Loading...
2019-02-25_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jour COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN FEBRUARY 11, 2019 AT 6:00 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER Present: Mayor Don Darling Deputy Mayor Shirley McAlary Councillor-at-Large Gary Sullivan Councillor Ward 1 Blake Armstrong Councillor Ward 1 Greg Norton Councillor Ward 2 Sean Casey Councillor Ward 2 John MacKenzie Councillor Ward 3 Donna Reardon Councillor Ward 4 David Merrithew Councillor Ward 4 Ray Strowbridge Also Present: City Manager J. Collin Police Inspector Tanya LeBlanc Fire Chief K. Clifford City Solicitor J. Nugent Commissioner Growth and Community Development J. Hamilton Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer K. Fudge Commissioner of Transportation and Environment M. Hugenholtz Commissioner of Saint John Water B. McGovern Common Clerk J. Taylor Deputy Common Clerk P. Anglin COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Mayor Darling, Deputy Mayor McAlary and Council presented certificates of 2019 Canada Winter Games in Red Deer Alberta. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes 2.1 Minutes of January 28, 2019 Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Armstrong: RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of Common Council, held on January 28, 2019, be approved. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Approval of Agenda Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the agenda of this meeting, with the addition of the following items be approved: 17.1 Safe, Clean Drinking Water Payment of Relief Events 17.2 Funding Agreement with ACOA and Province 17.3 Recommended Appointments to Committees MOTION CARRIED. 4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest J. Nugent, City Solicitor and Councillor G. Norton declared a conflict of interest with item 12.4 West Saint John Corrosion Control Investigation. 5. Consent Agenda 5.1 That pursuant to Section 14 of the Police Act of the Province of New Brunswick, the Common Council of the City of Saint John does hereby appoint the following member of the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires as By-Law Enforcement Officer with the responsibility and authority to enforce provisions of the Parking Meter By-Law and the provisions of Section 5, Section 5.1, Section 7, Section 8, Section 15 and Section 16 of the Saint John Traffic By-Law, namely: Markus Edison, Badge No. 9964. And further that this appointment shall continue until such time as the appointee ceases to be a member of the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires or until the appointment is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 5.2 That the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League Letter re Facilities Updates in Amphitheaters be referred to the Harbour Station Commission. 5.3 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-015: City of Saint John Transportation Strategic Plan MoveSJ Phase 3 Consulting and Engineering Services: 1)Common Council award engineering and consulting services for Transportation Strategic Plan MoveSJ, Phase 3 to IBI Group at a cost of $180,615 plus applicable taxes. 2)That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the Consulting Engineering Agreement. 5.4 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-010: Designation of Community Standards Coordinator, Common Council adopt the following: 1.WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, S.N.B. 2017 c.18, and Local Governance ActSaint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By- law, By-law Number M- 30 and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make inspections for the administration or enforcement of the By-law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsection 144(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may authorize officers enter the land, building or other structure at any reasonable time, and carry out the inspection after giving reasonable notice to the owner or occupant of the land, building or other structure to be entered; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED By-law Enforcement Officer, is hereby appointed as an inspection officer and authorized to enter at all reasonable times upon any property within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint John for the purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration or enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law which received first and second reading by Common Council on May 22, 2018 and third reading on June 4, 2018, being enacted upon approval by the Minister of Local Government, and/or the Local Governance Act COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Development Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 2.WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act, including the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, By-law Number M-Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has violated or failed to comply with the said By-law; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS subsection 132(1) and 132(2) of the Local Governance Act provides that an officer appointed by council may notify the owner or occupier of premises, a building or structure by notice in the form prescribed by regulation when a condition exists pursuant to subsections 131(1), 131(2) or 131(3) of the said Act; AND WHEREAS section 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the municipality or such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED ry is hereby appointed as a By- law Enforcement Officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED authorized to notify owners and occupiers with respect to premises, buildings or structures that are unsightly; buildings or structures that are a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of being vacant or unoccupied; buildings or structures that are a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation or unsoundness of structural strength, as set out in the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, effective immediately, and this designation and authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 3.WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and Community Planning ActSaint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 102 and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make inspections for the administration of this By-law; AND WHEREAS subsection 133(1) of the Community Planning Act provides that a council may authorize persons at all reasonable times, and with the consent of the owner or occupant, enter any land, building or premises for the purposes of inspection if the Director, the development officer or the person authorized by the Minister or the council has reasonable grounds to believe that a development or form of development on or in the land, building or premises violates a provision of this Act or the regulations or a bylaw or an order made under this Act; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED who is a By-law Enforcement Officer, is hereby authorized at all reasonable times, and with the consent of the owner or occupant, enter any land, building or premises within the territorial boundaries of the City of Saint John for the purpose of making any inspection that is necessary for the administration of the Saint John Building By-law, effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Development Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 4.WHEREAS the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by-laws pursuant to the authority of the Community Planning Act, S.N.B 2017, c. 19, and Community Planning ActSaint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 102, and amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to make orders for the administration of this By-law; AND WHEREAS subsection 134(1) of the Community Planning Act provides that a council may authorize persons to, when a development is undertaken in violation of the Community Planning Act, a by-law or regulation under the Community Planning Act, a by-law or terms and conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development, alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the undertaking of such development; COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED who is a By-law Enforcement Officer, is hereby authorized to, when a development is undertaken in violation of the Community Planning Act, the Saint John Building By-law or the terms and conditions imposed on the development, order the cessation of the development, alteration of such development so as to remove the violation, or the doing of anything required to restore the land, building or structure to its condition immediately prior to the undertaking of such development, effective immediately, and this authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of the Growth and Community Development Services department of The City of Saint John or until rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 5.WHEREAS, the Common Council of The City of Saint John has enacted certain by- laws pursuant to the authority of the Local Governance Act and the Community Planning Act, including the Saint John Dog Control By-law, By-law Number M-13, Mobile Home Parks By-law, By-law Number M-20, City of Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law, By-law Number C.P. 11, Saint John Building By-law, By-law Number C.P. 101, and The Zoning By-law, By-law Number C.P. 110, including all amendments thereto, and it may from time to time be necessary to commence proceedings in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick, when a person has contravened or failed to comply with these By-laws; AND WHEREAS section 72 of the Local Governance Act provides that a council may appoint by-law enforcement officers for the local government and may determine their terms of office; AND WHEREAS section 150(1) of the Local Governance Act provides that proceedings for breach of a by-law shall be commenced in the name of the clerk of the municipality or such other person as is designated for that purpose by the council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED- law Enforcement Officer with respect to the enforcement of the Saint John Dog Control By-law, the Mobile Home Parks By-law, the City of Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law, the Saint John Building By-law, and The Zoning By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED authorized to lay informations in the Provincial Court of the Province of New Brunswick for breach of the Saint John Dog Control By-law, the Mobile Home Parks By-law, the City of Saint John Flood Risk Areas By-law, the Saint John Building By- law, and The Zoning By-law, effective immediately, and this appointment and COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 authorization shall continue until he ceases to be an employee of Growth and Community Development Services of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 6.WHEREAS subsection 135(4) of the Local Governance Act provides that within thirty days after the terms of a notice have been complied with or a debt due to a municipality or due to the Minister of Finance, as the case may be, is discharged, the municipality shall provide a certificate in the form prescribed by regulation which requires that the corporate seal of the municipality to be affixed. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Jonathan A. Taylor, Common Clerk, is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal of The City of Saint John to a Certificate Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and Structures By-law, and such authorization shall continue until Jonathan A. Taylor ceases to be the Common Clerk of The City of Saint John or until it is rescinded by Common Council, whichever comes first. 5.5 Refer to Item 14.1 5.6 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-012: Contract No. 2018-10: Sanitary Sewer System - CSO-SSO Controls Phase III, the tender be awarded to the low Tenderer, Galbraith Construction Ltd., at the tendered price of $121,635.50 (including HST) as calculated based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. 5.7 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-020: Contract 2019-08: King Square South (Charlotte Street to Civic #12) Watermain Renewal and Storm Sewer Installation, the tender be awarded to the low Tenderer, Fairville Construction Ltd., at the tendered price of $217,114.25 (including HST) as calculated based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. 5.8 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-022: Contract 2019-04: Queen Square North (Charlotte Street to Sydney Street) Water Main, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Installation and Street Reconstruction, the tender be awarded to the low Tenderer, Galbraith Construction Ltd., at the tendered price of $469,896.90 (including HST) as calculated based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. 5.9 That Shining Horizons Therapeutic Riding Association Request to Present be referred to the Clerk to Schedule. 5.10 That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-027: COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 CentralSquare Technologies Maintenance Fees, Common Council: 1.Authorize payment to CentralSquare Technologies (formally Superion) of up to $192,524.40 + HST associated with the maintenance and support for 2019 for and 2.Approve the payment of future maintenance and support costs until such time as the City implements a new ERP system. 5.11 That the Saint John Board of Police Commissioners Letter re 2019 Executive be received for information. 5.12 That the Carleton Community Centre, Inc. 2018 Final Report be received for information. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the recommendation set out in each consent agenda item respectively, excluding item 5.5 that was identified for discussion, be adopted. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. Members Comments Council members commented on various community events. 7. Proclamations thth 7.1 Heritage Week February 11 to 18, 2019 thth The Mayor declared February 11 to 18, 2019 as Heritage Week in the City of Saint John. 8. Delegations/Presentations 8.1 Saint John Heritage Awards 2018 Bob Boyce, Chair of the Heritage Development Board announced the 2018 Saint John Heritage Award winners: 1.wĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ CğIJğķĻ wĻƭƷƚƩğƷźƚƓͲ ЊЏ vǒĻĻƓ Street, Colin & Jan Waldschutz, Contractors: Manchester Enterprises; William Leaman TING Painting. 2.wĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ CğIJğķĻ wĻŷğĬźƌźƷğƷźƚƓͲ ЌЉ vǒĻĻƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Contractors: McDonough Bros. Landscaping; M&M Painting; Ultimate Windows and . 3./ƚƒƒĻƩĭźğƌ CğIJğķĻ wĻƭƷƚƩğƷźƚƓͲ ЊЊЋ tƩźƓĭĻƭƭ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ŷĻğƷƩĻ /ƚƒƦğƓǤ Contractors: Dowd Roofing Inc.; Terry Butler; Echelon Home Improvements; Design Art Signs; Robert Boyce; Bonfire Communications. 