglas 127 Douglas Avenue 127 avenue Douglas 281 Douglas Avenue 281 avenue Douglas 147 Douglas Avenue 147 avenue Douglas pgIIB12q Annexe « D » - Secteur de conservation du patrimolne de 1'avenue Douglas L'annexe est composee de bdtiments, de structures et de terrains comme indiques et illustres ci-dessus, excluant l'empietement du bdtiment situe d l'adresse municipale 277, avenue Douglas (NID 55222137) sur l'adresse municipale 281, avenue Douglas (NID 55222129). Q-91 REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF DESIGNATION 24-0185 Date 2024-03-28 To: Heritage Development Board From: Growth and Community Services Prepared by: Rodrigo Mendes Campos Approved by: Jennifer Kirchner Diamond Schmitt Architects 241 DOUGLAS AVENUE (PID 00379230) SUBJECT Application to remove the property at 241 Douglas Avenue from designation under HC-1 Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law and to incorporate clarifying language associated with an encroachment into the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is an application for a site -specific amendment to remove designation under the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-law. The subject property features a 2-storey vernacular Italianate style building which was constructed circa 1881. The applicant has suggested de -designation for demolition to facilitate the revitalization of the New Brunswick Museum building. In addition to this application, staff are recommending to incorporate clarifying language into the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area section of the By -Law to address the long-standing encroachment of the non -designated New Brunswick Museum structure into the Heritage Conservation Area. DISCUSSION This is an application to remove a property situated at 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area by way of a site -specific amendment to the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-law. An additional text amendment is being incorporated to clarify the function of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area as it relates to the encroachment of a non -designated structure onto a designated parcel. OVERVIEW The applicant, Diamond Schmitt Architects, submitted a request for the removal of the heritage designation on title of the property located at 241 Douglas Avenue in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area in January 2024. The application indicates that the property is currently undergoing ownership transfer as part of the strategic acquisitions of land and the de -designation would facilitate the P.O. Box 1971 C.P. 1971 Saint John, NB Saint John, N.-B. Canada E2L4L1 Canada E2L41 SAINT JOHN www.ohn.ca Pagel of 27 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 revitalization and construction of the addition to the "Provincial Museum" building for the New Brunswick Museum. The applicant wishes to retain the property, which will form part of a larger non -designated museum property, and for that reason, have chosen not to proceed through the bylaw -recommended process for demolition and instead are seeking the removal of the heritage designation. The removal of this property from the Heritage Conservation Area is part of a series of applications that will ensure all the properties that form the Museum site will be subject to the same standards, regulations and policies. A property owner may request removal from the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law through the review and guidance by the Heritage Development Board and approval by Common Council. This type of request follows the procedure set in the Act, which outlines the role of the Heritage Development Board (referred to in this report as the HDB or the Board) in applications associated with By -Law amendments. The role of the Board is to provide Common Council with a recommendation on the requested heritage designation removal, as Common Council is the decision -making body for all Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law amendments. Applications for the removal of a designation are weighed on their own merit. Previous applications for de -designation may provide references but are not generally reliable as the circumstances of each building within each Heritage Conservation Area are unique. Staff's analysis for both the designation of new buildings and the maintenance of existing designations is based off the analysis of the public benefits associated with the regulation and preservation of significant architectural buildings, which reflects our city's history. The Heritage Development Board focuses on the request's alignment to the Heritage Conservation Areas By-law and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, therefore, this report will assess those elements of the application that are strictly within the Board's purview. A supplemental report will be prepared as part of the Common Council Agenda Package for the Public Hearing, which will discuss broader elements of the application which are under Common Council's purview. THE DOUGLAS AVENUE HERITAGE CONSERVATION AREA Douglas Avenue, or Douglas Road as it was originally known between 1835-37 in the Parish of Portland, was named after Sir. Howard Douglas, former Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick, and runs east to west from Main Street to the Reversing Falls. It is in a part of Saint John known as the North End and use to connect the towns of Portland and Lancaster before the amalgamation with Saint John in 1889, where it was considered part of the suburbs of the City from 1850-1950's. The construction of Douglas Avenue began in 1851, after residents started a campaign for a road to be built from Main Street to the suspension bridge. Improvements in transportation technology, like the spanning of the Reversing Falls in 1853 and the unveiling of the streetcar in 1902, opened most of this area for development. Attributed to the historical presence of different social groups with varying incomes, the Douglas Avenue area is very diverse by nature and encompasses architectural examples that range from the early 191" century to the late 20t" century, in a mixture of working-class tenements with the more substantial homes of the middle and wealthy classes, which reflect its own history as a neighbourhood. Most examples of Heritage Architecture found on Douglas Avenue are of Italianate, Queen Anne and Second Empire style, although some examples of Greek Revival can also be found. Page 2 of 27 265 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 The prime characteristic of Douglas Avenue is the mixture of working-class tenements with the more substantial homes of the middle and wealthy classes. Many architectural styles were built including French Cottage, Second Empire, Italianate, Queen Anne, Gothic Revival and many variations of these and other styles, and most of the homes built before the Great Fire of 1877 still exist, predating the buildings in the Trinity Royal Heritage Conservation Area. The Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area was designated by Common Council in 1992. The boundaries of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area run from Main Street to 303 Douglas Avenue, with inclusion of properties on Clarendon, Alexandra and Bentley Streets. There were 51 PIDs initially included in the creation of this Heritage Conservation Area. Since then, 2 PIDs have been removed, and a small number of PIDs have been added, following requests for inclusion. Due to the non-contiguous nature of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, it has faced challenges in both loss of buildings with immeasurable architectural value, such as the New Brunswick Observatory and St. Peters Church and more recently in retaining designation status of properties with a few applications for de -designation and/or demolition of designated buildings in recent years. ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY AND HERITAGE VALUE The property on 241 Douglas Avenue is a two -storey, wood vernacular Italianate residence. Erected circa 1881 at a time of extreme popularity of the Italianate style. Buildings of the Italianate style is a common style found in many instances throughout the city, particularly in the post -fire period in Saint John. Both the style and construction of 241 Douglas Avenue, however, predates the most prominent constructions in the area, including the vocational school (dated 1925), the New Brunswick Museum (1934) and the lost New Brunswick Observatory (1925). 241 Douglas Avenue was described in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study conducted by Architect Michael R. Richard (Attachment A) as: "A good example of both quality of design and craftsmanship. It is a good example of the vernacular Italianate style... It is a middle building of a bock cluster and not a landmark." As a common style during that historic period, is it common to find it in several applications and interpretations around the city. A Statement of Significance for the property could not be found by staff and very little information about the building could be found in general. The residence at 241 Douglas Avenue could be analyzed, however, by its unique characteristics, such as: - Two storey with an off-centre entrance in an enclosed double -storey tower; - Low slope gabled roof; - 3 bay entrance towers, with projecting hipped -roof; - Staggered entryway with transom and sidelights; - One over one windows, regularly spaced; and - Even setback with adjacent properties. Page 3 of 27 266 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Image excerpted from Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study - 1991 241 Douglas Avenue residence as of August 2023 Source: Google maps Despite its discrete nature along the Douglas Avenue streetscape, the building appears to have kept its character -defining elements and seems structurally sound — although studies haven't been presented that confirm those assumptions. A sales agreement for the property has been in place and the residence is expected to be vacated in the near future. Little is known about alterations or changes in character, except for the vinyl window addition at the second storey level above the main entrance door, that can be seen from the street. While not necessarily a rare instance of the style, it represents a good example of a designated building of the Vernacular Italianate style displayed on Douglas Avenue. No information could be found by staff on the Architect or builder of the structure, however information from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study indicates that the property was originally owned by Ansel Wiliams, a manager at the Bell Telegraph Co. and has changed ownership a few times in its history. APPLICANT SUBMISSION The application outlines the intention to de -designate the property of 241 Douglas Avenue to allow for demolitions that will facilitate the revitalization of the New Brunswick Museum. As noted by the applicant: "Of the six (6) adjacent properties acquired by the Museum, 241 Douglas Avenue is the sole heritage designated property. The properties will be consolidated with that of the Museum Building to form a single property. De -designation of 241 Douglas Avenue (..) is necessary to enable consolidation and facilitate expansion of building footprint." As a result of the desired retainment of the property for consolidation, the applicant has chosen not to proceed through the by-law process for demolition and instead are seeking the removal of the heritage designation as means to demolish the existing structure. The submission, which is included as Attachment C, includes a summary of the request from the applicant (Diamond Schmitt on behalf of the Museum), Page 4 of 27 267 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 and a formal letter requesting the de -designation, as well as contextual and historical analysis of the 241 Douglas Avenue Residence produced by EXP Architects. Per the official removal request, submitted by the applicant, three key points can be understood as rationales for de -designation: The first of which being the location of the property within a non-contiguous Heritage Conservation Area. Per consultant analysis, the de -designation of the building and its subsequent demolition would not interfere with the comprehensive integrity of the Douglas Avenue Conservation Area, due to the building's location at the end of a designated block as opposed to mid -block - a consequence of the non-contiguous designations in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The second key point is the claim that the building in question is of a ubiquitous architectural style and not an exemplary iteration of the Vernacular Italianate style. The applicant indicates that there are other examples of the style located not only in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area but in other Heritage Conservation Areas and that the averageness of its architectural quality would configure a reason for its de -designation. The third and last key point for removal is based upon the building having less of a public benefit to the street if compared to the Provincial Museum, which is described in the application as follows: "...(a) significant role in the preservation and promotion of the region's cultural and natural heritage, identity, as well as in the education and engagement of generations of visitors and residents" As indicated in the application overview, the applicant intends to demolish the building for the expansion of the museum. The preliminary design presented in the applicant's submission indicates the building will be demolished to accommodate part of parking needs for the building. An incorporated side yard landscaping will serve as a buffer between the future parking area and the adjacent residential parcel. The applicant has provided a letter expressing the commitment to designate the original New Brunswick Museum and King George VI Hall after construction (PIDs: 55222137 and 00377952). The Additional portion of the expansion project (which includes the properties acquired) would not be included in the designation, as expressed in Attachment E. Due to archeological findings of Indigenous heritage in and around the Museum property, currently protected by the Heritage Conservation Act the applicant intends to develop a conservation plan for these sites in partnership with First Nations and the Province of New Brunswick and not municipally designate the whole site. Discussions between staff and the Museum Board can be undertaken in the future to address the possibility of designating the entire Museum site. ENCROACHMENT CORRECTION A portion of the original Museum Building (located on 277 Douglas Avenue; PID: 55222137) currently encroaches onto the property of the adjacent designated Riverview Memorial Park (285 Douglas Avenue PID: 55222129). When establishing this Heritage Conversation Area, the intent was to include the entire land comprising of the park. By including the entire property, it unintentionally included the small portion of the Museum structure that encroached onto the park. The Museum building has never been considered to be included in the Hertiage Conservation Area, and as such, no Heritage Permits have been issued for any work undertaken on the Museum structure, including the area impacted by the encroachment. Staff are recommending to include an administrative correction to clarify that the encroaching portion of the building is not part of the Heritage Conservation Area. This adjustment on the Douglas Avenue Heritage Page 5 of 27 268 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Conservation Area written description in the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law seeks to exclude the portion of the lot that is correspondent with the standing Museum Building from the Riverview Memorial Park lot (PID: 55222129), which will better reflect the original intentions with the lot and how its been historically used. Encroachment of the Museum building on the Riverview Memorial Park property (highlighted in yellow). Recommended adjustment on Heritage Conservation Area boundary on HC-1 By -Law STAFF ANALYSIS There is no disagreement that the applicants' efforts to redevelop and maintain the original Museum Building, as well as the improvements introduced by the expansion of the building which will impact the area for the better. The arguments put forward by the applicant for the de -designation of the Heritage property and supporting analysis provided, should be further analyzed, and reviewed. Rationale #1- Location within the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area The City of Saint John has created a series of Heritage Conservation Areas that recognize the larger historic aspects of neighbourhoods. The majority of the Heritage Conservation Areas are contiguous, while some contain individually designated Heritage Buildings. The Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area is the only non-contiguous area in the City. Within those Heritage Conservation Areas, there are a variety of buildings: some of stunning historical significance, others of minimal significance, buildings from different eras and styles, as well as buildings of no significance whatsoever and some that have been stripped of their character -defining elements. It also covers vacant lands and establishes a set of standards of criteria for infill development and for the redevelopment of historic buildings. These all contribute to the character of these Heritage Areas. As defined by the Canadian Register of Historic Places, a heritage district/area is: "The broad range of buildings... are considered historic varies from modest to monumental, ancient to recent, and private to public. Buildings in a heritage district... may not be formally recognized individually but may be recognized as contributing to the larger historic place. There is no typical historic building. Each is valued for its own reasons..." Page 6 of 27 269 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 The Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area was designated by Common Council in 1992. The process was initiated by a neighbourhood study, performed by the architect Michael R. Richard in 1991 at the request of the City prior to designation. The report covered the historical, architectural and social aspects of the area, followed by the approaching of property owners for their interest in designation. The procedure for defining the boundaries and properties included in this Heritage Conservation Area differed from the procedures undertaken when developing previous Areas: property owners were given the option of declining to have their property included in the proposed Heritage Conservation Area. This Opt -Out approach resulted in a segmented boundary and limited inclusion of properties, unlike the contiguous Heritage Conservation Areas seen in different instances throughout the city. That uniqueness in the designation process of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area resulted in examples of extremely important historical and cultural significance buildings (such as the New Brunswick Museum building) or properties of representative architecture to not be designated while buildings of unknown history or little architectural significance to be considered for designation. Heritage Area (or Heritage district) designation has been considered a preferred method over individual or non-contiguous designations to recognize Heritage Value of properties while safeguarding the broader character of one area. Area designations enable the municipality to conserve, protect and enhance larger areas of cultural, architectural, and historical value, including multiple properties, resources, and features. That approach allows for a more holistic conservation mechanism that comprises not only of original historic structures, but the collective streetscapes in which they are inserted and that is composed of more subject components that are particular of the area, such as the relationships between buildings, scale of construction and overall character of a community. In the contrary, non-contiguous designations would only provide protection to certain buildings, which may or may not include spatial relationships, that have been historically present in the area and pose challenges in terms of the retention of properties, residents' buy -in and ultimately may result in change of character and dissolution. While de -designation of properties on more homogenous Heritage Conservation Areas can have severe impacts on their strength, the same is true about de -designations on non-contiguous areas, which can be considered more exposed to the risks of requests for de -designation, demolition, and non -conformity, as a result of comparison with their non -designated neighbours or concerns about costs. De -designations in those areas can deeply contribute to their increasing gap-toothed appearance and further promote their erosion. Despite these challenges, properties within non-contiguous Heritage Conservation Areas are not categorized, analyzed, or ranked exclusively based their location within that area. The first point utilized by the applicant as a rationale for the de -designation of Douglas Avenue consists of its location within a non-contiguous Heritage Conservation Area. While the location of a property could indicate an item for evaluation, it is typically not the only factor, as all buildings within a historic streetscape (be it contained in a Heritage Area that is contiguous or non-contiguous) contribute to its historic character. Historic neighbourhoods are generally perceived by the public as a continuous collection of heritage buildings that compose that street wall, to which every house has an equally important contribution. That is true of Douglas Avenue as well. Despite its irregular designation, while walking or driving through Douglas Avenue, every property contributes to the cohesiveness of that particular streetscape and celebrate the characteristics of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Heritage designated properties, despite perhaps not contained in a cluster, are part of a group of properties contained within a historical context in an area and they are all active contributors to that historic streetscape. It is for that reason why they should be valued as a playing a role in the broader narrative of the heritage streetscape. Page 7 of 27 270 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 The heritage value of a property, therefore, should not measured by the standards of its location in the Heritage Conservation Area that it is inserted, but rather it should be measured against the standards of its own style and merits. Where a designated property stands, in reference to the other designated buildings, may be just a consequence of how the designation took place in that area. It is not necessarily a reflection of its Heritage Value, nor does it diminish it as a contributor to the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. That is especially true in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area where a building that is cohesive to its surroundings in both architectural character and use, despite being surrounded by historic buildings of same or similar context, in the middle of a block became the bookend building of its designated neighbours, by the nature of designation. Applications for de -designation that utilized the rationale of the non-contiguous nature of Douglas Avenue have been successful in the past (249 Douglas Avenue and 12-14 Bentley Street. See Precedents for removal), however, because analysis considers each property's own set of merits and characteristics, precedent approvals for de -designation are not generally considered a rule for all future applications, as each case is considered unique and is analyzed as such. This application pertains to the removal and demolition of 241 Douglas Avenue for the rehabilitation and expansion of the New Brunswick Museum building. The property of 241 Douglas Avenue sits at the end of the cluster of designated properties that also includes 233 and 229 Douglas Avenue. The next Designated property of that side of Douglas Avenue can only be found 8 properties later (Riverview Memorial Park), as the 5 residential properties and the Museum property between them are currently not designated. The result is a 139m gap between the last designated property of the designated block (241 Douglas Avenue) and the next (Riverview Memorial Park). The designation proposed by the Museum will only be limited to the original historic building due to limitations on archeological findings and would contribute to the Heritage Area by including a historically significant Heritage Building to the list of designated properties (however facilitate by the loss of another designated building) and in helping to attenuate some of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area's gap-toothed appearance. Existing gap in designated properties on that portion of Douglas Avenue Rationale #2 — Heritage Value The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada is a Canada -wide set of conservation principles and recommendations that provides consistent guidance for appropriate decision Page 8 of 27 271 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 making when intervening on Canada's Historic Places which acts as a benchmark in forming the basis for review and assessment of proposed conservation intervention projects. It opens with the following statement: "Canada's historic places are a living legacy for all Canadians. Ensuring a future for these treasures will allow the next generations to use these exceptional places in ways both old and new." The City of Saint John has utilized an approach that aligns with the Standards and Guidelines in its efforts to protect Canada's built heritage. The Standards and Guidelines do not contemplate the demolition of historic structures as an acceptable intervention on buildings that have been deemed to have significance by a municipality and emphasizes the importance of conservation in protecting Historic Places in Canada. The second point utilized by the applicant for de -designation relies on the premise that the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is not a good example of a ubiquitous style and for that reason is a good candidate for de -designation. To determine Heritage Value, conservation practitioners operate in what is referred to as a 'values -based context' using a system that identifies and manages historic places according to values attributed through an evaluation of several criteria. The evaluation in this report will be supported by the utilization of the publication The Evaluation of Historic Buildings, prepared by Parks Canada in 1980 to help professionals who must evaluate buildings, to determine which buildings in their community are the most significant and why they are so. The set of criteria are listed on The Evaluation of Historic Buildings publication include the aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social and/or spiritual importance of a place. For the purposes of this Report, we will utilize the main categories Architecture, History, Environment and Use. In terms of Architecture, both properties should be evaluated based on their style, construction, age, Architect, design, and craftsmanship. The residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is described as a good example of a Vernacular Italianate Architecture, where original elements of the Italianate style are still present on the building, namely the decorative corbels, entrance tower and low-pitched roof, albeit with some adaptation of vernacular character in its materials, techniques, and forms. As a discrete example, the property on 241 Douglas Avenue represents the adaptation of a style to a specific landscape, local resources and social group and remains true to the diverse character of the Douglas Avenue streetscape. The Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law is committed to preserving all of Saint John's heritage and is not limited to the homogeneity of architectural styles or the prevalence of one style over others. The popularity of a style as precedent for de -designation followed by demolition would disregard the commitment of the Saint John Heritage By -Law to preserving all of Saint John's heritage by holding them to the same standards, despite number of occurrences. Admittedly, there are other instances of the Italianate style around Douglas Avenue, and some of them are much grander in scale and detailing. The Heritage Value discussion, however, shouldn't be restricted by purism of a style or quantity, but should rather rely on the building's own standards, characteristics, and its relationship to the heritage area they are inserted. Despite the presence of other vernacular Italianate buildings in the Douglas Avenue area, most examples of that style in designated properties either lack the ornamentation present on 241 Douglas Avenue or had their original elements stripped or modified, such as 187 Douglas Avenue, 28-30 Bentley Street, and 81-83 Clarendon Street, as shown below: Page 9 of 27 272 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 187 Douglas Avenue 28-30 Bentley Street 81-83 Clarendon Street Although no information that would support the building's historical importance or connections to important historical figures and Architects could be found by staff, its architectural importance can be attributed to the representation of its architectural style in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Utilized as a single-family residence, the property at 241 Douglas Avenue is a building of Vernacular Italianate style and a good example of buildings of that style during a specific period in history. The presence of a vernacular building, juxtaposed to more prominent examples of Italianate, Second Empire, Queen Anne and other styles perfectly encompasses the diverse character of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The mixture of simple working-class buildings in association with and in proximity to the substantial homes of the wealthy class is an important aspect of its character, as it was a rather uncommon phenomenon for the 191" century to have employees living next door to their employers. Aside from the architectural style and due to the long-established nature of Douglas Avenue in Saint John, it is also appropriate to analyze the property at 241 Douglas Avenue through the lens of historic period representation. Built in 1881, the residence dates from a historic period before the amalgamation of Portland with Saint John and a few years after the Great Saint John Fire. Based on the information laid out by the Douglas Avenue Management Plan Study, the majority of residences on and around Douglas Avenue are from the year 1900 onwards, a result of the improvements to the road that happened during that historic period, including the paving of the street, that dates to 1924. Information from the same Management Plan Study indicated that there aren't a high number of examples from the same time period as 241 Douglas Avenue in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Area - only 24 properties. That number would be even smaller if compared to designated properties, as of the 42 properties, only 8 are from that decade and would be protected from demolition and change of character by the Heritage Conservation Areas By - Law. The New Brunswick Museum building, erected in 1934, is the lineal descendant of the 1842 Gerner's Museum, officially the first designated museum in Canada. This landmark building was built in the Beaux- Arts architectural style, which is more commonly found in larger centres, and is a rare example of the style in the Maritimes and considered as having both excellent style and craftsmanship. It is one of only a few examples of that same style in Saint John, which include the Carnegie Building and the old Post Office building on Prince William Street. The Museum building at 277 Douglas Avenue was designed by Harry Claire Mott, son of the also prominent architect Harry H. Mott and officially opened to the public on Page 10 of 27 273 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 August 161", 1934, with a three-day celebration which marked the 1501" anniversary of the separation of New Brunswick from Nova Scotia, that included the presence of the (then) Prime Minister and New Brunswicker R. B. Bennett. To ensure the Museum's continuity, it became a provincial institution in 1942, when financial challenges in the past resulted in uneasiness as to its future. The Museum remained at that address from 1934 — 1996, when it moved the exhibition components to Market Square. Since then, the building has hosted the Archives and a few other departments of the Museum. The Museum's heritage value, however, surpasses the rarity of its architectural style, which would by itself grant enough grounds for its designation, but furthermore, its historical value as the location of the New Brunswick Museum as well as its cultural and social significance as the holder of documented information regarding various phases of the country's progress since before the French settlement in the region, as well as collections of cultural importance that are of invaluable significance would position the New Brunswick Museum building as an invaluable asset to the whole province. Both buildings contribute to the Heritage Conservation Area by representing the true nature of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, where diminutive buildings coexist with major prominent Institutions. Both buildings occupy their original site and have suffered little known alterations, except for the replacement of wood windows with vinyl windows that can be perceived from the street at 241 Douglas Avenue. It is important to point out that The Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study evaluated the Museum as a higher -priority candidate for designation over the property at 241 Douglas Avenue. That can be observed in Attachment B, containing an excerpt from The Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study that showcases both the building's rank when analyzed by history, architecture representation and contribution to streetscape, where 'A' represents a high priority of designation while 'C' represents low priority, by the author's methodology. This provides a direct acknowledgement of the higher importance of the Museum structure over the residence and provides a rationale for supporting the removal of the property at 241 Douglas Avenue in exchange for the preservation and future designation of the Museum structure. Rationale #3 — Public Benefit The third argument by the applicant relates to the better public benefit or historic value of the preservation and expansion of the Museum over the Residence at 241 Douglas Avenue and thus the de - designation of the property would be appropriate. The conservation of historic places as a public benefit has been recognized by the Municipal Plan (Plan SJ), which acknowledges the value and benefit of heritage conservation and the important role our built heritage plays in establishing community, sense of place and identity. This is a key contribution to not only our residents but also the countless visitors that venture to Saint John every year. The historic character of the city is a key attribute that is responsible for the attraction of thousands of visitors and new residents every year and separates Saint John from other cities in the Province. In recognition of the importance of Heritage Conservation for the City, in 1981 Common Council adopted The Saint John Heritage Conservation By -Law (HC-1) as a legal mechanism that seeks to direct the development of Heritage Conservation Areas, in a way that the exterior conservation of existing buildings and the construction of new (infill) buildings are carried out in a manner that protects the heritage character of these areas. Page 11 of 27 274 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Heritage Designation is