1997-10-25_Minutes
86-665
COMMON COUNCIL
OCTOBER 25, 1997
At a meeting of the Common Council, held at the City Hall in the City of
Saint John, on Saturday, the twenty-fifth day of October, AD. 1997, at 9:00 o'clock
a.m.
present
Shirley McAlary, Mayor
Councillors Arthurs, Ball, Brown, Chase, Fitzpatrick, Gould,
Knibb, Trites, Vincent and Waldschutz
- and -
Messrs. 1. Totten, City Manager; J. Nugent, City Solicitor; P.
Woods, Acting Commissioner of Finance; C. Robichaud,
Commissioner of Municipal Operations; J. C. MacKinnon,
Commissioner of Environment and Development Services; P.
Groody, Commissioner of Human Resources; B. Belyea, Budget
Officer; G. Tait, Fire Chief; R. Simonds, Deputy Chief of Police;
D. Sherwood, Chief of Police; G. Ingraham, Assistant Deputy
Chief of Police; D. Oram, Police Constable; J. Wilcox, Police
Constable; D. Christie, Police Department; M. Gillen, Fire
Department; G. Buchanan, Fire Department; Ms. J. Holt, Police
Constable; Mrs. M. Munford, Common Clerk; and Ms. C. Mosher,
Assistant Common Clerk.
MeetinQ Called To Order
Mayor McAlary called the meeting to order, noting Common Council
resolution of October 6, 1997 adopting the General Policy Statement with respect to
budget deliberations; and referred to the Budget Meeting Agenda (copies of which were
forwarded to Council members prior to this meeting as part of the information for this
meeting).
Overview Of The Process
Mr. Totten referred to the indication in the General Policy Statement with
respect to budget deliberations of an open session of Council and the requirement in
the Council Procedure By-Law for the City Manager to take his place at the Council
table and, having asking Council's permission to make his comments from the podium
as opposed to the Council table, addressed Council from the podium, clarifying that, to
allow for less-formal discussion, the General Policy Statement should have indicated
that it would be a general policy of Council to receive and hear budget submissions in
Committee of the Whole to which the public would be invited to attend, rather than an
open session of Council. In terms of budget guidelines, Mr. Totten advised that, under
the assumption that Council and the taxpayers of the community want the same level of
service as in the past year, the various City departments were asked to prepare a base
budget, recognizing some inflation and some already-agreed to wage settlements, as
well as to respond to the question of the effect on the departments a 10 per cent
budget reduction would have; and asked Council to refrain from making any resolutions
at this meeting in support of individual budget presentations in that it could confine the
City Manager's ability to come back with a recommendation on the entire budget.
1998 Financial Overview
Mr. Woods, through an overhead slide presentation, focused on the
General Operating Fund in providing a brief historical overview of the major factors that
have brought the City to its current financial position, including the Provincial
unconditional grant, property assessment and the fact that the City absorbs unpaid
Federal property taxes, Provincially-designated highway funding and the tax base, as
well as the City's response to these factors in terms of tax rate stability, increased
emphasis on tax base growth through initiatives to develop some increased level of
economic activity, being a service provider versus a provider of services such as in the
case of the Rockwood Park Golf Course, and expenditure/service reductions. Mr.
