1992-02-24_Minutes
83-375
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
At a meeting of the Common Council, held at the City Hall in the City of
Saint John, on Monday, the twenty-fourth day of February, A. D. 1992, at 4:00 o'clock
p.m.
present
Arthur L. Gould, Deputy Mayor
Councillors Coughlan, Davis, Flewwelling, Knibb, Rogers and A.
Vincent
- and -
Messrs. J. Brown, City Manager; F. Rodgers, City Solicitor; D.
Wilson, Commissioner of Finance; C. Robichaud, Assistant City
Manager - Operations; J. C. MacKinnon, Commissioner of
Environment and Infrastructure Services; P. Groody,
Commissioner of Human Resources; S. Armstrong, Director of
Engineering; S. Bedford, Director of Community Planning; W. D.
Todd, Director of Housing and Property Management; D. O'Leary,
Director of Economic Development; W. Butler, Director of Water
and Sewerage Services; B. Morrison, Director of Parks; M.
Jamer, Director of Works; S. Galbraith, Director of Supply and
Services; D. Sherwood, Chief of Police; R. Johnston, Deputy Fire
Chief; J. Johnson, Building Inspector; K. Galbraith, Manager of
Public Affairs; E. LeBlanc, Insurance Coordinator; B. Malone,
Planner; D. Harvey, Superintendent of Sanitation; Mrs. M.
Munford, Common Clerk; and Ms. C. Joyce, Assistant Common
Clerk.
Reverend Mark Dail, Associate Pastor of Forest Hills United Baptist
Church offered the opening prayer.
Deputy Mayor Gould advised that a letter of congratulations has been
forwarded on behalf of the City of Saint John to Saint John native, Mark Lackie, New
Brunswick's first Silver Olympian, who, with the three other members of the short-track
speedskating relay team, skated to the Silver Medal for Canada in Albertville, France,
and that plans are being developed with a sponsor to welcome Mark home later this
week; and proclaimed March 1992 to be Kidney Month; and February 29 to be Oxfam
Day in the City of Saint John, Oxfam being an international development agency which
works in partnership with people who are struggling to free themselves from the bonds
of poverty and oppression.
Councillor Knibb proposed a motion, which was seconded by Councillor
Coughlan, to add to the agenda of this meeting the proposed pedway agreement with
Saint John Mercantile Centre Limited, which was on the Committee of the Whole
agenda on this date.
Deputy Mayor Gould noted that the Council Procedure By-Law requires
a two-thirds vote of the total membership of Common Council to add an item to the
agenda, and the presence of only seven Council members at this meeting and, having
read the relevant section of the By-Law, asked for direction from the City Solicitor in this
regard. Mr. Rodgers advised that, based on his examination of the Council Procedure
By-Law and Bourinot's Rules of Order, if the item is placed on the agenda without eight
affirmative votes and, in view of the reason for it being added to the agenda, namely, to
obtain authority for the Mayor and Common Clerk to execute the agreement, he would
have very serious doubts about the validity of Council's motion to give authority to the
Deputy Mayor and the Clerk to execute the agreement; therefore, in his opinion, eight
votes are required to be certain that the policy adopted and the authorities are given
are sound and cannot be challenged.
The proposed motion was withdrawn with the consent of the mover and
seconder, with Councillor Knibb suggesting that it might be possible to add the item
later in the agenda should there be eight Council members present, and Councillor
Rogers asking to, if necessary, place before Council at the end of this meeting a motion
with respect to a special Council meeting to deal with the proposed pedway agreement.
83-376
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that minutes of the
meeting of Common Council, held on February 17, 1992, be approved.
Councillor Flewwelling asked how, as the City Manager's response to his
request at the above meeting for a more detailed explanation of specific items from the
list of payment vouchers is not on the agenda of this meeting and there is a lack of
eight Council members present in order to add the item to the agenda, this matter
should now be handled. Mr. Brown noted that Mr. Wilson was prepared at the last
meeting to respond verbally to the questions and did not have the opportunity to do so,
and suggested that Mr. Wilson could provide the responses at this time, otherwise he
would be prepared to do so at another more convenient time. Upon Councillor
Flewwelling's indication that he wanted the answers at this time, Mr. Wilson responded
to the questions asked in Councillor Flewwelling's letter to Council at the last meeting.
