2011-10-03_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jourCity of Saint John
Common Council Meeting
Monday, October 03, 2011
Committee of the Whole
1. Call to Order
5:15 p.m. 8th Floor Boardroom City Hall
1.1 Employment Matter 10.2(4)(b)
1.2 Financial Matter 10.2(4)(c,j)
1.3 Financial Matter 10.2(4)(c,j
Si vous auriez besoin des services en frangais pour une reunion de Conseil Communal,
veuillez contacter le bureau de la greffiere communale au 658 -2862.
Regular Meeting
1. Call to Order — Prayer
4:30 p.m. Council Chamber
2. Approval of Minutes
3. Adoption of Agenda
4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
3.1 Common Clerk: Committee System form of Governance (Tabled on
September 19, 2011)
5. Consent Agenda
5.1 Transfer of Landlocked Parcel (Recommendation in Report)
5.2 Notice to Negotiate a New or Replacement Agreement with NB Power
(Recommendation in Report)
5.3 Change to Pricing of Influenza Vaccines to Employees (Recommendation in
Report)
6. Members Comments
7. Proclamation
8. Delegations/ Presentations
9. Public Hearings
10. Consideration of By -laws
11. Submissions by Council Members
11.1 Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission Presentation Re Yard Waste
(Councillor Titus)
2
12. Business Matters — Municipal Officers
12.1 City Manager: Available Development Lots in the City of Saint John
13. Committee Reports
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
15. General Correspondence
16. Adjournment
3
City of Saint John
Seance du conseil communal
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011
Comite plenier
1. Ouverture de la seance
17 h 15 — Salle de conference, 8e etage, hotel de ville
1.1 Question contractuelle — alin &as 10.2(4)b)
1.2 Question financi &re — alineas 10.2(4)c), j)
1.3 Question financiere — alineas 10.2(4)c), j)
Seance ordinaire
1. Ouverture de la seance, suivie de la priere
16 h 30 — Salle du conseil
2. Approbation du proses- verbal
3. Adoption de 1'ordre du jour
3.1 Greffi &re communale : Mode de gestion du syst &me des comfit &s (point report&
lors de la reunion du 19 septembre 2011)
4. Divulgations de conflits d'interets
5. Questions soumises a 1'approbation du conseil
5.1 Transfert de la parcelle sans littoral (recommandation figurant au rapport)
5.2 Avis de n&gocier un nouvel accord avec Energie NB
5.3 Changement de tarification des vaccins contre la grippe aux employ &s
6. Commentaires presentes par les membres
7. Proclamation
8. Delegations et presentations
9. Audiences publiques
10. Etude des arretes municipaux
11. Interventions des membres du conseil
11.1 Presentation concernant les dechets de jardin (conseiller Titus)
12. Affaires municipales evoquees par les fonctionnaires municipaux
12.1 Directeur g &n &ral : Terrains disponibles aux fins d'am&nagement
13. Rapports deposes par les comites
14. Etude des sujets &cartes des questions soumises a 1'approbation du conseil
15. Correspondance generale
16. Levee de la seance
COMMITTEE SYSTEM
Proposed New Governance Model
for The City of Saint John
Principles of Good Governance
Legitimacy & Voice
Direction
Performance
Accountability
Fairness
Democratic/ Accessible
& Representative
Strategic Vision
Reponsive/
Efficient
Effective &
Accountable /
Transparent
Equity /Rule of Law
Common Purpose
Clear Direction
Clear Accountability
Improved Decisions
Citizen Participation
Better Service
Effective /Efficient
Potential Benefits and Pitfalls
Potential Benefits
► Specialize
► Interests
Citizen Input
Public Opinion
Speed Up Work
Informal Atmosphere
Participation of Staff
Better Decisions
Accountability
Responsive / Transparent
Potential Pitfalls
► Ignore Vision
Duplication Effort
Fragmented Outlook
Buck Passing
Neglect Community
Interference in Operations
Conflict .jurisdiction
Time lines
Design Pr[ndiples
Embrace the principles of good governance
Realize desired governance outcomes
Focus Council on policy and setting strategic
direction
Achieve the Community's vision
Realize the benefits, avoid the pitfalls
Model Features
► Anchored in achieving Community's Vision
► Focused - policy and strategic direction
More active /involved roles for Councillors
Enhanced public participation
More effective decision - making process
Improved effectiveness and efficiency in
operations
Improved accountability and transparency
Policy Focused System
• Policy... a governing principle, plan or course of action that guides or
influences future decisions
• Council makes public policy decisions; others implement
Policy
Adopt budget / set tax rate
Adopt visions /goals for
community, set strategic
direction