8.2 HMCS Brunswicker Naval Memorial Presentation Referring to the submitted report entitled HMCS Brunswicker Naval Memorial Presentation, D.M. Brown Commanding Officer HMCS Brunswicker, Senator Noel Kinsella Honorary Captain HMCS Brunswicker, requested that Common Council approve th a license to place the memorial of City land. The sod turning is planned for May 5, 2019, the anniversary of the Battle of the Atlantic. The City Solicitor advised that a licensing agreement would be required. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Deputy Mayor McAlary: RESOLVED that HMCS Brunswicker request to locate a Naval Memorial on City owned land on Harbour Passage be referred to the City Manager for implementation. MOTION CARRIED. 8.3 Saint John Energy A Vision for the Future Referring to the submitted report entitled Saint John Energy A Vision for the Future R. Robinson President & CEO outlined the opportunities SJ Energy projects will bring to the City. Benefits of SJ Energy: Rates are the lowest in Atlantic Canada No long term debt Customer satisfaction 85% Reliability higher than the National Average Customer support for renewables 95% Challenges / Opportunities: Disruptive technologies change presents opportunities for those who embrace it To be relevant and sustainable to consumers SJE is uniquely positioned to be able to play a leadership role in the new energy economy. COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Projects: Wind Projects: Burchill Wind Project NRCAN Smart Grid Project ($11M) PV Pilot (Solar Pilot) In summary, SJ Energy remains committed to the growth strategy and the evolution from a pure electric distribution utility to a more diverse generation, distribution and customer-driven energy services firm, a model that has been successfully implemented by municipalities of all sizes across Canada. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Strowbridge: RESOLVED that the Saint John Energy Presentation A Vision for the Future, be received for information. MOTION CARRIED 9. Public Hearings 6:30 PM 10. Consideration of By-laws 10.1 Nuisance Deer Management Program and Bylaw Respecting the Feeding of Deer stnd within the City (1 and 2 Reading) Referring to the submitted report entitled Nuisance Deer Management Program, Commissioner M. Hugenholtz introduced the Deer Management Program, and the Feeding of Deer Bylaw. As recommended in the report the Commissioner suggested that Council give first and second reading of the Feeding of Deer Bylaw at this meeting and that part two of the recommendation, the Nuisance Deer Management Assistance Program be tabled to a future meeting. Responding to a question, the City Manager advised that trespassing will be defined before third reading. Responding to a question, the City Solicitor advised that the Bylaw does not permit trespassing. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the by--Law Respecting the Feeding of Deer within MOTION CARRIED with Deputy Mayor McAlary voting nay. Read a first time by title, the by--Law Respecting the Feeding of Deer COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the by--Law Respecting the Feeding of Deer within MOTION CARRIED with Deputy Mayor McAlary voting nay. Read a second time by title, the by--Law Respecting the Feeding of Deer within The City of Saint 10.2 By-Law Respecting the Procedures of the Common Council of The City of Saint John Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by-By-Law Number M-5 A Law to Amend a By-Law respecting the Procedures to permit remote participation for Council members via telephone conference call for special meetings, emergency meetings and Committee of the Whole closed session; and provide a formal process for managing submissions or representations received by the City subsequent to a legislated public hearing held by Council, be read. MOTION CARRIED. In accordance with the Local Governance Act sub-section 15(3) the by-- Law Number M-5 A Law to Amend a By-Law respecting the Procedures of the Common summary as follows: on for Council members via telephone conference call for special meetings, emergency meetings and Committee of the Whole closed session; and provide a formal process for managing submissions or representations received by the City subsequent to a legislated public hearing held by Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by-By-Law Number M-5 A Law to Amend a By-Law respecting the Procedures to permit remote participation for Council members via telephone conference call for special meetings, emergency meetings and Committee of the Whole closed session; and provide a formal process for managing submissions or representations received by the City subsequent to a legislated public hearing held by Council, be read a third time, enacted and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto. MOTION CARRIED. COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Read a third time by title, the by-By-Law Number M-5 A Law to Amend a By-Law respecting the Procedures rd 10.3 Zoning Bylaw Amendment 3700 King William Road (3 Reading) with Section 59 Conditions Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by--Law of The City of ng Schedule A, the Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by re-zoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 31.1 hectares, located at 3700 King William Road, also identified as PID Number 55218754 from Medium Industrial (IM) to Pit and Quarry (PQ), be read in its entirety. MOTION CARRIED. The by-- read in its entirety. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, the use of the parcel of land with an area of 31.1 hectares, located at 3700 King William Road, also identified as PID Number 55218754, for the use of a Pit and for the use of a Quarry, be subject to the following conditions: a.An engineered storm drainage submission must be provided for excavation and rehabilitation activities. No storm drainage to the roadway or adjacent lands is allowed. b.Notwithstanding the provisions of 12.4(6)(a) of the Zoning By-law, the existing treed buffer along the portions of the property along King William Road shall be maintained. If the existing treed buffer along King William Road is damaged or further reduced, the owner must replant the buffer to meet the requirements of 12.4(6)(a) of the Zoning By-law. MOTION CARRIED. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that the by--Law of The City of -zoning a parcel of land having an area of approximately 31.1 hectares, located at 3700 King William Road, also identified as PID Number 55218754 from Medium Industrial (IM) to COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Pit and Quarry (PQ), be read a third time, enacted and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto. MOTION CARRIED. Read a third time by title, the by- to Amend the Zoning By-Law of 11. Submissions by Council Members 12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers 12.1 Demolition of Vacant, Dilapidated and Dangerous Building at 76 St. James Street West (PID# 55145916) Commissioner Hamilton introduced R. Van Wart Manager of the Demolition of Vacant Buildings Program to provide an overview of the demolition. The Mayor read the cautionary statement as follows: includes the report of the Building Inspector stating that the building located at 76 St. James Street West (PID 55145916) is a hazard to the safety of the public by virtue of its being, amongst other things, dilapidated or structurally unsound. Is there present an owner, including anyone holding any encumbrance upon this property, who wishes to present evidence to the contrary, i.e. that the building is No one came forward to present evidence that the building is structurally sound and not dilapidated. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-021: Demolition of Vacant, Dilapidated and Dangerous Building at 76 St. James Street West (PID 55145916), Common Council approve the following: RESOLVED that the building located at 76 St. James Street West, PID# 55145916, is to be demolished as it has become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of dilapidation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said building is to be demolished as it has become a hazard to the safety of the public by reason of unsoundness of structural strength; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that one or more by-law enforcement officers appointed and designated under the Saint John Unsightly Premises and Dangerous Buildings and COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 Structures By-law are hereby authorized to arrange for the demolition, in accordance with the applicable City purchasing policies. MOTION CARRIED. 12.2 2019 Community Grant Recommendations grant applications totaling over $648,503. The total grant envelope of $179,721 will be dispersed in community grants. B. Freeze responded to questions on criteria for selection. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report entitled M&C 2019-019: 2019 Community Grant Recommendations, Common Council approve that the following applicants be approved for funding at the indicated amount: 360 ARCf de Saint- KB Martinon Com NBYO COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 MOTION CARRIED. 12.3 2019 Sports Field Rates and Outdoor Facility Allocation Policy Commissioner Hugenholtz stated the increases are based on a council resolution and report from 2016. Responding to questions on continuing increases to user fees and residency requirements, the City Manager stated that user fees, residency and administration will be examined in a long term sustainability plan. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Armstrong: RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C 2019-017: 2019 Sports Field Rates and Outdoor Facility Allocation Policy, Common Council approve the proposed 2019 Field Rates and Outdoor Facility Allocation Policy. MOTION CARRIED. The City Solicitor and Councillor Norton withdrew from the meeting. The Acting City Solicitor M. Tompkins took her seat at the Council Table. 12.4 West Saint John - Corrosion Control Investigation Referring to the submitted report entitled M&C 2019-24: West Saint John - Corrosion Control Investigation, Commissioner McGovern updated Council on the results from Mr. Chaulk of CBCL Limited. Mr. Chaulk communicated his review of the results from the study. The Acting City Solicitor advised Council that the Water Dispute is under a litigation process begun by a group of residents on the West Side. Council committed to investigate and make the results of the investigation undertaken by Dalhousie University publicly available. Staff presented the results of the investigation this evening, and the information has been posted publicly on the City website. The solicitor cautioned that there is a court and plaintiff approved communication that provides that council as a public body is in a precarious position in that it has to fulfill its political obligations while at the same time not negatively impacting the legal process which is why questions that relate to the fundamental core or causation of this problem should be directed to legal COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 counsel. The solicitor cautioned council members to keep that in mind as they proceed with their questions. Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Deputy Mayor McAlary: RESOLVED that the submitted report M&C 2019-024: West Saint John - Corrosion Control Investigation, be received for information. MOTION CARRIED. 13. Committee Reports 14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda 14.1 Service Agreements - Priority Neighbourhood Associations Referring to the submitted report entitled M&C 2019-023: Service Agreements - Priority Neighbourhood Associations, Commissioner Hugenholtz stated that in previous years the term had been three years, however due to the forthcoming sustainability review the term has been reduced to two years. Responding to a question the Commissioner stated that each Agreement has a cancellation clause. Moved by Councillor Reardon, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the term for the Service Agreements be extended to three years. MOTION DEFEATED with Deputy Mayor McAlary and Councillors Armstrong, Merrithew, Norton, Casey and Sullivan voting nay. Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report 2019-023: Service Agreements - Priority Neighbourhood Associations: 1)Common Council approve service agreements with the Priority Neighbourhood 2)The City Solicitor be directed to prepare all necessary documents outlining the terms and conditions for specific Service Agreement with each Neighbourhood Association, and that; 3)The Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to sign any required documentation. MOTION CARRIED with Councillor Reardon voting nay. 15. General Correspondence COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 15.1 Ticket Purchase Request - Amazeatorium 2019 at Harbour Station Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor MacKenzie: RESOLVED that the ticket purchase request for Amazeatorium 2019 at Harbour Station be approved and the Office of the Common Clerk be directed to purchase the minimum number (25) tickets for those Council members wishing to attend the event subject to PRO kids not having already purchased tickets. MOTION CARRIED. 16. Supplemental Agenda 17. Committee of the Whole 17.1 Safe, Clean Drinking Water Payment of Relief Events Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on th February 11, 2019 Common Council adopt the following: 1.That the City accept the documentation provided by Port City Water Partners (PCWP) establishing at $2,019,917.25 plus HST the increase to carrying out the SCDWP Works caused by contamination Relief Events, for which the City retained the risk under the Project Agreement, during the Construction Period; and further, 2. That, pursuant to section 14 of the Project Agreement, the City pay to PCWP $2,019,917.25 plus HST for all open Relief Events on the project, except Relief Events 23 and 36, in return for a Full and Final Release. MOTION CARRIED. 17.2 Funding Agreement with ACOA and Province of New Brunswick Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on th February 11, 2019 Common Council adopt the following: RESOLVED that pursuant to applications for funding made by The City of Saint John (the vince of each of ACOA and the Province; COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute each such funding agreement; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Common Clerk authorize the allocation of $66,774 from the Growth Reserve over the coming three years to support the Succeed and Stay tri-government partnership; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforesaid funding agreements be kept confidential as required by ACOA, until a public announcement is coordinated by all involved partners. MOTION CARRIED. 