Woods reviewed the following major assumptions used in developing the 1998 budget
projections and establishing the guidelines for the various departments, recognizing
86-666
COMMON COUNCIL
OCTOBER 25, 1997
that the City has yet to receive from the Province of New Brunswick the exact tax base
numbers and the unconditional grant funding amount: (1) wage increases; (2) 1.8% for
general inflation on goods and services; (3) an increased cost of $2,370,000 relevant to
the landfill, including a tipping fee of $1,200,000 based for budget purposes on 20,000
tonnes at a tipping fee of $60 per tonne, loss of revenue of approximately $1,650,000,
and a savings in operating costs of $480,000; (4) an estimated increased annual debt
service cost of $294,000; and (5) a zero per cent increase in the tax base; and
commented on another consideration in view of the current deliberations on the
regionalization of economic development, major facilities and community planning,
each of which has the potential to effect the City's operations, including staffing, space
allocation and the like, as well as to the effect on the financial picture either in terms of
additional costs or potential new revenues. Mr. Woods noted the general rule of thumb
that increasing the tax rate by one cent would generate about $330,500 in new
revenue, while a one per cent increase in the tax base proper with no increase in the
tax rate would yield $500,000 in new revenue; and, in breaking down the expenditures
into percentages attributable to wage costs, goods and services, debt and transfers,
made the observation that wage costs represent 51 % of the total expenditures
corporately, although in some departments wage costs represent in excess of 90 per
cent of the operating costs. Mr. Woods provided a breakdown of the percentage of the
1997 Operating Budget of $85,046,125 attributable to departmental and non-
departmental expenditures, as well as debt charges; and projected a net impact of
either reduced revenues or increased costs of $6,415,909 which, if the City were to
resort to a tax rate increase to cover, would require an approximate 19.4 cent increase
on the tax rate to offset. With regard to the two options - expenditure reductions or a
tax rate increase, Mr. Woods proposed, as staff's response to the increased costs of
$6,415,909, a combination of expenditure reduction of $4 million and a tax rate
increase to address the remaining $2.4 million. Mr. Woods concluded to the effect that
the 1998 budget dilemma translates into $6.4 million in reduced revenues or increased
costs which, in turn, translates into a potential for a 19 cent increase in the tax rate,
being a combination of new landfill costs in the vicinity of $2.4 million, grant reductions
of $2.2 million, an increase in wages of $1.2 million, and a goods and services
inflationary increase of about a half million dollars, with staff's suggestion being a
combined approach that would see some reduction in service and funding levels and
some increase in the tax rate, with the pros and cons of each being part of the budget
deliberations. Mr. Woods apprised Council of the state of the City's finances to the
effect that they are in good shape and, while there was a serious budget problem going
forward for 1998, the City was well up to the challenge of dealing with it.
Saint John Transit Commission
Mr. Frank McCarey, General Manager of the Saint John Transit
Commission, introduced Commissioners Messrs. Peter Gaulton, Chairman, Andrew
Britton, Raymond French and Donald McKim, as well as Mr. Wayne Thorne,
Comptroller; and, referring to the Commission's 1998 Operating Budget request (copies
of which were distributed to Council members at this meeting), noted that the
Commission was asked to prepare a budget that would reflect operating the identical
services as is had now and to discuss the impact of reductions; and advised that, while
an identical service would cost $50,000 less next year than this year, it would seem this
year that the Commission would probably underspend its budget by $100,000, although
if the Commission were to keep that $100,000 to use next year, the service could
probably be maintained at the identical level and, in fact, have a reduction in costs of
about 7.5 per cent from what the City's supported it with last year. In terms of a
reduction of 10 per cent, Mr. McCarey advised that the Commission would probably
start the year off with identical service and see what happened over the first 2 to 3
months before making any reductions, all of which would be based on retaining the
$100,000 saved this year.
Mr. McCarey confirmed that the positive figures were due to a very
significant increase in ridership, particularly over the past four months; reviewed the
comparative statistics on cost efficiency, revenue cost ratio and municipal operating
contribution per capita, included in the submitted budget information, so as to assure
Council that it was getting good value for its investment; and advised of the importance
of Council looking at the issue of vehicle average age as the Commission was quickly
approaching some very serious situations with regard to its vehicles, in particular in
trying to continue operating twelve 1979 buses, which is almost 30% of its fleet, that
86-667
COMMON COUNCIL
OCTOBER 25, 1997
are now beyond their useful age and, in the near very near future if these buses are
expected to last more than 3 or 4 years, the Commission would have to start sending
them out to be refurbished at a cost that would probably be higher than what the capital
cost would be to replace them; and that, as the Commission has not bought three
buses in years that it should have, the Commission has fallen far behind in its vehicle
procurement plan and was at the point where it was about 12 vehicles behind which
was beginning to seriously affect the Commission. Mr. McCarey made the observation
that the budget was done on the projection that, in fact, three buses would be
purchased next year and in following years at least for about three or four years,
otherwise the expense numbers start to get very much higher to probably another
quarter of a million dollars. Mr. McCarey summarized to the effect that the Commission
was asking for $50,000 less than last year and suggesting that, if the anticipated under-
budget amount of $100,000 could be retained, the Commission would need $150,000
less, while anything beyond that would probably mean looking at a reduction of service.