Adopt policy allowing or
prohibiting off - street
parking
Administration
Propose budget, analyze
alternatives, spend<limits
Deliver services in support
of Council's strategic
direction
Enforce terms
policy
of parking
Political Organization
('0111nlittee of 4N11ole
i_ :0111111i111 4_:Ie1 k
4 -Av sillidtlll
Growth i Development
Committee
4_.41111111i111 '_.411111cil
Transportation .+ Environment
Committee
U1ban Environment
+::onlnlittee
City Manager
Treasurer
Saint Jahn Water
Committee
Coordinating
Committee
Committee Composition
► Only members of Council appointed to SPCs
► Mayor is ex- officio member (no vote; no
quorum)
City Mgr has right to attend all SPC meetings
Committee of Whole: All Members of Council
Coordinating Committee: Mayor (Chair),
Chairs of SPCs
Standing Policy Committee: 5 Members of
Council
Appointments
Chairs appointed by Mayor
Committee Members appointed by Council
Vice Chair elected by Standing Committee
Membership
A member of Council can only chair one
committee at any given time
► A member of Council cannot chair same
Committee in consecutive rotations
Committee Rotations
► Chairs are rotated every two (2) years
► Membership is rotated every two (2) years
Two (2) Members remain on the Committee
with three (3) new Members added
Rotation occurs midway through Mandate
(June)
Appointments according to established
process
Standing Committee Mandates
Standing committees make recommendations
on policy within a specified mandate
Broad mandates define the purpose and
authority of each committee
Public Presentations
► Public presentations are made at Committee
meetings
► The public does
Council unless:
not make presentations to
Required by legislation (i.e.: public hearing)
Recommended by a Committee and approved by
Council
Requests to make public presentations
require a written submission to the Clerk
Termination
► Non - performance
Personal Agenda
Not calling Meetings
Not representing views of Committee
Not Attending
Procedures
Rare Occurrence
Work Flow
Members of Council
Citizens
Administration i4 Committee_ iI Council
ABCs
Fundamental Change:
Other Stakeholders
Access to the Strategic Decision - Making
Process is through Committees
Work Flow
Members of Council
Citizens
City Manager
Common Clerk Common Clerk Council
Treasurer 11*1 1 1:> ( -i
City Solicitor
ABCs
Other Stakeholders Committees
(COW & Standing Commiees)
Standing Committees
Committees
Administrative Inquiries
► Administrative Inquiry: written request from
Committee Member for information /report
related to policy
Requests made through Committee to City
Manager, City Treasurer, City Solicitor and /or
Common Clerk
CM, CS, CC,CT answers verbally, in writing or
commits to written response
Only SC makes inquiries of CM, CT,CS and/or CC
No authority to make inquiries of CM,CS,CT,CC or
employees by Chairs or Committee members
Ad Hoc & Sub-Committees
Ad hoc
Created by Council to review and develop
recommendations for special purposes
Report to Council
Sub - Committees
Created by Standing Committees to review and help
develop policy on matters that fall within the mandate
Report to Standing Committees
Principles of Good Governance
Legitimacy & Voice
Direction
Performance
Accountability
Fairness
Democratic/ Accessible
& Representative
Strategic Vision
Reponsive/
Efficient
Effective &
Accountable /
Transparent
Equity /Rule of Law
Agencies, Boards & Commissions
► ABCs deliver services on behalf of City
ABCs contribute to policy development with
recommendations and information
City ABCs directly accountable to Council
ABCs will report through one or more of the
Standing Policy Committees (depending on
SPC mandate)
ABC mandate, authority, membership, service
outputs defined in Terms of Reference
Potential to eliminate some
Agencies, Boards & Commissions
Required reporting to Council through one or more
SPCs on:
Activities and performance
How activities contribute to Council's policy, strategic
direction and priorities
Budget allocations dependent - reporting,
performance, outcomes and alignment with
strategic direction
Requires individual review to determine real need
Councillors should be Governors not ABC members
Current System:
Meeting Type
Approximate Time Commitment
Total Time Commitment
Committee of the Whole
2 hrs /meeting X 2 meetings /month
4 hours per month
Council Meeting
4 hrs /meeting X 2 meetings /month
8 hours per month
Committee of the Whole
(reduced meeting time)
12 hours per month
Does not factor in weekly meetings during budget time.
Proposed System:
Each committee meets once per month.
Each councilor serves on 2 committees.
