2007-01-15_Agenda Packet--Dossier de l'ordre du jourCity of Saint John
Common Council Meeting
Monday, January 15, 2007
Regular Meeting
1. Call to Order — Prayer
5:00 p.m. Council Chamber
2. Approval of Minutes
2.1 Approval of December 18 & 19 2006 and January 2, 2007 Minutes
3. Adoption of Agenda
4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
5. Consent Agenda
5.1 Request of Board of Trade to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to
schedule presentation)
5.2 Kid's Help Phone Request for Financial Contribution (Recommendation:
Refer to City Manager)
5.3 ONE Change Inc Request to Present (Recommendation: Refer to Clerk to
schedule presentation)
5.4 Planning Advisory Committee Executive 2007 (Recommendation: Receive for
Information)
5.5 Gas Tax Funding (Recommendation in Report)
6. Members Comments
7. Proclamation
8. Delegations/ Presentations
9. Public Hearings
7:00 p.m.
9.1(a) Public Hearing Proposed Zoning By -law Amend - 18 Northumberland Ave
9.1(b) Planning Advisory Committee Recommending Rezoning of 18
Northumberland Avenue
10. Consideration of By -laws
10.1 Public Presentation Proposed Municipal Plan Amend & Zoning By -law
Amend - 40 Mountain View Dr
10.2(a) Uptown Saint John 2007 Budget
10.2(b) Business Improvement Area Levy for 2007
10.2(c) Business Improvement Levy By -law Amendment
10.3 Third Reading Zoning By -law Amend - 1000 Somerset St
10.4(a) Leinster Street Rezoning
10.4(b) Third Reading Zoning By -law Amend - 53 -75 Leinster Street
10.4(c) Section 39 Conditions - 53 -75 Leinster Street
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
11. Submissions by Council Members
11.1 Meetings Ottawa /Fredericton (Councillor Titus)
11.2 Residential Street Parking on Southern Peninsula (Deputy Mayor Hooton)
11.3 Proposed Pesticide Use By -law (Councillor White)
12. Business Matters — Municipal Officers
12.1 5:15 p.m. Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
12.2 Sprinkler System Replacement, City Market
12.3 Design & Construction Management: Reversing Falls Bridge Watermain
Replacement
12.4 Design and Construction Management: Simms Corner Reconfiguration
12.5 Renaming of Marlborough Avenue and New Street Name (Tabled Dec. 19,
2006)
12.6 Amending Condition of Sale Development of Single Family Dwelling
Corner of Millidge Ave and Somerset St
12.7 General Specifications - Division 6 General Administration of Contract
12.8 Public Hearing - 700 Somerset Street Withdrawal of Application
13. Committee Reports
13.1 Vision 2015 - Community Consultation
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
15. General Correspondence
16. Adjournment
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
City of Saint John
Seance du conseil communal
Le lundi 15 janvier 2007
Seance ordinaire
1. Ouverture de la seance, suivie de la priere
17 h Salle du conseil
2. Approbation du proces- verbal
2.1 Approbation du proces- verbal de la seance tenue les 18 et 19 d6cembre 2006
et le 2 janvier 2007
3. Adoption de l'ordre du jour
4. Divulgations de conflits d'interets
5. Questions soumises it 1'approbation du conseil
5.1 Demande presentee par la chambre de commerce voulant se presenter devant
le conseil (recommandation : transmettre au greffier pour qu'une date de
presentation soit fix6e)
5.2 Demande de financement presentee par Jeunesse J'6coute (recommandation :
transmettre au directeur general)
5.3 Demande presentee par ONE Change Inc voulant se presenter devant le
conseil ( recommandation : transmettre au greffier pour qu'une date de
presentation soit fix6e)
5.4 Comit6 consultatif d'urbanisme — direction 2007 ( recommandation : accepter a
titre informatif
5.5 Fonds de la taxe f6d6rale sur 1'essence ( recommandation portee au rapport)
6. Commentaires present6s par les membres
7. Proclamation
8. Delegations et presentations
9. Audiences publiques
19h
9.1 a) Audience publique relative au projet de modification de 1'Arret6 sur le
zonage visant le 18, avenue Northumberland
9. lb) Comite consultatif d'urbanisme recommandant le rezonage du bien -fonds
situ6 au 18, avenue Northumberland
10. Etude des arretes municipaux
10.1 Presentation publique de la modification du plan d'am6nagement propose et
de 1'arret6 sur le zonage visant le 40, promenade Mountain View
10.2a) Presentation du budget 2007 relatif a Uptown Saint John
10.2b) Taxe sur la zone d'amelioration des affaires pour 2007
10.2c) Projet de modification de 1'arret6 sur la taxe d'am6lioration des affaires
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
10.3 Troisi6me lecture de la modification de 1'arret6 sur le zonage visant le 1000,
rue Somerset
10.4a) Rezonage de la rue Leinster
10.4b) Troisieme lecture du projet de modification de 1'arret& sur le zonage visant
le 53 -75, rue Leinster
11. Intervention des membres du conseil
11.1 Reunions a Ottawa et a Fredericton (conseiller Titus)
11.2 Stationnement sur rue dans le secteur r6sidentiel de la p6ninsule
Southern Peninsula (mairesse suppl6ante Hooton)
Arr6t6 municipal propos6 relatif a 1'utilisation de pesticides (conseiller White)
12. Affaires municipales 6voqu6es par les fonctionnaires municipaux
12.1 17 h 15 Budgets d'exploitation et d'immobilisations propos6s de 2007
fonds d'administration
12.2 Remplacement du syst&me de gicleurs, march6 municipal
12.3 Gestion de la conception et de la construction : remplacement de la conduite
d'eau principale du pont Reversing Falls
12.4 Gestion de la conception et de la construction : reconfiguration du coin
Simms
12.5 Changement du nom de 1'avenue Marlborough et nouveau nom de rue
(proposition pr6sent6e le 19 d6cembre 2006)
12.6 Modification de la condition de la vente aff6rente a 1'am6nagement d'une
habitation unifamiliale au coin de 1'avenue Millidge et de la rue Somerset
12.7 Sp6cifications g&n&rales relatives a la division 6 visant 1'administration
g6n6rale dun contrat
12.8 Audience publique — Retrait de la demande de modification relative au 700,
rue Somerset
13. Rapports d6pos6s par les comit6s
13.1 Consultations communautaires pr6sent& par le Comit6 sur la Vision 2015
14. Etude des sujets 6cart6s des questions soumises a Papprobation du conseil
15. Correspondance g6n6rale
16. C16ture de la s6ance
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -607
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
COMMON COUNCIL MEETING — THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
CITY HALL — DECEMBER 18 - 6:30 P.M. & DECEMBER 19 — 4:30 P.M., 2006
present
Michelle Hooton, Deputy Mayor
Councillors Chang, Chase, Court, Farren, Ferguson, McGuire,
Tait, Titus and White
- and -
T. Totten, City Manager; J. Nugent, City Solicitor; Greg Yeomans,
Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer; P. Groody,
Commissioner of Municipal Operations; J. Baird, Commissioner
of Planning and Development; A. Bodechon, Chief of Police;
P. Woods, Common Clerk and Deputy City Manager; and E.
Gormley, Assistant Common Clerk
SEANCE DU CONSEIL COMMUNAL DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
TENUE A L'HOTEL DE VILLE
Le 18 decembre 2006 a 18 h 30 et le 19 decembre 2006 a 16 h 30
Sont presents :
Michelle Hooton, mairesse supplbante
Les conseillers Chang, Chase, Court, Farren, Ferguson,
McGuire, Tait, Titus et White
et
T. Totten, directeur gbnbral; J. Nugent, avocat municipal; Greg
Yeomans, commissaire aux finances et trbsorier; P. Groody,
commissaire aux opbrations municipales; J. Baird, commissaire b
I'urbanisme et au dbveloppement; A. Bodechon, chef de police;
P. Woods, greffier communal et directeur genbral adjoint; ainsi
que E. Gormley, greffibre communale adjointe
1. Call To Order — Prayer
Deputy Mayor Hooton called the meeting to order and Captain Bruce
Smith offered the opening prayer.
Ouverture de la reunion, suivie de la priere
La sbance est ouverte par la mairesse supplbante Hooton et le capitaine
Bruce Smith rbcite la pribre d'ouverture.
2. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Chang
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting of
Common Council, held on December 4, 2006, be approved.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
2. Approbation du proces- verbal
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuybe par le conseiller Chang
RESOLU que le procbs- verbal de la rbunion du
conseil communal tenue le 4 dbcembre 2006 soit approuv6.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptbe.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -608
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
3. Approval of Agenda
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the agenda of this meeting be
approved with the addition of item 5.12, Drury Cove Developments (Recommendation:
That Council approve an amendment in the matter of Drury Cove Developments —
Captain's Quarters Condominiums which formerly read "...exterior surface of the
gypsum board ", to now read "...the face of the studs in the walls ").
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
3. Adoption de I'ordre du jour
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que I'ordre du jour de la reunion soit
approuve, moyennant I'ajout du point 5.12, Drury Cove Developments
( Recommandation : Que le conseil approuve une modification relativement a la
declaration de Drury Cove Developments concernant le lotissement d'immeubles en
copropriete Condominiums du Captain's Quarters qui se lisait auparavant comme suit
... surface exterieure de plaque de platre », pour se lire maintenant « ... le cote des
poteaux aux murs »).
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
Councillor White declared a possible conflict with item 9.2, Proposed Re- zoning of 53 -75
Leinster Street as he is a member of the Board of Saint John Non Profit Housing.
4. Divulgations de conflits d'interets
Le conseiller White avoue titre en conflit d'interets relativement au point 9.2, projet de
rezonage du 53 -75, rue Leinster, puisqu'il est membre du conseil de Saint John Non
Profit Housing (logement sans but lucratif de Saint John).
5. Consent Agenda
5.2 That the request from Vibrant Communities for a traffic light at the intersection of
Broad and Wentworth Streets, be referred to the City Manager.
5.3 That the letter from Peter Smit and Judith Mackin requesting an update on the
upgrade of Princess Street, be referred to the City Manager.
5.4 That the letter from the Senior Advisory Committee requesting to make a
presentation to Council, be referred to the Common Clerk to schedule a presentation.
5.5 That the letter from the Duck Cove Recreation & Heritage Assoc. requesting an
update on the Western Beaches Trail, be referred to the City Manager.
5.6 1. That as recommended by the City Manager, Common Council initiate the
proposed rezoning of the right -of -way to 304 Westmorland Road and the rear of 298
Westmorland Road, having PID No. 55160113, from "RS -2" One and Two Family
Suburban Residential to "US" Utility and Service in conjunction with the applications of
Hughes Surveys & Consultants Inc. (304 Westmorland Road) and Haldor (1972) Ltd.
(rear of 298 Westmorland Road).
2. That Common Council schedule the Public Hearings for the rezoning
applications of Hughes Surveys & Consultants Inc. (304 Westmorland Road) and John
McLean (18 Northumberland Avenue) for January 15, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chamber.
5.7 1. That as recommended by the City Manager, The City of Saint John waive the
requirements set out in Clause 12.02 (Consent Required) of the Lease given on
November 27, 2006 by The City of Saint John as lessor to A.B.S. French Inc., as lessee,
and further
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -609
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
2. That The City of Saint John consent to the Assignment of the aforesaid Lease
from A.B.S. French Inc. to 628926 N.B. Inc.; and further
3. That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute such
documentation (as may be approved by the City Solicitor) to give effect to the
hereinabove given consent.
5.8 1. That as recommended by the City Manager, the City accept the offer from the
Executor and Trustee of Redvers G. Tiner, deceased, to purchase the freehold interest
in lands designated by PID Number 363531 for the sum of $7,500.; upon the terms and
conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase made by Wayne Morehouse, Executor, a
copy of which is attached to M & C 2006 -327.
2. That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute all documents
required to complete this sale of land.
5.9 That as recommended by the City Manager, the proposal of Hughes Survey and
Consultants Inc. for consulting engineering services for the 2006 Rural Road Upgrade
Project not be accepted.
5.10 That as recommended by the City Manager, Common Council:
1. Approve the submitted 'Agreement Respecting Communications Service'
between the Department of Local Government for the Province of New Brunswick and
The City of Saint John, relative to services provided to the Musquash Fire Department,
subject to a final review of the document as to form, by the Legal Department.
2. Authorize the Mayor and Common Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of
the City.
5.11 That the letter from the Holmesville Soil Series Committee requesting support for
a proclamation, be referred to the Common Clerk to schedule.
5.12 That Council approve an amendment in the matter of Drury Cove Developments
— Captain's Quarters Condominiums which formerly read "...exterior surface of the
gypsum board ", to now read "...the face of the studs in the walls ".
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the recommendation set out for
each consent agenda item respectively, with the exception of item 5.1, Saint John
Harbour Bridge Authority Budget, which has been identified for debate, be adopted.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
5. Questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil
5.2 Que la lettre de demande de Vibrant Communities (communautes vivantes) dans
laquelle on demande ('installation de feux de circulation au croisement des rues Broad et
Wentworth, soit transmise au directeur general.
5.3 Que la lettre regue de Peter Smit et Judith Mackin voulant une mise a jour visant
les travaux de refection en cours sur la rue Princess, soit transmise au directeur general.
5.4 Que la lettre de demande regue du Comite consultatif des aines, voulant faire
une presentation devant le conseil, soit transmise au greffier communal pour qu'il fixe
une date de presentation.
5.5 Que la lettre regue de I'association de loisirs et du patrimoine, Duck Cove
Recreation & Heritage Assoc., voulant une mise a jour visant le projet du sentier
longeant les plages de la cote ouest, soit transmise au directeur general.
5.6 1. Que, comme le recommande le directeur general, le conseil communal
procede a la mise en oeuvre du projet de rezonage du droit de passage allant au
304, chemin Westmorland et a I'arriere du terrain situe au 298, chemin Westmorland,
inscrit sous le NID 55160113, afin de faire passer la classification de zone residentielle
de banlieue — habitations unifamiliales et bifamiliales « RS -2 » a zone de services
publics et generaux « US », conformement aux demandes presentees par Hughes
Surveys & Consultants Inc. (304, chemin Westmorland) et Haldor (1972) Ltd., (I'arriere
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -610
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
du 298, chemin Westmorland).
2. Que le conseil communal prevoit des audiences publiques relativement aux
demandes de rezonage presentees par Hughes Surveys & Consultants Inc.,
(304, chemin Westmorland) et John McLean (18, avenue Northumberland), au
15 janvier 2007 a 19 h dans la salle du conseil.
5.7 1. Que, comme le recommande le directeur general, The City of Saint John
renonce aux exigences stipulees en vertu du paragraphe 12.02 (consentement exige) du
bail conclu le 27 novembre 2006 entre The City of Saint John, bailleur, et A.B.S. French
Inc., locataire.
2. Que The City of Saint John accorde son assentiment a la cession du bail
susmentionne de A.B.S. French Inc. a 628926 N. -B. Inc.
3. Que le maire et le greffier communal soient autorises a signer toute
documentation (qu'aura approuve I'avocat municipal) afin de donner force au
consentement susmentionne.
5.8 1. Que, comme le recommande le directeur general, The City of Saint John
accepte I'offre presentee par 1'executeur testamentaire et fiduciaire de feu Monsieur
Redvers G. Tiner, visant I'acquisition de I'interet franc sur les biens -fonds inscrits sous le
NID 363531 pour la somme de 7 500 $, selon les modalites stipulees a I'offre d'achat
signee par Wayne Morehouse, executeur testamentaire, dont copie est jointe au contrat
n° MC 2006 -327;
2. que le maire et le greffier communal soient autorises a signer toute
documentation exigee afin de conclure ladite vente de biens- fonds.
5.9 Que, comme le recommande le directeur general, la proposition presentee par
Hughes Survey and Consultants Inc., relative aux services d'ingenieurs- conseils visant
le projet de refection des routes rurales en 2006, soit rejetee.
5.10 RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur general, le conseil
communal:
1. approuve 1'entente relative au service de telecommunications presentee, entre le
ministere des Gouvernements locaux du Nouveau - Brunswick et The City of Saint John,
visant les services d'urgence du Service d'incendie de Musquash, moyennant la
presentation du document au Service juridique aux fins d'etude finale quant a sa forme;
2. autorise le maire et le greffier communal a signer 1'entente au nom de The City of
Saint John.
5.11 Que la lettre de demande reque du Comite sur la serie de sols de Holmesville,
voulant que la Ville appuie une proclamation, soit transmise au greffier communal pour
qu'il fixe une date de presentation.
5.12 Que le conseil approuve une modification relativement a la declaration de Drury
Cove Developments concernant le lotissement d'immeubles en copropriete Captain's
Quarters Condominiums, qui se lisait auparavant comme suit « ...surface exterieure de
plaque de platre », pour se lire maintenant « ...le cote des poteaux aux murs ».
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que la recommandation formulee pour
chacune des questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil, a 1'exclusion du point 5.1,
Budget de ('Administration du pont du port de Saint John, et qui a ete selectionnee aux
fins de deliberations, soit adoptee.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
6. Members Comments
Council members commented on various community events.
6. Commentaires presentes par les membres
Les membres du conseil s'expriment sur diverses activites communautaires.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -611
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
7. Proclamation
7. Proclamation
8. Delegations /Presentations
8. Delegations et presentations
8.1 Uptown Saint John 2007 Budget BIA
Referring to a submitted electronic slide presentation, Dick Daigle, President of Uptown
Saint John, updated Council on the organization's 2006 highlights and financial situation.
He advised that Uptown Saint John is not asking for a levy increase for the 2007 budget,
but is working to extend the BIA Levy boundaries.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that the Uptown Saint John 2007
budget be advertised and a date set for a public hearing for the BIA levy.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
8.1 Budget 2007 relatif a la zone d'amelioration des affaires de Uptown
Saint John
Se reportant b une presentation blectronique de diapositives soumise antbrieurement,
Dick Daigle, president de Uptown Saint John, met le conseil au courant des faits
saillants de I'annbe 2006 et de 1'6tat financier de son organisme. II indique que Uptown
Saint John ne demande aucune augmentation d'impot foncier pour combler son budget
de 2007, mais it vise plutot a reculer Ies bornes etablies en vertu de l'impot foncier relatif
b la zone d'amblioration des affaires.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuybe par le conseiller White
RESOLU que Ies avis relatifs au budget 2007 de
Uptown Saint John soient publibs et qu'une date soit fixbe pour la tenue d'une audience
publique visant l'impot foncier relatif a la zone d'amblioration des affaires.
A Tissue du vote, la proposition est adoptbe.
9. Public Hearings 7:00 P.M.
9.1(a) Section 39 Amendment - 450 Ashburn Road
The Common Clerk advised that the necessary advertising was completed with regard to
the proposed Section 39 Amendment amending the Section 39 conditions imposed on
the August 26, 1996 re- zoning of the property located at 450 Ashburn Road, also
identified as PID Number 52720 to permit a revised proposal.
9.1(b) Planning Advisory Committee Report - Section 39 Amendment - 450
Ashburn Road
Consideration was also given to a report from the Planning Advisory Committee
submitting a copy of Planning Staff's report considered at its December 12, 2006
meeting at which the Committee decided to recommend the amendment of the existing
Section 39 conditions described above.
The Deputy Mayor called for members of the public to speak against the proposed
amendment with no one presenting.
The Deputy Mayor called for members of the public to speak in favour of the proposed
amendment with Mike Cooper, the owner, advising that he is working with the Planning
Department to put a site plan in place, and that he agrees with the Planning Advisory
Committee recommendations.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -612
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
On motion of Councillor Tait
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED:
That Common Council amend the existing Section 39 conditions imposed on
the August 26, 1996 re- zoning of the property located at 450 Ashburn Road, also
identified as PID Number 52720 by adding the following conditions:
a) That a revised site plan, prepared by the applicant and approved by the
Development Officer, illustrate the following:
i. an additional 2 metres (6.6 feet) of landscaping at the front of the site;
ii. an extended paved parking area located on the northeast side of the garage;
iii. an evergreen tree hedge, surrounding all sides of the secure storage compound and
the extended paved parking area, with evergreens of a minimum height of 1.2 metres (4
feet) planted at a maximum centre -to- centre distance of 3 metres (10 feet);
iv. the removal and landscaping of the current gravel parking area located southwest of
the garage; and
v. a screened or covered area for the storage of all materials and equipment, including
tires, engines and all other automobile parts, and
b) That the sale of automobiles be permitted following the completion of all site
improvements shown on the revised site plan.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
(Councillor White withdrew from the meeting as he declared a conflict of
interest in the matter of the proposed re- zoning to follow.)
9. Audiences publiques a 19 h
9.1a) Conditions imposees par I'article 39 relatives au 450, chemin Ashburn
Le greffier communal indique que les avis requis ont ete publies relativement a la
modification proposee en vertu de I'article 39, modifiant les conditions imposees, le
26 aout 1996 relativement au rezonage de la propriete situee au 450, chemin Ashburn,
inscrite sous le NID 52720, afin de permettre la presentation d'une offre revisee.
9.1 b) Rapport presente par le Comite consultatif d'urbanisme relatif aux
modifications proposees en vertu de I'article 39 visant le 450, chemin Ashburn
De plus, examen d'un rapport presente par le Comite consultatif d'urbanisme
accompagne d'une copie du rapport du personnel du service d'urbanisme, etudie lors de
la seance du 12 decembre 2006 au cours de laquelle le comite a resolu de
recommander la modification des conditions actuelles susmentionnees imposees par
I'article 39.
La mairesse suppleante invite le public a se prononcer contre la modification proposee,
mais personne ne prend la parole.
La mairesse suppleante invite le public a se prononcer en faveur de la modification
proposee et Mike Cooper, le proprietaire, affirme qu'il travaille de concert avec le Service
d'urbanisme afin de dresser un plan de situation, et appuie les recommandations
formulees par le Comite consultatif d'urbanisme.
Proposition du conseiller Tait
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU :
RESOLU que le conseil communal modifie les conditions actuelles imposees par
I'article 39 le 26 aout 1996, modifiant le zonage de la propriete situee au 450, chemin
Ashburn et inscrite sous le NID 52720, en ajoutant les conditions suivantes :
a) qu'un plan de situation revise, dresse par le demandeur et approuve par I'agent
d'urbanisme, indique ce qui suit:
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -613
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
i) deux metres (6,6 pieds) additionnels d'amenagement paysager sur la partie frontale du
terrain; ii) une sire de stationnement agrandie et asphaltee situee du cote nord -est du
garage;
iii) une haie, composee d'arbres a feuillage persistant plantes a une distance maximale
de 3 metres (10 pieds), a partir du centre de chaque arbre et d'une hauteur minimale de
1,2 metres (4 pieds), entourant tous les cotes de ('installation d'entreposage securitaire
et de I'aire de stationnement agrandie et asphaltee;
iv) I'amenagement paysager de I'actuelle aire de stationnement en gravier situee au sud-
ouest du garage;
v. une sire cachee ou couverte pour 1'entreposage de tout le materiel et les machines, y
compris les pneus, les moteurs et toute autre piece automobile;
b) que la vente d'automobiles ne soit permise qu'apres I'achevement de tous les travaux
d'amelioration sur le terrain tels qu'ils sont indiques sur le plan de situation revise.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
(Le conseiller White annonce que la prochaine question de rezonage qui
sera discutee lui presente un conflit d'interets et it quitte la seance.)
9.2(a) Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment - 53 -75 Leinster Street
9.2(c) Letters in Opposition to Proposed Amendment
9.2(d) Letter in Support of Proposed Amendment
The Common Clerk advised that the necessary advertising was completed with regard to
the proposed addition of the following to the list of zones in Section 30(1): "special zones
SZ -21 ", and the addition of the following as Section 740(21): "Special Zone #21 (SZ -21)
regarding (a) Uses, and (b) Zones Standards, and the proposed re- zoning of a parcel of
land having an area of approximately 2770 square metres located at 53 -75 Leinster
Street, also identified as being PID Numbers 00009431 and 55059992, from "B -2"
General Business to "SZ -21" Special Zone #21 classification to permit a four - storey, 52-
unit apartment building as requested by Saint John Non Profit Housing Inc. with written
objections received.
Consideration was also given to submissions in favour of and objecting to the proposal.
9.2(b) Planning Advisory Committee Report - 53 -75 Leinster Street
Consideration was also given to a report from the Planning Advisory Committee
submitting a copy of Planning Staff's report considered at its December 12, 2006
meeting at which the Committee decided to recommend approval as set out in the staff
recommendation, recommending that Common Council amend the Zoning By -law by
adding to the list of zones in Section 30(1); adding 740(21), and by re- zoning the above
mentioned parcels of land located at 53 -75 Leinster Street from "B -2" General Business
to "SZ -21" Special Zone #21 classification.
Consideration was also given to submitted letters in support of and in opposition to the
proposal.
The Deputy Mayor called for members of the public to speak against the re- zoning with
the following presenting:
Nathalie Godbout, Counsel for the group, Citizens for the Revitalization of the South
Central Peninsula Ltd., identified members of the group as follows: Betty Rourke, Harold
McCormack, Dan Morehouse, Shane Goguen, Margaret Edwards, Lana Irish, Jonathan
Gallant, Jon McQueen, Tara O'Mahoney, Arthur Melanson, Brian Edwards, Victor
Robson, and Roderick MacKenzie.
Ms. Godbout presented submitted information from Planner, Dr. Robert Shipley and from
Architect, Johnson Engineered Solutions Limited, and advised that the Citizens' group
would like the building turned 180 degrees from the proposed plan, noting that it does
not oppose the project, but wishes to maintain the heritage quality of the neighbourhood.
The City Solicitor advised that work presently being done at the work site on Leinster St.
is being performed at the developer's own risk and does not contravene existing by-
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -614
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
laws. He clarified that if Council approves the proposed re- zoning, the issue of variance,
presently being appealed by citizens, would become a non - issue.
Jon MacQueen, owner of 58 Carmarthen Street and 154 -156 King Street East; Martha
Edwards, 90 Carmarthen Street; Betty Rourke, 166 King Street East; Jonathon Gallant,
96 Wentworth Street; and Arthur Melanson, 90 Wentworth Street expressed their
concerns over lack of parking, size of the proposed building, and loss of value and
enjoyment of their properties. Lana Irish, a tenant of Jon McQueen commented that if
the building is constructed, she would be moving.
The Deputy Mayor called recesses at 8:13 p.m., 9:07 p.m. and 10:50 p.m., reconvening
at 8:20 p.m., 9:15 p.m. and 10:57 p.m. respectively.
The Deputy Mayor called for members of the public to speak in favour of the re- zoning
with the following presenting:
Robert Vincent, counsel for Saint John Non Profit Housing Inc., and Clifford Lawrence, a
member of the board, appeared before Council on behalf of the applicant and expressed
agreement with the recommendation in the Planning Advisory Committee report. Mr.
Vincent advised that the initial design of the development has undergone several
modifications as a result of at least five meetings with area residents over the past year.
Mr. Lawrence reviewed the proposed project in detail, including a discussion of past
approvals as well as the changes that have been made in an attempt to address the
concerns of neighbouring property- owners.
Joe Barry, 127 Leinster Street spoke on behalf of the re- zoning saying that the addition
of the building would enhance the neighbourhood.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the meeting be extended beyond
10:00 p.m. to continue the Public Hearing.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that Council suspend the rules
pertaining to time of adjournment to complete the Public Hearing in progress.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillor Ferguson
voting nay.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that after completion of the Public
Hearing in progress Council reconvene at 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 in
the Council Chamber to complete the agenda.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillors Chase,
Farren and Ferguson voting nay.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the by -law entitled, "A Law to
Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ", amended by adding "special zones
SZ #21 ", its uses and standards, and re- zoning a parcel of land located at 53 -75 Leinster
Street, having an area of approximately 2770 square metres, also identified as being
PID Numbers 00009431 and 55059992, from "B -2" General Business to "SZ -21" Special
Zone #21 classification with Section 39 Conditions, be read a first time.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillor Farren
voting nay.
Read a first time by title, the by -law entitled, "A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of The
City of Saint John ".
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -615
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the by -law entitled, "A Law to
Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ", amended by adding "special zones
SZ #21 ", its uses and standards, and re- zoning a parcel of land located at 53 -75 Leinster
Street, having an area of approximately 2770 square metres, also identified as being
PID Numbers 00009431 and 55059992, from "B -2" General Business to "SZ -21" Special
Zone #21 classification with Section 39 Conditions, be read a second time.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillor Farren
voting nay.
Read a second time by title, the by -law entitled, "A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of
The City of Saint John ".
On motion of Councillor Ferguson
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that Council recommend the parties
involved in the proposed re- zoning of 53 -75 Leinster Street meet for discussions in the
next two weeks in an attempt to achieve further agreements.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting adjourned to be reconvened tomorrow evening,
December 19, at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to deal with the remainder of items
on the agenda.
9.2a) Projet de modification de I'arrete sur le zonage relatif au 53 -75, rue Leinster
9.2c) Lettres d'opposition au projet de modification
9.2d) Lettre d'appui au projet de modification
Le greffier communal indique que les avis requis ont ete publies relativement a I'ajout
propose de la zone suivante a la liste de zones inscrite a I'article 30(1) : « zone speciale
n° SZ -21 » et I'ajout de ce qui suit comme article 740(21) : « Zone speciale n° 21 (SZ -21)
relativement a) aux usages et b) aux normes de zonage, et le projet de rezonage d'une
parcelle de terrain d'une superficie approximative de 2 770 metres carres, situee au 53-
75, rue Leinster, inscrite sous les NID 00009431 et 55059992, afin de faire passer la
classification de zone commerciale generale « B -2 » a zone speciale n° 21, pour
permettre un immeuble de quatre etages a 52 logements, a la demande de I'organisme
Saint John Non - Profit Housing Inc., (logement sans but lucratif de Saint John), et que
des lettres d'opposition ecrites ont ete regues.
De plus, les conclusions en faveur ou contre la proposition sont examinees.
9.2b) Rapport presente par le Comite consultatif d'urbanisme visant le terrain
situe au 53 -75, rue Leinster
Le conseil a egalement examine un rapport du Comite consultatif d'urbanisme,
accompagne d'un exemplaire du rapport du personnel du service d'urbanisme, etudie
lors de la reunion du 12 decembre 2006, a laquelle le comite a resolu de recommander
I'approbation, telle qu'elle est soulignee dans le rapport du personnel du service
d'urbanisme, voulant que le conseil communal procede a la modification de I'arrete sur
le zonage en permettant I'ajout d'une zone a la liste de zones inscrite a I'article 30(1);
ajoutant I'article 740(21) et effectuant le rezonage des parcelles susmentionnees situees
au 53 -75, rue Leinster afin de faire passer la classification de zone commerciale
generale « B -2 » a zone speciale n° 21 « SZ -21 ».
De plus, les lettres d'appui et d'opposition presentees relativement au projet sont
examinees.
La mairesse suppleante invite le public a se prononcer contre le projet de rezonage et
les personnes suivantes prennent la parole :
Nathalie Godbout, conseillere juridique de Citizens for the Revitalization of the South
Central Peninsula Ltd., (citoyens pour la revitalisation de la peninsule centrale sud)
presente les membres du groupe suivants : Betty Rourke, Harold McCormack, Dan
Morehouse, Shane Goguen, Margaret Edwards, Lana Irish, Jonathan Gallant, Jon
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -616
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
McQueen, Tara O'Mahoney, Arthur Melanson, Brian Edwards, Victor Robson et
Roderick MacKenzie.
Me Godbout presente des renseignements soumis anterieurement par I'urbaniste,
Dr Robert Shipley, et la firme d'architectes, Johnson Engineered Solutions Limited, et
indique que le groupe de citoyens desire que I'immeuble soit pivote de 180 degres par
rapport au plan propose, qu'il ne s'oppose pas au projet, mais qu'il souhaite plutot
conserver les caracteristiques patrimoniales du quartier.
L'avocat municipal souligne que le promoteur assume tous les risques lies aux travaux
effectues a I'heure actuelle sur le terrain de la rue Leinster et qu'aucun arrete municipal
n'est enfreint. II explique que si le conseil approuve le projet de rezonage, la question de
la modification soulevee a I'heure actuelle par les citoyens ne poserait aucun probleme.
Jon MacQueen, proprietaire du 58, rue Carmarthen et du 154 -156, rue King Est, Martha
Edwards, residant au 90, rue Carmarthen, Betty Rourke, residant au 166, rue King Est,
Jonathon Gallant, residant au 96, rue Wentworth, et Arthur Melanson, residant au
90, rue Wentworth, expriment leurs inquietudes relatives au manque d'espaces de
stationnement, a la taille imposante de I'immeuble propose et a la depreciation de la
valeur et a la perte de jouissance de leurs proprietes. Lana Irish, locataire de Jon
McQueen, affirme que si I'immeuble est construit, elle demenagera.
La mairesse suppleante annonce des pauses a 20 h 13, a 21 h 7 et a 22 h 50, et la
seance reprend a 20 h 20, a 21 h 15 et a 22 h 57, respectivement.
La mairesse suppleante invite le public a se prononcer en faveur du rezonage, et les
personnes suivantes prennent la parole :
Robert Vincent, conseiller juridique de I'organisme Saint John Non - Profit Housing Inc.
(logement sans but lucratif de Saint John), et Clifford Lawrence, membre du conseil
d'administration, se presentent devant le conseil au nom du demandeur et expriment
leur accord avec les recommandations formulees dans le rapport du Comite consultatif
d'urbanisme. Me Vincent indique que la conception initiale de I'amenagement a subi
plusieurs modifications par suite aux cinq reunions tenues avec les residents du quartier
au cours de la derniere annee. M. Lawrence examine minutieusement le projet envisage
et mentionne les approbations accordees anterieurement ainsi que les modifications
effectuees afin d'adresser les inquietudes des proprietaires avoisinants.