As to a 10 per cent budget decrease, Mr. McCarey advised that it would be necessary
to cut 15 per cent to 18 per cent of its mileage, which would mean cutting those routes
with the poorest return which, at this point in time, would be the Loch Lomond,
Martinon, South End and Forest Glen routes, and to consider Sunday service for
elimination, which would result in a reduction of between 9 and 10, or about 15 per
cent, of the Commission's employees. With regard to the Handi-Bus service, Mr.
McCarey advised that, as the commitment to this service was not particularly high -
being at $40,000 in the proposed 1998 budget, perhaps the Commission would take
$4,000 or $5,000 back, although the Commission has looked at reducing its own
service as opposed to trying to make some corrections with the Handi-Bus amount, and
referenced the recent presentation to Council with regard to the Handi-Bus service. Mr.
McCarey responded to questions on the use of large versus small mini-van-type buses,
as well as to the concern in 1996 that a rate increase would result in a decrease in
ridership when, in fact, ridership increased.
Fire Department
Chief Tait, through a computerized presentation depicting both scenes of
locations with their response times, fire incidents, and the fire stations in the City of
Saint John and written and numerical information (copies of the written and numerical
portion were distributed to Council members at this meeting) and a video presentation
to illustrate a fire situation, addressed the Fire Department's proposed 1998 Operating
Budget request of $13,286,498 which would reflect the 1997 funding levels plus
acceptable increases in specific line items as per the 1998 budget guidelines, or an
Operating budget of $11,919,636 with a 10 per cent reduction. Chief Tait, in explaining
the rationale and required action to meet the 1998 budget guidelines, advised that, as
personnel costs equal 93 per cent of the Operating Budget or $12,316,958, the only
viable solution to meet guidelines would be personnel reduction and the required action
would be: (1) to eliminate the Holiday Relief Program at a saving of $575,000 which
would result in closing one fire station and the elimination of one fire company to meet
the function of staffing fire apparatus during absence (vacation, sickness, training, etc.),
with the consequence being the lay-off of 18 holiday relief fire fighters in accordance
with the collective agreement, the termination of the most cost-effective program within
the Fire Department (i.e. the salary of one permanent fire fighter = the salary of 2
holiday relief fire fighters), and the loss of ability to participate in the Provincial
Apprenticeship Program; and (2) to eliminate one captain, 3 lieutenants and 9 fire
fighters, and subsequently close a second fire company, which would result in layoffs in
accordance with the collective agreement and a saving of $749,405. Chief Tait, in
noting the impact of personnel reductions in a saving of $1,324,405, apprised Council
of the results of this in terms of response times, increased risk with a greater potential
for loss of life and property and an increased risk for fire fighters' safety, a weakened
Fire Department infrastructure, the probability of a change in the insurance rating and
the effect of such change; and referenced letters (copies of which were distributed to
Council members at this meeting), one from the Underwriters Survey, and one from the
Fundy Region Solid Waste Commission, the latter regarding the Fire Department's role
as the lead agency for emergency response at the Crane Mountain landfill.
Chief Tait responded to questions in the above regard during which time
he made the observation that, while his job involved the Fire Department doing the best
with the funding provided, he could certainly not recommend any reduction in the fire
service; and advised that he could make available, as requested, information on the
86-668
COMMON COUNCIL
OCTOBER 25, 1997
cost per ranking of the Fire Department.
Following a recess at 1:15 o'clock p.m., the meeting reconvened at 1:50
o'clock p.m.
Police Force
Chief Sherwood, through an overhead slide presentation, addressed the
proposed 1998 Operating Budget for the Saint John Police Force of $14,506,200
(copies of which were distributed to Council members at this meeting), consisting of
personnel costs of $12,293,381 and goods and services costs of $2,212,819, the 1997
budget having been $13,840,432; and advised that, to reduce the budget below the
1997 allocation of $13.8 million by 10 per cent, would mean finding $1,384,000 and, as
there were no significant issues in the Goods and Services account from where any
significant amount could be drawn, the bottom line would be the necessity of reducing
23 sworn officer positions to achieve the budget guideline of 10 per cent or $1.3 million.