not only a supporting mechanism utilized to retain the character of historic architecture in these areas, but also, and arguably most importantly, protects those Historic buildings from demolition. Section 9 of the Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-law permits the demolition of buildings in designated Heritage Conservation Areas in accordance with several requirements. One of which is the listing of the building for sale for a period of no less than 12 months, at a reasonable price. Only if no sale has occurred under the terms, may the HDB issue a demolition permit. The applicant has indicated their desire to retain the property, necessary for the expansion work to the Museum and as such, the prescribed process would not support their interest. As a result of the designation process undertaken when developing the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, that allowed for the property owners to opt -in or out of the program, the Museum is not yet a designated property. That means that, despite its importance, the Museum does not need to comply by the requirements of the Heritage Conservation Areas By -Law nor needs to follow the same procedures that seek to protect the building against change of character and demolition. It should be acknowledged that governmental and institutional structures of that magnitude can pose a serious challenge in terms of occupation if the original use is no longer operational. When these structures are left unoccupied, those buildings generally remain vacant for generations, as the costs for operating, maintaining and adaptively reusing a building of such a large scale would be a prohibitive factor for most development initiatives. The applicant has expressed interest in designating the portion of the original building, which includes the King George VI Hall, after construction and the prospect of the designation of the New Brunswick Museum Building means the building can be understood and analyzed as a heritage designated building, as it allows for a more linear analysis to be done between the two buildings and their contribution to the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Discussions of public benefit in the demolition of the 241 Douglas Avenue to facilitate the expansion of the New Brunswick Museum (now committed to becoming a designated heritage property, and therefore considered a public benefit) would revolve around their social contribution to the Heritage Conservation Area. As recognized by the applicant: "The Museum has (... ) played a significant role in the preservation and promotion of the region's cultural and natural heritage, identity, as well as in the education and engagement of generations of visitors and residents." Ideally, both buildings would co -exist in the Douglas Avenue streetscape, and contribute equally to the Heritage Conservation Area, however topographical, Archeological and encroachment constraints severely limit the development capacity on the existing museum property toward any direction other than the residential properties located to the east of the existing Museum building, which includes the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue. While recognizing the unfairness of comparing broader public benefits of a prominent, cultural use facilityto a private residence, it is important to understand the inherent public value in conserving our Heritage Architecture, especially when there are cultural and historic components that add to the social benefits provided by the conservation of historic places. The access to our Heritage enhances our communities in many ways. It's undeniable that the Presence of the Museum in the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area has the potential to provide educational opportunities to the people in the province, touristic opportunities to visitors, economic opportunities to all residents and other benefits that enhance the community in many ways and can be felt beyond the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. With the expression of interest by the applicant in the designation of the New Page 12 of 27 275 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Brunswick Museum, it recognizes the importance and efficacy of the Heritage program in Saint John as well as the Heritage Board's position in protecting built Heritage. In essence, by designating an already recognized and celebrated building, the Museum asserts its support in the protection of Saint John's built heritage as well as ensures that the social contributions of the Museum to the community is continued for futures generations to come. The loss of any historic building, whether designated or not cannot and should not be taken lightly, especially buildings with residential potential. However, as a result of the evaluation on both buildings, the designation of the New Brunswick Museum building indicates a contribution in a broader manner to the community of Douglas Avenue, the City of Saint John and the province alike. PRECEDENTS FOR REMOVAL Since the introduction of the Heritage Conservation Areas to Saint John in the 1980's, there have been few successfully de -designated heritage properties. Although each removal was based on its own merits, these exceptions were typically granted on the basis that the given property was not part of a contiguous Heritage Conservation Area. To provide some context, when the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area was undergoing formation, building owners at the time were individually given the option to opt in or out of heritage protections. This created an incomplete heritage streetscape and an inconsistent approach to building maintenance. While these conditions contributed to the successful removal of properties in this neighbourhood, each request was examined in detail by staff and deliberated upon by the Heritage Development Board on their own merits and against the applicable heritage by-law of the time. Successfully de -designated properties along the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area include 249 Douglas Avenue (a vacant lot that will form part of the Museum project) and 12-14 Bentley Street. In the case of 249 Douglas Avenue, the applicant applied for demolition of the existing house to make way for a contemporary single-family home to be designed to suit the constraints of the heritage bylaws and its infill standards in 2016. With respect to that application, it is worth noting the applicant's initial request did not include a request for removal from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. This request came only after the proposed infill design was denied by the HDB. Following this decision, the applicant put the property up for sale, followed by an application for removal from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Per the applicants' request, they no longer intended to build on the property themselves, and attempts to sell the designated property were unsuccessful. In the case of the former King Street West Heritage Conservation Area, the heritage protections of the entire conservation area were eventually removed in recognition of the poor state of the character - defining elements of most buildings and the general lack of participation in the Heritage Program. This was following the removal of key properties from the conservation area that had lasting impacts on the integrity of the heritage area. In addition to the precedents mentioned above, in 2017 there was a successful request to remove three PIDs (which housed surface parking) from the King Street East Heritage Conservation Area. The application was made to facilitate the redevelopment of the lots, along with 3 adjacent lots located outside the Page 13 of 27 276 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Conservation Area, into a parkade for Irving Oil Ltd. The rationale for the positive recommendation by both staff and the HDB of the request included the lack of sufficient built context to refer to in the design of the parkade, the shortfalls of the predecessor version to the current bylaw which lacked the flexibility to support the proposed development and the inability of the Board, due to legislative standards, to vary from the established design standards. Most recently, the removal of 111 King Street East (the Paikowsky Residence) was undertaken in part due to the poor condition of the structure, and this resulted in the construction of a children's playground as a public benefit for the area. That application to remove the property from the Heritage Conservation Area, and to demolish the structure, was denied by the Heritage Development Board, who felt that the Property was still in acceptable condition and given proper restoration could still maintain its residential use. De -designation was, however, approved by Common Council in part due to the poor condition of the building which placed it on the City's Vacant and Dangerous Building list. Two other requests for removal from the Heritage Conservation Areas within the Central Peninsula in recent years were denied by both the Heritage Development Board and Common Council including the requests for the removal of 191 Princess Street in 2021 and 66 Sydney Street in 2022. These requests were based on issues not related to the preservation of the structures. It's important, however, to highlight the unique nature of this application and how it differs from its predecessors. Previous applications for de -designation involved buildings that were (whether purposefully or not) left unattended to the point of raising public safety concerns or were de -designation requests based on disagreement with the Heritage Conservation Program. This application hasn't been submitted for any of the reasons listed above, but rather strictly to facilitate the redevelopment of the site, as part of the rehabilitation and expansion of the New Brunswick Museum and considering the requirements and limitations imposed by many factors that can't allow for the permanence of the designated property and the development to happen at the same time. Applications of this nature are not usually submitted, as they require the purchase of properties that are in good condition and are submitted to facilitate the expansion of an established use that will provide a broad public benefit. In addition, the removal of the heritage designation on 241 Douglas Avenue, will directly facilitate the addition of the Museum property to the Heritage Conservation Area, which is a scenario not anticipated to be replicated in other requests for de -designation. IMPACT OF A SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION ON THE HERITAGE PROGRAM In addition to past precedents, it is important to examine what the removal of heritage designation, followed by demolition of the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue, would set in terms of new precedents for future applications. The biggest risk with the de -designation of this property utilizing the arguments listed in the application is to create an outlet for applicants that disagree with the limitations established by the Heritage Conservation Areas program to demolish existing heritage buildings, thus contributing to the further erosion of Heritage Areas and ultimately resulting in the slow dissolution of the Heritage Conservation Areas, similarly to what happened to King Street West with the de -designation of the St. George Anglican Church. Page 14 of 27 277 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 Douglas Avenue was created differently from other Heritage Conservation Areas in the city and has continuously suffered the consequences of its non-contiguous nature. While past initiatives to de - designate other properties were due to limitations and restrictions that were prohibitive to facilitate infill development, this situation is different. Non-contiguous areas are known for offering challenges in both the retention of properties and residents' buy -in, as designated properties are held to different standards than their non -designated neighbours. By establishing a precedent that supports the concept of de - designation due to location within a non-contiguous Conservation Area this application could provide a successful case for applications for the removal of properties from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Areas under the same rationale, utilizing the premise of their location in a non-contiguous Heritage Conservation Area, and that the loss of individual buildings will not impact the integrity of the Area. That could enable other property owners to follow suite to achieve the demolition of a building without contemplating a new public benefit. De -designations can also make it more difficult to encourage property owners of the non -designated Douglas Avenue properties to join the Heritage Conservation Area, if there is a sense that the area will be eroded. It is important to note that, as mentioned previously, any application for de -designation is unique and based on evaluations that relate to the standards of the property's own style and merits. On a more positive perspective, despite the removal and demolition of the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue, the designation of the Museum property after its construction could instead work as catalyst for more designation interest in the area. The last request for the designation of a building on the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area took place in 2006, for the 270 Douglas Avenue property. Since then, the Heritage Area has only experienced requests for de -designations. The request for designation of the historic New Brunswick Museum building might spark some new interest in designation for property owners that have chosen to opt out in the past. Rather than questioning their belonging to a Heritage Area that has been eroded through time and of which future is uncertain, property owners will now see a historically significant property apply for designation to belong in their Heritage Conservation Area. Additionally, the opening of the museum will also bring with it an influx of visitors to the Douglas Avenue area. Property owners might be more inclined to join the Heritage Conservation Area, either motivated by the increase of their sense of pride resulting from being an active contributor to a vibrant and alive (and now more attractive to the public) Heritage Conservation Area that has been enhanced through the revitalized and designated Museum, or in taking advantage of the Heritage Grant Program that incentivize the maintenance of character of their historic property, now that the buildings could become more visible to the public. It is important to point out however, that a request to remove a property's designation for the purposes of developing and maintaining a public benefit, fully financed by the applicant, is distinctive in nature and due to the relative value of heritage properties, has limited potential to be repeated. Most applications received for property de -designation are associated with concerns over maintenance, insurance costs, and general disagreements with the heritage bylaw. This request posed bythis applicant is unique because it indicated the replacement of one public benefit — conservation of our built heritage for housing— for another public benefit — a museum facility. Staff does not anticipate that many applications in the future will originate from heritage property owners looking to transform their property into new public facilities at their own cost. The Heritage Development Board and Common Council are left to debate which benefit is in the City's best interest. Page 15 of 27 278 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS A few details in this application aren't necessarily within the Heritage Development Board purview but grant consideration, nonetheless. First is what will become of the site, after demolition. Attachment D indicates that the lot will be amalgamated and utilized as part of the redevelopment and revitalization of the New Brunswick Museum. The Museum has undertaken Archeological assessments in the area, which have indicated that the area is rich in First Nations Archeological findings especially in the area at the rear of the museum building, severely limiting the development capacity on the existing museum property towards the river. Furthermore, the existing structure encroaches on a Heritage Designated Park that honours the veterans of the Boer War. Due to this, there is no possible expansion opportunities into the Park. Due to these lot characteristics, expansion of the Museum is essentially limited to areas that have already been disrupted through existing development patterns and this results in the parking needing to be located along the lots of 2 properties, including 241 Douglas Avenue and the demolition of buildings to be able to accommodate the inclusion of any onsite parking. It should be noted that the demolition of buildings for stand alone parking lots are generally not supported anywhere within the City. However, a level of consideration for demolition is given regarding broader development schemes that are accompanied by significant social benefits, such as the scenario for this application. The second particularity of this application pertains to the Service Lift Station located on 255 Douglas Avenue (pictured below). It serves the four residential buildings which would be demolished for the Museum expansion project. The contract with the city states that the Lift station would be decommissioned with the acquisition of the lot. That results in the property on 241 Douglas Avenue being left without services, even if the de -designation or demolition were not to occur. Challenges associated with prohibitive cost for constructing a new private lift station to be financed and maintained by a single property owner, would likely result in the property being un-serviced and uninhabitable. Highlighted lift station located on 255 Douglas Avenue lot. Page 16 of 27 279 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 The applicant has also stated