Joe Barry, residant au 127, rue Leinster, se prononce en faveur du rezonage et constate
que I'amenagement de I'immeuble ameliorerait le quartier.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que la seance soit prolongee au -dela de
22 h afin de poursuivre I'audience publique.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le conseil suspende I'application du
reglement relatif a I'heure de cloture de la seance afin de conclure I'audience publique
en cours.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Ferguson vote
contre la proposition.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU qu'a la suite de I'audience publique en
cours, le conseil soit rappele a 16 h 30, le mardi 19 decembre 2006 dans la salle du
conseil afin de traiter tous les points de I'ordre du jour.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Les conseillers Chase,
Farren et Ferguson votent contre la proposition.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -617
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que I'arrete intitule « Arrete modifiant
I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John » modifie par I'ajout de la zone speciale
n° SZ -21, ainsi que les usages et les normes connexes, et le rezonage d'une parcelle de
terrain d'une superficie d'environ 2 770 metres carres, situee au 53 -75, rue Leinster et
portant les NID 00009431 et 55059992, en vue de faire passer la classification de zone
commerciale generale « B -2 » a zone speciale n° 21 « SZ -21 », sous reserve des
conditions imposees par I'article 39, fasse ('objet d'une premiere lecture.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Farren vote
contre la proposition.
Premiere lecture par titre de I'arrete intitule « Arrete modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de
The City of Saint John ».
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que I'arrete intitule « Arrete modifiant
I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John » modifie par I'ajout de la zone speciale
n° SZ -21, ainsi que les usages et les normes connexes, et le rezonage d'une parcelle de
terrain d'une superficie d'environ 2 770 metres carres, situee au 53 -75, rue Leinster et
portant les NID 00009431 et 55059992, en vue de faire passer la classification de zone
commerciale generale « B -2 » a zone speciale n° 21 « SZ -21 », sous reserve des
conditions imposees par I'article 39, fasse ('objet d'une deuxieme lecture.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Farren vote
contre la proposition.
Deuxieme lecture par titre de I'arrete intitule « Arrete modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de
The City of Saint John ».
Proposition du conseiller Ferguson
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que le conseil recommande aux parties
prenantes du projet de rezonage relatif au 53 -75, rue Leinster, de fixer un rendez -vous
dans les deux prochaines semaines afin de tenter de s'entendre sur d'autres questions.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
La mairesse suppleante declare que la seance est levee et sera rappelee demain apres-
midi, le 19 decembre a 16 h 30 dans la salle du conseil afin de traiter de tous les points
de I'ordre du jour.
The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting reconvened at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, December
19, 2006, a continuation of the meeting held on Monday, December 18, 2006, with the
following in attendance: Michelle Hooton, Deputy Mayor, Councillors, Chase, Court,
Farren, McGuire, Tait, Titus and White, and T. Totten, City Manager; B Cullinan,
Solicitor; Greg Yeomans, Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer; P. Groody,
Commissioner of Municipal Operations; W. Edwards, Commissioner of Buildings and
Inspection Services; B. Reid, Deputy Chief of Police; P. Woods, Common Clerk and
Deputy City Manager; and E. Gormley, Assistant Common Clerk.
On motion of Councillor Tait
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that item 12. 1, Collective Agreement —
The City of Saint John and CUPE Local 18, be brought forward.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
La mairesse suppleante declare que la seance est rappelee a 16 h 30, le mardi
19 decembre 2006, afin de prolonger la seance tenue le lundi 18 decembre 2006, et que
les personnes suivantes sont prenentes : la mairesse suppleante Hooton et les
conseillers Chase, Court, Farren, McGuire, Tait, Titus et White, et T. Totten, directeur
general; B. Cullinan, avocat; Greg Yeomans, commissaire aux finances et tresorier;
P. Groody, commissaire aux operations municipales; W. Edwards, commissaire aux
services d'inspection et des batiments; B. Reid, chef de police adjoint; P. Woods, greffier
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -618
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
communal et directeur general adjoint; ainsi que E. Gormley, greffiere communale
adjointe.
Proposition du conseiller Tait
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le point 12.1, Convention collective
entre The City of Saint John et la section locale 18 du SCFP, soit examine des
maintenant.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
12.1 Collective Agreement City of Saint John and CUPE Local 18
The City Manager introduced a submitted report and draft Collective Agreement
between The City of Saint John and CUPE Local 18. He referenced such factors as the
labour market, contracting versus public service, negotiated settlement versus mandated
agreement and commented that this contract reflects leadership and adequate flexibility.
He recommended that the contract be approved.
Mr. Groody reviewed the report and explained the key changes in the agreement noting
that he believes the contract as submitted is in the best interest of the City, the
community and the workforce.
Councillor Chase objected to the clause that restricts the employer from lowering the
workforce below 293 employees in Local 18 if deemed appropriate.
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Court
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Council approve the submitted tentative agreement with CUPE, Local 18
(Outside Workers) for the 4 -year term January 1 st, 2007 to December 31 st, 2010, and
authorize the Mayor and Common Clerk to sign the Working Agreement on behalf of The
City of Saint John (Employer), subject to the City Solicitor reviewing the document as to
its legality and form.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillor Chase
voting nay.
On motion of Councillor Tait
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that item 14.6, Saint John Harbour
Bridge Authority Budget, be brought forward.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.1 Convention collective entre The City of Saint John et la section locale 18 du
SCFP
Le directeur general presente un rapport soumis anterieurement et 1'ebauche d'une
convention collective entre The City of Saint John et la section locale 18 du SCFP. II se
reporte a certains facteurs, tels que le marche du travail, la sous - traitance par rapport a
la fonction publique et la negociation de reglements par opposition a la convention
prescrite; et it souligne que la presente convention fait preuve de leadership et d'une
flexibility adequate. II recommande I'approbation de la convention.
M. Groody s'entretient du rapport, souligne les principales modifications apportees a la
convention et affirme qu'il est d'avis que la convention presentee reflete les meilleurs
interets de la Ville, de la collectivite et de la main - d'oeuvre.
Le conseiller Chase s'oppose a la clause qui vise a interdire A 1'employeur de reduire la
main - d'oeuvre A moins de 293 employes dans la section locale 18, s'il le juge opportun.
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller Court
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil approuve la convention collective provisoire presentee entre la
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -619
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
section locale 18 du SUP (cols bleus) pour une durbe de quatre ans, b savoir du
1,r janvier 2007 au 31 decembre 2010, et autorise le maire et le greffier communal a
signer la convention au nom de The City of Saint John (employeur), sous reserve d'une
btude effectuee par I'avocat municipal quant a la forme et le fond.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Chase vote
contre la proposition.
Proposition du conseiller Tait
Appuybe par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le point 14.6, budget de
I'Administration du pont du port de Saint John, soit examinb des maintenant.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
14.6 Saint John Harbour Bridge Authority Budget
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that Common Council approve the
submitted 2006 -2007 Budget for the Saint John Harbour Bridge Authority.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
14.6 Budget de I'Administration du pont du port de Saint John
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuybe par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que le conseil communal approuve le
budget 2006 -2007 presente par I'Administration du pont du port de Saint John.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
10. Consideration of By -laws
10.1 Third Reading Proposed By -law Amendment - 16 Fern Street
On motion of Councillor Farren
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that the by -law entitled, "By -law
Number C.P. 110 -28, A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ", re-
zoning a parcel of land located at 16 Fern Street, having an area of approximately 470
square metres, also identified as PID Number 00317313, from "R -2" One and Two
Family Residential to "RM -1" Three Storey Multiple Residential classification, be read.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
The by -law entitled, "By -law Number C.P. 110 -28, a Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of
The City of Saint John was read in its entirety.
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that the by -law entitled, "By -law
Number C.P. 110 -28, A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ", re-
zoning a parcel of land located at 16 Fern Street, having an area of approximately 470
square metres, also identified as PID Number 00317313, from "R -2" One and Two
Family Residential to "RM -1" Three Storey Multiple Residential classification, be read a
third time, enacted and the Corporate Common Seal affixed thereto.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Read a third time by title, the by -law entitled, "By -law Number C.P. 110 -28, A Law to
Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ".
10. Etude des arretes municipaux
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -620
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
10.1 Troisieme lecture du projet de modification relatif a I'arrete sur le zonage
visant le 16, rue Fern
Proposition du conseiller Farren
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que 1'arrete intitule « Arrete no C.P. 110-
28 modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John », relativement au rezonage
d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie approximative de 470 metres carres, situee au
16, rue Fern et inscrite sous le NID 00317313 afin de faire passer la classification de
zone residentielle — habitations unifamiliales et bifamiliales « R -2 » a zone residentielle
d'immeubles a logements multiples de trois etages « RM -1 », fasse ('objet d'une lecture.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
L'arrete intitule « Arrete no C.P. 110 -28 modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of
Saint John » est lu integralement.
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que 1'arrete intitule « Arrete no C.P. 110-
28 modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John », relativement au rezonage
d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie approximative de 470 metres carres, situee au
16, rue Fern et inscrite sous le NID 00317313 afin de faire passer la classification de
zone residentielle — habitations unifamiliales et bifamiliales « R -2 » a zone residentielle
d'immeubles a logements multiples de trois etages « RM -1 », fasse ('objet d'une
troisieme lecture, que ledit arrete soit edicte et que le sceau communal y soit appose.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
Troisieme lecture par titre de 1'arrete intitule « Arrete no C.P. 110 -28 modifiant 1'arrete sur
le zonage de The City of Saint John ».
11. Submissions by Council Members
11.3 Performance Indicators - Value for Money
On motion of Councillor Chase
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that the Vision 2015 Committee
provide an update on the approach to be followed and the timing for implementation of
performance indicators for the City.
Question being taken, the motion was carried with Councillor Court voting
nay.
11. Intervention des membres du conseil
11.3 Indicateurs de rendement relatifs a ('optimisation des ressources
Proposition du conseiller Chase
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que le Comite sur la Vision 2015
presente une mise a jour relative aux demarches qui doivent titre entreprises et a
1'echeancier etabli pour la mise en oeuvre des indicateurs de rendement pour la ville.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Court vote
contre la proposition.
11.1 Freedom of the City
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that item 11.1 which was tabled on
November 20, 2006 and referred to the December 4, 2006 meeting, be lifted from the
table.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -621
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the Common Clerk be directed to
prepare a report on the process to be followed for bestowing Freedom of the City to
citizens, and that this report be referred to Committee of the Whole for further
consideration.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
11.1 Droit de cite
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que le point no 11. 1, reporte lors de la
reunion du 20 novembre 2006, et inscrit a I'ordre du jour de la seance du
4 decembre 2006, soit examine des maintenant.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le greffier communal soit charge de
la redaction d'un rapport etablissant les demarches a entreprendre pour I'octroi du droit
de cite aux citoyens et que ce rapport soit transmis au Comite plenier aux fins d'etude
approfondie.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
11.2 Disability Management
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that item 11.2 which was tabled on
November 20, 2006 and referred to the December 4, 2006 meeting, be lifted from the
table.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor Court
RESOLVED that the City Manager prepare a report
to advise Council on matters pertaining to the integration of short -term sick leave
benefits with Long Term Disability benefits provided in the Pension Plan.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
11.2 Gestion de I'incapacite
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que le point no 11.2, reporte lors de la
reunion du 20 novembre 2006, et inscrit a I'ordre du jour de la seance du
4 decembre 2006, soit examine des maintenant.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller Court
RESOLU que le directeur general redige un rapport
visant a conseiller les membres du conseil sur les questions relatives a ('inclusion
d'indemnites de conges de maladie a court terme et d'invalidite a long terme au regime
de retraite.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -622
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
11.4 Saint John Community Loan Fund
On motion of Councillor McGuire
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that The City of Saint John give
consideration to making an investment of $5,000. in the Saint John Community Loan
Fund and that this request be referred to both the City Manager and the City Solicitor.
Question being taken, the motion was carried with Councillor Tait voting
nay.
11.4 Fonds d'emprunt communautaire de Saint John
Proposition du conseiller McGuire
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que The City of Saint John considere
investir la somme de 5 000 $ dans la Saint John Community Loan Fund (fonds
d'emprunt communautaire) et que cette question soit adressee au directeur general et a
I'avocat municipal.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Tait vote
contre.
11.5 Canaport Community Environmental Liaison Committee
On motion of Councillor Court
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that the letter from Councillor Court
regarding a request from the Canaport Environmental Liaison Committee to bring to the
attention of Council three items for consideration, all dealing with the access road from
Black River Road to Red Head Road, be received for information.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
11.5 Comite de liaison environnemental communautaire de Canaport
Proposition du conseiller Court
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que la lettre presentee par le conseiller
Court relative a la demande du Comite de liaison environnemental communautaire de
Canaport voulant que le conseil porte son attention sur trois questions relatives a la voie
d'acces depuis le chemin Black River jusqu'au chemin Red Head, soit acceptee a titre
informatif.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
11.6 School Zone - Safety Kids
On motion of Councillor McGuire
Seconded by Councillor Court
RESOLVED that the matter of School Zone Safety
Kids be referred to the City Manager and to the Chief of Police through the Police
Commission, to report on the feasibility of implementing this program in Saint John, with
integration for mobility challenged children built into the program.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
11.6 Zone scolaire — securite des enfants
Proposition du conseiller McGuire
Appuyee par le conseiller Court
RESOLU que la question de la zone scolaire et de
la securite des enfants soit adressee au directeur general et au chef du service de police
par 1'entremise de la Commission de police aux fins de redaction d'un rapport sur la
faisabilite de la mise en oeuvre de ce programme a Saint John, y compris ('inclusion au
programme d'un volet adresse aux enfants a mobility reduite.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -623
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptbe.
12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers
12. Affaires municipales evoquees par les fonctionnaires municipaux
12.2 Manawagonish Road - Water, Sanitary, Storm and Road Reconstruction
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED as recommended by the City
Manager, Common Council:
1. provide early approval for projects on Manawagonish Road within the 2007 Water &
Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program as follows:
Infrastructure Renewal — Sanitary in the amount of $330,000.
Infrastructure Renewal — Water in the amount of $360,000.
Water Service Needs in the amount of $805,000.
2. provide early approval for projects on Manawagonish Road within the 2007 General
Fund Capital Program and the Municipal Designated Highways Grant Program as
follows:
Storm Sewer in the amount of $210,000.
Transportation in the amount of $260,000. as City Share and $925,000. as Other Share
to be funded within an expanded Municipal Designated Highways Grant Program, and
further;
3. authorize staff to conduct negotiations for the engagement of engineering design and
construction management services with Crandall Engineering Ltd. for street
reconstruction in accordance with the process approved by Common Council on
February 13, 2006 for the Engagement of Engineering Consultants — 2006 Capital
Program (M &C 2006 -31).
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.2 Chemin Manawagonish — amelioration du reseau d'aqueduc et d'egouts
sanitaires et pluviaux et refection de route
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuybe par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil communal :
1. approuve sans delais les projets relatifs au chemin Manawagonish en vertu du
programme d'immobilisations relatif au fonds du reseau d'aqueduc et d'6gouts pour
2007, comme suit:
renouvellement de ('infrastructure - reseau d'bgouts au montant de 330 000 $;
renouvellement de ('infrastructure - reseau d'aqueduc au montant de 360 000 $;
exigences au chapitre du reseau d'aqueduc au montant de 805 000 $;
2. approuve sans delais les projets relatifs au chemin Manawagonish en vertu du
programme gbnbral d'immobilisations et du programme relatif aux routes municipales
dbsignbes pour 2007, comme suit:
6gouts pluviaux au montant de 210 000 $;
transport — 260 000 $ paybs par la Ville et 925 000 $ subventionnbs en vertu d'un
programme blargi relatif aux routes municipales designbes;
3. autorise les employbs b entamer des nbgociations visant b engager les services de
Crandall Engineering Ltd., clans le cadre de la conception d'ingbnierie et de la gestion de
construction relativement a la refection des routes, conformbment au procbd6 approuv6
par le conseil le 13 fbvrier 2006 visant 1'engagement d'experts - conseils en ingbnierie —
programme d'immobilisations de 2006 (contrat n° MC 2006 -31).
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptbe.
12.3 Contract 2006 -1 - Harbour Passage - Water Street
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Contract No. 2006 -1: Harbour Passage — Water Street, be awarded to the low
tenderer, Fairville Construction Ltd., at its tendered price of $603,145. as calculated
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -624
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
based upon estimated quantities, and further that the Mayor and Common Clerk be
authorized to execute the necessary contract documents.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.3 Contrat no 2006 -1 : Passage du port et rue Water
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le contrat no 2006 -1, relatif au Passage du port et a la rue Water, soit accorde
au soumissionnaire le moins disant, Fairville Construction Ltd., au prix offert de
603 145 $, etabli a partir de quantites estimatives, et que le maire et le greffier
communal soient autorises a signer la documentation contractuelle exigee.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
12.4 Tender for the Collection of Residential Solid Waste
On motion of Councillor McGuire
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, the tenders of Fero Waste & Recycling Inc. and Dominion Refuse be accepted
for the establishment of a supply agreement for the collection of residential solid waste in
the zones identified in the tender document and for a period from January 1, 2007
through to June 30, 2007, with an option to extend, on a month to month basis for a
maximum additional 6 month term, be accepted.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.4 Soumission pour la collecte des dechets solides residentiels
Proposition du conseiller McGuire
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
regional, les soumissions presentees par Fero Waste & Recycling Inc. et Dominion
Refuse, soient acceptees en ce qui a trait a I'elaboration d'une convention
d'approvisionnement visant la collecte de dechets solides residentiels dans les zones
determinees en vertu du document de soumission, pour une periode allant du
1 er janvier 2007 au 30 juin 2007, incluant une option de prorogation mensuelle
automatique d'une duree additionnelle maximale de six mois, soit acceptee.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
12.5 2007 insurance
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Tait
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Council accepts the insurance package offered by AON Reed Stenhouse Inc,
and approves payments as follow:
AON Reed Stenhouse Inc. $858,448. consisting of Insurance premiums of $813,448.
and agreed agency fee of $45,000. for a total $858,448.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.5 Assurance 2007
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller Tait
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil accepte I'offre d'assurances proposee par AON Reed Stenhouse Inc.,
et approuve les paiements suivants :
a AON Reed Stenhouse Inc., la somme totale de 858 448 $ comprenant les primes
d'assurance au montant de 813 448 $ et les frais d'agence de 45 000 $.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -625
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
12.6 Authority to Expend Funds
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Titus
RESOLVED that the following resolution be
adopted, namely:
Whereas the 2007 budgets for The City of Saint John have not been approved;
And Whereas there are some day to day matters controlled by the general approval of
the budget:
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the City Manager be authorized to approve purchases
up to the value of $25,000. where provision for same is normally contained in the budget
which has not been approved:
And be it further resolved that the Treasurer be authorized to disburse funds related to
expenditures related to pre- existing contractual agreements and, to commissions and
organizations which, in his opinion, would ensure the continued economic and efficient
day -to -day operations of these commissions and organizations during this period.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.6 Autorisation de depense de fonds
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller Titus
RESOLU que la resolution suivante soit adoptee, a
savoir
Attendu que les budgets de The City of Saint John pour I'annee 2007 n'ont pas ete
approuves;
Et attendu que certaines affaires quotidiennes dependent de I'approbation generale du
budget;
En consequence, it est resolu que le directeur general soit autorise a approuver les
acquisitions d'une valeur maximale de 25 000 $ lorsqu'une telle disposition existe
normalement dans le budget non approuve;
Et qu'il soit de plus resolu que le tresorier soit autorise a verser des sommes, pendant
ladite periode, pour acquitter les depenses prevues en vertu d'engagements
contractuels anterieurs, et aux commissions et aux organisations qui, a son avis,
assurent quotidiennement de leur fonctionnement economique et efficace continu.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
12.7 Saint John Youth Cabinet
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Common Council:
1. recognize the Saint John Youth Cabinet (SJYC) as Council's youth advisory
Committee as per the terms of the submitted Outline for Official City Status;
2. direct the Saint John Youth Cabinet to submit an action plan by April of 2007 and
report back on its organization, membership, activities and results by December 2007;
3. provide a grant of $2,500. in the 2007 budget for the Saint John Youth Cabinet and
refer the request to the 2007 budget process, and
4. appoint a liaison Councillor to dialogue with the SJYC and refer the appointment to
the Nominating Committee.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.7 Saint John Youth Cabinet (cabinet jeunesse)
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil communal :
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -626
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
1. reconnaisse le Saint John Youth Cabinet (SJYC) (cabinet jeunesse) comme Comite
consultatif de la jeunesse creb par le conseil conformement aux modalites de l'avant-
projet presente relatif au statut officiel de la ville;
2. charge le cabinet jeunesse de Saint John de presenter un plan d'action au plus tard
en avril et de faire le compte rendu de ('organisation, des membres, des activites et des
resultats obtenus;
3. prbvoie une subvention de 2 500 $ au budget de 2007 pour le cabinet jeunesse de
Saint John et soumette la demande au procede budgetaire de 2007;
4. nomme un conseiller charge d'assurer la liaison avec le cabinet jeunesse et demande
au Comite des candidatures de s'assurer de cette nomination.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
13. Committee Reports
13. Rapports deposes par les comites
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
14.1 Request for Compensatory Storage - 643 Rothesay Avenue
On motion of Councillor Farren
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Milestone Construction & Development Inc. be advised that Common Council
will sell compensatory storage, calculated at the rate of $10.75 per cubic metre, for each
cubic metre of flood storage displaced by the development, up to 1,476 cubic metres, at
its development on Rothesay Avenue.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
14. Etude des sujets ecartes des questions soumises a I'approbation du
conseil
14.1 Demande d'entreposage compensatoire — 643, avenue Rothesay
Proposition du conseiller Farren
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU clue, comme le recommande le directeur
general, 1'entreprise Milestone Construction & Development Inc. soit avisee clue le
conseil communal vendra des espaces d'entreposage compensatoire, au prix de 10,75 $
le metre cube, pour chaque metre cube d'entreposage dbplace en raison d'inondation a
la suite des travaux d'amenagement, jusqu'a concurrence de 1 476 metres cubes, sur
Ies Iieux de I'amenagement de l'avenue Rothesay.
A Tissue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
14.2 Use of Pesticides on City Property
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the report from the City Manager
outlining how pesticides are being used on City property, be received for information.
Councillor Chase commented that the report was incongruent with Council's decision to
ban the use of pesticides.
On motion of Councillor Court
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that the report from the City Manager
outlining how pesticides are being used on City property, be tabled.
Question being taken, the tabling motion was carried.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -627
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
14.2 Utilisation des pesticides sur les proprietes municipales
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuybe par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le rapport prbsentb par le directeur
gbnbral soulignant la manibre dont les pesticides sont utilisbs sur les terrains
municipaux soit accept6 b titre informatif.
Le conseiller Chase constate que le rapport ne correspond pas b la dbcision prise par le
conseil visant b interdire ('utilisation de pesticides.
Proposition du conseiller Court
Appuybe par le conseiller White
RESOLU que le rapport prbsentb par le directeur
gbnbral soulignant la manibre dont les pesticides sont utilisbs sur les terrains
municipaux soit report6.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition visant b reporter 1'examen de cette
question est adoptbe.
14.3 Re- naming of Marlborough Avenue and New Street Name
On motion of Councillor Court
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Common Council:
a) change the name of Marlborough Avenue to Retail Drive; and b) approve the name
Fashion Drive for the access driveway serving the hotel and first phase of the East Point
Shopping Centre.
On motion of Councillor Farren
Seconded by Councillor Titus
RESOLVED that the report on re- naming
Marlborough Avenue and New Street Name be tabled.
Question being taken, the tabling motion was carried.
14.3 Changement de nom de I'avenue Marlborough et nouveau nom
Proposition du conseiller Court
Appuybe par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
gbnbral, le conseil communal :
a) change le nom de ('avenue Marlborough et la nomme promenade Retail; b) approuve
le nom de la promenade Fashion donn6 b la voie d'accbs desservant ('hotel et la
premibre phase du centre commercial East Point.
Proposition du conseiller Farren
Appuybe par le conseiller Titus
RESOLU que le rapport relatif au changement de
nom de ('avenue Marlborough et au nouveau nom soit report6.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition visant b reporter 1'examen de cette
question est adoptbe.
14.4 2006 Debenture Issue
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to sign the debentures between
the City and the New Brunswick Municipal Finance Corporation for $19,900,000. at the
listed terms.
Question being taken, the tabling motion was carried.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -628
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
14.4 Emission de debentures en 2006
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le maire et le greffier communal soient autorises a signer les debentures
emises par la Ville a la Corporation de financement des municipalites du Nouveau -
Brunswick, au montant de 19 900 000 $, selon les modalites stipulees.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition visant a reporter 1'examen de cette
question est adoptee.
14.5 Land for Public Purposes Trust Fund Application
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Common Council;
1. Approve the request for a grant of $5,000 to the Ecole Millidgeville North Playground
Committee, provided written permission is given by the School District to enable this
playground to be open for the use of the public at all times.
2. Approve the request for a grant of $1,912.28 to Seawood School Recreation
Committee, provided written permission is given by the School District to enable this
playground to be open for the use of the public at all times.
3. That the Land for Public Purpose Fund Grant program be temporarily discontinued to
allow for growth. Staff will make a recommendation to Council at the appropriate time.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
14.5 Demande en vertu du fonds en fiducie visant les terrains d'utilite publique
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil communal procede comme suit:
1. approuve la demande d'une subvention au montant de 5 000 $ pour le Comite sur les
terrains de jeux de I'Ecole Millidgeville North, pourvu que le district scolaire donne sa
permission par ecrit visant a donner au public libre acces a ce terrain de jeux en tout
temps;
2. approuve la demande d'une subvention au montant de 1 912,28 $ pour le Comite sur
les loisirs de I'Ecole Seawood, pourvu que le district scolaire donne sa permission par
ecrit visant a donner au public libre acces a ce terrain de jeux en tout temps;
3. que le programme de subvention relatif aux terrains d'utilite publique soit
temporairement interrompu afin de favoriser la croissance. Les membres du personnel
feront parvenir au conseil une recommandation en temps opportun.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
15. General Correspondence
15.1 Request from Ritchie's Carpet Warehouse for Traffic Signals - Intersection
of Rothesay and Broadview Avenues
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that the letter from Stephen J. Ritchie
Law Office on behalf of Ritchie's Carpet Warehouse requesting traffic signals at the
intersection of Rothesay and Broadview Avenues due to increased traffic volume, be
referred to the City Manager.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
15. Correspondance generale
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -629
COMMON COUNCIL /CONSEIL COMMUNAL
DECEMBER 18 & 19,2006/18 et 19 DECEMBRE 2006
15.1 Demande presentee par 1'entreprise Ritchie's Carpet Discount Warehouse
relativement a ('installation de feux de circulation a l'intersection des
avenues Rothesay et Broadway
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuybe par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que la lettre repue du cabinet Stephen
J. Ritchie Law Office, au nom de Ritchie's Carpet Warehouse, relativement a
('installation de feux de circulation a ('intersection des avenues Rothesay et Broadview,
en raison du volume accru de circulation, soit transmise au directeur gbnbral.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptbe.
16. Adjournment
The Deputy Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
16. Cloture de la seance
La mairesse supplbante dbclare que la sbance est levbe b 19 h 30.
Mayor /maire
Common Clerk /greffier communal
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -630
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
COMMON COUNCIL MEETING — THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
CITY HALL — JANUARY 2, 2007, 5:00 P.M.
present
Norman McFarlane, Mayor
Deputy Mayor Hooton and Councillors Chang, Chase, Court,
Farren, Ferguson, McGuire, Tait, Titus and White
-and -
T. Totten, City Manager; J. Nugent, City Solicitor; Greg Yeomans,
Commissioner of Finance and Treasurer; P. Groody,
Commissioner of Municipal Operations; J. Baird, Commissioner
of Planning and Development; W. Edwards, Commissioner of
Building Inspections; A. Bodechon, Chief of Police; R. Simonds,
Fire Chief, B Morrison, Commissioner of Leisure Services; P.
Woods, Common Clerk and Deputy City Manager; and E.
Gormley, Assistant Common Clerk
SEANCE DU CONSEIL COMMUNAL DE THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
A L'HOTEL DE VILLE, LE 2 JANVIER 2007 a 17 h
Sont presents :
Norman McFarlane, maire
la mairesse supplbante Hooton et les conseillers Chang, Chase,
Court, Farren, Ferguson, McGuire, Tait, Titus et White
et
T. Totten, directeur gbnbral; J. Nugent, avocat municipal; Greg
Yeomans, commissaire aux finances et trbsorier; P. Groody,
commissaire aux opbrations municipales; J. Baird, commissaire b
I'urbanisme et au dbveloppement; W. Edwards, commissaire aux
services d'inspection et des batiments; A. Bodechon, chef de
police; R. Simonds, chef du service d'incendie; B. Morrison,
commissaire aux services des loisirs; P. Woods, greffier
communal et directeur gbnbral adjoint; ainsi que E. Gormley,
greffibre communale adjointe
Call To Order — Prayer
Mayor McFarlane called the meeting to order and Reverend Eric Phinney
offered the opening prayer.
Ouverture de la reunion, suivie de la priere
La sbance est ouverte par le maire McFarlane et le pasteur Eric Phinney
rbcite la pribre d'ouverture.
2. Approval of Minutes
2. Approbation du proces- verbal
3. Approval of Agenda
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hooton
RESOLVED that the agenda of this meeting be
approved.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
3. Adoption de I'ordre du jour
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -631
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par la mairesse suppleante Hooton
RESOLU que I'ordre du jour de la presente seance
soit adopte.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
4. Disclosures of Conflict of Interest
4. Divulgations de conflits d'int6rets
5. Consent Agenda
5.1 That Common Council schedule the Public Hearings for the rezoning applications
of Robert Colquhoun (7 -9 MacLaren Boulevard), Tien Kim Hoa (150 Westmorland
Road), Gary Savoie (128 Millidge Avenue) and Heartland Developments Inc. (700
Somerset Street) for Monday, January 29, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
5.2 That the January 15, 2007 Public Hearings for the rezoning applications of
Hughes Surveys & Consultants Inc. (on behalf of Saint John Energy) at 304
Westmorland Road, and Haldor (1972) Ltd. at the rear portion of 298 Westmorland
Road, be cancelled, and that Common Council schedule new public hearings for
Monday, February 12, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
5.3 That the letter from Eric Cannon suggesting that a Paintball play zone could be
located in Rockwood Park be referred to the Rockwood Park Advisory Committee.
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hooton
RESOLVED that the recommendation set out for
each consent agenda item respectively, with the exception of items, 5.4 and 5.5 (to be
considered under section 8), which have been identified for debate, be adopted.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
5. Questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil
5.1 Que le conseil communal fixe la date d'audiences publiques relatives aux
demandes de rezonage presentees par Robert Colquhoun (7 -9, boulevard MacLaren),
Tien Kim Hoa (150, chemin Westmorland), Gary Savoie (128, avenue Millidge) et
Heartland Developments Inc. (700, rue Somerset) au lundi, 29 janvier 2007 a 19 h dans
la salle du conseil.
5.2 Que les audiences publiques prevues le 15 janvier 2007 relatives aux demandes
de rezonage presentees par Hughes Surveys & Consultants Inc., (au nom de Saint John
Energy), visant le 304, chemin Westmorland; et Haldor (1972) Ltd., visant le terrain situe
a I'arriere du 298, chemin Westmorland, soient annulees et que le conseil fixe une
nouvelle date pour la tenue d'une audience publique, soit le lundi, 12 fevrier 2007 a 19 h
dans la salle du conseil.
5.3 Que la lettre reque de Eric Cannon, voulant qu'un terrain de paintball soit
amenage dans le parc Rockwood, soit transmise au Comite consultatif du parc
Rockwood
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par la mairesse suppleante Hooton
RESOLU que la recommandation formulee
relativement a chacune des questions soumises a I'approbation du conseil, a 1'exclusion
des points 5.4 et 5.5 (moyennant 1'examen du point avec le point n 8), soit adoptee.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
6. Members Comments
Council members commented on various community events.
7. Proclamation
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -632
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
6. Commentaires presentes par les membres
Les membres du conseil s'expriment sur diverses activites communautaires.
7. Proclamation
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that item number 10 on the agenda be
brought forward and dealt with at this time.
Question being taken, the motion was carried
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
QUE le point 10 de I'ordre du jour soit examine et
traite des maintenant.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
10. Consideration of By -laws
10.1(a)Third Reading Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment 53 -75 Leinster Street
10.1(b)Section 39 Conditions - 53 -75 Leinster Street
10.1(c) Letters in Opposition to Proposed Rezoning of 53 -75 Leinster Street
10.1(d)Correspondence in Support of Rezoning of 53 -75 Leinster Street
The City Solicitor called attention to correspondence related to the proposed re- zoning of
53 -75 Leinster Street included in the agenda package which was received subsequent to
the Public Hearing, advising that it is not to be considered when making the decision on
third reading. He explained that the reason for this is that the Public Hearing is the
occasion provided for all parties to present their arguments fully and fairly in the
presence of Council as well as in the presence of all those interested in the matter, in a
single and unified process as set out in the Community Planning Act. He added that the
information was addressed to Council and it was therefore added to the agenda with the
note that it is not to be considered in making the decision on third reading.
(The Mayor and Councillor White withdrew from the meeting as Councillor White
had declared a conflict of interest before the Public Hearing on 53 -75 Leinster Street and
the Mayor having been absent during the hearing, and Deputy Mayor Hooton took the
chair.)
On motion of Councillor Titus
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the by -law entitled, "By -law
Number C.P. 110 -29, A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of Saint John ",
amended by adding "special zones SZ #21 ", its uses and standards, and re- zoning a
parcel of land located at 53 -75 Leinster Street, having an area of approximately 2770
square metres, also identified as being PID Numbers 00009431 and 55059992, from "B-
2" General Business to "SZ -21" Special Zone #21 classification with Section 39
Conditions, be read.