With regard to the Perivale + Taylor report, Chief Sherwood made the observation
that, as the Implementation Team had not yet brought all of its recommendations to
Council, there were a couple of issues in the Perivale + Taylor report on which he has
been unable to put a dollar value; and, with regard to the Victim Services Program
recently presented to Council, advised that, if Council were to fund the cost of
operating the Victim Services Co-Ordinator estimated at $15,000 for 1998, the Force
would find the human resource within the Force to deploy to that function, not
necessarily the person, but with some in-house shuffling, the Force could free-up the
dollars to fund the Victim Services position next year; and also advised that, with regard
to the recommendation dealing with digital voice recording for the computer system so
as to free-up officers' time for which the estimated cost of the equipment for this
program of $85,000 would be included in the 1998 Capital Program, if Council were to
approve the capital funding the Force could find three data entry clerks within the
Police Force to assign to that role and responsibility. Chief Sherwood further advised
that, having estimated a cost of $255,000 to implement the other Perivale and Taylor
recommendations brought before Council in terms of putting more officers back on the
street through some civilianization processes, particularly as it relates to Detention and
a couple of other areas in the Police Force, the data entry system in terms of time
would free up 15,000 hours of sworn officer time which could be devoted to different
policing activities on the road or on the street; and clarified that the $255,000 was not
included in the proposed 1998 Operating Budget but was a separate submission to
Council, nor was the amount of $1,026,218 for a community-based policing initiative,
the latter being the model proposed by the Perivale + Taylor report which, while the
ideal situation, the Force has no intention of recommending to Council but would
indicate to Council what could be done and at what cost with unlimited resources; and
explained that, if Detention were civilianized, the four officers involved could go back on
the street as the four district officers for the community-based policing districts.
Councillor Trites asked if there were some way of clarifying how much of
the $1,026,218 for community policing would be included somewhere else within the
budget in terms of officer commitments and so on and if there were an overlap, to
which Chief Sherwood confirmed that no additional personnel would be required in the
community-based policing model as the presentation to be made by Constable Holt
would deal with buildings, equipment and that sort of thing, based on rental, with
another dimension being that, through capital and partnerships in the community,
facilities could be acquired at a substantially-reduced price in terms of the operating
account. Councillor Trites asked why, if resources were available now within the
Department for Victim Services and three data entry people as indicated by Chief
Sherwood, they would not be identified for these particular programs within the budget
presentation, and Chief Sherwood explained that the proposal was that, dealing with
Victim Services, some of the Police duties and responsibilities, being the position of
Staffing Administrator, would be shifted in cooperation with Mr. Groody to the Human
Resources Department thereby giving the Force the ability to free-up a position from
which the salary and benefits could be assigned to the Victim Services Co-Ordinator
position; however, if the Force continued to do business the way it currently does, the
position would be needed.
Constable Janet Holt, through a slide presentation, highlighted the report
on community-based policing (copies of which were distributed to Council members at
this meeting), being the cadillac version of the needs of the Saint John Police Force to
86-669
COMMON COUNCIL
OCTOBER 25, 1997
better communicate with the community in the concept of community policing, focusing
on one-time investments and on-going expenses related to community policing, four
district offices, four neighbourhood police centres, and facilities and requirements for
each of the centres, and responded to questions in this regard.
(Councillor Fitzpatrick withdrew from the meeting during the above
presentation. )
During discussion Councillor Trites advised that he would like to see how
the Perivale + Taylor recommendations would fit into the 1998 budget, and Councillor
Waldschutz suggested that Council should have been presented a 1998 Operating
Budget proposal that would indicate, for example, the emphasis that should be placed
on community-based policing.
On motion of Councillor Vincent
Seconded by Councillor Arthurs
RESOLVED that Council terminate
discussion with the presenters and thank them for their presentations and, when
reconvened for the next budget meeting, Council could have additional or new
documentation and continue with its discussion with the Police Department at that time.
Councillor Trites suggested that the motion, in asking that the Police
budget come back to the next session, include a restructured budget proposal
incorporating the cost of implementation of various recommendations of the Perivale +
Taylor report and any economies that may result from that, such as civilianization,
changes in staffing through a retirement and recruitment program which would have
cost and benefit implications, community-based policing steps that the Force would like
to see happen in 1998 and so on; and the Mayor asked to be advised of the estimated
overtime costs for 1998 and whether or not the overall overtime cost would decrease
with the new contract and new programs in place, the latter to which Chief Sherwood
replied that initial experience with the new collective agreement was a saving of
approximately $10,000 per month. Mr. Totten advised that staff would be prepared to
work with the Chief and his staff on the information being requested, although its
submission to Council would depend on when the next budget meeting would be
scheduled.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:55 o'clock p.m.
Common Clerk