that, if successful with the removal of the designated property, they will produce Architecture Recordings of the character -defining elements of each residence (including the non - designated properties), prior to removal; undertaking the 3D scanning of the buildings (inside and out); and summarizing any known history associated with the residences. That information will subsequently be made available to the public. This is an entirely unique offering made by an applicant, to preserve the history of the buildings and stands far in excess of what has been offered by applicants in previous de - designations. The closest analogue is the addition of signage that references the History of the 111 King Street East property after demolition. Although not as effective as preserving our built heritage, it could help to diminish the irreparable loss of a designated Heritage building by allowing information previously private to be accessible to the general public, thus maintaining the memory of the residences that once stood in that area documented and safeguarded from complete loss. SUMMARY This is not a simple application, as the demolition of a Heritage Property is never advised or celebrated. However, the analysis of two Heritage buildings should be taken following the evaluation of their historical, architectural, and social benefits against each other. The return of the New Brunswick Museum to its historic setting with the expansions proposed and its subsequent Heritage designation undeniably represents a positive addition to Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area and the City of Saint John, not only because it involves the rehabilitation and protection of the original Historic building that hosted the Museum for decades (which represents a public benefit in and of itself), but also due to its enormous contribution to the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area, the community and the City as an educational, touristic and cultural resource. This application for the removal of 241 Douglas Avenue for demolition raises important questions about the inherent heritage value of a property and broader considerations around public benefits. The discussion, as it pertains to Heritage, consists of a soon -to -be designated building and an existing heritage building and it's measured in the architectural value of the structures and the broader contribution to the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Based on the assessment of the request and its alignment with the intent of Heritage By-law, staff are recommending approval of the request. RECOMMENDATION The intent of the By-law and through it, the Standards & Guidelines, prevent Staff from making any positive recommendation for the demolition of a designated Heritage building that would compromise the integrity of Heritage Conservation Areas. Considering however, the results of the evaluation between two designated buildings, the applicant's recognition of the importance of the Heritage Conservation program in providing protection to a rare example of Beaux-Arts architecture in the City and historical home of the New Brunswick Museum, the public access to the 3D scanning and documenting of history of the demolished properties and the positive contribution to the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area boundaries has convinced staff to make a positive recommendation to the Heritage Development Board. Recommended That The Heritage Development Board support the request for the removal of a property situated at 241 Douglas Avenue from the HC-1, The Saint John Heritage Conservation Areas By-law. Recommended That The Heritage Development Board support the request to incorporate clarifying language associated with an encroachment into the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. Page 17 of 27 280 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 ATTACHMENTS A: Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study conducted by Architect Michael R. Richard (241 Douglas Avenue and 277 Douglas Avenue — NBM) B. New Brunswick Museum (277 Douglas Avenue) and 241 Douglas Evaluation excerpted from Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study C. Submission Package D. Proposed expansion plan E. Letter of Intention to designate Page 18 of 27 281 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 A. Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study conducted by Architect Michael R. Richard INVENTORY D01UGLAWS AVENUE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLU STUDY IDENTIFICATION CHARACTER., AREA 1 PiRoP1a1 Y AbIJRSS.5 241 D-Ouglas AVIE,. R, I O'D379230 ZDH NGRK-I _ .'3RTGINAL- N_ &nse' WilllihmS CU V,'l 0WNZ;>iR_35 ORIGJNA • USE -- Owe, 11 n DESCRIPTION TXLE Italianate% vepnacular N�AS�,L�G d gr vorti�n, element koG.atio_'�. ryo ainpe vthm o! o�per��g� L rz SAI,IENjG 5 veWjndowsdohTs. dorrno ; rnne Al JaS f laav1 u n t rade§-,—]?a et QJ i3l 110116 RD tatl atu v ebv . _ d — . W i —1-1 1 - A iM.L rk ra l,� I R 1 12'1--1 k e s� C. +MG -5 -ter f1. .- ' r muncraYR 1>�a�F i trees, fenm2m, air ns at a era a F - �. - mil ADDITIONAL MOTES / SOURCES Michael R. Richard, Architect, for the City of 5aiht Ohn thrpogh the Parsservation Review Board and the Cormnun3.ty Planning DAP&rtment- Page 19 of 27 282 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 PHOMGRAPH roll lstr ipsneat.lre —_ EALATION HISTORICAL i a3a of hu ldina. __tbeocs.. parsonzinvent ] m r � r Page 20 of 27 283 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 INVENTORY DOUGLAS AVENUE HERITAGE MMAr*ZWNT PLAN STUDY IDENTIFICATION SZItARACT9E 4 PROPERIX ADDRES§277 Douglas Ave. 1,. R. 0037795Z ZONINC. ? ;GINAIJ pWNZRdd. 01 trie N,b. MUseLIM wT CWN N. .Hist.HesCaurces Admin HISTORIC AL TJSE useum E Ml�seum ARCHITECT o cme ONS R E 1034 DESCRIPTION Bpaux Arts HASSING f_. rQraortion element location, roof s51MP. rhythm cf Me!ni SAT IENT EtEMENTS verandah, porch. windows doors.. do er . ch i—Y , l ' ETAITA halustredes, br =ts nodallions, entablatures, V!Dr9ebiPArds 1 LANDSCAPE FEATUMS f trees fences.g+m'deng,_paths. hedgedriv-9—xaY—; ACCESSORY WILbIEGS r "."" barn tool shed. vuest hour AD DITI N L NOTE 1 SOURCES Michael R. Richard, Architect, for the City of Saint John through the Preservation Review Board and the Community Plsrining Department Page 21 of 27 Pi t,11 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 PHC} 7CE eCP f EVALUATION STREETSC&EE i continuity. laagnark ] Page 22 of 27 285 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 B. New Brunswick Museum (277 Douglas Avenue) and 241 Douglas Evaluation excerpted from Douglas Avenue Heritage Management Plan Study T°t�e rankings are divide6 into A. High B. Intermediate C. Low D. Post-1946 (Oon-historical proparty 147 DouglaB s A az 148 Douglas 1 C 61 149 DaugLas 1 Ei 60 152 DqugLas 1 A 74 153 Clouglas I. A 71 160 Dougl&s 1 A 71 161 DouglAv 1. B 70 159 Douglas 1 A 52- 170 Douglas 1 A 71 175 Doug l ag 1. A 78 176 Douglas 1 B 65 179 Douglas 1 13 64 100 Doug L as 1 A 77 1"-5 Douglas 1 C 50 186 Douglas 1 B 13a 157 Douglas I C 55 191-3 DougLas 1 C 51 195 Douglas I B 68 199 Douglas 1 C 59 197 Douglas 1 a 56 200 DQUgIas 1 A 75 201 Doug1 ar. 1 A 00 .202-4 Douglas 1 A 7g, 203 Douglas 1 C 5$ 206 Douglas 1 B 66 2D7 Douglas 1 B 74 209 Douglas i B 7Q 21Z Douglas i a L38 215 Douglas 1 A 76 216-a i+ougla$ 1 A 72 221-3 Douglas 1 A 77 222 DougIB.s i A 60 226 Douglas 1 A 55 22�6 Douglas 1 C 49 229 l3auglss 1 C 50 i3"� Fpqug I as 1 B 64 34 Douglas 1 C 6t 241 Douglas I C 63 247 Duugtas 1 B 65 246 Douglas 1 A 95 249 Douglas 1 C 54 254 Douglas 1 A 139 280 Douglas 1 B $4 261 Douglas I C 49 263 Douglas I C 5;9 270 Douglas 5 A 154 272 Douglas 3 A 72 274 Douglas 5 a 7Q 276 Douglas a A 71 277 Douglas 4 A 83 2$D DO Uglad 3 8 67 zez Douglas 3 A 73 2$4 Douglas; 3 A 84 UO UaUaIILa 3 A le Page 23 of 27 286 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 C. Submission Package Page 24 of 27 287 diamond schmitt 384 Adelaide Street West, Suite 100 Toronto, ON M5V 1R7 t: 416 862 8800 1050 West Pander Street, Suite 2010 Vancouver, BC V6E 3S7 t: 604 674 0866 1776 Broadway, Suite 2200 New York, NY 10019 t: 212 710 4329 www.dsai.ca info@dsai.ca Jennifer Kirchner Manager, Community Planning / Gestionnaire, Service D'Urbanisme City of Saint John I Ville de Saint John Cell / Cellulaire: (506) 639-7933 January 10, 2024 New Brunswick Museum - Re -zoning, Municipal Plan Amendment & Heritage De -designation Request Dear Jennifer, We have been working with the Board of the New Brunswick Museum on the preliminary planning and design for the exciting new museum project to be located at the original Douglas Ave. site. Please find below an outline of the purpose and rationale for this re -zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation application. The outline includes project summary, proposed zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation, site selection summary, design intent and community consultation strategy. Please find attached the following supporting documents and drawings: • List of properties forming application • Council Application • General Application • Consent letters from property owners • Request for heritage property de -designation • Parking Recommendations Report for the New Brunswick Museum • Traffic Impact Statement • Conceptual Sanitary & Water Demand • Site Plan • Site Plan — Demolished • Shadow Studies • Building Elevations* • Massing perspective* *Preliminary conceptual massing perspectives and elevations are included to indicate the general size, shape, and siting of the new museum. The design is being further developed and will integrate suggestions received during the Community Consultations sessions. Updated elevations and renderings will be provided as the design becomes more detailed. W-11.1j diamo6 schmit Project Summary The purpose of this planning application is to secure required re -zoning and Municipal Plan amendments for six (6) contiguous residential properties along Douglas Ave. Four (4) of the properties in question have reached an agreement for the transfer of ownership as part of a strategic acquisition of lands that will facilitate revitalization of the "Provincial Museum" building for the New Brunswick Museum (NBM). The other two (2) properties included in this application were previously acquired by The Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI). In addition to the rezoning and Municipal Plan amendments, this application also requests the removal of 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The properties included in this application will be consolidated with that of the Museum building (owned by the Province of New Brunswick) to form a single property and facilitate construction of the proposed addition to the existing Museum building. The design intent of the proposed addition will be presented in the following sections of this application to demonstrate alignment with the City of Saint John's growth and development goals and the Municipal Plan amendment process. The Museum's history in Saint John can be traced to the 1840's and is Canada's longest continuing museum facility. However, in 2022, the Market Square exhibition space (home of the NBM since 1996) was closed and there is presently no exhibits in operation until construction of the new facility has been completed. In January of last year, the NBM released a request for proposals for the design of a new facility to securely preserve and showcase New Brunswick's natural and cultural history. In early April 2023, it was announced Diamond Schmitt Architects (DSA) was selected to design the new facility. Since that time, the consultant team (DSA and EXP) has been diligently working toward breaking ground on the project; currently expected to begin in Spring 2024. The Archives & Research Library, Humanities & Natural History collection storage which has continued to operate from the Douglas Avenue "Provincial Museum" building has begun the process of relocating to a new off -site facility as the NBM prepares the building for the proposed renovation and addition. This significant project will not only stabilize the existing c.1930 building but return the museum to their original home as well. In doing so, securing the New Brunswick Museum's legacy for the next 100 years. Proposed Zoning and Municipal Plan Amendment The properties affected by this application are as follows: • 241 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379230) • 247 Douglas Ave. (PID 55172860) • 249 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379255) • 261 Douglas Ave. (PID 00377945) • 263 Douglas Ave. (PID 00358481) • 255 Douglas Ave. (PID 55222012) W:1'1 diamorr, schmitt Rezoning This application requests rezoning the six (6) properties (noted above) from Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to Major Community Facility (CFM). Rezoning will facilitate land consolidation required to build a state-of-the-art addition on the existing "Provincial Museum" building. Please refer to supporting materials for additional information on the proposed design. Comparison of the existing zoning to the proposed is demonstrated in the chart below. Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Major Community Facility (CFM) FRONT YARD 6m 5m REAR YARD 6m 7.5m SIDE YARD 1.5-2.5M 7.5M (DEPENDING ON RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY) FLANKAGE YARD 3.5m 7.5M MAXIMUM BUILDING 11 M 24M HEIGHT The development scale associated with the CFM zone is not unprecedented along Douglas Avenue. Similar land use and scale of building have existed previously along the corridor (ie. King George School and the Observatory, St. Peters Church). The neighbouring "Provincial Museum" museum property is already zoned CFM, as is Harbourview High School. Municipal Plan Amendment In addition to the proposed rezoning, this application also requires a Municipal Plan amendment; reassigning the residential lands (six properties previously identified) to Major Community Facility use. This request is supported by several policies under the Plan. Context Per the Municipal Plan (the Plan), Douglas Avenue is a "character corridor," identified as a place for ongoing investment in quality streetscaping and urban design, character corridors strengthen the quality of place in significant areas of the city. This investment along Douglas Avenue intends to maintain quality of the public realm (as it relates to the heritage context), as well as attract high quality development in the adjacent intensification areas. In addition to being along an important character corridor, the properties affected by this application are also part of a stable P4%I97 diam , schmi residential area that adjoins a large natural area to the west and heavy industrial to the east. The residential land use along Douglas Avenue is punctuated by two (2) historic institutional uses (The NB Museum and Harbourview High School), also designated Major Community Facilities under the Municipal Plan. Supported Rationale As noted by the Plan, stable Areas are intended to grow and evolve through minor change. The proposed renovation and addition to the "Provincial Museum" building is simply expanding the existing land use along Douglas Avenue thus reinstating the New Brunswick Museum to its historic home. Per the requirements of the CFM land use, key development/urban design goals and policies of the Plan, the proposed design intends to: • Contribute positively to the neighbourhood through high quality development and design excellence. • Use landscape design strategies that will enhance the site/ public realm and buffer the proposed addition from neighbouring residences. • Provide a universally accessible facility with an enhanced pedestrian arrival experience as well as better connection to the broader public realm along Douglas Avenue a new street facing entrance. • Leverage the existing transit corridor along Douglas Avenue, as well as active recreation (bike lanes) and connection to the South - Central Peninsula via Harbour Passage offered by the choice of site. • Demonstrate respect for the existing "Provincial Museum" building via setbacks, street wall, architectural massing, and materiality. • Leveraging existing topography to minimize changes to the existing context (ie. natural drainage patterns, existing areas of conservation and natural areas). • Contribute to the NBM's commitment to the cultural heritage of New Brunswick by rehabilitating the existing "Provincial Museum" building. • Providing a dedicated bus/ delivery areas at the interior of the site to minimize visual and traffic impacts to the neighbourhood. Economic Prosperity Tourism is a vitally important driver of the local and regional economy. As a key cultural asset, the New Brunswick Museum is an attractive destination for visitors, and residents alike. Furthermore, not only do schools and children benefit from the educational programming available, but museum spaces are popular event spaces (for weddings, conferences, etc.). Investment in the new facility ensures the NBM is retained in Saint John while also enabling its continued growth and operational success. NO-2 diam , schmi Major community facilities such as The New Brunswick Museum, contribute significantly to the quality of life, cultivating a strong sense of place and connection to history and our natural world. Moreover, a modern museum is more than space for a collection of objects, it provides a home for social engagement, education, culture, innovation, technology and more. Purpose built along Douglas Avenue almost 100 years ago, the residents of Saint John have never known the City without The New Brunswick Museum. The NBM site was strategically positioned at the top of Bentley Street, creating a view corridor between the site and Uptown. This project honors that 100 year old strategic decision, reinstalling the facility in its historic home. Request for De -designation — 241 Douglas Avenue Douglas Avenue is a broad tree lined street well known for the grand heritage homes that line it. They range in architectural style, however Italianate, Second Empire and Queen Anne are most prevalent. Constructed c.1881, the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is an example of the vernacular Italianate style. The house is two storeys' tall and features a prominent entry tower massing with a pavilion style hipped roof at the top. Ornamentation on the street facing fagade is generally consistent with the Italianate style, while other ornamentation— is of a simplified character consistent with a vernacular interpretation of the Italianate style. The Italianate style was hugely popular during the late 19th century in Canada. The style today is ubiquitous to the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area, as well as the City's other heritage areas . By comparison, the existing "Provincial Museum," is a late example of Beaux-Arts style designed by H. Claire Mott (son of preeminent Saint John -based architect H.H. Mott). The Museum building is unquestionably his most notable project. Defining heritage value of a building is not solely based upon architectural analysis. It is a holistic exercise informed by place (context), condition, evolution over time, and most importantly to this case - past and current importance to its community. The public importance of a purpose-built museum building (that is also of substantive architectural value) cannot be understated. 