17.3 Recommended Appointments to Committees Moved by Deputy Mayor McAlary, seconded by Councillor Sullivan: RESOLVED that as recommended by the Committee of the Whole having met on February 11, 2019, Common Council approve the following appointments: Citizen Recognition Awards Committee: to appoint Deputy Mayor McAlary, Councillor Norton, and Jonathan Taylor from Feb 11, 2019 until a recommendation is brought back to Council Heritage Development Board: Notwithstanding the policy adopted by Common Council on October 29, 2012 regarding appointments to agencies, boards, and commissions, to reappoint Bob Boyce for a 1 year term from April 4, 2019 to April 4, 2020 Lord Beaverbrook Rink: to appoint Heather McBriarty for a 3 year term from April 29, 2019 to April 29, 2022 PRO Kids: to appoint Jason Court, Laura Gould, and Caleb Jones for 3 year terms from February 11, 2019 to February 11, 2022 Saint John Aquatic Centre Commission: to appoint Leslie Keirstead for a 3 year term from February 11, 2019 to February 11, 2022 Saint John Parking-Transit Commission: to reappoint Patricia Ellsworth for a 3 year term from April 29, 2019 to April 29, 2022 to both the Parking and Transit Commissions Saint John Substandard Properties Appeal Committee: Notwithstanding the policy adopted by Common Council on October 29, 2012 regarding appointments to agencies, boards, and commissions, to reappoint Cheryl Johnson from April 4, 2019 to April 4, 2022 COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL February 11, 2019 / le 11février 2019 FCM Committee: Mayor Darling and Councillor MacKenzie to attend the 2019 FCM Conference in Quebec City. MOTION CARRIED. 18. Adjournment Moved by Councillor Sullivan, seconded by Councillor Armstrong: RESOLVED that the meeting of Common Council held on February 11, 2019, be adjourned. MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 9:48 p.m. ЊЊΉЉЋΉЋЉЊВ 5ĻğƩ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ʹ ağƩƷŷĻ DğǒƷƩĻğǒͲ w{‘Ή{L bĻǞ .ƩǒƓƭǞźĭƉ wĻƭƚǒƩĭĻ /ĻƓƷƩĻ 5źƩĻĭƷƚƩΉ5źƩĻĭƷƩźĭĻ /ĻƓƷƩĻ ķĻ ƩĻƭƭƚǒƩĭĻƭ ķǒ b͵Ώ.͵ IǒƓƷźƓŭƷƚƓ {ƚĭźĻƷǤ ƚŅ /ğƓğķğ Ή {ƚĭźĽƷĽ IǒƓƷźƓŭƷƚƓ ķǒ /ğƓğķğ t͵ h͵ .ƚǣ ЋВЉЎЋ Ή /͵t͵ ЋВЉЎЋ aƚƓĭƷƚƓͲ b͵.͵ 9ЊD ЍwЌ ΛЎЉЏΜ ЌБЍΏЋЌЍЎ ƚƌƌ ŅƩĻĻ Ή {ğƓƭ ŅƩğźƭ ЊΏБЍЍΏЌБЍΏЋЌЍЎ I{/ Ʒƚƌƌ ŅƩĻĻΉ {I/ ƭğƓƭ ŅƩğźƭ ЊΏБЉЉΏВВБΏАЌВБ ƒŭğǒƷƩĻğǒθŷǒƓƷźƓŭƷƚƓƭƚĭźĻƷǤ͵ĭğ ǞǞǞ͵ŷǒƓƷźƓŭƷƚƓƭƚĭźĻƷǤ͵ĭğ /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-31 Report Date February 14, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Saint John Water His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Contract 2019-01: Wentworth Street (Union Street to Elliot Row) Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Renewal and Street Reconstruction OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Brent McGovern / Brian John Collin Keenan RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Contract No. 2019-01: Wentworth Street (Union Street to Elliot Row) Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Renewal and Street Reconstruction be awarded to the low Tenderer, TerraEx Inc., at the tendered price of $483,194.35 (including HST) as calculated based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council award Contract 2019- 01: Wentworth Street (Union Street to Elliot Row) Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Renewal and Street Reconstruction to the low Tenderer. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION July 30, 2018; 2019 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program approved July 30, 2018; 2019 General Fund Capital Program approved REPORT BACKGROUND The approved 2019 General Fund and Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Programs include funding for the reconstruction of Wentworth Street from Union Street to Elliot Row. The work involves the replacement of the existing watermain and sanitary sewer, installation of a new storm sewer for separation and full street reconstruction including new concrete curb and sidewalk, roadway granulars, asphalt and landscaping. TENDER RESULTS Tenders closed on February 12, 2019 with the following results, including HST: 1.TerraEx Inc., Saint John, NB $ 483,194.35 2.Galbraith Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 505,583.70 3.Fairville Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 562,350.00 4.NRB Construction Company Limited, Saint John, NB $ 620,425.00 work was $594,353.35, including HST. ANALYSIS The tenders were reviewed by staff and all were found to be formal in all respects. Staff is of the opinion that the low tenderer has the necessary resources and ability to perform the work, and recommend acceptance of their tender. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2019 General Fund and Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Programs. This project is partially funded by the Clean Water Wastewater Fund program. Assuming award of the Contract to the low tenderer, an analysis has been completed which includes the estimated amount of work that will be performed by the Contractor and Others. The analysis is as follows: Budget $ 620,000.00 Project net cost $ 546,700.00 Variance (Surplus) $ 73,300.00 POLICY TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS The recommendation in this report is made in accordance with the provisions of tendering of construction Specifications and the specific project specifications. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The municipal infrastructure on this street is in poor condition and requires replacement. The renewal of the infrastructure will reduce the likelihood of future service disruptions to the local residents due to infrastructure failures. The storm water and sanitary sewer flows will also be separated on this section of Wentworth Street. In addition, this project provides the opportunity to improve the streetscape with the installation of grass medians and street trees. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-34 Report Date February 15, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Saint John Water His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Contract 2019-12: Ellerdale Street 200mm Water Main OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager John Campbell Brent McGovern / Brian John Collin Keenan RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Contract No. 2019-12: Ellerdale Street 200mm Water Main be awarded to the low Tenderer, Galbraith Construction Ltd., at the tendered price of $635,170.30 (including HST) as calculated based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to recommend that Council award Contract 2019- 12: Ellerdale Street 200mm Water Main to the low Tenderer. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION July 30, 2018; (M&C 2018-219) 2019 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program approved. REPORT BACKGROUND The approved 2019 Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program includes funding for the installation of a new 200mm water main on Ellerdale Street, between Valley Street and Margaret Street, to facilitate the removal of services from the 400mm Concrete Pressure Pipe (CPP) transmission main, and repair the holes where the services were removed. TENDER RESULTS Tenders closed on February 14, 2019 with the following results, including HST: 1.Gailbraith Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 635,170.30 2.TerraEx Inc., Saint John, NB $ 651,216.25 3.NRB Construction Company Limited, Saint John, NB $ 664,815.00 4.Fairville Construction Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 687,320.50 5.Maguire Excavating Ltd., Saint John, NB $ 743,391.63 he work was $667,480 including HST. ANALYSIS The tenders were reviewed by staff and all were found to be formal in all respects. Staff is of the opinion that the low tenderer has the necessary resources and expertise to perform the work, and recommend acceptance of their tender. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Contract includes work that is charged against the 2019 Water and Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program. Assuming award of the Contract to the low tenderer, an analysis has been completed which includes the estimated amount of work that will be performed by the Contractor and Others. The analysis is as follows: Budget $ 650,000.00 Project net cost $ 611,900.00 Variance (Surplus) $ 38,100.00 POLICY TENDERING OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS The recommendation in this report is made in accordance with the provisions of Specifications and the specific project specifications. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The new 200mm water main is required to service the properties in the project area that are currently serviced from the 400mm transmission main. The relocation of the services will reduce the likelihood of future, large-scale service disruptions due to infrastructure failures. This project will be completed within the original approved financial budget. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-36 Report Date February 15, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Transportation and Environment Services His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Traffic Paint Sole Source OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Katherine Shannon Michael Hugenholtz John Collin RECOMMENDATION that Common Council authorize City staff to purchase Franklin Paint Company traffic paint for the 2019 construction season as a sole source procurement from Stinson Equipment Limited at a cost of $95,307.17 plus HST. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is award a sole source contract for traffic paint due to improved overall quality and value. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION RESOLVED that the recommendation set out for each consent agenda item be adopted. That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report M&C2018- Common Council authorize City staff to purchase Franklin Paint Company traffic paint for the 2018 constructions season as a sole source procurement from Stinson Equipment Limited at a cost of $73,797.64 plus HST. REPORT Previous to 2016, the City had procured traffic paint from four different manufacturers. Three of these four manufacturers ultimately did not meet the requirements and the other two manufacturers provided product that clumped during the painting season causing damage to equipment and excessive down time. Only Franklin Paints met specifications upon delivery and throughout the subsequent painting season. City staff has endeavored over the years to maintain the competitive bidding process. Tender specifications had been updated each year including more stringent material and performance specifications, ability for the city to test the paint at its discretion and penalty clauses for non-conformance. Despite these efforts paint supplied by other manufacturers still had quality and other issues impacting operations. This more than offsets the lower cost of the low tender process. Quantifying the net benefit of procuring the higher quality and more costly Franklin Paint through a sole source procurement versus continuing a competitive bid process in 2019 is difficult. In 2015, a quote submitted for Franklin Paint was approximately $31,000 greater than the low tender based on the quantities needed in 2015. It is expected the relative cost savings on material if a low tender process was used for 2019 would to be similar. The question then turns to quantifying the operational effectiveness and efficiency benefits, by using the higher cost and quality of Franklin paint. When using lower quality paints clumping occurs, when clumping occurs there is lost production. One lost day of productivity when clumping of the lower quality paints occur, would cost approximately $1400 to make up in labor costs when overtime is required. It would only take 11 days of lost productivity to offset half this difference in material cost. The clumping is also hard on the painting equipment that the City owns, requiring more frequent replacement of parts such as pumps and filters. Additional staff time, both in working with manufacturers/suppliers of non- conforming paint and in explaining to the public delays to the painting program, is also an added cost. One key measurement of the operational effectiveness of the annual painting program is the repainting of all the approximately 3300 traffic markings and 350 KM of centre and lane lines in a timely manner. This is not possible when we receive sub-standard material. In 2016, 2017 and 2018 a sole source tender was awarded to Stinson Equipment Limited who is the sole distributor of the Franklin Paint Company product in this region. The product performed very well and none of the aforementioned issues related to the other vendors was experienced. The Department experienced zero downtime related to the quality of the paint and is happy with its performance and longevity. City staff remains committed to respecting the competitive bidding process and is always open to having manufacturers demonstrate that their traffic paint , staff has not had any other manufacturer demonstrate compliance with our required quality requirements. From a service efficiency and effectiveness perspective, Staff is confident a sole source purchase of Franklin Paint Company product, through Stinson Equipment Limited, is the best solution for the 2019 painting season. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT service delivery. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Funding is included in the 2019 General Fund Operating Budget for the anticipated purchase price of $95,307.17 of the Franklin paint. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Input from the Materials Management Division has been incorporated into this report. The City of Fredericton has used Franklin Company paint for the last seven years and is content with the product. The two previous years Fredericton used two different other manufacturers (same from the list of those used by Saint John) with similar negative results. The City of Moncton has also experienced issues with other manufacturers. They commenced a sole source procurement of Franklin Paint through Stinson Equipment Ltd. in 2015, and are planning the same in 2019. City staff has worked with the two cities to place a single larger order of paint to reduce the price with the larger order. ATTACHMENTS None COUNCIL REPORT M&C No. 2019-33 Report Date February 20, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Saint John Water His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. Reinstatement, Continuation & Amending Agreement Required for Contract 2019-09: M-R-G Forcemain Renewal Phase 1 OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager John Campbell Brent McGovern/Brian John Collin Keenan RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that: 1.The City of Saint John enter into the Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. Reinstatement, Continuation & Amending Agreement attached to M&C 2019-33 for the one-time fee of $10 plus HST, and further, 2.That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the attached Agreement document. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The attached Agreement between Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. and the City of Saint John is necessary in order to reinstate and amend the previous Consent Agreement between Brunswick Pipeline and the City of Saint John for the proposed Encroachment of Brunswick Pipeline KP 23.525 in the County of St. John, in the Province of New Brunswick. The encroachment is necessary in order to carry out the work of Contract 2019-09: M-R-G Forcemain Phase 1. There is a one-time fee for the Reinstatement, Continuation & Amending Agreement in the amount of $10 plus HST. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION December 9, 2013, (M&C 2013-272), 2014 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Fund Program Approved. September 29, 2014, (M&C 2014-168), Consent Agreement for Proposed Encroachment of Brunswick Pipeline KP 23.525 Approved. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT s Priority for Valued Service Delivery, specifically as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES N/A INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS This report and attac ATTACHMENTS 1.Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. Reinstatement, Continuation & Amending Agreement. 2.On-Site Activity Permit Application and Technical Guidelines. 3.M-R-G Forcemain Renewal Phase 1, Civil Plan & Profile, STA 0+000 to 0+180, P.Eng. Stamp date 4, Jan 2019. REINSTATEMENT, CONTINUATION & AMENDING AGREEMENT THIS REINSTATEMENT, CONTINUATION and AMENDING AGREEMENT made and effective as of this _____ day of February, 2019 BETWEEN: Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Federal laws of Canada (HCompany -and- The City of Saint John, a body corporate by Royal Charter in the County of Saint John and Province of New Brunswick (Hereinafter City - WHEREAS: th 1.The Parties have entered into a Consent Agreement dated the 6 of October, 2014 (the 2.The Consent Agreement, by its terms, has expired; and 3.The Parties wish to reinstate and continue the Consent Agreement and amend its terms. NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the mutual undertakings and obligations herein contained, the reinstatement and continuation of the Consent Agreement, the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency which is acknowledged by each Party hereto), the Parties covenant and agree as follows: 1.The termination of the Consent Agreement is hereby revoked and, except as expressly modified by this Agreement, the Consent Agreement shall be, and hereby is, reinstated in its entirety and shall be in full force and effect as if the same had never been terminated. 2.-10C, atin Article 2 of the Consent Agreement Technical Guidelines found http://www.emeranewbrunswick.com/site- emera/media/EmeraNewBrunswick/Brunswick%20Pipeline%20On- Site%20Activity%20Permit%20and%20Technical%20Guidelines.pdf 3.The reference in Article 3 of the Consent Agreement to drawing Replacement, Civil Plan Dever Road Sta. 0+000 to 0+180, stamp dated 8/7/2014) is M R G Forcemain Renewal-Phase 1, Civil Plan & Profile Sta. 0+000 to 0+180, P.Eng. Stamp date 4 Jan 2019 Њ 4.The reference in Article 4 of the Consent Agreement by February 4, 2021 unless the Parties agree to extend the completion date in writing prior to February 4, 2021. 5.- 6.The City shall submit to the Company two (2) copies of As-built drawings of the completed s Technical Guidelines within forty-five (45) days of the completion of the facilities. 7.Save and except for the amendments stated herein, the terms and conditions of the Consent Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. To the extent any provisions of this Agreement are inconsistent with any of the provisions set forth in the Consent Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern and control. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. NEXT PAGE IS EXECUTION PAGE. Ћ IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement, effective as of the date first written above. SIGNED in the presence of Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. ______________________________ Per: WITNESS The City of Saint John Mayor Common Clerk Common Council Resolution: , 2019 Ќ 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES REVISION HISTORY Rev No. Issue Date Brief Description of the Change 012018-10-04New document Uncontrolled if printed Page 1of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES OVERVIEW is to provide the necessary information to individuals, companies, stakeholders and other prescribed area (see Section 2 of the NEB PipelineDamage Prevention Regulations Authorizations (SOR/2016-124) Regulations). In associated surface facilities. Any work (or planned work) in the prescribed area which could interfere with EBPC easement rights or could create safety concerns for EBPC and/or the public is prohibited without an On-Site Activity Permit issued by the Company. Please note, these Guidelines are general in nature and any proposed activity by external parties, whether addressed in these Guidelines or not, requires consultation with the Company and its prior written approval. The general prohibition on activities in and around the pipeline and its ROW is found in Section 112(1) of the NEB Act. Section 112(1) of the NEB Act states: These Guidelines have been developed pursuant to Section 112(1) of the NEB Act as well as to meet the NEB PipelineDamage Prevention Regulations Authorizations (SOR/2016- 124). Links to NEB resources can be found on the NEB website (www.neb-one.gc.ca). Uncontrolled if printed Page 2of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES For any questions regarding the information provided in these Guidelines, please contact Brunswick Pipeline: Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company 1 Germain Street, Suite 1102 Saint John, NB E2L 4V1 Telephone: (506) 693-4214 Fax: (506) 658-0199 Email: brunswickpipeline@emera.com Uncontrolled if printed Page 3of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Contents 1 ACTIVITIES REQUIRING AN ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT ...................................... 5 Facility Construction ...................................................................................... 5 Crossing ...................................................................................................... 5 Ground Disturbance Activities ......................................................................... 5 Operation of Vehicles/Mobile Equipment Crossing Brunswick Pipeline .................. 5 2 ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS ............................................ 6 Request for a Permit ..................................................................................... 6 Permit Application - Required Information ........................................................ 6 Permit Application Assessment ....................................................................... 7 i) Activity Approval ....................................................................................... 7 ii) Emergency Activity Approval ....................................................................... 7 iii) Permit Application Rejection ........................................................................ 7 3 TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR PERMIT ACTIVITIES ............................................. 8 Facility Construction ...................................................................................... 8 i) Surface facilities (e.g. buildings, parking lots, monuments) ............................. 8 ii) Excavations (e.g. trenches, foundations, boreholes, open pits) ........................ 9 iii) Subsurface facilities not crossing the pipeline (e.g. cables, utility pipes, tanks) 11 iv) Overhead facilities (e.g. powerlines, towers) ...............................................12 v) Abandonment of facilities ..........................................................................13 Crossing ....................................................................................................13 i) Surface crossing (e.g. roads, driveways/access roads, sidewalks, railway) ......13 ii) Subsurface crossing (e.g. cables, utility pipes, transmission/distribution pipelines) ...............................................................................................14 Ground Disturbance Activities .......................................................................15 i) Blasting ..................................................................................................15 ii) Seismic Activity .......................................................................................15 Operation of Vehicles/Mobile Equipment Crossing Brunswick Pipeline ................16 4 LOCATE REQUESTS .......................................................................................17 5 APPENDICES ................................................................................................18 Uncontrolled if printed Page 4of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES 1ACTIVITIES REQUIRING AN ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT The following activities, if undertaken in the prescribed area, require an On-Site Activity Permit: Facility Construction o Surface facilities (e.g. buildings, parking lots, monuments) o Excavations (e.g. trenches, foundations, boreholes, open pits) o Subsurface facilities not crossing the pipeline (e.g. cables, utility pipes, tanks) o Overhead facilities (e.g. powerlines, towers) o Abandonment of facilities Crossing o Surface crossing (e.g. roads, driveways/access roads, sidewalks, railway) o Subsurface crossing (e.g. cables, utility pipes, transmission/distribution pipelines) 1 Ground Disturbance Activities o Blasting o Seismic Activity Operation of Vehicles/Mobile Equipment Crossing Brunswick Pipeline Note:The activities listed above as requiring a Permit is not a complete list. Any person considering an activity in the prescribed area, whether listed in these Guidelines or not, is required to contact the Company prior to commencing the activity to determine if the as any mitigation measures to protect the public, the environment, the Permit Applicant, and/or employees and its facilities. 1 Ground disturbance activities within 200 metres of the pipeline, even though outside of the prescribed area, still require an On-Site Activity Permit. Uncontrolled if printed Page 5of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES 2ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS An On-Site Activity Permit is required between the Company and anyone seeking to undertake the activities outlined above in the prescribed area. The party entering into the On-Site Activity Permit (and those working for them or on their behalf) shall adhere to the terms and conditions of the Permit, the requirements of these Guidelines and the NEB Regulations. A minimum beginning any activities in the prescribed area. The Company requires a minimum of 10 business e for larger construction projects and blasting activities. Request for a Permit For larger projects or blasting activities, the request for an On-Site Activity Permit must be made to the Company via email (brunswickpipeline@emera.com; attention: On-Site Activity Permit) a minimum of 10 business days in advance of the planned activity. For all other activities in the prescribed area, to request an On-Site Activity Permit, the Company must be contacted via the One-Call System (1-888-410-2220 or www.clickbeforeyoudig.com) a minimum of 3 business days in advance of the planned activity. Regardless of the activity, Locate Requests must be made via the One-Call System (1-888-410-2220 or www.clickbeforeyoudig.com) a minimum of 3 business days in advance of the planned activity. See Section 5 of these Guidelines for more information about Locate Requests. Permit Application - Required Information The Company will determine the supporting information required to be submitted for review and approval by the Company in support of Permit Applications. The following is the general information the Company requires at a minimum to be submitted for an On- Site Activity Permit: Applicant contact information; Proposed equipment to be used; All design standards mandated by federal, provincial, and/or local government agencies shall be satisfied; A letter shall be submitted to the Company stating that all appropriate federal, provincial, and/or local permits, authorizations and/or approvals have been granted or obtained for the subject project; Excavation Plan, if applicable; and Uncontrolled if printed Page 6of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Issued for Construction (IFC) Drawings (see Appendix 1 for IFC Drawing requirements). The Company will not consider incomplete Permit Applications. Permit Application Assessment Upon receipt of a Permit Application, the Company will inform the Permit Applicant within ten (10) business days whether or not approval is granted or additional information or time is required to consider the Permit Application. The Company will determine the complexity of the proposed activity, the degree of Company assessment and the level of Company approval required. For example, the Company may require additional information, time, assessment and/or levels of approval for projects that may affect the integrity of the C i)Activity Approval The Permit Applicant, if approval is received, will be required to provide the Company with a duly executed On-Site Activity Permit as provided by the Company. The On-Site Activity ments and conditions for the approved activity. The On-Site Activity Permit must be completed, executed by both parties and returned to the Company prior to initiating any work. A copy of the On-Site Activity Permit must be present on site at all times during construction activities. Within 45 days of the completion of the activity, the Permit Holder shall provide the Company all as-built drawings of all installations identifying their location in relation to the pipeline. ii)Emergency Activity Approval In the case of emergency repairs to critical public infrastructure or for public safety, where required to contact the Company via the One-Call System (1-888-410-2220 or www.clickbeforeyoudig.com) and obtain an On-Site Activity Permit. iii)Permit Application Rejection If the Permit Application is refused, the unsuccessful Permit Applicant will be provided with the reasons for refusal. The unsuccessful Permit Applicant has the right to contact the NEB to review the request as provided by the NEB Act, Section 112. Uncontrolled if printed Page 7of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES 3TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR PERMIT ACTIVITIES Facility Construction i)Surface facilities (e.g. buildings, parking lots, monuments) (1)Fencing Any