Councillor Tait called a point of order stating that the comments being made were not
germane to the issue which is the proper zoning for the land use in question, and that
procedural issues are not appropriate to debate at this time. The Deputy Mayor ruled
that comments are restricted to the zoning issue.
Question being taken, the motion was defeated, with Councillors Chang,
Chase, Court, Farren and Ferguson voting nay.
On motion of Councillor Ferguson
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that third reading of the by -law
entitled, "By -law Number C.P. 110 -29, A Law to Amend the Zoning By -law of The City of
Saint John ", amended by adding "special zones SZ #21 ", its uses and standards, and re-
zoning a parcel of land located at 53 -75 Leinster Street, having an area of approximately
2770 square metres, also identified as being PID Numbers 00009431 and 55059992,
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -633
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
from "B -2" General Business to "SZ -21" Special Zone #21 classification with Section 39
Conditions, be tabled.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillors McGuire,
Tait and Titus voting nay.
On motion of Councillor Ferguson
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that the City Manager and appropriate
staff, and the parties involved in the proposed re- zoning of 53 -75 Leinster Street, meet
with a view to finding a solution, and report back to Council.
Responding to a question from Councillor Chase, the City Solicitor commented on the
resolution adopted at the December 18th, 2006 meeting recommending that the parties
involved meet to seek a resolution, saying that Mr. Baird indicated that such a meeting
took place with no resolve. He advised that other information dealing with the merits and
arguments of the proposal received after the Public Hearing, should not be considered in
Council's decision regarding third reading.
During discussion between the Deputy Mayor and Mr. Baird, Councillor Ferguson raised
a point of order stating that the issue has been tabled to which the Deputy responded
that she will continue with her questioning.
Councillor Farren raised a point of privilege commenting that he took objection to
remarks made by a Councillor which he believed to be insinuating that he was against
development because he voted to table the issue.
In response to a question from Councillor Court, the City Solicitor advised Council that
any obligation that the City has with regard to Saint John Non Profit Housing does not
bear upon the decision regarding the proposed re- zoning before Council.
Councillor Titus commented that he believes in the project and disagrees with discussion
which is not germane to the land use issue at hand.
Councillor Tait advised that his understanding was that third reading was not contingent
on the results of a meeting between the parties.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillors McGuire,
Tait and Titus voting nay.
(The Mayor and Councillor White re- entered the meeting, and the Mayor took the chair.)
On motion of Councillor Tait
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the Common Clerk be advised
that, if any correspondence or material is received, other than that which Council has
requested from the City Manager on the issue of the proposed re- zoning of 53 -75
Leinster Street, it not be forwarded to Council Members.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
10. Etude des arret6s municipaux
10.1a) Troisieme lecture du projet de modification de I'arret6 sur le zonage relatif
au 53 -75, rue Leinster
10.1 b) Modification propos6e aux conditions impos6es par I'article 39 visant le
terrain situ6 au 53 -75, rue Leinster
10.1c) Lettres d'opposition au projet de modification visant le 53 -75, rue Leinster
10.1d) Lettres d'appui au projet de modification visant le 53 -75, rue Leinster
L'avocat municipal souligne que la correspondance relative au projet de rezonage visant
le 53 -75, rue Leinster, incluse dans la trousse de I'ordre du jour et regue a la suite de
I'audience publique, ne doit pas titre consideree au moment de la prise de decision en
troisieme lecture, etant donne que toutes les parties peuvent presenter a I'audience
publique leur argumentation de maniere exhaustive et equitable devant le conseil et
toute autre personne interessee, au cours d'une seule procedure, tel que le prevoit la Loi
sur l'urbanisme. II ajoute que ('information est adressee au conseil et qu'elle est alors
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -634
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
ajoutee a I'ordre du jour avec la mention qu'elle ne doit pas titre prise en consideration
au moment de la prise de decision en troisieme lecture.
(Le maire et le conseiller White quittent la seance puisque M. White avait declare
un conflit d'interets avant la tenue de I'audience publique relative au 53 -75, rue Leinster
et le maire n'avait pas assiste a I'audience, donc la mairesse suppleante Hooton assume
la presidence.)
Proposition du conseiller Titus
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que I'arrete intitule « Arrete no C. P. 110-
29, modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John » modifie par I'ajout de la
zone speciale no SZ -21, ainsi que les usages et les normes connexes, et le rezonage
d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ 2 770 metres carres, situee au 53-
75, rue Leinster et portant les NID 00009431 et 55059992, en vue de faire passer la
classification de zone commerciale generale « B -2 » a zone speciale no 21 « SZ -21 »,
sous reserve des conditions imposees par I'article 39, fasse ('objet d'une lecture.
Le conseiller Tait fait un rappel au reglement et indique que les commentaires formules
n'ont aucun rapport avec la pertinence du zonage quant a ('usage prevu et que la
question de procedure est inopportune en 1'espece. La mairesse suppleante affirme que
les commentaires ne doivent viser que la question de zonage.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est rejetee. Les conseillers Chang,
Chase, Court, Farren et Ferguson votent contre la proposition.
Proposition du conseiller Ferguson
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que la troisieme lecture de I'arrete intitule
« Arrete no C.P. 110 -29, modifiant I'arrete sur le zonage de The City of Saint John »
modifie par I'ajout de la zone speciale no SZ -21, ainsi que les usages et les normes
connexes, et le rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie d'environ
2 770 metres carres, situee au 53 -75, rue Leinster et portant les NID 00009431 et
55059992, en vue de faire passer la classification de zone commerciale generale « B-
2 » a zone speciale no 21 « SZ -21 », sous reserve des conditions imposees par
I'article 39, soit reportee.
A I'issue du vote, la proposition est acceptee. Les conseillers McGuire,
Tait et Titus votent contre la proposition.
Proposition du conseiller Ferguson
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que le directeur general, les employes
adequats et les parties interessees au projet de rezonage visant le 53 -75, rue Leinster
se reunissent afin de trouver une solution et qu'ils en fassent le compte rendu devant le
conseil.
L'avocat municipal repond a une question posee par le conseiller Chase et indique
qu'une resolution avait ete adoptee au cours de la seance du 18 decembre 2006 visant
a recommander aux parties prenantes de se reunir afin de resoudre toute question et
que M. Baird affirme qu'une telle reunion a eu lieu sans qu'un accord soit obtenu. II
reitere que d'autres renseignements obtenus a la suite de I'audience publique relatifs au
merite et aux arguments visant la proposition ne devraient pas titre consideres au
moment de la prise de decision en troisieme lecture.
Au cours des discussions engagees entre la mairesse suppleante et M. Baird, le
conseiller Ferguson fait un rappel au reglement et affirme que la question a ete reportee,
mais la mairesse suppleante repond qu'elle continuera a poser des questions.
Le conseiller Farren souleve une question de privilege et indique qu'il s'oppose aux
remarques exprimees par un conseiller qu'il interprete comme voulant signifier que ce
dernier suggere qu'il s'oppose a I'amenagement puisqu'il vote pour reporter la question.
Pour repondre a la question soulevee par le conseiller Court, I'avocat municipal indique
au conseil qu'aucune responsabilite assumee par la Ville envers I'organisme Saint John
Non - Profit Housing Inc. ne doit influencer sa prise de decision relativement au projet de
rezonage presente devant le conseil.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -635
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
Le conseiller Titus mentionne qu'il appuie le projet, mais s'oppose a toute discussion qui
ne porte pas sur la presente question d'usage des terres.
Le conseiller Tait dit avoir cru comprendre que la troisieme lecture ne releve pas des
conclusions degagees d'une reunion tenue entre les parties.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est acceptee. Les conseillers McGuire,
Tait et Titus votent contre la proposition.
(Le maire et le conseiller White sont de nouveau presents et le maire preside la seance.)
Proposition du conseiller Tait
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le greffier ne remette aux membres
du conseil aucune correspondance ou documentation reque, autre que celle exigee du
directeur general, portant sur le projet de rezonage relatif au 53 -75, rue Leinster.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
8. Delegations /Presentations
8.1 Communications Plan
Referring to a submitted report and electronic slide presentation, Janet McMillan, of
MT &L Public Relations Ltd., outlined her proposed plan to improve communications for
the City of Saint John.
On motion of Councillor Tait
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the Communication Audit and
Plan submitted by MT &L Public Relations Ltd., be referred to the 2007 budget and
considered for implementation.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
The Mayor called for a recess at 7:10 p.m., and resumed the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
8. D616gations et presentations
8.1 Plan de communication
Se reportant a un rapport presente et a I'aide d'une presentation electronique de
diapositives, Janet McMillan, de MT &L Public Relations Ltd., expose son projet visant a
ameliorer le service de communications de The City of Saint John.
Proposition du conseiller Tait
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le projet de verification et de
planification des communications presente par MT &L Public Relations Ltd. soit soumis a
un examen quant a sa realisation au cours des deliberations budgetaires de 2007.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
Le maire demande une suspension a 19 h 10 et la reunion se poursuit a 19 h 15.
8.2(a) Presentations - Union Locals - Pension Deficit
Bob Hickes, President of CUPE introduced the topic of funding the pension deficit from
the Unions' perspective and advised that the proposal to be delivered represents the 4
City of Saint John Union Locals and the Retirees' Association.
Referring to a submitted electronic slide presentation, Paul Duxbury, Actuary, advised
Council that the Union groups and Retirees' Association have agreed to a shared
solution to funding the pension deficit offering to commit to a raise in contribution with no
benefit changes, using an actuarial basis of 7% and the current mortality table.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -636
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
8.2(b) Management and Non -Union - Funding the Pension Plan
Referring to a submitted report and an electronic slide presentation, Paul Groody
reviewed the contents of the report entitled, "An Essential Plan for Sustainability -
Funding the Employees' Pension Plan on behalf of Management, Professional and Non
union employees of the City of Saint John which included recommendations for that
group's contribution for a solution to the pension deficit.
8.2(c) Retirees' Comments - Funding the Pension Plan
Claude McKinnon, President of the Retirees' Association, spoke on behalf of
approximately 750 retirees advising that his members support the Unions' presentation.
On motion of Councillor Ferguson
Seconded by Councillor Court
RESOLVED that the meeting be extended beyond
10:00 p.m. as provided for in Council's Procedural By -law.
Question being taken, the motion was carried, with Councillor Titus voting
nay.
On motion of Deputy Mayor Hooton
Seconded by Councillor Court
RESOLVED that the presentations delivered on
behalf of the Unions, Management, Professional and Non -Union and Retirees be
referred to the City Manager and budget deliberations for a report to come back to
Council.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
8.2(d) Superintendent of Pensions
On motion of Councillor Court
Seconded by Councillor White
RESOLVED that the correspondence from the
Superintendent of Pensions as well as a response prepared by City staff be received for
information.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
8.2a) Presentations — sections locales syndicales — deficit de la caisse de retraite
Bob Hickes, president du SCFP, presente le point de vue des syndicats relativement a la
question du financement visant a combler le deficit de la caisse de retraite et affirme que
cette proposition est appuyee par les quatre sections locales de The City of Saint John
et I'Association des retraites.
Se reportant a une presentation electronique de diapositives, Paul Duxbury, actuaire,
affirme devant le conseil que les syndicats et I'Association des retraites consentent a
participer a la realisation d'une solution visant a financer le deficit de la caisse de retraite
et s'engagent a accepter une hausse des contributions sans apporter de modifications
aux avantages, selon une base actuarielle de 7 % et en fonction de la table de mortalite
actuelle.
8.2b) Cadres et employes non syndiques — financement de la caisse de retraite
Se reportant a un rapport et a une presentation electronique de diapositives presentes,
Paul Groody expose le contenu du rapport intitule « An Essential Plan for Sustainability
— Funding the Employees' Pension Plan » (plan essentiel de durabilite : financement de
la caisse de retraite des employes), en faveur des cadres, des employes membres de
professions liberales et des employes non syndiques de The City of Saint John, qui
comprend des recommandations relatives aux contributions apportees par ce groupe
visant a trouver une solution pour combler le deficit de la caisse de retraite.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -637
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
8.2c) Commentaires formul6s par les retrait6s relatifs au financement de la
caisse de retraite
Claude McKinnon, president de I'Association des retrait6s, s'exprime au nom d'environ
750 retrait6s et affirme que les membres appuient la presentation donnee par les
syndicats.
Proposition du conseiller Ferguson
Appuyee par le conseiller Court
RESOLU que la seance soit prolongee au -dela de
22 h en vertu des dispositions de 1'arrete portant sur le reglement interieur du conseil.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee. Le conseiller Titus vote
contre la proposition.
Proposition de la mairesse suppleante Hooton
Appuyee par le conseiller Court
RESOLU que les presentations donnees par les
syndicats, les cadres, les employes membres de professions liberales, les employes non
syndiques et les retrait6s soient transmises au directeur general et soumises a un
examen au cours des deliberations budgetaires aux fins de la redaction d'un rapport a
('intention du conseil.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
8.2d) Surintendant des pensions
Proposition du conseiller Court
Appuyee par le conseiller White
RESOLU que la correspondance reque du
Surintendant des pensions ainsi que la reponse redigee par les employes municipaux
soient acceptees a titre informatif.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
9. Public Hearings 7:00 P.M.
9. Audiences publiques a 19 h
11. Submissions by Council Members
11. Intervention des membres du conseil
12. Business Matters - Municipal Officers
12.1 Request for Placement of a Mini Home - 600 Latimore Lake Road
On motion of Councillor Court
Seconded by Councillor Farren
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, Common Council approve the placement of another mini home on the subject
property at 600 Latimore Lake Road as generally indicated on the location map.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12. Affaires municipales 6voqu6es par les fonctionnaires municipaux
12.1 Demande pr6sent6e voulant installer une mini - maison au 600, chemin
Latimore Lake
Proposition du conseiller Court
Appuyee par le conseiller Farren
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le conseil approuve ('installation d'une mini - maison supplementaire sur ladite
propriete situee au 600, chemin Latimore Lake, comme le montre de maniere generale
la carte de situation.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -638
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
12.2 2007 Operating and Capital Budget - General Fund
On motion of Deputy Mayor Hooton
Seconded by Councillor McGuire
RESOLVED that the City Manager submit a
summary report on the actual 2006 budget and the proposed increases for 2007 for
discussion at the Committee of the Whole meeting at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday in the
Council Chamber.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
12.2 Budget d'exploitation et d'immobilisations de 2007 — fonds generaux
Proposition de la mairesse suppleante Hooton
Appuyee par le conseiller McGuire
RESOLU que le directeur general presente un
rapport preliminaire relatif au budget 2006 actuel et aux augmentations prevues pour
2007, aux fins de discussion devant le Comite plenier au cours de la seance fixee au
jeudi a 17 h dans la salle du conseil.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
13. Committee Reports
13. Rapports deposes par les comites
14. Consideration of Issues Separated from Consent Agenda
14.1 Offer to Lease - Tourist Information Center
On motion of Councillor White
Seconded by Deputy Mayor Hooton
RESOLVED that as recommended by the City
Manager, the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the Offer to Lease
from Se -Fish Associated Limited and 058854 N.B. Ltd. related to Unit 203, in Shoppes of
City Hall for the period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
14. Etude des sujets ecartes des questions soumises a I'approbation du
conseil
14.1 Offre de location — Centre d'information touristique
Proposition du conseiller White
Appuyee par la mairesse suppleante Hooton
RESOLU que, comme le recommande le directeur
general, le maire et le greffier communal soient autorises a signer I'offre de location
presentee par Se -Fish Associated Limited et 058854 N.B. Ltd. relative au bureau 203
situe au centre de boutiques de ('hotel de ville, pour la periode allant du 1,r janvier 2007
au 31 decembre 2007.
A ('issue du vote, la proposition est adoptee.
15. General Correspondence
15. Correspondance generale
16. Adjournment
The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
92 -639
COMMON COUNCIL / CONSEIL COMMUNAL
JANUARY 2, 2007 / Le 2 janvier 2007
16. Cloture de la seance
Le maire declare que la seance est levee a 22 h 15.
Mayor /maire
Common Clerk /greffier communal
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Saint John
Board of Trade
Making it happen for business
January 5, 2007
Common Clerk's Office
City of Saint John
PO Box 1971
Saint John, NB E2L 41_1
Email: commonclerk @saintjohn.ca
To Whom It May Concern:
Bureau de Commerce
de Saint John
Faisons marcher les affaires
On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Saint John Board of Trade, we respectfully submit this
request to make a presentation before Mayor and Council. Upon approval, Chairperson Bob
Manning would like to make an oral presentation and be available for questions from Council. The
Saint John Board of Trade's interest is to present key priorities and issues facing our members
and our business community.
The Saint John Board of Trade is dedicated to fostering an economic climate that enhances
growth, prosperity, and an improved quality of life in the community. With more than 1,000
members, representing 600 small, medium, and large businesses and organizations, the Board is
a dynamic advocate and the principal voice for the business community of Greater Saint John.
This past year, the Saint John Board of Trade's members worked on a variety of issues that are
important to the Greater Saint John business community including:
Harbour clean -up
Continued development of Saint John into a regional Energy Hub
• Government investment in key transportation infrastructure
• Enhanced partnerships with New Brunswick Community College, UNBSJ, Atlantic Health
Sciences Corporation, Enterprise Saint John, and other like- minded groups
The advancement of the ideals outlined at the inaugural Atlantica regional conference
We are also very committed to working with our partner organizations, the five regional mayors
and their True Growth strategy, as well as the provincial and federal governments to attract and
retain new investment into our region. We encourage strategic partnerships that will help define
economic, social, and cultural strategies for our region.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please do not hesitate to call either one of us to
discuss this matter further.
Yours Truly,
Bob Manning
Chairperson
Tel: 649 -6400
Email: bob.manning @omg.ca
Imelda Gilman
President
Tel: 634 -4157
Email: igilman @sjboardoftrade.com
40 rue King Street • C.P /P.O. Box 6037 • Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada E2L 4R5 • tel 506.634.8111 • fax 506.632.2008 • info@sjboardoffrade.com
_w.. www.sjboardoftrade.com
CORPORATE
SPONSORS
FOUNDING &
OFFICIAL
[tell Canada
BMO Financial Group
Nestle Canada
Parmalat Canada
A & P /Dominion
AIR MILES Reward Program
Bluenotes
Roston Pizza
Campbell Canada
Cineplex Galaxy
Group 4 Sucuricor
Kellogg Canada
Microsoft Canada
Motnrola
Soheyc
MAJOR PATRONS
Air Canada
Canadian 5 Pin
Bowlers' Association
Farnn Business Consultants
Hilton Canada
Mattel Canada
METRO
unigistix
REGIONAL
SPONSORS
Aliant
Fmpire Theatres Ltd.
SCW.Shurn Dairy Group
G.LET. Atlantic
CORPORATE
DONORS
INSPIRATION CIRCLE
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
Wallace & Carey
EMPOWERMENT CIRCLE
Baker Vandertuin
BOSS Print + Creative
EnCana
henderson has
istudia
Minacs
OMD Canada
Publicis
NATIONAL
MEDIA
PARTNERS
Bell Globemedia
CNW Group
'rhe Magazine
MuchMusic
YTV
being
there
for kids
December I I, 2006
City of Saint John
P 0. Box 1971, 15 Market Square
Saint John, NB
E2L 4L
Dear Council of the City of Saint John.
A troubled child is reaching out to Kids Help Phone right now.
Online or over the phone, he may be crying, he may be alone, he may even be from the
City of Saint John. And with your help, Kids Help Phone can make sure that a
professionally- trained counsellor is there for him.
Kids Help Phone is facing a serious funding shortfall as a result of significantly
increased demand for our web counselling service — we must raise more money to
meet the needs of Canadian kids.
Since 1989,
Kids Help Phone has been
there for troubled and abused
kids in Canada
through our
24 hour, bilingual, toll -fee,
confidential and anonymous
counselling services.
1112005, Kids Help Phone helped more than 1,000 kids a day through our counselling
services on the phone and web. While the time our counsellors spent on the phone in 2005
was up slightly from 2004, the biggest increase in demand from kids cattle through web
counselling. The number of questions that our online services, Ask a Counsellor and
Express Yourself, received from kids more than tripled between May 2005 and January
2006,
When the "Ask a Counsellor" service was launched online at � kid
2001, kids who posted a question for one of our professional counsellors received a
response in three days_ As of January 2005, that wait time had increased to six days.
Without funding to train and employ more staff, that time will continue to grow and
young people will suffer.
Because of the increased demand for web counselling, Kids Help Phone has already had
to temporarily block the ability to post questions from time to time in order to allow
counsellors to catch up — in effect creating a "busy signal" for our web counselling
service.
Counselling online in addition to over the phone costs Kids Help Phone more money.
Kids Help Phone responded to kids' need to communicate with us over the web by
duplicating our phone counselling services online. This requires us to now counsel
Atlantic Regional Office, 3433 Dutch Village Road, Halifax, Nova Scotia R3N 2S7
Tel:
902
- 457 -4779
Fax:
902-
457
-1074
Toll Free: 1- 888 - 470 -8880
Email:
atlantic @kidshelp.synipatico.ca
kidshelpphone.ca
through two mediums instead of one and means we also have to duplicate our counselling
resources. The cost of answering online questions is also higher per response than the cost
Of phone counselling.
Kids Help Phone uses only professional counsellors. In order to become a Kids Help
Phone counsellor, applicants must have appropriate post secondary education in fields
such as social work andlor psychology and solid experience working with troubled kids in
real -life situations.
Kids Help Phone counsellors listen and help each young person tap into their own unique
strengths and resources. If necessary, counsellors can access our one -of -a -kind database to
refer callers to one of more than 35,000 agencies in more than 3,000 communities in
Canada,
Kids Help Phone helps kids in your community!
We help more than 1,000 kids a daN through our phone and online services and in 2005,
this included 53,000 kids from more than 140 communifies in New Brunswick.
Will you be there for kids in your town who are reaching out to Kids Help Phone through
the phone and web" When planning your donation allocations in the upcoming
season, please consider a donation to Kids Help Phone. Your 2006 gift will help make
more counsellors available to ensure that Kids Help Phone is able to continue to respond
to kids on their own terms and in an immediate way.
I have enclosed our Fact Sheet which I hope will answer some of the questions you may
have about our services. I also encourage you to visit our website at
% ? I,..ai;: .n and read first -hand the types of issues that kids are contacting
Kids Help Phone about. If there is anything else you are wonderin <, about, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (902)457 -7751.
Thank you for considering a gift to Kids Help Phone or 2006. Your generous support is
vital to the well -being of kids from of New Brunswick.
Sincerely,
Sandra Butt
Marketing and Fund Development
Kids Help Phone - Atlantic Region
10 Great Things About Kids Help Phone
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, youth can contact Kids
Help Phone by calling toll -free (1- 800 686868) or by going online
CN8nww.kidshelpphone.ca or www.ieunesseiecoute.ca) from anywhere in
Canada
2. Kids Help Phone is 100% anonymous and confidential.
3. Kids Help Phone counsellors are paid professionals who meet the highest
academic and professional standards and have backgrounds in social
work, psychology, sociology and child and youth services.
4. Kids Help Phone counsellors help kids with a wide variety of issues like:
relationships; school; depression; physical, sexual and emotional abuse;
family; and suicide.
5. lids Help Phone counsellors can refer callers to services in their own
community through a current database of over 34,000 existing social and
community services across Canada.
6. Kids Help Phone web counselling and phone services are available in
English and French.
7. In 2005 Kids Help Phone helped Canadian kids in need more than 1 million
times from over 3,000 communities both online and on the phone.
8. Youth can get help with issues when they are not comfortable talking about
them by using our Web counselling services.
9. 43 kids on average benefit from the counselling responses to each
question posted online.
10. No problem is too big or too small.
What Kids Calved Us About In 2006 What Kids Asked About Onllne in 2005
Phone
Other
A%
School ldnnily and
3% Scl[Cunmpi
`ki
Web
4hal
Deanminµ 4`6 Olhtt
5%
0
o '•
� v
Q 5
D O
S
o
9
_
2
s
S
E
i
7
°
d
L
3
L
u
� N
Y �
C
Y E
0
u
a�
a u
3Y
_ o = L C •' � o
a 9 m y p u
� � L
v M '3E O
V
�J
d
y
w
1 IN 41*
W
z - Ir
Ihp �` III �" ♦� A� ` tL L. .1tiJl` .� a a �
V y t it i `1 .. • !i
). - Ijn - 1 t. 1 t I I I - I a L I I t I
II >w III ..[) III . 1'1..111 i III ddro `II 1, I+. Y u ... .....
J al CJ � ICI it I I I I it II I I A t I I t 1 :nl "I' 'P
(Iauud yL) uq aril'11/l0 l000l8all .un'4d J1 714 `Y lY I q)ol .mai n! 7u.nuinJ pu I ald
,LIfUPUais,
=1LP,1
<,I Li uc�uawV❑ I'S 1,�❑ p.tr ),I,Icrl\ ❑ a, 11Pa.u.iw 1!'I-l'�I "Id _
aPo,l jmll;od
�rnula
a,uinu.ld
,uoyd,l'.I_
gar)
a�ppf
awc)�
p�Isant)ll Id1Ll Iai zn.l.
I
FfA
January 10, 2007
195 Victoria Street
Saint John, NB
E2K 1 L7
Gary Sullivan (President), Scott Crawford (Vice- President),
Kit Hickey (Treasurer)
Dear Mayor McFarlane and Council
ONE Change Inc. has been working in the Old North End of Saint John for three
years and have been working to improve the quality of life for those living in one
of Saint John's most vulnerable neighbourhoods.
We would like an opportunity to make a presentation to council to discuss some of
our initiatives in which the city can partner. Our long term plan is the result of a
CMHC Charette in which many of our current council took part.
Five key areas of focus resulted: Housing, Community Pride & Beautification,
Celebrating Youth, Training & Skill Development and Health. By adding crime to
that list it describes the workings of ONE Change Inc. We are successful by
partnering with organizations and levels of government that work in these areas as
well.
We would like an opportunity to speak with council regarding the charette and
some of our plans that focus on Housing, Community Beautification and
Celebrating Youth. Engaging area youth is one of our key strategies in reducing
crime in the area and has demonstrated it's success through our summer teen
program.
Thank you for your time and consideration of ONE Change and I look forward to
hearing from you with regards to our presentation.
Sincerely
Gary ivan
President
"Improving the Onaiilq ofLife in the 01de North End"
January 12, 2007
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: Planning Advisory Committee Executive 2007
The Planning Advisory Committee Rules of Procedure provide for the
election of an executive on a yearly basis. The Committee at its
January 9, 2007 meeting elected the following individuals as members of
the executive for the year 2007.
Chairman Stephen Horgan
Vice - Chairman Stephen Cronk
Third Executive Member Carl Killen
RECOMMENDATION:
That this report be received and filed.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephen Horgan
Chairman
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M & C 2007 -03
January 12, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: Gas Tax Funding Agreement
BACKGROUND:
At a meeting of Common Council held on November 20th, 2006 the following
resolution was adopted:
"RESOLVED that the submitted documentation representing Target
Investment Levels by the General Fund and the Water and Sewer Utility for the
years 2006 through 2011 be adopted, and that the listing of specific projects and
supporting documentation for the years 2006 to 2009 which funding is being sought
under the Provincial/Federal Gas Tax be approved."
On December 20th, 2006 staff met with Mr. Stephen Battah the Director,
Federal/Provincial/Municipal Relations to review the submission. From this
discussion the Province has requested a modification to the original motion related
to the years for which supporting documentation is being submitted. The resolution
should state "supporting documentation for the years 2005 to 2009 which funding
is being sought under the Provincial/Federal Gas Tax be approved" and not for the
years 2006 to 2009 as stated in the original motion..
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
A
Mk 7-1
The City of Saint fohn
Report to Common Council Page 2
January 12, 2007
RECOMMENDATION:
In order to satisfy the requirements related to the Federal/Provincial Agreement
related to the Transfer of Gas Tax Revenues it is recommended that the following
revised wording be adopted:
RESOLVED that the submitted documentation representing Target Investment
Levels by the General Fund and the Water and Sewer Utility for the years 2006
through 2011 be adopted, and that the listing of specific projects and supporting
documentation for the years 2005 to 2009 which funding is being sought under the
Provincial/Federal Gas Tax be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Gregory J. Yeomans, CGA, MBA
Commissioner of Finance
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Sent By: CITY SAINT JOHN; 6582837; Feb -28 -06 4:54PM; Page 314
Application for a Zoning Dywlaw Amendment
Demande de modification it Varrgti sur le zonage
Applicant Related Information / Renseignements sur le demandeur
Name of Applicant / Nom du demandeur J O h in M ' k e a H _
Mailing Address of applicant / Addresse poosstale du demandeur C4O f�e 1^/ x t'O i r (/.1 L � � rC cj i n (,-
I Gi /M63 r Rp,, S {('. (��p I1 e��P <;if y At a. Postal Code/ Code postal
Telephone Number / Numdro de Wi dphone 1 3 — / / U 2�
Home / Domicile Work / Travail
Fax Number / Ntundro de tdldcopieur Z 4 t 0 /
Name of Property Owner (if different) / Nom du propridtaire (si different)
DQn;e! L LI -LA PQ k-
Address / Adresse Postal Code / Code postal
Property Information / Renseignementsls e
sur la propriit
Location /Emplacement rri /f �^ o! !^ U 0n per Ltl l r p 3 Z 43
Civic # / No de voirie Street / Rue PID / NIP
Lot Area/ Superficie du lot 6 9 y Y cd-a,Et Street Frontage / Fagade sur rue
Existing Use of Property / Utilisation actuelle de Is propridtd
Municipal Plan land Use Designation
Designation de utilization des tortes sur le plan municipal
Amendment Requested / Modification demandee
Present Zoning / Zonage actucl _, Z
�I Change Zoning to / Modification du nonage tl
and/orI on
l..l Text Amendment (indicate particulars) / Modification due texte (indiquez les ddtails)
Sent By: CITY SAINT JOHN; 6562637; Feb -26 -06 4:55PM; Page 4/4
Development Proposal / Proposition d'ambnagement
Description of Proposal / Description de la proposition
You must provide a scaled site plan that illustrates
your proposal You may also provide
photographs, building plans, elevation drawings
and any other form ofinformation. The plan must
show the dimensions ofthe property, the location
of all buildings, driveways, parking areas,
landscaping and signs. It is important that the
distance between the property boundary and
buildings are shown.
Vous devez fournir un plan du site d Pechelle illustrant votre
proposition. Vous pouvez egatement fournir des
photographies, des plans de bdriment, des dessins de plan
d'elevalton et toute outre forme de renseignement. Le plan
doit indiquer les dimensions de la prophet¢, !'emplacement de
to toialite des bdriments, des apses, des acres de
stationnement, des amenagemenis paysagers et des panneaux
de signalisation. Il est important &Maliquer la distance entre
les limites de la propriete et les bdtiments.
Provide reasons why these amendments should be approved. / Foumir tout autre renseignement concernant votre proposition
qui pourmit titre approuvees.
Provide any other information about your proposal that would be helpful. / Foumir tout autre rcamignement ooncernaut votre
proposition qui pourrait etre utile.
Signature of Applicant / Signature du demandeur LAV
Date
X $400 Application Foe Enclosed I Ci joint lcs frais do demande de 400 $
Ifyou are not the owner ofthe land in question St vows nWespas le proprietaire du terrain en question,
please have the owner sign below. The signature of veuilkz obtenir la signature du proprietaire dans la partie
the owner is authorizing this application to proceed ci- dessous. La signature du proprietaire autorisant le
for consideration by Common Council. traitement de to presente demande pour que cette derniere
salt examinee par le consell communal.
Signature of Owner (if applicable)
Signature due proprietaire (s'il y a lieu) 1 12 Le G 12 #IT C
Date:
March 1" 2006
To whom it may concern,
I authorize John McLean to act on my behalf for the rezoning application at 18 Northumberland
Ave, Saint John, New Brunswick. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to
contact me on (647) 401 3359 anytime.
Regards
Da �
Daniel Plud eek
PROPOSED ZONING BY -LAW
AMENDMENT
RE: 18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE
Public Notice is hereby given
Council of The City of Sain
consider amending The City of
By -law at its regular meeting
Council Chamber on Monday,
at 7:00 p.m., by:
that the Common
t John intends to
Saint John Zoning
to be held in the
January 15, 2007
Rezoning a parcel of land located at 18
Northumberland Avenue, having an area of
approximately 620 square metres, also identified as
PID No. 00321943, from "R -2" One and Two
Family Residential to "R -4" Four Family
Residential.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
To recognize an existing three - family dwelling as a
permitted use.
The proposed amendment may be inspected by any
interested person at the office of the Common
Clerk, or in the office of Planning and
Development, City Hall, 15 Market Square, Saint
John, N.B. between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, inclusive, holidays
excepted.
PROJET DE MODIFICATION DE L'ARRETE
SUR LE ZONAGE
OBJET: 18, AVENUE NORTHUMBERLAND
Avis public est donne, par la presente, que le
conseil communal de The City of Saint John a
]'intention d'etudier la modification suivante de
Farr6te sur le zonage de The City of Saint John, au
cours de la reunion ordinaire du conseil prevue le
lundi 15 janvier 2007 a 19 h dans la salle du
conseil:
Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une
superficie approximative de 620 metres canes,
situee au 18, avenue Northumberland, et identifiee
sous le NID 00321943, de zone residentielle —
habitations unifamiliales et bifamiliales <<R -2» a
zone r6sidentielle — habitations de quatre
logements <<R -4».
RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION:
Reconnaitre ]'utilisation d'un edifice a trois
logements existant.
Toute personne interestee peut examiner le projet
de modification an bureau du greffier communal ou
au bureau de 1'urbanisme et du d6veloppement a
1'h6te1 de ville au 15, Market Square, Saint John,
N. -B., entre 8 h 30 et 16 h 30 du lundi an vendredi,
sauf les j ours feries.
Written objections to the amendment may be sent Veuillez faire parvenir vos objections an projet de
to the undersigned at City Hall. modification par ecrit a ]'attention du soussigne a
1'h6tel de ville.