241 Douglas Avenue is a good candidate for de -designation from the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area when its heritage value is weighed against that of the Provincial Museum building, and the future public benefit having the NBM reinstated in its former home considered. Through a trade-off, the broader value (heritage and beyond) provided to the community by revitalizing the Provincial Museum building provides a sound argument for de -designation. diam , schmi Site Selection Process A Site Selection process was completed in the summer of 2023 and resulted in the selection of the historic Douglas Avenue site. Over the past 180 years, the Museum has acted as a custodian of the natural and human history of New Brunswick and its surrounding regions. By revitalizing the existing building and preserving its unique character, the Museum stays true to its ethos while also enriching the new museum experience and preserving a piece of history for the Saint John and New Brunswick community. The selection of the new museum site on Douglas Ave was a result of a thorough analysis and consideration of fundamental criteria that were weighted to ensure the success of the museum. The criteria considered included urban design connectivity, community benefits, economic considerations, site servicing, municipal planning objectives, site capacity, archaeological sites etc. Ultimately, the Douglas Ave. site was chosen as its merits relating to funding, operational and architectural criteria superseded any other possible sites. The Douglas Ave. site allows for seamless integration of the site design with adjacent parks and urban reserves, offering a significant benefit to the community. Additionally, the site provides excellent connectivity to Uptown Saint John through existing transit, cycle, and pedestrian routes, including the Harbour Passage, aligning perfectly with the planning goals of the City of Saint John. One notable feature of the Douglas Ave site is the breathtaking views it offers. To the west, there are stunning views of the Saint John River, while to the east, views of uptown Saint John, the Saint John Harbour, and beyond to the Bay of Fundy. The selection of the Douglas Ave site ensures that these remarkable views will once again be accessible to the entire community. New Brunswick Museum Design Intent The new design of the New Brunswick Museum will not only serve as a home for the museum but also as a destination venue for all New Brunswickers. The Facility will be the home of the NBM for the next century and beyond. The new Museum will play a crucial role in providing a safe and secure location for provincial collections and museological functions while also providing vibrant new exhibitions and public spaces. The new museum will be a first -choice destination for both the community and visitors, it will not only benefit tourism but will also serve as an inspiration for all age groups, igniting their creativity and curiosity. Through the selection of the Douglas Ave location, the existing museum building will be revitalised, and its re -use will be prioritized to enhance its existing qualities. The original museum building built in 1934 will be restored and principally maintained, as well as the south fagade of the King George Hall. The presence of the existing front steps will be retained and enhanced as a public benefit, while the placement of a new entrance will reveal the P4%Ic1 diam , schmi inherent architectural qualities of the existing building. The design approach will embrace the heritage of the original museum building while providing a contemporary addition that will meet the current and future needs of the museum. The integration of the facility into the landscape will be done sensitively, ensuring a harmonious relationship between the exterior elements of the site and the interior public space. The design will also prioritize the creation of inviting and accessible places and streetscapes. Safety, comfort, and enjoyment of the public realm will be enhanced, allowing for year-round interaction and enjoyment. The views, both at grade and from the rooftop terrace will offer visitors an experience, showcasing the Saint John River and harbor views. The new museum will respect and reinforce the existing and planned context in which it is located. This will be achieved through appropriate setbacks, landscaping, building entrance, massing, architectural style, and building materials. By doing so, the design will seamlessly integrate into the surrounding neighborhood and enhance the physical character of the area. The new addition to the Douglas Ave building will be sited to avoid any identified archaeological sites and it will avoid any encroachment on the Victoria Square Park. The new frontage will be articulated and setback from the street with consideration for the existing streetscape proportions and rhythm. Site services, loading and large group arrivals will be done seamlessly and discreetly on the north side of the museum, screened to mitigate disruption to Douglas Avenue streetscape. The new museum building will seek to embrace its existing context while offering a contemporary perspective. Through an inviting design, commitment to sustainability, and integration with the public realm, the museum will be an inspiring landmark that enhances the public experience and fosters a sense of community and connection. Community Consultations The community consultation strategy aims to foster local and Province -wide interest and enthusiasm for the new facility. The first round of community consultation sessions took place between September 9th and 28th, 2023. The Board of Directors of the New Brunswick Museum and the project design team engaged in sessions that took place in locations across the province and on Zoom, ensuring accessibility for as many individuals as possible. The locations included Saint John, Fredericton, Edmundston, Campbellton, Bathurst, Caraquet, Miramichi, Moncton, Province -wide Zoom. The goal was to provide an opportunity for citizens across New Brunswick to voice their opinions and contribute to the future of the NBM. The consultation sessions provided an opportunity for individuals to share their perspectives and contribute to the decision -making process. During the sessions participants engaged in interactive discussions, shared their ideas, and learned more about the project's overall mission and preliminary design concepts for the revitalized museum. The discussions were centered diam , schmi around crucial aspects such as the history and key characteristics of the site, urban design, community building elements, the relationship of museum interior spaces to the landscape and views, feature elements, materials, as well as public art. A community consultation summary report is being prepared and will be provided to the City, to accompany this planning application. P"01 exp. March 13, 2024 Heritage Development Board of Saint John C/O Rodrigo Mendes Campos, Heritage Analyst Growth & Community Services City of Saint John RE: Request for Removal — 241 Douglas Avenue R5 To the Heritage Development Board: AANB Architects Jean -Philippe Foisy Alexandre Clermont Monique Dame Aleno Fisher Michele Mikic Stephen Outerbridge Colin Turner Melissa Wakefield FRE-23004019-AO Please accept this letter requesting removal of 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The residential property is currently undergoing a transfer of ownership as part of the strategic acquisition of lands that will facilitate revitalization of the "Provincial Museum" building for the New Brunswick Museum. Of the six (6) adjacent properties acquired by the Museum, 241 Douglas Avenue is the sole heritage designated property. The properties will be consolidated with that of the Museum building to form a single property. De -designation of 241 Douglas Avenue (in conjunction with rezoning process, etc.) is necessary to enable consolidation, and facilitate expansion of building footprint. The Museum's history in Saint John can be traced to the 1840's and is Canada's longest continuing museum facility. The Douglas Avenue facility officially opened in 1934, coinciding with the sesquicentennial of the founding of New Brunswick in 1784. The New Brunswick Museum (NBM) operated out of the Douglas Avenue until 1996 at which time its exhibitions moved to Market Square. Since then, the Douglas Avenue building has been home to The Collections Centre, the Archives and Research Library, and the Museums' head office. Operations at the facility are now winding down as NBM prepares the building for a major renovation and addition designed by Diamond Schmitt Architects. This significant project will not only stabilize the existing c.1930 building but return the exhibitions to their original home as well. In doing so, securing the New Brunswick Museum's legacy for the next 100 years in Saint John. —�, w;,,+ing Residence Constructed c.1881, the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is an example of the vernacular Italianate style. The house is two storeys' tall and features an expressed entry tower massing with a pavilion style hipped roof at the top. Ornamentation on the street facing facade is of a simplified 1 Germain Street, Suite 1209, Saint John, NB, E2L 4V1, Canada t: +1.506.646.8020 f: +1.506.646.8025 www.exp.com P06Z.1 New Brunswick Museum Renovation & Addition Request for Removal - 241 Douglas Ave March 13, 2024 character consistent with a vernacular interpretation of the Italianate style. A one storey ell located at the rear of the building is also present, likely added sometime in the first 60 years of the original building construction. Archival research available is notably limited for this property, with no records found in the Historic Register, nor the New Brunswick Provincial Archives. One brief record on the existing building via the City of Saint John was retrieved by the consultant team. This record was used to validate the consultant teams own architectural analysis of the existing residence. Heritage Context Douglas Avenue is a long-established avenue connecting the historic towns of Portland and Lancaster. The broad, tree lined street is largely a residential corridor punctuated by several public institutions including The New Brunswick Museum, Harbour View High School, as well as places of worship. Douglas Avenue has also seen the loss of several notable landmarks over the years including King George School, the Observatory building, and most recently St. Peter's Church. Other structures have evolved and/ or found new life — such as the conversion of the Butter -Nut Bread Bakery into a multi -unit residential building and additions to The New Brunswick Museum building. The historic residences of Douglas Avenue (typically) are distinctly grand, sitting on large, landscaped parcels of land (compared to the South -Central Peninsula). They range in architectural style, however Italianate, Second Empire and Queen Anne are most prevalent. A few notable examples of the Greek Revival style remain as well. Most buildings are three (3) stories in height and are set back from the street some distance, though this varies substantially building to building. The Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area is non-contiguous. As the Board will know, challenges with non-contiguous conservation areas have contributed to other successful de - designation and/ or demolition requests along Douglas Avenue in recent years. Where the subject site is not located in the middle of a contiguous block of designated properties, rather at the end of designated block, de -designation of 241 Douglas Avenue does not interfere with the comprehensive integrity of the Douglas Avenue Conservation Area as a whole. The nearest heritage designated property (with a building present) along the western street wall of Douglas Avenue is approximately 300 meters away. Heritage Value The Italianate style was hugely popular during the late 19th century in Canada. The flurry of construction in the years after the Great Fire of 1877 provided Saint John with dozens of notable examples and interpretations of the style, in both wood and masonry. The style today is ubiquitous to the heritage conservation areas; a survey of the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area reveals (of 42 heritage designated properties) 28% are Italianate in style. A cursory review of the south-central peninsula conservation areas indicates an even higher percentage of Italianate style buildings. Most Italianate style buildings in the conservation areas can also be classified as vernacular interpretations due to their wood construction, simplified use of ornamentation, as well as use of borrowed elements from other architectural styles of the time. Page 2 of 4 P4%tl New Brunswick Museum Renovation & Addition Request for Removal - 241 Douglas Ave March 13, 2024 Therefore, the building at 241 Douglas Avenue is of average architecture value; being neither exemplary nor unique. Public Benefit Per the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, understanding heritage value is not based on architectural value alone. To understand a historic place requires a holistic review of place (context), condition, evolution over time, as well as past and current importance to its community, an essential step of good conservation practice. The New Brunswick Museum has been a cultural cornerstone in New Brunswick for over 180 years offering the public access to its rich and varied collections of natural and human history. The Museum has also played a significant role in the preservation and promotion of the region's cultural and natural heritage, identity, as well as in the education and engagement of generations of visitors and residents. While the "Provincial Museum" building itself is a rarefied example of the Beaux-Arts style, the revitalization project ensures the continued importance of the institution within the community. Conclusion The building located at 241 Douglas Avenue is a good candidate for de -designation when the public benefit of having the NBM reinstated in its former home considered. None the less, the proposed loss of a heritage building is not to be taken likely. When preparing a building for de -designation and ultimately its demolition, an architectural recording can safeguard the heritage of a place from being lost to history. The New Brunswick Museum, as proponents of this project, are committed to completing heritage recordings of each residence — heritage designated or not — prior to their removal. The NBM is proposing to undertake the following steps out of respect of the historical contribution of the building to the urban fabric of Saint John - • Complete a 3D scan of each residential building — both inside and outside. • Conduct an architectural recording of character defining elements at each building— both inside and outside. • Summarize any known history (people or events of significance) associated with the residences (if applicable). The NBM is committed to providing public access to historical records. As such, the data collected from affected properties will be made available to the public as part of the NBM's Archives and Research Library at a future date. In doing so, the heritage value of these private homes will become public for the first time. Thank you for your consideration of this important request. On behalf of Diamond Schmitt Architects Inc. and The New Brunswick Museum, d4_a Mel sa Wakefield, AANB, OAA Discipline Manager Architecture - Saint John I Architect Page 3of4 P4'1:j EXP Architects Inc. New Brunswick Museum Renovation & Addition Request for Removal - 241 Douglas Ave March 13, 2024 `A,iiV P. p��1 Page 4of4 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 D. Proposed Expansion plan Page 25 of 27 300 s CD E 25 M 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 E. Letter of Intention to designate NEW BRUNSWICK MUSEE DLJ MUSEUM NOUVEAU-BRUNSWICK DearJennifer Kirchner, As New Brunswick's preeminent Heritage Institution, I am writing this letter to confirm the New Brunswick Museum's commitment to conserving the Heritage of New Brunswick as part of the Revitalize NBM project which aims to provide a world -class museum to highlight the Natural and Human heritage of New Brunswick to the world. Your recent note on the merits of des 1 g nati ng the New Brunswick Museum as a municipal heritage site, cites the Heritage Conservation Act as a reason to focus on the Built Heritage designation. The Heritage Conservation Act does indeed recognize Built Heritage, but it also highlights the importance of conserving and commemorating archaeological, paleontological and social heritage. one of the reasons it has been so difficult to pursue a continued use of our historical home at 277 Douglas Avenue has been the limitations imposed by our commitment