Loading...
2024-02-05_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jourCity of Saint John Common Council Meeting AGENDA Monday, February 5, 2024 6:00 pm 2nd Floor Common Council Chamber, City Hall An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City's Website (wwwsaintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Pages 1. Call to Order 1.1 Land Acknowledgement 1.2 National Anthem 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of January 22, 2024 5 - 13 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 Designation of a By -Law Enforcement Officer - Olamilekan Balogun 14 - 22 (Recommendation in Report) 5.2 Designation of By -Law Enforcement Officer - Brian Brown (Recommendation in 23 - 25 Report) 5.3 Designation of By -Law Enforcement Officer - Tyler Thomas (Recommendation 26 - 28 in Report) 5.4 2024 Field, Arena Floor and Court Rates (Recommendation in Report) 29 - 37 6. Members Comments 7. Proclamation 8. Delegations / Presentations 9. Public Hearings - 6:30 p.m. 9.1 Proposed Zoning By -Law Amendment with Planning Advisory Committee report and Staff presentation - 172 City Line (1 st and 2nd Reading) 9.2 Proposed Municipal Plan and Zoning By -Law Amendment with Planning Advisory Committee report and Staff presentation - 1440 Loch Lomond Road (1st and 2nd Reading) 10. Consideration of By-laws 10.1 Public Presentation - Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment re: 241-281 Douglas Avenue 10.2 Traffic By -Law Amendment re: McNamara Drive (3rd Reading) 10.3 Vehicles for Hire By -Law Amendment (1st and 2nd Reading) 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers 12.1 Chief Administrative Officer Update on Select Catalytic Projects and Advocacy (Verbal) 12.2 Waste Wise First Year Anniversary Results 13. Committee Reports 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15. General Correspondence 15.1 D. Hersey: ByLaw request related to use of pellet guns (Recommendation: Refer to CAO for review and appropriate follow-up) 16. Supplemental Agenda 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 Access License with Saint John Energy 18. Adjournment 38 - 78 79 - 459 460 - 479 480 - 480 481 - 485 486 - 502 503 - 517 518 - 518 K u City of Saint John Common Council Meeting Monday, February 5, 2024 Committee of the Whole 1. Call to Order Si vous avez besoin des services en fran�ais pour une reunion de Conseil communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862. Each of the following items, either in whole or in part, is able to be discussed in private pursuant to the provisions of subsection 68(1) of the Local Governance Act and Council / Committee will make a decision(s) in that respect in Open Session: 5:00 p.m., 2nd Floor Boardroom, City Hall 1.1 Approval of Minutes 68(1) 1.2 Financial Matter 68(1)(c,d) Ville de Saint John Seance du conseil communal Lundi 5 fevrier 2024 18h30 2e etage de la Salle du Conseil communal, 1-16tel de ville Nous utiliserons un moyen de communication electronique lors de cette reunion. Le public peut assister a la seance en personne clans la Salle du Conseil ou la regarder sur le site Internet de la ville (www.saintiohn.ca) ou sur Rogers TV. Comite plenier 1. Ouverture de la seance Si vous souhaitez obtenir des services en frangais pour une seance du conseil communal, veuillez communiquer avec le bureau du greffier communal au 658-2862. Chacun des points suivants, en totalite ou en partie, peut faire I'objet d'une discussion en prive en vertu des dispositions prevues au paragraphe 68(1) de la Loi sur la gouvernance locale. Le conseil/comite prendra une ou des decisions a cet egard au cours de la seance publique : 17 h — Comite plenier a huis clos — Salle de conference du 2e etage 1.1 Approbation du proces-verbal 68(1) 1.2 Questions financieres 68(1)(c,d) 1.3 Questions financieres 68(1)(c,f,g) Seance ordinaire 1. Ouverture de la seance 1.1 Reconnaissance des terres 1.2 Hymne national 2. Approbation du proces-verbal 2.1 Proces-verbal du 22 janvier 2024 3. Adoption de I'ordre du jour K 4. Divulgations de conflits d'interets 5. Questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil 5.1 Designation d'un agent d'application des reglements municipaux — Olamilekan Balogun (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.2 Designation d'un agent d'application des reglements municipaux — Brian Brown (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.3 Designation d'un agent d'application des reglements municipaux — Tyler Thomas (recommandation clans le rapport) 5.4 2024 Tarifs pour le terrain de baseball, le plancher de I'arena et le terrain de tennis (recommandation clans le rapport) 6. Commentaires presentes par les membres 7. Proclamation 8. Delegations et presentations 9. Audiences publiques 9.1 Proposition de modification de I'arrete de zonage avec rapport du Comite consultatif d'urbanisme et presentation du personnel — 172, City Line (1" et 2e lecture) 9.2 Proposition de modification du plan municipal et de I'arrete de zonage avec rapport du Comite consultatif d'urbanisme et presentation du personnel (1" et 2e lecture) 10. Etude des arretes municipaux 10.1 Presentation publique — Proposition de modification du plan municipal concernant : 241-281, avenue Douglas 10.2 Modification de I'arrete relatif a la circulation concernant : la promenade McNamara (3e lecture) 10.3 Modification de I'arrete relatif aux vehicules de location (11e et 2e lecture) 11. Interventions des membres du conseil 12. Affaires municipales evoquees par les fonctionnaires municipaux 12.1 Mise a jour de I'administrateur en chef sur certains projets catalyseurs et la defense des interets (verbal) 12.2 Resultats du premier annivers ire du programme Lo-logique 13. Rapports deposes par les comites 14. Etude des sujets ecartes des questions soumises a I'approbation du Bureau 15. Correspondance generale 15.1 D. Hersey : Demande d'arrete relatif a ('utilisation de fusils a plomb (Recommandation :transmission au directeur municipal aux fins d'examen et de suivi appropries) 16.Ordre du jour supplementaire 17. Comite plenier 17.1 Licence d'acces avec Saint John Energy 18. levee de la seance CI COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 MINUTES — REGULAR MEETING COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN JANUARY 22, 2024 AT 6:30 PM 2ND FLOOR COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL An Electronic means of communication will be used at this meeting. The public may attend the meeting in person in the Council Chamber or view the meeting on the City's Website (www.saintjohn.ca) or on Rogers TV. Present: Mayor Donna Noade Reardon Deputy Mayor John MacKenzie Councillor -at -Large Gary Sullivan Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton Councillor Ward 2 Barry Ogden Councillor Ward 3 Gerry Lowe Councillor Ward 3 David Hickey Councillor Ward 4 Paula Radwan Absent: Councillor Ward 4 Greg Stewart Councillor -at -Large Brent Harris Councillor Ward 1 Joanna Killen Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) B. McGovern Director Legal Services / Solicitor J. Boucher Chief Financial Officer K. Fudge Commissioner Utilities & Infrastructure Services I. Fogan Fire Chief K. Clifford Commissioner Human Resources S. Hossack Deputy Commissioner Growth & Community Services A. Poffenroth Director External Relations L. Caissie Commissioner Public Works & Transportation M. Hugenholtz Director Legislative Services / City Clerk J. Taylor Deputy Clerk P. Anglin 61 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 1. Call to Order 1.1 Land Acknowledgement Councillor Sullivan read aloud the Land Acknowledgement and called for a moment of reflection. "The City of Saint John/Menaquesk is situated is the traditional territory of the Wolastogiyik/Maliseet.The Wolastogiyik/Maliseet along with their Indigenous Neighbours, the Mi'Kmaq/Mi'kmaw and Passamaquoddy/Peskotomuhkati signed Peace and Friendship Treaties with the British Crown in the 1700s that protected their rights to lands and resources." 1.2 National Anthem Erin White and Chris Roberts performed O Canada. 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of January 8. 2024 Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the minutes of January 8, 2024 be approved. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Approval of Agenda Moved by Deputy Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the agenda for January 22, 2024 be approved with the addition of 17.1 Request for Expression of Interest for 21 Troop Street; 17.2 - 2024 Community Centre and Neighbourhood Service Agreement Renewal; 17.3 Saint John Energy FCM Loan and Grant Request; and 17.4 Code of Conduct Complaints — Councillors Harris and Killen. MOTION CARRIED. 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-016: HotSpot Parking Inc. — Amendment to Software License and Services Agreement the City of Saint John enter into Amendment No. 1 with HotSpot Parking Inc., generally in the form as attached to M&C No. 2024-016, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute said Amendment No. 1 and any other documents ancillary thereto. 5.2 RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2024-015: Public Information Session: St. Paul Street (Winter Street to End) — Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Renewal and Street Reconstruction be received for information. 5.3 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-018: Public C.1 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 Space at Market Slip — HVAC, Mechanical, Electrical & Sprinkler Installations for New Enclosed Patios Common Council approve the following: a) The value of Contract 2022-081201T: Public Space at Market Slip & Harbour Passage Extension previously awarded to Maxim Construction Inc. on August 22, 2022 & April 3, 2023 (value of original contract increased for added scope), be increased from $15,396,716.99 (including HST) to $16,283,793.18 (including HST) based on the additional scope of work added to the contract as detailed in this report; and b) The Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute any necessary documentation in that regard. 5.4 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-017: 2024 Insurance Renewal Common Council authorize to bind the insurance coverage with BFL Canada Risk and Insurance Services Inc, through our Agent of Record, JM & CW Hope Grant Ltd. and approve the maximum payment of $1,918,391 detailed below. Insurance Premiums of $1,884,891 Agreed Agency Fee of $32,000 BFL Canada Fee $1,500 Payable to JM & CW Hope Grant Ltd. $1,918,391 5.5 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-025: Vehicle for Hire By -Law Change Common Council: a) Endorse a permanent adjustment to a ten (10) year age limit for a Taxicab. The age limit would move from eight (8) years to ten (10) years of age starting with 2015 vehicles; and b) Request that the General Counsel's office make the appropriate changes, to the Vehicle for Hire By -Law. 5.6 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-008: Community Development Fund Agreement: City of Saint John — Harbour Passage Extension the City enter into an Agreement with the Regional Development Corporation (RDC) for funding under the Province of New Brunswick Community Development Fund for funding for the City of Saint John — Harbour Passage Extension project in the form and upon the terms and conditions as submitted; and that the Mayor, CAO and City Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement. 5.7 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-013: Initiate Stop Up and Closure for a Portion of Red Head Road and Hewitt Road Common Council adopt the following: 1. That the Public Hearing to consider the passing of an amendment to the Street Closing By-law to Close a portion of Red Head Road, having an area of 1,441 square meters and a portion of Hewitt Road having an area of 695 square meters, as shown on a Plan of Survey titled, "Plan of Survey Showing portion of Red Hed Road and Hewitt Road, City of Saint John, Saint John County, New Brunswick" r� COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 (submitted), be set for Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber; 2. That Common Council authorize the publishing of a notice of its intention to consider the passing of such By-law, identified above; 3. That, if Common Council gives Third Reading to the proposed By -Law Amendment as noted above that the City sell the property to Ronald and Brenda Daigle for a purchase price of $2,400.00 plus H.S.T. if applicable, and that the purchaser be responsible for: a. any plan of survey required to initiate the process for the stop -up and closure for a portion of Red Head Road and Hewitt Road; and b. any fees or administrative processes to effect the conveyance of the property. 4. That the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute any documents necessary to effect the transaction. 5.8 RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-019: Heather Way Resurfacing/Reconstruction Common Council approve the recommendation to proceed with the resurfacing of one half of Heather Way and close off the other side of the median with temporary barricades as outlined in M&C 2024-019. Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in each consent agenda item respectively be adopted. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. Members Comments Members commented on various local events. 7. Proclamation 8. Delegations / Presentations 9. Public Hearings — 6:30 p.m. 10. Consideration of By -Laws 10.1 Zoning By -Law Amendment — 89-91 Red Head Road (31d Reading) / Recission of previous Section 59 Conditions Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By -Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning By -Law of the City of Saint John" amending Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by rezoning a piece of land having an area of approximately 319 square metres, located at 91 Red Head Road, also identified as PID Number 00344457, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to General Commercial (CG), be read. E:3 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 MOTION CARRIED. The by-law entitled, "By -Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning By -Law of the City of Saint John" was read in its entirety. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By -Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning By -Law of the City of Saint John" amending Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by rezoning a piece of land having an area of approximately 319 square metres, located at 91 Red Head Road, also identified as PID Number 00344457, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to General Commercial (CG), be read a third time, enacted, and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto. MOTION CARRIED. Read a third time by title, the by-law entitled, "By -Law Number C.P. 111-159 A Law to Amend the Zoning By -Law of the City of Saint John". Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, rescind the conditions imposed on the May 28, 1986, rezoning, for the parcel of land having an area of approximately 2,847.26 square metres, located at 91 Red Head Road, also identified as PID Number 00344457, stating: a. A solid fence of no less than 2 metres in height be erected beginning at the existing storage shed and running parallel to the property line to a point ending opposite the back of the repair shop, as shown on sketch entitled "Revised May 14/86", and that this fence be completed before June 30, 1986, and further that a sign be erected near the entrance to the driveway identifying the name of the business or Mr. Hogan's name; and b. The hours of operation of the motorcycle shop be 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday to Friday, and 9 a.m. to 12 noon on Saturday. MOTION CARRIED 10.2 McNamara Drive Speed Limit Reduction —Traffic By -Law Amendment (1 st and 2nd Reading) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By -Law Number MV-10.1 A By -Law to Amend a By - Law respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John and amendments thereto" amending Schedule "L-2" — 40 km/h Speed Limits by adding McNamara Drive, be read a first time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a first time by title, the by-law entitled "By -Law Number MV-10.1 A By -Law to Amend a By -Law respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John and amendments thereto." COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Radwan: RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By -Law Number MV-10.1 A By -Law to Amend a By - Law respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John and amendments thereto" amending Schedule "L-2" — 40 km/h Speed Limits by adding McNamara Drive, be read a second time. MOTION CARRIED. Read a second time by title, the by-law entitled "By -Law Number MV-10.1 A By -Law to Amend a By -Law respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John and amendments thereto." 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters — Municipal Officers 12.1 The Cove — Fundina Aareement Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Hickey: RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2024-020: The Cove — Funding Agreement the City enter into the Active Transportation Fund Contribution Agreement in the form as attached to M&C No. 2024-020 with His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities for funding under the Permanent Public Transit Program — Active Transportation Fund for the project entitled "The Cove" and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute said Agreement. MOTION CARRIED 12.2 Housina Accelerator Fund Manager of Housing A. Reid introduced the Housing Accelerator Fund concept to deliver affordable housing units. Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Hickey: RESOLVED that the submitted presentation entitled "Housing Accelerator Fund" be received for information. MOTION CARRIED 13. Committee Reports 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 15. General Correspondence 15.1 Dragonfly Events Planning: Empowering Women in Business 2024 — Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to schedule presentation) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Radwan: iN COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 RESOLVED that the request to present from Dragonfly Events Planning: Empowering Women in Business 2024 be referred to the City Clerk to schedule the presentation. MOTION CARRIED. 15.2 Saint John Horticultural Association: Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to schedule presentation) Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Ogden: RESOLVED that the request to present from the Saint John Horticultural Association be referred to the CAO for follow up. MOTION CARRIED. 15.3 YMCA of Southwestern NB: Request for Proclamation (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to prepare proclamation) Moved by Deputy Mayor Mackenzie, seconded by Councillor Norton: RESOLVED that the YMCA of Southwestern NB request for proclamation be referred to the City Clerk to prepare the proclamation. MOTION CARRIED. 15.4 J. Rennick: Not for profit Organizations: Request to Present (Recommendation: Receive for Information) Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the J. Rennick: Not for profit Organizations — request to present be received for information. MOTION CARRIED. 15.5 Age Friendly Active Communities NB — Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Growth Committee to schedule presentation) Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Norton: RESOLVED that the request to present from Age Friendly Active Communities NB be referred to the Growth Committee to schedule a presentation. MOTION CARRIED. 15.6 A. Folkins: Shelters in Loyalist Burial Ground (Recommendation: Receive for Information) Moved by Councillor Norton, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the correspondence from A. Folkins: Shelters in Loyalist Burial Grounds be received for information. MOTION CARRIED. 16. Supplemental Agenda 11 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 Request for Expression of Interest for 21 Troop Street Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Norton: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 22, 2024 Common Council deem the property at 21 Troop Street, comprised of PIDs 424283 and 55055230 as surplus to its needs. MOTION CARRIED. 17.2 2024 Communitv Centre and Neiahbourhood Service Aareement Renewal Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Councillor Norton RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 22, 2024 Common Council approve the following: RESOLVED that: The parties enter into an agreement in consideration for the annual grant between the City of Saint John and the Corporation of the Anglican Parish of St. Mark, Saint John. (Waterloo Village Neighbourhood Group) for a period of three (3) years, from January 1, 2024, until December 31, 2026, as outlined in Appendix `A' of the 2024 Community Centre and Neighbourhood Service Agreement Renewals report submitted to the Committee of the Whole agenda of January 22, 2024, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign all necessary documentation; The parties renew the agreement in consideration for the annual sum of $54,375.58 (HST included) between the City of Saint John and the YMCA of Greater Saint John Inc. for services at Millidgeville Community Centre for a period of three (3) years, from January 1, 2024, until December 31, 2026, as outlined in Appendix `B' of the 2024 Community Centre and Neighbourhood Service Agreement Renewals report submitted to the Committee of the Whole agenda of January 22, 2024, and that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to sign all necessary documentation; The City of Saint John retains the funds resulting from the terminated agreement with Human Development Council Inc. for future consideration of proposals for services or projects that aim to alleviate the effects of poverty within Saint John neighbourhoods. MOTION CARRIED 17.3 Saint John Energy FCM Loan and Grant Request Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole, having met on January 22, 2024, Common Council approve the following: 1) That, subject to (i) Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) approval of Saint John Energy's (SJE) Community Energy Fund (CEF) application, (ii) the approval 12 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL January 22, 2024 / le 22 janvier 2024 of the definitive loan and guarantor agreements by the Board of SJE and (iii) the approval of the definitive loan and guarantor agreements by the City, the City is prepared to guarantee the loan portion of SJE's potential funding under the CEF funding program and recognizes that doing so will require that the City be an additional signatory to SJE's FCM loan and grant agreement, as Guarantor. And 2) That the Mayor be authorized to send a letter to FCM in this respect. MOTION CARRIED. Councillor Sullivan withdrew for discussion of item 17.4. 17.4 Code of Conduct Complaints — Councillors Harris and Killen Moved by Deputy Mayor MacKenzie, seconded by Councillor Lowe: RESOLVED that the City enter into a Settlement Agreement with Brent Harris and Joanna Killen in the form presented to Committee of the Whole at its January 22, 2024 meeting and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the said Agreement; and further that Brent Harris and Joanna Killen be reinstated to their respective Boards and Committees in the capacity of members of such Boards and Committees, from which duties they were temporarily relieved by decision of Council at its October 3, 2023 meeting. MOTION CARRIED with Councillor Radwan voting nay stating for the record she did not want to take this step, personally believed Councillor Killen and Councillor Harris had their best intentions and although it is new hoping there will be a review of the Code of Conduct By -Law. Councillor Sullivan re-entered the meeting. 18. Adjournment Moved by Councillor Lowe, seconded by Councillor Norton: RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on January 22, 2024, be adjourned. MOTION CARRIED The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 7:48 p.m. 13 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-028 Report Date January 29, 2024 Meeting Date February 05, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Designation of a By-law Enforcement Officer AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Acting Chief Administrative Commissioner/Dept. Officer Head Pamela Bentley Amy Poffenroth J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council adopt the attached resolution appointing Olamilekan Balogun as a by-law enforcement officer for various City By-laws. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to designate Olamilekan Balogun, Assistant Building Inspector (temporary), as a by-law enforcement officer for the various by-laws which are enforced by the Growth and Community Services department. In doing so, Mr. Balogun will be authorized to: • Issue Orders to Comply and Notices to Comply with respect to enforcement of by-laws that fall within the scope of the Local Governance Act, the Community Planning Act and the Building Code Administration Act; • Lay informations in Provincial Court with respect to enforcement of bylaws that fall within the scope of the Local Governance Act, the Community Planning Act and the Building Code Administration Act; and • Conduct inspections pertaining to enforcement of by-laws that fall within the scope of the Local Governance Act, the Community Planning Act and the Building Code Administration Act. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A 14 -2- REPORT In 2023 Common Council approved the Community Enhancement Pilot program, increasing resources dedicated to the City's Property By-law Compliance Programs. Olamilekan Balogun has been hired as an Assistant Building Inspector for a period of up to 15 months to assist with the Minimum Property Standards Program. The program addresses the standards governing the condition, occupancy and maintenance of residential properties within the City and provides safeguards for the safety, health and welfare of the occupants and users of these properties. It is necessary to designate Olamilekan Balogun as a by-law enforcement officer by adopting the attached resolution so that he may carry out his duties. By adopting the attached resolution, Mr. Balogun will be authorized as a by-law enforcement officer under the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, the Saint John Building By-law and the Zoning By-law. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Enforcement of the City's by-laws aligns with Council's Grow and Belong priorities SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Not applicable. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The General Counsel's Office drafted the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS Resolution appointing Olamilekan Balogun as by-law enforcement officer. 15 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 RESOLVED, that as recommended by the Chief Administrative Officer, the following resolution be adopted: 1. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, By-law Number M-14, and amendments thereto (the "Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law"), and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By-law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsection 25(1) of the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law provides that a by-law enforcement officer appointed by council may notify the owner or occupier of premises, dwelling, dwelling unit or structure by issuing an Order where the condition of the premises, dwelling, dwelling unit or structure does not comply with said By-law; AND WHEREAS subsection 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the local government or such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby appointed as a by-law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby appointed and authorized to notify owners and occupiers where the condition of the premises, dwellings, dwelling units or structures does not comply with the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby designated and authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of the SaintJohn Minimum Property Standards By-law, effective immediately, and this designation and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 2. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law, By-law Number M-14 and amendments thereto (the "Saint John Minimum Property Standards By-law"), and it may from time to time be necessary to make inspections for the administration and enforcement of the By-law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsection 144(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may authorize by-law enforcement officers to enter the land, building or other structure at any reasonable time, and carry out the inspection after giving reasonable notice to the owner or occupant of the land, building or other structure to be entered; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun, by- law enforcement officer, is hereby appointed as an inspection officer and authorized to enter at all reasonable times upon any property within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint John for the purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration and enforcement of the Saint John Minimum Property Standards By- law which received first and second reading by Common Council on September 10, 2018 and third reading on September 24, 2018, being enacted upon approval by the Minister of Local Government, and/or the Local Governance Act effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 0a 17 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 3. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, By-law Number M-30, and amendments thereto (the "Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law"), and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By- law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsections 132(1) and 132(2) of the Local Governance Act provide that an officer appointed by council may notify the owner or occupier of premises, a building or structure by notice in the form prescribed by regulation when a condition exists pursuant to subsections 131(1), 131(2) or 131(3) of the said Act; AND WHEREAS subsection 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the local government or such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby appointed as a by-law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby appointed and authorized to notify owners and occupiers with respect to premises, buildings or structures that are unsightly; buildings or structures that are a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of being vacant or unoccupied; buildings or structures that are a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or unsoundness of structural strength, as set out in the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee 3 iF:3 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby designated and authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of the SaintJohn Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this designation and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 4. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By- law, By-law Number M-30 and amendments thereto (the "Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law"), and it may from time to time be necessary to make inspections for the administration and enforcement of the By- law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsection 144(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may authorize officers enter the land, building or other structure at any reasonable time, and carry out the inspection after giving reasonable notice to the owner or occupant of the land, building or other structure to be entered; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun, by- law enforcement officer, is hereby appointed as an inspection officer and authorized to enter at all reasonable times upon any property within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint John for the purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration and enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law which received first and second reading by Common Council on May 22, 2018 and third reading on June 4, 2018, being enacted upon approval by the Minister of Local Government, and/or the Local Governance Act effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and 4 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 5. WHEREAS subsection 135(4) of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto, provides that within thirty days after the terms of a notice have been complied with or a debt due to a local government or due to the Minister of Finance, as the case may be, is discharged, the local government shall provide a certificate in the form prescribed by regulation which requires that the corporate seal of the local government be affixed; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jonathan A. Taylor, City Clerk, is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal of The City of Saint John to a Certificate of Discharge that is issued by Olamilekan Balogun under the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By- law, and such authorization shall continue until Jonathan A. Taylor ceases to be the City Clerk of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 6. WHEREAS, the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain bylaws pursuant to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and amendments thereto, (the "Community Planning Act"), including The Zoning By-law, By-law Number C.P. 110, including all amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has contravened or failed to comply with these By-laws; AND WHEREAS paragraph 137(a) of the Community Planning Act provides that no person shall violate or fail to comply with a provision of a by-law made under this Act; AND WHEREAS section 139 of the Community Planning Act provides that proceedings for an offence under this Act shall be commenced in the name of the Minister or the clerk of the local government or any other person who is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby designated and authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of The Zoning By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 5 Q91 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 7. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted a by-law pursuant to the authority of the Building Code Administration Act, S.N.B. 2020, c. 8, and amendments thereto, (the "Building Code Administration Act"), namely the Building By-law, By-law Number BC-1 and amendments thereto (the "Building Bylaw"), and it is necessary to appoint building inspectors, acting building inspectors, deputy building inspectors and city inspectors for the administration and enforcement of this By-law; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby appointed as a city inspector, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Growth and Community Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 8. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Building Code Administration Act, S.N.B 2020, c. 8, and amendments thereto, (the "Building Code Administration Act") including the Building By-law, By-law Number BC-1, and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make orders for the administration of these By-laws; AND WHEREAS subsection 134(1) of the Building Code Administration Act provides that a council may authorize persons to, when a development is undertaken in violation of the Building Code Administration Act, a by-law or regulation under the Building Code Administration Act, a by-law or terms and conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development, alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the undertaking of such development; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby authorized to, when a development is undertaken in violation of the Building Code Administration Act, the Building By- law or the terms and conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development, alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the undertaking of such development, effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of Growth and Community Services of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. ro 21 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 5, 2024 / le 5 fevrier 2024 9. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Building Code Administration Act, S.N.B 2020, c. 8, and amendments thereto (the 'Building Code Administration Act"), including the Building By-law, By-law Number BC-1, and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By-law; AND WHEREAS paragraph 137(a) of the Building Code Administration Act provides that no person shall violate or fail to comply with a provision of a by-law made under this Act; AND WHEREAS section 139 of the Building Code Administration Act provides that proceedings for an offence under this Act shall be commenced in the name of the Minister or the clerk of the local government or any other person who is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Olamilekan Balogun is hereby designated and authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of the Saint John Building By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until they cease to be an employee of Growth and Community Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first III WA (i� -_�A I - _�.' 1 11 k ) . COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-033 Report Date January 31, 2024 Meeting Date February 5, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Designation of By -Law Enforcement Officer — Brian Brown AUTHORIZATION Primary Author(s) Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Jill Good Michael Hugenholtz/Marc Dionne J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council adopt the attached resolution appointing Brian Brown as by-law enforcement officer for the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to designate Brian Brown, Badge No. 1004 Canadian Corps of Commissionaires, as a by -Law enforcement officer, for the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law which are administered by the Parking department. In doing so, Mr. Brown will be authorized to: • Administer and enforce the Saint John Parking By -Law. • Administer and enforce the Saint John Traffic By -Law. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION Not applicable. REPORT It is necessary at this time to designate Brian Brown, a newly hired parking enforcement officer, as a by -Law enforcement officer, by adopting the attached resolution so that they may carry out their duties pertaining to enforcement of the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law. W -2- PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's "Growth" and "Belong" Priorities. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES N/A INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The General Counsel's Office has reviewed the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS Resolution appointing Brian Brown as by-law enforcement officer. COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL Feb 5, 2024 / le 5 fev 2024 RESOLVED, that as recommended by the Chief Administrative Officer, the following resolution be adopted: 1. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including By-law Respecting the Regulation of Parking in The City of Saint John, By-law Number LG-8 (the "Saint John Parking By -Law"), A By-law Respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John, By-law Number MV-10.1 (the "Saint John Traffic By -Law") and all amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Brian Brown is hereby appointed as by-law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Parking By -Law and Saint John Traffic By -Law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Parking department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; i►R (i� -_�A I - _�.' 1 11 k ) . COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-032 Report Date January 31, 2024 Meeting Date February 5, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Designation of By -Law Enforcement Officer — Tyler Thomas AUTHORIZATION Primary Author(s) Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Jill Good Michael Hugenholtz/Marc Dionne J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council adopt the attached resolution appointing Tyler Thomas as by-law enforcement officer for the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to designate Tyler Thomas, Badge No. 1003 Canadian Corps of Commissionaires, as a by -Law enforcement officer, for the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law which are administered by the Parking department. In doing so, Mr. Thomas will be authorized to: • Administer and enforce the Saint John Parking By -Law. • Administer and enforce the Saint John Traffic By -Law. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION Not applicable. REPORT It is necessary at this time to designate Tyler Thomas, a newly hired parking enforcement officer, as a by -Law enforcement officer, by adopting the attached resolution so that they may carry out their duties pertaining to enforcement of the Saint John Parking By-law and Saint John Traffic By-law. 41.1 -2- PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's "Growth" and "Belong" Priorities. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES N/A INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The General Counsel's Office has reviewed the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS Resolution appointing Tyler Thomas as by-law enforcement officer. WA COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL Feb 5, 2024 / le 5 fev 2024 RESOLVED, that as recommended by the Chief Administrative Officer, the following resolution be adopted: 1. WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and amendments thereto (the "Local Governance Act"), including By-law Respecting the Regulation of Parking in The City of Saint John, By-law Number LG-8 (the "Saint John Parking By -Law"), A By-law Respecting the Traffic on Streets in The City of Saint John, By-law Number MV-10.1 (the "Saint John Traffic By -Law") and all amendments thereto; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Tyler Thomas is hereby appointed as by-law enforcement officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Parking By -Law and Saint John Traffic By -Law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until they cease to be an employee of the Parking department of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; 4.11 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-027 Report Date January 30, 2024 Meeting Date February 05, 2024 Service Area Growth and Community Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. 2024 Field, Arena Floor and Court Rates AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Jen Reed Amy Poffenroth J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION Your Chief Administrative Officer recommends Common Council: 1. Approve a 3% rate increase for the 2024 Field, Arena Floor and Tennis Court rates as listed in table 1.0 of M&C Report 2024-027. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sport and Recreation programming is an important priority for the City of Saint John, which contributes to the City's quality -of -life offerings and broader value proposition. A review of the Recreation Subsidization Policy is required to make an informed adjustment to the formula to determine how recreation facility rates are calculated. Staff began working with a consulting firm in November 2023 to review the Recreation Subsidization Policy; however, rates still need to be set for the upcoming 2024 field, arena floor, and court season as the policy review is scheduled to be completed by June 2024. Staff is recommending Common Council raise the field, arena floor, and tennis court rates by 3% for the 2024 season. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION February 27th, 2023: RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2023-46: 2023: Field, Arena Floor and Tennis Court Rates, Common Council: 1. Approve a 3% rate increase for the 2023 Field, Arena Floor and Tennis Court rates as listed in table 1 of M&C Report 2023-46. This option will allow time for a complete review of the Recreation Subsidization Policy Wee -2- July 241h, 2023- RESOLVED that as recommended in the submitted report M&C 2023-182:2023-2024 Arena Ice Rates, Common Council approve a 3% rate increase as listed in table 1 of M&C Report 2023-182 for the 2023- 2024 Arena ice season. REPORT The City of Saint John provides access to recreational spaces and sport facilities for residents as well as visitors. These facilities and spaces are valued, and important municipal services. Those who have access to quality recreation opportunities are proven to be heathier, happier, and more connected to their community. Recreation and sport infrastructure can spur economic activity, attract residents and visitors, and create a source of community pride and spirit. It is for all these reasons that the City invests in these services and why residents have come to value and expect their provision. To ensure recreation facilities and spaces are accessible to all residents, the City must consider if the fees and charges to access these spaces are set at an appropriate level. To that end, the City is undertaking a Recreation Subsidy Policy Review. This project is an opportunity to look at fees and investment levels (subsidy) to understand if they best reflect the needs of the community in a balanced, equitable, transparent, and consistent fashion. Staff began working with RC Strategies in November 2023 to review the Recreation Subsidization Policy. RC Strategies is a Canadian consulting firm specializing in recreation, parks, trails, tourism, and culture planning. The project workplan (Appendix A) is scheduled to take eight months and is comprised of four phases; each phase has subcategories identified for competition. The four Phases are: Phase 1: Understanding Local and Project Context - Policy and planning background, research of leading practices, community demographic analysis. Phase 2: Contributor Engagement - Engagement and communication plan, internal and external discussion sessions. Phase 3: Fees and Charges Leading Practices - Environmental scan Phase 4: Setting an investment approach. - Analysis of existing approaches, key finding workshop, approach report drafts, council presentation, contributor communication, implementation plan and final report. Per the workplan schedule, staff is scheduled to return to Common Council in June 2024 with recommendations for a new governing policy for determining facility 091 -3- rates. This policy will detail how hourly rates are to be determined moving fo rwa rd . Staff recommend considering an operational increase for the 2024 field, arena floor, and court season. Proposed rates are listed in table 1.0 of the report. For context, the rates from 2023 are listed in table 1.1. The rates are exclusive of HST. The proposed rate increase is reflected in the final 2024 Operating Budget. Table 1.0 2024 Adult Youth Facility Type Adult/Hour Youth/Hour Shamrock Artificial Turf (multipurpose) $102.90 $62.59 A Level Field $59.41 $25.46 B Level Field $40.31 $9.54 Courts 1-5 $15.73 $10.49 Courts 6-8 $9.44 $6.29 Arena Floor $64.71 $43.15 Table 1.1 2023 Adult Youth Facility Type Adult/Hour Youth/Hour Shamrock Artificial Turf (multipurpose) $99.91 $60.77 A Level Field $57.68 $24.72 B Level Field $39.14 $9.27 Courts 1-5 $15.28 $10.19 Courts 6-8 $9.17 $6.11 Arena Floor $62.83 $41.89 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT This report aligns with Council's Priorities of BELONG by enhancing the quality of life and social well-being by offering recreation, arts, and cultural opportunities to align with PlaySJ and PERFORM by establishing a sustainability Recreation Subsidization Policy. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES It is expected that a rate increase of 3% will generate $6,041.88 in additional revenue to help offset operating expenditures that are increasing because of inflation. For reference, the Consumer Price Index for December 2023 was 3.4% and June 2023 was 2.8% year -over -year (Statistics Canada). 31 -4- INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Staff from Growth and Community Services, Public Works and Transportation Services, and Finance has reviewed this report. ATTACHMENTS Appendix A- Saint John Recreation Subsidization Review Workplan Schedule WA v •a a U m G L 7 W LL L 7 m W �c C W W N �C C i Z u Y m n O a -6 E to U1 i Y v p `p N E m ° N v o o� v ,v ., `-' v O —:° E :° v 3 v �- v o -o Y� o o v y, w .� c a .O .o `O m a c> w v c o� v ai E O a N o v '� O m > m v v? N on ,� y v a Y `o u > `° C E m -u a `° 6 Z Y v N w ° C i C v .0 `° .° o >, Y c v -o O t of0n Q N v v v Y 9 ° c Y v E u ° a ° o v 9 9 v v ° 0 v 3 w° 9 .Y m 9 o o° v v � T ti v U v v Y v t v -2= c o o 2 C m E° -6 c c o w o .0 c a o 'a o .�, Y o .o v o 3 0 .c a v v f0 u ._ m o° o c '° v v o �, .� c 3 v o 3 > 3 v p E _a a. v a 0 o c -o - c c m o y v a �, 9 v o 0 -6 v v `o c c 0 0 a on c a °' v v o a :° o c a, 9 a a rEo 9 ovn .. .'-" o E v v m v 9 Y 3 c v N= E E v v o ocn 0 9� v — o a v c p o - v °' _ �- v o N °1 °- a ocn 9 a 3 '� v c3 O N y v� E O u v .Q ,� c v '� � E a m Y 3 O ._. v '0 0 u v w v - a �_ � .` v a o � v o v c� a uw v o N :_ o`n w N v 9 c o c o v Q i ° E o E v a o o v Y o o a c> v c v 3 > Y° o> ° > o o E a U o ° c c v E o w w w-� f0 a Y m 0 0 °1 o 3 c� ._ - E v o =o o v c o Y v Yo E mm Yo `o 9 a c c '� O o 9 v E 3 E c .' m e a N E O v on c O ocn c v - -o v °�' O v 3 E� Y ': a" ° -o Y Y° -6 '' -o d �- o `o .� 3 9 'c .� ro c_ m- -0 3 ,o .• Y E a c o a o v N M O .o c .c -6 c m =o .x m .� 9 v v C U a .c rot Y> in -6 >, w .� c -6 v `o c 0 v o a v m bA c -6 .N N i -6 y E m M C c 3 .� i O v u 3 c °' v o c ±o v �, o f0 c 3 9 c c N E ro v v o °' zu " .. 'Q t .Y c v v_ v - ocn .'� w :� c E 9 o :° rn 0 °1 = E i o v -o c rr °om v v Y u v u ° o v .c O m c E ,c .. v w °1 v o > -o rEo o u , c a .o on c c f0 c 6 u c w-- = C o O� -6 c v 3 `o o`n u o .O v ro " °,' .-: w t 0 o 3 v E .0 .y c N 3 o v a .c - m mc Y '_ o y E 3 c Q o oq Y O v v 9 c v =°> .2 - v d Yo o a v .c - v o o c on :° > O m .� m o o m E a a E= v O a`, v .. 0 9 3 v a N 9 E v fl- E m rr o a s `° a '0 - a 9 .0 Q Y Eo v m Y v p fl- 'c U -o c - Y '� v' = E v 3 'v :., v m = o Y 9 a 3 v� E w U _ Y u ro a o 9 v Y �, u N 0 ,, .v o -o c cc >, Y m �o -r3 _ o m v �, m .o c 3 p o a -o Y v YO u 30 Y a 4E m O E E O° OO v a N a Y on N O 0 0 '> p �' OO -6 -6 0 io E u = v v o = > .: E '� .°, .c c c .3 ° N v ° -r3 ° N v N a u - a 0 'c 3 -o 0 c 'x f0 c '3 +7 _ � c E ro " m ° c° m E v u v m N _ a > -o on 9 o`°n fo v .0 c E '" :° 3 °.�' v �, Y `o y on c c 'c c o o �- ''" E �' •,., 0 on y ai o u v 9 u` E a .y 0 a" 3 0 y N O U c N v Y a a � on c y .o v -o c m a y c 'c aEi o v m `> Y v o m t 3 ro 3 a a o> u 0 9 0 0 '^ v Y o u w v E a y av 2 E a E o' , v N U rco 0 �� oo`n v a c� 'o°n D a v a a 0 v w a .� ¢a � m m a m c m J n c w E no �, :Ec tv N O w a '6 m m w C ry O E r c N 'E cm c a o 3 o m 0 s `o '^ a w E a c c m O N N -o c rn N O C y N W = y e+ y w N tlq .E c .E E N o u c r-1 m O ba 3 !� N y 3 j 3 33 mo cc YH E E N OC sn6 m O w 0c mco ow am ay aTu u m a w u u rn aM wm aamo aj x- C7 o N N N N u C .°n E 9 -6 '3 o = v y c o '- c m > o ., O ro U f N io E N E m C m c bA -6 -6 N '� N N O0 O D ON '� C > Y m 'z- on a v D .y .v io `N ro >, C C Y N f0 v m -p a, N u a 9 9 U N 'C O N X _ C N 0 C C -6 o O Y a ro m fl- O v C a Y i --- to _6 v _? w N .� '6 c C N O r0o m a v v N -p `� t C p E N in � _ _ -6 N C it O -w to u . D w 0 3 a -6 E c 9 o N p ro o -o - c ai o E a E E 9 v rco �- N C m C a vN v m v 0 N .— -o -o a u v -6 E v E O o� ro >. rco >. o w co a N .o o a o v a c o u N 0 a a o a' o N u M 3 o io c c. . E 2 3 9 E u 3 m m v ,C > o E o u E N o u� Q 'E u E m a m c o occ '� 0 >c m Q 3 E 'c c v t 'v E c v `a° o '� J bA 0 Y '— V E a> E p'- c b u 'E v 3 rco � 3 c .°_° 'E v c 'c o 'c E v '3 ° 'v t -o .�uw c E o `vot E c- 0v 'w v v v Q oc v - c O-o Eo uouo oo oE mY co o MCA C Yf N 0 O c sue+ v j 9 E N v O E ate+ Ul c m to E a O N_ N un 0 E C .0 ro a Y N Y bA 0 a .c c v N a` v it 'E a .c N a` u O O m N a 0 0 0 0a 0 ° 0 0 ° a10i z r w z r c O 0 0 c w z r z 0 c0t •� z 4 a 10 z 0 L G o o L G o 10 c C C O o c 4 L G o Q •m Q •m a u •c •c Q •m w N .. w # a y w N O $ >• m O r, m W O U G L ti a# .+?• � U G O u O O u u £ U - CV] Task Description Review City plans, studies, policies, regulations/by-laws, and other supporting documentation. This will provide background information for the development of the new Master Plan, that must align with other plans and the City's overall strategic Planning Review directions. Review the City of Saint John population, demographics, community profile and forecasted growth and changes. Identify any unique populations within the city (e.g., seniors, youth, diverse, persons with disabilities, the 2SLGBTQIA+ Community, and low income) and review current services for such. Assess how fees and investment (subsidy) levels may (or may not) be a barrier to participation as well as other important characteristics of the Demographics population related to fees and charges. Identify recreation best practices that are occurring at the national, provincial, and local levels to capture current context and understanding of the municipal provision of recreation Leading Practices facilities and services. Outline the roles and responsibilities of the consulting team and the City project team, timing, and key implementation Engagement Plan considerations for each tactic. Discussion Create internal and external discussion guides and supporting Guides meeting materials. Internal Discussion Sessions Conduct up to 6 discussion sessions with City staff External Discussion Sessions Conduct up to 10 discussion sessions with contributors What We Heard Memo Summary of discussion sessions and analysis of findings Identify related fees and charges planning efforts and polices that Environmental exist in comparable communities, as well as current fee standards Scan in place. W Responsibil Meaghan Mike Timeline Gather inputs from client Policy Review Draft: December 6 for policy and planning Completed: December 14 review Reports: November 24 Analysis of demographics Demogaphic Analysis: December to determine impact on 14 access levels to recreation. Draft: November 30 (share with client) Completed: December 12 Develop research plan Develop research plan Draft: November 30 (share with client) Develop engagement Completed: December 13 Develop engagement plan plan Draft: January 5 (share with client) Completed: January 12 Create discussion guides Create discussion guides Schedule Week of January 22 Host discussion sessions Schedule Week of Febuary 12 Host discussion sessions Draft: Febuary 26 (share with client) Analysis of findings Completed: March 13 Develop report Draft: Febuary 16 (share with client) Completed: March 4 01-1 ities Meaghan / Holly Devon Gather documents for review Write up policy analysis summary Community Analysis of demographic reports demographics GIS Analyis / Write up of analysis Mapping Develop research plan Conduct research Write up findings Support development of engagement plan Note taking discussion sessions Note taking discussion sessions Write up summary of discussion sessions Kul Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution Property: 172 City Line Public Hearing, 1" and 2nd Reading: February 5, 2024 Item Required: Recommendation (Y/N) Municipal Plan No Amendment Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 1St and 2nd reading to an Amendment Amendment to the Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an area of area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PIDs 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). Other No 3rd Reading: Tentative date February 20, 2024 Item: Required: Recommendation (Y/N) Municipal Plan No Amendment Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 3rd reading to an Amendment to Amendment the Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PIDs 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). Recission of Yes That Common Council, rescind the conditions imposed on Previous s. 39/s. May 3, 2016, rezoning of the property located at 172 City 59 Conditions Line, also identified as PID Numbers 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191. Section 59 Yes a) Any development of the site shall be in accordance Conditions with a detailed landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer. This detailed landscaping plan must include the following: i. Landscaping along the City Line frontage including the retention of the existing mature tree if possible; K1:3 1. Landscaping along City Line Frontage shall include the planting of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required yard provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. ii. Landscaping and/or alternative screening along the boundaries of the site, including along boundaries abutting residential properties. Section 59 No Agreement Section 131 No Agreement Other No PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE : 407_ January 18, 2024 The City of Saint John Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council Your Worship and Councillors: SUBJECT: Proposed Rezoning and Section 59 Amendment 172 City Line On December 11, 2023, Common Council referred the above matter to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation. The Committee considered the attached report at its January 16, 2024 meeting. Yeva Mattson, Planner with Growth and Community Services, appeared before the Committee and provided an overview of the proposed Rezoning. No members of the public appeared to speak in favor or opposition. The committee voiced disappointment that the applicant was not present for the meeting. Councillor Sullivan noted that questions for the applicant could be put in the recommendation letter to enable Council to ask them to the applicant. Questions regarding timeline of the project were raised as the applicant had two large projects before PAC during the same meeting. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PI Ds 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 2. That Common Council, rescind the conditions imposed on May 3, 2016, rezoning of the property located at 172 City Line, also identified as PID Numbers 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191. Page 1 of 2 40 City Line Holdings 172 City Line January 18, 2024 3. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PID Numbers 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191: a. Any development of the site shall be in accordance with a detailed landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer. This detailed landscaping plan must include the following: i. Landscaping along the City Line frontage including the retention of the existing mature tree if possible; 1. Landscaping along City Line Frontage shall include the planting of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required yard provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. ii. Landscaping and/or alternative screening along the boundaries of the site, including along boundaries abutting residential properties. Respectfully submitted, Brad Mitchel Chair Attachments Page 2 of 2 41 The City of Saint Jahn Date: January 11, 2024 To: Planning Advisory Committee From: Growth & Community Services Meeting: January 16, 2024 SUBJECT Applicant: Erik de Jong Landowner: City Line Holdings Ltd. Location: 172 City Line PID: 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, 55087191 Plan Designation: Stable Residential Existing Zoning: Integrated Development (ID) Proposed Zoning: Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Application Type: Rezoning and Section 59 Amendment Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law and amendments to the Section 59 conditions of the subject property. Common Council will consider the Committee's recommendation at a public hearing on Monday, February 5, 2024. Page 1 of 7 42 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is applying to rezone the site at 172 City Line from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to allow for the adaptive reuse of a former school building as a multi- unit residential building. In addition, this proposal would also support the future development of townhouses along the Lancaster Street frontage. The overall redevelopment of the property would also involve site improvements including new parking, landscaping, and fencing in order to not only bring the site into compliance with the RM zoning standards but also to transition the site from an institutional to a residential property. Additionally, the application includes rescinding the existing Section 59 Conditions which limit the use of the site to a specific proposal from a previous rezoning. Approval of the application is recommended. RECOMMENDATION That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PIDs 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 2. That Common Council, rescind the conditions imposed on May 3, 2016, rezoning of the property located at 172 City Line, also identified as PID Numbers 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191. 3. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PID Numbers 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191: a. Any development of the site shall be in accordance with a detailed landscaping plan, to be prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer. This detailed landscaping plan must include the following: i. Landscaping along the City Line frontage including the retention of the existing mature tree if possible; 1. Landscaping along City Line Frontage shall include the planting of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required yard provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. ii. Landscaping and/or alternative screening along the boundaries of the site, including along boundaries abutting residential properties. DECISION HISTORY The subject site was rezoned in April 2016 from Neighbourhood Community Facility (CFN) to Integrated Development (ID) and Section 39 Conditions were established. The building was previously a privately owned building and operated as a public school by the Anglophone School District South until 2014 and was rezoned in 2016 to accommodate a mixed commercial and residential development. The Integrated Development Zone is a specialty zone consisting of combinations of uses of land contained in a specific proposal through attached Section 39 Page 2 of 7 43 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 conditions. The previous conditions restricted the use of the site to the former applicant's specific proposal during the 2016 rezoning and that any permitted modifications to the site would align with the standards found in the General Commercial (CG) zone. The previous applicant and owner of the site did not proceed with the development. ANALYSIS Proposal The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to allow for the redevelopment of the site as residential. This proposal would include the development of approximately 37 residential units in the existing vacant building and, in a future phase, the development of townhouse units along Lancaster Street. The proposal would include the development of parking, landscaping, and fencing that would meet the zoning standards. Any future phases of the project, including townhouses, would also have to be developed to the standards of the RM zone including parking and landscaping. Additionally, the proposal includes the rescinding of the existing Section 59 conditions and incorporating new Section 59 Conditions associated with site improvements that will transition the property to residential use. Site and Neighbourhood The subject site is located on the Saint John West Side just west of the Lower West area. The immediate residential neighbourhood incorporates a variety of residential zoning ranging from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). These zones support a range of housing densities including multi -unit residential development such as townhouses. This is a well -established neighbourhood, with buildings built as early as the 1800's. The broader surrounding area is characterized by having a mixture of land uses that supports a diverse range of housing typologies with varying densities, commercial uses, community facilities and park uses, and industrial uses. The majority of the area is zoned for residential uses, including Two -Unit Residential (R2), Low -Rise Residential (RL) and Mid -Rise Residential (RM). The nearby commercial sites are largely General Commercial (CG) and Local Commercial (CL) and includes a variety of convenience stores, local daycares, and bed -and -breakfasts. Community uses, including Beaconsfield Middle School, Seaside Elementary, Martello Tower, and a variety of churches also are present in the wider neighbourhood. Queen Square West sits in very close proximity to the site and serves as a large neighborhood park that allows active and passive recreation for residents. The playground on site will be demolished, but while some children in the neighborhood may use it, it is decommissioned and not a public playground. The next available playground is 500 metres away on City Line behind the Hilton Belyea Arena. Seaside Elementary to the North and Carleton Community Centre to the South also contain large playgrounds and outdoor recreation amenities. Page 3 of 7 44 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 The subject site is accessible by a variety of transportation options. The area is served by Saint John Transit Route 15, with transit stops located adjacent to the subject site. Route 15 is the main route for the west side and provides a connection to the major commercial node on Fairville Boulevard as well as directly to Uptown. Pedestrian movement is facilitated by sidewalks on nearly every surrounding street. While there are no dedicated bike lanes, the main roads are wide enough to accommodate shared uses. Municipal Plan and Rezoning Municipal Plan The site is designated as Stable Residential in the Municipal Plan. An analysis of the proposal with respect to the relevant policies of the Municipal Plan is provided in Attachment 2. The proposal conforms to the policies established within the Municipal Plan, which supports the diversification of housing typologies within established neighbourhoods. While a density target is not provided for Stable Residential areas, housing of almost every form and density may be found. Development proposals located within existing neighbourhoods should take into account the existing neighbourhood context and should reinforce the predominant community character and make a positive contribution to the existing neighbourhood. The rezoning application provides for the adaptive reuse of a vacant former school, which has served as a landmark in the area since its construction in the 1920s. The additional structures proposed for the property are townhouse units which represent an existing building typology found in the near vicinity of the property. The proposed development is compatible with the vision established within the Municipal Plan, as the proposed development: • Provides densification in an area with existing municipal services. • Is compatible with surrounding land uses given that the project involves the adaptive reuse of a nearly 100-year-old structure and the addition of new dwelling units which will align with the established building typologies found within the neighbourhood. The proposal represents an opportunity to support additional density in a suburban context while retaining the community character through the adaptive reuse of a landmark building. The future phase, which is proposed to include new townhouses, would align with the general character of the area which includes a number of townhouse developments. Due to the alignment of the proposal with the Municipal Plan Policies (Attachment 2), staff are of the opinion that the proposed development achieves the intent of the Municipal Plan based on the proposed use. Zoning The Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Zone accommodates a range of medium -density residential uses ranging from a single -detached dwelling to multi -unit buildings. The RM zone is compatible with the surrounding development pattern, which includes multi -unit building typologies. The proposed multi -unit and multi -building development aligns with the regulations established for Page 4 of 7 45 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 the RM zone within the City's Zoning By -Law. This includes the provision of the required onsite parking spaces to support the dwelling units, amenity space, and landscaping. A variance may be required for the setback for the proposed northeast parking area abutting 269 St John Street, but the rest of the proposal meets the standards of the RM zone. Parking is proposed in numbers that meet the zoning standards and includes two accessible stalls. The new access onto St John Street also meets the standards of the RM zone and will create an easier path of travel for vehicles and pedestrians than the previous single access onto City Line. The landscaping requirements for the site, as dictated by the Zoning By -Law, will see screening established between the parking and the abutting residential neighbours to create a physical and visual buffer that helps separate the lower density use from the proposed development. Where landscaped screening will not be viable, due to limited setbacks, a privacy fence will be erected on the boundary to provide physical screening for adjacent lower density residential. The playground on site will be demolished, as it is decommissioned and not a public playground, to make space for the required parking and landscaping. Some variances will be required for the rear setbacks from Lancaster Street as the parking infringes on the required setback. Any such variances can be granted by the Development Officer and will be reviewed upon submission of site and landscaping plans as part of the building permit application process. Due to the large amount of hard surfacing of the site when it was an institutional use, landscaping will be a main focus of the section 59 conditions. While the Zoning By -Law has landscaping standards that must be adhered to, Section 59 conditions requiring detailed landscaping plans to be approved by the Development Officer are recommended to ensure higher quality landscaping than generally required for the RM zone and to help ensure the site successful transitions from a long-standing institutional use to a residential use. Section 59 Conditions and The Affordable Housing Action Plan Common practice in the City of Saint John has been to include a Section 59 condition that limits proposed rezonings to a maximum number of dwelling units. The unit number caps have always been tied to the specific proposal presented as part of the rezoning process and have been used to tie a rezoning to a very specific development proposal. This trend has resulted in an increased number of Section 59 amendment applications being submitted to allow increases to the unit count within existing developments and occasionally in advance of new construction projects. These increases are often minimal in nature and are typically the result of design changes to the size of proposed dwelling units as opposed to expansion of the existing or proposed building footprint. With the adoption of the City's Affordable Housing Action Plan, staff are looking at amending previous practices to "permit/encourage various innovative housing models to help expand the supply of housing". While the applicant has proposed to rezone to Mid -Rise Residential to accommodate approximately 44 dwelling units between two phases, staff undertook an assessment of the existing building and property to determine if there would be existing capacity for a possible unit Page 5 of 7 46 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 increase in the future. If a proposal were to be brought forward to increase the unit count above the proposed number of units, it would be subject to the standards established in the RM zoning, as well as being required to meet the requirements of the National Building Code of Canada. The owner would also be required to apply for a Change of use Permit which will allow Building to review floor plans and conduct an inspection of fire separation and safety. The existing building has a large footprint and lot size, which based on the standards of the RM zone means it could accommodate a higher number of units if they are of smaller size. The site does have limited capacity for parking and amenity space and will largely be working within the existing building. In the future, any large expansion of residential use would likely require variance applications that require a staff review which acts as mechanism to ensure that proposed development is suitable for the size of the property. Staff recommend not requiring any Section 59 conditions related to the number of units allowable as the requirements of the Zoning Bylaw and the Building Code act as structures to limit the development of the site for future use. Section 59 conditions regarding landscaping are recommended to help improve the character of the site and to acknowledge the transition of the site from an institutional property into a residential use. Since a large portion of the required landscaping areas abuts neighbouring residential properties, requiring a landscaping plan to be approved by the Development Officer is recommended as part of the Section 59 conditions to make sure adequate landscaping and screening is provided. Due to the size of the development, more intensive landscaping for the frontage, generally seen in commercial zones across the city, is recommended. These frontage landscaping conditions would encourage the planting of more shrubs and trees than is required by the general residential landscaping standards. Tree retention is also recommended as part of the conditions but should there be unavoidable loss of the existing tree, the strict landscaping requirements for the front yard would see the introduction of new trees and shrubs regardless. Conclusion The proposed rezoning to redevelop the existing building into multi -unit residential with a future phase for townhouse development, aligns with the policies established in the City's Municipal Plan and conforms to the City's Zoning By -Law. The proposed rezoning and Section 59 amendment will facilitate the use of the property as a multi -unit and multi -building residential development while also seeing site improvements associated with parking, landscaping, and fencing. Staff are recommending approval of the rezoning and section 59 amendment. ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No alternatives were considered. ENGAGEMENT In accordance with the Committee's Rules of Procedure, notification of the proposal was sent to landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on December 18, 2023. The public hearing notice was posted on the City of Saint John website on or before January 11, 2023. Page 6 of 7 47 City Line Holdings Ltd. 172 City Line January 16, 2024 APPROVALS AND CONTACT Manager I Director I Commissioner Jennifer Kirchner, RPP, MCIP I David Dobbelsteyn I Amy Poffenroth Contact: Yeva Mattson Telephone: (506) 721-8453 Email: yeva.mattson@saintjohn.ca Application: 23-0246 APPENDIX Map 1: Aerial Photography Map 2: Future Land Use Map 3: Zoning Attachment 1: Site Photography Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy Review Submission 1: Site Plan Page 7 of 7 48 `\ J kh o S"s, J � R 1 %4 1 L J E E O E U) O E U U o O U a � U � U U V C7 0 � a Lo m O O u O m 0 O O 0 0 C7 O O r m W O O x x m N W N U O U W U) D 70 M J N LL M N O N M N W ^U) �W/ I.A_ W T E c: n N N O N O J (n 0 V ! W � 22tbG � 0 7 0 0 ono y \ LL 7 0 ° / { ( § y / § / j 3 3 2 LO 2 E N/ 7 7 7 f \ \ \ CL > \ \ \ \ \ ATTACHMENT 1: SITE PHOTOGRAPHY Subject Site from City Line looking East at the front entrance Subject Site from City Line looking Northwest 61 Subject site from City Line looking at the Northwest side of the site which abuts with property at 290 Tower Street Subject Site from corner of Lancaster Ave, St John Street, and City Line Park looking at the southeast side of the site which will become parking 53 Subject Site looking from Lancaster Street — area in far right of image would be the location of a future phase townhouse development 6'i! � U C L vba O bb VF1 O 7 a) f6 CL O a) p '� u 4' u '� +, C V C: 'a bio O • CL .� CL � — •�_ s a) E tins S N O U L s C a) a) O U C U +� ° aa) O U a) — s '� a) o 3 � s a) � +° C: tw s �n a) C: -a CL a) O +� -0 L'- X E N O L > CCLA O CA O U 4, L p a O +� C M a) } Oso0 N L CO Oa °O s +1 ° a uo a) o-0C L C s x a) 3 p � N +� a) v, +1 L m +� C a) L i6 C VI C O s m m 4-S a a) i6 Ln a) p 0 > N •� Ln a) X .� O E s CL C 0 3 to s V — +� O +- •- L C a) > O O LnO C 0 ; 1 C +� 3 'X 4 Ln VI L -a -a N 'N 'tw a) •N VI tw -a N a)m C 'N L t:a O a p CA O (6 s -a -a +•' pp � -C +j +� s a) s p C Ln O U '� s = C '� tw CCA C O U-0 C L E i6 S VI S CL •X f6 V a) y N O 76 -a CL +� o 6) C E -0 C a) m VI +•' 6j +•� 3Ln 3 o °Ao 3stO`��� E ° m E do c + a) a) E � '� �' ° a) 3 0 o °o a) s Lo > a) s tin •E -a s ago a) .O ° > tw s L a) O aa) �, O -a C: tw' C p ' C: 0) � N U N S i6 'a +� L E3 IA w 3 x o a) Ln a)EA s CL Ln -a s ao .E N c o N N s o s N c° o -`� a) E 3 E a) a-•� N •a) a) •i6 'C w s C N CCA N L a CL Q CL �a C C E Ln �a C O O a) i6 O p (6 V) O 4• `� c L 0 +� -c 0 0 Ln > S > CL 'tw a N 3 a�i a) 0 W( c J Q u (6 �n E 'a_ _ _ a) — CL a 0 CL Cz .v 'a CL 'a O 41 o - aco E o 3 aa) 3 nz a) E ° +° � ° ° a) ° a 0 CL p ° -a -a s a) a) s s a) s a) s s C: s >, C a� a) s a) C U s (6 VI a) L VI +� (6 L= +, N P. = C > +, L a-0 +� 3 ° -°a .E o m u ai f6 C 3 +! E p CA �_ •L C a) C C: a) 14 a) U m s +� C " C o -a E m a) sa6 C O � cC6 O f6 O C y. N a 30 +, - a Q U Ln X�= M j a) O >, m N C a) s > 'a �+, u > a) 0� u c O C i6 L +, O O +' a) > ° CL 3 C > •E >� +•� "' L U `� N °; n c C s o 3 u� aEi 4� C' L s s m L 0 +� 3 +� C Ln U U n5 L E .E m C C f6 a) a) t6 E noo a�°i u a) 3 > a) a) - +� °�° C: °; a °) °) o 'c o o c c c + o m o m 3 CL a) +� s s 3 o E o 0 s � o ago C' `� s +' o °o +� aE) a) 3 U +1 N L Ln Ln C: - o �E a� 6�� s a�i c� s c a) •> N� -'L, f6 a) C f6 L +' L -0 a) C a E a) +1 O -a ,} a) (6 tw N C: nz s O E M> m O CL W a) 3 �> o a CL -a w E CA s (6 0 C •L i6 -a S CL N U CL +� C a) CL +1 Ln O •a) _a > VI a) •� CL •VI z +1 (6 L (6 F +� f6 f6 L ,_ O U a) L (6 f6 L C -a (6 a) (6 C CL >` Eo s tw L C +6 s s •Q C a) a a s 3 c o E N'n E a) a; nz N a Ln U a) C (�6 C s C �, a) E a) +' a) C -a U a) O 4� .v L 7 a) a) +, CL a o 3 -a L s O o +� +' +, L a) -a U C a) > L a s a) 7 +, °° X ° Ln s E �, a) � C ° s O � E C = O a)U a) nz a) i O U 3 O CL L O a -0 0 L s p N O S 0 O a) 'a C C U 4- C C N CL CL m Ln 7 0 0o a) M = . o °° m o 00 CL aaCL ) sao � o s a�i � E a�i o a) a�i Q j 41 >, N f6 7 J a-•�Ln J CL o C:E C •7 i U s y Q .t o +� C. E p VI E U :� N +, a) f6 U .O 7 .� 0 N a• f6 -0 U -a O a) p L a) p E a � U CL 'a U m O a +' a O m a CL a C: w -a a) L a) L LO LO a) C C:C: tin O C U C (C: (6 (6 3 ? C a) a — U qP p E C a) L �V) Ln +, O a) N U � +�+ +�+ L 4- a) 0 ' +' N ao C ° s C a) s C ° L •E O s CCo c °' o U 4 O L C CL > C N >O to N a) (6 a) L } C Ln a) C .N Q- O 7 L N LO •C C c U > � ° 3 > (6 p CA = a) 3 X a) a) >- +, +, 0 C o a) a) a) -0 E m a o a) to +' '3 � ° '� u s a a -0 — o c a) o p C E +� tiA —_ o 3 N � O c O -a a) • 'a a) +' s O > tw W (C6 > (C6 +' C p+� C ,n s a) U to O N +' 'X to a-0 E_ CLO C x +, f6 -a o .� ;� s> f6 -a E a) do M O CL a= s +� Q E 0� 0-0�s ° E a) CL a s c a) N 4' a) -a s E U nz +� a) .W — — C :t ° Q- H U H c 3 H 3 H C O ° L °' o Q tw ° L C 0 VI °�° a) s o a) u o o nz +� C C o O .L a) +1 C -a p O m ° U ° s ° E > �, C N O N +, 0- CL a) f6 f6 +, •w i +' +' � +' •L a) y C O W f6 E a) > to O a) _ C N a) a) O U a) 'a -a O U +� c w tw a) 4� 0 0 V) nz p nz 0 +, -0� a) +, 3 V U — •L U a) L f6 p aL) O C ao Q p a)a) U > C na5) C n5 a) a) a f6 (6O O o p 0 V) CL 0 N O CO 4 bio O Q )L 0 a) CA >- _a O V) � O L E +) 3 c .� s +� c c o o a) p a) L, C +' : a L O a) L E L L O N U N V O -a L O �-) o N p 3 a) 4 N ° U> ,n 3 4 i, L m a a) U - a) u f6 L ° E Ln C U� C +' W E a -a +� +� +� a) > a o L nz s a) E E s 0 0 a) L L E 4- +' ° E C a) > a) > � U O V) 4O a) a) a) U a) 'X -a M m C 0-to C C O -a C •— (C6 C C a) C M O O a) O +� +� C C .L L 7 E >, - >, `� p 0 EO E ,C (6 (6 .� V) a) to M a) -a M CL O y CA t]A 0 S N O U f6 vi f6 Q O U C O C a) 7 a=+ U (6 C a —_ 7 a O a) C 4. f6 +' p +' O U L C +1 to •v CL Q CL fL6 a) (L6 U p +� O Q O C Q LL f6 -a U p S a H 'a Q� -a Q a) -a O a to Q O N a) 2 CL to Q W C a O in Q O Q O 16 � .L) N N -a Q U O O .O U -a � t6 U 'a a nz 0 LO ti LO 76 +, c a) E c O L i L L s O c m nz tin c 3aEw Aso Ok I k o 0 - ua- �� =aa us s €GIL � J� " as — o ao g a 0 — w V z _ O 4,2 oa w� 2.M Uo m a ka a FG ap a \oo w l J /+� ve va v`Ja ve U Mai • U 133aUS NHOP '1S Z F U c O N co N N Lo n CD W �U O E � N QO � � U U) J Q CU � CO eq x 0 a O x a W 2 ®! saw z 0 u 0 a w H w H m .m l Ake Vb TV Al cc 0 0 0 • 0 0. C: O U) U _0 CM a� '= O n >% }' U co CP C37 4-0 G � =3 O U O O v �� cc U E O cc U) CL cc •— U) � U (� U) O E LO cc > cc a)07 cc O }'� L-a) L- O 4-0 0)}, O EE O cc C � O cc p U) a•— O N U U V'fn � - .0 O JO JO O� 4� E r _ 0 0 N O O � U N O �^ p co � � O � U O O � � Ca Cn — � U O O ca. U � � •U � M O N Z O 4� 00 =3 � G � • p O � U 0 i 4-J Lr) U) C 4� O i 4-J U • () O N � U }, •- [� ;f VE 11 n: tE CE FS Developent Shop PLANNING RiiTL)-)IhG IhiPItASTRUCTURF. N onestop @saintjohn.ca Phone:658-2911 Fax:632-6199 General Application Form GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN LO CATI O N CIVIC ADDRESS: T1 72 City Line P I D # : 55087175, 55087183, 55087191, 00364877, 00365247 LU HERITAGE AREA: Y / N INTENSIFICATION AREA: Y / N FLOOD RISK AREA: Y / N APPROVED GRADING PLAN: Y / N Z) LL APPLICATION #: DATE RECEIVED: Q "' RECEIVED BY: APPLICANT EMAIL PHONE Erik de Jong/ City Line Holdings Ltd Erik@slopesideholdings.com 506-469-4460 z 0 MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE a 77 Westmorland St, Suite 300, Fredericton NB E313 6Z3 CONTRACTOR EMAIL PHONE O w z — F- MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE Z Q U J OWNER EMAIL PHONE a City Line Holdings Ltd MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE Same as above PRESENT USE: school PROPOSED USE: mUltl family BUILDING PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE HERITAGE QRINTERIORRENOVATION [:]NEW CONSTRUCTION VARIANCE �STREETEXCAVATION HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT Q EXTERIOR RENOVATION [:]ACCESSORYBLDG PLANNING LETTER [:]DRIVEWAY CULVERT HERITAGESIGN H ADDITION POOL PAC APPLICATION DRAINAGE �HERITAGEINFILL J Q DECK DEMOLITION �COUNCILAPP WATER & SEWERAGE HERITAGE DEMO U w �CHANGEOFUSE SIGN SUBDIVISION OTHER OTHER 2 U El MINIMUM STANDARDS OTHER OTHER LL Convert an existing derelict school into a multi family building having between 35 and 40 units and z construct 6-7 townhouses on excess land facing Lancaster St O Y H 0 O U v7 w 01 consent to the City of Saint John sending to me commercial electronic messages, from time to time, regarding City initiatives and incentives. General Collection Statement This information is being collected in order for the City of Saint John to deliver an existing program / service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program / service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saint John will not share your personal information with any third partywithout your express consent. The legal authorityfor collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act For further information or questions regarding the collection ofpersonal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building 15 MarketSquare Saint John, NB E2L IE8 commonclerk(dsaintiohn.ca (506) 658-2862 7M Oty asainqohn 7 , the undersigned, hereby apply for the permit(s) or approval(s), indicated 7bove for the work described on plans, submissions and forms herewith submitted. This application includes all relevant documentation necessary for `he applied for permit(s) or approval(s). I agree to comply with the plans, specifications and further agree to comply with all relevant City By-laws and i-onditions imposed. Applicant Name C�� 2_1z g&�t� Applicant Signature eeaq'p utS,Shop Council Application GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN CIVIC ADDRESS 172 City Line APPLICATION # I FEE PAID I Y I N TYPE OF APPLICATION Land for Public Purposes Release Service Fee: $300 Section 59 Amendment Service Fee: $2,650 Non -Conforming Use Service Fee: $200 Zoning By-law Amendment Service Fee: $2,650 Satisfactory Servicing Service Fee: $200 Zoning By-law Amendment with a Municipal Plan Amendment Service Fee: $3,700 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION Where applicable, indicate the changes to existing Section 39 conditions, zoning, or Municipal Plan designation being requested. Attach site plans, building elevations, floor plans, and other documentation to fully describe the application. The submission of a preliminary proposal and a Pre -Application Meeting is encouraged prior to seeking approval. Please contact the One -Stop Development Shop at (506) 658-2911 for further information. Change the zoning from existing ID zone to Mid Rise Residential ENCUMBRANCES Describe any easements, restrictive covenants, and other encumbrances affecting the land. AUTHORIZATION As of the date of this application, I, the undersigned, am the registered owner of the land described in this application or the authorized agent thereof, and I have examined the contents of this application and hereby certify that the information submitted with the application is correct insofar as I have knowledge of these facts, and I hereby authorize the applicant to represent this matter and to provide any additional information that will be necessary for this application. Erik de Jong �?�_ Registered Owner or Authorized Agent Additional Registered Owner October 23, 2023 Date Date The information contained in this application and any documentation, including plans, drawings, reports, and studies, provided in support of this application will become part of the public record. roil Erik de Jong City Line Holdings Ltd 77 Westmorland St Suite 300 Fredericton, NB E313 6Z3 10-23-23 Mark Reade Senior Planner Growth and Community Services City of Saint John Dear Mark Reade: I have purchased the property located at 172 City Line, known as St. Patrick's School having PID's 55087175, 55087183, 55087191, 00364877, 00365247. It is my intent to convert this existing property into a 35-40 unit multi -family property. The exact number of units will be determined once I move through the design process. I estimate that I can create 37 units within the existing classrooms, however, the location of the elevator may interfere with that unit count. There is also land that runs along Lancaster street that I think would be ideal for the development of 6-7, three story townhouses. The current zoning for the property is ID, with a number of Section 59 restrictions related to the specific use of the previous owners. I would like to apply to re -zone the property to the Mid - Rise Residential (RM) Zone. Existing Site and Land Use: The subject property is currently vacant, but was used as an elementary school until 2014. The combined site is approximately 6181 m2. The property is nestled in a mature residential community bordered by single family homes, small scale apartment complexes and townhouses. The area planned for townhouses is currently a grass covered, sloped yard, with a small retaining wall near the sidewalk. Re -Zoning Proposal The Saint John apartment vacancy rate is extremely low at only 1.6% (CMHC Oct 2022). There is a high demand for new rental units throughout the city. The proposed re -zoning will add to the supply of rental housing in the city. This development will also include a number of CMHC affordable apartments. As shown in the attached conceptual site plan the playground will be largely converted into parking. With generous stall sizes and wide drive aisles, I can get 50 parking spaces on site that would be dedicated to service the residents of the apartments. The townhouse rKj Mark Reade 10-23-23 Page 2 residents will have a garage in which they can park one vehicle. The balance of the paved section will be removed and replaced with grass. I am also planning on creating a private outdoor amenity space on the harbor side with a raised bed community garden for the residents to use as a source of local food production and for them to use as a gathering place to create meaningful social connections. I intend to install privacy fencing between the neighboring properties and my development. Conformity with Policy LU-88 • The repair and re -use of the existing building will contribute positively to the existing, mature residential neighborhood. • The current municipal services are believed to be adequate to service a development of this magnitude with no additional upgrades needed on behalf of the municipality. • The site design incorporates buffering via a privacy fence from the neighboring residential properties • The existing building facade will be repaired and maintained. • The existing landscaping will be repurposed, enhanced and large portions of pavement will be removed and replaced with landscaping. With municipal support via re -zoning, this derelict property will be repurposed into quality rental housing which will enhance the character of the neighborhood and compliment the other nearby historic structures such as Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Church and the nearby Martello Tower. Once I receive feedback from you and your team and I know when the application will be heard by PAC, I will put together my own materials and canvas the neighborhood to ensure that the neighbors are aware of my re -development and have an opportunity to provide insight and input into my future plans. The neighbors I've spoken with already have all been very enthusiastic with their support and are looking forward to there being new life brought into this important community landmark. I look forward to hearing from you and working with you through this re -zoning process. Sincerely, ci�� Erik de Jong President City Line Holdings Ltd. rL! 3aEw Aso Ok I k o 0 - ua- �� =aa us s €GIL � J� " as — o ao g a 0 — w V z _ O 4,2 oa w� 2.M Uo m a ka a FG ap a \oo w l J /+� ve va v`Ja ve U Mai • U 133aUS NHOP '1S Z F U Proposed Zoning By -Law Amendment RE: 172 City Line Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to consider amending The City of Saint John Zoning By-law at its regular meeting to be held in the Council Chambers on Monday February 5, 2024, at 6:30 p.m., by: 1. Rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PID 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) as illustrated below. bb n� 4 � Our r y a 4� o- a r,g^r c; REASON FOR CHANGE: To convert the existing building into a multiple unit dwelling For details on how to inspect the amendment, or to register to participate, please contact the Office of the Common Clerk at CommonClerk(a)-saintiohn.ca. Written objections to the amendment may be provided in writing and/or verbally at the Public Hearing to be held by Common Council. To register for participation in the hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at commonclerk(a)-saintiohn.ca If you require French services for a Common Council meeting, please contact the office of the Common Clerk. NQ Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk (506) 658-2862 Projet de modification de 1'arrete de zonage Objet : 172 City Line Par les presentes, un avis public est donne par lequel le conseil communal de The City of Saint John indique son intention de modifier 1'arrete de zonage de The City of Saint John, lors de la reunion ordinaire qui se tiendra dans la salle du conseil le lundi 5 fevier 2024 a 18 h 30, en apportant les modifications suivantes : Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 6174 metres, situe au 172 City Line, egalement identifie comme le NID 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, 55087191, de Zone d'amenagement integre (ID) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM) tel qu'illustre ci- dessous. INSERT PHOTO (this is just a note to make sure the photo goes here on the web site, no need to actually insert it) RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION: Pour permettre un batiment comportant des habitations multifamiliales. Pour plus d'informations concernant la lecture de I'amendement, ou pour s'enregistrer a I'audience publique, veuillez contacter le Bureau du greffier communal a I'adresse CommonClerk(a)-saintiohn.ca. Les objections a I'amendement peuvent titre ecrites ou presentees oralement a I'audience publique tenue par le conseil commun. Veuillez faire part de vos objections au projet de modification par ecrit a I'attention du soussigne a ('hotel de ville. Si vous avez besoin des services en frangais pour une reunion de Conseil Communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal. Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal (506) 658-2862 NO BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-X A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- LAW OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: Amending Schedule "A", the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately of area of approximately 6174 square metres, located at 172 City Line, also identified as PIDs 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, and 55087191, from Integrated Development (ID) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). - all as shown on the plan attached hereto and forming part of this by-law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the X day of February, A.D. 2024 and signed by: Mayor/Maire ARRETE NO C.P. 111-X ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE DE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a decrete ce qui suit : Uarrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John, decrete le quinze (15) decembre 2014, est modifie par : La modification de I'annexe «A», Plan de zonage de la ville de Saint John, permettant de modifier la designation pour une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 6174 metres, situe au 172 City Line, egalement identifie comme le NID 00365247, 00364877, 55087175, 55087183, 55087191, de Zone d'amenagement integre (ID) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM). - toutes les modifications sont indiquees sur le plan ci joint et font partie du present arrete. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arrete le X fevier 2024, avec les signatures suivantes: Common Clerk/Greffier communal First Reading - X Premiere lecture - X Second Reading - X Deuxieme lecture - X Third Reading - X Troisieme lecture - X 78 Staff Recommendation for Council Resolution Property: 1440 Loch Lomond Road Public Hearing, 1" and 2nd Reading: February 5, 2024 Item: Required: (Y/N) Recommendation Municipal Plan Yes That Common Council give 111 and 2nd Reading to an Amendment Amendment to the Municipal Plan to 1. Re -designate, on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan. 2. Re -designate, on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan. Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 1st and 2nd Reading to an Amendment Amendment to a Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). That Common Council give 1st and 2nd Reading to an Amendment to a Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (1112) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 3rd Reading: Scheduled for February 20, 2024 Item: Required: Recommendation (Y/N) Municipal Plan Yes That Common Council give 3rd Reading to an Amendment to Amendment the Municipal Plan to 0611 1. Re -designate, on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan. Re -designate, on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan. Zoning By -Law Yes That Common Council give 3rd Reading to an Amendment to a Amendment Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). That Common Council give 3rd Reading to an Amendment to a Zoning By-law which rezones a parcel of land having an approximate area of 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (1112) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). Recission of No Previous s. 39/s. 59 Conditions Section 59 Yes That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 Conditions of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of approximately 10.1 hectares, located adjacent to 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID Number 55094981 and a portion of PID Number 00313031: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in accordance with detailed building elevation and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, garbage enclosures, outdoor storage, driveway accesses, vehicle, and bicycle parking, loading areas, landscaping, amenity spaces, signs, exterior lighting, and other such site features; (b) Exterior elevations of buildings within the development are to have a cohesive design E:ii] incorporating elements including but not limited to similar colours, siding materials and door and window proportions and trim, subject to the approval of the Development Officer. (c) That a landscaping plan be prepared for the site by the proponent, for the approval of the Development Officer, demonstrating landscaping of the site and including the following elements: Landscaping along the Loch Lomond Road and new Public Street frontage of the area of the site where the four multi -unit buildings will be located, which includes the planting of a minimum of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required front yard, provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. (d) The above elevation, landscaping, and site plans be attached to the permit application for the development of the parcel of land. (e) That any proposed changes to the development that would result in an increased sanitary sewage flow or water demands be reviewed by Saint John Water to determine that the sanitary sewer and water supply system have adequate capacity to accommodate any proposed change. (f) If any municipal infrastructure improvements are required to service this proposal, it will be the owner/developer's full responsibility and cost to complete. Prior to determining this, detailed engineering plans and a design brief must be submitted by the owner/developer's engineering consultant to the City for review and approval by the City. (g) That the developer provides a Wetland and Watercourse Alteration Permit, should one be required by the province, or written confirmation that one is not required, to the Development Officer at the time of Building Permit application for portions of the project that are within 30 metres of a watercourse or wetland. E:1iI That the developer be responsible for the costs associated with the installation of a crosswalk incorporating a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed new Public Street serving the development. Section 59 No Agreement Section 131 No Agreement Other Yes 1. That Common Council assent to one or more subdivision plans, in one or more phases in general accordance with the site design for the proposed development with respect to the vesting of the new Public Street serving the site from Loch Lomond Road and any Local Government Services Easements to be determined during detailed design, including those for the relocation of the trunk sanitary sewer, 2. That Common Council accept money -in -lieu of Land for Public Purposes for the proposed subdivision and any future subdivision related to the proposed townhouse development or the subdivision of the proposed multiple unit buildings onto individual lots. PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 22, 2024 Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council Your Worship and Councillors: SUBJECT: Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Subdivision Application 1440 Loch Lomond Road On December 11, 2023, Common Council referred the above matter to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation. The Committee considered the attached report at its January 15, 2024, meeting. The City of Saint John The committee voiced disappointment that the applicant was not present for the meeting. Councillor Sullivan noted that questions for the applicant could be put in the recommendation letter to Council to ask of the applicant. Questions regarding the timeline of the project were raised as the applicant had two large projects at the same PAC meeting. Committee members also suggested a time limit be placed on the development through a Section 59 condition. Staff noted that a time limit wasn't a component of the Staff Recommendation, but Common Council could impose any additional conditions in this regard based on the outcome of the Public Hearing. No other persons appeared before the Committee and five letters were received regarding the application. The Committee adopted an amended Staff Recommendation to Common Council presented below which incorporated an additional component to the recommendation that, based on the outcome of the Public Hearing, Common Council potentially impose a time limit on the completion of the development as an additional Section 59 condition to those recommended by Staff. The Committee also granted a variance removing the requirement for the developer to provide the pedestrian walkways required by subsections 14(4) and 16(2) of the Subdivision By -Law. Page 1 of 4 83 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 22, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: That Common Council re -designate, on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan. 2. That Common Council re -designate, on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan. 3. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 4. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 5. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of approximately 10.1 hectares, located adjacent to 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID Number 55094981 and a portion of PID Number 00313031: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in accordance with detailed building elevation and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, garbage enclosures, outdoor storage, driveway accesses, vehicle, and bicycle parking, loading areas, landscaping, amenity spaces, signs, exterior lighting, and other such site features; (b) Exterior elevations of buildings within the development are to have a cohesive design incorporating elements including but not limited to similar colours, siding materials and door and window proportions and trim, subject to the approval of the Development Officer. Page 2 of 4 84 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 22, 2024 (c) That a landscaping plan be prepared for the site by the proponent, for the approval of the Development Officer, demonstrating landscaping of the site and including the following elements: Landscaping along the Loch Lomond Road and new Public Street frontage of the area of the site where the four multi- unit buildings will be located, which includes the planting of a minimum of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required front yard, provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. (d) The above elevation, landscaping, and site plans be attached to the permit application for the development of the parcel of land. (e) That any proposed changes to the development that would result in an increased sanitary sewage flow or water demands be reviewed by Saint John Water to determine that the sanitary sewer and water supply system have adequate capacity to accommodate any proposed change. (f) If any municipal infrastructure improvements are required to service this proposal, it will be the owner/developer's full responsibility and cost to complete. Prior to determining this, detailed engineering plans and a design brief must be submitted by the owner/developer's engineering consultant to the City for review and approval by the City. (g) That the developer provides a Wetland and Watercourse Alteration Permit, should one be required by the province, or written confirmation that one is not required, to the Development Officer at the time of Building Permit application for portions of the project that are within 30 metres of a watercourse or wetland. (h) That the developer be responsible for the costs associated with the installation of a crosswalk incorporating a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed new Public Street serving the development. 6. That Common Council assent to one or more subdivision plans, in one or more phases in general accordance with the site design for the proposed development with respect to the vesting of the new Public Street serving the site from Loch Lomond Road and any Local Government Services Easements to be determined during detailed design, including those for the relocation of the trunk sanitary sewer, Page 3 of 4 85 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 22, 2024 7. That Common Council accept money -in -lieu of Land for Public Purposes for the proposed subdivision and any future subdivision related to the proposed townhouse development or the subdivision of the proposed multiple unit buildings onto individual lots. 8. That Common Council, based on the outcome of the Public Hearing, potentially impose a time limit on the completion of the development as an additional Section 59 condition to those recommended by Staff. Respectfully submitted, Brad Mitchell Chair Attachments Page 4 of 4 86 The City of Saint Jahn ate: To: From: Meeting: SUBJECT Applicant: Landowner: Location: .s Existing Plan Designation: Proposed Plan Designation January 12, 2024 Planning Advisory Committee Growth & Community Services January 16, 2024 Slopeside Holdings Paula and Jean Tippett 1440 Loch Lomond Road 00313031 and 55094981 Stable Residential and Urban Reserve Stable Residential Existing Zoning: Two Unit Residential (R2) and Future Development (FD) Proposed Zoning: Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Application Type: Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Subdivision, and Variance Jurisdiction: The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Municipal Plan and Zoning By -Law. Common Council will consider the Committee's recommendation at a public hearing on Monday, February 5, 2024. Page 1 of 15 87 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to advise Common Council concerning the vesting of public streets. The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to grant reasonable variances from certain requirements of the Zoning By -Law and Subdivision By -Law. Terms and conditions can be imposed. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant has applied to amend the Municipal Plan Designation of one of the parcels of the proposed development site and to rezone a portion of the proposed development site to allow for the construction of a residential development. The proposed residential development will include four 52-unit buildings in the middle portion of the site along Loch Lomond Road and 18 townhouse units in the eastern portion of the site. A new Public Street, located in the eastern portion of the site, will provide access to the multiple unit building sites and townhouses from Loch Lomond Road. The required amendment to the Municipal Plan and rezoning is recommended by Community Planning as the proposed development conforms to the policy direction established in the Municipal Plan and conforms to the surrounding neighbourhood context. The recommendation also contains Common Councils assent to money -in -lieu of Lands for Public Purposes, and the proposed Public Street, along with any necessary Local Government Services Easements related to the proposed subdivision. The Committee's approval of a variance related to the provision of Land for Public Purposes is also recommended. RECOMMENDATION 1. That Common Council re -designate, on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan. 2. That Common Council re -designate, on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, a parcel of land with an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan. 3. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). Page 2 of 15 88 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 4. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land having an approximate area of 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 5. That Common Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, impose the following conditions on the parcel of land having an area of approximately 10.1 hectares, located adjacent to 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID Number 55094981 and a portion of PID Number 00313031: (a) The development and use of the parcel of land be in accordance with detailed building elevation and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, illustrating the design and location of buildings and structures, garbage enclosures, outdoor storage, driveway accesses, vehicle, and bicycle parking, loading areas, landscaping, amenity spaces, signs, exterior lighting, and other such site features; (b) Exterior elevations of buildings within the development are to have a cohesive design incorporating elements including but not limited to similar colours, siding materials and door and window proportions and trim, subject to the approval of the Development Officer. (c) That a landscaping plan be prepared for the site by the proponent, for the approval of the Development Officer, demonstrating landscaping of the site and including the following elements: Landscaping along the Loch Lomond Road and new Public Street frontage of the area of the site where the four multi -unit buildings will be located, which includes the planting of a minimum of one tree or shrub for every 45 square metres of required front yard, provided at least 50 percent of the required plants are trees. (d) The above elevation, landscaping, and site plans be attached to the permit application for the development of the parcel of land. (e) That any proposed changes to the development that would result in an increased sanitary sewage flow or water demands be reviewed by Saint John Water to determine that the sanitary sewer and water supply system have adequate capacity to accommodate any proposed change. (f) If any municipal infrastructure improvements are required to service this proposal, it will be the owner/developer's full responsibility and cost to complete. Prior to determining this, detailed engineering plans and a design brief must be submitted by the owner/developer's engineering consultant to the City for review and approval by the City. Page 3 of 15 89 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 (g) That the developer provides a Wetland and Watercourse Alteration Permit, should one be required by the province, or written confirmation that one is not required, to the Development Officer at the time of Building Permit application for portions of the project that are within 30 metres of a watercourse or wetland. (h) That the developer be responsible for the costs associated with the installation of a crosswalk incorporating a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed new Public Street serving the development. 6. That Common Council assent to one or more subdivision plans, in one or more phases in general accordance with the site design for the proposed development with respect to the vesting of the new Public Street serving the site from Loch Lomond Road and any Local Government Services Easements to be determined during detailed design, including those for the relocation of the trunk sanitary sewer, 7. That Common Council accept money -in -lieu of Land for Public Purposes for the proposed subdivision and any future subdivision related to the proposed townhouse development or the subdivision of the proposed multiple unit buildings onto individual lots. 8. That the Planning Advisory Committee grant a variance removing the requirement for the developer to provide the pedestrian walkways required by subsections 14(4) and 16(2) of the Subdivision By -Law. DECISION HISTORY The site has not been the subject of any past planning applications. ANALYSIS Proposal The applicant is seeking approval of a residential development incorporating four 52-unit four story multiple unit buildings and 18 townhouses along with a new Public Street in the eastern portion of the site that would provide access from Loch Lomond Road. The multiple unit buildings will be in the northern, central portion of the site and incorporate both surface and underground parking with a mix of one and two -bedroom units. The multiple unit buildings will incorporate a number of units deemed affordable by CMHC standards. Four townhouse clusters will be located in the eastern portion of the site and accessed from a new Public Street providing access from Loch Lomond Road. Exterior amenity space in the development will include a walking trail with park benches and picnic tables winding through the development and lands along with community gardens in each phase of construction. The concept is to create a park -like setting for the residents to enjoy with extensive landscaping across the entire site. Page 4 of 15 90 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 The existing single unit dwelling and outbuildings in the northwestern portion of the site will remain and will be subdivided and retained by the current owner of the property. Site and Neighbourhood The two subject parcels have an area approximately 10.7 hectares, with approximately 0.6 hectares in the northwestern portion of the site to be subdivided to accommodate the existing single unit dwelling and outbuildings on the site. The remaining 10.1 hectares will accommodate the proposed residential development with this development located on the northernmost four hectares of the sited closest to Loch Lomond Road owing to the delineated wetland and the Little River watercourse. The area to be developed has approximately 150 metres of frontage along Loch Lomond Road. Elevations of the site range from 50 metres along Loch Lomond Road to 45 metres along Little River. Lands in the vicinity of the site contains a mix of zoning and land uses including areas of single - unit, two -unit, and multiple unit dwellings zoned Two Unit Residential (R2), Low -Rise Residential (RL), Mid -Rise Residential (RM) and High -Rise Residential (RH). Commercially zoned areas include a commercial node at the Hickey Road/Loch Lomond Road intersection and a convenience store and gas bar located just east of the subject site with these areas zoned General Commercial (CG) and Commercial Corridor (CC). Institutional and utility uses in the area include day care centre, church, and telephone switching facility. An area of existing single -unit residential development zoned Two -Unit Residential (R2) is located immediately west of the site and south of the site adjacent to the wetland area along Little River. Undeveloped lands to the west and immediately east of the site are zoned Future Development. Municipal Plan The site currently has two designations within the Municipal Plan, the larger westernmost parcel (PID 00313031) is designated as Stable Residential in the Municipal Plan with the easternmost parcel (PID 55094981) designated as Urban Reserve. Stable Residential areas are existing neighbourhoods within the Primary Development Area having the potential to accommodate additional development, at a scale and density consistent with the surrounding context. Urban Reserve areas are lands not required to accommodate immediate development demand over the planning period but are meant to retain a supply of serviceable land available for future development when growth and land demand warrants its usage. When the Municipal Plan was developed in 2012, the city had a significantly slower growth rate and minimal development pressures. Due to recent years of high growth, development pressures are significant and serviceable land retained as Urban Reserve will now transition into active development areas. Policies within the Municipal Plan, including Policy LU- 4, provide a framework for evaluating redesignation of Urban Reserve areas to a land use designation that supports their redesignation to support current demand. Page 5 of 15 91 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 An analysis of the proposal with respect to the relevant policies of the Municipal Plan is provided in Attachment 2. This analysis focuses on the following: Redesignation of a portion of the site (PID 55094981) from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential. Conformance of the proposed development with the Stable Residential land use designation. Redesignation to Stable Residential Policy LU-4 of the Municipal Plan provides criteria for assessing a request for redesignation of the Municipal Plan designation of land. These criteria include: Not consider changing the designation of lands on the Future Land Use map (Schedule B) through a Municipal Plan amendment, unless the proposal: • Meets the general intent of the Municipal Plan. • Is necessary given lack of supply of quality land already designated in the Municipal Plan to accommodate the development, • Enhances the community and the quality of life offered to residents of the City. • Efficiently uses available infrastructure. • Does not negatively impact the use and enjoyment of adjacent lands and neighbourhoods. • Is an appropriate use within the land use designation being sought for the property, and the proposal is consistent with the specific policies regulating development in the designation. • Adequately addresses and mitigates any significant environmental impacts. Given the current demand for housing in the City, Community Planning is of the opinion the Municipal Plan amendment is warranted and conforms to the criteria established in Policy LU-4 for a change in the future land use designation. Community Planning is of the opinion the redesignation of PID 55094981 represents an extension of the adjacent Stable Residential area and is consistent with the general intent of the Municipal Plan of development proximate to currently developed areas, infill development, and development along major arterial roadways. Staff note the parcel of land being redesignated (PID 55094981) is 3.6 hectares in area with development proposed for a 1.3-hectare portion of the parcel with the remainder of the parcel being a delineated wetland and associated buffer. This represents a minor increase to the amount of land designated Stable Residential within the City Community enhancement will be met through the provision of additional housing within East Saint John and the City through additional density and housing diversity into a suburban context. The site is proximate to key employment nodes and supported by recreational assets such as the Irving Oil Fieldhouse and the Little River Reservoir District Park. Also, the site is located along a corridor that is transitioning with commercial, institutional, and other medium density residential developments. Page 6 of 15 92 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 Servicing is available through connection to existing water and sewer mains that run along Loch Lomond Road and through the site. Infrastructure Development and Saint John Water have confirmed that capacity exists within the water supply and sanitary sewer system and the area's roadway network to support the development. Impacts on the use and enjoyment of adjacent lands is mitigated by the buffering and plantings proposed along the boundary with the existing dwelling on the site. An area of single -unit dwellings exists south of the site along Omega Drive, but a wetland area and Little River provide between 175 and 220 metres of separation from the proposed multi -unit buildings and townhouses. Community Planning recommends approval of the Municipal Plan Amendment to redesignate a portion of the site from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential as it represents an extension of the existing Stable Residential area located immediately west of PID 55094981 and the broader area surrounding the site. Conformity with Stable Residential Designation Built form and density of the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and aligns with the policy direction provided in the Municipal Plan. The proposed development is considered infill development of a vacant parcel of land utilizing existing municipal services, which conforms to a key direction established in the Municipal Plan. While a density target is not provided for Stable Residential areas, these areas can contain a mix of housing types and densities. In this case, the surrounding residential neighbourhoods have predominately lower density building types such as single and two -unit dwellings with higher density multiple unit dwellings also located in these surrounding neighbourhoods. These areas of multiple unit development include two, 6-unit buildings located at 1421 Loch Lomond Road, five buildings ranging between 12 and 30 units along Inverness Place, and a 39-unit building at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Eugene's Way. In addition, a development including 2-40-unit buildings and eighteen townhouse units was recently approved by Common Council for the site at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. These developments have site densities ranging from 30 to approximately 63 units/hectare. The proposed development has a density of 35 units per hectare, which is comparable to the density found in existing multiple unit developments in the surrounding area of the site. While the Stable Residential land use designation does not have a numeric density target, instead relying on the context of the surrounding neighbourhood, Staff note the proposed net density of 35 units per hectare is within the density target of between 35 and 90 units per hectare envisioned in the Municipal Plan for Low to Medium Density Residential Intensification areas and within the range of 20 to 45 units per hectare in Low Density Residential Intensification Areas. In addition, the proposed development is located on an arterial roadway, which is an appropriate location for higher density development within a residential Page 7 of 15 93 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 neighbourhood. Given this, Community Planning is of the opinion that the density of the proposed development is reasonable for the site. Along with the density targets established in the Municipal Plan, the proposal conforms to the development vision established in the Municipal Plan through conformance with the following criteria: • Compatibility with Existing Development— Separation is provided from adjacent areas of residential development through proposed landscaping for residential uses adjacent to the proposed development and a minimum separation distance of 175 metres from the residential area south of the development along Omega Drive. • Adequacy of Servicing and Transportation — Water and sanitary sewer capacity exists for the proposed development. Loch Lomond Road is served by transit and a Traffic Impact Study completed for the development has identified that no off -site transportation improvements are required to support the development aside from a crosswalk at the intersection of the proposed Public Street and Loch Lomond Road. As the site is located within the Primary Development Area, it represents the infill of a site along an arterial roadway corridor where services exist. • Building Design - While the proposed buildings are subject to detailed design, the massing of the proposed buildings are consistent with multiple unit buildings located within the surrounding area. The proponent is proposing to incorporate articulation of the facades and varying rooflines to mitigate the massing of the buildings. Site Location - The site is located on an arterial roadway and is located approximately 590 metres southeast of the Forest Hills/Lakewood Suburban Intensification Area and 320 metres east of the existing Stable Commercial designation along Loch Lomond Road. • Impact on Intensification Areas — Multi -unit residential development has been and is currently being constructed in the adjacent Intensification Area with the recent completion of the Knights of Columbus apartments at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Eugene's Way and the construction of the Calabria Estates development off Mountain View Drive. Other intensification areas such as the Uptown and Millidgeville area are also experiencing strong demand and given this, the proposal is not anticipated to detract from demand being experienced in the Intensification Areas established in the Municipal Plan. The proposal represents an opportunity to introduce additional density and housing diversity into a suburban context within East Saint John to meet the demands of future population growth and evolving housing needs in this area of the city and the broader community. Housing provided by the development can provide affordability for many sectors of the market including a growing student population at NBCC and provide housing in proximity to employment nodes in East Page 8 of 15 94 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 Saint John including the refinery, industrial parks, and regional retail districts. Development in this area is also supported by recreational assets such as the Irving Oil Fieldhouse and the Little River Reservoir District Park. Also, the site is located along a corridor that is transitioning with commercial, institutional, and other medium density residential developments. Affordable Housing This development will also incorporate a number of designated CMHC affordable apartments. A key goal of the Municipal Plan is to provide an appropriate range of housing types. Unit sizes and affordability and different forms of ownership at various densities are needed to meet the needs and income levels of current and future City residents. The applicant is also proposing eighteen townhouses in the eastern portion of the site. These townhouses represent a building topology that meets the definition of the "missing middle"' with respect to housing affordability. These are units that fit within the broad range of housing styles between single detached units and apartment style multiple unit buildings. The developer's approach conforms with the intent of the Municipal Plan to integrate mixed incomes across all neighbourhoods within the city. Given this, a specific condition attached to the rezoning requiring the provision of affordable housing units is not recommended by Community Planning. From the above summary and the analysis of conformance with the Municipal Plan Policies (Attachment 2), Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development achieves the intent of the Municipal Plan based on the density, the proposed uses, and the building forms in the proposed development. Statements of Public Interest In conjunction with land use planning initiatives implemented by the Province of New Brunswick associated with local governance reform, the province enacted the Statement of Public Interest (SPI) Regulation under the Community Planning Act in 2022. The SPIs enacted through the regulation identify the public's interests and priorities for land use planning. Provincial, local, and regional land use planning initiatives and regulations such as Municipal Plans and Municipal Plan Amendments are required to align with these statements. The Statements focus on five areas with an assessment of the conformance of proposal with these statements presented in Attachment 2: • Settlement Patterns - promoting settlement patterns that enhance the well-being of the residents of the province, minimize impacts on the environment, and support vibrant rural and urban economies. ' CMHC, through the Housing Accelerator Fund, defined Missing Middle as follows: Multi -unit housing characterized as missing middle refers to ground -oriented housing types that exist between single - detached and mid -rise apartments. This includes garden suites, secondary suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, row houses, courtyard housing, and low-rise apartments (less than 4 stories). Page 9 of 15 95 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 • Agriculture - promoting the agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture sectors and the production of food in the province. • Climate Change - providing that land use decisions consider climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation. • Flood and Natural Hazard Areas - managing developments in areas presenting these risks to increase health and safety and limit social, environmental and economic costs to the province, local governments, and residents of the province. • Natural Resource Development - protecting the province's natural resources for present and future generations while fostering a more consistent and predictable regulatory environment. From the analysis provided in Attachment 2, the proposed development and Municipal Plan amendment conform to the Statements of Public Interest. Rezoning The subject site is currently zoned Two Unit Residential (R2) and Future Development (FD). These zones do not permit the proposed building forms of multiple unit dwellings and townhouses, and the applicant has requested a rezoning to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to allow for the development. From a review of the plans submitted with the application, the proposed dimensions and setbacks meet the standards of the requested RM zoning and parking standards, except for the following: • Multiple unit dwelling parking areas — Variances to permit more than 30 parking spaces in a row without a landscaped break and to permit more than 130 parking spaces for each pair of 54-unit buildings. In addition, the multiple unit parking areas will require the addition of landscaped islands to conform to the Zoning By -Law. Discussions with the developer indicate this is a draft site plan and the parking areas are still subject to final design with the overall site plan. • Townhouse Front Yard —Variance to increase maximum front yards in a portion of the development from 9 metres to approximately 10 metres. This variance is considered reasonable and will be processed through the Development Officer variance process (staff level) prior to issuance of the required building permit(s). This Amenity space will be provided through exterior areas on the site and potentially common rooms and fitness rooms for residents of the building. Servicing and Traffic Infrastructure Development and Saint John Water have reviewed the proposal and have not noted any concerns with respect to water or sewer capacity. Detailed engineering plans for the development will be subject to review and approval by the City. The development will also be subject to the City's Drainage By -Law which requires that the engineered stormwater Page 10 of 15 96 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 management plan achieve a zero net increase from the site (i.e., limits post -development discharge to the existing pre -development discharge). An existing 750 mm diameter sanitary trunk sewer is located on the site in a low-lying area that is within an existing delineated wetland. This sewer experiences significant inflow from the wetland and causes capacity issues for the existing sewer and any proposed development connections. Saint John Water and the developer have discussed the relocating of the existing sewer by Saint John Water to an area south of the development site along with the acquisition of any required Local Government Services Easements by the City. The developer was supportive of this request for relocation made by Saint John Water and had no objection to the city collaborating with their consultant to determine the feasibility of a sewer relocation. Costs related to the sanitary sewer relocation will be the responsibility of Saint John Water. A Traffic Impact Statement2 was completed for the site. Key findings of the Traffic Impact Statement are summarized below: It is estimated that 120 and 126 new trips would be generated by the proposed residential development during the weekday AM and PM Peak hours, respectively. • Study Area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of delay and capacity although some vehicle movements experience longer queues (over 100 metres in length) during the morning and afternoon peak hours. Forecast 2032 background traffic volumes without the development will result in reduced performance at Study Area intersections. Certain traffic movements at the Loch Lomond Road/McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive intersection and the Hickey Road/Loch Lomond Road intersection will operate with high levels of delay with anticipated traffic volumes without the proposed development. • With traffic resulting from the proposed development, study area intersections will operate at similar levels as the 2032 background scenario with marginal decreases in performance with the development traffic added. Traffic movements from the proposed Public Street accessing Loch Lomond Road would operate with high delays (LOS F during both AM and PM Peak hours but have acceptable volume -to -capacity ratios. • While traffic signals are not warranted at the intersection of the new Public Street and Loch Lomond Road, a crosswalk at this location is warranted with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB). The Traffic Impact Study also considered the traffic volumes resulting from the recently approved development at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. While the Traffic Impact Study noted that a second lane in each direction along this section of Loch Lomond Road is a possible mitigation z CBCL Limited. Loch Lomond Estates Traffic Impact Study. Final Report. December 2023. Page 11 of 15 97 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 measure to future vehicle delays, the City is pursuing opportunities to optimize the traffic infrastructure in the area, with longer term fixes being outside the scope of this application. City staff note that traffic on Loch Lomond is influenced by as -of -right development in areas along this roadway corridor and additional development outside of the City's boundaries. Through developing MoveSJ, it was recognized that Loch Lomond Road is reaching its capacity to effectively handle added vehicle traffic volumes, particularly in the westbound lanes. This is also substantiated through community input. There will be a point in the future where increasing vehicular capacity along Loch Lomond Road will require upgrades to Loch Lomond Road, improving access to existing alternate arterial or collector routes (such as Golden Grove Road or the Airport Arterial), constructing new alternate arterial or collector routes, or a combination of these various solutions. The review and update to the Municipal Plan provides for the findings and recommendations of MoveSJ and its associated Transportation Model to be incorporated to provide integration between the City's future transportation and land use networks. Over the shorter term, there are opportunities to gain additional capacity from existing infrastructure on Loch Lomond Road. The City's continued focus on a balanced transportation including Transit, would be expected to divert trips from private vehicles to other modes, reducing the number of cars added to Saint John streets, including on Loch Lomond Road. The addition of Vehicle Detection at key signalized intersections along Loch Lomond Road including the Hickey Road, McAllister Drive, McDonald Street, and Bayside Drive (Kane's Corner) intersections allows traffic signal timings to adjust to variations in demand, improving the efficiency of how traffic signals work, and in this case, traffic operations along Loch Lomond Road. The site is currently served by both dedicated transit routes and the Saint John Transit's new east side Flex service. In addition to the cost-effective introduction of technology (Vehicle Detection), City staff has identified an opportunity to explore another cost-effective technology, traffic signal coordination, which may also lead to increased efficiency of traffic flow along Loch Lomond Road. Coordination is the process of aligning the operation of several sets of traffic signals along a certain roadway corridor to improve traffic flow along that corridor. In the case of Loch Lomond Road, for example, coordinating the signals at Hickey Road and McAllister Drive in the westbound direction during the morning rush hour so that the signals at McAllister Drive turn Green when the traffic reaches that intersection from Hickey Road, would create efficiencies in flow in that direction that would otherwise be caused by forcing the traffic to stop for a red signal. Recommended Section 59 Conditions Staff are recommending a series of conditions be imposed in accordance with Section 59 of the Community Planning Act. These conditions include considerations relating to the design of the development and landscaping along the Loch Lomond Road frontage and the eastern boundary of the site. Page 12 of 15 98 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 • Detailed Plans — Staff recommend the standard condition requiring the development and use of the parcel of land be in accordance with detailed building elevations and site plans, prepared by the proponent and subject to the approval of the Development Officer, and submitted with the permit application for the development of the parcel of land. Building Elevations - The Mid -Rise Residential (RM) zone does not regulate facade materials or building design elements such as cladding. Staff have recommended a Section 59 condition requiring exterior elevations of buildings within the development to have a cohesive design utilizing design elements including but not limited to similar colours, siding materials and door and window proportions and trim. Landscaping Plan — A condition is recommended to require a landscaping plan, for the approval of the Development Officer and that landscaping along the Public Street frontages of the portion of the site where the multi -unit buildings are located be in accordance with the required front yard landscaping for Commercial zones. • Wetland and Watercourse Alteration Permit — A watercourse and wetland exists in the southern portion of the site. Staff recommend a condition requiring the Developer to provide a Wetland and Watercourse Alteration Permit, should one be required by the province, or written confirmation that one is not required to the Development Officer at the time of Building Permit application for portions of the project that are within 30 metres of a watercourse. • Sanitary Sewer and Water Servicing —A condition is also recommended that any proposed changes to the development that would result in an increased sanitary sewage flow or water demand be reviewed by Saint John Water to determine that the area's infrastructure has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed change. Required Infrastructure Upgrades — Consistent with City Policy, if any municipal infrastructure improvements are required to service this proposal, these will be the owner/developer's full responsibility and cost to complete. Prior to determining this, detailed engineering plans and a design brief must be submitted by the owner/developer's engineering consultant for review and approval by the City. • Crosswalk Infrastructure — A condition is recommended requiring that the developer be responsible for the costs associated with the installation of a crosswalk incorporating a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed new Public Street serving the development. Subdivision A subdivision of the site is proposed which will result in the creation of a separate lot for the existing single -unit dwelling located on the site, separating it from the proposed development Page 13 of 15 99 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 site. The subdivision also proposes a new Public Street providing access to the site from Loch Lomond Road. Servicing and Local Government Service Easements Saint John Water is proposing to relocate an existing trunk sanitary sewer in the southern portion of the site that is subject to inflow and infiltration. It is recommended that Council assent to all necessary Local Government Service Easements to provide for the proposed sanitary sewer relocation and servicing of the site. Land for Public Purposes The Subdivision By -Law requires the acquisition of pedestrian walkways at the terminus of cul- de-sacs to provide pedestrian connectivity on these dead-end streets. In addition, the By -Law also requires the dedication of lands that have been identified as a "City Wide Route — Proposed," "City Wide Route — Future," "Community Route — Proposed," "Community Route — Future," "Neighbourhood Route —Proposed," or "Neighbourhood Route — Future" in Appendix C of the Trails and Bikeways Strategic Plan. Routes proposed in the 2010 The Trails and Bikeways Strategic Plan have been further refined since the adoption of the Subdivision By -Law in 2016 with the completion of the MoveSJ Cycling Strategy in 2022. The 2010 Strategy included a much more ambitious network of routes which presents challenges to implementation as it involves numerous stretches of lengthy infrastructure spanning the full City limits. In an effort to focus investment proximate to existing developed areas, the MoveSJ Cycling Strategy seeks to develop a "hub and spoke" network — made up of a main "hub" destination (Uptown Saint John) and a series of important employment and commercial centres (such as the Saint John Regional Hospital/University of New Brunswick Saint John area) or residential neighbourhoods as "spokes", connected by cycling facilities that form priority corridors. A sizable portion of the subject site includes a Provincially Regulated Wetland and associated 30-metre buffer. The City's Parks and Recreational Facilities Service Area notes construction and maintenance of a trail in this area presents challenges, and as a result this service area is supportive of a variance. Given this, Community Planning recommends a variance be granted to not take a physical Land for Public Purposes dedication and instead obtain money -in -lieu of Lands for Public Purposes. New Public Street A new Public Street is proposed to access the site from Loch Lomond Road. Common Council's assent to this Public Street is recommended. Conclusion Approval of the application is recommended as it confirms to the Municipal Plan and conforms with the surrounding neighbourhood context. Page 14 of 15 100 Slopeside Holdings 1440 Loch Lomond Road January 12, 2024 Section 59 conditions are recommended in conjunction with the rezoning approval and the proposed subdivision is supported by Community Planning. Council assents related to money - in -lieu of Lands for Public Purposes, Local Government Services Easements, and vesting of the new Public Street are also recommended along with the Committee's approval of a variances related to parkland acquisition. ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS No alternatives are proposed. ENGAGEMENT Proponent The proponent conducted community engagement in conjunction with the proposal including consultation with area residents and a meeting. Public In accordance with the Committee's Rules of Procedure, notification of the application was sent to landowners within 100 metres of the subject property on December 28, 2023. On October 17, 2023, notice of the public presentation for the Municipal Plan Amendment and associated 30- day comment period was posted on the City's website. Notice of the Public Hearing for the rezoning will be posted on the City of Saint John website on January 1, 2024. APPROVALS AND CONTACT Author Manager Director (Acting) Commissioner (Acting) Mark Reade, P.Eng., MCIP, RPP Jennifer Kirchner, MCIP, RPP David Dobbelsteyn Amy Poffenroth, P.Eng., MBA Contact: Mark Reade Telephone: (506) 721-0736 Email: Mark.Reade@saintjohn.ca Application: 22-231 APPENDIX Map 1: Aerial Photography Map 2: Future Land Use Map 3: Zoning Attachment 1: Site Photography Attachment 2: Municipal Plan Policy and Provincial Statement of Public Interest Review Submission 1: Site Plans and Building Plans Submission 2: Traffic Impact Study Page 15 of 15 101 E U) 0 0 6 0 O O O � 0 o o 0) cu E E 0 O CM C O 7 O a) O_ O) 2 U a) cu E E LO O O) E O N — a) -0 Q' j O J cu cu C O pp7 f7>1 N q a) 0) cu E E 0 O C O 7 O N a) Q' L O) no N E fB a) J O O C Ln 0 T N N E � E EO U c r 5 C 0 N � O 0 _I _T U LL _T (6 mo (6 C a E O E O Z C N D 6 U O a m Y 9 DO�II�� C a � m O E U w C O N C N LL LL Q C n U E Q O � d N N M to CD 0 a in 10 a N i J K a o 0 o� �E U N Q Q O T T 2 OO T � E U O T � E U O N N '6 O LL' O LLr 0 LLr 1 � Z LL LL Q 7 N' I a o U � N n O N a co O N a m i s O N(n a cN o U I o U I U) I Fa P. E. ra LO O V) V) � L S 0 ° S C C •+_� +� o L nz u p s O1 to c ° a") I s U -� s E c x Ln tin � E 0 a� L E s m tw a) 0 a) 3 a� L C to u 0 L � s +° N s CL o ° a) o o m> ° c D� L 3 ° +� u a 0 a� C 4- p a) ° s c p a a) _� a) a) a C +� X do E a� +� s C to s C a) 3 E a) C c6 a) +� i (6 (6 f6 .� s C +, 'X (C6 X +� M C w o> a� Q +� E a' nz ° rn° o Z E 0� to C:� U E E 3 E +� � +� a C o a L ° E s p 0 ° 0 C C .� +� W a) O cn +� +, f6 L — U L O VI a) 0-2 C C VI VI L s Q 0 `� N t6 w °' o E o a t6 't6 +' s x C C o U 0 N p U 3 s a) O> -a �O C o C 'a C 21) E �n •C -a a) c6 a) 0 0 CL E `� w a) H c � > a) a) c +� o E Q s a) — u s U a) ao c .� C N L Ol -a — C In O +�+ C .0 C tin nz s nz +1 .� ° .° a� ao -a ° � C vi �, a -a +� C tin 0 s tin c c a� +' c c o c6 ° a� ° c a) p c +� L •C 0 ,C.O L C V1 'N a) ' Ln C 3 p� u CL X�� s o c o ao aLn CL E��i w E s � w C C L C U a w E o � p nz a 0 C L L s f6 m C 0 0 - } 'O Q O L E s o, 0 t6 O LfI N 3 -O a) C Cl a- o �n tjo'U Q (6 p +' C a) 0 0 C L.fI Cl L a) C a) 7 •C .L% : m C C •C L a) 0 •a) > +, O 0 s O 41 s O O U M CL • N c� > C '0 -0 " +� Ln U 4 C Q 4, E s j C 'a tiA � s p 0 - O a) N O a) p s > f6 C s L 0 VI L E a) C a) +, 4- a) U 3 Q L Q- C N +� N 'a 0 Q s a) a) f6 'a C 0 CL E L a) 0 0 0 a) tw s 'E C � � L S � 0 f6 f6 L CL L •N +, S f6 C 6 N ° ,} L �, L U C do CL a) L CL •> s 'VI C 0 �' a `� C +� >° U C C a) a; > o a) f6 U o a) p 3 G1 C .� Q 'a — C a) N a) .