J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk
658 -2862
J. Patrick Woods, Greffier communal
658 -2862
PROPOSED ZONING BY -LAW AMENDMENT
RE: 18 NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE
Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of The City of Saint John intends to consider
amending The City of Saint John Zoning By -law at its regular meeting to be held in the Council Chamber
on Monday, January 15, 2007 at 7:00 p.m., by:
Rezoning a parcel of land located at 18 Northumberland Avenue, having an area of approximately 620
square metres, also identified as PID No. 00321943, from "R -2" One and Two Family Residential to
10114" Four Family Residential.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
To recognize an existing three - family dwelling as a permitted use.
The proposed amendment may be inspected by any interested person at the office of the Common Clerk,
or in the office of Planning and Development, City Hall, 15 Market Square, Saint John, N.B. between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, inclusive, holidays excepted.
Written objections to the amendment may be sent to the undersigned at City Hall.
J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk
658 -2862
PROJET DE MODIFICATION DE L'ARRETt SUR LE ZONAGE
OBJET: 18, AVENUE NORTHUMBERLAND
Avis public
est donne, par la presente,
que le conseil communal
de The City
of Saint John a ]'intention
d'etudier la
modification suivante de
1'arrete sur le zonage de The City of
Saint John, an cows de la
reunion ordinaire
du conseil prevue le lundi 15 janvier 2007 a 19
h dans la salle
du conseil:
Rezonage d'une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie approximative de 620 metres canes, situee an 18,
avenue Northumberland, et identifiee sous le NID 00321943, de zone residentielle — habitations
unifamiliales et bifamiliales <<R -2>> a zone residentielle — habitations de quatre logements <<R -4».
RAISON DE LA MODIFICATION:
Reconnaitre ]'utilisation d'un edifice a trois logements existant.
Toute personne interestee pent examiner le projet de modification au bureau du greffier communal ou an
bureau de l'urbanisme et du developpement a 116tel de ville an 15, Market Square, Saint John, N. -B.,
entre 8 h 30 et 16 h 30 du lundi au vendredi, sauf les j ours feries.
Veuillez faire parvenir vos objections an projet de modification par ecrit a ]'attention du soussigne a
1'h6tel de ville.
J. Patrick Woods, Greffier communal
658 -2862
City of Saint John
INTERNAL INSERTION ORDER
For City of Saint John use only:
Bud et Number: 110 0801 442 2010
Department: Common Clerk's Office (Account # 71206)
Contact: J. Patrick Woods
Phone: (506) 658 -2862
Fax: (506) 674 -4214
Special Instructions (if any):
Newspaper Insertion Dates
(Check as applicable)
(SJTJ= Saint John Telegraph Journal)
" SJTJ City Information Ad
" SJTJ Independent Placement
SJTJ Classifieds
Date(s): Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
Date(s):
Date(s):
Information for Ad
(Boldface anything you want Bold in Ad, Centre, Tab, etc.)
Section Headline: ❑
General Notice
❑ Tender
❑ Proposal
Text:
INSERT ATTACHED
Call to Action:
Public Notice
Contact:
❑x
Sub - Headline
if applicable):
Text:
INSERT ATTACHED
Call to Action:
J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk/Greffier communal
Contact:
Telephone: (506) 658 -2862
BY -LAW NUMBER C.P. 110 -
A LAW TO AMEND
THE ZONING BY -LAW
OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
Be it enacted by The City of Saint
John in Common Council convened, as
follows:
The Zoning By -law of The City of
Saint John enacted on the nineteenth day of
December, A.D. 2005, is amended by:
1 Amending Schedule "A ", the
Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by
re- zoning a parcel of land located at 18
Northumberland Avenue, having an area of
approximately 620 square metres, also
identified as PID number 00321943, from
"R -2" One and Two Family Residential to
"R -4" Four Family Residential
- all as shown on the plan attached hereto
and forming part of this by -law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of
Saint John has caused the Corporate
Common Seal of the said City to be affixed
to this by -law the * day of *, A.D. 2007
and signed by:
Mayor/Maire
ARRETE N° C.P. 110 -
ARRETE MODIFIANT VARRETE
SUR LE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF
SAINT JOHN
Lors d'une reunion du conseil
communal, The City of Saint John a
decrete ce qui suit :
L'arrete sur le zonage de The City
of Saint John, decrete le dix -neuf (19)
decembre 2005, est modifie par :
1 La modification de 1'annexe <<Au,
Plan de zonage de The City of Saint John,
permettant de modifier la designation pour
une parcelle de terrain d'une superficie
approximative de 620 metres canes, situee
an 18, avenue Northumberland, et
identifiee sous le NID 00321943, de zone
residentielle — habitations unifamiliales et
bifamiliales uR -2n a zone residentielle —
habitations de quatre logements «R -4»
- toutes les modifications sont indiquees sur
le plan ci joint et font partie du present
arrete.
EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John
a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le
present arret6 le 20075
avec les signatures suivantes :
Common Clerk/Greffier communal
First Reading - Premiere lecture
Second Reading - Deuxie'me lecture
Third Reading - Troisi6me lecture
January 10, 2007
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: 18 Northumberland Avenue - Rezoning Application
On December 18, 2006 Common Council referred the above matter to the
Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation. The Committee
considered the attached report at its January 9, 2007 meeting and adopted the
recommendation set out below.
Mr. John McLean, the owner's realtor, appeared in support of the application and
promised that he would make the owner aware of the property maintenance issues
noted by staff and neighbours. He also noted that the unregistered vehicle located
in the driveway of 18 Northumberland Avenue had now been removed.
In addition to the attached letters received by the Planning and Development
Department, a number of residents were present at the meeting. Both Mrs. Nancy
Wallace and Mrs. Muriel Stevens spoke in opposition to the application and stated
concerns regarding the maintenance of the property.
After considering the attached report and the issues raised by neighbouring
property owners, the Committee recommended that an additional condition
requiring that all tenant parking be restricted to the rear of the property be placed
upon the proposed rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Common Council rezone a parcel of land with an area of
approximately 620 square metres, located at 18 Northumberland Avenue,
also identified as being PID Number 00321943, from "R -2" One and Two
Family Residential to "R -4" Four Family Residential.
2. That, pursuant to the provisions of Section 39 of the Community Planning
Act, the proposed rezoning of a parcel of land with an area of
approximately 620 square metres, located at 18 Northumberland Avenue,
also identified as being PID Number 00321943, be subject to the
following conditions:
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Planning Advisory Committee
January 12, 2007
Page 2
a. that the use of the property is limited to a maximum of three
dwelling units; and
b. that all tenant parking be restricted to the rear of the property;
and further that upon rezoning of the property the land and building or
structure thereon must be developed an used in conformity with the proposal
and conditions identified herein.
3. That the required Change of Use permit not be issued until the owner or
applicant provide proof that the outstanding violation of the Dangerous
and Unsightly Premises By -law noted in the Final Notice of Violation
issued by the Building and Technical Services Department on August 3,
2006 is remedied.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephen Horgan
Chairman
SKH
Attachments
Project No. 07 -003
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
DATE:
JANUARY 5, 2007
TO:
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FROM:
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
FOR:
MEETING OF JANUARY 9, 2007
Type of Application: Rezoning
JURISDICTION OF COMMITTEE:
The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to
Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Zoning By -law. Common Council will
consider the Committee's recommendation at a Public Hearing on Monday, January 15, 2007.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Sarah Herring
Planner
SUBJECT:
Name of Applicant:
John McLean
Name of Owner:
Daniel Pludek
Location:
18 Northumberland Avenue
PID:
321943
Municipal Plan:
Low Density Residential
Zoning:
Current: "R -2" One and Two Family Residential
Proposed: "R -4" Four Family Residential
Proposal:
To recognize the existing three - family dwelling as a
permitted use.
Type of Application: Rezoning
JURISDICTION OF COMMITTEE:
The Community Planning Act authorizes the Planning Advisory Committee to give its views to
Common Council concerning proposed amendments to the Zoning By -law. Common Council will
consider the Committee's recommendation at a Public Hearing on Monday, January 15, 2007.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
John McLean Page 2
18 Northumberland Avenue January 5, 2007
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO COMMITTEE:
1. That Common Council rezone a parcel of land with an area of approximately 620 square
metres, located at 18 Northumberland Avenue, also identified as being PID Number
00321943, from "R -2" One and Two Family Residential to "R -4" Four Family Residential;
2. That, pursuant to the provisions of Section 39 ofthe Community Planning Act, the proposed
rezoning of a parcel of land with an area of approximately 620 square metres, located at 18
Northumberland Avenue, also identified as being PID Number 00321943, be subject to the
condition that the use of the property is limited to a maximum of three dwelling units, and
further that upon rezoning of the property, the land and building or structure thereon must be
developed and used in conformity with the proposal and condition identified herein; and
3. That the required Change of Use permit not be issued until the owner or applicant provide
proof that the outstanding violation of the Dangerous and Unsightly Premises By -law noted in
the Final Notice of Violation issued by the Building and Technical Services Department on
August 3, 2006 is remedied.
BACKGROUND:
On August 3, 2006 the Building and Technical Services Department issued a final notice for an
uncorrected violation of the Dangerous and Unsightly Premises By -law at 18 Northumberland
Avenue and ordered that the violation be corrected before August 17, 2006.
The violation notice was issued as a complaint and subsequent inspection indicated that a blue
Oldsmobile with three flat tires and expired registration tags was located on the property, in violation
to the By -law's requirement that "no person shall permit any junk, cleanings of yards, bodies or parts
of automobiles or of other vehicles or machinery, rubbish or refuse to remain in their yard so as to
cause such place to be dangerous, unsightly or unhealthful ".
INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES:
Municipal Operations and Engineering has no objections to this application.
Building and Technical Services notes that a similar issue was dealt with for the property at 40
Northumberland Avenue and was rejected by the Planning Advisory Committee but subsequently
rezoned by Common Council. No permit was ever obtained that change of use, so this process
should specifically require that the owner obtain a permit from the Building Inspector.
Fire Department has no objection to this application.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
John McLean
18 Northumberland Avenue
ANALYSIS:
Page 3
January 5, 2007
The subject site is located on Northumberland Avenue, between Westmorland Road and Highmount
Court, in the Westmorland Heights neighbourhood of East Saint John. This is a residential area of
one - family, two - family and three - family dwellings, most of which were constructed in the 1960's and
1970's. The existing dwelling on the subject site appears typical of several others in the immediate
neighbourhood, being a three -level structure with a low -pitch hipped roof and a driveway to the side
of the dwelling. The building contains three dwelling units, with one unit located on each level of the
dwelling.
Neither the Planning and Development Department nor the Building and Technical Services
Department have any files on record to indicate when the building on the subject site became a three -
family dwelling, although the applicant believes that it may have been used as a three - family dwelling
from the time of its construction. Of the twenty -eight dwellings on Northumberland Avenue, nine are
currently assessed as three - family dwellings, although only one of these is appropriately zoned. The
dwelling at 40 Northumberland Avenue was rezoned from "R -2" One and Two Family Residential to
"R -4" Four Family Residential on July 4, 2005 to recognize the existing use of the subject site as a
three - family dwelling
A driveway at the side of the lot leads to a gravel parking area in the rear yard which can
accommodate the four parking spaces required for a three - family dwelling. The residents of 18
Northumberland Avenue also use a small parking area at the front of the lot; however, this area is
actually located on the street right -of -way and cannot be considered as off - street parking since it is
not located on the subject site.
Although the dwelling itself appears to be fairly well maintained, during a site visit on January 2, 2007
staff noted several pieces of indoor furniture in the rear yard and that the blue Oldsmobile mentioned
in the background section of this report was still parked in the driveway, in violation of the Final
Notice for Dangerous and Unsightly Premises issued to the property owner on August 3, 2006.
Subsequent discussion with the applicant revealed that the owner, Mr. Daniel Pludek, no longer
resides in Saint John and may not have received the violation notices sent to his former address.
The current owner became aware of the discrepancy between the permitted and existing use of the
dwelling when the subject site was purchased in October of 2006 and is applying, via Mr. John
McLean, his realtor, to have the property rezoned to recognize the existing three - family dwelling as a
permitted use. The Zoning By -law does not have an "R -3" category; therefore the "R -4" Four Family
Residential zone is being proposed for this site. Common Council may; however, limit the use of the
subject site to a three - family dwelling as a condition of the rezoning pursuant to Section 39 of the
Community Planning Act should the application for rezoning be approved.
The existing three - family dwelling at 18 Northumberland Avenue does not appear particularly out of
place in the overall neighbourhood context, although improvements in the maintenance of the
property need to be made. As well, the apparently long - standing existence of the third dwelling unit
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
John McLean
18 Northumberland Avenue
Page 4
January 5, 2007
with no record of earlier complaints suggests that the use of the property has not caused any major
land use conflicts in the neighbourhood.
CONCLUSION:
Given that this application is, for all intents and purposes, the same as the rezoning approved for the
three - family dwelling at 40 Northumberland Avenue on July 4, 2005 and that the third dwelling unit
has existed for some time with few or no apparent problems the requested rezoning can be supported.
While "R -4" Four Family Residential zoning is being recommended for this site, it is also
recommended that the use of the dwelling be limited to a maximum of three dwelling units and that
the required Change of Use permit not be issued until the applicant provides proof that the
aforementioned violation of the Dangerous and Unsightly Premises By -law has been remedied.
SKH
Project No. 07 -003
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT /URBANISME ET DEVELOPPEMENT
P
�j
s
c
3p s'
s�
0 3t
6y
19
NO!
Fern l� i l ( (:ernai-er
r
Ig
4 6
v
<� v
' p °
of ��
h�
�0
m ° v, �• B-2. .,
222 R-
n D
c �
t m nAi
1p
u o q
,L ..ow ��o t� °0,• way
u° u
Subject Site /site en question: P I D(s) /NIP (s): 321943
Location: 18 avenue Northumberland Avenue
Date: December 12, 2006
Scale /echelle: Not to scale /Pas a Pechelle
i
k 3.2m existing �
9a fie,
a <CIo-
co'Q Qp,Y
\o-ra5 QCO�A
6
3
existing dwelling ;
'i
+I
� ± 2,5m
c6 c o Qea 6
++ bards 3
L
r�or%umberlar,d Avenue
S
v
Q
_d
5
0
Z
tp
C
d
Q-
0
LD
The Planning Advisory Comrrittee
City of Saintjohn
PO Box 1971
Saint John, NB
E2L 4L1
Thomas and Mona Crowley
29 Crowley Road
Saint John, NB
E2K 5J1
December 22, 2006
Dear Ms. Herring:
Re: Rezoning Application -18 Northumberland Avenue
We have no objection to the above proposed rezoning and in fact strongly
support it.
Sincerely
Tom and Mona Crowley
Owners of Property at 8 Northumberland Avenue
4
To: Planning Advisor
c/o Sarah Herrir
City of Saint Joh
P.O. Box 1971
Saint John, N.B.
2L 4L1
28 December, 2006
JIFnCF xD
mmittee
jpg 2 2D07
L/
7rom: Leo and Muriel Stevens
24 Northumberland Ave.
Saint John, N.B.
E23 20
Ph # 506 657 4376
e mail: lemur @nb.sympatico.ca
SUBJECT: Re- zoning Application - 18 Northumberland Avenue
Dear Sir /Madam,
Please be advised that we reside adjacent to the noted property and are
greatly against this re- zoning application. Future more, we have other
matters related to this address which need to be addressed:
1. Since the property has been sold to an absentee landlord, Mr. Daniel
Pludeic of Somerset Street, no listed telephone number, the property has
deteriorated quickly. Complaints have been made on a fallen -down fence,
discarded furniture, derelict vehicles parked in the yard /lawn, towels /bed
sheets being used as curtains, front storm door /screen not replaced, to name
a few. As well, tall grass has remained unattended, creating a potential fire
hazard along what remains of the fence and our garage.
2. This property lot, 60x120, contains a duplex house and garage leaving
little room for tenant parking. As it is now, cars park not only in the front and
back yard but also on the front lawn, on the street, and on occasion in our
drive -way which has caused inconveniences to our family.
We realize that pictures do not tell the whole truth, therefore, we would
appreciate an inspection, of the property, and official documentation of the
difference between the property mentioned and other maintained properties
on Northumberland Avenue.
In summary, please reject this re- zoning application, and further; may we
begin the process of having the property brought up to the standards and
conditions required by its current zoning. Much has been done to keep our
neighbourhood a pleasant and comfortable place to live, your continued
support in this regard is much appreciated,
rs respectfully,
Leo and Muriel Stevens
January 2, 2007
Planning and Development,
P.O. Box 1971,
Saint John, N.B.
E2L 4L1
Dear Sirs:-
Re: Rezoning Application
18 Northumberland Ave.
JAN 4 2007
i
OtSA'ftglf
The house at 18 Northumberland Ave. was built in the mid 1960s -
"R -2" One and Two Family Residential - as a two family home.
The owner occupied one level and rented the other. A number of
years later a small granny suite, not an apartment, was made in
the basement for an elderly family member.
Several years passed and eventually the house was sold. The new
owners then decided to rent the basement, which was not even an
apartment and against zoning at that time.
The property has again been sold and now has an absentee landlord
who has let it fall into disrepair. It is a disgrace to our lovely
neighbourhood.
The front storm door is now
The driveway to the back of
part way in with no licence
in bad need of repair. Th
a portion of which has been
The whole fence needs to be
missing, the grounds are terrible.
the property has a derelict car parked
plate. The garage in the backyard is
ere is a board fence in the backyard,
lying on the ground for quite sometime.
replaced.
This
is the same property that neighbours
had to
contact city hall
last
Fall to have a car removed from the
front of
the premises,
which
was not working and had three flat
tires.
Think, why is the property owner making a rezoning application
when in fact there is not supposed to be a basement apartment?
The owner should be doing serious repairs with continued maintenance
not rezoning.
We built our home on Northumberland Ave. forty -two years ago under
"R -2" One and Two Family Residential. That is the way it should
remain.
We are definitely not in favour of having 18 Northumberland Ave.
rezoned from "R -2" One and Two Family Residential to "R -4" Four
Family Residential.
With Regards,
28 Northumberland Ave.,
Saint John, N.B.
Application for a Municipal Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment
Demande de modification au plan municipal et a 1'arrete sur le nonage
Applicant Related Information / Renseignements sur le demandeur
Name of Applicant/ Nom du demandeur
s L,.�.L.
Mailing Address of applicant/ Addresse postale du demandeur 15 tai c K g}} t4 E
Postal Code/ Code postal tr I e 02 C jj
Telephone Number / Numdro de t6ldphone o q
Home/Domicile 504— % L+ci— 6 68 (D Work / Travail
Fax Number / Numdro de tdldcopieur 50 (o — 633 $ !� 0 v
Name of Property Owner (if different) / Nom du propridtaire (si diffdrent) �a a In �D an) w 4 S Cc
Address / Adresse_
Code / Code
Property Information / Renseignements sur la propri&6
Location/ Emplacement Md✓044,N J1tv7 17R • �r+/"�s u� `3l3'1rZZi yx%u5,
Civic # / No de voirie Street / Rue PID / NIP
Lot Area / Superficie du lot oZ• 33 h� • Street Frontage / Fagade sur rue 115 m e k,rs
Existing Use of Property/ Utilisation actuelle de la propridtd _ V CktCXyt
Present Municipal Plan Land Use Designation n
Ddsignation actuel de utilization des terres sur le plan municipal Lbw de..51,Al� lrl= s at a-V*L aJ
Present Zoning / Zonage actuel gS #;L A?a e "0 G. i c
Amendments Requested / Modifications demandees
MM 'cipal Plan / Plan municipal
M Change Land Use Designation tto�/ Modifier la ddsignation de Putilisation des terres 8
D %is %V%eSS� ^VZ
and /or / ou
❑ Text Amendment (indicate particulars on attachment) / Modification du texte (indiquez les ddtails en annexe)
Zoning By -law/ Arretd sur le Zonage •
Yr Change Zoning to / Modification du zonage 8
and/or / ou
❑ Text Amendment (indicate particulars on attachment) / Modification due texte (indiquez les ddtails en annexe)
Development Proposal / Proposition d'aminagement
Description of Proposal / Description de la proposition
To 'On,.s24orwr1 c. kjAk e&J '4u.coRL j 7-0 c,55 e.wclp��
Ql%eRau�c use o� roer,tnak 3usiues5 . Faci4il^� is apftrva< aDO Lo Ng
�.. A.lb&4wW-o_. ranwOQ ;)fs" a ( 6 1 K tvyrc $,Svn,) 6ul\cACP4 w LAA 6Q,
V l��
cdNs-4rua-�%a 0� prt cw5-+ or +IL-4 up cew,R,v -+ walls Yw +twferg 6LLS5.
You must provide a scaled site plan that illustrates
your proposal. You may also provide
photographs, building plans, elevation drawings
and any other form of information. The site plan
must show the dimensions of the property, the
location ofall buildings, driveways, parking areas,
landscaping and signs. It is important that the
distance between the property boundary and
buildings are shown.
Vous devez fournir un plan du site d 1'echelle illustrant votre
proposition. Vous pouvez egalement fournir des
photographies, des plans de bbtiment, des dessins de plan
d'elevation et toule autre forme de renseignement. Le plan du
site dolt indiquer les dimensions de la propriete,
l'emplacement de la totalite des bbtiments, des allees, des
sires de stationnement, des amenagements paysagers et des
panneaux de signalisalion. II est important d'indiquer la
distance entre les limiles de la propriete et les bbtiments.
Provide reasons why these amendments should be approved. / Fournir les raisons pour les quelles les modifications devraient
@tre approuvdes.
c>LesSkel:ICa1\� olec.s: nt e►�dvtc�eS� m°obs +'N Sa
Q%Uk;, is 3 toc4
Jo1�a`I.RBPPo�r so rwe��r`s !�COvV% rAc- YCA "kSk'teu 7IQ ar %VA%.sjwLCL
Provide any other information about your proposal that would be helpful. 4 Fournir tout autre renseignement concernant votre
proposition qui pourrait We utile.
'>u Sc:,�na J a I, N 1.0-1 i5 tkk i 50 wteA-e rs o4- iw t'.a,s+t4 zO 0lMsr
Signature of Applicant / Signature du demandeur
Date %2 -)2 = o L
V$400 Application Fee Enclosed / Ci joint les frais de demande de 400 $
Ifyou are not the owner of the land in question Si vows n'etes pas le proprietaire du terrain en question,
please have the owner sign below. The signature of veuillez obtenir la signature du proprietaire dons la partie
the owner authorizing this application to proceed is ci- dessous. La signature du proprietaire autorisant le
required for consideration by Common Council. traitement de la presente demande est requise pour que
cette derniere soil examinee par le co�ommunal.
Signature of Owner (if applicable)
Signature du propridtaire (s'il y a lieu)
Datee— /306
PROPOSED MUNICIPAL
PLAN AMENDMENT
RE: 40 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE
Public Notice is hereby given that the Common
Council of The City of Saint John intends to
consider an amendment to the Municipal
Development Plan that would redesignate on
Schedule 2 -A of the Plan, from Low Density
Residential to Business Park, the following
property:
A parcel of land with an area of approximately 2.33
hectares, located at 40 Mountain View Drive, also
identified as being portions of PID Nos. 00313429
and 00426452, as illustrated below.
(INSERT MAP)
A public presentation of the proposed amendment
will take place at the regular meeting of Common
Council on Monday, January 15, 2007 in the
Council Chamber, Lobby Level, City Hall.
REASON FOR CHANGE:
To permit the rezoning of the land, from "RS -2"
One and Two Family Suburban Residential to `BP"
Business Park, and subsequent development of a
building for the assembly of heating products, and
related office uses.
Written objections to the proposed amendment may
be made to the Council, in care of the undersigned,
by February 14, 2007. Enquiries may be made at
the office of the Common Clerk or Planning and
Development, City Hall, 15 Market Square, Saint
John, N.B. between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, inclusive, holidays
excepted.
J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk
658 -2862
PROJET DE MODIFICATION DU
PLAN MUNICIPAL
OBJET: 40, PROMENADE MOUNTAIN VIEW
Avis public est donne, par les presentes, que le
conseil communal de The City of Saint John a
1'intention d'etudier une modification du plan
d'amenagement municipal visant a faire passer la
classification du bien -fonds suivant, a 1'annexe 2 -A
du plan, de zone residentielle de faible densite a
zone de pare commercial:
one parcelle de terrain d'une superficie
approximative de 2,33 hectares, situe,e an
40, promenade Mountain View, et faisam partie des
biens -fonds inscrits sous les NID 00313429 et
00426452, telle qu'elle est delimitee sur la carte ci-
dessous.
(INSERER LA CARTE)
Une presentation publique du projet de
modification aura lieu au cours de la seance
ordinaire du conseil communal prevue le lundi
15 janvier 2007 dans la salle du conseil, au niveau
du hall d'entree, a 116tel de ville.
MOTIFS DE LA MODIFICATION:
Permettre le rezonage desdits biens -fonds afin de
faire passer la classification s'y rapportant de zone
residentielle de banlieue — habitations unifamiliales
et bifamiliales « RS -2 >> a zone de pare commercial
u BP » on vue de 1'amenagement d'un batiment
destine a 1'assemblage de produits de chauffage et
de bureaux connexes.
Veuillez faire part au conseil par ecrit de vos
objections an projet de modification au plus tard le
14 f6vrier 2007 a 1'attention du soussigne. Pour
toute demande de renseignements, veuillez vous
adresser au bureau du greffier communal on an
bureau de 1'urbanisme et du developpement a I'h6tel
de ville an 15, Market Square, Saint John, N. -B.,
entre 8 h 30 et 16 h 30 du lundi au vendredi, sau£
les jours feries.
J. Patrick Woods, greffier communal
658 -2862
tilal
.401
crois. Carlile Cr.
r o�
MGP
ol00
City of Saint John
INTERNAL INSERTION ORDER
For City of Saint John use only:
Bud et Number: 110 0801 442 2010
Department: Common Clerk's Office Account # 71206
Contact: J. Patrick Woods
Phone: (506 ) 658 -2862
Fax: (506) 674 -4214
Special Instructions (if any):
Newspaper Insertion Dates
(Check as applicable)
(SJTJ= Saint John Telegraph Journal)
" SJTJ City Information Ad
SJTJ Independent Placement
me SJTJ Classifieds
Date(s): Tuesday, January 2, 2007
Date(s):
Date(s):
Information for Ad
(Boldface anything you want Bold in Ad, Centre, Tab, etc.)
Section Headline: ❑
General Notice
❑ Tender
❑ Proposal
I Telephone: (506) 658 -2862
❑Q
Public Notice
Sub - Headline (if applicable):
Text:
INSERT ATTACHED
Call to Action: J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk/Greffier communal
Contact:
I Telephone: (506) 658 -2862
BY -LAW NUMBER C.P. 105 -
A LAW TO AMEND THE
MUNICIPAL PLAN BY -LAW
Be it enacted by The City of Saint
John in Common Council convened, as
follows:
The Municipal Plan By -law of The
City of Saint John enacted on the 3rd day
of January, A.D. 2006 is amended by:
1 Amending Schedule 2 -A, the
Future Land Use Plan, by redesignating a
parcel of land with an area of
approximately 2.33 hectares, located at 40
Mountain View Drive, also identified a
being portions of PID Nos. 00313429 and
00426452, from Low Density Residential
to Business Park classification
- all as shown on the plan attached hereto
and forming part of this by -law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of
Saint John has caused the Corporate
Common Seal of the said City to be affixed
to this by -law the * day of *, A.D. 2007
and signed by:
Mayor
ARRETE No C.P. 105 -
ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE
RELATIF AU PLAN MUNICIPAL
Lors dune reunion du conseil
communal, The City of Saint John a edict6
ce qui suit:
L'arrete relatif au plan municipal de
The City of Saint John ddcr6t6 le
3 janvier 2006 est modifie par:
1 la modification de 1'annexe 2 -A,
relative au plan d'utilisation future des
terres, afin de faire passer la designation
d'une parcelle de terrain dune superficie
approximative de 2,33 hectares, situee an
40, promenade Mountain View, et faisant
partie des biens -fonds inscrits sous les NID
00313429 et 00426452, de zone
residentielle de faible densit6 a zone de
pare commercial;
- routes les modifications sont indiqu6es sur
le plan ci -joint et font partie du present
arr &6.
EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John
a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le
present arret6 le 2007, avec les
signatures suivantes :
Common Clerk/Greffier communal
First Reading - Premiere lecture
Second Reading - Deuxieme lecture
Third Reading - Troisi6me lecture
m
W
N
W
z January 10, 2007
z
x
0 Mayor McFarlane and
Members of Common Council
City Hall
15 Market Square
Z Saint John, NB
E21, 4L1
d
Your Worship and Councillors,
F The Board of Uptown Saint John Inc. met on January 10, 2007 to consider the
W attached revised 2007 budget. This budget does not contain the levy that would be
W collected from the proposed boundary expansion areas, due to timing concems
expressed by the City Solicitor and senior staff. While we are still hopeful that the
Province will collect the levies from the new expanded areas in 2007, as they have
F- indicated, we concur with City staff in taking this prudent approach.
We ask that Council give first and second reading to this revised budget on January
15, 2007, a budget which is essentially the same as the previously submitted budget
z less the revenue from the expanded areas. Timing is important and we will be
undertaking our required process with our membership to gain approval of the
amended budget so that third reading can be given by Council on January 29, 2007,
o and that it can be forwarded on to the Minister for final approval.
We thank you for your support and continued partnership in making the uptown a
vibrant heart in greater Saint John.
t Sincerely,
O 0�
c aigle
President
C
0 T. 506.633.9797 F. 506.652.3525 www.uptownsi.com
UPTOWN SAINT JOHN INC.
2007 BUDGET
($0.00% Levy Increase)
REVENUE YEAR 2007
BIA Levy 2455437.00
Employment Grants 41500.00
Bad Debts Recovered 21000.00
Environmental Trust Fund Grant 20,000.00
Capital Interest Waterfront Development 15,000.00
Festivals and Events 68,300.00
Co- operative Marketing Campaigns 25,000.00
Miscellaneous Revenue 22000.00
TOTAL REVENUE 3829237.00
EXPENDITURES
YEAR 2007
Urban Design & Planning (ETF Grant)
20,000.00
Waterfront Development
15,000.00
Marketing
37,130.00
Festivals & Events
685300.00
Uptown Development
10,000.00
Communications
51300.00
Program Delivery
81200.00
Annual Meeting and Awards
51000.00
Operations
210,307.00
Non - Recoverable
39000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
382,237.00
January 10, 2007
Common Council of
The City of Saint John
Your Worship and Councillors:
Re: Business Improvement Area Levy for 2007
Common Council at its meeting scheduled for Monday, January 15, 2007 will
have on its Agenda the matter of the proposed Business Improvement Area
Levy for 2007. The advertising required by the Business Improvement Areas
Act has taken place and the Common Clerk will advise upon the response
received as a result.
It has come to our attention that the budget of projected 2007 expenditures
which was submitted to Council on December 18, 2006 was based upon
revenue generated in part by a levy upon property lying beyond the existing
Business Improvement Area. The submission of Uptown Saint John Inc. to
Council on December 18, 2006 sought an expansion of the existing Business
Improvement Area. Such an expansion would occur by amendment to the
Business Improvement Area By -Law.
The Business Improvement Area Act in Section 2(8) makes it clear that:
" ... no amendment altering the boundaries of a business
improvement area is effective before the 31" day of December
of the year in which it is made. "
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Common Council
January 12, 2007
Re: Business Improvement Area Levy for 2007
City Solicitor
Page 2
In other words, an expansion of the existing Business Improvement Area
cannot become effective before December 31, 2007 and consequently, a levy
cannot be applied in 2007 to the properties within the "new" area. This results
in Uptown Saint John Inc.'s needing either to increase the proposed levy to
support the projected expenditures or to reduce the projected expenditures to
reflect the proposed levy upon properties within the existing Business
Improvement Area only.
It is my understanding having spoken with the President and General Manager
of Uptown Saint John Inc. on Wednesday, January 10th, that correspondence
addressing this matter, will be delivered to the Clerk's Office so that it can be
placed on the Agenda for the January 15, 2007 Council Meeting. It is my
further understanding that such correspondence will request Council to give
first and second reading to the By -Law imposing the 16 cent levy for 2007,
with third reading to await Uptown Saint John Inc.'s complying with Council's
requirements and those of the Business Improvement Areas Act.
The course for Common Council to take should it wish to consider a revised
Budget which accurately reflects the revenue to be generated by imposing the
proposed levy within the existing Business Improvement Area, would be to
give first and second reading to the Levy By -Law and to require the Board of
Directors of Uptown Saint John Inc. to convene a General Meeting of non-
residential users within the Business Improvement Area to consider a revised
Budget.
Uptown Saint John Inc. would then be expected to convene the required
meeting and report the result to Common Council at the next following
Council Meeting. If two - thirds of those present at the aforesaid General
Meeting approve the revised Budget and it is submitted by the Board of
Uptown Saint John Inc. to Council, then Council may, 15 days following that
Budget's submission and subject to the statutory provisions respecting
objections, approve it and give third reading to the Levy By -Law for 2007.