to preserve the Indigenous heritage of this significantsite. Because this site has been an important focus for human occupation, ceremony and sacred use over the past8,000 years we have committed to avoiding impacts to these sites, now and into the future. This commitment to the conservation of the Province's heritage represents a considerable increased cost to the overall project, but we feed that the significance of these heritage sites warrant the Jong —term conservation of these provincially significant heritage resources. We are currently working with our project architects and engineers to ensure as much of the original structure as possible can be conserved as part of the new facility. The fagade, and major original elements of the interior are being conserved as part of this work. The New Brunswick Museum commitsto reconimendingdesignation of the original exterior eiementsfor heritage designation once the project is completed. We feel that as per your suggestion, the designation of a building as significantasthe 1934 Douglas Avenue Museum represents a form of mitigation for the loss of the single dwelling which is part of the current Heritage District. We further carnrnitto fully documenting all of the heritage structures (designated or otherwise)which may be impacted by our proposed project. The structures will be 3D scanned )internal and external), photographed and sampled to ensure a permanent record exists. of the structuresas part of the Archives of the New Brunswick Museum. These recordswtil be available to allvisitorsin perpetuity. Your citing of the Heritage Conservation Act is to be applauded, as itwas developed with direct input from New Brunswick citizens who stressed that conservation of heritage resources must include consideration of natural, human and built heritage. In this light, we hope that the city wi II consider revisiting its heritage by[aw to include the other important heritage resources defined by the H e ritag e Conse rvation Act. The Indigenous heritage sites in Page 26 of 27 302 241 Douglas Avenue 24-0185 April 3, 2024 and around the Museum currently are protected by the Heritage Conservation Act and as such it is our intent to develop a conservation plan for thesesites "in partnership with First Nations and the Province of New Brunswick. We look forward to continuing to work with your heritage Bea rdto promote the continued conservation of the provinces non-renewable heritage. Respectfully, Brent Suttie, MA Chief {operating DfEicer/Chef des operations Director of Research/Directeur de la recherche New Brunswick Museum/Musee du Nouveau -Brunswick Page 27 of 27 303 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-135 Report Date May 07, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Repair of Unsightly Conditions at 80 Main Street AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Benn Purinton A Poffenroth / C McKiel J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council direct one or more of the Officers appointed and designated by Council for the enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law to clean-up the premises and repair the unsightly, dilapidated conditions on the building located at 80 Main Street (PID# 00374108). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise Council that a Notice to Comply was issued under Part 13 of the Local Governance Act for the building and premises located at 80 Main Street. The unsightly conditions outlined in the Notice have not been remedied by the owner within the required time frame and staff is looking for authorization from Council to arrange clean-up of the premise and repair of the unsightly, dilapidated conditions on the building. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A REPORT The Unsightly Repair Program, launched in 2023 under the Community Enhancement Project, provides City staff with an enforcement tool for vacant buildings with non -hazardous unsightly conditions. Under the program, City staff may issue a Notice to Comply that requires an owner of a vacant building to repair EcZiL! -2- unsightly exterior conditions within a specified timeframe. By doing so, staff can require owners to invest time and money in a vacant building that may otherwise be neglected. The goal is to accelerate owner timelines, potentially prompting a full repair or a sale. The program allows the City staff to address unsightly issues that detract from community pride, repairing conditions like peeling paint, missing siding and broken windows. If the owner does not comply with the timeline provided, City staff can arrange for repair of any unsightly conditions if approved by Common Council. Costs associated with these repairs are billed to the owner. If the bill goes unpaid, the costs are reimbursed to the City bythe Province and added to the next property tax bill. In spring 2023, Notices to Comply for unsightly repair were issued on three properties and have been mostly successful. Two of the owners who were issued Notices are actively working towards compliance with repairs currently ongoing. It is anticipated that work on both properties will continue until completion and City action will not be required. The third property, 80 Main Street, received partial compliance from the owner, but no further action has been taken. 80 Main Street The two -storey, single-family home at 80 Main Street has been monitored under the City's Dangerous and Vacant Building Program since 2020. The property is located in the City's North End and is currently assessed at $111,800 as per Service New Brunswick's Land Registry. A Notice to Comply which outlined unsightly conditions at the property was issued and posted to the building on April 13, 2023. The conditions identified in the Notice included peeling and missing paint, a dilapidated chimney and broken windows, among other items. Also included in the Notice was a structurally unsound garage at the rear of the property that needed to be demolished. The Notice provided the owner with 120 days to remedy the conditions at the property. The owner did not file a Notice of Appeal within the time frame provided. In the time since the Notice was issued, the partially collapsed garage at the rear of the property was demolished, the dilapidated chimney was removed, a broken window was repaired and a small section of missing siding was replaced. However, the owner has not addressed the peeling or missing paint on the building and has -3- provided no plans to do so. If approved, City staff will arrange for scraping and repainting of the affected areas, as well as clean-up of some debris remaining on the property. Attached for Council's reference is the Notice to Comply that was issued and the affidavit attesting to service. A copy of the letters advising of the Common Council Hearing date is attached. The letters were posted to the front door of the buildings on April 23, 2024. Also included are photos of each building. A report is attached, forming part of the issued Notice to Comply, and provides evidence of the unsightly conditions at the buildings. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law aligns with Council's Belong priority. Unsightly vacant buildings devalue neighbouring properties and diminish community pride. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Total cost of the repair work for the property is estimated at $6,000. Upon approval of the recommendation, staff will seek competitive bidding in accordance with the City's purchasing policy. The cost of the work will be billed to the property owner and if left unpaid, it will be submitted to the Province with a request for reimbursement. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS General counsel registered the Notice to Comply with Service New Brunswick's Land Registry. ATTACHMENTS Affidavit of Service — Notice to Comply Affidavit of Service — Notice of Common Council Hearing Letter Photos KiiZ.1 CANADA PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK COUNTY OF SAINT JOHN CITY OF SAINT JOHN IN THE MATTER OF THE BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED AT (0 S , Saint John, N.B. (PID number 3 7 `t L0 � ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, 9j, Llhlorz , of the City of Saint John in the County of Saint John and the Province of New Brunswick MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS: On the 13* day of A 2023 at approximately to 0 , I posted the following documents: • a Notice to Comply, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" • and a Notice of Appeal, attached i hereto as Exhibit "B" to the building at Main Ste- , Saint John, N.B. Sworn To me at the City of Saint John, N.B. on the 13 4-k day of 2023 PAMELA M H BENTLEY COMMISSIONER OF OATHS fp CEM Eg RS3Y8 2023 191irl FORM 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY — DANGEROUS OR UNSIGHLTY PREMISES (Local Governance Act, S.N.B., 2017, c.18, s 132(2)) Parcel identifier: PID # 00374108 Address: 80 Main Street, Saint John, NB Owner(s) or Occupier(s): Name: Lisha Lin Address: 2246 Kingston Road, Toronto, ON, MIN 1T9 FORMULE 4 AVIS DE CONFORMITL` — LIEUX DANGEREUX OU INESTHETIQUES (Loi sur la gouvernance locale, L.N.-B. 2017, ch. 18, par.132(2)) Numiro d'identitication de la parcelle : NID .00374108 Adresse : 80 rue Main. Saint John, NB Propri6taire(s) on occupant(s) : Nom : Lisha Lin Adresse : 2246 rue Kingston, Toronto, ON, MIN IT9 Local government giving notice: The City of Saint Gouvernement local signifiant Pavis : The City of John. Saint John. By-law contravened: Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By -Law, By- law Number M-30 and amendments thereto (the "By- law"). Provision(s) contravened: Subsections 6(I) and 6(3) of the By-law. Conditions(s) that exist: The premises are unsightly by permitting junk, rubbish, refuse and a dilapidated building to remain on the premises. The garage attached to the building has become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation and unsoundness of structural strength. The conditions of the building, garage and premises are not in compliance with the standards provided for pursuant to the By-law. The conditions of the building, garage and premises are described in Schedule "A", a true copy of the inspection report dated April 13, 2023 prepared by Benn Purinton, by-law enforcement officer, reviewed and concurred in by Pamela Bentley, P. Eng., by-law enforcement officer. What must be done to correct the condition: The owner is to remedy the conditions by complying with the required remedial actions of the aforementioned inspection report and bring the building, garage and premises into compliance with the aforesaid By-law. In the event that the owner does not remedy the condition of the building, garage and premises in the time prescribed by this Notice to Comply, the garage may be demolished as the corrective action to address the hazard to the safety of the public and the premises may be cleaned up. The building may be repaired as the corrective action to address the unsightly condition and the premises may be cleaned up. In the event of demolition, all debris and items on the premises will be disposed of as the corrective action to address the hazard to the safety of the public. TNs Is Exhlbit h /)- f r Referred to in�)e AHida t of Sworn before me at the City of Saint John, New &VnSwiqk A'�ey'�Of Oaths Arrete enfreint : Arree relatif aux lieux ines►hetigues et aux b6timents et constructions dangereux de Saint John, Arrete= nuntdro M-30, ainsi que ses modifications ci-affdrentes (1'« Arretd >>). Disposition(s) enfreinte(s) : Les paragrapher 6(1) et paragraphe 6(3) de 1'Arretd. Description de la (des) situation(s) : Les lieux sont inesth6tiques en permettant la presence de ferraille, de detritus, de d6chets et le batiment ddlabre. Le garage attach6 au batiment est devenu dangereuse pour la sdcuritd du public du fait de son 6tat d6labrement et de son manque de solidite. Les conditions du batiment, du garage et des lieux ne sont pas en conformitd selon les standards prdvus dans I'Arretd. Les conditions du batiment, du garage et des lieux sont decrites A I'annexe « A », une copie conforme du rapport d'inspection en date du 13 avril 2023 et prdpard par Benn Purinton, une agente chargd de I'exdcution des am6t& du gouvemement local, r6vis6 et en d'accorde avec par Pamela Bentley, ing., une agente chargd de 1'exdcution des arretds du gouvernement local. Ce qu'il y a lieu de faire pour y remidier: La propri6taire doit restaurer les conditions en se conformant aux recommandations du rapport d'inspection susmentionn6 et d'amener le batiment, le garage et les lieux en conformit6s avec I'Arretd. Dans 1'6ventualitd que fa propri6taire ne rem6dient pas le batiment, le garage et les lieux daps le temps prescrit par le pr6sent avis de conformit6, le garage pourront 8tre ddmolis ou r6pares comme mesure corrective compte tenu qu'il represents un danger pour la s6curitd du public et les lieux pourront titre nettoyds. Le batiment pourra titre r6pares comme mesure corrective pour rem6dier a I'dtat inesthdtique et les lieux pourront titre nettoyds. Dans 1'6ventualitd de ddmolition, tous les debris et autres items sur les lieux seront dispos6s comme mesure corrective dans le but de rem6dier le danger pour la s6curitd du public. PAMELA M H BENTLEY COMMISSIONER OF OATHS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMBER 3VS 2023 I: The aforementioned remedial actions relating to the demolition of the garage and the disposal of debris and items on the premises do not include the carry -out clean- up, site rehabilitation, restoration of land, premises or personal property or other remedial action in order to control or reduce, eliminate the release, alter the manner of release or the release of any contaminant into or upon the environment or any part of the environment. Les mesures correctives susmentionnees relativement a la demolition du garage et la disposition des debris et autres items sur les lieux ne comprennent pas le nettoyage, la remise en dtat des lieux, des terrains ou des biens personnels ou toute autre mesure corrective dans le but de controler ou de reduire, d'eliminer le deversement, de modifier le mode de deversemen(ou le deversement d'un polluant dans ou sur 1'environnement ou toute partie de 1'environnement. Date before which the condition must be corrected:' Delai imparti pour y remedier : ' a) The clean-up of the property must be completed within 45 days of being served with the Notice to Comply. b) The demolition or repair of the garage and the repair related remedies to the building must be completed within 120 days of being served with the Notice to Comply. a) Le nettoyage des lieux doivent etre completees dans les 45 jours qui suivent la signification de I'avis de conformitd. b) La demolition ou r6paration du garage et les reparations reliees au batiment doivent etre completees dans les 120 jours qui suivent la signification de I'avis de conformitd. Date for giving notice of appeal: Within 14 days of Date limite pour donner Pavis d'appel: Dans les 14 being served with the Notice to Comply. jours qui suivent la notification de I'avis de conformitd. Process to appeal: The owner may within 14 days after having been served with this Notice to Comply, send a Notice of Appeal by registered mail to the City Clerk of The City of Saint John, City Hall — 2nd Floor, 15 Market Square, Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L 1. Potential penalty for not complying with notice within time set out in notice:'- Subsection l 1( I) of the By-law states that a person who fails to comply with the terms of a Notice to Comply given under section 7 of the said By-law, commits an offence that is punishable under Part 2 of the Provincial Offences Procedure Act as a category F offence. Where an offence under subsection 1 l(I) continues for more than one day, the minimum fine that may be imposed is the minimum fine set by the Provincial Offences Procedure Act for a category F offence multiplied by the number of days during which the offence continues pursuant to subparagraph I I(3)(b)(i). Local government's authority to undertake repairs or remedy:' Paragraphs 12(1)(a) and 12(1)(c) of the By- law state that if an owner or occupier does not comply with a Notice to Comply given under section 7 within the time set out in the said Notice, the City may, cause the premises of that owner or occupier to be cleaned up or repaired, or cause the building or other structure of that owner or occupier to be repaired or demolished. Further, subsection 12(3) of the By-law states that the cost of carrying out such work, including any associated charge or fee, is chargeable to the owner or occupier and becomes a debt due to the City. Processus d'appel : La proprietaire peux dons les 14 jours qui suivent la notification de I'avis de conformitd, envoye on avis d'appel par courrier recommande a la greffii re de la municipalite, a The City of Saint John, Edifice de I'hotel de ville, 21 dtage, 15 Market Square, Saint John, Nouveau -Brunswick, E2L 4L 1. Peine possible en cas d'omission de se conformer aux exigences de ('avis dans le ddlai y imparti : , Le paragraphe 11(1) de I' Arrete prevoit quiconque omet de se conformer aux exigences fotmuldes dans on avis de conformitd notifid aux termes de ]'article 7 de ladite Arrdtd, commet one infraction qui est punissable en vertu de la partie 2 de la Loi sur la procedure applicable aux infractions provinciales a litre d'infraction de [a classe F. Lorsqu'une infraction prdvue au paragraphe Il(1) se poursuit pendant plus d'une joumee, I'amende minimale qui peut etre imposee est I'amende minimale prdvue par la Lai sur la procedure applicable aux infractions provinciales pour one infraction de ]a classe F multiplied par le nombre de jours pendant lesquels ('infraction se poursuit conformement a i'alinda 1 I(3)b)i). Pouvoir du gouvernement local d'entreprendre des reparations ou de remddier a la situation : 3 Conformement aux alindas 12(1)a) et 12(1)c) de I'Arrete, si on avis de conformitd a dtd signifid aux termer de I'article 7 de ladite Arretd et, que le proprietaire ou l'occupant ne se conforme pas a cet avis de conformitd dans le ddlai imparti et tel qu'il est repute confirmd en vertu le paragraphe 12(3) de ladite Arrete, la municipalite peut faire nettoyer ou rdparer les lieux de cc proprietaire ou de cet occupant ou de faire reparer ou ddmolir le batiment ou autre construction de cc proprietaire ou de cet occupant, et les touts affdrents a 1'execution des ouvrages, y compris toute redevance ou tout droit connexe, sont mis a la charge du proprietaire ou de ]'occupant et deviennent one crdance de la municipalite. CM Dated at Saint John on the Q day of April, 2023. Local government: The City of Saint John. Signature of the officer of the local government: Fait a Saint John le _ avril 2023. Gouvernement locale: The City of Saint John. Signature du fonctionnaire du gouvernement local: Contact information of the officer of the local Coordonnees du fonctionnaire du gouvernement government: local: Name: Benn Purinton Mailing address: Growth and Community Services The City of Saint John 15 Market Square City Hall Building, I" Floor P. O. Box 1971 Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L1 Telephone: (506) 658-2911 E-mail: benn.punnton@saintjohn.ca Fax: (506) 632-6199 Corporate seal of the local government Notes: I. All appropriate permits must obtained and all relevant legislation must be complied with in the course of carrying out the required remedial action. Nom : Benn Purinton Adresse postale: Service de Ia Croissance et du Communautaire The City of Saint John 15 Market Square Edifice de I'h6tel de ville, 11 etage Case postale 1971 Saint John (Nouveau -Brunswick) E2L 4L1 Telephone : (506) 658-2911 Adresse dlectronique: benn.purinion@saintjohn.ca Telecopieur : (506) 632-6199 Sceau du gouvernement local Notes : 1. Tous les permis prescrits doivent eire obtenus et toute la 16gislation peninente doit ere respect6e pendant 1'ex6culion des mesures de rernt5diation. 