fences are to cross the pipeline ROW at or near as possible to right angles. Fencing must be easily removed and replaced, if necessary, and contain a 3.7-metre (12-foot) wide gate for access at each location where the fence intersects the ROW. This would include fencing of any type or kind including, but not limited to, wire type, chain-link, snow-fencing, PVC, wood, stockade, and decorative type fencing. The location of fence posts in the prescribed area shall be approved by the Company. The within the pipeline ROW. (2)New Facilities within the prescribed area but not crossing the Test pits may be required, at the discretion of the Company, in areas where equipment/vehicle crossings and/or Permit Applicant facility crossings are proposed. Company deems that the installation of easing pipe and/or other alterations are necessary to protect the pipeline, the Permit Holder shall be required to pay to the Company the estimated cost of such alterations prior to the Company beginning the work. At the completion of the work and when the actual costs have been incurred and tabulated by the Company, any additional costs incurred above the estimate shall be paid by the Permit Holder to the Company and any savings shall be remitted to the Permit Holder. The Company will furnish applicable as-built pipeline location information upon request by the Permit Applicant seeking to construct facilities within the prescribed area of the buildings, fencing, structures (permanent or temporary) or other obstructions (including trees, shrubs, bushes, plants and landscaping) proposed to be erected or placed within, above or below the prescribed area. (3)Landscaping The only circumstance where the Company will allow the planting of trees on the pipeline ROW is if it has been negotiated and defined in a landowner Letter of Commitments. It is iminate Uncontrolled if printed Page 8of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES obstruction of the ROW visibility from ground or air, however, the Company reserves the written approval. Landscaping grades and drainage swales will comply with the following requirements: With prior written approval from the Company, predetermined and approved limited additional fill over the existing grade may be deposited on the ROW. slope of 4:1 longitudinal with the pipeline and/or 8:1 cross slope, and have a minimum coverage as per the most recent version of CSA Z662 - Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. The maximum cover will be determined by the Company, taking into account pipeline specifications and local conditions. Proposed grades will not cause the ponding of surface water, or redirect the flow of Permit Holder may be required to install erosion and control measures upstream to limit the amount of surface runoff across the ROW. Company access to the pipeline ROW shall not be restricted by the proposed grades. The Company reserves the right at any time, without notice or approval, to modify all cover/grade requirements. ii)Excavations (e.g. trenches, foundations, boreholes, open pits) Excavation operations shall be performed in accordance with the Guidelines set forth below. No excavation, crossing, backfilling or construction operations in the prescribed area of is on site. The Company representative shall have the authority to stop work or an activity at any time should the Company representative deem the work or activity unsafe or a and/or its facilities. Test pits within the prescribed area employing mechanical excavation can be scheduled during the period of April 15-November 01 by contacting the Company at least 10 business days in advance and submitting at that time an Excavation Plan (as described in this Section below). Excavation of test pits may be performed provided a Company representative is present. The Company will make reasonable efforts to accommodate the requested schedule but such scheduling will be subject to, among other things, availability Uncontrolled if printed Page 9of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES of appropriate Company personnel as determined by the Company, weather, or field operating conditions. Excavation of test pits within the prescribed area by means of mechanical equipment is not allowed during the period of November 01-April 15. During this time period, pipeline hand digging or soft digging equipment. The Company must be contacted at least 10 business days in advance to coordinate these activities, and an Excavation Plan must be submitted (as described below) at that time. Once an Excavation Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Company, excavation may proceed in accordance with the approved Plan. The Excavation Plan shall be a written document approved by the authorized Company representative. When developing an Excavation Plan, the following should be considered as well as any other relevant considerations: Backhoe/excavator set-up position in relationship to the pipeline; Need for benching to level backhoe; Required excavation depth and length; Sloping and shoring requirements; Ingress/egress ramp locations; Minimum clearance requirements for mechanical equipment; Pipeline location and depth; Verify bar has been welded onto backhoe teeth and side cutters have been removed; Spoil pile location; and Compliance with Canada Occupational Health and Safety regulations. The authorized Company representative will direct the use of mechanical equipment within the NEB prescribed area associated w until the pipeline is visually located. Once the pipeline is visually located, hand tools or soft dig equipment shall be used to complete the final excavation of the pipeline inside the In the case of a trenchless excavation method within the NEB prescribed area, a plan shall be submitted to the Company for its approval that indicates the minimum radial clearance Note: This clause refers to trenchless excavation within the 30-metre NEB prescribed area only; crossing the pipeline requires further approvals. Uncontrolled if printed Page 10of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Federal regulations that require the pipeline to be inspected by the Company. In order to Canada Occupational Health and Safety regulations that pertain to excavations must be adhered to. A minimum 24-hour written notice to the Company is required to perform the relevant inspections prior to proceeding with backfill operations. Permit Holder Excavation & Backfill Activities: Bucket teeth shall be barred and side cutters removed. excavate near the pipeline. A line locator and/or probe bar shall be used to maintain the minimum 5-metre clearance to the pipeline. line. The Permit Holder shall continue to locate the pipe using industry best practices (such as line locator, daylighting, or probe bar) during the excavation process to ensure no unidentified works or infrastructure is damaged until the final ditch grade is achieved. allow the authorized Company representative to perform relevant inspections prior to proceeding with backfill operations. A Company representative is available during normal business hours (Monday to Friday, excluding holidays, 8:30 am 4:30 pm AT). Permit Holder bears all costs and expenses (as determined by the Company) for the supply of a Company representative outside normal business hours. iii)Subsurface facilities not crossing the pipeline (e.g. cables, utility pipes, tanks) All buried facilities shall be installed as per the appropriate typical crossing drawing as listed in Appendix 2 and in accordance with the process and procedures set out below. To the fullest extent possible, all foreign lines, roads, electrical cables and other utilities -of-way at an angle at or near right angles. requires a minimum clearance as indicated in the appropriate typical crossing drawing. This clearance may need to be increased in some circumstances, as determined by the Company in its discretion. Uncontrolled if printed Page 11of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES The Company will not be responsible for any loss, damage or required repairs to a Permit activities (or otherwise). All such loss, damage and repairs shall be at the sole risk, cost and expense of the Permit Holder. Acceptable backfill must be free of rocks, organic material, impacted soils, refuse and any rescribed area will be considered by the Company on a case-by-case basis and will be subject to the On-Site Activity Permit terms as specified by the Company. Permit Applicant to provide the information listed below to the Company for its review and approval prior to any such installation: Number, spacing and voltage of cables Line loading and phase relationship of cables Grounding system Position of cables and load facilities relative to pipeline Specific installation requirements for cables carrying less than 600 volts shall be determined by the Company on a case-by-case basis. pipeline prescribed area will be considered by the Company on a case-by-case basis and will be subject to the On-Site Activity Permit terms as specified by the Company. mitigation. Any crossing will require an assessment of this system at the cost, risk and responsibility of the Permit Applicant. Any additions or modifications that result from the older. For metallic line installations two No. 10 THWN black insulated copper wires for the use of test leads will be installed and attached at the point of crossing for corrosion control monitoring at the discretion of the authorized Company representative. The test wires will be routed underground and terminated at a point specified by the Company. iv)Overhead facilities (e.g. powerlines, towers) Overhead power lines, telephone lines and telecommunication installations shall be reviewed by the Company on a case-by-case basis using the following assessment criteria: Uncontrolled if printed Page 12of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES The Permit Applicant shall be responsible to provide a mitigation design in accordance Practices of there is a determination of electrical interference between its facilit pipeline. This solution will be presented prior to construction, if applicable. The vertical distance between the lowest wire of an overhead line catenary and the surface of the ground within the pipeline easement shall not be less than the minimum vertical clearance distance set out in that part of the Canadian Electrical Code Part III (C Overhead lines shall be installed with the minimum clearance as required by CSA and -of-way. The installation ROW. The Permit Holder, where directed by the Company, shall install aerial warning devices on g aerial patrols. v)Abandonment of facilities separate On-Site Activity Permit is required. The abandonment (including means and methods) of existing facilities must be approved abandonment of existing facilities, all federal, provincial, and/or local government laws, regulations, by-laws, permits, authorizations, rules, procedures and mandated requirements must be obtained and adhered to by the Permit Holder. Once all applicable federal, provincial, and/or local permits, authorizations and/or approvals are granted, a letter certifying same shall be submitted to the Company by the Permit Holder prior to the commencement of any facility abandonment activities. Crossing i)Surface crossing (e.g. roads, driveways/access roads, sidewalks, railway) Access Road Uncontrolled if printed Page 13of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Typical drawings for Private Access Roads or Temporary Access Roads will be made available by the Company to the Permit Applicant upon request. A list of the typical drawings is found in Appendix 2. Maximum and minimum depths of cover for all areas of equipment/vehicular travel (e.g., highways, roads, railroads, construction access, driveways, parking lots, etc.) will be determined by the Company and local, provincial, and federal requirements. For this purpose, cover can be defined as the distance from the top of the pipe to the finished grade. Mitigative methods where the cover is insufficient will be determined on a case-by- case basis by the Company. Test pits may be required, at the discretion of the Company, in areas where equipment/vehicle crossings and/or Permit Applicant facility crossings are proposed. When planning parking areas, the pipeline ROW location is to be taken into account so as to avoid covering the ROW. ii)Subsurface crossing (e.g. cables, utility pipes, transmission/distribution pipelines) considered by the Company on a case-by-case basis and will be subject to the On-Site Activity Permit terms as specified by the Company. Installation of all electric Permit Applicant to provide the information listed below to the Company for its review and approval prior to any such installation: Number, spacing and voltage of cables Line loading and phase relationship of cables Grounding system Position of cables and load facilities relative to pipeline Specific installation requirements for cables carrying less than 600 volts shall be determined by the Company on a case-by-case basis. Installation of pipeline prescribed area will be considered by the Company on a case-by-case basis and will be subject to the On-Site Activity Permit terms as specified by the Company. peline is designed with a cathodic protection system which includes AC mitigation. Any crossing will require an assessment of this system at the cost, risk and responsibility of the Permit Applicant. Any additions or modifications that result from the asse Uncontrolled if printed Page 14of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES For metallic line installations two No. 10 THWN black insulated copper wires for the use of test leads will be installed and attached at the point of crossing for corrosion control monitoring at the discretion of the authorized Company representative. The test wires will be routed underground and terminated at a point specified by the Company. Ground Disturbance Activities Any ground disturbance activity within the prescribed area shall not be performed unless the authorized Company representative is on site. The Company representative shall have the authority to stop work or an activity at any time should it deem the work or activity unsafe or a danger to the public, the environment, the Permit Holder, and/or the i)Blasting Ground disturbance activities within 200 metres of the pipeline, even though outside of the prescribed area, still require an On-Site Activity Permit. Blasting operations, in addition to applicable federal, provincial and local laws, regulations, by-laws and codes, shall comply with the guidelines set forth below. blasting shall occ-of-way if the Company determines that such blasting may be detrimental to its facilities. For any blasting proposed within 200 m (656 ft) of the pipeline ROW, the Company shall be advised in writing 90 calendar days prior to commencement of the blasting. A Blasting Proposal outlining the scope and location of work must accompany the notice. The Company requires all applicable blasting codes, by-laws, regulations and laws to