Mr. Brown noted that Council, at some time in the past, agreed to all the commitments
for the expenditures to be paid; and advised that, in terms of an administrative
procedure of Council with respect to how reports on expenditures should be handled in
the future, he and the Commissioner of Finance would like to submit to Council,
possibly at the next meeting, recommendations on how to deal with these matters in
the City's best interest.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Councillor Flewwelling proposed a motion, which was seconded by
Councillor A. Vincent, that items of expenditures over and above those authorized by
the City Manager be placed before Council as a matter of information.
Councillor Rogers rose on a point of order on the basis of the above
matter being a new item for which a two-thirds vote of Council is required to add it to
the agenda of this meeting.
(Councillors Coughlan and Knibb withdrew from the meeting.)
Deputy Mayor Gould noted the lack of a quorum, and Councillor
Flewwelling withdrew the above-proposed motion.
(Councillors Coughlan and Knibb re-entered the meeting.)
On motion of Councillor Rogers
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that the letter from
Councillor Rogers commenting on the City of Fredericton's Municipal Youth Advisory
Council, which has been very beneficial for the youth and the City; and asking that this
item be referred to the City Manager with the intent of setting up a Municipal Youth
Advisory Council for the City of Saint John -- be referred to the City Manager.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that as recommended by
the City Manager, authority be granted for payment of the following construction
progress certificate, namely:-
1. Contract 91-0824T, Grandview Avenue
Works GaraQe, Metal RoofinQ & SidinQ
Meridian Construction Inc.
Original estimated value of work
Total work done, Estimate Number 2
Retention
$ 49,400.00
55,820.00
Nil
Payments previously approved
Sum recommended for payment, Progress
Estimate Number 2, dated February 20, 1992
Final holdback release
83-377
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
40,508.00
$ 15,312.00
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that as recommended by
the City Manager, authority be granted for payment of the following construction
progress certificates, namely:-
1. Contract 90-14, Park Street
Extension - Water and Sewer
QM Construction Ltd.
Original estimated value of work
Total work done, Estimate Number 4
Retention
Payments previously approved
Sub-Total
G.ST Component
Sum recommended for payment, Progress
Estimate Number 4, dated February 18, 1992
Final holdback release
2. Contract 91-7, Watermain & Sewermain Renewal
Pleasant Street, Ludlow Street & Market Place
Dean Construction Limited
Original estimated value of work
Total work done, Estimate Number 3
Retention
Payments previously approved
Sub-Total
G.ST Component
Sum recommended for payment, Progress
Estimate Number 3, dated February 19, 1992
Partial holdback release.
$249,615.00
220,952.26
Nil
217,490.61
3,461.65
226.46
$ 3,461.65
$249,470.00
230,435.10
1,000.00
154,873.40
74,561.70
4,877.87
$ 74,561.70
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that as recommended by
the City Manager, a sum of money, certificate of deposit, letter of credit or guarantee in
the amount of $215,000 be accepted from Grove Construction (1986) Inc. as security to
ensure the rehabilitation of the gravel pit at 2740 Golden Grove Road.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Read a report from the City Manager advising that the firm of Huestis
Insurance Limited, which Council appointed in 1991 to act as the City's insurance
broker for a five-year term beginning January 1, 1991, has presented its proposal for
1992; highlighting the submitted three schedules which set out the various coverages,
deductions and premiums with respect to property insurance, automobile fleet
insurance, comprehensive liability insurance, umbrella liability insurance, and public
officials liability insurance; and advising that, while the City's agent approached nine
reputable insurers for quotations, only the City's present insurers were willing to quote
on all the major coverages, and the agent has indicated that, due to the City's loss
ratios, he can understand the increases, but that the City is still below the per capita
cost of Fredericton and Moncton. The report also advises that the funds presently
available in the 1992 budget are $475,425 and the expected 1992 insurance costs,
83-378
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
allowing for midterm additions and deductible paybacks, should be in the vicinity of
$600,000 and that, allowing for a recovery of premiums from associated entities of
approximately $50,000, the City will be facing an overall cost of $550,000, and, in all
likelihood, the projected insurance budget will be about $74,575 short for 1992 which
will have to be picked up from other areas in the operating budget as the year
progresses; and submits a recommendation in this regard.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that as recommended by the
City Manager, the 1992 insurance coverage proposal from Huestis Insurance Limited
be accepted and authority be granted to make the payments as indicated in the above
report from the City Manager.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Consideration was given to a report from the City Manager advising that
the full report prepared by Jacques Whitford and Associates, dated January 1992, on
the latest set of water samples from the Spruce Lake area, is available in the Council
room, and, in summary, indicates very little difference from previous sampling events in
that the Mill Creek and Marsh Creek areas do not appear to be significantly affected by
landfill activities, and Burchill's Brook, as in previous sampling occasions, does
continue to show signs of landfilling, and that the probable source of the bacteria in
domestic well DM5, which shows levels of coliforms and fecal coliforms which exceed
the limit of Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines, is a local septic system; and
submitting a recommendation in this regard.