2. Payment of the fine does not alleviate the obligation to comply 2. Le paiement de I'amende n'a pas pour effel d'annuler with the by-law, standard or notice. ('obligation de se conformer 3 I'arretd. A la norme ou 3 I'avis. 3. Costs become a debt due to the local government and may be 3. Les touts deviennent une cr6ance du gouvememem local et added to the joint local government and provincial Real Property peuvent are ajoui& h I'avis commun d'dvaluation et d'imp6t Assessment and Tax Notice. fonder des gouvernements local et provincial. 310 t hereby certify that the document is a true copy of & INSPECTION REPORT oria , al. Schedule "A" 80 Main Street Dated at Saint 3ohm Saint John, New Brunswick th's day of P1D#O0374I08 Q r:r 20-4 Inspection Date: March 20, 2023 Inspection Conducted By: Berm Purinton, EIT ()flit er Introduction Inspection of the property. PID#00374108, revealed that there is one building on the premises (the "Premises"); a two -storey, wood -framed, two -unit apartment building (the "Building") with an attached garage (the "Garage'"). The properly is located in the City's North End in a residential zone. The Premises has become unsightly due it presence of junk, rubbish and refuse and due to the dilapidated condition of the Building. The Garage has become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation and by reason of unsoundness of structural strength. Discussion The Premises do not comply with the Sahrt John Unsi,qht/r Prendse., and Dangerous Buildings and Structures &-lute, By-law Number M-30, and amendments thereto (the "By-law"). Unsightly Premise Conditions Subsection 6(I) of the By-law state,: No person shall permit premises owned or occupied by him or her to be unsightly by permitting to remain on any part of"such premises. a) any ashes, junk, rubbish or refuse, b) an accumulation of wood shavings, paper, sawdust or other residue of production or construction, c) it derelict vehicle, equipment, machinery or the body of any part of a vehicle equipment or machinery, or d) a dilapidated building. The Premises The Premises are a 6600-sgl'i property located in the City's North End Ironting Main Street, 1. There is junk, rubbish, and refuse dispersed throughout the Premises. The junk is primarily composed of old furniture. The junk, rubbish Lind refuse are unsightly and must he removed from the property. Disposal of these items must take place at an approved solid waste disposal site, in accordance with all applicable by-laws, acts and regulations. The Building The Building is a 2-storey, 2-unit, wood -framed apartment building. Its exterior cladding is composed of fiber -cement siding. There is wood trim around windows and doors. The Building's fascia is made of wood and there are architectural elements on the front fa4ade made of wood. The front fagade has a mansard style roof with two large dormers. The Building has both wood -frame and aluminum4rame windows. There are aluminum screen doors present at all entrances. 2. There is it section of exterior cladding missing from the right side of Building. 311 Any loose of- broken cladding must he repaired or replaced, and any missing cladding must he replaced. 3. There are various instances of peeling paint on the wood element~ throughout the Building. This includes the wood trim around window,, and doors, the wood framing within windows and the wood architectural elements on the Front far ade and the wood fascia. Some area% have peeled to an extent that paint is missing entirely. All peeling paint must be scraped and repainted and any areas with missing paint must be repainted. 4- The glass in the Building's front screen door is broken. The dilapidated front door must be repaired or replaced. 5. The exterior portion of the Building's brick chimney is dilapidated. There is a significant amount of mortar missing on all sides. The exterior dilapidated portion of the brick chimney must be repaired, removed or replaced. 4. A section of the Building's mansard roof is dilapidated. There is a large accumulation of moss on the asphalt roof shingles between the two dormers. The dilapidated section of the Building's mansard 1-001' must be repaired or replaced. Dilapidated & Structurally Unsound Building Conditions Subsection 6(3) of the By-law gates: No person shall permit if building or other structure owned or occupied by the person to become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or unsoundness of strucuu•al strength. The Garage is a hazard to the safety of- the public by reason of dilapidation and by reason of unsoundness of structural strength as follows: The Garage The Garage is approximately 14-ft x 144t in sire attached to the rear left corner of the Building. 7. The Garage is partially collapsed and at risk oft! , urlher collapse. The center of the Garage roofis sagging significantly and within the Garage, detached framing members are visible. If the Garage were to fully collapse, it could injure any individual in close proximity. The Garage must be demolished or fully repaired in order to remove the hazardous conditions it presents. If the Garage is demolished, any damage or unsightly condition present at the section of the Building where the Garage is attached must be repaired. Required Remedial Actions The owner must remedy the conditions of the Building and Garage, and clean up the Premises as lol lows: I. The Building must be repaired to remedy the above -mentioned unsightly conditions while meeting the requirements of the NeW nta! Building Code o/'Canada (2015) as well as all other applicable by-laws. 312 2. A building permit must he obtained Irom the City of Saint John for any and all applicable work prior to commencing said work in order to comply with the BuildingBy-law, By-law Number BC -I, and amendments thereto (the "Building By-law"). 3. The Garage must be demolished or repaired to remove the hazardous condition~. 4. The Premises must be cleared of the debris from the demolition and the lot must be reasonably level with grade so as to not create a tripping or falling hazard. All debris must be disposed of at an approved solid waste disposal site, and in accordance with all applicable By-lawS, Acts and Regulations. 5. The Premises must be cleaned up by removing and disposing of all junk, rubbish and refuse at an approved solid waste disposal site, and in accordance with all applicable By -Laws, Acts and Regulations. 6. Documented proof that clearly demonsu•atcs that an approved solid waste disposal site was used for disposal of the debris, junk, rubbish and refuse must he provided to the Department. Prepared by: Bern Purinton, EIT Technical Services Ol'ticer Growth and Community Services Reviewed and concurred in by: Pamela Bentley, P.Eng. Technical Services Engineer Growth and Canmunity Services Afycj 131, 2,07 Date Da e 313 Schedule "B" FORM 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL File No.: BETWEEN: Appellant(s), - and - THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, Respondent. Parcel Identifier : PID # Parcel Address: Owner(s) or Occupier(s): Name: Address: Telephone: Name: Address: Annexe o B FORMULE I AVIS WAPPEL N° du dossier ENTRE: Appelant(s), -et- THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, Intimee. Numero d'identification de la parcelle : # NID Adresse de la parcelle : Proprietaire(s) ou occupant(s) Nom : Adresse : Telephone: Nom : Adresse Telephone: Telephone: The above named appellant(s) is (are) not satisfied L'appelant ou les appelants susnommd(s) n'accepte(nt) with the terms and conditions set out in: pas les modalites ou les conditions qui sont enonces dans : (a) a Notice that was given under section 7 of the (a) un AVIS qui a cte donne en vertu de Particle 7 de Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous I'Arrete relatif aux lieux inesthetiques et aux Buildings and Structures By -Law; or b6timents et constructions dangereux dons The City of Saint John; ou (h) an Order that was issued under section 25 of the (b) une ORDONNANCE qui a ete emise en vertu de Saint John Minimum Property Standards By- Particle 25 de I'Arrete concernant les normes Law; minimales regissont les residences de Saint John and therefore appeals to the Saint John Substandard et fait ainsi appel dcvant le C'omiM des appels sur les Properties Appeal Committee. residences non conformes aux normes de Saint John. This is Exhibit "JR k The appellant's grounds for this W,- kt 4o jWVa&Vj& motifs d'appel de I'appelant(s) dans le present (set out the grounds clearly but sont les suivants (enoncer les motifs de./aVon Sworn before me at the City of Saint,lghn, Nets, PAMELA M H BENTLEY the dey of COMMISSIONER OF OATHS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Commissioner - DECEMBER 318; 2p23 -2- Dated at the , 20 Signature of owner or occupier claire e1 concise) ; day of Fait a The appellant(s) intends to proceed in the English [ ] or French [ ] language (Please check the appropriate box). 20 Signature du propridtaire ou de ('occupant le L'appelant a ou les appelants ont ('intention d'utiliser la langue francaise [ ] ou anelaise [ ] (Veuillez cocker la case appropriee). Please forward your Notice of Appeal by registered Veuillez faire parvenir volre ,jV1-V D'APPF1. par courrier mail to the City Clerk within fourteen (14) days after recommande au greffier municipal dans les quatorze having been given the Notice or Order at the (14) jours qui suivent la notification de 1 Aills ou de following address: 1 'ORDONNANCF 0 1 •adresse suivante City Clerk's Office 15 Market Square, City Hall Building, 2n1 Floor P. O. Box 1971 Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L 1 Telephone: 506-65 8-2862 Facsimile: 506-674-4214 Notes: 1. A Notice or Order that is not appealed within fourteen (14) days after having been given or issued shall be deemed to be confirmed. Bureau du greffier municipal 15 Market Square, Edifice de I'h6tel de ville, 2' dtage Case postale 1971 Saint John (Nouveau -Brunswick) E2L 4L1 T616phone : 506-658-2862 Facsimile: 506-674-4214 Notes : 1. Un AVIS ou une ORDONNANCE dont it West pas interjetd appel dans les quatorze (14) jours qui suivent la notification de I'AVIS ou I'dmission de I'ORDONNANCE est rdputd confirme. 2. On an appeal, the Saint John Substandard 2. Lors d'un appel, le Comile des appels .stir les Properties Appeal Committee shall hold a hearing residences non conformes aux normes de Saint John into the matter at which the owner(s) or occupier(s) doit tenir, sur le point en litige, une audience au cours bringing the appeal has (have) a right to be heard and de laquelle le(s) propridtaire(s) ou l'occupant ou les may be represented by counsel. occupants qui interjette(nt) appel a (ont) le droit d'etre entendu(s) et peut (peuvent) se faire representer par un avocat. 3. On an appeal, the Saint John Substandard 3. Lors d'un appel, le Comite des appels sur les Properties Appeal Committee may confirm, modify residences non conformes aux normes de Saint John or rescind the Notice or Order, or extend the time for peut confirmer, modifier ou annuler I'AVIS Ou complying with the Notice or Order. I'ORDONNANCE ou proroger le delai pour s'y conformer. 4. The Saint John Substandard Properties Appeal Committee shall provide a copy of its decision to the owner(s) or occupier(s) of the premises, building or structure who brought the appeal within fourteen (14) days after making its decision. 4. Le Comile des appels .sur les residences non conformes aux normes de Saint John doit fournir une copie de sa decision au(x) propridtaire(s) ou a ('occupant ou aux occupants des lieux, du batiment ou de la construction qui lui a (ont) interjetd appel dans les quatorze (14) jours suivant la date a laquelle it a rendu 315 -3- 5. The owner(s) or occupier(s) who is provided with a copy of a decision from the Saint John Substandard Properties Appeal Committee regarding a Notice, may appeal the decision to a judge of The Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick within fourteen (14) days after the copy of the decision was provided to the owner(s) or occupier(s) on the grounds that (a) the procedure required to be followed by the by-law was not followed, or (b) the decision is unreasonable. sa decision. S. Le(s) proprietaire(s) ou ('occupant ou les occupants a qui une copie d'une decision a ete fournie par le Comite des appels sur les residences non conformes aux normes de Saint John concernant un Avis peut (peuvent), dans les quatorze (14) jours qui suivent, interjeter appel de la decision devant un juge de la Cour du Banc de la Reine du Nouveau -Brunswick au motif que (a) la demarche a suivre en vertu de 1'arrete n'a pas ete suivie, ou (b) la decision est deraisonnable. 316 CANADA PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK COUNTY OF SAINT JOHN CITY OF SAINT JOHN IN THE MATTER OF THE BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED AT VO MIA IA ' , Saint John, N.B. (PID number 3-7 A 1 Or ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, 134-vq n P-y, A �dVI , of the City of Saint John in the County of Saint John and the Province of New Brunswick MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS: I. I am employed by the City of Saint John in its Growth and Community Services Department. I have personal knowledge of the matters herein deposed where otherwise stated. 2. On the 2-3 day of A e rt + 2024 at approximately / ,, I posted a copy of the Notice of Common Council Hearin letter, annexed hereto marked Exhibit "A" to the building at fro MCA , Saint John, N.B. Sworn To me at the City of Saint John, N.B. on the day of , 2024 Commissioner of Oaths My Commission Expires December 31, 2025 MIFA Permitting & Inspection / Service des inspections et de l'application By-law Enforcement / Service d'Application des Arrke's Municipaux Phone / Tel : (506) 658-4455 Fax / Telec : (506) 632-6199 ne cRy of saw lay April 23, 2024 REGISTERED MAIL Lisha Lin 2246 Kingston Rd Toronto, ON MIN 1T9 NOTICE OF COMMON COUNCIL HEARING Dear Sir/Madam. Re: 80 Main St, PID #00374108 Unsightly Repair Program On April 13, 2023, a Notice to Comply was issued for the above -mentioned property which required remedial action to bring the building and premises into compliance with the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law. The Notice to Comply was posted on said property on April 13, 2023. The timeline outlined in the Notice to Comply has expired. A compliance inspection will be carried out on May 2, 2024. If the property is not in compliance with the aforesaid By-law at the time of the inspection, City Staff will be attending the Common Council meeting scheduled on May 13, 2024 at 6:00pm to recommend that unsightly dilapidated conditions at the building be repaired and CD that the premise be cleaned -up. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me at (506) 639-2625. Regards, Benn Purinton, EIT Technical Services Officer Growth & Community Services This is Exhibit I Referred to in the Afildavk of 3 cN t U_-) Swom before me at the City o Saint Jyht, New nsMc l _ _ - ' the ay f a �'7�� Commissioner of Oaths SAINT IOHN 1911F:3 :v .� l '7j :4zl U) 4-) U) O N � � �-4 �-4 I- 4—) (—n UD CD CD - H O 00 O y s� aA y . ILA IL IL 11 • x.i.� • r .'` • i■ ■1+si .yF Q4 _rd o —1- V r, V ) JV '. \ co r() UC) �-4 �-4 4-) (:QCn o O 0o O �' N ii i1 1 ♦ �� } 04 ��► .�` wig.,: --- „� � ii. .t , , � �� l� i Ink �rNr.K 4 a 4-) U) O (D �-4 �-4 4—) U� O r O i a co 00 r �. co o q N 4 I� no �A si Ir I� U) U 4-) U) O N r- N �-4 �-4 I-- 4-) M U) O O C7 �' N ,-a.. > N - c-0 O am Will $A"¢ A MOP Q-4 ml" - 1. P--- QL4 U) u rd 00 4-) U) CD � � I-- 4-) Cn U) CD CD CD 00 0 �-D COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-132 Report Date May 07, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Development Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. North End Neighbourhood Plan - Advisory Committee Terms of Reference OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner Chief Growth /Dept Head Administrative Committee Chair Officer Yeva Mattson & Amy Poffenroth / J. Brent Deputy Mayor Jennifer Kirchner Pankaj Nalavde McGovern MacKenzie RECOMMENDATION The Growth Committee recommends that Common Council adopt the Terms of Reference for the North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At Council's direction and included in the City's Housing Accelerator Fund Action plan, staff has begun the process of creating a new North End Neighbourhood Plan. Staff has prepared Terms of Reference for the proposed North End Plan Advisory Committee and recommend their adoption by Common Council. The Advisory Committee will serve as a critical component of the development of the North End Plan and will ensure there is a diverse cross section of members of the public that can provide regular feedback and advice on the development of the plan. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION April 19, 2024 Growth Committee Resolution 1. That Growth Committee receive and file the North End Neighbourhood Plan Draft Boundary report. 2. That Growth Committee recommend that Common Council adopt the Terms of Reference for the North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee. 19NO.1 -2- In July 2019, the Common Council approved the Central Peninsula Secondary Plan for Uptown and nearby neighborhoods. After its five-year implementation, staff were directed to formulate the next Secondary Plan for the North End. The North End Neighborhood Plan is a key deliverable of the City's Housing Accelerator Fund Action Plan. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Common Council adopted a set of Priorities for 2021-2026. Under the "Grow" and "Belong" goals, priorities include promoting population growth and community vibrancy through beautification. Report The North End Neighbourhood Plan is the upcoming Secondary Plan for a sub- area of the City. The Central Peninsula Secondary Plan, adopted in 2019 and having completed its five-year implementation, was the first secondary plan under the Municipal Plan adopted in 2011. Following Council's directive, staff has shifted its focus to the North End of the City. As one of the first stages of the creation of a new Secondary Plan, Staff has prepared Terms of Reference for the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee will serve as a critical component of the development of the North End Plan and will ensure there is a diverse cross section of members of the public that can provide regular feedback and advice on the development of the plan. This Committee will consist of Council members and community members interested in contributing to the development of this new neighborhood plan. The aim is for the Committee to represent a diverse cross-section of individuals who work, live, volunteer, and are invested in the health and sustainability of this extensive neighborhood. Community members should encompass both property owners and renters, members of the business community, individuals working and volunteering in the non-profit sector, and those possessing skills and knowledge conducive to a successful neighborhood plan. Once the terms of reference are adopted by Common Council, the City will launch a recruitment campaign to encourage interested individuals to apply for a spot on the Committee. The members will be appointed by Common Council on the advice of the Nominating Committee. CONCLUSION At Council's direction, staff has been undertaking initial project work on the North End Plan. The adoption of the Terms of Reference for the Advisory Committee will enable staff to move forward with the formation of this important Committee. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES [tide] -3- A Secondary Plan is intended to further implement the City's Municipal Plan and align and be responsive to the City's recreation, transportation, economic, and population growth strategies. Together, these strategies will guide growth, development, and revitalization efforts in the City's North End for decades. The City has received funding through the Housing Accelerator Fund to support the development of this new Neighbourhood Plan. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS NA ATTACHMENTS North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee —Terms of Reference. 331 North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee Terms of Reference 1. Background 1.1. The City of Saint John is in the process of developing a Neighbourhood Plan for the North End of Saint John, which will include a variety of existing communities such as the Old North End, Douglas Avenue, Crescent Valley, and Mount Pleasant. The Plan will provide a policy framework and action plan to catalyze long term growth and guide reinvestment in the Plan area. The Plan will be based on the collective aspirations of citizens and key stakeholders on how best to preserve and enhance the neighbourhood's quality of life and to guide these communities into the future. To this end, the Plan will take into consideration important social, economic, environmental, sustainability, housing, and cultural objectives. It will include strategies and planning related policy for neighbourhood revitalization and infill development opportunities, with a focus on achieving the mixed -income neighbourhood goals of the Municipal Plan. 2. Mandate and Purpose of the Neighbourhood Advisory Committee 2.1. The Neighbourhood Advisory Committee [Advisory Committee] is a 11-person advisory committee established by Common Council to provide feedback and advice on goals objectives, policies, and implementation for the North End Neighbourhood plan. 2.2. The Advisory Committee will offer support and advice to city staff (tasked with leading the development of the North End Neighbourhood Plan) as well as the Growth Committee and Common Council as requested. 2.3. The Advisory Committee will act as an advisory committee that will represent the broader neighbourhood interests through the Plan development process, promote and supporting community engagement on the project and validate that the Plan's policies and action plan reflects the diverse elements of the included communities. 2.4. The Advisory Committee will also serve as ambassadors within the community to actively promote public involvement in the planning process and to help establish long- term, sustainable community ownership over the implementation of the plan. 3. Role of the Neighbourhood Advisory Committee 3.1. The Advisory Committee will play a key role in validating the feedback gathered from the community and ensuring that the Plan development is representative of the neighbourhood it serves. 1919% 3.2. Their advice and guidance will help to formulate recommendations to Common Council during each phase of the development of the North End Neighbourhood Plan. 3.3. More specifically, the Committee may: 3.3.1. Advise the project team on the delivery of the public engagement program; 3.3.2. Ensure transparency to the public throughout the development of the Plan; 3.3.3. Actively engage in the Plan development process by promoting the public engagement events and encouraging community participation and involvement; 3.3.4. Provide recommendations and input on reports, policies, maps and sub - neighbourhood boundaries. 3.3.5. Discuss the variety of themes to be addressed in the Plan; 3.3.6. Help define the principles that will guide the development of the Plan; 3.3.7. Explore the issues and opportunities identified by the public during engagement sessions and through background research; 3.3.8. Assist in establishing and evaluating strategies, actions and policies to support neighbourhood reinvestment; 3.3.9. Function as Ambassadors for the Neighbourhood Plan and actively promote public involvement in the planning process throughout all sectors of the community; and 3.3.10. Help to establish long-term, sustainable community ownership over the implementation of the plan. 4. Committee Membership 4.1. The Advisory Committee will be appointed by Common Council and will consist of 11 persons including: 4.1.1. Two (2) members of Common Council. 4.1.2. Nine (9) at -large community members, including: 4.1.2.1. One (1) representative proposed by ONE Change. 4.1.2.2. One (1) representative proposed by the Crescent Valley Resource Centre. 4.2. When appointing the community members to the Committee, the following selection criteria will be considered to ensure a balanced and diverse Advisory Committee: 4.2.1. All members must either live, work, or regularly volunteer within the Plan boundary. 4.2.2. Consideration should be given to ensure members broadly reflect the community such as through age, gender, culture, and socioeconomic status. 4.2.3. Representatives should include members of the business community such as developers, business owners, commercial property owners, etc. 4.2.4. Community members who have an interest, knowledge or skill set that can be beneficial in developing the Plan. This could include individuals with technical North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee 2 a4_) Terms of Reference SAINT J©HN 333 skills associated with topics such as economics, education, culture, diversity, community development, architecture, and the environment. 4.2.5. The ability and willingness to serve as an ambassador of the North End Neighbourhood Plan and to actively promote the public engagement sessions to the wider community. 5. Terms of Membership 5.1. Members shall participate without renumeration. However, where cost would be a legitimate barrier for participation, the City may reimburse a member for reasonable expenses related to attending meetings of the Advisory Committee. 5.2. Members are appointed until the Neighbourhood Plan is adopted by Comon Council; it is anticipated that the Plan development will take approximately 18 months. 5.3. A person will cease to be a member of the Advisory Committee if that individual fails to attend three (3) consecutive Advisory Committee meetings unless such absence is authorized by the Advisory Committee. 5.4. Any member of the Advisory Committee may resign at anytime upon sending written notice to the City. 5.5. Should a member of the Committee be in a situation that constitutes a conflict of interest, he or she should declare this to the Advisory Committee Chair at the earliest opportunity and withdraw from any discussion (unless invited by the Chair to remain to provide information) or decisions relating to it. 5.6. All members are expected to behave ethically and civilly, including at advisory committee meetings, public engagement sessions and on social media. 5.6.1. During a meeting, if a member is disorderly, bullying, combative, harassing, or acts in a manner that would objectively reflect poorly on the Advisory Committee or the City of Saint John and refuses to apologize or withdraw remarks when directed by the Chair or Vice Chair, the Chair or Vice Chair may direct the member to leave the meeting. 5.6.2. If the member's negative behaviour is persistent or egregious, the member may be permanently removed from the Advisory Committee with a Committee vote or by resolution of Common Council. 6. Chair and Vice Chair 6.1. Common Council will appoint a Chair for the Committee. 6.2. The Chair's primary responsibility is to facilitate meetings. The Chair will keep the group focused on the agreed -upon tasks, ensure that all agenda items are completed and encourage the participation of all Advisory Committee members. 6.3. The Committee will appoint a Vice Chair from among its members. 6.4. The Vice Chair shall take on the responsibilities of the Chair in the event of the Chair's absence. North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee 3 a4_) Terms of Reference SAINT J©HN 334 6.5. When required, the Chair will also act as a spokesperson on behalf of the Advisory Committee but will not act as a spokesperson for the City of Saint John. 7. The Role of Staff and Project Team 7.1. City Staff appointed by the Commissioner of Growth and Community Services will attend and participate in all meetings of the Committee. 7.2. Staff will take minutes of meetings and will prepare and publish agendas for all meetings of the advisory committee. 7.3. Staff will gather information, coordinate, and facilitate all studies, public engagement, planning reviews, and plan recommendations. Staff will take advice and recommendations on these matters from the Advisory Committee in a genuine spirit of collaboration. 7.4. Staff will be responsible for authoring the neighbourhood plan. 7.5. Any consultants hired to support the development of the plan will report to staff and not to the Advisory Committee. 8. Meetings 8.1. The Committee will meet regularly throughout the development of the Neighbourhood Plan as scheduled by staff after consulting with the chair. 8.2. The frequency of meetings may be increased or decreased as required to support the work program for the development of the Plan. 8.3. Meetings must not be closed to the public. 9. Decision -Making 9.1. All members of the Advisory Committee except City staff have a vote. 9.2. In a spirit of collaboration, every attempt should be made for decisions of the Advisory Committee to be made by consensus. However, when required, a majority of members present will suffice for making a decision. 9.3. The Advisory Committee will serve primarily in an important advisory role. They will provide guidance, recommendations and advise on Plan development to City Staff and advise to Common Council on the Plan as requested. Staff and Council may consider the advice and recommendations of the Committee but is not obligated to implement such recommendations. 9.4. The quorum for meetings shall be six (6) plus one member of City Staff. North End Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee a4_) Terms of Reference 4 SAINT J©HN 335 From: Emma Gittens <thatsfantastic@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 2:43 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca>; City of Saint John Mayor's Office <mayor@saintjohn.ca>; MacKenzie, John <john.mackenzie@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Please rescind motion to designate 1671 Sandy Point Road property as surplus Some people who received this message don't often get email from thatsfantastic@gmail.com. Learn why this is important [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsamplea-saintiohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Hello! Although I am not currently a Saint John resident, my husband and two kids and I are planning to relocate there from BC in the next year. I find it alarming that even after a public consultation, the SJ Common Council has passed another motion to declare a part of Rockwood park as surplus land. Why do you keep coming for this beloved park? Rockwood Park is a gem, just the way it is. Please rescind the motion to surplus this property as soon as possible. Sincerely, Emma Gittens, BC Resident Emma Gittens 604-779-5725 K1ci-1 M&C No. 2024-131 Report Date May 09, 2024 Meeting Date May 13, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Development Services SUBJECT: FCM Green Municipal Fund Grant Agreement — North End Sustainable Neighbourhood Action Plan (DFC-22-0070) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL The City of Saint John applied to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) for a green municipal fund grant to reimburse eligible project costs associated with the North End Plan project. COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1. That the City of Saint John enter into a Green Municipal Fund Grant Agreement with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) for the North End Sustainable Neighbourhood Action Plan, generally in the form as presented to the Committee of the Whole at its May 13, 2024 meeting; and, 2. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said agreement and any documents ancillary thereto. 1919YA Nominating Committee Meeting — May 7, 2024 2nd Floor Boardroom, City Hall Present: Mayor D. Noade Reardon Deputy Mayor J. MacKenzie Councillor D. Hickey Councillor G. Lowe City Clerk J. Taylor Administrative Assistant K. Tibbits Committee of the Whole Members: Subject: Recommended Appointments to Committees The Nominating Committee, having met on May 7, 2024, makes the following recommendations: TD Station Commission: to reappoint Patricia Ellsworth for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027; and to appoint Mohd Suhail for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Canada Games Aquatic Centre Commission: to reappoint both David Connell and Peter Murray each for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Saint John Community Arts Board: to reappoint Andrea Kikuchi for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027; and to appoint Lindsay Jacquard for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027; and to appoint both Fujun Zhao and Bryn Robinson each for a three-year term from May 14, 2024 to May 14, 2027. Saint John Shared Risk Pension Plan Board of Trustees: to appoint Samuel Tetteh as the alternate trustee for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Fort LaTour Development Authority: Notwithstanding the policy adopted by Common Council on October 29, 2012 regarding appointments to agencies, boards and commissions, Beth Kelly Hatt be reappointed for a one-year term from May 14, 2024 to May 14, 2025; and to appoint Brooke Cheeks for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. SAINT JOHN P.O. Box 1971 Saint John, NB Canada E2L 4L1 I vww+w,saintjohn.ca I C.P. 1971 Saint John, N.-B. Canada E2L 4L1 ---ter K191:j PRO Kids: to appoint Larry Harlow for a three-year term from May 14, 2024 to May 14, 2027; and to appoint Amanda Downey for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Saint John Transit Commission: to reappoint Neville Crabbe for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Saint John Energy: to reappoint Neil Jacobsen for a three-year term from July 27, 2024 to July 27, 2027. Saint John Board of Police Commissioners: Notwithstanding the policy adopted by Common Council on October 29, 2012 regarding appointments to agencies, boards and commissions Michael Costello be reappointed for a one-year term from July 31, 2024 to July 31, 2025. Sincerely, Mayor and Chair of the Nominating Committee 60- SAINT JOHN ---ter P.O. Box 1971 Saint John, NB Canada E2L 4L1 I vww+w,saintjohn.ca I C.P. 1971 Saint John, N.-B. Canada E2L 4L1 Kite