Loading...
1989-12-11_Minutes 82-115 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 At a meeting of the Common Council, held at the City Hall in the City of Saint John, on Monday, the eleventh day of December, AD. 1989, at 4:00 o'clock p.m. present Elsie E. Wayne, Mayor Councillors Coughlan, Davis, Fitzpatrick, Flewwelling, Gould, Knibb, Rogers, A Vincent and M. Vincent - and - Messrs. G. Taylor, City Manager; N. Barfoot, Deputy City Manager; C. Robichaud, Assistant City Manager - Operations; J. Brown, Assistant City Manager - Development; F. Rodgers, City Solicitor; D. Wilson, Commissioner of Finance; 1. Totten, Deputy Commissioner of Finance; S. Armstrong, Director of Engineering; W. D. Todd, Director Of Housing and Property Management; S. Bedford, Director of Community Planning; R. McDevitt, Fire Chief; D. Sherwood, Chief of Police; A Martin, Assistant Deputy Chief of Police; and Mrs. M. Munford, Common Clerk; and Ms. C. Joyce, Assistant Common Clerk. Reverend John Dickinson of Lancaster Baptist Church offered the opening prayer. On motion of Councillor Flewwelling Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that minutes of the meeting of Common Council, held on December 4, 1989, be approved. Question being taken, the motion was carried. (Councillor Coughlan entered the meeting.) On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that the letter from Councillor Rogers expressing the understanding that other municipalities in Canada have in place a safe driver award program, and recommending that, in order to increase public awareness of the need for safe and courteous driving habits, the City Manager, in conjunction with the Police Department, investigate the possibility of instituting a program to recognize those motorists who demonstrate courteous driving habits -- be received and filed and the recommendation adopted. Councillor Fitzpatrick asked that the Traffic Engineer review the need for traffic lights on the Gilbert Street Overpass near the entrance to Rockwood Court based on his understanding that, during a recent power failure, the morning traffic flow involving the Throughway traffic was actually better without the lights working. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Coughlan Seconded by Councillor Davis RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager, the tender for the supply of concrete pipe sections be awarded to the low tenderer, L. E. Shaw Limited, at the bid price of $30,483.17, including Provincial taxes; and that contract 89-17, M.R.G. retention tanks, be awarded to the low tenderer, Que- Mar Construction (Maritimes) Limited, at the bid price of $23,000.00, and that the Mayor and Common Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary contract documents. Question being taken, the motion was carried. 82-116 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor Davis RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager, money or a surety bond in the amount of $18,000.00 be accepted from Gulf Operators as security to ensure the rehabilitation of the gravel pit at 1975 Manawagonish Road. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Coughlan Seconded by Councillor Fitzpatrick RESOLVED that as recommended by the City Manager, a Housing Through Infill Development Grant of $12,975.00 be approved in favour of Mr. Corey Stephen relative to the construction of a single-family home at 63 Mecklenburg Street. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor M. Vincent Seconded by Councillor Davis RESOLVED that the report from the City Manager regarding the letter to Council on December 4 concerning the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Local 73's proposal to construct its headquarters at 49 Linton Road; advising that the Engineering Department estimates the cost of the required extensions and street upgrading to be in the order of $23,500.00 and, in comparison, the developer has proposed to carry out work with an estimated value of $19,000.00 with the cost difference being the value of the concrete curb installation and a portion of the asphalt paving; also advising that, if a cost sharing arrangement for the value of piping materials is entertained by Council, pursuant to the provisions for cost sharing as prescribed in the Subdivision By-Law, a reimbursement of approximately $5,500.00 is anticipated; therefore, in the final analysis, given the municipal services and street are developed to full standards and cost sharing is available, the net effect to the developer is a positive one; further advising that, while cost sharing of piping material utilized in extensions to municipal services cannot be facilitated by the existing policy due to the nature of the development, Council has in the past approved cost sharing for the extension and/or replacement of municipal services for commercial/retail development and, similarly in this case, has the authority to approve such an arrangement; and recommending that approval of the development of 49 Linton Road be conditional upon the provision of full services, as directed by the Engineering Department and further that cost sharing for the extension of services as determined by the provisions in the Subdivision By-Law be approved -- be received and filed and the recommendation adopted. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling RESOLVED that the report from the City Manager regarding status of the Blair Construction Ltd. property at 152-156 Westmorland Road, which was the subject of discussion at Council's meeting of August 28, 1989; submitting a technical appendix detailing all matters pertaining to the non- conforming use status of the subject site and buildings; advising that, as part of developing this position, staff has met with the owner of the property during which time the owner advised that the sale of the property is being pursued and that staff now understands that Mr. Blair intends to ask for re-zoning of the property to permit a development plan for the subject site rather than comply with the conditions staff has recommended; also advising that, although the latest proposal is not entirely detailed at this time, it has a degree of similarity with Plan E, which was presented to Council during the August 14 meeting and which was acceptable to staff, the Planning Advisory Committee and the area residents, but not to Mr. Blair; suggesting that, as the Legal 82-117 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 Department has advised that this proposal is different from the previous application which means an application could be considered by Council, sufficient time be provided to Mr. Blair to prepare a detailed application and submit it to Council; and recommending that, in receiving and filing this report, should no application for re- zoning be received from Mr. Blair by January 3, 1990, staff be requested to develop recommendations to Council with respect to the information contained within the submitted appendix -- be received and filed and the recommendation adopted. (Councillor Knibb entered the meeting.) During discussion Mr. Bedford explained that, although staff was initially prepared to recommend to Council that the City proceed immediately with the process outlined in the submitted technical appendix, based on discussion with Mr. Blair, staff is now recommending that Mr. Blair be given an opportunity to sell the property and come forward with a proposal; however, if that is not the case, staff would submit to Council in January a recommendation to apply conditions. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that the letter from Mrs. Muriel Stevens of 24 Northumberland Avenue (copies of which were forwarded to Council members as an information item) be added to the agenda of this meeting. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor Coughlan RESOLVED that the above letter from Mrs. Muriel Stevens to the City Manager requesting a detailed report of his decisions and recommendations concerning the long-standing problem with respect to 152-156 Westmorland Road -- be received and filed. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "By-Law Number C.P. 100-190 A Law To Amend The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint John", by (1) adding a new Section 540(2)(b) to read "(b) Notwithstanding the prohibitions in (a) a gas bar is permitted at 258 Union Street (including L.R.I.S. Numbers 17574, 17558, 17541, 17533)."; and (2) renumbering the existing Section 540(2) to be 540(2)(a), be read a third time and enacted and the Common Corporate Seal be affixed thereto. The by-law entitled, "By-Law Number C.P. 100-190 A Law To Amend The Zoning By-Law Of The City Of Saint John", was read in its entirety. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Rogers RESOLVED that the by-law entitled, "A By-Law To Amend A By-Law Respecting The Stopping Up and Closing Of Highways In The City Of Saint John", with respect to the following portion of highway:- JONES DRIVE (portion): All that certain lot place and parcel of land situate lying and being in the City of Saint John in the County of Saint John and Province of New Brunswick and shown on the Subdivision Plan prepared by The City of Saint John Works Department dated Aug/69 entitled "Jones Drive Widening Including A Portion of 82-118 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 Ashburn Road" and filed in the Saint John County Registry Office on February 5, 1970 as File 47 #139 and more particularly shown thereon as: Beginning at a point on the south side of Hunter's Cove Road, said point being distant 227.5 feet eastwardly from the northwest corner of Lot 4A thence N 87055' E a distance of 28.7 feet, thence N 75004' Wa distance of 66.95 feet thence S 2 40 15' W to the northwest corner of Part 2 thence in a southwestwardly direction to the northwest corner of Lot 3A thence northwardly and westwardly along the northeastern side of Lot 4A to the point of beginning. The above described parcel of land being the most westwardly portion of Jones Drive as shown on a subdivision plan prepared by Hughes Surveys Ltd. and filed in the aforesaid Registry Office as File 42 #21. - be read a third time and enacted and the Corporate Common Seal be affixed thereto. The by-law entitled, "A By-Law To Amend A By-Law Respecting The Stopping Up And Closing Of Highways In The City Of Saint John", was read in its entirety. Question being taken, the motion was carried. Read report of the Committee of the Whole (as follows) To the COMMON COUNCIL of the City of Saint John The Committee of the Whole reports Your Committee begs leave to report that it sat on December 4, 1989, when there were present Mayor Wayne and Councillors Coughlan, Davis, Fitzpatrick, Flewwelling, Gould, Knibb, Landers, Rogers and A. Vincent, and your Committee submits the following recommendations, namely:- 1. That as recommended by the City Manager, the first and second levels of the former Lipton Tea packaging warehouse consisting of approximately 6,000 square feet be leased to Ampal Pallets Inc. on a month-to-month basis, as long as it is acceptable to the City, under the same terms and conditions approved by Common Council resolution of October 10, 1989. 2. That a grant of $5,000.00 a year for five years, commencing in 1990, be approved for the IWK Children's Hospital Capital Campaign which was the subject of a presentation to Council in open session on October 23, 1989. 3. That Common Council resolution of July 7, 1986, pertaining to the policy of performance pay and/or salary adjustments for department heads and other officials which the Common Council has the power to appoint, be rescinded; and that the policy as contained in Common Council resolution of October 6, 1980 be adopted as follows: "That with the exception of department heads and other officials which the Common Council has the power to appoint, the City Manager be authorized to set or change the salary range of an individual employee within the aforementioned salary ranges". 4. That as recommended by the City Manager, Council approve a one-step merit increment, effective September 1, 1989, for department heads and other officials which Common Council has the power to appoint. December 11, 1989, Saint John, N.B. Respectfully submitted, (sgd.) Elsie E. Wayne, C h air man. 82-119 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Rogers RESOLVED that section 1 of the above report be adopted. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor A. Vincent Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that section 2 of the above report be adopted. Councillor Knibb spoke in opposition to the above motion on the basis that it is not right or proper for Council, as representatives of the citizens of Saint John, to contribute an amount of $25,000.00 to an institution located out of the Province. Question being taken, the motion was carried with Councillor Knibb voting "nay". On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor Knibb RESOLVED that section 3 of the above report be adopted. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that section 4 of the above report be adopted. During discussion Councillor A. Vincent asked why the position of Chief of Police was not included on the list of positions submitted to Committee of the Whole and expressed concern that the Chief of Police, if not considered a City employee, is a member of the Pension Plan; and Mr. Rodgers explained that, under the Police Act, the City of Saint John is the employer of the members of its Police Force and the members of the Police Force are the employees of the municipality and for that reason there is nothing improper about nor is there any violation with regard to what is taking place with respect to the relationship between members of the Police Force and the City of Saint John Pension Act; and also explained that, in accordance with the Police Act and in view of the existence of the Saint John Board of Police Commissioners, the Board appoints the Chief of Police and, while this is not adequate enough to indicate who fixes the salary, the Police Act also indicates that the Chief of Police is to report to no other body or person but the Board of Police Commissioners; thus, if there were no Board, the Chief of Police would report to Common Council. Mr. Rodgers concluded that, while the Board is in existence and the provision is in the Police Act, he cannot see it making sense for anyone else to set the Chief of Police's salary except the Board of Police Commissioners. Question being taken, the motion was carried. Consideration was given to the previous report from the Planning Advisory Committee regarding the proposed Paul Chase Sub-division at 881 Sand Cove Road, (which was considered by Council on October 10, 1989, and the subject of a letter considered at Council's approval of proposal "A"); recommending that (1) Council assent to one or more subdivision plans prepared in accordance with Proposal "A" showing the widening of Keans Road, land for public purposes and municipal services easement; (2) Council authorize the preparation and execution of City/Developer subdivision agreement to ensure provisions of the required services; and (3) the subdivision agreement include a clause requiring Development Officer's 82-120 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 approval of a detailed site plan and driveway location for each dwelling. On motion of Councillor Rogers Seconded by Councillor Flewwelling RESOLVED that the above matter be laid on the table. Councillor Rogers made the observation that, despite the previous discussions with respect to the above matter, the residents of Sand Cove Road were not informed that the report would be considered at this meeting; and the Mayor noted that both the residents and Mr. Chase have been represented before Council, although this is not a matter for a public hearing. Question being taken, the tabling motion was carried with the Mayor and Councillors Davis and Fitzpatrick voting "nay". Mr. Rodgers questioned the reason for the above tabling motion on the basis that the Procedure By-Law requires that Council state a reason for tabling a matter, and explained that what was before Council at this meeting, as a result of a combination of the letter from Mr. Chase's solicitor and a Planning Advisory Committee recommendation, is a proposal referred to as Proposal "A" and that Council is requested to assent to a plan dealing with land for public purposes and public streets, and further that this matter is properly before Council on the basis that the Committee is the body that has an obligation under the Community Planning Act to make recommendations on land for public purposes and public streets. Mr. Rodgers made the observation that, as this is the first time that this proposal is before Council wherein both the developer and the Committee are asking Council to deal with proposal "A", there is nothing else that is really appropriate or relevant to what Council is asked to do and required to do under the Community Planning Act than what is before Council at this time; therefore, Council is obligated to deal with this matter, having the right to either approve or reject the Committee's recommendation, although reasons should be stated if Council rejects same; and further that the matter before Council does not require a public hearing under statute and is a straight application for assent to a plan dealing with streets and land for public purposes with respect to Proposal "A" with which the developer has requested Council to deal. The duration of the tabling motion was questioned to which Councillor Rogers advised that it is the intent to table the matter for one week for the purpose of staff contacting the developer and the area residents and inviting them to address the matter at Council's next meeting. Councillor Knibb made the observation that the new information in this regard is that Mr. Paul Chase, the developer of the property, is now prepared to proceed with Proposal "A" in spite of the rejection of variances, and suggested that Mr. B. Mosher, solicitor for the developer, should be invited to explain why, when he previously would not, the developer now accepts Proposal "A". It was noted that both the developer and the area residents were represented at this meeting. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Coughlan RESOLVED that the above tabling motion be rescinded. The initial motion proposed by Councillor Knibb and seconded by Councillor Coughlan was that the matter be taken from the table and Council now consider the proposal on the condition that Council assents to hear both sides of the matter. The Mayor proceeded to call the question on the motion whereupon Deputy Mayor Gould rose to a point of order on the propriety of the motion on the basis that the above tabling motion should be rescinded in order to open up the matter again for discussion at this meeting, to which Mr. Rodgers expressed the opinion that the tabling motion could be rescinded or the proposed motion proceeded with although the latter action would require a two-thirds majority vote of the Council. The Mayor suggested to the mover and seconder of the proposed motion that their motion be changed to rescind the tabling motion. Question being taken, the motion was lost with Councillors Davis, Flewwelling, Gould, Rogers, A. Vincent and M. Vincent voting "nay". 82-121 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Rogers RESOLVED that staff be instructed to re- submit the above matter to Council at its next meeting with an invitation to both sides to speak to the matter. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that the letter from The Honourable Peter Trites, Minister of Housing, regarding Common Council resolution of November 27, 1989 transferring the delivery of the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program to the New Brunswick Housing Corporation, acknowledging the contribution that the City's Housing Division has made in the administration of RRAP, and expressing appreciation for the City's involvement in the delivery of this program -- be received and filed with appreciation. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Gould RESOLVED that the letter from Provincial- Municipal Council Inc. submitting the Minister of Environment's response to a resolution originating from Saint John to the Cities of New Brunswick Association and subsequently to Provincial-Municipal Council Inc., requesting the province to give early priority to controlling emissions from its own plants and ensuring that any Provincial plants meet or exceed air quality standards; citing examples of the recent implementa- tion of this approach to demonstrate the Department's commitment to improvement of air emission control at publicly-owned facilities, and assuring that it is consistent with the provincial requirements for private industry in New Brunswick as well -- be received and filed. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor A. Vincent Seconded by Councillor Rogers RESOLVED that the application of Irving Oil Limited for a Zoning By-Law text amendment with respect to 350 Union Street be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and that the necessary advertising be authorized in this regard, with the public hearing to be held on January 29, 1990. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor M. Vincent RESOLVED that the application of Mr. Peter J. Scholten for the re-zoning of 915 Red Head Road be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and that the necessary advertising be authorized in this regard, with the public hearing to be held on January 29, 1990. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Fitzpatrick 82-122 COMMON COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 1989 RESOLVED that the application of Manford M. Thompson Construction Company Limited for the re-zoning of 1260 Manawagonish Road be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and that the necessary advertising be authorized in this regard, with the public hearing to be held on January 29, 1990. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Gould RESOLVED that the applications of Clearview Mobile Homes Ltd. for the re-zoning of (a) Lot 88-1 and (b) Lot 88-2 at 500 Westmorland Road be referred to the Planning Advisory Committee for a report and recommendation and that the necessary advertising be authorized in this regard, with the public hearings to be held on January 29, 1990. Councillor M. Vincent asked that Council be provided with information, including any legislation, with regard to mobile home parks. Question being taken, the motion was carried. On motion of Councillor Knibb Seconded by Councillor Gould RESOLVED that this meeting be adjourned. Question being taken, the motion was carried. Common Clerk