On motion of Councillor Rogers
Seconded by Councillor Knibb
RESOLVED that as recommended by the
City Manager, the above report on the water chemistry analysis at the Spruce Lake
landfill and vicinity be received and filed and a copy of the Jacques Whitford and
Associates report, dated January 1992, be made available to the Lorneville Ratepayers'
Association and that the public in general be so notified.
The mover and seconder of the proposed motion agreed to add, at the
suggestion of Councillor Flewwelling, that the public in general be so notified, and
Deputy Mayor Gould suggested that the report could be made more readily available if
placed in the Common Clerk's Office, rather than in the Council room.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Read a report from the City Manager submitting an excerpt from the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities' submission to the Special Joint Committee on a
Renewed Canada, dated December 18, 1991, regarding an issue of concern with
respect to the entrenchment of private property rights in the Constitution; advising that,
while the introduction of property rights has been proposed, the wording has been
vague and it is, therefore, difficult to evaluate the potential specific impacts; suggesting
that, in view of the three apparent implications as listed, it is appropriate that municipal
government be involved in any discussion on property rights amendments to the
Charter; and submitting a recommendation in this regard in that it is anticipated that
much of the cost of defending municipal initiatives against Charter challenges will be
borne directly by the municipalities.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that as recommended by
the City Manager, (1) Common Council express concern to The Right Honourable Joe
Clark, Minister Responsible for Constitutional Affairs, stating that property right
amendments should not be proposed until they are drafted in a fashion which is clear
and unambiguous, and which strictly limits anticipated disruptions to current municipal
government policy, programs, and regulations; (2) Council advise the Federation of
83-379
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
Canadian Municipalities (FCM) of this submission; and (3) Council advise the Provincial
Government of this submission.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Consideration was given to a report from the City Solicitor referring to
Council's consideration at its February 17 meeting of a recommendation from the
Planning Advisory Committee with respect to a proposed Section 39 amendment to the
conditions of re-zoning of 3840 Loch Lomond Road, as well as the discussion of the
requirement for a public statement about the close vicinity of the proposed subdivision
to the Airport; and expressing the opinion that a requirement of this nature on the
subdivision plan would be an appropriate condition of re-zoning; however for such a
condition to be part of a Section 39 amendment, re-advertising is necessary. The
report concludes that the Development Officer has informed him that the owner of the
property is willing to place such notice on the subdivision plan and, if done, this would
serve the same purpose; however, Council should be aware that, if the owner fails to
do so, there is no remedy available which would affect the re-zoning.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that the above report from
the City Solicitor be received and filed:
AND FURTHER that as recommended by the Planning Advisory
Committee, Council amend its May 24, 1988 Section 39 resolution regarding property
at 3840 Loch Lomond Road by: (1) permitting the creation of two additional lots (91-7
and 91-8); and (2) allowing for the possible approval of a third additional lot (91-9) on
condition that testing of the Douglas Lake water quality be carried out to the
satisfaction of the Department of Municipal Affairs and Environment to verify that no
contamination would occur from septic tank effluent and approval of the Department of
Health with respect to septic tank and disposal field installation:
AND FURTHER that the owner of the property place a notice on the
subdivision plan about the close vicinity of the proposed subdivision to the Airport.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "A
Law To Amend The Municipal Plan By-Law", by amending Schedule 5-A by deleting
the proposed fire station locations in the Church Avenue/Main Street West area and in
the Westgate Park area (proposed Nelson Vale District Centre), and designating a
proposed fire station location in the Manawagonish Road/Manchester Avenue area, be
read a third time and enacted and the Corporate Common Seal be affixed thereto.
The by-law entitled, "A Law To Amend The Municipal Plan By-Law", was
read in its entirety.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By-
Law Number C.P. 100-264 A Law To Amend The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint
John", insofar as it concerns re-zoning a parcel of land at 41 Manchester Avenue
(NBGIC Number 55072672), located on the west side of Manchester Avenue between
Manawagonish Road and Scotiaview Drive, from "R-1A" One-Family Residential to
"US" Utility and Service classification, save and except a portion of the above-noted
parcel having a frontage on Manchester Avenue of approximately 24 metres (80 feet)
and depth of approximately 54 metres (180 feet), and located directly adjacent to 101
Manchester Avenue (NBGIC Numbers 55067342 and 55072680), be read a third time
and enacted and the Corporate Common Seal be affixed thereto.
83-380
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
The by-law entitled, "By-Law Number C.P. 100-264 A Law To Amend
The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint John", was read in its entirety.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Davis
RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By-
Law Number C.P. 100-265 A Law To Amend The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint
John", insofar as it concerns re-zoning the property at 12 Birch Street West (NBGIC
Number 35238), comprising 40 feet of street frontage and 110 feet in depth and
approximately 4400 square feet in area, from "R-IA" One-Family Residential to "R-4"
Four-Family Residential classification, be read a third time and enacted and the
Corporate Common Seal be affixed thereto:
AND FURTHER that pursuant to Section 39 of the Community Planning
Act, the said re-zoning be subject to a condition limiting the use to a maximum of three
dwelling units.
The by-law entitled, "By-Law Number C.P. 100-265 A Law To Amend
The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint John", was read in its entirety.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Read report of the Committee of the Whole
(as follows)
To the COMMON COUNCIL of the City of Saint John
The Committee of the Whole
reports
Your Committee begs leave to report that it sat on February 10, 1992,
when there were present Mayor Wayne and Councillors Coughlan, Davis, Fitzpatrick,
Flewwelling, Gould, Knibb, Landers and Rogers, and your Committee submits the
following recommendation, namely:-
1. That as recommended by the City Manager, Council adopt the preferred
option (System Y), with the conditions noted, all as outlined by staff in this report, and
that Fundy SWAT be so notified.
February 24, 1992,
Saint John, N.B.
Respectfully submitted,
(sgd.) Elsie E. Wayne,
C h air man.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that the above report be
received and filed and the recommendation therein be adopted.
Deputy Mayor Gould, who with Councillor Davis represent the City on
Fundy SWAT, advised that Fundy SWAT adopted System Y, which includes waste
reduction, education, maximized recycling and a sanitary landfill, and accepted the
City's recommendation to re-evaluate the land requirements in order to provide for
growth in that the 160 acres stipulated in System Y is predicated on the landfill
accepting 75% of solid waste by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000 and, while it is hoped
that these targets will be met, this depends on the success of the recycling program in
that the market for recyclables is questionable; and that Fundy SWAT has been urged
to approach the Department of Environment to immediately conduct a market study for
recyclables.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
83-381
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
Read report of the Committee of the Whole
(as follows)
To the COMMON COUNCIL of the City of Saint John
The Committee of the Whole
reports
Your Committee begs leave to report that it sat on February 17, 1992,
when there were present Deputy Mayor Gould and Councillors Coughlan, Davis,
Fitzpatrick, Flewwelling, Knibb, Landers, Rogers, A. Vincent and M. Vincent, and your
Committee submits the following recommendation, namely:-
1. That the City Manager's report submitting the vehicle policy, which was
considered in Committee of the Whole on February 10, 1992, be considered at the next
open session of Council.
February 24, 1992,
Saint John, N.B.
Respectfully submitted,
(sgd.) Arthur L. Gould,
C h air man.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that the above report be
received and filed and Council confirm the existing vehicle policy as outlined by the City
Manager.
Councillor Coughlan expressed concern about the type of vehicles
purchased, their assignment and traditional use, and the fact that, while the City
Manager has reviewed the policy, he is still recommending that employees be allowed
to take City vehicles to their place of residence outside the City limits particularly in view
of the City's residency policy, and also about the assignment of vehicles to seven
members of the Police Department.
Moved in amendment by Councillor Coughlan
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that no City vehicle be
permitted outside the City limits unless travelling on City business.
Question being taken, the amendment to the motion was lost with
Deputy Mayor Gould and Councillors Davis, Flewwelling, Knibb and A. Vincent voting
"nay".
During discussion it was noted that this provision is included in the
existing vehicle policy under the Guidelines 4.4; and Councillor Rogers, in noting that
former City Manager G. Taylor did not carry through on issues relevant to the vehicle
policy although he indicated to Council he would do so, asked why vehicle pooling has
not been carried out and if other cities have been surveyed in reference to this, to
which Mr. Brown replied that the City does, in fact, have a vehicle pool in that the
Building Inspection, Planning and Engineering Departments use a pool, and that the
City has a variety of cars for the City's use, being cars assigned to employees on an
on-call and on-duty basis, with vehicles left at the place of work, some at the City Hall
parking garage, meaning that there are three different sorts of vehicle assignment, and
he noted that the vehicle policy before Council, which Council approved on November
26, 1990, outlines a number of basic objectives and guidelines and gave the City
Manager the ability to make administrative adjustments to the policy without further
advising Council as long as the adjustments were consistent with the basic statements
of policy and objectives, with only one change having been made and that by Mr.
Wilson who, as Acting City Manager, on June 20, 1991, made an administrative
change allowing for a passenger to be in a vehicle only if there was no additional travel
required, and to enable staff, while using a City vehicle on City business, to undertake
83-382
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
incidental and very minor activities of a personal nature, such as to stop off at a
convenience store directly on the way home, thereby allowing no extra time nor trips,
and that such change, in his opinion, was in full conformity with the policy Council
approved. Mr. Brown clarified that, while former City Manager G. Taylor was of the
opinion that it would be possible to not allow City vehicles to be taken to employees'
places of residence and so advised Council that such would be the case, Council was
also advised that the situation would be left with the Assistant City Manager -
Operations to address and to propose a solution for within thirty days, and Mr.
Robichaud explained that he met with Mr. Taylor in this regard to express his concern
that the City has to be able to respond to a problem immediately, not about whether an
employee lived in or outside the City, and that the reason an employee should take a
vehicle home was to be able to respond for operational purposes, although it is realized
that residing too far outside the City limits is relevant to responding to an issue and the
employee has to be able to respond within a reasonable period, otherwise the
employee would not take a vehicle home, and that Mr. Taylor appreciated the fact that
the City could not operate properly if what he proposed was put in place and he
decided not to put it in place. Mr. Brown expressed the opinion that the policy in place
very reasonably covers the intent of providing to staff members vehicles consistent with
their ability to provide duties to the City and advised his intent to review the vehicle
policy in 1992 and submit any recommendations for Council's consideration.
Question being taken, the original motion was carried with Councillors
Coughlan and Rogers voting "nay".
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that the 1991 Annual
Report of the Board of Trustees of the City of Saint John Pension Fund be received
and filed with appreciation.
Mr. Wilson, Treasurer of the Board of Trustees, highlighted the above
Annual Report by recognizing the Board's investment manager, the firm of Jarislowsky,
Fraser & Company, in that the Board commenced the year with approximately $102
million and completed the year with $121,609,261, an increase of $19,437,583 from the
previous year, being a rate of return for the year of 19.7% which is exceptionally good,
and the Fund's ranking in the top 16% of similar funds measured by the firm of SEI
Limited, which is again an exceptional performance; and noted that, for the past 5
years, the average rate of return has been 9.6%, with inflation during that period having
been 4.4%, meaning that the real rate of return was 5.1 %, far in excess of inflation. Mr.
Wilson also noted that the Board has before it an actuarial review of December 31,
1986 which indicates an unfunded liability of $7,020,000, as well as an intervaluation
estimate as of December 31, 1987 indicating that the unfunded liability had grown to
$11,387,000, and also that the Plan is due for another actuarial review as at December
31, 1991 which should be completed within the next three months. Mr. Wilson
commented on the matter of 1992 Federal and Provincial legislation which will impact
the City's Pension Fund, the latter dealing with minimum standards that must be
followed for any pension fund in the Province, although it is believed that the benefits in
the City's Pension Plan exceed those prescribed as minimum by legislation thereby
requiring no major changes in the City's benefits, with an added administrative
responsibility relating to specifications for types of communication that should take
place between a plan sponsor and its participants; and the former being significant to
the City because of its comments with respect to disability in that the City's Plan prior to
1992 had a disability definition with disability benefits paid from the Pension Plan, while
the Federal legislation will require compliance with its definition of disability, in order to
continue to have pension plans registered, and its definition is much more stringent and
restrictive than the definition in the City's Pension Plan.
(Councillor Coughlan withdrew from the meeting during the above
remarks.)
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
83-383
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
Seconded by Councillor Rogers
RESOLVED that the letter from The
Honourable Pierre Blais, Minister of Consumer and Corporate Affairs, responding to
Common Council resolution of November 4, 1991 expressing concern with regard to
the proposed method of financing for the Wage Claim Payment Program; advising that
Bill C-22 received second reading in the House of Commons on November 5 and is
now before the Standing Committee on Consumer and Corporate Affairs and
Government Operations for detailed clause-by-clause review; and assuring Council that
its views will be considered during this legislative review of Bill C-22 -- be received and
filed.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that the application of
E.P. Steeves Ltd. for an amendment to the Section 39 conditions of re-zoning of 93
Loch Lomond Road be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and
recommendation, and that the necessary advertising be authorized in this regard, with
the public hearing to be held on March 30, 1992.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
(Councillor Coughlan re-entered the meeting.)
On motion of Councillor Rogers
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that the letter from the
Saint John School of Nursing Alumnae Association asking the City to consider giving a
grant of $500 to assist in its reunion in recognition of 1992 being the 20th year of
graduating nurses into the nursing profession -- be referred to the City Manager.
Councillor Knibb initially proposed a motion, which was not seconded,
that the above letter be received and filed, and Councillor Knibb expressed opposition
to Council financially supporting reunions of this nature. Councillor Coughlan asked if
the City differentiates between conventions and reunions in that both attract visitors to
the City.
Question being taken, the motion was carried with Councillor Knibb
voting "nay".
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that the letter from the
Tourism Industry Association of New Brunswick requesting assistance with its
upcoming Annual General meeting to be held April 24, 25 and 26 in Saint John -- be
referred to the City Manager for a recommendation.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Coughlan
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that the letter from Dr.
Apollos Ikejiani of Saint John Analytical Services Ltd. explaining why he had initially
wanted to make his presentation on fluoridation in closed session, and accepting the
opportunity to address Council in open session -- be received and filed and the
Common Clerk make arrangements for his presentation to Council.
Councillor Rogers suggested that Dr. Ikejiani should be made aware of
the rules and regulations for making a presentation to Council in that its purpose is not
to ask questions of Council but rather to give Council information, and Councillor Knibb
83-384
COMMON COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 24, 1992
suggested that the above motion should caution him in this regard.
Question being taken, the motion was carried with Councillors Knibb and
Rogers voting "nay".
On motion of Councillor Rogers
Seconded by Councillor Coughlan
RESOLVED that the letter from Dr. Tim
Chaisson, President of the Saint John & District Dental Society, expressing agreement
with the Canadian Dental Associations Policy Statement on Controlled Water
Fluoridation which recommends that, where possible, the fluoride content of community
water supplies be adjusted to the optimal level for the maximum protection of dental
decay -- be received and filed.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
On motion of Councillor Rogers
Seconded by Councillor A. Vincent
RESOLVED that the letter from the
Rothesay Legion Scout Troop requesting a donation to assist in its attendance at the
Boy Scouts of America 1992 Connecticut International Camporee, scheduled for July 2-
11 -- be referred to the City Manager to determine if the Public Relations or Public
Affairs Office could be of assistance to this group.
Councillor Knibb initially proposed a motion, which was not seconded, to
receive and file the above request.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Councillor Knibb made the observation that Council was still not in a
position to add to the agenda of this meeting the proposed pedway agreement with
Saint John Mercantile Centre Limited in that there were still only seven Council
members present; and he proposed a motion, which was seconded by Councillor
Rogers, that the Common Clerk and the City Manager consult with the Deputy Mayor to
arrange for Council to meet in Committee of the Whole and later have a special
meeting in open session in this regard. Deputy Mayor Gould noted that a two-thirds
vote of the whole Council would be required to add this matter to the agenda at this
time and, following Mr. Rodgers' advice that, in the Mayor's absence, the Deputy Mayor
should be given the first opportunity to call a special meeting of Council and, if he
refuses, only after that would three Council members be permitted to send a notice to
the Common Clerk to call a special Council meeting, Deputy Mayor Gould advised that
he would take steps to call a special meeting as soon as an adequate number of
Council members was available to constitute a quorum.
On motion of Councillor Knibb
Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling
RESOLVED that this meeting be
adjourned.
Question being taken, the motion was carried.
Common Clerk