Committees
Approximate Time Commitment
Total Time Commitment
Each Committee
1.5 hrs /meeting X 2 meetings /month
3 hours per month
Coordinating Committee
(4 Chairs of SPC's)
1.5 hrs /meeting X 1 meeting /month
1.5 hours per month
Committee of the Whole
(reduced meeting time)
1 hr /meeting X 2 meetings /month
2 hours per month
Council Meeting
(reduced meeting time)
1.5 hrs /meeting X 2 meetings /month
3 hours per month
9.5 hours per month
25
Sample Meeting Schedule:
June 2012
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
May 27
28
29
30
31
Jun 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
COW Closed
G &D Meeting
Council Meeting
Titus / Farren /
Higgins / Snook /
McGuire
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Coordinating
UE Meeting
Committee
McGuire / Mott /
(Chairs of SPC's)
Snook / Sullivan /
Norton
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
COW Closed
T &E Meeting
Council Meeting
Norton / Higgins /
Titus / Chase /
Court
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
SJW Meeting
Chase / Sullivan /
Court / Mott /
Farren
SPC — Standing Policy Committee G &D — Growth & Development
UE— Urban Environment T &E— Transportation & Environment
04:
SJW — Saint John Water
3'i
.Y�
September 19, 2011
His Worship Mayor Ivan Court, Deputy Mayor Chase
And Councillors
Subject: Committee System form of Governance
Your Worship, Deputy and Councillors,
Over the past several years Council has received presentations from staff and from the City of
Fredericton on the Committee System form of Governance. At the April 28th 2008 Council
meeting 1St and 2nd readings were given to a by -law respecting this governance system, and a
resolution was passed by Council at the November 17, 2008 meeting not to proceed at that time
with the committee system. On May 25, 2009 Council directed the Clerk to schedule another
presentation on the committee system, and on August 29, 2011 Council directed the Common
Clerk, the City Manage and, the City Solicitor to prepare a draft by -law with respect to a
committee system of governance.
This report and attached slides will review a proposed committee system form of governance for
the City of Saint John, and the draft by -law will be reported to Council at a later date.
A Standing Committee System for Municipal Government puts more focus on citizen
participation, permits Council to concern itself with policy issues, and would align with the
recently approved service based organization. Five Standing Committees are proposed, Growth
and Development, Urban Environment, Transportation and Environment, Saint John Water, and
a Coordinating Committee. Council members will comprise the membership on all the
committees, with the chairs of each committee being a member of the Coordinating Committee
to be chaired by the Mayor.
Some cities operating under a Standing Committee system are: Port Coquitlan, BC, Calgary and
Edmunton, AB, Winnipeg, MN, Barry, Kinston, Richmond, Guelph, Hamilton and London, ON,
St. John's, NF, Cape Breton Regional Municipality, NS, and Fredericton, NB.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Gormley
Common Clerk
SAINT JOHN P.O. Box 1971 Saint John, NB Canada E2L 4L1 I www saintjohn.ca I C.P. 1971 Saint John, N. -B, Canada E2L 4L1
27
�.I REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M &C 2011 -258
September 27, 2011
His Worship Mayor Ivan Court and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors,
Re: Transfer of Landlocked Parcel
Background
n`�:
City of Saint John
Peter and Brenda Lanigan own PID 55178131, being a 5,400 square metre parcel located
at 587 Wallace Court, West Saint John. The property is improved with a single family
dwelling and is encumbered by a strip of City owned land, a former common lane which
divides the developed parcel practically in half.
The City parcel is inaccessible by municipal right of way, abuts the "no access" Saint
John Throughway and is not large enough to support improvement as it is only 430
square metres. The land has no utility or use by itself.
Genivar, acting on behalf of their clients, the Lanigans, have asked that the City transfer
PID 55166375 so they may assemble the larger site and subsequently subdivide and sell a
portion of the property as a building lot. The future lot may require a variance for
frontage however the improvement of the proposed lot with a single family dwelling
could be an appropriate use and result in infill which would result in additional tax base
to the City's benefit.
The City's parcel has no value as it stands today. It cannot be accessed, improved or
transferred to any other interest other than the Lanigans. It could be argued that the lot
adds value to the Lanigan's parcel, however the cost associated with the land transfer;
legal and survey engineering fees have been absorbed by the prospective purchasers.
2
Recommendation
That Common Council approves the transfer of PID 55166375to Brenda and Peter
Lanigan for $1 on or before November 25, 2011.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ken Forrest, MCIP RPP
Commissioner of Planning and Development
trick Woods CGA
Ci y Manager
29
APPROVALS
PARCEL 'Bx
Po ssiesns
�+ I
/BRENDA BUCKLEY I
/ PETER LANIGAN
\ I
49 94 -2 \kSe
\ 94-3
O SFF 4 aDDa.M
PR SSiS3S]
1 aZ \
I,
LOT B
Pu o°oxse:z'
t
LOT 1
0
SURVEY
AREA
LOT 2
SEE PuN 11 {1F .a
HD DDDSM1i»
LOT
sEE Pun m nc o
PR aooaasal
LOT 16
SFE Pl,.x ,�y r1,E i6
LOCALITY SKETCH
DESCRIPTION
rE Noww
MD 5V"VEV uM"p RAI
Ssruro
"xD s� ,cv u"xxEp ra
rEn DoDxpw"¢ e0
T Mw.Tm rnwax "¢ wPYxel
PARED vD00d SN,fV M
SDUME �acH eM Pa,
Rax arc Pa
acuxD ixw aM ra
DC"frla(/ ,EST
v "1EP V4VF / HM xTpM
B YauxTED Gip d
MxDU: O MH E"SEVENI(S) -
unutt PqE / cw
up— v "1Ex uw
� — — —
MVFxr (
ua�r sTMDMO Pu9UC uTUTr vwyo,T P.uE
Ew exu�swcx w,D wmcruR eels nc "rt a< xEasrExEO oxxrns,w ao
pWORT}� xDU xmsT«"TN« xweEA un EMCn $xnPEx „,
Sol IWrOD"l YRVDES FwYLExi u5{ (e)
Lu05 DENT WTx DV — PIM1V Ma: /"Own, D"LLID 1W ix Oz (ewe)
SKETCH SHOWING LANDS TO BE ACQUIRED BY:
BRENDA BUCKLEY
PETER LANIGAN
WALLACE COURT, SAINT JOHN, SAINT JOHN COUNTY, N.B.