° .L p s 'a C a) s C a) C s L 0 0 a) CL N 0 �n a) C a) s C a) +' c6 'a i6 H s H 0_ n5 s 1A L L L Q ,U a) Cl CL L J C o U tw f6 U EA v0i j a) CLi O N a) +�' > a) a) �n Q CA Q 0 v�i v0i CL H U- M C7 C a) a) L p C a) 0 C +, VI U- 'C O E C U a) 4- >, °° do } M6 0 ° N Q -= to 0 +� U >, C a� N CL 7 > �n a- 7 Qj - do C 'a CL 0 L CL CL f6 L C a) a) f6 a) 0 C U 0 ,V 41 N 0 a) •V C to v, s 0 0 +� L a E mstio p - c us°s a) C-p c tiro o W C o 4- -aj > c a) a sto 3° w a) CO L a i m �-0 a s s V) CQ s CL s L > � s E s f6 ,� L � 4"� C to s 3 s > c a) o `� ° 'E +- +, L tin s 0 y CL s ao ° c 5 > tab In tiA Ln N w `n `n �6 m w 0 w t�6 �' o Q N u- -i, O U -a (1) t6 s U -6 N h0 L C L O i C > E j O p ,C f6 a) -a •L O vi C O CL +' a) -a te O +' > (6 a) O Q C N 7 -+ a) X N -0 bDOU a) � L +, Q S M 4, +' O O a) +, N CL 4- O > U O +' a) +1 -a O ° c (6 C L M N-a-0-0 +' (6 N Q a) EV L C +� s a) — c o CL LO :t ° a) o M a) -a ? 0 Q c`a CL 7 7 41 (6 � C C L -0 Q o 4 � p E o o s o o E 3° 4-+ s a+ o Q .� aa) u ai a) o c a) _ o 3 ° 0 .L E o a Ln o M° I °U' o CA > E E c CA a i i a� N + o" N c°" M s a� L ca 3 c O m C .� O 0 4- 3 o om +U (6 E E a) p . E a) > E L *' m— C 4� (6 (6 7 N a+ C CA 'X >; CA S - Q U a) , sCA s N 7 0 -a -a U O C 4� - O a E 3 a a c °� °) m Q- Q Q C S > L O L a) N s 0 v, m 0 +� -0 C U 'a p m C p m a) L a) S a) U E 4- a) 4-+ C N N E N C C L 00 CAS C +� (>6 >, p Q- to O Q E 0 a Ln CA c C + 00 CA L O s Q E a) 4 > CLA >, a) > S Ln C C Q .- +, U U O a) a) L , � -0 s -a � CA a) -U O a) -a Ln m Q > a) a)a C O ° 4- c 4- o Q ' E m 0 E a A ao a �E� a) m E +, pL E E •> s O a) — Q O E -C•++; s _C CA a) -a a) OL'aO U >C •> C Q- C 4'3C O •C OO V CQ v 6 Ln a) N -a+� CU+� aEMaEa) U a) p O-a +� a >Q OU E CO Ln L a) � -aa a) m a) Q a) a) -0 +av,)a) O E a a D 0 O a) 'a E a O +'s o m U LnE +� 0 r ° a) s + : o o � L ° s � +, a 4 3 N E C u s c a) s ° c w c ao O-0 oa a) o +� O �, O N a..l u a) s o to c C E >; S -c J E C 0 C p nz 3 c � O �_ c H u o -a aa)) 0 tin c 4 a) ° aa) a s a s E W `� ° m s to c E W 4� •o Ol VI � 7 N ° *' O U `H u C �n U N Q u c •X a) O Ln c bD a c s L o Q) JO (06 N to s 3 O s JO o a)a� ? a>i aci C c c c .� +� s a) u 4- 3 a u (6 ° o O o nz o E o O °o N +�OM N oto =M +1 0co° � E � O c ) O cO -a O a)"a>s +, I-- a N3 � >c" ° ti m N E :t •-"u N a)•+� 4- N s) N a a O o tw a E o a a) w +1 u 41 u o C � •° 0 a)+, ON�C a) , c +,Q � O _4, >, OIn :t a s aL_) ) sO E S U +, • N 0 C 3 a NCCal U a c o"E a a) > a ° � a) a aaL_)c an ai o Es.F Q a) -a +' C +' C Q a) O O C E U a) a)D N lO + C +o C a) MC U a) a) O O O Q � Oa) > ) >v '� a) O S•f_6 O O O Q U a O m O 0 'O C u1 O O O a) (6 Q a) a) (6 Q +, (6 s C Q aO+ +� s 0 C �n 3 L U N O a) N an N aco an a) a>) a>) a) N 1 � —aa)) o ao E 0-16 � s CL o Lno Q °) +' a s E m +_ a>i s° 3 u E t E c c +6 ° L Q) a) a) N > ° nz Lo a) o ° .0 O +� o ° ° c Q m a° Q c tW 4 L � �n a) � 3 a) +� -a n5 +1 ° u L 3 3 s a) CL — s O a u CA L° c +' � o 0 bD O a �' a a) in Q a f6 a) -a .E o C a) 0 s O (6 � a I (6 a") s o L �, .� > N .D m (6 m �C.a a) �' a) C 0 m m �C: s N °— i N -a qA H-0 c a) C a) L O f6 3 L m = m �° H n voi 0 4 a �° -0�° Q a) s -a 0 0 0 +� c c s a E nz o +' O O a) a) 3 L E CL Q' L C C O O a) Q — a) s � > a 3 a) nz +� E O— N +' O 'a '� U u 'a O C O N 'U O m 41 C: C m 0 0 a) a) CC.O 0 N X a) a) c E -a C -0 O •t 'a �a) a)E u W E-6 E E s � C -a a) 4� m ° C OU 7 > o s 3 C a o > O o o +� 3 +; a c 0 a) m -076 s O a) c O to -- bD O •aa -0 +J a `� -a c -a c a a c 00 a) a) tiA to O c — E m O s s J 41 U +� O 4- a) bD VI Q- U C 4' 'a Q a) 'o 'E u a a) a) g a s a) � O 0 a U E O +� a) U E s + O= O . 0 C: 0 E 0 J s U 0 J 0 c-I 3 a) a) a) C U 7 d 0 +1 C: a) E 76 U C 0 d C nz U 0 d C nz d 76 Q U a C a) E s U to Q C a) L s s W a)C m Ln 'O 3 a) a) a) ° F +, nz ,} a) 0 +, p a to +1 +� L nz 0 +� Q c 7 0 a) a) s s nz p to s cn a) a o a tin C *' : 0 s ° o m `L, a c a) o a�i s +� N o f a) v s° o s — a) U � 7 Q a�i L a) a) O ha ° X W L 'O 0 N C C 4— a) a) :t o to 7Ec a) 0 3 a) 0 L 'u tin o a� a) U >� U L CL O C -a `� C -a p s N 0 Q CA m -O m a 4-+ C a) 0 o p +- oo c a� c 0 N U a s '- E s c c a m° U N a ° cn .� 0C: U o o -0 a) c o N s u a) L C c a) N s aXi p L a) s a) +—�' s p +S '^ vOi s Q 6 - N s C cL6 c °� c� s L 3 m `� a 3 +' c c a s c o o +� a u m E o a a a) a) c s *: + a) to s a c nz -0 0 L > W 4� C � 0 3 a) -a W a �, _ 3 a) s 3 U (6 c) -a o C ,� L C C a) C (6 (6 aO+ L s L vi Q +� L Q o s -a +' L C 0 (L6 +� > p qA (6 � to a) O (6 Q L E L +� = a) C a) a) i a) O Q a+ O C a) a) ° f6 S U O N � 0-0 7 'a f6 E a) -a Q VI — p •C ac—o c C ao a) aco C ° O a) O O L 0 3 = +� c �n +� aa) p ac) a) � " ° S > -C O ° N +��+ (6 > ° a) J — C f 6 +' 3 a) 0 N +� -aa - a) to o •L .� 'a a Ln� 0 s c 3 c n S W 7 Ln p m-o > O a) o u Ln f6 O> o a) C 0 a a N •C C: a nz s ° 'a +, p a s a) E a o +� u o a �n U d U 7 L C-0 a) +' +� 'a s— 0 +� Q O tW +� 7 O C C E c:a) 4 N-0 a) O O O a) 0 S Q +� N �� J vi -a W O f6 Q •a) s� 'a Q 0 -a .L a) > �n N 4O O u o to to a) ° H N a) 4n E 0c ° 4� •3 L 0 Q o 3 w� CE CL 4� C s E � 4 +' a) 3 a) o a) o > aci O E L ' C' N " —_ C O CL -0 3 a ° N c:-0 a) f6 m f6 ; 76 +� s ; a) -0 a) 4�tiA c L 0 > a) a) CA c -a L c •- +� C L a" E as N a) 0 p u C C:a) a)E Q -O 7 N E a) S N L a) Q C a) (6 dA 0 s E m U N Q E�> = U a) a) a N 3: o- N Ubp o ° E Ln a) a) .Q u C p Q Q — a) a o s 'N 0 0 0 L to :a o 3 � p s U 4�— a a ° -a u nz -0 a)41 + > a) 0 C a) C a) a) •C O +� C 3 O L � > �n U a) a) -a C = C a) .� Q O a) tw `~ u C E 0 ,� +� L C Ln M a) " C tw m a _a -0 -0 " � -0 .c s m a) U C Q) L 4' •- 4= CC: (6 m C a) Q a) M v, C +J s a) .� a a) •U L m 'm a) •L E 0 u U °� o M a) ,} a) nz nz a) L c +� 3 0 � 0° a a) a a) c a °) s E s o °° - M -0 o �a�i o > •+>—, Lp s nz n a>i 4- 0 -a U 0 00 0 C s L> L a) f6 �; U a) N 00 N s 00 O ° N a) E 'a C 0 J +� a) a) �n N s O a) s a) s -a 41 a) C u +' U ° 41 C a) -a s C H Q- H H (6 �n Q cn (6 _ ao _ N nz > O > a) p a) O C L C a) a o c U c a w m 0-0 0 0 -leM �O N N ° 3 a > oN E +' o +' ° ° u Q s o ° hO E p +, c ° c s s E c s a) > > Q c U- o a) nz 3 +� > c } nz +, 3 X N ao a`) a`) N �° O r' +' 3 0 a) •a) aa)) a �° v o 0 D c 4� � 'O E f6 L C s = p -O S a) 'a In CCA W Q +O+ a) N L >, O a) O p a) � L +� a) C +� qA C E s -0 c a) ° `� Q N E o+ a) c s s > O p 3� +' o a) a) E C a) +, L N a) = C o a) u - a) Q) E +� t6 _ ° m a) p E s ° 'X °) s E `� ° U E s (6 sL C C -0 � + s > L ° a) +� N O E +n = +� 3 a) ° a) bD (6 .N to a) + U a) o C: Q o o 0 Q `� u E o o c6 o u � ° a) a E O a) J a) O U Q O a) 'a v E N Ln +' �n -a _ cn Q Q X U � U a) (6 (6 Q E > ° 0 •L t6 c-I hA a) t6 tw a) C � C C a) > L s +, L > N p L (6 s U 'O (6 E u s •°) c) �, Q a) f6 p° O VI O > Q h0 —_ (6 to +� a) ha Q a) -a N i 'L a) m W Q O0 � 0 Q U CA � O E 3 a) 3 m-c E t' 0s� o C Es J ` : aa))H a) E a") Q m > O E L Q Q +� O L +' O N t6 +� C a) O to L Q O O a) O_ C i C y. N o a) L L _ a) ° aXi L Q" 3 c O_ a) CCA c a) c U ` a) + do 'a N_ Oc 'L >, a) p C t E a) 0 O to c6 +� cn c s a) +� ° 4' v, c6 s U 0 a) J °�° s L M o ° +6 c o o F 3 U E O_ C C 3 < 'a o o cm O L 4; f6 C .LU > a� a") (6 p O C a) _ a) N +' N Q a) O_ a) a) O C� a a o •O 0 3 a>i O U 4° 0 3 E c s c a) �6 s a>i U} N bD a) ap C� a) p E u° c) � a 00 ° aco '� c c a w N aco w - O a+ Q O '> C 3 ° s u E aco O a) a) 0 aci L— O -a -a X N O a) L +, to U U 3 �_ E E (6 s C n5 (6 (6 (6 > N O N M E M a) M O_ C m u- 0 a� O_ . N •C +' +� f6 O i a) a) O 4— °A -p o O L L J L >, m a) ._ E U t)D O a) o 'O f6 C � a) +� X a) O 'a a) � p O C - do C •- +� 'O a) Ca Q) s m 'a C -p .Ln a) L n5 a) a°. . . E c N C +, (�6 3 a) a; a c N a) E Q> ,N 'a a) O E ° �; O E C> .0 s +' .0 L u E U u. U c_ L O p o 'O Q a) p O t6 C O a) 'Cu p ' p p t6 s p O 'a L L a) O l L a) +� n asHLOf Q L Ln C ++ � O U � 3 � -°a a c o a) s L 4. O V +� C U C � O L Q a) O •L C O •co U o •� E L O 0 a) (6 o a) 41 C Q E 4- L VI C: 'N u C: Q L U +1 0 0 C Q Ln , L L Q O a) 41 c EIn U E E a +� s c c 0 +1 C O c a) N4° s +� o o > c C: 76 a can } s a) .CL O >, s c V s 0 V L +' 4- s c OU p a) p �n C Q H 4� 4 U 0 r r t�: L C (6 Q O C: O (1) L +, C Q V) O L m � �-+ � U L •L EL C Q s a) C L V) s +� L 0 +, a) L Vi ~ 7 a) L i6 a) C N 0 CA C L X i0 M p N a) m 'O 7 s a Q N a) s a) a o -a +, a) 3 +' C m O CL U C m a-+ C -a p 4- C Q � a) c -a :t Ln O O a) - c f6 -a E s — Q N +� .- a) V) C s s a-+ L �' L Q -0 U 4. E ° E s C0 � c O r-I s +� E m a s s 4• E o N ° 3 o N ° a) aa) o c nz +1ho U OL 'a CL E a° _ tw +� �, L �, E N O L E s E O a) +, ° C 0 O > (6 C ° a) O 4- a) o � V' s L C co p U N W N m �, OL Ln Q •E -a •C �O � ,N >, .0 � s Ln Q C L a0 CA } _ a) f6 _ •3 Q Co Q 7 'U U f i ' 'V) s O f6 N C L N u s_a o to C C N to Q o Q� f6 a) s CA to Q a) : tw '° a) O E C f6 O a) a) a) a) 4, a) O a) E> 'a 4-+ (6 C -a f6 C C o o c� �"W -a V) m ° 'a >` 4 J o C U •� Q M (a U •� N ° O U N U O a) O C (6 a) CO N N C° �., U X Q s a L nz •� s E x +' N U +1 a) ° 3 L O L C O a) C 3 O w CA s •> Ln L Q- Q to a) to C C CL to +' N 4O O J �Q+ ° C a) +� +' f6 O O +� U C C CA C-a O f6 a) a) E > a) L O (6 O Ln O C CA C a) +, >. 4- +, O +, E p C Q •V +� f6 +� ° N a) s 'a 'a > O p O a) w O a) a) O U > s +' a) U L a) L U E -_ a) In s T� ._ C a) 7 J L 'L L (6 J C L (6 -a O +p +, C a) U s c `•~ 3 C N E- s u °) L s° Ln a �, Cn O +6 .N E c tw s E-° ° m tw m o° c o a) -0 M a) O V' a) +' O O 3 C tw L } .� Ln s to +1 C o U ai > N c N c c f6 a) 4-+ o -a U Q _ O S U O •7 � L IIn a) — _ 7 � Cn C 'N O O O 'a = 7 +� C L U a) +, C vS >' C a) +' E c o L ° C nz a ° s °° '� a) a) N E � `� a) E - N a) E -0 � N a) L `� 3 .° c ° ao -a m— c '� o U s U a) s° Q- ao E o +� c a) a oc nz a= °) s ° oo V)M -a ) s = 0 � � E a ai >m Qa) + o° a _ 0 ai V)C-0U U C C a) +� a 6 L Q > N L C C s °' +a�) a ° L' 0 �) jo > E Q •� Oa)7 a) - C ) C s )a) C Q tw a) ON C Ol EoL O o 0- s 'a Q CA Q QQa-0 Lu QNU a tin C tw } vi c '3 v' a) C O .X U a) E� a) a N C: nz +� nz a) s m C: 0 s 0 a) o I a 4' U L U +) C p I a C C +� _— i +1 `� C E a) a) +' a) a) � s U > o s -a s °° E L U s �- 3 +1 L +� CA a) ° -a c a) > L c c (6 > x Q) Q O s a) s •U -0 � a) +1 C C +, — c a) O C a) -a •- O Q C Q O a) U u 4' E 'a C ( C s CC0 C° 6 a•' >- -0 ° U a) Q +� " ' 4, � — C nz s E M o o s a) a° a) CCo �, 'X °—' 3 s Lo c 'u a) s nz - a) OVA a) -a a) a) U 4- a) +� a) s W ,E L Q U U a C •� N S � V 'o N Q V L O p V, N Q) " L U p 4-+ E fL6 3 V' a) 3 c a) s nz cn +' L ° `� U° u V' c o ES Ln a) ° O C 4+ 'C C a) U a) U i Q C a O p O U O a) CQ L4>+ X 1n-0 a) E• CCCL ) Q A Q C 0 6 a) O C:-0CA ) CA C U C C , C O Oo -0 io O C U y Ln L > U V' •V' � 7 U � u _a 'V' s V a))a s Q- V a)) to V L CL 4-1 to ,a Q- — nz E v; E a) cCL 'L c+n 3 a c s to to +' °�° O W a) CA (6 Q > C .L CA C C 'C Q .0 m 'a O CA C E a) 'L > C 0 O p Q OL a) N U Q C t' Q = 7 Q L 'a a) �_ OD +, C a) •O OU '7 4O 0 W s CL 7 a) -0 H c6 f6 _ Q J D c c6 E" O�-0 Q 4- U O D (6 C a) - -a = = a o c6 ci ai O C — 0 a W 4- -a a) C L O +' CA N N +� ) a) u Ln C:s 0 a) a) 4' s �° 4-0 o a C ai LnE >, 0 +- a) c m a) +' 0 c 46 ° ° c 3 + a) a°i o ° a) a) a) •c s o a) '> L N > N > tw E N > 41 L a) `~ a) a) a) O O 3 4s N a) ca s> � s �N s 4' CLa� a) Q- O o o +' C j 4' - a) s a) 4� a � 3 a) p N JO O tw L a) C: a) ° .> p V L N p Q •O L L i s m Ln C CLa) _ tw VI C O L a) s CL 4O -a a) O N a) L Q' f6 f6 N ° E a) L +� ° s s a) c s C E O f6 > O " 4- 'a .� E L s a) a) O +' '> C O -a a) •� co a) vi E +' a) Ol E () s a) a>-0 c a)� W° C E 3 4� Ln � a E c Q 0 c nz � - p C a) ° Ln °) a)o N o •� s- >-- n a 3°+> a) O •3 Q) 0 cn a) p u o +� c s s - s M Q O L nz s v ° yI U C° o? U o U ao nzs �s4-+- +° 3 Os� 3 CL E nz a L o E +' c U 2 °° E rn tw 0 0 a) 3 E+� p� o Ln a c C� c� a) c tw E s° a) o 0 3 o o N o� (6 E� o E •C a) +, L Q a) a) a) a) O O L +' OU a) 4- L (6 • }J � p_ s C " L N C L f6 +, f6 f6 a) VI +, = f6 - H m VI Q Q 16 Q d L Ln Z d= U C: bD a) C a) Ln C L c E a) C:Ln 'Fu s L > m N ,� O O f6 a) a) O L L +1 Ln a) }J Q U 0 L U U I s i-� � f6 s U ° f6 Ln L a) 0 m Q a) >_ s 3 nz c to CL O a) c) a) 3 s vi a0 f 6 O L -a L a) C p > ,n 3 > a) tin aco ` u ao M C" s ° o *' m -a a +; c s m m c Q ._ vi U 0 (p s tw a) O C:L m c a a a a) � a � L qA s .� C 3 �_ o `� o -a •C 3 c o ° O> U N W C C O C. M O Q' C - 'a L Q s >- a) --0 U +, CC.O O O Q- m C a) L L `~ a) E m C p +' a) Ln s C f6 (C6 •� N '> p a) s qA E O a) UvUi m L a C tin O Q- tw a) v > N +� C O CA C C a) +' a) m C M 'a L O a) S C+ E a) a) 4O N a) C Ln C +� s C> C -0 >, C i-, O f6 ; N a) L L C a) f6 c _ •5 f6 +, M C fL6 Q W m-a M O �O . 'a U > S O a) O E> � " +� O C tw p c a) s c °) o N Ln +� E U 3 L ° m Ln C aco � m c tw c `� C s -°a Ln ;M .E = � .E -0 a`) >- a; 0 tw a a a) •(6 +� a s c -a a) U 3 0 a s tin t c M c N a nz m c 0 a) 0 4s _a a) }' 0 U a) c m > ai +� O n M- a C U a) o 'to E a) v; o t o °' C: ao � .c �> a) C� F- •� C 'N a)Ln �_ O 'L -0 a) Ln CA tw L .0 N ,C m 3° a-+ C +� C C (6 C W +� -a •L •°) •° U C L a� L w= .0 C tw E E C (6 C a) M O L 0 O L a) :t C O �-+ .tw 0-0 C s tw •a) +� •O tw •N •� C •N C .N U L .N E •� O .� C ,� p L -0•h0 s C tw C L CL �-+ •C O O O O a) m Q CA N f6 'a a) i CA s 41 o o a O E o +� 'a s O f6 'L a) C •h_0 +� a _C a) 6 `� 'C +� (6 110 C C s L L a) a) L Q tw CA 5 ,U - - 'L a) O 7 �"� L •_ •_ ob s _ ° s � N to a..l 'O O +, C O O O a0 +' a) Ln U tw a) s Lns - m C a) s C c p O s +' E nz 2 0 E *' 3 -0 a) O C: a o O m O a) s +� +� a) > s L o -a a-' a) V) a) E VI f6 Q •� s 4O L a)Ln J O L p E Q •X 7 a) U a- CA E L ° ° O s s — s > O a)a) U L > a) E � C a) n5 E co to C -0 � E +, -a L O L E O C O O C V) LL N f6 O L a) E U m CA 0 -a O 3) ° c E Q 3 m '} ° .0 o� a) U +j nz : C O a) M a) C a) +� L a=+ o u m _° o s o c a ° a) C E +� -a o s ° O � o ago ,n a) -0 � a) E c o c o L +, > C Q O C 4, c a a) a) 0 -a 'a U 0 a) C +� O U s a a) -P a) a) Q VI f6 -a > L N tw N s H ° s a) C L 4- 'a f6 a) -a �n Q � ai O a) C co co `cox f6 U a) C0 E L 3 O m m f6 � a) s 0 4 L tw 4- U w U CL Q •� a) Q> V) •L L L O +� U ate+ Ubio N O N CA V) a) +- o L io m N L � V L s d E � a) 0 3 s L O •� Co U a) +- 4 , U C a) z- `� U O `� y' a) O O L N V) 4' >, •C a) s> ._ C O to C ao 4 •L +� to to } +� C W C (6 3 W 4� -p -a +, L a) E Q to U a) +� s Cis naU �Nvi a) C o o sLO -sL O � c � •a) + C .�'U u o-a :}CNjL �o C 'U p_ > Q tC M C > .c CC ' }a 0 0-0 V O O aC Ln a E C N ° U, Q C UM ULn tw CL a)" a) - LC p a) '- �Eo 41 saa-+) ma) Us >� a mI " s o C: O �'_� _ ' N '� tw ) U V ° a, -a a C N Ln o CL U pmtw C > tw a_ 6 +N O tw C C a) O 6 LJ C:+ O C +� U a C +) C +� A U >a. soo a s ` � c E t ° >. 'a)i LO -a — c -0 m to a) E a") � � a � � � 3 _0 m a L +, Ln s C a) a..l Q Q 'O O >, m m a) Q a) vUi -a Q a) fL6 " �+ C f 4- -0 a) O a) a L C tw � .�_ a +t•' 4 O -a C C a) " m +.� (6 U O -a O > L O aO+ OU C U L O O O O � m _ an a) C p : (6 Q L 'a O C 41 C CA O tw t].a .0 �a) > 7 +� U L E .C_ C Q a a) a-+ N N an 'C (6 CA i a) M CA a +'I +� qA O U L +' f6 N +� Q C h0 C .V po > a) 6 U C C CA � U a) N >� .� a CA f6 in a) C S U a) () O E V) a) U V) C C m Q O ri +, V) s V) Q -a a) a Q O J 4� .� J 4S U Q u (J Q m s -a � s s O s _ s s a C 1 N H H z H H H Co u -a ai tab N -0n6 O C L C a w Q m O C O E O J s U O J 0 -I I 3 a) a) a) a) c U a 0 C a) E 76 U C O d C U O a C f6 d 76 Q U ca C C a) E s U M Q nz C s s nz — — +� +, a •3 a�i 3 +' 0 L 7 N M U O C:O 0 'a u O vi Li C O 0 d 0 N H 00 +' 3 41 s 'O O 0 C:J a N o U s u rn 3 U ° 4S � a) C 4- a Ln Ln C o E C a) O >_ +� O o tio o C: Ln C -0 +� o41 O O a) a C7 -a a) 41 a aa) c E c ' 0 3 - a ° a`) a ° a) s 3 4 U s 41 N 7 Q *' s aa) O s s M a) O 7 os �s+� o > sL +1 'a C +� O u a)° LnL C a) Q E Ln U ° a) O U N a) -ajU ° N Q O O a) O a) 'o a) s H H a H a) s H N L 3 —> C W ° O U to + to ° C +� > to -a to a) (6 a) C: C +1 a) a) W U (6 �, -a I O U O C m s C (6 O L O a) 7 +, CA L _a a) + L N C: N L Q O E N N L •� {/1 a) •- I L i-•1 S +' C N a) a) a Q C O �' > a) L a o 7 U O 4- VI C: -0E a, s 0 O 3CL f6 > +, +j a) U C f6 L -a L to O t6 L LL aCo aa)) +° s 3 — o a) o a) E a) E +, � > + O 3 u 0 .E vi Fu C > L) > > N L s> > ° to a a) -a aa) to �, C O O qA U C 4' C L °� +� (6 L> a) w — E a a) N co +1 a) C •f6 +, L O C a) +0 +, (6 (6 •L L U f6 a) i-•I -a to ° -a s -a Q -a E O C o L o `� o 0 °° Q L a a) 4— O C 0 3 C a C ° E o N +� 3 L 41 � L L 0 •O � > � O a) -a CA u +, 4O S a) a) a) +� U OL Q 4-+ O E !o s L C L N >` s s E L 'u U CL a) - ° C: C: s C +, O_ .. C 'O O N �o 4- M +, -E +� 3 a) a) L a) a) 4' N U •U (6 m +, COO 0 7 O C O 0 a) �` f6 a) +� E •- (6 f6 i-•I �o O Q N>° •E •L -0 N s> 3 a) f6 7 C s a) > L +,I M s +� a) L -a ao -a N 'c +1 a- O a) s ° E m c C C �o a) ha 0 a) N O >, a) U > VI +1 L -a C > C '3 - C •f6 C N f6 a) C L U E N L C C C >' 0 C N C a) •0 O L a) L L 'a tw a) U O C O ,O 'a .� L C C O � a) N E +� O E — f6 E .Q E `� ° C O — a L f6 � U f6 O �, U U N a) to •� f6 O M .— O ,o O C L Q f6 L +� > U 0 O `~ a) E 7 -a -a U (6 !n w -a '> u +1 CCA a) 4. +, a) Q 0 -a a) N 7 +1 a) +' a) +� 0 U a) Q :.% a LCL a OL N •L 4- 7 ° O ri C C > N M O C M �' S O S O M 0 _� Q N M Q a +�+ Q W a) O z wO CL N�M > 4+ C " N O OO N 3 u m u �_ +6 .0 •u _ o o •L u • �d • u 3 — • aa)) •L •U • U O N s C 0 L i6 0 i-•1 'L i6 O d L C d f6 O L O d C w O O d U a) C O M d Q 0 4 1 0 N 0 N O d x w Q O d C — E a) ._ U L LO u, +f6,0 C o U N 6 > C U O O C CA O 6 O > +, C (1) s n 4, C O p>, aC a- LC+, _U> _•UL U nO O O O Nf O NN 'aN O O f6 O C N N O _p `� a) O O CL C C O p C OCL•LO 0 O ON W O M a�> U :NCL O O N C f6 3 o ° O " L Q 0 M 4- U 4, > CL ° E a' a�i E O c o �' C m o o C o L Q) L +, a� 'p •S •L >, -O m O N N N Q E Q O E N O U f6 N 'O 3 f6 C O L O Q- M N O -O p +� } C s +� 4-N O O +' +, U C m c N N 4, s C VI L f6 > +� —_ f6 N >` O N fL6 — L -0 Zn m s C -p ' •U a) f6 > L M C C U O •O C O a) ON O U N Q m E Q O N U ELn X >, 'O N m (A ago Q N N > _C E cC6 N 4� = O i O O 0 4� C O E N 0 U N N L N Q f6 4, 4' C s � }� CL N �+ Q Q O f6 `� (]A O O > N f6 +1 f6 C 'a a) U 'O L O E `~ O N L O 7 O N� L f6 -a +' > •N ptIo N E 4- = C N L to N O +� 6 'n 6° ' 'a °° asi ;� m o m m a) c s 3 w a� U W �' ao 3 w m CL V N L— N -O N U N +� C CA M O U -a N--0 VI C N u m L L -a s to N •C C m C f6 .0 L 4, C -O N C w O VI f6 •� N i N S N +, �-+ L �O+ O _ N +, �-+ CA C f6 +�+ vOi m O O L O Q LL 'a H Q O Q d s '� E O s 0 `� C y. C �n O C O m CL Q O N Q 'p O L m Q CA C 0 u Ln 0 s CL 0 U > 2 Q 0 cn Q Q N N CL aO+ CL (1) - c 3 N U N C � nz O C O E O J s U O J O c-I 3 a) C U d 0 c a) E (6 N 76 U c O d C nz U O a C (6 d 76 a U 7 N C a) E s U M Q C s a) s U a N U a) C a) a) E N O +' O Q O a) Q a) C O > Q 0 V 0 CCA > Q aO+ o_ +� N vi s W C C: m �' > O g ±, N m a�i 4- a) Ln N C f6 U O L, Q C a-•� o g � C x �n M (6 Q � (6 +' L C �n U C � O O V U = O — +' to U 4- .Q t6 t6 — to U U > 3 c L 4 3 O nz stio > a) C vi * o Q o a) C n5 a) u (1) V O } o a) o U 3 0 s� C U a) ago o c a s o 'Z W o 4- Ua) s a) t 0 o c a) N tin 4- a C s E E E ,C Ln E C:os °C C: sj o O� aCa) s++E�3VCa�)I Ln '�a E0 +�3Q Ln +'`�•a x o c ° o 3-� CL o tia) 7 M Qa+na,z)� �Qa� L C a) +- L .VV) s —M �Q .m -O WQCj = C n-O N > 0 a)N O O +� 0 O C v '� O L � Q�Q Ea3aL) 4, U s C sa ) O LL LL U +6 '3 �aoi > E E � to C aa)) ate) � E � � s +, o a) -a O s 0 tw a) �aoi > E a) > E a) Q •x C -O a) In Q C +, - C s -a_ 7 > a) O a) Q- 'a 0 O C 'O C O f6 a) N 4� .� E O O 'a M 'a O > a �, a) ° a) E o N s s > o o 41 o 0 o ate) E ° .� °' N CL 0 o CL E In o L L io c f6 L +, +� o s 4' +, C a-•� > o a) s �_ •E E C O E (6 O L o L (6 �n Q C x C .� L +� L Q Q E E 'a s a C 0 s O= M s s L s= s a C `~ O 4� C +�+ (6 N O 3 a) C > +� o 0 +� O ai tw � E a) E Q ai N s E O V U a) Q a E C i �, a) L s C: L C f6 > a) U W N m N p C:N C O O Q N a +, o 4, vi a) s 4 C O N' WL f6 a) C L a' u Q C C c6 N c`nL6 E o > O E E O CL > L OE C C O .c: 4- a) Q) +' O �n � ,c) O s aCo O ;; 4, r � N a) i � 'V O ° O ao O C s O C L E Q a) s O Q- +, 'a O N a a) °) 'E +' a>i n6 c CL a 76 o E U •� o EO o� Q O 0 E O u E to O •ao L O W > C CA C •� � d d-a N= Q O C -1 N -� M O •� Ln N L a) ass a C as a C a'x a cn +� 4� cn n5 cn 4� cn a) cn a) f6 O C O E O J s U O J O 3 a) +J Vl a) C U 7 d 0 C a) E +J 76 U C O d C (6 U_ O d C d 76 Q U c7 G N C a) E s U M a a) a) a s +' N U O U O C o Ln C •� Ln 7 f6 J L f6 X W W ,0 N 41 � C >� O 3 -a +� t6 0 s +� -a C c a) 3 a C `� O a) L tin E 0 -a C E 0 = ° -0 nz o +' W �, 0 a�i c ai 3 L Vf 4 N � (O — E C C — — -� L +1 0 Q p O O N C o L N a) C C d .� .� to ` ; V O L a) N Q a) t6 Q ° t�: 3 0 +, OL 4-N U L U +, t6 C W > f6 LL _ V Q U f6 C - 'X s X a) U C 0 > L L t6 s } a) .� C a) O + (6 Q L -� L �; X c 3 ° 41 O c c O � °) o a) a) L E a) > 3 > + 1 > a) +� m U 0 Ln t6 LL a) E Q— }Oi t6 l a L 0 0 E a) (6 a) Q Q m U ,- O C O O Ln a) O aa) _ .3 N s U L Q- N E W � L Q a) O a) L i-•1 a) X LL -0 -a U ._ a) = W -� O Q O U L +� _ _ _ _ Q Q +� E C Q > -a a) O M L (n CL CL CL CL O 'a O a) f6 +•1 LL a) C -a L a..1 U LL LL LL LL L a) C a) E 0 a) +� L +� +� +� +� a) O O a Z H .� Q H O C a- Z Z Z Z U H 0 -a Q Vl a) � L N 3> U U O Q +�a L O +J U +1 L C C E f6 a CL E E O C L O a' a) Q U -a Q a) E Q W C E > E m " C: Q C m 't t6 t6 +, O 0 _a U a) L 0 0 s +� t6 a) Q E LnL � p CL a) E U i U � OU a)C 41 f6 a) i C •VI 7 U f6 a) N +' L L � L N Ea) 0 a) a) >, U U C � L L C C 0 S S L a) N U U t6 C a) 4- E o? Q p C 3 c o C 0 °� L vi a) D L a) — a) a +� U� C 3 O m a) n5 _- 0 -a U +�+ Q' a) M s = L 0 O L N O +, Ln m a) U a) Ln a Q- C m C Q +s.1 aj a C N (6 a) a-•1 C L C 3 -a C a) L a (6 a) (6 Ln L h0 — (6 Q a) C C of L L Q L O C O m Q a) C L a) O 0 a c a +� _ E o +� f6 - C L N (,) a-•1 U 3 > 0 t6 O +� ,C =� L = 4 L C N } N f6 a) N Q W C� 7 a) p L qA Q" C E -a o s O o m O E C to o E O ° 0 t6 +' O a) + 1 a) L a) 0- a) (6 _a +� a) C >- C C (6 +.1 O C m tw +� Ln O -a a) C s s to N 0 -a W 4 C 0 C a) 7 a) -a a . -•1 L a) s U Q c6 -a Q m f6 4� U a) a) 'a a) a) L U N N 3 0 -a C U Q a) O C +, f6 .- L +, O a) +,1 a) a) a) Q 7 >. a- L a) N (6 a) C 4.1 a) (6 a) 76 E s C E 0 E nz E m E .E 3 c c a C u E -0 (6 j N O c6 O � O s� -0 � -a 'a 0 a) O 0 a) +�, > CA a) ° aXi �_ I� o a 00 — a Ol o i N M 3 'a ca � +� O > a) a) L d a) O a) d a) d d L O0 Q L pp Q a) Q i) a) C (6 L U 7 -a m Ln C-a E Ln �' Ln �' Ln a s m a= a nz U U a- ti r \ $ / # E : � 5 \ \ E 3 / y ° / ± u e g ' % R / / $ ( / - u R / E / \ ) e 'o e ƒ ± E > .0 e e 3 u& u 0 7 / kk� §f 0 \ � - u 'k ƒ 0 / E / % k .[ E § \ B o = » e / / k / ./ u / � e to E § cL $ 2 u ƒ M 7 \ 'e k $ 2 [ ƒ m £ M M 2 ° } \ o B 2 CL g E % a)± a)& E% R u / u / g & '0 3® m § E ƒ / / § / ƒ .§ \ / 0 / / u ( % 2 0 E E .E y § ± / / a) ° / u 2 \ / \ 0 E E±y :� E% u t e° E£ u q ( : } m '§ d \ 3 5 e M§ M$% 0 \ e g = .E ± @ ± = / E•E # % f \ ) k k / .- 2 E E E o E__ $ 2= s E E E M S g° q o 0 0 f o® 2 ƒ \ / _ — e e s a > 2 7 § $ $ $ ƒ 3 } G E k= e e o t $ # 3 f / ® e 2 .f : / % _ § M § _ M t />/ § •- e E e o e U E m = § / § § / § g o c.0 O 2 f 2 f/\ e &" y m ,f o/ 2 q m ' 2 _§ 2 ._ e e Eƒ e$/ /§ z z z: / y f 0� m y� £ / (& j a E / § o § u 3# 2 2 2� g$ / _� E e N -0m( 2 f§ CL / \ ƒ % LL / ƒ § ƒ 2 u- \ LL a E m 5�a ®m OO $ Y 1= I X F 3I 1 s : 4:- G yam= 3� .�' �qEi Ng�= 3 @8 `y 5€� 3A nax ; _ HEY-! �aP�1A, 's! s�& sg m gaF gag :p 1_ c a= s Y `E s °' a a iv 8a"- �� a �` IN �g W s S gay aits■® I rmm®�s8s ssEsl ss o�®b 0 �z�>E -G� �: a3$� W 54 1 R4, z O 0 U O =) E— of O ~ z cn z O U IN =, 11 , LEM W klklla.kkktal.l� � hallawl.r.. _-T -F U _-I, 13 O }' O 41 � O O 'N U � O N cn U m � L O � � L 41 O 41 U ++ L o Wow 0 10 0 i At,,# ANN ONE MEN 3 Final Report R1 Mark MacDonald Dec. 15/23 Brendan McPhee 2 Final Report Mark MacDonald Dec. 12/23 Brendan McPhee 1 Draft Report Mark MacDonald Dec. 22/22 Brendan McPhee -. This document was prepared for the party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflect CBCL ■ Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available atthe time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third -party use of this document. Project No. 222939.02 MMMSolutions today I Tomorrow(Dmind CenterBeam Place, 14 King Street, Suite 420, PO Box 20040, Saint John, NB, E2L 1 G2 1 506-633-6650 I CBCL.ca I info@CBCL.ca December 15, 2023 Erik de Jong Owner Loch Lomond Estates Ltd. 927 Prospect Street Fredericton, NB E313 2T7 erik@slopesideholdings.com Dear Mr. de Jong: RE., Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study - Final R1 BEST MANAGED COMPANIES We are pleased to present this revised final Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed residential development located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. The study was completed in accordance with industry best practices to address potential traffic impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to assist with your proposed development. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Yours very truly, CBCL Limited Prepared by: Brendan McPhee, M.Sc.E., P.Eng. Transportation Engineer Direct: 506-633-6650 ext. 3236 Email: bmcphee@cbcl.ca cc: Evan Embree, P.Eng. Project No.: 222939.02 Reviewed by: Mark MacDonald, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Engineer Direct: 902-892-0303 ext. 3408 Email: markmacd@cbcl.ca This document was prepared forthe party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflect CBCL Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third - party use of this document. Solutions today I Tomorrow(jmind 125 Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background........................................................................................................... 1 1,2 Study Objectives................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Unit Count Change............................................................................................................ 2 StudyAre...............................................................................................3 2.1 Road Network.................................................................................................................... 3 2,2 Study Intersections............................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1 Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive ............................. 4 2.2.2 Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road................................................................ 5 2.2.3 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive ........................................................ 6 2.2.4 Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road .................................................... 6 2.3 Active Transportation........................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Public Transit..................................................................................................................... 7 3 2022 Baseline Condition.......................................................................8 3.1 2022 Baseline Traffic Volumes......................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 Resulting Baseline Volumes................................................................................ 8 3.2 Intersection Analysis and Performance Indicators....................................................... 10 3.3 2022 Baseline Traffic Operations................................................................................... 11 4 Future 2032 No Build Condition....................................................... 13 4.1 Annual Background Traffic Growth................................................................................ 13 4.2 Other Planned Developments........................................................................................ 14 4.3 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes....................................................................................... 14 4,4 2032 No Build Traffic Operations................................................................................... 14 Site Generfir-1 Traffic........................................................................ 18 5.1 Trip Generation Rates..................................................................................................... 18 5,2 Trip Reduction Considerations....................................................................................... 19 5.3 Distribution of Site Trips................................................................................................. 20 IN Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study i 126 6 Future 2032 Build Condition............................................................. 22 6.1 2032 Build Traffic Volumes............................................................................................. 22 6.2 2032 Build Traffic Operations......................................................................................... 22 6.3 Construction Phasing......................................................................................................25 6.4 Development Access Alignment..................................................................................... 26 vva rra ri t iAna iyses................................................................................ 28 7.1 Traffic Signal Warrant...................................................................................................... 28 7.2 Pedestrian Crosswalk Warrant Analysis........................................................................ 28 7.2.1 Sight Distance Assessment............................................................................... 30 7.2.2 Nearby Bus Stops............................................................................................... 31 7.2.3 Recommended RRFB Placement...................................................................... 32 R Mitigation Measures........................................................................... �? 8.1 Added WB Lane............................................................................................................... 33 8.2 Added WB and EB Lanes................................................................................................. 37 8.3 Improvement Recommendation....................................................................................39 8.3.1 Roundabout Consideration............................................................................... 39 9 Conclusion.. ....... ................................................................................. 40 Appendices A Site Plan B Traffic Count Reports C Synchro Analysis Reports - 2022 Baseline D Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 No Build E Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build F Synchro Analysis Reports - Construction Phasing G Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis H Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build with Mitigation IN Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study ii 127 Executive Summary A residential development, proposed for 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB, is planned to include a total of 224 residential units to be developed over six (6) phases. It is expected to be fully constructed and occupied by 2032. New traffic counts were obtained for three (3) study intersections along Loch Lomond Road at Bon Accord Drive, Hickey Road, and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. These counts were used to analyse existing 2022 Baseline traffic conditions during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours. Analysis of the 2022 Baseline condition using Synchro 11 software suggests the study intersections are all currently operating within acceptable limits for V/C ratios and average delays. Several lane groups at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive have 951" percentile queue lengths exceeding 100m. The 951" percentile queues at intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road also exceeds 100m for WB throughs (AM), and EB throughs (PM peak hour). A 2032 No Build scenario was then analysed to quantify the impact of both background traffic growth and another nearby development planned for construction at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. Analysis of the 2032 No Build condition suggests certain traffic movements at the study intersections will begin to experience reduced performance. At Loch Lomond Road/McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive, the NB left turns (AM) and SB lefts (PM) are both expected to operate at LOS E with V/C ratios at or near 1.0. At Hickey Road and Loch Lomond, NB lefts are expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. At Bon Accord Drive and Loch Lomond Road, the SB left/rights operate at LOS F and LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition, it was estimated that 120 and 126 new trips would be generated by the proposed residential development during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Analysis of the 2032 Build scenario suggests the study intersections will operate at similar levels as the 2032 No Build scenario with marginal decreases in performance with the development traffic added. The proposed site road, Loch Lomond Road, and Civic 1429 would operate at LOS B and LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively; however, the NB approach would operate at LOS F during both peak hours, and the SB lane group would operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour. A traffic signal warrant analysis was subsequently carried out for the intersection at the proposed site road, and it indicated that traffic signals would not be warranted. A pedestrian crossing warrant was also completed, which recommended that a crossing outfitted with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) be provided. CBCL Iif11:3 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study iii A sight distance assessment was carried out; it determined both Stopping Sight Distance and Intersection Sight Distance were available at the proposed site road, so long as the vegetation within the sight triangle to the west is removed/maintained. It is recommended that a new pedestrian crossing be installed at the proposed site road with a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB), complete with the necessary traffic signage and pavement markings. As noted in the analysis of the 2032 No Build and 2032 Build scenarios, there are existing operational issues along the Loch Lomond Road that are marginally worsened with the additional of the proposed development traffic. To help alleviate the existing, and worsened future queueing on Loch Lomond Road, two scenarios were analysed: F Adding a second WB through lane along Loch Lomond Road Adding a second WB and EB through lane along the corridor Both of these scenarios included traffic signal optimization and coordination. Adding both WB and EB lanes appear to relieve the congestion issue and increase capacity along the corridor, but it is understood these upgrades would require significant road widening and utility relocation. INLoch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study iv 129 � Introduction 1 1 Project Background CBCL Limited (CBCL) was engaged to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for a proposed residential development to be located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. It is proposed to include four (4) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each and 16 townhomes, for a total of 224 residential units. We understand full build -out of the site is expected by 2032. The proposed site plan, dated February 9, 2023, is illustrated in Figure 1.1 and is provided in Appendix A. Access to the proposed development will be provided by a single two-way road with access onto Loch Lomond Road. City staff have indicated that the anticipated traffic generated by another nearby proposed multi -unit residential development, to be built at 1429 Loch Lomond Road, must be considered as part of this study; its proposed access is located roughly 83 m west of the proposed site road for the subject property. It is planned to include 80 apartment units and 24 townhomes. 1.2 Study Objectives The following goals and primary objectives were identified for this study: ► Establish existing traffic operations throughout the study area. Estimate the peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. F Evaluate the traffic impacts at the study intersections, while considering the planned development at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. 1 Conduct traffic signal and crosswalk warrant analyses for the intersection of the proposed site road and Loch Lomond Road. 1 Identify and recommend mitigation measures to address any anticipated traffic impacts. CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study • 1 l Ilr 4 1 V Figure 1.1: Proposed Site Plan for the Development 13 Unit Count Change When the draft Traffic Impact Study was completed in December of 2022, the development was to include six (6) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each, for a total of 312 residential units. However, investigations following the draft report's submission revealed that two of the apartment buildings were not feasible due to their proximity to the wetland. These two buildings were removed and replaced with 16 townhomes, for a new total of 224 residential units. Despite this reduction of 88 residential units, there is no impact on the conclusions of this study (i.e., traffic signals are not warranted at the proposed development's site road and Loch Lomond Road, and the existing issues identified in the No Build scenario persist and require additional through lanes on Loch Lomond Road). Therefore, the analyses were left unchanged and are reflective of the original 312 residential unit count. CBCL 131 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 2 Figure 1.1: Proposed Site Plan for the Development 13 Unit Count Change When the draft Traffic Impact Study was completed in December of 2022, the development was to include six (6) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each, for a total of 312 residential units. However, investigations following the draft report's submission revealed that two of the apartment buildings were not feasible due to their proximity to the wetland. These two buildings were removed and replaced with 16 townhomes, for a new total of 224 residential units. Despite this reduction of 88 residential units, there is no impact on the conclusions of this study (i.e., traffic signals are not warranted at the proposed development's site road and Loch Lomond Road, and the existing issues identified in the No Build scenario persist and require additional through lanes on Loch Lomond Road). Therefore, the analyses were left unchanged and are reflective of the original 312 residential unit count. CBCL 131 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 2 Study Area The study area considered for this assignment is the nearby road network that might be impacted by the added traffic from the proposed development. The intersections and associated roads considered for this study were confirmed with City staff, and include: I! Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road; 1 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive; Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road; and, I! Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. Road Network The road network considered in the study area include the streets immediately adjacent to the proposed development, as illustrated in Figure 2.1 and are summarized in Table 2.1. Figure 2.1: Study Area with Study Intersections (Red Circles) CBCL `9% Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 3 Table 2.1: Characteristics of Study Area Streets Loch Lomond Sidewalk - 50 km/h; 2 to 3 Arterial East-West Road South side 60 km/h Bon Accord Sidewalk - 2 Local North -South 50 km/h Drive West side Sidewalk - Hickey Road 2 Collector East-West 60 km/h South side Sidewalk - McAllister Drive 5 Arterial North -South 50 km/h both sides Champlain Sidewalk - 2 Collector North -South 50 km/h Drive East side The road classifications presented in Table 2.1 above were selected to align with the classes presented in the 2017 MoveSJ Transportation Strategic Plan (Phase 1) Final Report prepared by IBI Group. 2.2 Study Intersections 2.2.1 Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain D rive This four -leg signalized intersection is located west of the proposed development, and is the largest intersection included in this study. Westbound (WB) right turns have a channelized right -turn. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: F Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: left turn lane through lane through/right turn lane I► Loch Lomond Road Westbound: left turn lane through lane right turn lane Champlain Drive Northbound: left turn lane through lane right turn lane ► McAllister Drive Southbound: left turn lane left turn lane through/right turn lane All approaches have crosswalks with pedestrian signals and pedestrian push buttons. There is a pork chop island on the northeast corner of the intersection, but it is too small to provide pedestrian refuge and the adjacent crosswalks bypass it; it is occupied by a utility pole and traffic signal pole. Pedestrians using either of these crosswalks are required to cross five traffic lanes. Figure 2.2 illustrates this intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 4 `Edic1 ------------ -- -- ------------ - __ -- - J Figure 2.2: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive (Photo taken from southeast corner, facing west) 2.2.2 Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road This three -leg signalized intersection is located west of the proposed development. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: 1 Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: through lane right turn lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: left turn lane through lane 1 Hickey Road Northbound: left turn lane I right turn lane There is sidewalk along the south side of the road, with a pedestrian crossing on Hickey Road marked by twin parallel lines; however, there are no pedestrian signal heads. Figure 2.3 illustrates this intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 5 R011I Figure 2.3: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road (Photo taken from southeast corner, facing northwest) 2.2.3 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive This three -leg unsignalized intersection is located west of the proposed development. The intersection operates under Two -Way Stop Control (TWSC) with free flow traffic along Loch Lomond Road and a stop sign on Bon Accord Drive. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: F Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: left turn lane I through lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: through/right turn lane Bon Accord Drive Southbound: left/right turn lane A pedestrian crosswalk is available on the west leg of the intersection and has crosswalk signage. Figure 2.4 illustrates the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive. 2.2.4 Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road This planned four -leg unsignalized intersection will be created by the proposed site road at 1440 Loch Lomond Road. The intersection was assumed to operate under Two -Way Stop Control (TWSC) with free flow along Loch Lomond Road and stop signs on proposed site road. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 6 `K191 Figure 2.4: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive (Photo taken from southwest corner, facing east) The proposed intersection approaches would have the following lane configurations: 1 Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: one left/thru/right lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: one left/thru/right lane Proposed 1440 Loch Lomond Site Road Northbound: one left/thru/right lane 2,3 Active Transportation The City of Saint John's Active Transportation (AT) network provides connectivity across the city, primarily using sidewalks and trails. There is a concrete sidewalk along the south side of Loch Lomond Road, from the intersection at McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive to the Irving Circle K at Civic 1233 where it switches and continues along the north side of the road. 2A Public Transit Saint John Transit provides transit services via bus throughout the city and to neighbouring municipalities. There are several bus stops close to the proposed development that serve several routes. The nearest bus stops are on Loch Lomond Road immediately adjacent to the proposed site road and approximately 250m to the west. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 7 `Ki.1 3 2022 Baseline Condition 31 2022 Baseline Traffic Volumes Baseline turning movement traffic volumes were obtained utilizing Miovision Scout video collection units on Tuesday and Wednesday, November 22nd and 23rd, 2022 at the Loch Lomond Road intersections of Bon Accord Drive, Hickey Road, and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. Traffic movements were recorded during the morning (AM) peak period between 7:OOAM and 9:OOAM, and the afternoon (PM) peak period between 4:OOPM and 6:OOPM over those typical weekdays. The mid -day (MD) peak period between 11:30AM- 1:30PM was also captured at the Bon Accord Drive intersection because six (6) hours of traffic data are required to complete a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis. The video files were uploaded for processing by Miovision, and the raw traffic data reports are provided in Appendix B. Peak hours for the network were determined to fall between 7:45-8:45AM for the AM peak period and 4:30-5:30PM for the PM peak period. Since the traffic volumes were observed to be similar across both days for the peak periods, the average traffic volume for each turning movement was utilized. While restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have caused some traffic reductions over the past two years, it appears that traffic has now returned to relatively 'normal' volumes. Therefore, the new traffic counts were not adjusted to account for COVID-19 restrictions. 3.1.1 Resulting Baseline Volumes The following adjustments were made to the new traffic counts to develop the 2022 Baseline volumes for analysis: h Rounded volumes to the nearest multiple of 5; and, 1 Adjusted as needed so that all movements have a minimum peak hour volume of 5. The resulting 2022 Baseline traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3.1. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study Ii19YA fi o � m o � Proposed Access Legend t FAM Peak Hour ! PM Peak Hour r Figure 3.1: 2022 Baseline Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N.T.S. CBCL `91-11 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 9 3.2 Intersection Analysis and Performance Indicators Using the 2022 Baseline peak hour volume data, Synchro software (Version 11) was used to perform a Level of Service (LOS) analysis of the study intersections for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, using the methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6t" Edition, published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB). LOS is the key indicator of intersection performance with respect to traffic movement and is defined by the average amount of delay experienced by drivers using each of the various intersection movements. Higher delays result in increased driver discomfort, fuel consumption, and travel time. LOS gives an indication of speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, traffic flow, comfort, and convenience, and is expressed as a scale from'A'to F. LOS'A' represents conditions approaching free -flow and LOST' represents a level of delay generally unacceptable to drivers and where traffic volumes usually exceed capacity. LOS'D' is used by most jurisdictions as the minimum acceptable LOS during peak periods and it was used as such for this study. The criteria associated with each LOS are found in Table 3.1. As shown, the delays listed for signalized intersections are higher than for the same LOS at unsignalized intersections; this is because motorists are generally more tolerant of extended delays at signalized intersections. Table 3.1: Level of Service (LOS) Criteria for S alized and Unsignalized Intersections A <10 <10 B >10 and <20 >10 and <15 C >20 and <35 >15 and <25 D >35 and <55 >25 and <35 E >55 and <80 >35 and <50 F >80 >50 In addition to LOS, the Volume -to -Capacity (V/C) ratio is a strong indicator of intersection performance. The V/C ratio is the relationship between traffic volumes and the maximum theoretical capacity of an intersection or traffic movement. As the V/C ratio approaches 1.0, the intersection has less ability to accommodate additional traffic. Adjustments to intersection geometry or traffic control can be implemented to increase capacity and therefore reduce the V/C ratio. V/C ratios of 0.85 and 0.90, or less, are generally considered acceptable for shared and exclusive turning movements, respectively. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 10 Synchro was also used to approximate the anticipated 95t" percentile queue lengths for each lane group. For unsignalized intersections, the queue lengths are given as number of vehicles; therefore, these values were converted to metres (m) assuming each vehicle adds approximately 7.Om to a queue. 3.3 2022 Baseline Traffic Operations CBCL developed a detailed street network of the study area using Synchro 11 that includes existing infrastructure, such as traffic control devices, road alignments, intersection geometry, and lane configurations. The corresponding Synchro LOS analysis reports for the 2022 Baseline condition are provided in Appendix C, and Table 3.2 shows the results of the LOS analyses. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive operates within acceptable limits at LOS C during both peak hours. The average delay for each of the lane groups are within acceptable limits during both peak hours. The highest V/C ratio of 0.81 was recorded for the WB through lane group during the AM peak period. The 95t" percentile queue for WB throughs are expected to exceed 200m during the AM peak hour as well. The EB through/rights and WB throughs have 95t" percentile queues exceeding 100m in the PM peak hour. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road operates at LOS C and LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The average delays for each of the lane groups are within acceptable limits during both peak hours. The V/C ratios are also within acceptable limits for all lane groups, with the highest V/C ratio of 0.86 recorded for EB throughs during the PM peak hour. The 95t" percentile queues for the WB through and EB through movements are expected to reach roughly 120m (AM peak hour) and 235m (PM peak hour), respectively. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive operates at LOS A during both peak hours. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queues are all within acceptable limits for all lane groups. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 11 M11191 i awe 3.L: inTersecuon rerrormance Kesuits - LULL esaseiine i raTTIC volumes Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM [Queue Storage Queue WC Delay LOS4 Queue WC Delay LOS4 Node][Synchro EB Left (78m) 16.1 0.30 17.5 B 37.6 0.41 20.3 C EB Thru/Right 36.1 0.22 19.6 B 111.2 0.61 29.0 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 10.5 0.07 14.7 B 9.9 0.12 18.4 B McAllister WB Thru 213.4 0.81 39.5 D 111.1 0.66 39.1 D Drive & WB Right (160m) 0.0 0.21 0.3 A 18.8 0.45 5.8 A Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 34.3 0.48 33.1 C 27.6 0.35 23.2 C NB Thru 45.2 0.35 42.5 D 67.4 0.66 50.9 D [1] (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.0 0.12 0.5 A 0.0 0.19 2.7 A SB Left 24.7 0.24 27.1 C 61.2 0.68 25.0 C Signals) SB Thru/Right 95.9 0.75 53.9 D 74.4 0.58 36.9 D Overall 29.7 C 28.0 C EB Thru 38.2 0.40 19.1 B 234.9 0.86 29.3 C EB Right 9.8 0.42 4.3 A 35.1 0.44 5.9 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 19.9 0.28 8.3 A 9.3 0.28 9.0 A & Hickey Road WB Thru 119.6 0.75 16.6 B 50.1 0.33 8.1 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 64.5 1 0.62 27.5 C 1 61.2 0.70 1 42.3 D Signals) NB Right (120m) 7.7 0.12 7.0 A 11.5 0.35 6.5 A Overall 15.7 B 20.0 B Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 0.7 0.04 10.4 B 2.1 0.08 8.5 A & Bon Accord Drive SB Left/Right 15.4 0.46 29.5 D 5.6 0.22 19.4 C [3] (Unsignalized) Overall F 2.7 A 1.3 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 12 M111I 4 Future 2032 No Build Condition A future "No Build" scenario was developed to compare with the future "Build" conditions to quantify the impact of the estimated traffic volumes on the proposed development in the future. The No Build traffic volumes are an estimate of future traffic volumes if the proposed development was not built. The time horizon for traffic studies typically considers a horizon five -years post development; however, since the final phase is not expected to be completed until 2032 and analysing traffic operations 15 years from now would not yield a meaningful result, 2032 was used as the future horizon year for analyses The 2032 No Build volumes were developed as the sum of: f 2022 Baseline traffic volumes; 1 Annual background traffic growth over 10 years; and, 1 Traffic generated by the other planned development at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. 1 Annual Background Traffic Growth The background growth rate accounts for other developments or densification that may occur within or near the study area that would impact traffic volumes at the study intersections. As directed by Saint John City staff, an annual background growth rate of 1.5% per year was used forth is study. The 2032 No Build traffic volumes were calculated by cumulatively adding assumed annual background traffic growth to the 2022 Baseline volumes at the rate of 1.5% per year for 10 years. Therefore, all 2022 Baseline turning movement traffic volumes were increased by 16.1 % using the equation below to estimate the background volumes. A = (1 + r)n where: A - Proportional increase in traffic volumes r - Rate of background trafficgrowth n - Number ofperiods from base year Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 13 M11% 4.2 Other Planned Developments Another high -density residential development is proposed for the property at 1429 Loch Lomond Road directly across the road from the 1440 Loch Lomond Road development site; as per direction from City staff, new traffic from it is required to be considered in the analysis for this study. Anticipated trip generation, distribution, and traffic volumes were provided in a Traffic Impact Statement, 1429 Loch Lomond Road Residential Development report prepared by Englobe in October 2021. The report stated the development will be comprised of 20 units of Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise), and 85 units of Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise). The resulting trips to be generated by this site are summarized in Table 4.1 and were distributed through the study network per existing traffic patterns. Table 4.1: Summary of New Site Trips AM Peak Hour 10 30 40 PM Peak Hour 29 19 48 There were no other planned developments specified to be considered for this study. 4.3 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes The additional traffic associated with the background growth rate was added to the 2022 Baseline traffic volumes, along with the estimated traffic associated with other planned development to obtain the estimated 2032 No Build traffic volumes. The resulting 2032 No Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4.1. 4A 2032 No Build Traffic Operations Synchro 11 was used to perform LOS analyses for the study intersections under the 2032 No Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for all signalized intersections. Table 4.2 summarizes the results of the Synchro analysis, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix D. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 14 ` 11191 p N Q CD cc O iV Proposed Access+j i Legend t FAM Peak Hour ! PM Peak dour r Figure 4.1: 2032 No Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N.T.S. CBCL M"El! Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 15 Table 4.2: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes Loch Lomond, McAllister Drive & Champlain Drive [1] (Traffic Signals) I EB Left (78m) 17.7 1 0.43 20.3 C 1 34.0 0.51 20.6 C EB Thru/Right 34.6 0.25 17.0 B 107.8 0.64 27.1 C WB Left (100m) 10.5 0.09 12.7 B 9.6 0.18 15.3 B WB Thru 243.7 0.90 43.9 D 99.2 0.62 32.8 C WB Right (160m) 16.3 0.41 3.6 A 16.4 0.45 4.3 A NB Left (70m) 36.3 0.91 77.3 E 28.8 0.54 30.9 C NB Thru 42.3 0.44 39.4 D 59.3 0.72 51.5 D NB Right (40m) 0.0 0.15 1.3 A 3.8 0.22 3.8 A SB Left 23.3 0.36 26.6 C 98.1 1.00 65.1 E SB Thru/Right 1 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.66 40.3 D I Overall 1 33.3 C 35.'a D EB Thru Loch Lomond EB Right & Hickey Road WB Left (130m) [2] WB Thru (Traffic NB Left Signals) NB Right (120m) Overall 32.7 1 0.40 15.5 B 243.2 0.95 36.6 D 9.2 0.42 3.5 A 12.2 0.46 2.4 A 16.6 0.35 7.6 A 11.6 0.40 12.4 B 140.3 0.84 20.3 C 40.6 0.37 6.4 A 65.8 0.79 35.8 D 89.3 0.97 80.7 F 7.3 0.16 6.0 A 13.4 0.44 7.8 A 17.8 B 26.6 C Loch Lomond I EB Left (50m) 1.4 1 0.06 11.6 B 1 2.1 0.10 8.9 A & Bon Accord Drive SB Left/Right 35.0 0.75 64.4 F 14.0 0.43 35.5 E [3] (Unsignalized) Overall 5.9 A 2.1 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. V/C Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if>0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F1 The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour, but now operates at LOS D during the PM peak hour. During the AM peak hour, the NB lefts now operate at LOS E with a V/C ratio of 0.91, and WB throughs experience 95th percentile queues upwards of 245m. During the PM peak hour, SB lefts now operates at LOS E and have a V/C ratio of 1.00, indicating it has reached its theoretical capacity. The 95th percentile queue length for EB through/rights has decreased slightly to 107.8m, thanks to the signal optimization. The intersection of Loch Lomond and Hickey Road continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak period, but now operates at LOS C during the PM peak period. NB lefts now operate at LOS E during the AM peak period, and LOS F in the PM peak period. V/C ratios remain within acceptable limits during the AM peak hour; however, V/C ratios for the EB CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 16 through and NB lefts are approaching their capacity with V/C ratios of 0.95 and 0.97, respectively, during the PM peak hour. The 95th percentile queue length for WB throughs have increased to roughly 140m during the AM peak, and queuing for EB throughs are roughly 245m during the PM peak hour. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive continues to operate at LOS A during both peak periods. The SB left/right lane group now operates at LOS F in the AM peak period, and LOS E in the PM peak period. The 951h percentile queue lengths and V/C ratios continue to fall within acceptable levels. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 17 M111.1 s Site Generated Traffic To estimate the new morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hour traffic generated by the proposed development, trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, I Ir' Edition, were used. Rates published in this manual are widely accepted by the traffic engineering community, as they are based on empirical data. This chapter outlines our methodology and findings. m Trip Generation Rates Since the proposed development will include only residential land uses, the ITE Land Use (LU) Code 221 for "Multi -Family Housing (Mid -Rise)" was selected from ITE's Trip Generation Manual and used to estimate the number of new vehicle trips generated by the development. Furthermore, the location setting for a "General Urban/Suburban" development was selected as it generally reflects the area context for the development site. This development is planned in six (6) phases, each including the construction of a 52- unit apartment building, for a total of 312 units. The estimated numbers of new trips based on the proposed number of residential units for each construction phase are summarized in Table 5.1. Each additional phase is expected to add roughly 20 new trips during the AM and PM peak hours. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 18 MN/ Table 5.1: ITE Trin Generation for Residential Trins ITE I nd Use I de 221 (Multifamily Housing ,Inbound 52 Total Units Rate Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 N 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 M 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 IV 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 Ln 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 W 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a �AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic Trip Reduction Considerations: Consideration was given to determine whether the trips would represent exclusively new traffic to the street network, or if any reductions may be appropriate based on the following factors: On -site synergy: If the proposed development were to have multiple land use types, some site trips may be internal to the site in which case a reduction would be appropriate. For example, this could include residents making trips to ground floor commercial businesses. However, as the proposed development will only include residential dwelling units, no reduction was applied for on -site synergy. Pass -by and Diverted -Link trips: The proposed development will be exclusively residential units, which is a land use that generally does not attract pass -by or diverted - link trips. Therefore, no reductions were applied for these trip types. Active Transportation and Transit Trips: While there may be some AT and transit trips from the development, no reductions were applied. The overall trips estimated to be generated by the site at full build -out are summarized in Table 5.2. CBCL `[E:j Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 19 Table 5.2: Summary of New Site Trips Out M. AM Peak Hour 30 90 120 PM Peak Hour 78 48 126 5.3 Distribution of Site Trips Site trips were distributed to the study intersections based on the proportions of observed trips entering and exiting the study area boundaries for both the AM and PM peak periods. Movement proportions for both peak periods were averaged to estimate the trip distribution through the street network, as summarized in Table 5.3. The estimated total new site trips distributed through the study intersections are shown in Figure 5.1. Table 5.3: Summary of Trip Distribution Approach West East North South South North AM Trip Dist. IN 15% 36% 19% 12% 14% 4% PM Trip Dist. IN 33% 14% 26% 12% 13% 2% AM Trip Dist. OUT 38% 10% 21 % 12% 17% 2% PM Trip Dist. OUT 18% 32% 21 % 9% 17% 3% CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 20 149 c� 46. �j L 0/0 � N.T.S. oo o ♦ 0/0 �1)1-lve4J 4 L* r6/20 McAllisTeCDr,ve 0/0- 41 t 1+ 0/0 —10� M o 4/9Z � � CD 0 414 0/0. t *100 t 4/10Z 4 O Cr O E O J U D O � J ca L0/0 4 r 1/2 t 1 O r N h Or�ii r Q o 4 a Proposed Access4J { 81/33_I 41 t o Legend L f 4—AM Peak Hour / PM Peak Hour r Figure 5.1: Estimated Peak Hour Site Traffic Volumes CBCL `N7i7 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 21 6 Future 2032 Build Condition 6.1 2032 Build Traffic Volumes The 2032 No Build volumes and the estimated site trips were summed to obtain the estimated 2032 Build volumes, which are summarized in Figure 6.1. 6.2 2032 Build Traffic Operations The LOS analysis for the study intersections were performed using Synchro for the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections. The proposed site road was modelled with a shared lane. The operational results for the 2032 Build condition are summarized in Table 6.1, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix E. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour, and LOS D during the PM peak hour. SB lefts now operate at LOS F with a V/C ratio of 1.07 during the PM peak hour. The WB throughs have increased 95th percentile queue length of roughly 260m (from -245m in 2032 No Build) and V/C ratio of 0.94 (from 0.90 in 2032 No Build) during the AM peak hour. The 95th percentile queue lengths for EB through/rights, WB throughs, and SB lefts have all slightly increased to marginally exceed 100m. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road continues to operate at LOS C during both peak periods. Marginal increases to queueing, V/C ratios, and average delay are reported for most lane groups. NB lefts continue operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The 95th percentile queues have increased for WB throughs during the AM peak hour to roughly 150m (from -140 in 2032 No Build), and EB throughs have increased to roughly 260m (from 245m in 2032 No Build) during the PM peak hour. The V/C ratios for both EB through and NB lefts have increased to 1.00 during the PM peak period. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 22 151 Ln � � - u, - L 140/120 N.T.S. fdi N ♦ 190/170 11rlve4.11 Lr r220/640 McAtiister Drive 135/125-t +1 t 150/215 i � O m 65/90Z ;n m C CD CD rn Q n Ln rn U) NN 4J a 325/275-t 4CD1 ''a 70/1907 rn CO 1 QI N 4 � O "Cl O E J u n 0 1 J Ln 1� C, 'L90/55 ♦ 4 r20115 tr o a(14 rQ N a N o `o m N N Proposed Access4 95/35 j 41 t Un Legend 00 10/2074L L N 4-AM Peak Hour / PM Peak Hour Q r Figure 6.1: 2032 Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CBCL `M Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 23 Table 6.1: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM [Queue Storage Queue WC Delay LOS4 Queue v/C Delay LOS4 Node][Synchro EB Left (78m) 17.7 0.43 20.3 C 34.0 0.51 20.2 C EB Thru/Right 35.4 0.25 17.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 12.8 0.12 12.8 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B McAllister WB Thru 259.3 0.94 49.4 D 102.3 0.62 32.3 C Drive & WB Right (160m) 16.7 0.43 3.7 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 36.3 0.91 77.3 E 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 42.3 0.44 39.4 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1] (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 2.0 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.8 0.36 26.7 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F Signals) SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 34.7 C 40.1 D EB Thru 34.8 0.42 15.8 B 262.2 1.00 47.5 D EB Right 9.2 0.43 3.5 A 13.1 0.46 2.5 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 15.9 0.37 7.0 A 13.9 0.44 14.3 B & Hickey Road WB Thru 149.5 0.88 21.7 C 41.0 0.39 6.2 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 72.3 0.85 44.4 D 92.6 1.00 90.1 F Signals) NB Right (120m) 7.7 0.17 6.6 A 17.3 0.48 10.5 B Overall 19.7 B 32.3 C Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.06 12.2 B 2.1 0.11 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.86 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A (Unsignalized) Loch Lomond WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [4] Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A (Unsignalized) Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or>0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive continue to operate at LOS A during both peak hours. SB left/rights still operate at LOS F and LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queue lengths remain all within acceptable limits. CBCL fIW Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 24 The intersection of Loch Lomond Road. and the proposed site road operates at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. NB left/thru/rights operate at LOS F during both peak hours. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queue lengths remain all within acceptable limits. The addition of site trips to the study network has marginal impact to traffic operations at the study intersections, and existing operational issues appear to be exacerbated from the 2032 No Build scenario. It is suggested that traffic operations at the Loch Lomond Road intersections with McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive and Hickey Road be monitored into the future. 6.3 Construction Phasing The intersection of the proposed development access and Loch Lomond Road was analysed following each phase of the development to understand traffic operations as each phase comes online. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 6.2, and the corresponding Synchro analysis reports are provided in Appendix F. The NB lane group is not expected to operate with notable performance issues during the peak hours (LOS E) until Phase 3 in 2027. During Phase 4 in 2029, the NB lane group further decreases to LOS F during the PM peak hour only. Lastly, the NB lane group starts to operate at LOS F during both peak hours during Phase 6 in 2032. There are no issues with V/C ratios or 951" percentile queues expected, and the overall intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours for each of the phases. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 25 `N'il Table 6.2 Level of Service (LOS) - Construction Phasing at the Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road Phaa 1 (202. Phaa 2 (202, Phaa 3 (202' Phaa 4 (202, Phaa 5 (203 Phaa 6 (203 te r) ,e 9r Lane Group [Queue Storage�, WB Left/Thru 95th • 0.0 AM Peak 0.00 Hour Average 7.8 A �, • 0.0 mr PM 0.01 Peak Hour Average 10.8 B NB Left /Right 2.1 0.10 23.2 C 2.8 0.11 32.9 D �) Overall 0.4 A 0.4 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.00 7.8 A 0.0 0.01 11.0 B NB Left /Right 4.9 0.20 28.8 D 4.9 0.19 36.5 E �) Overall 0.8 A 0.6 A ,e Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 11.2 B -WB NB Left /Right 9.1 0.31 35.1 E 7.0 0.26 43.3 E �) Overall 1.4 A 0.9 A ,e �) WB Left/Thru NB Left /Right Overall 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 0.36 11.4 B 12.6 0.41 40.1 E 10.5 50.6 F 2.0 A 1.3 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 11.7 B NB Left /Right 12.6 0.41 40.1 E 13.3 0.44 60.8 F �) Overall 2.0 A 1.7 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B NB Left /Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Z) Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 10 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. V/C Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.90] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F] 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] 6A Development Access Alignment Operations at the proposed development access and the neighbouring development (Civic 1429) were initially analysed assuming their proposed accesses were closer together, since the site plan for the proposed development was not yet available at the time of issuing the draft report. Now that the site plans for both developments are available, the distance between their accesses is roughly 83m, as shown in Figure 6.2. Therefore, the impact to the two developments accesses is not as critical since they are not planned to be aligned into a single intersection on Loch Lomond Road. CBCL `N191 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 26 Civic 1429 Development Access MOM /LAlk0, Figure 6.2: Access Separation Between Proposed Development (Civic 1440) and Civic 1429 CBCL `RV Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 27 Warrant Analyses Warrant analyses were completed to evaluate the need for traffic signals and a pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed development road. The following sections outline the results of those analyses. 71 Traffic Signal Warrant Significant delays for the proposed site road (i.e., NB lane group) at its intersection with Loch Lomond Road are expected under 2032 Build conditions. Therefore, a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis was carried out in accordance with the methodology outlined by the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) to evaluate if traffic signals would be an appropriate mitigation measure. Traffic volumes from the 2032 Build condition were applied for the morning (AM), mid -day (MD), and afternoon (PM) peak periods, as they would represent the typical highest 6-hour periods. The Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis produced a score of 55 points; this compares to the 100 points normally required to warrant traffic signals. Therefore, this analysis suggests that traffic signals are not warranted at this intersection. The corresponding Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis worksheet is provided in Appendix G. Given the conflicting results between the traffic model and the warrant analysis, it is suggested this intersection be closely monitored following construction and occupancy of the proposed development. 7,2 Pedestrian Crosswalk Warrant Analysis Since the proposed development is expected to create latent demand for pedestrians from the proposed development to cross Loch Lomond Road to reach the sidewalk, a crosswalk warrant analysis was carried out. Guidance was provided from the Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide, Third Edition, published by TAC. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 28 IiUYA The Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide provides a decision support tool to aide in selecting the appropriate crossing control system, which is based on the Average Daily Traffic (ADT), posted speed limit, and lane configuration of the proposed crossing location. The decision support tool from the guide is illustrated in Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: Decision Support Tool - Treatment Selection Matrix The speed limit along Loch Lomond Road is posted at 60 km/h near the proposed site road, although it was noted that a short distance to the west the speed limit is posted at 50 km/h. The road cross-section is 2 lanes, with 1 lane for each EB and WB through traffic. While current ADT data is not available at this location, guidance provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) suggests the two-way Design Hour Volume (DHV) is typically 8-12% of the ADT. The estimated 2032 Build traffic volume at the proposed site road indicates a DHV of 1,400 and 1,700 vehicles per hour during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Therefore, the corresponding ADT would range between roughly 12,000 to 18,000 for the AM peak hour and 14,000 to 21,000 for the PM peak hour. Based on the road characteristics detailed above, the treatment selection matrix indicates that installation of a crosswalk with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) would be appropriate. The RRFB could be placed at the proposed development access (i.e., a new crosswalk) or implemented at the nearby crosswalk on the west leg of Bon Accord / Loch Lomond Road; this existing crosswalk is roughly 330m west of the proposed development's access and it services a bus stop that does not have sidewalk between the crosswalk and the bus stop. The existing sidewalk is on the north side of Loch Lomond Road so pedestrians need to cross the road to access nearby amenities (e.g., Irving Gas Station, Tim Hortons) and Simonds High School; the proposed development is within the 2.4km walk zone for the school, so students would be expected to walk or be driven. Therefore, pedestrians from the development would require either a designated crosswalk at the CBCL `N11:3 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 29 proposed development access or the construction of roughly 330m of new sidewalk on the south side of Loch Lomond Road to reach the existing crosswalk. As it would be less costly to install a new crosswalk at the proposed development's access with Loch Lomond Road, a sight distance assessment was carried out to determine if the crosswalk and RRFB system would be appropriate at the proposed site road. 7.2.1 Sight Distance Assessment An assessment of both Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) were completed to determine if there are adequate sight lines for approaching traffic and a stopped vehicle turning onto Loch Lomond Road from the proposed site road. 7.2.1.1 Sight Distance Requirements Sight distance is determined based on several factors, including the design speed of the road, brake reaction time, deceleration rate, road gradient, population demographic, and gap acceptance time. The posted limit on Loch Lomond Road is 60 km/hr is near the proposed site road, and the operating speed was assumed to be 70 km/hr. According to the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads(GOG), 2017Edition, the minimum sight distances for SSD and ISD are: I! SSD = 105m minimum 1 ISD = 150m minimum for a left turning vehicle ISD = 130m minimum for a right turning vehicle 7.2.1.2 Available Sight Distance A site visit was conducted by CBCL on December 5, 2023, to determine the available sight distance for SSD and ISD at the proposed access location on Loch Lomond Road. In accordance with TAC's GDG, the following field parameters were used to conduct the assessment: 1 Driver eye height of 1.08m, located 4.4m from the edge of the nearest travel lane ll� Object height of 0.38m for SSD Object height of 1.30m for TSD Table 7.1: Summary of Sight Distance Evaluation . .P - EMW— SSD 105m 150m + Sufficient ISD (Left) 150m 150m + Sufficient ISD (Right) 130m 150m + Sufficient There were no concerns identified with the approach east of the proposed site road, as the minimum SSD and ISD are available. To the west of the proposed site road, the minimum Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 30 `N11%7 SSD and ISD are also available, but there was concern identified with vegetation (e.g., shrubs, trees) along the southern portion of Loch Lomond Road being inside the sight triangle; the vegetation appears to be partly within the municipal right-of-way and on the development property. While the vegetation did not completely obscure the line of sight, the available sight distance would be reduced to roughly 80m in the summer months when the vegetation is in full bloom. However, it is recommended to remove, or at least maintain, the vegetation once the development access is constructed to alleviate this concern. Therefore, the available SSD and ISD at the proposed development access meet the minimum requirements for both approaches, contingent on the removal/future maintenance of the vegetation to the west. 7.2.2 Nearby Bus Stops The location of the existing bus stops near the proposed development were reviewed. The bus stops nearest the proposed development are immediately adjacent to the site road, which would also be the nearest bus top for the development at Civic 1429. For pedestrians from either development to access the opposing bus stop, a designated crosswalk close to these developments would be required to cross the road (i.e., pedestrians from Civic 1440 would need to cross the road to access the north side bus stop). Civic 1429 r Access a Civic 1440 Access 7Existing Crosswalk Legend: p Bus Stop Locations Figure 7.2: Bus Stops Near the Proposed Development Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 31 IiiRis] 7.2.3 Recommended RRFB Placement Since there is sufficient sight distance available at the proposed development's access, and to service the needs of transit users near the proposed development(s), the installation of a new crosswalk at the proposed site road would be recommended. Installing a new crosswalk complete with an RRFB system at this location would provide direct access to the existing sidewalk and be less costly than constructing sidewalk to connect with the existing crosswalk. Furthermore, it appears the intersection spacing is sufficient between the new crosswalk at the proposed site road and the existing crosswalk at Bon Accord Drive. However, the posted speed limit of 60km/hr on Loch Lomond Road could potentially be reduced to 50km/hr in front of the proposed until some distance east of the proposed site road development to encourage slower travel speeds, enhance pedestrian safety, and reduce the minimum sight distances required. The increase to 60 km/hr could be relocated east of the new crosswalk so drivers transitioning to a higher speed are doing so further from the crosswalk. This speed limit reduction could be passively enforced with the introduction of traffic calming measures along Loch Lomond Road (e.g., curb extensions at intersections, through lane width reduction, etc.). Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 32 IiiN s Mitigation Measures As noted in the analysis of the 2032 No Build and 2032 Build scenarios, there are existing operational issues along the Loch Lomond Road that are marginally worsened with the additional of the proposed development traffic. However, two mitigation options were analysed to improve traffic capacity along Loch Lomond Road: adding an additional WB lane and adding both an additional WB and EB lane. 8.1 Added WB Lane A WB lane was added along Loch Lomond Road beginning roughly 420m east of Hickey Road, near the Irving gas station, through to the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive, as shown in Figures 8.1 and 8.2. The WB lane was initially analysed starting at the intersection with Bon Accord / Loch Lomond; however, notable improvements were not found by starting the added WB lane that far east. Furthermore, a single WB through lane at Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive was modelled, but it was insufficient to provide notable improvements to LOS and queueing, so two WB through lanes were modelled. The LOS analysis for the study intersections with the added WB lane were performed using the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections, with signal coordination implemented. The operational results for the 2032 Build scenario with an added WB lane are summarized in Table 8.1, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix H. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 33 Ii"M Figure 8.1: Synchro Model with Added WB Lane, Western Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) Figure 8.2: Synchro Model with Added WB Lane, Eastern Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) The following notable improvements were identified at the signalized intersections with the addition of a second WB through lane on Loch Lomond Road, as it allowed an efficient reallocation of green time between lane groups: Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive: o AM Peak Hour 110 second cycle length WB through queueing and V/C ratio are brought within acceptable limits ONLoch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 34 163 • NB left V/C ratio and average delay brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 10.4 seconds. o PM Peak Hour • 110 second cycle length • WB through queueing is brought within acceptable limits 1 Loch Lomond Road / Hickey: o AM Peak Hour • 55 second cycle length • WB through queueing is brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 8 seconds. o PM Peak Hour • 90 second cycle length • No notable improvements noted No improvements were identified for the other unsignalized intersections on Loch Lomond Road. The addition of a second WB lane helps improve operations, especially during the AM peak hour, as there is a greater proportion of WB traffic. However, during the PM peak hour when there is greater EB traffic demand, a second EB lane would also be needed at the intersection of Hickey / Loch Lomond. To permit the additional WB lane through the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive, a combination of road widening and lane narrowing would be required to fit within the existing built area around the intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 35 IiC:�I Table 8.1: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes with iviiTigaTion: Aaaea VVLS Lane AM Peak Hour""""""" PM Peak Hour IntersectionW 95th % Average 95th % Average [Synchro [Queue Storage WC Queue Delay LOS4Queue WC Delay LOS4 EB Left (78m) 16.6 0.27 15.8 B 34.0 0.40 17.4 B EB Thru/Right 36.7 0.27 19.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 12.8 0.13 11.6 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B McAllister WB Thru 76.0 0.53 1 21.7 C 44.6 1 0.33 25.1 C Drive & Champlain Drive WB Right (160m) 21.3 0.45 4.9 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A NB Left (70m) 31.7 0.70 41.0 D 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 41.1 0.41 37.1 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1l (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 1.8 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.0 0.32 24.1 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F Signals) SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 24.3 C 39.1 D EB Thru 24.5 0.49 13.3 B 262.2 0.99 44.1 D Loch Lomond EB Right 0.0 0.46 3.5 A 13.1 0.46 2.5 A WB Left (130m) 19.2 0.42 9.3 A 14.3 0.45 15.1 B & Hickey Road WB Thru 42.3 0.51 9.6 A 17.0 0.20 4.6 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 49.3 0.72 27.0 C 92.6 1.03 97.8 F Signals) NB Right (120m) 6.5 0.15 5.0 A 17.3 0.49 10.6 B Overall 11.7 B 31.5 C Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.06 12.2 B 2.1 0.01 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.86 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A (Unsignalized) 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B Loch Lomond WB Left/Thru & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [4] Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A (Unsignalized) Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F] 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 36 iiW Added WB and EB Lanes A second mitigation scenario was analysed that included adding a lane for both directions along Loch Lomond Road. The added EB lane starts at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive and ends at Bon Accord / Loch Lomond as shown in Figure 8.3; two EB through lanes we modelled at Hickey / Loch Lomond, and the second EB through lane turns into the EB left turn lane at Bon Accord / Loch Lomond. The added WB lane was configured identical to section 8.1. Figure 8.3: Synchro Model with Added WB and EB Lanes, Eastern Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) The LOS analysis for the study intersections with the added WB and EB lanes were performed using the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections, with coordination implemented. The operational results for the 2032 Build scenario with an added WB and EB lane are summarized in Table 8.2, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix H. CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 37 Table 8.2: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes with ivilTigaTion: Added vvts ana US Lanes Peak Ho PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM Lane •, Average 95th % Average [Synchro Node] [Queue Storage Queue V/C Delay LOS4 Queue v/C Ratio' Delay LOS4 EB Left (78m) 16.6 0.27 15.8 B 34.0 0.40 17.4 B EB Thru/Right 36.7 0.27 19.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C WB Left (100m) 13.4 0.13 14.4 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B Loch Lomond, WB Thru 89.2 0.53 26.0 C 44.6 0.33 25.1 C McAllister Drive WB Right (160m) 17.2 0.45 4.0 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A & Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 31.7 0.70 41.0 D 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 41.1 0.41 37.1 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1] (Traffic Signals) NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 1.8 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.0 0.32 24.1 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 25.5 C 39.1 D EB Thru 15.4 0.28 14.4 B 71.3 0.71 18.0 B EB Right 10.4 0.49 4.9 A 14.2 0.53 3.6 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 16.3 0.41 8.6 A 7.9 0.30 7.6 A & Hickey Road [2] (Traffic Signals) WB Thru 35.9 0.55 9.4 A 17.6 0.24 6.3 A NB Left 50.5 0.73 25.7 C 54.2 0.77 35.5 D NB Right (120m) 5.9 0.15 4.8 A 10.6 0.40 5.5 A Overall 11.6 B 13.8 B Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.86 12.2 B 0.0 0.11 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.06 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] (Unsignalized) Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B Loch Lomond & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [41 (Unsignalized) Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] The following notable improvements were identified at the signalized intersections with the addition of a second WB and EB through lane on Loch Lomond Road: Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive: 0 110 second cycle length o No notable improvement for AM or PM peak hours since there are currently two EB through lanes Loch Lomond Road / Hickey: o AM Peak Hour CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 38 • 45 second cycle length • Marginal improvements as there are higher WB volumes during the AM. o PM Peak Hour • 60 second cycle length • EB through queueing and V/C ratio are brought within acceptable limits • NB left V/C ratio and average delay brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 17.7 seconds. Again, no notable improvements were identified for either of the unsignalized study intersections. 83 Improvement Recommendation Based on the traffic operational analyses performed for expected future traffic volumes along Loch Lomond Road, it appears existing, and future, congestion can be alleviated by adding a second through lane for WB and EB directions. While the added lanes would provide increased capacity along the road links and signalized intersections, significant road widening, intersection reconfiguration, and utility pole relocation would be required to accommodate these upgrades. The incorporation of these upgrades will be challenging due to the existing built areas, especially around the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive. It is suggested that the City of Saint John carefully consider the proposed upgrades with their current transportation plan and vision for the Loch Lomond Road corridor. Additional traffic analysis using microsimulation (e.g., PTV VISSIM) would also be warranted to validate the results of the Synchro analysis and to better understand impacts to all road users (e.g., transit, active transportation). Furthermore, while 8.3.1 Roundabout Consideration While a roundabout was not closely investigated at the signalized intersections, its application could be a worthwhile measure to explore. Operational analysis for a roundabout would require the use of a specialized traffic software, ARCADY, along with use of PTV VISSIM to appropriately configure the approach lanes. Despite larger capital costs to implement a roundabout, operation and maintenance costs are typically low, and it would also provide other benefits in terms of increased vehicle/pedestrian safety and more efficient traffic operations. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 39 A Conclusion This report outlines the detailed methodology undertaken to prepare a comprehensive Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed development at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. It is CBCL's professional opinion that the study intersections have sufficient overall intersection capacity to accommodate the new traffic generated by the proposed development; however, certain lane groups on Loch Lomond Road are currently experiencing congestion that will be worsened with traffic from the proposed development. Therefore, road widening (i.e., additional WB and EB lanes) and intersection reconfiguration along this corridor will eventually be needed but will require delicate planning as the area is well established. The following critical elements were also identified: 1 While the traffic signal warrant analysis did not suggest traffic signals would be warranted at the proposed site road intersection with Loch Lomond Road, traffic operations at this intersection should be monitored going forward. 1 A new crosswalk is recommended on Loch Lomond Road at the proposed development's site road, along with a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and the necessary traffic signage and pavement markings. Thank you for the opportunity to complete this TIS for your proposed development. Please contact us if you have any questions or require further information. Yours very truly, CBCL Limited 00.1 ZI-e- 1A Prepared by: Brendan McPhee, M.Sc.E., P.Eng. Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Mark MacDonald, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Engineer This document was prepared for the party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflects CBCL Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third -party use of this document. CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 40 APPENDIX A Site Plan OR170 Appendices 4 C e 6 a• ayaia e 0� d_ ® m OO _ .d E Alo. s as yy$ y 1 s � 3:- G yi= 3� .�' �qEi Ng�= 3 �Y ��yky" SA tlYbJ tlE i�&Y gN�€9€ yy' HEY-:!Y3aSS' ;�a:a�s F� 5 ¢g9 may q Ep' 1^3 'ii�— g'1A, a d d ! 55 EY d 'g a 5454 c S #g i @Y 3 3 Y O iv a� a �` IN UwFI $'3 .�Wb !a �$ 3 is -G� �aili �: �3$� W 54 1 APPENDIX B Traffic Count Reports C�« `rya Appendices McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, CIA 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 7:OOAM 19 29 15 0 63 0 59 148 28 0 235 0 4 11 18 0 33 0 13 26 7 0 46 0 377 7:15AM 19 48 20 0 87 1 58 181 27 0 266 0 6 11 15 0 32 0 19 28 13 0 60 0 445 7:30AM 31 46 38 0 115 1 72 188 15 0 275 0 3 20 30 0 53 0 11 36 7 0 54 0 497 7:45AM 23 37 28 0 88 0 76 175 7 0 258 0 14 22 24 0 60 0 14 53 14 0 81 0 487 Hourly Total 92 160 101 0 353 2 265 692 77 0 1034 0 27 64 87 0 178 0 57 143 41 0 241 0 1806 8:OOAM 25 43 48 0 116 1 69 175 11 0 255 0 15 31 39 0 85 0 17 60 20 0 97 0 553 8:15AM 38 45 48 0 131 2 70 166 10 0 246 0 12 26 27 0 65 0 23 54 22 0 99 0 541 8:30AM 31 33 49 0 113 0 80 171 12 0 263 0 14 34 25 0 73 2 17 82 11 0 110 3 559 8:45AM 24 20 67 0 111 0 84 131 9 0 224 0 12 27 12 0 51 0 11 60 20 0 91 0 477 Hourly Total 118 141 212 0 471 3 303 643 42 0 988 0 53 118 103 0 274 2 68 256 73 0 397 3 2130 9:OOAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:OOPM 17 25 123 0 165 0 60 81 11 0 152 0 16 48 24 0 88 2 23 122 24 0 169 0 574 4:15PM 16 18 101 0 135 0 71 74 8 0 153 0 23 45 30 0 98 0 28 166 33 0 227 0 613 4:30PM 21 34 123 0 178 0 79 94 6 0 179 0 16 55 25 0 96 0 31 167 50 0 248 0 701 4:45PM 24 35 113 0 172 0 74 74 5 0 153 0 10 30 17 0 57 0 20 172 46 0 238 1 620 Hourly Total 78 112 460 0 650 0 284 323 30 0 637 0 65 178 96 0 339 2 102 627 153 0 882 1 2508 S:OOPM 26 52 153 0 231 0 68 73 12 0 153 0 21 61 28 0 110 0 25 188 35 0 248 0 742 5:15PM 25 31 131 0 187 0 64 96 3 0 163 0 18 47 25 0 90 0 28 191 39 0 258 0 698 5:30PM 25 19 106 0 150 0 70 90 9 0 169 0 20 57 35 0 112 0 19 176 33 0 228 0 659 5:45PM 14 37 99 0 150 0 59 70 9 0 138 0 12 38 14 0 64 0 15 121 23 0 159 1 511 Hourly Total 90 139 489 0 718 0 261 329 33 0 623 0 71 203 102 0 376 0 87 676 130 0 893 1 2610 6:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022-11-23 7:OOAM 19 39 11 0 69 0 57 150 18 0 225 0 1 7 12 0 20 1 8 26 4 0 38 0 352 7:15AM 24 40 14 0 78 1 65 167 19 0 251 0 10 17 23 0 50 0 13 37 5 0 55 0 434 7:30AM 29 36 27 0 92 0 77 191 16 0 284 0 6 22 28 0 56 0 13 41 12 0 66 0 498 7:45AM 32 36 33 0 101 0 78 179 9 0 266 0 6 20 23 0 49 0 21 47 15 0 83 0 499 Hourly Total 104 151 85 0 340 1 277 687 62 0 1026 0 23 66 86 0 175 1 55 151 36 0 242 0 1783 8:OOAM 27 47 38 0 112 0 90 168 10 0 268 0 11 41 37 0 89 0 25 52 16 0 93 0 562 8:15AM 32 40 54 0 126 0 78 163 12 0 253 0 13 35 35 0 83 0 21 43 13 0 77 0 539 8:30AM 27 30 58 0 115 0 99 150 9 0 258 0 14 32 16 0 62 0 16 67 11 0 94 0 529 8:45AM 22 17 56 0 95 0 89 113 9 0 211 0 14 20 12 0 46 0 9 73 20 0 102 0 454 Hourly Total 108 134 206 0 448 0 356 594 40 0 990 0 52 128 100 0 280 0 71 235 60 0 366 0 2084 4:OOPM 18 33 96 0 147 0 58 63 10 0 131 0 16 49 24 0 89 0 24 160 32 0 216 0 583 4:15PM 18 27 83 0 128 0 55 83 10 0 148 0 19 43 15 0 77 0 18 145 39 0 202 0 555 4:30PM 30 27 104 0 161 0 64 93 8 0 165 0 11 51 29 0 91 0 19 186 37 0 242 1 659 4:45PM 24 32 129 0 185 0 51 70 13 0 134 0 14 34 16 0 64 1 19 183 37 0 239 0 622 Hourly Total 90 119 412 0 621 0 228 309 41 0 578 0 60 177 84 0 321 1 80 674 145 0 899 1 2419 S:OOPM 25 40 158 0 223 0 74 95 6 0 175 0 15 55 40 0 110 0 22 182 42 0 246 0 754 5:15PM 16 32 137 0 185 0 70 82 3 0 155 0 24 37 23 0 84 1 24 169 44 0 237 0 661 5:30PM 32 20 114 0 166 0 54 89 8 0 151 0 19 50 37 0 106 0 17 162 34 0 213 0 636 5:45PM 21 29 97 0 147 0 81 77 6 0 164 0 12 23 17 0 52 0 17 100 18 0 135 0 498 Hourly Total 94 121 506 0 721 0 279 343 23 0 645 0 70 165 117 0 352 1 80 613 138 0 831 0 2549 Total 774 1077 2471 0 4322 6 2253 3921 348 0 6522 0 421 1099 775 0 2295 7 600 3375 776 0 4751 6 17890 %Approach 17.9% 24.9% 57.2% 0% - - 34.5% 60.1% 5.3% 0% - - 18.3% 47.9% 33.8% 0% - - 12.6% 71.0% 16.3% 0% - - - % Total 4.3% 6.0% 13.8% 0% 24.2% 12.6% 21.9% 1.9% 0% 36.5% 2.4% 6.1% 4.3% 0% 12.8% 3.4% 18.9% 4.3% 0% 26.6% - Lights 739 1060 2418 0 4217 2211 3841 332 0 6384 398 1084 745 0 2227 570 3300 738 0 4608 17436 % Lights 95.5% 98.4% 97.9% 0% 97.6% 98.1% 98.0% 95.4% 0% 97.9% 94.5% 98.6% 96.1% 0% 97.0% 95.0% 97.8% 95.1% 0% 97.0% 97.5% Articulated Trucks 10 0 6 0 16 9 6 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 16 47 %Articulated Trucks 1.3% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 1.8% 0% 0.3% 0.3% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 25 17 47 0 89 33 74 16 0 123 23 15 30 0 68 30 73 24 0 127 407 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 3.2% 1.6% 1.9% 0% 2.1% 1.5% 1.9% 4.6% 0% 1.9% 5.5% 1.4% 3.9% 0% 3.0% 5.0% 2.2% 3.1% 0% 2.7% 2.3% Pedestrians - - - 6 - - 0 - - - 7 - - - 6 % Pedestrians - 100% - - 100% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0 0 - 0 - 0 I tj 1 of Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% 0% 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 174 2of7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 E O O J r 0 ­1 u F- Ln O J It 776 3375 •11 [N] McAllister Total: 8450 In:4322 Out:4128 o � rl N 2 --avow Ln rn ­1 I- Ol N r- O rl Out: 2025 In: 2295 Total: 4320 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 2253 N N (Q Ln O 3921 `.0 c C O O 348 E — O r J 0 u (.0~ N (.0 O J +� O W 175 3of7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 7:45AM 23 37 28 0 88 0 76 175 7 0 258 0 14 22 24 0 60 0 14 53 14 0 81 0 487 8:OOAM 25 43 48 0 116 1 69 175 11 0 255 0 15 31 39 0 85 0 17 60 20 0 97 0 553 8:15AM 38 45 48 0 131 2 70 166 10 0 246 0 12 26 27 0 65 0 23 54 22 0 99 0 541 8:30AM 31 33 49 0 113 0 80 171 12 0 263 0 14 34 25 0 73 2 17 82 11 0 110 3 559 Total 117 158 173 0 448 3 295 687 40 0 1022 0 55 113 115 0 283 2 71 249 67 0 387 3 2140 %Approach 26.1% 35.3% 38.6% 0% - - 28.9% 67.2% 3.9% 0% - - 19.4% 39.9% 40.6% 0% - - 18.3% 64.3% 17.3% 0% - - - % Total 5.5% 7.4% 8.1% 0% 20.9% 13.8% 32.1% 1.9% 0% 47.8% 2.6% 5.3% 5.4% 0% 13.2% 3.3% 11.6% 3.1% 0% 18.1% - PHF 0.770 0.878 0.883 - 0.855 0.922 0.981 0.833 - 0.971 0.917 0.831 0.737 - 0.832 0.772 0.759 0.761 - 0.880 0.957 Lights 106 153 163 0 422 288 669 40 0 997 52 110 106 0 268 65 236 60 0 361 2048 % Lights 90.6% 96.8% 94.2% 0% 94.2% 97.6% 97.4% 100% 0% 97.6% 94.5% 97.3% 92.2% 0% 94.7% 91.5% 94.8% 89.6% 0% 93.3% 95.7% Articulated Trucks 3 0 3 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 % Articulated Trucks 2.6% 0% 1.7% 0% 1.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.5% 0% 0.3% 0.4% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 8 5 7 0 20 6 17 0 0 23 3 3 9 0 15 6 13 6 0 25 83 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.8% 3.2% 4.0% 0% 4.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0% 0% 2.3% 5.5% 2.7% 7.8% 0% 5.3% 8.5% 5.2% 9.0% 0% 6.5% 3.9% Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - 2 - - - 3 % Pedestrians - 100% - - 100% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0 0 - 0 - 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - 0% 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 176 4of7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 67 249 71 i E [N] McAllister Total: 923 In:448 Out:475 I- 00 M ­1 Ln n ­1 ­1 ­1 Ln M Ln r I rl Ln rl rl Out: 269 In: 283 Total: 552 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 295 N N � O O 687 oC C � c Cn O 40 E n 4� J o �F__r_ u O O J W u 177 5of7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, CIA 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 4:30PM 21 34 123 0 178 0 79 94 6 0 179 0 16 55 25 0 96 0 31 167 50 0 248 0 701 4:45PM 24 35 113 0 172 0 74 74 5 0 153 0 10 30 17 0 57 0 20 172 46 0 238 1 620 S:OOPM 26 52 153 0 231 0 68 73 12 0 153 0 21 61 28 0 110 0 25 188 35 0 248 0 742 5:15PM 25 31 131 0 187 0 64 96 3 0 163 0 18 47 25 0 90 0 28 191 39 0 258 0 698 Total 96 152 520 0 768 0 285 337 26 0 648 0 65 193 95 0 353 0 104 718 170 0 992 1 2761 %Approach 12.5% 19.8% 67.7% 0% - - 44.0% 52.0% 4.0% 0% - - 18.4% 54.7% 26.9% 0% - - 10.5% 72.4% 17.1% 0% - - - % Total 3.5% 5.5% 18.8% 0% 27.8% 10.3% 12.2% 0.9% 0% 23.5% 2.4% 7.0% 3.4% 0% 12.8% 3.8% 26.0% 6.2% 0% 35.9% - PUF 0.923 0.731 0.850 - 0.831 0.902 0.878 0.542 - 0.905 0.774 0.791 0.848 - 0.802 0.839 0.940 0.850 - 0.961 0.930 Lights 95 150 515 0 760 280 335 24 0 639 65 192 92 0 349 102 715 167 0 984 2732 % Lights 99.0% 98.7% 99.0% 0% 99.0% 98.2% 99.4% 92.3% 0% 98.6% 100% 99.5% 96.8% 0% 98.99/6 98.1% 99.6% 98.2% 0% 99.2% 98.9% Articulated Trucks 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 % Articulated Trucks 1.0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.1% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 2 4 0 6 3 2 2 0 7 0 1 3 0 4 2 3 2 0 7 24 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.3% 0.8% 0% 0.8% 1.1% 0.6% 7.7% 0% 1.1% 0% 0.5% 3.2% 0% 1.1% 1.9% 0.4% 1.2% 0% 0.7% 0.9% Pedestrians - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - 0 - - - - - 1 % Pedestrians - - - - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 - 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 178 6of7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 (0 O rr co N Ln O N 7 E Lrni O O J ra 0 u F N O rn J c E 170 718 104 [N] McAllister Total: 1416 In:768 Out:648 Q0 N O CYI Ln N r i Ln Ln m Ln rn rn Q0 Out: 282 In: 353 Total: 635 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 285 0 It 337 1° Ln O CYI O 26 E O � J n-mF- -r- O U M O ­1 J 4� 0 W O - 179 7of7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* lot 2022-11-22 7:00AM 161 26 0 187 0 9 69 0 78 0 17 29 0 46 0 311 7:15AM 210 14 0 224 0 7 58 0 65 0 21 35 0 56 0 345 7:30AM 205 22 0 227 0 17 70 0 87 1 29 46 1 76 0 390 7:45AM 214 28 0 242 0 15 59 0 74 0 43 49 0 92 0 408 Hourly Total 790 90 0 880 0 48 256 0 304 1 110 159 1 270 0 1454 8:00AM 183 39 0 222 0 19 68 0 87 0 74 46 0 120 0 429 8:15AM 176 52 0 228 0 15 71 0 86 0 67 50 0 117 0 431 8:30AM 186 49 0 235 0 12 67 0 79 0 69 69 0 138 0 452 8:45AM 118 31 0 149 0 21 94 0 115 0 73 66 0 139 0 403 Hourly Total 663 171 0 834 0 67 300 0 367 0 283 231 0 514 0 1715 4:00PM 87 15 0 102 0 33 61 0 94 0 81 166 0 247 0 443 4:15PM 95 15 0 110 0 41 60 0 101 0 84 188 0 272 0 483 4:30PM 101 13 0 114 0 41 60 0 101 0 88 175 0 263 0 478 4:45PM 83 13 0 96 0 29 53 0 82 0 88 211 0 299 0 477 Hourly Total 366 56 0 422 0 144 234 0 378 0 341 740 0 1081 0 1881 5:00PM 107 15 0 122 0 38 55 0 93 0 129 205 0 334 0 549 5:15PM 98 18 0 116 0 31 55 0 86 0 111 228 0 339 0 541 5:30PM 106 18 0 124 0 28 64 0 92 0 102 202 0 304 0 520 5:45PM 76 12 0 88 0 35 54 0 89 0 87 142 0 229 0 406 Hourly Total 387 63 0 450 0 132 228 0 360 0 429 777 0 1206 0 2016 6:00PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022-11-23 7:00AM 182 13 0 195 0 8 58 0 66 0 17 22 0 39 0 300 7:15AM 196 16 0 212 0 5 60 0 65 0 18 40 0 58 0 335 7:30AM 223 20 0 243 0 12 74 0 86 0 29 42 0 71 0 400 7:45AM 197 32 0 229 0 9 62 0 71 0 47 35 0 82 0 382 Hourly Total 798 81 0 879 0 34 254 0 288 0 111 139 0 250 0 1417 8:00AM 191 30 0 221 0 14 69 0 83 0 53 47 0 100 0 404 8:15AM 179 52 0 231 0 11 74 0 85 1 69 47 0 116 0 432 8:30AM 150 40 0 190 0 11 84 0 95 0 77 54 0 131 0 416 8:45AM 118 38 0 156 0 16 108 0 124 0 75 69 0 144 0 424 Hourly Total 638 160 0 798 0 52 335 0 387 1 274 217 0 491 0 1676 4:00PM 81 14 0 95 0 35 60 0 95 0 81 189 0 270 0 460 4:15PM 104 15 0 119 0 23 46 0 69 0 77 172 0 249 0 437 4:30PM 102 13 0 115 0 47 54 0 101 0 100 193 0 293 0 509 4:45PM 88 17 0 105 0 26 50 0 76 2 96 215 0 311 0 492 Hourly Total 375 59 0 434 0 131 210 0 341 2 354 769 0 1123 0 1898 5:00PM 101 17 0 118 0 40 82 0 122 0 101 212 0 313 0 553 5:15PM 86 19 0 105 0 44 52 0 96 0 119 215 0 334 0 535 5:30PM 94 18 0 112 0 35 54 0 89 0 95 188 0 283 0 484 5:45PM 109 16 0 125 0 30 57 0 87 1 66 143 0 209 0 421 Hourly Total 390 70 0 460 0 149 245 0 394 1 381 758 0 1139 0 1993 Total 4407 750 0 5157 0 757 2062 0 2819 5 2283 3790 1 6074 0 14050 %Approach 85.5% 14.5% 0% - - 26.9% 73.1% 0% - - 37.6% 62.4% 0% - - - %Total 31.4% 5.3% 0% 36.7% 5.4% 14.7% 0% 20.1% 16.2% 27.0% 0% 43.2% - Lights 4332 701 0 5033 721 1989 0 2710 2203 3719 1 5923 13666 %Lights 98.3% 93.5% 0% 97.6% 95.2% 96.5% 0% 96.1% 96.5% 98.1% 100% 973% 97.3% Articulated Trucks 8 2 0 10 0 6 0 6 4 4 0 8 24 % Articulated Trucks 0.2% 0.3% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.3% 0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 67 47 0 114 36 67 0 103 76 67 0 143 360 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.5% 6.3% 0% 2.2% 4.8% 3.2% 0% 3.7% 3.3% 1.8% 0% 2.4% 2.6% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 4 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians 80.0% of 7 Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Int Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 11 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - 20.0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 181 2of7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 � o ro � O Q0 O O Ln E N O� 1 J r6 4� ~ p 0 3790 J (.0 E '—' 2283 p4 3 N I- l4 Ln O I� N Out: 3033 In: 2819 Total: 5852 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 4407 750 182 3 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Iot 2022-11-22 7:45AM 214 28 0 242 0 15 59 0 74 0 43 49 0 92 0 408 8:00AM 183 39 0 222 0 19 68 0 87 0 74 46 0 120 0 429 8:15AM 176 52 0 228 0 15 71 0 86 0 67 50 0 117 0 431 8:30AM 186 49 0 235 0 12 67 0 79 0 69 69 0 138 0 4522 Total 759 168 0 927 0 61 265 0 326 0 253 214 0 467 0 1720 %Approach 81.9% 18.1% 0% - - 18.7% 81.3% 0% - - 54.2% 45.8% 0% - - - %Total 44.1% 9.8% 0% 53.9% 3.5% 15.4% 0% 19.0% 14.7% 12.4% 0% 27.2% - PHF 0.887 0.808 - 0.958 0.803 0.933 - 0.937 0.855 0.775 - 0.846 0.951 Lights 745 152 0 897 51 249 0 300 237 206 0 443 1640 %Lights 98.2% 90.5% 0% 96.8% 83.6% 94.0% 0% 92.0% 93.7% 96.3% 0% 94.9% 95.3% Articulated Trucks 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 5 % Articulated Trucks 0.3% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.4% 0.9% 0% 0.6% 0.3% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 12 16 0 28 10 16 0 26 15 6 0 21 75 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.6% 9.5% 0% 3.0% 16.4% 6.0% 0% 8.0% 5.9% 2.8% 0% 4.5% 4.4% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 183 4of7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 214 253 Ln r I Q0 FO N Out: 421 In: 326 Total: 747 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 759 168 ro O Cn c � N O O N Erl Ln � J N F_ _r_ U O O J W u 184 5 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Wed Nov 23, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 23 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Int 2022-11-23 4:30PM 102 13 0 115 0 47 54 0 101 0 100 193 0 293 0 509 4:45PM 88 17 0 105 0 26 50 0 76 2 96 215 0 311 0 492 5:OOPM 101 17 0 118 0 40 82 0 122 0 101 212 0 313 0 553 5:15PM 86 19 0 105 0 44 52 0 96 0 119 215 0 334 0 535 Total 377 66 0 443 0 157 238 0 395 2 416 835 0 1251 0 2089 %Approach 85.1% 14.9% 0% - - 39.7% 60.3% 0% - - 33.3% 66.7% 0% - - - %Total 18.0% 3.2% 0% 21.2% 7.5% 11.4% 0% 18.9% 19.9% 40.0% 0% 59.9% - PHF 0.924 0.868 - 0.939 0.835 0.726 - 0.809 0.874 0.971 - 0.936 0.944 Lights 372 64 0 436 154 234 0 388 412 830 0 1242 2066 %Lights 98.7% 97.0% 0% 98.49% 98.1% 98.3% 0% 98.2% 99.0% 99.4% 0% 99.3% 98.9% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 5 2 0 7 3 4 0 7 4 5 0 9 23 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.3% 3.0% 0% 1.6% 1.9% 1.7% 0% 1.8% 1.0% 0.6% 0% 0.7% 1.1% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 2 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - 100% - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 185 6of7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Wed Nov 23, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 23 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 ro O rr un Q0 O �.o O �.o E rcol O O J 4� o u ~ r' O `^ Sm 835 416 00 r- M Ln N ri Out: 482 In: 395 Total: 877 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 377 186 7 of 7 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (11:30 AM-1:30 PM, 7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Eastbound Road Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 7:00AM 12 3 0 15 1 0 206 0 206 0 27 2 0 29 0 250 7:15AM 17 3 0 20 2 1 236 0 237 0 32 3 0 35 0 292 7:30AM 15 4 0 19 0 1 255 0 256 0 56 4 0 60 0 335 7:45AM 27 5 0 32 0 2 218 0 220 0 56 6 0 62 0 314 Hourly Total 71 15 0 86 3 4 915 0 919 0 171 15 0 186 0 1191 8:00AM 19 3 0 22 0 1 246 0 247 0 54 5 0 59 0 328 8:15AM 23 2 0 25 0 5 195 0 200 0 67 7 0 74 0 299 8:30AM 10 2 0 12 1 4 221 0 225 0 67 4 0 71 0 308 8:45AM 11 0 0 11 1 2 140 0 142 0 69 8 0 77 0 230 Hourly Total 63 7 0 70 2 12 802 0 814 0 257 24 0 281 0 1165 9:00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30AM 5 2 0 7 0 2 81 0 83 0 97 6 0 103 0 193 11:45AM 10 3 0 13 0 1 79 0 80 0 90 6 0 96 0 189 Hourly Total 15 5 0 20 0 3 160 0 163 0 187 12 0 199 0 382 12:00PM 10 2 0 12 0 4 78 0 82 0 101 14 0 115 0 209 12:15PM 10 2 0 12 0 0 124 0 124 0 95 14 0 109 0 245 12:30PM 7 3 0 10 0 2 105 0 107 0 98 8 0 106 0 223 12:45PM 10 3 0 13 1 0 108 0 108 0 88 10 0 98 0 219 Hourly Total 37 10 0 47 1 6 415 0 421 0 382 46 0 428 0 896 1:00PM 7 2 0 9 1 5 94 0 99 0 92 7 0 99 0 207 1:15PM 9 4 0 13 0 4 113 0 117 0 124 10 0 134 0 264 Hourly Total 16 6 0 22 1 9 207 0 216 0 216 17 0 233 0 471 4:00PM 9 1 0 10 0 4 89 0 93 0 196 15 0 211 0 314 4:15PM 7 1 0 8 0 2 106 0 108 0 225 13 0 238 0 354 4:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 2 107 0 109 0 222 15 0 237 0 358 4:45PM 11 3 0 14 0 5 85 0 90 0 222 23 0 245 0 349 Hourly Total 38 6 0 44 0 13 387 0 400 0 865 66 0 931 0 1375 5:00PM 9 0 0 9 1 6 111 0 117 0 230 22 0 252 0 378 5:15PM 8 2 0 10 0 2 98 0 100 0 264 21 0 285 0 395 5:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 0 108 0 108 0 225 20 0 245 0 365 5:45PM 9 1 0 10 1 2 74 0 76 0 174 16 0 190 1 276 Hourly Total 37 4 0 41 2 10 391 0 401 0 893 79 0 972 1 1414 2022-11-23 7:00AM 10 4 0 14 0 0 202 0 202 0 27 2 0 29 0 245 7:15AM 16 3 0 19 0 1 233 0 234 0 29 5 0 34 0 287 7:30AM 15 2 0 17 1 0 249 0 249 0 58 5 0 63 0 329 7:45AM 19 7 0 26 0 5 249 0 254 0 34 3 0 37 0 317 Hourly Total 60 16 0 76 1 6 933 0 939 0 148 15 0 163 0 1178 8:00AM 18 5 0 23 0 2 204 0 206 0 53 3 0 56 0 285 8:15AM 14 3 0 17 1 7 219 0 226 0 51 6 0 57 0 300 8:30AM 15 1 0 16 0 2 166 0 168 0 50 9 0 59 0 243 8:45AM 13 2 0 15 0 1 143 0 144 0 78 9 0 87 0 246 Hourly Total 60 11 0 71 1 12 732 0 744 0 232 27 0 259 0 1074 11:30AM 6 2 0 8 0 0 102 0 102 0 79 13 0 92 0 202 11:45AM 12 1 0 13 0 1 89 0 90 0 80 7 0 87 0 190 Hourly Total 18 3 0 21 0 1 191 0 192 0 159 20 0 179 0 392 12:00PM 12 3 0 15 0 0 96 0 96 0 86 7 0 93 0 204 12:15PM 10 1 0 11 0 2 89 0 91 0 95 12 0 107 0 209 12:30PM 9 1 0 10 0 0 80 0 80 0 100 9 0 109 0 199 12:45PM 9 1 0 10 0 3 96 0 99 0 101 7 0 108 01 217 Hourly Total 40 6 0 46 0 5 361 0 366 0 382 35 0 417 0 829 1:00PM 13 1 0 14 1 3 90 0 93 0 113 8 0 121 0 228 1:15PM 14 3 0 17 0 6 84 0 90 01 91 10 0 101 01 208 I ONI ia9s7 Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* Iot Hourly Total 27 4 0 31 1 9 174 0 183 0 204 18 0 222 0 436 4:OOPM 10 3 0 13 0 3 84 0 87 0 200 16 0 216 0 316 4:15PM 10 1 0 11 1 1 102 0 103 0 186 15 0 201 0 315 4:30PM 14 2 0 16 1 2 91 0 93 0 209 21 0 230 0 339 4:45PM 8 1 0 9 0 4 99 0 103 0 238 12 0 250 0 362 Hourly Total 42 7 0 49 2 10 376 0 386 0 833 64 0 897 0 1332 5:OOPM 15 4 0 19 0 4 95 0 99 0 239 21 0 260 0 378 5:15PM 12 4 0 16 0 2 93 0 95 0 260 24 0 284 0 395 5:30PM 9 3 0 12 1 3 90 0 93 0 230 15 0 245 0 350 5:45PM 12 2 0 14 1 3 107 0 110 0 177 11 0 188 0 312 Hourly Total 48 13 0 61 2 12 385 0 397 0 906 71 0 977 0 1435 6:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 572 113 0 685 16 112 6429 0 6541 0 5835 509 0 6344 1 13570 %Approach 83.5% 16.5% 0% - - 1.7% 98.3% 0% - - 92.0% 8.0% 0% - - - %Total 4.2% 0.8% 0% 5.0% 0.8% 47.4% 0% 48.2% 43.0% 3.8% 0% 46.8% - Lights 555 105 0 660 97 6277 0 6374 5695 500 0 6195 13229 %Lights 97.0% 92.9% 0% 96.4% 86.6% 97.6% 0% 97.4% 97.6% 98.2% 0% 97.7% 97.5% Articulated Trucks 2 2 0 4 0 11 0 11 1 0 0 1 16 % Articulated Trucks 0.3% 1.8% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 15 6 0 21 15 141 0 156 139 9 0 148 325 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 2.6% 5.3% 0% 3.1% 13.4% 2.2% 0% 2.4% 2.4% 1.8% 0% 2.3% 2.4% Pedestrians - - - - 14 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 % Pedestrians 87.5% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk 2 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 12.5% - 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 188 2of9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (11:30 AM-1:30 PM, 7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 O Ln O O It m E rn O J rp ort u F- zt O m J (.0 509 5835 ri [N] Bon Accord Total: 1306 In:685 Out:621 N M n r-I Ln r I 2 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 112 rl (a O Ln 6429 10 Eck CO tt O N rl E — O ro J 0,F� Ln u O +� J O W 189 3of9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 7:30AM 15 4 0 19 0 1 255 0 256 0 56 4 0 60 0 335 7:45AM 27 5 0 32 0 2 218 0 220 0 56 6 0 62 0 314 8:00AM 19 3 0 22 0 1 246 0 247 0 54 5 0 59 0 328 8:15AM 23 2 0 25 0 5 195 0 200 0 67 7 0 74 0 299 Total 84 14 0 98 0 9 914 0 923 0 233 22 0 255 0 1276 %Approach 85.7% 14.3% 0% - - 1.0% 99.0% 0% - - 91.4% 8.6% 0% - - - %Total 6.6% 1.1% 0% 7.7% 0.7% 71.6% 0% 72.3% 18.3% 1.7% 0% 20.0% - PHF 0.778 0.700 - 0.766 0.450 0.896 - 0.901 0.869 0.786 - 0.861 0.952 Lights 79 13 0 92 6 891 0 897 217 22 0 239 1228 %Lights 94.0% 92.9% 0% 93.9% 66.7% 97.5% 0% 97.2% 93.1% 100% 0% 93.7% 96.2% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 5 1 0 6 3 23 0 26 16 0 0 16 48 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.0% 7.1% 0% 6.1% 33.3% 2.5% 0% 2.8% 6.9% 0% 0% 6.3% 3.8% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk -1 - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 190 4of9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 ro 00 O rn ry, rn O n-m O O un 22 233 E [N] Bon Accord Total: 129 In:98 Out:31 ItRt 00­1 FE mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 0 914 W u 191 5of9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Midday Peak (Nov 22 2022 12:30PM - 1:30 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-2212:30PM 7 3 0 10 0 2 105 0 107 0 98 8 0 106 0 223 12:45PM 10 3 0 13 1 0 108 0 108 0 88 10 0 98 0 219 1:00PM 7 2 0 9 1 5 94 0 99 0 92 7 0 99 0 207 1:15PM 9 4 0 13 0 4 113 0 117 0 124 10 0 134 0 264 Total 33 12 0 45 2 11 420 0 431 0 402 35 0 437 0 913 %Approach 73.3% 26.7% 0% - - 2.6% 97.4% 0% - - 92.0% 8.0% 0% - - - %Total 3.6% 1.3% 0% 4.9% 1.2% 46.0% 0% 47.2% 44.0% 3.8% 0% 47.9% - PHF 0.825 0.750 - 0.865 0.550 0.929 - 0.921 0.810 0.875 - 0.815 0.865 Lights 31 12 0 43 11 406 0 417 392 35 0 427 887 %Lights 93.9% 100% 0% 95.6% 100% 96.7% 0% 96.8% 97.5% 100% 0% 97.7% 97.2% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 2 0 0 2 0 13 0 13 10 0 0 10 25 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.1% 0% 0% 4.4% 0% 3.1% 0% 3.0% 2.5% 0% 0% 2.3% 2.7% Pedestrians - - - - 2 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians 100% - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 192 6 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Midday Peak (Nov 22 2022 12:30PM - 1:30 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 (0 m O Ln r O 00 O 0, E co O J r 0 _r_ F_ u O � J c E 35 402 [N] Bon Accord Total: 91 In:45 Out:46 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 11 420 193 7of9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:45PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 4:45PM 11 3 0 14 0 5 85 0 90 0 222 23 0 245 0 349 S:OOPM 9 0 0 9 1 6 111 0 117 0 230 22 0 252 0 378 5:15PM 8 2 0 10 0 2 98 0 100 0 264 21 0 285 0 395 5:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 0 108 0 108 0 225 20 0 245 0 365 Total 39 6 0 45 1 13 402 0 415 0 941 86 0 1027 0 1487 %Approach 86.7% 13.3% 0% - - 3.1% 96.9% 0% - - 91.6% 8.4% 0% - - - %Total 2.6% 0.4% 0% 3.0% 0.9% 27.0% 0% 27.9% 63.3% 5.8% 0% 69.1% - PHF 0.886 0.500 - 0.804 0.542 0.905 - 0.887 0.891 0.935 - 0.901 0.941 Lights 39 6 0 45 13 394 0 407 936 86 0 1022 1474 %Lights 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98.0% 0% 98.1% 99.5% 100% 0% 99.5% 99.1% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 5 0 0 5 13 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.0% 0% 1.9% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.5% 0.9% Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians 100% - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 194 8 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:45PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 :• 941 Sm [N] Bon Accord Total: 144 In:45 Out:99 rnQ0 m mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 13 402 195 9of9 APPENDIX C Synchro Analysis Reports - 2022 Baseline C�« Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 1- Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 65 230 80 40 675 320 115 125 50 180 160 120 Future Volume (vph) 65 230 80 40 675 320 115 125 50 180 160 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.123 0.536 0.225 0.659 Satd. Flow (perm) 249 3439 0 1010 1946 1583 410 1883 1742 2434 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 36 259 125 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 256 89 41 696 330 142 154 62 205 182 136 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 345 0 41 696 330 142 154 62 205 318 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Free pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Free 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 20.0 66.0 20.0 66.0 20.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 51.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 59.4 52.2 58.3 51.6 117.3 41.9 27.7 27.7 36.2 24.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.45 0.50 0.44 1.00 0.36 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.22 0.07 0.81 0.21 0.48 0.35 0.12 0.24 0.75 Control Delay 17.5 19.6 14.7 39.5 0.3 33.1 42.5 0.5 27.1 53.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.5 19.6 14.7 39.5 0.3 33.1 42.5 0.5 27.1 53.9 LOS B B B D A C D A C D Approach Delay 19.2 26.4 31.5 43.4 Approach LOS B C C D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.2 21.6 4.0 132.4 0.0 22.0 29.2 0.0 15.9 63.6 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.1 36.1 10.5 #213.4 0.0 34.3 45.2 0.0 24.7 95.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 357 1877 643 1045 1583 328 531 581 1207 787 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.18 0.06 0.67 0.21 0.43 0.29 0.11 0.17 0.40 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 157 Actuated Cycle Length: 117.3 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd J f'i l i `111. - ± 5 � 56 ■ 0`.� 20 1 166S 16S 1 M51-9 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 200 250 165 740 280 55 Future Volume (vph) 200 250 165 740 280 55 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.474 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 863 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 301 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 241 301 174 779 308 60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 241 301 174 779 308 60 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 24.0 79.0 35.0 35.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.1 20.1 35.1 34.0 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.56 0.55 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.42 0.28 0.75 0.62 0.12 Control Delay 19.1 4.3 8.3 16.6 27.5 7.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.1 4.3 8.3 16.6 27.5 7.0 LOS B A A B C A Approach Delay 10.9 15.1 24.2 Approach LOS B B C Queue Length 50th (m) 18.2 0.0 7.4 53.0 26.3 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 38.2 9.8 19.9 119.6 64.5 7.7 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1533 1356 785 1836 915 884 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.42 0.34 0.07 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 114 Actuated Cycle Length: 62.2 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd u1 � 7_ 24 s 1553 355 TP CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Ij RU] 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 220 860 15 15 75 Future Vol, veh/h 25 220 860 15 15 75 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 28 247 989 17 20 100 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1006 0 0 1301 998 Stage 1 - - - 998 - Stage 2 - 303 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 689 178 296 Stage 1 - 357 - Stage 2 - 749 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 689 171 296 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 171 - Stage 1 342 Stage 2 749 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 29.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 689 264 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.455 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 29.5 HCM Lane LOS B D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2.2 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 LL Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 230 0 0 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 230 0 0 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 250 0 0 951 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 951 0 0 250 0 0 1201 1201 250 1201 1201 951 Stage 1 - - - - - - 250 250 - 951 951 - Stage 2 - - 951 951 - 250 250 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 1316 162 185 789 162 185 315 Stage 1 - - 754 700 - 312 338 - Stage 2 - - 312 338 - 754 700 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 1316 162 185 789 162 185 315 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 162 185 - 162 185 - Stage 1 754 700 312 338 Stage 2 312 338 754 700 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 722 1316 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 WIN 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 165 720 95 30 340 275 105 185 65 525 145 100 Future Volume (vph) 165 720 95 30 340 275 105 185 65 525 145 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1924 0 Flt Permitted 0.284 0.261 0.524 0.321 Satd. Flow (perm) 576 3514 0 492 1946 1583 954 1883 1742 1186 1924 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 306 125 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 170 742 98 33 378 306 131 231 81 625 173 119 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 170 840 0 33 378 306 131 231 81 625 292 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 20.0 66.0 20.0 66.0 66.0 20.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 51.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 47.5 40.0 38.7 30.0 30.0 31.3 18.9 18.9 43.5 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.39 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.31 0.19 0.19 0.43 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.61 0.12 0.66 0.45 0.35 0.66 0.19 0.68 0.58 Control Delay 20.3 29.0 18.4 39.1 5.8 23.2 50.9 2.7 25.0 36.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 29.0 18.4 39.1 5.8 23.2 50.9 2.7 25.0 36.9 LOS C C B D A C D A C D Approach Delay 27.5 23.9 33.9 28.8 Approach LOS C C C C Queue Length 50th (m) 16.8 66.1 3.0 58.0 0.0 14.2 38.7 0.0 39.3 42.4 Queue Length 95th (m) 37.6 111.2 9.9 111.1 18.8 27.6 67.4 0.0 61.2 74.4 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 479 2188 424 1209 1099 456 584 627 1233 908 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.08 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.40 0.13 0.51 0.32 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 157 Actuated Cycle Length: 101.8 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd C,1\11 1 t 20 s 66 g 35 s ib 5 35 I 0■ 20s 1 166S 1 M51S CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Wel 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 830 420 65 385 235 150 Future Volume (vph) 830 420 65 385 235 150 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.095 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 173 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 313 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 902 457 70 414 276 176 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 902 457 70 414 276 176 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 24.0 79.0 35.0 35.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 50.6 50.6 60.4 59.4 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.67 0.66 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.44 0.28 0.33 0.70 0.35 Control Delay 29.3 5.9 9.0 8.1 42.3 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.3 5.9 9.0 8.1 42.3 6.5 LOS C A A A D A Approach Delay 21.4 8.2 28.4 Approach LOS C A C Queue Length 50th (m) 119.0 10.8 3.3 24.8 41.4 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #234.9 35.1 9.3 50.1 61.2 11.5 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1052 1030 468 1584 600 677 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.86 0.44 0.15 0.26 0.46 0.26 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 114 Actuated Cycle Length: 89.6 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd u ; I -'j" Nt.I- 24!; 1555 25= r;r. 7Q ; WIN 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 945 390 15 10 45 Future Vol, veh/h 80 945 390 15 10 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 89 1050 424 16 13 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 440 0 0 1660 432 Stage 1 - - - 432 - Stage 2 - 1228 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 107 624 Stage 1 - 655 - Stage 2 - 277 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 99 624 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 603 Stage 2 277 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 19.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1120 318 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.216 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 19.4 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.8 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 WIN 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 955 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 955 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1038 0 0 440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 440 0 0 1038 0 0 1478 1478 1038 1478 1478 440 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1038 1038 - 440 440 - Stage 2 - - 440 440 - 1038 1038 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 670 104 126 280 104 126 617 Stage 1 - - 279 308 - 596 578 - Stage 2 - - 596 578 - 279 308 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 670 104 126 280 104 126 617 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 104 126 - 104 126 - Stage 1 279 308 596 578 Stage 2 596 578 279 308 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1120 670 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Well APPENDIX D Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 No Build C�« f► 911, Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 270 95 50 795 380 135 150 60 215 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 270 95 50 795 380 135 150 60 215 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.079 0.498 0.174 0.541 Satd. Flow (perm) 160 3439 0 938 1946 1583 317 1883 1742 1998 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 54 392 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 300 106 52 820 392 167 185 74 244 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 406 0 52 820 392 167 185 74 244 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 12.0 50.0 50.0 12.0 36.0 36.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 58.9 51.8 58.2 51.5 51.5 32.4 24.4 24.4 32.4 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.47 0.53 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.09 0.90 0.41 0.91 0.44 0.15 0.36 0.83 Control Delay 20.3 17.0 12.7 43.9 3.6 77.3 39.4 1.3 26.6 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 17.0 12.7 43.9 3.6 77.3 39.4 1.3 26.6 52.8 LOS C B B D A E D A C D Approach Delay 17.6 30.1 47.6 42.4 Approach LOS B C D D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.6 22.1 4.4 154.1 0.0 23.7 31.5 0.0 17.3 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 17.7 34.6 10.5 #243.7 16.3 #36.3 42.3 0.0 23.3 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 206 1648 551 910 949 183 513 568 685 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.09 0.90 0.41 0.91 0.36 0.13 0.36 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 17, i - :R F\11-'.3v to i� s 50- s L2 S -6I= W91-1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 240 295 200 880 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 240 295 200 880 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.456 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 831 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 289 355 211 926 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 289 355 211 926 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 11.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.6 23.6 35.7 34.7 15.3 15.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.60 0.58 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.42 0.35 0.84 0.79 0.16 Control Delay 15.5 3.5 7.6 20.3 35.8 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.5 3.5 7.6 20.3 35.8 6.0 LOS B A A C D A Approach Delay 8.9 18.0 30.5 Approach LOS A B C Queue Length 50th (m) 20.6 0.0 8.9 70.3 33.1 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 32.7 9.2 16.6 #140.3 #65.8 7.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 736 839 602 1101 472 497 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.42 0.35 0.84 0.76 0.15 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd f Fri 5 x I aSl 395 KIYA 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.9 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 265 1025 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 265 1025 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 298 1178 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1201 0 0 1556 1190 Stage 1 - - - 1190 - Stage 2 - 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 581 124 229 Stage 1 - 289 - Stage 2 - 702 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 581 117 229 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 117 - Stage 1 272 Stage 2 702 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 64.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 581 195 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.752 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 64.4 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 5 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 W91.13 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 270 0 0 1020 5 0 0 0 10 0 25 Future Vol, veh/h 10 270 0 0 1020 5 0 0 0 10 0 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 293 0 0 1109 5 0 0 0 11 0 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1114 0 0 293 0 0 1440 1429 293 1427 1427 1112 Stage 1 - - - - - - 315 315 - 1112 1112 - Stage 2 - - 1125 1114 - 315 315 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1269 111 135 746 113 135 254 Stage 1 - - 696 656 - 253 284 - Stage 2 - - 249 284 - 696 656 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1269 98 132 746 111 132 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 98 132 - 111 132 - Stage 1 681 642 248 284 Stage 2 222 284 681 642 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 0 29.3 HCM LOS A D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 627 1269 186 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.205 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.8 0 0 29.3 HCM Lane LOS A B A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - 0 0.7 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 W916.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 845 115 40 400 325 125 215 80 620 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 845 115 40 400 325 125 215 80 620 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.265 0.185 0.381 0.274 Satd. Flow (perm) 538 3514 0 348 1946 1583 694 1883 1742 1012 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 16 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 871 119 44 444 361 156 269 100 738 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 990 0 44 444 361 156 269 100 738 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.0 48.1 48.6 40.6 40.6 32.2 21.9 21.9 41.4 28.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.38 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.64 0.18 0.62 0.45 0.54 0.72 0.22 1.00 0.66 Control Delay 20.6 27.1 15.3 32.8 4.3 30.9 51.5 3.8 65.1 40.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.6 27.1 15.3 32.8 4.3 30.9 51.5 3.8 65.1 40.3 LOS C C B C A C D A E D Approach Delay 26.0 19.7 36.3 57.2 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 20.0 81.5 4.0 70.8 0.0 20.7 50.3 0.0 -60.4 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 107.8 9.6 99.2 16.4 28.8 59.3 3.8 #98.1 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 392 1544 246 743 827 290 513 568 739 564 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.64 0.18 0.60 0.44 0.54 0.52 0.18 1.00 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Ph to] 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3I 1'ss 15 T7.V- - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 211 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 980 490 80 460 275 180 Future Volume (vph) 980 490 80 460 275 180 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.070 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 127 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 522 212 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1065 533 86 495 324 212 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1065 533 86 495 324 212 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 11.0 68.0 22.0 22.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 54.2 54.2 64.0 63.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.71 0.70 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.97 0.44 Control Delay 36.6 2.4 12.4 6.4 80.7 7.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.6 2.4 12.4 6.4 80.7 7.8 LOS D A B A F A Approach Delay 25.2 7.3 51.9 Approach LOS C A D Queue Length 50th (m) 155.0 0.7 3.5 27.3 51.7 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #243.2 12.2 11.6 40.6 #89.3 13.4 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1122 1161 214 1332 334 484 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.97 0.44 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd l�- 1 1575 r•` � PA 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.1 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1120 470 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1120 470 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1244 511 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 533 0 0 1978 522 Stage 1 - - - 522 - Stage 2 - 1456 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1035 68 555 Stage 1 - 595 - Stage 2 - 214 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1035 61 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 61 - Stage 1 534 Stage 2 214 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 35.5 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1035 203 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.102 0.431 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 35.5 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 fh91 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 1110 0 0 475 10 0 0 0 10 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 20 1110 0 0 475 10 0 0 0 10 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 1207 0 0 516 11 0 0 0 11 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 527 0 0 1207 0 0 1781 1778 1207 1773 1773 522 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1251 1251 - 522 522 - Stage 2 - - 530 527 - 1251 1251 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 578 64 82 223 65 83 555 Stage 1 - - 211 244 - 538 531 - Stage 2 - - 533 528 - 211 244 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 578 59 77 223 62 78 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 59 77 - 62 78 - Stage 1 197 228 504 531 Stage 2 517 528 197 228 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 0 38.9 HCM LOS A E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1040 578 133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - 0.204 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 8.5 0 0 38.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - 0 0.7 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 PAE111 APPENDIX E Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build C�« PON'7 Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.079 0.491 0.174 0.541 Satd. Flow (perm) 160 3439 0 925 1946 1583 317 1883 1742 1998 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 52 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 12.0 50.0 50.0 12.0 36.0 36.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 58.8 51.7 58.4 51.5 51.5 32.4 24.4 24.4 32.4 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.47 0.53 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.12 0.94 0.43 0.91 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.83 Control Delay 20.3 17.3 12.8 49.4 3.7 77.3 39.4 2.0 26.7 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 17.3 12.8 49.4 3.7 77.3 39.4 2.0 26.7 52.8 LOS C B B D A E D A C D Approach Delay 17.8 33.4 47.1 42.3 Approach LOS B C D D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.6 22.8 5.7 -168.0 0.0 23.7 31.5 0.0 17.7 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 17.7 35.4 12.8 #259.3 16.7 #36.3 42.3 0.6 23.8 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 206 1642 548 910 959 183 513 568 685 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.12 0.94 0.43 0.91 0.36 0.14 0.36 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Ph1.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd i2 - 50 S L2 S E. 5 436 f 4 1,- T 58 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 PAIN 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.437 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 796 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 13.0 41.0 19.0 19.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.4 23.4 36.8 35.8 14.2 14.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.61 0.60 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.43 0.37 0.88 0.85 0.17 Control Delay 15.8 3.5 7.0 21.7 44.4 6.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 3.5 7.0 21.7 44.4 6.6 LOS B A A C D A Approach Delay 9.2 19.0 37.7 Approach LOS A B D Queue Length 50th (m) 22.1 0.0 8.6 73.1 34.8 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.8 9.2 15.9 #149.5 #72.3 7.7 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 730 836 628 1145 422 452 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.87 0.85 0.17 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd i 5 1 1285 t ai PAF-11 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 13.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 270 20 15 1020 5 85 0 10 10 0 25 Future Vol, veh/h 10 270 20 15 1020 5 85 0 10 10 0 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 293 22 16 1109 5 92 0 11 11 0 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1114 0 0 315 0 0 1483 1472 304 1476 1481 1112 Stage 1 - - - - - - 326 326 - 1144 1144 - Stage 2 - - 1157 1146 - 332 337 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1245 103 127 736 104 125 254 Stage 1 - - 687 648 - 243 275 - Stage 2 - - 239 274 - 681 641 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1245 — 88 120 736 98 118 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - — 88 120 - 98 118 - Stage 1 673 634 238 266 Stage 2 206 265 657 628 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.1 190.8 31.2 HCM LOS F D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 97 627 1245 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.065 0.017 0.013 0.217 HCM Control Delay (s) 190.8 10.8 0 7.9 0 31.2 HCM Lane LOS F B A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 6.6 0.1 0 0.8 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 PIN91 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.266 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 540 3514 0 309 1946 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.68 0.21 0.62 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 20.2 28.9 15.6 32.3 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.2 28.9 15.6 32.3 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS C C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.5 19.7 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 72.8 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 102.3 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 393 1490 234 743 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.68 0.21 0.61 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 40.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 221 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd D4 ;.s 48 4 is s SIe. 07 #s CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 0% 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.070 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 127 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 505 202 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 11.0 69.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 53.1 53.1 62.7 61.7 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.71 0.70 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.46 0.44 0.39 1.00 0.48 Control Delay 47.5 2.5 14.3 6.2 90.1 10.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.5 2.5 14.3 6.2 90.1 10.5 LOS D A B A F B Approach Delay 33.0 7.5 57.5 Approach LOS C A E Queue Length 50th (m) -194.6 1.7 3.8 27.6 -55.8 3.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #262.2 13.1 13.9 41.0 #92.6 17.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1127 1157 218 1391 323 467 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.46 0.44 0.37 1.00 0.48 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 87.8 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 3 NOW 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd l i s1 156 2 69 s CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Witz"l 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 OR 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 1110 70 15 475 10 35 0 20 10 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 20 1110 70 15 475 10 35 0 20 10 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 1207 76 16 516 11 38 0 22 11 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 527 0 0 1283 0 0 1851 1848 1245 1854 1881 522 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1289 1289 - 554 554 - Stage 2 - - 562 559 - 1300 1327 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 541 57 75 212 57 71 555 Stage 1 - - 201 234 - 517 514 - Stage 2 - - 512 511 - 198 225 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 541 50 66 212 47 63 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 50 66 - 47 63 - Stage 1 186 216 478 492 Stage 2 476 490 164 208 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 172.9 51.4 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 69 1040 541 104 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.866 0.021 0.03 0.261 HCM Control Delay (s) 172.9 8.5 0 11.9 0 51.4 HCM Lane LOS F A A B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 1 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 PGRU 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 20 15 1045 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 20 15 1045 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 22 16 1136 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 315 0 1472 304 Stage 1 - - - - 304 - Stage 2 - 1168 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 140 736 Stage 1 - 748 - Stage 2 - 296 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 135 736 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 135 - Stage 1 748 Stage 2 286 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 72 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 148 1245 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.698 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 72 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1110 70 15 475 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1110 70 15 475 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1207 76 16 516 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1283 0 1793 1245 Stage 1 - - - - 1245 - Stage 2 - 548 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 541 89 212 Stage 1 - 271 - Stage 2 - 579 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 541 85 212 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 85 - Stage 1 271 Stage 2 555 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 72.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 109 541 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.548 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 72.3 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.1 - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 PJQ:j APPENDIX F Synchro Analysis Reports - Construction Phasing Wel 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2024 Phase 1 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-22-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'fir 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 250 5 5 930 15 5 Future Vol, veh/h 250 5 5 930 15 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 272 5 5 1011 16 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 277 0 1296 275 Stage 1 - - - - 275 - Stage 2 - 1021 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1286 179 764 Stage 1 - 771 - Stage 2 - 348 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1286 177 764 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 177 - Stage 1 771 Stage 2 345 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 23.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 219 1286 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 23.2 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 230 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2024 Phase 1 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1005 15 5 435 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 1005 15 5 435 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1092 16 5 473 11 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1108 0 1583 1100 Stage 1 - - - - 1100 - Stage 2 - 483 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 630 120 258 Stage 1 - 319 - Stage 2 - 620 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 630 119 258 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 119 - Stage 1 319 Stage 2 613 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 32.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 145 630 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.9 10.8 0 HCM Lane LOS D B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 231 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2026 Phase 2 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 255 10 5 955 30 5 Future Vol, veh/h 255 10 5 955 30 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 277 11 5 1038 33 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 288 0 1331 283 Stage 1 - - - - 283 - Stage 2 - 1048 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1274 170 756 Stage 1 - 765 - Stage 2 - 338 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1274 168 756 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 168 - Stage 1 765 Stage 2 335 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 28.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 189 1274 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.201 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 28.8 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 09% 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2026 Phase 2 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.6 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1035 25 5 445 15 10 Future Vol, veh/h 1035 25 5 445 15 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1125 27 5 484 16 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1152 0 1633 1139 Stage 1 - - - - 1139 - Stage 2 - 494 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 606 111 245 Stage 1 - 305 - Stage 2 - 613 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 606 110 245 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 110 - Stage 1 305 Stage 2 606 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 36.5 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 141 606 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 36.5 11 0 HCM Lane LOS E B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P49191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2027 Phase 3 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 260 10 10 970 45 5 Future Vol, veh/h 260 10 10 970 45 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 283 11 11 1054 49 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 294 0 1365 289 Stage 1 - - - - 289 - Stage 2 - 1076 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1268 162 750 Stage 1 - 760 - Stage 2 - 327 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1268 159 750 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 159 - Stage 1 760 Stage 2 320 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 35.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 173 1268 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.314 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 35.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 WE11 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2027 Phase 3 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.9 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1050 35 10 455 20 10 Future Vol, veh/h 1050 35 10 455 20 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1141 38 11 495 22 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1179 0 1677 1160 Stage 1 - - - - 1160 - Stage 2 - 517 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 592 105 238 Stage 1 - 298 - Stage 2 - 598 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 592 102 238 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 102 - Stage 1 298 Stage 2 582 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 43.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 126 592 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 43.3 11.2 0 HCM Lane LOS E B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P49191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2029 Phase 4 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-21-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'fir 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 16 11 1087 60 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 309 0 1410 301 Stage 1 - - - - 301 - Stage 2 - 1109 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 153 739 Stage 1 - 751 - Stage 2 - 316 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 150 739 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 150 - Stage 1 751 Stage 2 309 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 171 1252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.413 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 40.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 236 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2029 Phase 4 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.3 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1080 45 10 465 25 15 Future Vol, veh/h 1080 45 10 465 25 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1174 49 11 505 27 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1223 0 1726 1199 Stage 1 - - - - 1199 - Stage 2 - 527 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 98 226 Stage 1 - 286 - Stage 2 - 592 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 570 95 226 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 95 - Stage 1 286 Stage 2 576 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 50.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 121 570 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.359 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 50.6 11.4 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P49YA 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2030 Phase 5 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 16 11 1087 60 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 309 0 1410 301 Stage 1 - - - - 301 - Stage 2 - 1109 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 153 739 Stage 1 - 751 - Stage 2 - 316 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 150 739 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 150 - Stage 1 751 Stage 2 309 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 171 1252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.413 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 40.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P491:3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2030 Phase 5 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1100 60 10 475 30 15 Future Vol, veh/h 1100 60 10 475 30 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1196 65 11 516 33 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1261 0 1767 1229 Stage 1 - - - - 1229 - Stage 2 - 538 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 92 217 Stage 1 - 276 - Stage 2 - 585 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 551 89 217 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 89 - Stage 1 276 Stage 2 569 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 60.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 111 551 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.441 0.02 HCM Control Delay (s) 60.8 11.7 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 091%7 APPENDIX G Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Q,IK City of Saint John - Traffic Signal & Pedestrian Signal Head Warrant Analysis 1 2 Main Street (name) Loch Lomond Road Direction (EW or NS) 7NS Road Authority: Side Street(name) Civic 1440 Direction(EW or NS) City: Quadrant/ Int# 4 Comments 2032 Build Conditions Analysis Date: for Warrant Calculadon CHECKSHEET Count Date: Results, please hit'Page Date Entry Format: Down' Lane Coafiguradon 11 Loch Lomovd Rood WB 1 920 1 12 Loch Lomovd Rood EB 1 1 13 Civic 1440 NB 1 1 14 Civic 1440 SB 0 ngvlmms slgvaleonlry lmpeaea oy mrougvmovemev" Iyvl 16 1] Arethe Loch Lomovd Road WBrightNmssigvific.tlyimpededbythroughmovemevts7 (y/v) 18 Are the Loch Lomovd Road EB right turns sigvific ly impeded by through movemmb? (y/v) Set Peak Hours Traffic Input Average 6-hour Peak Turning Movements 3] < WB Loch Lomond Rc EB F614 A z City of Saint John Saint John 2023 Dec 04, Mon 2022 Nov 22, Tue (=-mm-dd) Samradon Flow Default Rates(ifnotdefault) Samradon Flow (vphpl) Rates (vphpl) 11 Tum 1,610 Throw h 1,800 Right Tom 1 1,500 Demo ra hies Elem. schooVMobilit Challev ed /v smweo Com 11. /v thwv Peto school /v M'toAV2 ulotiov # H0,6H Cevhol Busivess District (y/v) ®a®a ®a®a ®aaa ®a®a ®aaa ®a®a ®a�a eaea WSIG = 1Cht0'v-v) / K1 + (F (Xv-p) L) / K21 x Ci W = 55 52 3 AKA pzIi APPENDIX H Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build with Mitigation 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.223 0.484 0.164 0.594 Satd. Flow (perm) 452 3439 0 912 3697 1583 299 1883 1742 2194 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 14.0 38.0 38.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.3 48.1 54.9 47.9 47.9 37.7 26.3 26.3 34.0 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.41 0.16 0.32 0.83 Control Delay 15.8 19.3 11.6 21.7 4.9 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 19.3 11.6 21.7 4.9 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 LOS B B B C A D D A C D Approach Delay 18.7 16.0 32.1 41.3 Approach LOS B B C D Queue Length 50th (m) 8.8 25.5 6.7 64.1 9.9 21.5 30.5 0.0 16.1 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.6 36.7 m12.8 76.0 21.3 #31.7 41.1 0.6 23.0 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 328 1533 514 1613 923 238 547 598 780 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Pz191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd C, v< t� 4 mils S CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 PzEII 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.408 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 743 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 11.0 33.0 22.0 22.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 18.5 18.5 30.7 29.7 15.3 15.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.56 0.54 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.51 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 13.3 3.5 9.3 9.6 27.0 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.3 3.5 9.3 9.6 27.0 5.0 LOS B A A A C A Approach Delay 8.1 9.6 23.1 Approach LOS A A C Queue Length 50th (m) 28.1 0.0 10.0 29.1 28.0 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 24.5 0.0 19.2 42.3 49.3 6.5 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 625 767 543 1952 547 564 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.51 0.65 0.14 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 42 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd -k-, t 33 � CBCL - BLM Page 3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 304 22 16 1114 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 326 0 1461 315 Stage 1 - - - - 315 - Stage 2 - 1146 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 142 725 Stage 1 - 740 - Stage 2 - 303 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 137 725 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 137 - Stage 1 740 Stage 2 293 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 70 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 150 1234 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.688 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 70 8 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.397 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 805 3514 0 309 3697 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS B C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.0 15.9 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 33.4 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 44.6 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1490 234 1412 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.32 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Pzf:1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3II ,�s ; r # 03 1'ss7 15 T7.V- - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.068 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 124 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 505 202 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Prot pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 11.0 69.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.2 55.2 65.0 64.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.72 0.71 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.46 0.45 0.20 1.03 0.49 Control Delay 44.1 2.5 15.1 4.6 97.8 10.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 2.5 15.1 4.6 97.8 10.6 LOS D A B A F B Approach Delay 30.8 6.3 62.2 Approach LOS C A E Queue Length 50th (m) -194.6 1.7 3.8 12.3 -55.8 3.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #262.2 13.1 14.3 17.0 #92.6 17.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1142 1165 214 2572 314 460 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.99 0.46 0.45 0.20 1.03 0.49 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 3 ��791 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 4 251 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 PM 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.5 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1217 76 16 527 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1293 0 1814 1255 Stage 1 - - - - 1255 - Stage 2 - 559 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 86 209 Stage 1 - 268 - Stage 2 - 572 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 82 209 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 82 - Stage 1 268 Stage 2 548 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 77.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 105 536 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 77.2 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 NX 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.223 0.484 0.164 0.594 Satd. Flow (perm) 452 3439 0 912 3697 1583 299 1883 1742 2194 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 14.0 38.0 38.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.3 48.1 54.9 47.9 47.9 37.7 26.3 26.3 34.0 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.41 0.16 0.32 0.83 Control Delay 15.8 19.3 14.4 26.0 4.0 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 19.3 14.4 26.0 4.0 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 LOS B B B C A D D A C D Approach Delay 18.7 18.6 32.1 41.3 Approach LOS B B C D Queue Length 50th (m) 8.8 25.5 6.5 71.0 0.0 21.5 30.5 0.0 16.1 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.6 36.7 13.4 89.2 17.2 #31.7 41.1 0.6 23.0 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 328 1533 514 1613 923 238 547 598 780 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd , 1 � R•. 1- i�s ;85 12 U38 Ne"I 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.432 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 787 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 11.0 27.0 18.0 18.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 13.8 23.6 22.6 12.4 12.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.52 0.50 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.28 0.49 0.41 0.55 0.73 0.15 Control Delay 14.4 4.9 8.6 9.4 25.7 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.4 4.9 8.6 9.4 25.7 4.8 LOS B A A A C A Approach Delay 9.3 9.2 22.0 Approach LOS A A C Queue Length 50th (m) 9.6 0.0 8.1 23.8 22.6 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 15.4 10.4 16.3 35.9 #50.5 5.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 100.0 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1084 731 558 1815 512 533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.49 0.41 0.55 0.70 0.14 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 45 Actuated Cycle Length: 45 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 16s i t�s r� N&I 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 304 22 16 1114 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 326 0 1461 315 Stage 1 - - - - 315 - Stage 2 - 1146 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 142 725 Stage 1 - 740 - Stage 2 - 303 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 137 725 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 137 - Stage 1 740 Stage 2 293 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 70 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 150 1234 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.688 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 70 8 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 P49YA 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.397 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 805 3514 0 309 3697 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS B C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.0 15.9 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 33.4 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 44.6 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1490 234 1412 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.32 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P491:3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3II ,�s ; r # 03 1'ss7 15 T7.V- - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 N&I 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.133 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 242 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 533 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Prot pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 11.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 26.9 26.9 36.7 35.7 14.3 14.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.61 0.60 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.53 0.30 0.24 0.77 0.40 Control Delay 18.0 3.6 7.6 6.3 35.5 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.0 3.6 7.6 6.3 35.5 5.5 LOS B A A A D A Approach Delay 13.4 6.5 23.2 Approach LOS B A C Queue Length 50th (m) 50.9 0.0 3.6 11.6 30.1 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 71.3 14.2 7.9 17.6 #54.2 10.6 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 100.0 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1586 1004 321 2152 442 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.53 0.30 0.24 0.73 0.39 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd y s 29 € -n . N091 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 K.q 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.5 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1217 76 16 527 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1293 0 1814 1255 Stage 1 - - - - 1255 - Stage 2 - 559 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 86 209 Stage 1 - 268 - Stage 2 - 572 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 82 209 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 82 - Stage 1 268 Stage 2 548 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 77.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 105 536 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 77.2 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 KIM From: Trudy Hanley <hanley0001@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 6:55 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Letter of Opposition for 1440 Loch Lomond Rd. — Proposed Development [ External Email Alert] "Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample cr saintiohn.ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047.** Trudy and Seamus Hanley, Old Lake Trail Barry and Janice Shannon, Lakefield Court We would like to say that we fully understand the city's need for development, to build homes for people to live and increase its population for fiscal growth and security. However, this proposed development is too large for this location. There are already 2 large 40 Unit — 4 Storey Buildings approved for a development directly across the road at 1429 Loch Lomond Rd. This proposal is 4 — 4 Storey, 52 Unit buildings and 18 Townhomes. We do like the townhome idea, but 2 storey (max) homes. Three stories are not allowed under the by-law, which the developer should know. Three stories also eliminates multiple demographics from being able to purchase these homes due to the number of stairs. These are not practical for the majority of Saint John residence. We understand that affordable housing is at the top of the city's list of needs and a main concern we have heard previously by Common Council. However, we do not see the addition of any affordable housing proposed for this development. Considering it's size that should be a city requirement. Another issue is currently that the Loch Lomond area cannot properly support these larger scale developments and overall increase in population. By combining both developments we end up with potentially 6 multi-storey 40-52 unit buildings and 42 single family homes all emptying onto Loch Lomond Rd. in the same location. We need to consider these as one large development having an enormous impact on the current neighbourhoods and vehicle congestion on Loch Lomond Rd. The combined affect is an increase in traffic by an additional 500-650 vehicles. Currently Loch Lomond Rd. can become backed -up almost 2Km and possibly further. Adding an additional 500 — 650 vehicles will cause more traffic problems and extended wait times. We have multiple years of experience driving on Loch Lomond Rd. during ever season and every type of weather, during peak times of morning and evening. There will be increased wait times and backed -up traffic due to the additional vehicles. �iR1.11 The schools in this area. Lakewood Heights Elementary and Bayside Middle Schools are already near capacity. The schools in the area won't support this kind of increase in population. How do you intend to add potentially another 300 — 450 students or more? Then there is providing transportation for all of these students to school and daycare facilities which are insufficient for this explosive population growth. We understand the need to develop, but what is potentially being allowed to happen here is incomprehensible in terms of the size and number of rental buildings. The city seems to be allowing more and more large scale developments but we see very little affordable housing, if any, as part of them. The path that the city is currently on is not sustainable. What we have seen over the past two years in terms of the types of available housing is disheartening. The city is also allowing an imbalance of housing options to take place. More rental units are being built with less ownership units being built. The middle housing market of owned units is basically being left behind. Home ownership can be the biggest source of wealth for some people. Home ownership reduces social differences and plays an important part in social and economic sustainability. The path that the city is currently on is not sustainable. The city is on its way to a crisis of a wealth and power imbalance. There are going to be a lot of wealthy developer/ building owners and fewer residence actually owning due to lack of housing types. This leads to a Power and Financial Imbalance between Developers/ Landlords and Tenants We might be able to accept this if the number of townhomes were increased from 18 to 35 or 40, having them closer to Loch Lomond Rd. providing a neighbourhood feel and pushing the remainder of the development to the back of the property and drastically reducing the overall Regards Trudy Hanley -----Original Message ----- From: Gwenn Bartlett <gwennsie@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 5:34 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: 1429, 1440 Loch Lomond Road [ External Email Alert) **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsamnlesaintjohn ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047.** Dear Sir: I'm really sad about this. My question is why, when original proposal was reduced in size to get approved by council, is it suddenly ok to increase substantially and couple with another proposal directly across the road? Any way you (anyone ) looks at this, it's TOO BIG and WILL create several problems due to the size of each development in such a condensed space. Will it be approved because the push is on to create living spaces for those who need it? The irony is, those who need it the most, will not be able to afford these units. Do we, the existing residents and home owners need to say good bye to the peace and quiet and the near pastoral area we've enjoyed and chose specifically for that reason? Please consider these proposals carefully. Sincerely, Christopher and Gwenn Bartlett 223 Bon Accord Drive . DU] Reade, Mark From: OneStop Sent: January 8, 2024 5:55 PM To: Reade, Mark Subject: FW: Planning Advisory Committee - 1440 Loch Lomond Road Importance: High -----Original Message ----- From: Rachel Van Wart <rach.vanwart@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2024 9:20 PM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Planning Advisory Commi. ee - 1440 Loch Lomond Road Importance: High [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsample@saintjohn.ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047.** Attention: Planning Advisory Committee RE: Municipal Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Subdivision Application 1440 Loch Lomond Road (PIDs 00313031 and 55094981) PAC Meeting Date: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 We are property owners on Omega Drive in East Saint John. The proposed development will be directly adjacent to the rear (North) of our property. Our concerns include the following: 1. A site map was not included with planned, approximate, location of buildings, townhomes and Public Street to understand their location on the land. Will there be loss of privacy for the residents on Omega Drive? 2. A buffer of mature green space between the proposed development and adjacent neighbourhood would be strongly desired. 3. Protection of watercourse running through to Little River Reservoir. 4. Traffic considerations on Loch Lomond Road. Has a traffic impact study been completed? Will lights and crosswalk be installed? 5. Abrasive lighting being installed on 4+ storey apartment buildings. 6. Infrastructure considerations. Can the existing infrastructure (water/ wastewater) on Loch Lomond Road support the development? 7. Timeline of construction. Will the development be a disruption in our neighbourhood for years of 'phases'? Or will a required timeline be implemented as a condition? We understand the current housing challenges in the City, however we wish for the Planning Advisory Committee to consider our above concerns. Sincerely, 1 266 Rachel Van Wart and Robert Hanlon Residents of Omega Drive KIM From: OneStop To: Reade. Mark Subject: FW: 1440 Loch Lomond Road Date: January 15, 2024 11:50:10 AM Attachments: imaoe001.ono Ill print off copies for PAC tomorrow. Sincerely, Travis Radtke (He/Him/II) BBA-Acc Administrative Assistant / Adjoint administratif One Stop Development Shop / Guichet unique pour l'am6nagement City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-4455 Website I Facebook I X I Instagram AIML SAINT JOH N small City, Big Heart_ Petite ville, grand cc our. From: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:47 AM To: OneStop <onestop@saintjohn.ca> Subject: FW: 1440 Loch Lomond Road Good Morning, We received this through external email, but assuming that it is intended for One Stop. Please advise if it should be directed elsewhere. Regards, Kelly Kelly Tibbits Administrative Assistant / assistant administrative City Clerk's Office / Bureau de greffier municipal City of Saint John / La Ville de Saint John Office / Bureau: (506) 658-2856 Q-1-13 SAINT JOHN Small City, Big Heart. Petite ville, grand omur. From: Terri -Lee Shaw <Terri-Lee.ShawPmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:36 AM To: Common Clerk <commonclerkna saintiohn.ca> Subject: 1440 Loch Lomond Road [ External Email Alert] "Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to soanisanIplenSaintlohn.ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047. * * Hello Have received the information for the new application. Questions: A fence? Would a fence be put up to separate my property from the new development? To keep people from trespassing through my property to get to Loch Lomond Rd? We already have people who use the property that has been bought for ATV and bikes that respect our property and stay off. Where would the new streeet start? Already so busy on Loch Lomond What type of lighting would be used? Would be LED smart lights? Blue? Would the work only be done M-F? What would be the earliest start? Latest end of day? Does that affect the zoning of my property? When samples are done for the soil and other tests would that be shared with us? Especially if the results came back wth any concerns found? For all tests/samples. What happens to the property next to me that's owned by the City of Saint john? What plans for the water/stream that goes through the property? What's the percentage of owned vs rentals? Will the new development be for low income? When do they plan to start? Would the company to do the construction be from NB? Local from Saint John? Or from outsde? The letter sent says about money in lieu of land for public purposes. What does that mean? Have received the letter from the developer but have misplaced. Thanks in advance K-16.1 PlUll SA JO N NN T* REGION To: Planning Advisory Committee Date: January 9, 2024 Dear Members of the Committee, ALWAYS MOVING FORWARD Envision Saint John is happy to write a letter of support for the proposed rezoning of the subject property at 1440 Loch Lomond Road. Our office has been in discussions with the developer over the past few months and we are happy to see the proposal include a high number of residential units. It is important to note that there have been a few challenging circumstances that have plagued development in recent years both locally and across the country. One of the most pressing issues has been the cost of construction, which has increased significantly, reaching a point that has made several development projects non -viable. We feel strongly that density is an important tool that developers have as an option to mitigate the impact of these escalating construction costs, which will simultaneously help the community realise a much -needed increase in the number of units developed in the near future. We expect to see more development proposals come forward that will include an increased amount of density than what has been generally proposed in the past. Indeed, the demand for more residential units in Saint John has not been as urgent an issue in recent memory as it is today. It is important that we recognise this need and continue to support the construction of more supply. Unfortunately, we will be unable to attend the PAC meeting to support this application but will be in attendance at the Public Hearing to voice our support. Sincerely, Prepared By: Jody Kliffer Manager of Real Estate and Development ENVISION SAINT JOHN: The Regional Growth Agency Jody.kliffer(@envisionsaintjohn.com T: 506-658-2877 x103 Reviewed By: Jeffrey Cyr Director of Economics, Data, & Real Estate ENVISION SAINT JOHN: The Regional Growth Agency ieff.cyr(a)envisionsaintjohn.com T: 506-658-2877 x114 I ■NE PCGIpNA� GROWTH. 4GENCY 0 w ma 0 E 0 J C.) 0 J Cl qq TOOOO m .c 0 N cu c O co N cn a� ^L n U O .i. N O N Lo A L CU L N LL Lvz 0 a O x a V CO) O N •� — r O E 3 O J V � C� 5 v O O O 0 0 cn Z . . . . Is. 0 a O x a r � I { 1 t r } `r r i s. ro { 1, 0 a O x a • t I LO ti N X .�5 IL -mm qw� w w ow +� wpm .. Af7 �' . '� - . , 4 N. *4 . 4.1 F,r.- * ` i iA-1 r_ M L1 k Lvz 0 a O x a 0 0 ft pm-N a 0 an Lid M .4 Riofir.- "`s.`'.:'.,� r'� , I — la, e z go 0 ohq-4 � -1 -4 U i = — O n E co 0 m O L 0cu L co o co +-' U > O co �—�' _N O L co Q � •co > c N N _0 0 Q — O co - _O_ N DC 0 +� E U co L � •� L N_0 0 co E O r) Q coCO Co U O ca 'L N N-0 0) N Q 0-0_ ��C:. N� �U a cm DO� °L C>-P n� Na) O _ °vi CD co a� � CoCa. C'> Q��co co c U ��w °'J�o-0< �--� 0 . � . � U 0 0 N 0 0 N U co 7 .co > co c O O O �--� CL (n _O 0 O co _0 v_ co co co C/) co . N _ N _O N cn 0 U _ O N (n 0 co Ca L _ ^CO L i COLL .� �--� co rT:l m 0. i Q � � O -� > U co -� co I •cn O C C: co DC O � _0 _0 •Q E c: co co cn U U O _0 U)E O N � J O J U c m J U N CD •Cn •� O4-0 U cc }' _O 4-J cam > 0 •p C� _ � W U) U co E Q � � � LL co5 cnE � O U cv m Z 0) •� N U X }, •Q cm E co U �_ U E > i Q Ca •ca cm w cc 3: cn +� cc -C O Q O J 0 Cn U — U z 0 A El U co U) N U) U N 1 U) c L Ca E cu N U cn co W =3 Ca c L cn U 0 N L c rW `/ ' C L L �~ O L O .� (D U U 0 0 c cu Z � U) co co co L Q O Z . I >� rl �1 4- 0 LZ L ( 4-0 O O O O U) 4--a •� O rl � U L- O 4-0 4-0 O U •— cu cn — CM N � O � N E � N CO p O N p N L � W O �i� CM N O N L ma O v Al voi A .� L co W U O L U � Q � � U U � � U � U O > Z i� 0 m 0 co 0- co .CDL .0 2-11 a� co 4-+ 4� 0 U (n G 0 4-0 U) U O N (1) Of U) O 4-0 O U O� LO U U U) co 0 co Cn 4--+ U) fn Q Ca m C6 I co a v 4-0 c 4- '� U E U) co O O o �1 U) m U) w 0 U C6 co O co O L- CL CL a U a 0 a 0 ca C/) El 0 � � A 00CU>, +�(� (1) :tf C: -0 Q F= o-0 � +=� =3Ecoa) Q)-o � ° -P C:E �0 +� cn 0 cn co 0 +� oQ�� O � 0 1 >% a- O0 -0— co 0 � --7 0 — C) 4-0 > 0 (j) =3 0 E o U 0 a) Co �� 0 coO, O U U) (1) Ca ,O 01% � 0=�� W O Uv a. ° co+-j � O ° � +� L. Developent Shop PLANNING RiiTL)-)IhG IhiPItASTRUCTURF. N onestop (9saintiohn.ca Phone:658-2911 Fax:632-6199 General Application Form GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN LOCATION ICIVICADDRESS: 11440 Loch Lomond I PID#: 100313031 1 w V) Z) LL LL Q F- V) HERITAGE AREA: Y / N INTENSIFICATION AREA: Y / N FLOOD RISK AREA: Y / N APPROVED GRADING PLAN: Y / N IAPPLICATI0N #: I IDATE RECEIVED: I I RECEIVED BY: APPLICANT EMAIL PHONE Slopeside Holdings Ltd./Erik de Jong erik@slopesideholdings.com 506-469-4460 z 0 MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE a 93 Veysey road, Lower Kingsclear NB CONTRACTOR EMAIL PHONE O w z — F- MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE Z Q U J OWNER EMAIL PHONE a Jean and Paula Tippett 506-696-1676 MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE 1440 Loch Lomond, Saint John NB E2J 1Z7 PRESENT USE: vacant land PROPOSED USE: residential development BUILDING PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE HERITAGE QINTERIOR RENOVATION [:]NEW CONSTRUCTION VARIANCE STREET EXCAVATION HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT Q EXTERIOR RENOVATION [:]ACCESSORYBLDG PLANNING LETTER [:]DRIVEWAY CULVERT HERITAGESIGN H J ADDITION POOL IZI PAC APPLICATION DRAINAGE �HERITAGEINFILL Q DECK DEMOLITION �COUNCILAPP WATER&SEWERAGE HERITAGE DEMO Y rCHANGEOFUSE SIGN SUBDIVISION OTHER OTHER U RMINIMUM STANDARDS OOTHER OTHER LL I Re zoning/municipal plan amendment for a portion of PID 00313031 O z O Y H 0 O U v7 w RI consent to the City of Saint John sending to me commercial electronic messages, from time to time, regarding City initiatives and incentives. General Collection Statement This information is being collected in order for the City of Saint John to deliver an existing program / service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program / service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saint John will not share your personal information with any third partywithout your express consent. The legal authorityfor collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act For further information or questions regarding the collection ofpersonal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building 15 MarketSquare Saint John, NB E2L IE8 commonclerk(dsaingohn.ca (506) 658-2862 7M Uty �sain� Sohn the undersigned, hereby apply for the permit(s) or approval(s), indicated ibove for the work described on plans, submissions and forms herewith ubmitted. This application includes all relevant documentation necessary for he applied for permit(s) or approval(s). I agree to comply with the plans, oecifications and further agree to comply with all relevant City By-laws and onditions imposed. Erik de Jona Hppiiuuni rvarne (1�� '-'� Q&�t� Applicant Signature 9-17-2023 Erik de Jong Slopeside Holdings Ltd. 93 Veysey Road Lower Kingsclear, NB E3E1M9 9-17-2023 Jennifer Kirchner Zoning Application Manager, Community Planning City of Saint John RE: 1440 Loch Lomond Road re -zoning and municipal plan amendment Dear Jennifer Kirchner: As discussed in our previous meetings, I have the properties (PID's 00313031 and 55094981) currently under a conditional agreement of purchase and sale. It would be my intent to develop this parcel as a mixed density residential development including multi -unit buildings and townhouses. The current zoning is for PID 00313031 is R2, and PID 55094981 is designated as Urban Reserve. I would like to apply to conditionally re -zone the two PID's to the Mid -Rise Residential (RM) zone. PID 55094981 will also require a municipal plan amendment to change it's designation from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential. Existing Site and Land Use: The subject property is approximately 22 acres and includes the vacant land located at 1440 Loch Lomond. This proposed re- zoning does not include the existing farmhouse and outbuildings. That new lot will be subdivided prior to completion of the sale and the original lot will not be included in this re- zoning application. Historically the land was agricultural in nature and used to farm market crops. The property is bordered by a few single family dwellings (R2) to the west, a vacant commercial property(GC) that used to be a fuel station and convenience store to the northeast, vacant land to the east (Urban Reserve) and single family dwellings across Little River to the south. Across Loch Lomond road to the north is a church, multi -unit apartment buildings at 1419/1421 Loch Lomond, a proposed multi -residential development, as well as a daycare and residence. f84%L! 9-17-2023 Page 2 Re -Zoning Proposal The Saint John apartment vacancy rate is extremely low at only 1.6% (CMHC Oct 2022). There is a high demand for new rental units throughout the city. In response to this rental pressure, the proposed rezoning will add to the supply of rental housing in the city. This development will also incorporate a number of designated CMHC affordable apartments. As shown in the attached conceptual site plan (Schedule A), there are four proposed 52 unit multi- unit buildings with underground parking, as well as a four townhouse clusters focused to the east of the site. I am proposing to construct a new public cul-de-sac to provide easier subdivision of the land as the multi phased development is built out. As part of this development, I will be constructing a walking trail with park benches and picnic tables that winds through the development and lands. I am also planning to develop community gardens as part of each planned phase of construction. These outdoor amenities will be enjoyed by the residents as local food production and the social connections that will be fostered through gardening will be an important part of the future lives of the residents. These small gathering places will be an important part of the culture of community I am planning to foster here. As shown on the draft site plan, our intent is to provide vegetative barriers between the existing farm house and this development. Ultimately, the goal is to create a park -like setting for the residents to enjoy with extensive landscaping across the entire site. This proposed development meets all requirements of the Mid Rise Residential zoning. These buildings and locations as presented are in draft form and subject to final design. This development with a mix of 4 story apartment buildings and townhouse clusters meets the requirement for accommodation a range of serviced residential development forms. The minimum lot area required for the proposed 52 unit buildings and townhouses is 34 440 sq m, and the proposed development site is approximately 89 000 sq m. Conformity with Policy LU-88 • The layout of the buildings with a large amount of landscaped green space will contribute to the existing mixed neighborhood. • The proposed development will fit in well with the mix of multi -family, commercial and residential land surrounding the proposed site • The current municipal services are adequate to service a development of this magnitude with no additional upgrades needed on behalf of the municipality. P"01 9-17-2023 Page 3 • The site design incorporates buffering from the neighboring residential property, as well as significant setbacks from other neighbors. Stormwater management will be incorporated into the site design as per municipal regulations. • The buildings with have facades with a number of jogs and recesses, with varying rooflines to break up the rectangular nature of apartment buildings. See schedule B for an example of the apartment design, as well as artistic sketch of the townhome concepts. I think re -zoning will result in an excellent development that will increase the supply of new rental housing in Saint John. I look forward to receiving feedback from you and your team. Once we know when this application will be reviewed by PAC, I will schedule my own public meeting with the neighborhood and invite the community to come see my concepts for development, as well as go door to door in the immediate neighborhood to describe the development in detail to the residents who will be impacted by this change in use. Sincerely, ci�� 14 Erik de Jong (•84%1-1 5�a ®m OO $ Y 1= I X F 3I 1 s : 4:- G yam= 3� .�' �qEi Ng�= 3 @8 `y 5€� 3A nax ; _ HEY-! �aP�1A, 's! s�& sg m gaF gag :p 1_ c a= s Y `E s °' a a iv 8a"- �� a �` IN �g W s S gay aits■® I rmm®�s8s ssEsl ss o�®b 0 �z�>E -G� �: a3$� W 54 1 R4, z O 0 U O =) E— of O ~ z cn z O U IN =, 11 , LEM W klklla.kkktal.l� � hallawl.r.. _-T -F U _-I, 13 O }' O 41 � O O 'N U � O N cn U m � L O � � L 41 O 41 U ++ L o 01*v� 2ieResidential / Commercial Development 11 Develo eat ShopConceptual sanitary Demand 1.6)1`:d; 1:-1 R." �- WNr 10HN GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES Email: onestop @saintiohn.ca Phone: (506) 658-4455 CITY OF SAINT JOHN DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Development Name: Loch Lomond Estates Development Address: 1440 Loch Lomond Road, Saint John NB Owner: Paula and Jean Tippett - Applicant is Erik de Jong Contact Information: Jean - 506-696 1676, Erik de Jong - 506-469-4460 Consultant: CBCL Limited Contact Information: Evan Embree, P.Eng. eembree@cbcl.ca, (506)450-9441 PROJECT INFORMATION — DEVELOPMENT USE: e Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential & Commercial ❑ Other: RESIDENTIAL POPULATION INFORMATION Total Number of Units: 228 Persons / Dwelling: 2.5 Bedrooms / Unit: BUILDING INFORMATION Storeys: 4 Type of Use: Residence - Private or Apartment Total Building Area (m2):T6,803 Average Daily Wastewater Flow: 216,600 Lpd Please note: submitted calculations are to be completed in accordance with the Atlantic Canada Wastewater Guidelines PEAK SANITARY FLOW (FULL BUILD OUT) PEAKING FACTOR Total Residential Flow (L/s) 10.9 Residential Peaking Factor: 3.9 Total Commercial Flow (L/s) Commercial Peaking Factor: Total Other Flow (L/s) Other Peaking Factor: TOTAL FLOW (L/5) 10.9 Please include peaking factor calculations MUNICIPAL CONNECTION POINT PHASING INFORMATION Please provide the general location (street name) of the proposed sanitary service/main connection to the municipal system. Please provide the proposed location of the service / main as it relates to the municipal system. Please provide a drawing to scale including site contours, illustrating the conceptual design of the proposed development. Phase Buildings per Buildi phase Construction Estimate (# of years / phase) Estimated Occupancy Date (mm/yy) 1 1 1.5 12/2025 Z 1 1.5 6/2027 3 2 1.5 12/2029 4 2 1.5 6/2031 TOTAL 6 6.0 General Collection Statement This information is being collected for the City of Saintlohn to deliver an existing program/service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program/service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saintlohn will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building, 2nd Floor -15 Market Square, Saint John, NB E2L 1E8, commonclerk@saintjohn.ca (506) 658- 2862. Revised May 2022 Page 1 of 2 301 01*V� 2ieResidential / Commercial Development 11 Develo eat ShopConceptual sanitary Demand 1.6)11,Ai 1:-1 R." �- WNr 10HN GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES Email: onestop @saintiohn.ca Phone: (506) 658-4455 CITY OF SAINT JOHN DEVELOPER INPUT: The Developer is expected to provide the following information to the City of Saint John for their proposed development: • The Developer shall; o Complete and submit this form to the City of Saint John. o Provide back-up information and calculations illustrating assumptions for all calculated peak sanitary design flows. CITY OF SAINT JOHN OUTPUT: Potential outputs for the Developer from the City of Saint John based on development information provided by the Developer: • At this time, based on the information provided, Saint John Water does not see and issues with the proposed development in relation to the downstream sanitary sewer system. • At this time, based on the information provided, Saint John Water does see issues with the downstream sanitary sewer system when incorporating the proposed development flows, thus further discussions between the Developer and the City are required as potentially more in-depth analysis and/or investigation may be required to be completed by the Developer for the proposed development. NOTE: The sewer model is a simulated analysis. Information provided by the city of Saint John is to be received by the Developer as an estimation of the municipal system's capability. ENGINEERING CONSULTANT INFORMATION: Firm Name: CBCL Limited Consultant Name: Evan Embree, P.Eng. Contact Number: (506)450-9441 E-Mail Address: eembree@cbcl.ca 10/04/2023 Signature of Applicant / Engineering Consultant Date General Collection Statement This information is being collected for the City of Saintlohn to deliver an existing program/service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program/service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saintlohn will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building, 2nd Floor -15 Market Square, Saint John, NB E2L 1E8, commonclerk@saintjohn.co (506) 658- 2862. Revised May 2022 Page 2 of 2 302 01*Vel- 2�pResidential / Commercial Development Developuent Sho Conceptual Water Demand I I '•! I .I VA', 11r I,. I I 1' iSAINT 1OHi GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES Email: onestop @saintiohn.ca Phone: (506) 658-4455 CITY OF SAINT JOHN DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Development Name: Loch Lomond Estates Development Address: 1440 Loch Lomond Road, Saint John NB Owner: Paula and Jean Tippett - Applicant is Erik de Jong Contact Information: Jean - 506-696 1676, Erik de Jong - 506-469-4460 Consultant: CBCL Limited Contact Information: Evan Embree, P.Eng. eembree@cbcl.ca, (506)450-9441 PROJECT INFORMATION — DEVELOPMENT USE: 0 Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential & Commercial ❑ Other: RESIDENTIAL POPULATION INFORMATION Total Number of Units: 228 Persons / Dwelling: 2.5 Bedrooms / Unit: BUILDING INFORMATION Type of Use: Residence - Apartment Storeys: 4 Total Building Area (m2): 6,803 Please note: submitted calculations are to be completed in accordance with the Atlantic Canada Water Supply Guidelines WATER DEMAND (FULL BUILD OUT —ALL PHASES) FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST Average Day Demand (ADD) 2.5 *Fire flow testing helps confirm SJW model results. If there has not been a Fire Flow Test completed, please note this on the form. Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 6.9 Peak Hourly Demand (PHD) 10.4 Fire Hydrant Flow Test Attached: ❑ Yes e No *Please provide all demand flow in L/s Sprinkler System Required? e Yes ❑ No FIRE DEMAND Requested fire flow for the proposed site: L/s PSI MUNICIPAL CONNECTION POINT PHASING INFORMATION Please provide the general location (street name) of the proposed water connection to the municipal system. Please provide a drawing to scale including site contours, illustrating the conceptual design of the proposed development. The new water main that is incorporated into the City's water model will use these contours for approximate water main elevations. Phase Buildings per Phase Construction Estimate (# of years / phase) Estimated Occupancy Date (mm/yy) 1 1 1.5 12/2025 2 1 1.5 6/2027 3 2 1.5 12/2029 4 2 1.5 6/2031 TOTAL 6 6.0 General Collection Statement This information is being collected for the City of saintlohn to deliver an existing program/service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program/service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of saintlohn will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building, 2nd Floor -15 Market Square, Saint John, NB E2L 1E8, commonclerk@saintjohn.co (506) 658- 2862. Revised May 2022 Page 1 of 2 303 01*V� 2�p_Residential / Commercial Development Developuent ShopConceptual Water Demand 1 I I'•! I .i P'.A'` 1+I ,. I I 1'i SAINT 1OHN GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES Email: onestop @saintiohn.ca Phone: (506) 658-4455 CITY OF SAINT JOHN DEVELOPER INPUT: The Developer is expected to provide the following information to the City of Saint John for their proposed development: • The Developer shall; o Complete and submit this form to the City of Saint John. o Provide back-up information and calculations illustrating assumptions for all calculated water demands. o Complete a Hydrant Flow Test in the area of the Development if one is not available from the City of Saint John. CITY OF SAINT JOHN OUTPUT: Potential outputs for the Developer from the City of Saint John based on development information provided by the Developer: • Approximate pressure in the City of Saint John municipal system near the proposed development from the Water Model using the Developer's Water Demands. • Approximate available fire flow in the City of Saint John municipal system near the proposed development from the Water Model using the Developer's Water Demands. NOTE: The Water Model is a simulated analysis. Information provided by the City of Saint John is to be received by the Developer as an estimation of available flow / pressure. ENGINEERING CONSULTANT INFORMATION: Firm Name: CBCL Limited Consultant Name: Evan Embree, P.Eng. Contact Number: (506)450-9441 E-Mail Address: eembree@cbcl.ca 10/04/2023 Signature of Applicant / Engineering Consultant Date General Collection Statement This information is being collected for the City of Saintlohn to deliver an existing program/service; the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program/service. Unless required to do so by law, the City of Saintlohn will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy Officer: City Hall Building, 2nd Floor -15 Market Square, Saint John, NB E2L 1E8, commonclerk@saintjohn.co (506) 658- 2862. Revised May 2022 Page 2 of 2 304 p Subdivision Application eaq'p utsShop GROWTH & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN CIVIC ADDRESS 1440 Loch Lomond Road APPLICATION # I FEE PAID I Y I N TYPE OF APPLICATION ❑ Instrument ❑ Type 1 Subdivision ❑ Type 2 Subdivision Document requiring Development Lot boundary adjustment, consolidation, or Subdivision involving the construction or Officer endorsement for registration new lot abutting an existing street extension of a street Application Fee: $60 Application Fee: $300 plus $60 per new lot Application Fee: $600 plus $120 per new lot DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION Attach the instrument or tentative subdivision plan, plus any additional documentation to fully describe the application. Tenative subdivision plans must adhere to the requirements of the Community Planning Act of New Brunswick. In the case of a Type 2 Subdivision, the submission of a preliminary proposal and a Pre -Application Meeting with City staff is encouraged prior to seeking approval. Please contact the One Stop Development Shop at (506) 658-2911 or OneStop@saintjohn.ca for further information. Re zoning/municipal plan amendment fora portion of PID 00313031 ENCUMBRANCES Describe any easements, restrictive covenants, and other encumbrances affecting the land. AUTHORIZATION As of the date of this application, I, the undersigned, am the registered owner of the land described in this application or the authorized agent thereof, and I have examined the contents of this application and hereby certify that the information submitted with the application is correct insofar as I have knowledge of these facts, and I hereby authorize the applicant to represent this matter and to provide any additional information that will be necessary for this application. Registered Owner or Authorized Agent Date Additional Registered Owner Date The information contained in this application and any documentation, including plans, drawings, reports, and studies, provided in support of this application will become part of the public record. Subdivision Application Form 2021 06 01 305 Conceptual Sanitary Demand Calculations Number of Units 228 Persons/Dwelling 2.5 Per Capita Daily Flow 380 L/cap*d Average Daily Wastewater Flow 216600 L/d Peaking Factor (Harman) 3.9 Tributary Area 4.1 ha Peak Extraneous Flow per Hectare 0.15 L/s Sag Manhole Inflow Allowance 0.4 L/s Manholes in sag locations 1 Peak Domestic Flow 10.9 Us K 91.1 Conceptual Water Demand Calculations Number of Units Persons/Dwelling Per Capita Daily Flow Average Daily Water Flow Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand (2.75 x ADD) Peak hourly Demand (4.13 x ADD) 228 2.5 380 L/cap*d 216600 L/d 2.5 Us 6.9 Us 10.4 Us Wow 0 10 0 i At,,# ANN ONE MEN 3 Final Report R1 Mark MacDonald Dec. 15/23 Brendan McPhee 2 Final Report Mark MacDonald Dec. 12/23 Brendan McPhee 1 Draft Report Mark MacDonald Dec. 22/22 Brendan McPhee -. This document was prepared for the party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflect CBCL ■ Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available atthe time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third -party use of this document. Project No. 222939.02 Kole.] MMMSolutions today I Tomorrow(Dmind CenterBeam Place, 14 King Street, Suite 420, PO Box 20040, Saint John, NB, E2L 1 G2 1 506-633-6650 I CBCL.ca I info@CBCL.ca December 15, 2023 Erik de Jong Owner Loch Lomond Estates Ltd. 927 Prospect Street Fredericton, NB E313 2T7 erik@slopesideholdings.com Dear Mr. de Jong: RE., Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study - Final R1 BEST MANAGED COMPANIES We are pleased to present this revised final Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed residential development located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. The study was completed in accordance with industry best practices to address potential traffic impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to assist with your proposed development. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Yours very truly, CBCL Limited Prepared by: Brendan McPhee, M.Sc.E., P.Eng. Transportation Engineer Direct: 506-633-6650 ext. 3236 Email: bmcphee@cbcl.ca cc: Evan Embree, P.Eng. Project No.: 222939.02 Reviewed by: Mark MacDonald, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Engineer Direct: 902-892-0303 ext. 3408 Email: markmacd@cbcl.ca This document was prepared forthe party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflect CBCL Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third - party use of this document. Solutions today I Tomorrow(jmind 310 Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background........................................................................................................... 1 1,2 Study Objectives................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Unit Count Change............................................................................................................ 2 StudyAre...............................................................................................3 2.1 Road Network.................................................................................................................... 3 2,2 Study Intersections............................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1 Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive ............................. 4 2.2.2 Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road................................................................ 5 2.2.3 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive ........................................................ 6 2.2.4 Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road .................................................... 6 2.3 Active Transportation........................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Public Transit..................................................................................................................... 7 3 2022 Baseline Condition.......................................................................8 3.1 2022 Baseline Traffic Volumes......................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 Resulting Baseline Volumes................................................................................ 8 3.2 Intersection Analysis and Performance Indicators....................................................... 10 3.3 2022 Baseline Traffic Operations................................................................................... 11 4 Future 2032 No Build Condition....................................................... 13 4.1 Annual Background Traffic Growth................................................................................ 13 4.2 Other Planned Developments........................................................................................ 14 4.3 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes....................................................................................... 14 4,4 2032 No Build Traffic Operations................................................................................... 14 Site Generfir-1 Traffic........................................................................ 18 5.1 Trip Generation Rates..................................................................................................... 18 5,2 Trip Reduction Considerations....................................................................................... 19 5.3 Distribution of Site Trips................................................................................................. 20 IN Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study i 311 6 Future 2032 Build Condition............................................................. 22 6.1 2032 Build Traffic Volumes............................................................................................. 22 6.2 2032 Build Traffic Operations......................................................................................... 22 6.3 Construction Phasing......................................................................................................25 6.4 Development Access Alignment..................................................................................... 26 vva rra ri t iAna iyses................................................................................ 28 7.1 Traffic Signal Warrant...................................................................................................... 28 7.2 Pedestrian Crosswalk Warrant Analysis........................................................................ 28 7.2.1 Sight Distance Assessment............................................................................... 30 7.2.2 Nearby Bus Stops............................................................................................... 31 7.2.3 Recommended RRFB Placement...................................................................... 32 R Mitigation Measures........................................................................... �? 8.1 Added WB Lane............................................................................................................... 33 8.2 Added WB and EB Lanes................................................................................................. 37 8.3 Improvement Recommendation....................................................................................39 8.3.1 Roundabout Consideration............................................................................... 39 9 Conclusion.. ....... ................................................................................. 40 Appendices A Site Plan B Traffic Count Reports C Synchro Analysis Reports - 2022 Baseline D Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 No Build E Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build F Synchro Analysis Reports - Construction Phasing G Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis H Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build with Mitigation IN Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study ii 312 Executive Summary A residential development, proposed for 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB, is planned to include a total of 224 residential units to be developed over six (6) phases. It is expected to be fully constructed and occupied by 2032. New traffic counts were obtained for three (3) study intersections along Loch Lomond Road at Bon Accord Drive, Hickey Road, and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. These counts were used to analyse existing 2022 Baseline traffic conditions during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours. Analysis of the 2022 Baseline condition using Synchro 11 software suggests the study intersections are all currently operating within acceptable limits for V/C ratios and average delays. Several lane groups at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive have 951" percentile queue lengths exceeding 100m. The 951" percentile queues at intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road also exceeds 100m for WB throughs (AM), and EB throughs (PM peak hour). A 2032 No Build scenario was then analysed to quantify the impact of both background traffic growth and another nearby development planned for construction at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. Analysis of the 2032 No Build condition suggests certain traffic movements at the study intersections will begin to experience reduced performance. At Loch Lomond Road/McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive, the NB left turns (AM) and SB lefts (PM) are both expected to operate at LOS E with V/C ratios at or near 1.0. At Hickey Road and Loch Lomond, NB lefts are expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. At Bon Accord Drive and Loch Lomond Road, the SB left/rights operate at LOS F and LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition, it was estimated that 120 and 126 new trips would be generated by the proposed residential development during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Analysis of the 2032 Build scenario suggests the study intersections will operate at similar levels as the 2032 No Build scenario with marginal decreases in performance with the development traffic added. The proposed site road, Loch Lomond Road, and Civic 1429 would operate at LOS B and LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively; however, the NB approach would operate at LOS F during both peak hours, and the SB lane group would operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour. A traffic signal warrant analysis was subsequently carried out for the intersection at the proposed site road, and it indicated that traffic signals would not be warranted. A pedestrian crossing warrant was also completed, which recommended that a crossing outfitted with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) be provided. CBCL 191`Ec1 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study iii A sight distance assessment was carried out; it determined both Stopping Sight Distance and Intersection Sight Distance were available at the proposed site road, so long as the vegetation within the sight triangle to the west is removed/maintained. It is recommended that a new pedestrian crossing be installed at the proposed site road with a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB), complete with the necessary traffic signage and pavement markings. As noted in the analysis of the 2032 No Build and 2032 Build scenarios, there are existing operational issues along the Loch Lomond Road that are marginally worsened with the additional of the proposed development traffic. To help alleviate the existing, and worsened future queueing on Loch Lomond Road, two scenarios were analysed: F Adding a second WB through lane along Loch Lomond Road Adding a second WB and EB through lane along the corridor Both of these scenarios included traffic signal optimization and coordination. Adding both WB and EB lanes appear to relieve the congestion issue and increase capacity along the corridor, but it is understood these upgrades would require significant road widening and utility relocation. INLoch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study iv 314 � Introduction 1 1 Project Background CBCL Limited (CBCL) was engaged to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for a proposed residential development to be located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. It is proposed to include four (4) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each and 16 townhomes, for a total of 224 residential units. We understand full build -out of the site is expected by 2032. The proposed site plan, dated February 9, 2023, is illustrated in Figure 1.1 and is provided in Appendix A. Access to the proposed development will be provided by a single two-way road with access onto Loch Lomond Road. City staff have indicated that the anticipated traffic generated by another nearby proposed multi -unit residential development, to be built at 1429 Loch Lomond Road, must be considered as part of this study; its proposed access is located roughly 83 m west of the proposed site road for the subject property. It is planned to include 80 apartment units and 24 townhomes. 1.2 Study Objectives The following goals and primary objectives were identified for this study: ► Establish existing traffic operations throughout the study area. Estimate the peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. F Evaluate the traffic impacts at the study intersections, while considering the planned development at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. 1 Conduct traffic signal and crosswalk warrant analyses for the intersection of the proposed site road and Loch Lomond Road. 1 Identify and recommend mitigation measures to address any anticipated traffic impacts. CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study • 1 l Ilr 4 1 V Figure 1.1: Proposed Site Plan for the Development 13 Unit Count Change When the draft Traffic Impact Study was completed in December of 2022, the development was to include six (6) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each, for a total of 312 residential units. However, investigations following the draft report's submission revealed that two of the apartment buildings were not feasible due to their proximity to the wetland. These two buildings were removed and replaced with 16 townhomes, for a new total of 224 residential units. Despite this reduction of 88 residential units, there is no impact on the conclusions of this study (i.e., traffic signals are not warranted at the proposed development's site road and Loch Lomond Road, and the existing issues identified in the No Build scenario persist and require additional through lanes on Loch Lomond Road). Therefore, the analyses were left unchanged and are reflective of the original 312 residential unit count. CBCL K5C:1 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 2 Figure 1.1: Proposed Site Plan for the Development 13 Unit Count Change When the draft Traffic Impact Study was completed in December of 2022, the development was to include six (6) multi -story apartment buildings comprised of 52 units each, for a total of 312 residential units. However, investigations following the draft report's submission revealed that two of the apartment buildings were not feasible due to their proximity to the wetland. These two buildings were removed and replaced with 16 townhomes, for a new total of 224 residential units. Despite this reduction of 88 residential units, there is no impact on the conclusions of this study (i.e., traffic signals are not warranted at the proposed development's site road and Loch Lomond Road, and the existing issues identified in the No Build scenario persist and require additional through lanes on Loch Lomond Road). Therefore, the analyses were left unchanged and are reflective of the original 312 residential unit count. CBCL K5C:1 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 2 Study Area The study area considered for this assignment is the nearby road network that might be impacted by the added traffic from the proposed development. The intersections and associated roads considered for this study were confirmed with City staff, and include: I! Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road; 1 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive; Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road; and, I! Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. Road Network The road network considered in the study area include the streets immediately adjacent to the proposed development, as illustrated in Figure 2.1 and are summarized in Table 2.1. Figure 2.1: Study Area with Study Intersections (Red Circles) CBCL K5r� Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 3 Table 2.1: Characteristics of Study Area Streets Loch Lomond Sidewalk - 50 km/h; 2 to 3 Arterial East-West Road South side 60 km/h Bon Accord Sidewalk - 2 Local North -South 50 km/h Drive West side Sidewalk - Hickey Road 2 Collector East-West 60 km/h South side Sidewalk - McAllister Drive 5 Arterial North -South 50 km/h both sides Champlain Sidewalk - 2 Collector North -South 50 km/h Drive East side The road classifications presented in Table 2.1 above were selected to align with the classes presented in the 2017 MoveSJ Transportation Strategic Plan (Phase 1) Final Report prepared by IBI Group. 2.2 Study Intersections 2.2.1 Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain D rive This four -leg signalized intersection is located west of the proposed development, and is the largest intersection included in this study. Westbound (WB) right turns have a channelized right -turn. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: F Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: left turn lane through lane through/right turn lane I► Loch Lomond Road Westbound: left turn lane through lane right turn lane Champlain Drive Northbound: left turn lane through lane right turn lane ► McAllister Drive Southbound: left turn lane left turn lane through/right turn lane All approaches have crosswalks with pedestrian signals and pedestrian push buttons. There is a pork chop island on the northeast corner of the intersection, but it is too small to provide pedestrian refuge and the adjacent crosswalks bypass it; it is occupied by a utility pole and traffic signal pole. Pedestrians using either of these crosswalks are required to cross five traffic lanes. Figure 2.2 illustrates this intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 4 ic1iF:3 ------------ -- -- ------------ - __ -- - J Figure 2.2: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive (Photo taken from southeast corner, facing west) 2.2.2 Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road This three -leg signalized intersection is located west of the proposed development. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: 1 Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: through lane right turn lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: left turn lane through lane 1 Hickey Road Northbound: left turn lane I right turn lane There is sidewalk along the south side of the road, with a pedestrian crossing on Hickey Road marked by twin parallel lines; however, there are no pedestrian signal heads. Figure 2.3 illustrates this intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 5 Figure 2.3: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road (Photo taken from southeast corner, facing northwest) 2.2.3 Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive This three -leg unsignalized intersection is located west of the proposed development. The intersection operates under Two -Way Stop Control (TWSC) with free flow traffic along Loch Lomond Road and a stop sign on Bon Accord Drive. The intersection approaches have the following lane configurations: F Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: left turn lane I through lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: through/right turn lane Bon Accord Drive Southbound: left/right turn lane A pedestrian crosswalk is available on the west leg of the intersection and has crosswalk signage. Figure 2.4 illustrates the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive. 2.2.4 Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road This planned four -leg unsignalized intersection will be created by the proposed site road at 1440 Loch Lomond Road. The intersection was assumed to operate under Two -Way Stop Control (TWSC) with free flow along Loch Lomond Road and stop signs on proposed site road. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 6 i9YU Figure 2.4: Intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive (Photo taken from southwest corner, facing east) The proposed intersection approaches would have the following lane configurations: 1 Loch Lomond Road Eastbound: one left/thru/right lane 1 Loch Lomond Road Westbound: one left/thru/right lane Proposed 1440 Loch Lomond Site Road Northbound: one left/thru/right lane 2,3 Active Transportation The City of Saint John's Active Transportation (AT) network provides connectivity across the city, primarily using sidewalks and trails. There is a concrete sidewalk along the south side of Loch Lomond Road, from the intersection at McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive to the Irving Circle K at Civic 1233 where it switches and continues along the north side of the road. 2A Public Transit Saint John Transit provides transit services via bus throughout the city and to neighbouring municipalities. There are several bus stops close to the proposed development that serve several routes. The nearest bus stops are on Loch Lomond Road immediately adjacent to the proposed site road and approximately 250m to the west. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 7 321 3 2022 Baseline Condition 31 2022 Baseline Traffic Volumes Baseline turning movement traffic volumes were obtained utilizing Miovision Scout video collection units on Tuesday and Wednesday, November 22nd and 23rd, 2022 at the Loch Lomond Road intersections of Bon Accord Drive, Hickey Road, and McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive. Traffic movements were recorded during the morning (AM) peak period between 7:OOAM and 9:OOAM, and the afternoon (PM) peak period between 4:OOPM and 6:OOPM over those typical weekdays. The mid -day (MD) peak period between 11:30AM- 1:30PM was also captured at the Bon Accord Drive intersection because six (6) hours of traffic data are required to complete a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis. The video files were uploaded for processing by Miovision, and the raw traffic data reports are provided in Appendix B. Peak hours for the network were determined to fall between 7:45-8:45AM for the AM peak period and 4:30-5:30PM for the PM peak period. Since the traffic volumes were observed to be similar across both days for the peak periods, the average traffic volume for each turning movement was utilized. While restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have caused some traffic reductions over the past two years, it appears that traffic has now returned to relatively 'normal' volumes. Therefore, the new traffic counts were not adjusted to account for COVID-19 restrictions. 3.1.1 Resulting Baseline Volumes The following adjustments were made to the new traffic counts to develop the 2022 Baseline volumes for analysis: h Rounded volumes to the nearest multiple of 5; and, 1 Adjusted as needed so that all movements have a minimum peak hour volume of 5. The resulting 2022 Baseline traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3.1. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 19YA fi o � m o � Proposed Access Legend t FAM Peak Hour ! PM Peak Hour r Figure 3.1: 2022 Baseline Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N.T.S. CBCL 19Y491 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 9 3.2 Intersection Analysis and Performance Indicators Using the 2022 Baseline peak hour volume data, Synchro software (Version 11) was used to perform a Level of Service (LOS) analysis of the study intersections for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, using the methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6t" Edition, published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB). LOS is the key indicator of intersection performance with respect to traffic movement and is defined by the average amount of delay experienced by drivers using each of the various intersection movements. Higher delays result in increased driver discomfort, fuel consumption, and travel time. LOS gives an indication of speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, traffic flow, comfort, and convenience, and is expressed as a scale from'A'to F. LOS'A' represents conditions approaching free -flow and LOST' represents a level of delay generally unacceptable to drivers and where traffic volumes usually exceed capacity. LOS'D' is used by most jurisdictions as the minimum acceptable LOS during peak periods and it was used as such for this study. The criteria associated with each LOS are found in Table 3.1. As shown, the delays listed for signalized intersections are higher than for the same LOS at unsignalized intersections; this is because motorists are generally more tolerant of extended delays at signalized intersections. Table 3.1: Level of Service (LOS) Criteria for S alized and Unsignalized Intersections A <10 <10 B >10 and <20 >10 and <15 C >20 and <35 >15 and <25 D >35 and <55 >25 and <35 E >55 and <80 >35 and <50 F >80 >50 In addition to LOS, the Volume -to -Capacity (V/C) ratio is a strong indicator of intersection performance. The V/C ratio is the relationship between traffic volumes and the maximum theoretical capacity of an intersection or traffic movement. As the V/C ratio approaches 1.0, the intersection has less ability to accommodate additional traffic. Adjustments to intersection geometry or traffic control can be implemented to increase capacity and therefore reduce the V/C ratio. V/C ratios of 0.85 and 0.90, or less, are generally considered acceptable for shared and exclusive turning movements, respectively. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 10 KYzl Synchro was also used to approximate the anticipated 95t" percentile queue lengths for each lane group. For unsignalized intersections, the queue lengths are given as number of vehicles; therefore, these values were converted to metres (m) assuming each vehicle adds approximately 7.Om to a queue. 3.3 2022 Baseline Traffic Operations CBCL developed a detailed street network of the study area using Synchro 11 that includes existing infrastructure, such as traffic control devices, road alignments, intersection geometry, and lane configurations. The corresponding Synchro LOS analysis reports for the 2022 Baseline condition are provided in Appendix C, and Table 3.2 shows the results of the LOS analyses. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive operates within acceptable limits at LOS C during both peak hours. The average delay for each of the lane groups are within acceptable limits during both peak hours. The highest V/C ratio of 0.81 was recorded for the WB through lane group during the AM peak period. The 95t" percentile queue for WB throughs are expected to exceed 200m during the AM peak hour as well. The EB through/rights and WB throughs have 95t" percentile queues exceeding 100m in the PM peak hour. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road operates at LOS C and LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The average delays for each of the lane groups are within acceptable limits during both peak hours. The V/C ratios are also within acceptable limits for all lane groups, with the highest V/C ratio of 0.86 recorded for EB throughs during the PM peak hour. The 95t" percentile queues for the WB through and EB through movements are expected to reach roughly 120m (AM peak hour) and 235m (PM peak hour), respectively. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive operates at LOS A during both peak hours. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queues are all within acceptable limits for all lane groups. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 11 K��G1 i awe 3.L: inTersecuon rerrormance Kesuits - LULL esaseiine i raTTIC volumes Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM [Queue Storage Queue WC Delay LOS4 Queue WC Delay LOS4 Node][Synchro EB Left (78m) 16.1 0.30 17.5 B 37.6 0.41 20.3 C EB Thru/Right 36.1 0.22 19.6 B 111.2 0.61 29.0 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 10.5 0.07 14.7 B 9.9 0.12 18.4 B McAllister WB Thru 213.4 0.81 39.5 D 111.1 0.66 39.1 D Drive & WB Right (160m) 0.0 0.21 0.3 A 18.8 0.45 5.8 A Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 34.3 0.48 33.1 C 27.6 0.35 23.2 C NB Thru 45.2 0.35 42.5 D 67.4 0.66 50.9 D [1] (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.0 0.12 0.5 A 0.0 0.19 2.7 A SB Left 24.7 0.24 27.1 C 61.2 0.68 25.0 C Signals) SB Thru/Right 95.9 0.75 53.9 D 74.4 0.58 36.9 D Overall 29.7 C 28.0 C EB Thru 38.2 0.40 19.1 B 234.9 0.86 29.3 C EB Right 9.8 0.42 4.3 A 35.1 0.44 5.9 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 19.9 0.28 8.3 A 9.3 0.28 9.0 A & Hickey Road WB Thru 119.6 0.75 16.6 B 50.1 0.33 8.1 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 64.5 1 0.62 27.5 C 1 61.2 0.70 1 42.3 D Signals) NB Right (120m) 7.7 0.12 7.0 A 11.5 0.35 6.5 A Overall 15.7 B 20.0 B Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 0.7 0.04 10.4 B 2.1 0.08 8.5 A & Bon Accord Drive SB Left/Right 15.4 0.46 29.5 D 5.6 0.22 19.4 C [3] (Unsignalized) Overall F 2.7 A 1.3 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 12 19YU 4 Future 2032 No Build Condition A future "No Build" scenario was developed to compare with the future "Build" conditions to quantify the impact of the estimated traffic volumes on the proposed development in the future. The No Build traffic volumes are an estimate of future traffic volumes if the proposed development was not built. The time horizon for traffic studies typically considers a horizon five -years post development; however, since the final phase is not expected to be completed until 2032 and analysing traffic operations 15 years from now would not yield a meaningful result, 2032 was used as the future horizon year for analyses The 2032 No Build volumes were developed as the sum of: f 2022 Baseline traffic volumes; 1 Annual background traffic growth over 10 years; and, 1 Traffic generated by the other planned development at 1429 Loch Lomond Road. 1 Annual Background Traffic Growth The background growth rate accounts for other developments or densification that may occur within or near the study area that would impact traffic volumes at the study intersections. As directed by Saint John City staff, an annual background growth rate of 1.5% per year was used forth is study. The 2032 No Build traffic volumes were calculated by cumulatively adding assumed annual background traffic growth to the 2022 Baseline volumes at the rate of 1.5% per year for 10 years. Therefore, all 2022 Baseline turning movement traffic volumes were increased by 16.1 % using the equation below to estimate the background volumes. A = (1 + r)n where: A - Proportional increase in traffic volumes r - Rate of background trafficgrowth n - Number ofperiods from base year Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 13 4.2 Other Planned Developments Another high -density residential development is proposed for the property at 1429 Loch Lomond Road directly across the road from the 1440 Loch Lomond Road development site; as per direction from City staff, new traffic from it is required to be considered in the analysis for this study. Anticipated trip generation, distribution, and traffic volumes were provided in a Traffic Impact Statement, 1429 Loch Lomond Road Residential Development report prepared by Englobe in October 2021. The report stated the development will be comprised of 20 units of Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise), and 85 units of Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise). The resulting trips to be generated by this site are summarized in Table 4.1 and were distributed through the study network per existing traffic patterns. Table 4.1: Summary of New Site Trips AM Peak Hour 10 30 40 PM Peak Hour 29 19 48 There were no other planned developments specified to be considered for this study. 4.3 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes The additional traffic associated with the background growth rate was added to the 2022 Baseline traffic volumes, along with the estimated traffic associated with other planned development to obtain the estimated 2032 No Build traffic volumes. The resulting 2032 No Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4.1. 4A 2032 No Build Traffic Operations Synchro 11 was used to perform LOS analyses for the study intersections under the 2032 No Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for all signalized intersections. Table 4.2 summarizes the results of the Synchro analysis, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix D. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 14 19M.13 p N Q CD cc O iV Proposed Access+j i Legend t FAM Peak Hour ! PM Peak dour r Figure 4.1: 2032 No Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N.T.S. CBCL 19MO.1 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 15 Table 4.2: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 No Build Traffic Volumes Loch Lomond, McAllister Drive & Champlain Drive [1] (Traffic Signals) I EB Left (78m) 17.7 1 0.43 20.3 C 1 34.0 0.51 20.6 C EB Thru/Right 34.6 0.25 17.0 B 107.8 0.64 27.1 C WB Left (100m) 10.5 0.09 12.7 B 9.6 0.18 15.3 B WB Thru 243.7 0.90 43.9 D 99.2 0.62 32.8 C WB Right (160m) 16.3 0.41 3.6 A 16.4 0.45 4.3 A NB Left (70m) 36.3 0.91 77.3 E 28.8 0.54 30.9 C NB Thru 42.3 0.44 39.4 D 59.3 0.72 51.5 D NB Right (40m) 0.0 0.15 1.3 A 3.8 0.22 3.8 A SB Left 23.3 0.36 26.6 C 98.1 1.00 65.1 E SB Thru/Right 1 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.66 40.3 D I Overall 1 33.3 C 35.'a D EB Thru Loch Lomond EB Right & Hickey Road WB Left (130m) [2] WB Thru (Traffic NB Left Signals) NB Right (120m) Overall 32.7 1 0.40 15.5 B 243.2 0.95 36.6 D 9.2 0.42 3.5 A 12.2 0.46 2.4 A 16.6 0.35 7.6 A 11.6 0.40 12.4 B 140.3 0.84 20.3 C 40.6 0.37 6.4 A 65.8 0.79 35.8 D 89.3 0.97 80.7 F 7.3 0.16 6.0 A 13.4 0.44 7.8 A 17.8 B 26.6 C Loch Lomond I EB Left (50m) 1.4 1 0.06 11.6 B 1 2.1 0.10 8.9 A & Bon Accord Drive SB Left/Right 35.0 0.75 64.4 F 14.0 0.43 35.5 E [3] (Unsignalized) Overall 5.9 A 2.1 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. V/C Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if>0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F1 The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour, but now operates at LOS D during the PM peak hour. During the AM peak hour, the NB lefts now operate at LOS E with a V/C ratio of 0.91, and WB throughs experience 95th percentile queues upwards of 245m. During the PM peak hour, SB lefts now operates at LOS E and have a V/C ratio of 1.00, indicating it has reached its theoretical capacity. The 95th percentile queue length for EB through/rights has decreased slightly to 107.8m, thanks to the signal optimization. The intersection of Loch Lomond and Hickey Road continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak period, but now operates at LOS C during the PM peak period. NB lefts now operate at LOS E during the AM peak period, and LOS F in the PM peak period. V/C ratios remain within acceptable limits during the AM peak hour; however, V/C ratios for the EB CBCL [tide] Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 16 through and NB lefts are approaching their capacity with V/C ratios of 0.95 and 0.97, respectively, during the PM peak hour. The 95th percentile queue length for WB throughs have increased to roughly 140m during the AM peak, and queuing for EB throughs are roughly 245m during the PM peak hour. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive continues to operate at LOS A during both peak periods. The SB left/right lane group now operates at LOS F in the AM peak period, and LOS E in the PM peak period. The 951h percentile queue lengths and V/C ratios continue to fall within acceptable levels. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 17 331 s Site Generated Traffic To estimate the new morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hour traffic generated by the proposed development, trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, I Ir' Edition, were used. Rates published in this manual are widely accepted by the traffic engineering community, as they are based on empirical data. This chapter outlines our methodology and findings. m Trip Generation Rates Since the proposed development will include only residential land uses, the ITE Land Use (LU) Code 221 for "Multi -Family Housing (Mid -Rise)" was selected from ITE's Trip Generation Manual and used to estimate the number of new vehicle trips generated by the development. Furthermore, the location setting for a "General Urban/Suburban" development was selected as it generally reflects the area context for the development site. This development is planned in six (6) phases, each including the construction of a 52- unit apartment building, for a total of 312 units. The estimated numbers of new trips based on the proposed number of residential units for each construction phase are summarized in Table 5.1. Each additional phase is expected to add roughly 20 new trips during the AM and PM peak hours. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 18 1919% Table 5.1: ITE Trin Generation for Residential Trins ITE I nd Use I de 221 (Multifamily Housing ,Inbound 52 Total Units Rate Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 N 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 M 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 IV 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 Ln 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 W 52 Total Units Rate Inbound Outbound Trips In Trips Out Total Trips W a �AM Peak H r of Adj. Street Traffic 0.37 23% 77% 5 15 20 2 0.39 61% 39% 13 8 21 IL PM Peak Hr of Adj. Street Traffic Trip Reduction Considerations: Consideration was given to determine whether the trips would represent exclusively new traffic to the street network, or if any reductions may be appropriate based on the following factors: On -site synergy: If the proposed development were to have multiple land use types, some site trips may be internal to the site in which case a reduction would be appropriate. For example, this could include residents making trips to ground floor commercial businesses. However, as the proposed development will only include residential dwelling units, no reduction was applied for on -site synergy. Pass -by and Diverted -Link trips: The proposed development will be exclusively residential units, which is a land use that generally does not attract pass -by or diverted - link trips. Therefore, no reductions were applied for these trip types. Active Transportation and Transit Trips: While there may be some AT and transit trips from the development, no reductions were applied. The overall trips estimated to be generated by the site at full build -out are summarized in Table 5.2. CBCL 1919191 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 19 Table 5.2: Summary of New Site Trips Out M. AM Peak Hour 30 90 120 PM Peak Hour 78 48 126 5.3 Distribution of Site Trips Site trips were distributed to the study intersections based on the proportions of observed trips entering and exiting the study area boundaries for both the AM and PM peak periods. Movement proportions for both peak periods were averaged to estimate the trip distribution through the street network, as summarized in Table 5.3. The estimated total new site trips distributed through the study intersections are shown in Figure 5.1. Table 5.3: Summary of Trip Distribution Approach West East North South South North AM Trip Dist. IN 15% 36% 19% 12% 14% 4% PM Trip Dist. IN 33% 14% 26% 12% 13% 2% AM Trip Dist. OUT 38% 10% 21 % 12% 17% 2% PM Trip Dist. OUT 18% 32% 21 % 9% 17% 3% CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 20 334 c� 46. �j L 0/0 � N.T.S. oo o ♦ 0/0 �1)1-lve4J 4 L* r6/20 McAllisTeCDr,ve 0/0- 41 t 1+ 0/0 —10� M o 4/9Z � � CD 0 414 0/0. t *100 t 4/10Z 4 O Cr O E O J U D O � J ca L0/0 4 r 1/2 t 1 O r N h Or�ii r Q o 4 a Proposed Access4J { 81/33_I 41 t o Legend L f 4—AM Peak Hour / PM Peak Hour r Figure 5.1: Estimated Peak Hour Site Traffic Volumes CBCL 1919191 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 21 6 Future 2032 Build Condition 6.1 2032 Build Traffic Volumes The 2032 No Build volumes and the estimated site trips were summed to obtain the estimated 2032 Build volumes, which are summarized in Figure 6.1. 6.2 2032 Build Traffic Operations The LOS analysis for the study intersections were performed using Synchro for the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections. The proposed site road was modelled with a shared lane. The operational results for the 2032 Build condition are summarized in Table 6.1, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix E. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road, McAllister Drive and Champlain Drive continues to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour, and LOS D during the PM peak hour. SB lefts now operate at LOS F with a V/C ratio of 1.07 during the PM peak hour. The WB throughs have increased 95th percentile queue length of roughly 260m (from -245m in 2032 No Build) and V/C ratio of 0.94 (from 0.90 in 2032 No Build) during the AM peak hour. The 95th percentile queue lengths for EB through/rights, WB throughs, and SB lefts have all slightly increased to marginally exceed 100m. The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Hickey Road continues to operate at LOS C during both peak periods. Marginal increases to queueing, V/C ratios, and average delay are reported for most lane groups. NB lefts continue operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The 95th percentile queues have increased for WB throughs during the AM peak hour to roughly 150m (from -140 in 2032 No Build), and EB throughs have increased to roughly 260m (from 245m in 2032 No Build) during the PM peak hour. The V/C ratios for both EB through and NB lefts have increased to 1.00 during the PM peak period. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 22 K19Z-1 Ln � � - u, - L 140/120 N.T.S. fdi N ♦ 190/170 11rlve4.11 Lr r220/640 McAtiister Drive 135/125-t +1 t 150/215 i � O m 65/90Z ;n m C CD CD rn Q n Ln rn U) NN 4J a 325/275-t 4CD1 ''a 70/1907 rn CO 1 QI N 4 � O "Cl O E J u n 0 1 J Ln 1� C, 'L90/55 ♦ 4 r20115 tr o a(14 rQ N a N o `o m N N Proposed Access4 95/35 j 41 t Un Legend 00 10/2074L L N 4-AM Peak Hour / PM Peak Hour Q r Figure 6.1: 2032 Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes CBCL 1919YA Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 23 Table 6.1: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM [Queue Storage Queue WC Delay LOS4 Queue v/C Delay LOS4 Node][Synchro EB Left (78m) 17.7 0.43 20.3 C 34.0 0.51 20.2 C EB Thru/Right 35.4 0.25 17.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 12.8 0.12 12.8 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B McAllister WB Thru 259.3 0.94 49.4 D 102.3 0.62 32.3 C Drive & WB Right (160m) 16.7 0.43 3.7 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 36.3 0.91 77.3 E 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 42.3 0.44 39.4 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1] (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 2.0 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.8 0.36 26.7 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F Signals) SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 34.7 C 40.1 D EB Thru 34.8 0.42 15.8 B 262.2 1.00 47.5 D EB Right 9.2 0.43 3.5 A 13.1 0.46 2.5 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 15.9 0.37 7.0 A 13.9 0.44 14.3 B & Hickey Road WB Thru 149.5 0.88 21.7 C 41.0 0.39 6.2 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 72.3 0.85 44.4 D 92.6 1.00 90.1 F Signals) NB Right (120m) 7.7 0.17 6.6 A 17.3 0.48 10.5 B Overall 19.7 B 32.3 C Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.06 12.2 B 2.1 0.11 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.86 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A (Unsignalized) Loch Lomond WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [4] Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A (Unsignalized) Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or>0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] The intersection of Loch Lomond Road and Bon Accord Drive continue to operate at LOS A during both peak hours. SB left/rights still operate at LOS F and LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queue lengths remain all within acceptable limits. CBCL Kic1:3 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 24 The intersection of Loch Lomond Road. and the proposed site road operates at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. NB left/thru/rights operate at LOS F during both peak hours. The V/C ratios and 95t" percentile queue lengths remain all within acceptable limits. The addition of site trips to the study network has marginal impact to traffic operations at the study intersections, and existing operational issues appear to be exacerbated from the 2032 No Build scenario. It is suggested that traffic operations at the Loch Lomond Road intersections with McAllister Drive/Champlain Drive and Hickey Road be monitored into the future. 6.3 Construction Phasing The intersection of the proposed development access and Loch Lomond Road was analysed following each phase of the development to understand traffic operations as each phase comes online. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 6.2, and the corresponding Synchro analysis reports are provided in Appendix F. The NB lane group is not expected to operate with notable performance issues during the peak hours (LOS E) until Phase 3 in 2027. During Phase 4 in 2029, the NB lane group further decreases to LOS F during the PM peak hour only. Lastly, the NB lane group starts to operate at LOS F during both peak hours during Phase 6 in 2032. There are no issues with V/C ratios or 951" percentile queues expected, and the overall intersection is expected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours for each of the phases. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 25 [cicle.] Table 6.2 Level of Service (LOS) - Construction Phasing at the Proposed Site Road and Loch Lomond Road Phaa 1 (202. Phaa 2 (202, Phaa 3 (202' Phaa 4 (202, Phaa 5 (203 Phaa 6 (203 te r) ,e 9r Lane Group [Queue Storage�, WB Left/Thru 95th • 0.0 AM Peak 0.00 Hour Average 7.8 A �, • 0.0 mr PM 0.01 Peak Hour Average 10.8 B NB Left /Right 2.1 0.10 23.2 C 2.8 0.11 32.9 D �) Overall 0.4 A 0.4 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.00 7.8 A 0.0 0.01 11.0 B NB Left /Right 4.9 0.20 28.8 D 4.9 0.19 36.5 E �) Overall 0.8 A 0.6 A ,e Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 11.2 B -WB NB Left /Right 9.1 0.31 35.1 E 7.0 0.26 43.3 E �) Overall 1.4 A 0.9 A ,e �) WB Left/Thru NB Left /Right Overall 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 0.36 11.4 B 12.6 0.41 40.1 E 10.5 50.6 F 2.0 A 1.3 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 7.9 A 0.7 0.02 11.7 B NB Left /Right 12.6 0.41 40.1 E 13.3 0.44 60.8 F �) Overall 2.0 A 1.7 A ,e WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B NB Left /Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Z) Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 10 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. V/C Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.90] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F] 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] 6A Development Access Alignment Operations at the proposed development access and the neighbouring development (Civic 1429) were initially analysed assuming their proposed accesses were closer together, since the site plan for the proposed development was not yet available at the time of issuing the draft report. Now that the site plans for both developments are available, the distance between their accesses is roughly 83m, as shown in Figure 6.2. Therefore, the impact to the two developments accesses is not as critical since they are not planned to be aligned into a single intersection on Loch Lomond Road. CBCL [i t,IK Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 26 Civic 1429 Development Access MOM /LAlk0, Figure 6.2: Access Separation Between Proposed Development (Civic 1440) and Civic 1429 CBCL Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 27 Warrant Analyses Warrant analyses were completed to evaluate the need for traffic signals and a pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road and the proposed development road. The following sections outline the results of those analyses. 71 Traffic Signal Warrant Significant delays for the proposed site road (i.e., NB lane group) at its intersection with Loch Lomond Road are expected under 2032 Build conditions. Therefore, a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis was carried out in accordance with the methodology outlined by the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) to evaluate if traffic signals would be an appropriate mitigation measure. Traffic volumes from the 2032 Build condition were applied for the morning (AM), mid -day (MD), and afternoon (PM) peak periods, as they would represent the typical highest 6-hour periods. The Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis produced a score of 55 points; this compares to the 100 points normally required to warrant traffic signals. Therefore, this analysis suggests that traffic signals are not warranted at this intersection. The corresponding Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis worksheet is provided in Appendix G. Given the conflicting results between the traffic model and the warrant analysis, it is suggested this intersection be closely monitored following construction and occupancy of the proposed development. 7,2 Pedestrian Crosswalk Warrant Analysis Since the proposed development is expected to create latent demand for pedestrians from the proposed development to cross Loch Lomond Road to reach the sidewalk, a crosswalk warrant analysis was carried out. Guidance was provided from the Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide, Third Edition, published by TAC. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 28 KtN The Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide provides a decision support tool to aide in selecting the appropriate crossing control system, which is based on the Average Daily Traffic (ADT), posted speed limit, and lane configuration of the proposed crossing location. The decision support tool from the guide is illustrated in Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: Decision Support Tool - Treatment Selection Matrix The speed limit along Loch Lomond Road is posted at 60 km/h near the proposed site road, although it was noted that a short distance to the west the speed limit is posted at 50 km/h. The road cross-section is 2 lanes, with 1 lane for each EB and WB through traffic. While current ADT data is not available at this location, guidance provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) suggests the two-way Design Hour Volume (DHV) is typically 8-12% of the ADT. The estimated 2032 Build traffic volume at the proposed site road indicates a DHV of 1,400 and 1,700 vehicles per hour during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Therefore, the corresponding ADT would range between roughly 12,000 to 18,000 for the AM peak hour and 14,000 to 21,000 for the PM peak hour. Based on the road characteristics detailed above, the treatment selection matrix indicates that installation of a crosswalk with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) would be appropriate. The RRFB could be placed at the proposed development access (i.e., a new crosswalk) or implemented at the nearby crosswalk on the west leg of Bon Accord / Loch Lomond Road; this existing crosswalk is roughly 330m west of the proposed development's access and it services a bus stop that does not have sidewalk between the crosswalk and the bus stop. The existing sidewalk is on the north side of Loch Lomond Road so pedestrians need to cross the road to access nearby amenities (e.g., Irving Gas Station, Tim Hortons) and Simonds High School; the proposed development is within the 2.4km walk zone for the school, so students would be expected to walk or be driven. Therefore, pedestrians from the development would require either a designated crosswalk at the CBCL Ect191 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 29 proposed development access or the construction of roughly 330m of new sidewalk on the south side of Loch Lomond Road to reach the existing crosswalk. As it would be less costly to install a new crosswalk at the proposed development's access with Loch Lomond Road, a sight distance assessment was carried out to determine if the crosswalk and RRFB system would be appropriate at the proposed site road. 7.2.1 Sight Distance Assessment An assessment of both Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) were completed to determine if there are adequate sight lines for approaching traffic and a stopped vehicle turning onto Loch Lomond Road from the proposed site road. 7.2.1.1 Sight Distance Requirements Sight distance is determined based on several factors, including the design speed of the road, brake reaction time, deceleration rate, road gradient, population demographic, and gap acceptance time. The posted limit on Loch Lomond Road is 60 km/hr is near the proposed site road, and the operating speed was assumed to be 70 km/hr. According to the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads(GOG), 2017Edition, the minimum sight distances for SSD and ISD are: I! SSD = 105m minimum 1 ISD = 150m minimum for a left turning vehicle ISD = 130m minimum for a right turning vehicle 7.2.1.2 Available Sight Distance A site visit was conducted by CBCL on December 5, 2023, to determine the available sight distance for SSD and ISD at the proposed access location on Loch Lomond Road. In accordance with TAC's GDG, the following field parameters were used to conduct the assessment: 1 Driver eye height of 1.08m, located 4.4m from the edge of the nearest travel lane ll� Object height of 0.38m for SSD Object height of 1.30m for TSD Table 7.1: Summary of Sight Distance Evaluation . .P - EMW— SSD 105m 150m + Sufficient ISD (Left) 150m 150m + Sufficient ISD (Right) 130m 150m + Sufficient There were no concerns identified with the approach east of the proposed site road, as the minimum SSD and ISD are available. To the west of the proposed site road, the minimum Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 30 SSD and ISD are also available, but there was concern identified with vegetation (e.g., shrubs, trees) along the southern portion of Loch Lomond Road being inside the sight triangle; the vegetation appears to be partly within the municipal right-of-way and on the development property. While the vegetation did not completely obscure the line of sight, the available sight distance would be reduced to roughly 80m in the summer months when the vegetation is in full bloom. However, it is recommended to remove, or at least maintain, the vegetation once the development access is constructed to alleviate this concern. Therefore, the available SSD and ISD at the proposed development access meet the minimum requirements for both approaches, contingent on the removal/future maintenance of the vegetation to the west. 7.2.2 Nearby Bus Stops The location of the existing bus stops near the proposed development were reviewed. The bus stops nearest the proposed development are immediately adjacent to the site road, which would also be the nearest bus top for the development at Civic 1429. For pedestrians from either development to access the opposing bus stop, a designated crosswalk close to these developments would be required to cross the road (i.e., pedestrians from Civic 1440 would need to cross the road to access the north side bus stop). Civic 1429 r Access a Civic 1440 Access 7Existing Crosswalk Legend: p Bus Stop Locations Figure 7.2: Bus Stops Near the Proposed Development Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 31 7.2.3 Recommended RRFB Placement Since there is sufficient sight distance available at the proposed development's access, and to service the needs of transit users near the proposed development(s), the installation of a new crosswalk at the proposed site road would be recommended. Installing a new crosswalk complete with an RRFB system at this location would provide direct access to the existing sidewalk and be less costly than constructing sidewalk to connect with the existing crosswalk. Furthermore, it appears the intersection spacing is sufficient between the new crosswalk at the proposed site road and the existing crosswalk at Bon Accord Drive. However, the posted speed limit of 60km/hr on Loch Lomond Road could potentially be reduced to 50km/hr in front of the proposed until some distance east of the proposed site road development to encourage slower travel speeds, enhance pedestrian safety, and reduce the minimum sight distances required. The increase to 60 km/hr could be relocated east of the new crosswalk so drivers transitioning to a higher speed are doing so further from the crosswalk. This speed limit reduction could be passively enforced with the introduction of traffic calming measures along Loch Lomond Road (e.g., curb extensions at intersections, through lane width reduction, etc.). Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 32 EcM1[.1 s Mitigation Measures As noted in the analysis of the 2032 No Build and 2032 Build scenarios, there are existing operational issues along the Loch Lomond Road that are marginally worsened with the additional of the proposed development traffic. However, two mitigation options were analysed to improve traffic capacity along Loch Lomond Road: adding an additional WB lane and adding both an additional WB and EB lane. 8.1 Added WB Lane A WB lane was added along Loch Lomond Road beginning roughly 420m east of Hickey Road, near the Irving gas station, through to the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive, as shown in Figures 8.1 and 8.2. The WB lane was initially analysed starting at the intersection with Bon Accord / Loch Lomond; however, notable improvements were not found by starting the added WB lane that far east. Furthermore, a single WB through lane at Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive was modelled, but it was insufficient to provide notable improvements to LOS and queueing, so two WB through lanes were modelled. The LOS analysis for the study intersections with the added WB lane were performed using the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections, with signal coordination implemented. The operational results for the 2032 Build scenario with an added WB lane are summarized in Table 8.1, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix H. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 33 EctIF/ Figure 8.1: Synchro Model with Added WB Lane, Western Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) Figure 8.2: Synchro Model with Added WB Lane, Eastern Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) The following notable improvements were identified at the signalized intersections with the addition of a second WB through lane on Loch Lomond Road, as it allowed an efficient reallocation of green time between lane groups: Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive: o AM Peak Hour 110 second cycle length WB through queueing and V/C ratio are brought within acceptable limits ONLoch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 34 348 • NB left V/C ratio and average delay brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 10.4 seconds. o PM Peak Hour • 110 second cycle length • WB through queueing is brought within acceptable limits 1 Loch Lomond Road / Hickey: o AM Peak Hour • 55 second cycle length • WB through queueing is brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 8 seconds. o PM Peak Hour • 90 second cycle length • No notable improvements noted No improvements were identified for the other unsignalized intersections on Loch Lomond Road. The addition of a second WB lane helps improve operations, especially during the AM peak hour, as there is a greater proportion of WB traffic. However, during the PM peak hour when there is greater EB traffic demand, a second EB lane would also be needed at the intersection of Hickey / Loch Lomond. To permit the additional WB lane through the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive, a combination of road widening and lane narrowing would be required to fit within the existing built area around the intersection. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 35 Ect10.1 Table 8.1: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes with iviiTigaTion: Aaaea VVLS Lane AM Peak Hour""""""" PM Peak Hour IntersectionW 95th % Average 95th % Average [Synchro [Queue Storage WC Queue Delay LOS4Queue WC Delay LOS4 EB Left (78m) 16.6 0.27 15.8 B 34.0 0.40 17.4 B EB Thru/Right 36.7 0.27 19.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C Loch Lomond, WB Left (100m) 12.8 0.13 11.6 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B McAllister WB Thru 76.0 0.53 1 21.7 C 44.6 1 0.33 25.1 C Drive & Champlain Drive WB Right (160m) 21.3 0.45 4.9 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A NB Left (70m) 31.7 0.70 41.0 D 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 41.1 0.41 37.1 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1l (Traffic NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 1.8 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.0 0.32 24.1 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F Signals) SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 24.3 C 39.1 D EB Thru 24.5 0.49 13.3 B 262.2 0.99 44.1 D Loch Lomond EB Right 0.0 0.46 3.5 A 13.1 0.46 2.5 A WB Left (130m) 19.2 0.42 9.3 A 14.3 0.45 15.1 B & Hickey Road WB Thru 42.3 0.51 9.6 A 17.0 0.20 4.6 A [2] (Traffic NB Left 49.3 0.72 27.0 C 92.6 1.03 97.8 F Signals) NB Right (120m) 6.5 0.15 5.0 A 17.3 0.49 10.6 B Overall 11.7 B 31.5 C Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.06 12.2 B 2.1 0.01 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.86 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A (Unsignalized) 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B Loch Lomond WB Left/Thru & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [4] Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A (Unsignalized) Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F] 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 36 M1191 Added WB and EB Lanes A second mitigation scenario was analysed that included adding a lane for both directions along Loch Lomond Road. The added EB lane starts at the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive and ends at Bon Accord / Loch Lomond as shown in Figure 8.3; two EB through lanes we modelled at Hickey / Loch Lomond, and the second EB through lane turns into the EB left turn lane at Bon Accord / Loch Lomond. The added WB lane was configured identical to section 8.1. Figure 8.3: Synchro Model with Added WB and EB Lanes, Eastern Study Area (2032 Build PM Shown) The LOS analysis for the study intersections with the added WB and EB lanes were performed using the forecasted 2032 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Splits and cycle lengths were optimized for both signalized intersections, with coordination implemented. The operational results for the 2032 Build scenario with an added WB and EB lane are summarized in Table 8.2, and the corresponding analysis reports are provided in Appendix H. CBCL 351 Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 37 Table 8.2: Intersection Performance Results - 2032 Build Traffic Volumes with ivilTigaTion: Added vvts ana US Lanes Peak Ho PM Peak Hour IntersectionAM Lane •, Average 95th % Average [Synchro Node] [Queue Storage Queue V/C Delay LOS4 Queue v/C Ratio' Delay LOS4 EB Left (78m) 16.6 0.27 15.8 B 34.0 0.40 17.4 B EB Thru/Right 36.7 0.27 19.3 B 111.8 0.68 28.9 C WB Left (100m) 13.4 0.13 14.4 B 10.6 0.21 15.6 B Loch Lomond, WB Thru 89.2 0.53 26.0 C 44.6 0.33 25.1 C McAllister Drive WB Right (160m) 17.2 0.45 4.0 A 16.4 0.44 4.2 A & Champlain Drive NB Left (70m) 31.7 0.70 41.0 D 28.8 0.56 32.0 C NB Thru 41.1 0.41 37.1 D 59.3 0.71 51.0 D [1] (Traffic Signals) NB Right (40m) 0.6 0.16 1.8 A 6.0 0.25 5.6 A SB Left 23.0 0.32 24.1 C 103.3 1.07 85.8 F SB Thru/Right 87.9 0.83 52.8 D 74.0 0.68 41.4 D Overall 25.5 C 39.1 D EB Thru 15.4 0.28 14.4 B 71.3 0.71 18.0 B EB Right 10.4 0.49 4.9 A 14.2 0.53 3.6 A Loch Lomond WB Left (130m) 16.3 0.41 8.6 A 7.9 0.30 7.6 A & Hickey Road [2] (Traffic Signals) WB Thru 35.9 0.55 9.4 A 17.6 0.24 6.3 A NB Left 50.5 0.73 25.7 C 54.2 0.77 35.5 D NB Right (120m) 5.9 0.15 4.8 A 10.6 0.40 5.5 A Overall 11.6 B 13.8 B Loch Lomond EB Left (50m) 1.4 0.86 12.2 B 0.0 0.11 9.0 A & Bon Accord SB Left/Right 42.7 0.06 91.1 F 16.8 0.49 43.0 E Drive [3] (Unsignalized) Overall 7.7 A 2.3 A WB Left/Thru 0.0 0.01 8.0 A 0.7 0.03 11.9 B Loch Lomond & Proposed NB Left/Right 28.0 0.69 70.0 F 18.9 0.57 77.2 F Development [41 (Unsignalized) Overall 4.7 A 2.5 A Notes: Analysis by CBCL Limited using Synchro 11 1. 95% Queue - 95th percentile queue length [highlighted if >available storage or 100m] 2. WC Ratio - Volume -to -Capacity ratio [highlighted if >0.85 for shared movements or >0.90 for exclusive turning movements] 3. Average Delay - average total delay per vehicle [highlighted for LOS E or F1 4. LOS - Level of Service [highlighted for LOS E or F] The following notable improvements were identified at the signalized intersections with the addition of a second WB and EB through lane on Loch Lomond Road: Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive: 0 110 second cycle length o No notable improvement for AM or PM peak hours since there are currently two EB through lanes Loch Lomond Road / Hickey: o AM Peak Hour CBCL RM Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 38 • 45 second cycle length • Marginal improvements as there are higher WB volumes during the AM. o PM Peak Hour • 60 second cycle length • EB through queueing and V/C ratio are brought within acceptable limits • NB left V/C ratio and average delay brought within acceptable limits • Overall intersection average delay is reduced by 17.7 seconds. Again, no notable improvements were identified for either of the unsignalized study intersections. 83 Improvement Recommendation Based on the traffic operational analyses performed for expected future traffic volumes along Loch Lomond Road, it appears existing, and future, congestion can be alleviated by adding a second through lane for WB and EB directions. While the added lanes would provide increased capacity along the road links and signalized intersections, significant road widening, intersection reconfiguration, and utility pole relocation would be required to accommodate these upgrades. The incorporation of these upgrades will be challenging due to the existing built areas, especially around the intersection of Loch Lomond Road / McAllister Drive / Champlain Drive. It is suggested that the City of Saint John carefully consider the proposed upgrades with their current transportation plan and vision for the Loch Lomond Road corridor. Additional traffic analysis using microsimulation (e.g., PTV VISSIM) would also be warranted to validate the results of the Synchro analysis and to better understand impacts to all road users (e.g., transit, active transportation). Furthermore, while 8.3.1 Roundabout Consideration While a roundabout was not closely investigated at the signalized intersections, its application could be a worthwhile measure to explore. Operational analysis for a roundabout would require the use of a specialized traffic software, ARCADY, along with use of PTV VISSIM to appropriately configure the approach lanes. Despite larger capital costs to implement a roundabout, operation and maintenance costs are typically low, and it would also provide other benefits in terms of increased vehicle/pedestrian safety and more efficient traffic operations. Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 39 ECM A Conclusion This report outlines the detailed methodology undertaken to prepare a comprehensive Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed development at 1440 Loch Lomond Road in Saint John, NB. It is CBCL's professional opinion that the study intersections have sufficient overall intersection capacity to accommodate the new traffic generated by the proposed development; however, certain lane groups on Loch Lomond Road are currently experiencing congestion that will be worsened with traffic from the proposed development. Therefore, road widening (i.e., additional WB and EB lanes) and intersection reconfiguration along this corridor will eventually be needed but will require delicate planning as the area is well established. The following critical elements were also identified: 1 While the traffic signal warrant analysis did not suggest traffic signals would be warranted at the proposed site road intersection with Loch Lomond Road, traffic operations at this intersection should be monitored going forward. 1 A new crosswalk is recommended on Loch Lomond Road at the proposed development's site road, along with a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and the necessary traffic signage and pavement markings. Thank you for the opportunity to complete this TIS for your proposed development. Please contact us if you have any questions or require further information. Yours very truly, CBCL Limited 00.1 ZI-e- 1A Prepared by: Brendan McPhee, M.Sc.E., P.Eng. Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Mark MacDonald, P.Eng. Senior Transportation Engineer This document was prepared for the party indicated herein. The material and information in the document reflects CBCL Limited's opinion and bestjudgment based on the information available at the time of preparation. Any use of this document or reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third -party use of this document. CBCL KREI Loch Lomond Estates - Traffic Impact Study 40 APPENDIX A Site Plan OR355 Appendices 4 C e 6 a• ayaia e 0� d_ ® m OO _ .d E Alo. s as yy$ y 1 s � 3:- G yi= 3� .�' �qEi Ng�= 3 �Y ��yky" SA tlYbJ tlE i�&Y gN�€9€ yy' HEY-:!Y3aSS' ;�a:a�s F� 5 ¢g9 may q Ep' 1^3 'ii�— g'1A, a d d ! 55 EY d 'g a 5454 c S #g i @Y 3 3 Y O iv a� a �` IN UwFI $'3 .�Wb !a �$ 3 is -G� �aili �: �3$� W 54 1 APPENDIX B Traffic Count Reports C�« RUN Appendices McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, CIA 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 7:OOAM 19 29 15 0 63 0 59 148 28 0 235 0 4 11 18 0 33 0 13 26 7 0 46 0 377 7:15AM 19 48 20 0 87 1 58 181 27 0 266 0 6 11 15 0 32 0 19 28 13 0 60 0 445 7:30AM 31 46 38 0 115 1 72 188 15 0 275 0 3 20 30 0 53 0 11 36 7 0 54 0 497 7:45AM 23 37 28 0 88 0 76 175 7 0 258 0 14 22 24 0 60 0 14 53 14 0 81 0 487 Hourly Total 92 160 101 0 353 2 265 692 77 0 1034 0 27 64 87 0 178 0 57 143 41 0 241 0 1806 8:OOAM 25 43 48 0 116 1 69 175 11 0 255 0 15 31 39 0 85 0 17 60 20 0 97 0 553 8:15AM 38 45 48 0 131 2 70 166 10 0 246 0 12 26 27 0 65 0 23 54 22 0 99 0 541 8:30AM 31 33 49 0 113 0 80 171 12 0 263 0 14 34 25 0 73 2 17 82 11 0 110 3 559 8:45AM 24 20 67 0 111 0 84 131 9 0 224 0 12 27 12 0 51 0 11 60 20 0 91 0 477 Hourly Total 118 141 212 0 471 3 303 643 42 0 988 0 53 118 103 0 274 2 68 256 73 0 397 3 2130 9:OOAM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:OOPM 17 25 123 0 165 0 60 81 11 0 152 0 16 48 24 0 88 2 23 122 24 0 169 0 574 4:15PM 16 18 101 0 135 0 71 74 8 0 153 0 23 45 30 0 98 0 28 166 33 0 227 0 613 4:30PM 21 34 123 0 178 0 79 94 6 0 179 0 16 55 25 0 96 0 31 167 50 0 248 0 701 4:45PM 24 35 113 0 172 0 74 74 5 0 153 0 10 30 17 0 57 0 20 172 46 0 238 1 620 Hourly Total 78 112 460 0 650 0 284 323 30 0 637 0 65 178 96 0 339 2 102 627 153 0 882 1 2508 S:OOPM 26 52 153 0 231 0 68 73 12 0 153 0 21 61 28 0 110 0 25 188 35 0 248 0 742 5:15PM 25 31 131 0 187 0 64 96 3 0 163 0 18 47 25 0 90 0 28 191 39 0 258 0 698 5:30PM 25 19 106 0 150 0 70 90 9 0 169 0 20 57 35 0 112 0 19 176 33 0 228 0 659 5:45PM 14 37 99 0 150 0 59 70 9 0 138 0 12 38 14 0 64 0 15 121 23 0 159 1 511 Hourly Total 90 139 489 0 718 0 261 329 33 0 623 0 71 203 102 0 376 0 87 676 130 0 893 1 2610 6:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022-11-23 7:OOAM 19 39 11 0 69 0 57 150 18 0 225 0 1 7 12 0 20 1 8 26 4 0 38 0 352 7:15AM 24 40 14 0 78 1 65 167 19 0 251 0 10 17 23 0 50 0 13 37 5 0 55 0 434 7:30AM 29 36 27 0 92 0 77 191 16 0 284 0 6 22 28 0 56 0 13 41 12 0 66 0 498 7:45AM 32 36 33 0 101 0 78 179 9 0 266 0 6 20 23 0 49 0 21 47 15 0 83 0 499 Hourly Total 104 151 85 0 340 1 277 687 62 0 1026 0 23 66 86 0 175 1 55 151 36 0 242 0 1783 8:OOAM 27 47 38 0 112 0 90 168 10 0 268 0 11 41 37 0 89 0 25 52 16 0 93 0 562 8:15AM 32 40 54 0 126 0 78 163 12 0 253 0 13 35 35 0 83 0 21 43 13 0 77 0 539 8:30AM 27 30 58 0 115 0 99 150 9 0 258 0 14 32 16 0 62 0 16 67 11 0 94 0 529 8:45AM 22 17 56 0 95 0 89 113 9 0 211 0 14 20 12 0 46 0 9 73 20 0 102 0 454 Hourly Total 108 134 206 0 448 0 356 594 40 0 990 0 52 128 100 0 280 0 71 235 60 0 366 0 2084 4:OOPM 18 33 96 0 147 0 58 63 10 0 131 0 16 49 24 0 89 0 24 160 32 0 216 0 583 4:15PM 18 27 83 0 128 0 55 83 10 0 148 0 19 43 15 0 77 0 18 145 39 0 202 0 555 4:30PM 30 27 104 0 161 0 64 93 8 0 165 0 11 51 29 0 91 0 19 186 37 0 242 1 659 4:45PM 24 32 129 0 185 0 51 70 13 0 134 0 14 34 16 0 64 1 19 183 37 0 239 0 622 Hourly Total 90 119 412 0 621 0 228 309 41 0 578 0 60 177 84 0 321 1 80 674 145 0 899 1 2419 S:OOPM 25 40 158 0 223 0 74 95 6 0 175 0 15 55 40 0 110 0 22 182 42 0 246 0 754 5:15PM 16 32 137 0 185 0 70 82 3 0 155 0 24 37 23 0 84 1 24 169 44 0 237 0 661 5:30PM 32 20 114 0 166 0 54 89 8 0 151 0 19 50 37 0 106 0 17 162 34 0 213 0 636 5:45PM 21 29 97 0 147 0 81 77 6 0 164 0 12 23 17 0 52 0 17 100 18 0 135 0 498 Hourly Total 94 121 506 0 721 0 279 343 23 0 645 0 70 165 117 0 352 1 80 613 138 0 831 0 2549 Total 774 1077 2471 0 4322 6 2253 3921 348 0 6522 0 421 1099 775 0 2295 7 600 3375 776 0 4751 6 17890 %Approach 17.9% 24.9% 57.2% 0% - - 34.5% 60.1% 5.3% 0% - - 18.3% 47.9% 33.8% 0% - - 12.6% 71.0% 16.3% 0% - - - % Total 4.3% 6.0% 13.8% 0% 24.2% 12.6% 21.9% 1.9% 0% 36.5% 2.4% 6.1% 4.3% 0% 12.8% 3.4% 18.9% 4.3% 0% 26.6% - Lights 739 1060 2418 0 4217 2211 3841 332 0 6384 398 1084 745 0 2227 570 3300 738 0 4608 17436 % Lights 95.5% 98.4% 97.9% 0% 97.6% 98.1% 98.0% 95.4% 0% 97.9% 94.5% 98.6% 96.1% 0% 97.0% 95.0% 97.8% 95.1% 0% 97.0% 97.5% Articulated Trucks 10 0 6 0 16 9 6 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 16 47 %Articulated Trucks 1.3% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 1.8% 0% 0.3% 0.3% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 25 17 47 0 89 33 74 16 0 123 23 15 30 0 68 30 73 24 0 127 407 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 3.2% 1.6% 1.9% 0% 2.1% 1.5% 1.9% 4.6% 0% 1.9% 5.5% 1.4% 3.9% 0% 3.0% 5.0% 2.2% 3.1% 0% 2.7% 2.3% Pedestrians - - - 6 - - 0 - - - 7 - - - 6 % Pedestrians - 100% - - 100% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0 0 - 0 - 0 JiDb 1of7 Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% 0% 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 359 2 of 7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 E O O J r 0 ­1 u F- Ln O J It 776 3375 •11 [N] McAllister Total: 8450 In:4322 Out:4128 o � rl N 2 --avow Ln rn ­1 I- Ol N r- O rl Out: 2025 In: 2295 Total: 4320 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 2253 N N (Q Ln O 3921 `.0 c C O O 348 E — O r J 0 u (.0~ N (.0 O J +� O W 360 3 of 7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 7:45AM 23 37 28 0 88 0 76 175 7 0 258 0 14 22 24 0 60 0 14 53 14 0 81 0 487 8:OOAM 25 43 48 0 116 1 69 175 11 0 255 0 15 31 39 0 85 0 17 60 20 0 97 0 553 8:15AM 38 45 48 0 131 2 70 166 10 0 246 0 12 26 27 0 65 0 23 54 22 0 99 0 541 8:30AM 31 33 49 0 113 0 80 171 12 0 263 0 14 34 25 0 73 2 17 82 11 0 110 3 559 Total 117 158 173 0 448 3 295 687 40 0 1022 0 55 113 115 0 283 2 71 249 67 0 387 3 2140 %Approach 26.1% 35.3% 38.6% 0% - - 28.9% 67.2% 3.9% 0% - - 19.4% 39.9% 40.6% 0% - - 18.3% 64.3% 17.3% 0% - - - % Total 5.5% 7.4% 8.1% 0% 20.9% 13.8% 32.1% 1.9% 0% 47.8% 2.6% 5.3% 5.4% 0% 13.2% 3.3% 11.6% 3.1% 0% 18.1% - PHF 0.770 0.878 0.883 - 0.855 0.922 0.981 0.833 - 0.971 0.917 0.831 0.737 - 0.832 0.772 0.759 0.761 - 0.880 0.957 Lights 106 153 163 0 422 288 669 40 0 997 52 110 106 0 268 65 236 60 0 361 2048 % Lights 90.6% 96.8% 94.2% 0% 94.2% 97.6% 97.4% 100% 0% 97.6% 94.5% 97.3% 92.2% 0% 94.7% 91.5% 94.8% 89.6% 0% 93.3% 95.7% Articulated Trucks 3 0 3 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 % Articulated Trucks 2.6% 0% 1.7% 0% 1.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.5% 0% 0.3% 0.4% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 8 5 7 0 20 6 17 0 0 23 3 3 9 0 15 6 13 6 0 25 83 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.8% 3.2% 4.0% 0% 4.5% 2.0% 2.5% 0% 0% 2.3% 5.5% 2.7% 7.8% 0% 5.3% 8.5% 5.2% 9.0% 0% 6.5% 3.9% Pedestrians - - - 3 - - - - - 0 - - - 2 - - - 3 % Pedestrians - 100% - - 100% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0 0 - 0 - 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - 0% 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 361 4 of 7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 67 249 71 i E [N] McAllister Total: 923 In:448 Out:475 r- 00 M ­1 Ln r� ­1 ­1 ­1 Ln M Ln r I rl Ln rl rl Out: 269 In: 283 Total: 552 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 295 N N � O O 687 C � c Cn0 40 E n 4� J o �F__r_ u O O J W u 362 5 of 7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, CIA 7N4, CA Leg Direction McAllister Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Champlain Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* R T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 4:30PM 21 34 123 0 178 0 79 94 6 0 179 0 16 55 25 0 96 0 31 167 50 0 248 0 701 4:45PM 24 35 113 0 172 0 74 74 5 0 153 0 10 30 17 0 57 0 20 172 46 0 238 1 620 S:OOPM 26 52 153 0 231 0 68 73 12 0 153 0 21 61 28 0 110 0 25 188 35 0 248 0 742 5:15PM 25 31 131 0 187 0 64 96 3 0 163 0 18 47 25 0 90 0 28 191 39 0 258 0 698 Total 96 152 520 0 768 0 285 337 26 0 648 0 65 193 95 0 353 0 104 718 170 0 992 1 2761 %Approach 12.5% 19.8% 67.7% 0% - - 44.0% 52.0% 4.0% 0% - - 18.4% 54.7% 26.9% 0% - - 10.5% 72.4% 17.1% 0% - - - % Total 3.5% 5.5% 18.8% 0% 27.8% 10.3% 12.2% 0.9% 0% 23.5% 2.4% 7.0% 3.4% 0% 12.8% 3.8% 26.0% 6.2% 0% 35.9% - PUF 0.923 0.731 0.850 - 0.831 0.902 0.878 0.542 - 0.905 0.774 0.791 0.848 - 0.802 0.839 0.940 0.850 - 0.961 0.930 Lights 95 150 515 0 760 280 335 24 0 639 65 192 92 0 349 102 715 167 0 984 2732 % Lights 99.0% 98.7% 99.0% 0% 99.0% 98.2% 99.4% 92.3% 0% 98.6% 100% 99.5% 96.8% 0% 98.99/6 98.1% 99.6% 98.2% 0% 99.2% 98.9% Articulated Trucks 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 % Articulated Trucks 1.0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.1% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 2 4 0 6 3 2 2 0 7 0 1 3 0 4 2 3 2 0 7 24 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 1.3% 0.8% 0% 0.8% 1.1% 0.6% 7.7% 0% 1.1% 0% 0.5% 3.2% 0% 1.1% 1.9% 0.4% 1.2% 0% 0.7% 0.9% Pedestrians - - 0 - - - - - 0 - - 0 - - - - - 1 % Pedestrians - - - - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 - 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - - 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 363 6 of 7 McAllister - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017745, Location: 45.299912,-66.005608 (0 O rr co N Ln O N 7 E Lrni O O J ra 0 u F N O rn J c E 170 718 104 [N] McAllister Total: 1416 In:768 Out:648 Q0 N O CYI Ln N r i Ln Ln m Ln rn rn Q0 Out: 282 In: 353 Total: 635 [5] Champlain mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 285 0 It 337 1° Ln O CYI O 26 E O � J n-mF- -r- O U M O ­1 J 4� 0 W O - 364 7 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* lot 2022-11-22 7:00AM 161 26 0 187 0 9 69 0 78 0 17 29 0 46 0 311 7:15AM 210 14 0 224 0 7 58 0 65 0 21 35 0 56 0 345 7:30AM 205 22 0 227 0 17 70 0 87 1 29 46 1 76 0 390 7:45AM 214 28 0 242 0 15 59 0 74 0 43 49 0 92 0 408 Hourly Total 790 90 0 880 0 48 256 0 304 1 110 159 1 270 0 1454 8:00AM 183 39 0 222 0 19 68 0 87 0 74 46 0 120 0 429 8:15AM 176 52 0 228 0 15 71 0 86 0 67 50 0 117 0 431 8:30AM 186 49 0 235 0 12 67 0 79 0 69 69 0 138 0 452 8:45AM 118 31 0 149 0 21 94 0 115 0 73 66 0 139 0 403 Hourly Total 663 171 0 834 0 67 300 0 367 0 283 231 0 514 0 1715 4:00PM 87 15 0 102 0 33 61 0 94 0 81 166 0 247 0 443 4:15PM 95 15 0 110 0 41 60 0 101 0 84 188 0 272 0 483 4:30PM 101 13 0 114 0 41 60 0 101 0 88 175 0 263 0 478 4:45PM 83 13 0 96 0 29 53 0 82 0 88 211 0 299 0 477 Hourly Total 366 56 0 422 0 144 234 0 378 0 341 740 0 1081 0 1881 5:00PM 107 15 0 122 0 38 55 0 93 0 129 205 0 334 0 549 5:15PM 98 18 0 116 0 31 55 0 86 0 111 228 0 339 0 541 5:30PM 106 18 0 124 0 28 64 0 92 0 102 202 0 304 0 520 5:45PM 76 12 0 88 0 35 54 0 89 0 87 142 0 229 0 406 Hourly Total 387 63 0 450 0 132 228 0 360 0 429 777 0 1206 0 2016 6:00PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022-11-23 7:00AM 182 13 0 195 0 8 58 0 66 0 17 22 0 39 0 300 7:15AM 196 16 0 212 0 5 60 0 65 0 18 40 0 58 0 335 7:30AM 223 20 0 243 0 12 74 0 86 0 29 42 0 71 0 400 7:45AM 197 32 0 229 0 9 62 0 71 0 47 35 0 82 0 382 Hourly Total 798 81 0 879 0 34 254 0 288 0 111 139 0 250 0 1417 8:00AM 191 30 0 221 0 14 69 0 83 0 53 47 0 100 0 404 8:15AM 179 52 0 231 0 11 74 0 85 1 69 47 0 116 0 432 8:30AM 150 40 0 190 0 11 84 0 95 0 77 54 0 131 0 416 8:45AM 118 38 0 156 0 16 108 0 124 0 75 69 0 144 0 424 Hourly Total 638 160 0 798 0 52 335 0 387 1 274 217 0 491 0 1676 4:00PM 81 14 0 95 0 35 60 0 95 0 81 189 0 270 0 460 4:15PM 104 15 0 119 0 23 46 0 69 0 77 172 0 249 0 437 4:30PM 102 13 0 115 0 47 54 0 101 0 100 193 0 293 0 509 4:45PM 88 17 0 105 0 26 50 0 76 2 96 215 0 311 0 492 Hourly Total 375 59 0 434 0 131 210 0 341 2 354 769 0 1123 0 1898 5:00PM 101 17 0 118 0 40 82 0 122 0 101 212 0 313 0 553 5:15PM 86 19 0 105 0 44 52 0 96 0 119 215 0 334 0 535 5:30PM 94 18 0 112 0 35 54 0 89 0 95 188 0 283 0 484 5:45PM 109 16 0 125 0 30 57 0 87 1 66 143 0 209 0 421 Hourly Total 390 70 0 460 0 149 245 0 394 1 381 758 0 1139 0 1993 Total 4407 750 0 5157 0 757 2062 0 2819 5 2283 3790 1 6074 0 14050 %Approach 85.5% 14.5% 0% - - 26.9% 73.1% 0% - - 37.6% 62.4% 0% - - - %Total 31.4% 5.3% 0% 36.7% 5.4% 14.7% 0% 20.1% 16.2% 27.0% 0% 43.2% - Lights 4332 701 0 5033 721 1989 0 2710 2203 3719 1 5923 13666 %Lights 98.3% 93.5% 0% 97.6% 95.2% 96.5% 0% 96.1% 96.5% 98.1% 100% 973% 97.3% Articulated Trucks 8 2 0 10 0 6 0 6 4 4 0 8 24 % Articulated Trucks 0.2% 0.3% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.3% 0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0% 0.1% 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 67 47 0 114 36 67 0 103 76 67 0 143 360 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.5% 6.3% 0% 2.2% 4.8% 3.2% 0% 3.7% 3.3% 1.8% 0% 2.4% 2.6% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 4 - - - - 0 % Pedestriansr 80.0% of 7 Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Int Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 11 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - 20.0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 366 2 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 � o ro � O Q0 O O Ln E N O� 1 J r6 4� ~ p 0 3790 J (.0 E '—' 2283 p4 3 N I- l4 Ln O I� N Out: 3033 In: 2819 Total: 5852 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 4407 750 367 3 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Iot 2022-11-22 7:45AM 214 28 0 242 0 15 59 0 74 0 43 49 0 92 0 408 8:00AM 183 39 0 222 0 19 68 0 87 0 74 46 0 120 0 429 8:15AM 176 52 0 228 0 15 71 0 86 0 67 50 0 117 0 431 8:30AM 186 49 0 235 0 12 67 0 79 0 69 69 0 138 0 4522 Total 759 168 0 927 0 61 265 0 326 0 253 214 0 467 0 1720 %Approach 81.9% 18.1% 0% - - 18.7% 81.3% 0% - - 54.2% 45.8% 0% - - - %Total 44.1% 9.8% 0% 53.9% 3.5% 15.4% 0% 19.0% 14.7% 12.4% 0% 27.2% - PHF 0.887 0.808 - 0.958 0.803 0.933 - 0.937 0.855 0.775 - 0.846 0.951 Lights 745 152 0 897 51 249 0 300 237 206 0 443 1640 %Lights 98.2% 90.5% 0% 96.8% 83.6% 94.0% 0% 92.0% 93.7% 96.3% 0% 94.9% 95.3% Articulated Trucks 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 5 % Articulated Trucks 0.3% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.4% 0.9% 0% 0.6% 0.3% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 12 16 0 28 10 16 0 26 15 6 0 21 75 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.6% 9.5% 0% 3.0% 16.4% 6.0% 0% 8.0% 5.9% 2.8% 0% 4.5% 4.4% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 368 4 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:45AM - 8:45 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 214 253 Ln r I Q0 FO N Out: 421 In: 326 Total: 747 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 759 168 ro O Cn c � N O O N Erl Ln � J N F_ _r_ U O O J W u 369 5 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Wed Nov 23, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 23 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Loch Lomond Road Westbound Hickey Road Northbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time T L U App Ped* R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* Int 2022-11-23 4:30PM 102 13 0 115 0 47 54 0 101 0 100 193 0 293 0 509 4:45PM 88 17 0 105 0 26 50 0 76 2 96 215 0 311 0 492 5:OOPM 101 17 0 118 0 40 82 0 122 0 101 212 0 313 0 553 5:15PM 86 19 0 105 0 44 52 0 96 0 119 215 0 334 0 535 Total 377 66 0 443 0 157 238 0 395 2 416 835 0 1251 0 2089 %Approach 85.1% 14.9% 0% - - 39.7% 60.3% 0% - - 33.3% 66.7% 0% - - - %Total 18.0% 3.2% 0% 21.2% 7.5% 11.4% 0% 18.9% 19.9% 40.0% 0% 59.9% - PHF 0.924 0.868 - 0.939 0.835 0.726 - 0.809 0.874 0.971 - 0.936 0.944 Lights 372 64 0 436 154 234 0 388 412 830 0 1242 2066 %Lights 98.7% 97.0% 0% 98.49% 98.1% 98.3% 0% 98.2% 99.0% 99.4% 0% 99.3% 98.9% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 5 2 0 7 3 4 0 7 4 5 0 9 23 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 1.3% 3.0% 0% 1.6% 1.9% 1.7% 0% 1.8% 1.0% 0.6% 0% 0.7% 1.1% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 2 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - 100% - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk - 0% *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 370 6 of 7 Hickey Road - Loch Lomond - TMC Wed Nov 23, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 23 2022 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017744, Location: 45.301848,-65.997826 ro O rr un Q0 O �.o O �.o E rcol O O J 4� o u ~ r' O `^ Sm 835 416 00 r- M Ln N ri Out: 482 In: 395 Total: 877 [5] Hickey Road mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 377 371 7 of 7 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (11:30 AM-1:30 PM, 7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Eastbound Road Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* Int 2022-11-22 7:00AM 12 3 0 15 1 0 206 0 206 0 27 2 0 29 0 250 7:15AM 17 3 0 20 2 1 236 0 237 0 32 3 0 35 0 292 7:30AM 15 4 0 19 0 1 255 0 256 0 56 4 0 60 0 335 7:45AM 27 5 0 32 0 2 218 0 220 0 56 6 0 62 0 314 Hourly Total 71 15 0 86 3 4 915 0 919 0 171 15 0 186 0 1191 8:00AM 19 3 0 22 0 1 246 0 247 0 54 5 0 59 0 328 8:15AM 23 2 0 25 0 5 195 0 200 0 67 7 0 74 0 299 8:30AM 10 2 0 12 1 4 221 0 225 0 67 4 0 71 0 308 8:45AM 11 0 0 11 1 2 140 0 142 0 69 8 0 77 0 230 Hourly Total 63 7 0 70 2 12 802 0 814 0 257 24 0 281 0 1165 9:00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30AM 5 2 0 7 0 2 81 0 83 0 97 6 0 103 0 193 11:45AM 10 3 0 13 0 1 79 0 80 0 90 6 0 96 0 189 Hourly Total 15 5 0 20 0 3 160 0 163 0 187 12 0 199 0 382 12:00PM 10 2 0 12 0 4 78 0 82 0 101 14 0 115 0 209 12:15PM 10 2 0 12 0 0 124 0 124 0 95 14 0 109 0 245 12:30PM 7 3 0 10 0 2 105 0 107 0 98 8 0 106 0 223 12:45PM 10 3 0 13 1 0 108 0 108 0 88 10 0 98 0 219 Hourly Total 37 10 0 47 1 6 415 0 421 0 382 46 0 428 0 896 1:00PM 7 2 0 9 1 5 94 0 99 0 92 7 0 99 0 207 1:15PM 9 4 0 13 0 4 113 0 117 0 124 10 0 134 0 264 Hourly Total 16 6 0 22 1 9 207 0 216 0 216 17 0 233 0 471 4:00PM 9 1 0 10 0 4 89 0 93 0 196 15 0 211 0 314 4:15PM 7 1 0 8 0 2 106 0 108 0 225 13 0 238 0 354 4:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 2 107 0 109 0 222 15 0 237 0 358 4:45PM 11 3 0 14 0 5 85 0 90 0 222 23 0 245 0 349 Hourly Total 38 6 0 44 0 13 387 0 400 0 865 66 0 931 0 1375 5:00PM 9 0 0 9 1 6 111 0 117 0 230 22 0 252 0 378 5:15PM 8 2 0 10 0 2 98 0 100 0 264 21 0 285 0 395 5:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 0 108 0 108 0 225 20 0 245 0 365 5:45PM 9 1 0 10 1 2 74 0 76 0 174 16 0 190 1 276 Hourly Total 37 4 0 41 2 10 391 0 401 0 893 79 0 972 1 1414 2022-11-23 7:00AM 10 4 0 14 0 0 202 0 202 0 27 2 0 29 0 245 7:15AM 16 3 0 19 0 1 233 0 234 0 29 5 0 34 0 287 7:30AM 15 2 0 17 1 0 249 0 249 0 58 5 0 63 0 329 7:45AM 19 7 0 26 0 5 249 0 254 0 34 3 0 37 0 317 Hourly Total 60 16 0 76 1 6 933 0 939 0 148 15 0 163 0 1178 8:00AM 18 5 0 23 0 2 204 0 206 0 53 3 0 56 0 285 8:15AM 14 3 0 17 1 7 219 0 226 0 51 6 0 57 0 300 8:30AM 15 1 0 16 0 2 166 0 168 0 50 9 0 59 0 243 8:45AM 13 2 0 15 0 1 143 0 144 0 78 9 0 87 0 246 Hourly Total 60 11 0 71 1 12 732 0 744 0 232 27 0 259 0 1074 11:30AM 6 2 0 8 0 0 102 0 102 0 79 13 0 92 0 202 11:45AM 12 1 0 13 0 1 89 0 90 0 80 7 0 87 0 190 Hourly Total 18 3 0 21 0 1 191 0 192 0 159 20 0 179 0 392 12:00PM 12 3 0 15 0 0 96 0 96 0 86 7 0 93 0 204 12:15PM 10 1 0 11 0 2 89 0 91 0 95 12 0 107 0 209 12:30PM 9 1 0 10 0 0 80 0 80 0 100 9 0 109 0 199 12:45PM 9 1 0 10 0 3 96 0 99 0 101 7 0 108 01 217 Hourly Total 40 6 0 46 0 5 361 0 366 0 382 35 0 417 0 829 1:00PM 13 1 0 14 1 3 90 0 93 0 113 8 0 121 0 228 1:15PM 14 3 0 17 0 6 84 0 90 01 91 10 0 101 01 208 ia9s7 Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* Iot Hourly Total 27 4 0 31 1 9 174 0 183 0 204 18 0 222 0 436 4:OOPM 10 3 0 13 0 3 84 0 87 0 200 16 0 216 0 316 4:15PM 10 1 0 11 1 1 102 0 103 0 186 15 0 201 0 315 4:30PM 14 2 0 16 1 2 91 0 93 0 209 21 0 230 0 339 4:45PM 8 1 0 9 0 4 99 0 103 0 238 12 0 250 0 362 Hourly Total 42 7 0 49 2 10 376 0 386 0 833 64 0 897 0 1332 5:OOPM 15 4 0 19 0 4 95 0 99 0 239 21 0 260 0 378 5:15PM 12 4 0 16 0 2 93 0 95 0 260 24 0 284 0 395 5:30PM 9 3 0 12 1 3 90 0 93 0 230 15 0 245 0 350 5:45PM 12 2 0 14 1 3 107 0 110 0 177 11 0 188 0 312 Hourly Total 48 13 0 61 2 12 385 0 397 0 906 71 0 977 0 1435 6:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 572 113 0 685 16 112 6429 0 6541 0 5835 509 0 6344 1 13570 %Approach 83.5% 16.5% 0% - - 1.7% 98.3% 0% - - 92.0% 8.0% 0% - - - %Total 4.2% 0.8% 0% 5.0% 0.8% 47.4% 0% 48.2% 43.0% 3.8% 0% 46.8% - Lights 555 105 0 660 97 6277 0 6374 5695 500 0 6195 13229 %Lights 97.0% 92.9% 0% 96.4% 86.6% 97.6% 0% 97.4% 97.6% 98.2% 0% 97.7% 97.5% Articulated Trucks 2 2 0 4 0 11 0 11 1 0 0 1 16 % Articulated Trucks 0.3% 1.8% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 15 6 0 21 15 141 0 156 139 9 0 148 325 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 2.6% 5.3% 0% 3.1% 13.4% 2.2% 0% 2.4% 2.4% 1.8% 0% 2.3% 2.4% Pedestrians - - - - 14 - - - - 0 - - - - 1 % Pedestrians 87.5% - 100% - Bicycles on Crosswalk 2 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 12.5% - 0% - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 373 2 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Full Length (11:30 AM-1:30 PM, 7 AM-9 AM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 O Ln O O It m E rn O J rp ort u F- zt O m J (.0 509 5835 ri [N] Bon Accord Total: 1306 In:685 Out:621 N M n r-I Ln r I 2 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 112 rl (a O Ln 6429 10 Eck CO tt O N rl E — O ro J 0,F� Ln u O +� J O W 374 3 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 7:30AM 15 4 0 19 0 1 255 0 256 0 56 4 0 60 0 335 7:45AM 27 5 0 32 0 2 218 0 220 0 56 6 0 62 0 314 8:00AM 19 3 0 22 0 1 246 0 247 0 54 5 0 59 0 328 8:15AM 23 2 0 25 0 5 195 0 200 0 67 7 0 74 0 299 Total 84 14 0 98 0 9 914 0 923 0 233 22 0 255 0 1276 %Approach 85.7% 14.3% 0% - - 1.0% 99.0% 0% - - 91.4% 8.6% 0% - - - %Total 6.6% 1.1% 0% 7.7% 0.7% 71.6% 0% 72.3% 18.3% 1.7% 0% 20.0% - PHF 0.778 0.700 - 0.766 0.450 0.896 - 0.901 0.869 0.786 - 0.861 0.952 Lights 79 13 0 92 6 891 0 897 217 22 0 239 1228 %Lights 94.0% 92.9% 0% 93.9% 66.7% 97.5% 0% 97.2% 93.1% 100% 0% 93.7% 96.2% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 5 1 0 6 3 23 0 26 16 0 0 16 48 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.0% 7.1% 0% 6.1% 33.3% 2.5% 0% 2.8% 6.9% 0% 0% 6.3% 3.8% Pedestrians - - - - 0 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians - - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk -1 - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 375 4 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 AM Peak (Nov 22 2022 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 ro 00 O rn ry, rn O n-m O O un 22 233 E [N] Bon Accord Total: 129 In:98 Out:31 ItRt 00­1 FE mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 0 914 W u 376 5 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 Midday Peak (Nov 22 2022 12:30PM - 1:30 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-2212:30PM 7 3 0 10 0 2 105 0 107 0 98 8 0 106 0 223 12:45PM 10 3 0 13 1 0 108 0 108 0 88 10 0 98 0 219 1:00PM 7 2 0 9 1 5 94 0 99 0 92 7 0 99 0 207 1:15PM 9 4 0 13 0 4 113 0 117 0 124 10 0 134 0 264 Total 33 12 0 45 2 11 420 0 431 0 402 35 0 437 0 913 %Approach 73.3% 26.7% 0% - - 2.6% 97.4% 0% - - 92.0% 8.0% 0% - - - %Total 3.6% 1.3% 0% 4.9% 1.2% 46.0% 0% 47.2% 44.0% 3.8% 0% 47.9% - PHF 0.825 0.750 - 0.865 0.550 0.929 - 0.921 0.810 0.875 - 0.815 0.865 Lights 31 12 0 43 11 406 0 417 392 35 0 427 887 %Lights 93.9% 100% 0% 95.6% 100% 96.7% 0% 96.8% 97.5% 100% 0% 97.7% 97.2% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 2 0 0 2 0 13 0 13 10 0 0 10 25 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 6.1% 0% 0% 4.4% 0% 3.1% 0% 3.0% 2.5% 0% 0% 2.3% 2.7% Pedestrians - - - - 2 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians 100% - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 377 6 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 Midday Peak (Nov 22 2022 12:30PM - 1:30 PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 (a M O Ln r O 00 O p, E co O J r 0 _r_ F_ u O � J c E 35 402 [N] Bon Accord Total: 91 In:45 Out:46 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 11 420 378 7 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Tue Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:45PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C 1A 7N4, CA Leg Direction Bon Accord Southbound Loch Lomond Road Westbound Loch Lomond Road Eastbound Time R L U App Ped* R T U App Ped* T L U App Ped* lnt 2022-11-22 4:45PM 11 3 0 14 0 5 85 0 90 0 222 23 0 245 0 349 S:OOPM 9 0 0 9 1 6 111 0 117 0 230 22 0 252 0 378 5:15PM 8 2 0 10 0 2 98 0 100 0 264 21 0 285 0 395 5:30PM 11 1 0 12 0 0 108 0 108 0 225 20 0 245 0 365 Total 39 6 0 45 1 13 402 0 415 0 941 86 0 1027 0 1487 %Approach 86.7% 13.3% 0% - - 3.1% 96.9% 0% - - 91.6% 8.4% 0% - - - %Total 2.6% 0.4% 0% 3.0% 0.9% 27.0% 0% 27.9% 63.3% 5.8% 0% 69.1% - PHF 0.886 0.500 - 0.804 0.542 0.905 - 0.887 0.891 0.935 - 0.901 0.941 Lights 39 6 0 45 13 394 0 407 936 86 0 1022 1474 %Lights 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 98.0% 0% 98.1% 99.5% 100% 0% 99.5% 99.1% Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 5 0 0 5 13 % Buses and Single -Unit Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.0% 0% 1.9% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.5% 0.9% Pedestrians - - - - 1 - - - - 0 - - - - 0 % Pedestrians 100% - - - Bicycles on Crosswalk 01 01 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0% - - *Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 379 8 of 9 Bon Accord - Loch Lomond - TMC Toe Nov 22, 2022 PM Peak (Nov 22 2022 4:45PM - 5:45 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: 1017656, Location: 45.304705,-65.988913 :• 941 Sm [N] Bon Accord Total: 144 In:45 Out:99 rnQ0 m mmmm Provided by: CBCL Limited 135 St. Peters Road, Suite 201, PO Box 1659, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N4, CA 13 402 380 9 of 9 APPENDIX C Synchro Analysis Reports - 2022 Baseline C�« M-15 Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 1- Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 65 230 80 40 675 320 115 125 50 180 160 120 Future Volume (vph) 65 230 80 40 675 320 115 125 50 180 160 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.123 0.536 0.225 0.659 Satd. Flow (perm) 249 3439 0 1010 1946 1583 410 1883 1742 2434 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 36 259 125 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 256 89 41 696 330 142 154 62 205 182 136 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 345 0 41 696 330 142 154 62 205 318 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Free pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Free 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 20.0 66.0 20.0 66.0 20.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 51.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 59.4 52.2 58.3 51.6 117.3 41.9 27.7 27.7 36.2 24.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.45 0.50 0.44 1.00 0.36 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.22 0.07 0.81 0.21 0.48 0.35 0.12 0.24 0.75 Control Delay 17.5 19.6 14.7 39.5 0.3 33.1 42.5 0.5 27.1 53.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.5 19.6 14.7 39.5 0.3 33.1 42.5 0.5 27.1 53.9 LOS B B B D A C D A C D Approach Delay 19.2 26.4 31.5 43.4 Approach LOS B C C D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.2 21.6 4.0 132.4 0.0 22.0 29.2 0.0 15.9 63.6 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.1 36.1 10.5 #213.4 0.0 34.3 45.2 0.0 24.7 95.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 357 1877 643 1045 1583 328 531 581 1207 787 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.18 0.06 0.67 0.21 0.43 0.29 0.11 0.17 0.40 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 157 Actuated Cycle Length: 117.3 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd J f'i l i `111. - ± 5 � 56 ■ 0`.� 20 1 166S 16S 1 M51-9 191.1% 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 200 250 165 740 280 55 Future Volume (vph) 200 250 165 740 280 55 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.474 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 863 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 301 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 241 301 174 779 308 60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 241 301 174 779 308 60 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 24.0 79.0 35.0 35.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.1 20.1 35.1 34.0 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.56 0.55 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.42 0.28 0.75 0.62 0.12 Control Delay 19.1 4.3 8.3 16.6 27.5 7.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.1 4.3 8.3 16.6 27.5 7.0 LOS B A A B C A Approach Delay 10.9 15.1 24.2 Approach LOS B B C Queue Length 50th (m) 18.2 0.0 7.4 53.0 26.3 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 38.2 9.8 19.9 119.6 64.5 7.7 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1533 1356 785 1836 915 884 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.42 0.34 0.07 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 114 Actuated Cycle Length: 62.2 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd u1 � 7_ 24 s 1553 355 TP CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 191:191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 220 860 15 15 75 Future Vol, veh/h 25 220 860 15 15 75 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 28 247 989 17 20 100 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1006 0 0 1301 998 Stage 1 - - - 998 - Stage 2 - 303 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 689 178 296 Stage 1 - 357 - Stage 2 - 749 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 689 171 296 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 171 - Stage 1 342 Stage 2 749 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 29.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 689 264 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.455 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 29.5 HCM Lane LOS B D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2.2 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Ec�:il 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 LL Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 230 0 0 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 230 0 0 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 250 0 0 951 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 951 0 0 250 0 0 1201 1201 250 1201 1201 951 Stage 1 - - - - - - 250 250 - 951 951 - Stage 2 - - 951 951 - 250 250 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 1316 162 185 789 162 185 315 Stage 1 - - 754 700 - 312 338 - Stage 2 - - 312 338 - 754 700 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 1316 162 185 789 162 185 315 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 162 185 - 162 185 - Stage 1 754 700 312 338 Stage 2 312 338 754 700 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 722 1316 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 191:19 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 165 720 95 30 340 275 105 185 65 525 145 100 Future Volume (vph) 165 720 95 30 340 275 105 185 65 525 145 100 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1924 0 Flt Permitted 0.284 0.261 0.524 0.321 Satd. Flow (perm) 576 3514 0 492 1946 1583 954 1883 1742 1186 1924 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 306 125 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 170 742 98 33 378 306 131 231 81 625 173 119 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 170 840 0 33 378 306 131 231 81 625 292 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 20.0 66.0 20.0 66.0 66.0 20.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 51.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 47.5 40.0 38.7 30.0 30.0 31.3 18.9 18.9 43.5 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.39 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.31 0.19 0.19 0.43 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.61 0.12 0.66 0.45 0.35 0.66 0.19 0.68 0.58 Control Delay 20.3 29.0 18.4 39.1 5.8 23.2 50.9 2.7 25.0 36.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 29.0 18.4 39.1 5.8 23.2 50.9 2.7 25.0 36.9 LOS C C B D A C D A C D Approach Delay 27.5 23.9 33.9 28.8 Approach LOS C C C C Queue Length 50th (m) 16.8 66.1 3.0 58.0 0.0 14.2 38.7 0.0 39.3 42.4 Queue Length 95th (m) 37.6 111.2 9.9 111.1 18.8 27.6 67.4 0.0 61.2 74.4 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 479 2188 424 1209 1099 456 584 627 1233 908 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.08 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.40 0.13 0.51 0.32 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 157 Actuated Cycle Length: 101.8 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd C,1\11 1 t 20 s 66 g 35 s ib 5 35 I 0■ 20s 1 166S 1 M51S CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 191:i.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 830 420 65 385 235 150 Future Volume (vph) 830 420 65 385 235 150 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.095 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 173 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 313 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 902 457 70 414 276 176 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 902 457 70 414 276 176 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 55.0 55.0 24.0 79.0 35.0 35.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 50.6 50.6 60.4 59.4 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.67 0.66 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.44 0.28 0.33 0.70 0.35 Control Delay 29.3 5.9 9.0 8.1 42.3 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 29.3 5.9 9.0 8.1 42.3 6.5 LOS C A A A D A Approach Delay 21.4 8.2 28.4 Approach LOS C A C Queue Length 50th (m) 119.0 10.8 3.3 24.8 41.4 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #234.9 35.1 9.3 50.1 61.2 11.5 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1052 1030 468 1584 600 677 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.86 0.44 0.15 0.26 0.46 0.26 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 114 Actuated Cycle Length: 89.6 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd u ; I -'j" Nt.I- 24!; 1555 25= r;r. 7Q ; K1:�� 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 945 390 15 10 45 Future Vol, veh/h 80 945 390 15 10 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 89 1050 424 16 13 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 440 0 0 1660 432 Stage 1 - - - 432 - Stage 2 - 1228 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 107 624 Stage 1 - 655 - Stage 2 - 277 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 99 624 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 603 Stage 2 277 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 19.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1120 318 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.216 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 19.4 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.8 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Ec1:1:3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2022 Baseline PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 955 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 955 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1038 0 0 440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 440 0 0 1038 0 0 1478 1478 1038 1478 1478 440 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1038 1038 - 440 440 - Stage 2 - - 440 440 - 1038 1038 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 670 104 126 280 104 126 617 Stage 1 - - 279 308 - 596 578 - Stage 2 - - 596 578 - 279 308 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1120 670 104 126 280 104 126 617 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 104 126 - 104 126 - Stage 1 279 308 596 578 Stage 2 596 578 279 308 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 0 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1120 670 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Ec1:10.1 APPENDIX D Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 No Build C�« 01191 Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 270 95 50 795 380 135 150 60 215 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 270 95 50 795 380 135 150 60 215 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.079 0.498 0.174 0.541 Satd. Flow (perm) 160 3439 0 938 1946 1583 317 1883 1742 1998 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 54 392 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 300 106 52 820 392 167 185 74 244 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 406 0 52 820 392 167 185 74 244 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 12.0 50.0 50.0 12.0 36.0 36.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 58.9 51.8 58.2 51.5 51.5 32.4 24.4 24.4 32.4 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.47 0.53 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.09 0.90 0.41 0.91 0.44 0.15 0.36 0.83 Control Delay 20.3 17.0 12.7 43.9 3.6 77.3 39.4 1.3 26.6 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 17.0 12.7 43.9 3.6 77.3 39.4 1.3 26.6 52.8 LOS C B B D A E D A C D Approach Delay 17.6 30.1 47.6 42.4 Approach LOS B C D D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.6 22.1 4.4 154.1 0.0 23.7 31.5 0.0 17.3 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 17.7 34.6 10.5 #243.7 16.3 #36.3 42.3 0.0 23.3 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 206 1648 551 910 949 183 513 568 685 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.09 0.90 0.41 0.91 0.36 0.13 0.36 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 17, i - :R F\11-'.3v to i� s 50- s L2 S -6I= 06% 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 240 295 200 880 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 240 295 200 880 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.456 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 831 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 289 355 211 926 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 289 355 211 926 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 11.0 39.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.6 23.6 35.7 34.7 15.3 15.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.60 0.58 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.42 0.35 0.84 0.79 0.16 Control Delay 15.5 3.5 7.6 20.3 35.8 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.5 3.5 7.6 20.3 35.8 6.0 LOS B A A C D A Approach Delay 8.9 18.0 30.5 Approach LOS A B C Queue Length 50th (m) 20.6 0.0 8.9 70.3 33.1 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 32.7 9.2 16.6 #140.3 #65.8 7.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 736 839 602 1101 472 497 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.42 0.35 0.84 0.76 0.15 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd f Fri 5 x I aSl 395 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.9 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 265 1025 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 265 1025 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 298 1178 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1201 0 0 1556 1190 Stage 1 - - - 1190 - Stage 2 - 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 581 124 229 Stage 1 - 289 - Stage 2 - 702 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 581 117 229 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 117 - Stage 1 272 Stage 2 702 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 64.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 581 195 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.752 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 64.4 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 5 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 270 0 0 1020 5 0 0 0 10 0 25 Future Vol, veh/h 10 270 0 0 1020 5 0 0 0 10 0 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 293 0 0 1109 5 0 0 0 11 0 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1114 0 0 293 0 0 1440 1429 293 1427 1427 1112 Stage 1 - - - - - - 315 315 - 1112 1112 - Stage 2 - - 1125 1114 - 315 315 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1269 111 135 746 113 135 254 Stage 1 - - 696 656 - 253 284 - Stage 2 - - 249 284 - 696 656 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1269 98 132 746 111 132 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 98 132 - 111 132 - Stage 1 681 642 248 284 Stage 2 222 284 681 642 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 0 29.3 HCM LOS A D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 627 1269 186 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.205 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 10.8 0 0 29.3 HCM Lane LOS A B A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - 0 0.7 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 06z"I 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 845 115 40 400 325 125 215 80 620 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 845 115 40 400 325 125 215 80 620 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.265 0.185 0.381 0.274 Satd. Flow (perm) 538 3514 0 348 1946 1583 694 1883 1742 1012 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 16 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 871 119 44 444 361 156 269 100 738 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 990 0 44 444 361 156 269 100 738 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.0 48.1 48.6 40.6 40.6 32.2 21.9 21.9 41.4 28.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.38 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.64 0.18 0.62 0.45 0.54 0.72 0.22 1.00 0.66 Control Delay 20.6 27.1 15.3 32.8 4.3 30.9 51.5 3.8 65.1 40.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.6 27.1 15.3 32.8 4.3 30.9 51.5 3.8 65.1 40.3 LOS C C B C A C D A E D Approach Delay 26.0 19.7 36.3 57.2 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 20.0 81.5 4.0 70.8 0.0 20.7 50.3 0.0 -60.4 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 107.8 9.6 99.2 16.4 28.8 59.3 3.8 #98.1 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 392 1544 246 743 827 290 513 568 739 564 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.64 0.18 0.60 0.44 0.54 0.52 0.18 1.00 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3I 1'ss 15 T7.V- - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 980 490 80 460 275 180 Future Volume (vph) 980 490 80 460 275 180 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.070 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 127 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 522 212 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1065 533 86 495 324 212 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1065 533 86 495 324 212 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 11.0 68.0 22.0 22.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 54.2 54.2 64.0 63.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.71 0.70 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.97 0.44 Control Delay 36.6 2.4 12.4 6.4 80.7 7.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.6 2.4 12.4 6.4 80.7 7.8 LOS D A B A F A Approach Delay 25.2 7.3 51.9 Approach LOS C A D Queue Length 50th (m) 155.0 0.7 3.5 27.3 51.7 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #243.2 12.2 11.6 40.6 #89.3 13.4 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1122 1161 214 1332 334 484 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.97 0.44 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 26.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd l�- 1 1575 r•` � MOM 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.1 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1120 470 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1120 470 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1244 511 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 533 0 0 1978 522 Stage 1 - - - 522 - Stage 2 - 1456 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1035 68 555 Stage 1 - 595 - Stage 2 - 214 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1035 61 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 61 - Stage 1 534 Stage 2 214 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 35.5 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1035 203 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.102 0.431 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 35.5 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 061.11 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 No Build PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 1110 0 0 475 10 0 0 0 10 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 20 1110 0 0 475 10 0 0 0 10 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 1207 0 0 516 11 0 0 0 11 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 527 0 0 1207 0 0 1781 1778 1207 1773 1773 522 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1251 1251 - 522 522 - Stage 2 - - 530 527 - 1251 1251 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 578 64 82 223 65 83 555 Stage 1 - - 211 244 - 538 531 - Stage 2 - - 533 528 - 211 244 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 578 59 77 223 62 78 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 59 77 - 62 78 - Stage 1 197 228 504 531 Stage 2 517 528 197 228 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 0 38.9 HCM LOS A E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1040 578 133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - 0.204 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 8.5 0 0 38.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - 0 0.7 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 0616.1 APPENDIX E Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build C�« ['1110] Appendices 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.079 0.491 0.174 0.541 Satd. Flow (perm) 160 3439 0 925 1946 1583 317 1883 1742 1998 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 52 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 12.0 50.0 50.0 12.0 36.0 36.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 58.8 51.7 58.4 51.5 51.5 32.4 24.4 24.4 32.4 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.47 0.53 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.12 0.94 0.43 0.91 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.83 Control Delay 20.3 17.3 12.8 49.4 3.7 77.3 39.4 2.0 26.7 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.3 17.3 12.8 49.4 3.7 77.3 39.4 2.0 26.7 52.8 LOS C B B D A E D A C D Approach Delay 17.8 33.4 47.1 42.3 Approach LOS B C D D Queue Length 50th (m) 7.6 22.8 5.7 -168.0 0.0 23.7 31.5 0.0 17.7 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 17.7 35.4 12.8 #259.3 16.7 #36.3 42.3 0.6 23.8 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 206 1642 548 910 959 183 513 568 685 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.43 0.25 0.12 0.94 0.43 0.91 0.36 0.14 0.36 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HQ 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd i2 - 50 S L2 S E. 5 436 f 4 1,- T 58 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.437 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 796 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 13.0 41.0 19.0 19.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.4 23.4 36.8 35.8 14.2 14.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.61 0.60 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.43 0.37 0.88 0.85 0.17 Control Delay 15.8 3.5 7.0 21.7 44.4 6.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 3.5 7.0 21.7 44.4 6.6 LOS B A A C D A Approach Delay 9.2 19.0 37.7 Approach LOS A B D Queue Length 50th (m) 22.1 0.0 8.6 73.1 34.8 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.8 9.2 15.9 #149.5 #72.3 7.7 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 730 836 628 1145 422 452 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.87 0.85 0.17 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd i 5 1 1285 t ai [30] 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C[iLl 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 13.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 270 20 15 1020 5 85 0 10 10 0 25 Future Vol, veh/h 10 270 20 15 1020 5 85 0 10 10 0 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 293 22 16 1109 5 92 0 11 11 0 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1114 0 0 315 0 0 1483 1472 304 1476 1481 1112 Stage 1 - - - - - - 326 326 - 1144 1144 - Stage 2 - - 1157 1146 - 332 337 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1245 103 127 736 104 125 254 Stage 1 - - 687 648 - 243 275 - Stage 2 - - 239 274 - 681 641 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 627 1245 — 88 120 736 98 118 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - — 88 120 - 98 118 - Stage 1 673 634 238 266 Stage 2 206 265 657 628 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.1 190.8 31.2 HCM LOS F D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 97 627 1245 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.065 0.017 0.013 0.217 HCM Control Delay (s) 190.8 10.8 0 7.9 0 31.2 HCM Lane LOS F B A A A D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 6.6 0.1 0 0.8 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 [360 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-08-2022 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t + r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 1946 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.266 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 540 3514 0 309 1946 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.68 0.21 0.62 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 20.2 28.9 15.6 32.3 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.2 28.9 15.6 32.3 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS C C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.5 19.7 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 72.8 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 102.3 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 393 1490 234 743 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.68 0.21 0.61 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 40.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C[iZ.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd D4 ;.s 48 4 is s SIe. 07 #s CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' + Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 1904 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.070 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 127 1904 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 505 202 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 11.0 69.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 53.1 53.1 62.7 61.7 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.71 0.70 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.46 0.44 0.39 1.00 0.48 Control Delay 47.5 2.5 14.3 6.2 90.1 10.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.5 2.5 14.3 6.2 90.1 10.5 LOS D A B A F B Approach Delay 33.0 7.5 57.5 Approach LOS C A E Queue Length 50th (m) -194.6 1.7 3.8 27.6 -55.8 3.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #262.2 13.1 13.9 41.0 #92.6 17.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 739.2 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1127 1157 218 1391 323 467 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.00 0.46 0.44 0.37 1.00 0.48 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 87.8 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Hfi-,] 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd l i s1 156 2 69 s CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 4 C[i16.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HK 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes 4: Proposed Development/1429 Loch Lomond Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-08-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 1110 70 15 475 10 35 0 20 10 0 15 Future Vol, veh/h 20 1110 70 15 475 10 35 0 20 10 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 1207 76 16 516 11 38 0 22 11 0 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 527 0 0 1283 0 0 1851 1848 1245 1854 1881 522 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1289 1289 - 554 554 - Stage 2 - - 562 559 - 1300 1327 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 541 57 75 212 57 71 555 Stage 1 - - 201 234 - 517 514 - Stage 2 - - 512 511 - 198 225 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1040 541 50 66 212 47 63 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 50 66 - 47 63 - Stage 1 186 216 478 492 Stage 2 476 490 164 208 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 172.9 51.4 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 69 1040 541 104 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.866 0.021 0.03 0.261 HCM Control Delay (s) 172.9 8.5 0 11.9 0 51.4 HCM Lane LOS F A A B A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 1 CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Cis 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 20 15 1045 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 20 15 1045 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 22 16 1136 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 315 0 1472 304 Stage 1 - - - - 304 - Stage 2 - 1168 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 140 736 Stage 1 - 748 - Stage 2 - 296 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1245 135 736 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 135 - Stage 1 748 Stage 2 286 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 72 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 148 1245 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.698 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 72 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 111K 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1110 70 15 475 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1110 70 15 475 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1207 76 16 516 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1283 0 1793 1245 Stage 1 - - - - 1245 - Stage 2 - 548 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 541 89 212 Stage 1 - 271 - Stage 2 - 579 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 541 85 212 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 85 - Stage 1 271 Stage 2 555 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 72.3 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 109 541 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.548 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 72.3 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.1 - CBCL - DC Synchro 11 Report Page 1 APPENDIX F Synchro Analysis Reports - Construction Phasing «011 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2024 Phase 1 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-22-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'fir 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 250 5 5 930 15 5 Future Vol, veh/h 250 5 5 930 15 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 272 5 5 1011 16 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 277 0 1296 275 Stage 1 - - - - 275 - Stage 2 - 1021 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1286 179 764 Stage 1 - 771 - Stage 2 - 348 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1286 177 764 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 177 - Stage 1 771 Stage 2 345 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 23.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 219 1286 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 23.2 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 415 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2024 Phase 1 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1005 15 5 435 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 1005 15 5 435 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1092 16 5 473 11 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1108 0 1583 1100 Stage 1 - - - - 1100 - Stage 2 - 483 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 630 120 258 Stage 1 - 319 - Stage 2 - 620 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 630 119 258 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 119 - Stage 1 319 Stage 2 613 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 32.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 145 630 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.9 10.8 0 HCM Lane LOS D B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C1i[.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2026 Phase 2 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 255 10 5 955 30 5 Future Vol, veh/h 255 10 5 955 30 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 277 11 5 1038 33 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 288 0 1331 283 Stage 1 - - - - 283 - Stage 2 - 1048 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1274 170 756 Stage 1 - 765 - Stage 2 - 338 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1274 168 756 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 168 - Stage 1 765 Stage 2 335 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 28.8 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 189 1274 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.201 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 28.8 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 111r1A 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2026 Phase 2 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.6 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1035 25 5 445 15 10 Future Vol, veh/h 1035 25 5 445 15 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1125 27 5 484 16 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1152 0 1633 1139 Stage 1 - - - - 1139 - Stage 2 - 494 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 606 111 245 Stage 1 - 305 - Stage 2 - 613 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 606 110 245 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 110 - Stage 1 305 Stage 2 606 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 36.5 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 141 606 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 36.5 11 0 HCM Lane LOS E B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C1F-11 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2027 Phase 3 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 260 10 10 970 45 5 Future Vol, veh/h 260 10 10 970 45 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 283 11 11 1054 49 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 294 0 1365 289 Stage 1 - - - - 289 - Stage 2 - 1076 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1268 162 750 Stage 1 - 760 - Stage 2 - 327 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1268 159 750 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 159 - Stage 1 760 Stage 2 320 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 35.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 173 1268 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.314 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 35.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C1i&67 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2027 Phase 3 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.9 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1050 35 10 455 20 10 Future Vol, veh/h 1050 35 10 455 20 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1141 38 11 495 22 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1179 0 1677 1160 Stage 1 - - - - 1160 - Stage 2 - 517 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 592 105 238 Stage 1 - 298 - Stage 2 - 598 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 592 102 238 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 102 - Stage 1 298 Stage 2 582 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 43.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 126 592 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 43.3 11.2 0 HCM Lane LOS E B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 11K91 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2029 Phase 4 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-21-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'fir 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 16 11 1087 60 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 309 0 1410 301 Stage 1 - - - - 301 - Stage 2 - 1109 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 153 739 Stage 1 - 751 - Stage 2 - 316 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 150 739 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 150 - Stage 1 751 Stage 2 309 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 171 1252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.413 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 40.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 421 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2029 Phase 4 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.3 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1080 45 10 465 25 15 Future Vol, veh/h 1080 45 10 465 25 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1174 49 11 505 27 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1223 0 1726 1199 Stage 1 - - - - 1199 - Stage 2 - 527 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 98 226 Stage 1 - 286 - Stage 2 - 592 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 570 95 226 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 95 - Stage 1 286 Stage 2 576 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 50.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 121 570 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.359 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 50.6 11.4 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 CPA 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2030 Phase 5 AM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Future Vol, veh/h 270 15 10 1000 55 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 293 16 11 1087 60 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 309 0 1410 301 Stage 1 - - - - 301 - Stage 2 - 1109 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 153 739 Stage 1 - 751 - Stage 2 - 316 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1252 150 739 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 150 - Stage 1 751 Stage 2 309 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 171 1252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.413 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 40.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 0 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Cy491 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2030 Phase 5 PM - Separated Driveways 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-20-2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1100 60 10 475 30 15 Future Vol, veh/h 1100 60 10 475 30 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1196 65 11 516 33 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1261 0 1767 1229 Stage 1 - - - - 1229 - Stage 2 - 538 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 92 217 Stage 1 - 276 - Stage 2 - 585 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 551 89 217 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 89 - Stage 1 276 Stage 2 569 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 60.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 111 551 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.441 0.02 HCM Control Delay (s) 60.8 11.7 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.1 - CBCL-BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 APPENDIX G Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis «,R City of Saint John - Traffic Signal & Pedestrian Signal Head Warrant Analysis 1 2 Main Street (name) Loch Lomond Road Direction (EW or NS) 7NS Road Authority: Side Street(name) Civic 1440 Direction(EW or NS) City: Quadrant/ Int# 4 Comments 2032 Build Conditions Analysis Date: for Warrant Calculadon CHECKSHEET Count Date: Results, please hit'Page Date Entry Format: Down' Lane Coafiguradon 11 Loch Lomovd Rood WB 1 920 1 12 Loch Lomovd Rood EB 1 1 13 Civic 1440 NB 1 1 14 Civic 1440 SB 0 ngvlmms slgvaleonlry lmpeaea oy mrougvmovemev" Iyvl 16 1] Arethe Loch Lomovd Road WBrightNmssigvific.tlyimpededbythroughmovemevts7 (y/v) 18 Are the Loch Lomovd Road EB right turns sigvific ly impeded by through movemmb? (y/v) Set Peak Hours Traffic Input Average 6-hour Peak Turning Movements 3] < WB Loch Lomond Rc EB F614 A z City of Saint John Saint John 2023 Dec 04, Mon 2022 Nov 22, Tue (=-mm-dd) Samradon Flow Default Rates(ifnotdefault) Samradon Flow (vphpl) Rates (vphpl) 11 Tum 1,610 Throw h 1,800 Right Tom 1 1,500 Demo ra hies Elem. schooVMobilit Challev ed /v smweo Com 11. /v thwv Peto school /v M'toAV2 ulotiov # H0,6H Cevhol Busivess District (y/v) ®a®a ®a®a ®aaa ®a®a ®aaa ®a®a ®a�a eaea WSIG = 1Cht0'v-v) / K1 + (F (Xv-p) L) / K21 x Ci W = 55 52 3 AKA 11NO APPENDIX H Synchro Analysis Reports - 2032 Build with Mitigation «xN 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.223 0.484 0.164 0.594 Satd. Flow (perm) 452 3439 0 912 3697 1583 299 1883 1742 2194 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 14.0 38.0 38.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.3 48.1 54.9 47.9 47.9 37.7 26.3 26.3 34.0 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.41 0.16 0.32 0.83 Control Delay 15.8 19.3 11.6 21.7 4.9 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 19.3 11.6 21.7 4.9 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 LOS B B B C A D D A C D Approach Delay 18.7 16.0 32.1 41.3 Approach LOS B B C D Queue Length 50th (m) 8.8 25.5 6.7 64.1 9.9 21.5 30.5 0.0 16.1 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.6 36.7 m12.8 76.0 21.3 #31.7 41.1 0.6 23.0 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 328 1533 514 1613 923 238 547 598 780 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 CK:3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd C, v< t� 4 mils S CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Cy4%7 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.408 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 743 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 11.0 33.0 22.0 22.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 18.5 18.5 30.7 29.7 15.3 15.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.56 0.54 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.51 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 13.3 3.5 9.3 9.6 27.0 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.3 3.5 9.3 9.6 27.0 5.0 LOS B A A A C A Approach Delay 8.1 9.6 23.1 Approach LOS A A C Queue Length 50th (m) 28.1 0.0 10.0 29.1 28.0 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 24.5 0.0 19.2 42.3 49.3 6.5 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 625 767 543 1952 547 564 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.51 0.65 0.14 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 42 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.72 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd -k-, t 33 � CBCL - BLM Page 3 1119191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 C191iI 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 304 22 16 1114 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 326 0 1461 315 Stage 1 - - - - 315 - Stage 2 - 1146 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 142 725 Stage 1 - 740 - Stage 2 - 303 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 137 725 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 137 - Stage 1 740 Stage 2 293 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 70 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 150 1234 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.688 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 70 8 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 1119% 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.397 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 805 3514 0 309 3697 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS B C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.0 15.9 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 33.4 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 44.6 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1490 234 1412 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.32 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Htic3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3II ,�s ; r # 03 1'ss7 15 T7.V- - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.068 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 124 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 505 202 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Prot pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 Total Split (s) 58.0 58.0 11.0 69.0 21.0 21.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.2 55.2 65.0 64.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.72 0.71 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.46 0.45 0.20 1.03 0.49 Control Delay 44.1 2.5 15.1 4.6 97.8 10.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.1 2.5 15.1 4.6 97.8 10.6 LOS D A B A F B Approach Delay 30.8 6.3 62.2 Approach LOS C A E Queue Length 50th (m) -194.6 1.7 3.8 12.3 -55.8 3.0 Queue Length 95th (m) #262.2 13.1 14.3 17.0 #92.6 17.3 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1142 1165 214 2572 314 460 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.99 0.46 0.45 0.20 1.03 0.49 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 3 1119191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 4 C1Ci.1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.5 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1217 76 16 527 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1293 0 1814 1255 Stage 1 - - - - 1255 - Stage 2 - 559 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 86 209 Stage 1 - 268 - Stage 2 - 572 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 82 209 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 82 - Stage 1 268 Stage 2 548 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 77.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 105 536 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 77.2 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Ucf:3 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Future Volume (vph) 80 275 95 65 830 400 135 150 65 220 190 140 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3439 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1918 0 Flt Permitted 0.223 0.484 0.164 0.594 Satd. Flow (perm) 452 3439 0 912 3697 1583 299 1883 1742 2194 1918 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 412 129 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 306 106 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 216 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 412 0 67 856 412 167 185 80 250 375 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 14.0 38.0 38.0 12.0 36.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.3 48.1 54.9 47.9 47.9 37.7 26.3 26.3 34.0 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.50 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.41 0.16 0.32 0.83 Control Delay 15.8 19.3 14.4 26.0 4.0 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.8 19.3 14.4 26.0 4.0 41.0 37.1 1.8 24.1 52.8 LOS B B B C A D D A C D Approach Delay 18.7 18.6 32.1 41.3 Approach LOS B B C D Queue Length 50th (m) 8.8 25.5 6.5 71.0 0.0 21.5 30.5 0.0 16.1 64.8 Queue Length 95th (m) 16.6 36.7 13.4 89.2 17.2 #31.7 41.1 0.6 23.0 87.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 328 1533 514 1613 923 238 547 598 780 547 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.53 0.45 0.70 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.69 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd , 1 � R•. 1- i�s ;85 12 U38 HCR� 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Future Volume (vph) 255 295 215 945 325 70 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.432 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 787 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 355 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 355 226 995 357 77 Turn Type NA Perm pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases = 2 6 Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 11.0 27.0 18.0 18.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 13.8 23.6 22.6 12.4 12.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.52 0.50 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.28 0.49 0.41 0.55 0.73 0.15 Control Delay 14.4 4.9 8.6 9.4 25.7 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 14.4 4.9 8.6 9.4 25.7 4.8 LOS B A A A C A Approach Delay 9.3 9.2 22.0 Approach LOS A A C Queue Length 50th (m) 9.6 0.0 8.1 23.8 22.6 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 15.4 10.4 16.3 35.9 #50.5 5.9 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 100.0 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1084 731 558 1815 512 533 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.49 0.41 0.55 0.70 0.14 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 45 Actuated Cycle Length: 45 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 16s i t�s r� CEK 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 7.7 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Future Vol, veh/h 30 285 1105 20 20 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 89 89 87 87 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 320 1270 23 27 120 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1293 0 0 1670 1282 Stage 1 - - - 1282 - Stage 2 - 388 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 106 202 Stage 1 - 260 - Stage 2 - 686 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 99 202 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 99 - Stage 1 244 Stage 2 686 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 91.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 536 170 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.863 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 91.1 HCM Lane LOS B F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 6.1 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 CEI 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build AM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Future Vol, veh/h 280 20 15 1025 85 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 304 22 16 1114 92 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 326 0 1461 315 Stage 1 - - - - 315 - Stage 2 - 1146 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 142 725 Stage 1 - 740 - Stage 2 - 303 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1234 137 725 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 137 - Stage 1 740 Stage 2 293 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 70 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 150 1234 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.688 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 70 8 0 HCM Lane LOS F A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 CEK 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd --1. .4--- t 1I12-05-2023 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t tt r ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Future Volume (vph) 195 870 115 45 410 325 125 215 90 640 170 120 Satd. Flow (prot) 1927 3514 0 1789 3697 1583 1730 1883 1742 3509 1922 0 Flt Permitted 0.397 0.164 0.355 0.277 Satd. Flow (perm) 805 3514 0 309 3697 1583 647 1883 1742 1023 1922 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 129 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 897 119 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 202 143 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1016 0 50 456 361 156 269 113 762 345 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 4 4 8 Total Split (s) 12.0 48.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 13.0 36.0 36.0 14.0 37.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.4 46.4 49.5 41.4 41.4 32.3 22.1 22.1 40.5 27.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.56 0.71 0.25 1.07 0.68 Control Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.4 28.9 15.6 25.1 4.2 32.0 51.0 5.6 85.8 41.4 LOS B C B C A C D A F D Approach Delay 27.0 15.9 36.0 72.0 Approach LOS C B D E Queue Length 50th (m) 19.8 84.1 4.6 33.4 0.0 20.9 49.7 0.0 -68.9 59.3 Queue Length 95th (m) 34.0 111.8 10.6 44.6 16.4 28.8 59.3 6.0 #103.3 74.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 217.2 620.4 296.1 157.8 Turn Bay Length (m) 78.0 100.0 160.0 70.0 40.0 Base Capacity (vph) 503 1490 234 1412 827 281 513 568 711 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.21 0.32 0.44 0.56 0.52 0.20 1.07 0.61 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 CE191 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Splits and Phases: 1: Champlain Dr/McAllister Dr & Loch Lomond Rd ;.a 48{ ias 3II ,�s ; r # 03 1'ss7 15 T7.V- - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 2: Hickey Rd & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 -4. '4- Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ft r ' tt Vii r Traffic Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Future Volume (vph) 1040 490 90 480 275 190 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1730 3618 1770 1654 Flt Permitted 0.133 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 242 3618 1770 1654 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 533 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1130 533 97 516 324 224 Turn Type NA Prot pm+pt NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 11.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Act Effct Green (s) 26.9 26.9 36.7 35.7 14.3 14.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.61 0.60 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.53 0.30 0.24 0.77 0.40 Control Delay 18.0 3.6 7.6 6.3 35.5 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.0 3.6 7.6 6.3 35.5 5.5 LOS B A A A D A Approach Delay 13.4 6.5 23.2 Approach LOS B A C Queue Length 50th (m) 50.9 0.0 3.6 11.6 30.1 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 71.3 14.2 7.9 17.6 #54.2 10.6 Internal Link Dist (m) 620.4 444.9 269.7 Turn Bay Length (m) 100.0 130.0 120.0 Base Capacity (vph) 1586 1004 321 2152 442 581 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.53 0.30 0.24 0.73 0.39 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2: Hickev Rd & Loch Lomond Rd y s 29 € -n . C��'7 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 3: Loch Lomond Rd & Bon Accord Dr 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.3 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Vii + 1G Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Future Vol, veh/h 95 1185 500 20 15 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 92 92 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 106 1317 543 22 19 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 565 0 0 2083 554 Stage 1 - - - 554 - Stage 2 - 1529 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 58 532 Stage 1 - 575 - Stage 2 - 197 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1007 52 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 52 - Stage 1 515 Stage 2 197 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 43 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1007 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.489 HCM Control Delay (s) 9 43 HCM Lane LOS A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.4 CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 222939.02 Loch Lomond Estates TIS 2032 Build PM Volumes - Added WB/EB Lane 4: Proposed Development & Loch Lomond Rd 12-05-2023 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 2.5 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Future Vol, veh/h 1120 70 15 485 35 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1217 76 16 527 38 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1293 0 1814 1255 Stage 1 - - - - 1255 - Stage 2 - 559 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 536 86 209 Stage 1 - 268 - Stage 2 - 572 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 82 209 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 82 - Stage 1 268 Stage 2 548 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 77.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 105 536 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 77.2 11.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.7 0.1 - CBCL - BLM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 MINA Proposed Municipal Plan Amendment and Zoning By -Law Amendement RE: 1440 Loch Lomond Road Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to consider amending The City of Saint John Municipal Development Plan and Zoning By -Law at its regular meeting to be held in the Council Chambers on Monday, February 5, 2024, at 6:30 p.m., by: 1. Redesignating on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area, as illustrated below. 2. Redesignating on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential, as illustrated below. 3. Rezoning a parcel of land having an approximate area of 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) as illustrated below. 4. Rezoning a parcel of land having an approximate area of 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM) as illustrated below. CEIE:3 REASON FOR CHANGE: To permit a residential development. For details on how to inspect the amendment, or to register to participate, please contact the Office of the Common Clerk at CommonClerk(a)saintiohn.ca. Written objections to the amendment may be provided in writing and/or verbally at the Public Hearing to be held by Common Council. To register for participation in the hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office in advance at commonclerka-saintiohn.ca Written objections to the amendment may be sent to the undersigned at City Hall. If you require French services for a Common Council meeting, please contact the office of the Common Clerk. Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk (506) 658-2862 CM] Projet de modification du plan municipal et I'arrete de zonage Objet : 1440 rue Loch Lomond Par les presentes, un avis public est donne que le conseil municipal de la ville de Saint John a ('intention d'envisager de modifier le plan d'amenagement municipal et I'arrete de zonage de la ville de Saint John Tors de sa reunion ordinaire qui se tiendra dans la salle du conseil le lundi 5 fevrier 2024, a 18h30, par: 1. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 3,68 hectares, situee au 1440, rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme NID 55094981, qui passera de Reserve urbaine a Secteur stable, comme illustre ci-dessous; 2. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 3,68 hectares, situe au 1440, rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme NID 55094981, qui passera de Reserve urbaine a Secteur residentiel stable, comme illustre ci-dessous. 3. Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 3,68 hectares, situee au 1440 rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme NID 55094981, de Zone d'amenagement futur (FD) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM), tel qu'illustre ci- dessous. 4. Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 6,42 hectares, situee au 1440 rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 00313031, de Zone residentielle bifamiliale (R2) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM), tel qu'illustre ci- dessous. MII (III i RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION: Pour permettre un developpement residentiel. Pour plus de details sur la fagon d'inspecter la modification ou pour vous inscrire pour participer, veuillez contacter le Bureau du greffier commun a CommonClerk@saintjohn.ca. Les objections ecrites a la modification peuvent titre fournies par ecrit et/ou verbalement lors de I'audience publique qui sera tenue par le conseil municipal. Pour vous inscrire a I'audience, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier municipal a I'avance a commonclerk@saintjohn.ca Veuillez faire part de vos objections au projet de modification par ecrit a I'attention du soussigne a ('hotel de ville. Si vous avez besoin des services en frangais pour une reunion de Conseil Communal, veuillez contacter le bureau du greffier communal. Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal (506) 658-2862 BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 106-xx A LAW TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL PLAN BY-LAW Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: The Municipal Plan By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the 30th day of January, A.D. 2012 is amended by: 1 Amending Schedule A — City Structure, by redesignating a parcel of land with an area of approximately 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Area classification; 2 Amending Schedule B — Future Land Use, by redesignating a parcel of land with an area of approximately 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Urban Reserve to Stable Residential; - all as shown on the plans attached hereto and forming part of this by-law IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the * day of *, A.D. 2024 and signed by: ARRETE MODIFIANT VARRETE RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL ARRETE No C.P. 106-xx Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a 6dict6 cc qui suit: L'arr&6 concernant le plan municipal de The City of Saint John decrete le 30 janvier 2012 est modifie par: 1 La modification de Fannexe A — Structure de la municipalite, afin de faire passer la designation d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 3,68 hectares, situee au 1440, rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme NID 55094981, qui passera de Reserve urbaine a Secteur stable; 2 La modification de Fannexe B — Utilisation future des sols, afin de faire passer la designation d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 3,68 hectares, situe au 1440, rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme NID 55094981, qui passera de Reserve urbaine a Secteur residentiel stable; - toutes les modifications sont indiqu6es sur les plans ci joints et font partie du present arrete. EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arr6te le 2024, avec les signatures suivantes : Mayor City Clerk/Greffier communal First Reading - Premiere lecture - Second Reading - Deuxieme lecture - Third Reading - Troisieme lecture - I'M BY-LAW NUMBER C.P. 111-X ARRETE NO C.P. 111-X ARRETE A LAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BY- MODIFIANT L'ARRETE DE ZONAGE LAW DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRETE No C.P. 111-X Be it enacted by The City of Saint John in Common Council convened, as follows: Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John a decrete ce qui suit : The Zoning By-law of The City of Saint John enacted on the fifteenth day of L'arrete sur le zonage de The December, A.D. 2014, is amended by: City of Saint John, decrete le quinze (15) decembre 2014, est modifie par : 1. Rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 3.68 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as PID 55094981, from Future Development (FD) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 2. Rezoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 6.42 hectares, located at 1440 Loch Lomond Road, also identified as a portion of PID 00313031, from Two -Unit Residential (R2) to Mid -Rise Residential (RM). 1. Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 3.68 hectares, situee au 1440 rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme N I D 55094981, de Zone d'amenagement futur (FD) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM). 2. Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 6,42 hectares, situee au 1440 rue Loch Lomond, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 00313031, de Zone residentielle bifamiliale (R2) a Zone residentielle — Immeubles d'habitation de hauteur moyenne (RM). - all as shown on the plan attached - toutes les modifications sont hereto and forming part of this by-law. indiquees sur le plan ci-joint et font partie du present arrete. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John Common Seal of the said City to be affixed a fait apposer son sceau communal sur to this by-law the X day of X, A.D. 2024 and le present arrete le X 2024, avec les signed by: signatures suivantes : [3X Mayor/Maire Common Clerk/Greffier communal First Reading - X Premiere lecture - X Second Reading - X Deuxieme lecture - X Third Reading - X Troisieme lecture - X C�'il From: Trudy Hanley <hanle-V0001'1-tmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 9:09 AM To: OneStop <onestopQ',-0saint1ohn.ca> Subject: 1440 loch Lomond Rd. - Opposition to Development [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsamplesaintiohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Good morning; First off I would like to say that the lack of people in person speaking out against this development at PAC was not because people agree with this proposal it is because area residents did not know about the PAC meeting taking place. The city's email notification system happened to be down and a notification regarding the meeting was never sent out. There was also no information on the city facebook page regarding this either. There were no notifications indicating that the system would be or was down so why would anyone think to check the city website if they were unaware of any issues with receiving information. I would like to voice my opposition to this development Due to the already rezoned property at 1429 Loch Lomond Rd., the addition of this development is going to create a traffic and noise nightmare for the residents. Construction vehicles in and out of both developments and the noise now from 2 construction sites simultaneously. The development is too dense for the area and there is not enough housing diversity or affordable housing provided. The available land for this proposal, allows for an opportunity to create a more complete nelahbourhood with varied housing types for the needs of all people. We have seen in the recent past that affordable housing and a few townhomes are included and designed in such a way that they can easily be dropped after development approval and not provided. Municipal Plan - To p rovide and facilitate the development of quality and diverse housing to meet the needs of the changing demographics of the community, Where is the responsibility of the city and developers to ensure and provide this diversification and affordability so desperately needed. Where is the responsibility of the city to ensure that developers follow through with the approved plans and provide the diversification and affordability that was agreed to? I realise, through experiencel, that this development will no doubt be approved one way or another. had an idea that I wanted to present at PAC, regarding an alternate proposal that would provide more housing diversification. The proposed development has the potential to fill a great need within the city, to be an inclusive and integrated complete neighbourhood. Instead the proposal is not integrated and does not fulfill the need for diversification. You do not have to accept the proposal as provided. Changes must be made as these types of developments are not sustainable for the city. would also like clarification on the following: The proposed development is in a low lying area susceptible to possible flooding and wet soil conditions that may not support buildings of this size. 1. Was a Geotechnical Inspection done on this property? 2. What was the outcome in terms of soil stability? 3. Will there be a need for piles to support the buildings? 4. Would a reduced building size facilitate construction without the use of piles? If pile driving is required for this development, I would like to see limits placed on times of day for this work assuming there are no By -Law stipulations that are more stringent. • No earlier that 8:00 am weekdays • No later than 6:00 pm weekdays • No work on weekends or holidays Pile driving is a very loud and intrusive process and I do not want to be subject to this type of noise pollution on my weekends or in my evenings as I am sure the other area residents would agree. Alternate Development Option: C!!•7.1 Alternate Design Regards 4-0!� as,-� Trudy Hanley 1440 LOCH LOMOND RD. A —1 Level; (900-1000 MA.) B — 2 Level; (900-1800 sa ft j C — 3 Level; (1200-2400 sq.ft.) Mix of units for different demographics 38 Townhomes (Owned) Better traffic flow would allow for on demand bus circulation, school bus circulation and safety and easier access to community transit for the elderly. Why can't this development be a better planned neighbourhood. Placing the apartments at the back allows for a gradual flow of building heights and transitions. More homes of various sizes to accommodate a wider demographic. 11l7A -----Original Message ----- From: Gwenn Bartlett <gwennsiehotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 10:44 PM To: OneStop <onesto;pCa)saintohn.ca> Subject: 1440 Loch Lomond Rd. [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to sfiamsaml:lle! �,saintiohn.ca. or contact the IT Service Desk.** To the Mayor and Councillors of the city of Saint John: This is to voice our opposition to the development of the apartment buildings and townhouses proposed at 1440 Loch Lomond road. This development is much too large to be supported by the surrounding infrastructure. With a similar development proposed directly across the road at 1429 Loch Lomond road, the resulting traffic will be increased substantially to the already very busy flow that exists on this two lane highway. For those of us living in the Bon Accord subdivision, this is especially concerning given the fact that, at times, turning left is extremely difficult and dangerous. The construction of both of these developments will be very disturbing and noisy for those residents already living in the vicinity. And construction will take several years. We believe that the council has an obligation to ensure that existing homeowners are considered when new development is proposed. We don't think it's asking too much to consider how one would feel if faced with many years of disruptive noise, dirt, traffic problems, in and around their homes. These homeowners have chosen the area for its relative peace and quiet with added benefit of the proximity of amenities. We have paid our taxes. And now we ask for consideration. Please consider this carefully. The density of these developments is too much for this area. Sincerely, Chris and Gwenn Bartlett 223 Bon Accord Drive Sent from my iPhone -----Original Message ----- From: Beth Roy <bethro_yiam LmailLcom> Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 7:01 PMs To: OneStop <onestopr�saintiohn.ca> Subject: Housing development [ External Email Alert] **Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to sParnsamgle saintlohn.ca or contact the IT Service Desk.** Hello The housing development proposal for 1440 Loch Lomond rd has the same concerns as the development at 1429 LochLomond rd, traffic being the main one. The narrow, windy rd cannot accommodate any more traffic. The subdivision in the area will have a very difficult time trying to get out to the main road. Sidewalks are limited and the small elementary school in Lakewood Hgts does not have any more room. Please consider the congestion this will cause in the area and reconsider your approval of this project Thank you Beth & Don Roy 3 Roatan Way Sent from my iPhone 11We] PROPOSED MUNICIPAL PLAN AMENDMENT RE: 241 - 281 DOUGLAS AVENUE Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to consider an amendment to the Municipal Development Plan that would: Redesignate on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 2. Redesignate on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 3. Redesignate on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Area and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 4. Redesignate on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Area, and Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 5. Redesignate on Schedule A of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Stable Area; 6. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 584.42 square metres, located at 241 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379230, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 7. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 829.18 square metres, located at 247 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55172860, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 8. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 960.21 square metres, located at 249 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00379255, from Stable Residential and Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility; 9. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 115.88 square metres, located at 255 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 55222012, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 10. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 544.57 square metres, located at 261 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00377945, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 11. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 546.77 square metres, located at 263 Douglas Avenue, also identified as PID 00358481, from Stable Residential to Major Community Facility; 12. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 16,773.37 square metres, located at PID 00377937, from Stable Residential, Park and Natural Area and Major Community Facility to Major Community Facility; and 13. Redesignate on Schedule B of the Municipal Development Plan, land having an approximate area of 694 square metres, located at 281 Douglas Avenue, also identified as a portion of PID 55222129, from Park and Natural Area to Major Community Facility, as illustrated below. 1rr ,Iqy " A public presentation of the proposed amendment will take place at a regular meeting of Common Council, to be held in the Council Chamber at City Hall on Monday, February 5, 2024. REASON FOR CHANGE: To permit the expansion of a museum. 11N Written objections to the proposed amendment may be made to the Council, in care of the undersigned, by March 6, 2024. Enquiries may be made at the office of the Common Clerk or Growth & Community Services, City Hall, 15 Market Square, Saint John, N.B. between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, inclusive, holidays excepted. Jonathan Taylor, Common Clerk (506) 658-2862 UM PROJET DE MODIFICATION DU PLAN MUNICIPAL OBJET : 241-281, AVENUE DOUGLAS Par les presentes, un avis public est donne par lequel le conseil communal de ville de Saint John a ('intention d'etudier la modification du plan d'amenagement municipal comme suit: A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379230, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 2. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 3. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 4. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 00377937, qui passera de secteur stable et parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 5. A I'annexe A du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 55222129, qui passera de parc ou aire naturelle a secteur stable; 6. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 584,42 metres carres, situee au 241 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379230, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 7. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 829,18 metres carres, situee au 247 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 55172860, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 8. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 960,21 metres carres, situee au 249 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00379255, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable et parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 9. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 115,88 metres carres, situee au 255 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 55222012, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; I'D%] 10. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 544,57 metres carres, situee au 261 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00377945, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 11. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 546,77 metres carres, situee au 263 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme NID 00358481, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable a etablissements communautaires majeurs; 12. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 16773,37 metres carres, situee au NID 00377937, qui passera de secteur residentiel stable, parc ou aire naturelle et etablissements communautaires majeurs a etablissements communautaires majeurs; et 13. A I'annexe B du plan d'amenagement municipal, modifier la designation d'un terrain d'une superficie de 694 metres carres, situee au 281 Avenue Douglas, egalement identifie comme une partie de NID 55222129, qui passera de parc ou aire naturelle a etablissements communautaires majeurs comme illustre ci- dessous. Une presentation publique de la modification proposee aura lieu lors d'une reunion ordinaire du Conseil communal, qui aura lieu dans la salle du Conseil a I'hotel de ville, le lundi 5 fevrier 2024. RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION: Pour permettre I'agrand issement d'un musee. Les objections ecrites a la modification proposee peuvent titre presentees au Conseil, aux soins du soussigne, d'ici le 6 mars 2024. Les demandes de renseignements peuvent titre presentees au bureau du greffier communal ou aux Services de croissance et de developpement communautaire, Hotel de ville, 15, Market Square, Saint John (N.-B.), entre 8 h 30 et 18 h, du lundi au jeudi, inclusivement, jours feries exclus. Jonathan Taylor, greffier communal (506) 658-2862 DPie o eat ShD r Council Appllcatloo GROWTH & COMM'MTY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JOHN CIVIC ADDRESS 241, 247, 249, 261 & 263 Douglas Avenue APPLICATION # FEE PAID Y N TYPE OF APPLICATION ❑Land for Public Purposes Release Application Fee: $350 Section 59 Amendment Application Fee: $2,650 Non -Conforming Use �j Application Fee: $250 Zoning By-law Amendment Application Fee: $2.650 Satisfactory Servicing Application Fee: $350 QZoning By-law Amendment with Municipal Plan Amendment Application Fee: $3,700 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION Where applicable, indicate the changes to existing Section 59 conditions, zoning, or Municipal Plan designation being requested, Attach site plans, building elevations, floor plans, and other documentation to fully describe the application. The submission of a preliminary proposal and a Pre -Application Meeting is encouraged prior to seeking approval. Please contact the One Stop Development Shop at (506) 658-2911 or OneStop@saintjohn.ca for further information. Rezoning and municipal plan amendment as rewired for 5 residential properties undergoing strategic acquisition by the Province of NB (please see supporting materials for additional (NRM) and will facailate constri ictie)n of Me proposed mi. isei im addition The project will ret, 'rn the NBM to it's historic home of 277 Douglas Avenue (also Known as "Thee Provincial Museum" building) ENCUMBRANCES Describe any easements, restrictive covenants, and other encumbrances affecting the }and. The civic address 255 Douglas Avenue (PID 55222012) between 249 and 261 Douglas Avenue is awned by the .I n , am n n ancl nrovl es access to ari existing municioal services easement a lolnl ct trie rear Or Tne A private sewer easement is also present on the properly of 247 Douglas Avenue. AUTHORIZATION As of the date of this application, I, the undersigned, am the registered owner of the land described in this application or the authorized agent thereof, and I have examined the contents of this application and hereby certify that the information submitted with the application is correct insofar as l have knowledge of these fads, and I hereby authorize the applicant to represent this matter and to provide any additional inform ation,that Ai11 bo necessary for this ap �ication. F b��,,�� - See Supporting Materials Registered Owner or Authorized Agent Additional Registered owner Date Note: Consent has been received from each property owner. Signed consent letters are included within the documentation of this application. Date The information contained in this application and any documentation, including plans, drawings, reports, and studies, provided in support of this application will become part of the public record. Cwndl Application Form 2021 05 01 M ti N "v 1 l a ltil !{_: ti I [tl_"C rl xf' SMiNT OHN 0 Rol 11----ent Shope I I..:i. . [. l� t l .[ d C� i One5top@saintjohn.ca Phone:558-2911 Fax:632-6199 General Application Form GROWTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES CITY OF SAINT JC7HN LOCATION CIVIC ADDRESS : 241, 247, 249, 261 & 263 Douglas Avenue PI D # : Various (see supporting materials attached) w HERITAGE AREA: Y/ N INTENSIFICATION AREA: Y/ N FLOOD RISK AREA: Y f N APPROVED GRADING PLAN: Y I N LL APPLICATION 4C DATE RECEIVED: 'n RECEWED BY: APPLICANT EMAI L PHONE 506-W-2351 C MAI LING ADDRESS POSTALCODE 277 Douglas Avenue E2K 1 E5 CONTRACTOR EMAIL PHONE 0 NA I— MAILING ADDRESS POSTAL CDDE Z OWNER EMAIL PHONE CL Various (see supporting materials attached) MAI LING ADDRESS POSTAL CODE PRESENT USE: Residential PROPOSED USE: Museum BUILDING PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE HERITAGE C D INTERIOR RENOVAT10N ®NEW CONSTRUCTION VARIANCE ®STREETEXCAVATION �I H ERITAGE DEVELOP MENT 1-- �EXTEMOR RENOVATION [_]ACCESSORYBLDG 'PLANNING LETTER ❑ DRIVEWAY CULVERT ❑ HERITAGESIGN ❑AppIMN ©POOL �PACAPPLICATIQN �pRAINAGE HERITAGE IN FILL J DECK ❑ DEMOLITION COUNCIL APP 11 WATER & SEWERAGE ❑ HERITAGE DEMO x ®CHANGECrFUSE SIGN ❑SUBDIVISION OTHER �✓ OTHER u DMINIMUMSTANDARDS F—IOTHER Rezoning and municipal plan amendment as required for 5 residential properties undergoing strategic acquisition by the Province ovil Ice o N.- (please See Supporting material's foradditional Now Brunswick Ctrifermation). The properties will be eemsall ated with that oeetipied by The Museum (NEM) and will facilitate construction of the proposed museum addition- The pro-ject will W return the NSM to it's historic home of 277 Douglas Avenue (also known as "The Provincial ©Museum" building . F-1I consent to the City of Saint John sending to me commercial electronic messages, from time to time, regarding City initiatives and incentives. General Collection Statement This information is being collected in order for the City of Saint John to deliver an existing program / service: the collection is limited to that which is necessary to deliver the program f service. unless required to do so by law, the City of Saint John will not share your personal information with any third party without your express consent. The legal authority for collecting this information is to be found in the Municipalities Act and the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. For further information or questions regarding the collection of personal information, please contact the Access & Privacy officer: City Hall Building 15 Market square Saint F � John, NB E21- IES CommonCl erk@saintjohn.ca (506)65&-2862 1, the undersigned, hereby apply for the permitis) or approvalis), indicated above for the work described on plans, submissions and forms herewith submitted. This application includes all relevant documentation necessary for the applied for permit(s) or approvalls). I agree to comply with the plans, specificolions and further agree to comply with all relevant City By --laws and conditions Tosed. 467 diaML schm 384 Adelaide Street West, Suite 100 Toronto, ON M5V 1R7 t: 416 862 8800 1050 West Pender Street, Suite 2010 Vancouver, BC V6E 357 t. 604 674 0866 1776 Broadway, Suite 2200 New York NY 10019 t: 212 710 4329 www.dsai.ca info@a dsai.ca Jennifer Kirchner Manager, Community Planning / Gestionnaire, Service D'Urbanisme City of Saint John I Ville de Saint John Cell / Cellulaire: (506) 639-7933 January 10, 2024 New Brunswick Museum - Re -zoning, Municipal Plan Amendment & Heritage De -designation Request Dear Jennifer, We have been working with the Board of the New Brunswick Museum on the preliminary planning and design for the exciting new museum project to be located at the original Douglas Ave. site. Please find below an outline of the purpose and rationale for this re -zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation application. The outline includes project summary, proposed zoning, municipal plan amendment and heritage de -designation, site selection summary, design intent and community consultation strategy. Please find attached the following supporting documents and drawings: • List of properties forming application • Council Application • General Application • Consent letters from property owners • Request for heritage property de -designation • Parking Recommendations Report for the New Brunswick Museum • Traffic Impact Statement • Conceptual Sanitary & Water Demand • Site Plan • Site Plan — Demolished • Shadow Studies • Building Elevations* • Massing perspective* *Preliminary conceptual massing perspectives and elevations are included to indicate the general size, shape, and siting of the new museum. The design is being further developed and will integrate suggestions received during the Community Consultations sessions. Updated elevations and renderings will be provided as the design becomes more detailed. ERR] diam0ric Schmitt Project Summary The purpose of this planning application is to secure required re -zoning and Municipal Plan amendments for six (6) contiguous residential properties along Douglas Ave. Four (4) of the properties in question have reached an agreement for the transfer of ownership as part of a strategic acquisition of lands that will facilitate revitalization of the "Provincial Museum" building for the New Brunswick Museum (NBM). The other two (2) properties included in this application were previously acquired by The Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI). In addition to the rezoning and Municipal Plan amendments, this application also requests the removal of 241 Douglas Avenue from the Douglas Avenue Heritage Conservation Area. The properties included in this application will be consolidated with that of the Museum building (owned by the Province of New Brunswick) to form a single property and facilitate construction of the proposed addition to the existing Museum building. The design intent of the proposed addition will be presented in the following sections of this application to demonstrate alignment with the City of Saint John's growth and development goals and the Municipal Plan amendment process. The Museum's history in Saint John can be traced to the 1840's and is Canada's longest continuing museum facility. However, in 2022, the Market Square exhibition space (home of the NBM since 1996) was closed and there is presently no exhibits in operation until construction of the new facility has been completed. In January of last year, the NBM released a request for proposals for the design of a new facility to securely preserve and showcase New Brunswick's natural and cultural history. In early April 2023, it was announced Diamond Schmitt Architects (DSA) was selected to design the new facility. Since that time, the consultant team (DSA and EXP) has been diligently working toward breaking ground on the project; currently expected to begin in Spring 2024. The Archives & Research Library, Humanities & Natural History collection storage which has continued to operate from the Douglas Avenue "Provincial Museum" building has begun the process of relocating to a new off -site facility as the NBM prepares the building for the proposed renovation and addition. This significant project will not only stabilize the existing c.1930 building but return the museum to their original home as well. In doing so, securing the New Brunswick Museum's legacy for the next 100 years. Proposed Zoning and Municipal Plan Amendment The properties affected by this application are as follows: • 241 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379230) • 247 Douglas Ave. (PID 55172860) • 249 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379255) • 261 Douglas Ave. (PID 00377945) • 263 Douglas Ave. (PID 00358481) • 255 Douglas Ave. (PID 55222012) C[:1'7 diaML schm Rezoning This application requests rezoning the six (6) properties (noted above) from Mid -Rise Residential (RM) to Major Community Facility (CFM). Rezoning will facilitate land consolidation required to build a state-of-the-art addition on the existing "Provincial Museum" building. Please refer to supporting materials for additional information on the proposed design. Comparison of the existing zoning to the proposed is demonstrated in the chart below. Mid -Rise Residential (RM) Major Community Facility (CFM) FRONT YARD 6m 5m REAR YARD 6m 7.5m SIDE YARD 1.5-2.5M 7.5M (DEPENDING ON RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY) FLANKAGE YARD 3.5m 7.5M MAXIMUM BUILDING 1 1 M 24M HEIGHT The development scale associated with the CFM zone is not unprecedented along Douglas Avenue. Similar land use and scale of building have existed previously along the corridor (ie. King George School and the Observatory, St. Peters Church). The neighbouring "Provincial Museum" museum property is already zoned CFM, as is Harbourview High School. Municipal Plan Amendment In addition to the proposed rezoning, this application also requires a Municipal Plan amendment; reassigning the residential lands (six properties previously identified) to Major Community Facility use. This request is supported by several policies under the Plan. Context Per the Municipal Plan (the Plan), Douglas Avenue is a "character corridor," identified as a place for ongoing investment in quality streetscaping and urban design, character corridors strengthen the quality of place in significant areas of the city. This investment along Douglas Avenue intends to maintain quality of the public realm (as it relates to the heritage context), as well as attract high quality development in the adjacent intensification areas. In addition to being along an important character corridor, the properties affected by this application are also part of a stable M&H diaML schm residential area that adjoins a large natural area to the west and heavy industrial to the east. The residential land use along Douglas Avenue is punctuated by two (2) historic institutional uses (The NB Museum and Harbourview High School), also designated Major Community Facilities under the Municipal Plan. Supported Rationale As noted by the Plan, stable Areas are intended to grow and evolve through minor change. The proposed renovation and addition to the "Provincial Museum" building is simply expanding the existing land use along Douglas Avenue thus reinstating the New Brunswick Museum to its historic home. Per the requirements of the CFM land use, key development/urban design goals and policies of the Plan, the proposed design intends to: • Contribute positively to the neighbourhood through high quality development and design excellence. • Use landscape design strategies that will enhance the site/ public realm and buffer the proposed addition from neighbouring residences. • Provide a universally accessible facility with an enhanced pedestrian arrival experience as well as better connection to the broader public realm along Douglas Avenue a new street facing entrance. • Leverage the existing transit corridor along Douglas Avenue, as well as active recreation (bike lanes) and connection to the South - Central Peninsula via Harbour Passage offered by the choice of site. • Demonstrate respect for the existing "Provincial Museum" building via setbacks, street wall, architectural massing, and materiality. • Leveraging existing topography to minimize changes to the existing context (ie. natural drainage patterns, existing areas of conservation and natural areas). • Contribute to the NBM's commitment to the cultural heritage of New Brunswick by rehabilitating the existing "Provincial Museum" building. • Providing a dedicated bus/ delivery areas at the interior of the site to minimize visual and traffic impacts to the neighbourhood. Economic Prosperity Tourism is a vitally important driver of the local and regional economy. As a key cultural asset, the New Brunswick Museum is an attractive destination for visitors, and residents alike. Furthermore, not only do schools and children benefit from the educational programming available, but museum spaces are popular event spaces (for weddings, conferences, etc.). Investment in the new facility ensures the NBM is retained in Saint John while also enabling its continued growth and operational success. C1115AI diaML schm Major community facilities such as The New Brunswick Museum, contribute significantly to the quality of life, cultivating a strong sense of place and connection to history and our natural world. Moreover, a modern museum is more than space for a collection of objects, it provides a home for social engagement, education, culture, innovation, technology and more. Purpose built along Douglas Avenue almost 100 years ago, the residents of Saint John have never known the City without The New Brunswick Museum. The NBM site was strategically positioned at the top of Bentley Street, creating a view corridor between the site and Uptown. This project honors that 100 year old strategic decision, reinstalling the facility in its historic home. Request for De -designation — 241 Douglas Avenue Douglas Avenue is a broad tree lined street well known for the grand heritage homes that line it. They range in architectural style, however Italianate, Second Empire and Queen Anne are most prevalent. Constructed c.1881, the residence at 241 Douglas Avenue is an example of the vernacular Italianate style. The house is two storeys' tall and features a prominent entry tower massing with a pavilion style hipped roof at the top. Ornamentation on the street facing fapade is generally consistent with the Italianate style, while other ornamentation— is of a simplified character consistent with a vernacular interpretation of the Italianate style. The Italianate style was hugely popular during the late 19th century in Canada. The style today is ubiquitous to the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area, as well as the City's other heritage areas . By comparison, the existing "Provincial Museum," is a late example of Beaux-Arts style designed by H. Claire Mott (son of preeminent Saint John -based architect H.H. Mott). The Museum building is unquestionably his most notable project. Defining heritage value of a building is not solely based upon architectural analysis. It is a holistic exercise informed by place (context), condition, evolution over time, and most importantly to this case - past and current importance to its community. The public importance of a purpose-built museum building (that is also of substantive architectural value) cannot be understated. 241 Douglas Avenue is a good candidate for de -designation from the Douglas Avenue heritage conservation area when its heritage value is weighed against that of the Provincial Museum building, and the future public benefit having the NBM reinstated in its former home considered. Through a trade-off, the broader value (heritage and beyond) provided to the community by revitalizing the Provincial Museum building provides a sound argument for de -designation. diaML schm Site Selection Process A Site Selection process was completed in the summer of 2023 and resulted in the selection of the historic Douglas Avenue site. Over the past 180 years, the Museum has acted as a custodian of the natural and human history of New Brunswick and its surrounding regions. By revitalizing the existing building and preserving its unique character, the Museum stays true to its ethos while also enriching the new museum experience and preserving a piece of history for the Saint John and New Brunswick community. The selection of the new museum site on Douglas Ave was a result of a thorough analysis and consideration of fundamental criteria that were weighted to ensure the success of the museum. The criteria considered included urban design connectivity, community benefits, economic considerations, site servicing, municipal planning objectives, site capacity, archaeological sites etc. Ultimately, the Douglas Ave. site was chosen as its merits relating to funding, operational and architectural criteria superseded any other possible sites. The Douglas Ave. site allows for seamless integration of the site design with adjacent parks and urban reserves, offering a significant benefit to the community. Additionally, the site provides excellent connectivity to Uptown Saint John through existing transit, cycle, and pedestrian routes, including the Harbour Passage, aligning perfectly with the planning goals of the City of Saint John. One notable feature of the Douglas Ave site is the breathtaking views it offers. To the west, there are stunning views of the Saint John River, while to the east, views of uptown Saint John, the Saint John Harbour, and beyond to the Bay of Fundy. The selection of the Douglas Ave site ensures that these remarkable views will once again be accessible to the entire community. New Brunswick Museum Design Intent The new design of the New Brunswick Museum will not only serve as a home for the museum but also as a destination venue for all New Brunswickers. The Facility will be the home of the NBM for the next century and beyond. The new Museum will play a crucial role in providing a safe and secure location for provincial collections and museological functions while also providing vibrant new exhibitions and public spaces. The new museum will be a first -choice destination for both the community and visitors, it will not only benefit tourism but will also serve as an inspiration for all age groups, igniting their creativity and curiosity. Through the selection of the Douglas Ave location, the existing museum building will be revitalised, and its re -use will be prioritized to enhance its existing qualities. The original museum building built in 1934 will be restored and principally maintained, as well as the south fapade of the King George Hall. The presence of the existing front steps will be retained and enhanced as a public benefit, while the placement of a new entrance will reveal the diaML schm inherent architectural qualities of the existing building. The design approach will embrace the heritage of the original museum building while providing a contemporary addition that will meet the current and future needs of the museum. The integration of the facility into the landscape will be done sensitively, ensuring a harmonious relationship between the exterior elements of the site and the interior public space. The design will also prioritize the creation of inviting and accessible places and streetscapes. Safety, comfort, and enjoyment of the public realm will be enhanced, allowing for year-round interaction and enjoyment. The views, both at grade and from the rooftop terrace will offer visitors an experience, showcasing the Saint John River and harbor views. The new museum will respect and reinforce the existing and planned context in which it is located. This will be achieved through appropriate setbacks, landscaping, building entrance, massing, architectural style, and building materials. By doing so, the design will seamlessly integrate into the surrounding neighborhood and enhance the physical character of the area. The new addition to the Douglas Ave building will be sited to avoid any identified archaeological sites and it will avoid any encroachment on the Victoria Square Park. The new frontage will be articulated and setback from the street with consideration for the existing streetscape proportions and rhythm. Site services, loading and large group arrivals will be done seamlessly and discreetly on the north side of the museum, screened to mitigate disruption to Douglas Avenue streetscape. The new museum building will seek to embrace its existing context while offering a contemporary perspective. Through an inviting design, commitment to sustainability, and integration with the public realm, the museum will be an inspiring landmark that enhances the public experience and fosters a sense of community and connection. Community Consultations The community consultation strategy aims to foster local and Province -wide interest and enthusiasm for the new facility. The first round of community consultation sessions took place between September 9th and 28th, 2023. The Board of Directors of the New Brunswick Museum and the project design team engaged in sessions that took place in locations across the province and on Zoom, ensuring accessibility for as many individuals as possible. The locations included Saint John, Fredericton, Edmundston, Campbellton, Bathurst, Caraquet, Miramichi, Moncton, Province -wide Zoom. The goal was to provide an opportunity for citizens across New Brunswick to voice their opinions and contribute to the future of the NBM. The consultation sessions provided an opportunity for individuals to share their perspectives and contribute to the decision -making process. During the sessions participants engaged in interactive discussions, shared their ideas, and learned more about the project's overall mission and preliminary design concepts for the revitalized museum. The discussions were centered CAL! diamonu achmitt around crucial aspects such as the history and key characteristics of the site, urban design, community building elements, the relationship of museum interior spaces to the landscape and views, feature elements, materials, as well as public art. A community consultation summary report is being prepared and will be provided to the City, to accompany this planning application. C1FN'7 diaML schm Properties Forming/ Pertaining to the Application 241 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379230) *See letter of consent attached 247 Douglas Ave. (PID 55172860) *See letter of consent attached 249 Douglas Ave. (PID 00379255) *See letter of consent attached 261 Douglas Ave. (PID 00377945) *See letter of consent attached 263 Douglas Ave. (PID 00358481) *See letter of consent attached 255 Douglas Ave. (PID 55222012) 11VV 0 e� £s 25 m H ;�ex �.. r o m v O N` O a E E E _ 0 C.w O.m E CD E Y < s z a O � 0 m moa y Q M o w J ui N Y/ as 0 - - 7 000 = i co 0 ry ry z iU- �o O i` oil Di of I Z 0 w w w o 3 , ZZ2J 51T]ng-dSO HD2V-0101 /LZ2J010 EZ//—G-Po]1V A BY-LAW TO AMEND A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE TRAFFIC ON STREETS IN THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, BY-LAW NUMBER MV-10.1, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE RELATIF A LA CIRCULATION DANS LES RUES DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, ARRETE NUMERO MV-10.1, ET MODIFICATIONS AFFERENTES Be it enacted by the Common Council of Lors d'une reunion du conseil municipal, The City of Saint John as follows: The City of Saint John a decrete ce qui suit : A By-law of The City of Saint John entitled "A By-law respecting the Traffic On Streets in The City of Saint John, By-law Number MV-10.1" and amendments thereto, enacted on the 7m day of October, A.D. 2019, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Schedule "L-2" — 40 km/h Speed Limits is amended by adding the following words under the following headings: Street Limits McNamara Entire Length Drive IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the day of , A.D., 2024 signed by: Par les presentes, 1' arrete de The City of Saint John intitule « Arrete relatif a la circulation dans les rues de The City of Saint John, Arrete numero MV-10.1 » et modifications afferentes, decrete le 7e jour d'octobre 2019, est modifie comme suit: 1. L'annexe « L-2 » — Vitesses Maximales Autorisees de 40 km/h est modifiee par 1' adj onction des mots suivants sous les titres suivants : Rue Limites Promenade sur toute sa McNamara longueur EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau municipal sur le present arrete le 2024, avec les signatures suivantes : Mayor / maire City Clerk / greffier de la municipalite First Reading - January 22, 2024 Premiere lecture Second Reading - January 22, 2024 Deuxieme lecture Third Reading - Troisieme lecture - le 22 janvier 2024 - le 22 janvier 2024 [3-,X BY-LAW NO. M-12 A BY-LAW TO AMEND A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE REGULATION AND LICENSING OF OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF VEHICLES FOR HIRE IN THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN ARRETE NUMERO M-12 ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE PORTANT REGLEMENTATION DES ACTIVITES DES PROPRIETAIRES ET EXPLOITANTS DE VEHICULES DE LOCATION ET DE L'OCTROI DE PERMIS AUX PROPRIETAIRES ET EXPLOITANTS DE VEHICULES DE LOCATION DANS THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN Be it enacted by the Common Council of Lors d'une reunion du conseil communal, The City of Saint John as follows: The City of Saint John a decrete cc qui suit: A By-law of The City of Saint John entitled "A By-law Respecting the Regulation and Licensing of Owners and Operators of Vehicles for Hire in the City of Saint John", enacted on the 30' day of July, A.D. 2018, is hereby amended as follows: 1 Section 10(1)(i) paragraph (iii) is repealed and replaced with the following: "in 2020 and all subsequent years, ten (10) years old or newer;" IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John has caused the Corporate Common Seal of the said City to be affixed to this by-law the day of , A.D. 2024 and signed by: Par les presentes, Farrete de The City of Saint John intitule « Arrete portant reglementation des activites des proprietaires et exploitants de vehicules de location et de Foctroi de permis aux proprietaires et exploitants de vehicules de location dans The City of Saint John » , decrete le 30 juillet 2018, est modifie comme suit: 1. Le paragraphe 10(1)(i)(iii) est abroge et remplace par cc qui suit: en 2020, et pour tome annee subsequente, an plus dix (10) ans; EN FOI DE QUOI The City of Saint John a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le present arrete le 2024, avec les signatures suivantes Mayor / Maire City Clerk / Greffier de la municipalite First Reading Premiere lecture - Second Reading - Deuxieme lecture - Third Reading Troisieme lecture - 481 -: "Ah_Fr� real COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-025 Report Date January 17, 2024 Meeting Date January 22, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Vehicle for Hire By-law Change AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Kevin Loughery / Charles Freake Michael Hugenholtz / Ian MacKinnon J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council: a) Endorse a permanent adjustment to a ten (10) year age limit for a Taxicab. The age limit would move from eight (8) years to ten (10) years of age starting with 2015 vehicles. b) Request that the General Counsel's office make the appropriate changes, to the Vehicle for Hire By -Law. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2018, the Saint John Transit Commission, on behalf of the City of Saint John assumed responsibility of the day-to-day administration of the Vehicles for Hire By-law. As per the bylaw; "Each calendar year during the month of October, the Saint John Transit Commission shall issue a public notice to commence the annual review process respecting the rates prescribed for Taxicabs and Limousines in Schedule "B" to this By-law. Such notice shall state its purpose and provide to any interested party an open period of thirty (30) days within such interested parties may provide written submissions respecting whether schedule "B" should remain unchanged or be amended and, if the latter, identify what amendments would be in order together with supporting rationale." Schedule "B" relates to the provisions applicable to taxicabs and the metered rates in accordance with the parameters prescribed in this schedule to the By - Law. This year a submission was received, outside the above mandate, respecting the age of the vehicles during this process and the Transit Commission recommended it be brought forward to Common Council. Covid-19 has forced significant changes to all businesses across the world, including the taxi industry. As a result of these continued challenges, the age amendment is being suggested to help alleviate the negative impact on the taxi industry and provide some relief respecting the age of vehicles. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A REPORT Covid-19 has significantly impacted virtually every industry in the world, with many still reeling from its effects almost four years later, including the taxi industry. Factory shutdowns due to COVID-19 made for widespread shortages of parts, filtering down to a historic lack of finished vehicles for sale on dealer lots. Additionally, the costs of passenger vehicles have seen a significant increase with an uneasy equilibrium between supply and demand and long delivery times. Initially, semiconductors were in acutely short supply, a situation that impacted the availability of everything from iPhones to fridges and cars. Auto manufacturers focused on using these limited resources to produce larger, more expensive, and more profitable vehicles, instead of cheaper entry level sedans with lower margins. While the semiconductor shortage is subsiding, it is still affecting supply, and in the interim, the price of everything from copper and aluminum to rubber, steel and labour is sharply higher than previously. An opportunity exists whereby the Vehicle for Hire By-law could be amended to provide relief, because of these challenging times. The Vehicle for Hire By -Law has the following criteria that should be permanently adjusted: Section 10(1)(i), paragraph (iii) states, "in 2020 and all subsequent years, eight (8) years old or newer." It is recommended that for 2024 and all subsequent years that all taxis that are eight (8) years of age, can now be ten (10) years old or newer. This would mean, when taxi licenses are renewed in 2024, 2015 cars will not have to be removed and could be entered into the business. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT One of Councils Priorities is to "Grow". Amending the Vehicle for hire By-law supports the notion that Saint John wants to ensure the retention of businesses, 1:ic3 which supports the creation of job opportunities. SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Financially, the amendment to the Vehicle for Hire By -Law has zero negative impact on the City of Saint John. Notably, the permanent change to the age of the taxi will provide financial relief to those working in the Taxi Industry, during the current downturn in the industry and into the future. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The input from the taxi industry is incorporated into this report. ATTACHMENTS N/A U-30 COMMON COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2024-029 Report Date January 30, 2024 Meeting Date February 05, 2024 Service Area Public Works and Transportation Services Her Worship Mayor Donna Noade Reardon and Members of Common Council SUBJECT. Waste Wise First Year Anniversary Results AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head Chief Administrative Officer Tim O'Reilly Michael Hugenholtz J. Brent McGovern RECOMMENDATION Your Chief Administration Officer recommends Common Council receive and file this report and that Council approve a presentation by Circular Materials at a future meeting date. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY October 23, 2023 marked a significant milestone for the City of Saint John. Waste Wise, the City's transformed solid waste collection service, marked its first anniversary on this date. This report presents the one-year results of Waste Wise relative to the original program targets. Waste Wise included the introduction of curbside recycling collection, limits on collection of subsidized garbage, continued collection of compost, service efficiency and employee safety improvements, as well as programs tailored to the needs of our citizens and unique neighbourhoods. Waste Wise had three over -arching targets: 1. Environmental: Reduce the amount of garbage that ends up in the landfill by 15%, 2. Financial: Introduce a brand-new curbside recycling collection program without requiring investment from higher property taxes, and 3. Safety and Efficiency: Introduce mechanical lifting of garbage that reduces repetitive lifting and increases productivity. The tonnage of garbage collected is down by 37% on average, over double the target, and we are seeing substantially higher rates of recycling and composting. The combination of savings from landfill tipping fees and revenues from bag tags is paying back the City's $3 Million capital investment. CE:i.1 -2- PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS Common Council has been briefed many times on Waste Wise over the last few years including providing direction when needed, such as program purchases. REPORT Modernization of the City's Solid Waste Collection Service, known as Waste Wise, began on October 23, 2022. The primary performance measure of Waste Wise is to reduce the amount of garbage sent to the Crane Mountain Landfill. The target was to reduce garbage by 15% (by weight). Several components of Waste Wise allowed the opportunity for this target to be achieved: • A limit on the amount of garbage that households could place curbside was introduced, equating to one bag every week. All but approximately 3000 of 22,000 households that are Wastewise customers received 180 Litre carts for their subsidized garbage. The remaining 3000 households that could not use garbage carts began receiving Urban Bag Tags in the mail for their subsidized garbage. • Each participating household was able to, for the first time, place unlimited recyclables curbside for collection. With this more convenient service offering over the previous central blue bin system and subsidized garbage limits, households were given the ability to divert more waste to the recycling stream. • The City would continue to collect unlimited amount of compost curbside, again with the intent households would divert even more waste from the garbage stream to this alternate stream. • Information about Waste Wise was made available to households through a variety of ways including at their door, on the City website, one-on-one interactions through our Customer Service Centre, and at participating Community Centres. Waste Wise incentivized households to reduce garbage being sent to the landfill but success of the program also required participation from Saint John's households. Other components of WasteWise includes: • Excess bag tags: Bag tags for garbage that households produced in excess of their subsidized amounts became available for $2 each at participating vendors around the City, by mail, or in -person at the City's Customer Service Centre. • Operational efficiencies: Operational efficiencies were introduced including use of mechanical lifting devices on City garbage trucks, and complete shift to single -person garbage trucks. The same fleet of garbage trucks is used to collect garbage and compost by day, then recycling at 11DYA -3- night using; this doubled the usage of this equipment rather than investing in more to collect the new curbside recycling stream. • Education and enforcement: Using a balance of both education and enforcement strategies ensure households were served fairly by the new solid waste model. • Supporting Non -Profits: Qualifying non -profits that historically relied on City solid waste collection to keep their costs down continued to be supported through Waste Wise, with a new ability (through provision of bag tags at no cost) for the City to quantify the level of City support provided to each. • Removing affordability barrier: Community centres are provided access to bag tags at no charge to be distributed to households without the financial means to purchase bag tags. This is done at the discretion of the centres. • Subsidized Medical Waste Support Program: Bag tags, equivalent to one extra bag per week, are provided to qualified households at no charge when a household member has a medical condition that produces significantly more waste. • Bulky Item Pick-up Program: Twice per year, households are permitted to have collected up to three larger items. • No charge extra bag twice per year: Each household is permitted one extra bag at no charge (without affixing a tag) after the holiday season and at spring cleaning time when households tend to produce extra garbage. Waste Wise Performance After One Year Waste Wise's performance has more than doubled the program's 15% garbage reduction target after one full year of implementation. Overall, garbage, by weight, has reduced by 37% relative to the average of the three years prior to Waste Wise roll -out. Over 4000 tonnes of garbage has been diverted from the landfill in just one year. It is also clear Saint John households have increased their use of the compost stream. Overall, compost, by weight, has increased by 39% relative to the average of the prior three years. The increased use of compost alone accounts for approximately 25% of the diverted garbage. Saint John households are making use of the new Waste Wise curbside recycling stream. Thirteen percent (13%), by weight, of households' solid waste is being diverted to the recycling stream over the first year, again leading to reduction in garbage in the landfill. City staff are unable to compare recycling rates to pre - Waste Wise state given recycling was previously collected from more than just Saint John households. However, given compost rates have significantly increased and the convenience of the new curbside recycling stream, it is very likely most households have also increased diversion to recycling relative to the prior blue bin program. EDD] -4- There are 20 active Medical Waste Support Program customers. As of October 2023, the City has supplied 3419 tags to community centers free of charge. Even Better Things to Come — Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Program for Recycling Collection and Expansion May 1, 2024 will be another significant milestone for Waste Wise. On this date, the responsibility for the cost of collecting recycling from the City's 22,000 Waste Wise customers shifts from City taxpayers to companies that generate paper and packaging products with the expansion of the provincial Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Program. May 1, 2025 is the expected date when households of apartments larger than 4 units in Saint John will begin to receive curbside recycling as part of the EPR. More packaging materials (besides those currently collected in the curbside blue and green recycling totes) are also becoming recyclable as part of the EPR including plastic bags, Styrofoam, and an array of other packaging materials. These improvements will further benefit environmental outcomes, further reduce tipping fee costs paid by the City, and allow Saint John households to stay within their garbage limits more often, reducing their need to buy additional bag tags. Circular Materials, the organization responsible for these recycling transitions on behalf of the Province Recycle NB, will communicate more details with our community as May 1 approaches. City staff are working with the organization to schedule a presentation to Common Council, likely in March or April 2024. The City will also support Circular Materials' communication efforts to Saint John citizens. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Waste Wise aligns with two of Common Council's priorities: • GREEN: Waste Wise demonstrates environmental stewardship. • PERFORM: Waste Wise has a Business Plan with identified and measured performance targets. Reducing waste forms one of the six "Big Moves" of the City's brand new Community Energy Action Plan (ActSJ) and therefore Waste Wise's garbage reduction results aligns with this plan. Waste Wise outcomes and approaches can contribute to the City's future Subsidization Policy. CE:1'7 -5- SERVICEAND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Service outcomes relative to Waste Wise are detailed previously in this report. The fiscal goal of Waste Wise was to introduce Capital and Operating investments as well as a brand-new service (curbside recycling) without causing the need for increased property taxes. Despite an 8.8% increase in the per -tonne costs to dispose of garbage at the Crane Mountain Landfill, the City spent $260,000 less in solid waste tipping fees in the 2023 fiscal year (first fiscal year during Waste Wise) than the average of the three full previous fiscal years before Waste Wise (2019-2021). Approximately $238,000 in revenues was achieved in 2023 from sale of bag tags. The combination of saved tipping fees and bag tag revenues has secured nearly $500,000 in 2023 alone, which will contribute to the fiscal goal of Waste Wise being achieved. Commencement of recycling collection using other funding sources (besides City taxpayer funded operating budgets) as of May 1, 2024 will even further improve the business plan for Waste Wise and allow the City to focus on other Public Works service enhancements. In addition to the fiscal benefits to the City of Saint John and the overall environmental benefits of Waste Wise's garbage reduction results, the efforts of Saint John residents in the last year has also had positive influence on extending the life of the current Crane Mountain Landfill with the 4000 tonne decrease in garbage. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Waste Wise roll -out was planned and implemented with the input from the broader community, five of the City's Community Centres, Fundy Recycles, and several City departments including: • Public Works • Fleet Services • Growth & Community Services • Finance • General Counsel's Office 1116-I97 -6- • Integrated Customer Service Centre • Communications ATTACHMENTS • City Staff Presentation z x 0 E=4 z N N N co V) L Q� XC C a R U) 1L cr a) i--P m U C 7 O U c O E E O U O C O cv C O O O d N O N L a O LL 0 0 0 0 0 Cf) LM _+ C O E U p O U � fa cn fn E � i fa O O ca 7 Q Q U Q w O ii Cd O y a ►- lAq J L Ong C cv Q O O O c Z3 m bA 0 a� a� a� cc 3 0 c 0 C. 0 L- a co 0) 1-4 -j 9 a 0 a cap c U O O U C � fa � C O cv O O 7 V O O U 0 E _ Q fa O O O O O — U Q fn V (n U U +r C O C-a O E U p U +� + E a) E � O Q Z3 O Z3 O O a� a U U LL CD p E U � E >, 7 O } O U U a� c U U O i � O C i fa fa O O fa O C O cn N cv O C O — O O N O 0) O_ m O O -0 O O O Q O U O ca n O O 0 U > m 0) U >, U O fn U N O N - fa m fn ca •� fa O � O W � 171 U O fn i � O cv c � fa O O � U O E U cp } O cnO O 4- � O O cn O O XAfO U U O m 171 U O fn i � O cv c � fa O O � U O E U cp } O cnO O 4- � O O cn O O XAfO U U O m m TO, a� O n n co U O U co co 0 n a� T co U Z U U a� E a� co co a� co U U O co U cn aj co Q _0 N O N C 0 c ca O t O O r1 L O E L O co L cu O cn CD cu 0 CD M L O C cu a� J From: City of Saint John, New Brunswick <webform-no reply@saintjohn.ca> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 2:09 PM To: Common Clerk <commonclerk@saintjohn.ca> Subject: Webform submission from: Submission to Council Form [ External Email Alert] "Please note that this message is from an external sender. If it appears to be sent from a Saint John employee, please forward the email to spamsampleCcD-saintiohn.ca or contact IT Service Desk at 649-6047.** Submitted on Wed, 01/24/2024 - 14:02 Submitted by: Anonymous Submitted values are: About Person/Group Submitting First name Darlene Last name Hersey Mailing Address Telephone Email If you do not wish to have your personal information (address, phone number, email) become part of the public record, please check this box. Yes About your Submission Topic of submission By-law in respect to the use of pellet gun, air guns, spring guns,etc. not being allowed to be used in residential areas in the City of Saint John, N.B. We currently do not have one. Purpose for submission (what is the ask of council): In our sub division, we are currently dealing with a gentleman using a pellet gun almost N79X3 daily and randomly shooting at animals and birds. We have found numerous dead and injured animals and birds with one most recently crawling on it's side because it had been shot with a pellet on Sunday, Jan. 21, 2024. That is a concern, but our bigger concern is getting shot with one of these pellets in the face or eye because he is either standing in his garage doorway randomly shooting which angles directly towards us or as I witnessed a couple weeks ago, standing in the middle of his yard where he fired 5 or 6 shots up at 2 crows in a tree, at least 50 feet minimum in the air. This tree also borders on his neighbor's property. His neighbor and myself are very concerned because we are constantly on our properties working around them and our yards are all attached to one another with no buffer. Our yards all open to one another. One of these pellets could certainly hit us because he shoots with absolutely no control. As well, believe he is in his 80's. We should not have to fear that working around our properties which we maintain very well, could result in us losing an eye, being seriously injured or having property damage. I have advised him he needs to stop and he just laughed and when I told him I was calling the police he told me to go ahead, he did not care. Now going outside, I have to check to ensure he is not out there with the gun. He starts first thing in the morning before I even leave for work. Police and Conservation have been there twice but with no by-law in effect, there is nothing they can do. As well, the gun he shows them is not the handgun I witnessed him use and they have no authority to enter his premises. I have done some research for you and I am surprised we are one of very few places who have no by-law in respect to guns in residential areas. It also looks like Sussex and Oromocto have the same one. Think about this, as we see more and more land being used in the city and people having to live closer and closer i.e. high rise apartment buildings, because there is no by-law in respect to this, I believe I could sit on a top floor balcony and shoot a pellet gun. As long as I do not harm someone or cause property damage, there is nothing the police can do. Imagine what could happen in this situation. Both the police officer and conservation officer last Sunday told me to push to have this by-law enacted. It then gives the police authority here. It is also another income source for the city because you would also set fines for this. You would want it to be a deterrent, $500. first offense, $1000. second offense and $2000. after that??? I guess you would have to decide what your eye is worth or maybe the eye of your child or grandchild. We have been dealing with this in our residential area far too long and in reality, this man could be your neighbor some day. It is awful having to peek around corners on your property that you should be allowed to enjoy to ensure he is not out there randomly firing his gun. I am asking for your full support in enacting this by-law. It is 100% needed. Someone is going to get seriously hurt with these pellets. Please I am begging you to consider this by-law request seriously. It is horrible living near this as we are constantly waiting to feel that hit to a body part. You are more than welcome to contact me and come for a visit 506-639-5051. We do have an association Myles Rate Payer's Assoc. We are a small sub division and this is the only neighbor that there is constantly an issue with, that we have to call on and waste city resources. Crying shame really. Us younger seniors look out for our older seniors and this small sub division has many of those. One of the older seniors called the other night to express that she is scared she may get hit with a pellet. I told her so was I and that I am trying to get it stopped. Again, please look at the by-laws attached and adopt one..... please. 679L1 Thank you all so much, I seriously appreciate your consideration. I do not know what else to do. Document Uploads CCF 001181.pdf (4.53 MB) N7i19 C L BY-LAW NO. S-5 ARRIET* NOS-5 A BY-LAW RESPECTING FIREWORKS. ARRETE CONCERNANT LES PIECES SPRING GUNS AND AIR RIFLES WARTIFICE, LES ARMES A RESSORT ET I.ES CARARINES A, AIR C OMPRIME PASSED: August 22, 2005 BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the City of Fredericton as follows: I. DEFINITIONS In this by-law: "air rifle" means air rifle, air pistol or air gun and any instrument or device for projecting missiles by air pressure obtained by mechanical means; (carabine a air com prime) "fireworks" includes firecrackers, cannon - crackers, fireballs, mines, skyrockets, squibs, torpedoes, and any other explosives designated by the Lieutenant Governor -in - Council; (pieces d'artrfice) "spring gun., means any spring gun and includes any instnment or device for projecting missiles by spring pressure obtained by mechanical means. (arme d ressort) 2. RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTft : le 22 aout 2005 Le conseil municipal de Fredericton EDICI'E : 1. DlkF]NITIONs Les definitions qui suivent s'appliquent au present arrete. arme i ressort >) Toute arme it ressort, et y soot assimiles les instruments ct dispositifs servant a lancer des projectiles par la force d'un ressort fournie par un moyen mecanique. (springgun) o carabine i air comprime » Carabine, pistolet ou arme A air comprimd, ainsi que tout instrument ou dispositif servant i lancer des projcctilcs par ]a pression d'air fournic par un moyen mecanique. (air rifle) <c pieces d'artifice » Y sont assimiles les petards, pots d'artifice, mines, iivsees volantes, serpenteaux, torpilles et tout autrc cxplosii dcsignc par le lieutenant gouvemeur en conseil. (flreworks) 2. RlkGLEMENT 2.01 Subject to the provisions of the Fire 2.01 Sous reserve de la Loi sur la ,prevention Prevention Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, c. F-13, dear incendies, L.R.N.-B. 1973, c. F- I3, and amendments thereto, ensemble ses modifications, it est interdit : (1) no person shall within the City have or keep in his possession any firework, or (2) set fire to, discharge or cause to (1) d'avoir ou de garder en sa possession des pieces d'artifice dans la municipalite; (2) d'allumer, de ddcharger ou de fairc 19119Z:1 lay -taw No. 1 Arr&ie N" S-5 2 explode any firework. exploser des pieces d'artif ice. 2.02 No person shall within the City discharge 2.02 II est interdit de tirer aver urge arme i any spring gun or air rifle except while ressort ou une carabine i air comprime engaged in target practice carried on dans la municipalite, sauf pour le tir i la exclusively within a building. cible exeree completement i l'interieur d'un batiment. 2.03 No person shall have or keep in his 2-03 11 est interdit d'avoir ou de garder cn sa possession within the City any spring gun possession Bans la municipalite une arme i or air rifle without registering the same ressort ou une carabine a air comprime with and obtaining a permit therefore from sans 1'enregistrer aupr6s du chef de police the Chief of Police. et sans obtenir de ce dernier un perms. 2.04 (1) The Chief of Police shall maintain 2.04 a register of the name and address of the owner of every spring gun or air rifle who applied for registration of the same, and shall record therein a description of such spring gun or air rifle. (2) The Chief of Police shall upon application therefore and upon payment of the prescribed Fee issue a permit to the owner of any spring gun or air rifle. (3) The fee payable to the City on the issue of a permit under this section shall be two dollars ($2.00). (4) A permit issued under this section shall continue in force until cancelled. 2.05 (1) The Chief of Police upon application by any person engaged in the business of a retailer of spring guns or air rifles within the City may issue a permit therefor entitling such person to have or keep in his possession and to sell by retail within the City spring guns or air rifles. (2) The lee payable to the City on the (1) Le chef de police tient un registee comportant le nom et l'adresse du proprictaire do cheque arme i ressort ou carabine i air comprime qui cn demande 1'enregistremcnt, et it y consigne une description de Parme i ressort ou de la carabine i air comprime. (2) Sur reception d'une dtmunde d'enregistrement et des droits prescrits, le chef de police delivre un permis au propridtairc do 1'arme i ressort ou de la carabine i air comprime. (3) Les droits payables i la municipalite en vue de la delivrance d'un permis en vertu du present article sont de deux dollars. (4) Le permis delivre en vertu du present article derneure valide jusqu'i son annulation. 2.05 (1) Sur demande de toute personne qui s'adonne A la vente au detail d'armes i ressort ou de carabines a air comprime dans fa municipalite, le chef de police peut delivrer un permis Pautorisant i avoir, i garder en sa possession et i vendre au detail des Armes a ressort ou des carabines a air comprimn dans la municipalite. (2) Les droits payables i la municipalite N7ir/ Hy -law No. J ArrW N" :5-5 issue of a permit under this section shall be two dollars ($2.00). (3) A permit issued under this section shall continue in force until cancelled. (4) The Chief of Police shall keep a record of all permits issued under this section. sur dclivrance d'un permis en vertu du present article soot de deux dollars. (3) Le permis accorde en vertu du present article demeure valide jusqu'i son annulation. (4) Le chef de police bent un registre de toes les permis delivres en vertu du present article. 2.06 Any permit issued under this by-law may 2.06 Tout pc, rnis delivre en vertu du present be cancelled by the Chief of Police upon arrete pout Etre annule par le chef de police conviction of the holder thereof for any sur declaration de culpabilite de son offence under this by-law. titulaire pour toute infraction au present arretE. 2.07 Any police officer may seize any firework, 2.07 Tout agent de police pout faire la saisie de spring gun or air rifle had or kept in toute piece d'artifice, arme i ressort on contravention of this by-law. carabine i air comprime possedee ou gardEe en contravention au present arrete. 2.08 The Chief of Police may, at any time after 2.08 A tout moment apres 1'expiration de the expiry of 10 days following a seizure 1p jours suivant la saisie effechree en vertu made under the authority of section 2.07, du sous -article 2.07, le chef de police peut destroy any fire cracker, spring gun or air dEtruire toute piece d'artifice, arme A rifle so seized_ ressort ou carabine A air comprim6 saisie. 3. PENALTIES Every person who violates any provision of this by- law is guilty of an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) and not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00). 4. REPEAL PROVISIONS 3. WINES Quiconque contrevient au present arretE cornmet one infraction et est passible, sur declaration de eulpabilite par procedure sommaire, d'une amends de cinquante i deux cents dollars. 4. ABROGATION 4.01 By-law No. S-5, A By-law Rcspeeting 4.01 Est abroge Parretti n° S-5, intitule A By-law Fireworks, Spring Guns and Air Rifles, Respecting Fireworks, Spring Guns and and amendments thereto, given third Air Rifles, adopte en troisieme lecture le reading on October 22, 1990, is hereby 22 octobre 1990, ensemble ses repealed. modifications. 4.02 The repeal of By-law No. S-5, A By-law 4.02 L'abrogation de 1'arretc susmentionne n'a Resnecting Fireworks Spring Guns and aucun effct sur Ics pcines ou confiscations Air Rifles, of the City of Fredericton, shall encourues, ou sur ]a responsabilit6 not affect any penalty, forfeiture or engagee, avant cette abrogation, ni sur les liability, incurred before such repeal or any procedures d'ex&cution y afferentes proceeding for enforcing the same achevees ou pendantes au moment de N7i1:3 By-law No. / Arr&6 N' S-5 completed or pending at the time of repeal; nor shall it repeal, defeat, disturb, invalidate or prejudicially affect any matter or thing whatsoever completed, existing or pending at the time of repeal. (.Sgd) Brad Woodside Brad Woodside Mayor/maire 4 celle-ci; elle n'a pas non plus pour effet d'abroger, d'annuler, de modifier, d'invalider ou d'alterer quoi que cc soit qua serait acheve, courant ou pendant i cc moment. (Sgd.) Melanie D_ Alain Melanie D. Alain Assistant City Clerk/secretaire rnunicipale adjointe N7i10.1 BY-LAW 407 A BY-LAW RESPECTING DISGH EARMS IN THE TOWN OF Lei k",X0111C!] The Council of the Town of Oro moc` 6-uAU&ertt-e­authority invested in it by Section 11(1) (g) of the Municipalities Act being Chapter M-22 of the Revised Statutes of New Brunswick, 1996 and the amendments thereto and for the purpose of peace, order and good government enacts as follows: DEFINITIONS I. In this By-Law- (1) A "Firearm" is defined as per section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada as — a barreled weapon from which any shot, bullet or other projectile can be discharged and that is capable of causing serious bodily injury or death to a person, and includes any frame or receiver of such a barreled weapon and anything that can be adapted for use as a firearm_ (2) "Spring Gun" means any spring gun and includes any instrument or device for projectile missiles by spring pressure obtained by mechanical means; (3) "Air Rifles" means air rifle, air pistol or air gun and any instrument or device for projectile missiles by air and by gas pressure obtained by any mechanical means: (4) "Bow" means a device for shooting arrows and includes a long bow, reflex bow, compound bow and a cross bow; and (5) "Sling Shot" means a framed mechanical catapult, for propelling a projectile. 2. "Town" means Town of Oromocto but excludes the portion of property of the Crown within the Town known as the garrison of Canadian Forces Base Gagetown. STATUTES AND PROHIBITIONS 3. Statutes for the possession, registration, and storage of firearms and munitions are defined under Federal Statute Bill C-68, "An act respecting firearms and other weapons". 4. in addition to the Statutes and regulations for the Province of New Brunswick in the Fish & Wildlife Act; for reasons of public safety, no person shall within the Town discharge a firearm except whilst engaged in target practice conducted exclusively within an appropriate designed and constructed building and/or at a designated approved site by the Town Council or its delegate. PENALTY 5. Every person who violates any provision of this By -Law is liable upon summary conviction to a tine no less tan $200 (two hundred dollars) and not more than the maximum fine that may be imposed for commission of an offence punishable under Part II of the provincial Offences Procedure Act as a category C offence; unless superceded by the penalties associated with the Federal and Provincial Statutes outlined above in Section 3 and 4 respectively. REPEAL 6. By -Law 210 "A By -Law Respectiriglldand Guns, Shot Guns, Rifles, Spring Guns ADMINISTRATOR/CLERK MAYOR 511 FIRE CRACKERS, SPRING GUNS AND AIR RIFLES BY-LAW BY-LAW # 351-11 PAGE 114 The Council of the Town of Sussex; under and by authority vested in it by the Municipalities Act, Section 1 1 (1) (g) hereby enacts as follows: 1. In this by -Law: (i) "fire cracker" means fire cracker, sparkler, squib, fire works or otter pyrotechnic device; (H) "sprrnggun"means any spring gun and includes any instrument or device for projecting missiles by spring pressure obtained by mechanical means; (iii) "ajr title" means air rifle, air pistol or air gun and any instrument or device for projecting missiles by air pressure obtained by mechanical means; O "Fire Ch el'means the Fire Chief of the Town of Sussex; and (v) "Police 4 cer" means: * a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; * a police officer appointed under Section 14, 11, or 17.3 of the Police Act; 4 an auxiliary police officer or an auxiliary police constable appointed under Section 13 of the Police Act, when accompanied by or under the supervision of a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. 615N By -Law # :351-11 Page 214 1i. No person shall set fire to, discharge or cause to explode any fire cracker within the Town. III. Notwithstaxt tig anything contained in Section 2, a person may with the approval of the Council and under the supervision of the Fire Chief or his designate, set off' or use fireworks within the Town. IV. No person shall discharge any spring gun, air pistol or air rifle, except while engaged in target practice carried on exclusively within a building within. the Town, V. Any police officer may seize any fire cracker, spring gun, air pistol or air rifle or potato gun used in contravention of this by-law. VI. The police officer may at any time, after the expiry of thirty (30) days following a seizure made under authority of Section V, destroy such fire cracker, spring gun, air pistol or air rifle or potato gun so seized. VII. PLURAL OR FEMININE TERMS The use of the terms plural or feminine may apply whenever the singular, masculine or feminine is used in this by-law. It shall be considered as if the plural, feminine or masculine has been used where the context of the party or parties hereto so requires. N1591 By -Law # 351-11 Page 3/4 VIII. PENALTIES (1) A person who violates any provision of this by-law commits an offence and is liable, upon conviction, to a penalty under the Provincial [offences Procedure Act, as a Category D offence. ot) The Council hereby designates the Town Treasurer, or his designate, to accept from a person alleged to have committed an offence under this by-law, the payment of a sum equal to the minimum prescribed for such violation as a Category D offence under the Provincial offences Procedure Act. IX. VALIDITY The invalidity of any section, clause, sentence or provision of this By - Law shall not affect the validity of any other part of this by -Law which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. X. REPEAI. {i) The repeal of "A By -Law of the Town of Sussex. Respecting Fire Crackers, Spring Guns and Air Rifles, By -Law # 351-04", shall not affect any penalty, forfeiture or liability incurred or pending at the time of repeal, nor shall it repeal, defeat, disturb, invalidate or prejudicially affect any matter or thing whatsoever completed, existing or pending at the time of repeal. Nei[! By -Law # 351-11 Page 414 (il) The by -Law, A By -Law of the Town of Sussex Respecting Fire Crackers, Spring Guns and Air Rifles By -Law #351.-04, enacted on the 19' day of July, 2004, and amendments thereto are hereby repealed. READ FIRST TIME BY TITLE READ SECOND TIME BY TITLE READ IN ENTIRETY MAY 16, 2011 MAY 15 2011 MAY 24, 2011 THIRD READING A DING BY TITLE AND ENACTED JUNE 20, 2011 RALPH A. CARR PAUL 1. MAGUIR,E MAYOR TOWN CLERIC 1122124, 3:15 PM City of St John's, By -Law 1316, ARGUN BY-LAW This is not the official Version. Elzim Copyright 0 1993: City of St. John's, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Important Information (Includes disclaimer and copyright information and details about the availability of printed and electronic Versions of the Lay -Laws.) BY-LAW NO. 1316 AMENDMENT NO. 1359 AIRGUN BY-LAW PASSED BY COUNCIL ON November 15, 93 Pursuant to the powers vested in it under and by virtue of Section 29 and Section 162 of the City of St. John's Act, R.S.N. 1990 c. C-17 as amended and all other powers it enabling, the St. John's Municipal Council in regular session convened on this 15th day of November, A.D. 1993, hereby passes and enacts the following By -Law relating to the use of airguns in the City of St. John's. BY-LAW 1. This By -Law may be cited as the City of St. John's Airgun By -Law. 2, For the purpose of this By -Law: 4. No airgun shall be transported or moved from the airgun holder's private property except under the following conditions: (a) the airgun shall be rendered inoperable; (b) the airgun shall be, at all times, fully encased and enclosed in a case or holder made and used specifically for transporting the airgun and no part of the airgun shall be exposed to the public; and (c) all ammunition and compressed gas cylinders that may be used for the operation of the airgun steal 1, at all times, be entirely separate from the case in which the airgun is fully encased or enclosed. 516 hftsJ/apps.s"ns.ca/try4aws.nspnrvByLowNum1131Fi#—#ex#={a) airgun indudes those guns,John's. 112 1122/24, 3:15 PM City of SL John's, By -Law 1316, AIRGUN BY-LAW 5. A police officer may seize any airgun where there are reasonable and probable grounds to believe that an offense has been committed pursuant to Section 3 or Section 4. 6. Where a charge is not laid pursuant to Section 3 or Section 4 within a period of 30 days from the date of the offence, any airgun seized pursuant to Section 5 shall be returned. 7. The provisions of this By -Law shall not apply to: (a) any person where prior approval for the discharge or use of an aupm has been received from the City; and (b) the firing or discharge of an airgun on a range approved by the City for the said use. 8. Any person who contravenes the provisions of this By -Law shall be guilty of an offence and liable upon summary conviction to a penalty as provided for in Section 403 of the City of St. John's Act. (Amended 07/24/95; #1358) 5 https:llapps.stjohns, albylaws.nsftrrwByLawNuml1316#:—:text=(a) airgun iu�des those guns,John's. 212 M&C No. 2024-031 Report Date January 17, 2024 Meeting Date February 05, 2024 Service Area General Counsel SUBJECT: Access License with Saint John Energy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT FOR OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL City staff have been working closely with Saint John Energy ("SJE") on its various initiatives. The adoption of the recommendation will result in SJE having access to certain city -owned lands to do further investigations. COUNCIL RESOLUTION That the City enter into an Access License Agreement in the form as presented to Committee of the Whole at its meeting held February 5, 2024, with the Power Commission of the City of Saint John (Saint John Energy) for access to city -owned lands identified as PIDs 51771 (700 Woodward Ave), 331330 (1800 Loch Lomond Road), and 55058945 (707 Samuel Davis Drive), (collectively referred to as the "Sites") and that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign the said Access License Agreement and any other documents ancillary thereto. N15F-11