Respectfully Submitted,
John L. Nugent
City Solicitor
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
BY -LAW NUMBER BIA -2
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT LEVY BY -LAW
Be it enacted by the Common Council of
the City of Saint John as follows:
The Business Improvement Levy By -law
of The City of Saint John enacted on the third day
of January, 2006, is amended by:
ARRETE No BIA -2
ARRETE CONCERNANT LA
CONTRIBUTION POUR L'AMELIORATION
DES AFFAIRES
Le conseil communal de The City of
Saint John decr&te ce qui suit :
L'arret6 concernant la contribution pour
1'am6lioration des affaires de The City of Saint
John d6cr&6 le 3 janvier 2006 est modifi6 par :
1 Repealing section 2 thereof and inserting 1 1'abrogation de Particle 2 aux pr6sentes et
the following: l'ajout du texte qui suit :
2 A levy of 16 cents for each one
hundred dollars of assessed value is hereby
imposed for 2007 upon non - residential property
within the Business Improvement Area established
by By -law No. BIA -1 Business Improvement Area
By -law enacted on the 5th day of January, 2004.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of Saint John
has caused the Common Seal of the said City to be
affixed to this by -law the * day of *, A.D. 2007 and
signed by:
First Reading -
Second Reading -
Third Reading -
Mayor /maire
2 Par la pr6sente, une contribution de
16 cents par tranche de cent dollars par rapport a la
valeur fix6e est imposee pour 1'ann6e 2007 sur les
immeubles non r6sidentiels situ6s a l'int6rieur de la
zone d'am6lioration des affaires 6tablie en vertu de
1'Arret6 ri BIA -1 relatif a la zone d'am6lioration
des affaires 6dict6 le 5 janvier 2004.
EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John a fait
apposer son sceau communal sur le pr6sent arret6 le
2007, avec les signatures suivantes :
Common Clerk/greffier communal
Premiere lecture
Deuxi&me lecture
Troisi&me lecture
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT LEVY
TAXE SUR L'AMELIORATION
DES AFFAIRES
Public Notice is hereby given that the Common Par les pr6sentes,
Council of The City of Saint John has been par lequel le conseil
requested by the Board of Directors of Uptown
Saint John Inc. and intends to consider approving a
budget for the designated Business Improvement
Area, at its regular meeting to be held in the
Council Chamber on Monday, January 15, 2007
at 7:00 p.m.
un avis public est donn6
communal de The City of
Saint John, a la demande du conseil
d'administration de Uptown Saint John Inc.,
indique son intention d'approuver un budget pour la
zone d'am6lioration des affaires design6e lors de la
r6union ordinaire qui se tiendra le
lundi 15 janvier 2007 a 19 h.
The proposed budget for the Business Improvement Le budget propos6 pour la zone d'am6lioration des
Area is as follows: affaires se r6partit comme suit :
REVENUE
Business Improvement Area Levy $277,207
Employment Grants
4,500
Bad Debts Recovered
2,000
Environmental Trust Fund Grant
20,000
Capital Interest Waterfront Development
15,000
Festivals and Events
68,300
Co- operative Marketing Campaigns
25,000
Miscellaneous Revenue
2,000
Total Revenue $414,007
EXPENDITURES
Urban Design and Planning (ETF Grant)$ 20,000
Waterfront Development
15,000
Marketing
68,900
Festivals and Events
68,300
Uptown Development
10,000
Communications
5,300
Program Delivery
8,200
Annual Meeting and Awards
5,000
Operations
210,307
Non - Recoverable
3,000
Total Expenditures
$414,007
The proposed levy to be imposed on non-
residential property within the designated business
improvement area is 16 cents per $100.00 of
assessment for 2007.
Pursuant to the Business Improvement Areas Act
the said proposed budget shall not be approved if
objections in writing are filed with the undersigned
RECETTES
20 000 $
Taxe sur la zone d'am6lioration des
277 207 $
affaires
68 900
Subventions a 1'emploi
4 500
Recouvrement de mauvaises cr6ances
2000
Subventions du fonds en fiducie pour
20 000
1'environnement
8200
Participation au capital visant
15 000
1'am6nagement riverain
210 307
Festivals et 6v6nements
68 300
Campagnes de mercatique symbiotique
25 000
Recettes diverses
2000
Recettes totales 414 007 $
DEPENSES
Conception et planification urbaine
(Subvention du fonds en fiducie pour
1'environnement)
20 000 $
Am6nagement riverain
15 000
Marketing
68 900
Festivals et 6v6nements
68 300
Am6nagement du centre -ville
10 000
Communications
5 300
Realisation de programmes
8200
Assembl6e annuelle et prix
5 000
Exploitation
210 307
D6penses non recouvrables
3 000
D6penses totales
414 007 $
La taxe pr6vue sur les biens -fonds non r6sidentiels
situ6s dans la zone d'am6lioration des affaires
d6sign6e sera de 0,16 $ par tranche de 100 $
d'6valuation pour 1'an 2007.
En vertu de la Loi sur les zones d'amelioration des
affaires, le budget pr6vu ne doit pas etre approuv6
si des objections par 6crit sont d6pos6es au
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
not later than January 12, 2007 jointl y
independently by one -third or more of all
residential users or by non - residential users
would together be liable to pay one -third or
of the amount to be raised by a levy.
or soussigne au plus tard le 12 janvier 2007,
non- conjointement ou independamment, par un tiers ou
who plus de tous les utilisateurs non residentiels ou par
more un groupe d'utilisateurs non residentiels qui
seraient responsables de payer un tiers ou plus du
montant a prelever au moyen dune taxe.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
City of Saint John
INTERNAL INSERTION ORDER
For City of Saint John use only:
Budget Number: 1 10 0801 442 2010
Department: Common Clerk's Office (Account # 71206)
Contact: J. Patrick Woods
Phone: (506) 658 -2862 Fax: (506) 674 -4214
Special Instructions (if any):
Newspaper Insertion Dates
(Check as applicable)
(SJTJ= Saint John Telegraph Journal)
SJTJ City Information Ad Date(s):
SJTJ Independent Placement Date(s): Thursday, December 21, 2006
l hursday, December 28, 2006
SJTJ Classifieds Date(s):
Information for Ad
(Boldface anything you want Bold in Ad, Centre, Tab, etc.)
Section Headline: ❑ General Notice ❑ Tender ❑ Proposal
❑x Public Notice
Sub - Headline (if applicable):
Text:
INSERT ATTACHED
Call to Action: J. Patrick Woods, Common Clerk /Greffier communal
Contact:
Telephone: (506) 658 -2862
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
BY -LAW NUMBER C.P. 110 -30
A LAW TO AMEND
THE ZONING BY -LAW
OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
Be it enacted by The City of Saint
John in Common Council convened, as
follows:
The Zoning By -law of The City of
Saint John enacted on the nineteenth day of
December, A.D. 2005, is amended by:
1 Amending Schedule "A ", the
Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by
rezoning a parcel of land with an area of
approximately 8240 square metres, located
at 1000 Somerset Street, also identified as
being PID No. 00047381, from "RS -2"
One and Two Family Suburban Residential
to "RM -1" Three Storey Multiple
Residential classification.
- all as shown on the plan attached hereto
and forming part of this by -law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of
Saint John has caused the Corporate
Common Seal of the said City to be affixed
to this by -law the * day of *, A.D. 2007
and signed by:
Mayor /Maire
ARRETE N° C.P. 110 -30
ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRRTE
SUR LE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF
SAINT JOHN
Lors d'une reunion du conseil
communal, The City of Saint John a
de'cre't6 ce qui suit:
L'arr6t6 sur le zonage de The City
of Saint John, ddcr6t6 le dix -neuf (19)
d6cembre 2005, est modifi6 par:
1 La rezonage d'une parcelle de
terrain d'une superficie d'environ 8 240
metres carr6s, situde au 1000, rue Somerset,
et portant le NID 00047381, de zone
r6sidentielle de banlieue — habitations
unifamiliales et bifamiliales <<RS -2>> A
zone d'6difices a logements multiples de
trois 6tages <<RM -1>>.
- toutes les modifications sent indiqu6es sur
le plan ci joint et font partie du present
arr6t6.
EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John
a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le
present arret6 le 2007,
avec les signatures suivantes :
Common Clerk/Greffier communal
First Reading - December 4, 2006 Premi6re lecture - 4 decembre 2006
Second Reading - December 4, 2006 Deuxi&me lecture - 4 decembre 2006
Third Reading - Troisi&me lecture -
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT / URBANISME ET D�VELOPPEMENT
REZONING / REZONAGE
Amending Schedule "A" of the Zoning By -Law of The City of Saint John
Modifiant Annexe «A» de I'ArrW de zonage de The City of Saint John
e,
d
e,
9
a
9
FROM / DE TO / A
RS -2 One and Two Family Suburban RMA - Three Storey Multiple
Residential /Zone r6sidentielle Residential /Zone d'edifices
de banlieue- habitations a logements multiples de
unifamiliales et bifamiliales. trois etages
Applicant: Cavanagh Construction Ltd.
Location: 1000 Somerset Street
PID(s) /NIP(s) 00047381
06N -79NW
Drawn By /Cr6ee Par: David Couture
Date Drawn /Carte Cr66e: January 11 Janvier, 2007
Considered by RA.C.Iconsidere par le C.C.U.: November 28 novembre, 2006
Enacted by Council /ApproM par Is Conseil:
Filed in Registry Office /Enregistre le:
January 12, 2007
M &C# 2007 -15
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT: LEINSTER STREET REZONING
PT TR POq-F *
The purpose of this report is threefold. First it is to provide Council with advice as to the
context in which Council must come to a decision as to whether to adopt Third Reading
of the rezoning.
Secondly, it is to provide Council with a summation of the most recent discussions
between the Saint John Non Profit Housing Incorporated and the Citizens for the
Revitalization of the South End Peninsula.
Thirdly, it is to clarify the relationship between the Saint John Non Profit Housing
Incorporated and the City of Saint John. As a result of comments made at the last session
of Council, this issue in the minds of some, has gained some prominence and therefore
needs to be addressed.
I ADVICE TO COUNCIL
As so often is the case when dealing with issues on which individuals have such strong
views, Council often finds itself becoming pulled into the minutia of the process, of what
one party said to another, on what date a meeting was held, who was in attendance and
other such matters.
In reality, while all of such information maybe interesting, Councillors need to remain
focused on their overriding obligation as set out in the Municipalities Act. Section 36(2)
of the Act states;
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
Subject: Leinster Street Rezoning
"A Councillor of a Municipality shall:
Page 2
a) consider the welfare and interests of the entire municipality when
making decisions;
Beyond this overriding obligation, Councillors when dealing with an issue such as is
before them this evening must come to their own conclusion as to whether "the
development is generally appropriate for the location on which it is being proposed? "
The fact that under the Community Planning Act there are specific authorities provided to
the Planning Advisory Committee and to Common Council, is reflective of the reality
that many developments simply do not always fit nicely into the stipulated requirements
for a location. When this occurs, it is both PAC and the Council who must consider the
welfare and interest of the entire municipality, grant variances or approve rezoning if they
deem it appropriate.
The preceding advice is provided on the basis that this particular site is an anomaly in the
South End. Had the location been elsewhere on the Peninsula, the rezoning would not
have been required. Given this, Council must come to a decision as to whether this
particular site is of such a nature that to rezone this location similar to other locations on
the Peninsula is detrimental to the welfare and interest of the entire Community.
II SUMMATION OF THE MEETING WITH THE PARTIES
The City Manager, as directed by Common Council, did meet with representatives of the
parties on Friday, January 5th at 3:00 p.m. in the eighth floor boardroom at City Hall. Mr.
Baird was also asked to be present in the event that questions of a technical nature were
raised. As it turned out, further advice from Mr. Baird was not required. Both parties
seem to have an excellent handle on the planning issues and the process.
In attendance were the following representatives.
CITIZENS FOR REVITALIZATION
Jon McQueen (Property Owner)
Betty Rourke (Property Owner)
Arthur Melanson (Property Owner)
Lana Irish(Resident)
Mel Norton (Legal Counsel)
Kelly Vanbuskirk (Legal Counsel)
Nathalie Godbout (Legal Counsel)
John Johnson (Engineering Consultant)
SAINT JOHN NON PROFIT HOUSING
INCORPORATED
Wayne Wolfe (Director)
Lisa Keenan (Director)
Clifford Lawrence (Director)
Narinder Singh (staff)
Bob Vincent (Legal Counsel)
Amy Theriault (Legal Counsel)
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
Subject: Leinster Street Rezoning
Page 3
The meeting began with a series of acknowledgements by the City Manager. First, an
apology for any confusion that may have been created with respect to the Council
resolution of December 18th and the expectation of staff involvement. Secondly, a thank
you to the parties for meeting between Christmas and New Years to see if a solution
could be found as requested by Council. Finally, the City Manager did indicate that he
fully understood that issues have been raised regarding both Council's procedures and the
precarious financial situation of this project. These issues were acknowledged, however,
the City Manager took the position that he was not going to entertain discussion on
procedural issues nor was he particularly interested in knowing all of the details with
respect to the financing of this project. Yes, important issues, but Council's direction
was to meet with the parties in an effort to see if on either side there is any possibility of
movement so as to make the project more acceptable to all parties.
THE POSITION OF THE CITIZENS' GROUP
While individuals stated it in different ways, perhaps the best summation was provided
by Mr. Vanbuskirk, Legal Counsel. In general terms, Mr. Vanbuskirk stated that the
residents hold the view that the proposed development is in fact "overdevelopment" for
the site.
Given this, the citizens have very real and tangible concerns that need to be addressed.
This "overdevelopment" is affecting the quality of life of residents. The citizen's
position is that their approach has always been "solutions driven ". It was for this very
reason that notwithstanding their view that the project is too large for the site, `flipping
the project " would address some of their concerns and therefore their opposition to the
project would cease.
While staff believe this to be the central concern, there were underlying issues that
continued to surface during the meeting. Given where the parties are, there is no resolve
to these issues. Nevertheless, they are identified below so that Council can fully
appreciate the setting in which a compromise is being sought.
• The citizens strongly believe that any suggestion that they are opposed to this
development based on the income mix of prospective tenants is repugnant. Such
a suggestion is totally unfair and absolutely false.
• The citizens do not believe that they were listened to by the Developer. They feel
very much ignored.
• The citizens have the perception that the developer was arrogant, hurtful and
offensive.
• The citizens have a perception that the developer has received preferential
treatment by city staff.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
Subject: Leinster Street Rezoning
Page 4
Finally, when asked whether there were any other changes, other than flipping the
project that would make the development more acceptable, no agreed upon answer was
provided, although one resident casually stated "take off a floor ".
Subsequent to the meeting, the City Manager did have a telephone conversation with one
of the property owners indicating that whatever Council decides there still is an
expectation that the Developer will work with the adjacent property owners with respect
to the backyard retaining walls, fencing and access, all of which had previously been
discussed.
THE POSITION OF THE DEVELOPER
The Developer's position, in general terms, is that:
• The project as proposed is in the best interest of the community.
• They have complied with all legislative requirements.
• Their position is that they have made changes to the project as a result of citizen
input. Changes that they have embraced and that will admittedly result in a better
overall project.
• This project, like any other, must make economic sense. The cost of this project,
because of delays, is in danger of experiencing escalating costs. Increasing costs
that this developer and this project cannot afford to carry.
• To avoid these escalating costs, the developer made the decision to start
construction knowing full well of the downside financial risk to the company.
• In making this decision, they would acknowledge the perception that it may have
left with the opponents, however, from their perspective it was simply a business
decision.
• They did entertain "flipping the project ". Whether the cost of doing so is $90,000
as suggested by the opponents, or $250,000 as an initial estimate provided by
their Architect, this non profit developer does not have the financial resources to
make this change.
• Even if the financial resources were available, the developer would question
whether on this site, a better project would result. Yes, the flipping of the project
would provide some additional space for those properties at the rear. It would,
however, have little curb appeal, and to some other residents in the area, would
not be acceptable. Their view is that this is a very slippery slope to start down
and with the real risk of losing support from other area residents, simply more
delays, escalating costs and absolutely no guarantees.
In concluding, the Developer reiterated their position that a failure to rezone the property,
or to table the matter essentially results in a failed project. The developer and those
financing the project can no longer carry the financial risk without some expectation as to
when a rental income stream may develop.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
Subject: Leinster Street Rezoning
Page S
III THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SAINT JOHN NON PROFIT HOUSING INCORPORATED
AND THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
At the last meeting of Common Council, an elected representative began quoting from a
document which, it was suggested, spelled out the relationship between the City of Saint
John and the Developer.
Without the document being tabled with Common Council, staff was unsure as to its
origin. However, it would appear that the now outdated document had its origins pre
1984 or 1985. Prior to these years, and in fact as early as 1970, the Saint John Non Profit
Hosing Incorporated was pre- existed by the Saint John Housing Commission. This
Commission when established by resolution of Council was very much dependent on the
City of Saint John. By the mid 1980's, the Commission had been fully transformed into
Saint John Non Profit Housing Incorporated, one of the largest landlords in the
community. At the end of 2005, the Company reported $19 million in assets with a
depreciation value of $13,614,000. Pledged against these assets are mortgages and other
long term instruments totalling $13,687,000.
The accumulation of these assets and the related financing have almost entirely occurred
since the mid 1980's. It was at that time updated bylaws were created and were then
subsequently amended in 1995. Many of these changes were put in place to more fully
separate the activities of the company and those of the City. In fact, to further separate
the parties, the company chose to relocate its offices from City Hall to another location.
For at least the last decade, the only ongoing direct functioning relationship between the
City and the Company is that the Company contracts with the City to perform its
accounting. The company pays the City for this service.
It is true that the Mayor, the City Manager and the Commissioner of Finance are named
as ex- officio members. This is true with many of the municipally created companies
and/or commissions. Having said this, the reality of this situation is that for more than a
decade there has been little, if any at all, direct involvement by the Mayor, the City
Manager or Commissioner of Finance in any decisions of the Corporation.
The result of all of this is that the current relationship between the parties is as described
in the note to the Financial Statements of the Company which states:
Related Party Transaction:
The City of Saint John controls the organization through its ability to appoint the Board
of Directors. During the year, was charged administrative services of $42,000 and water
and sewer services of $113,376. These transactions are in the normal course of
operations are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration
established and agreed to by the related parties.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
Subject: Leinster Street Rezoning
Page 6
A further review of the audited financial statement of both the City of Saint John and
Saint John Non Profit Housing Incorporated revealed no further disclosure of any real or
contingent liabilities that would accrue to the City as a result of the activities of the
Corporation.
CONCLUSION:
As directed, staff has met with the parties but unfortunately the situation and the timing
have made further compromises impossible. Council must now make a decision. The
information provided in this report does identify the current position of the parties and
provides a better appreciation of the relationship that exists between the City and Saint
John Non Profit Housing Incorporated.
Respectfully submitted,
Terrence L. Totten, FCA
CITY MANAGER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
BY -LAW NUMBER C.P 110 -29
A LAW TO AMEND
THE ZONING BY -LAW
OF THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
Be it enacted by The City of Saint
John in Common Council convened, as
follows:
The Zoning By -law of The City of
Saint John enacted on the nineteenth day of
December, A.D. 2005, is amended by:
ARRETE No C.P. 110 -29
ARRETE MODIFIANT L'ARRETE
SUR LE ZONAGE DE THE CITY OF
SAINT JOHN
Lors d'une reunion du conseil
communal, The City of Saint John a
de'ere'te cc qui suit :
L'arrete' sur le zonage de The City
of Saint John, decrete le dix -neuf (19)
decembre 2005, est modifie' par :
1. Adding the following to the list of 1
zones in Section 30(l):
"special zones SZ -21"
2. Adding the following as Section
740(21):
"Special Zone #21 SZ -21
a) Uses
Any land, building or structure
may be used for the purpose of,
and for no other purpose than,
i) the following uses:
- a multiple dwelling, provided
that Council has approved a
specific proposal pursuant to
Section 39 of the Community
Planning Act.
b) Zone Standards
Standards for development in
Special Zone #21 shall not be
subject to General Sections 810 to
870 but shall be limited by the
proposal which is approved by
Council pursuant to Section 39 of
the Community Planning Act."
3. Amending Schedule "A ", the
Zoning Map of The City of Saint John, by
rezoning a parcel of land with an area of
approximately 2770 square metres, located
at 53 -75 Leinster Street, also identified as
being PID Nos. 00009431 and 55059992,
from `B -2" General Business to "SZ -21"
Special Zone #21 classification pursuant to
a resolution adopted by Common Council
under Section 39 of the Community
Planning Act.
- all as shown on the plan attached hereto
and forming part of this by -law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF The City of
Saint John has caused the Corporate
Common Seal of the said City to be affixed
to this by -law the * day of *, A.D. 2007
and signed by:
L'ajout de 1'e1ement suivant a la liste
de zones du paragraphe 30(1)
u zones speciales SZ -21 >>
2. L'ajout du paragraphe 740(21) qui se
lit comme suit :
a Zone speciale n° 21 S( Z -21)
a) Usages
Les terrains, batiments ou
constructions ne peuvent titre
affecte's qu'aux fins :
i) des usages suivants
- une habitation multifamiliale, a la
condition que le conseil ait
approuve one proposition
particuliere en vertu de Particle 39
de la Loi sur l'urbanisme.
b) Normes applicables
Les normes d'amenagement dans
la zone speciale n° 21 ne sont pas
assujetties aux dispositions
generales des articles 810 a 870,
mais elles sont assujetties a la
proposition approuve'e par le
conseil en vertu de Particle 39 de la
Loi sur 1'urbanisme. »
3. La modification de I'annexe a A »,
Plan de zonage de The City of Saint John,
permettant de modifier la designation d'une
parcelle de terrain d'une superficie
d'environ 2 770 metres carres, situee au 53-
75, rue Leinster, et portant les NID
00009431 et 55059992, de zone
commerciale ge'nerale o B -2 » a zone
speciale n° 21 a SZ -21 » conformement a
une resolution adoptee par le conseil
municipal en vertu de I'artiele 39 de la Loi
sur Purbanisme
- toutes les modifications sent indiquees sur
le plan ci -joint et font partie du present
arrete.
EN FOI DE QUOI, The City of Saint John
a fait apposer son sceau communal sur le
present arrete le 2007,
avec les signatures suivantes :
Mayor
Common Clerk/Greffier communal
First Reading - December 19, 2006 Premiere lecture - 19 decembre 2006
Second Reading - December 19, 2006 Deuxieme lecture - 19 decembre 2006
Third Reading - Troisieme lecture -
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT / URBANISME ET DtVELOPPEMENT
REZONING / REZONAGE
Amending Schedule "A" of the Zoning By -Law of The City of Saint John
Modifiant Annexe «A» de I'Arr6t6 de zonage de The City of Saint John
1 1 1
.s
' 1
tint ` r�
Keg
1
1
1
1 `
Ta
s
e
1 w
` 1 1
` ` t
FROM / DE TO I A
B -2 -General Business/ SZ -21 - Special Zone #21
Zone comerciale g6ndrale M Zone sp6ciale n°. 21
Pursuant to a Resolution under Section 39 of the Community Planning Act
* Conform6ment fi une resolution adopt6e par Is conseil municipal en vertu de
I'article 39 de la Loi sur l'urbanisme
Applicant: Saint John Non Profit Housing Inc.
Location: 53 -75 rue Leinster Street
PID(s) /NIP(s) 00009431 and /et 55059992
06N -98SW
Drawn By /Cr66e Par: David Couture
Date Drawn /Carte Cr66e: December 18 D6cembre, 2006
Considered by P.A.C./consid6r6 par le C.C.U.: December 12 Decembee, 2006
Enacted by Council /Approuv6 par le Conseil:
Filed in Registry Office /Enregistr6 le:
Section 39 Conditions — 53 -75 Leinster Street
That pursuant to the provisions of Section 39 of the Community Planning Act, the
proposed development of a parcel of land having an area of approximately 2770 square
metres, located at 53 -75 Leinster Street, also identified as being PID Numbers
00009431 and 55059992, with a multiple dwelling be subject to the following conditions:
a) use of the site is limited to the proposed four - storey apartment building
having a maximum of 52 dwelling units;
b) the building location, height, massing and significant features of the building (e.g.
window and door locations), as well as the location and layout of the proposed parking
facilities, shall be generally in accordance with the submitted site plan and building
elevation plans prepared by B.A. Roma Architect Limited and dated November 28, 2006;
c) the exterior fagade of the proposed building must be constructed of a combination of
brick, cultured stone and fibre cement siding, and architectural details must be in
accordance with architectural plans approved by the Development Officer to ensure
compatibility with the surrounding buildings along the adjacent portion of Leinster Street;
d) parking for the apartment building shall be provided at a minimum rate of one space
per dwelling unit, and
further that, upon the rezoning, the land and any building or structure thereon must be
developed and used in conformity with the proposal and conditions identified herein
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
www.saintjohn.ca
January 10, 2007
Mayor Norm McFarlane and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Fellow Councilors:
Re; Meetings Ottawa/Fredericton
Background;
P.O. Box/C.P. t971
Saint John, NB /N. -B,
Canada E2L 4L1
There are a number of outstanding issues in our community that can only be addressed
with the support of our Federal and Provincial counterparts. A few of the more
noteworthy include; Harbour Clean-Up, Designated Highway Funding, the Police- Justice
Complex, One Mile House Inter - change, acquisition of the Coast Guard Property, and
securing Infrastructure Funding.
These are significant files that require the active participation and support of Council. I
believe we need to formulate a coordinated plan of action on each of these items and
organize face to face meetings in Fredericton and Ottawa to make sure that our needs are
fully understood and acted upon.
Recommendation
I move that the City Manager be directed to prepare an action plan in consultation with
Council and further request the Mayor's office to make the required meeting
arrangements with the other levels of government as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
C�
stopher T. Titus
Councillor
www.saintjohn.ca
January 10, 2007
P.O. Box/C.P. 1971
Saint John, NB /N. -B. —
Canada E2L 4L1
x
ca
The City of Saint John
His worship Mayor Norm MacFarlane
And Members of Saint John Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Common Council,
SUBJECT: Residential Street Parking on Southern Peninsula
BACKGROUND
The Southern Peninsula is seeing an increase in both new residential
development and residential renovation.
As more families choose to reside on the Southern Peninsula, residential street
parking will continue to become very limited. It would prove very helpful to
residents if parking spaces were marked, therefore avoiding the scenario where
one car takes up two parking spaces.
MOTION:
I move that this item be referred to the Parking Commission and that the Parking
Commission provides a report for Council for the next open session.
Respectively submitted,
Received by e-mail
Deputy Mayor Michelle Hooton
01/11/2007 13:33 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY a 96744214 NO.370 P02
January 15, 2007
OPEC 1 SESSION
Mayor Norman McFarlane
And Members of Common Council
RE: Proposed Pesticide Use By -Law
As Council is aware, there has been discussion by this Council to look at initiating a By-
law regarding the use of Pesticides in our Community. It is my belief that prior to
finalizing any proposed action, Council should be aware of as many facts as possible on
this issue.
It has come to my attention that on January 25, 2007 there will be a one day Seminar
hosted at the Crown Plaza Hotel in Moncton. I believe that it would be beneficial for the
City of Saint John to bave representation at this event. The event is being sponsored by
the New Brunswick Horticultural Trades Association.
It is very clear that we would benefit from attendance at this event, and gain valuable
information to us as a Community as we pursue this issue and the possible creation of a
By -law.
i therefore make the following recommendation;
That the information regarding the Landscape and Lawn Care Information
Seminar be referred to the City Manager, and that appropriate staff are directed to
attend this event to acquire information that could be valuable to the City as we
pursue action on this issue. And further, that Members of Council who are
interested, also attend the event as well.
Resp etfully submitte ,
Carl A. White, Councillor
Attachment
01/11/2007 13:33 DEPT OF PUBLIC SRFETY � 96744214
LANDSCAPE AND LAWN CARE INFORMATION SEMINAR
NO.370 1703
"Pesticide Toxicology and Risks;
...understanding the public health and environmental concerns about Pesticide
use in urban areas..."
Date: January 25, 2007
Where: Crowne Plaza Hotel, Moncton NB
Who should attend?
• Municipal and government regulatory officials
• Plant Health Care and IPM Specialists
• Environment and Health Care Specialists
Why Attend?
The landscape industry and public share concerns about the risks associated with the
use of pesticides. Headlines seem to daily announce alarms about pesticide risks and
the calls for banning all pesticide substances. Are they true? Are they false? Is there a
middle ground? How do we find the real truth and how concerned should we be about
the risks? If you have asked any of these questions and are still seeking clear
answers than this seminar is worth attending. If you are still unsure read on...
..,Are the Federal and Provincial governments doing enough to protect us and the
environment from pesticide risks? Are Health Canada and the Pest Management
Regulatory Agency doing a good job evaluating and registering pesticides for use?
Are provinces doing a good job licensing pesticide vendors and applicators? Are
municipalities making goad decisions to create additional by -laws and bans restricting
pesticide use? Is there an ideal by -law regarding landscape pesticide use that would
be acceptable for everybody? Do homeowners who apply their own pesticides have
greater risk of pesticide exposure than IPM certified landscape applicators? Should
we accept any level of risk posed by landscape pesticide use and, if so, where do we
draw the line and convince the public that it is acceptable risk?
01/11/2007 13:33 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY -a 96744214 NO.370 PO4
Agenda:
a:30 Reception & Registration
8:50 Opening Remarks — NBHTA President and Environment Chair
9:00 The new Federal Pest Control Products Act: how it mitigates Pesticide Risks,
Lindsay Hanson, Toxicologist, PMRA
10:30 An Overview of Provincial Pesticide Reaulation
NB Department Of Environment, Mark Boldon
10:45 Public Health Risks Associated with "Cosmetic" Pesticide Use in New
Brunswick
Medical Health Officer, NS Dept. of Health
11:00 Understanding Pesticide Risk; the Science Perspective
Dr. Gerald Stephenson, Toxicologist, University of Guelph
12:00: Lunch provided
13:00 Can I trust the Coroorate Science and Research Data on Pesticides
TBA
13:45 Can I trust the Corporate Science and Research Data on Pesticides
Crop Life Canada
14:15 Municioal Pesticide Bylaws; Are they-Re
.quired; Effective?
Ken Pavely, IPM Specialist, Landscape Ontario
14:30 IPM Accreditation Options & Recommendations
Ken Pavely, IPM Specialist, Landscape Ontario
15:00 Panel 0 & A
15:45 Final Wrap-up - Conclusions N8HTA chair
This event is being sponsored by the New Brunswick
Horticultural Trades Association (NBHTA)
Pre- registration is required, To pre - register and for more
information contact: Karen Richard, (546) 451 -22361
karenr�nbnet.nb.ca
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
January 12, 2007
M & C Report #2007 -15 The city of saint John
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 2007 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS: GENERAL FUND
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to recommend to Common Council a series of resolutions
that, if acceptable to the majority of Council Members, would constitute the formal
adoption of the 2007 Operating and Capital Budget of the General Fund.
CONTEXT: FINDING THE APPROPRIATE "BALANCE"
Each time Council is asked to adopt an Operating and Capital Budget for the ensuing
year, Council must take a moment to reflect on the context in which they are being asked
to approve the recommendations. The reason being is that it is these documents, that
essentially spell out to the taxpayer, how, and on what, Council intends to invest their tax
dollars.
Equally important is that the budget documents are a clear direction and work plan for the
Administration and, to a lesser extent, to the various Agencies, Boards and Commissions
to which Council provides funds. Finally, this budget is an indication of support to many
volunteer groups who work tirelessly in an effort to make our community all that it can
be.
In considering recommendations, Council must often attempt to weigh conflicting
interests in an effort to arrive at a compromise that will best serve the entire community
and to position the community in a manner that will allow it to either take full advantage
of the opportunities that lie ahead, or conversely to deal with pending or anticipated
financial challenges.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
As staff had indicated to Council during our budget discussion of January 4a', there are
strong indicators that our community is on the verge of a period of growth that it has not
experienced since the 1980's. Household incomes are rising; consumer spending is at an
all time high as are Building Permit Values. At the same time, the Unemployment Rate
is relatively low and millions if not billions of dollars of investment in this community
are under serious consideration. The single most often repeated challenge that is facing
this community is, where are we going to find the people, workers and professionals to
take advantage of the financial opportunities that are just now being created.
The significance of all of this is that increased job opportunities, increased personal
incomes, additional demand for homes, office space, factories or warehouses all
contribute to the increased value of the real property in the community.
It is this increase in the value of real property that is so critical to the financial well being
of the Municipality and to the services it provides to residents. It is also critical to
Council's ability to meet the wide array of expectations that are placed upon it.
The point being made is that there are a number of indicators that wealth is being
generated and that in the not too distant future, Common Council should expect to see
this new wealth being translated in higher increases in the municipal tax base than staff
would otherwise have projected. In 2007, Council is witnessing a bit of this trend, but
not nearly enough to allow Council to respond positively to all of the identified needs and
requests and at the same time meet its contractual commitments, legislative requirements
and to maintain the same municipal tax rate. It could be as long as two, three or even
four years before we see the anticipated growth in the tax base.
Equally important to the optimistic outlook for our community is the acknowledgement
that not everyone in the community will have the same opportunity to participate in the
wealth creation activities that are about to occur. Whether because of education, life or
health circumstances, there are some who will be excluded. There are also those who
because of age, have had to leave the workplace and finally there are those who made the
personal decision to retire from active participation in the economy.
All of these citizens, regardless of the reason, view Council's decision with respect to the
municipal tax rate as simply another claim against their relatively low or even fixed
incomes. In our community, there are a significant number of individuals who find
themselves in this situation and as such Common Council must be sensitive to their
views.
At the same time as Council is weighing the ability of those participating in the economy
to pay more with the concerns of others who simply cannot, Council also has to give
consideration to the municipality's legislative and contractual commitments. Although
every year such commitments and requirements exist, 2007 brings with it the additional
Report to Common Council Page 3
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
burden of a special payment required by Legislation to be made to the City of Saint John
Pension Plan.
Given that this is a budget document and not a dissertation on explanation of the
challenges of the Pension Plan, all of which are on the public record, nothing more will
be said other than to acknowledge that Council must deal with the issue in 2007.
COUNCIL'S OBJECTIVE:
As this is the background, Common Council on January 4a', 2007, gave specific
instructions to the Administration regarding what it wished to accomplish in formulating
the 2007 Operating and Capital Budget. In simple terms, Common Council stated that
it wanted to maintain the same tax rate in 2007 that currently exists and that the required
special payments to the Pension Plan are to be incorporated into the expenditure base.