10 o m m » " a0
SCALE 1:500
590 MMI Sff1EET. HM1YARD PLACE
SUM JOMH. HEW BRU1L N
GENIVAR 19
Wmv.GENNNLCOM
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN IS CORRECT. B
N.B.LS. UGX'tx�
SURVEYED BY: ANDREW K. TOOLE, N.B.LS.
DATED: MAY 12, 2011 #379 MAW: ANT mI : X% CIE—
JOB N0.WI023 CAD:SJI102�620
O
M
APPROVALS
/
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
9� IE �>e'eem ft
59 LOT B
PARCEL "B" 176'39'ST
ssRn,.uH ,ensms� 1,.151 zvJO
-3E °se P
24.959 LOT 1
rn sEC� a
a ')'
�'�
4
✓ vv
ROUTE l ,1
J, `
4-r- J
Q
I
ROITC 1
/�/
d AREA
SURY
LOCALITY SKETCH
yea /
LOT nE4�
LEGEND
DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
/ � 8$
/ _
/
� �.
11 -1 I
3425 m'
cOrnDe n rpvx9T
rww
rn
x.9x9 nlxrJa
O
fJLpUnD
cd
sT
<uwurm mwaw.a —T
p
OmwpT / sawE / ..cc
0o</r«.Na
rbulArm w'wn0°,eiC n(JEMwIY
SwM¢ IICnFS
SUN3Ee r9009 SYRNY POSt
®
NMxE,FAS
11 -2
2601 m
/
z462 <1
LOT 3
I ss
I 31
"b00d Sunx .05t
❑
NEtTbE
saJ4nE i9p eN+ rwNO
■
9be15
p PbE r011M
O
OENVJD 909 PLeN
(pw)
JR rWxO
�
ElEV�np
EI4V.
wNElw
.v
355}g'y
\
rerFA vµ5( / On( xvpuxr
59x¢ NCr 9MJNSrp,
5x9
— —
0.4Tp 9.v4N
NL
O5DG0.b 5
_ _ __
b�
42.953 21852'26-
4a I sTa LRJN' T 1saLnE Ie
ouxrm utp 9evH
®C
n IIwE
swell arp ewx
uNOlRparO ures
-
�� eze
OUP�
WZ
9�
O
3-
n0 SamJ.ee
\g.�• \ 29e}'994
\ J'21'
2650
94 -2
„ � \\ < � k 29 }SA• STANLEY
e , CHESWTN
M1 94 -3 Po Ss ,.yyjn4 ° 541
h ee pro ss a907x
es
\ \
\ \ \
\
WALLACE COURT
sucE 905
®
w9e
uagE
O MH
CwYYExr(51 SxOw MOS
—_ _
rerER ur,E
_
r.__
Opt sturoum
ou9uC urun umlp,r
r.u.E
�° e9 Nerex uH0 �Rx a
NPe
aRnnu¢
a REDS O o xJE,nn9rc.n
wno 0
7s E
. eERnEm
■ 9
NIDee9 CY
S
(e)
M
ex¢ /e7NxrN CeuID rna w Oa.
(ems°)
SUBDIVISION PLAN:
BRENDA BUCKLEY AND PETER
LANIGAN SUBDIVISION
WALLACE COURT, SAINT JOHN, SAINT JOHN COUNTY, N.B. , e
,D D ID
SCALE 1:500
v ]0 b
PURPOSE OF PLAN
DOCUMENT
NOTES
-TO CREATE LOT 11 -1 TO ACCOMMODATE BRENDA LEE BUCKLEY
EXISTING CONDITION. PETER FRANCIS LANIGAN
-TO CREATE LOT 11 -2 FOR RESIDENTIAL PID 55176131
BUILDING PURPOSES. DATED: 009-1: 27877514
DATED: 2009 -10 -09
- DIRECTIONS ARE N.B. GRID AZIMUTHS DERIVED FROM THE N.B.
GRID MONUMENTS TABULATED HEREON.
-THE SCALE FACTOR USED WAS 1.000036.
-THE DOCUMENT NUMBERS REFERRED TO ON THIS PLAN ARE
THOSE THE COUNTY REGISTRY OFFICE
Se0 WJN 51REET, x4YMOPUOE
3e1M JOHN HEW 9RUIFM'ICY.
T/uuDA Eac,Js
GENIVAR PHONE:'A669
OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
E
-AS USED HEREIN, THE VKKtO CERTIFY SHALL MEAN AN
EXPRESSION OFTHE CONSULTANT'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION TO
ex: weayse0'e
.
— GEHVNLOOM
THE BEST OF ITS INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE BY THE
CONSULTANT.
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
BRENDA LEE BUCKLEY
PETER FRANCIS LANIGAN
- ADJACENT OWNER INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM SNB
RECORDS.
-ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE CALCULATED GRID DISTANCES. CERTIFICATION IS NOT MADE AS TO LEGAL TITLE, BEING THE
DOMAIN OF A LAWYER, NOR TO THE ZONING & SETBACK BY -LAWS OR REGULATIONS, BEING THE DOMAIN OF A
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER.
- CERTIFICATION IS NOT MADE AS TO COVENANTS SET OUT IN
THE DOCUMENT(S) AND THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND
SERVICES AND /OR FIXTURES, PERMANENT OR OTHERWISE.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN IS CORRECT.
N.B.L.S.
N• B. ut�
SURVEYED BY: ANDREW K. TOOLS, N.B.L.S.
DATED: MAY 12, 2011 /379
MAW MT Flan: v CNEIXm:
- INITIAL FIELD SURVEY WAS COMPLETED FEBRUARY 16, 2009.
JOB No.SJtl023 CAD:SJ1102 3-620
M
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M & C 2011 - 260
September 29, 2011
His Worship Mayor Ivan Court
& Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
The City of Saint John
RE: Notice to Negotiate a New or Replacement Agreement with NB Power
Background:
On November 2, 1999, the City and the New Brunswick Power Corporation ( "NB Power ")
entered into an agreement respecting the provision of fire protection services on the latter's
behalf at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station, a copy of which is attached (the
"1999 Agreement "). The compensation payable to the City by NB Power for providing
such services, as outlined in Article 4 of the 1999 Agreement, has not increased since
1999. At the same time, the cost of providing the City's fire protection services has
increased substantially over the last 12 years.
Article 5 of the 1999 Agreement provides as follows:
5 Term
This Agreement shall take effect and be binding on the parties hereto for the period
from January 1, A.D. 1999 to December 31, 2002, inclusive and shall remain in
force for successive periods of thirty six months (36) months thereafter, unless
either party requests negotiation of a new or replacement agreement by giving
written notice to the other party not less than sixty (60) days and not more than
ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of this Agreement or any renewal
thereof.
In the month of October 2011, there is an opportunity to provide written notice to NB
Power of the City's desire to negotiate a "new or replacement agreement" in accordance
with Article 5 of the 1999 Agreement. The primary purpose behind providing such written
32
Page 2
notice to NB Power would be to update Article 4 of the 1999 Agreement to bring it in line
with current fire protection services costs.
Analysis:
The 1999 Agreement provided for a $40,000 per year stand -by fee to be paid to the City.
During the 2011 budget approval process, staff highlighted the renegotiation of the 1999
Agreement as one of the new revenue sources for the City. Similarly, sections of the 1999
Agreement pertaining to the "form of response" and reimbursement for responding require
updating.
As Council may be aware, NB Power underwent a corporate reorganization subsequent to
the execution of the 1999 Agreement. The City Solicitor's Office has conferred with NB
Power's legal department to ascertain the applicable NB Power entity and was informed
that any new or replacement agreement would most likely be with the New Brunswick
Power Nuclear Corporation.
Recommendation:
In view of the forgoing, we make the following recommendation:
That the City give written notice to the New Brunswick Power Nuclear Corporation and
the New Brunswick Power Holding Corporation in the attached form of the City's desire to
negotiate a new or replacement agreement to the agreement executed on November 2nd,
1999 between the City and the New Brunswick Power Corporation respecting the City's
provision of fire protection services on the latter's behalf at the Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station in accordance with Article 5 thereof (the "1999 Agreement "), and
That Common Council direct the Acting Fire Chief or his designate, in collaboration with
the City Solicitor or his designate, to negotiate and draft a new or replacement agreement
to the 1999 Agreement with the appropriate corporate entity for the subsequent
consideration of Common Council and such appropriate corporate entity.
Respectfully submitted,
J. Patrick Woods, CGA
City Manager
g Ke -n CIiNor , A, C
Acting Fire Chief
33
Page 3
Ms. Wanda Harrison
Corporate Secretary and General Counsel
New Brunswick Power Nuclear Corporation and
New Brunswick Power Holding Corporation
515 King Street, 9th Floor
P.O. Box 2050
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 5G4
Via Facsimile (506 458 -4319) and Registered Mail
Dear Ms. Harrison:
Re: Notice to Negotiate a New or Replacement Agreement
On November 2nd, 1999, the City of Saint John and the New Brunswick Power Corporation ( "NB Power ")
entered into an agreement respecting the provision of fire protection services on the latter's behalf at the
Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station, a copy of which is attached (the "1999 Agreement "). The 1999
Agreement (most notably Article 4 thereof respecting the City's compensation) has not been updated for 12
years. In view of the fact that significant restructuring has occurred at NB Power since the 1999 Agreement
was executed, we trust that one of the two corporate entities identified above is the correct corporate entity to
which this correspondence should be directed. If we are incorrect in this regard, we ask that you advise us
accordingly.
The City hereby provides written notice in accordance with Article 5 of the 1999 Agreement of the City's
desire to negotiate a new or replacement agreement to the 1999 Agreement. We kindly ask that you confirm
receipt of this written notice by reply correspondence to Mr. Scott A. Brittain, Solicitor, and that you advise
regarding your availability for starting the process of negotiating a new or replacement agreement to the 1999
Agreement. Mr. Brittain's direct contact particulars are as follows:
Mr. Scott A. Brittain
Solicitor, City Solicitor's Office
The City of Saint John
P.O. Box 1971
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L1
Fax: 506.649.7939
Tel: 506.635.2021
Dated at Saint John, N.B. this day of Octobcr, 2011.
Mayor
Common Clerk
Resolution Date
34
This Agreement is made in duplicate by and between:
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN, in the County of
Saint John and Province of New Brunswick, a
body corporate by Royal Charter, hereinafter
called the "City"
OF THE FIRST PART
- and -
NEW BRUNSWICK POWER CORPORATION, a
Crown Corporation duly appointed under and
by virtue of The Electric Power Act, Chapter E-
5, R.S.N.B. 1973, hereinafter called
"N.B.Power"
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS N.B. Power is the owner and operator of a 630 MW Nuclear
Generating Station situated at Point Lepreau being in the Counties of
Saint John and Charlotte in the Province of New Brunswick;
AND WHEREAS the City is the owner and operator of a fire department
that is hereinafter called "the City's Fire Department ";
AND WHEREAS N.B. Power may from time to time require back -up fire
protection services to supplement its fire protection capabilities at the
Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station;
AND WHEREAS the City has agreed to provide the service of the City's
Fire Department for the aforesaid purpose;
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH as follows:
1. Responsibility of The City of Saint John
1.01 Subject to section 3, the City's Fire Department will provide back-
up fire protection services for N.B. Power at the Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station.
35
-2-
1.02 The City's Fire Department will participate in training/ orientation
sessions and exercises that are fully sponsored by N.B. Power for the
Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station. It is understood that the
personnel of the City's Fire Department who may be required to
participate in any such sponsorship programs will be the crews that are
expected to respond to the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station
should the need arise.
1.03 Upon the City's Public Safety Communications Center receiving a
call for assistance from the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station,
the City's Fire Department will immediately dispatch thereto:
(a) One Incident Commander; and
(b) One Engine and Crew, consisting of one (1) Officer and three (3)
Fire Fighters; and
(c) One Ladder Truck and Crew consisting of one (1) Officer and
three (3) Fire Fighters.
1.04 The Public Safety Communications Center will confirm that the
call is authentic by calling the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating
Station Control Room at 659 -2540.
1.05 Upon arrival at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station the
City's Fire Department personnel will immediately commence to work
and will continue to work under the direction and supervision of the
Point Lepreau Shift Supervisor in cooperation with the Incident
Commander until the Shift Supervisor determines that their assistance
on the call is no longer required.
2. Responsibility of the New Brunswick Power Corporation
2.01 In the event that the back -up assistance of the City's Fire
Department is required at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating
Station, the Point Lepreau Shift Supervisor or his delegate will call the
City's Fire Department at telephone number 911. The caller will
identify him /herself, briefly explain the situation and request
assistance.
36
-3-
2.02 The Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station Shift Supervisor
will be responsible in cooperation with the Incident Commander for the
direction and supervision of the City's Fire Department personnel while
they are present at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station.
2.03 At all times during which the City's Fire Department personnel
are present at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station as the
result of a call for assistance, N.B. Power will be responsible to protect
them from exposure to radiation and will provide them with meals, dry
clothing and such other accommodations as the situation may require.
2.04 N.B. Power will provide on an ongoing basis the necessary
familiarization and /or orientation to the personnel of the City's Fire
Department that are required to respond to the Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station. Any and all specialized training and equipment
that is not normally part of structural firefighting shall be provided by
N.B. Power to those crews responding to the Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station.
3. It is recognized by the parties that the primary responsibility of
the City's Fire Department is to provide fire protection services within
the City of Saint John. It is also recognized that the computer problem
that is referred to by such names as the Year 2000 problem or the Y2K
problem may have an adverse affect on the ability of governments to
provide services. It is agreed that the City is not required to provide, at
Point Lepreau, the City's Fire Department personnel and equipment
referred to herein, if the ability of the City's Fire Department to do so is
adversely affected by the aforesaid problem or if, in the opinion of the
Chief of the City's Fire Department, it is necessary for any or all of them
to remain in or return to the City of Saint John to provide fire protection
services therein.
4. Payment
4.01 N.B. Power will compensate the City as follows for its services
provided hereunder:
(a) a monthly "on call" fee of $3,333.33 ($40,000.00 per year);
(b) a "user fee" calculated as follows for each person and vehicle
provided by the City pursuant to this agreement:
37
First Hour Each Additional Hour or Part
Thereof
Truck $ 150.00 $ 150.00
Car $ 30.00 $ 50.00
Person according to the City's collective agreements with its
firefighters' union
(c) any overtime rates incurred by the City with respect to the
firefighters who are sent to the Point Lepreau Nuclear
Generating Station and with respect to firefighters who are
called in to restore the on -duty complement of the City's Fire
Department. Overtime rates shall be in accordance with the
City's collective agreements with its firefighters' union.
4.02 The "user fee" applies from the commencement of the fourth hour
following the dispatch of the men and equipment and continues until
their return to their fire station.
5. Term
This Agreement shall take effect and be binding on the parties hereto
for the period from January 1, A.D., 1999 to December 31, 2002,
inclusive and shall remain in force for successive periods of thirty six
(36) months thereafter, unless either party requests negotiation of a
new or replacement agreement by giving written notice to the other
party not less than sixty (60) days and not more than ninety (90) days
prior to the expiration date of this Agreement of any renewal thereof.
6. Contact
The contact person at Point Lepreau for clarification of the
arrangements herein provided will be the Co- Ordinator of Fire
Prevention. The contact person in any emergency will be the Duty Shift
Supervisor — Telephone 659 -6214.
KN
-5-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and N.B. Power have caused this
agreement to be duly executed.
Signed, Staled & Delivered by The City of Saint John on September
2 �19�99.
Signed, Sealed & Delivered
oe 4-' 1999.
)
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
C
Shirley McAI ,May r
)
Mary Mu ord, Common C rk
}
Common Council Resolutions:
January 11, 1999 and amended
September 20, 1999.
by the New Brunswick Power Corporation on
NEW BRUNSWICK POWER
CORPORATION
Per:
Secretary
39
r'
J� REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
September 29, 2011
Mayor Ivan Court and
Members of Common Council:
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT: CHANGE TO PRICING OF INFLUENZA VACCINES TO EMPLOYEES
BACKGROUND:
7-7
City of Saint John
On August 15, 2011, the 2011 Influenza Vaccine Program was dealt with by Common Council and a
recommendation was made to enter into a contract with the Victorian Order of Nurses (VON) as per the
attached Schedule A. Since that time, the VON has advised that their Legal Department requires an
additional clause be added to their contract:
" In the event, that the nurse becomes idle, VON will then charge the hourly rate of $73.00 per hour
after 15 minutes of lag time until the next client arrives for his /her immunization."
VON has now provided another price schedule which is more economical to the City for the various Flu
Clinics and addresses VON's concern with the possibility of Police and Fire call outs and the nurse being
left idle. Please see Schedule B.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the recommendation of Common Council of August 15, 2011, be amended and the pricing schedule
replaced with the pricing contained in the attached Schedule B.
tfullly ssbmitted,
J. atrick Woods, CGA
T MANAGER
W
Schedule A
That as recommended by the City Manager in the submitted report Influenza Vaccines to
Employees, The City of Saint John enter into a contract with the Victorian Order of Nurses
Canada New Brunswick Branch Inc. to administer influenza vaccines to its Employees, and
agrees to pay the charges as follows:
a) Nurse rate and supplies (Minimum 10 injections per clinic) $25.00 per injection;
b) Cancellation charge (less than 48 hours notice) or less than 50% expected participation
$250.00; and
That the City Solicitor be directed to prepare all necessary documents, and that the Mayor and
Common Clerk be authorized to sign all related documents.
Schedule B
The City of Saint John enter into a contract with the Victorian Order of Nurses Canada New
Brunswick Branch Inc. to administer influenza vaccines to its Employees, and agrees to pay the
charges as follows:
a) Nurse rate and supplies are $77.00 per hour and $13.00 per injection;
b) Cancellation charge (less than 48 hours notice) or less than 50% expected
participation $154.00; and
That the City Solicitor be directed to prepare all necessary documents, and that the Mayor and
Common Clerk be authorized to sign all related documents.
41
1
Tim Ot4 nfStin[Jawn
September 27, 2011
Your Worship and Members of Common Council,
Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission Presentation Re Yard waste
Recently the Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission made a decision regarding yard waste. I am
requesting that Council approve a brief presentation from the commission regarding how this new
decision will impact upon customers and the cost of waste collection.
Motion: That Council hear a brief presentation from the Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission on
Monday, October 3, 2011.
Respectfully Submitted,
Councillor Chris Titus
Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission Chair
�p
SAINT JOHN P.O. Box 1 371 Saint ;ohn, Na CanaM E2L 40 1 www.saintjahnxa I C.P. 1971 Saint john, N B. Canada ESL 4L1
42
o ept 22, 2011
CSC?
Fundy Legion
Solid Waste Commission
Frndi" a getter way.
Yard Waste is:
Leaves
Weeds
Grass
Twigs
Branches (less than 2" in
diameter)
Fundy Fein
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
EA EA!
The Issue
Leaves, grass &other yard waste make up a
significant volume of material
Compost $28 /tonne Landfill $1o8/tonne
Yard waste is easy to compost
On own property
In green cart
Still have yard waste entering landfill
Fundy Region
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
Mi
Yard Waste in Compost
Compost Cart
Brown paper bags
Compostable bags
Leaves in clear plastic bags
Twigs bundled
NO black or coloured plastic
bags
Fundy Region
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
C[:
s
.
Residential Compost
1000
goo
Boo
700
boo —
500
400
300
200
100
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
«A
2009
■ 2010
"Unsorted Waste" - Garbage containing yard
waste
Strong disincentive
Charge double the landfill tip fee for unsorted
waste
Fundy Fiore
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
CE:
Advertising Campaign —Now through October
Print — TJ, Valley Viewer, Hampton Herald,
River Valley News
Radio — Kloo, CHSJ, Rogers 88.9,
Wave
PSA
Fundy Fiore
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
Ch':
97.3 the
61f,
Meet with Haulers &Saint John staff
Contact suppliers and retailers
Provide stickers to haulers
Work with haulers
Monitor loads this fall
Fundy Fiore
Solid Waste Commission
Finding a better way.
51
Jan 2012
Unsorted Waste - is garbage containing Yard
Waste
Double tip fee for "unsorted waste"
(6Fundy Region
Solid Waste Commission
J4ndAng a better way,
52
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M & C — 2011 - 257
September 27, 2011
His Worship Mayor Ivan Court and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: Available Residential Development Lots in the City of Saint
John
INTRODUCTION
City of Saint john
At the September 12, 2011 meeting of Common Council, the following resolution
was adopted:
"RESOLVED that the Planning Department, through the City
Manager, prepare a report on the available development lots
currently approved by the City and that have yet to be developed. "
DISCUSSION
In order to provide the information requested by Common Council, the City's
geographic information system was used to identify vacant building lots that were
created through the subdivision process over the last 10 years. As Council will
appreciate, the number of available lots is dynamic and rapidly changes as
construction takes place. The data provided in this report should be viewed as an
"order of magnitude" analysis as it will not reflect any projects currently under
construction nor will it include lots that have received subdivision approvals but
have yet to be officially registered. It also does not include residential units that
have been proposed on existing lots.
The results of this analysis generally indicate that there is not a large supply of
available building lots in the City for most forms of housing. Overall, the total
inventory at this point in time represents less than 2 years of actual total housing
demand though it should be noted that there is adequate short -term supply for
some types of housing and under - supply or a complete absence of supply for
other types of residential units.
53
M & C-2011-257 - 2 - September 27, 2011
Type of Housing
Zones
Ward 1
Ward 2
Ward 3
Ward 4
Total
(West)
(North)
(Central)
(East)
Unserviced and
RS -1,
0
0
0
50
50
Rural One Family
RS -1M,
Residential
RS -2M,
RR
Large Lot
RSS,
0
31
0
32
63
Serviced One and
R1 -A,
Two Family
RS -2
Residential
Small Lot
R1 -B,
26
6
0
66
98
Serviced One and
R -2, R -4
Two Family
Residential
Serviced Mobile
MH
0
0
0
0
0
Home
Townhouse
TH
0
42
0
2
44
Medium Density
RM -1
7
10
1
0
18
Residential
Totals 1
33
89
1
150
267
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Common Council receive and file this report.
Respectfully submitted,
Ken Forrest, MCIP RPP
Commissioner of Planning and Development
l
trick Woods, C.G.A.
City Manager
54