be strictly followed in all cases. In addition, the Company reserves the right to require the Permit Applicant who will be undertaking blasting activity to furnish a certified Blasting Plan (including estimated peak particle velocities at the closest pipeline location and a proposed monitoring plan) Blasting Proposal, a minimum of ten (10) business days prior to the commencement of blasting work. This shall provide the Company time to evaluate and to arrange for a Company representative to witness the blasting operation, including blast-hole drilling and loading activities. The Company will require blast reports, including monitoring, within 24 hours of a blast for review. ii)Seismic Activity encing seismic activity within Uncontrolled if printed Page 15of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Operation of Vehicles/Mobile Equipment Crossing Brunswick Pipeline Temporary vehicle or mobile equipment crossings at any location along the pipeline shall be performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth below: For the purposes of paragraph 112(2)(a) of the NEB Act, the operation of a vehicle or mobile equipment across a pipeline is authorized if the person that intends to operate the vehicle or mobile equipment across the pi consent. For the purposes of paragraph 112(2)(a) of the NEB Act, the operation across the pipeline of a vehicle or mobile equipment that is used to perform an agricultural activity is authorized if the following conditions are met: (a) the loaded axle weight and tire pressures of the vehicle or mobile equipment are (b) the point of crossing has not been the subject of a notification under the NEB PipelineDamage Prevention Regulations Authorizations (SOR/2016-124). Temporary bridging such as, but not limited to, additional cover, construction mats, or temporary structural spans shall be installed for the protection of the Company pipeline at any point of construction equipment crossing, unless approval to cross without protection is specifically granted in writing by the Company. Uncontrolled if printed Page 16of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES 4LOCATE REQUESTS All pipelines must be located using either Call Before You Dig: 1-888-410-2220 or Click Before You Dig: www.clickbeforeyoudig.com. The Company will provide field locate services and mark its pipeline(s) at selected points in accordance with federal, provincial and local requirements. If the Company representative requires the pipeline be located by excavation, the cost to excavate the pipeline and restore surface improvements (e.g., pavement, landscaping, and sidewalks) shall be the responsibility of the Permit Holder. Note: A Company representative must be present during any excavation to expose the pipeline. During this perio surveyor/engineer provided by and for the account of the Permit Holder. The surveyor shall prepare the plans, sections, and profile drawingsand the Company shall be provided with a copy of the completed plans and drawings. All survey data shall be referenced to the New Brunswick High Precision Network (NBHPN) with coordinates referenced to NB Stereographic Projection and vertical datum using geoid model Ht1_01. In addition to complying with the above requirements, Permit Holders shall comply with the provisions of all federal, provincial and/or local laws, regulations, by-laws and permits relating to excavation and demolition work in the vicinity of underground facilities, including, but not limited to, the local one-call regulations and procedures. Uncontrolled if printed Page 17of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES 5APPENDICES Appendix 1 Drawing Requirements Issued for Construction Drawings In order to maintain accurate records of the Brunswick Pipeline System, when applicable, of the Permit Application that identifies all modifications and activity that could affect the pipeline. As a minimum, the Permit Applicant will be required to submit the following drawings: Plan view with scale indicated Accuracy to one tenth (0.1) metre or better; pipeline(s), pipeline appurtenances, markers, cathodic test facilities and right-of- way and other utilities and utility easements; Proposed activities (measured to the Compa Temporary facilities used for construction purposes (examples: parking lots, storage yards, staging areas, laydown areas, etc.). Profile/Cross Section view(s) with scales indicated Section view(s) along the proposed facilities th within the prescribed area. Company pipeline right-of-way limits; Vertical distance of the proposed utility below grade; Existing and proposed grades, with reference point; Clearance to Identify and state diameter of each underground facility; Identify coordinate system; Indicate vertical datum. Notes Note referencing compliance with all applicable CSA standards and the National Energy Board Pipeline Crossing Regulations; Include a North Arrow and Scale on all drawings; parish, town, village, etc.); Uncontrolled if printed Page 18of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Name of the Applicant and the name of the engineering company who compiled the drawing (where applicable); Drawing number and the date of the drawing; Date and method of the survey; Signature of the Applicant and the engineering company; Change orders During the course of the work, any change orders that impact the Company approved IFC scope and/or drawings will require review and approval from the Company. As-Built Drawings As a minimum, all information listed in regards to Issue for Construction drawings is required to be submitted in an As-Build state within 45 days of the project completion. As- build drawings submission must include: one (1) paper copy; one (1) PDF copy; and a digital AutoCAD file using the latest edition. NOTE: The Permit Holder drawing(s) must be available to on site Company representative for reference during construction. Uncontrolled if printed Page 19of20 PUBLIC 5ƚĭ bƚ͵ 5ttΏt5wΏЉЌ ON-SITE ACTIVITY PERMIT wĻǝ {ƷğƷǒƭ ЉЊ APPLICATION and TECHNICAL LƭƭǒĻ 5ğƷĻ ЋЉЊБΏЊЉΏЉЍ GUIDELINES Appendix 2 Typical Crossing Drawings The Company has generated typical drawings, which are available upon request, as reference for the following common activities: Typical Road Crossing Typical Overhead Power Crossing Typical Pipeline / Cable Crossing Typical Access Road Timber Crossing Uncontrolled if printed Page 20of20 PUBLIC /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-39 Report Date February 19, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Finance and Administrative Services His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Fleet Replacement Procurement February 2019 OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author(s) Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Kevin Loughery / Kevin Fudge / John Collin Chris Roberts Ian Fogan RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council award the purchase of one (1) Vacuum/Jetter Truck at a total cost of $538,843.00 plus HST to FST Canada Inc. O/A Joe Johnson Equipment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City manages a fleet of 52 heavy trucks utilized by the City of Saint John and Saint John Water. Each year, the Cworks with various City departments and commissions to identify and replace vehicles which have reached the end of their useful service lives. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations to award the latest tendered vehicles and/or equipment which require Common Council approval. The City currently has over 100 vehicles and equipment past their optimal replacement point (ORP, a calculation based on the age of a vehicle, the odometer reading, overall condition and maintenance cost) and this year, vehicles (some of which are the least reliable and most expensive to maintain) . The one (1) vacuum/jetter truck in this recommendation is to replace one (1) vacuum/jetter truck, like for like; unit 454. Unit 454 is a 2009 International cab and chassis with a Vactor body and ORP index of 21. The lifetime maintenance cost for unit 454 is $311,474.58 with $89,608.01 representing the last two years of use. The total lifetime maintenance costs of this unit are quickly approaching the initial purchase price and the escalating maintenance costs are expected to continue with continued operation. This unit is also equipped with Navistar MaxxForce Advanced EGR diesel engine, which has traditionally had higher than usual life maintenance costs. The expected delivery timeframe on the new Vacuum/Jetter Truck is thirty-five (35) weeks. The Vacuum/Jetter Truck is a critical piece of equipment for Saint John Water. On the water distribution side, this equipment serves as a hydro excavation tool to locate critical infrastructure like natural gas and electrical wires. It also serves to clean out and thaw valve chambers and service boxes. The Vacuum/Jetter Truck similarly assists with controlling the water in a trench during a water main repair under pressure. On the sewer side, the Vacuum/Jetter Truck is vital to flush low grade sewers to prevent sewer backup, which reduces o serves to flush other sewers that are plugged with grease, debris or other materials. In addition, the Vacuum/Jetter Truck assists with the maintenance of pump stations by pumping down the wet wells, cleaning out manholes and other related tasks. The Vacuum/Jetter Truck furthermore enables Saint John Water to locate underground infrastructure by hydro excavation, which significantly reduces the excavation perimeter and is therefore considerably more cost effective, as it reduces reinstatement expenses. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION Not applicable. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT as it relates to investing in sustainable City services and municipal infrastructure. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES This purchase is a planned replacement of existing fleet equipment, approved in the 2018 capital budget. The funds specifically are provided for in the fleet reserve, funded from the operating budget. The specifications allow for vendors to submit proposals of new and/or used equipment to be evaluated using common criteria. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT Materials Management facilitated the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to solicit proposals for the Vacuum/Jetter Truck. As such the RFP closed on December 6, 2018 with the following proponents responding by submitting proposals: Asybco-Tremcar Saint-Jean-sur-Richelio, QC East Coast International Trucks Inc. Moncton, NB Saunders Equipment Fredericton, NB FST Canada Inc. O/A Joe Johnson Equipment Dartmouth, NS Dartmouth, NS C.M. Equipment Inc. Ajax, ON SNT solutions Inc. Dartmouth, NS A review committee, consisting of staff from Materials Management, Saint John Water and Fleet Management reviewed the submissions for completeness and compliance with the RFP requirements and selection criteria consisting of the following: 1.Presentation and Quality of Proposal 2.Compliance with Specifications 3.Delivery Timeframe 4.Service Response Time 5.Value Added 6.Cost Following this, the financial proposals were opened and evaluated and corresponding scores were added to the technical scores. proposal was selected as the best proposal based on an overall rating of the evaluation criteria offering the strongest overall solution for the City at a cost acceptable to staff. Materials Management support the recommendations being put forth. ATTACHMENTS None Presentation to SJ City counc Goals of this presentation To inform the city council about the unique value proposition and mission that SJTL brings to Saint John and New Brunswick To talk about the success and challenges of the Tool Library To introduce the Community Build concept and pitch a culture of barn raising for our community Our mission: to inspire, equip and revitalize our neighborhoods Our members rock! A great value proposition for SJ Affordable access to nearly any tool you need to fix up a home citizens, customers make sales targets. This is about community Addressing environmentalism (next slide) No other tool library in NB! On the cutting edge of a sharing economy movement that started here in SJ. A place to learn essential DIY skills in environmentalism? Precious Plastics SJ coming soon! Classes you said? Our Successes 120 members in 8 months. Need 270 annual members by June 2020 1400 completed loans 12 renovations supported 2 businesses fully renovated (Visitors on Union and 1 more coming soon) 90+ people in classes Starting a renovation and construction team The Community Build (coming later 8 jobs created including 3 external jobs un related to SJTL Grey area in community development funding streams. Lack of willingness to collaborate by some other groups. Our Awareness of our library and shop challenges features/existence Our big event, The Community Build! https://youtu.be/bz5g5n2ewb8 So what is our ask? Help us form this Community build and barn raising thing further. A couple of thoughts on how What about these boarded up homes? Can we mobilize a build around these to make them into a CO-OP housing solution? Procurement. With no major donors yet, we lack building materials to help battle! Rundown housing can literally ruin the psychology of the people who live in their neighborhoods.. Help the Tool Library become a de facto piece of the cities or extension of the existing library systems. /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-38 Report Date February 21, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Corporate Services His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: A By-Law Respecting Closing of Roads, Streets or Highways in The City of Saint John OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager John L. Nugent John L. Nugent John Collin RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Common Council give first and second reading to a By- Law Respecting the Closing of Roads, Streets or Highways in The City of Saint John. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Municipalities Act while in effect set out in detail the process to be followed closing a public street. A street closing under that process was -law identifying the street or portion and replaces the Municipalities Act does not stipulate the process to be followed. Rather, the LGA simply enables a council to adopt a by-law respecting: Highway Act, (ii) the temporary and permanent opening and -law would, if enacted, assure from a legal perspective the legitimacy and effectiveness of any Council decision to close a public street or portion thereof. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION N/A STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT A Street Closing By-Law supports Council decisions which align with the Council priorities of growth and prosperity and valued service delivery. REPORT The Municipalities Act stipulated certain conditions precedent to the closing of a public street: 1.publication of a notice of by-law to close a street, 2.the fixing by Council of the time and place for consideration of objections to the by-law; and to hear from those wishing to speak to the proposed closing, and 3.as well as hearing and considering any written objections received as well as any verbal representations from persons wishing to speak for or against the proposed closing. -laws for municipal purposes respecting (p) subject to the Highway Act, (ii) the temporary and permanent opening and closing of roads, stre The proposed by-law in large part mimics the process as had been stipulated by the now repealed Municipalities Act. The only significant change is that the 14 days prior to the scheduled hearing to be conducted by Council. This contrasts with the earlier requirement that publication be by way of newspaper notice. The matter of a possible street closing will reach Council in the same fashion as has been the case for many years, i.e. a recommendation will be made by the City Manager that Common Council consider enacting a by-law which would close an identified public street or portion thereof. If Council accepts the recommendation, the Common Clerk would be directed to advertise that decision for the stipulated period of time; Council would at the time and date stipulated in the Notice consider any written objections received and hear from anyone wishing to speak in favour of or opposition to the proposed closing; and Finally, Common Council would decide whether to enact a by-law effecting the closing of the street in question. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The consideration of a requested street closing is oft times associated with proposed development or City infrastructure initiatives. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS The text of the proposed by-law has been distributed to the Transportation and Environment, Growth and Community Development and Finance and Administration (Real Property Division) service areas for review and any comments or questions received have been accounted for in the submitted text. ATTACHMENTS Draft of the text of the proposed Street Closing By-Law. wĻĭĻźǝĻķ 5ğƷĻ CĻĬƩǒğƩǤ ЋЊͲ ЋЉЊВ aĻĻƷźƓŭ 5ğƷĻ CĻĬƩǒğƩǤ ЋЎͲ ЋЉЊВ hƦĻƓ ƚƩ /ƌƚƭĻķ hƦĻƓ {ĻƭƭźƚƓ Iźƭ ‘ƚƩƭŷźƦ 5ƚƓ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ ğƓķ aĻƒĬĻƩƭ ƚŅ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ —ƚǒƩ ‘ƚƩƭŷźƦ ğƓķ /ƚǒƓĭźƌƌƚƩƭʹ {ǒĬƆĻĭƷʹ \[ƚĭğƌźǩĻķ CƌƚƚķźƓŭ .ğĭƉŭƩƚǒƓķʹ WğƓǒğƩǤ ЋЌƩķ ЋЉЊВ ƷŷĻ ĭźƷǤ ĻǣƦĻƩźĻƓĭĻķ ğ ƩğźƓ ƭƷƚƩƒ ĻǝĻƓƷ ƷŷğƷ ƩĻƭǒƌƷĻķ źƓ ƌƚĭğƌźǩĻķ ŅƌƚƚķźƓŭ ƷŷğƷ ƩĻƭǒƌƷĻķ źƓ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ ķğƒğŭĻ Ʒƚ ƩĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ ŷƚƒĻƭ ğƓķ ĭƚƒƒĻƩĭźğƌ ĬǒƭźƓĻƭƭĻƭ źƓ 9ğƭƷ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ ƭƦĻĭźŅźĭğƌƌǤ ğƩƚǒƓķ DƌĻƓ Cğƌƌƭ ğƓķ ƷŷĻ DƚƌķĻƓ DƩƚǝĻ wƚğķ ğƩĻğ͵ ŷĻ ƌƚĭğƌ ƭƷƚƩƒ ǞğƷĻƩ ƭǤƭƷĻƒƭ ğƓķ ŷƚƌķźƓŭ ƦƚƓķƭ ĬĻĭğƒĻ ŅƩƚǩĻƓ ğƓķ ĻƭƭĻƓƷźğƌƌǤ ĬƌƚĭƉĻķ Ʒŷǒƭ ƦƩĻǝĻƓƷźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ǞğƷĻƩ ĻƭĭğƦźƓŭ Ǟŷźĭŷ ŷğƭ ƩğźƭĻķ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓƭ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƓķźƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ŷƚƌķźƓŭ ƦƚƓķ ƚƓ DƚƌķĻƓ DƩƚǝĻ wƚğķ ğƓķ źŅ źƷ źƭ Ĭźŭ ĻƓƚǒŭŷ Ʒƚ ŷƚƌķ ƷŷĻƭĻ ğƒƚǒƓƷƭ ƚŅ ǞğƷĻƩ ĬĻĭğǒƭĻ ƷŷĻƭĻ ƷǤƦĻƭ ƚŅ ƩğźƓ ĻǝĻƓƷƭͲ ĭƚƒƦƌźĭğƷĻķ ǞźƷŷ ƭƓƚǞ źĭĻͲ ĭƚǒƌķ ĻğƭźƌǤ ƩĻƚĭĭǒƩ͵ L ĬĻƌźĻǝĻ ǞĻ ƒǒƭƷ ĬĻ ƦƩƚğĭƷźǝĻ ğƓķ ƓƚƷ ƩĻğĭƷźǝĻ͵ aƚƷźƚƓʹ 5źƩĻĭƷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ağƓğŭĻƩ Ʒƚ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ ĬğĭƉ ƚƓ Ʒŷźƭ ğƩĻğƭ ĻƓƷźƩĻ ƭƷƚƩƒ ǞğƷĻƩ źƓŅƩğƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ ğƓķ ƭƦĻĭźŅźĭğƌƌǤ źŅ ğ ƭĻĭƚƓķ ŷƚƌķźƓŭ ƦƚƓķ ƭŷƚǒƌķ ĬĻ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷĻķͲ ğƭƭĻƭƭ źŅ ƷŷĻ ĭǒƩƩĻƓƷ ƒğźƓƷĻƓğƓĭĻ ƭĭŷĻķǒƌĻ ğƓķ ƦƩƚƷƚĭƚƌ źƭ ğķĻƨǒğƷĻͲ ƦƩƚǝźķĻ ƷŷĻ ƭǒƩǝĻǤƚƩ ƩĻƭǒƌƷƭ ƷŷğƷ ƭŷƚǞ ƷŷĻ ŷƚƌķźƓŭ ƦƚƓķ ğƓķ ƭǒĬƭĻƨǒĻƓƷ ķźƷĭŷĻƭ ğƩĻ ƭƷźƌƌ ğĬƌĻ Ʒƚ ŷƚƌķ ƷŷĻ ğƒƚǒƓƷƭ ƚŅ ǞğƷĻƩ ƚŅ ƷŷĻźƩ ƚƩźŭźƓğƌ ķĻƭźŭƓͲ ğķķƩĻƭƭ ƷŷĻ Ņƌƚƚķ ƭƷƚƩğŭĻ ƦƚƌźĭǤ ğƓķ źŅ Ʒŷźƭ ğƩĻğ źƭ ƒğǣĻķ ƚǒƷ ŅƚƩ ƓĻǞ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓͲ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƓķźƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ağƩƭŷ /ƩĻĻƉ ğƓķ źƷƭ ğĬźƌźƷǤ Ʒƚ ğĭĭƚƒƒƚķğƷĻ ƷŷĻ ƭƷƚƩƒ ǞğƷĻƩ ĻǣźƷ ĭğƦğĭźƷǤ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ .ğǤ ƚŅ CǒƓķǤͲ ğ ƒƚƩĻ ğŭŭƩĻƭƭźǝĻ ğƦƦƩƚğĭŷ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ĭǒƩƩĻƓƷ ƭƷƚƩƒ ƩĻƭƦƚƓƭĻ ƦƩƚƷƚĭƚƌ źƓ Ʒŷźƭ ğƩĻğ ƭǒĭŷ ğƭ ƷŷğǞźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ƭƷƚƩƒ ǞğƷĻƩ ķƩğźƓƭͲ ƭƓƚǞ ƩĻƒƚǝğƌ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ŷƚƌķźƓŭ ƦƚƓķ͵ wĻƭƦĻĭƷŅǒƌƌǤ {ǒĬƒźƷƷĻķͲ ΛwĻĭĻźǝĻķ ǝźğ ĻƒğźƌΜ wğǤ {ƷƩƚǞĬƩźķŭĻͲ /ƚǒƓĭźƌƌƚƩͲ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ĻƌĻƦŷƚƓĻ ΛЎЉЏΜ ВААΏЌБЍЏ 9ƒğźƌʹ wğǤ͵ƭƷƩƚǞĬƩźķŭĻθƭğźƓƷƆƚŷƓ͵ĭğ /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-40 Report Date February 20, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Corporate Services His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Love Your City Campaign OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Lisa Caissie Neil Jacobsen John Collin RECOMMENDATION Receive for Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide Mayor and Council with an update on the \[ƚǝĻ —ƚǒƩ /źƷǤ civic pride campaign. REPORT In the Fall of 2018, the City of Saint John launched the \[ƚǝĻ —ƚǒƩ /źƷǤ civic pride campaign with a vision to inspire our greatest ambassadors for growth our citizens. The focus of the campaign is to foster an even greater self-image of Saint John. The goals are to inspire citizens to share what they love about Saint John, encourage positive online dialogue and remind each other many incredible assets. The hashtag for the campaign is #MySaintJohn, and the first phase included an online photograph submission Citizens were asked to share photos of their favourite fall places across the City. Anyone who submitted a photo that met the contest requirements had their name entered into a draw for a Saint John Brag Bag filled with various items including SWAG, tickets and gift cards that had been generously donated by local business, organizations and agencies. Five winners were drawn over a five week period and presented with the brag bags in City Hall. Over the course of the contest, close to 200 beautiful and unique photographs were submitted and shared. The photographs included everything from beaches, parks and trails, to neighbourhoods, streets, social gatherings, animals, and Uptown architecture and events. Phase one wrapped up at the end of November after accomplishing what it set out to achieve. We thank the community for the submissions of their favourite Saint John places. We saw those where people go to take selfies, and places that would make you stop in your tracks to snap a photo for the view. Together, they are the places that set Saint John apart from the rest of the world; those that make us proud to call #MySaintJohn home. In December, a plan was developed for phase two of the \[ƚǝĻ —ƚǒƩ /źƷǤ campaign, which was set to begin in February of 2019. Phase two involves civic pride through storytelling to capture the voices of Saint John citizens and staff. Over the coming months, a series of videos edia pages featuring stories about what citizens love about Saint John. Social media followers are encouraged to watch, like, comment on, tag an out-of-town friend and share videos using the hashtag #MySaintJohn. In addition to social media channels, the City has partnered with Country 94 and 97.3 The Wave to host a radio call-in contest. Beginning the week of February 18, the weekday morning shows will ask listeners to call in and share what they love about Saint John. This can be anything, from people, places, activities, our heritage, culture, arts, entertainment, neighbourhoods, etc. The ninth caller will have their name entered into a draw for a #MySaintJohn prize package, which includes an exclusive print of the City skyline by local artist, Kevin Goggan, along with $100 in City Market Money. The draw for each radio station will take place on Friday, March 8. A dedicated webpage has been developed for the campaign and can be found at www.saintjohn.ca/mysaintjohn. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Growth and Community Development ATTACHMENTS PowerPoint Presentation: ϔaǤ{ğźƓƷWƚŷƓ Love Your City: A Civic Pride Campaign 2018/2019 /ğƒƦğźŭƓ ĬğĭƉŭƩƚǒƓķ A deliverable of the tƚƦǒƌğƷźƚƓ DƩƚǞƷŷ CƩğƒĻǞƚƩƉʹ Love Your City social media campaign The Focus: Serves to inspire our greatest ambassadors for growth our citizens We need to grow and in order to do this, our best feet have to be forward We want to give those who have something positive to say about life in Saint John a platform to do so The Goals: Inspire citizens to share what they love about Saint John Allow for positive online dialogue Increase social media engagement tŷğƭĻ L ƭŷƚǞ ğƓķ ƭŷğƩĻ Focus: PLACES Explored the places people love and what attracts people to Saint John Social media campaign, included photo contest with donated prizes Ran from the beginning of October to the end of November Target audience: Saint John residents; Facebook & Twitter users Was a success! Dedicated webpage for the campaign: saintjohn.ca/mysaintjohn wĻƭǒƌƷƭ Ώ ǞŷğƷ ǞĻ ƭğǞ Visit our online album on Facebook @CityofSaintJohnNB Think about how Ǥƚǒ feel after seeing the photos! wĻƭǒƌƷƭ Ώ ǞŷğƷ ǞĻ ŷĻğƩķ wĻƭǒƌƷƭ ĭƚƓĭƌǒƭźƚƓ ε ƷŷğƓƉƭ Phase I came to a close at the end of November \[ƚƷƭ ƚŅ ƌƚǝĻ ƭŷğƩĻķ ğƓķ Ў ŷğƦƦǤ ǞźƓƓĻƩƭͧ tŷğƭĻ LL ƭŷƚǞ ğƓķ ƷĻƌƌ Focus: PEOPLE Explore what keeps people in Saint John; their city love story Social media campaign, supported by radio with a contest Will run from mid-February to the spring of 2019 Target audience: Saint John residents; Facebook & Twitter users, radio listeners Co-sponsored with 97.3 The Wave and Country 94 tǒĬƌźĭ ĻƓŭğŭĻƒĻƓƷ Videos of citizens and staff telling their Saint John lo ve stories Radio promotion City ad to kick-start the campaign Call-ins run for 2 weeks, weekdays, with montage every Friday Contest is sponsored by the City of Saint John & Acadia Broadcasting Limited, and supported by the City Market & local artist Kevin Goggan Dedicated webpage for the campaign: saintjohn.ca/mysaintjohn WƚźƓ ƷŷĻ ĭƚƓǝĻƩƭğƷźƚƓ Be our greatest ambassadors and tell ǤƚǒƩ Saint John love stories. Share our efforts through your own social media channels. Watch, like, love, comment on and tag an out-of-town friend COMMON COUNCIL REPORT Report Date February 19, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 SUBJECT: 2019 Expectation Letters for Economic Development Agencies OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Growth Committee RECOMMENDATION Growth Committee recommends that Common Council approve the 2019 expectation letters with DevelopSJ and Economic Development Greater Saint John. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the proposed 2019 expectation letters encies DevelopSJ and Economic Development Greater Saint John (EDGSJ). These letters set expectations to promote a positive working relationship with its agencies and a more robust process with larger reporting expectations, to improve accountability for investment into economic development. City expectations for DiscoverSJ form part of a contract with the City, which expires at the end of 2019. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION th On Tuesday February 12, 2019, the Growth Committee adopted the recommendation to Council for 2019 Develop SJ and EDGSJ expectation letters. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Common Council has adopted a new set of Council Priorities: 2016-2020 in early positive and supportive city. We grow in a smart way and attract talent, adopted key performance indicators to evaluate its ability to DƩƚǞ {W, including, x base assessment within th the Roadmap for Smart Growth on Monday March 27, 2017. REPORT The purpose of this report is to seek Common Council the 2019 expectation encies, DevelopSJ and Economic Development Greater Saint John (formerly Enterprise Saint John). City expectations for DiscoverSJ form part of a contract with the City, which expires at the end of 2019. New Approach to Expectation Letters Last December, the Growth Committee endorsed a new approach to the expectation letters, one that ensures a more robust process with larger reporting expectations and improved accountability for investment in economic development. The approach being recommended achieves the following: DƩĻğƷĻƩ ĭƌğƩźƷǤ ƚƓ for the investment provided, in driving economic development on behalf of the City. The letters are intended to set a positive tone for an improved working relationship with the City. aƚƩĻ ƩƚĬǒƭƷ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭ ŅƚƩ ğŭĻƓĭǤ ƩĻƦƚƩƷźƓŭ. The agencies will be accountable for setting targets, reporting results and communicating how their activities contributed in a measurable way to achieving the results. A new timeline is included which defines expectations and key milestones for reporting of targets and results. {źŭƓğƌ ĭŷğƓŭĻƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ĻĭƚƓƚƒźĭ ķĻƌźǝĻƩǤ ƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ ğƩĻ ƌźƉĻƌǤ ŅƚƩ ЋЉЋЉ, The City Manager will be communicating further details on this initiative expected to roll out in 2019 to ensure greater alignment to optimize the governance model for growth. The 2019 process will involve: In February, Common Council approves and issues the 2019 letters. Q2 agencies present to Common Council annual work plan and targets. Q3 agencies present mid-year progress report to Growth Committee. Q1 (2020) Agencies present year-end report to Common Council. Review of economic service delivery governance model. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES -related efforts and investments are to achieve new levels of employment, population and tax base growth. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS N/A ATTACHMENTS 2019 Expectation Letters with DevelopSJ & Economic Development Greater Saint John CĻĬƩǒğƩǤ ЋЏͲ ЋЉЊВ CƩğƓĭźƭ tƚǞĻƩ /ŷğźƩͲ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦ{W hƓĻ ağƩƉĻƷ {ƨǒğƩĻͲ {ǒźƷĻ ЌЉЊ t͵h͵ .ƚǣ ЊВАЊ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓͲ b͵.