Beyond this specific instruction, staff was afforded considerable latitude in bringing forth
proposals on the basis that staff would endeavour to take a balanced approach. Finally,
Council did direct staff to identify any significant concerns with respect to service levels
being provided to residents and property owners in 2007 flowing from Council's
direction.
Accompanying this narrative and recommendations are various schedules that comprise
the proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets that are intended to meet the objectives
of Common Council as conveyed to the Administration.
COMMENTARY: THE 2007 OPERATING BUDGET:
In an effort to relate the complexities of these documents to an approach that would
appear to be more understandable to the Council and perhaps to those a step or two
removed from their preparation, a "modified" explanation of Revenues and Expenditures
is set out below.
REVENUES:
Total revenues for 2007 are
budget
as being $112,041,669 or $5,420,425 more than
existed
in
2006.
The
source
of this
additional
revenue is as
follows:
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
•,:,
SOURCE OF NEW REVENUES
An increase in the Unconditional Grant
$3741832
An Increase in Fees, Fines, and Permits (Most notably in Building Permits)
938,800
An increase in the amount to be collected from Tax Payers as a result of
41106,793
Increased Assessments
Total New Revenues
$5,4201425
MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXPENDITURE BASE
Expenditures incurred or recorded in 2006, no longer required or have
been eliminated from the 2007 base in order to meet Council's
objectives.
• Elimination of the Workforce Adjustment.
$19050,000
• Elimination of the amount set aside for Contingencies.
$480,000
• Reduction in Operating Department's Budgets for the
$194979500
replacement of vehicles, apparatus and technology
$8,447,925
Total Monies Available: To meet 2007 service needs, contractual
commitments, and legislative requirements
It should be noted that there are no so called "hidden taxes" contained within this budget.
User fees, fines and other amounts charged for this use of municipal facilities remain
unchanged. The only other revenue items that deserves specific mention is the Building
Permit Fee associated with the construction of the LNG Terminal. In discussions with
Service New Brunswick, staff has been advised that the tanks to be constructed on the
site are considered as real property and the City's Building Bylaw requires a fee to be
paid on such construction.
The project is scheduled to be completed over the next two or three years. Staff's
estimate of the Building Permit Fee on real property to be constructed in 2007 is
$965,000. Associated somewhat with the LNG Terminal, the 2007 budget also contains
an estimate of revenues of $450,000 to be received from the sale of easements over City
owned lands required by the Emera pipeline, should their application be approved.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
EXPENDITURES:
Page 5
As required by Legislation, total expenditures in the Operating Budget are expected to
increase to $112,041,669 or 5.08% more than were incurred in 2006. In other words, the
Operating Budget being recommended is "balanced" and Council is not being asked to
expend more than is actually being generated by the new sources of revenue.
The following summation is offered to assist Council members in more fully appreciating
some of those items that are built into the 2007 Operating Budget, as directed by
Common Council.
NEW INVESTMENTS PROPOSED
(APPROXIMATE ALLOCATION)
Special Pension payments (Legislative Requirements)
Over and Above the Amount in the 2006 Base, yet net of
additional contribution from employees
$3,6359767
Contracted Wage Settlements (all Five Employee Groups)
1,500,000
Inflationary Pressure on all other Goods and Services
1,000,000
Increased Fiscal Charges
5809000
Regional Facilities/
285,000
Adjustment to the 2006 Base to recognize budget shortfalls as a
result of actual experiences (Fire, Transit, Street Lighting)
(Market Square, Leisure Services)
5009000
New Service Initiatives: Police, PSCC, Bylaw Enforcement,
Training Officer
425,000
A number of pluses and minuses in all other areas.
522,158
Total New Revenues Invested
$87447,925
Report to Common Council Page 6
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
UNMET NEEDS AND REQUESTS:
Council had indicated the desire for both Council and the public to be informed of the
consequences of pursuing Council's objectives in preparing the 2007 Operating Budget
(i.e. maintaining the same tax rate, while at the same time meeting the City's Contractual
and Legislative requirements and inflationary pressures).
From staff's perspective we could go on at great lengths articulating the community's
needs however, there is nothing to be served by stressing on all the work that needs to be
done. Council should be made aware of these items, but to do more than mention them
would simply take away from the thrust of Council's objective with respect to this
budget. Furthermore, from the citizens perspective, very little, if anything at all will be
noticeable.
In any event, the result is that a number of community needs or requests of Council
cannot be addressed in the next 11 month period. For example;
The Police Commission will, staff would anticipate, have to defer the hiring of six
additional officers until Sept. 15th, 2007 and make other less significant changes
to their 2007 plans. Although these changes are being driven by Council's
direction they are also being affected by the challenges facing the Commission as
it attempts to recruit the necessary qualified individuals in a very competitive
market. The result is that the Police Commission's request of Council has been
adjusted by $388,580 to reflect this reality.
The City's plan had been to invest $1.1 million more in its Asphalt Resurfacing
Program in 2007 than it had in 2006. Council's direction has resulted in the Plan
being amended to reflect this new reality. Having said this, the Program still
contemplates an investment of $1.4 million. Notwithstanding that an ambitious
Capital Program is being proposed, Council should be apprised that as a
municipality we are not investing nearly enough to properly maintain existing
asphalt services and the community will experience the continued deterioration of
non priority streets and road surfaces.
The City's Communication initiative, most notably the creation of a
Communication Unit is being deferred until 2008. The initial submission to
Council had suggested that $250,000 would be required to fund this initiative.
The recommendation is that $200,000 of this amount not be funded and that
$50,000 be reallocated to the Vision 2015 initiative to improve communications
to the public. In addition, $37,500 previously provided directly to Enterprise
Saint John for the promotion of True Growth is being reallocated to Vision
2015,and staff assigned to Vision 2015 are bring instructed to work directly with
and support the efforts of the Communications Team that are overseeing the True
Growth Communication Initiative. This change should not be construed as being
Report to Common Council Page 7
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
a lack of support for this initiative but rather an effort to ensure that a consistent
message is being delivered with respect to these two complimentary initiatives.
The City had received a request from Saint John Emergency Measures
Organization to increase its funding by approximately $200,000. This
Organization has consistently stated that the Municipality's various Emergency
Contingency Plans are not meeting the needs of this community. Therefore their
request to the municipality was to fund two Emergency Planner Positions in 2007
along with other associated costs to meet this need. The recommendations before
Council do not address this request and the City's commitment to the Saint John
Emergency Measures Organization will remain unchanged.
The initial request of Public Transit was for operating assistance of $3,167,000 or
$367,000 more than in 2006. The City acknowledges that providing a Public
Transit Service is both essential and expensive. Having said this, it must be
acknowledged that those responsible for this service must continue to be
challenged to rationalize its delivery. As such, the recommendation is to provide
funding of $3,080,000 which is only marginally more than staff expect to be
expended in 2006. This has been discussed with Transit's General Manager who
has pointed out that this level of funding will not support the same service level as
currently exists unless ridership increases or fuel costs continue to decline. As a
result, operations are going to have to be closely monitored. Although changes to
the Transit Funding Request are always of concern, Council's commitment is
beyond question. One only need to look at the very substantial capital monies
invested in 2005, 2006 and being proposed for 2007.
The recommendations, if adopted will also preclude meeting new funding
requests from the Saint John Community Loan Fund, the New Brunswick
Community College and the Loch Lomond Villa.
Finally, and perhaps most significant, is that the recommendations, if adopted will
seriously affect the City's efforts to fund more and more of its investment in
Capital Assets directly from current operating dollars. The initial submission to
Council had proposed that $1.2 million be set aside for this purpose. In addition,
within the various operating department budgets was a total amount of $1,931,456
being set aside for the ongoing replacement of vehicles, apparatus and
technology. Unfortunately, the current financial challenges have required a
significant backing away from this Plan with approximately $1.5 Million having
being removed for the current year.
PROGRESS BEING MADE:
Although it is unfortunate that all the needs and requests simply cannot be met in 2007,
staff would not want Council or the public to be left with the impression that the
Report to Common Council Page 8
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
recommendations will result in no improvements in service levels whatsoever. This is
not at all the situation and a few items need mentioning.
First of all, it must be stated that, to staff's knowledge at this time, there are no service
level reductions contemplated as a result of Council approving these recommendations.
Citizens should expect to receive the same level of services that they received in 2006.
Secondly, the recommendations do envisage Council making every reasonable effort to
continue improving services in some areas. For example,
Support still remains, and funding has been provided, for the employment
of additional Police Officers, albeit deferred for nine months.
An additional Training Officer is to be employed in the Fire Service. A
direct result of concerns for the public's safety as the community moves
closer to becoming an Energy Hub.
• Additional monies are being provided to improve the City's ability to
respond to citizens requests for increased By -law Enforcement. An
ongoing concern of residents.
Monies are being provided to shore up those services upon which all
public interfacing services depend. Information Systems, Financial
Support Services and the Public Safety Communication Center are all
being marginally enhanced in 2007.
• Support to Arts and Cultural initiatives are not only being maintained but
slightly improved. For example:
• An additional $20,000 is being provided to the Community Arts
Board, bringing the total funding support to $70.000.
• While the Saint John Theatre Company had requested $25,000 in
2007 with perhaps little hope of success, $10,000. is being
recommended.
The recommendation is that Uptown Saint John be provided with
$15,000.00 for the second phase of the Cultural Mapping initiative.
• Support to a number of the more significant festivals and
celebration is being maintained.
In each of these cases, it is anticipated that these relatively small investments will lever
significant funding from other levels of government and from the private sector.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
INVESTMENT ALLOCATION OF EACH TAXPAYER DOLLAR:
Memo
Having identified that certain requests and needs cannot be addressed for at least the next
11 months, the public should be aware of how the Municipality is investing each tax
dollar that it is collecting. While attention is often given to the smaller less significant
items, the reality is that the vast majority of each dollar being collected is being invested
in those items that are always identified by the silent majority as being the most
important, i.e., Public Safety, Mobility (Roads and Transit) and Infrastructure Financing.
More specifically, the proposed 2007 Operating Budget contemplates the following;
FOR EVERY $1 COLLECTED FROM THE TAXPAYER, COUNCIL WILL BE MAKING THE
FOLLOWING INVESTMENTS
In Public Safety
39.8¢
In Mobility of Citizens
17.4¢
In Financing Infrastructure Renewal
10.3¢
Pursuing/Economic Development
5.1¢
Enhancing Physical Recreation Needs
14¢
Protecting the Environment
11¢
Maintaining Public Infrastructure /Assets
4.1¢
In Neighbourhoods /Social Development
1.3¢
In creating a Sense of Place
1.2¢
In Governance /Administrating/Supporting
9.5¢
Special Pension Payments
4.8¢
A MOVE AWAY FROM THE LONGTERM FINANCIAL PLAN
In order to meet the objectives of Common Council with respect to the 2007 Operating
Budget, staff has had to propose certain actions that are inconsistent with the City's long
Report to Common Council Page 10
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
term financial objectives. Council will recall that the Plan called for an ever increasing
amount of money to be raised annually from taxpayers and used exclusively to fund
recurring capital assets directly from Operating Funds. The existence of this Plan, more
than any other single factor, has provided the necessary flexibility to deal with the current
financial challenge.
This plan was, and continues to be, a laudable objective. Unfortunately, in 2007 and
perhaps again in 2008, other legislative requirements will result in very little progress
toward the ultimate goal. Having said this, tough issues require tough decisions
regarding the relative importance of sometimes conflicting priorities. In this situation,
Council direction was unequivocal: Priority is holding the tax rate in 2007 and the
objectives of the Long Term Financial Plan will have to be revisited as soon as the City
experiences the growth in the tax base that is expected or the City's requirement to make
special payments to the Pension Plan is eliminated.
COMMENTARY: 2007 CAPITAL BUDGET
The proposed 2007 Capital Budget is at a level that the Community has not previously
experienced. It is so because of previous delays that have been encountered in moving
forward with a new police facility. It is so because of the opportunity that Council
wishes to seize with respect to retail development on the Westside. It is so because of our
commitment to make real and significant improvements to portions of the existing Red
Head and Old Black River Roads. It is so because of the expectations that the
community has regarding the current state of many of the City's recreational facilities.
And finally, it is at this level because of Council's efforts to support those economic
development initiatives that hopefully result in increased values to real property or
contribute to our efforts to lever funds from other levels of government or the private
sector.
The Capital Budget recommends investments in Capital Assets of $40,385,504 and if
every project progresses as planned, the potential of additional Debenture Financing of
$291450,504.
Touching on some of the highlights;
Over $850,000 being invested in Storm Water Remedies for both the Glen Falls
and Manchester Avenue areas.
$580,000 being invested to reconstruct a portion of Champlain Drive.
Almost $1 million dollars being invested almost equally on the Hillcrest and
Latimore Lake Roads.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
$900,000 in the MacLaren Boulevard area.
$1,040,000 on Mountain Road reconstruction.
$80,000 in sidewalks on a portion of University Avenue.
An additional $1.5 million is being recommended for the Red Head Road
The completion of the Water Street project.
Page 11
- $29000,000 is budgeted in 2007 for the construction of a new West Works Depot.
- $7,000,000 is being allocated in 2007 for the start of construction of a new bus
facility with a similar amount planned for 2008.
- Over $19 million is budgeted over the next three years for a new Police Facility.
- $11 Million is budgeted over the next three years for a new Uptown Parking
Facility.
The Allison Grounds will undergo an extensive upgrade ($440,000).
The field adjacent to the Lowell Street Arena will be substantially improved
($2409000).
The Tennis Courts at the Shamrock Grounds will be totally reconstructed.
A program for replacing the ice boards and safety glass at our community arenas
will commence in 2007. Approximately $260,000 is to be invested at the Stu
Hurley arena, while the Parking lot adjacent to the Gorman will be reconstructed
at an approximate cost of $272,000.
Two more Low Rider Buses will be acquired at a cost of approximately $90,000
(in addition to the 11 now on order). This investment is consistent with our
commitment to the Human Rights Commission and to those who have certain
disabilities.
Over $300,000 is being earmarked for Capital Improvements to the Trade Center
with a further $100,000 being set aside to explore the challenges with making this
facility more competitive as newer facilities are being constructed in competing
marketplaces.
Report to Common Council Page 12
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
$450,000 is budgeted for the continued Wireless Communication Project along
with $75,000 in Computer Security Measures and $165,000 in the computer
Refresh Program, and finally;
$2.3 million is budgeted to replace 32 vehicle and apparatus units, the newest of
which is 2001 and the oldest being a 1982 snowblower.
Staff would bring to Council's attention that there are two items currently not included in
the Capital Program in 2007 and that may cause some concern. First, staff have not
included any amount for the purchase of the Coast Guard site. It is unlikely, however,
that a closing date will occur in 2007 even if the parties were to come to an agreement in
the next couple of months.
Secondly, staff have not included a $500,000 request from the Recreation
Implementation Committee. This decision was based on the fact that significant
improvements are being made on a number of recreational facilities as suggested by the
so called "Wallace" report. Having said this, the Committee is currently working on a
Needs Analysis for a Multiplex Facility and an assessment of the Canada Games Stadium
is ongoing. When completed, Council can expect to receive a much more specific
request from the Committee in late spring or early summer. It is suggested that Council
defer its decision on this matter until such time as the appropriate Business Plans are
prepared and the major funding partners have been identified.
Staff would suggest that this is an extremely aggressive Capital Program, one that will
stretch the human resource capacity of this Organization. This brings us to the last
significant discussion point.
ESTABLISHMENT CHANGES:
Both the Operating and Capital Work Programs will require a very dedicated unionized
and more importantly, management staff. The reality is however that some minor
modifications are required to the Establishment in order that the Administration can
reasonably have any chance of success at meeting the expectations of the community.
The following changes to the Establishment are inherent in this document.
1. Deletion of the senior management position of "Commissioner of Corporate
Service," having been approved by Council in the spring of 2006.
2. Addition of one unionized position of Training Officer in the Fire Department. If
this City is to be the Energy Hub than Council must take the necessary steps to
ensure that the Fire Service is well trained to respond in a much more complex
Report to Common Council Page 13
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
environment. It is anticipated that much of the incremental cost will be recovered
from the private sector.
The addition of one unionized Technical Services Inspector with a focus on By-
Law Enforcement to meet citizens' expectation.
4. Making "Permanent" one current, casual position in Property Management that
has existed for three years.
5. The addition of two Local 486 positions being an Accounts Payable Clerk and a
Utility Billings Clerk (to be funded 80% by the Utility).
6. The Administration is seeking authority to attract qualified candidates to the
following positions;
a. Technical Architect (1) (Management/ Professional)
b. Network Analysis (2)
c. Desk top Technician (1)
d. Application Specialist (1)
e. Administrative Clerk (1)
The functions to be carried out by these positions are all now being totally funded
within the departmental budget and being acquired from third party suppliers and
by the use of casuals. The reality is that the City has one of the most complicated
and critical computer networks in the community and the risk of failure is far too
great to allow us to continue to rely on others for this mission critical service.
These changes have no budget implications. Our success in this area will be
totally dependent on our ability to attract qualified individuals to our
Organization. Although the Establishment is being changed the administration is
facing tremendous challenges before these positions are posted, advertised and
filled on a permanent basis. While no additional funds are being provided,
Council's commitment to change the Establishment in this area will provide the
Administration with the opportunity to reduce significant risks to a number of
service providers.
7. The addition of one additional Operations Manager in the PSCC currently
managed by one individual 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The Municipality's
experience is that the work load and expectations is simply far too great thus
leading to the premature departure of qualified managers.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
Page 14
The total net additional cost to fund all of these positions is estimated as being $295,000
in 2007.
LOOKING TO 2008 AND BEYOND:
As previously stated in this report, there are a number of factors all contributing to an
optimistic view of the future for this community and therefore to increased tax base
growth.
At the same time, staff would acknowledge that there are some who hold the view that
because of the strong growth in the assets of the Pension Fund, coupled with some
tweaking of Actuarial Assumptions, the possibility exists that the additional special
payments to the Pension fund will no longer be required or be significantly reduced in
2008.
Staff's concern, however, is with the timing in which the Municipality may experience
these events.
In particular, the time delay between "community buzz" and translation into direct tax
base growth can be as long as four to five years. It is for this reason that the preliminary
forecast for 2008 envisages a 4.5% increase in the tax base consistent with 2007.
As for the matter of the special pension payments, staff have based the 2008 forecast on
the information we know today, not what we hope to be the case. Those who hold the
more optimistic view may prove to be correct, however, it would be inappropriate for
staff to speculate based on so many unknowns at this time.
Beyond these two most important challenges, there are a number of others that need to be
brought to the attention of Council;
For example:
Both Local 61 and Local 771 will be entering into negotiations with the City in
2007. The 2008 forecast is based on assumptions that do not reflect wage
settlements significantly different than what has been experienced over the last
few years. Should a third party be required to assist with a settlement and the
result is beyond what staff are anticipating than this will pose a significant
challenge.
The Council has an expectation that the Municipality will do a better job in
communicating both externally and internally. At the same time, Council is also
exploring the idea of altering the governance structure. While these initiatives
have been deferred, Council may choose to pursue them in 2008. There will be
Report to Common Council Page 15
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
new costs to create both a Communication Unit and to provide support services in
the Clerk's office to a Committee System.
Council can also expect to see Fiscal Charges escalate in 2008. The reason being
is that the level of Capital spending proposed for 2007 is beyond that which was
previously proposed.
• Finally, as Council is well aware, there will always be those new ideas brought
forward or new needs identified. Some may be ignored, but inevitably there will
be some that simply need to be done or are just worth pursuing.
The 2008 Outlook's column indicating a possible Tax Rate of $1.86 is just a forecast.
Council is not being asked to either agree or approve of its compilation. It is presented
on the basis that Council should be apprised of staff's current assessment of the future
and should always be kept in mind as Council is asked to make decisions throughout
2007.
CONCLUSION:
In concluding, staff is confident that the recommendations are entirely consistent with the
direction given by Common Council. The Municipal Tax Rate remains unchanged. The
special payment to the Pension Plan has been incorporated into the 2007 expenditure
base. There are no recommended service level reductions. At the same time, the very
aggressive Capital Works Program will result in many anticipated projects moving
forward on a timely basis. All and all, taken as a package, the document presented
represents a balanced approach in dealing with a multitude of issues.
RECOMMENDATION:
RESOLVED that the sum of $112,041,669 be the total Operating Fund Budget of
the City of Saint John for 2007 as detailed in the attached Appendix A, and
RESOLVED that the estimate required to be raised by levy on real property
assessment liable to taxation under the Assessment Act within the City for the year 2007
be adopted in the amount of $84,246,996, and
RESOLVED that Common Council orders and directs the levying of $1.795 per
hundred dollars of assessment by the Minister of Environment and Local Government on
real property liable to taxation under the Assessment Act within the City.
RESOLVED that Common Council approve a 2007 Capital Budget amounting to
$40,385,504 of which not more than $29,450,504 shall be financed by the issuance of
debentures, as detailed in the attached Appendix B.
Report to Common Council
Subject: Proposed 2007 Operating and Capital Budgets: General Fund
Page 16
RESOLVED that Common Council approve the 2007 Establishment as found in
Appendix D.
RESOLVED that Common Council approve the 2007 Management Professional
Pay Scale as found in
Terrence L. Totten, FCA
CITY MANAGER
Attachments:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix E:
The Operating Budget
The Capital Budget
The Operating Budget:
The Establishment
An Alternative View
Management /Professional Pay Scale
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN
OPERATING BUDGET
2007
1/11/2007
2006
2007
%
2008
%
BUDGET
BUDGET
CHANGE
OUTLOOK
CHANGE
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$1062621,244
$112,041,669
5.08%
$118,820,952
6.05%
LESS: NON -TAX REVENUE
7,738,400
8,677,200
12.13%
8,043,450
-7.30%
985882,844
1035364,469
4.53%
110,777,502
7.17%
UNCONDITIONAL GRANT
18,742,621
19,117,473
2.00%
19,499,823
2.00%
NETBUDGET
80,140,223
84,246,996
91,277,679
TAX DENOMINATOR
$4,464,636.372
$4,693,424,219
5.12%
$4,904,628,309
4.50%
TAX RATE
1.795
1.795
0.00%
1.861
3.68%
1/11/2007
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
NON -TAX REVENUE
SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES
FIRE SERVICES
HAZMAT FUNDING
POINT LEPREAU
CLEARANCE LETTERS
POLICE SERVICES
LODGE PRISONERS
ACCIDENT REPORTS
TAXI LICENCES
OTHER
RECREATION AND CULTURAL
SPORTSFIELDS
SUMMERPROGRAMS
WEST
SENIORS PROGRAMS
CARLETON COMMUNITY CENTER
CENTRAL
SOMERSET COMMUNITY CENTER
NORTH END COMMUNITY CENTER
EAST
FOREST HILLS COMMUNITY CENTER
Other (26.49)
Other (26 -50)
HURLEY ARENA
GORMAN ARENA
BELYEA ARENA
PETER MURRAY ARENA
HARBOUR BRIDGE AUTHORITY
EMERGENCY DISPATCH
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
HOUSING OPERATIONS
Saint John Transit
PENSION PLAN
WATER AND SEWERAGE UTILITY
OTHER
WATER SALES
OTHER TOURISM
PLANNING DEPT SERVICES
SALE OF USED EQUIPMENT
GARBAGE COLLECTION
TRANSPORTATION TENDERS
2006
BUDGET
70,000
40,000
4,000
3,000
11,000
50,000
35,000
57,000
9,000
5,800
9,000
25,000
125,000
144,000
192,000
125,000
200,000
569,000
43,000
100,000
1,412,000
12,000
3,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
500
2007
BUDGET
70,000
40,000
41000
3,000
11,000
50,000
35,000
50,000
4,300
7,900
6,500
20,000
16,000
30,000
110,000
125,000
170,000
110,000
0
560,000
44,000
42,000
100,000
1,391,000
0
3,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
500
APPENDIX A
2008
OUTLOOK
70,000
40,000
4,000
3,000
11,000
50,000
35,000
52,500
0
0
4,300
7,900
0
0
6,500
0
20,000
16,000
30,000
115,500
131,250
178,500
115,500
0
400,000
44,000
42,000
100,000
1,391,000
0
3,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
500
Page 2 of 6
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
NON -TAX REVENUE
OTHER REVENUE FROM OWN SOURCES
LICENSES AND PERMITS
BUILDING PERMITS
PLUMBING PERMITS
DEMOLITION PERMITS
MOBILE HOME PERMITS
GRAVEL PIT PERMITS
EXCAVATION PERMITS
BUSINESS LICENCES
REZONING APPLICATIONS
OTHER
GAS PIPELINE LICENCE
FINES AND PARKING
MARKET SQUARE PARKING
PARKING METERS
METER VIOLATIONS
METER SUMMONSES
TRAFFIC BY LAW FINES
TRAFFIC BY LAW SUMMONSES
MOTOR VEHICLE FINES
COURT FINES
RENTALS
MARKET RENTALS
LAND AND BUILDINGS
CITY HALL
SHORT TERM INTEREST
CONDITIONAL GRANTS FROM OTHER GOVMNTS
PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY MAINT
TOURISM
OTHER REVENUE
Miscellaneous
Other (Building Permit) LNG
Pipeline easement sales
TOTAL NON TAX REVENUE
2006 2007
BUDGET BUDGET
APPENDIX A
2008
OUTLOOK
500,000
700,000
700,000
42,000
65,000
65,000
51000
5,000
5,000
11250
1,250
1,250
19,000
197000
19,000
250
250
250
500
500
500
20,000
20,000
20,000
91000
9,000
9,000
26,000
16,500
16,500
733,000
733,000
733,000
724,500
724,500
724,500
240,000
240,000
240,000
40,000
44,000
40,000
190,000
220,000
1902000
25,000
28,000
25,000
152000
15,000
15,000
507000
50,000
502000
467,000
435,000
440,000
165,000
135,000
135,000
275,000
58,000
58,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
386,600 360,000 360,000
0 0 0
250,000 505000 50,000
0 965,000 965,000
0 450,000 0
7,738,400 8,677,200 81043,450
Page 3 of 6
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
CITY MANAG ER
VISION 2015
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT
COMMON CLERK
FINANCE
LEGAL
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCES
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SUPPORT
FLEET SERVICES
CORPORATE SERVICES
FIRE
BUILDING & INSPECTION SERVICES
FACILITY MANAGEMENT
CARPENTRYSHOP
CITY HALL BUILDING
BUILDINGS AND INSPECTION SERVICES
EMERGENCY MEASURES ORGANIZATION
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS ADMIN
SERVICE & FROG DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING & GROWTH
TRAFFIC ENG & SYSTEMS
SNOW CONTROL STREETS
SNOW CONTROL SIDEWALKS
STORM DRAINAGE
STREET CLEANING
SANITATION
STREET SERVICES
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
COMMUNITY PLANNING
REAL ESTATE
GIS
HERITAGE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMM
ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
442,000
500,000
100,000
828,290
1,204,763
576,528
3,651 581
1,048,446
1,196,681
1,722,927
1,878,918
417,872
6,264 844
16,749,433
1,197,760
878,422
454,479
1,645,766
170,630
1,208,324
487,107
362,722
1,048,461
4,712,303
466,089
1,980,573
1,319,093
3,360,349
4,404,483
19,369,504
760,516
420,839
260,825
189,290
10,700
3,200
1,845,370
2007
BUDGET
194,275
385,170
579,445 5.03%
487,220
600,646
0
754,991
1,317,441
697.120
3,857,418 5.64%
928,707
1,298,130
1,871,028
1,923,905
496,019
6,517,789 4.04%
17,810,788 6.34%
1,266,095
899,322
460,053
1,521,025
4,146,505 -0.72%
171,351
1,412,208
555,623
376,171
986,887
4,254,632
383,731
2,198,468
1,319,414
3,169,262
4.358.874
19. 01 5,270 -1.83%
819,382
437,730
267,007
206,951
11,500
4,400
1, 7462969 6.17%
APPENDIX A
2008
OUTLOOK
201,150
392,430
593,580 2.44%
504,185
2006
OEPARTMENTNAME
BUDGET
150,000
5.05%
MAYOR'S OFFICE
193,360
COUNCIL
358,330
LEGISLATIVE
5519690
CITY MANAG ER
VISION 2015
COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT
COMMON CLERK
FINANCE
LEGAL
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
HUMAN RESOURCES
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SUPPORT
FLEET SERVICES
CORPORATE SERVICES
FIRE
BUILDING & INSPECTION SERVICES
FACILITY MANAGEMENT
CARPENTRYSHOP
CITY HALL BUILDING
BUILDINGS AND INSPECTION SERVICES
EMERGENCY MEASURES ORGANIZATION
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS ADMIN
SERVICE & FROG DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING & GROWTH
TRAFFIC ENG & SYSTEMS
SNOW CONTROL STREETS
SNOW CONTROL SIDEWALKS
STORM DRAINAGE
STREET CLEANING
SANITATION
STREET SERVICES
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
COMMUNITY PLANNING
REAL ESTATE
GIS
HERITAGE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMM
ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
442,000
500,000
100,000
828,290
1,204,763
576,528
3,651 581
1,048,446
1,196,681
1,722,927
1,878,918
417,872
6,264 844
16,749,433
1,197,760
878,422
454,479
1,645,766
170,630
1,208,324
487,107
362,722
1,048,461
4,712,303
466,089
1,980,573
1,319,093
3,360,349
4,404,483
19,369,504
760,516
420,839
260,825
189,290
10,700
3,200
1,845,370
2007
BUDGET
194,275
385,170
579,445 5.03%
487,220
600,646
0
754,991
1,317,441
697.120
3,857,418 5.64%
928,707
1,298,130
1,871,028
1,923,905
496,019
6,517,789 4.04%
17,810,788 6.34%
1,266,095
899,322
460,053
1,521,025
4,146,505 -0.72%
171,351
1,412,208
555,623
376,171
986,887
4,254,632
383,731
2,198,468
1,319,414
3,169,262
4.358.874
19. 01 5,270 -1.83%
819,382
437,730
267,007
206,951
11,500
4,400
1, 7462969 6.17%
APPENDIX A
2008
OUTLOOK
201,150
392,430
593,580 2.44%
504,185
5.39%
565,544
159%
150,000
5.05%
787,805
3.00%
1,376,834
4.51%
696,515
5.79%
4,080 883
977,875
1,395,120
1,939,500
3.66%
1,994,200
3.65%
576,641
6,883,336 5.61%
18,461532 3.65%
12334,400
5.39%
931,600
159%
483,300
5.05%
1,566,700
3.00%
4.09%
4,316,000
392,723
1,299,875
572,019
390,875
1,046,728
5,013,629
460,095
2,311,387
1,417,323
3,234,440
4,989,420
20,735,791 9.05%
858,088
460,531
283,125
214,813
12,000
5,000
17833,558 4.96%
Page 4 of 6
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
APPENDIX A
DEPARTMENT NAME
2006
BUDGET
2007
BUDGET
2008
OUTLOOK
LEISURE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
730,098
790,130
FACILITIES
1 ,382,920
1,038,981
827,097
ARENAS
LANDSCAPE
925,198
1,347,161
881,711
1,408,461
W EST DISTRICT
1,353,505
1,429,932
1,532,692
CENTRAL DISTRICT
359,907
307,995
319,761
EAST DISTRICT
404,011
489,813
503,780
CITY MARKET
463,866
378,006
388,622
CONTRACTED SERVICES
741,406
748,250
768,191
SUBSIDIES: FACILITY USAGE
92,000
183,000
92,000
92,000
RECREATION COMMUNITYGROUPS
18,000
183,000
183,000
LEISURE SERVICES
18,000
18,000
6.653,909
69823,268
2.55%
6,921315
1.44%
TOURISM
8959620
915,000
2.16%
959718
4.89%
POLICE COMMISSION
18,014,630
18,880220
4.80%
19. 754653
4.63%
NON DEPARTMENTAL
SAINT JOHN TRANSIT OPERATING
SAINT JOHN TRANSIT DEBT
2,800,000
3,080,000
10.00%
3,386,925
9.97%
MARKET SQ. - COMMON AREA COSTS
641,870
1,878,752
639,506
747,106
WATER SUPPLY$ HYDRANTS
2,046,380
8.92%
2,138,467
4.50%
REGIONAL FACILITIES COMM
1,662,403
1,708,119
2.75%
1,747,406
2.30%
STREET LIGHTING
1,554,496
1,839,757
18.35%
1,639,757
- 10.87/
PROPERTYASSESSMENT
800,000
925,000
952,750
REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
892,927
938,685
980,92 6
LIABILITY INSURANCE
396,495
408,420
408,426
ARTS AND CULTURE INITIATIVES
600,000
435,000
445,875
2.50%
LIBRARY
168,330
225,570
230,677
PARKING SUPPORT
360,993
451,591
369,280
380,440
SAINT JOHN E
143,500
431,410
435,798
WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT
PMENT
100,000
147,446
150,000
ANIMALE PEST CONTROL
165,000
100,000
LORD
150,000
130,000
137,000
S.J. RICULTBROOK
128,750
132,600
136,600
T JOHN INDUSTRIAL PA
SAINT JOHN INDUSTRIAL PARKS LTD
56,000
80,000
58,000
58,000
FESTIVALS /PUBLIC CELEBRATIONS
103,000
82,200
84,700
3.04%
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
305,500
43,000
43,000
TRUE GROWTH INITIATIVES
37,500
310,000
309,500
0
0
NON DEPARTMENTAL
132312,107
14,115,373
14573,347
2.82%
WORKFORCE ADJUSTMENT
1,050,000
0
0
FUNDING OF THE GOING CONCERN PENSION LIABILITY
FUNDING CHARGE 2004, 2005, 82006
1,400,000
2,031,120
11958,880
CURRENT YEAR SPECIAL PAYMENT
31915,150
4,032,597
LESS 85% OF ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION
FROM EMPLOYEES
(910,503)
(937,811)
NET IMPACT PENSION FUNDING
1,400 000
590353787
5,053,886
FISCAL CHARGES
DEBT PAYMENTS
CAPITAL FROM OPERATING
11,029,127
11,625,571
13,370,851
Contingency
516,381
735,000
950,000
2nd PREVIOUS YEAR DEFICIT
480,000
689,991
0
0
FISCAL CHARGES
65,935
0
12715499
12426506
-2.27%
14320,851
15.24%
TOTALS
106,621,244
1121041 669
5.08%
118,820952
6.05%
Page 5 of 6
1/11/2007
THE CITY OF SAINT JOHN APPENDIX A
SUBSIDIES AND GRANTS
2007 BUDGET
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
UNBSJ CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ( free rent)
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (free rent - 8,000)
P.R.U.D.E. (free rent)
ABILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
SEAFARER'S MISSION
YOUTH CABINET
OTHER
200,000
2006
2007
2008
31,000
BUDGET
BUDGET
OUTLOOK
48,000
ARTS AND CULTURE INITIATIVES
22,000
22,000
3,000
ARTS AND CULTURE BOARD
50,000
70,000
70,000
PUBLIC ART RESERVE FUND
25,000
25,000
25,000
CULTURAL AFFAIRS OFFICE
93,330
95,570
100,677
OTHER
35,000
35,000
168,330
225,570
230,677
FESTIVALS /PUBLIC CELEBRATIONS
LOYALIST HERITAGE FESTIVAL
31000
3,000
3,000
FUNDY BAY FESTIVAL
5,000
0
JAZZ AND BLUES FESTIVAL
15,000
15,000
0
15,000
FESTIVAL de la BAIE FRANCAIS
5,000
5,000
5,000
FESTIVAL SAINT JOHN (UPTOWN SAINT JOHN)
5,000
0
CANADIAN COUNTRY MUSIC WEEK
60,000
0
0
OTHER
10,000
20,000
0
20,000
103,000
43,000
43,000
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
UNBSJ CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ( free rent)
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (free rent - 8,000)
P.R.U.D.E. (free rent)
ABILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
SEAFARER'S MISSION
YOUTH CABINET
OTHER
200,000
200,000
200,000
31,000
31,000
31,000
48,000
48,000
48,000
22,000
22,000
22,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
1,500
1,500
1,500
0
1,500
1,000
0
3,000
3,000
305,500 310,000 309,500
Page 6 of 6
APPENDIX B
1/11/2007
City of Saint John
Proposed Capital Expenditures
General Fund
Infrastucture Renewal:
Transportation:
Roads & Streets
Asphalt Resurfacing
Storm System Upgrades
APPENDIX B
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
8,045,000 756705000 85235,000 91525,000 6,185,000 6,245,000
1,300,000
4,383,000
31709,000 1,327,000 1,460,000 11350,000
1,605000
15435,000
285,200
1,620,000
410,241
2575000
2,390,000
2,325,000
9,345,000
100,000
11172,888
9,275,000
91670,000
115,000
11,145,000
40,000
855755000
8,570000
Building/Equipment Upgrades/Energy Me
Municipal Facilities
On- street Parking Equipmment
Lilly Lake Pavilion
Lord Beaverbrook Rink
Fire Department
Police Commission
EMO
Market Square
Trade & Convention Centre
Transit Commission
Harbour Station
Aquatic Centre
Rockwood Park Golf Course
Horticultural Association
Library
Recreation
Parks, Fields and Facilities
Rockwood Park Entrance
Technology & Communications:
Information Systems (Internal)
Mobility Systems
19000,000
4,383,000
31709,000 1,327,000 1,460,000 11350,000
150,000
179,600
285,200
215,000
410,241
2575000
250,000
448,000
115,000
100,000
11172,888
3,1559799 254065594 4,448,580 2,646,000
25,000
115,000
25,000
40,000
1225000
318,000
300,000 188,000 290,000 311,000
100,000
523,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
1500000
100,000
410,241
2575000
3105900
448,000
115,000
25,000
959000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
40,000
50,000
51 ,71 5
53,500
555100
2,0425000
7,248,444
72935,499
4,4621594
6,821,580
4,5975000
1,202,750 574,750 3935250 363,000 181,500
1,000,000
660,000 2,202,750 574,750 393,250 3635000 181,500
800,000
1,6225900
1,692,700
1,091,200
6935300
687,300
500,000
1,300,000
1,622,900
1,6927700
1,091,200
693,300
687,300
Page 1 of 3
1/11/2007
1,750,000
4,0005000
9,0005000
65150,000
City of Saint John
2,000,000
61000,000
3,000,000
Proposed Capital Expenditures
7,000,000
71000,000
3,000,000
APPENDIX B
General Fund
150,000
3,000,000
51000,000
2,000,000
Economic Development:
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Fleet Replacement:
1,000,000
700,000
1,000,000
11000,000
1,000,000
15000,000
Public Transportation
City Services
900,000
9405000
11875,000
139655000
25065,000
1,675,000
Other
3,200,000
2,500,000
35000,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
25500,000
4,100000
3,440,000
4,875,000
4,465,000
4,565000
4,175000
Waterfront Development
11700,000
15490000
1,850000
11850A00
12650000
15550000
Water Street Reconstruction
815,000
800,000
Harbour Passage
663.000
656,410
5009000
300.000
0
0
Total
11478,000
1,456,410
52,097,949
4028575044
_
19,760,800
Police Facility
1,750,000
4,0005000
9,0005000
65150,000
Parking Facility
2,000,000
61000,000
3,000,000
Transit Facility
7,000,000
71000,000
3,000,000
Renovated Trade Centre Initiative
150,000
3,000,000
51000,000
2,000,000
Economic Development:
Residential /Commercial Incentives
Industrial Parks Growth
1,000,000
700,000
1,000,000
11000,000
1,000,000
15000,000
Heritage Grants
350,000
340,000
4005000
400,000
200,000
100,000
Other
50,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
300,000
300,000
3003000
3007000
300,000
300,000
11700,000
15490000
1,850000
11850A00
12650000
15550000
Environment:
Landfill closure
600,000
500,000
5009000
300.000
0
0
Total
22,975,000
40,385,504
52,097,949
4028575044
24,667,880
19,760,800
Page 2 of 3
1/11/2007
City of Saint John
Proposed Capital Expenditures
General Fund
Funding Sources:
Provincial /Federal Government
Other Agencies
Gas Tax Revenue
Proceeds from asset sales
General Operating Fund
Private Sector Funding
Debenture Financing
Difference - REQUIRED
BORROWINGS
APPENDIX B
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010 2011
2,595,000
5,885,000
42200,000
3,200,000
3,200,000
407,800
100,000
2,550,000
450,000
31000,000
2,500,000
2,557,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
31000,000
3,000,000 35000,000
1,000,000
14,865,200
22975,000
101935000
72009000
9200000
6,200,000 3,000.000
(29450 (44,897,949) (31,657,044) (18,467,880) 16,760.800)
Page 3 of 3
Category
Environment
Storm
Transportation
No. of
roject:
2
6
20
Other
Share
$5��
$450,000
$2,140,000
City
Share
mm� $5
$1,605,000
$7,670,000
Total
$1,0
$2,055,000
$9,810,000
Water Street Reconstruction 1 $159009000
$8009000 $29700,000
TOTALS: 29 $4,9909000 $10,5759000
$1595659000
i
_Summary of Capital Costs (City Share)
Water Street
Reconstruction Environment
8% 4.7%
-- -72.5% .._..
I
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
W&s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
C=*: PROJECTS CARRIED OVER FOR COMPLETION THE FOLLOWING YEAR
PROJECTS INDICATED WITH "ARE DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
Priority assignments are subject to change at anytime.
Environment
Project Location Description Other mn City
Share Share
" Howes Lake Landfill Site At Howes Lake Landfill site closure - Phase IV, including 300,000 300,000
design and construction management services
' Spmce Lake Landfill Site Spruce Lake -- — - -- - - -- - - - -__ -- - - - --
P Design and construction of leachate 2005000 200,000
management system for the Spruce Lake
Landfill Site, including design and construction
management services - Phase I
TOTAL: $500,000 $500V000
MDH; MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
W &S: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
C -": PROJECTS CARRIED OVER FOR COMPLETION THE FOLLOWING YEAR
PROJECTS INDICATED WITH' ARE DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
Storm
Project Location Description
Share Share
Bay Street Bay Street at cross culvert Install approx. I Sm of new 1800mtn concrete
location culvert across Bay Street to supplement 0 100,000
existing culvert and improve storm water
handling capabilities in the area, including
design and construction management services
(Pre - approved by Common Council on August
- Head - - -- - - -..... _ _ _ _ 28, 2006; M & C No 2006 -240)
Green Road - �- -�_
Russell Hill Road to Mosquito Install approx. 125m of new 300mm and - -
Cove 450mm storm sewer for separation, including 0 110,000
design and construction management services
was Manawagonish Road (MDH #100) - Coronation Install approx. 340m of new 300mm and
Avenue to Fairville Boulevard 375mm stone sewer for separation, including 0 210,000
design and construction management services
(application for funding under proposed
Municipal Designated Highways Grant
Program) (Pre- approved by Common Council
_ on D_ ecem_ber 19 2006; M & C No. 2006 -333)
Manchester Avenue Under NB Southern Railway _ - - - - PP - -
new line near Manchester Avenue new twinned culverts under railway tracks to 450,000 450,000
improve stone water handling capabilities in
the area, including design and construction
management services
Prince Sheet Ludlow Street to Civic #232 Install approx, 350m of new 300mm and
375mm storm sewer for separation, including 0 335,000
- - - - __ design and construction management services
Stone Water _... _ _- _.. -_ - -_ -__ __..__. _._ _ _
Glen Road and Simpson Drive Renew existing cross culverts and guide rails to 0
Management - Glen Falls Extension cross culvert locations improve stone water handling capabilities and 400,000
safety, including design and construction
management services
Water &Sanitary No. Of Sum Of Sum Of TOTAL: $460,000 JI&S 000
Related Storm Projects Projects Other Share City Share
Not Related 5 $450,000
W &S Related $1,395,000
1 $0 $210,000
TOTALS: 6 $450,000 $1,605,000
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS This is a tentative program listing of proposed Capital projects.
w &s: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
C- *: PROJECTS CARRIED OVER FOR COMPLETION THE FOLLOWING YEAR This list has not been approved by Common Council.
PROJECTS INDICATED WITH 'ARE DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
Transportation
Project
Location
Description
Other
City
including design and construction management
Share
Share
Albert Street
Newman Street to Victoria Street
Street reconstruction (excavation, backfill,
0
75,000
curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving), including
curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving), including
design and construction management services
Civic 4600 to Civic #967
design and construction management services
0 540,000
aysr a Drive
_-_
Civic #450 to Little River Bridge
- - --- -------
Road - reconstruction - to correct -- sup---eretevation - -- --
0
520,000
construction management services
of the road for safety, including design and
Lackie Road to Bustin Boulevard
Curb, sidewalk, drainage control, landscaping,
0 4405000
construction management services
_
management services
amplain Drive
Civic #30 to Traffic Circle
Street reconstruction (storm sewer, excavation,
0
580,000
sidewalk, landscaping, including design and
L
construction management services
d
w &s Elgin Street
Hillcrest Road
Lattimore Lake Road
* Loch Lomond Road
* Loch Lomond Road
Loch Lomond Road
w&s MacLaren Boulevard
w &s Manawagonish Road
(nort en at Crwghton Avenue)
backfill, curb, sidewalk (west side from York
Street to Civic #94), landscaping, paving),
including design and construction management
services
Newman Street to Victoria Street
Street reconstruction (excavation, backfill,
0 85,000
curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving), including
design and construction management services
Civic 4600 to Civic #967
Road reconstruction (drainage control,
0 540,000
ditching, road widening, expanded foam
asphalt resurfacing), including design and
construction management services
Lackie Road to Bustin Boulevard
Curb, sidewalk, drainage control, landscaping,
0 4405000
paving, including design and construction
_
management services
(MDH) - Garnett Road to
Storm sewer, excavation, backfill, curb,
690,000 115,000
Charles Street East
sidewalk, landscaping, including design and
construction management services
(MDH) - Garnett Road to
Structure adjustments, shouldering, cold
525,000 0
Charles Street East
milling, asphalt resurfacing, including design
and construction management services
Between Commerce Drive and
Design and land acquisition for slope
0 605000
Old Champlain Drive
stabilization on north side of road to improve
safety and protect infrastructure, including
design services
Taylor Avenue to Sandy Point
Street reconstruction (excavation, backfill,
-
0 900,000 0
Road
curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving), including
design and construction management services
- _ - - -(MD ---- -- --- _ -c- - -- - ..------ --- . - -- --.
(MDH #100) - Fairville Street rxonstruchon ( excavatton, backfill,
Boulevard to Ridge Row drainage control, curb, sidewalk, landscaping,
paving), including design and construction
management services (Pre- approved by
Common Council on December 19,2006; M &
C No. 2006 -333)
260,000
MDH: MUNICIPAL DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
PDH: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
w85: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
C ": PROJECTS CARRIED OVER FOR COMPLETION THE FOLLOWING YEAR This list has not been approved by Common Council.
PROJECTS INDICATED WITH' ARE DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS Priority assignments are subject to change at any time.
Transportation
Project
Location
Description
Other
City
Share
Share
Mountain Road
Westmorland Road to Mountain
Street reconstruction (storm sewer, excavation,
0
11040,000
View Drive
curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving); program
to commence reconstruction of streets in Forest
Hills Subdivision, including design and
construction management services
Old Black River Road
At Grandview Avenue
Intersection realignment (approx. 155m of new
0
6259000
intersection
300mm storm sewer, road widening, curb and
gutter, cold milling, landscaping, paving),
including design and construction management
_
services
w &s Red Head Road
_.. Bay - -- _._
Bayside Drive to Red Head
.__. - - -- - -- -- -_..__ _._
Funding to supplement the 2006 Capital
0
1,5001000
Marsh
Program for road reconstruction including
slope stabilization, including design and
construction management services
'" Rothesay Road
(PDH #100) - Railroad overpass
Storm sewer, road widening, curb, sidewalk,
7005000
370,000
to Colony Road
landscaping, including design and construction
management services
Rural Road Upgrades
Locations to be determined
Design and land acquisition for upgrade of
0
60,000
rural roads, including design services
Simms Corner
Catherwood Street to Reversing
_.__.._ -_--- - .
Easement / land acquisition and survey work
0
250,000
Falls Bridge
for realignment of intersection, including
design services
w &s * Somerset Street
(RDH) - Barker Street to
Street reconstruction (excavation, backfill, cold
2255000
140,000
Wellesley Avenue
milling, curb, sidewalk, landscaping, paving),
including design and construction management
services
University Avenue
Royal Parkway to Saint John
New sidewalk, ditching, landscaping (north
0
805000
Regional Hospital Entrance Road
side), including design and construction
management services
Westmorland Road
Civic #152 between Kilburn
Curb, sidewalk, retaining wall, landscaping
0
303000
Avenue and Northumberland
(north side), including design and construction
Avenue
management services
TOTAL: $2,140,000 $7,670,000
run: PROVINCIALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
RDH: REGIONALLY DESIGNATED HIGHWAYS
W &S: WATER AND SEWER RELATED PROJECTS
C-* *: PROJECTS CARRIED OVER FOR COMPLETION THE FOLLOWING YEAR
PROJECTS INDICATED WITH *ARE DEPENDANT ON FUNDING FROM OTHERS
Project
Water Street
This is a tentative program listing of proposed capital projects.
This list has not been approved by Common Council.
Priority assignments are subject to change at anytime.
Water Street Reconstruction
Location
Description
Share Share
Between Saint Patrick Street and Street reconstruction - Phase III (waterfront 159003000 800,000
Broad Street development, enhanced parks, streetsmpes
including St. Andrew's Square, St. Patrick's
_ Park, Veterans Tribute Park and Pugsley Park)
TOTAL: $1,900,000 $800,000
565,000
2008 32 $4,2209000 $10,170,000 $14,3905000
2009 36 $49120,000 $11,4451000 $15,5659000
2010 35 $31540,000 $895755000 $12,1159000
2011 41 $1,1309000 $8,5709000 $9,7009000
Totals 173 $18,000,000 $499335,000 $6793359000
No. of
Year projects Other Share City Share Total Cost
2007 29 $4,9901000 $1095753000 $151
General Fund - Ca4ital
Program
Projections
Cost
(Millions)
N
$18
n
$16
$14
$12
$10
$8
$6
$4
$2
$0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Year
■Total Cost
No. of
Year projects Other Share City Share Total Cost
2007 29 $4,9901000 $1095753000 $151
N
n
Year Category No. of
8 y Projects Other Share City Share Total Cost
2007 Environment 2 $5009000 $5009000 $1,0001000
Proposed Total Expenditures: 173 $1840004000 $49.335,000 $674335.000
Storm
6
$4509000
$1,605,000
$2,0559000
Transportation
20
$2,1401000
$7,6703000
$9,810,000
Water Street Reconstruction
1
$1,900,000
$800,000
$2,700,000
Totals:
29
$4,9905000
$1095759000
$15,565,000
2008
Environment
2
$500,000
$500,000
$1900000
Storm
7
$0
$19435,000
$1,4359000
Transportation
23
$397205000
$8,2355000
$111955,000
Totals:
32
$4420,000
$10,1709000
$14,3909000
2009
Environment
1
$300,000
$300,000
$600,000
Storm
11
$0
$19620,000
$1,6209000
Transportation
24
$3,820,000
$99525,000
$13,3459000
Totals:
36
$4,120,000
$11,445,000
$15,5659000
2010
Storm
15
$0
$21390,000
$293909000
Transportation
20
$31540,000
$6,185,000
$9,725,000
Totals:
35
$39540,000
$8,5751000
$12,1159000
2011
Storm
18
$245,000
$2,3251000
$29570,000
Transportation
23
$8859000
$61245,000
$79130,000
Totals:
41
$19130,000
$8,570,000
$9,7009000
Proposed Total Expenditures: 173 $1840004000 $49.335,000 $674335.000
APPENDIX C
( THE OPERATING BUDGET - AN
ALTERNATIVE PRESENTATION)
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
SUMMARY
Net Investment in Public Safety
Net Investment in the Community's
Physical Recreation Needs
Net Investment in Neighbourhoods
& Social Development
Net Investment in Mobility/
Transportation
Net Investment in Maintaining Our
Public Infrastructure & Assets
Net Investment in Economic
Development
Net Investment in Creating a
Sense of Place
Net Investment Solid Waste
Collection & Disposal
Net Investment in Governance/
Administration
Total for Pension Funding
Net non - operating expenditures
Unconditional Grant
Net amount to be raised from
Tax Warrant
Tax base in thousands (000)
Tax rate
2006
2007
BUDGET
BUDGET
391052,783
41,113,601
31142,802 315409023
11394,484 11354,114
171913,294 18,0031753
4,147,724 4,2091043
416739644 5,224,285
1,179,661 13222,119
3,375,349 31164,262
9,349,604
9,7851997
1,4009000
55035,767
13, 253, 499
10, 711, 506
98, 882, 844
103, 364, 469
181742,621
195117,473
809140,223 84,2469996
44,646,364 4639349242
$ 1.795 $ 1.795
APPENDIX C
$0.398
$0.034
$0.013
$0.174
$0.041
$0.051
$0.012
$0.031
$0.095
$0.048
$0.103
Pagel of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
APPENDIX C
Page 2 of 10
2006
2007
2008
BUDGET
BUDGET
OUTLOOK
Investment in Public Safety
Public Safety Communications Centre
11722,927
1,871,028
13939,500
Fire Department
16,7493433
17,810,788
18,4611532
Water Supply & Hydrant
1,6621403
1,708,119
19747,406
Inspection Services
12197,760
1,266,095
1,334,400
Emergency Measures
1705630
171,351
392723
Police Commission
18,014,630
18,880,220
191754,653
Street Lighting
800,000
925,000
952,750
Animal Pest Control
150,000
130,000
1373000
40,4679783
421762,601
44,7199964
Recovery of costs
Lodging prisoners
3,000
3,000
31000
Accident reports
11,000
11,000
11,000
Taxi licenses
50,000
50,000
50,000
Other
35,000
353000
35,000
Emergency Dispatch
5692000
580,000
400,000
Hazmat
70,000
70,000
70,000
Point Lepreau
40,000
40,000
40,000
Clearance letters
4,000
41000
49000
Motor vehicle fines
15,000
15,000
15,000
Court Fines
50,000
503000
507000
Building Permits
500,000
700,000
700,000
Plumbing Permits
42,000
65,000
652000
Demolition Permits
51000
59000
57000
Mobile Home Permits
11250
19250
11250
Gravel Pit Permits
19,000
19,000
19,000
Excavation Permits
250
250
250
Business Licenses
500
500
500
1, 415,000
11649,000
1,469,000
Net Investment in Public Safety
39,052,783
41,113,601
43,250,964
Page 2 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
2006 2007
BUDGET BUDGET
APPENDIX C
2008
OUTLOOK
Investment in the Community's Physical
Recreation Needs
50,000
52,500
Administration
730,098
790,130
827,097
Facilities
11382,920
12038o981
881,711
Arenas
9250196
1,347,161
1,406,461
Subsidy's - Facility Usage
183,000
183,000
183,000
Lord Beaverbrook Rink
128,750
132,600
136,600
Saint John Horticultural Association
56,000
58,000
58,000
Aquatic Centre
379,838
571,151
508,981
3,785,802
4,121,023
41001,850
Recovery of costs
Sportsfields
57,000
50,000
52,500
Pro Kids
0
169000
169000
Hurley Arena
125,000
1102000
115,500
Gorman Arena
144,000
125,000
131,250
Belyea Arena
192,000
1703000
178,500
Peter Murray Arena
125,000
110,000
115.500
643.000
581,000
609,250
Net Investment in the Community's
Physical Recreation Needs 311429802 3,540,023 31392,600
Page 3 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
APPENDIX C
Page 4 of 10
2006
2007
2008
BUDGET
BUDGET
OUTLOOK
Investment in Neighbourhoods & Social
Development
West District
359,907
307,995
319,761
Central District
404,011
489,813
503,780
East District
463,866
378,006
388,622
Contracted Services
92,000
927000
92,000
Recreation Community Groups
18,000
18,000
18,000
Senior Citizens
31,000
31,000
31,000
Human Development Council
48,000
48,000
481000
PRUDE
22,000
22,000
229000
Ability Advisory
3,000
3,000
37000
Seafarers Mission
11500
1,500
1,500
Loch Lomond Villa
0
1,500
1,000
TO BE DETERMINED
0
0
0
1,443,284
11392,814
1,428, 663
Recovery of costs
Senior's Programs
51800
4,300
4,300
West
9,000
0
0
Central
91000
0
0
East
25,000
0
0
Carleton Community Centre
0
7,900
71900
North End Communty Centre
0
6,500
6,500
Forest Hills Community Centre
0
20,000
20,000
48,800
38,700
38,700
Net Investment in Neighbourhoods
& Social Development
11394,484
1,354,114
1,389,963
Page 4 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN APPENDIX C
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
2006 2007 2008
BUDGET BUDGET OUTLOOK
Investment in Mobility/Transportation
Transit Commission Operating 21800,000 3,080,000 31386,925
Transit Commission Debt 641,870 639,506 747,106
Parking Admin Support 451,591 431,410 435,798
Municipal Operations Admin 1,208,324 15412,208 11299,875
Service & Program Delivery 487,107 555,623 572,019
Traffic Engineering 1,048,461 986,887 17046,728
Snow Control Streets 4,712,303 4,254,632 51013,629
Snow Control Sidewalks 466,089 383,731 460,095
Storm Drainage 1,9801573 21198,468 2,311,387
Street Cleaning 1,319,093 15319,414 1,417,323
Street Services 4,4049483 4,358,874 4,9895420
19,519,894 191620,753 21,680,305
Recovery of costs
Transportation Tenders 500 500 500
Parking Meters 724,500 724,500 724,500
Meter Viloations 240,000 240,000 240,000
Meter Summons 40,000 44,000 40,000
Traffic By -law 215,000 248,000 215,000
Provincial Highway Maintenance 386,600 360,000 360,000
1,6062600 1,617 000 1,580,000
Net Investment in Mobility/
Transportation 171913,294 182003,753 202100,305
Page 5 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
2006
BUDGET
Investment in Maintaining Our Public Infrastructure & Assets
Facility Management 8789422
Carpentry Shop 454,479
Landscape 11353,505
Materials Management 11048,446
Fleet Services 417,872
4,152,724
Recovery of costs
Sale of Used Equipment
Net Investment in Maintaining Our
Public Infrastructure & Assets
2007
BUDGET
899,322
460,063
1,429,932
928,707
496,019
4,214,043
51000 51000
4,147,724 4,209,043
APPENDIX C
2008
OUTLOOK
931,600
483,300
1,532,692
977,875
576,641
4,502,108
5,000
4,497,108
Page 6 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
Investment in Economic Development
Tourism
City Market
Market Square Common Area Costs
Enterprise Saint John
Saint John Development Corporation
Saint John Industrial Parks
True Growth Initiatives
Engineering & Growth
Waterfront Development
Trade & Convention Centre
Harbour Station
Real Estate
UNBSJ
NBCC
Recovery of costs
Tourism
Harbour Bridge Authority
Rockwood Golf Course
Market Rentals
Market Square Parking
Net Investment in Economic
Development
2006
BUDGET
895,620
741,406
12878P752
396,495
143,500
80,000
37,500
362,722
100,000
464,497
355,313
4202839
200,000
0
6,076,644
3,000
200,000
0
467,000
733,000
1,403,000
2007
BUDGET
915,000
748,250
2,046,380
408,420
147,446
82,200
0
376,171
165,000
475,510
420,178
437,730
200,000
3,000
61425,285
3,000
0
30,000
435,000
733,000
1,201,000
4,673,644 5,224,285
APPENDIX C
2008
OUTLOOK
959,718
768,191
2,138,467
408,420
150,000
84,700
0
390,875
100,000
423,877
374,521
460,531
200,000
3,000
6,462,300
3,000
0
30,000
440,000
733,000
1,206,000
5,256,300
Page 7 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
Investment in Creating a Sense of Place
Arts and Culture Initatives
Festivals & Public Celebrations
Library
Heritage
Imperial Theatre
Arts Centre
Environment Committee
Net Investment in Creating a
Sense of Place
Investment Solid Waste Collection & Disposal
Sanitation Services
Recovery of costs
Garbage collection
Net Investment Solid Waste
Collection & Disposal
2006
BUDGET
168,330
103,000
360,993
189,290
289,805
65,043
3,200
2007
BUDGET
225o570
43,000
369,280
206,951
308,498
64,420
4,400
11179,661 1,222,119
3,380,349
5,000
3,375,349
3,169,262
APPENDIX C
2008
OUTLOOK
230,677
43,000
380,440
214,813
274,987
57,391
5,000
1,206,308
3,234,440
5,000 51000
31164,262 3,2291440
Page 8 of 10
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
APPENDIX C
2006 2007 2008
BUDGET BUDGET OUTLOOK
Investment in GovernanceAdministration
Mayor's Office
Common Council 193,360 194,275 201,150
City Manager's Office 358,330 385,170 392,430
Vision 2015 4429000 4872220 504,185
Communication 500,000 600,646 565,544
Common Clerk 100,000 0 150,000
Finance 828,290 754,991 787,805
Legal 1,204, 763 11317,441 1, 376,834
Human Resources 576,528 697,120 696,515
Information Systems & Support 1'196'681 1,298,130 1,395,120
City Hall Building 1°878,918 1,923,905 1,9947200
Community Planning 1,645,766 11521,025 1,566,700
G.I.S. 760,516 819,382 858,088
Planning Advisory Committee 260,825 267,007 283,125
Liability Insurance 109700 11,500 12,000
Property Assessment 600,000 4357000 445,875
892,92726
�__ _ 9_ 38,685
11,449,604 12
11_ 657,497
Recovery of costs
Housing
Saint John Transit 43,000 44,000 44,000
Pension Plan 0 42,000 42,000
Water & Sewerage Utility 100,000 100,000 100,000
Land & Buildings 114129000 11391,000 1,391,000
City Hall 165,000 135,000 135,000
Planning Services 275,000 58,000 58,000
Rezoning 50,000 50,000 50,000
Other 20,000 20,000 20,000
Gas pipeline 90000 9,000 9,000
26,000 __ 16 500
-�_ 16,500
_2,100 000 1500 1 865 500
Net Investment in Governance/
Administration
9,349,604 92785 997
10,344,997
Page 9 of 1 o
1/11/2007
CITY OF SAINT JOHN
2007 OPERATING BUDGET
Special Pension Funding
Liability for years 2004, 2005 & 2006
Current Special Funding (net)
Total for Pension Funding
Non - operating items:
Workforce Adjustment Program
Fiscal Charges
Total non - operating expenditures
Non - operating revenues
Short-term interest
Miscellaneous
Water Sales
LNG Building permit revenue
Pipeline easement revenue
Total Non - operating revenues
Net non - operating expenditures
2006
BUDGET
1t4000000
0
1,400,000
2007
BUDGET
2,031,120
3,004,647
5,035,767
APPENDIX C
2008
OUTLOOK
1,958,880
3,094,786
5,053,666
12050,000 0 0
12, 715, 499 12, 426, 506 14, 320, 851
13, 765, 499 122426,506 14, 320, 851
250,000
250,000
12,000
0
0
512,000
13,253,499
250,000
50,000
0
965,000
450,000
1,715,000
10,711,506
250,000
50,000
0
965,000
0
1,265, 000
13,055,851
Page 10 of 10
APPENDIX D
City of Saint John
Establishment of Permanent Positions
As of January 1, 2007
Department
Management/
Non
Inside
Outside
2007
2006
Professional
Union
Workers
Workers
Firefighters
Total
Total
Solicitor's Office
5
1
0
0
0
6
6
Common Clerk
4
1
2
0
0
7
7
City Manager
2
1
0
0
0
3
3
Vision 2015
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
Corporate Services
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Finance
4
0
21
0
0
25
23
Human Resources
5
4
2
0
0
11
11
Information Systems
& Support
3
0
16
0
0
19
13
PSCC
2
0
20
0
0
22
21
Materials & Fleet
Management
3
0
8
38
0
49
49
Leisure Services
4
0
12
33
0
49
52
Tourism
2
0
4
0
0
6
6
Municipal Operations
General Operations
7
0
10
127
0
144
144
Water & Sewerage
15
0
20.5
85
0
120.5
120.5
Fire
11
0
2
0
161
174
173
Buildings & Inspection
Services
4
0
17.5
13
0
34.5
29.5
Planning &
Development
9
0
8
0
0
17
17
Totals
82
7
143
296
161
889
878
2006 Totals
81
7
134
296
160
678
APPENDIX E
City of Saint John
Management/Professional Employees
SALARY GRID
PROPOSED (January 1, 2007)
Salary
Steps
Gouping
A
B
C
D
E
F
1
46,944
47,883
48,601
499330
499823
50,322
2
52,879
53,937
54,746
55,567
56,123
56,684
3
63,219
64,483
65,451
66,432
67,097
67,768
4
67,097
68,439
695465
70,507
71,212
715924
5
71,212
729636
73,726
74,832
75,580
76,336
6
77,099
78,641
79,821
812018
81,828
829647
7
86,848
88,585
89,913
91,262
92,175
93,096
8
103,250
105,315
107,380
109,445
1119510
113,575
9
1139575
117,705
119,770
121,835
123,900
125,965
OPEN SESSION
M & C 2007 010
January 10, 2007
His Worship Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT
Sprinkler System Replacement, City Market
BACKGROUND
In the late Fall of 2006, as part of the ongoing Facility Management maintenance
program at the City Market, a number of significant deficiencies were identified
during routine maintenance of the sprinkler system in the main part of the City
Market. Due to inadequate maintenance in the past and the age of the seventy
year old sprinkler system, it is currently in such a condition that it may not
provide adequate sprinkler protection in the event of a fire nor will it sound the
fire alarm system as designed. After this determination was made, staff
considered a number of options, and it was concluded that completely replacing
the existing dry sprinkler system with a new wet system as soon as possible was
the best choice.
Staff of Buildings and Inspection Services consulted with the Fire Department
and the Fire Marshall's office to discuss the temporary shut -down of the system
while repairs are being carried out, as well as preventative measures in the interim
while proposals were being sought. Code requires that while a sprinkler system is
inoperable due to repairs or failure, a 24 -7 fire watch is required. A fire watch is
currently in place at the City Market, with staff or commissionaires on site at all
times and inspecting the whole building on an hourly basis. This will continue to
take place until such time that the sprinkler system is again fully operational.
ANALYSIS:
A Request for Proposals closed on Thursday, January 4, 2007 to supply all labour,
materials, equipment etc. as required for the removal and disposal of the dry
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M & C 2007 — 010 - 2 - January 10, 2007
sprinkler system servicing the City Market and replacement with a new wet
sprinkler system.
Three New Brunswick companies submitted proposals — a summary of the bids is
attached for your consideration. Staff of Materials & Fleet Management and
Buildings and Inspection Services have reviewed the proposals and have found
them to be complete.
Viking Fire Protection Inc. submitted the lowest bid at $236,673.00 plus HST.
Their proposal meets our expectations and we are confident that they have the
experience and expertise to carry out the work as specified.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The total cost for the removal of the dry pipe sprinkler system and replacement
with a wet pipe sprinkler system, if awarded to the lowest bidder as per the staff
recommendation, will be $236,673.00 plus HST. There are funds available for
this project in the remaining 2006 Capital Budget in Facility Management.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the proposal submitted by Viking Fire Protection Inc. in
the amount of $236,673.00 plus tax, for the supply of all labour, materials,
equipment as required for the removal and disposal of the dry sprinkler systems
and replacement with a wet sprinkler system at the City Market, be accepted.
Respectfully submitted,
William Edwards, P. Eng.
Commissioner, Buildings and Inspection Services
David Logan, CPPB
Purchasing Agent
T.L. Totten, FCA
City Manager
Attachment
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
BID SUMMARY
2006-085401P
Sprinkler System Replacement City Market
Closing Date: Thursday, January 4, 2007
Vipond Inc.
Moncton, NB
Edwards Sprinkler
Moncton,. NB
Viking Fire Protection Inc.
Saint John, NB
$278,000.00
$272,793.00
* $236,673.00
( *) INDICATES RECOMMENDATION
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M &C 2007 -12
January 15, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT:
Design and Construction Management:
Reversing Falls Bridge Watermain Replacement
BACKGROUND
M.
The City of Saint John
On September 25, 2006, (M &C 2006 -268) Council provided early approval for a high priority
2007 Water & Sewerage Utility Fund Capital Program project to replace an aging 475 mm steel
watermain which is suspended under the Reversing Falls Bridge. The existing watermain will be
replaced with two new 600 mm watermains. Council also authorized staff to conduct
negotiations with CBCL Limited for the design and construction management of this project.
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
The purpose of this report is to make recommendations for consulting engineering services for
the project.
ANALYSIS
On November 16, 2006 with a comprehensive and detailed scope of work document developed
by staff, a proposal for consulting engineering services was requested from CBCL Limited. In
response to this request, CBCL submitted a proposal on December 8, 2006. Staff was previously
authorized to conduct negotiations with this consultant for engineering services for the Reversing
Falls Bridge Watermain Replacement project.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C 2007 -12
January 9, 2007
Page 2
A Review Committee consisting of the following staff completed an analysis of the submission:
Brian Keenan, P. Eng.
Engineering Manager, Municipal Engineering
Brett L. McLean, P. Eng.
Municipal Engineer, Municipal Engineering
Dean Price, P. Eng.
Municipal Engineer, Municipal Engineering
Dave Logan, CPPB
Purchasing Agent/Manager, Materials and Fleet Management
Brent McGovern, P. Eng.
Manager, Water and Wastewater Operations
Bob Ross
Operations Manager, Water & Sanitary Systems
Each member completed an independent review of the submission and a subsequent meeting of
the Review Committee was held to jointly discuss the information presented in the CBCL
proposal. The upset price contained in the proposal was also evaluated and the committee agreed
that the consultant's requested fee was appropriate for submission to Council for approval.
The submission from CBCL Limited met all of the requirements of the request for proposal in a
manner acceptable to the committee with a cost - effective bid for the project.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The proposed cost of the work from CBCL Limited to provide design and construction
management services is approximately $319,077.85 including the City's eligible HST rebate.
An amount of $370,000.00 was pre- approved in the 2007 Water and Sewerage Utility Fund
Capital Program (M &C 2006 -268) for design and construction management.
Engineering fees to cover the cost of design and construction management generally do not
exceed 12 -17% of the total project cost, depending on the nature of the project and the
engineering services required. The upset fee is approximately 12.7% of the total overall project
cost, which is considered appropriate for this type of project.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C 2007 -12
January 9, 2007
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the proposal of CBCL Limited for engineering services (design and
construction management) for the Reversing Falls Bridge Watermain Replacement project be
accepted and that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the appropriate
documentation in that regard.
Respectfully submitted,
J. M. Paul Groody, P. Eng.
Commissioner,
Municipal Operations & Engineering
Terrence L. Totten, F.C.A.
City Manager
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M &C 2007 -13
January 12, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT:
Design and Construction Management: Simms Corner Reconfiguration
BACKGROUND
M.
The City of Saint John
The approved 2006 General Fund Capital Program — Transportation category includes a project
for the design of the realignment of the intersection and roadways at Simms Corner. The project
includes funding necessary to engage engineering services to complete the following:
♦ Part A — Site Surveys, Preliminary Investigation and Data Collection
♦ Part B — Preliminary Design, Cost Estimates and Design Report
♦ Part C — Conduct Public Consultation Process
♦ Part D — Detailed Design
The construction of the Simms Corner Reconfiguration project is now proposed for 2008 and
will include funding for the construction management component of the project. The Consultants
were requested to include in their proposals for the construction management component:
♦ Part E — Tender period services, contract administration and resident services
The purpose of this report is to make a recommendation for consulting engineering services for
design and construction management of the Simms Corner Reconfiguration project. Please note
that this work includes Fairville Boulevard/Bridge Road (NB Route 100) between Catherwood
Street and the Reversing Falls Bridge.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C 2007 -13
January 11, 2007
Page 2
ANALYSIS
With a comprehensive and very detailed terms of reference document developed by staff, a
public call for proposals was made for consulting engineering services. Submissions were
received from three consulting engineering companies.
A Review Committee of staff was selected to complete an analysis of all aspects of the
submissions:
♦ Brian Keenan, P.Eng.
Engineering Manager, Municipal Engineering
♦ Brett McLean, P. Eng.
Municipal Engineer, Municipal Engineering
♦ Tim O'Reilly
Operations Manager, Transportation (West)
♦ Dave Logan, C.P.P.B.
Purchasing Agent / Manager, Materials and Fleet Management
Each member completed an independent review of the submissions, and a joint discussion was
held to develop the final ranking of submissions. The Review Committee came to a unanimous
conclusion on their recommendation, which follows later in the report.
The evaluation process uses the expertise of a variety of staff from Purchasing, Operations and
Engineering to ensure a thorough review of the various submissions. The work contemplated is
very significant, vital to the overall transportation network and with a high consequence of error.
Care must be taken to ensure that the necessary level of effort and expertise is being directed to
the various tasks involved in the work, while still ensuring that costs to be incurred are
appropriate and controllable. It is for these reasons that cost, although very important, cannot be
the sole nor most critical deciding factor in making the selection of a consulting engineering
firm.
Proposals were received from three firms:
• Terrain Group Inc., Saint John
• CBCL Limited, Saint John
• Project Engineering Ltd., Fredericton
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C 2007 -13
January 11, 2007
Page 3
As previously stated, the proposals were reviewed on the basis of the comprehensive and
detailed terms of reference and their relationship to the following criteria:
1. Quality and Completeness — Does the proposal address all of the concerns raised?
2. Experience — Has the consultant demonstrated, for all parties concerned (primary
consultant firm, sub consultant firms and staff of both), sufficient experience with this
type of project?
3. Methodology — Has the consultant addressed all of the areas called for in the terms of
reference and have they allowed sufficient time and resources to adequately address all
needs?
4. Cost — Is the price quoted in line with the City's estimate for the work and has it allowed
for each aspect of the project to be adequately addressed?
After careful, independent consideration of presentation, company experience, personnel and
technical proposal, the Review Committee met to analyze the findings of each member. After
completion of the "technical" evaluation, the financial proposals were opened and addressed.
These had been submitted in separate, sealed envelopes.
After due consideration the Review Committee unanimously selected the submission of Terrain
Group Inc. as the best proposal based on an overall rating of the evaluation criteria -
presentation, company experience, personnel, technical proposal and cost.
The submission from Terrain Group Inc. met all of the requirements of the proposal call, in a
manner acceptable to the committee, with a cost - effective bid for the project.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The proposed cost of work from Terrain Group Inc. to provide the design and construction
management services is $428,941 including the City's eligible HST rebate. An amount of
$400,000.00 is included in the 2006 General Capital Program to cover the cost of detailed
design.
Staff proposes that Terrain Group Inc. proceed in the coming months to complete Parts A, B, C
& D of the terms of reference which totals approximately $253,579.
The remainder of the engineering costs $175,362 ($428,941 - $253,579) is associated with Part
E. This component of the engineering work will take place in conjunction with the construction
which is planned for the 2008 General Fund Capital Program.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C 2007 -13
January 11, 2007
Page 4
Engineering fees to cover the cost of design and construction management generally do not
exceed 12 -17% of the total overall project cost, depending on the nature of the project and the
engineering services required. This upset fee is approximately 12.6 % of the total overall project
cost, which is considered appropriate for this type of project.
PLANNED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
The anticipated cost of the reconstruction (upgrade and realignment) of Simms Corner (including
Bridge Road and Fairville Boulevard to Catherwood Street) will be in the order of $3.6 million.
The required changes would address a wide series of needs, not the least of which is the safe and
efficient movement of the thousands of motorists and pedestrians who travel that area daily.
In order to ensure that a suitable design and financial package is secured, there will be need to
involve several stakeholders, including the NB Department of Transportation (Route 100) and a
number of industrial "partners ". The cost sharing currently outlined in the City's 5 -year
transportation plan indicates an inordinate share of the responsibility on City of Saint John
taxpayers. For one thing, Bridge Road and Fairville Boulevard to Catherwood Streets are parts
of Provincial Route 100. Realignment to improve the approach to this intersection must also
accommodate access to the industrial site /road just west of the Reversing Falls Bridge. The
railway crossings at Main Street and Fairville Boulevard, and access points to the Lancaster
Mall, present other challenges.
The required time needs to be taken to produce an optimal and fully- integrated design, as well as
an appropriate sharing of cost responsibilities. Accordingly, we are proposing that actual
construction work be planned for 2008.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the proposal of Terrain Group Inc. for engineering design and
construction management services for the Simms Corner reconfiguration project be accepted and
that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute appropriate documentation in that
regard.
Respectfully submitted,
J. M. Paul Groody, P. Eng.
Commissioner,
Municipal Operations & Engineering
Terrence L. Totten, F.C.A.
City Manager
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M & C — 2007 - 009
January 10, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane and
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: Renaming of Marlborough Avenue and New Street Name
BACKGROUND:
On December 19, 2006 Common Council tabled the above -noted proposal to
change the name of Marlborough Avenue to Retail Drive and to approve the name
Fashion Drive for the access driveway serving the hotel and first phase of the East
Point Shopping Centre development. The matter was tabled in order to obtain the
shopping centre developer's input concerning a suggestion that the name
Marlborough Avenue be retained and, further, that Retail Drive be renamed to
Marlborough Avenue as well.
ANALYSIS:
As Council is aware, work is progressing to completion of the new Retail Drive
collector street off Westmorland Road. When completed and open to traffic,
Retail Drive will connect with the existing Marlborough Avenue, which the
developer is also reconstructing as a four -lane collector street. This will result in a
single continuous street from Westmorland Road to Rothesay Avenue.
For ease of identification and to avoid confusion, especially during emergency
situations, it is desirable that what is essentially a single continuous street have a
single consistent name for its entire length. The developer had proposed the name
Retail Drive, which has been approved in conjunction with the shopping centre
development on July 11, 2006. While renaming Retail Drive to Marlborough
Avenue would also provide one consistent name for the entire street, it was
anticipated by all parties that the opposite would occur, i.e. that the name Retail
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
January 10, 2007
Page 2
Drive would be applied to Marlborough Avenue once the connection through to
Rothesay Avenue was completed. Commitments have been made to retail tenants
based on this understanding and, therefore, the developer strongly prefers that the
street be named Retail Drive.
At present there are only four residential properties with a Marlborough Avenue
address (civic numbers 16, 18 -20, 22 -24 and 26 -28), and one of these properties is
currently owned by the developer. Letters were sent in November 2006 to all
property- owners on Marlborough Avenue informing them of the proposed name
change to Retail Drive and, to date, staff are not aware of any objections having
been received.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Common Council:
a) change the name of Marlborough Avenue to Retail Drive; and
b) approve the name Fashion Drive for the access driveway serving the hotel
and first phase of the East Point Shopping Centre.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim R. Baird, MCIP
Commissioner
Planning and Development
Terrence Totten, C.A.
City Manager
1C : ,
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M & C — 2007 -11
January 12, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Councillors:
SUBJECT: Amending Condition of Sale for Development of Single Family
Dwelling - Corner of Millidge Avenue and Somerset Street
The purpose of this report is to present the conclusion of negotiations required for the
removal of a restrictive covenant, as well as respond to specific issues raised at a Public
Hearing on December 4, 2006.
BACKGROUND:
This property has been offered for sale on a number of occasions and has been deemed
surplus for City needs for a number of years.
In December of 2005, Mr. Michael Cavanagh approached the City to purchase the above
noted 1.8 acre property for the construction of a single family dwelling. Access to the
site was to be from Somerset Street and it was to have its own on -site septic and well.
Upon review of the request, a number of concerns were raised by City staff. The
property contains a significant rock outcrop that would make it very difficult to provide a
safe driveway access not to mention the expense of excavating the rock. In addition, City
staff insisted that any development be connected to City municipal water and sewer
adjacent to the lot. After extensive consultation between City Engineering and Mr.
Cavanagh it was decided that City services could be installed to service this property and
that an acceptable driveway access at the eastern end of the property was possible off
Somerset Street.
On April 24, 2006 Common Council considered a report from staff and adopted a
resolution to sell the fee simple interest in this property to a numbered company, owned
by Michael Cavanagh. At the time of sale, the parcel was zoned one and two family
residential. The density of the proposed development did not afford the purchaser the
economies of scale normally involved with infrastructure commitments of this
magnitude. Hence a reduction in sale price of $3,500.00 was supported to offset the
extraordinary development costs which must be incurred by the developer.
The sale of this property was finalized on July 28, 2006. The terms and conditions of
sale for this property included the following:
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
January 12, 2007
Page 2
a) placement of access to the subject property from a public street is subject
to approval by the Chief City Engineer or his designate, and a restrictive
covenant that the placement of access, as approved by the City Engineer
will not be enlarged, amended, extended or replaced, unless prior written
approval has been obtained from the Chief City Engineer or his
designate;
b) the subject property must be connected to municipal water and sewer
services, prior to any occupancy of the building;
C) that a restrictive covenant be placed on the deed/title limiting the
development of this site to a single family dwelling; and
d) if construction of the above said building, including the foundation for
the dwelling has not commenced within six months of the transfer of the
property to 600608 N.B. Ltd., the City has an option to repurchase the
subject property within 90 days of the City giving written notice to the
purchaser and that the repurchase of the said property shall be for
$3,500.00.
Subsequent to the purchase of the property, Mr. Cavanagh determined that it would not
be financial feasible to construct a single family dwelling on this property.
Consequently, the proponent looked at an alternative plan to construct two, 12 -unit
apartment buildings on the site. The change in the owner's plans has resulted in a
rezoning application for this property to rezone the parcel from "RS -2" One and Two
Family Suburban Residential to "RM -1" Three Storey Multiple Residential.
Mr. Cavanagh hired the services of Terrain Inc. to provide a preliminary cost estimate
(see attached) for the multi -unit development. The analysis provided cost estimates for
site preparation, extension of municipal services and for the construction of a driveway
and parking area. The total preliminary cost for the above work is estimated to be
approximately $430,000.00.
On December 4, 2006 Common Council considered the rezoning application and
resolved to give it first and second reading. Council also resolved that third reading not
be given until a report outlining the result of negotiations dealing with the amendment of
an existing covenant is brought back for their consideration.
In addition, Council also requested that staff review the water pressure to be expected for
the intended multi -unit development and also traffic safety using the proposed driveway.
In both cases, City Engineering reaffirmed suitability of the proposed access from a
traffic perspective and indicated water pressure will be acceptable for the proposal.
ANALYSIS:
The restrictive covenant limiting the use was a direct reflection of the negotiated sale
price for the property as discussed in the Background of this report. Consequently, from
the perspective of the City, a higher purchase price for the property would have been
required if there had not been a covenant. The developer does not agree and has argued
that the high development cost associated with this site would not have supported a
higher sale price. After long negotiation, a resolution has been proposed.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Report to Common Council
January 12, 2007
Page 3
The City Legal Department has informed staff that any re- negotiation is a fee for
removing a covenant and not a renegotiation of a concluded transaction, as the property
has transferred. The proponent is prepared to pay $2,400.00 plus H.S.T. to remove the
covenant.
In addition, condition (2)(d) of the above stated resolution involving a "buy back' option
is directly impacted upon the removal of the restrictive covenant in that the option refers
to the construction of the "above said building" referencing the single family dwelling.
Mr. Cavanagh is in agreement with amending condition (2)(d) by referencing a multi -unit
building rather than a single unit dwelling and extending the timeline for development to
commence within 10 months of the transfer of this property (till May 28, 2007).
Staff is supportive of this development proposal. It is in keeping with the area and the
negotiations reflect the high development cost. Completion of the development will also
result in a significant tax lift.
If Council is in agreement, the recommendation contained in this report will facilitate the
removal of the covenant restricting the use of this property.
RECOMMENDATION:
That The City of Saint John release condition "2c" contained in the M & C 2006-
92 dated April 20, 2006 and adopted by Council on April 26, 2006; thereby
removing a restrictive covenant limiting the development of this property to a
single family dwelling which is found in Schedule "D" of the Transfer, upon
payment of $2,400.00 plus H.S.T. (if applicable).
That Common Council amend condition "2d" contained in the M & C 2006 -92
dated April 20, 2006 and adopted by Council on April 26, 2006 by, replacing it
with, "if construction of a multi -unit dwelling, including the foundation for the
building, has not commenced within 10 months of the transfer of the property to
600608 N.B. Ltd., the City has an option to repurchase the subject property within
90 days of the City giving written notice to the purchaser and that the repurchase
of the said property shall be for $3,500.00.
That the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to sign any necessary
documents required to finalize this transaction.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim R. Baird, MCIP
Commissioner
Planning and Development
Terrence Totten, FCA
City Manager
CL /c
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Comeau
MacKenzie
Architecture
December 12, 2006
City of Saint John
15 Market Square; PO Box 1971
Saint John, NB
E21, 4L 1
Attention: Honourable Mayor and Councillors
Dear Mayor and Councillors:
RE: 600608 NB Ltd. - Development on Millidge Avenue
RREIVIED
®.
We write, as requested by 600608 NB Limited, to offer explanation and rationale of development
costs at the above - captioned property. More specifically, we address the financial viability of the
project as it relates to land cost and cost of installing services.
Attached please find cost breakdowns and quantity take -offs as provided directly to 600608 NB
Limited by Terrain, Inc., a consulting agency in the area of municipal engineering. These costs are
based on delivering municipal storm, sanitary and water service to the site, all as per Terrain's site
plan drawing, also attached. The total servicing and development cost of $377,350 also includes the
access driveway, preparation of the two building pads, and creation of the plateau for parking.
Developers often compare municipal servicing costs on various sites, to determine economic
viability of a project. Municipal servicing costs and land value are two very important indicators of
viability of a prdject. For the Millidge Avenue project, the land value of $3,500 plus servicing and
development costs net a cost per unit of $15,868 over the 24 units. This is high by local Saint John
standards. This same developer's most recent building project, at 25 Magazine Street, finished at
a land value plus services cost of $11,360 per unit, on a 12 -unit project.
... /2
Peter G. MacKenzie BEDS, B.Arch., AANB, NAA 115 Prince William Street Suite 300
NSAA, Reg. Maine Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 2B4
Tel: (506) 657 -1611 Fax: (506) 657 -1614
E -Mail: mackarch@nbnet.nb.ca
-2-
Most Saint John developers would find a land plus services value in excess of $15,000 per unit too
high, and adjudge the project to be not viable. In fact, two other Saint John developers had
contracted the services of our firm for projects on this same site, over the last six years, and had
found the site services cost to be too high, regardless of land acquisition value.
Comeau MacKenzie Architecture has worked with this developer, and his predecessor companies,
to produce in excess of 75 dwelling units within the City of Saint John, with a total assessment value
of over $10,000,000, over the past 15 years. We have every confidence that 600608 NB Ltd.'s
proposed Millidge Avenue property will also be a valuable asset to both its owner and the
community.
Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if any further information is required.
Yours very truly,
HITECTURE
of Planning (City of Saint John)
t6rramn
TN[ 5 C I C NCf Of YII• CT IC. LL SOW f IONS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
Page 1 of 2
12/11/2006
Item
No.
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit of
Measurement
Unit Price
Estimated
Total Price
Site Preparation
1
lClearing and grubbing
4800
square metre
$4.50
$21,600.00
2
IMass common excavation
1000
cubic metre
$5.00
$5,000.00
3
Mass rock excavation
7000
cubic metre
$11.00
$77,000.00
Water System
4
Trench rock excavation
260
cubic metre
$65.00
$16,900.00
5
Connect proposed 200mm diameter PVC
watermain to existing 500mm diameter concrete
pressure pipe
1
lump sum
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
6
200mm diameter
PVC DR18 watermain
110
lineal metre
$120.00
$13,200.00
7
200mm diameter 22.5 degree bend c/w
mechanical joint restraints and thrust block
5
each
$800.00
$4,000.00
8
200mm diameter gate valve c/w 130mm valve
box
1
each
$2,125.00
$2,125.00
9
Fire hydrant (complete with tee, valve, valve box,
and all appurtenances)
1
each
$3,100.00
$3,100.00
10
50mm diameter water service pipe
30
lineal metre
$130.00
$3,900.00
11
50mm diameter corporation stop c/w saddle
2
each
$415.00
$830.00
12
50mm diameter curb stop c/w 105mm valve box
2
each
$660.00
$1,320.00
13
50mm thick rigid foam insulation
20
square metre
$20.00
$400.00
Storm Sewer System
14
Trench rock excavation
170
cubic metre
$65.00
$11,050.00
15
1050 mm dia. storm manhole c/w self - levelling
frame and cover
1
each
$3,100.00
$3,100.00
16
750mm diameter pre -cast catchbasin c/w City of
Saint John standard frame and cover
3
each
$1,550.00
$4,650.00
17
150mm diameter PVC DR35 catchbasin lateral
10
lineal metre
$115.00
$1,150.00
18
150mm diameter HDPE storm pipe
100
lineal metre
$115.00
1
$11,500.00
19
200mm diameter HDPE storm pipe
35
lineal metre
$125.00
$4,375.00
20
Connect 200mm diameter HDPE storm pipe to
existing 375mm diameter concrete storm sewer
using Kor -N -Tee or approved equal
1
lump sum
$600.00
$600.00
Cavanaugh Homes
Proposed Apartment Development
Millidge Avenue and Somerset Street
Saint John, New Brunswick
'td ra m
r
TIIE SCIENCE Of PAAC7ICAE SUIUT1011S
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
Page 2 of 2
12/11/2006
Item
No.
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit of
Measurement
Unit Price
Estimated
Total Price
Sanitary Sewer System
21
ITrench rock excavation
340
cubic metre
$65.00
$222100.00
22
1050 mm dia. Sanitary Manhole c/w self - levelling
frame and cover
1
each
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
23
24
150 mm dia. PVC Sanitary Lateral
200 mm dia. HDPE Sanitary Main
30
120
lineal metre
lineal metre
$135.00
$165.00
$4,050.00
$19,800.00
25
Core drill hole in existing sanitary manhole and
connect new 200mm diameter HDPE sanitary
1
lump sum
$800.00
$800.00
Driveway and Parking Areas
26
Barrier -type concrete curb (includes crushed stone beneath )
360
lineal metre
$57.00
$20,520.00
27
1.5m wide concrete sidewalk
120
lineal metre
$67.00
$8,040.00
28
300mm crushed gravel base
750
cubic metre
$27.00
$20,250.00
29
75mm thickness asphalt pavement
360
tonnes
$90.00
$32,400.00
30
Guiderail
90
lineal metre
$82.00
$7,380.00
31
Line painting allowance
1
lump sum
$1,000.00
$13000.00
Landsca ing and Reinstatement
32
150mm thickness topsoil
210 1
cubic metre 1
$31.00
$6,510.00
33 lNurserysod
1400
s ware metreF
$7.50
$10,500.00
Engineering
$24,700.00
Contingencies
$0.00
Sub Total (before tax)
$377,350.00
14% HST
$52,829.00
Total 1
$430,179.00
Cavanaugh Homes
Proposed Apartment Development
Millidge Avenue and Somerset Street
Saint John, New Brunswick
{{ r
n p9p FF3
e
j
I �!
ail y ,
i '�4''`� 1
,
!,
s as
iC
1
,
=�a
p
°3� I
I �!
ail y ,
i '�4''`� 1
,
!,
s as
iC
1
,
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
M &C2007 -08
January 10, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Council:
SUBJECT:
General Specifications — Division 6 General Administration of Contract
PURPOSE
M.
The City of Saint John
The purpose of this report is to propose that Council adopt the attached revision to Division 6 —
General Administration of Contract.
BACKGROUND
On May 31, 2004 (M & C 2004 — 99), Council approved Division 6 — General Administration of
Contract. It was understood that from time to time it would be necessary to make improvements
to the language of certain clauses under Division 6 of the General Specifications to ensure the
document remains current and continues to represent the best interests of the City.
ANALYSIS
As a result of our experience with recent construction contracts and research into the
construction specifications of other jurisdictions — namely, the Province of New Brunswick, it is
recommended that an adjustment be made to the allowable markup on additional work for
construction contracts. It is proposed that the allowable markup on additional work for
construction contracts be increased from ten persent (10 %) to fifteen (15 %) for extra work
carried out by the Contractor. The revised Section 6.18 — Measurement of Additional and
Omitted Work has been attached to this report.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
M &C2007 -08
January 10, 2007
Page 2
INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES
As was the case for the original revisions to Division 6, the revision contained in this report has
been reviewed by and discussed with the City's Legal Department.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Common Council adopt the attached revision to Division 6 — General
Administration of Contract, General Specifications.
Respectfully submitted,
J. M. Paul Groody, P. Eng.
Commissioner,
Municipal Operations & Engineering
Terrence L. Totten, F.C.A.
City Manager
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Attachment to M &C 2007 -08
General Specifications — Division 6 -
General Administration of Contract
6.18 MEASUREMENT OF ADDITIONAL AND OMITTED WORK
The Engineer shall determine the amount, if any, to be added to, or deducted from, the sum named in the
Contract, in respect of any extra or additional Work done, or Work omitted, by the Engineer's order. All
such Work shall be valued using the Schedule of Quantities and Unit Prices, Division 4 of the Contract
Specifications, if, in the opinion of the Engineer, the same shall be applicable.
If the Contract does not contain an item in the Schedule of Quantities and Unit Prices, Division 4 of the
Contract Specifications, applicable to the extra, additional, or omitted Work, then reasonable prices shall
be fixed by the Engineer. These prices shall be based on the sum of the following six (6) items:
(a) The necessary cost to the Contractor of the material required for the Work, as furnished by
the Contractor and delivered by the Contractor to the Site. All invoices are to be supplied
by the Contractor or as directed by the Engineer.
(b) Basic wages or salaries paid for labour plus a mark -up of twenty -five percent (25 %) (or
more if submitted documents substantiate that additional payroll levies were paid by the
Contractor), which shall be compensation for all payroll levies and burdens, small tools and
other related items. No charge shall be made for personnel beyond the class of Foreman.
(c) Cost of consumable tools, other than tools customarily provided by tradesmen (small tools),
necessary for and used in the execution of the Works.
(d) Fifteen percent (15 %) of the sum of items (a), (b), and (c) which shall be considered as
covering all other expenses and profit.
(e) Use of Construction Equipment other than small tools, at the rate paid by the latest revision
of rates prepared by the Department of Transportation of the Province of New Brunswick,
or less. Department of Transportation rates include depreciation, interest, liability
insurance, repairs, maintenance, supplies, fuels, lubricants, overhead and profit.
(f) All applicable taxes.
The Engineer may at the Engineer's discretion approve payment of extra Work based on a quotation
which has been received in writing from the Contractor and approved by the Engineer.
No compensation for extra Work or material shall be allowed unless such Work or material is ordered, in
writing, by the Engineer.
When the extra, additional or omitted Work, which cannot be valued at the Schedule of Quantities and
Unit Prices, Division 4 of the Contract Specifications, is carried out by the Contractor's approved
subcontractor, the price for this Work shall be based on the subcontractor's approved invoice plus ten
percent (10 %) of the amount of this invoice which shall be considered as covering all the Contractor's
expenses and profit.
Whenever any extra Work is in progress, the Contractor shall each working day agree with the Engineer,
in writing, in full detail, the amount of the labour, equipment and materials used in carrying out each order
for extra Work on the preceding working day, and no claim for compensation for extra Work or materials
will be considered or allowed unless such agreement shall have been made.
Equipment downtime will be paid at fifty percent (50 %) of the rate set out in the latest edition of the New
Brunswick Department of Transportation maximum rates for equipment on Site but whose production has
stopped directly due to decisions, investigations, unforeseen repairs, clarifications or extra Work required
by the City. This rate shall apply to all the Contractor's equipment whether owned or rented.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Common Clerk's Office
Bureau du greffier communal
www.saintjohn.ca
January 15, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
And Councillors
Your Worship and Councillors:
P.O. Box /C.P. 1971
Saint John, NB /N. -B.
Canada E2L 4L1
Subject: Public Hearing — 700 Somerset Street
At the Council meeting of January 2, 2007, Council approved the scheduling of a Public
Hearing for the rezoning application of Heartland Developments Inc. (700 Somerset
Street) for Monday, January 29, 2007.
Attached is a letter from Heartland Developments Inc. requesting to withdraw its
application for the rezoning. If Council agrees to accept this request the following
resolution is in order.
Recommendation: That Council accept the request of Heartland Developments to
withdraw its application for rezoning and cancel the Public Hearing for the proposed
rezoning of 700 Somerset Street.
7 o Truly,
PatricWoods
Common Clerk
Attachment
01/08/2007 17:11 5068573116 CORBEL BLDG SYS PAGE 01/01
215 Millennium Blvd.
Moncton, N8, Canada, EIE 2G7
TeL 15081887 -1740 iax:15861857.3116
January 8, 2007
Office of the City Clerk
City of Saint John
PO Box 1971
Saint John, NB
E2L, 4L1
Please be advised that we wish to withdraw our application for a section 39 amendment
and a variance for property located at 700 Somerset St.
Yours truly,
Warren M. Hansen, P.Eng.
President
cc. Randall G. Pollock, MCRP
by Fax: 658 -2837
REPORT TO COMMON COUNCIL
January 12, 2007
His Worship Mayor Norm McFarlane
and Members of Common Council
Your Worship and Members of Common Council:
SUBJECT: Vision 2015 — Community Consultation
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to provide Saint John Common Council with an
update on the Community Sustainable Growth Vision Project which is the first
phase in the community consultation process.
BACKGROUND
On November 6, 2006, Common Council adopted the following resolution:
"RESOLVED that Common Council endorse and support the initiation of
community consultation process regarding the long -term vision for our community
as detailed in the submitted report Vision 2015 — Community Consultation."
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
Following the adoption of the Common Council resolution a number of significant
activities have taken place to prepare for a community consultation.
The Community Sustainable Growth Vision Project has been initiated. The goal of
this project is to develop a community vision and the desired outcomes necessary
to attain this vision for Saint John. Through this process sustainability principles
will be developed and the vision will support these principles and encompass the
characteristics of the community.
4
The City of 5aiM John
After a review of the current practices in developing sustainability plans, two
well - developed methodologies were selected to guide the visioning process. These
are the THE EARTHCAT GUIDE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and the
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE FOR MUNICIPAL SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING. The
advantage of using these comparable methods is that the theory involved in
sustainability planning has been put in to practice. The City of Saint John will
benefit from the learning experiences of other communities and the time line for
the project will be optimized, as much of the research in best practices is included
in the guides. In addition, the methodologies will allow the City of Saint John to
build upon municipal plans currently in place.
This project will be community led. The citizens of Saint John not only need to
support a vision but it is essential they have an active role in defining a vision. A
Citizens Advisory Group has been formed to lead this process and define the
desired outcomes necessary to attain this vision for Saint John. This group is a
working committee that will research, plan and implement the community
consultation.
We have assembled a team of community leaders that are committed to ensuring
the success of this project and a positive future for our City. The team is
comprised of-, Susan Atkinson, Franqois Beaulieu, Stephanie Bell, Don Coholan,
Ross Galbraith, Daniel Goodwin, Sarah Jones, Michael Schulze and Jocelyn
Stevens. Vision 2015 Steering Committee members are ex- officio participants in
the group. We are finalizing the membership of three other individuals for the
Citizens Advisory Group. The initial meeting was held on Thursday January 11,
2007.
The project deliverables and timelines are as follows.
v p
-
—
Charter Approved
Project _
-�.I
November 2006m_
Formation of A Citizens Advisory Group
December 2006
Project Plan Approved
January 2007
Communications Plan Approved
January 2007
[ Sustamability Principles Developed for City of Saint John
February 2007
Adoption of Sustainability Principles by Common Council
February 2007
Community Consultation Process
May 2007
Community Vision Statement
June 2007
The success of the project will be determined by a number of factors being met
including:
• A process that is led by the community through the Citizens Advisory
Group,
• Engaging key stakeholders including those groups within the City of
Saint John and external groups that may have a vested interest in a
discussion about the future of the City of Saint John,
• Balancing the competing needs of the community by following a whole
systems approach in the project,
• Ensuring there is a long -term focus for the community vision,
• Development of clear and understandable community outcomes that can
be used as inputs into the Program and Service Refinement Project, Saint
John Governance Project, and a strategic planning project,
• A project communications plan to maximize public input, and
• Supporting the requirements outlined in the CANADA — NEW BRUNSWICK
AGREEMENT ON THE TRANSFER OF FEDERAL GAS TAX REVENUES UNDER
THE NEW DEAL FOR CITIES AND COMMUNITIES 2005 — 2015 for the
development of an Integrated Community Sustainability Plan.
One of the first project activities will be a weekend training session on Sustainable
Community Development planned for January 26 -28, 2007. The training will be a
combination of theory and practical application and will include the following
topics.
• Sustainable Community Development For 21st Century
• Creating Excitement and Momentum For Community Development Planning
• Teambuilding and Conflict Management For Stakeholder Processes
• Shared Vision and Goal Setting
• Asset Inventory and Capacity Assessment
• Introduction to Systems Thinking
• Systems Thinking in Action
• Leverage Points for Saint John
The Citizens Advisory Group welcomes Common Council's participation in this
exercise and would like to invite you to attend the sessions.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Saint John Common Council receive and file this report
for information.
Respectfully submitted,
Councillor Glen Tait
Chair Vision 2015 Committee