͵ 9Ћ\[Ѝ\[Њ 5ĻğƩ aƩ͵ tƚǞĻƩͲ ŷĻ /źƷǤ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ źƭ ĻǣĭźƷĻķ ğĬƚǒƷ źƷƭ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ͵ ‘Ļ ŷğǝĻ ğƓ źƓƓƚǝğƷźǝĻ ğƓķ ƦźƚƓĻĻƩźƓŭ ƭƦźƩźƷ ğƓķ ǞĻ ğƩĻ ŅƚĭǒƭƭĻķ ƚƓ ƌĻğķźƓŭ ĭŷğƓŭĻ͵ ‘Ļ ƉƓƚǞ ƷŷĻ ĭŷğƌƌĻƓŭĻƭͲ ĬǒƷ ǞĻ ğƩĻ ƚƦƷźƒźƭƷźĭ ǞĻ ĭğƓ ƚǝĻƩĭƚƒĻ ƷŷĻƒ ğƓķ ǞĻ ĬĻƌźĻǝĻ ƷŷğƷ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦ{W ƦƌğǤƭ ğ ƉĻǤ ƩƚƌĻ źƓ ƭŷğƦźƓŭ ğ ĬƩźŭŷƷĻƩ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ ŅƚƩ ƚǒƩ /źƷǤ͵ ĻĭƚƓƚƒźĭ ķĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ ķĻƌźǝĻƩǤ͵ źƓ ĻǣĻĭǒƷźƚƓ ĬǒƷͲ źƓ ƷŷĻ ĻƓķͲ Ǥƚǒ ĭğƓ ğƦƦƩĻĭźğƷĻ ƷŷğƷ ǞĻ ŷƚƦĻ Ʒƚ ƭĻĻ ğƓ ĻǣĭĻƌƌĻƓƷ ƩĻƷǒƩƓ ƚƓ ƚǒƩ źƓǝĻƭƷƒĻƓƷ͵ ‘Ļ ƌƚƚƉ ŅƚƩǞğƩķ Ʒƚ ĭƚƌƌğĬƚƩğƷźƓŭ ğƓķ ǞƚƩƉźƓŭ źƓ ƦğƩƷƓĻƩƭŷźƦ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ğŭĻƓĭǤ źƓ ğĭŷźĻǝźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ ŭƚğƌƭʹ υБЋЊͲЉЉЋ źƓƷƚ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦ{W͵ ƚ źƒƦƩƚǝĻ ğƓķ ƭƷƩĻƓŭƷŷĻƓ ƷŷĻ ǞƚƩƉźƓŭ ƩĻƌğƷźƚƓƭŷźƦ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤͲ źƓ ƦğƩƷźĭǒƌğƩ ğƷ ƷŷĻ ƭƷğŅŅ ƌĻǝĻƌͲ ĬǤ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƷƩǒƭƷ ğƓķ ƭǒƦƦƚƩƷźƓŭ ğƌźŭƓƒĻƓƷ źƓ ğĭŷźĻǝźƓŭ ŭƩƚǞƷŷ ƚǒƷĭƚƒĻƭ͵ ŷźƭ źƭ ĭƩźƷźĭğƌ Ʒƚ ĻƓƭǒƩĻ ĭƚƓƷźƓǒĻķ ĭƚƚƦĻƩğƷźƚƓ ğƓķ ƒğǣźƒźǩĻ ŭƩƚǞƷŷ ƚǒƷĭƚƒĻƭ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ĭźƷźǩĻƓƭ ƚŅ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ͵ ƚ ŅƚƭƷĻƩ ğ ŭƩĻğƷĻƩ ƌĻǝĻƌ ƚŅ ƷƩğƓƭƦğƩĻƓĭǤ ğƓķ źƒƦƩƚǝĻķ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƚƓ Ʒƚ Ĭǒźƌķ ĭƚƓŅźķĻƓĭĻ ǞźƷŷ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ ğƓķ ĭƌĻğƩƌǤ ķĻƒƚƓƭƷƩğƷĻ ƷŷĻ ƩĻƷǒƩƓ ƚƓ źƓǝĻƭƷƒĻƓƷ͵ 9ƓŷğƓĭĻķ ƩĻƦƚƩƷźƓŭ ğƓķ ğĭĭƚǒƓƷğĬźƌźƷǤ ƒĻğƭǒƩĻƭ Ǟźƌƌ ŷĻƌƦ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ĬĻƷƷĻƩ ǒƓķĻƩƭƷğƓķ ŷƚǞ źƷƭ źƓǝĻƭƷƒĻƓƷƭ źƓ ǤƚǒƩ ƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓ ŷğǝĻ ŭĻƓĻƩğƷĻķ ƦƩƚŭƩĻƭƭ ƚƓ ŭƩƚǞƷŷ ƚǒƷĭƚƒĻƭ͵ ŷźƭ Ǟźƌƌ ĬĻ ğĭŷźĻǝĻķ ƷŷƩƚǒŭŷ ğ ƭĭŷĻķǒƌĻ ƚŅ ƩĻŭǒƌğƩ ƩĻƦƚƩƷźƓŭ Ʒƚ ƒĻƒĬĻƩƭ ƚŅ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌʹ o vЋ ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ğƓƓǒğƌ ǞƚƩƉ ƦƌğƓ ğƓķ ƷğƩŭĻƷƭ Ʒƚ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌͳ o vЌ ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ƒźķΏǤĻğƩ ƦƩƚŭƩĻƭƭ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ Ʒƚ DƩƚǞƷŷ /ƚƒƒźƷƷĻĻ ƚŅ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌͳ o vЊ ΛЋЉЋЉΜ ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷ ǤĻğƩΏĻƓķ ƩĻƦƚƩƷ Ʒƚ /ƚƒƒƚƓ /ƚǒƓĭźƌ͵ ΏЋΏ LƓ ЋЉЊВͲ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ Ǟźƌƌ ğƌƭƚ ĬĻ ƦǒƩƭǒźƓŭ ĻŅŅƚƩƷƭ Ʒƚ ĻƓŷğƓĭĻ ƷŷĻ ĻĭƚƓƚƒźĭ ƌğƓķƭĭğƦĻ ŅƚƩ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ͵ ŷźƭ Ǟźƌƌ źƓǝƚƌǝĻ ğ ǞƚƩƉ ƦƌğƓ ğƌźŭƓƒĻƓƷ ĻǣĻƩĭźƭĻ ğƓķ ĻŅŅƚƩƷƭ Ʒƚ ƚƦƷźƒźǩĻ ƷŷĻ ŭƚǝĻƩƓğƓĭĻ ƒƚķĻƌ ŅƚƩ ŭƩƚǞƷŷ͵ 5ĻƷğźƌƭ Ǟźƌƌ ƭƚƚƓ ĬĻ ƦƩƚǝźķĻķ ĬǤ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ ağƓğŭĻƩ͵ ‘Ļ ǞĻƌĭƚƒĻ ǤƚǒƩ ƦğƩƷźĭźƦğƷźƚƓ źƓ ƷŷĻƭĻ ķźƭĭǒƭƭźƚƓƭ ğƭ ƷŷĻǤ ƒƚǝĻ ŅƚƩǞğƩķ͵ ğƓķ ƒƚǝĻ {ğźƓƷ WƚŷƓ ƷƚǞğƩķƭ ğ ƒƚƩĻ ƦƩƚƭƦĻƩƚǒƭ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ͵ —ƚǒƩƭ ƩǒƌǤͲ ağǤƚƩ 5ƚƓ 5ğƩƌźƓŭ February 26, 2019 Andrew Oland Chair, Economic Development Greater Saint John 40 King Street Saint John, N.B. Dear Mr. Oland, The City of Saint John is excited about its future. We have an innovative and pioneering spirit and we are focussed on leading change. We know the challenges, but we are optimistic we can overcome them and we believe that Economic Development Greater Saint John (EDGSJ) plays a key role in shaping a brighter future for our City. This letter is intended to share expectations related to Economic Development Greater Saint John xpectations are broad in nature to permit flexibility in execution but, in the end, you can appreciate that we hope to see an excellent return on our investment. We look forward to collaborating and working in partnership with the agency in achieving the following goals: $475,000 into Economic Development Greater Saint John. To improve and strengthen the working relationship with the City, in particular at the staff level, by building trust and supporting alignment in achieving growth outcomes. This is critical to ensure continued cooperation and maximize growth outcomes for the citizens of Saint John. To foster a greater level of transparency and improved communication to build confidence with Council and clearly demonstrate the return on investment. Enhanced reporting and accountability measures will help the City better understand how its investments in your organization have generated progress on growth outcomes. This will be achieved through a schedule of regular reporting to members of Common Council: o Q2 present annual work plan and targets to Common Council; o Q3 present mid-year progress report to Growth Committee of Common Council; o Q1 (2020) present year-end report to Common Council. -2- In 2019, the City will also be pursuing efforts to enhance the economic landscape for Saint John. This will involve a work plan alignment exercise and efforts to optimize the governance model for growth. Details will soon be provided by the City Manager. We welcome your participation in these discussions as they move forward. and move Saint John towards a more prosperous future. Yours Truly, Mayor Don Darling YMCA of Greater Saint John 191 Churchill Blvd. Saint John, NB E2K 3E2 Tel: 693-9622 Fax: 634-0783 Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council City of Saint John PO Box 1971 Saint John NB E2L 4L1 February 8, 2019 Dear Mayor Darling, Deputy Mayor McAlary and Council Members, We are excited to be hosting the 2019 Red Triangle Award Gala at the Saint John Regional Y on April 11th. This will be a great opportunity to recognize outstanding community leaders while raising funds to support the YMCA Strong Communities Campaign. Dr. Shelley Rinehart will be receiving the prestigious Red Triangle Award. This award is presented in recognition of long and meritorious volunteer service, outstanding contributions and achievement in the community. The Leader to Watch is presented to an individual that provides skilled and enthusiastic leadership in the community and the award is being presented to Jennifer Brown. They are both very deserving recipients and we are excited to share this evening with them. Both individuals have contributed to the growth and well-being of the City of Saint John in many ways, -Chair of the P.R.O. Kids Advisory Committee. Further information regarding the event and recipients can be found in the attached media release. The Red Triangle Award Gala will be held on Thursday, April 11 at 6:30pm. Tickets can be purchased online at www.saintjohny.ymca.ca , at the front desk of the Saint John Regional Y or by phoning 634- 4422. They cost $100 each or 10 for $900. It would be appreciated if you could mention this important fundraising event at an upcoming Council Meeting. Perhaps you will also consider purchasing 10 tickets in support of the recipients and the Strong Communities Campaign. Thank you for sharing news about this event and considering the purchase of event tickets. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Cindy Floyd, CFRE, VP, Philanthropy and Communications YMCA of Greater Saint John 191 Churchill Blvd. Saint John, NB E2K 3E2 Tel: 506-693-9622 Fax: 506-634-0783 For Immediate Release th January 24, 2019 Red Triangle Award Recipients Announced Saint John, NB The YMCA of Greater Saint John announced details of the 2019 Red Triangle Award Gala and the recipients of the Red Triangle and Leader to Watch Awards at a Press Conference held today at the Saint John Regional Y. The 28th annual Red Triangle Award Gala will be held at the Saint John Regional Y on April 11th. The elegant reception style event will feature delicious food catered by popular restaurants and the formal presentation will highlight the evening. Funds raised at this event will support the Strong Communities Campaign, ensuring that YMCA programs are accessible to everyone. The ypresenting sponsor is Emera New Brunswick. They were represented by General ManagerEmera New Brunswick is proud to be part of this community and proud to be part of The Red Triangle Awards which recognizes leaders who are making a difference in our community. The Red Triangle Award recognizes long and meritorious service, outstanding contributions and achievement in the co Dr. Shelley Rinehart. Shelley is passionate about her community and displays her love for community development through her dedicated volunteer work. Besides her commitment to building healthy communities through volunteerism at the YMCA, Shelley gives back to many other organizations and initiatives including the Canadian Mental Health Association and Early Literacy Friends. The Leader to Watch Award recognizes a young individual that is a role model for other young adults in our community. The individual demonstrates leadership and enthusiasm in their work, in learning and in volunteering in our community. This year's recipient is Jennifer Brown. Jennifer is an active volunteer and role model in our community. She is passionate about eliminating poverty throughout the region and works to advocate for many young people. She supports a number of community initiatives through her work and volunteer commitments. She is determined to make a difference by sharing her story and working to ensure others are provided with opportunities to succeed. The recipients will receive their awards at the Red Triangle Event on April 11th. YMCA of Greater Saint John 191 Churchill Blvd. Saint John, NB E2K 3E2 Tel: 506-693-9622 Fax: 506-634-0783 We are thrilled to be honouring Boucher, President and CEO of the YMCA of Greater Saint about people that make a difference in the lives of others, role models that lead by example. Tickets will go on sale today and will be available online at www.saintjohny.ymca.ca 30- Additional information on the award recipients: Dr. Shelley Rinehart: Shelley has a long history with the YMCA of Greater Saint John. Besides holding the position of Past Chair on the Board of Directors and the Red Triangle Committee, she was a member of the Capital Campaign Committee for the Saint John Regional Y. She is also a billet family for the Saint John Seadogs and volunteers to coordinate post-secondary education for the team. Shelley is an advocate for early literacy and education. She supports the business community as a judge for the Board of Trade Outstanding Business Awards, past chair of Saint John Energy and Board Member for Port Saint John. In May of 2018 she was honoured with the University of community. Jennifer Brown: Jennifer is committed to empowering future generations in her community. As Chair of the d a committee of young professionals that are focused on youth retention throughout Greater Saint John. She is the Vice-Chair of PRO Kids Saint John and sits on the Enriched Education Action Team for Living SJ. As the Director of Events for Fusion Saint John she works to connect young professionals and provide opportunities for and was named a Fundy Wellness Champion in 2018. In 2014, Jenn was awarded the Governor and volunteer roles. About the YMCA of Greater Saint John The YMCA of Greater Saint John is a trusted charity that delivers lasting personal and social change. We are committed to nurturing the potential of children, youth and families, promoting healthy living and fostering social responsibility within the community. There are 15 locations throughout Greater Saint John. Together, we serve more than 22,000 people. Our YMCA of Greater Saint John 191 Churchill Blvd. Saint John, NB E2K 3E2 Tel: 506-693-9622 Fax: 506-634-0783 focus on providing a sense of belonging and accessibility means we serve people of all ages, backgrounds and abilities through all stages of life. Through the Y Strong Communities Fund, we are accessible to all. About Emera New Brunswick: Emera New Brunswick, a subsidiary of Emera Inc. is headquartered in Saint John, New Brunswick, and owns and operates the Brunswick Pipeline, a 145 km natural gas transmission pipeline that delivers natural gas from the Canaport Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal near Saint John, New Brunswick to markets in Canada and the US Northeast. Emera Inc. is a geographically diverse energy and energy services company headquartered in Halifax, Nova Scotia with approximately $30 billion in assets and 2017 revenues of more than $6 billion. The company invests in electricity generation, transmission and distribution, gas transmission and distribution, and utility energy services with a strategic focus on transformation from high carbon to low carbon energy sources. Emera has investments throughout North America, and in four Caribbean countries. Media Contact: Nicole Vair Marketing and Communications Supervisor n.vair@saintjohny.ca 506-634-4852 TABLESPONSORINVITATION NIGHT OF WONDERS GALA Donation Reply Form /h…b/L\[ w9thw M&C No. 2019-369 Report Date February 19, 2019 Meeting Date February 25, 2019 Service Area Growth and Community Development Services His Worship Mayor Don Darling and Members of Common Council SUBJECT: Proposed Public Hearing Date 175 Hilyard Street and 86-88 Regent Street OPEN OR CLOSED SESSION This matter is to be discussed in open session of Common Council. AUTHORIZATION Primary Author Commissioner/Dept. Head City Manager Mark Reade Jacqueline Hamilton John Collin RECOMMENDATION That Common Council schedule the public hearings for the zoning by-law text amendment and rezoning applications of Haldor (1972) Ltd. (175 Hilyard Street) and Joseph Fabien Duguay and John Bujold (on behalf of Stephen and Linda Jarvis) (86-88 Regent Street) for Monday April 8, 2019 at 6:30 p.m. in the Ludlow Room, and refer the applications to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise Common Council of the rezoning and Section 59 amendment applications received and to recommend an appropriate public hearing date. The next available public hearing date is Monday April 8, 2019. PREVIOUS RESOLUTION At its meeting of August 3, 2004, Common Council resolved that: 1.the Commissioner of Planning and Development receive all applications for amendments to the Zoning By-law and Section 39 \[now referred as section 59\] resolutions/ agreements and proceed to prepare the required advertisements; and 2.when applications are received a report will be prepared recommending the appropriate resolution setting the time and place for public hearings and be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee as required by the Community Planning Act. REPORT As pro the rezoning and Section 59 amendment applications received and recommends an appropriate public hearing date. Details of the applications are available in the ice and will form part of the documentation at the public hearings. The following applications have been received: STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT While the holding of public hearings for proposed rezoning and Section 59 amendments is a legislative requirement of the Community Planning Act, it is also a key component of a clear and consistent land development processes envisioned in the One Stop Development Shop Program. These processes provide transparency and predictability for the development community and City residents. On a broader note, the development approvals process works towards fulfilling key Council priorities including: ensuring Saint John has a competitive business environment for investment, supporting business retention and attraction; and driving development in accordance with PlanSJ which creates the density required for efficient infrastructure, services and economic growth. SERVICE AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES The scheduling of the public hearing and referral to the Planning Advisory Committee satisfies the legislative and service requirements as mandated by the Community Planning Service. INPUT FROM OTHER SERVICE AREAS AND STAKEHOLDERS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS None